September 2008 Archives
Saturday, September 27, 2008
PRE-POSTSCRIPT: The Deceased Incan Noble Speaks: How many times have I felt, and feel it during this financial crisis, exactly what Solomon says about the last eight years ....
---
The Paulson-Bernanke proposal for a financial sector bailout still seems to be floundering in Washington. The House Republicans, at last report, are still split on the idea, and without a united front from them, the Democrats are not willing to jump in alone.
For a moment, set aside the economics of the proposal and focus on the politics. The Congressional Republicans suffered in the 2006 elections from the perception that they had completely lost it on restraining federal spending. They had also spent six years in partisan lockstep with Bush on spending, expanding government, and the Iraq war. Enough conservative and independent voters got pissed off by the Republican abandonment of anything resembling conservative policies that many just stayed home or, in some cases, voted Democratic. The Republicans lost control of Congress.
That painful lesson floats in the background now as the House Republicans struggle with the question of whether to support the plan. Some support it because they think it's a good idea, and others oppose because they think it's bad. What hangs in the balance is how much Bush can call on simple partisan and personal loyalty. He lacks the automatic Republican support he enjoyed in his first term, and thus we see a political cliffhanger.
Now turn back to the economics of the plan. Paulson and Bernanke got themselves in some trouble because they failed to explain the situation and their proposal completely enough.
Some of the problem is everyone's ignorance about when and where the housing market will bottom. That event will be crucial ....
Last Sunday I attended the third annual Genesis Award presented by Christians and Jews United for Israel at Temple Emeth in Brookline. Alan Dershowitz was this year's recipient. Here are some photos and video.
Yes, as always, there was a protest. It was only three when I arrived, though three more came later. I'm still waiting on pics of those late arrivers:
Enough of that. Let's go inside.
Below: Video of Alan Dershowitz's acceptance speech, video of Gerald and Cynthia Bell of Strong Tower Church getting the audience going, as well as some more photos.
Continue reading "Dershowitz Accepts CJUI Genesis Award"From Palestinian Media Watch (in full -- not yet on line):
PA TV video:
There never has been a Jewish Temple - never will be! Defend the Al-Aqsa Mosque against Israel
"Oh [Sons of] Zion, no matter how much you dig
and no matter how much you destroy,
your imaginary Temple will not come into being"
by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook
A music video currently broadcast on Palestinian Television denies any historical connection between the Jewish people and Jerusalem: "Oh [Sons of] Zion, no matter how much you dig and no matter how much you destroy, your imaginary Temple will not come into being". The repeated refrain, "Al-Aqsa is ours," is meant to emphasize this statement, as the Al-Aqsa mosque is built on the site of the Temple, destroyed in the year 70 during Israel's revolt against the Roman Empire.
The video images focus on the Al-Aqsa Mosque and praying Muslims, and together with the lyrics repeat the Palestinian fabrication that Israel is planning to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque and therefore it needs protection: "Oh God, protect Al-Aqsa, Oh Allah, Al-Aqsa is ours, [protect Al-Aqsa] from every thief and every oppressor."
In ancient times, the Chimor Kingdom of the Incan Empire practiced a particular type of ancestor worship where the deceased nobles would be kept around with all their wealth and land in tact. Their retinues would keep the mummy around, and an oracle would "consult" with the corpse to determine its will in current affairs.
It kind of reminds me of what we've been dealing with for the past eight years only it's a desicated mummy occupying the White House, and it's been left to everyone else -- the pundits, the staff, the members of Congress...even the bloggers -- to give animation, articulation and intelligence to the perceived desires of the royal corpse. (Democrats should refrain from taking any pleasure in this. That dried up stump managed to handle two stiffs named Gore and Kerry quite handily thank you very much.)
In any candidate I'm looking for a number of things, but to take two of the most important, I'm looking for two things, and in this order:
1) Stand for the right things. Ideologically even more than specific policies which always wind up being adjusted later anyway. Policy articulations during the campaign are useful mostly as a reflection of ideological impulses.
2) An ability to articulate positions and thus provide leadership we can admire.
Both aspects work together. 1 is ineffective without 2, and 2 is downright dangerous with the wrong 1.
On #1, Barack Obama and his party fail me utterly. I wouldn't vote for him if you paid me. A vote for Obama is a vote for a Reid and Pelosi co-Presidency as they will run roughshod over that noob.
I was hoping to see signs of life on #2 with McCain last night, and while not a disaster, I was disappointed and left agreeing with John Hinderaker at Power Line: A Draw, At Best. Obama spouted a stream of predictable left-wing blogger boilerplate on international affairs that any of a dozen right-wing radio hosts would have had a field day dealing with. In fact, Mitt Romney would have made mince-meat of Obama last night.
I've heard that Obama spent the week in debate boot camp, and McCain pretty much winged it and it showed. Where was the defense of his tax plan? Where was the explanation of the connection between Iraq and the Global War on Terror? At least Kissinger has come out to say that McCain is right, and Obama wrong on Iran, but that's the morning after. Most people learned about these men last night, and I'm afraid that Obama did a good job last night in pulling the wool over their eyes.
McCain has to step it up for the next time -- and Sarah Palin betting be practicing.
Update: "UndecidedMan" has a nifty post that examines the issue -- or myth -- of the single issue voter, and addresses one of my pet-peeves -- the tendency of the press to spend 10 seconds on substance and 10 minutes on horse race: Perspective
Breath of the Beast comments here: The Hidden Radical Shows Himself
Friday, September 26, 2008
Happy Jerusalem Day! Iranians mock Holocaust on annual Jerusalem Day
TEHRAN (AFP) -- Iranians chanted "Death to Israel" on Friday as Islamist students unveiled a book mocking the Holocaust in an Al-Quds (Jerusalem) Day annual parade to show solidarity with the Palestinians.
And in Gaza City, the Islamist Hamas movement that has ruled the impoverished Palestinian territory since June 2007 marked the day by calling for more suicide attacks on Israel.
The book "Holocaust," published by members of Iran's Islamist Basij militia, features dozens of cartoons and sarcastic commentary.
Education Minister Alireza Ali-Ahmadi attended the official launch of the book in Tehran's Palestine Square.
The cover shows a Jew with a crooked nose and dressed in traditional garb drawing outlines of dead bodies on the ground.
Inside, bearded Jews are shown leaving and re-entering a gas chamber with a counter that reads the number 5,999,999.
Another illustration depicts Jewish prisoners entering a furnace in a Nazi extermination camp and leaving from the other side as gun-wielding "terrorists."
Yet another shows a patient draped in an Israeli flag and on life support breathing Zyklon-B, the poisonous gas used in the extermination chambers...
Meanwhile, at the UN, here's video, courtesy of Eye on the UN, of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad making his speech full of raw antisemitism and getting a big round of applause and a nice hug from the General Assembly President:
Panoramic photography was popular in the 19th and early 20th centuries, before the rise of movies. Photographers would take multiple still photos from different perspectives on a scene, then assemble the photos next to each other to recover the full scene. A panorama could project a scene wider than a person could see at one glance by the naked eye.
The Library of Congress' American Memory collection includes almost 4,000 panoramic photos, from 1851 to 1991. Most date from the heyday of panoramic photography in the early 20th century. The panorama on the upper left is of Boston around 1894, looking west from the Old North Church. The State House sits almost at dead center.
If you browse by category, you'll find all sorts of fascinating subjects: African-Americans (including early civil rights meetings), airplanes, the Anti-Saloon League .... My favorites are "bathing beauties" and "beauty contests." Curiously, they all date from the 1920s -- the first decade in which such things were not a complete scandal, I suppose.
A further update to the Left's sabotage of Monday's anti-Ahmadinejad protest...
Barry Shrage, President of the Boston chapter of Combined Jewish Philanthropies, has sent an important and creditable email to Malcolm Hoenlein demanding answers for how, exactly, it all happened. Let's start with CJP's initial email, sent out by their VP of Marketing. This email didn't do CJP any favors (emphasis is mine):
**Dear Friends,**
After yesterday's CJP Israel Connection email, we heard from a number of people upset at Sarah Palin's presence at the upcoming Stop Iran rally in New York City and at the way that our email was worded.
While Hillary Clinton had originally been slated to speak, she withdrew after Palin was invited. Many people across the country felt the same way about the apparent politicization of this event, which has been organized by a consortium of national Jewish organizations. Without both sides represented, the rally became controversial.
Yesterday afternoon, the organizers of the rally did what was right. They decided that no American political figure should participate - exactly as many of you suggested. Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel and Israeli Knesset Speaker Dalia Itzik will speak.
We regret if our email in any way appeared to be partisan. CJP has never been, nor will it ever be, tied to any political party. We thank all of you who contacted us and told us so honestly what you thought of our communication.
We also hope that you will still consider attending the rally and focusing on its goal - raising awareness about the threat of Iran's nuclear power and protesting the visit of Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the U.N. General Assembly. Seats are still available and can be reserved by visiting http://www.jcrcboston.org/ [They never did get enough people to get on that bus. -S].
Please don't hesitate to contact me with more feedback either now or in the future. We welcome it. We know we can always do better.
You see the problem? It sounds like CJP was influenced by the complaints about Palin, and that they accepted the silly Clinton argument about her. Not surprisingly, this email earned CJP another round of even angrier emails, and one of those emails was a request to be taken off of CJP's email list. This earned a reply from CJP of Greater Boston head, Barry Shrage:
Continue reading "Demanding a Full Accounting for Monday's Fiasco"CAIR's latest fund-raising email features a pitch from notorious former congressman, Paul "the Jews got me!" Findley. Screenshot:
Yesterday, along with the Mennonite Central Council and The World Council of Churches, the American Friends Service Committee held a dinner to honor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's Jew-hating and genocide-threatening Shi'a President.
In response to the cordial invitation to Iran's gay-killing, Jew-hating, Presidential bigot, thousands of people protested the dinner across the country [Here is an excellent gallery of photos of the well attended New York event. -S]. In Cambridge, Massachusetts, home of the New England offices of the AFSC, Christians and Jews United for Israel (CJUI) demonstrated outside the offices of the Quaker organization.
An organization so quick to protest others was genuinely shocked by people having the temerity to call them on the carpet for welcoming and honoring one of the world's most vicious theo-fascists.
When you conjure up images of the American Friends Service Committee your brain returns pictures of a variety of soft and cuddly folks: Graying, pony-tailed guys involved in "Peace and Justice" studies, Vietnam-era draft dodgers (pardon me, "resisters") and the usual array of central casting, post-Woodstock extras. Many baby-boomers will wistfully recall the AFSC exchange student programs of the 1960's when third world kids broke bread at the homes of their wealthy and guilt-ridden American sponsors.
The offspring of this generation has now come of age -- they're carrying on the "internationalist" (read "socialist") tradition of their parents with a particularly nasty campaign against Israel and Jews.
Continue reading "Quaker Values in Action: A Protest of the AFSC (with Pics)"This is a guest post from "Yal," a frequent emailer:
There is nothing similar in how this crisis came about, yet there is a lot that Ben Bernanke could learn from the way a much smaller scale crisis was resolved. I am referring to a crisis that took place not in Japan, and not in 1929, but one that very few people heard about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_stock_crisis_(Israel_1983)
In a nut shell, most Israelis were for years led to believe that shares of the biggest 4 banks in Israel could not go down. Investment in those bank shares had become the main tenant of a conservative portfolio of every Israeli. My grandfather and grandmother -- at the time age 75 -- held all their savings in these stocks because they trusted the local bank manager who told them this was a safe investment that yielded slightly above inflation.
This went on for years but when the selling pressure became too high and the bank shares were about to collapse the government had to intervene. The way they did it is what the US should be looking at now. The government of Israel (in 1983) not only prevented an economic collapse and saved savers like my grandparents, but avoided inflation (which was already running high but the government prevented adding fuel to the fire and reduced it considerably in the following years) and eventually managed to get the tax payers profit from the way the crisis was resolved.
The way it was done included 3 basic principals:
- Government took ownership of the banks and thus restored confidence but the tax payers now owned the banks.
- They started an investigation, in some cases criminal probes, into the people responsible and they had to pay fines for their part of creating the crisis.
- Debt restructuring: Holders of the failed financial instruments received a replacement specifically issued government bonds for 6-12 years. The elderly were given parts of their money within 1-3 years, younger people within 6 years and corporations within 12.
During the next 20 years the government slowly sold off 3 out of the 4 banks. It is still trying to sell the 4th one. Each of those banks was sold at profit for the tax payer on their initial investment. The Israeli economy -- which in 1982-1983 was on the brink of falling apart with high inflation, loss of confidence (people were literally taking their money in cash (US dollars) and keeping it at home), has thrived since the crisis was resolved in this way.
Now, what's more un-American? To temporarliy "nationalize" the banks, or to give bankers the break of their lives after years of abuse?
Not only can't you do your dieting in Gaza properly, but it looks like you can get your shopping-thing on pretty good, too. Take a look at these photos from a well-stocked Gaza market: Gaza market before Eid al-Fitr.
The Warsaw ghetto was never like this.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
Now in Syria...
p. 383:
...Storing my souvenirs at the Amawi, I took a bus to our consulate. Its distance from the heart of the Syrian capital impressed me as being symbolic of the distance I felt our officials maintained from the soul of Syria. They were trying hard to do a thorough job of understanding the Arab and fostering good will,m but they were limited by many handicaps: (a) they were Anglo-Saxons from far-off America; (b) they were essentially transients in the land; (c) they counted a great deal on local Syrians for data and interpretation -- and every Syrian had his own axe to grind. Objective reporting is unknown among the highly emotional and partisan Arabs. The Americans I met were extremely friendly and hospitable. But I could not help feeling that officially we were far removed from the realities of Arab life and Arab psychology -- a feeling that I found equally applicable to our legations all over the Middle East.
Our American officials' general anti-Zionist, pro-Arab attitude that I met in the Arab world impressed me as not a conviction arrived at intellectually, but a matter of policy dictated by State Department dogma, resulting among other things from the fact that we had invested enormously in Middle East properties and depended on the good will of the Arab world for forty per cent of our oil. I felt that if substantial deposits were discovered in the Negev our State Department attitude would be modified overnight.
At Best of the Web...witty:
CNN reports on the Obama campaign's latest effort to hold the Jewish vote:
Rep. Alcee Hastings told an audience of Jewish Democrats Wednesday that they should be wary of Republican VP nominee Sarah Palin because "anybody toting guns and stripping moose don't care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks."
"If Sarah Palin isn't enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention," Rep. Alcee Hastings of Florida said at a panel about the shared agenda of Jewish and African-American Democrats Wednesday.
At first this was a bit of a head-scratcher, but we figured it out when an email debate erupted among our Jewish colleagues over whether moose is kosher. Then it seemed obvious: Hastings is trying to turn Jewish voters against Palin by implying that her meat is unclean. This would also explain Barack Obama's porcine allusions, although the laws of Kashrut do not apply to facial cosmetics.
There's a lot of misinformation out there, so we did some research, and here's what we found: Moose have cloven hoofs and are ruminants. Therefore as a species they do meet the necessary conditions to be kosher.
In order for a particular animal to be kosher, however, it must be ritually slaughtered in accordance with Jewish law. This requires that it be killed with a long, sharp blade to the neck. Shooting a wild moose and eating it, therefore, is forbidden; the only way to keep it kosher would be to trap it alive and have a shochet do the honors.
But Hastings ignores one important point: Her aversion to pork notwithstanding, Palin is not Jewish. If Joe Lieberman were eating meat from improperly slaughtered game animals, he would be in violation of religious law. (Whether it would be appropriate to raise that in a political attack is another question.) But Judaism makes no claim that its dietary laws are universal. Unless she decides to become a giyoret, Palin is free to devour all the treif she wants.
Rep. Stephen Cohen of Tennessee spoke at the same event:
Cohen, who recently remarked that Jesus Christ was a community organizer, took his comments about the founder of the Christian faith further Wednesday. "A lot of what Jesus talks about is wonderful," Cohen said. "Talks about helping people and lifting them up and caring about people who are sick and all those things. He's a great Democrat."
In fact, the modern Democratic Party dates only to 1828; its predecessor, Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party, to 1792. Jesus was born within a few years of 1, so he could not have been a Democrat.
This might have been an honest mistake. But Cohen, who is not Christian, ought to be aware that those who are, regard Jesus as the Messiah. To disparage him as a mere "community organizer" or "Democrat" is a show of disrespect for other people's religion. Would Cohen describe the Prophet Muhammad as a "community organizer"?
Republicans would be excoriated for using such imagery, but of course Democrats can get away with saying things like 'Jesus was a Democrat,' because no one believes that Democrats take religion seriously as anything but a cynical political tool. To them it's a punch line.
And the solicitation has found its way to the Muslim Brotherhood/Islamic Society of Boston email list:
Tenure-track Position in Islamic & Middle Eastern Studies at Brandeis University
Brandeis University announces an opening for a tenure-track open rank position in Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies (IMES) to begin in the 2009-10 academic year. Specialization and departmental affiliation are ope n, but applicants must possess thorough knowledge of the languages, literatures, and histories of the classical period, and must be familiar with Islam's social history, major sects, principal schools of thought and forms of practice. The successful candidate must be able to teach the core introductory course: "Islam: Civilization and Institutions," and should be able to teach courses that complement our current offerings, including those pertaining to medieval Islam and the relation of the classical tradition to modern and contemporary Islam. (The latter is a research focus of the University's Crown Center for Middle East Studies with which the candidate will be able to interact). Only applicants with the Ph.D., or who expect to have the Ph.D. by August 2009, will be considered.
First consideration will be given to applications that arrive by October 20, 2008. Applications must include: a letter expressing research and teaching interests, CV, a sample syllabus for a course on "Islam: Civilization and Institutions," teaching evaluations (if available), one brief writing sample and three confidential letters of reference. All materials should be sent to: Chair of the Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies Search, Brandeis University, MS 054, PO Box 549110, Waltham, MA 02454-9110. Brandeis University is an equal opportunity employer committed to building a culturally diverse intellectual community and strongly encourages applications from women and minorities.
I'm telling you, if you give money to a university, you'd better be confident of where your money is going.
Interesting choice of advocate as The Guardian chooses Ghada Karmi, a Palestinian activist who doesn't believe the Jews are a people, to stump for their own preferred, 'one-state' solution. What the Arabs haven't been able to accomplish through force of arms, the British press would like to help them accomplish through op-eds: The future is one nation: The two-state approach in the Middle East has failed. There is a fairer, more durable solution
That would be a good trick. Refuse what the UN handed you on a silver platter, abdicate every responsibility to actually build something, instead try to destroy what your neighbor has, then stew in jealousy and wish that you could just theorize it out of them. There's a thing about that "fairness" business as well, since it's hardly fair or durable to impose a "solution" on people who don't want it and deny Jews their own right to self-determination.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
[Scroll down for details of the protests planned for Thursday in New York and Cambridge, MA.]
Dinner with hate: Quakers, Iran leader to meet, eat
Keepers of Protestantism's pacifist traditions will showcase just how far they've come from their humble roots in Europe's persecuted peasantry when they share an intimate dinner Thursday in New York with a world leader.
It's not just any world leader, however, but Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who's been labeled an international pariah for his nuclear ambitions, denial of the Holocaust, saber-rattling toward Israel and alleged support of terrorism.
But for Quakers and Mennonites who'll be at the table, breaking bread with this controversial man means drawing deeply on the same spiritual roots that sustained their embattled ancestors long ago.
"Jesus ate with lepers and with tax collectors, and in the United States right now, Iran would be in that category," says Arli Klassen, executive director of the Mennonite Central Committee, an outreach arm for Mennonite and Brethren in Christ churches in the United States and Canada...
An analysis of the pathology of that last statement would fill a book. Ahmadinejad is not a victim, nor is he doing a necessary, if resented, job. Nor will he starve or feel isolated if the Mennonites refuse to break bread with him.
The ADL, amongst many, many others is objecting:
Continue reading "Quakers and Mennonites Host Genocidal Antisemite -- Protests Planned for Thursday"CAIR is very upset about the release of this important film: CAIR Asks FEC to Probe Anti-Muslim DVDs Sent to Swing States. The Obsession folks aren't exactly worried (nor should they be), they have a news flash plastered across the top of their web site.
Despite the fact that the film Obsession contains no political content and was made well before the 2008 election cycle began, CAIR, those paragons of Islamic moderation and honesty, would now have you believe that the national distribution of the DVD was an Israeli plot to elect John McCain.
This is a very revealing action for CAIR to take. It reveals in particular two key aspects of CAIR's mindset:
1. It shows that CAIR is fully aware that the jihad against Israel is an integral part of the global jihad, and is not just a struggle to recover Palestinian "stolen land." Thus a film that reveals the nature and goals of that global jihad -- Obsession -- benefits Israel.
2. It also shows that CAIR believes that John McCain will fight against the global jihad in a way that Barack Obama will not -- and that it believes therefore the distribution of an anti-jihad film, which in a sane world would be welcomed by both the Left and the Right since the global jihad wishes to destroy and remake the West utterly, must be some partisan plot.
It further shows CAIR yet again on the wrong side of the jihad, as they are again and again...
I saw Tom Trento speak on Sunday. Impressive.
A few more links:
Atlas at American Thinker: Obama, Hillary and Palin's Disinvite
... no one took the Soros-created J Street Project seriously, until Hoenlein gave them credibility. Hoenlein should have insisted that Palin appear and pushed back. He should have insisted that Obama send someone to represent him or suffer the consequences of an empty chair...
Caroline Glick: Your abortions or your lives!
...The lives of 6 million Jews in Israel are today tied to the fortunes of those women, to the fortunes of American forces in Iraq, to the willingness of Americans across the political and ideological spectrum to recognize that there is more that unifies them than divides them and to act on that knowledge to defeat the forces of genocide, oppression, hatred and destruction that are led today by the Iranian regime and personified in the brutal personality of Ahmadinejad. But Jewish Democrats chose to ignore this basic truth in order to silence Palin...
Jennifer Rubin: Palin Snub Rocks Jewish Community -- and the Presidential Race
The decision last week by organizers (the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations) of the anti-Iran rally in New York City to disinvite Governor Sarah Palin after Senator Hillary Clinton backed out in a huff has set off a torrent of negative reaction -- which the media, not surprisingly, has chosen largely to ignore. It also may have opened the door for the McCain-Palin ticket to attack Barack Obama for placing partisan politics above national security and support for Israel.
Many prominent American Jews and a number of media outlets are labeling the action disgraceful...
Roger L. Simon: Open Letter to My Fellow Jews: The Democratic Party is not your religion (or anybody's)
...No, those Democrats thought of themselves and their party first, the citizens of this country and the world later. When Republicans behave in a similar reprehensible manner, we should condemn them with all ferocity. But fellow Jews, stop being slaves to the Democratic Party. End this illicit love affair - not just for your own good, but for the good of humanity.
Phyllis Chesler: J Street Jews: The McCarthyites of our Era
Ah yes, my people, my nation, my burden, my glory, my J Street. The Jews of J Street have named themselves after an imaginary street in Washington, DC, a suitable name for the kind of imaginary but dangerous human engineering projects they have in mind both for America and for the Middle East. The J Street Jews would rather die at Ahmadinejad's hands -- as long as a Democrat is voted into the White House-than live under a Republican administration...
Finally, Gil Troy: Playing the partisan
...In fact, in addition to denouncing Ahmadinejad, Senator Hillary Clinton could have helped remind Americans of the many things that unite them, even during this campaign. Instead, Hillary Clinton played the partisan - and diminished her own moral standing in the process.
Check out the little, tiny people.
My report from an August visit to Beirut is up at Pajamas Media: Two Visits to a Fast-Changing Lebanon
...Hezbollah's effort to take over Lebanon is often portrayed as a religious quest, but at the [2006] rally, in the tent city and in the crowd, I saw few signs of religious devotion. I saw a lot of evidence that Hezbollah's "civil disobedience" was politically opportunistic extortion. With their ability to gain allies, with their weapons and their support from Syria and Iran, Hezbollah and friends were demanding that the rest of Lebanon give in to their demands or risk civil war, basically saying, "Nice country you've got; wouldn't want anything to happen to it."
The first time I visited Beirut, it was as a blogger and a photographer, documenting a city in the midst of an attempted putsch. When I revisited the city this August, it was as a tourist, visiting friends.
Unfortunately, many of the Lebanese bloggers I knew had left Beirut. Most people were leaving for better economic opportunities in the Gulf, Europe, or America. For those who stayed in Lebanon, goodbye parties were frequent, almost weekly social gatherings...
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
PRE-POSTSCRIPT: The cure has been found for wild financial market behavior: estrogen. Seriously: that, plus some old guys.
And why do these financial crashes seem to happen in the autumn? Is it the falling leaves, perhaps? The end of summer and intimations of mortality?
---
I mean, do you remember where you were in October 1929?
The Brits usually do this better than we do: some comic relief while the financial crisis continues to lurch forward. It's impossible to get through these things without some gallows humor.
There's no stopping Biden's gaffe-o-matic:
When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told [Katie] Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened."'Cuz when the stock market crashed in 1929, FDR had already become president, and there was a television in every living room -- really :) There's a real point there, somewhere: the level of political eloquence and plain-speaking has, on the whole, dropped noticeably since then. And it's not a forte of our current president or, actually, almost any of our current politicos.
But this brings up a more serious point. Another one of those encrusted, hoary myths is that the 1929 stock market crash "caused" the Great Depression ....
Millions spend half of income on housing
Ray, 44, is looking for work and renting out a room in his two-bedroom condo in Davie, Fla., for $500, but his monthly income doesn't match his expenses and he's facing foreclosure.
"I barely have money to survive," he said.
Ray is one of more than 7.5 million people -- almost 15 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage -- who are spending half of their income or more on housing costs, according to 2007 data released Tuesday by the U.S. Census Bureau. That is up from nearly 7.1 million the year before.
Traditionally, the government and most lenders consider a homeowner spending 30 percent or more of their income on housing costs to be financially burdened. But that definition now covers almost 38 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage -- 19 million of them.
Though home prices have fallen this year, in the most expensive markets where home prices tripled during the boom, many working families still cannot afford to buy a home.
"We had a bubble," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. "This is a case where we absolutely want the market to adjust."
During the dot-com era, people were willing to invest millions of dollars on businesses that had no hope of ever showing a profit. Sure, you could 'flip' them, but everyone knew that businesses based on no profit plus 'flipping' would peak, then fall. A lot of people ignored that fact, and they lost a lot of money.
However, the government didn't finance the dot-com bubble and the majority of the population wasn't using dot coms to provide warmth and shelter. This housing crisis will move slower and it will be much larger. The dot com bust was like a tornado. The housing crisis will be more like Katrina.
Bankers were willing to lend money to just about anyone because house prices were going up. As long as house prices kept going up, the mortgage system thrived.
However, anyone who thought about this situation would have to realize that housing prices could not continue to rise indefinitely. There had to be a certain point when real estate prices would peak, then fall. This isn't rocket science, it's basic physics - economics - life.
But no one thought about it. Bankers, financial experts, stock brokers are educated people. But they didn't think about where they were going or what they were doing. They didn't think outside of their little box. Why should they, when the box had such a nice view and the $300-per-bottle vodka was so smooth?
We have to wonder why educated people don't think. Why do they base their actions and their fortunes on a obviously bad idea?
And what will the next bad idea be?
Monday, September 22, 2008
They keep saying it, and it's true: an era is ending on Wall Street. In fact, "Wall Street" as defined for the last 30 years, centered on independent investment banks seeking large returns by taking large risks, will be only a memory in a few months. Wall Street's two remaining large investment houses (Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs) are seeking to become much more like commercial banks. They will still do investing, but it won't be their sole business any longer. Diversified commercial banking is apparently the future of finance. Investment banking as an independent activity is about to disappear, at least as an institutional phenomenon.
The origins of this almost-gone era lie in the Great Inflation of the 70s and the reaction of investors desperately seeking higher returns to compensate. One asset bubble after another followed: commodities, such as gold; loans to developing countries, leading to an early 80s bust; the savings & loans (S&L) bubble and crack-up in the late 80s; the stock bubble of the mid- to late 90s; and lastly and most grandly, the 30-year-long housing boom that culminated in a bubble (2002-2007) and bust (2007-?). The housing boom lasted as long as it did because of the demographic bulge of the Baby Boomers, who entered their prime house-buying years in the mid-70s and exited just a few years ago.
The whole investment landscape is rapidly changing. Expect thinking and practice to become much more traditional, "square," and 9-to-5-ish. The era of the frantic, 14-hour investment banking workday is surely finished.
The new government intervention in financial markets is evolving in strange and not necessarily good directions. The danger is that the Treasury Department and Fed have developed a premature, pre-emptive, and open-ended intervention -- the risk and cost to taxpayers are vague and potentially large.
Unlike previous government bailouts, there's no clear criterion of which actors really are in distress and which are just having a bad day.
Armin Rosen, writing in the Columbia Spectator, basically tells the college administration to crap or get off the pot with regards to the Joseph Massad tenure battle: The Massad Tenure Battle: Year Two
...Brinkley effectively backpedaled from a potential faculty revolt by putting off a final decision on Massad -- after a final decision had been reached. And if convening a second ad hoc committee and re-reviewing an apparently settled tenure case already seems a shade capitulatory, as well as a waste of the faculty's time and energy, consider the candidate involved. Joseph Massad's papers and articles addressing "Zionism as the new anti-Semitism" and encouraging the violent dismantling of "Jewish society in Israel" have appeared in respected outlets like New Politics and the Journal of Palestine Studies. Even if one discounts his reliably hysterical work for the Egyptian paper Al-Ahram, his output is that of a scholar who views the academy not as a venue for scholarship and inquiry, but as a mouthpiece. He does more than reduce this school's discourse on the Middle East to recrimination and innuendo. He jeopardizes Columbia's reputation as a serious place of study.
The only thing worse than this feckless treatment of the Massad question is getting the final answer wrong. If the provost and the University are as concerned about the school's academic integrity and intellectual environment as they apparently are about keeping up appearances, they should do now what they allegedly did 10 months ago: deny tenure to Joseph Massad.
The head of the state-owned France 2 television station has agreed to a demand from a Jewish community leader to establish a panel of experts to probe the controversial "Muhammad al-Dura broadcast," the European Jewish Press reported Friday...
It's a good start, but the devil will be in the details:
...The Anti-Defamation League has expressed support for the call for an independent investigation into the report. The panel of experts is expected to be established in November, and will be headed by Patrick Gaubert, chairman of Licra, the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism, who is also an EU Parliament member.
Karsenty called the decision to set up a panel "good news" but said he would monitor who was selected as "experts" as well as what material was submitted for the panel's consideration...
You better believe it. Also see: French public tv gives green light to working group on Al-Dura broadcast
Today was supposed to have been the day that a high-profile, bi-partisan event was to occur at the United Nations to protest the appearance of genocidal madman Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but it was not to be. There's an event happening, yes, but the high-profile representatives of both mainstream parties won't be there, and a damaged and fractured Jewish community is left holding the bag.
And you better remember who's at fault. You better remember who put party ahead of a non-nuclear Iran: The Democratic Party, the National Jewish Democratic Council, J-Street and their backers like Alan Solomont.
For years and years, groups like AIPAC have done almost miraculous work keeping the interests of mainstream Jews the interests of both parties in government. How many events over the years have we seen where representatives of both the Republicans and the Democrats have come together for a common cause, and even partisan outlets like the one you're reading now have laid that aside for a day to praise people who are...at least for a day...at least for one issue...on the right side. The same side.
But the Democrats are really feeling the heat this election, and the derangement runs deep, and some people are becoming desperate. Like the drowning man who pulls his rescuer down with him, desperation makes people irrational, cast the veneer of civilization aside and show their truest, deepest selves and priorities.
And when it comes down to it, it's not Jews in Israel that motivates Democrats, and it's not Jews in America that motivates them either. It's their own power. It's their own little dinners, and board memberships, and their silly narcissistic college freshman platitudes...that's what motivates them. And when they finally get around to looking out the window, their bogeyman isn't an Iran armed with nuclear weapons led by a Holocaust-denying antisemitic America-hater...it's "conservatives." Ahmadinejad is, after all, an ocean away, but it's conservatives here at home that prevent them from inflicting their peculiar vision of the worker's paradise on all of the rest of us.
Never forget that it wasn't an extremist group, it was the National Jewish Democratic Council that politicized this event: NJDC Calls for Withdrawal of Palin Invitation to Iran Rally
WASHINGTON, DC - Marc R. Stanley, Chairman of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), released the following statement:
Monday's protest against Ahmadinejad is too important to be tainted by partisanship. Unfortunately, the campaign of Senator John McCain is much more interested in scoring political points than insuring there is bipartisan solidarity around the anti- Ahmadinejad efforts. Therefore, we call upon the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations to withdraw the invitation to Governor Sarah Palin and we applaud Senator Hillary Clinton's decision to not attend the rally after the attendance of Palin was announced...
What Orwellian turn-speak! It was the NJDC that brought partisanship to the event. Rather than letting their high-profile Democrat show up, or encouraging their party to one-up the Republicans and send their Presidential nominee, they crapped on the entire event. When did Sarah Palin become David Duke?
And when the dirty-work was done: NJDC Commends the Withdrawal of Palin's Invitation to the Iran Rally It's typical liberal "thinking" -- if you're a leftist that's just being moderate and non-partisan, if you're on the right you're a partisan.
The partisans against the rally were willing to stop at nothing, including threats against the tax-exempt status of the sponsoring groups -- a nonsensical threat that nevertheless can cost money to defend: Sources: Intense Pressure Led To Palin UN Snub
CBS 2 HD Has Learned Democrats Threatened To Attack Jewish Groups' Tax Exempt Status Over VP Nominee Invite
...Sources tell CBS 2 HD that a decision to disinvite Palin from the high profile rally after Clinton pulled out in a huff came as the result of intense pressure from Democrats.
"This is insulting. This is embarrassing, especially to Gov. Palin, to me and I think it should be to every single New Yorker," Assemblyman Dov Hikind, D-Brooklyn, told CBS 2 HD.
Sources say the axes were out for Palin as soon as Sen. Clinton pulled out because she did not want to attend the same event as the Republican vice presidential candidate...
...The groups sponsoring the rally against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN were reportedly told, "it could jeopardize their tax exempt status" if they had Palin and not Clinton or Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on hand...
...As for Sen. Clinton, she brushed right past CBS 2 HD's Lou Young when he tried to ask her about the issue on Thursday night.
Lou Young: "Were the organizers of Monday's rally right to depoliticize it?"
Clinton walked past Young, said "Thank you all very much" and started hugging people...
Soccer Dad, who has a good post on this, thinks I'm too quick to let J-Street off the hook, tying matters in to the common-denominator, self-appointed exilarch, local left-wing activist and Obama supporter, Alan Solomont. I still say that J-Street itself doesn't have the pull to screw a rally like this by itself. The groups involved wouldn't bow to them, though they, and Solomont are names to remember and have their share of responsibility (See J-Street's crowing about their "victory": We Won! Palin Not Speaking at Iran Rally).
Solomont is one of the jet-setting busy-bodies who went off to Switzerland a few years back, watched a parade at the podium to praise Arafat and denounce Sharon, then came back to Boston to act as pimp-daddy for an idea so skanky he couldn't give it away. In the post CJP's Email Apologizes for Inviting Sarah Palin to anti-Ahmadinejad Rally, Jewish Russian Telegraph notes:
...Patty Jacobson, CJP's VP of Marketing tells us that the organizers did not want to "politicize" the event. We have a question to Ms. Jacobson --- since when CJP is extra kosher when it comes to partisan political connections? Since when such modesty? Alan Solomont, during his time as CJP's chairman, used to use, absolutely openly, CJP's donors lists to raise money for the Democrats. He dismissed all the criticism at the time and explained that this was a difficult, but correct decision. Alan is a committed lefty working for socialist paradise for the rest of us -- whether we want it or not...
I've heard through the grape vine that even Elie Wiesel was pressured to drop out of the event.
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, a bi-partisan group, Richard Holbrooke, R. James Woolsey, Dennis B. Ross and Mark D. Wallace, writes that a nuclear Iran is a serious matter: Everyone Needs to Worry About Iran
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the United Nations in New York this week. Don't expect an honest update from him on his country's nuclear program. Iran is now edging closer to being armed with nuclear weapons, and it continues to develop a ballistic-missile capability.
Such developments may be overshadowed by our presidential election, but the challenge Iran poses is very real and not a partisan matter. We may have different political allegiances and worldviews, yet we share a common concern -- Iran's drive to be a nuclear state. We believe that Iran's desire for nuclear weapons is one of the most urgent issues facing America today, because even the most conservative estimates tell us that they could have nuclear weapons soon.
A nuclear-armed Iran would likely destabilize an already dangerous region that includes Israel, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, and pose a direct threat to America's national security. For this reason, Iran's nuclear ambitions demand a response that will compel Iran's leaders to change their behavior and come to understand that they have more to lose than to gain by going nuclear...
But here's the fact. The Democrats not only don't want to allow Sarah Palin to have a stage that would show with finality that their smears about her cavorting with "Nazi sympathizers" is plain crap, but they also don't want to admit that they simply don't support the goals of this protest. They are afraid of serious sanctions against Iran. They don't want it. They don't support it, and their friends in the organized Jewish community are willing to run cover for them.
Update: Dennis Hale has an excellent piece on this, here: What Obama means by "bipartisanship"
The NY Sun has the text of the speech Sarah Palin would have delivered: Palin on Ahmadinejad: 'He Must Be Stopped'
Despite the best efforts of the Democrat party, the rally has drawn a huge crowd. The Boston Jewish Community couldn't fill a single bus and the trip had to be canceled.
Update: Iowahawk: Council Demands Palin Ouster from Fallout Shelter (brilliant)
Mickey Mouse must die, says Saudi Arabian cleric/diplomat Sheikh Muhammad Munajid:
The cleric, a former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, said that under Sharia, both household mice and their cartoon counterparts must be killed.
Mr Munajid was asked to give Islam's teaching on mice during a religious affairs programme broadcast on al-Majd TV, an Arab television network.
According to a translation prepared by the Middle East Media Research Institute, an American press monitoring service, he said: "The mouse is one of Satan's soldiers and is steered by him...
"Mickey Mouse has become an awesome character, even though according to Islamic law, Mickey Mouse should be killed in all cases."
Last month Mr Munajid condemned the Beijing Olympics as the "bikini Olympics", claiming that nothing made Satan happier than seeing females athletes dressed in skimpy outfits.
A former diplomat. There are the guys who our State Department depends on to:
1. be a moderating force in the Middle East
2. keep our economy running smoothly
3. help us in the war against terrorism
..and we wonder why everything is so screwed up?
UPDATE: In my comments section reader DPU asks:"And there's no chance [he] was making a joke?"
Yeah, I'd say it's a typical example of Saudi po-mo irony. Those guys just kill at the Laff Lounge.
I mean literally. The head of Saudi Arabian Supreme Judiciary Council Sheikh Salih A-Lahidan declared that evil TV [satellite channel owners] can be killed, saying "It is legitimate to kill those who encourage corruption in faith...if their evil cannot be stopped by other penalties,"
Hey, that's the same Saudi government official who, in 2005, told young Saudis to go to Iraq and become suicide bombers. You know, King Abdullah's best friend. What a kidder.
Partisan bloggers say: "That's not funny. It is utter filth"
At the Power Line News Forum, IronDioPriest says:
OK. This is it. I HATE the Left. The Left is showing itself to be the embodiment of evil on this earth. Satan's playthings. All you liberals can kiss my a$$. Your protestations mean absolutely nothing to me. You are all one and the same in my mind now. You are all my enemies, and you will all rot in the same hell.
Freedom Eden says: Saturday Night Live went WAY over the line in a skit on the September 20 show.
They both seem to have read this World Net Daily article on the offending skit:
Palin family 'incest' joked about on NBC
'Saturday Night Live' skit suggests husband of VP candidate has sex with own daughters
A week after a high-profile send-up of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin on "Saturday Night Live," the NBC comedy show returned to making fun of the Alaskan governor in a skit where New York Times reporters sought to probe the possibility Palin's husband was having sex with the couple's own daughters...
Okay, I'm totally opposed to the press invading people's private lives and/or making up stupid stories. I also think SNL has a lefty bias. But I saw the Saturday Night Live skit discussed at World Net Daily, and it was dead-on. The whole thing was a parody of how clueless and provincial NY Times writers can be.
I wish I could find the video (according to WND, the clip of the incest sketch was never posted online). The skit starts sets the mood with the with the best joke. The editor, played by Franco, announces that he's taking his best investigative reporters off of their current assignments and putting them on the Palin beat.
One reporter raises his hand and says: "..but I'm working on a report about the current crisis at Lehman Brothers"
The editor says "...that's not important, Lehman isn't going anywhere."
So, are we supposed to see this editor as a fact-based kind of guy? Of course not.
One female Times writer is infamous for making a fortune over bogus sexual harrassment suits. One Times writer weeps when he discovers that there is only one psychoanalyst in Alaska (he sees his NY-based analysts at least twice a day). None of the writers can drive, and one had irrational fears of polar bear attacks. Most abandoned the assignment when they heard that there were few taxis and no Thai takeout in Alaska. The Palin incest rumor was provided as another example of the Times' general cluelessness.
If the media had never spread rumors about incest within the Palin family, SNL could possibly deserve a lot of grief for making this grotesque suggestion. But the media did spread those lies, and SNL was obviously parodying them.
Get a grip, people.
UPDATE: Found it! Here's the SNL video of the NY Times parody, thanks to Allah at Hot Air who says:
Think of it as a comic rendering of Saturday night's quotes of the day. Pretty funny -- you'll laugh, more than once -- but not as gratifying as it would have been if they'd zeroed in on the smearmongering.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Sorry, the skit has been removed. According to YouTube, it's no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal
YET ANOTHER UPDATE: Welcome Ann Coulter readers!
Naw, there's nothing wrong with the legal system: Panel to Review Pants Case
Roy L. Pearson Jr., who sued a dry cleaners for $54 million over a missing pair of pants, is getting a chance to revive the case.
More than a year after his lawsuit was rejected by a judge in D.C. Superior Court, Pearson has persuaded an appellate panel to review the case. The D.C. Court of Appeals will hear arguments Oct. 22, officials said.
Pearson drew international attention with the suit against Custom Cleaners, a Northeast Washington shop he said lost his pants in spring 2005. Among other things, he claimed that he was defrauded by a "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign posted by the owners, Soo and Jin Chung.
In a separate case, he is suing the District government, alleging that it broke the law when it decided against reappointing him last year to a 10-year term as an administrative law judge, a job that paid $100,000 a year. The commission that oversees administrative law judges challenged his judgment and temperament during two years on the bench...
Via the Marmot. People with a law degree and some spare time can do a lot of damage.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Patrick Poole has found some new information that shows that Ohio "terror sheik" Salah Soltan (also spelled Salah Sultan) is still up to his old tricks. Soltan was a guest of the Islamic Society of Boston, and a founder of the Islamic American University. We first met him here: Salah Soltan - A moderate's guest?. In his post, Ohio terror sheikh, Fiqh Council of North America member Salah Sultan: Jews killed President Kennedy, advocates Islamic theocracy in US elections, Poole notes that, among other things, he quotes from Paul Findley's book that:
...a man responsible for 300 Jewish organizations proposing to fund all his campaign on one condition which was to place the keys of foreign policy in his hands, and Kennedy refused such proposal. The result was the assassination of John Kennedy.
Jeff Beatty is John Kerry's opponent for Senate. Thanks to Chatham Republicans for getting out this recording of the interview Jeff did yesterday on Fox 25:
Harvard freshman Jacob Benson attends day 1 of "Pursuits of Happiness: Ordinary Lives in Revolutionary America." What he gets is a lesson not in the greatness of the founders, but in their flaws...and a lecture in current events: Obama and History (Class)
...I walked into the packed lecture hall, standing in the back with my laptop open ready to take notes. During the first half of the lecture, Professor Laurel Thatcher Ulrich discussed the answers she received from the first session of this class (which I did not attend), when she had asked those in the room to jot down a list of things that come to mind when she said the words "American Revolution."
Not surprisingly, the discussion centered on the names of the major founding fathers. But this, we were told by Professor Ulrich, was "Founding father chic." In other words: we possessed only an immature understanding of American Revolutionary history, clouded by the glorification of its main political players. A short discussion of the founding documents ensued, during which Professor Ulrich quoted the historian Pauline Maier on the issue of the founding documents having achieved a quasi-sacred status in the civic religion of American politics, in a way comparable to the way other religions revere their own holy texts.
Professor Ulrich then announced, with some disappointment, that only 3 students-out of a response pool of approximately 180-wrote down the word slavery. This comment began the second half of her lecture, which might well have been titled, "A Short Break From American History to Glorify, Not the Founding Fathers, But Barack Obama." Professor Ulrich, after mentioning the (real and disturbing) relationship between the founding fathers and slavery, proceeded to play, on two massive projector screens, the first few minutes of Barack Obama's famed speech on race in Philadelphia this past March...
[via Power Line]
Some people think so, and it's perfectly believable, but the counter explanation sounds perfectly plausible as well. The Obama campaign's ham-handed response to the initial accusation, a response that seemed to confirm the worst, didn't help. Yet it doesn't seem to me to be sufficiently a sure thing, given the fuller explanation, to get worked up over. There are plenty of things we know, for sure, about Barack and his party, to not want him President.
Friday, September 19, 2008
More on the shameful episode:
Phyllis Chesler writes: Hillary vs. Sarah, America vs. Iran, and the Film About Stonings in Iran That Ahmadinejad Needs To See
The plot thickens but there is a bottom line; there always is. Obama is the one who decided not to send anyone of rank to stand with the Jews who are opposing Amadinejad's genocidal and nuclear policies. The Jews in charge did not lean on Obama to come himself, (which would have made sense) but instead, no doubt under some unimaginably heavy pressure, dis-invited Palin. What? Allow Palin to take on the Iranian Monster on prime-time TV and win even more votes? New York Jewish votes? Women's votes? Anything but that.
To cover themselves, the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations now claim to have dis-invited all politicians; too "partisan," too distracting from the matter at hand.
I'll say...
Israpundit has posted some of J-Street's crowing over their "success" (and let's be clear, I'm sure the real culprit for politicizing this was the National Jewish Democratic Council, not the still-fringe in all but funding, J-Street): "Obama chose politics rather than the national interest". They also have John McCain's statement, here: Statement By John McCain On The "Stop Iran" Rally
Update: Soccer Dad has a good round up here: Diss-inviting palin
Israel Matzav has some emails indicating it wasn't Malcolm Hoenlein's idea to cancel Palin: McCain campaign statement on disinviting of Sarah Palin from anti-Ahmadinejad rally; UPDATE: It wasn't the Conference's idea
Contentions notes that Joe Biden was issued an invitation when Hillary canceled, but had a prior engagement (fair enough on that): Biden's Refusal to Appear At Iran Protest Caused the Disinvitation of Palin
Also: Hot Air: Wonderful: Under pressure from the left, organizers disinvite Palin from anti-Iran rally
JTA has more on that supposed "push poll" from the Republican Jewish Coalition (previous: Pat Buchanan: 'My position on Israel is...a lot closer to Barack Obama's than it is John McCain.'): Experts say RJC survey was no 'push poll,'
but Dems say it was misleading
Democratic and GOP pollsters say that in at least one respect the Republican Jewish Coalition has received a bum wrap: Despite initial suggestions to the contrary, the RJC's recent survey testing negative messages about Barack Obama was not a "push poll."...
...Democrats now concede that the RJC did not conduct a push poll, though they continue to insist that the messages the organization was testing were filled with distortions and untruths. They have called on Brooks to release the full list of questions...
...Democratic pollster Mark Mellman, who was John Kerry's pollster during the 2004 presidential campaign, said the lengthy list of questions appears to indicate that the survey was designed to test messages and "did not meet the definition of a push poll," which usually lasts for a much shorter time than a regular survey, since the point is to spread the negative message to as many people as possible.
While clearing the RJC of the push poll claim, Mellman said it appears the organization was testing messages that wouldn't stand up to scrutiny -- and that he wouldn't test as a pollster...
Not only was the poll not a push-poll, but the messages it was, in part, testing were accurate, as Omri has examined here: Democrats Outraged Over Anti-Obama Jewish-Issues Poll Questions That Are... Umm... Demonstrably True
* Obama's political advisors are "pro-Palestinian" - true. They also have a habit of popping up in places like Syria, where they do things like promise Assad that the US will work to push Israel into a land-for-peace swap.
* Obama once said "the Palestinians have suffered the most" - the quote was actually "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people", but true.
* The president of Iran also "endorsed Obama" - true.
* Obama "supported a united Jerusalem and then switched his opinion and believed in a divided Jerusalem" - true. Which makes sense when you consider that his foreign policy advisers think Israel needs to put Jerusalem on the table.
* Jimmy Carter's "anti-Israel national security adviser is one of Barack Obama's foreign policy advisers" - true.
Read the rest. He has stuff the RJC left out.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
After seven years, full resolution remains open on the question of how to deal with al Qa'eda terrorists: ordinary criminals, prisoners of war, or something else? The Bush administration's improvised approach, based on the unprecedented situation, was one of administrative detention, modified by court rulings and Congress' 2005 action on military tribunals.
Many of the Bush administration critics can't be taken seriously. They seem to think government's job is hairsplitting rather than protecting the public at large. Government is elected to do nothing else.
The situation actually is unprecedented, at least for the US. Terrorist groups are not state armies and thus not protected by the Geneva Convention. OTOH, they act as enemies of American society and not just criminals. They're private armies in all but name. No existing body of law comprehensively reflects this fact.
The central problem with the Bush policy is not that it is a "torture policy," but rather, no policy at all. Improvised from the start by wide-ranging executive discretion, the Bush non-policy was shaped by Cheney's obsession with executive privilege and secrecy and threatens to vanish when he leaves office. Only a new legal structure, qualified and honed by court precedent, can last.
This is one of the basic points of Jack Goldsmith's The Terror Presidency. His title reflects the new reality that every president from now on will have to respond to. Goldsmith served as legal counsel to the Bush administration and found much of its improvisation in this department seriously flawed. His points of comparison are the reactions of FDR and Lincoln in roughly analogous situations. But he also convincingly shows the dereliction of Congress, which increasingly seems silly and irrelevant. Its lack of involvement is the big black hole of this issue. Today it spends most of its energy on attacking Bush when convenient and otherwise ducking its responsibilities.
Goldsmith's points are underscored and given deeper resonance by Benjamin Wittes' recent fine book, Law and the Long War. Even more than in Goldsmith's book, Congress is the main target of Wittes' contempt.
The larger situation is worth a long look. Dealing with private armies is, for us, a new kind of war. Much of the problem that people feel about this conflict stems ultimately from the nature of the Middle Eastern and Muslim governments who make up some of our most crucial allies. All of them are dysfunctional and corrupt, frequently oppressive and mostly autocratic. Most of them routinely use torture and treat accused terrorists outside of any regular legal process.
Such facts make policies like "rendition" all but inevitable. It is certainly in no way a new policy. The first rendition occurred under the Reagan administration, and the Clinton years saw over a hundred. There's no way to cooperate with these regimes and get their cooperation for our purposes without it. To ask for something else would mean having to reconsider our whole alliance and cooperation with these regimes from scratch. Talk otherwise is fantasy.
We have democratic allies with experience in this area. We can start by studying them: Britain, France, Israel. The French system is all-civilian but tough (much tougher than the American in many ways), but requires the highly centralized and unitary state of France. The British and Israeli experience is more relevant to our own, because of their mixed and divided systems of government. They feature military capture and interrogation on the "front end" and civilian review and closure on the "back end." That is what the American system is stumbling towards. But it needs real Congressional supervision, not hot air and grandstanding.
DISTURBING POSTSCRIPT: Have you noticed a repeated theme here and elsewhere? It's the irrelevance of Congress. Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Todd Zywicki has a thoughtful and disturbing post on this topic. Are we turning into a bureaucratic dictatorship, where we get to vote on the dictator every four years?
Of course, the fact that the present Congress is the most non-productive in modern history is perhaps a blessing. No one's aching to see them turn their attention to anything serious, as they'll just further screw it up.
POST-POSTSCRIPT: Speaking of torture, McCain's former captors in Vietnam admire him and want him as US president -- seriously! Of course, it's been a while since that nasty and strange war ended. In the meantime, the US has normalized relations with Vietnam (thanks, in part, to McCain and other Vietnam vets) and has spent over a decade expanding military cooperation, in an effort to offset China's rising power. Why, the US Navy is even back in Cam Ranh Bay :)
In politics, it really is better to be respected than loved.
What an amazing cock-up from the organizers (Previous: Hillary Cancels Appearance at Anti-Iran Rally - Palin-hate Reaches New Heights). What a disgusting display by Hillary Clinton and her Democratic Party masters: Ben Smith at Politico: Palin disinvited from Iran rally
The organizers of an anti-Iran rally Monday rescinded their invitation to Alaska Governor Sarah Palin after Democrats protested that her presence would turn the event into a political rally, McCain campaign and Jewish community sources said...
The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations created a political tempest by inviting Palin to speak without clearing her invitation with another speaker, Senator Hillary Clinton. Clinton promptly dropped out of the event, saying it would be seen as unduly political. The McCain campaign then pressed Senator Barack Obama to join Palin on the stage in a show of unity against Iran.
The Obama campaign in turn offered to send Congressman Robert Wexler of Florida to the event, but the appearance that the non-partisan group was aligning with the Republican ticket put the group and its president, Malcolm Hoenlein, under heavy pressure from Jewish Democrats, including members of the conference, members of Congress, and the liberal group J Street, not to give Palin a platform, sources said. Hoenlein told the McCain campaign that he would have to rescind Palin's invitation or cancel the rally.
The organizers, I'm told, have formally disinvited all elected and political officials, but the move was about Palin.
Glad to see J Street has their priorities in order. Check out the link, in which J Street goes balls to the wall in politicizing the event and trying to get Palin dropped. Despicable. There have been any number of these events over the years at which politicians of all stripes have appeared side by side. The idea is to get whatever prominent names you can to show up. I've never seen one politicized as badly as this one, and it wasn't McCain/Palin that did it. The press release now shows only Elie Wiesel and Dalia Itzik as confirmed speakers.
I guess accounting professors have to invent their own fantasies once in a while in order to keep life interesting:
Following is an excerpt from an interview with Paul Sheldon Foote, professor of accounting at California State University, Fullerton, which aired on Press TV on September 11, 2008.
Interviewer: Do remarks by Israeli minister Rafi Eitan - indicating the use of force and resorting to violence against the officials of a sovereign country, a member of the United Nations - constitute a violation of international law?
Paul Sheldon Foote: This is the story of his life in all respects. It is very appropriate that we are talking about this on the anniversary of 9/11, because a year after September 11, 2001, this man was traveling around the United States for a year, using a false name on an Israeli passport, meeting with known drug dealers. The FBI monitored him very carefully, on the assumption that he might be plotting another 9/11-type attack on America that he could blame on the Islamic world. So it is beyond illegal... This guy makes the Mafia look like choir boys.
Sounds like he's been reading too many cheap detective novels ("This guy makes the Mafia look like choir boys." cliche!). Foote was a signatory to the Academics for Ron Paul statement.
As an antidote to the Steve Almonds out there, I thought I'd post up this piece sent in by reader and occasional guest-poster, Tom Glennon:
As the proud father of a member of the US Air Force, I am getting a bit tired of people like Steve Almond, a clone of Joel Stein. I wonder how many service men or women he actually knows. I wrote the following to introduce people to two of the heroes that I know...
To see him in a normal social setting, the casual observer would note only the college student, dressed in a plaid flannel shirt and blue jeans. Of average height, you might notice that he had an above average muscular build, but nothing to make him stand out in a crowd. The very slight limp, as he crossed the room, would be hard for most people to detect.
The other young man is certainly notable for his height. Standing almost 6'5", with the build of an athlete, he does stand out. But his youthful face and business casual attire would peg him as a young man just entering the business world.
These two young men, both well known to me, have several things in common. Both are Eagle Scouts from my very small central Iowa BSA district. Both are the same age as my youngest son, and served with him as summer camp counselors at our local Scout reservation. One is currently a college student, while the other graduated with my son from Iowa State. They have one more thing in common. Both are decorated combat veterans, and survivors of wounds received in Iraq.
The college student is Sgt Mike F. Mike joined the Army after attending our local Junior College. He was sent to Iraq with a Bradley Fighting Vehicle Unit. His leadership earned him an early trip back to the US, not to be excused from serving in combat, but to train with the first Stryker Brigade before they were deployed to Iraq. While in Iraq for the second time, he led a squad into a building to clear it of terrorists. Entering one room, he was bayoneted from behind by a terrorist hiding in a closet. After disposing of his attacker, Sgt. Mike returned to his Stryker, and put his Scout experience to work. He grabbed a roll of duck tape, wound it around his bleeding leg, and rejoined his squad. He was not seen by any medical personnel until his entire unit safely returned to their forward operating base. He was stitched up and kept overnight for observation, returning to his unit the next day. He completed his entire 15 month tour without any further interruption. He told me the limp can be fixed with some tendon repair, but that can wait until he finishes his graduate degree.
The tall young man joined the Army ROTC while in college. After graduation, he went through his initial training, and was accepted into Army Ranger training. Second Lieutenant Robert S. was sent to Iraq with his Rangers, and saw his first combat two days after arrival. In the first month, he learned about one disadvantage to his height. He was struck in the head by a snipers bullet. It pierced his helmet, and he describes how "it kind of rattled around doing some minor damage to my forehead, ear and hairline." Several months later, while on patrol, he was hit by a rocket propelled grenade. The warhead missed hitting a bone, and so did not detonate. However, the fin left a deep gash in his thigh. He finished his patrol before seeking medical care and multiple stitches. Asked how he completed his mission with the pain from his leg, Lt. Rob said he didn't really notice the pain. He was too busy looking for the second RPG that usually followed an initial attack. While Rob survived both wounds, neither the sniper nor the RPG shooter did. He has a month off, before returning to duty. He was offered a position with Army intelligence, but instead applied for Special Forces training. He is excited that he was accepted for this assignment, as he wants to remain with the guys who have boots on the ground.
So, two young Iowa sons, exceptional not in appearance, nor notable for athletic competition, or business success. Average in most respects, they would not be noticeable while in a mall, at church, or having a cold tall one with friends. They are among the thousands of quiet heroes that walk among us every day. Yet most of us do not know them, nor do we thank them. Two young men who do the things that most of us can't do, or won't do. Yet, everything we are able to do so freely are the result of the quiet courage of men and women like them.
I look at these young men, and the twenty-two other former Scouts and adult leaders (my Air Force son among them) serving in the military from my small District here in flyover country, and I am in awe of the character they show every day. We are indeed blessed that we have heroes that walk among us. Unknown, unrecognized, but there when we need them the most.
Here's an informative and concise piece on Sarah Palin's denomination in Christianity Today. I was immediately struck by the quote from Andrew Sullivan that kicks off the article:
"She is a longtime member of the Assemblies of God. That's all you need to know."
That's how political blogger Andrew Sullivan recently summarized Governor Sarah Palin's faith background...
I've been hearing how unhinged Sullivan had become, but I haven't read him in an age, and I'm sure the blogosphere has long caught that quip by Sullivan and had its way with it, but forgive me as I had not heard it before. Imagine! "She's a Muslim. That's all you need to know," or, "She's a Jew. That's all you need to know." The rawest of bigotry against Christians is OK I guess.
In any case, the Christianity Today article is worth a few minutes, and also includes a long and occasionally interesting comment thread.
This seems related (regarding an extraordinarily cynical use of religious symbolism by the Democrats): Pontius Palin and Messiah Obama
By publishing op-eds like Steve Almond's: Supporting our troops
PERHAPS the most insidious byproduct of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has been a reflexive sanctification of the military. To put this in bumper stickerese: Support the Troops.
Well, I have an ugly confession to make: I don't support the troops - at least not unconditionally. When somebody tells me they serve in the military, my first impulse isn't to say, "Thank you for your service!" like those insufferable chickenhawks on talk radio.
My first impulse is to say, "I'm sorry to hear that." Because I am. I'm sorry to know that the person I'm talking to might someday be maimed or killed on the job, or might someday kill someone else. Or refuel a plane that drops bombs on buildings...
A fringe point of view? I say more mainstream on the left that some people want to admit.
Let's see...
Loathing of the American military, check...
A Michelle Obama-like attitude about the United States, check...
A preening, over-bearing ego, check...
And an utter cluelessness about economic and political realities, check and check...
...UPDATE! I had forgotten that Steve Almond is the nitwit who resigned from his part-time job at Boston College because they dared to invite Condi Rice as a commencement speaker. Apparently he was lobbying for William Ayers instead...
FROM A LISTENER:
I had to laugh this morning about the Globe article and his "feelings" about the military. It reminded me of a conversation with my 10 year old who "feels" that it is wrong to kill animals but still wanted a hamburger for dinner.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
...and of course, they blame her.
What are the media thugs going to do next, mug her and blame her for walking down the wrong alley? Where are the police when we need them?
Just another reason why this newsreport from the Onion is so true.
Edit (Solomon): Worth noting: The Secret Service asked AP for a copy of the "widely-circulated" emails and they refused to cooperate. Wow, how brave of them to stand up to 'the man' like that. Was this an anonymous source of theirs they're trying to protect? No, they just don't want to cooperate in a trivial manner with a criminal investigation that has nothing to do with them.
Lisa Goldman is far too cozy with Jeff Halper for my taste, but her knowledge of the crossings to Gaza is clearly deep, and her ability to sift for transparent nonsense is formidable...and transferable to us. An excellent expose of the casual lies of Lauren Booth is posted at PJM today: Tony Blair's Sister-in-Law's Gaza Media Circus.
It's clear that people like Booth tell fairy stories on a regular basis, and are used to having them reported without critical examination.
Jane Novak reports in the Long War Journal
Yemeni security forces repelled a complex attack on the US embassy in the capital of Sana'a. More than sixteen were killed after terrorists detonated multiple bombs then launched a ground attack in an attempt to breach the compound.The attack begun after several bombs were detonated just outside the embassy. The terrorists then ambushed the first responders by using pre-positioned snipers. The terrorists were wearing uniforms of Yemeni security forces and driving what appeared to be police cars, which enabled them to get close to the heavily fortified compound.
I've been seeing a lot of interesting articles lately about the mind-body equation. Here are a few:
Referred pain opens a research window for neuroscientists: Nerves Tangle, and Back Pain Becomes a Toothache (link thanks to Noam)
There is no mind-body dualism. "All mental processes, even the most complex psychological processes, derive from operations of the brain."
Where memory lives: The hippocampus.
Brainy Taxi drivers: Memorizing and applying extensive navigation experience can increase the size of the (adult) hippocampus
So says a new series of ads from the Republican Jewish Coalition:
...The new ad highlights an endorsement of Senator Barack Obama's Israel and Middle East views by commentator Pat Buchanan. Buchanan said on MSNBC:
Let me say about Israel here. My position on Israel is frankly awful. It is like Mika [Brzezinski]'s father's, it's a lot closer to Barack Obama's than it is John McCain. I think Barack is right, we ought to talk to the Iranians, he's right to oppose the war and, frankly, he's right to say the Palestinian people have got a terrible deal over there and their suffering ought to be recognized. That's Obama's position. It's my position. I don't think it is a Nazi position. (http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Buchanan_hugs_Obama.html, 9/2/08)
"By no means does the RJC infer from this quote that Barack Obama supports the views of Patrick Buchanan. Rather, we are highlighting the fact that Buchanan believes that his views are in line with Obama's on the critical issues of Israel and Iran," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "Because Pat Buchanan shares Obama's views on Iran and Israel, how comfortable can the Jewish community be with those positions?" Brooks added.
This is quite a boomerang in the side of the head for Congressman Robert Wexler who was out earlier accusing Sarah Palin of supporting the "Nazi sympathizer" Buchanan. Wexler is also quote in this article at Politico, GOP group behind negative Obama poll:
..."The fact that the Republican Jewish Coalition is targeting Jewish Americans with these disgraceful and deceitful tactics fits in perfectly with the dishonorable campaign that John McCain has chosen to run. Peddling lies and hateful distortions to scare Jewish voters is reprehensible and deeply disrespectful to Jewish Americans," said Florida Congressman Robert Wexler, an Obama supporter...
Wexler is this season's appointed Jewish attack dog and smear merchant. The trouble with his statement is that, as far as I can tell from Ben Smith's Politico article -- and Smith does his level best to let Obama off the hook and turns things around on the RJC -- there are no lies in the poll...push or not. Obama's shifts (and I'm happy for them, though I think they are superficial at best) have come though the necessities of national politics, and even that hasn't saved him from making a series of errors through his choice of advisers.
Wow. Hillary Clinton canceled her scheduled appearance at an anti-Iranian nuke rally to be held this Monday at the UN when she learned Sarah Palin would also be appearing. In fact, the press release is still titled "Media Advisory: Vice Presidential Nominee Sarah Palin and Senator Hillary Clinton to Speak Monday at NYC Rally to Stop Iran Now". The NY Sun reports: Clinton Cancels Iran Protest Appearance After Palin Invite
Senator Clinton has canceled an appearance at a New York rally next week after organizers blindsided her by inviting the Republican vice presidential candidate, Governor Palin, aides to the senator said yesterday.
Several American Jewish groups plan a major rally outside the United Nations on September 22 to protest against President Ahmadinejad of Iran.
Organizers said yesterday that both Mrs. Clinton, who nearly won the Democratic nomination for president, and Palin, Republican candidate John McCain's running mate, are expected to attend...
...Clinton aides were furious. They first learned of the plan to have both Ms. Clinton and Mrs. Palin appear when informed by reporters.
"Her attendance was news to us, and this was never billed to us as a partisan political event," a Clinton spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. "Senator Clinton will therefore not be attending."...
Don't you usually call that a "bi-partisan" event? I guess now we know how deep Hillary's concern for Iranian nukes really is -- skin deep. As soon as she learned that Sarah Palin would be there, she was out the door. Thanks for nothing. I get the feeling she reacted worse to this news than she would have had she heard that Monica would be there making a speech. Nothing, absolutely nothing, trumps cynical selfish partisan politics on Planet Clinton. Not even Iranian nukes.
Robert Spencer has picked up the story of the Islamic Society of Boston's plans to broadcast the call to prayer outside the mosque despite their previous assurances that they had no plans to do so: Controversial Boston mosque run by Muslim Brotherhood opens, will broadcast call to prayer over loudspeaker
Sure, the controversy has faded -- except the Muslim American Society is running this mosque. According to a 2004 Chicago Tribune exposé, the Muslim American Society is the name under which the Muslim Brotherhood operates in the United States. Nor does it mention that according to a 1991 Brotherhood memorandum about its strategy in the U.S., it is embarked upon a "grand Jihad" aimed at "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."...
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
Now in Jordan...
p. 370:
Jordan had no streetcars, horse-drawn or otherwise, less than three hundred miles of railroads, and only 360 miles of roads. And it was probably the only Arab State that had not a single Jew. Jews, by an unwritten law, were forbidden to take up residence. This explained in part Jordan's commercial and cultural lethargy. The King proved kind to the Armenians, many of whom settled in Jordan after fleeing from Palestine. Displaying energy and resourcefulness, they had already achieved some prominence in many fields of endeavor, adding materially to Jordan's progress.
pp. 375-376:
The next day I met a group of English deserters who were living in the Royal Air Force barracks on Amman's outskirts. I knew most of them from Jerusalem, and took their pictures. One of the boys -- I prefer to identify him only as Sidney -- gave me a message to take to his parents in Birmingham if I should ever get back to England:
Dear Mum & All:I am still alive & having a wonderful time fighting the Jews in Palestine. I am joining the Arab Legion. As soon as it is possible I will send you my address. Your loving son always,
Sidney
The Harvard Crimson reports that Harvard's J. Lorand Matory will be leaving the university to take up a position at Duke: Matory To Join Duke Faculty
Anthropology professor J. Lorand Matory '82, a leading scholar on the African diaspora who is known for his strong criticisms of Israel and his opposition to former University President Lawrence H. Summers, will leave Harvard next fall to chair Duke's African and African-American studies department.
Matory said that Harvard did not respond to Duke's offer with a comparable position or salary...
You may recall Matory for his confrontation with our own Hillel Stavis, reported on back here: Confrontation at Harvard: Defa-Matory and Out to Lunch. Audio of the confrontation is included in the post.
Alan Dershowitz, quoted in the Crimson piece, is one faculty member willing to go on the record as not sad to see Matory go:
At least one professor welcomed the news of Matory's departure. The anthropologist's longtime antagonist, law professor Alan M. Dershowitz, a fierce defender of Israel, said that he was "thrilled" that Matory was leaving.
"I think it's the best thing that's happened to Harvard in a long time," he said in a phone interview yesterday. "Privately, there's a real sense of exhilaration and relief that this man is no longer a blot on our community."...
Buh. Bye.
Someone has put a whole lot of cash into distributing the movie Obsession as an insert into millions of newspapers across the country. I find this to be a risky endeavor, as the film is important, but pretty heavy-handed, so you never know what the reaction will be. Good for the already converted, unpredictable for the uninitiated. CAIR, of course, is flipping out (They're on to us!). Robert Spencer has a series of posts discussing many of the of clueless reactions:
Reaction to Obsession DVD distribution shows many Americans clueless about jihad
Pennsylvania woman deeply offended to learn that there's a jihad against the U.S.A.
"All in all, the propaganda campaign is a shameful episode for the Fourth Estate"
Columnist: Obsession distribution all part of the vast right-wing conspiracy
Jihad violence offends Muslims -- no, wait, scratch that -- Obsession DVD offends Muslims
Following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian-American writer Nonie Darwish, which aired on Al-Hayat TV on August 7, 2008.
Nonie Darwish: Jihad was the most important thing. Every day, at school in Gaza, we would sing songs or recite poems about killing ourselves, about waging Jihad, and dying as martyrs. I would recite these poems daily. We were always taught to love Jihad, to love the resistance, and to desire death...
Darwish: I grew up in the days of Gamal Abd Al-Nasser. All the radio stations would constantly play songs about Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the love of fighting. All Egypt's wealth was wasted on preparations for war. In many places in the Koran and the Hadith, the Muslims are instructed to fight, not just in wars. They are instructed to kill anyone who is not a Muslim. In other words, it is the Muslim's duty to kill the Jews. Even if...
Interviewer: Even if they are non-combatants?
Darwish: Yes, such things indeed happened. In the seventh century, there was no Israel or Palestine, or anything. How come we don't have any compassion or love for non-Muslims? This is what led me to feel that we... I used to think that this was a good thing. I used to think that the love of fighting and martyrdom was a good thing...
Darwish's father was a Gaza Palestinian terrorist killed by the Israelis. Now she's an indefatigable exponent of Western values.
As long as it's the Saudis doing it: Time: Out of Its Mind
In Time, Bobby Ghosh, the magazine's world editor, has written perhaps the single most morally vacuous piece about the War on Terror since the attacks of September 11. Ghosh took a trip to Saudi Arabia and while there he decided not to dwell on 9/11 because "It seemed unfair to burden Riyadh with the legacy of its most notorious son -- especially since the city wants so badly to expurgate him from its self-image."...
From the Time piece:
...How did the Saudis do it? They used a combination of brute force and subtle persuasion. Few details are available on the crackdown on terrorist groups because the authorities here don't much like talking about it. So it's a fair guess that many of the means they used wouldn't pass any Western human-rights test. Riyadhis speak in whispers about midnight raids, arrests, torture and summary executions. The government also put the squeeze on al-Qaeda's sources of funding by imposing rules on previously unmonitored religious charities. In private, officials boast that bin Laden's organization receives no money from his homeland...
Well, at least it's not the evil Bush Administration doing it. That would be bad.
Monday, September 15, 2008
The Islamic Society of Boston has revealed that they intend to broadcast an amplified call to prayer throughout the neighborhood now that the Boston mosque is complete...but that's contrary to what two previous spokespeople assured the public when the mosque was still under construction.
The Boston Globe has done a pleasant puff-piece on the Islamic Society of Boston/Muslim American Society Boston Mosque: Making peace, and prayers. Sub-head: 'Mosque opens its doors as controversy fades'. Controversy fades? Only in the pages of the Boston Globe. Quoted in the piece are representatives of the Muslim American Society (MAS) and Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), without mentioning both groups' ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, the many controversies that stir around both groups, the mosques' ties to Saudi extremists and funding, the fractures within the local Muslim Community itself, and the many other still-living issues surrounding the mosque project and its leadership. As Michael Graham writes today:
...Speaking of taxpayer screwjobs, the Boston Globe-Democrat has a story today about the opening of Menino's Mosque. Interestingly, this long and detailed article leaves out the two key facts about the Islamic Society of Boston's project:
The taxpayers of Boston subsidized the building of this mosque by "donating" a $2 million parcel of land to the ISB for less than $200,000- -- a deal arranged when a member of the Boston Redevelopment Board also just happened to be a fundraiser for the ISB.
The ISB is notorious for its support of terror advocates like Mullah Al-Qawadari, who was the first prominent mullah to urge women to become suicide bombers, too. The ISB has actually distributed the teachings of this sicko. And now, thanks to Mayor Menino, they've got a publicly-funded mosque to continue their work.
A revealing comment appears in religion reporter Michael Paulson's related blog entry: A view from the minaret. Paulson makes a stab at climbing the minaret. He writes:
I made it high enough to report that there's a nice view to be had of the crescent-topped mosque dome silhouetted against the distant skyline, but not high enough to tell you what it would be like if you were the muezzin who had to go up there five times a day to chant the call to prayer. Of course, the muezzin can't tell you either -- he's no fool -- they're going to broadcast the prayer summons (which will only happen during the day out of respect for the neighbors) by loudspeaker.
Well isn't that interesting? If you'd like to hear what neighborhood folks are going to put up with multiple times a day, let me remind you what it sounded like the day of the minaret capping:
Of course, this is the 21st century, there is no need for an amplified call to prayer. People have watches, cell phones and pagers now. This is proselytizing. To show you how things creep, let me remind you of a comment left by Miss Kelly on that post about the capping:
...I saw Salma Kazmi, former ISB spokesman, interviewed on Emily Rooney's show a few years ago, and she was asked about if the ISB was going to broadcast the call to prayer. She said "We have no plans to do that, at this time." Wiggle words!...
Wiggle words indeed.
Ron Newman, in the same thread, states (emphasis mine):
At yesterday's Workmen's Circle event, I asked Jessica Maase about the timing and volume of calls to prayer from the minaret.
She said that there would be no public calls to prayer audible outside the mosque at all, and that they had to get a special 'entertainment permit' from the city for the topping-off ceremony.
Another commenter followed up:
When Jessica Maase [Masse] states that "no public calls to prayer audible outside the mosque at all" she is being disingenuous at best. This tactic of starting prayers at a low volume than slowly raising the volume until the sound of the Muslim prayers are even able to penetrate solid concrete has been used around the world since the late 1970's...
So despite the fact that two previous spokespeople assured the public that there would be no calls broadcast outside the mosque, now that the structure is built plans have changed -- now that we'll have a battle of freedom of religion versus simple noise ordinances (Looks like a similar situation to that faced in Hamtramck, Michigan, where the City Council waved the noise ordinances in deference to the mosque there). This is how it happens...one step at a time.
Update 9-17-08: Robert Spencer comments on the story: Controversial Boston mosque run by Muslim Brotherhood opens, will broadcast call to prayer over loudspeaker
Update: 9-19-08: Miss Kelly has lots of important background and analysis on this here: ISB Mosque Controversy Fades - for the Boston Globe Maybe
Mordechai Kedar, the guy who schooled an Al Jazeera reporter on his own religion's history and has written on the subject before, writes again on the fact that Jerusalem's importance to the 'Ummah' is a pure political fabrication: The myth of al-Aqsa
Holiness of Jerusalem to Islam has always been politically motivated
When the Prophet Mohammad established Islam, he introduced a minimum of innovations. He employed the hallowed personages, historic legends and sacred sites of Judaism and Christianity, and even paganism, by Islamizing them. Thus, according to Islam, Abraham was the first Muslim and Jesus and St. John (the sons of Miriam, sister of Moses and Aron) were prophets and guardians of the second heaven. Many Biblical legends ("asatir al-awwalin",) which were familiar to the pagan Arabs before the dawn of Islam, underwent an Islamic conversion, and the Koran as well as the Hadith (the Islamic oral tradition), are replete with them.
Islamization was practiced on places as well as persons: Mecca and the holy stone - al-Ka'bah - were holy sites of the pre-Islamic pagan Arabs. The Umayyad Mosque in Damascus and the Great Mosque of Istanbul were erected on the sites of Christian-Byzantine churches - two of the better known examples of how Islam treats sanctuaries of other faiths.
Jerusalem, too, underwent the process of Islamization: at first Muhammad attempted to convince the Jews near Medina to join his young community, and, by way of persuasion, established the direction of prayer (kiblah) to be to the north, towards Jerusalem, in keeping with Jewish practice; but after he failed in this attempt he turned against the Jews, killed many of them, and directed the kiblah southward, towards Mecca.
Muhammad's abandonment of Jerusalem explains the fact that this city is not mentioned even once in the Koran. After Palestine was occupied by the Muslims, its capital was Ramlah, 30 miles to the west of Jerusalem, signifying that Jerusalem meant nothing to them.
Rediscovering Jerusalem
Islam rediscovered Jerusalem 50 years after Mohammad's death....
Mike Nesmith: "You are the dummy, dummy!"Peter Tork: "I'm the dummy, Micky. I'm always the dummy!"
-Head
Actually, the real dummies are those anti-American Europeans, as anyone not blinded by that horrid "Oh please don't hate me because I'm an American" self-hate so many people seem to suffer from. A nice run-down at PJM: Anti-Americanism in Europe Fueled by Ignorance
More than 50 percent of Britons believe that polygamy is legal in the United States; in fact, it is illegal in all 50 states. Almost one-third of Britons believe that Americans who have not paid their hospital fees or insurance premiums are not entitled to emergency medical care; in fact, such treatment must be provided by law.
Seventy percent of Britons think the United States has done a worse job than the European Union in reducing carbon emissions since 2000; in fact, America's rate of growth of carbon emissions has decreased by almost ten percent since 2000, while that of the EU has increased by 2.3 percent.
Eighty percent of Britons believe that "from 1973 to 1990, the United States sold Saddam Hussein more than a quarter of his weapons." In fact, the United States sold just 0.46 percent of Saddam's arsenal to him; Russia, France, and China supplied 57 percent, 13 percent, and 12 percent, respectively.
The majority of Britons believe that since the Second World War, the United States has more often sided with non-Muslims than with Muslims. In fact, in 11 out of 12 major conflicts between Muslims and non-Muslims, Muslims and secular forces, or Arabs and non-Arabs, the United States has sided with Muslims and/or Arabs...
My experience has certainly been in line with the article's sub-head: "Those who know the least about America seem to hate it the most." They tend to like to trumpet their supposed superiority in geography -- as though being able to locate Minnesota on a map grants one some special insight into American political thought. Most of the anti-Americanism I've encountered has been born of a certain childish ignorance combined with a foot-stomping petulance that tries to manipulate through insults, all fed by an establishment leftist European press.
JTA: Iraq punishes lawmaker who visited Israel
Iraq's parliament has punished a Sunni lawmaker who visited Israel.
The parliamentary immunity of Mithal al-Alousi was lifted, making him subject to prosecution. He also has been banned from traveling outside of Iraq and from attending parliamentary sessions.
Speaking Sept. 10 at a conference on terror in Herzliya, Alousi called for stronger cooperation between Iraq and Israel in fighting terror.
The Iraqi legislator visited Israel in 2004 to participate in a counterterrorism conference, after which his two grown sons were murdered by extremists in an apparent payback.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Oh yes! Quaking! Israel Is Terrified Americans Will Write-In Ron Paul
The movement to write-in Ron Paul instead of electing the two israeli/mormon candidates is picking up speed, and this is just something that is happening of its own accord, as the israeli media tries to push the unbelievable and despicable on Americans once again. People are waking up to the bush/israeli treason and, in fact, Americans are getting their noses shoved in it, even the idiot fundamentalists who put bush in and are now trying to deny they had anything to do with it.
Every time those lying fools go to the gas station they must now face their folly, and their own treason, whether they like it or not. These holier than thou twits put lords and kings above Americas well being and now we have a depression as well as a police state and ultra surveillance everywhere...
...As israels next dramatic charade nears (The elections) expect much more spying by the mormon church and their israeli counterparts here (Mossad/CIA/KGB/FBI/DHS/SUK/ASS). Also, watch israel do their best to start more wars and create false flag terrorism. Many sites are being harassed, passwords stolen, and worse. To understand the true measure of israels mind control police state here and now, read the book DEVILVISION...
Devilvision apparently has something to do with using the TV to beam out subliminal messages. The posting actually makes Indy Media commenters seem sane.
This one earned a smile:
What I don't understand is, if you write in Congressman Ron Paul (God bless him), won't the ballot be spoiled? It would be just like drawing in a happy face. Ron Paul (God bless him) is telling American voters to support their local independants...
What's that (God bless him) thing? Is that like PBUH?
[h/t: Adam Holland]
Sitemeter, the stat-tracking service loads of bloggers use, did a major "upgrade" today. To put it bluntly, it sucks. I was wondering if there were just something I was missing because I couldn't see my day's unique visitor count and recent referrers -- the two things every blogger watches like a mental patient -- when I saw the new page. Oh no, it wasn't just me. Way to mess it up, guys. The number of people screaming "what are the alternatives" (I was going to give it another day or two, but most bloggers are the instant gratification (and instant whine)-type) has prompted a roll-back of the service. Smooth move ex-lax. I mean ...uh... poor Sitemeter guys.
In other news, you might have noted a slightly different look around here. Hope it doesn't grate on the eyes, I just can't leave well enough alone I guess. I've actually got a couple other backgrounds based on this one I will rotate in. I've been slowly tuning up the site to be able to easily swap in and out different style sheets and graphics, though at this point I have no plans for a javascript-based system where the user can select their own look as I had in the distant past. I don't think anyone really bothered with it. I think I'll just rotate the looks every few days.
You, the reader, are encouraged to voice your preferences.
First Mickey Mouse, now Paul McCartney? Paul's in trouble: Muslim leader threatens to kill Paul McCartney over Israel gig
An Islamic militant leader warned that former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney could be the target of suicide bombers unless he cancels his first concert in Israel, reported the British Sunday Express.
The celebrated rock star plans to arrive in Israel as part of a world tour, and give a single concert at Tel Aviv's Park Hayarkon on September 25.
Omar Bakri, an Islamic preacher, said McCartney's decision to perform as part of Israel's 60th anniversary celebrations made him the enemy of Muslims worldwide.
"If he values his life, Mr. McCartney must not come to Israel," Bakri was quoted as saying. "He will not be safe there. The sacrifice operatives will be waiting for him."
Bakri added, "Instead of supporting the people of Palestine in their suffering, McCartney is celebrating the atrocities of the occupiers," Bakri was quoted as saying...
Do people like Bakri ever do anything other than support the suffering of the "Palestinians."? It seems the only thing they know how to do.
And kudos to Paul, he's hanging tough (and I've seen the messages urging people to contact him on the hate lists):
McCartney was also been pressured by pro-Palestinian groups to cancel the show, but has resisted.
"I was approached by different groups and political bodies who asked me not to come here. I refused. I do what I think, and I have many friends who support Israel," McCartney said in an interview with Yedioth Ahronoth...
You try to bring joy to all children, and all they do is toss you out with the rest of the impure garbage...
MEMRITV: Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-Munajid: Mickey Mouse Must Die!
Following is an excerpt from a religious program featuring Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-Munajid, which aired on Al-Majd TV on August 27, 2008:
...To view MEMRI TV's Page on Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-Munajid visit here.
Muhammad Al-Munajid: What is the position of Islamic law with regard to mice? The Shari'a refers to the mouse as "little corrupter," and says it is permissible to kill it in all cases. It says that mice set fire to the house, and are steered by Satan. The mouse is one of Satan's soldiers and is steered by him. If a mouse falls into a pot of food - if the food is solid, you should chuck out the mouse and the food touching it, and if it is liquid - you should chuck out the whole thing. Because the mouse is i-m-p-u-r-e!
According to Islamic law, the mouse is a repulsive, corrupting creature. How do you think children view mice today - after Tom and Jerry? Even creatures that are repulsive by nature, by logic, and according to Islamic law have become wonderful and are loved by children. Even mice. Mickey Mouse has become an awesome character, even though according to Islamic law, Mickey Mouse should be killed in all cases.
Well there you have it.
At first I thought Gerard must be doing his own Photoshop, mocking The Atlantic's anti-McCain bias.
But he isn't. John McCain sat for a photo-shoot at the studio of Beverly Hills photographer Jill Greenberg for The Atlantic Monthly. Photographer Greenberg apparently had some fun with the out-takes, and not only did she waste McCain's time with intentionally ill-lit extra shots, but she posted the manipulated shots on her professional web site and then bragged about what she had done online! Classless? Tasteless? Unprofessional?
Questions: What will her client The Atlantic have to say about it? Was she so sure that the client shared her views that she didn't need to worry and could throw judgment to the wind, or that she's so surrounded by hate for Republicans that she didn't imagine there would be consequences (after all, "everyone I know hates John McCain")...or even have second thoughts about what she was doing?
Read Gerard's excellent post for the full explanation and more visuals: Out-Takes: The Atlantic Monthly Finances Vile Anti-McCain Propaganda
Update: Via the comments at American Digest, this is the same woman who abuses kids so she can get photos of them crying. Yeah, I would say a sense of propriety is likely beyond her.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Is there any way to keep up with the jaw-dropping mix of bias, arrogance, adulterated junk food, and obtuse stupidity that the American news media has on display for us this election year? Bloggers, talk-show hosts, and others who are about to replace the American news industry struggle to come up with the words that will, in effect, form its epitaph.
The recent flap over Sarah Palin's ABC interview with Charles Gibson has even sympathetic media observers agog. Just pick a random blog in the blogroll to the right and look. Start with Mary Madigan comparing the raw and doctored interviews, and finish up with this classic Simpsons clip (requires WMP 11 or IE7). Like the indispensable Onion, only parody can now do justice to the schlock, "advocacy," and strutting, vicious pretense -- both cutthroat and petty -- that make up so much of our so-called "news."
The core problem here is that Palin, limited as her political experience is, is smart, as well as direct and plain-spoken. Her mere existence highlights the phoniness of liberal and "progressive" politics. Her limited but real accomplishments in Alaska underscore, every time those intolerable boobs on MSNBC open their mouths, the empty hype and puffery of the Obama campaign.
So media-land is in a tizzy. I don't take polls that seriously, but one poll and survey after another in the last decade has indicated that a large swath of the voting public knows what they're seeing and reading and are willing to say so. Some of these polls indicate that even a majority of self-described liberals now admit that the media is biased junk. And there's no mystery as to the nature of that bias.
In all likelihood, this election cycle will be the last in which the conventional news media has a dominant role in "reporting" and shaping the outcome. The media's credibility and prestige have been eroding for 25 or more years. But few foresaw the stunning speed of collapse we're now watching.
Judith just forwarded this transcript of Gibson's interview with Sarah Palin before ABC cherrypicked her quotes, editing out key parts of her responses.
Thanks to Newsbusters:
GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.
PALIN: Sure.
GIBSON: Let's start, because we are near Russia, let's start with Russia and Georgia.
The administration has said we've got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
PALIN: First off, we're going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain's running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we've got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep...
GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.
PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That's why we have to keep an eye on Russia.
And, Charlie, you're in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They're very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they're doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I'm giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it's in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
We also see from Palin's following remark, which was also edited out, that she is far from some sort of latter day Cold Warrior which the edited interview made her seem to be:
We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We've learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.
We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it's in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
Palin's extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia.
More here at Newsbusters
Via Newsweek:
With that kind of blunt talk--and an estimated $3 billion fortune to back it up with action--Pickens, who last made headlines for funding the Swift Boat attack ads against John Kerry in 2004, has put himself back in the spotlight in time for the 2008 presidential election. It's an audacious act of rebranding: the flamboyant 80-year-old oilman and onetime corporate raider reborn as green wildcatter and the Web's first senior blog star. Since it was launched a month ago, www.pickensplan.com has cracked the top-1,000 list of most heavily trafficked sites worldwide, according to the Internet marketing firm Quantcast.
If you haven't yet heard of the Pickens Plan, then you've no doubt been on vacation: he has flooded TV and radio with thousands of ads urging viewers to log on to his Web site and demand that Washington overhaul the country's energy infrastructure. "The American people know something is wrong as far as energy is concerned," he tells NEWSWEEK. "They don't think they are being told the truth."
Just don't mistake Pickens for a tree-hugger...
[Speaking of Green places, I've received requests from Flickr viewers for more information about solar power in Israel after they saw this picture.]
Friday, September 12, 2008
The babies suffer: BBC: Splits behind Gaza medics strike
The factional fighting in the Palestinian Territories may have died down, but a new political battleground has emerged - the hospitals of the Gaza Strip...
...two weeks ago, things got much worse for Dr Shatat, when more than half of his colleagues decided to go on strike.
"It's very hard to work during this strike," he says. "Of course, it affects the quality of our service, mortality rates have increased."
"Here, on the first day of the strike, a newborn baby died. He was very ill, but there were so few medical workers, that the constant supervision he needed could not be given."
At the end of the ward, 26-year-old Um Givara cradles her baby, waiting for the use of a ventilator.
"We're all worried about this strike because our sick children need doctors and nurses to look after them," she says. "I can tell, things are not like before."...
...The strike is being driven by the pro-Fatah Medical Workers Union.
Its director, Osama Najjar, in Ramallah, says scores of striking doctors in Gaza have been called in for interrogations, and had their private clinics closed down as punishment.
But he is adamant the strike will continue until Hamas backs down.
In fact, he is calling for much more pressure to be applied to Hamas in Gaza. Even asking that Mr Abbas hold on to the aid money he receives to pay for Gaza's electricity.
"It is like we are giving Hamas a furnished apartment in Gaza and paying for it, while Hamas humiliates our people. We should think hard about paying these bills for them, let Hamas be responsible."
These days, people may not be getting killed in the cross-fire of Fatah-Hamas gunfights on the streets of Gaza, as they used to, but the political wrangles are still hurting them...
What's one to do on a Friday afternoon when one's work (OK, most of it) is done? Why, a spot of the old photoshop, of course.
We've all heard the story of the boat ride to Gaza, and followed the travails of Tony Blair's publicity-mad sister in law, Lauren Booth, as she gallivants about the Gaza Strip, attempting to stir up attention to herself the horrors of Gaza. Trouble is, the pictures don't really seem to match the narrative.
I was particularly inspired by these two shots showing Booth buying supplies in a rather well-stocked Gaza supermarket, particularly the first, which shows off the scope of Booth's...attributes (if anyone is hungry in Gaza, it sure ain't Lauren Booth):
Click on either for the larger version. So what's a boy to do? Why, break out the photoshop, that's what:
Continue reading "Photoshop Friday: Lauren Booth in Gaza"Sanity 1, Moonbats 0: Divestment initiative thrown out in Seattle
A Seattle judge has thrown out a ballot proposal on divesting from companies that do business with Israel.
King County Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez ruled that Initiative 97, which would have compelled Seattle's retirement board to divest from some companies that do business with Israel, exceeds the scope of power for ballot initiatives.
"The funds in question are pension funds, not city funds. They belong to workers who will need them to retire," Gonzalez said. "Given that, [I-97] is beyond the scope of the initiative process."
The initiative, which supporters had been telling residents was a measure to divest from Iraq, had prompted opposition from several Jewish organizations, the mayor and most of Seattle's city council members...
...it shouldn't be a surprise that the Muslim Student Union chapter at the University of Southern California (USC) acts in accordance with its sister chapters, and until recently hosted a violent quote in the "compendium" of hadiths on the USC Muslim Students Association page. The quote advocates massacring Jews as a pathway of redemption for Muslims, and reads as follows:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.
The David Horowitz Freedom Center worked with the Simon Wiesenthal Center to draft a letter to Alan Casden, a USC trustee, about the "hadith of hate," as it is often called. Disturbed that a call for genocide should be on the USC server, Casden contacted Provost Chrysostomos Nikias to express his concern. Nikias investigated the matter and sent Casden the following letter:
The passage you cited is truly despicable and I share your concerns about its being on the USC server. We did some investigations and I have ordered the passage removed.The passage in the hadith that you brought to our attention violates the USC Principles of Community, and it has no place on a USC server.
...USC's decision to remove the hadith from the school's server marks the first time that an American university has recognized that the Muslim Students Association's agenda involves the promotion of ethnic hatred. It is also the first time that an administrator has acted to remove "despicable" material.
A statement issued by the Muslim Student Union at USC suggested that the hadith was being taken out of context and called the school's decision to remove it from the website "unprecedented and unconscionable." The Muslim Student Union accused the USC administration of practicing unfair censorship...
Read the rest. This is what's going on on the campuses.
This is a guy who supports an academic boycott of Israelis, but get ready for the whining and moaning if anyone should actually criticize him: New Columbia Hire Backed Academic Boycott of Israel
A professor who signed a letter supporting the academic boycott of Israel is the most recent addition to Columbia's Middle Eastern studies department, which has come under scrutiny in the past over allegations of political bias.
Timothy Mitchell, who was a politics professor at New York University and a previous director of the center for Near Eastern studies there, is now a professor of Arab studies at Columbia and the head of the graduate studies program in the Middle Eastern studies department.
Mr. Mitchell, who specializes in modern Middle East politics, has authored several books on modern Egypt and postcolonial theory. A Hebrew and Arabic literature graduate student in the department, Suzanne Schneider, said Mr. Mitchell is "a big deal in the field."
In 2004, he signed an open letter, along with several hundred other academics calling themselves "defenders of Palestinian academic freedom and supporters of the academic boycott against Israel," demanding that Israeli academics take a stand on Israeli government policy towards Palestinians...
His wife is a familiar name:
...Mr. Mitchell is married to Lila Abu-Lughod, a professor of anthropology and gender studies at Columbia. She also signed the letter in support of the Israeli academic boycott, along with other professors in the department, including Joseph Massad, Hamid Dabashi, George Saliba, and Gil Andijar. She is the daughter of Ibrahim Abu-Lughod, to whom the Columbia comparative literature professor, Edward Said, who has since died, dedicated his most famous book, "Orientalism."...
Israel has invented an anti-protest device that makes leftists even more smelly. What's the point you say? Innovation or risk of global ecological disaster...you be the judge: Making a stink
"A terrible stench - the smell of a rotting, dead animal," says left-wing activist Dr. David Nir in disgust. For over three years he has been participating in protests against the separation fence, but he wasn't prepared for this: Three weeks ago, at a demonstration in the West Bank village of Na'alin, he personally experienced the debut of Boash - the Skunk - a new method of dispersing demonstrations, developed by the Israel Police.
"We are very experienced, very familiar with the rubber bullets, the tear-gas grenades and the water hoses, but suddenly two Border Policemen arrived with strange packs on their backs and began to spray demonstrators with a liquid," says Nir. "It was terrible. Some people got completely drenched. Fortunately, I managed to stay out of range and did not get too much of it, but the smell stuck to me, too. It was absorbed into my skin. It was really unpleasant. I couldn't stand the stench; you deserve a gold medal for putting up with that smell.
"A week after the demonstration in Na'alin, a white truck arrived at a demonstration in Bil'in," Nir continues. "It began approaching and we tried to keep our distance." The truck stopped near the fence, "and then we heard the motor working harder in order to create condensed air for operating the Skunk cannon. And then it came: Strong bursts of a foul-smelling spray were showered on us, directly hitting those who didn't move away, at up to a 30- to 50-meter radius. Because the wind was with the cannon, most of us were enveloped in vapors of stench that penetrated our lungs. On the way to Tel Aviv we drove with open windows, but we were unable to get rid of the smell even when we sprayed ourselves with deodorant. There are no words to describe it; it's the worst odor imaginable. It's an experience equal to jumping headfirst into a sewer. The Palestinians simply call it 'shit.'"...
Stop complaining. It's all natural!
...Ben Harosh said he had an entirely different approach: "I created a liquid from only natural organic substances, which when combined produced the unique smell. I looked for a substance that came from 'green' agriculture, in particular. Along the way I smelled a large number of odors, and in the end I found a particular one and began to investigate it. I arrived at the lab that produces this substance and together we began to develop the basic ingredients of the Skunk. For two years we took apart the substance and in a process of trial and error, arrived at the new substance."...
...What is the liquid composed of?
"The formula is secret and unique, but I can say that the dominant components are yeast and protein."
A health drink?
"You can drink it, and you would definitely have a great protein drink. The only problem is that it has a very powerful stench."...
It's green!
...this time, anti-Christian, and in a tactic that the Jewish Community is so familiar with, they front a "Christian" to do the dirty work. At UCC Truths: Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite's hatred and bigotry.
From Thistelthwaites distorted screed:
...I think the first order of business with Palin is to ask her to give the same kind of speech that was demanded of John F. Kennedy re his Catholicism. Kennedy said he would obey the Constitution over the Pope. Will Palin obey the Constitution over her husband?...
Don't we rightly denounce those who made such demands as anti-Catholic bigots? Yet here is a nominal "liberal" playing the role of the bigot. UCC Truths:
Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, the (thankfully) former President of the Chicago Theological Seminary, is promoting a religious litmus test for Presidential candidates and revealing her deep bigotry towards people who don't share the same faith as she does. Her latest post on the Washington Post's "On Faith" blog should put her comfortably in the company of other bigots like David Duke and Louis Farrakhan. Maybe that's overstating it a bit... Duke and Farakhan have an audience (however small) that takes them seriously while nearly no one knows who Thistlethwaite is or cares what she thinks...
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Sean Gannon defends his position in a follow-up letter in The Irish Times (previous: Real Collective Punishment). Note, btw, the title the paper gives the letter seems geared to give the opposite impression than the one Gannon intends: Charge of 'collective punishment' over Israel's blockade in Gaza
Madam, - Philip O'Connor of the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign (Opinion, August 21st) defends the assertion that Israel's blockade of Gaza constitutes "collective punishment" and a violation of international law, but fails to engage with a single one of my arguments to the contrary (Opinion, August 21st).
He contents himself instead with quoting an assortment of statements by UN, EU and Irish Government officials in support of his position, an appeal to consensus which calls to mind the adage "100,000 lemmings can't be wrong."...
Etc. Sensible conclusion:
...Palestinians must, like electorates the world over, take responsibility for their democratic choices - in this case the handing of power to a jihadist terrorist organisation that has murdered over 500 innocent Israelis as part of its campaign to "liberate all historic Palestine from the impurity of the Jews." - Yours, etc,
SEÁN GANNON,
Irish Friends of Israel..
[h/t: DKK]
Being a columnist for the Boston Globe means never having to be a slave to the facts. Michael Graham has at it with Globe columnist and Democratic consultant, Dan Payne: 9/11: The Perfect Day For The Globe-Democrat To Compare Gov. Palin To The Taliban
Criticizing the Boston Globe-Democrat for bad journalism is mocking the terrible fashion sense of teenage boys: Why would you expect any better?
But the hate-filled, fact-deficient scrawlings of failed political operative Dan Payne in the Boston Globe-Democrat today manages to break new ground -- quite an accomplishment for an op-ed page that regularly features the writings of James "I Can't Find My Meds" Carroll.
Today is -- if they haven't gotten the word at Morrissey Blvd -- the 7th anniversary of 9/11. And today -- when we remember the mass murder of Americans at the hands of Al Qaeda and the Taliban -- is the day that Dan Payne chooses to write:
[Sarah Palin]'s got a Taliban-like tolerance for beliefs unlike her own.
Stay classy, Boston Globe-Democrat! Hey, maybe on December 7th you can print that Gov. Palin is a "Conservative kamikaze who should never have made it past Hawaii!"
If I had the time and interest, or if I believed there was still a fact-checker on the payroll at the BG-D, I would take the time to point out the many glaring fact errors in Payne's pathetic tirade.
The obvious ones...
Graham goes on to enumerate some of the specifics, most of which (the correct information) have appeared in the Globe's own news pages.
A convoy of opposition politicians and other hangers-on set out on one of those publicity-stunt trips to the border with Gaza yesterday. The trouble? The Egyptian government doesn't want that border open any more than the Israelis do and they stopped them.
The Hope: Palestinians prepare to receive Egyptian convey breaking closure
Palestinians set to prepare an official and popular ceremony to receive Egyptian campaigners who are traveling to Gaza Strip to break the closure of the territory, a Palestinian official said on Wednesday.
Jamal al-Khodary, an independent Palestinian lawmaker who leads a lobby against the Israeli blockade on Gaza Strip, representatives of Hamas government in Gaza and lawmakers will join the ceremony to receive the convoy.
The Egyptian convoy made up of parliamentarians, journalists, Islamic and leftist leaders. They will travel by land to Rafah crossing point between Egypt and Gaza and try to enter the Hamas-controlled territory.
But reports said that Egyptian security forces blocked the roads to Sinai before the convoy. The campaigners could pass some roadblocks but the road is still not cleared before the convoy which carry aid, according to the reports...
The Outcome: Egypt thwarts protest against siege on Gaza
Egyptian authorities on Wednesday blocked an opposition convoy headed for the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip, a security official said. The group of judges, independent MPs, members of the main opposition Muslim Brotherhood and activists from other parties wanted to protest the continued closure of the Rafah crossing by Israel and Egypt.
Police set up checkpoints on the road between Ismailiya and the town of Al-Arish in northern Sinai, about 48 kilometers from Rafah, the security official said, asking not to be identified.
"The authorities have reinforced security measures on ferries crossing the Suez Canal into the Sinai Peninsula," he added...
The Whining: IMEMC: Barhoum: denying entry of an Egyptian convoy into Gaza an 'irresponsible action
...Hamas spokesman in Gaza, Fawzi Barhoum, said in a statement, emailed to press, "we have been looking forward that such a convoy would help break the Israeli blockade on Gaza"...
The Idiot (loosely related): Blair sister-in-law: Gaza world's largest concentration camp
British left-wing activist Lauren Booth remains stuck in Strip after journey to 'break' Israeli naval blockade, equates situation to Holocaust, Darfur...
Lauren Booth's presence in Gaza isn't exactly contributing to anyone's desire to unlock the gate.
Seven years ago I was driving to work, listening to the Howard Stern show on my then endless commute. Stern & Co. had gotten very serious and were talking about a plane...maybe a small plane, maybe something else, that had hit the World Trade Center. It wasn't until about 9:30 or so that I got to my office and could see some of the images.
Cox & Forkum: That Day (click for larger -- much larger)
Cox & Forkum: FDNY 9/11 (Click for larger)
Dan Rather on Letterman:
Particularly: Part 2. I just wish Dan had remembered some of the things he said that day: "...unlike the Gulf War, we will have the staying power..."
Update: Smooth Stone remembers one of the victims: Welles Remy Crowther, age 24
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
In Jordan now, Carlson attends a film (the next few posts will be short). p. 366:
The film was an Egyptian tale about a Bedouin triangle in which a desert sheikh contrived to kidnap the fiancee of another sheikh the night before the wedding. The lover was killed and the girl murdered by her father for letting herself be kidnapped, and presumably kissed. As for the ending, nobody lived happily ever after. Thus Arab justice triumphed -- for there is no greater sin in the lexicon of Arab morals than feminine unchastity. No one cares about the morals of the male.
Alan Hart was the British journalist who wrote that if fellow journalist Alan Johnston were killed by his Gaza captors, it must have been the Israelis who did it (see the links). After all, when have the Palestinian Arabs ever done anything that didn't seem to square with their interests?
He's rather exposed himself quite a bit more since then, and Adam Holland has a nice post narrating Hart's search for the "hidden hand" of the Jews and his authorial escapade: Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews (in two volumes!): Alan Hart: Israel kidnapped Alan Johnston ... "by default"
Elizabeth Samson: Criminalizing Criticism of Islam
There are strange happenings in the world of international jurisprudence that do not bode well for the future of free speech. In an unprecedented case, a Jordanian court is prosecuting 12 Europeans in an extraterritorial attempt to silence the debate on radical Islam.
The prosecutor general in Amman charged the 12 with blasphemy, demeaning Islam and Muslim feelings, and slandering and insulting the prophet Muhammad in violation of the Jordanian Penal Code. The charges are especially unusual because the alleged violations were not committed on Jordanian soil.
Among the defendants is the Danish cartoonist whose alleged crime was to draw in 2005 one of the Muhammad illustrations that instigators then used to spark Muslim riots around the world. His co-defendants include 10 editors of Danish newspapers that published the images. The 12th accused man is Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, who supposedly broke Jordanian law by releasing on the Web his recent film, "Fitna," which tries to examine how the Quran inspires Islamic terrorism.
Jordan's attempt at criminalizing free speech beyond its own borders wouldn't be so serious if it were an isolated case...
Of course the UN makes an appearance:
More worrying, the U.N. Human Rights Council in June said it would refrain from condemning human-rights abuses related to "a particular religion." The ban applies to all religions, but it was prompted by Muslim countries that complained about linking Islamic law, Shariah, to such outrages as female genital mutilation and death by stoning for adulterers. This kind of self-censorship could prove dangerous for people suffering abuse, and it follows the council's March decision to have its expert on free speech investigate individuals and the media for negative comments about Islam...
Michael Totten's insightful and somewhat terrifying report, "From Baku to Russian-Occupied Georgia"
...I slowly paced back and forth while Goltz spoke jovially to the soldiers in their own language. The Russians joked and laughed with Goltz. They were very nearly the only people I saw in the entire country who laughed or smiled. The Georgians certainly had little to smile about. Honestly, though, the Russian soldiers didn't have much to smile about either, and I was slightly surprised to see it.Whether it's true or not, I have no idea, but I heard from many Georgians that some Russian soldiers were furious when they came upon Georgian military bases and saw that their Georgian counterparts had superior food, clothing, and living conditions. I might be tempted to dismiss this as self-serving propaganda that makes the Georgians feel better, but Russian soldiers really are notoriously underpaid and underfed even inside their own country.
My sometimes traveling companion Sean LaFreniere visited Russia a few years ago, and he saw uniformed Russian soldiers begging for money and food on the streets. And he met a Russian woman who told him about the ordeal her younger brother endured in the army.
"[She] told me that her little brother had recently returned from his first few months of 'boot camp' in the Russian army," he wrote. "When he arrived home for a holiday dinner, his family found him a broken shell. He had been physically, psychologically, and even sexually abused as part of his 'training.' His parents and siblings refused to let him return. They have been hiding him for months while trying to acquire papers to get him out of the country. Many Western newspapers have documented similar suffering by Russian soldiers. The BBC and the Guardian recently ran stories on one Private Sychev. He lost his legs and genitals to gangrene after ritualized abuse by the comrades in his unit. Other recruits are forced into pornography and prostitution to enrich their superior officers."
I never heard any expression of hatred toward the people of Russia by Georgians. I didn't even hear any complaints about, let alone hatred for, the Abkhaz or Ossetians in the breakaway regions. Georgians are, of course, unhappy with the Russian invasion, but they didn't seem to be making it personal. I heard much more serious denunciations of Armenians from Azeris every day in Azerbaijan than I heard even once from anybody in Georgia toward anyone. Azerbaijan's anger toward Armenia is understandable, though a bit unhinged and over the top in some quarters, so the muted reaction toward Russians among Georgians surprised me...
So says Michael Freund: Payback time at the UN
The war in Lebanon may have ended two years ago, but that hasn't stopped the UN from exploiting the conflict to besmirch Israel. In a move that harks back to the bad old days of UN hypocrisy and double standards vis-à-vis the Jewish state, Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon is reportedly set to demand that Israel reimburse Lebanon and Syria for damage caused during the war against Hizbullah.
Yes, you read that correctly. The UN wants Israel to pay for having the gall to defend itself. According to the Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, Ban has prepared a report that he will present to the upcoming General Assembly in New York. Based on calculations made by the World Bank, he will insist that Israel cough up approximately $1 billion in "compensation" for material and environmental harm to Lebanese society and infrastructure.
In addition, Ban will purportedly highlight the bombing of the Jiyeh power plant 30 kilometers south of Beirut in mid-July 2006. As a result of the attack, thousands of barrels of oil are said to have spilled into the Mediterranean, polluting parts of the Lebanese and Syrian coastlines and causing ecological damage to marine life.
The report is a sequel, of sorts, to one issued last fall by Ban, in which he called on Israel "to take the necessary actions toward assuming responsibility for prompt and adequate compensation to the government of Lebanon." Since Israel rightly ignored that preposterous request, Ban has now apparently decided to turn up the heat in the hopes of pressing Jerusalem to pay...
Unreal. If anyone should be paying it should be Iran and Syria for supporting Hizballah, or Lebanon itself for allowing. Freund:
If the Lebanese authorities allow their sovereign territory to be used as a launching pad for attacks, as they did in the summer of 2006, they bear responsibility for what ensues, including any damage caused as a result of Israel's actions taken in self-defense.
You don't need to be a moral philosopher or international legal scholar to figure that one out...Why shouldn't Syria, Lebanon and Iran be made to pay for their sponsorship of Hizbullah and the damage it wrought?...
The UN does many humanitarian tasks that could just as easily be performed by charitable organizations. As a pseudo-world government and arbiter of justice, the UN isn't just incompetent, it's an enemy.
No, FactCheck.org isn't sliming Palin (don't mean to pull an Us Weekly there), but they did look in to some of the nonsense being spread about her. Good to have it all in one place: False Internet claims and rumors fly about McCain's running mate.
We've been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCain's running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading.
- Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn't cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.
- She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a "What if?" question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin's first term.
- She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She's been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
- Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a "courtesy" when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
- Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to "debate both sides" of the evolution question, but she also said creationism "doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."
We'll be looking into other charges in an e-mail by a woman named Anne Kilkenny for a future story. For more explanation of the bullet points above, please read the Analysis.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
I once had a date, sort of, in Hezekiah's tunnel in Jerusalem. My friends started calling it "Hezekiah's Tunnel of Love" in honor of that event. Seems like a long time ago :)
This month's Biblical Archaeology Review has an excellent article on the expanding discoveries at the tunnel. It's an underground water way, over 1700 feet long, dug by the Judahite king Hezekiah (II Kings 18-20) in the late eighth century BCE. The tunnel traverses a winding course from the Gihon Spring (Jeruslem's only natural water source) to the Pool of Siloam (Shiloach). Hezekiah's engineers dug it in anticipation of a siege by the Assyrian king Sennacherib, because the spring was outside biblical Jerusalem's walls. The article discusses some recent finds and conclusions that illuminate how such engineering was done in the early Iron Age. From Assyrian records, the siege is most likely to be dated to 701 BCE.
In 1880, an inscription in paleo-Hebrew (not the post-Babylonian script used today) was discovered in the tunnel. It commemorates the completion of the tunnel and describes in vivid terms how the water started to flow when the two teams of workmen, converging from the two ends, met up. The inscription was taken to the Istanbul Archaeological Museum, where it still sits today.
In the late 1990s, a particularly foolish group of "biblical minimalists" asserted that the Tunnel inscription dated from Hellenistic times (third century BCE, after Alexander the Great). The hard scientists struck back, and the minimalists had to beat an embarrassing retreat. The most recent work on Hezekiah's Tunnel demonstrated the antiquity of the tunnel anew, with radiocarbon dating of twigs and leaves left in the tunnel by the engineers. The date: eighth century BCE.
Although they rarely say it, the minimalists frequently insinuate that their claims are modern, skeptical, and "scientific." Their frequent target is an invented straw man ("biblical maximalists"). This dispute is sometimes echoed in the popular media, with the same insinuation intact. The minimalists have even, on occasion, attempted to attack Jewish presence in Palestine as late as the Dead Sea Scrolls era (second and first centuries BCE).
The truth is very different. While scarcely fundamentalists, the "hard" scientists know that the northern Israelite and southern Judahite kingdoms were real and were destroyed by the Assyrians in 721 and the Babylonians in the 586 BCE, respectively. Post-exilic Jewish presence in the land in the Persian (539-332 BCE), Hellenistic (332-37 BCE), and Roman eras (after 37 BCE) is massively attested and beyond question. The minimalists are made up of historians and literary critics, coming into frequent conflict with the "hard" sciences of archeology, epigraphy, and linguistics. It's the minimalists who are anti-science, not their opponents.
POSTSCRIPT: The complete body of Dead Sea Scrolls texts is about to be published online by the Israel Antiquities Authority.
As always, click for larger versions.
This is very positive news indeed. It appears, if the following email forwarded from the Al-Awda Media email list is correct, that ICAHD, the Israeli Committee Against House Demolition [and the existence of Israel] has not had its funding renewed by the EU. Jeff Halper may have lost his Euro meal-ticket. If true, this step is long overdue. The EU had no business funding a hostile entity like ICAHD.
Al-Awda (another group dedicated to dismantling the Jewish State) is attempting to pick up where the EU left off. The following message appeared on the Al-Awda Media list and contains all the details. Hassan Fouda, btw, was one of the presenters at the Wheels of Justice show in Andover last January '07 (emphasis is mine):
Fwd: ICAHD-USA: Urgent Message from Jeff Halper Posted by: "hassan fouda" hfouda@[snip] hfouda Mon Sep 8, 2008 10:22 am (PDT)
ICAHD-USA
From: ICAHD-USA
To: hfouda@yahoo.com
Subject: ICAHD-USA: Urgent Message from Jeff Halper
The S.S. Liberty arrives at port in Gaza
"What we've done shows that people can do what governments should have done. If people stand up against injustice, we can truly be the conscience of the world." --Jeff Halper
We write to you at this time to both CELEBRATE the historic voyage of 44 international activists to Gaza and, at the same time, inform you of some DIFFICULT NEWS about the future of ICAHD:
As you know, ICAHD Director Jeff Halper, our partner on numerous educational and Palestinian home rebuilding projects, was one of 44 activists from 17 nations who successfully sailed from Cyprus to Gaza aboard two fishing boats in defiance of Israel's blockade. The group was met by 40,000 "joyous Gazans." Jeff and the others brought with them 200 hearing aids; the main aim of the symbolic blockade-busting action was to publicize the plight of the people in this besieged territory. As the only Israeli Jew on this historic challenge to Israel's blockade, Jeff was arrested and spent the night in an Israeli jail upon his return, where he tells us he was protected from threatening Israeli right-wingers by his Palestinian cellmates. He still faces possible indictment. In his latest communication, he describes how "reaching Gaza and leaving has created a free and regular channel between Gaza and the outside world. It has ... forced the Israeli government to make a clear policy declaration that it is not occupying Gaza and therefore will not prevent the free movement of Palestinians in and out (at least by sea)."
To read more details about Jeff's experience and about the Free Gaza effort, go to our website at www.icahdusa.org or visit the ICAHD website at www.icahd.org.
Unfortunately, right before this historic boat ride, ICAHD was informed that they had lost their funding from the European Union, funding essential to their operations. Here is an excerpt from Jeff Halper's email to us:
We have just heard that our request for re-funding has been rejected, in high probability because of pressure brought to bear by right-wing Israeli neo-cons who have campaigned obsessively against our funding while threatening publicly to close us down.
So we now face a real crisis.
That said, those who want us "gone" make a mistake in assuming that we will close if our funding is withdrawn. Our plan is to keep the office open and retain two staff; I will work on a voluntary basis until the financial picture improves.
We continue to be very grateful for the support we've received from the ICAHD-USA community; your contributions have been an important supplement to the EU funding, allowing us to launch the Constructing Peace Campaign. Now we are turning to you for help; we must work together to preserve ICAHD's position as a leader in the Israeli peace movement.
I promise you, no matter what, ICAHD will not be silenced.
We obviously want to help Jeff and ICAHD honor this critically important promise. As the board of ICAHD-USA, we have pledged to raise at least $30,000 in the next couple of months. Here is what we have planned.
First, we have invited Jeff to the States for a fall tour. As you know, Jeff's tours are one of the primary ways that we educate people in the U.S. and build support for our joint work. A tour at this critical time will both serve the educational mission of our two organizations and help raise desperately needed financial support for ICAHD's work.
Second, we are reaching out to you. Our plan is raise money with both this email appeal as well as a letter we are sending out through the regular mail. We will grant what we raise to ICAHD to support our joint educational and house building efforts. Individual board members have agreed to match what you give in response to this specific appeal dollar for dollar.
It is not our custom to send urgent appeals and we wish we didn't have to now. All of us appreciate how generous you have been with both your moral and financial support in the past. At this critical time, we're asking you to consider making another thoughtful and generous donation to get us to the $30,000 goal. If you have given ICAHD-USA $25 in the past, consider whether you might be able to double that amount. If you have given $50, or $100, or $250, please also consider doubling, increasing, or repeating that gift now. Whatever you can give, at whatever level, will be deeply appreciated. Keep in mind that your gift will have twice the punch, as we will match your giving dollar for dollar.
We, along with Jeff, promise you that ICAHD will not be silenced. Together, we will continue to be a loud and persistent voice for justice.
For a strong ICAHD supported by both a strong ICAHD-USA family and a strong will to carry on,
the ICAHD-USA Board
Betsy Barlow
Marc Braverman
Hassan Fouda
John Hickox
Jack Holtzman
Jennifer Loewenstein
Dave Neunuebel
Tom Stern
Wafa Shami
Mary Lou Smith
Monday, September 8, 2008
Pretty cool collection at The Big Picture.
CAMERA's Dexter Van Zile takes a look at an upcoming "debate" being sponsored by the far-left World Council of Churches:
Between Sept. 10 and Sept. 14, 2008 the World Council of Churches, an ecumenical organization headquartered in Switzerland, is holding a "debate" regarding the issue of "promised land." The debate, which will be attended by approximately 65 theologians from WCC member churches, is billed as an effort to promote an "understanding of how theological issues may be related to the [Arab-Israeli] conflict."
The debate is designed to initiate the "process of developing a handbook for congregations and parishes, aimed at facilitating their reflection on issues like the Promised Land, the Church and Israel, justice and peace."
This may sound innocent enough, but publicity surrounding the event indicates that the debate will place Biblical claims to land under close scrutiny without making any effort to understand Muslim teachings about the land, or the Jewish people. In particular, the press release makes repeated references to Bible, but offers no mention of the Koranic theology regarding land and the Jewish people. The lack of any reference to this issue is troubling, because it suggests that a very important part of the Arab-Israeli conflict will not be addressed by the conference...
This should go well. As you'll see from the post's updates, the WCC is already displeased with CAMERA's scrutiny.
Following are excerpts from an interview with Mus'ab Hassan Yousef, the son of West Bank Hamas leader Sheikh Hassan Yousef, which aired on Al-Hayat TV on August 19, 2008
Video and transcript at the link.
But that won't prevent the media and international entities from relying on the, CAMERA has a close look at B'Tselem's numbers: In 2007, B'Tselem Casualty Count Doesn't Add Up
B'Tselem has pulled it off again, duping the mainstream media into believing it has tallied civilian Palestinian casualties when it has done no such thing. The oft-cited organization bills itself as a human rights group devoted to rigorous documentation of Israeli conduct in the West Bank and Gaza aimed at educating the public and encouraging political action. Yet the so-called documentation continues to be marred by serious flaws that journalists routinely ignore while reporting the group's charges at face value.
B'Tselem, it should be noted, is heavily funded by European entities, including German, British, Irish, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian and Swiss groups, as well as the Ford Foundation and the New Israel Fund.
Among the most deceptive claims by the group are those embedded in its yearly statistical summary of Palestinian fatalities. B'Tselem reported in a Dec. 31, 2007 press release that in 2007 Israeli security forced killed 373 Palestinians and that "about 35 percent of those killed were civilians who were not taking part in the hostilities when killed." These claims were reported without caveat in the New York Times, Voice of America, the Guardian, and the New York Jewish Week, among others.
Despite the press release's statement about the percentage of those killed who were civilians, B'Tselem's data do not actually break down Palestinian casualties according to civilians or combatants...
A revealing report and an important resource. You can skip right to the end for the kicker:
...But if this detailed analysis is too long or tedious for the time-strapped journalist or other skeptic to absorb, here's one quick fact which should raise serious question marks about B'Tselem's credibility on Palestinian casualties: the organization still lists Mohammad Al-Dura as killed by Israeli security forces.
Asharq Al-Awsat: Armed Palestinian Factions Use Calm with Israel to Train New Fighters
Gaza, Asharq Al-Awsat - Shortly after nightfall, blinding heavy dust suddenly rises over the Al-Sikkah Street, which is adjacent from the western side to the Birkat al-Wazz, to the west of the Al-Maghazi Refugee Camp in the middle of the Gaza Strip.
At the same time, the sound of heavy fire can be heard, while minutes later, tens of men belonging to the al-Qassam Brigades, military wing of the Hamas Movement, are seen moving fast in columns in the street with their full military gear.
To the north of that neighborhood, lies the garrison of "Battalion 13", which is the main training location of the al-Qassam Brigades in the area. In the past, this site belonged to the security agencies of Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas, but it was seized during the decisive military action that ended with Hamas's takeover of the Gaza Strip.
Since the calm agreement between Israel and Hamas came into play, it has been clearly evident that Palestinian resistance factions, without exception, have taken advantage of the ceasefire by conducting military training for their recruits...
We've discussed these cases before, including a podcast with lead attorney David Strachman. The New York Times presents the details on the Aharon Ellis case, in which the Palestinian Authority has sought and received permission for a re-do on the terrorism judgment against them...just one rub...they have to put up the $192.7 million this time so they have to pay when they lose this time.
Big surprise, they're crying poor mouth, which is OK, because that means they have to prove it, and that means they have to prove it. And that means outsiders get to look at the books...and thus hopefully add further proof of the ties you and I already know exist: Palestinians Seek to Overturn Judgment, but There's a $192.7 Million Catch
When a Palestinian gunman burst into a bat mitzvah celebration in northern Israel in 2002, killing 6 people and wounding more than 30, the attack sparked anger and despair, and military retaliation by Israel. It also prompted a lawsuit in New York, which has taken an unusual turn.
The family of the sole American, Aharon Ellis, killed in the attack, charged the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority with orchestrating the shooting that killed him. The suit was brought under a law that allows American victims of international terrorism to sue for triple damages in federal court.
A federal judge awarded the family a default judgment of $192.7 million in damages after the P.L.O. and the Palestinian Authority refused to defend the suit on the merits.
But now the Palestinians, holding themselves out as a partner in the Middle East peace process, have changed lawyers, and asked the judge for a second chance. The judge, Victor Marrero of Federal District Court in Manhattan, has agreed to set aside the judgment and give them that chance.
But there's a catch. He is requiring the Palestinians to post a bond of $192.7 million so that if they lose again, the damages would be paid...
..."Civil litigation, even in normal circumstances, is time-consuming, expensive, and you certainly can't be certain of victory," said John F. Murphy, a Villanova University law professor. "That kind of problem is exacerbated in the terrorist context."
Professor Murphy estimated that there had been a few dozen cases under the law, which was passed in the early 1990s after the murder of Leon Klinghoffer in a Palestinian hijacking of the cruise ship Achille Lauro. Another expert, Beth Van Schaack, an associate law professor at Santa Clara University, said that the legal process, if the Palestinians do participate fully, could allow an inquiry into Palestinian finances, and whether money went to support terrorism.
"The Abbas administration has gotten themselves in a little bit of a bind," Professor Van Schaack said. "If they are claiming, 'We can't put up the bond because we don't have the money,' " she said, "that opens the door to do some level of discovery about money."...
IsraeliGirl (who recently gave birth to a son -- I swear! I've never met that woman! -- uh, mazel tov) scored an interview with Israeli Government Spokesman Mark Regev in which Regev answers questions presented by readers: Mark Regev Answer Readers' Questions.
The guy is smooth, no doubt.
...the media, that is. But they've got a more important target than the terrorism beat now...Sarah Palin: Counterterrorism Blog: Mainstream Media Diverting Terrorism Reporters Into Political Investigations
I see one after another of the mainstream media outlets which have made important contributions to the factual underpinnings of the counter-terrorism effort dropping off that beat. Editors in the print media are shifting terrorism experts on their staffs towards investigations of political candidates. At least three such reporters at three major papers are now chasing Sarah Palin stories (I haven't had time to chase down everybody in "the business"). The move away from terrorism investigations started over a year ago as the print media entered into a long-term decline in ad revenues, but the trend has been accelerated in this election year. It is an unfortunate coincidence that true experts, with some of the best contacts and intel in the private CT community, are being moved out of their chosen fields just as we approach the anniversary of the 9-11 attacks...
h/t to Michael B. 'Priorities' indeed.
If you have five dollars and Chuck Norris has five dollars, Chuck Norris has more money than you.
There is no 'ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.
Apple pays Chuck Norris 99 cents every time he listens to a song.
Chuck Norris can sneeze with his eyes open.
Thanks to Regnery for sending along a copy of Black Belt Patriotism: How to Reawaken America. I will be sure to read it to avoid a good punching.
Did I ever tell you I actually met Chuck Norris once? Well, not "met" exactly. I had bought his book The Secret of Inner Strength: My Story and went to a book signing at the Harvard Coop. The line was around the block. The guy in front of me was a professional ticket scalper at Red Sox games. I kid you not. Got to the front of the line, got my book signed and a hand shake. Meaty. A hand as rugged as his reputation. I'll never forget what Chuck said to me: "Hi, thanks for coming." Soulmates.
I'll look forward to reading the new book.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
This is not exactly a way you lead a vigorous state, or any negotiation for that matter. You're already showing you're coming to the table a loser, demoralized yourself as you demoralize your own side and embolden the other to demand ever more. Even if it is likely that some evacuation will be necessary, why be so public about it? I realize Israel is a small state where such plans would be tough to keep secret, but why be so clear in painting the final picture? And why not push the idea that any Palestinian-Arab state will need not to ethnically cleanse the Jews from their midst, but include them and protect their rights, which Israel will stand by to ensure? I realize that's not a solution the Jews would want, but it's a good test of whether the Arabs are serious about building a state for all its citizens, or just another racist Arab apartheid state? Olmert: We must prepare now for the evacuation of West Bank settlers
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said on Sunday that the government must begin preparing at once for the evacuation of settlers from the West Bank.
At the opening of the weekly cabinet meeting, Olmert said that Israel would likely have to uproot West Bank settlers as part of a future peace agreement with the Palestinians.
In light of Israel's continuing peace talks with the Palestinians, he added, it would be proper to think about providing cash incentives for settlers to leave voluntarily.
Olmert said it was important to learn from the mistakes of Israel's last evacuation of settlers - the 2005 pullout from the Gaza Strip - and it was important to plan ahead.
"Since it is possible we will need to make decisions in the future that will involve the evacuation of residents, we should already prepare for this now and think about its consequences, especially while serious [peace] negotiations are being held," said Olmert.
The prime minister made the comments at the beginning of a debate on Vice Premier Haim Ramon's evacuation-compensation bill at the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. The bill would enable settlers who live beyond the security fence to receive financial compensation for relocating west of it...
Saturday, September 6, 2008
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
pp. 362-364:
...When I arrived at the marketplace it was already teeming with traqffic, pedestrians, and idlers as taxis, trucks, and other traffic from Amman and Jerusalem passed through. Trucks were arriving with scrap lumber, metal, pipes, and assorted machinery from the direction of the Dead Sea. I decided to investigate.
In an Armenian barbershop on Jericho's main street, I met a young refugee from Jerusalem named Torkom. Together we got into a bus going in the direction of the Dead Seam then walked the remaining distance over the semi-arid backed earth. Vast brine evaporation-beds, dazzling white under the sun, met the eye in all directions, connected by miles of pipelines. Beyond them was the huge plant of Palestine Potash, Ltd. (a once highly profitable British corporation owned jointly by English and Jewish capital), which converted the fabulous mineral wealth of the Dead Sea into common salt, bromides, and chlorides of magnesium, potassium, and calcium.
Photographing as I went along, I saw, with Torkom, a sight that sickened me. The huge plant, stretching over many acres, with its generators, transformers, pumps, and a thousand and one irreplaceable items of machinery -- transported at tremendous cost from England and the United States was systematically being looted and destroyed: building by building, machine by machine, board by board. Hundreds of Arab scavengers, working with teams of donkeys, mules, and trucks, had already stripped away most of the vital working parts, and were now tearing at the corrugated tin, pipes, wire, boards, and small machines. What they could not take apart they smashed with sledge hammers. Instead of utilizing the giant plant, or at least expropriating some of the equipment for constructive purposes -- in a land so desperately in need of lumber, glass, ironwork and all else that was in such abundance here -- they were destroying everything, ruthlessly, cold-bloodedly, insanely.
The plant already looked like a miniature Hiroshima, minus the ravages of fire. And this wanton destruction was more or less officially sanctioned by the Trans-Jordan officials. A dozen Arab Legion guards were on hand to keep law and order among the looters.
Further on, I saw the remains of Hotel Kallia, a noted winter resort on the shores of the Dead Sea. Near by were the ruins of the cottages built by the Palestine Potash Corporation to house not only officials, engineers and laborers, but scientists and achaeologists. About a mile away I saw what was left of Beth Harava, a settlement founded by the Jews, who had brought water there to make the desert bloom, so that trees and flowers grew 1,300 feet below sea level.
When the war broke out the isolated colonists packed away their belongings, automobiles and all, and set sail during the night for the southern shore, site of a smaller potash concession. I found their homes stripped to the ground, with only the framework of a few houses remaining. I walked through one ruined home, where sash, doors, and flooring were all gone. Unable to rip off the toilet bowl, the Arabs had broken it in half. Overwhelmed by this destruction all about us, Torkom and I walked on to the shores of the Dead Sea itself. It was a silent lake, forty-seven miles long and ten miles wide. For thousands of years the Jordan had poured mineral sediment into it. I found wrecked boats; pilfered wreckage dotted the shore as far as the eye could reach.
Torkom and I silently hitch-hiked back to Jericho on a huge truck laden with plunder. Our scavenger friends drove straight to the bazaar and began to sell their loot as junk -- which was what they had made out of the once valuable machinery and equipment.
Watching Amy Goodman being bundled into the back of a police van and dragged off to the cooler at the RNC is more entertaining than anything on my DVR right now:
Yeah, it's a few days old, but the HuffPo thread is here: Amy Goodman Violently Arrested Today at RNC. If only it were actually a violent arrest. Alas, Goodman can't even show enough respect for the home viewer to resist arrest properly.
One of the producers she was trying to step in for filmed her own arrest, here.
Just a couple short items here on the goings on with the local Muslim Brotherhood:
Executive Director M. Bilal Kaleem circulates an announcement that Siraj Wahaj, unindicted co-conspirator in the case of the Blind Sheik (read all about Wahaj's record here), will be appearing will be appearing at the Islamic Center of Burlington for a fundraiser on September 12. Wahaj is a frequent mosque guest. I've heard his lectures (in contrast to some of this personal beliefs) are quite dull, actually.
Miss Kelly has a little cloak-room gossip on the changing of the guard in the Wellesley College Muslim Chaplaincy: Who Will Be the Next Muslim Adviser at Wellesley? Word has it that Nancy Khalil will be making way for Bilal Kaleem's wife, Najiba Akbar with no announcement or job search.
The Muslim American Society's creeping control over local Muslim institutions, including college Muslim groups, has been a concern for local reform-minded Muslims for some time, as have Nancy Khalil's obscure funding sources. Miss Kelly notes:
...According to several Wellesley Muslim students, there was strong peer pressure in the Wellesley Muslim student group to wear headscarves and cover up. Otherwise, you were not considered a "real Muslim." Another student reported being told "not to run and not to laugh too loudly" at an Al-Muslimat weekend retreat. At Wellesley, Hillary Clinton's college, imagine a woman being told this!...not all Muslims are happy about the "Muslim mafia" and their monopoly on leadership in local Islamic organizations...
More here.
This guy must have boiled harder than I did if he watched Obama squirm and dodge and hedge trying to avoid admitting he was wrong about the surge (isn't that one of the things we're supposed to be upset at George Bush for? -- not to mention listening to the rest of his high school analysis) on O'Reilly the other night.
[h/t: Maggie]
Friday, September 5, 2008
Here's one more sign of the end of the Kyoto era. No country that signed the Accord a decade-plus ago has met its carbon dioxide emissions targets.
The conventional wisdom was that Britain had come closest and showed that significant reductions in CO2 emissions were possible. But the conventional wisdom is wrong.
The respected Stockholm Environment Institute, in York, has done its own CO2 emissions audit and found that Britain's emissions have been rising along with everyone else's, at a similar pace. The official figures demonstrate how open the entire issue is to manipulation.
A fascinating story of a family's secret: Pardon sought for dad's aid to Israel
A South Florida man is working to get a presidential pardon for his father, who helped smuggle weapons to Jews fighting in what was then Palestine in the late 1940s
Weapons for sale, prison time and secret air missions halfway around the world.
All made up the hidden life of Charles Winters, an average guy, quiet, who never spoke with his children about those years just after World War II.
His son, Jimmy Winters of Miami, discovered the details of his father's adventures only after Charles Winters died in 1984. Before then, there were just some small clues.
As when teenage Jimmy asked his father to buy him a gun so he could go hunting with his buddies in the Everglades. His dad said no, that he wasn't allowed to buy guns.
He didn't add that it was because he was a convicted felon.
''That was the first hint I had that something had happened,'' said Jimmy Winters, 44.
In the late 1940s, nearly everyone in this area's large Jewish community, in Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties, wanted to help in the struggle to create Israel.
But Charles Winters was a Protestant from Boston. When it was all over, he was the only man to serve time. He served 18 months in prison for his help flying weapons to the Jews in Palestine, fighting for what would later become Israel...
The son catches a clue when there are blue and white flags all over his dad's funeral. Good luck to his efforts.
He needs support to beat John Kerry for US Senate, and Jeff Beatty is no joke candidate. Chatham Republicans notes:
...Kerry has been in the Senate for 24 undistinguished years, occasionally popping up in Massachusetts news for wind-surfing and bar hopping in Nantucket. Kerry fatigue is working in Beatty's favor and the idea that Massachusetts would benefit from two-party representation in Washington could be catching on.
They point out James Taranto's hand-shake with Beatty at the RNC:
...Beatty gives us his card, which lists on its reverse an impressive list of credentials: Delta Force, Purple Heart, FBI hostage rescue, CIA counterterrorism, "safe schools expert," small businessman. (Actually, he wasn't that small.)
Kerry has held that seat for 24 years, and Massachusetts last elected a Republican to the Senate in 1972, when Sen.-elect Joe Biden was a scant 29. Beatty has an uphill climb.
According to Nielsen:
Palin Triggers RNC Ratings Spike
More than 37.2 million people tuned in for coverage of the third night of the 2008 Republican National Convention, which featured Sarah Palin's much anticipated national debut.
Wednesday night's RNC broadcasts attracted just a 1.1 million fewer viewers than Barack Obama's record-breaking speech on day four of the Democratic convention.
Coverage of day three of the GOP convention drew a large female audience (19.5 million) -- 5.2 million more women than tuned in for day two of the Democratic convention, when Hillary Clinton addressed the delegates, and 6.9 million more women than watched Joe Biden accept the Democrats' vice presidential nomination last Wednesday night...
And even bigger for McCain: McCain Tops Obama's Record-Breaking Ratings
On Thursday night, John McCain's acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention bested Barack Obama's record-breaking viewership numbers from last week by 500,000 viewers.
More than 38.9 million people tuned in to coverage of the final night of the GOP convention. In comparison, Obama's acceptance speech at the Democratic convention drew 38.4 million viewers.
For the third night in a row, more women (19.2 million) than men (17.9 million) watched the RNC coverage...
Chatham Republicans speculates about some of the reasons, here.
The Chabad envoy to Alaska on Thursday praised State Governor and recently nominated Republican candidate for Vice President Sarah Palin for her steadfast support for Israel.
"Based on my personal acquaintance with Governor Palin, I can confidently say that if she is elected, the Jewish people and the State of Israel will have a great friend and admirer in the White House," Rabbi Yosef Greenberg told Haaretz.
Greenberg has lived in Alaska for the past 17 years and he is coordinating Chabad activities in the state, where some 6,000 Jews live. He said that he meets the governor for friendly chats on a regular basis and that he has almost free access to her office.
Even in her previous role as the mayor of Wasilla, Greenberg continued, she maintained very good relations with the local Jewish community.
He said that when the Wasilla Conservative congregation inaugurated a new synagogue a few years ago, they were pleasantly surprised by her decision to attend the ceremony, even though she had not been invited.
She said at the event that she felt it was right to attend in order to express her satisfaction with the fact that people of the Jewish faith have a house of worship.
For Israel's 60th anniversary in May, Palin passed a resolution recognizing Alaska's relationship with Israel...
Related: Omri did yeoman's work debunking the despicable idea floated by Robert Wexler that Palin somehow has the neo-Nazi vote: New Leftist Meme: Palin "Solved Jewish Problem" That Obama Never Really Had (Plus: Anti-Palin "Buchanan Endorsement" Meme Also A Lie)
Another Ramadan, another chance to propagandize a captive audience. Note that this is not just a case of top-down propaganda, stirring up the people to take their minds off the failings of their own corrupt leaders, but a case of pandering -- Fatah is competing with Hamas to cater to their constituents' own hatreds. It's another reminder that the project of democracy and liberalization is a long, long-term one.
First, Haaretz reports (but buries the lede): Why was airing of 1st Palestinian soap opera cancelled?
The official Palestine Broadcasting Corporation (PBC) has cancelled the airing scheduled for this week of a new soap series, Matabb (Arabic for "speed bump").
Producer Fareed Majari confirmed Friday the cancellation, which members of the production team said came as a complete surprise.
They said no grounds were given, but speculated political reasons may be behind it, with some of the topics being dealt with in the series seen as too liberal for official Palestinian "state" television.
Officials at the PBC told Deutsche Presse-Agentur Friday that the German-funded series - the first homemade Palestinian soap opera - was not cancelled, but postponed until certain scenes were changed...
...They said some scenes were found offensive to the general Palestinian public and therefore could not be aired on Palestine TV, an official and nationalist institution.
Among others, certain scenes failed to show the Israeli occupation in a negative enough light, they charged. The officials mentioned one scene in which a Palestinian gives a flower to Israeli soldiers at an army checkpoint in the West Bank.
They insinuated the series was influenced by the fact that it was funded by Germany's Goethe Institute and the European Commission, which would not back programs that do not encourage coexistence between Israel and the Palestinians.
Observers said Palestine TV, owned by the West Bank administration of moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas of the secular Fatah party, is already struggling with claims by the rival radical Hamas.
Can't encourage that coexistence crap after all!
Palestinian Media Watch shows how Fatah is using state TV for indoctrinating the kids in the ongoing Jihad: PA TV children's quiz: Teaching about a world without Israel
Palestinian children are taught through formal and informal education to see a world in which the state of "Palestine" exists and replaces all of Israel. A children's quiz broadcast this week on Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority television shows how thoroughly Palestinian children have absorbed this message.
Children on the TV program routinely identified every Israeli city and landmark as part of the State of "Palestine." Haifa, Ashdod and Eilat are described as Palestinian ports, the Sea of Galilee is said to be a Palestinian lake, and the area of the Palestinian state is said to be 27,000 square kilometers. In fact, the total area of Gaza and the West Bank totals 6,200 square kilometers, so the only way to come up with the larger measurement is to include undisputed Israeli territory in the calculation. The "State of Palestine" is said to border Lebanon and the Red Sea; in fact, these are Israel's borders.
In an unsettling reminder of the 2007 Hamas children's TV program that used a Mickey Mouse character to preach hatred and world Islamic domination, the child host of this week's PATV (Fatah) program is sitting in front of a photo of Mickey Mouse...
The PMW report goes on to offer similar examples from Palestinian textbooks.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
The most curious solar cycle 24 continues its dearth of sunspots. The Sun has now gone more than a month without a spot, the first time in a century (nice roundups here and here).
Why is this important? There is circumstantial but strong evidence that the 11-year solar magnetic cycle and its longer-term modulations are responsible for the Earth's climate variability over decades to centuries to millennia. The stronger that cycle is on the Sun, the warmer it seems to be here; the weaker, the cooler. The best proxy metric for the cycle strength is its exact period, which varies somewhat from just under 10 years to about 11 years. The cycle is stronger when the period is shorter, weaker when longer.
However, other measures of cycle strength are also used. One is total solar surface area covered by spots; another is number of spots. "No spots visible" might mean the new cycle 24 will be weaker. The last four cycles have been fairly strong, with cycle 22 of the late 80s being the strongest of the four. Perhaps not accidentally, temperatures on Earth the last year or so have been ~ 0.6 - 1.0 oC cooler than the decade immediately prior (with annual and daily variations removed).
Meanwhile, some scientific organizations have issued an equally curious call for a lot more money to be spent in climate modeling, because, you see, climate still isn't nailed down. If it means going back to scratch with unanswered basic scientific questions, yes, although I doubt a huge amount will be necessary. If it means continuing down the same deadend path climate modeling has been on for the last 30 years, no, it's a waste. It's more of the same mistakes. But it's not what they said that's really important, it's what's implied: climate is not nailed down scientifically. Indeed.
I think we're within a year or two of laying the manufactured climate crisis to rest for good. Then the science can come out from under its 15-year partial embargo.
POSTSCRIPT: Here's a technical comparison of climate models with observed climate, over weekly-to-century time scales (Koutsoyiannis et al.), with negative conclusions about the reliability of climate models beyond a scale of about a year. That is, conventional climate models are unreliable for "climate" as opposed to "weather." (Hat tip to ClimateAudit.)
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
That's what I felt like after watching the happenings this evening. Loved Romney (especially when I heard Paul Begala trash him), like Huckabee, loved Giuliani...and Palin smashed it out of the park. The site of her young daughter licking the palm of her hand and smoothing the baby's hair was a hoot.
Lots of red meat for the Republican supporters. High-level political entertainment.
Update 9/4: The reviews from Republicans are ecstatic this morning. My only regret is that I missed Michael Steele. Chatham Republicans has some good links, including a transcript of Palin's speech. BTW, at the same site...what media bias? A tale of two magazine covers.
It's been a significant trend that has frustrated Republican efforts to become the majority party: since the late 90s, a significant number of voters who used to vote Republican for fiscal and/or national security reasons have become turned off. Some of them (at least in 2004 and 2006) voted Democratic. But most are abstaining from voting for any major-party candidate in general elections. Discrepancies in vote tallies in 2000 and 2004 between congressional and presidential votes seem to reflect this, as did the Ron Paul candidacy. Whether McCain can overcome this trend in 2008 remains to be seen.
But this year, I'm detecting something similar happening to Democrats. (See here and here, for example.) Obama's failure to win a majority of the Democratic primary vote has set the Democrats up for trouble. Some of these voters will vote for McCain; others will just abstain. The 2008 general election will thus feature two growing blocs of the disaffected, adding a multidimensional wild card to the outcome.
I love pictures like this, putting you on the surface of another planet.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a press release: "U.S. Muslims Urge McCain, Palin to Offer 'Inclusive' Speeches"
A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today called on John McCain and Sarah Palin to 'avoid divisive Islamophobic rhetoric' and instead offer 'inclusive' addresses at this week's GOP convention in Minnesota.
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said Sen. McCain and his supporters have in the past used rhetoric that many American Muslims believe serves to marginalize religious minorities, particularly Muslims...
...and lay off the 'Jihad' talk...and ixnay on the uslimMay otherhoodBray...knowwhatimean, knowwhatimean...and please allow us to photograph the nuclear wessels...
Anyway, they're probably too busy working the Palestinian Islamic Jihad fund-raising phone banks with just released on bail Sami al-Arian (which they are thrilled about) to actually watch any of the convention. Priorities don't you know.
Man do I hope Sami skips bail.
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
pp. 356-359:
Not until the first streaks of gray showed on the horizon did I realize that I was in totally strange territory. I was lost -- on a narrow road dug into the side of a scrubby mountain. Not even the famous Tower of the Russian Church on the Mount of Olives, highest landmark outside the Old City, was visible. Before me spread range after range of Judean hills. Below me -- at the bottom of a chasm some five hundred feet deep -- was an Arab mud village. Behind me an escarpment rose to the height of fifty feet. From my left a husky young Arab came down the trail, prodding his laden donkey before him.
"Sabah il-kher," I said. "Good morning."
"Sabah il-kher," he replied, and moved on.
A moment later another Arab came down the road. He was an oldish man with close-set eyes, no brighter facially than the donkey on which he was mounted. He rode on it with his stubby legs astride, his sandaled feet sticking out on each side, keeping step with the donkey's hopping stride.
"Sabah il-kher," he said.
"Sabah il-kher," I answered.
A talkative old man, he stopped the animal and jabbered...
"Ana Inglisi. Muta'asif la ahki Arabie," I said. "Assalamu aleikum. Peace be upon you."
He looked at me a moment, his eyes narrowing into slits.
"Yahoodi! Anta Yahoodi! You are a Jew! You are a Jew!" he screamed.
I whipped out an identification card, the one issued by the Mufti's Arab Higher Committee in Jerusalem. He held it upside down.
It dawned on me that the old man was illiterate.
"Yahoodi! Yahoodi!" he screamed like a siren, in a voice that carried deep into the mountain crags and the village below. He jumped off the donkey, snatched at his dagger and, still yelling Yahoodi, Yahoodi, roared down at me.
I took to my heels down the trail. He was easy to out distance, but racing toward me was the young Arab I had met a minute ago. He was brandishing his dagger above his head; the sun's glare made it dazzle like a fiery sword. I felt for a moment as though Damocles' blade was about to fall on me. There was absolutely no escape! Below me was the chasm, with precipitous sides. I'd roll to the bottom without stopping. Above me was the escarpment. I'd be overtaken easily if I tried to flee. Flee where? The old man would have awakened the countryside -- racing through it like Paul Revere on a donkey souynding the alarm against the Yahoodi. A hundred daggers would have sought me out.
As I ran toward the young man I kept yelling: "Armani, Inglisi! Ana mish Yahoodi!" I girded myself for the inevitable hand-to-hand encounter on the mountaintop, for I had no notion of letting myself be stabbed in the throat. I noted the Arab's guard was open. I would try to knock him down the cliff with a quick right uppercut before the old man reached us, then push the latter down and flee. I have no idea what made me address the young Arab in English, for he was the last man on earth I'd expect to understand me, but I screamed just before closing in: "Hold back your knife till you've seen my papers!"
"You are English, or Armenian, which?" my incredulous ears heard him say.
"Read this quick. It's from the Mufti. Read this, and this. I'm a friend of all Arabs. I love the Arabs. I'm no Jew."
The old man was upon us, his dagger all set, the blood lust hot in his eyes. At his age he wanted to make sure of getting into Allah's heaven and there was no easier way than by killing either a Yahoodi or a Gentile. The young Arab grabbed him and held him back. The two struggled briefly on the mountain trail, a dagger in the hands of each. "Yahoodi! Yahood! the old man kept yelling, trying to get at me. Up the trail two more Arabs came into view and prodded their donkeys as they saw the struggle. The young man won out in the nick of time, for the newcomers had dismounted and were coming down upon us with their daggers out.
My benefactor began to argue vigorously with the old man; he showed my papers to the newcomers, and they, too, agreed I was a pro-Arab Christian and that every courtesy should be shown me. The old man kept muttering "Yahoodi!" At last he was quieted down and put his dagger away...
...We walked on for a while, then the Arab pointed to a fork in the road.
"That way is Jerusalem."
They all wished me peace and a safe journey, except the old man whom I had cheated of his place in heaven, for which he'd never forgive me.
No, they don't get sliced, their lungs explode due to the air pressure shift: On a Wing and Low Air: The Surprising Way Wind Turbines Kill Bats
Scientists have known since 2004 that wind farms kill bats, just as they kill birds, even though the flying mammals should be able to avoid them. Many biologists thought that the bats, like their avian counterparts, might be falling victim to the fast-spinning turbine blades. But an examination of 188 hoary and silver-haired bats killed at a wind farm in southwestern Alberta in Canada between July and September in 2007 showed that nearly half showed no external injuries--as would be expected if the giant blades had smashed the flying mammals to the ground.
Instead, 90 percent of the 75 bats the researchers ultimately dissected had been killed by burst blood vessels in their lungs, according to results presented in Current Biology -- suggesting that the air pressure difference created by the spinning windmills had terminated them, not contact with the blades.
"As turbine height increases, bat deaths increase exponentially," says ecologist Erin Baerwald of the University of Calgary in Alberta, who led research into the deaths as part of her master's project. "What we found is a lot of internal hemorrhaging."...
A European MEP states what should be the obvious: EU aid to Palestine is funding the conflict
...Still, the EU's generosity with our money - it has paid the Palestinian Authority €256 million so far this year - creates two problems. First, the PA is run by Hamas, which is on the EU's list of designated terrorist operations. Under Brussels rules, funding such an organisation is a criminal offence. Euro-lawyers have sought to circumvent the letter of the law by funnelling aid money through NGOs, but this is sheer sophistry. Many of the PA's officials are Hamas militants, whose salaries are being paid while they serve their sentences in Israeli jails.
Second, it is becoming increasingly clear that overseas aid is arresting a political settlement in the region. (This goes equally for American subventions to Israel which, as Ron Paul argues, have sapped the enterprise of the Jewish state; but that's another story.) Palestinians receive more assistance, per capita, than any other people on Earth, and live in one of its most violent spaces. The two facts are connected.
The idea that aggression can be buried under a landslide of euros sounds reasonable, but it is based on a false premise, namely that political violence is caused by economic deprivation. This notion derives ultimately from Marx and, like many of his ideas, it looks plausible on the page, but turns out to be specious...
Well, almost right...the Ron Paul bit fails since Israel is not the perpetuator of the conflict, Hamas, the PA and the Arab cheer-leaders are. Our aid is also all military, which allows the Israelis to maintain a deterrent and be more precise when they do need to strike. So if not an apples to oranges comparison, it is at least an apples to crab-apples one -- looks similar, tastes totally different.
[Via A7, which clips the Ron Paul bit.]
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
PRE-POSTSCRIPT: Oh, and how could I forget Juno? The movie's director talks here about life imitating art imitating life imitating art ....
---
One of the most remarkable things about American society today is how long it takes the average middle or upper-middle class person to mature into adulthood.
I was comparing notes with a friend about Obama and Palin versus JFK at the same point in his life, and several large facts struck both of us. When JFK ran for president in 1960, he had been in Congress for 14 years and had served in the Navy four years before that, a total of 18 years of public service. Obama is frequently compared to JFK, but honestly, there is no comparison: Obama is man of manifest talent and no achievement. Only the media's relentless promotion of him has obscured this and the fact that he's lost without coaching and teleprompter. He's the perfect icon for the entitlement mentality. Even Palin, limited as her political career has been, has more on her resumé.
Part of the explanation is that everyone's living longer today and the Boomers and their immediate predecessors, the Depression-war babies, fill and will remain in positions of importance for many years to come. That means advancement for anyone under, say, 50 is harder than it was in JFK's day.
But today's American society, and the Western world in general, is also set up to make adulthood harder than it once was. Adolescence was once a prologue to adulthood. Today, adulthood is a prolongation of adolescence.
.... But not for Bristol Palin, obviously eager to jump into adulthood a little too early. An object lesson for the way we infantilize, not only adults, but late teens on the verge of adulthood. What they need is, not infantilization, but as much responsibility as they can handle, along with a little adult supervision. Without adult responsibility handed to them, the pluckier and more risk-tolerant will seek it out themselves, whether they know what they're getting into or not.
POSTSCRIPT: Bless her heart, Megan McArdle has two very sensible postings (here and here) about the women of the Palin household. (I count Bristol as an adult.)
The Supreme Council of 1925, that is. A7 relates the news of an uncovered guide-book produced by the Muslim authorities that shows how history has "changed" as convenience dictates:
The widely-disseminated Arab Moslem position that the Temple Mount is not Jewish has been debunked - by the Supreme Moslem Council (Waqf) of Jerusalem, in a Temple Mount guide published in 1925.
In 1997, the chief Moslem cleric of the Palestinian Authority, Mufti Ikrama Sabri, stated, "The claim of the Jews to the right over [Jerusalem] is false, and we recognize nothing but an entirely Islamic Jerusalem under Islamic supervision..."
Thus began a campaign to convince the world that the millennia-old natural association between Jerusalem and Jews was untrue. As Islamic Movement chief Raed Salah stated in 2006, "We remind, for the 1,000th time, that the entire Al-Aqsa mosque [on the Temple Mount], including all of its area and alleys above the ground and under it, is exclusive and absolute Moslem property, and no one else has any rights to even one grain of earth in it."
However, it is now known that this "absolute" Moslem claim is actually not as absolute as claimed. In fact, back in 1925, the Supreme Moslem Council - also known as the Waqf, which has overseen Temple Mount activities on behalf of the Moslem religion for hundreds of years - boasted proudly that the site was none other than that of Solomon's Temple.
The Jerusalem-based Temple Institute reports that it has acquired a copy of the official 1925 Supreme Moslem Council Guide Book to Al-Haram Al-Sharif (the Moslem name for the Temple Mount). On page 4, the Waqf states, "Its identity with the site of Solomon's Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to universal belief, on which 'David built there an altar unto the L-rd...', citing the source in 2 Samuel XXIV,25...
Update: And by the way, copies are available -- most are from the 60's, but there are also editions going back earlier.
I always tell my activist friends...don't piss off the regular people. It's a sign of utter fanaticism when you find yourself doing things like this:
PROTESTERS who interrupted a concert by Israeli musicians five times yesterday sparked outrage - but the audience for the recital, by the Jerusalem Quartet as part of the Edinburgh International Festival, responded with a standing ovation.
The Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign claimed to have struck a blow against a group they claimed were "cultural ambassadors for Israel".
Five Scottish protesters stood up, one after another, at the concert in the Queen's Hall to disrupt the performance, denouncing "Israeli army musicians", before being bundled out and arrested. The group campaigns for a cultural boycott of Israeli.
But the audience yesterday rallied to the musicians - two of whom are members of the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, established to promote harmony between Israeli and Arab musicians and cultures. Some tried to silence the protesters or drown them out with clapping.
Hugh Kerr, formerly the MEP overseeing the European Parliament's music policy, was at the concert. He said: "I am a long-time supporter of Palestinian rights, as I suspect were many in the Queen's Hall this morning. However, the effect was totally counterproductive."...
Of course, on their own lists, the heroes of the concert jihad are congratulating themselves on a job well done, but all this really achieves is a warning to ordinary Jews not to be complacent.
...and tap their bank accounts there:
A Jerusalem judge Sunday said a U.S. court ruling that the Palestinian Authority must compensate the family of a U.S. citizen killed by Palestinian militants is enforceable in Israel too.
The judgment means the family's lawyers can claim around $117 million from Palestinian Authority assets in Israel.
The Palestinians are expected to appeal.
Sunday's court ruling was the latest development in a long-running lawsuit filed by relatives of Yaron Ungar, who also holds Israeli citizenship, and his wife Efrat, who were killed by Hamas gunmen in June 1996.
His family filed a claim with a federal court in Rhode Island, saying the gunmen acted under orders from the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, making them responsible.
Monday, September 1, 2008
This is Binah, from the Kavanna blog, and thanks to a gracious invitation from Martin, I'm here on his blog as well. I'll be co-blogging and maybe even "co-evolving" with Martin as the fall unrolls. My postings will be his postings, and whither he goeth ... no, sorry :)
Look for more in the next day or two.
[This post continues the series of excerpts from John Roy Carlson's 1951 work, Cairo to Damascus (link to in-print paperback). All posts in the series will be collected on this page.]
Secular nationalism as an antidote to Islamism? Out of the frying pan and into the fire.
pp. 351-352:
"I'm Captain Moustafa Kamal Sidki, in charge of Intelligence in this area...I understand you are a reporter for Al Misri. May I see your credentials -- all of them?" Under the gaslight he examined each minutely, including those given me by Major Abdullah el Tel.
"The Arab Legion is no friend of Egypt," he said, heatedly.
"What's wrong with the Arab Legion?" I asked innocently.
"Everything," he snapped, eyes blazaing. "They're not Arab. They're British agents, British tools...I am a strong Arab nationalist. I was released from prison only four months ago with seventeen other officer."
"The charge must have been serious," I said, surprised at his candor.
"Yes. Plotting against the government. We were all nationalists -- the nucleus of something much bigger to come. We want to build the future of the Arab world on a military basis. We are in a coma now. It will take us at least ten years to awaken. Only military regimes can accomplish this, and at the same time protect us from our enemies -- England and the Jews."
"What is your program?" I asked.
"To rid Palestine of the Jew though it takes a hundred years. Out motto is: 'God and Nation, Egypt First!' We trust no one except the military. We have learned much from the Germans. All Egyptian officers respect German militarism and admire the way the Germans were able to fight against the whole world. The other Arab countries will follow our example -- when they see that we have the solution of the Jewish problem, the British problem, the home problem."
"You are speaking very frankly with me," I said. "I appreciate that."
"It's because I think you are one American who is sympathetic to us." His black eyes were fastened on me. "You are, aren't you?"
"Oh, yes, yes," I said...
The British thought they could buy influence with the Arabs by opposing the Jews and supplying the Legion. They were wrong. To this day people think that they can nullify the Jihadists by supporting the secular fascist nationalists. They underestimate the problem. As the Rousseau quote currently at the top of this page teaches...
"Will he listen to his inner voice? But it is said that this voice is only formed by the habit of judging and feeling in the bosom of society and according to the laws; it cannot, then, serve to establish them."
...new-fangled secular nationalism stands, in the Arab Middle East particularly, on someone's shoulders. It does not grow from sand sui generis and should not be mistaken for Western versions and expected to be dealt with in the same ways. Its roots are of the Middle East, Islam, and tribalism.
A surprisingly good piece from the CBC: Islamic state? Not yet
GAZA CITY -- Mahmoud Zahar doesn't believe in evolution. And he has not evolved.
For Gaza, this could be a problem.
The fierce co-founder of the Palestinian militant group Hamas, a surgeon by training, spent 20 minutes after a recent interview with CBC News insisting that evolution is false.
After all, said Zahar, a donkey can eat shrubbery and survive, but a human cannot.
"So, a donkey is more evolved than a human? No," scoffs Zahar, seemingly satisfied that he has demonstrated the absurdity of Charles Darwin's theory. Allah, not evolution, made man, he says, and Allah has made Gaza Islamic.
"We are already an Islamic society," Zahar declares. "We are controlled by Islam in every quarter, every inch of our life."...
No arguing that logic.
The piece goes on to use this as a hook to show how it's Hamas -- not Israel or anyone else -- holding Gaza in retrograde. While it let's the average guy in Gaza off the hook far too easily, it's a surprisingly decent piece. We can only hope that popular support for the group has sunk as far as the CBC implies.
Just sayin'. From about 6:50 or so into the video on this page.
[h/t: Republican Jewish Coalition.]
Pakistani lawmaker defends honor killings
A Pakistani lawmaker defended a decision by southwestern tribesmen to bury five women alive because they wanted to choose their own husbands, telling stunned members of Parliament this week to spare him their outrage.
"These are centuries-old traditions and I will continue to defend them," Israr Ullah Zehri, who represents Baluchistan province, said Saturday. "Only those who indulge in immoral acts should be afraid." The women, three of whom were teenagers, were first shot and then thrown into a ditch.
They were still breathing as their bodies were covered with rocks and mud, according media reports and human rights activists, who said their only "crime" was that they wished to marry men of their own choosing Zehri told a packed and flabbergasted parliament on Friday that Baluch tribal traditions helped stop obscenity and then asked fellow lawmakers not to make a big fuss about it.
Many stood up in protest, saying the executions were "barbaric" and demanding that discussions continue Monday. But a handful said it was an internal matter of the deeply conservative province.
"I was shocked," said lawmaker Nilofar Bakhtiar, who pushed for legislation calling for perpetrators of so-called honor killings to be punished when she served as minister of women's affairs under the last government. "I feel that we've gone back to the starting point again," she said. "It's really sad for me."