Thursday, January 31, 2008
Tufts student Daniel Halper has a good one on a bad subject in today's Tufts University paper:
In 2006, Tufts' Hillel received part of a $1.6-million Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grant to promote "inter-faith and intercultural dialogue." The program's intentions are noble and its goals laudable, since it is best to resolve conflict through dialogue.
But this past fall, Tufts' Interfaith Initiative, "Pathways," used its federal money to sponsor a dinner and dialogue by Edina Lekovic on "Women, Faith, and Women."
The problem is that Lekovic is a radical Islamist sympathizer who has gone so far as to defend Osama bin Laden.
A former managing editor of "Al-Talib, a Muslim publication at UCLA, Lekovic was on the masthead when it published an editorial - signed by the Al-Talib staff - praising and defending Osama bin Laden.
The editorial stated, "When we hear someone refer to the great Mujahid, Osama bin Laden, as a 'terrorist,' we should defend our brother and refer to him as a freedom fighter; someone who has forsaken wealth and power to fight in Allah's cause and speak out against oppressors. We take these stances only to please Allah."
When confronted on national television about it, Lekovic initially denied any participation in the publication. Yet recently, she has admitted her involvement - claiming, however, that her position was insignificant, though it was listed as second highest on the masthead. She furthermore remained on the publication for the next three years and attributed the editorial to a printing mistake...
Lekovic was the Muslim Public Affairs Council official who was taken to task on this issue by Steven Emerson. See here and here. As Daniel notes in his piece, the Pathways program was also involved in the protest against Daniel Pipes. I'll give Daniel the last word:
...These individuals are uncompromising extremists who are not really interested in dialogue. By inviting such extremists to speak at Tufts, the Pathways program gives them stature and publicity; moreover, such dialogue leads Muslims away from accepting American values like human rights and freedom for all. Moderation and dialogue are laudable goals, but the Pathways program works against them.
Indeed, it is by talking with the wrong people that we raise their elevation in their own communities - thus promoting a particular form of extremism...
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Department of Homeland Security's funds bring Islamist sympathizers to Tufts.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/14098
Tufts student Daniel Halper's excellent op-ed exposing the invitation of the representative of Islamist MPAC to a Homeland Security-funded Tufts University forum has drawn a response, and, in the immortal words of Gomer Pyle, 'Surprise, surprise, surpr... Read More
Here's another little bit of news my trip to the Tufts campus landed me with last night: I've written before about Jewish and pro-Israel organizations that ignore advocating on behalf of their own mission statements, and I'm sad to report... Read More
In 2006, Tufts' Hillel received part of a $1.6-million Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grant to promote "inter-faith and intercultural dialogue." The program's intentions are noble and its goals laudable, since it is best to resolve conflict through dialogue.
Why on earth should DHS be involved in a program like this, whether or not one approves of the speakers or topics? That's ridiculous. It's not their job to "resolve conflict".