Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Remember? Well now there's an entire lobbying group with a budget dedicated to that mindset. JR Telegraph (upon whom we bestow a gold star for the perfect use of the word "exilarch" in a sentence) points out this piece by Isi Liebler on the new anti-AIPAC, J-Street: With friends like these...
It's disconcerting and sad to see American Jewish "progressives" frenziedly lobbying the American administration to pressure Israel for further unilateral concessions to the Palestinians.
To make matters worse, they understate - even obfuscate - their real game plan. They describe themselves as "pro-Israel," "Zionist" and "moderate." They lay claim to being the true custodians of peace, portraying other Jewish leaders and AIPAC as neoconservatives and extremists. While tempting to dismiss their behavior and Orwellian doublespeak as naןve and inconsequential, recall that the sham Soviet peace fronts succeeded in duping many gullible well-meaning liberals into endorsing campaigns promoting totalitarianism.
It's all the more bizarre because no one would suggest that the current Israeli government is "hawkish." On the contrary, the Olmert government has lost the confidence of its people precisely because of unilateral concessions which undermine Israel's security and embolden terrorists. His government is an amen chorus which capitulates to every demand imposed on it by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. It has provided weapons to the Palestinians which will almost certainly once again be redirected against Israel; it has released and granted amnesty to terrorists; and despite bitter opposition from the IDF, it has closed checkpoints and acceded to demands compromising security which have already resulted in Israeli casualties.
Yet like a replay of the odious behavior of Haaretz editor David Landau, who told Rice that it would be his "wet dream" for the US "to rape Israel" for its own good, American "progressives" are urging their government to exert pressure on Israel for further unilateral concessions...
Much more worth reading. The fact is that a budget and some professional publicists aren't going to matter when people sniff out that this group's view is about as close as you can be to Jewish Voice for Peace and not be written off as overtly anti-Zionist. The only elected officials that will openly align themselves with J-Street for the money they're offering (a $50,000 coffer for campaign contributions according to the article) are ones who would have aligned against the Israeli and American governments already and don't mind being affiliated with the far Left.
These Jewish voices, so called "independent" and "going against the stream", do not care about peace for Israel, or Palestine. They are more concerned about scrubbing their image, which has been repeatedly defamed and besmirched by the likes of Jimmy Carter. Mearsheimer & Walt, Arun Gandhi, or Desmond Tutu.
Anti-Zionist Jews have become a highly desirable commodity...