Amazon.com Widgets

November 2007 Archives

Friday, November 30, 2007

CNN Reports (breaking). The lunchbox icon of my youth has passed, and to be honest, I didn't even know he was still with us.

evel.jpg

RIP.

Update: Marc Danziger has some reflections.

Or, 'How Federman visited a War Zone and couldn't figure out why there were walls everywhere.'

Local Jewish Voice for Peace leader, Marty Federman, the "religious Jew" who spent a recent Sabbath denouncing Israel and has his letters published in the local Jewish Advocate on a regular basis far out of proportion to the percentage of Jewish opinion he represents, was recently on a trip to Israel with a "Cambridge delegation" and has had his journals published online starting here: Marty Federman's 2007 Visit Journal - Entry # 1. He must have been travelling with some nefarious characters as he expresses surprise that more of them weren't delayed entering the country.

...The plane was not full so I had empty seats on both sides of me and basically read the Sunday Times and slept a little. The only other thought of note. A few rows behind me, across the aisle, was a noticeably Jewish family (the father had a medium length beard and a large knit Kippah (Yarmulke/Skullcap). 38 years ago I would have felt an instant bond with this family, all of us going to Israel. This time – and I have to be careful about how I say this – I’ve spent the last many years speaking out against making judgments about people based on stereotypes and looks – but the sad truth is that I not only felt no desire to "bond" with these fellow-Jews, but could not help but wonder what they would think if they knew why I was going to "Ha’aretz" and what I would be doing when I got there. And even as I type these words my innate paranoia makes me wonder what my entry this time will be like if, somehow, someone at Ben Gurion Airport was actually able to access this entry...

In fact, Federman was given a bit of extra attention when he got there. Maybe on his next trip he'll get a bit more. Lots of talk about walls and difficulties, no talk at all about the reasons the walls (a recent phenomenon) were built.

From Part 4:

...Marwan goes off at one point stressing that when they talk about Israelis or Zionists they do not confuse that with "Jews." They have, he tells us, no problem with Jews, his problem is with Israelis and (this, I thought, was insightful) although they sometimes may talk about what the "Jews" are doing to them, they don’t mean Jews as in those who follow Judaism, they mean Israelis. We don’t spend any time talking about how Israeli leadership and the institutional Jewish community in the U.S. have conflated the two for their own tactical reasons and then shout "anti-Semite" when the other side blames "Jews."...

It's only those uppity-Jews they have a problem with -- Jews who have the temerity to express the same nationalist aspirations as anyone else. It never occurs that what he's really saying in being against "Zionists," is that he's (and many others that Federman meets) against the existance of the state next door. Zion's existence, after all, is no longer theoretical. And that his desire to see that state destroyed leads he and his neighbors, even if they themselves don't throw the bombs, to sit back and do nothing when others do the dirty work for them. And so the wall goes up, and these guys pose as peaceniks to useful tools just because they personally don't pull the trigger.

No wonder they're suffering. They're in the middle of war they're doing nothing to stop.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Another timely Fact from Myths & Facts:

Just as the parties were preparing for peace talks in Annapolis, the Palestine Authority’s chief negotiator, Saeb Erekat, said the Palestinians would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. This latest effort by a Palestinian official to delegitimize Israel was accompanied by Erekat’s startling statement that “no state in the world connects its national identity to a religious identity.”

Apparently Erekat has not read the draft constitution for the future state he envisions in Palestine or the PA’s Basic Law, which declare Islam the state religion of Palestine. He also conveniently overlooks the following nations that have established Islam as their state religion: Afghanistan, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Yemen, United Arab Emirates.

Nations with predominantly Muslim populations are not the only ones to link their national and religious identity. These nations constitutionally recognize Christianity or Catholicism as their state religion: Argentina, Armenia, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Denmark, El Salvador, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Lichtenstein, Malta, Monaco, Norway and the United Kingdom. Bhutan and Cambodia are officially Buddhist nations.

Israel has no official state religion. Freedom of worship is guaranteed to all. It is, however, the homeland of the Jewish people and was established and recognized internationally as a Jewish state by the United Nations in the partition resolution.

See the original for sourcing.

Shulamit Reinharz has a good piece in this week's Jewish Advocate that, while focusing on the Nadia Abu El-Haj matter, now decided, poses some interesting commentary on the Academy and its tenure decisions: Freedom or excellence in academe

...To my mind, Abu El-Haj’s tenure case reflects the problems surrounding many tenure cases today. "Academic freedom," more than scholarly excellence, seems to have become the evaluation yardstick. By using the concept of "academic freedom," however, just about anyone is entitled to tenure. People who question this reasoning are coming under attack. In Abu El-Haj’s case, her defenders label people who criticize her work as trying to silence her. But isn’t it possible for criticism to be criticism?

Some Abu El-Haj defenders applaud her courage in taking "unpopular positions on controversial issues." But is tenure about popular and unpopular positions? I thought it was about the quality of a person’s work, about accuracy and truth, according to widely shared scientific and scholarly standards. In the fall issue of Barnard Magazine, in an article about tenure, President Judith Shapiro stresses the importance of students facing "challenges to previous assumptions and beliefs." Does it follow that faculty should teach creationism because it challenges students’ beliefs? Should students be taught that slavery is dignified? That the Holocaust did not exist?

I reject these rationales for granting tenure. Exacting standards are imperative, especially if the research topic is embroiled in ideological controversy, as Abu El-Haj’s work is.

In "Return to the Days of the Mufti" (Haaretz newspaper, Nov. 14, 2007), Israeli journalist Nadav Shragai explains that every time an Israeli archaeologist begins to dig anywhere in the Old City of Jerusalem, members of the Arab and Palestinian community protest loudly that Israelis want to destroy the structural foundations of the Temple Mount mosques in order to construct the Third Temple. In 1929, Grand Mufti Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, the Muslim cleric in charge of Muslim holy places in Jerusalem, incited Palestinians against Jews by spreading this lie. The current Mufti is doing the same, using the Temple Mount to inflame people against the Jewish rule that "soils the Muslimhood of Jerusalem."

Contrary to what Abu El-Haj claims about Jewish destruction of Muslim artifacts, it is actually Muslims engaged in ostensible "repairs" to the Temple Mount who are doing everything in their power to destroy the remnants of Jewish (and Christian) past. This activity paves the way, according to Shragai, for pseudo-academics to rewrite the history of Jerusalem, inventing new Palestinian and Islamic terminology that even some Islamic historians define as baseless. As Shragai writes, "Hundreds of academic and religious publications charge that the Temple did not exist at all or if it did exist, that the mosques preceded it." This remarkable statement claims that Islam predates Judaism.

A story in the current issue of The Jerusalem Report parallels this cognitive problem. The interviewer, Eeta Prince-Gibson, asked a woman who lives in the Israeli-Arab city of Umm el-Fahm her opinion about incorporating the city into a new Palestinian state when one is established, rather than have it remain within the Jewish state of Israel. The woman became very emotional and said she wants to remain in Israel. "For 60 years, we’ve lived here." The interviewer then pointed out that Umm el-Fahm was not originally part of Israel and only became attached to the state in 1951. The woman responded, "You Israelis always like to bring up technical things and historical facts that don’t matter." But technical things and historical facts are precisely what matter and can help us resolve debates.

As reported in the Advocate last week, the administrative body of the Temple Mount – called the Waqf – does not permit Israelis to conduct archaeological excavations. Its fear of digs does not arise out of concern for Al-Aqsa’s safety, Shragai tells us. Rather the Waqf fears a challenge to “the web of lies that the Jews were just passersby and not a nation whose roots were planted in Jerusalem” for many centuries prior to the rise of Islam.

Those who deny Jews the right to dig do not want to confront evidence that contemporary Jews are linked to a past whose artifacts lie beneath their feet. Too bad the Islamic archaeological strong-arming in Jerusalem has been transformed into the academically respectable at Barnard.

Note the bolded portion. I keep encountering this in these tenure battles. It's as though our affirming, nurturing, child-rearing that encourages creative thought and "coloring outside the lines" as it were has been translated amongst the grownups who were raised on that stuff to devalue technical prowess and precision in thought. Creativity trumps getting it right.

It's much easier and requires far fewer judgments to be made, yet respect for objective fact and truth-seeking is exactly what has kept the Western Academy advanced over its weaker cousins. Instead, in the interest of diversity, we've gotten so diverse we even have to accept the wrong. In our fear of stifling vigorous debate, we've thrown standards out the window altogether.

Regarding the debate in this thread: About Keeping Jerusalem 'Safe, Intact and United'..., which has been interesting, here is some also interesting data (assuming it's accurate) which I think contributes to the discussion without necessarily privileging one side or the other: The Land Status of East Jerusalem

In June 1967, only 17 days after the six-day war, Israel changed Jerusalem's municipal borders by adding/annexing/occupying approximately 70 sq. kilometers of West Bank territory to the city. The size of Jerusalem thus tripled (from a previous area of only 40sq. kilometers), making it the largest city in Israel. At the same time, Israel applied its law and administration to the land and to the people residing in these territories, which are today known as East Jerusalem.

The size of Jerusalem during the Jordanian rule prior to 1967 was only 6 sq. kilometers, including the Old City (1 sq. kilometer) and five sq. kilometers around it. The areas which Israel added/annexed/occupied in 1967 were together, several times larger than Jordanian Jerusalem. Aside from the Jordanian city, Jerusalem’s new boundaries included 28 additional Palestinian villages which had previously not been considered to be part of the City.

The new municipal boundaries were based on the recommendations of a military committee, which was approved by the government. The recommendations represented interests – or thinking – of the time, and integrated military, demographic and geographic parameters. Militarily, there was a desire to control a route of military and strategic importance surrounding West Jerusalem. Geographically, the aim was to rule as large a territory as possible around what was Western Jerusalem. Demographically, the goal was to include as few Palestinians as possible in the added/annexed/occupied territories.

Arguments relating to Jerusalem's "sanctity", its status as the "eternal" capital of the Jewish people, and the necessity of keeping it united, were not taken into consideration and were not relevant to the considerations upon which the new municipal boundaries were set.

It should also be noted that the new municipal boundaries, set based on the parameters described above, were virtual and evident only in Israeli maps. There was no attempt to signify the new boundaries between Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank on the ground. It is important to stress that the Arab World and the International Community never recognized the new boundaries of the city.

Here is a PDF map with various areas marked.

Update: On the other hand, Media Backspin links to a version of the original proposed partition map that indicates greater borders still.

That's pretty straightforward: Hamas demands UN rescind '47 partition

Hamas on Thursday called on the UN to rescind the 1947 decision to partition Palestine into two states, one for Jews and one for Arabs.

The group said in a statement, released on the 60th anniversary of the UN vote, that "Palestine is Arab Islamic land, from the river to the sea, including Jerusalem... there is no room in it for the Jews."

Regarding the partition decision, Hamas said that "correcting mistakes is nothing to be ashamed of, but prolonging it is exploitation."...

Here's a spun AP story from last April with a complete non sequitur of a headline: Hamas Tells U.N. It Wants Peace With Israel. The headline was completely unsupported, though wishful thinking could make you overlook the obvious Hamas double-talk:

...the reference to a possible two-state solution — even negatively — was seen as a possible opening.

As was Zahar's final sentence: "Like all other people in the world, we look forward to live in peace and security and for our people to live a dignified life in freedom and independence, side by side with our neighbors in this sacred part of the world."...

At the time it was intentionally left ambiguous as to who those "neighbors" included. Not anymore.

The short answer is an obvious No. Last night I attended a lecture by Professor Ruth Wisse and in response to a question concerning the state of the Academy, she recommended the following op-ed from the Harvard Crimson Julia I. Bertelsmann. Worth reading in full: Who’s Really Trembling?

Are critics of Israel persecuted at Harvard?

Anthropology and African-American studies professor J. Lorand Matory ’82 thinks so. At a recent Faculty meeting, he proposed that Harvard reaffirm "civil dialogue," arguing that critics of Israel "tremble in fear" on campus.

In fear of what, one wonders—becoming a bestselling author at the Harvard Coop?

Nine months ago, I started a student journal entitled "New Society: Harvard College Student Middle East Journal," with the aim of creating a more constructive dialogue on campus about the future of the region. The journal was inspired by a Harvard Hillel trip to Israel last winter. I was determined to include a variety of perspectives, so before I approached Harvard Students for Israel or any other Jewish groups on campus, I asked several Muslim and Arab students to contribute articles to the journal.

But I was met with little success: Many Muslim and Arab students preferred not to publish their views, fearing the threat of reprisal.

An Iranian student who had privately expressed opposition to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declined to write, saying he preferred to "lay low" for fear of political consequences back home.

Another Iranian-American student backed out after sending me several articles about Iranian academics based in the U.S. who had been arrested on visits to Tehran. One such academic, Haleh Esfandiari, on a visit to her elderly mother, was detained for eight months and charged with crimes against "national security." The student told me he feared the same fate and worried about what would become of his family if he ever expressed his views about Iran’s theocratic regime.

Similarly, an Arab student who was approached to speak about the situation in Darfur refused, saying that he was certain some of his compatriots at Harvard would report back home about his activities abroad and that he feared being arrested or harassed by his country’s security services.

And one of our writers, Chia N. Mustafa ’09, was told by a poster on the journal’s website that he belonged to "the rank of traitors" and for writing an article advocating independence for Kurdistan.

So when Matory claims that people at Harvard "tremble in fear" because of their views on the Middle East, he is half-right...

[h/t: Fred]

Update: An emailer writes:

Well, the point is well taken, but, frankly, doesn't go far enough.

On this campus [Columbia], students get berated, publicly mocked in class by professors for mentioning the Armenian genocide, or jihad as part of the problem in the middle east.

You not only don't get publicly mocked by your professor for calling Israel an apartheid state.

I actually know a girl who had to accept a B+ in a class after refusing the opportunity to rewrite a topic-assigned essay to include a discussion of Israeli apartheid. You had to support that definition to get an A- or better.

She won't go public. The fear is too great.

I just wanted to put in a plug for Movable Type expert Mark Carey of MT-Hacks.com for his help in sorting a couple of issues here on the back end of the blog. Movable Type is a nice blogging platform, but the new version, 4.01, still has a few issues. I recommend the platform, but suggest users wait until the next update coming up next month. The platform is also going to be released with an open source version which will hopefully rejuvenate the MT community a bit.

I've used several of Mark's plugins in the past, and currently rely on his Fastsearch plugin to power searches here. Mark was kind enough to help me sort out a couple of issues, and if you need some consulting work done for MT I would highly recommend him.

Update: And let me not slight the ever-vigilant Chad Everett, another helpful and skilled programmer whose ever-useful MT-Notifier plugin powers the comment subscriptions on this site.

Big surprise. Lots of questioners at last night's GOP debate with undisclosed ties. See Michelle and Gateway. I missed most of it, but the bit I caught was certainly refreshing compared to the Dem version. Finally, some serious people (except for crazy Uncle Ron).

Miss Kelly watched Channel 5's Chronicle episode that aired last night and featured a lengthy segment on the Islamic Society of Boston's Mosque project. While not a pure puff-piece, it missed some important issues.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Some good links at Yourish by Meryl and Soccerdad: Soccerdad comments on Thomas Friedman's take: Annapolis and beyond. Meryl lashes out at some of the spin: Annapolis: The spin is in, and finally Soccerdad rounds up some reaction to a Ralph Peters column: The limits of Annapolis.

Elsewhere, there's Khaled Abu Toameh: Abbas won't be able to impose any deal on Gaza.

Two weak leaders just lucky to still have their seats (and in Abbas's case, his head) are sitting around chatting over things that are beside the point. It's not about borders or roadblocks or anything else, it's about Arab society and its inability to accept a non-Muslim state in the region. The well is so poisoned it's almost impossible to get by this. Now they're all invited to the White House. I bet the food is good.

I guess the bottom-line here is that pretty much everyone has been too keyed-up over this one event. The key for activism now is to keep a keen eye on the direction these more quiet negotiations are taking from here on.

Frankly, this low-key approach may just be the way to accomplish something positive if you keep a long term view. It's impossible to tell.

Daniel Froomkin has what's basically a long blog-post and round-up at The Washington Post, here: The White House 'After Party'

Update: Our friend Tom Glennon has it right:

...The bottom line to me is that the entire comedy of this conference is an exercise in futility. The Palestinians do not want an accord, they want Israel to disappear. Almost all of the attendees want the same, even if they do not want to participate directly in Israel’s destruction. Any pronouncement by the three main participants will be considered meaningless due to their weak standing at home and the overwhelming opposition to the continued existence of Israel by most other nations at the table. My only question is how destructive the results can be to our only true friend in the region, and ultimately, to our own interests and influence...

Any possible conference is futile because the other side doesn't want peace, they want to win -- and they're willing to kill their own children to achieve it. I think Bush is right to do about the only thing you can do by keeping expectations low and starting some sort of process that could (though the odds are microscopic) establish a new dynamic and incentive system of its own.

Day after Annapolis: Palestinian Authority TV shows "Palestine" map erasing Israel

PATV281107map.jpg
by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook - November 28, 2007

Just a day after Israeli and Palestinian leaders at the Annapolis peace conference pledged to negotiate a peace treaty by the end of 2008, Mahmoud Abbas’s Palestinian Authority continues to paint a picture for its people of a world without Israel.

An information clip produced by the Palestinian Authority Central Bureau of Statistics and rebroadcast today on Abbas-controlled Palestinian television, shows a map in which Israel is painted in the colors of the Palestinian flag, symbolizing Israel turned into a Palestinian state.

The description of all of the state of Israel as "Palestine" is not coincidental, and is part of a formal, systematic educational approach throughout the Palestinian Authority. This uniform message of a world without Israel is repeated in school books, children's programs, crossword puzzles, video clips, formal symbols, school and street names, etc. The picture painted for the Palestinian population, both verbally and visually, is of a world without Israel.

The fact that this campaign continues before the ink on the Annapolis agreement is even dry appears to contradict the central promise of the Palestinians at the Annapolis conference: that Israel has a right to exist.

Click to view video on PMW website

IAF Strike Signals New Tit-for-Tat Policy

(IsraelNN.com) The attack on a Hamas position in Khan Yunis Wednesday afternoon which killed two was the first implementation of a new IDF policy regarding the Gaza terrorists. Military sources told Maariv/NRG that from now on, the IAF will attack a random Hamas target in Gaza every time a mortar shell or rocket hits an Israeli community, and will no longer limit itself to striking the terrorists who launched the rockets. They said that the IDF has now established that Hamas is behind all of the terror emanating from Gaza and will thus retaliate against Hamas targets regardless of which organization takes credit for terror attacks.

After a salvo of mortar shells landed near the security fence near Nahal Oz at around 3 P.M. Wednesday, IAF aircraft retaliated by attacking a Hamas position in southern Gaza. Gaza Arabs said one of those killed in the IAF strike today was Rami Abu-Rus, who is active in Hamas. At least 10 people were wounded in the blast.

For months, the IDF's policy has been to try to strike terrorists in the act of firing rockets, or immediately before or after launching them. Strikes on terrorists in the act of firing at Israeli civilians were called off if they entailed a danger of hurting non-combatants. This policy caused great frustration among the victims of the Gaza terrorists, many of whom felt that the government prefers the enemies' lives over their own.

6,288 rockets in six years

Gaza terror squads fired one rocket and five mortar shells at Israeli civilians Wednesday morning. The rocket exploded in a kibbutz in the western Negev, causing no casualties. One mortar shell hit a chicken coop in an agricultural community in the area, causing some damage but no casualties. Two additional mortars were fired in the evening, exploding near the security fence and hurting no one.

The counter at the Committee for Secure Sderot website currently shows 6,288 rocket attacks from Gaza in the past six years...

In the extended entry are some photos of a rally held yesterday in front of the Israeli Consulate here in Boston to coincide with the Annapolis conference. It's been interesting to watch while, as often happens with these events, various groups wrestle with how to support Israel and its elected government while still carefully remaining true to the memberships' -- sometimes diverse -- opinions and desire to express them.

Bravo to those who turned out.

Continue reading "'Rally for a Safe Israel' Pics"

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Pajamas Media has a round up.

Jules Crittenden:

the best promise of Annapolis is that it could see the formalizing of the estrangement of Hamas, initiated by the summer’s revolting Palestinian-on-Palestinian violence, and the formal recognition by more Arab states that Palestinian moderates and Israel are the only legitimate players. The prospects of the return of the Golan could drive a significant wedge between terrorism-supporting Syria and Iran, whose isolation is intensified. The most intransigent parties to this conflict and their people will be provided with an opportunity to recognize their self-interest, if only incrementally.

Annapolis will not mean peace in our time. But it could be a meaningful step toward peace in someone else’s time.

Cal Thomas:

...The so-called Palestinian side brings nothing to the table. It has yet to fulfill a major pledge made at previous summit meetings. If the Palestinian side were applying for a bank loan, they would be turned down for defaulting on prior loans. Only in the twisted logic of Middle East "diplomacy" is their credit undamaged...

Barry Rubin:

...Despite thousands of claims by lots of famous people, national leaders, and respected journals, solving the Arab-Israeli conflict will not make radical Islamism or terrorism go away. Would you like to know why? Because even if this issue could be solved—which isn’t about to happen for reasons requiring a different article—to do so would necessitate a compromise including an end to the conflict, acceptance of Israel, and compromises by the Arab side. These steps would inflame the extremists and make any Arab rulers who accepted it vulnerable to being called traitors. It would increase instability in the Arab world, also by removing the conflict as splendid excuse and basis for mobilizing support for the current rulers. Arab politicians understand this reality; most people in the West don’t...

Michelle Malkin has links.

Update: Jules Crittenden has posted a Stratfor analysis in full.

Court says US border inspections of Muslims were allowed

U.S. immigration authorities acted constitutionally when they subjected dozens of people returning from an Islamic convention in Canada to screening tactics usually reserved for people suspected of being terrorists, an appeals court said Monday.

The court upheld the conclusion of a federal judge that the 2004 inspections, which involved frisking and fingerprinting, did not violate U.S. constitutional rights to practice religion and avoid unlawful searches.

"We do not believe the extra hassle of being fingerprinted and photographed — for the sole purpose of having their identities verified — is a significant additional burden that turns an otherwise constitutional policy into one that is unconstitutional," a three-judge panel wrote.

The New York Civil Liberties Union had sued on behalf of five New York residents who attended the "Reviving the Islamic Spirit" conference in Toronto. The NYCLU sought a court order to prevent similar inspections, along with destruction of personal information collected during the stops...

...The U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection had received intelligence giving it reason to believe people with terrorist ties would be attending certain Islamic conferences during the 2004 year-end holiday season.

The court said the inspections were necessary because it was not possible for authorities to know who at the conference may have interacted and potentially exchanged identification or travel documents with people suspected of being terrorists...

So beyond the general security situation, border officials had specific reason to be interested in these people -- expect that to be left out of most critical comment on the incident.

An interesting tid-bit from a Time Magazine article on Gaza, dated 1968: Rootless in Gaza

...For the first time in 20 years, the Gazans are allowed to travel outside the Strip. With Israeli encouragement, more than 30,000 of them have gone to seek jobs in Jordan or the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The Arabs charge that the Israelis are allowing them to leave for political rather than humane motives, since every departing Arab is one potential terrorist fewer to deal with and one mouth fewer to feed. But the rate of the Arab exodus by bus and hired taxi has dropped off lately as word has spread that few jobs are available in Jordan...

And this:

...the Israelis seem more intent on holding onto the Gaza Strip than any other part of their conquered territory, except Jerusalem. They are slowly integrating this arid area into Israel, and impressing on the Arabs the permanence of their presence. The reason: Worthless in every other respect, the Gaza Strip is important to Israel's security, since it probes like a finger into Israeli territory. Egyptian troops massed there before the outbreak of the war, and the Strip had long been a base for Arab terrorist raids...

And yet they gave it up.

Another must-read on what it's really like in Iraq: An Edgy Calm in Fallujah

FALLUJAH, IRAQ – "You're probably safer here than you are in New York City," said Marine First Lieutenant Barry Edwards when I arrived in Fallujah. I raised my eyebrows at him skeptically. "How many people got shot at last night in New York City?" he said.

"Probably somebody," I said.

"Yeah, probably somebody did," he said. "Somewhere."

Nobody was shot last night in Fallujah. No American has been shot anywhere in Fallujah since the 3rd Battalion 5th Marine Regiment rotated into the city two months ago. There have been no rocket, or mortar attacks since the summer. Not a single of the 3/5 Marines has even been wounded.

"The only shots we've fired since we got here are warning shots," said Lieutenant J.C. Davis. Another officer didn't agree. "We haven't even fired warning shots," he said. "It's too dangerous."

It's dangerous because anti-American sentiment still exists in the city, even though it is mostly passive right now. It isn't entirely passive, however. Someone has been taking pot shots at Americans. A few days ago somebody threw a hand grenade at Marines. Two weeks ago an insurgent was caught by Iraqi Police officers while planting an IED near the main station. He freaked out, accidentally connected the wires, and blew himself up. "That's what he gets," Private Gauniel said...

John Hawkins did one of his polls of conservative bloggers. Here's the list of questions:

1) Which candidate would you most like to see as the nominee?
2) Which candidate do you think is most likely to capture the GOP nomination?
3) Which of the candidates do you believe is the most conservative?
4) Who do you believe would be the MOST electable candidate in 2008?
5) Who do you believe would be the LEAST electable candidate in 2008?
6) Which candidate do you trust the most to be tough on illegal immigration?
7) Which candidate do you trust the most to be fiscally conservative?
8) Which candidate do you trust the most on foreign policy issues?

Multiple choice answers included the top five Republican candidates. Results here. This batch of bloggers seems to really like Fred.

Apparently the Nick Griffin/David Irving appearance at the Oxford Union turned into quite a zoo.

Demonstrators broke into Oxford's venerable debating society Monday night, sitting on the debating table of the Oxford Union to protest the appearance of infamous Holocaust denier David Irving and far-right British National Party leader Nick Griffin.

At least 200 protesters chanted anti-fascist slogans and waved placards decrying the appearance of the two.

Irving and Griffin were bundled into the hall hours before the forum was to take place as protesters yelled "Keep Oxford fascist-free; We will defend democracy."

Just minutes before the debate was due to take place, a group of protesters broke through the security cordon around the Union and staged a sit-down protest in the hall.

Several students groups, including the Oxford Student Union and the university's Jewish and Muslim societies, have teamed up with activist group Unite Against Fascism to organize the protest...

Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews is quite right in saying:

..."Generations of students have sought to push at boundaries, often doing so with a mixture of idealism and naivety...Those who issued these invitations doubtless think that they too are testing the limits of free speech, but rather than being daring and original, they are just being dupes. Most of the rest of us see this as a rather immature student stunt which in this case has wider ramifications because of the credibility Irving and Griffin will seek to claim from their involvement."...

But Yair Zivan, from the Union of Jewish Students is wrong to defend the disruption of the event (if that is indeed what he is doing, you never can be sure with the use of the quotes in articles like this):

"We are desperately disappointed that the president of the union has chosen to allow this debate to go ahead...The [union] president seems completely unconcerned by the offense this debate has caused to Jewish students...Democracy does include the right to free speech - so long as that doesn't incite hatred against others - but it also includes the right to tell extremists that they're not welcome and the responsibility to protect minorities...By allowing this event to go ahead, the president has put the welfare of Jewish students on campus secondary to his own publicity seeking and we believe that this will send out entirely the wrong message"...

This is an uncomfortable situation. The invitation and the excuse for it was a ridiculous one, but once the event is ongoing, the mob cannot rule. We may yet reach a point that people like Irving and Griffin are so dangerous that their very presence must be opposed by force, but society is not so fragile that we are there yet. Speech exercised under rule of law, not at the sufferance of a mob, is essential, and ultimately its loss far more dangerous than anything an evening with Griffin and Irving could possibly represent.

Monday, November 26, 2007

'Negotiations are foredoomed.' Bernard Lewis in the Wall Street Journal (in full):

Herewith some thoughts about tomorrow's Annapolis peace conference, and the larger problem of how to approach the Israel-Palestine conflict. The first question (one might think it is obvious but apparently not) is, "What is the conflict about?" There are basically two possibilities: that it is about the size of Israel, or about its existence.

If the issue is about the size of Israel, then we have a straightforward border problem, like Alsace-Lorraine or Texas. That is to say, not easy, but possible to solve in the long run, and to live with in the meantime.

If, on the other hand, the issue is the existence of Israel, then clearly it is insoluble by negotiation. There is no compromise position between existing and not existing, and no conceivable government of Israel is going to negotiate on whether that country should or should not exist.

PLO and other Palestinian spokesmen have, from time to time, given formal indications of recognition of Israel in their diplomatic discourse in foreign languages. But that's not the message delivered at home in Arabic, in everything from primary school textbooks to political speeches and religious sermons. Here the terms used in Arabic denote, not the end of hostilities, but an armistice or truce, until such time that the war against Israel can be resumed with better prospects for success. Without genuine acceptance of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State, as the more than 20 members of the Arab League exist as Arab States, or the much larger number of members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference exist as Islamic states, peace cannot be negotiated.

Continue reading "Bernard Lewis: On the Jewish Question"

The Kendal Square Cinema can be thankful that American libel laws are so protective of free speech:

Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv cinematheques will pay NIS 40,000 in restitution to five IDF reservists who were offended by the screening of the contentious film "Jenin Jenin". The reservists maintained that the film, in which actor and director Mohammed Bakri depicts IDF excursions into Gaza during Operation Defensive Shield, is defamatory and slanderous.

First screened in 2002, the documentary "Jenin Jenin" asserts that the IDF committed atrocious war crimes and deliberately slaughtered innocent civilians during Operation Defensive Shield in the West Bank town. Following the screening, the reservists filed suit for defamation against both Bakri and the cinematheques that screened his films to the tune of NIS 2.5 million.

The five reservists involved—Attorney Ofer Ben-Natan, Doron Keidar, Nir Oshri, Adam Arbiv and Yonatan Van Kaspel, were all on active duty— and acting as part of an IDF reconnaissance unit— during "Operation Defensive Shield".

Though the five reservists themselves do not personally appear in the film, they claimed that it slanders both their IDF unit, and the fellow soldiers with whom they served.

On their part, the cinematheques involved claimed that they enjoy artistic license to screen whatever films they deem fit. They objected to demands to censor films, or to ensure their factual accuracy. The cinematheques furthermore asserted that the High Court has sanctioned the screening of Bakri's film.

Bakri appealed to the High Court after the Israeli Motion Picture Association refused to screen his film, claiming it offered a skewed and one sided depiction of events in Jenin. In its verdict, the High Court stated that it is up to the public to view the film for themselves, and evaluate its factual accuracy...

..."This plea agreement is a major achievement," said Yonatan Van Kaspel, one of the IDF soldiers involved. "Every director will now have to think twice before filming blatant lies, and every movie theater will have to be considerably more careful about what they screen.

Right now we only have the battle against Bakri left," Van Kaspel continued. "I feel that we owe this as a moral debt to our friends who were killed or wounded in Jenin."

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Dumb smart kids.

Nick Griffin, the leader of the right-wing British National Party (BNP) and Holocaust-denier historian David Irving are scheduled to give a lecture at Oxford University on Monday. Despite the protests, members of Oxford's Debating Society voted in favor of inviting Griffin and Irving.

Oxford University's students associated condemned the idea as well several Muslim students' organizations who object to Griffin's policies and the Jewish student body. Yet, the Debating Society insisted that in the name of free speech, all opinions must be heard.

Trevor Phillips, chairman of Britain's Equality and Human Rights Commission, said Irving never should have been invited.

"I think it is an absolute disgrace. As a former president of the National Union of Students, I'm ashamed that this has happened," Phillips told British Broadcasting Corp. television. "This is not a question of freedom of speech; this is a juvenile provocation."

He said students at Oxford were "supposed to be brilliant,'" and he appealed for them to "put your brains back in your head."

Phillips said people did not fight and die for the right to freedom of speech only for it to be used as a "silly parlor game."

Last week, British Defense Secretary Des Browne and at least three other lawmakers canceled appearances at Oxford University's 182-year-old debating society because of the Irving invitation. They were not invited to attend Monday's event, but were scheduled to speak before the union on other days.

Luke Tryl, President of the Society claimed that Griffin and Irving were invited to a forum that will discuss the boundaries of the freedom of speech alongside other speakers who will challenge their views.

The Society reported that tickets to event have been sold out.

How can you have a meaningful debate with a person like Irving who trades in lies? It's a dog and pony show.

More at Harry's Place.

Defiant Hamas rules by fear in isolated Gaza

...But this Hamas-imposed security has come at huge cost. Only believers feel safe; supporters of Fatah, the political organisation led by Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, are routinely arrested and tortured. Journalists are harassed and unIslamic dress can result in a beating as well. More and more women in Gaza are covering not just their hair but their faces. Many bitterly resent Hamas...

Meanwhile, Hamas is guaranteeing they'll do their best to derail anything coming out of Annapolis: Hamas shocked by Arab backing for peace summit, threatens deadlier attacks

Hamas said Saturday it was shocked Arab countries have decided to attend next week's Mideast peace summit in the United States, and underlined its opposition with a threat to launch deadlier rocket attacks on Israel.

Hamas argues the time is not right for talks with Israel because the Palestinians are divided. With the Islamic militant group in control of Gaza, Hamas says moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas does not have a mandate to negotiate.

"The announcement of the Arabs that they would participate in the Annapolis conference was a great shock for the Palestinian people," Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri, said in a statement. "Participation opens doors for normalization of relations with the Israeli occupiers."

Another Hamas official said the group was on the brink of developing a more lethal type of warhead for the rockets it regularly lobs from Gaza into Israel...

Jeff Jacoby: Let's hear it for good news from Iraq

...With the media at last paying attention to the progress in Iraq, shouldn't leading Democrats think about doing the same? Perhaps this would be a good time for Hillary Clinton to express regret for telling Petraeus that his recent progress report on Iraq required "a willing suspension of disbelief" - in effect, calling him a liar. Perhaps Senate majority leader Harry Reid should admit that he may have been wrong to declare so emphatically: "This war is lost, and the surge is not accomplishing anything."

All of the Democratic presidential candidates have been running on a platform of abandoning Iraq. At the recent debate in Las Vegas, they refused to relax their embrace of defeat even when asked about the striking evidence of improvement. They continued to insist that "the surge is not working" (Bill Richardson), that "the occupation is fueling the insurgency" (Dennis Kucinich), and that the "strategy is failed" and we must "get our troops out" (Barack Obama).

Blind opposition to war that seems lost is understandable. But can Democrats be so invested in defeat that they would abandon even a war that may be winnable? With developments in Iraq looking so hopeful, this is no time to cling to a counsel of despair.

Listening to the Democrat debates can be a bit surreal. It's like listening to a bunch of folks in a time-warp whose info is months out of date. I always get this feeling of "these people can't be serious."

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Amazing what you can accomplish with a pick. Here's their main site: Temples of Damanhur.

hallmirrorsDM2111_800x364.jpg

Wow...people. Who knows what they'll come up with next? Seems to be a whole "thing." Little culty perhaps.

[via Dean]

An Israeli reader writes in the following concerning "dividing" Jerusalem:

Keeping Jerusalem 'Safe, Intact and United' is an oxymoron.

Jerusalem is divided already and that gives it the little safety it still has. Most Jews never go into the Palestinian side (i.e. beyond the old city) and most Palestinians avoid the Israeli part -- unless they have a good reason to go there.

By now, all of the suicide bombers who exploded anywhere in Israel in the last two years crossed from the West Bank via Jerusalem -- they used the places where holes in the Security Barrier are left to keep Jerusalem "united."

Dividing Jerusalem is the only possible realistic scenario. It does not mean giving up on the Wailing Wall or the old city or everything that once was East Jerusalem but we must keep in mind that Israel has enlarged into the Municipality borders of Jerusalem many West-Bank villages that never were the city itself. They are remote and have no religious meaning, they go well beyond the Mount of Olives or other important sites.

When Jews yearned for Jerusalem - have they meant the Shua'aft refugee camp? Kafar Akeb (which is actually a suburb of Ramallah), Abu Dis (en route to Jericho) -- it is clear they did not.

The enlargement of the Jerusalem municipal border has made hundreds of thousands of West-Bank residents become "Jerusalem resident" with an Israeli ID and social security and health coverage and the right to drive a car with an Israeli license plate which gives them access to everywhere within Israel (but they also can travel to the West Bank). It is no mystery that East Jerusalemites are now the transport fabric of terror and smuggling from the West Bank into Israel. It is no wonder that East Jerusalem is the center of Palestinian internal immigration from the West Bank into Israel. It is no wonder that the act of having a 2nd wife is all too common in East Jerusalem -- every Palestinian family wants to send their daughter to a better future by marrying an East Jerusalemite and having someone in the family get an Israeli ID.

The wall was built on this WRONG municipal border, and as a result it divided tens of West Bank villages/towns which were around Jerusalem but were marked on the maps as "inside Jerusalem borders." In A-Ram, Beit Hanina, the wall was built dividing the town along the main road -- only because in 1967 the west part of that combined town was marked inside Jerusalem and the east part was marked West Bank. Now is it surprising that people in this town have a need to cross that wall a few times a day every day -- tens of thousands of them? Is it surprising that no security checkpoints can process that many people and still provide fast but thorough security checks? So Israel is left with a choice of its own making: Either do a real search on every person coming in, and have enough patrols to prevent people from sneaking in (it takes anywhere from 12 -45 seconds to climb the wall)...or allow people to come into "Jerusalem" in droves. If Israel does the former it would cost a ton of money and Israel would be accused of violating the human rights of tens of thousands who have to stand in lines every day on the way to work, schools, hospitals, mosques. If it does the latter (which is what it does today) it gives up on "Security" in the hope that with intelligence Israel can still prevent suicide bombers by knowing who they are. This works nine out of ten times so the amount of bombers passing into Israel is reduced, but not to zero.

This may change. East Jerusalem voted overwhelmingly for Hamas in the Palestinian elections. So far, since 2005, Hamas has kept its word not to engage in suicide bombings (only smaller organization do them now). Hamas is not stupid. They must have explosives and dormant operators already in East Jerusalem. Should they decide again to launch a bombing campaign, the lack of security in Jerusalem will be in their favor. It was a single East-Jerusalem cell that during 2000-2002 did most of the more horrific suicide bombings in Israel (including the one in Jerusalem's own Hebrew University but also ones in the rest of Israel). Utilizing their cars with Israeli license plates the Hamas cell moved freely in and out of the West Bank into Israel just like any car driven by any other Israeli.

Friday, November 23, 2007

What could the groups be that you and I could possibly agree to fund? What real peace groups are there on the West Bank that you and I would agree to give money to? This report at the State Department's site is short on details regarding attendees. Just exactly who have I been training over there? Palestinian Activists Hone Advocacy Skills - Nongovernmental groups, political leaders learn to target audiences

Palestinians traditionally value education as the way forward, so it is not surprising that the West Bank has dozens of articulate, home-grown advocacy groups. But even the most seasoned civic activists constantly seek new strategies to communicate their message. Recently, the U.S. Consulate General invited an experienced U.S. activist to work with local advocacy groups on communicating their message through the media as part of the United States’ continuing support for democratic development in the Palestinian Territories.

Tarek Rizk, a garrulous American with Egyptian roots, is the associate director of the Global Interdependence Initiative at the Washington-based Aspen Institute. At his workshops in Jerusalem and the West Bank city of Ramallah, he discussed ideas with Palestinian activists on choosing the target audience and ensuring their message is noticed...

"Target" audience? Getting noticed? Neither seems to have been a problem in the past.

...For the final session of the NGO training, 10 media representatives joined the activists to discuss better cooperation. Meeting the press proved tense for some of the activists who felt ignored or even slighted in the past by some prominent media...

Again I ask. What groups?

Wow. AP has actually published one of those de rigeur stories showcasing an Arab and Israeli view on a subject and has explicitly rejected a moral equivalence between the two cases: Israelis, Palestinians doubtful on talks

RAMALLAH, West Bank - Mohammed Naji's son was killed by Israeli soldiers. Ron Kehrmann's daughter died at the hands of a Palestinian suicide bomber.

Beyond their grief, the two fathers share something else — both are skeptical next week's Mideast summit called by President Bush in Annapolis, Md., will do anything to end decades of conflict between their two peoples...

...Naji and Kehrmann lost their children in vastly different circumstances — and the deaths cannot be equated.

Naji's son, Abdel Moneim, was a militant who was targeted by an Israeli undercover unit in 2004. Kehrmann's daughter Tal was a 17-year-old girl killed four years ago while riding a bus on her way to shop for her high school graduation...

Maybe all those letters and phone calls actually do have an impact.

It's major news that there's a funded effort to get books into Arabic:

The Collected Stories Of Isaac Bashevis Singer, by an author who was raised in Poland but for decades dominated Yiddish writing in New York, will join titles ranging from Sophocles and Chaucer to Stephen Hawking and Haruki Murakami among the first selections of the Kalima translation programme.

The Kalima (meaning "word" in Arabic) project aims to revive the art of translation across the Arab world and reverse the long decline in Arabic readers' access to major works of global literature, philosophy, science and history.

"The choices reflect what we consider are the real gaps in the Arab library," said Karim Nagy, the founder and chief executive of the project, which was launched yesterday in Abu Dhabi...

...Inspired by Mr Nagy, a literature-loving Egyptian entrepreneur and former McKinsey management consultant now based in Abu Dhabi, Kalima has become an official venture of the Abu Dhabi government. One of the triggers which led to its creation was a widely-circulated statistic from the 2003 UN report into human development in the Arab world. It estimated that more books (about 10,000) were translated into Spanish every year than had been translated into Arabic over the past millennium...

An emailer points out that "This is a nice way of saying that per year only 250 books are translated to Arabic IN THE WHOLE ARAB WORLD and that for years preventing translation was a way to keep Arabs away from western culture, values and education.

In Israel -- a tiny tiny market compare to the Arab world (There are about 200 times more Arab speakers in the world than Hebrew speakers) -- there are several thousand translations per year. (about a dozen new one each day)"

...they'll just invent a new claim to demand more. The bottom line is that the Muslims will never accept any non-Muslim sovereignty in what they consider dar al-Islam. That's why trying to appease every new act in the Arab grievance theater is ultimately a waste of time and counter-productive as it just encourages more demands.

JCPA: The Palestinian Authority and the Jewish Holy Sites in the West Bank: Rachel's Tomb as a Test Case

...In 2000, after hundreds of years of recognizing the site as Rachel's Tomb, Muslims began calling it the "Bilal ibn Rabah mosque." Members of the Wakf used the name first in 1996, but it has since entered the national Palestinian discourse. Bilal ibn Rabah was an Ethiopian known in Islamic history as a slave who served in the house of the prophet Muhammad as the first muezzin (the individual who calls the faithful to prayer five times a day). When Muhammad died, ibn Rabah went to fight the Muslim wars in Syria, was killed in 642 CE, and buried in either Aleppo or Damascus. The Palestinian Authority claimed that according to Islamic tradition, it was Muslim conquerors who named the mosque erected at Rachel's Tomb after Bilal ibn Rabah.

The Palestinian claim ignored the fact that Ottoman firmans (mandates or decrees) gave Jews in the Land of Israel the right of access to the site at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The Palestinian claim even ignored accepted Muslim tradition, which admires Rachel and recognizes the site as her burial place. According to tradition, the name "Rachel" comes from the word "wander," because she died during one of her wanderings and was buried on the Bethlehem road. Her name is referred to in the Koran, and in other Muslim sources, Joseph is said to fall upon his mother Rachel's grave and cry bitterly as the caravan of his captors passes by. For hundreds of years, Muslim holy men (walis) were buried in tombs whose form was the same as Rachel's.

Then, out of the blue, the connection between Rachel, admired even by the Muslims, and her tomb is erased and the place becomes "the Bilal ibn Rabah mosque." Well-known Orientalist Professor Yehoshua Porat has called the "tradition" the Muslims referred to as "false." He said the Arabic name of the site was "the Dome of Rachel, a place where the Jews prayed."

Only a few years ago, official Palestinian publications contained not a single reference to such a mosque. The same was true for the Palestinian Lexicon issued by the Arab League and the PLO in 1984, and for Al-mawsu'ah al-filastiniyah, the Palestinian encyclopedia published in Italy after 1996. Palestine, the Holy Land, published by the Palestinian Council for Development and Rehabilitation, with an introduction written by Yasser Arafat, simply says that "at the northwest entrance to the city [Bethlehem] lies the tomb of the matriarch Rachel, who died while giving life to Benjamin." The West Bank and Gaza - Palestine also mentions the site as the Tomb of Rachel and not as the Mosque of Bilal ibn Rabah. However, the Palestinian deputy minister for endowments and religious affairs has now defined Rachel's Tomb as a Muslim site.

On Yom Kippur in 2000, six days after the IDF withdrew from Joseph's Tomb, the Palestinian daily newspaper Al-Hayat al-Jadida published an article marking the next target as Rachel's Tomb. It read in part, "Bethlehem - ‘the Tomb of Rachel,' or the Bilal ibn Rabah mosque, is one of the nails the occupation government and the Zionist movement hammered into many Palestinian cities....The tomb is false and was originally a Muslim mosque."...

...asks Caroline Glick. Is Israel about to be thrown to the crocodile?

The mood is dark in the IDF's General Staff ahead of next week's "peace" conference in Annapolis. As one senior officer directly involved in the negotiations with the Palestinians and the Americans said, "As bad as it might look from the outside, the truth is ten times worse. This is a nightmare. The Americans have never been so hostile."

Thursday a draft of the joint statement that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators are discussing ahead of the conference was leaked to the media. A reading of the document bears out the IDF's concerns.

The draft document shows that the Palestinians and the Israelis differ not only on every issue, but differ on the purpose of the document. It also shows that the US firmly backs the Palestinians against Israel.

As the draft document makes clear, Israel is trying to avoid committing itself to anything at Annapolis. For their part, the Palestinians are trying to force Israel's hand by tying it to diplomatic formulas that presuppose an Israeli withdrawal to the 1949 armistice lines and an Israeli acceptance of the so-called "right of return" or free immigration of foreign Arabs to Israel...

Here is an interesting site: Keep Jerusalem United

On November 26th, world leaders will congregate in Annapolis to once again seek concessions from Israel and declare that Jerusalem should be divided, with part becoming the capital of a new, Hamas-controlled Palestinian terror-state. Israel should not be pressured by the United States, least of all while facing terrorism, rocket attacks, and hate, and while its kidnapped soldiers remain hostages...

If you go to the site, there is a simple system there to automatically (and at no cost) connect you to The White House, Sallai Meridor at the Embassy of Israel and Condoleeza Rice's office and there is a sample message you should leave for them as the Annapolis Conference draws near. Using that link will actually track people coming from this site, which is cool (I guess). Hopefully a few of you folks will use it.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

idfqassamstrike.jpg

Be thankful today for hi-tech optics and accurate missile strikes: IDF strike against Qassam cell caught on tape

Rare footage of a Palestinian terror cell in Gaza preparing to launch Qassam rockets towards Israel last week was released by the IDF on Tuesday.

The cell is shown retrieving the projectiles and launchers and sets them up in a dirt embankment in northern Gaza. At this point army intelligence makes a positive identification and confirms the men are not civilians.

The IDF then launches its first attack against the cell, wounding several of its members.

As the remaining terrorists attempt to flee the scene and evacuate their wounded the army launches its second strike, killing all four of the cell members and destroying the rocket launchers.

Only 3% of attacks are thwarted

While the IDF has time and again stressed the importance of striking rocket launching cells caught in the act, recent statements made by IAF chief, Maj. Gen. Eliezer Shkedi indicate that less than 3% of all Qassam attacks are thwarted.

Shkedi said that the air strikes were effective in targeting between 1-3% of the cells. "If we want to fight, we have to hurt those who manufacture the Qassams, issue the orders, transport the cells, and develop the explosives… everything else related to this industry. We cannot ignore the other 97%," he said.

But for now the army, following directives from the political echelon, can only focus on cells already in the field...

A Tel Aviv University professor, Uzi Even, is speculating that what the Israelis bombed in Syria was not, in fact could not have been, a nuclear reactor. What it may have in fact been was a facility for taking already produced plutonium -- from North Korea in this case -- and doing final production of a bomb. The theory is an interesting, and disturbing, one -- not only the bomb, but the speculation that once again, the State Department and other government entities are keeping the truth under wraps so that negotiations (in this case the Six Party Talks with North Korea) aren't jeopardized.

Haaretz: Inside Intel / Not a reactor - something far more vicious

...Over the years, particularly during the period when North Korea was not under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it produced plutonium from the nuclear fuel rods. U.S. intelligence estimates that even after the nuclear test conducted about a year ago (a test which failed), North Korea still has reserves of about 40 kilograms of plutonium, which is sufficient to produce 10 atom bombs. This plutonium is not under supervision, and North Korea could have concealed it in its laboratories or sold it to another country - Syria, for example...

...Even's questions relate to several substantive issues. First, in the reactor in Yongbyon, one can clearly see a chimney, which is necessary for the emission of the radioactive gases (incidentally, based on the emission of the gases experts can determine the capacity of the reactor). In the satellite photos of the structure in Syria there is no chimney. It could be claimed that the Syrians may not have had time to build it. This is a reasonable answer, but it is overshadowed by the fact that there is evidence that the structure was under construction already four years ago. There are satellite photos of the site from 2003. In these photos one can clearly see in one of the building walls openings, which disappeared in the 2007 photos. "We can assume that construction began even before 2003," says Even. "In all those years, five years or even more, a chimney had still not been built? Very strange."

No less strange in his opinion is the fact that the "reactor" did not have cooling towers. The pumping station seen in the photos, 5 kilometers from the site, cannot, according to him, be a substitute for such towers. "A structure without cooling towers cannot be a reactor," he says, pointing to the satellite photo from Yongbyon, in which one can clearly see the cooling tower, with steam rising from it...

..."In my estimation this was something very nasty and vicious, and even more dangerous than a reactor," says Even. "I have no information, only an assessment, but I suspect that it was a plant for processing plutonium, namely a factory for assembling the bomb."

In other words, Syria already had several kilograms of plutonium, and it was involved in building a bomb factory (the assembling of one bomb requires about four kilograms of fissionable material).

Processing the plutonium and assembling the bomb require utmost caution, because plutonium is one of the most toxic and radioactive materials. One microgram can kill one person, and a gram is capable of killing a million people. Handling it requires special lathes, but because of its lethal nature nobody is allowed to come into direct contact with plutonium or with the lathes. That is why there is a need to build labs containing dozens of glove boxes, which isolate and separate the worker from the material and the equipment.

What reinforces Even's suspicion that the structure attacked in Syria was in fact a bomb assembly plant is the fact that the satellite photos taken after the bombing clearly show that the Syrians made an effort to bury the entire site under piles of earth. "They did so because of the lethal nature of the material that was in the structure, and that can be plutonium," he said. That may also be the reason they refused to allow IAEA inspectors to visit the site and take samples of the earth, which would give away their secret...

Phil Orenstein describes the case of one defender of sanity in the classroom and he lawsuit he's having to endure: Sharad Karkhanis Stands on the Moral High Ground

The vast majority of Americans don’t want convicted terrorists or terrorist sympathizers teaching their kids. But a City University of New York faculty union leader, Susan O’Malley is suing Dr. Sharad Karkhanis, CUNY professor emeritus for criticizing her for being obsessed with "finding jobs for terrorists" at CUNY. However, she is surely not the only one "recruiting terrorists" on campus. CUNY faculty and Professional Staff Congress (PSC) leaders besides O’Malley have been defending convicted terrorists’ right to teach and donating to their legal funds using the members’ union dues for these and numerous other political causes. Now, CUNY professor Francis Fox Piven, from the New Caucus of the PSC, has stepped up to defend South African scholar Adam Habib who was accused of engaging in a terrorist activity and barred from entering the United States by the State Department. Professor Piven said "(w)e think this is a clear violation of academic freedom" and invited him to him to speak at the American Sociological Association's annual conference, saying "(h)e would be much in demand" at a number of CUNY campuses...

...it’s the lowly professor Karkhanis and his defenders who speak for the majority of Americans who hold the moral high ground. These are the decent hard working people who pay a lot of money to send their kids to college. They don’t want their kids to be lectured by convicted terrorists. Weather Underground terrorist Susan Rosenberg, convicted terrorist conspirator Mohammad Yousry, Lynne Stewart, Sami Al-Arian, Lori Berenson, Adam Habib and their ilk shouldn’t be promoting their bloodstained ideology in the classroom. The majority of Americans are disgusted with an academic elite that crushes dissent and free speech. Americans who want colleges free from this vermin and who want to ensure free speech for Sharad Karkahnis, are the ones who are now rallying to his side.

Karkhanis speaks for the vast majority of Americans from within the cloistered walls of an elitist institution that silences dissenting points of view...

Uh oh, trouble with Israeli Baseball: Scandal Tarnishes Holy Land Baseball Diamonds

After a bumpy first season marked by allegations of financial mismanagement, Israel’s fledgling baseball league suffered a new setback last week with the sudden departure of its commissioner and a dozen volunteer advisers.

Daniel Kurtzer, a former American ambassador to both Egypt and Israel who served as the first commissioner of the Israel Baseball League, announced his resignation November 15. He was joined by a majority of the IBL’s advisory board members, who, in a statement released to the press, alleged that the league’s managers had been "unwilling to provide relevant financial information."

The departures come as the league’s founder and sole owner, Boston-based businessman Larry Baras, finds himself under considerable scrutiny. In recent months, reports have surfaced that the IBL owes money to players and to vendors and may not return for a second season. Meanwhile, one of Baras’s former friends and business associates, Natalie Blacher of Dade County, Fla., filed a lawsuit in late September accusing Baras of misappropriating $275,000 she had invested in his company, SJR Foods.

Marty Appel, who was among the board members who resigned, said the decision had come after "continuing attempts to get a better grip of the situation" over the past six or seven weeks...

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Honest Reporting has released a 6 Month Study: Are there any patterns of bias in New York Times reporting?

...The New York Times: April-September 2007 - Summary of Findings:
  • Balance: Despite an evenly balanced selection of stories on Israel and the Palestinians, the New York Times gave far more weight to Israeli military incidents in text location, headlines and photo selection than to Palestinian attacks. More than 60% of images sympathetic to one side or the other favored the Palestinians.
  • Consistency: Israeli and Palestinian actions were not treated consistently in choice of language. Israel or the Israel Defense Forces were the subject of strongly worded, direct headlines in 18 out of 20 cases (90%). However, in the 20 cases where the Palestinians were responsible for attacks, the language was mostly passive and the group responsible was only named in eight instances (40%).
  • Context and Accuracy: Inaccurate statements or important context that would give readers a fuller picture of news events was often omitted. Terms such as "militants", "occupied territory," and "illegal settlements" were used without providing a proper explanation...

A futile effort, but bringing all pressure to bear, including on the world stage, can't hurt: ZAKA, Sderot's Municipality sue Mashaal

In lawsuit submitted to International Criminal Court in The Hague, volunteer organization and rocket-ridden city's mayor argue Hamas leader responsible for murder of 176 Israeli citizens, injury of hundreds

ZAKA, a volunteer organization committed to the recovery and identification of human remains, in coordination with the municipality of the rocket-battered city of Sderot, may be on to a new method for combating Hamas: The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

In a lawsuit against Hamas politburo chief Khaled Mashaal, ZAKA's directors Yehuda Meshi-Zahav and Dudi Zilbershlag and Sderot Mayor Eli Moyal argue that Mashaal is responsible for numerous murders and crimes against humanity and war crimes.

In the suit Mashaal is blamed for the killing of 176 civilians and the wounding of hundreds in Hamas-sponsored terror attacks and suicide bombings that took place since 2002. Attacks on military targets were not included in the lawsuit.

Speaking to Ynet, Meshi-Zahav said the plan was to use the international judicial system to combat Hamas.

Referring to the botched attempt on Mashaal's life, Meshi-Zahav said, "If they couldn't kill him in Jordan, we might be able to get him arrested in another country."...

Zaka is, of course, an amazing organization. If you want to see a little of what the guys from Zaka deal with (they are among the first responders to terror-attacks, and they stay to literally scrape the remains off the wall in keeping with Jewish Law's respect for the dead), take a look at some of these photos. Blood warning.

Richard Miniter takes on the case of Joseph Massad in the pages of the New York Post: Hatemonger U? Columbia May Tenure Extremist

...COLUMBIA University is about to give tenure to an anti-Israel ex tremist. Joseph Massad, an associate professor of modern Arab politics, has a history of shouting down his students. He compares Jews to Nazis and bizarrely accuses Israel of "anti-Semitism" for its treatment of the Palestinians. (Massad is a Palestinian.) In a course description, he describes his class on Israeli-Arab relations as "not balanced."...

...To students, Massad often seems less like a scholar than a prosecutor presenting his case. Three students recently came forward to say that Massad "repeatedly likened Israel to apartheid South Africa, dismissed its legitimacy as a Jewish state and almost never addressed human-rights abuses in countries such as Iraq, Iran and Syria."...

You may remember those 10 outrageous things Massad has said: The Crackpot Scholarship of Joseph Massad. Anyone got anything new to add to the list?

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Job well done, Jawa Report (which has lots of links).

...Bilal Hussein, a stringer for the Associated Press suspected of having ties to al Qaeda in Iraq, will be charged by the Iraqi government at the request of the U.S. military. Bilal Hussein was caught in an apartment with known members of al Qaeda-- with bomb making material.

Hussein, a native of once al Qaeda in Iraq "capital" Fallujah, alleged the U.S. committed war crimes when it retook the city. Absent from Hussein's reports were photos of al Qaeda torture and murder chambers as they killed any one in the city suspected of being 'too Western'...

They're whirling with righteous indignation over at Lightstalkers.

I have an announcement here from Scholars for Peace in the Middle East:

Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group press has announced that the eagerly awaited hardcover volumn, "Postcololonial Theory and the Arab-Israeli Conflict" edited by Philip Carl Salzman and Donna Robinson Divine will be delayed until May, 2008 for publication. In the meantime, the papers from this SPME-sponsored conference are available through the currently available Israel Affairs,Volume 13, No. 3. October 2007 in soft cover.

For a contribution of $500 or more, SPME will send a free copy of the hardcover edition when it is available in May, 2008. Click here

For a contribution of $360 to $499, SPME will send a free copy of the Israel Affairs issue right now. Click here

To pre-order the hardcover edition from Routledge Press click here.

I am going to chance posting the Introduction to this fascinating-looking volume here in the extended entry below.

Continue reading "Deconstructing Postcolonialism"

Their idea of fun and my idea of fun are distinct:

KHAN YOUNIS, Gaza (Reuters) - If you believe the building plans, "Media City" will be a Disneyland fused with Hollywood and the CNN Centre on the shores of the Mediterranean.

There's only one catch: it's in the Gaza Strip.

Workers at this ex-Jewish settlement go in fear of Israeli air strikes, while there is a blockade on building materials.

And the Hamas Islamists backing the site -- envisioned as a combined amusement park, movie studio and hub for international journalism all in one -- say foreign filmmakers will be welcome, as long as their works don't show people kissing.

But those setbacks and the reality of Hamas rule and Israeli sanctions have not discouraged Gaza Media City's backers, inspired by Arab examples in Dubai and Egypt that have drawn foreign investment and created jobs.

They have started work on landscaping in the hope that one day the project will feature a zoo and film lots that recreate among other things, the Palestinian villages of a century ago and today's Israeli settlements...

Oh no, not the zoo!

If you were following the events of the Dabke dance troupe that was canceled out of a tour of Connecticut schools after causing outrage among parents and students, you should be aware that these people have no sense of propriety and nothing else to do, so their next step is to try to pressure the Superintendent of Schools in Old Saybrook, CT into inviting Anna "Terrorist Madonna" Baltzer in. A group message encourages people to write:

Dear Fellow Activists,

I have just been told that Anna Baltzer has made an offer to the Superintendent of Schools in Old Saybrook, CT to come and speak to the students there about the situation in Israel / Palestine and about what happened recently when a youth dance troupe from Palestine was prevented from performing in the school system.

I'm planning to write my own letter to the Superintendent, encouraging him to take Anna up on her offer. What a wonderful opportunity this could be to actually open up a dialogue in the public school system on the issue of Israel-Palestine! But this window of opportunity could easily pass us by if not enough people encourage the Superintendent to follow through. He needs to know that there are enough people in the community who would support an honest and open study of this issue.

If you want to write a letter to the Old Saybrook superintendent as well, encouraging him to allow the students to study this issue, his address is:

Joseph Onofrio, II
Superintendent of Schools...(etc...)

One would think that the Super had learned his lesson, but you never know. Folks in the area might want to just make sure Mr. Onofrio is aware that Anna Baltzer is hardly the antidote to manipulative political propaganda. She's more of the poison.

Surfer dude stuns physicists with theory of everything

An impoverished surfer has drawn up a new theory of the universe, seen by some as the Holy Grail of physics, which has received rave reviews from scientists.

Garrett Lisi, 39, has a doctorate but no university affiliation and spends most of the year surfing in Hawaii, where he has also been a hiking guide and bridge builder (when he slept in a jungle yurt).

In winter, he heads to the mountains near Lake Tahoe, Nevada, where he snowboards. "Being poor sucks," Lisi says. "It's hard to figure out the secrets of the universe when you're trying to figure out where you and your girlfriend are going to sleep next month."

Despite this unusual career path, his proposal is remarkable because, by the arcane standards of particle physics, it does not require highly complex mathematics.

Even better, it does not require more than one dimension of time and three of space, when some rival theories need ten or even more spatial dimensions and other bizarre concepts. And it may even be possible to test his theory, which predicts a host of new particles, perhaps even using the new Large Hadron Collider atom smasher that will go into action near Geneva next year...

I couldn't tell you what any of it means, but I do know that this is sitting on page 14 of the PDF:

startheory.jpg

Monday, November 19, 2007

Noah Pollak has a good article in the latest issue of Azure that addresses Israel's "media war" -- how they're victimized, how they can fight back: Show of Force. Worth reading in full, but here's the money:

...it is long past time that Israel pushed back against the worst of the journalists, activists, and NGO employees who have made a cottage industry out of operating in the Jewish state under false pretenses. More disturbing than the fraudulent coverage of al-Dura, Jenin, Lebanon, and the Gaza beach explosion is the fact that Israel did nothing to punish those who so eagerly participated in the dissemination of propaganda. The journalists who wrote sensational fabrications of an Israeli massacre in Jenin kept their press passes, and the offices of the news organizations for which they worked remained open. In the same manner, the human rights and NGO activists who provide journalists and the UN with their fig leaf of false objectivity consistently retain their work visas. In refusing to hold this rogues’ gallery of repeat offenders responsible, Israel succeeds only in emboldening the ambitions of those who have made careers out of working to destroy Israel from within its own borders. Should Israel expel journalists simply on the basis of negative coverage? Absolutely not; the freedom to criticize remains the essence of democratic debate. But there is a fundamental difference between criticism and defamation, and the Israeli government should make no apologies for refusing to make its country a haven for unscrupulous activists masquerading as reporters...

Long overdue. Never happen. It would take an indefatigable bureaucrat with support from all levels of government with the power to hold quick determination of negligent disregard for fact and standards who could expeditiously revoke credentials and visas. Nice if it could work.

More outrageous posing at an American college: Noose outcry is a new entry in the campus hall of shame

Does anyone still wonder why college culture is the laughingstock of the larger community? Our campuses seem to lurch from one politically correct knee-slapper to the next.

Does anyone crack a book at these places anymore?

Meet Gabriel Keith, an aspiring journalist who attends Minneapolis Community and Technical College. Keith has served as news editor of the campus paper, volunteering many hours and even quitting his part-time job when it interfered with the paper's needs.

Keith came to MCTC after three tours of duty in Iraq as a Marine. He saw some pretty scary stuff there. But now he knows that a combat zone is a Boy Scout camp compared with a standard-issue college inquisition in 2007.

We join Keith sitting in the college newsroom one afternoon last month.

He is lamenting the headache of student reporters' missed deadlines with fellow staffers. The group jokes about various tongue-in-cheek motivational messages -- an ice pick, a bloody knife and other fanciful instruments of discipline. Keith impulsively sticks a mock noose made from his sweatshirt drawstring to the ceiling, with a note about the hazards of missed deadlines...

Ergo, ipso facto, sine qua non (whatever), Keith is a racist who must be fired, shunned, vilified and used as an excuse for every hand-wringing poser on campus and off. Apparently nooses in any context have been decreed to be racist symbols. What? You didn't get the memo.

Here's the rest.

[via Power Line]

Last night I had the privilege of attending the 3rd Annual Charity Ball of the Russian Jewish Community Foundation. It was a very impressive event. The Russian Jewish Community here in Massachusetts is organized and active, and there are more of them than you might imagine. The ballroom at Lombardo's is no small venue and it was filled. AND I won a gift basket in the raffle!

I don't think anyone can afford to say "I am sorry we ever started up with the Russians" anymore.

Thanks to Greg Margolin for the invitation.

This is cool: Notorious Boston jail transformed into luxury hotel

parkstreetlobby.jpg

BOSTON, Massachusetts (AP) -- The elegant iron-railing balconies were once catwalks where guards stood watch over the inmates to make sure they didn't try to break out. If you look closely, you can still see the outline of the holes from the iron bars on the windows.

At the newly opened Liberty Hotel, it's hard to escape what this building once was: a decrepit jail where Boston locked up its most notorious prisoners.

But that's just the point.

After a five-year, $150 million renovation, the old Charles Street jail is now a luxury hotel for guests who can afford to pay anywhere from $319 a night for the lowest-priced room to $5,500 for the presidential suite. The hotel, at the foot of Boston's stately Beacon Hill neighborhood, opened in September.

Architects took pains to preserve many features of the 156-year-old stone building and its history.

The old sally port, where guards once brought prisoners from paddy wagons to their cells, is being converted into the entrance to a new restaurant, Scampo, which is Italian for "escape."

In another restaurant, named Clink, diners can look through original bars from cell doors and windows as they order smoked lobster bisque or citrus poached prawns from waiters and waitresses wearing shirts with prison numbers. The hotel bar, Alibi, is built in the jail's former drunk tank...

nojews.jpg

I'll tell you why. Because anti-Semitic nut-jobs like Karin Friedemann are big supporters and get people cross-posting their stuff on Boston Now and Rense.com (another anti-Semitic site).

...Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist and a non-interventionist. Everybody disagrees with him about something. The leftists hate him because he's anti-abortion. But again, we have to put aside our personal opinions and stop the war immediately or lose our democracy. We only have one chance. The only thing that can unite Americans is the Constitution (as flawed a document as it is - but it's better than the lawlessness of Bush). Not a single Jewish organization supports Ron Paul for president...

Vote for Ron Paul...no Jews!

Sunday, November 18, 2007

I think the vid of the student is from Columbia Unbecoming.

They should have that whole denial of tenure thing reversed in no time.

The debate continues: Studies spark new execution debate

For the first time in a generation, the question of whether the death penalty deters murders has captured the attention of scholars in law and economics, setting off an intense new debate about one of the central justifications for capital punishment.

According to roughly a dozen recent studies, executions save lives. For each inmate put to death, the studies say, three to 18 murders are prevented.

The effect is most pronounced, according to some studies, in Texas and other states that execute condemned inmates relatively often and relatively quickly.

The studies, performed by economists in the past decade, compare the number of executions in different jurisdictions with homicide rates over time - while trying to eliminate the effects of crime rates, conviction rates, and other factors - and say that murder rates tend to fall as executions rise. One study looked at 3,054 counties over two decades.

"I personally am opposed to the death penalty," said H. Naci Mocan, an economist at Louisiana State University and an author of a study finding that each execution saves five lives. "But my research shows that there is a deterrent effect."...

I can think of at least one guy overseas who should have been executed long ago. That would have prevented him (and terrorists like him) from becoming the focus of further kidnappings and violence. You can't exchange for a dead man...well, the West can (including the Israelis), because we value life and the families of the deceased.

As for the domestic death penalty, I have no problem with it in principle, but do worry about how it works in practice. Nevertheless, the fact that this guy is still alive and giving speeches long after he received the sentence is shameful.

I had missed this article last week, but I think it's worth noting, especially in light of some of James Russell's comments: Group Formed To Improve Middle East Scholarship

Middle East scholars are forming a new group to promote high standards of teaching and scholarship on the Middle East.

The Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa, founded by a noted Middle East scholar at Princeton University, Bernard Lewis, will challenge the Middle East Studies Association, which is dominated by academics who have been critical of Israel and of America's role in the Middle East. "Because of various political and financial pressures and inducements, the study of the Middle East and of Africa has been politicized to a degree without precedent," Professor Lewis said in a statement. "Given the importance of these regions, there is an acute need for objective and accurate scholarship and debate, unhampered by entrenched interests and allegiances."

"MESA is still fighting some of the old battles from the '60s and '70s," the president of ASMEA, Mark Clark, said. "They're dealing with nationalism in the territories, and anti-colonialism, which is far less important today."...

Really? It's pretty vague:

...In an indirect reference to the [IAEA]'s report, which concluded that Iran is continuing its uranium-enrichment efforts, he says that "in accordance with [United Nations Security Council] Resolution 1747, we have no choice but to make another decision at the Security Council [on imposing new sanctions]."

When asked if in light of the Russian and Chinese opposition, a likelihood exists of forcing Iran to abandon its nuclear project without having to use force, Kouchner said: "We have proposed to our European partners to adopt measures against Iran also within the European Union framework, in order to let Iran understand that it cannot continue with its policy of creating faits accomplis."

Will France support the use of force by the United States or Israel? Will France be willing to participate in an attack on Iran? Kouchner did not respond directly to the questions but used language that suggests that for France, all options, including that of military force, are open:

"I intend to continue with great determination along this path [of pressuring Iran] which is the only way to bring about an agreed solution, the only one that will prevent us from having, one day, to be faced with a dilemma of 'an Iranian bomb or bombing Iran.'"...

Well, he didn't denounce the possibility altogether, as France did with regard to invading Iraq, that's true, but once there's 'an Iranian bomb,' there's no real possibility of 'bombing Iran.'

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Jules Crittendon outdoes himself here: G.I. Suicide and Cultural Suicide

My favorite quote of many: "Our war dead are called a waste by those who would lead us."

It's a little late, considering she's gotten tenure already, but Columbia's The Current has a three-parter on Nadia -- nary a one positive. In fact they're all quite good. The intro is here.

David Rosen: Searching for "Facts" on the Ground. Rosen hits the big point here that some of Nadia's defenders, picking over sentence fragments don't get. It's not just the bad scholarship, it's the overall agenda of the work that's flawed:

...But politicization also derives from the impact of literary criticism and cultural studies upon anthropological method. Facts on the Ground is profoundly shaped by Edward Said's book Orientalism, which clearly rejects the idea of the objectivity of knowledge. Said's view is that science itself developed in the context of colonialism. By locating the scientific enterprise within the colonial, it becomes possible for writers like El-Haj to create labels such as "colonial science" that treat archeology in much the way old line-Marxists used the idea of "bourgeois science" to try to expunge Mendelian genetics from Soviet scientific thought. Like genetics, archeology is treated as suspect because it allegedly serves the interests of ruling groups.

But the problems with this approach actually run much deeper. In Orientalism, Said argued that the traditional scholarly study of the Middle East constituted a racist and imperialist discourse. As borrowed from Foucault, the concept of discourse refers to a set of interconnected ideas. One of the most distinctive conceptual elements of "discourse" is that it is not rule-bound; its connective threads are neither empirical nor logical but political and often comprise a disparate collection of ideas strung together in a come-what-may manner...Borrowing thoughts and ideas indiscriminately from the worlds of literary criticism, literature, law, politics and in this instance from archeology, they construct their analyses with little concern for empirical or logical connectedness. Like mythology, they are masters of the found object, and pull in anything to create a story. This methodology has no connection to science. Its power lies in its politics and its aesthetics, and not in such boring ideas as validity and reliability...

James R. Russell: Ideology over Integrity in Academe. Russell's piece has lots of good snips and anecdotes. Here's one:

...Said dealt with the 18th and 19th centuries, for the most part, but the Arabs were not the political player in the region then: Ottoman Turkey, a powerful empire and seat of the Muslim Caliphate, ruled them. Millions of Christian Greeks, Romanians, Bulgarians, Serbs, and Armenians labored under Ottoman misrule too. The first four broke away, but the Armenian homeland was in Anatolia itself. So in 1915, during World War I, the Turks decided upon genocide, and carried it out.

Said did not mention the Armenians even once in his book, for it would have made his passive, victimized Islamic world look rather less passive and not at all the victim. It is a glaring omission. Said's book was properly dismissed by many prominent reviewers as amateurish and dishonest—though on other grounds. They did not even notice the Turkish and Armenian aspect. The book might have been consigned to well-deserved oblivion...

Finally, Jonathan Rosenbaum: Is Truth Attainable?. He asks three questions:

  • Can tendentious, politically motivated, subjective, polemical, unbalanced, and/or intentionally misleading and inaccurate publications qualify the possessor of a terminal degree for tenure in his or her field?
  • Is the promotion of a personal, political agenda under the guise of an academic discipline legitimate scholarship protected by academic freedom?
  • Are disseminating demonstrably erroneous information and extolling the destruction of primary data acceptable elements of publications considered for academic advancement?

All three are a good read, and worth it for the record. With regard to Nadia, no one can say they weren't warned.

...A source in Israel just emailed to say [father of Muhammed Al-Dura]. No other info.

Update: Richard Landes has more on this story, here.

FACT

Jews have been living in Jerusalem continuously for nearly two millennia. They have constituted the largest single group of inhabitants there since the 1840’s. Jerusalem contains the Western Wall of the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism.

Jerusalem was never the capital of any Arab entity. In fact, it was a backwater for most of Arab history. Jerusalem never served as a provincial capital under Muslim rule nor was it ever a Muslim cultural center. For Jews, the entire city is sacred, but Muslims revere a site — the Dome of the Rock — not the city. “To a Muslim,” observed British writer Christopher Sykes, “there is a profound difference between Jerusalem and Mecca or Medina. The latter are holy places containing holy sites.” Besides the Dome of the Rock, he noted, Jerusalem has no major Islamic significance.

[See extended entry for population chart which I assume includes the entire "municipality," and not just the "Old City" from which the Jews were expelled en masse in 1948. -S]

Continue reading "Myth: 'Jerusalem is an Arab City'"

Via Yourish: Prince Charles' aides try to thwart Israel visit

...The affair began at the beginning of July, when Knesset Chairman Dalia Itzik visited London and met with the British royal. Itzik and Prince Charles exchanged jokes and discussed politics and environmental issues.

At the end of the meeting, the Israeli official invited the Prince of Wales to visit the Jewish state for its 60th anniversary celebrations.

Following the meeting, the Jewish Chronicle reported Friday, Israeli Ambassador to Britain Zvi Heifetz invited Sir Michael Peat, Prince Charles’s principal private secretary, and Clive Alderton, deputy private secretary, to Israel as a prelude to a possible official visit by the prince.

In August, Sir Michael — copying in Alderton — expressed enthusiasm for the idea, replying in an email to the embassy, "The invitation is hugely appreciated and Clive and I would love to come."

However, a private email exchange a month later between the two aides to the prince revealed a completely different picture.

In the exchange of emails seen by the JC, Alderton privately sought reassurance from his superior that the pair need never accept the invitation.

Alderton — whose responsibilities include foreign affairs and relations with ethnic and faith communities and who has accompanied Prince Charles and his wife on a visit to Kuwait in February— complained to Sir Michael in an email of being "pursued" by the ambassador, and asked: "Safe to assume there is no chance of this visit ever actually happening?

"Acceptance would make it hard to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH (Prince Charles) to help burnish its international image. In which case, let’s agree a way to lower his expectations."...


Friday, November 16, 2007

Robert Spencer at Frontpage:

One of the most energetic opponents of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week was the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), which sent letters to the presidents of all the colleges hosting IFAW events, urging them to censor the speakers in advance and not allow the Week’s activities to go on. The ADC’s President, former U.S. Representative Mary Rose Oakar, charged in the letter that "these planned activities seek not to increase awareness, tolerance, and understanding, but instead promote intolerance, fear, and bigotry…ADC is deeply troubled by the possibility that a tiny handful of student with a narrow political agenda, backed by a well-funded special interest group, would organize this type of hateful and bigoted event on your campus. I urge you to ensure that hate speech and demonstrations of bigotry and racial and religious profiling not be tolerated on your campus."

It was ironic that the ADC would charge the Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week speakers with promoting "hate speech" and "bigotry," since the ADC itself has never hesitated to ally itself with genuine purveyors of hate speech and worse. ADC then-President Hamzi Moghrabi said in 1994: "I will not call [Hamas] a terrorist organization. I mean, I know many people in Hamas. They are very respectable…I don’t believe Hamas, as an organization, is a violent organization." This despite the "glory record" Hamas featured on its website up until just a few years ago – a record that openly celebrated the murders of innocent civilians. In 1996, Moghrabi’s successor as ADC’s President, Hala Maksoud, declared: "I find it shocking that [one] would include Hezbollah in…[an] inventory of Middle East ‘terrorist’ groups." Similarly, the ADC’s Communications Director Hussein Ibish said in 2000: "Everywhere Hezbollah fighters, derided by the Israeli and U.S. governments as ‘terrorists,’ conducted themselves in an exemplary manner."...

For video of Merrie Najimy, the Massachusetts head of the ADC, see here and here. And note the quote from Najimy at the end of this post about Mitt Romney's statements while Governor that the authorities should be keeping a close eye on mosques:

...[President of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee of Massachusetts Merrie] Najimy, who is Lebanese, said she does not think American society has "come a long way" since the attacks of four years ago...

American society hasn't come a long way???

Former post on James Aboourezk: here, and video of Abourezk on Al-Manar's terror-TV is linked to here.

YonPhoto-4.jpg
Today, Muslims mostly filled the front pews of St John’s. Muslims who want their Christian friends and neighbors to come home. The Christians who might see these photos likely will recognize their friends here. The Muslims in this neighborhood worry that other people will take the homes of their Christian neighbors, and that the Christians will never come back. And so they came to St John’s today in force, and they showed their faces, and they said, "Come back to Iraq. Come home." They wanted the cameras to catch it. They wanted to spread the word: Come home. Muslims keep telling me to get it on the news. "Tell the Christians to come home to their country Iraq."

Michael Yon has an important photo essay with much more like the above: Come Home.

From this week's Jewish Advocate:

deng.jpg

Late last month, I went to hear Bishop Desmond Tutu speak at Boston’s Old South Church at a conference on "Israel Apartheid." Tutu is a well respected man of God. He brought reconciliation between blacks and whites in South Africa. That he would lead a conference that damns the Jewish state is very disturbing to me.

The State of Israel is not an apartheid state. I know because I write this from Jerusalem where I have seen Arab mothers peacefully strolling with their families – even though I also drove on Israeli roads protected by walls and fences from Arab bullets and stones. I know Arabs go to Israeli schools, and get the best medical care in the world. I know they vote and have elected representatives to the Israeli Parliament. I see street signs in Arabic, an official language here. None of this was true for blacks under Apartheid in Tutu’s South Africa.

I also know countries that do deserve the apartheid label: My country, Sudan, is on the top of the list, but so are Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. What has happened to my people in Sudan is a thousand times worse than Apartheid in South Africa. And no matter how the Palestinians suffer, they suffer nothing compared to my people. Nothing. And most of the suffering is the fault of their leaders. Bishop Tutu, I see black Jews walking down the street here in Jerusalem. Black like us, free and proud.

Tutu said Israeli checkpoints are a nightmare. But checkpoints are there because Palestinians are sent into Israel to blow up and kill innocent women and children. Tutu wants checkpoints removed. Do you not have doors in your home, Bishop? Does that make your house an apartheid house? If someone, Heaven forbid, tried to enter with a bomb, we would want you to have security people "humiliating" your guests with searches, and we would not call you racist for doing so. We all go through checkpoints at every airport. Are the airlines being racist? No.

Yes, the Palestinians are inconvenienced at checkpoints. But why, Bishop Tutu, do you care more about that inconvenience than about Jewish lives?

Bishop, when you used to dance for Mandela’s freedom, we Africans – all over Africa – joined in. Our support was key in your freedom. But when children in Burundi and Kinshasa, all the way to Liberia and Sierra Leone, and in particular in Sudan, cried and called for rescue, you heard but chose to be silent.

Today, black children are enslaved in Sudan, the last place in the continent of Africa where humans are owned by other humans – I was part of the movement to stop slavery in Mauritania, which just now abolished the practice. But you were not with us, Bishop Tutu.

So where is Desmond Tutu when my people call out for freedom? Slaughter and genocide and slavery are lashing Africans right now. Where are you for Sudan, Bishop Tutu? You are busy attacking the Jewish state. Why?

Simon Deng, a native of the Shiluk Kingdom in southern Sudan, is an escaped jihad slave and a leading human rights activist.

Also, there was a good op-ed in the Boston Herald at the time of the Sabeel Conference that I neglected to link: John R. Regier: Anti-Israeli agenda borders on sacrilege

Thursday, November 15, 2007

But we mustn't judge:

...A court in the ultra-conservative kingdom of Saudi Arabia is punishing a female victim of gang rape with 200 lashes and six months in jail, a newspaper reported on Thursday.

The 19-year-old woman -- whose six armed attackers have been sentenced to jail terms -- was initially ordered to undergo 90 lashes for "being in the car of an unrelated male at the time of the rape," the Arab News reported.

But in a new verdict issued after Saudi Arabia's Higher Judicial Council ordered a retrial, the court in the eastern town of Al-Qatif more than doubled the number of lashes to 200.

A court source told the English-language Arab News that the judges had decided to punish the woman further for "her attempt to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media."...

memrijumblatt.jpg

Walid Jumblatt, telling it like it is. Unaccountable terror regime have no need for peace.

MEMRI TV: Lebanese Druze Leader Walid Jumblatt: Peace with Israel Will Mean the End for the Syrian Regime

Following are excerpts from an interview with Lebanese Druze Leader Walid Jumblatt, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on November 8, 2007.

Interviewer: Is it true that when Dennis Ross asked you what should be done, you said: "If you have car bombs, send them to Syria"?

Walid Jumblatt: Correct. I said this for a simple reason. Dennis Ross asked me: "What would you think if we engaged Syria?" I said: "I would have no objection. You were a negotiator back then, and you almost reached an agreement about the Golan in Geneva." There was a disagreement with regard to a few meters on the border – not the border of the French and British mandates from 1933-34, but the status quo border from 1948. Hafez Al-Assad almost got to swim in the Sea of Galilee, but he rejected [the agreement], because the principle of peace according to U.N. Resolution 242 means the end of the Syrian regime. What does the Syrian regime do, except operate through Lebanon and Palestine, and send terrorists to Iraq? They do nothing else, but the moment they accept peace, this regime is finished. Just for your information, I once heard from a senior Syrian official, whose name I won't mention, that high-ranking officers had approached Hafez Al-Assad and said to him: Where are you leading us? We can't bear peace. When we sign peace, we are finished."

If you're a gamer, funny:

...9. I want a super-cool custom-weapons lab where I can design mech armor for my infantry with wicked acid-tipped missiles and guns that shoot spiders. Then I want to watch as 100 men are cooked alive in the desert because of a defect in the internal air conditioning units that shorted due to condensation in the fusion coils and insufficient insulation in the wiring units bypassing the laser reactor core, due to the contractor's decision to use over-the-counter components instead of the military-grade ones mandated in Subsection 12:94A, Paragraph B of the Military Weapons Platform Procurement Act of 3013, a document that is 14,724 pages long and contains some 81,301 loopholes that allow congressmen to bypass component testing and funnel lucrative military contracts to cut-rate suppliers from their home districts at the peak of every election cycle...

...17. In my Public Support Meter display, let me find out that the news media has run, in the same magazine, one story blasting us for going to war for minerals and another story blasting us for not acting on the continuing mineral shortage back home.

There should also be simultaneous stories about the outrageous expense of the war effort, and another about how the troops are under-funded and under-equipped. Set it so that I somehow lose public-support points with each story...

[via The Ghost]

A guest post from Hillel Stavis:

November 13th
Newton Country Day School
Newton, Ma
7:00 pm

Screening and Discussion of the Film, Encounter Point
A presentation of the Newton Human Rights Commission

The film’s production company describes itself this way:

"Just Vision is a nonprofit organization that informs local and international audiences about under-documented Palestinian and Israeli joint civilian efforts to resolve the conflict nonviolently. Using media and educational tools, we raise awareness in order to encourage civic participation in grassroots peace building."

Encounter Point was produced and directed by Ronit Avni, an American-Israeli with the following cv:

Ronit graduated with honors with a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Vassar College. She received a Burnam Fellowship to intern at B’Tselem: the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. While abroad, Ronit volunteered for the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI). Ronit acquired a DEC in Professional Theatre Studies from Dawson College.

Ronit Avni is the Founder and Executive Director of Just Vision, a non-profit that widens the influence of Palestinian and Israeli grassroots peace builders, for which she received the 2005 Auburn Seminary’s ‘Lives of Commitment’ Award. Ronit recently directed and produced the documentary film, Encounter Point, which received the 2006 San Francisco International Film Festival Audience Award and was an official selection at the Tribeca Film Festival, Hot Docs, Atlanta, Dubai and Jerusalem International Film Festival. Encounter Point has screened at the International Finance Center, the United Nations and in Gaza, Tel Aviv, Jenin and more than 31 cities worldwide. Ronit appeared on the Oprah Winfrey Show in 2005 with her colleague, Joline Makhlouf and her work was featured on Oprah.com.

Ronit was assisted on the film by Julia Bacha, writer for The Control Room, the apologetic documentary on Al Jazeera.

Encounter Point attempts to "share pain and hope" through interviews with a number of Israelis and Palestinians, ostensibly advocating the "linear equation" model of pain and suffering: equal portions of pain on both sides of the conflict. Given the filmmakers’ backgrounds and the subtle, manipulative techniques employed, however, the film’s objectivity and purported absence of political message remains highly questionable.

Playing out against the general backdrop of "equal" tragedies, the film reveals its true colors at the very outset. Selection becomes advocacy when you encounter whom Avni has chosen to speak on camera:

"A former Israeli settler, a Palestinian ex-prisoner, a bereaved Israeli mother and a wounded Palestinian bereaved brother."

All of a sudden, the equation is no longer an equation. One side has clearly become the villain in the piece.

Continue reading "Close Encounters of the Dhimmi Kind: Encounter Point Review"

Yesterday I participated, OK, listened in on, a blogger conference call with Ambassador John Bolton sponsored by One Jerusalem. He's got a new book out, Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations. No surprise, I like the guy, and I think readers will be interested in some of the things he had to say on the call.

The audio is available here: Ambassador John Bolton -- Patriot

Jerry Gordon discusses the call here: Ambassador John Bolton, Condi’s "Legacy project is delusional"

Mere Rhetoric: Ambassador John Bolton Unloads On The US State Department

Jewish Current Issues: John Bolton Bloggers Call

Also posting: Tigerhawk, Daled Amos, Israel Matzav and Liberally Conservative.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Monday's post, The Inside Fight Over Massad, had some wondering whether the event really had anything to do with the Columbia (for the time being) scholar's tenure fight. A reader who attended the seminar wrote in yesterday:

At last night's seminar honoring Joseph Massad, Massad gave brief thank you remarks. He thanked his colleagues for arranging this "intervention" in the tenure process. That's the word he used. "Intervention."

Reports from today's court session are beginning to come in.

Melanie Phillips at The Spectator: The al Durah blood libel

...the judge ordered France 2 to produce the unscreened footage of this incident; today it did so.

Well, sort of. What it actually produced was 18 minutes out of the 27 it was required to bring forward. From this footage, which according to France 2’s Palestinian cameraman was filmed during an implausible 45 minutes of continuous shooting by Israeli soldiers, there is no evidence that anyone at all was killed or injured -- including Mohammed al Durah who by the end of the frames in which he figured seemed to be still very much alive and unmarked by any wound whatsoever.

The drama of today’s hearing was enhanced by the appearance of Enderlin himself, who until today had not graced this case with his presence. As the film was shown to a packed and overheated (in every sense) courtroom, Enderlin and Karsenty offered rival interpretations of the images on the screen. If Enderlin thought he would thus demonstrate the inadequacy of Karsenty’s case, he was very much mistaken. On the contrary, parts of his commentary were so absurd that the courtroom several times burst into incredulous laughter.

Enderlin offered only a vague, rambling and unconvincing explanation of why he had only produced 18 minutes of footage rather than the 27 he claimed to have received from his cameraman in Gaza (Enderlin himself was not in Gaza when these events occurred). After the hearing Professor Richard Landes, one of the people who had already seen the contested footage, said that two scenes had been cut out which clearly showed that the violence had been staged -- including one in which a Palestinian preparing to throw a missile is suddenly picked up and carried into an ambulance despite showing no signs of injury. This scene, said Landes, was filmed by Reuters, who actually filmed the France 2 cameraman filming it. Yet there was no sign of it today...

Phillips' post is a must-read.

More: Breath of the Beast: Outrage in Paris! The Ghost of Rose Mary Woods Stalks the Court Room

Richard Landes had Thoughts before the Court Viewing of the France2 Rushes which contains lots of good lead-up info. I'm sure he'll have a lot to say later when he's had a chance to write.

Also (pre-hearing): CAMERA: Charles Enderlin Backtracks Again: The Al Dura Scandal Continues

...Enderlin might not remember where the 27 minutes came from, but we can remind him. His cameraman in whom he claimed to have "full confidence" testified to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights that he had "spent approximately 27 minutes photographing the incident which took place for 45 minutes.": And the three French journalists who were invited by France 2 to view the footage, Luc Rosenzwieg, Denis Jeambar and Daniel Leconte, reported that "In the 24 minutes of film preceding the footage of Al Dura, young Palestinians are performing for the television cameras. They fall and when they think that no one is around, they get up."...

Update: Honest Reporting had someone in the courtroom as well. Good stuff here: Dura Discredited. A snip:

...After the hearing ended, how did people react to what they saw?

Not one person believed that the version of France 2 was right. Some people maintained that the footage was staged. Others think the footage was real. Clearly, nobody believed that anybody died.

Does the footage vindicate Karsenty?

Everyone was going, "Wow" and talking about whether he'll take action against France 2 for trying to swindle the court. He can wait for the verdict, or sue France 2 for tampering with the tape. He has quite a few options. Clearly, the judge wasn't convinced by France 2's version. The judge's verdict is to be given on February 27.

How did the France 2 people react after the hearing?

France 2 left immediately. They just ran out and left. They didn't want to speak to anyone.

Some people were concerned that reviving the footage would harm Israel's image.

There's absolutely no reason to be concerned for that now...

Update: Richard Landes has his first post-court entry up, discussing some of the missing footage: Gambling with a Lie: Enderlin pulls a Rosemary Woods

Honest Reporting is posting video interviews of courtroom observers' reactions.

Miss Kelly has the info on a new Federal terror-funding trial starting up here in Boston. Actually, the charge is "tax-evasion"...

Federal Trial in Boston for 3 Former Leaders of Islamic Charity

Is the tide turning in Boston? Are the feds starting to catch up with the Islamic radicals who have been operating without any hindrances for years in these parts? From today's Boston Globe:
"Three former leaders of a defunct Boston-based Islamic charity are scheduled to go on trial today in federal court, accused of lying to the government to win tax-exempt status for the charity and then using the nonprofit to distribute publications promoting jihad and to support Muslim militants overseas."

"In what is believed to be the first criminal trial in US District Court in Boston that will explore the role of US charities in financing terrorism, Emadeddin Muntasser, Muhamed Mubayyid, and Samir Al-Monla are charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, tax violations, and making false statements."...

..."...The government alleges that in the early 1990s, the three men were involved in operating the Boston branch of Al-Kifah Refugee Center - which supported Muslims engaged in violent, religiously based military conflict overseas - and published a pro-jihad newsletter called Al-Hussam, Arabic for The Sword."

"After members of the New York office of Al-Kifah were linked to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing in New York, the Boston branch of Al-Kifah was disbanded, and Muntasser founded its successor organization, Massachusetts Care International, the indictment alleges. The group is not affiliated with the global relief organization CARE International..."

Hmm, Al-Kifah, where have I heard that before? Ahh yes, Aafia Siddiqi - former MIT trained biochemist, now wanted by the FBI - used to work for Al-Kifah in Brooklyn. I'm only speculating here, but I bet there were ample ties between Al-Kifah Brooklyn and Al-Kifah Boston...

Much more.

Way to confirm what many people believe about too many of Israel's Arab citizens. And where else is this true?

Minister Majadele: Israel's laws do not apply at Temple Mount

"The laws of the State of Israel do not apply at the Temple Mount," Culture Minister Raleb Majadelel said in response to a question on the issue submitted by MK Arieh Eldad.

Majadele said, "I am a Muslim first, and a government minister second."

The answer was in response to the destructive digging that's been going on on the Temple Mount by the Muslim Waqf.

He did insult the Prophet after all:

...[Abdel Karim Soliman] who is an Egyptian blogger sentenced to prison for 4 years for 'vilifying religions' and defaming the president was tortured & that was ordered and supervised by an investigation officer in Borg Alarab prison. Karim was also ordered into a solitary cell where he was assaulted again and had one of his teeth broken; this assault's date came to mark one year since Karim was sent to jail...

Read and be informed.

This is a guest piece written frequent emailer. Good food for thought that I think explains some points quite well. There are a lot of issues here that seem minor, but one really needs to understand why these "minor" issues are so important now, or the seeds of some very bad things will be planted that will flower later.

The nature of the Israeli State is not a religious issue. When Ehud Olmert speaks about a "Jewish state" he refers to Israel being the (only) homeland for the Jewish people.

Most of the Jewish people, even inside Israel, are secular. Internally, within Israel there is and always will be a debate on how many and how many Jewish (this time religious) characteristics the state should adopt (i.e should buses run on Saturdays or not). Such Jewish characteristics are an internal issue and this is not what Annapolis is about.

When Olmert speaks about his condition for recognizing Israel's right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish People he is touching the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict: Many Arabs are willing for Israel to become a bi-national state side by side to a Palestinian state as long that in the course of the time both those countries would become majority Arab.

For Israel to agree to a Palestinian state there must be a similar and symmetrical recognition that the "'Jewish People" -- not the Jewish religion, the PEOPLE -- have the same right for self determination as any other people: The French, the Germans, the Palestinians etc... - the right of a homeland.

Exact borders are not the issue here and DON'T let ISM style academics/lefties or shrude negotiators like Saeb Erekat make you think there is any religious issue (they always claim "no other religions have a country"). It is NOT the religion it is "WE the (Jewish) People."

Why are Palestinians against such a symmetrical definition?

For various reasons. Some are unwilling to give up their demand to live inside Israel, some are following the teachings of Hamas and the Koran which do not permit a non-Muslim people to hold sovereignty over any part of a land once ruled by Muslims (so-called Dar al-Islam). This type especially see Palestine as a secret Muslim land (Wakf) which belongs to the whole Muslim nation (Ummah).

They need to give up their hidden claim to Israel and recognize the right of the Jewish people to their own national homeland in the Middle East. Israel will of course recognize similar right for the Palestinian people.

For instance, Erekat says, "The Palestinians won't accept Israel as a Jewish state.":

...Miri Eisin, declined to comment directly on Erekat's remarks, but said that recognition of Israel's identity was key to any peace process. "This is not something that is up for discussion. It is a basic creed of the State of Israel," she said. "Our country is a Jewish democratic state. We expect to be recognized as such by any country that would expect to have a peace treaty with us."...

It is not just the issue of refugees but of any future character of Israel and the demographic threat from its own Arab population. If the Arabs have national aspirations as Palestinans they must realize them in Palestine, not in Israel.

Palestinian Arab negotiators do not want to recognize Israel as a Jewish State because then they won't have their desired destruction of Israel's demographic character affirmed. If Palestinians do not recognize Israel as a Jewish State from the beginning that means they can progress with their absurd right of return, meaning all Palestinians will flow into Israel proper even after the Palestinian State is created. The Palestinian negotiators know that this will be suicide for Israel which will become majority Arab in a few years because of Arab profligate birthrate compared to that of Jews. After this is achieved, then the majority can decide on the government, on policies and basically on everything internally.

The Palestinians once said that the Arab womb will be the destroyer of Israel. The only solution is this...once the Palestinian State is a reality, all Arabs including the so called refugees, will only be allowed to enter the country they dreamed of for so long -- meaning none on Israeli property and land. Let them live with their brothers in the future Palestinian state.

This only shows you Palestinian intent. Why so difficult to recognize us as a Jewish State? Why? If they have their own country side by side with ours, why does it really matter what they call us Israeli or Jewish State? It matters a lot to them because through this semantic, they intend to institute the law of return of all refugees to flood Israel with a majority Arab population in the future. By that time not only will Israel not be a majority Israeli State, it won't even be Jewish any more.

Wording on agreements is crucial for both Arabs and Israelis. Semantics for Arabs means they can twist any "written agreement" to their advantage. Let the world and Jews in Israel say no! We should be recognized as a JEWISH STATE -- not only a place that happens to have the name "Israel." Otherwise, no go!

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

memrinonviolentmartyrs.jpg

That's a simple principle, isn't it?

MEMRI TV: Lebanese Cleric, Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: Hizbullah Casualties Are Not Martyrs. Saudi Arabia Persecutes Christians (video at link)

Following are excerpts from an interview with Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i, Lebanese lecturer on Christianity and Islam, which aired on Noursat TV on October 31, 2007.

Interviewer: Take, for example, the people who were killed in South Lebanon, while fighting the Israelis – should they be considered martyrs?

Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: Definitely not. They are not martyrs, because they were fighting. This is political defense...

Interviewer: So they are by no means martyrs? Is it wrong and inappropriate to use the word "martyr" in this case?

Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: This word is used to incite people and to justify one's positions. If I take my weapon and go to war against another armed person, this means that one of us could get killed. There are victims... In any case, I am considered an aggressor, just like him. Even if he managed to hit me, and I did not manage to hit him, it does not mean that I am considered a martyr and he is the executioner. Moreover, like Dr. Samir said, Gandhi should indeed be considered a martyr, because he was killed fighting for the sake of non-violence, and because he sought to unite the Muslims and the Hindus. In addition, some Buddhists, like those we are seeing now in Myanmar, can be considered martyrs.

Interviewer: They are victims of the lack of religious freedom.

Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: Yes, because first, there must be non-violence. The violent cannot be considered a martyr...

...Interviewer: Do you think that Christians are persecuted in Saudi Arabia?

Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: By law, Christians are not allowed to exist there. If a person prays within his own home – as in the case of some people from India, the Philippines, and Pakistan – he is sent to prison and flogged. If a man wears a cross under his shirt... The Saudi airline... This appeared on the Internet three weeks ago, and was removed after they received complaints. They had a list of things that travelers must not take on board: The Holy Bible, any non-Muslim religious symbol, and so on...

...Father Samir Khalil Al-Yasou'i: There's no doubt that among the countries that violate human rights the most, one finds China and Saudi Arabia. This is well known. But this constitutes cowardice on the part of the Western world. They dare not say a word to Saudi Arabia, because they need the Saudi oil and money. So they keep quiet. This is cowardice.

A shocking pitty-piece in the London Times on the plight of poor, impoverished Suha Arafat...I'll take the £5,000 a month, and by the way, I don't believe a word.

Arafat’s widow: I live on just £5,000 a month

...According to Suha, 44, she receives a pension from the Palestinian Authority of $10,000 (£5,000) a month -- a large sum to many Palestinians but far from the exorbitant figures being bandied around on the eve of Arafat’s death...

...Suha had been accused of living it up in Paris as Arafat braved an Israeli siege of his compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

She was rumoured to own properties in the French capital and to spend her time shopping with the wife of Adnan Khashoggi, the billionaire Saudi arms dealer, and the sister of the King of Morocco. None of it was true, she said.

"I have met Mrs Khashoggi once and never went shopping with her," said Suha. "I own no property whatsoever. My rented apartment in Paris is an old, ordinary building."...

The heart bleeds.

Times of London reporter Paul Martin: 'I was arrested by Hamas'

Today I was detained while watching a demonstration by female students Beit Hanoun, in the northern Gaza Strip.

They had gone on strike at noon in protest against the killings in the rally yesterday, and they had made their way to a nearby police station where they were singing and chanting. In particular, they yelled: 'Shia, Shia, Shia,' which is a reference to Hamas being funded by Iran.

Within a few minutes, baton-wielding police laid into the girls. Some fell to the ground, but most ran away.

As this was happening, some other members of the police force grabbed me and dragged me into a cell. They pushed me against the wall, and one of the officers shouted: 'Hit him, hit him, hit him' in Arabic.

They snatched the camera from me, and one of the police officers urged his colleagues to break my camera. Then, my cameraman was dragged into the room too.

Another police officer, more senior than the others, eventually arrived and insisted on viewing the videotape that my cameraman had. I kept telling them that I was a journalist and that I would telephone the chief of police unless I was released, and eventually they did so.

Today's incident follows two previous incidents yesterday, in which my activities as a journalist were deliberately curtailed...

If one is in danger of being beaten for taking the wrong photo, or reporting on the wrong event or in the wrong way, how might that affect the coverage one might encounter of such a place where such things go on do you suppose?

Here's the article he was writing: Hamas carries out mass arrests and puts down Gaza schoolgirl demo

Hamas security forces in Gaza violently put down a protest by female pro-Fatah students, temporarily detained a British journalist, and arrested hundreds of senior Fatah members today, a day after seven were shot dead at a mass rally...

They spread diseases:

Member of Iranian Parliament admits homosexuals in his country are executed. 'They spread diseases. It’s a severe crime that is against the laws of nature,' he says

Homosexuals should be executed, Iranian Parliament Member Mohsen Yahyavi said during a discussion between Iranian legislators and British officials in London in May, according to the protocol of the meeting published Tuesday in the British newspaper The Times.

Yahyavi, a member of the committee on energy affairs in Iran's Parliament, was in Britain for a peace summit.

"According to Islamic law, homosexuality is a grave crime," Yahyavi was quoted as saying. "It's a severe crime that goes against the laws of nature. It is human nature to procreate and homosexuals do not procreate."

The Iranian legislator added, "We do not have any opposition to this type of behavior as long as it is done behind closed doors, but those who (engage in) this behavior in public should be put to death."

The protocol shows that Yahyavi originally indicated that homosexuals should be "tortured," but he quickly corrected himself and said they should be "put to death."...

Here's the Times story: Gays should be hanged, says Iranian minister

Homosexuals deserve to be executed or tortured and possibly both, an Iranian leader told British MPs during a private meeting at a peace conference, The Times has learnt.

Mohsen Yahyavi is the highest-ranked politician to admit that Iran believes in the death penalty for homosexuality after a spate of reports that gay youths were being hanged.

President Ahmadinejad, questioned by students in New York two months ago about the executions, dodged the issue by suggesting that there were no gays in his country.

Britain regularly challenges Iran about its gay hangings, stonings and executions of adulterers and perceived moral criminals, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) papers show.

The latest row involves a woman hanged this June in the town of Gorgan after becoming pregnant by her brother. He was absolved after expressing his remorse. Britain said that this demonstrated the unequal treatment of men and women in law and breached Iran’s pledge to restrict the death penalty to the most serious crimes...

But we mustn't be rude to Ahmadinejad.

Monday, November 12, 2007

And one more on Columbia for the evening... Sources confirm that the ad hoc committee has denied tenure to Joseph Massad, but pro-Massad forces are fighting back. This event: ICLS: History, Translation, Sexuality—A Symposium on Joseph Massad's Desiring Arabs -- brought to you by the people who invited Ahmadinejad -- should be seen in that context. You see, they don't mind influencing a tenure decision, they just want to make sure they're the ones peddling the influence.

Nadia's got tenure, and is back to signing political petitions, but the discussion continues. Ralph Harrington has another good piece at History News Network: Was Nadia Abu El Haj Treated Fairly?

Worth reading in full for those following the debate. Some very good observations.

The American campus is beyond parody: Bollinger's Backbone

It speaks well of the Columbia president, Lee Bollinger, that a group of left-wing or anti-Israel faculty members is now petitioning against him. In a letter obtained by The New York Sun's Annie Karni, 70 Columbia faculty members speak of a "crisis of confidence" in Mr. Bollinger, faulting him for his harsh introduction of President Ahmadinejad, which, they said, "were not only uncivil and bad pedagogy, they allied the University with the Bush administration's war in Iraq, a position anathema to many in the University community." The Bush administration is apparently more of an anathema to these faculty members than is the Holocaust-denying, American soldier-killing, terrorist supporting, nuclear bomb-building administration of Iran.

The nub of the matter is the petition's reference to "the autonomy of the University in the face of outside threats and pressures," and "a determining role for faculty in the governance of the University." When the professors say "autonomy," they mean a total lack of responsibility or accountability to trustees, students, parents, alumni, or America. When they say "outside threats and pressures," they mean Jewish students and alumni, but not the Arab potentate that funds the professorship of one of the petitioners, Rashid Khalidi.

A similar putsch by leftist and anti-Israel professors ousted Lawrence Summers last year from the presidency of Harvard. Mr. Bollinger's enemies are a sign of his character. How he handles them will be a test of his backbone, and will determine whether Columbia sinks back into the troubled mediocrity that afflicted it after the 1968 strike, or rises above it into the very first rank of American universities.

Update: More and more interesting. Here is an article with more information: Faculty Group: Bollinger Allying With Bush Administration. And here is the text of the petition with list of signatories: Columbia University Faculty Action Committee Statement of Concern. Now that she's got tenure, look who's back to signing political petitions again. That's right, Nadia Abu El Haj, front and center.

Further, Scholars for Peace in the Middle East has launched a counter-petition. I don't see it on the web site, so the full text is in the extended entry below.

Continue reading "Columbia Faculty Angry at Bollinger for Being Rude to Ahmadinejad (Updated, Bumped)"

Jerry Gordon traces out the source of those Dabke dancers that stirred up all that trouble in Connecticut: Palestinian 'cultural exchange' backfires in Connecticut. It's fairly predictable:

...How did this ‘cultural exchange' ever get to Connecticut? The answer can be laid at the feet of Rev. David W. Good, senior minister of First Church Congregationalist (UCC) in neighboring Old Lyme, Connecticut. Good had brought the Palestinian dance troupe to perform the prior weekend at the Third Annual Tree of Life conference -- an interfaith gathering of those allegedly committed to Palestinian Israeli ‘peacemaking'.

One of those ‘peace makers' attending the Music and Dance performance by Al-Ghad was Palestinian nationalist extremist Mazin Qumsiyeh. He was formerly associated with the Palestinian ‘rights of return' advocacy group Al Awda , and was a former Yale Medical School genetics lab director. Qumsiyeh was denied tenure, in part, because of his misuse of university auspices for patently political and, some contend, antisemi tic purposes. Qumsiyeh, a naturalized American citizen, hailed originally from the Beit Sahour district near Bethlehem and is a Lutheran. I have written about his energetic exploits in fostering hate of Israel and Antisemitism at another liberal Protestant church in Connecticut and helped to cancel his appearance at an elite private school in New York City...

Who could imagine it? A memorial for a Nobel Peace-Prize winner erupted into violence in Gaza. "I went to a memorial for a terrorist and a gunfight broke out. Big surprise." Looks like things went a little differently there than they did in Ramallah.

Arafat memorial erupts into gunfire in Gaza

arafat2AP_468x359.jpg

Gunfire killed at least six people and wounded 80 today at a Fatah memorial rally for Yasser Arafat attended by hundreds of thousands of supporters of the defeated faction in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

A sea of yellow Fatah flags had filled a Gaza square for the biggest gathering held by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's secular faction in the territory since Hamas Islamists routed its fighters there in June.

The rare Fatah rally broke up in chaos after gunfire rang out and grew into what Hamas described as battles with the rival group's fighters, forcing even members of the crowd who had initially stood their ground to bolt for cover.

Dr Muawiyah Hassanein, head of Gaza's emergency medical services, said six people, all civilians, were killed. He said 80 people, including several Hamas security men, were wounded.

Fatah officials accused Hamas forces of opening fire from the nearby Islamic University. Hamas said its men had come under attack from Fatah gunmen and returned fire...

...Fatah nationalist songs blared from loudspeakers as many in the crowd expressed their longing for Arafat, regarded by Palestinians as a symbol of unity.

"Abu Mazen (Abbas) is not like Arafat but he is our president now and we respect him. We urge him to end Hamas occupation," said a teenage participant, who gave his name only as Khaled.

More from Tim Butcher, using careful language on Hamas's behalf: Hamas police open fire at Fatah rally: six dead

... At one point the crowd began to shout "Shi'ite, Shi'ite" as an insult against Hamas which enjoys strong links with the Shia Islamic republic in Iran. Palestinians belong to the rival Sunni sect of Islam.

It is not clear if they were fired on first from inside the crowd but it is known that six members of the crowd died and at least 130 were wounded, mostly from injuries suffered in the resulting stampede...

For those not keeping score, Karin Friedemann (aka Maria Hussain) is the local Boston anti-Semitic whack-job (see linked search or just start here) active with such groups as the Islamic Society of Boston and the Green-Rainbow Party. Add a new one to the list: She's trolling the Paulians for converts now.

The Boston Ron Paul 2008 Meetup Group

Location: Boston, MA us
member_2822514.jpeg

Link: World View News Service

Introduction:

"I am here to support Ron Paul for President because he supports ending US funding of foreign countries. I live in Dorchester, and am editor of the awesome and thought-provoking World View News Service."
Stats:

* Meetup member since November 10, 2007
* Group member since November 10, 2007
* Last visited in the past few days

There's something predictable here.

BTW, if you've taken any interest in the Jamaica-Plain Greens discussions, you may have noticed a surprising silence on the part of Karin and hubby Joachim. This may have an explanation in the existence of one of those stress points in the Left/Islamist alliance. A veiled explanation at the GRP web site in a proposal about blunting a couple of "party statements" in an effort to appease some of the members (the Palestine statement, too) could hold an explanation:

...6. Our statement on Equal Marriage Rights has been controversial among some of our Muslim members in the Boston chapter. It is not only that they disagree with the issue; the major problem is that it has been labeled as being so important. Recently, two of our active members in the Boston chapter have taken a leave of absence from our chapter; my understanding is that this was the most important political reason for their decision...

Make of it all what you will.

He sounds less angry than when first we met.

bhatMOS1111_468x421.jpg
A complex character.

The surprising truth about Rage Boy, America's hated poster-boy of Islamic radicalism

...Shakeel was not a very good militant. When I asked him how many people he had killed, he looked embarrassed.

"I gave scares but I never killed anyone," he said. "I couldn't. I never hurled a grenade in a public place."

His greatest achievement was opening fire on the cavalcade of a visiting Indian government minister.

Even when his team caught a police informant, Shakeel called for him to be set free. "I thought I would set an example. Forgiveness is better than killing."

In 1994, when he was 16, he was arrested and taken to a military barracks. Of the 20 boys and young men who had crossed the border to Pakistan with him, only eight were still alive.

Shakeel was tortured. He was stripped, doused with water and given electric shocks. A nail was pushed through his jaw (he showed me the scar). His head was immersed in water.

When he was released, he remained under police surveillance. An injury to his right arm as a result of the torture had left him unable to lift anything and he has relied on his brothers to support him since then. Shakeel is still unemployed and says he feels as if he is 110 years old...

Interesting comment:

There are millions being brainwashed, raised up to be suicide bombers, and they want to kill .. kill .. kill. When they start using dirty bombs in western cities perhaps our governments will begin to get the message we must take this more seriously. I frankly don't care about what motivates them. If the Indian military has been harsh I do not condone it. It's wrong. However, when Hindu pilgrims are shot dead on the way to their shrines repeatedly it leads to excesses from their military. People get tired of being the brunt of Islamic rage. Too many have been killed by it all over the world.

Honest Reporting has exclusive video of Philippe Karsenty before the showing of the Al Dura rushes in French court. Already there is controversy as France 2 is only releasing 18 minutes of footage, while it has always been known the real amount of footage for more like 27.

Here is the video of Philippe:

Here's Honest Reporting's timeline.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Very good post at Judith Apter Klinghoffer's:

Mike Perloff clearly had enough of the fashionable, if baseless, reference to Israel as an Apartheid state. So, he left this post on my site. I thought it is worthy of sharing:

=A Lesson About Middle East Apartheid=

Which group being compared in the chart below appears to be engaged in the practice of Apartheid?

Read the chart and reach your own conclusions.

The identity of each group appears at the end.

Here's the chart in full. I helped the formatting along a bit...

CharacteristicGroup 1Group 2
Official languagesArabic/HebrewArabic
Religious minoritiesGrowingShrinking
Both Mosques and Synagogues allowedYesNo
Education/Medical care for allYesNo
Arab & Jewish judgesYesNo
Arabs & Jews in governmentYesNo
Arabs & Jews in diplomatic corpsYesNo
Arabs & Jews on sports teamsYesNo
Arabs & Jews can serve in army and policeYesNo
Arab & Jewish civilian killings condemnedYesNo
Arabs & Jews allowed to buy homesYesNo
People are killed for selling homes or property to members of the other groupNoYes
Children taught respect for lifeYesNo
Children taught martyrdom & hateNoYes

I think you can see where this is going.

In case you were wondering. Green-Rainbow's Grace Ross lost her bid for City Council in Worcester, in spite of the party's desperate scrubbing of their record and shoveling of their wackos under various beds and carpets.

Brendan Melican reports (under "The Losers"):

Grace C. Ross: Whatever. It may have been nice to have a different perspective on the council; but who could really take her seriously? She has a Jewish support page on her website for the love of Yahweh. If you’ve taken the time to piss off the greater Jewish population to a degree where this kind of endorsement makes sense…

My name is Jim Hammerman. I grew up Jewish outside Chicago and now live in Brookline. While I am not a devout Jew, I bake challah and light Shabbat candles; I fast for Yom Kippur and reflect on its promise of repentance and renewal; I delight in playing dreidel and lighting the menorah with my daughters to remember our ancient fight for freedom of religious practice; and I am inspired to work for a better world for everyone by the annual Pesach telling of how our people broke the bonds of slavery in Egypt.

…you suck. The only thing keeping this campaign from turning into a sketch comedy routine was the lack of a Sudanese support page. “Hi, My name is Mukimbe and although both my arms were chopped off when I was two while I watched my mom get gang raped; I support Grace Ross for Council because Hemp clothing is pretty sweet”. Spare me.

Michael Graham describes the behavior of the Iraq Veterans Against the War and their Code Pink friends at today's Veterans Day event in Boston: What REALLY Happened At Today's Boston Veteran's Day Parade:

...These so-called "veterans" stood and blocked the audience's view of the platform where wreaths were to be placed in remembrance of fallen heroes. These obnoxious idiots stood, holding their signs and preventing the tribute from taking place. It should be noted that the signs were about "impeachment" and foreign policy, not about veterans or their sacrifices.

Far from honoring American heroes, these self-absorbed jerks flew the American flag upside down, in the presence of hundreds of people who had been shot at to keep that same flag flying above battlefields abroad.

It turned my stomach, not for any insult towards me--these "VFP" lame-brains can't make a complete sentence, much less an argument worthy of being taken seriously--but for their incredible insult to the veterans.

Once these egomaniacs brought the program to a stop, once they had ensured everyone saw their junior-high-level "statement," the assumption was that they would at least have the decency to go away.

Wrong...

According to Graham's explanation, the other veterans (or veterans period...according to Graham some of these folks weren't vets, just hangers-on) were exceedingly patient. I heard the local head of this group on the radio yesterday whining that they weren't going to be allowed to participate. Well this is why. They're not there to participate like anyone else (honest question: are there any other vet's groups included with a political message like these guys), they were there to disrupt the event. Both on the radio and at the anti-war event on the Boston Common, this guy's script was the same. He doesn't believe in the system, he believes in direct action, and he's the guy with all the answers. Dangerous.

Look who the nation's foremost Muslim Civil Rights group is honoring.

Debbie Schlussel says:

...He uttered these words: "Islam is escalating and cannot be resisted. I pray that Allah may tear apart America just as the Soviet Union was torn apart."

As the chief Palestinian judge and Muslim cleric, Al-Tamimi frequently appears on Palestinian Authority Television praising homicide bombers and spreading anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and fatwas.

In 1994, Al-Tamimi said, "The Jews are destined to be persecuted, humiliated, and tortured forever, and it is a Muslim duty to see to it that they reap their due. No petty arguments must be allowed to divide us. Where Hitler failed, we must succeed."

In August 2003, Al-Tamimi, a personal friend of Yasser Arafat (who appointed him Chief Islamic Judge), was arrested for inciting terrorism. Al-Tamimi’s extremist sermons are well-known for urging attacks on Israel and calling upon Arab nations to wage war. In March 2000, Al-Tamimi delivered a hate speech during the Pope’s visit to Jerusalem, accusing Israel of "genocide" and "strangling Jerusalem." He called on Christians to join Muslims in a jihad to oust Jews from all of Israel...

I'd ask how he got into the country in the first place, but I think it's far better to let him run around and see where his trail leads. And lookee...it's CAIR.

Rev. Nancy Taylor of the UCC's Old South Church has responded to Rabbi Ronne Friedman's open letter. The letter is creditable overall.

...I am no apologist for Sabeel. Nevertheless Sabeel represents an important Palestinian voice. Unlike some other Palestinian groups Sabeel 1) supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 2) condemns suicide bombing as morally and theologically wrong, and 3) supports the search for peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through non-violent means...

I believe these three points of description are only superficially correct. Most interesting is that Sabeel represents an important Palestinian voice. True, in that there are no organized Palestinian groups truly dedicated to living in peace with their neighbors -- there are no serious interlocutors. Sabeel and all the rest are far more interested in one state than two, whatever they may be forced to acquiesce to. The Jewish Community is tired of being put to a false equivalence between their own organized and overwhelming communal desire for peace and the Arab desire to destroy them. One of these narratives is not like the other.

In other Sabeel news, a Sabeel activist, American citizen and United Church of Christ sponsoree named Krista Johnson was prevented from reentering Israel on her return from the Boston conference. Much seething and whining on the anti-Israel blogs and mailing lists has ensued. Personally, I am glad to see they are not asleep at the switch at Israeli immigration. Sabeel is primarily a political group, not religious, and no foreign national should have any right to enter Israel to engage in political activity against the state. Sabeel reps travel the world stirring up hatred against their state. The state shouldn't have to play along. Keep 'em out.

Update: James Hutchins agrees:

...Krista Johnson is not clergy, she is an activist and doesn't (and shouldn't) qualify for reciprocity.

As James notes, Sabeel is complaining that there is a long-standing system of "reciprocity" between Israel and the US concerning those seeking religious visas. If that system is damaged (and I doubt very much it will be), the damage will be because of activists like Sabeel and Krista Johnson who abuse the system.

If you had to name one really good reason to take a hard line on possession of Jerusalem, it might be to prevent the spectacle of the "Arafat Mausoleum" being constructed in the city and the old terrorists remains being moved there. The only thing worse might be building the Yasser Arafat Home for Wayward Boys.

Palestinians unveil Arafat mausoleum

539w.jpg

RAMALLAH, West Bank - The squat tomb sits in dignified quiet, decked in gleaming white Jerusalem stone on a slope that soon will be carpeted green by 25 species of trees and shrubs.

A two-story prayer hall and 98-foot minaret stand guard nearby, completing a memorial complex for the late Yasser Arafat that is tranquil, stately, and well ordered. It is, in other words, pretty much everything his reign as Palestinian Authority leader was not.

Three years after Arafat's death, Palestinian officials yesterday unveiled a tomb complex on the spot where he was buried Nov. 12, 2004, in a scene of pandemonium a day after his death.

During the ceremony, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, laid a wreath in the colors of the Palestinian flag on the tombstone and honored his onetime rival with a moment of silence.

In a brief speech, Abbas pledged to reclaim part of Jerusalem for his people, the Associated Press reported. The fate of the city, claimed by both Israel and the Palestinians as a capital, is one of the most explosive issues in peace talks, expected to resume after a US-hosted Mideast conference in Annapolis, Md., later this month.

"We will continue on the path of the martyred President Yasser Arafat to be reburied in Jerusalem, which he loved . . . Jerusalem, which he tried to make, and which all our people are trying to make, the capital of the Palestinian state," Abbas said...

KUNSAN AFB F16.jpg
KUNSAN AB, South Korea-- Aircraft taxi into position for their turn to take off during a Peninsula Operational Readiness Exercise here Nov. 7. The PENORE is conducted to ensure members of the Wolf Pack remain ready to execute its mission of “Defend the Base, Accept Follow on Forces and Take the Fight North.” (U.S. Air Force Photo/Master Sgt.Jack Braden)

[h/t: Tom Glennon]

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Janet Lahr Lewis; traveling voice of the United Methodist Church and Sabeel. An important profile by Adam Holland: Anti-Israel propagandist touring US churches

The traditional covered dish dinner of the small town American church has changed. Along with the pot roast and macaroni and cheese, you may now be served a helping of anti-Israel propaganda delivered by a professional propagandist. These propagandists are insinuating themselves into the mainstream via the grassroots, attending regularly scheduled suppers and meetings to deliver a carefully crafted anti-Israel message. It has now become commonplace within many churches in this country to view Israel in only the most negative terms, and to dismiss all Christian support for Israel as a form of fundamentalism. In fact, it has become difficult to discuss the issue at all within many churches unless you adhere to the views of people like Janet Lahr Lewis.

Janet Lahr Lewis is a professional anti-Israel activist who worked for Sabeel's main office in Jerusalem for 10 years and served as the executive director of Friends of Sabeel for two years, in which position she runs their international outreach operations. She has also achieved a level of prominence within the United Methodist Church, which is the largest mainline Protestant denomination in the U.S. Her UMC profile lists her as the UMC "liaison between ecumenical groups and Israel and Palestine"... Janet is the main contact for ... United Methodist visitors who wish to follow the recommendation of the General Conference to spend a significant amount of time in the area with (Israeli and Palestinian) Christians." In other words, the United Methodist Church has installed a strident anti-Israel activist as their primary contact person for groups wishing to conduct fact-finding tours of Israel and the Palestinian territories under church aegis...

Much more.

Mark Steyn made a local appearance on Wednesday night, and I was there taking audio and video. Several others were there as well, and have already written things up. Start with Miss Kelly here and here. Also see couchtiger, semper-fido, and Bloodthirsty Liberal. Good write-ups, all.

Steyn is a terrific speaker, sometimes a bit too glib, but always interesting. On the whole I share his views, though sometimes they come out a little oversimplified. For instance, he's certainly right, in principle, that we should have demanded Iraq discard its official war with Israel and Afghanistan stop trying to kill Muslims who convert to Christianity in the early weeks after the invasions. Practically speaking, though, we're not such a hyper-power that we can clean out the cess-pit of society across mass tracks of the Middle East (You're not going to change this by decree in a day). Nits aside, the evening was well worth it. If you have a chance to see Steyn speak, go! Understand that I complain because I think these issues are so important we don't have time for any frivolous talk.

Oh, and being in an audience in a Jewish venue applauding a conservative speaker is also an enjoyable occasion, even though the subject matter is so damn depressing. Steyn is charming enough that even those that may be to his left can enjoy it.

I won't bother with any more description as the others have done that just fine. Here is my video of his talk. I do have video of the Q&A and if, as with Wafa Sultan, there is enough interest I can post an edited version of that as well. As before, I had no tripod and was fairly seriously zoomed in, so the picture moves around a lot. You may need to close your eyes to avoid vertigo. There's also a missing few minutes from when I had to get up and go to the bathroom...ooops. An MP3 of the entire thing -- including the missing few minutes and the entire Q&A with the questions clipped out (they were mostly inaudible anyway) -- is also included. Toss it in your MP3 player.

Here's the audio alone (full event):

Update: Richard Landes has notes and analysis, here.

Richard Landes has a must-read today at PJM: Al-Dura and the "Public Secret" of Middle East Journalism

...When Talal abu Rahmah received an award for his footage of Muhammad al Dura in Morocco in 2001, he told a reporter, "I went into journalism to carry on the fight for my people."...

...Which brings us to a problem more complex than the fairly straightforward observation that Palestinian journalists play by a different set of rules in which this kind of manipulation of the "truth" is entirely legitimate. What do Western journalists do with these products of propaganda? Do they know these are fakes or are they fooled? Do they tell the cameramen working for them and using their equipment that filming such staged scenes is unethical and unacceptable? And if they do, why do cameramen who have worked for them for years – Talal worked for Enderlin for over a decade when he took these rushes – continue to film these scenes. And how often do our journalists run this staged footage as real news?

Here the evidence provided by the Al Dura affair suggests that, in some sense, journalists are "in" on the public secret. When representatives of France2 were confronted with the pervasive evidence of staging in Talal’s footage, they both responded the same way. "Oh, they always do that, it’s a cultural thing," said Enderlin to me in Jerusalem. "Yes Monsieur, but, you know, it’s always like that," said Didier Eppelbaum to Denis Jeambar, Daniel Leconte, and Luc Rosenzweig in Paris...

The rest. Release of the tapes is only days away. Will France 2 manipulate again what they release, this time to a French court? Witnesses who have seen the uncut footage are standing by.

What did I tell you? You can't expect anything "Palestinian" to be about culture only. There are always politics and an agenda attached - -especially when aimed at kids. We saw before the video of a local guy explaining how Dabke dance can be used for political purposes. We lived through the Wheels of Justice saga.

So now controversy erupts in Old Saybrook, Connecticut with the visit of a traveling Dabke group, and whadaya know? Parents were disturbed by the group's political message: Palestinian dance troupe performances in Old Saybrook canceled

OLD SAYBROOK, Conn. --Officials in Old Saybrook have canceled performances by a Palestinian dance troupe after getting a complaint that it is offensive to Jews and Israel. more stories like this

The decision involves planned performances at the town's elementary and middle schools by Al-Ghad Folklore Dancing Troupe.

Town resident Ginger Horton says she felt compelled to complain to school officials after her two grandchildren told her they were offended by the troupe's performance at the high school Monday.

Horton says the grandchildren told her the high school performance depicted Israeli soldiers beating and torturing Palestinians.

School Superintendent Joseph Onofrio says he canceled further performances after learning several parents questioned whether it was appropriate for their children.

My advice is to find out who invited this group into town and into the schools in the first place. There's your problem. WTNH reports:

...The Palestinian folklore group has been touring the shoreline. Tonight, they visited the Church of the Holy Advent in Clinton. It was a fundraiser for the Episcopal Church in Jerusalem.
dabkedancepolitics.jpg

The troupe has also performed for schoolchildren in public schools and that has angered and outraged some who say they're not teaching, they're preaching...

...The Al Ghad Folklore Dancing Group is made up of Christian teenagers from the town of Bethlehem in the West Bank. Along with the traditional costumes and music there's interpretive dance, raising the Palestinian flag and crouching under netting to symbolize being restrained and oppressed. The Reverend Bruce Shipman says the politics is part of their cultural experience.

"They also are telling a story of occupation and struggle and hardship and that must be said also,": said Rev. Bruce Shipman from the Church of the Holy Advent...

TNH has a video report here. Click on "Palestinian dance troupe performances in Old Saybrook canceled - story by Annie Rourke."

Keep an eye on those schools, people. There are folks out there who want to normalize the world view we see being shaped by the stuff we get translated by MEMRI, Palestinian Media Watch and others every day, and they want to inflict it on your kids. It's not just "another narrative."

[h/t: Jerry Gordon]

Update: Unsurprisingly, these looks to be yet another Mazin Qumsiyeh (of Wheels of Justice) production. The Al-Awda email list has been abuzz, with messages from Hassan Fouda (also of Wheels of Justice), notorious anti-Semites Anne Selden Annab, and Karin Friedemann, and confused locals Marilyn Levin and Jewish Voice for Peace leader Martin Federman up in arms. Witness Federman calling for letters without knowing what the hell even happened:

...This clearly seems like another case of outrageous censorship thanks to the worst elements in Old Saybrook's community - and, if so, should be responded to sharply. I'm just curious as to the nature and content of dance troupe's performance is, i.e., is it strictly a dance performance, is there a "political" piece to their presentation?

To be clear - stopping them from performing, even if there was political content, is unacceptable and we need to respond to that. I'm asking because what the nature of our response should be would be framed somewhat differently...

Friday, November 9, 2007

Last Tuesday night I headed in to Temple Israel in Boston for a presentation by Yigal Carmon of MEMRI and Dr. Wafa Sultan, the outspoken Syrian-born, now proud American, psychologist.

If you're not familiar with Sultan, watch her on video here, here and here.

You can read a good description of events at Miss Kelly's blog, here: MEMRI and Dr. Wafa Sultan in Boston, so I won't repeat what she's already said. Sultan doesn't mince words. One thing I will add is my compliments to TI for the hors d'oeuvre -- a step above the usual evening fare one usually sees at these things.

I took video with my new camcorder. I didn't use a tripod, so the view is shaky (I had to zoom in) and the audio has a lot of echo, but it is listenable. If the video is too distracting, just close your eyes I guess. If there's interest, I can post bits, or all, of the Q&A so you can see Carmon and Sultan respond to questions. Some of the answers are very...straightforward. Here is Wafa Sultan's speech (about 14 minutes):

(BTW, I've also got video and audio of Mark Steyn the following night which I'll also be posting within a day or two.

The Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Saudi-funded front group for the Muslim Brotherhood, today announced a massive campaign to distribute "A Journalist's Guide to Understanding of Islam and Muslims". As if the media didn't have enough issues. Via email:

U.S. Muslims to Launch Major News Media Education Campaign Journalists’ guides to be distributed to 40,000 American media professionals

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 11/9/2007) On Tuesday, November 13, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) will hold a noon news conference in the nation’s capital to announce the launch of a major initiative to help enhance understanding of Islam and Muslims in the news media.

Similar news conferences will be held at CAIR offices in Princeton, N.J.; San Diego, Calif.; Cleveland and Cincinnati, Ohio; Tampa, Fla.; and Dallas, Texas...

...The centerpiece of CAIR’s educational campaign will be distribution of the newly-published "American Muslims: A Journalist's Guide to Understanding of Islam and Muslims" to some 40,000 media professionals nationwide.

Other aspects of CAIR’s educational initiative will be outlined at the news conferences...

..."It is essential that all those who write about or comment on domestic and international events have access to accurate, balanced information about Islam and Muslims," said CAIR Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Director Tahra Goraya. "Because Muslims have a duty to provide that information, we will be calling on the Islamic community to support this important initiative."...

And if they won't no worries...the KSA will take care of it for them.

One of the 58 of 59 synagogues destroyed by the Jordanians when they ethnically-cleansed Jerusalem in 1948, the Hurva Synagogue will have the highest dome in the city when reconstruction is complete. Story (with requisite hand-wringing) at The Forward: A New Ruin Rising

...The Hurva’s violent history befits its evocative name. The synagogue dates back to the year 1701, when a group of newly arrived Polish Hasidic Jews led by Rabbi Yehuda ha-Hasid began constructing a new house of worship for their small congregation. Two decades later, the building was still unfinished when the congregation ran out of money and was expelled from the city by local Arab creditors, who proceeded to tear down the incomplete structure. The ruined remnants of the building stood, untouched, for a century, giving the synagogue its name — “Hurva,” Hebrew for “ruin.” Then, in a project that began in 1836, disciples of the Vilna Gaon rebuilt the synagogue. For the next 80 years, the domed, neo-Byzantine synagogue dominated the skyline of the Jewish quarter.
Hurvaconstruction-110907thumb.jpg

But its architectural reign came to an end in 1948, when the Jordanian army destroyed the Hurva during the War of Independence as part of a larger effort to erase the Jewish presence from the Old City and prevent Jews from ever returning there. The Jordanians’ plans failed in the end, however, for with Israel’s victory over Jordan, and its re-conquest, of East Jerusalem in the Six Day War of 1967, the Hurva’s remnants once again fell into Israeli hands. With this pivotal event began what has since become a 40-year saga to decide the building’s ultimate fate...

A letter, sent to the Islamic Center of New England (ICNE) Board of Directors, posted at Miss Kelly's:

..."With that said I, (Jane Doe), report my complaint of the misconduct not only by my husband (John Doe) but also by Brother (Abdul Doe) reprensentative of Islamic center of Sharon,where through the authority given to brother (Abdul Doe) by the center of Sharon ,my husband (John Doe) was able to marry illegally and secretly and without my knowledge three american muslim women, and because of that my self and my children have suffered and still suffering tremendously,and because of the failure of the Islamic center as well the Imams to prevent such misconduct, I had no choice but to file for divorce, and demand through the court for my rights as well as my childrens,and for me to insure that, I will expose this misconduct to the court and media if I have to, I also hope through this letter that you will make sure that this victimizations doesn't happen to any other sisters."...

Read the rest!

Regarding that video: Terrorists on Tape Launching Rockets from Behind Gaza School, the IHT now reports: U.N. condemns use of Gaza school by Palestinian militants

The United Nations is very disturbed about an incident last month in which Gaza militants fired mortar shells from a U.N. school and will open an investigation, a U.N. official in Jerusalem said Friday.

The official made the comment a day after U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon condemned the militants for using the school.

Footage taken by an Israeli aircraft on October 29 and released by the Israeli military showed Palestinian militants firing mortars from the yard of an elementary school for boys in the north Gaza town of Beit Hanoun. The school is run by the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, which oversees aid to Palestinian refugees.

"The United Nations is very disturbed about this, and wants to make sure that such incidents are not repeated. It is unacceptable that U.N. premises be used in this fashion," the U.N. official said...

Not that anything will come of it...

Here's the video again:


memridomineeringwomen.jpg

It's 60% women.

MEMRI TV: Head of the Egyptian Front for the Struggle against Domineering Women Mursi Nuweishi: Egyptian Women Have More Rights Than They Should

Interviewer: What is the front?[...]

Mursi Nuweishi: There is a misuse of the rights [of women]. This misuse is detrimental to the women themselves and to their interests.

Interviewer: Before we talk about this misuse, what drove you to form this front of yours now, and how would you characterize it?

Mursi Nuweishi: We realized that there is a misuse of [women's] rights.

Interviewer: So what did you do?

Mursi Nuweishi: The Egyptian women – my mother, my sister, my daughter, my wife – have more freedom than they should have. They demanded their rights, and received very many rights, including the recent ruling that they can become judges. So we men want to demand our rights too, because we feel that our rights have been neglected.

Interviewer: So you established the front.

Mursi Nuweishi: Yes.

Interviewer: How many members do you have?

Mursi Nuweishi: We have about 250-300 activists – these are people who convene, and so on.

Interviewer: I expect they are all men.

Mursi Nuweishi: 60% of the members are women.

Interviewer: There are women in the Front for the Struggle against Domineering Women?

Mursi Nuweishi: One of them decided, just today, to form an association [of women] in support of men. She is, incidentally, a senior official in the Foreign Ministry, and the wife of one of the senior ambassadors.

But no money for food or medicine? Hamas plans to build $200 million movie production house in Gaza

GAZA CITY - It's a tale worthy of its own movie script: The Gaza Strip's isolated and cash-strapped Hamas rulers plan to build a $200 million media city and movie production house that will be part tourist attraction and part effort to cement control of the territory it seized by force in June.

So far, though, the Islamic militants have raised only a tiny fraction of the money it needs for its own Hollywood, at a time when the Gaza economy has ground to a standstill and its people are struggling to feed themselves because of Israeli and international sanctions against the Islamic group listed as a terror organization.

Even so, Hamas envisions a glittering facility with production and graphics studios, satellite technology, gardens, water ponds, a children's entertainment area and an array of cafes and restaurants, said the Felasteen daily, a Hamas paper.

It will even feature mock towns and villages similar to those that Palestinians fled or were forced out after Israel's creation in 1948, the newspaper reported, quoting Fathi Hamad, a Hamas lawmaker and head of the
project...

Meanwhile, one of the big items coming through the smuggling tunnels from Egypt? Viagra.

memritoothpickman.jpg

Yeah, I know you've probably seen this already. It gets exciting when he takes his toothpick out of his robe. (Video at the link.)

MEMRI TV: Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-'Arifi Explains Wife Beating in Islam to Young Muslims in a Ramadhan Show

Al-'Arifi: Beating in the face is forbidden, even when it comes to animals. When a person is beating an animal... Even if you want your camel or donkey to start walking, you are not allowed to beat it in the face. If this is true for animals, it is all the more true when it comes to humans. So beatings should be light and not in the face. Some religious scholars say: "He should beat her with a toothpick." I happen to have a toothpick with me. A man who is angry with his wife because she doesn't get it... If he says to her: "Watch out, the child has fallen next to the stove," or: "Move the child away from the electrical socket," and she says: "I am busy" - then he beats her with a toothpick or something like it. He doesn't beat her with a bottle of water, a plate, or a knife. This is forbidden. The scholars said he should beat her with a toothpick. Check out how gentle the toothpick used for beating is. This shows you that the purpose is not to inflict pain. When you beat an animal, you intend to cause it pain so it will obey you, because an animal would not understand if you said: "Oh camel, come on, start moving." The camel does not understand such things, unless you beat it. A donkey understands nothing but beatings, but a woman, a man, a child, and so on, are generally more affected by emotions than by other things. If you beat her with a toothpick, or if you beat her lightly with your hand, and so on, it is meant to convey: "Woman, it has gone too far. I can't bear it anymore." If he beats her, the beatings must be light and must not make her face ugly. He must beat her where it will not leave marks. He should not beat her on the hand... He should beat her in some places where it will not cause any damage. He should not beat her like he would beat an animal or a child - slapping them right and left. Unfortunately, many husbands beat their wives only when they get mad, and when they start beating, it as if they are punching a wall - they beat with their hands, right and left, and sometimes use their feet. Brother, it is a human being you are beating. This is forbidden. He must not do this.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

beep...beep...beep...

Sorry if you tried to leave a comment and it didn't go through. Ironing out bugs...

(Don't even bother trying to leave a comment right now in fact.)

Update: Should be working. Computers really suck sometimes.


ThankPraise400.jpg

Michael Yon: Thanks and Praise

A Muslim man had invited the American soldiers from “Chosen” Company 2-12 Infantry to the church, where I videotaped as Muslims and Christians worked and rejoiced at the reopening of St John’s, an occasion all viewed as a sign of hope.

The Iraqis asked me to convey a message of thanks to the American people. ” Thank you, thank you,” the people were saying. One man said, “Thank you for peace.” Another man, a Muslim, said “All the people, all the people in Iraq, Muslim and Christian, is brother.” The men and women were holding bells, and for the first time in memory freedom rang over the ravaged land between two rivers.



coin.jpg

Project Valour-IT, in memory of SFC William V. Ziegenfuss, helps provide voice-controlled and adaptive laptop computers to wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand wounds and other severe injuries at major military medical centers. Operating laptops by speaking into a microphone or using other adaptive technologies, our wounded heroes are able to send and receive messages from friends and loved ones, surf the 'Net, and communicate with buddies still in the field. The experience of MAJ Charles “Chuck” Ziegenfuss, a partner in the project who suffered serious hand wounds while serving in Iraq, illustrates how important these laptops can be to a wounded service member's recovery.

For a limited time only! If you donate $25 or more to the laptops for soldiers project (Voice-Activated Laptops for OUR Injured Troops -- Valour-IT) through one of the teams (use the link or click on that graphic here on my page), you get that nifty military challenge coin shown above.

Pajamas Media has published my piece responding to Larry Cohler-Esses' piece in The Nation entitled “The New McCarthyism."

They said they wanted something "lively," so rather than doing a blog-style fisking in detail on all the many issues Cohler-Esses hits in his piece -- something that would have pegged the word count pretty severely -- I hit each in passing while making it pretty clear what I think of the entire frivolous concept of a "New McCarthyism" in the first place.

The New "New McCarthyism": Are Left-Wing Academics Being Persecuted?

Things should be back up and running, now under new and improved Movable Type 4.01. I labored to make the move as cosmetically transparent as possible and also make sure all the old permalinks still work. Please let me know if you see any weirdness or encounter any bugs. No bug or oddity too small to mention.

A few things had to be removed because they don't quite work with v.4, but I'll be seeking newer ways to achieve the same functionality, adding things in as we go. Thank you for your patience during the move.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Originally appeared in Haaretz, by Catrin Ormestad

Rows of plastic chairs where the grieving family receives condolences, a few dozen colorful plastic flower wreaths leaning against the wall at the entrance to the building, and a pale, clean-shaven young man in glasses, cautiously smiling from the martyr posters that cover the walls. But the usual image of Al-Aqsa mosque is missing from the picture, and the handwritten notes on the wreaths have quotations from the Bible, not the Koran. The victim belonged to Gaza's Christian community.

Rami Ayad, 31, was the manager of The Teacher's Bookshop, the only Christian bookstore in Gaza, operated by the Palestinian Bible Society. In addition to selling Bibles and Christian books, it offers computer classes and an Internet cafe. The bookstore has been attacked several times in the past two years. Internet cafes, pharmacies and music stores have been targeted as well, by what is assumed to be radical Islamic groups. Following the first attack in February 2006, a few days after the elections for the Palestinian parliament, in which Hamas won a sweeping victory, a note was found on the doorstep, demanding that the shop close immediately. The Bible Society reopened it a few weeks later.

According to Rami Ayad's widow, Pauline, her husband had not received any personal threats. But in retrospect, she realized there were signs that should have been taken seriously. Two months before the murder, a man entered the bookstore and asked Rami why he was not a Muslim. "Because I believe in Jesus," Rami replied. "I know how to make you become a Muslim," the man said, and left.

Two days before the murder, the taxi driver who took Rami home from the bookstore noticed that they were being followed by a car. It parked on the street outside his house, waited for Rami to get out of the taxi, and then drove away. Rami didn't recognize the driver, but he did note that he had a beard. On Saturday, he left the bookstore at four in the afternoon. Two hours later, he called his wife and told her that he might be late. That was the last time anyone heard from him. On the morning of the next day his body was found on a street in Gaza City, shot in the head and stabbed in the chest.

Continue reading "'I know how to make you a Muslim'"

Iranians celebrate US embassy seizure

TEHRAN (AFP) — Thousands of young Iranians proclaimed "Death to America" on Sunday as they celebrated the 28th anniversary of the storming of the US embassy in Tehran by student radicals.

A massive crowd, composed mainly of schoolchildren bussed in to central Tehran, gathered outside the site of the former US embassy, known locally as the "Den of Spies."

"Death to America! Death to Israel!" the young people shouted, wearing bibs that depicted the burning of the US and Israeli flags.

Interior Minister Mostafa Pour Mohammadi, in a keynote address, hailed the embassy seizure as "a great and glorious event" from which Iranians were still drawing inspiration...

..."By being here I am doing my religious duty, and by being here I am saying I hate the bullying powers, especially the United States and Israel," said 18-year-old seminary student Esmaeel Mohammadi.

Reihaneh Deqipour, 16, said: "My coming here is a sign I am ready to defend my country and slap the United States in the face, and I'm ready to defend the country to the last drop of my blood.

"Relations with the United States are fine as long as we are equals," she added...

We're not equals.

Reader Joseph Major sends in this week-old picture of WW1 (that's uno) era veteran Robley Rex -- the man who remembers Armistice Day. (Previous: On eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month...)

Kentucky's time machine must be...106 now? Big hats off to Robley Rex on this upcoming Veterans Day.

It's tough to build real democracy movements when the underlying society has so many issues. Barry Rubin discusses Egypt's Kifaya -- so much promise, gone to pot: Enough of "Enough"

...During 2004-2006 the Kifaya movement was not just Egypt's main moderate opposition force but the most important organized liberal group in the Arabic-speaking world. It began in December 2004 when participants in a small demonstration chanted that they had had "enough" (kifaya) of President Husni Mubarak's quarter-century-long rule as head of a half-century-long regime.

Thus began the Egyptian Movement for Change, best known as the Kifaya group. Those involved expected Egypt's imminent, dramatic transformation. George Isaac, the movement's coordinator, reflected what one reporter called this "delirious optimism." "The door of change is open," Isaac proclaimed "and no one can close it again. Never."

But it slammed shut pretty fast. The regime was still very much in control. In the 2005 elections, Kifaya did not do well. Of course, the elections were fixed but the Muslim Brotherhood emerged with triple the vote Kifaya received. Kifaya's presidential candidate was soon in prison. The masses didn't rise up. Liberalism clearly couldn't compete with either the regime's Arab nationalism or the Brotherhood's Islamism. Isaac now concluded: "Our people are naïve."

How, then, to compete for these "naïve" people's support? Most of Kifaya now seized the same tool the Arab nationalists and Islamists used: nationalist and religious demagoguery. In short, if you can't beat them, join them.

Aside from whether or not using this weapon helped Kifaya—it didn't—the tactic strengthened all the anti-democratic concepts which held Egypt back. They now claimed that the fault was external, not internal. The now insisted that the solution was not a freer culture and society or defeat of extremist ideologies but fighting the evil imperialists and Zionists. Yet if this is true, who needs Kifaya? Who needs internal reform? Who needs democracy?

In 2006, then, the movement made a U-turn. Rather than challenge its competitors' xenophobia, Kifaya imitated it...

Remember Kifaya's effort to annul Egypt's peace treaty with Israel?

The New York Sun editorializes on the Nadia Abu El-Haj tenure decision:

The news, coming over the weekend, that Barnard College has granted tenure to an anti-Israel anthropologist, Nadia Abu El-Haj, is a setback to those who had hoped that the tide of anti-Israel sentiment at Morningside Heights would begin to recede after President Bollinger's welcome of President Ahmadinejad. Press coverage of Ms. El-Haj's case in the Nation and the Jewish Week (by the same reporter, no less) has sought to portray her opponents as McCarthyites and has insisted that she has been falsely accused. In fact, she is on the record accusing Israel of being a colonial project.

This is a point to mark. Martin Kramer, who is the Wexler-Fromer Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, made the key point when, in a remarks published by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, he wrote, "The tragedy of the academy is that it has become home to countless people whose mission is to prove the lie that Zionism is colonialism. Thus research is undertaken, books are written, and lectures delivered to establish a falsehood." He called the idea that Zionism is colonialism "the root lie."

This is the lie that Ms. El-Haj is dedicated to promoting. In her book "Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society," she writes, "The colonial dimension of Jewish settlement in Palestine cannot be sidelined if one is to understand the significance and consequences of archaeological practice or, far more fundamentally, if one is to comprehend the dynamics of Israeli nation-state building and the contours of the Jewish national imagination as it crystallized therein."

This is, not to put too fine a point on it, nonsense...

Monday, November 5, 2007

Flash guided tour. Comet Holmes is up there and is supposed to be an easy find. I'm planning on taking my little scope out if it's clear tonight.

Mao's children:

Beijing, Nov 2, 2007 (CNA).- Organizes of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing have published a list of “prohibited objects” in the Olympic village where athletes will stay. To the surprise of many, Bibles are among the objects that will not be allowed.

According to the Italian daily La Gazzetta dello Sport, organizers have cited “security reasons” and have prohibited athletes from bearing any kind of religious symbol at Olympic facilities.

Other objects on the list include video cameras and cups.

The Spanish daily La Razon said the rule was one of a number of “signs of censure and intolerance” towards religious objects, particularly those used by Christians in China. Currently in China five bishops and fifteen priests are in prison for opposing the official Church.

[h/t: Tom Glennon]

At least 2000 people and children as young as 15:

LONDON, England (CNN) -- The head of Britain's intelligence services has warned that children as young as 15 are becoming involved in terrorist-related activity.

Jonathan Evans, the chief of MI5, also said that at least 2,000 people are living in Britain who pose a threat to security because of the country's support for al Qaeda-inspired terrorism.

"As I speak, terrorists are methodically and intentionally targeting young people and children in this country. They are radicalising, indoctrinating and grooming young, vulnerable people to carry out acts of terrorism," he told a gathering of newspaper editors in Manchester.

Evans said the figure of 2,000 -- an increase of 400 since November 2006 -- only included those the intelligence services knew about and that the actual number could be double.

He said there had been 200 terrorist convictions in Britain since the September 11 attacks.

The MI5 head added that over recent years much of the command and inspiration for attack planning in the UK had come from al Qaeda's remaining core leadership in the tribal areas of Pakistan.

However, he said in the last 12 months terrorist plots on British soil were increasingly been inspired by al Qaeda cadres in other countries, including in Iraq and East Africa...

Phillipe Karsenty emails pointers to two articles on the Al Dura controversy. The rushes are due to be shown in French court in about two weeks. The Haaretz article (!) is quite good: In the footsteps of the al-Dura controversy

...Two weeks ago I watched an 18-minute tape, from which Enderlin prepared his story in September 2000, and which will be submitted to the Parisian court on November 14. The first 10 minutes show footage of a demonstration at Netzarim junction: Dozens, perhaps hundreds of people are throwing a heavy barrage of stones at an IDF outpost. They are all dressed in civilian clothing, some are children under 10 years of age. Molotov cocktails are also seen being thrown at the outpost, and some of them catch fire.

During these moments no reaction is recorded from the IDF outpost, and the first shot, whose source is not visible on the tape, occurs at about the 10th minute. Between minutes 9 and 14, the photographer conducts two interviews at the junction itself. The two interviewees are standing in the direct line of sight of the IDF outpost.

By minute 14, more frequent shooting can be heard. Palestinian policemen in uniform fire from rifles they are holding, but it can't be seen at what, and Palestinians in civilian clothing who were in the IDF's line of fire are seen fleeing from the spot. The first time Mohammed al-Dura and his father are seen on the tape is at 14 minutes and 30 seconds, stooping behind a concrete cylinder. The camera pans right and left and does not focus on them. It returns to them occasionally until approximately minute 16.

The two appear again from minute 17 until the end of the tape, a minute later. These are the images that were broadcast internationally. The father is holding on to the cylinder and waving his hands, and the boy is trying to take refuge in his lap. At this point frequent shots are heard. In the last picture Mohammed al-Dura is seen lifting his head.

alduraraisesarm.jpg

Also: Jerusalem Post: Officials divided on al-Dura footage

The Samir Qumsiyeh referred to in this article is the cousin of arch-anti-Israel campaigner Mazin. Samir's plight has come up before (Bethlehem Christians fear neighbors). Samir has been under threat before. The finances have finally caught up with him: Only Christian TV station in Holy Land closes

The only Christian television station in the Holy Land has closed after 11 years because of a lack of funding.

Nativity television, or al-Mahed as it was known in Arabic, broadcast a mix of church services, films and discussion programmes 24 hours a day from a small studio in Bethlehem, not far from the Church of the Nativity.

Samir Qumsieh, the Greek Orthodox owner and director of the channel, said it had lost around $800,000, half of which were his own personal debts. "I have hundreds of letters thanking me and gratitude shields thanking us from all the churches but nobody translated this into financial support," he said. The station closed yesterday.

"I reached the point where I couldn't continue any more," he said...

I mentioned Gisha previously back here. Seems in their zeal to get "trapped" university students out of the Gaza Strip, they included at least one fake on the list...and the Associated Press actually uncovered the fraud. Amazing.

Friday, November 2, 2007

City Journal has a very interesting article on the history and the present of Boston's Central Artery project: Lessons of Boston’s Big Dig

I've always looked at the Big Dig as an embarrassing indicator of how Massachusetts has devolved into a third-world nation where you can't do a large public works project without massive waste and corruption and still emerge with a dysfunctional product in the end. The City Journal piece is more sanguine.

By Edgar P. Sousé

“Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.”

No, those words were not spoken by Stephen Walt or John Mearsheimer, the authors of the recent, controversial book, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” – although they certainly could have been written by them.

nazipraiseforlindberg.jpg

They were spoken by Charles A. Lindbergh on September 11, 1941 in Des Moines Iowa for an America First rally, an organization committed to keeping America from going to war with Hitler.  So great was the public reaction to this speech, that hundreds of newspapers denounced him in spite of his canonization for his 1927 solo flight across the Atlantic and his name was even removed from the water tower in his home town of Little Falls, Minnesota.

Nor did Lucky Lindy back down from his philipics against the Roosevelt administration. Later that year, in front of an adoring crowd of 20,000 America Firsters in Madison Square Garden, he attacked the President, accusing him of leading the country into war through “subterfuge.”

“There is no danger to this nation from without”, he declared, “Our only danger lies from within.”  And you didn’t have to look far to see that the group “agitating” for war was The Jewish Lobby. And all the time, Lindy punctuated his screeds with denials of anti-Semitism.

At the same New York rally in 1941, John Cudahy, former United States Ambassador to Belgium and staunch America First Committee leader, supplied the antidote to these “agitators” who were working against America’s national interest.  What was necessary, he stated, was engagement. He called for an immediate peace conference with Herr Hitler, referring to the Fuhrer as “a passing phase.” Senator Burton K. Wheeler, Democratic senator from Montana, and another staunch supporter of America First, railed against the President claiming that American generals had “even set the date for American entry into the war.”

If all this sounds more than a bit familiar, it is. With a bit of character substitution you have the dictionary definition of “La plus ca change…” Lindbergh becomes Walt and Mearsheimer and Senator Wheeler easily morphs into Sy Hersh of The New Yorker with his Nostradamus like predictions of the date set for the Bush administration’s launching of the war against Iran.

A further Lindbergh quote from his Iowa speech fits the bill for Walt and Mearsheimer:

“The terms "fifth columnist," "traitor," "Nazi," "anti-Semitic" were thrown ceaselessly at any one who dared to suggest that it was not to the best interests of the United States to enter the war…Before long, lecture halls that were open to the advocates of war were closed to speakers who opposed it. A fear campaign was inaugurated. We are on the verge of war, but it is not yet too late to stay out. It is not too late to show that no amount of money, or propaganda, or patronage can force a free and independent people into war against its will. "

But perhaps most chilling of all these comparisons is Walt and Mearsheimer’s sanitization of the existential threat against Israel from the mouth of the madman of Tehran. According to the tag team, Ahmadinejad’s words, sandwiched in between a Holocaust denial “conference” and the announcement of the installation of 3,000 centrifuges for producing fissionable material, were “mistranslated.”  It was a simple misunderstanding.  You see, in Farsi, “Wipe Israel off the map”  was really “Israel shall disappear from the pages of time.” What a relief to hear the accurate translation. What on earth was I worried about?

Incidentally, neither Walt nor Mearsheimer understands Farsi.

I want to end with one more quote.

"Today I will once more be a prophet: if the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevizing of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!"

This one is not the product of The America First Committee. It was delivered at about the same time, however, as the Lindbergh speech.

And many would subsequently claim that Hitler’s original words in German were mistranslated.

Readers may be interested in this original document [document from CharlesLindbergh.com] on Lindbergh by Leon M. Birkhead's Friends of Democracy. Birkhead was a Unitarian Universalist. How times have changed.

Perhaps someone could call Sabeel. Here's a pastor being threatened and told to sign over some of his family's land:

An Arab-American evangelical pastor said Wednesday that he has been threatened by a Palestinian security official in the West Bank city of Ramallah, and has fled to Jerusalem for safety.

Pastor Isa Bajalia, 47, a US citizen born in Birmingham, Alabama, said that he had been threatened over the last two months by a Fatah security official from the Tanzim militia who also demanded $30,000 in protection money. Bajalia said he had moved to nearby Jerusalem since the threats began.

The pastor has been living in Ramallah, considered to be the most liberal of all the West Bank cities under Palestinian control, since 1991, together with his American wife and son, who attended school in Jerusalem and has since joined the US Air Force.

For the last decade he served as pastor for a group of 30-35 people in Ramallah, holding Sunday services in private homes and carrying out missionary work among the Palestinians, who are predominantly Muslim.

Initially, Bajalia said he was treated with respect, but some suspicion, by the locals, and viewed as an outsider coming in with a foreign concept. The pastor said the threats began about two months ago after a group of church workers were seen praying on behalf of Palestinians.

"We will do to you what Hamas did to Fatah in Gaza," Bajalia said the Palestinian security official warned him. Bajalia, who has a vision problem, said he was also told that in addition to his eye problems he would not be able to walk anymore.

The Palestinian security official subsequently told Bajalia to register some of his family's land in the official's name and pay him $30,000, the pastor said. Bajalia said he had also been watched for six months...

David Trimble:

...The former leader of the Ulster Unionist Party and ex-first minister of Northern Ireland said there had been a "selective reading" of the Northern Ireland conflict that was "misleading and demonstrably false." In many cases, he said, it was more about contemporary agendas in the Middle East than serious analysis of the recent history of Northern Ireland.

"Nowhere is the analogy applied more vigorously than in the case of the Israel-Palestinian conflict," Trimble said. "For those eager to inject a creative breakthrough there, the lessons from Northern Ireland are often cited as an inspiration. The foremost expression of this can be seen in the response of many to the growing status and influence of Hamas in recent years.

He called on the Middle East Quartet and international community to "stand firm" regarding Hamas ahead of the Annapolis conference next month.

"It is essential to recognize that Northern Ireland's peace process operated within a distinct context - and one scarcely repeated elsewhere... this narrative which has been transported - often uncritically - to the Middle East, is fundamentally misleading about the true achievements of the Northern Ireland peace process," Trimble said.

"If there is one lesson to learn from Northern Ireland's experience - contrary to what is often recommended in relation to dialogue with Hamas - it is that preconditions were crucial to ending the violence in producing a settlement," he added.

In the 24-page report, Trimble cites the near total collapse of the Northern Ireland peace process on "Bloody Friday" in 1972, when the IRA killed nine people and wounded 130 in a bombing, as evidence that weakening preconditions to dialogue made increased violence more likely.

He questioned whether players in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were seeking victory or accommodation. Whereas the majority in Israel wanted "accommodation," Hamas might still be on the lookout for "victories," he said.

Hamas doesn't want accommodation; rather, they have played into the hands of the most intransigent elements in the Middle East, Trimble said.

Khaled Abu Toameh in the JPost:

Scores of Fatah policemen who used to serve in the Palestinian Authority security forces in the Gaza Strip have now joined the al-Qaida-affiliated group calling itself the Army of Islam, sources in the Hamas-controlled Interior Ministry told The Jerusalem Post Thursday.

Meanwhile, Fatah's armed wing, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades, claimed responsibility for firing 20 rockets from the Gaza Strip recently. The group said the attacks signaled the beginning of a military campaign dubbed "Operation Gaza Autumn," in the course of which it would fire hundreds of rockets at Israeli communities. It said residents of Sderot had two choices: leave or die.

Fatah officials in Ramallah said they did not know if the threat by the Aksa Martyrs Brigades was genuine.

"We don't know what's happening in the Gaza Strip," a senior Fatah official said. "Ever since the Hamas coup last June, we have no idea what's happening on the ground."

The official, however, did not rule out the possibility that disgruntled Fatah activists were behind the recent spate of rocket attacks, or that some former Fatah-affiliated policemen had joined the Army of Islam.

According to the sources Hamas's Interior Ministry, dozens of Fatah-affiliated policemen who recently lost their jobs have joined the al-Qaida-linked group. The Army of Islam is headed by Abu Muhammad al-Ansari, who is also known as Mumtaz Dughmush.

Ansari is a former PA Preventive Security Service officer in the Gaza Strip. He belongs to the Dughmush clan, whose members have kidnapped several foreign nationals, including BBC reporter Alan Johnston, and bombed Internet cafes, hair salons and restaurants...

Video here, dated 10-29-07. The overlay says "mortars" but I suspect that's a mistranslation. May require IE.

Update: Here's the YouTube version:


pietannabenheine.jpg

HS emails:

This is the absolute best! Even better than Naim Ateek and his crucifixion express! Hamas crucified in the arms of the holy mother, Anna Baltzer. Baltzer is currently touring N.E. with her one virgin show.

Not necessarily Hamas, could be Fatah, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, etc., etc... Ben Heine, the cartoonist, was banned from Daily Kos because of the nature of his drawings.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

It looks like the rumor of a back room deal was true. Nadia Abu El Haj has been granted tenure and Joseph Massad has been denied. Columbia's MEALAC (Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures) Department is said to be appealing.

I've heard they were holding the announcement until tomorrow -- start of a four day academic holiday.

That's what I've heard. Looks like we're about to move from a scholar who uses post-colonial theory to delegitimize Jewish nationalism to a scholar-in-residence who uses Jewish genetic theory to do the same thing. Let the circus games begin.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]