Monday, September 22, 2008
Today was supposed to have been the day that a high-profile, bi-partisan event was to occur at the United Nations to protest the appearance of genocidal madman Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but it was not to be. There's an event happening, yes, but the high-profile representatives of both mainstream parties won't be there, and a damaged and fractured Jewish community is left holding the bag.
And you better remember who's at fault. You better remember who put party ahead of a non-nuclear Iran: The Democratic Party, the National Jewish Democratic Council, J-Street and their backers like Alan Solomont.
For years and years, groups like AIPAC have done almost miraculous work keeping the interests of mainstream Jews the interests of both parties in government. How many events over the years have we seen where representatives of both the Republicans and the Democrats have come together for a common cause, and even partisan outlets like the one you're reading now have laid that aside for a day to praise people who are...at least for a day...at least for one issue...on the right side. The same side.
But the Democrats are really feeling the heat this election, and the derangement runs deep, and some people are becoming desperate. Like the drowning man who pulls his rescuer down with him, desperation makes people irrational, cast the veneer of civilization aside and show their truest, deepest selves and priorities.
And when it comes down to it, it's not Jews in Israel that motivates Democrats, and it's not Jews in America that motivates them either. It's their own power. It's their own little dinners, and board memberships, and their silly narcissistic college freshman platitudes...that's what motivates them. And when they finally get around to looking out the window, their bogeyman isn't an Iran armed with nuclear weapons led by a Holocaust-denying antisemitic America-hater...it's "conservatives." Ahmadinejad is, after all, an ocean away, but it's conservatives here at home that prevent them from inflicting their peculiar vision of the worker's paradise on all of the rest of us.
Never forget that it wasn't an extremist group, it was the National Jewish Democratic Council that politicized this event: NJDC Calls for Withdrawal of Palin Invitation to Iran Rally
WASHINGTON, DC - Marc R. Stanley, Chairman of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), released the following statement:
Monday's protest against Ahmadinejad is too important to be tainted by partisanship. Unfortunately, the campaign of Senator John McCain is much more interested in scoring political points than insuring there is bipartisan solidarity around the anti- Ahmadinejad efforts. Therefore, we call upon the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations to withdraw the invitation to Governor Sarah Palin and we applaud Senator Hillary Clinton's decision to not attend the rally after the attendance of Palin was announced...
What Orwellian turn-speak! It was the NJDC that brought partisanship to the event. Rather than letting their high-profile Democrat show up, or encouraging their party to one-up the Republicans and send their Presidential nominee, they crapped on the entire event. When did Sarah Palin become David Duke?
And when the dirty-work was done: NJDC Commends the Withdrawal of Palin's Invitation to the Iran Rally It's typical liberal "thinking" -- if you're a leftist that's just being moderate and non-partisan, if you're on the right you're a partisan.
The partisans against the rally were willing to stop at nothing, including threats against the tax-exempt status of the sponsoring groups -- a nonsensical threat that nevertheless can cost money to defend: Sources: Intense Pressure Led To Palin UN Snub
CBS 2 HD Has Learned Democrats Threatened To Attack Jewish Groups' Tax Exempt Status Over VP Nominee Invite
...Sources tell CBS 2 HD that a decision to disinvite Palin from the high profile rally after Clinton pulled out in a huff came as the result of intense pressure from Democrats.
"This is insulting. This is embarrassing, especially to Gov. Palin, to me and I think it should be to every single New Yorker," Assemblyman Dov Hikind, D-Brooklyn, told CBS 2 HD.
Sources say the axes were out for Palin as soon as Sen. Clinton pulled out because she did not want to attend the same event as the Republican vice presidential candidate...
...The groups sponsoring the rally against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN were reportedly told, "it could jeopardize their tax exempt status" if they had Palin and not Clinton or Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on hand...
...As for Sen. Clinton, she brushed right past CBS 2 HD's Lou Young when he tried to ask her about the issue on Thursday night.
Lou Young: "Were the organizers of Monday's rally right to depoliticize it?"
Clinton walked past Young, said "Thank you all very much" and started hugging people...
Soccer Dad, who has a good post on this, thinks I'm too quick to let J-Street off the hook, tying matters in to the common-denominator, self-appointed exilarch, local left-wing activist and Obama supporter, Alan Solomont. I still say that J-Street itself doesn't have the pull to screw a rally like this by itself. The groups involved wouldn't bow to them, though they, and Solomont are names to remember and have their share of responsibility (See J-Street's crowing about their "victory": We Won! Palin Not Speaking at Iran Rally).
Solomont is one of the jet-setting busy-bodies who went off to Switzerland a few years back, watched a parade at the podium to praise Arafat and denounce Sharon, then came back to Boston to act as pimp-daddy for an idea so skanky he couldn't give it away. In the post CJP's Email Apologizes for Inviting Sarah Palin to anti-Ahmadinejad Rally, Jewish Russian Telegraph notes:
...Patty Jacobson, CJP's VP of Marketing tells us that the organizers did not want to "politicize" the event. We have a question to Ms. Jacobson --- since when CJP is extra kosher when it comes to partisan political connections? Since when such modesty? Alan Solomont, during his time as CJP's chairman, used to use, absolutely openly, CJP's donors lists to raise money for the Democrats. He dismissed all the criticism at the time and explained that this was a difficult, but correct decision. Alan is a committed lefty working for socialist paradise for the rest of us -- whether we want it or not...
I've heard through the grape vine that even Elie Wiesel was pressured to drop out of the event.
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, a bi-partisan group, Richard Holbrooke, R. James Woolsey, Dennis B. Ross and Mark D. Wallace, writes that a nuclear Iran is a serious matter: Everyone Needs to Worry About Iran
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the United Nations in New York this week. Don't expect an honest update from him on his country's nuclear program. Iran is now edging closer to being armed with nuclear weapons, and it continues to develop a ballistic-missile capability.
Such developments may be overshadowed by our presidential election, but the challenge Iran poses is very real and not a partisan matter. We may have different political allegiances and worldviews, yet we share a common concern -- Iran's drive to be a nuclear state. We believe that Iran's desire for nuclear weapons is one of the most urgent issues facing America today, because even the most conservative estimates tell us that they could have nuclear weapons soon.
A nuclear-armed Iran would likely destabilize an already dangerous region that includes Israel, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, and pose a direct threat to America's national security. For this reason, Iran's nuclear ambitions demand a response that will compel Iran's leaders to change their behavior and come to understand that they have more to lose than to gain by going nuclear...
But here's the fact. The Democrats not only don't want to allow Sarah Palin to have a stage that would show with finality that their smears about her cavorting with "Nazi sympathizers" is plain crap, but they also don't want to admit that they simply don't support the goals of this protest. They are afraid of serious sanctions against Iran. They don't want it. They don't support it, and their friends in the organized Jewish community are willing to run cover for them.
Update: Dennis Hale has an excellent piece on this, here: What Obama means by "bipartisanship"
The NY Sun has the text of the speech Sarah Palin would have delivered: Palin on Ahmadinejad: 'He Must Be Stopped'
Despite the best efforts of the Democrat party, the rally has drawn a huge crowd. The Boston Jewish Community couldn't fill a single bus and the trip had to be canceled.
Update: Iowahawk: Council Demands Palin Ouster from Fallout Shelter (brilliant)
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: How Do You Spell Democrat - A-H-M-A-D-I-N-E-J-A-D.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/15503
I've just had "that conversation" for the umpteenth time with an employee here (not for the umpteenth time with this particular person, just the umpteenth time overall), regarding, now the results, of the election: 1. Isn't George Bush just t... Read More
Tom Mountain is kind enough to send along his latest Jewish Advocate column on a subject I was considering but never got to posting about, this Interfaith Declaration for Peace. Here it is in full: Having declared themselves "anguished by... Read More
As we've pointed out, CJP will be hosting a discussion next Thursday featuring J-Street's Jeremy Ben-Ami: Why is CJP Giving Oxygen to J-Street? The event has produced an outcry within the community, not only for giving a seat to J-Street,... Read More
Indeed, and, as Herb Keinon points out, contrary to the warnings of Boston Consul General Nadav Tamir: Poll shows surge of support for Israel in US In stark contrast to the cable leaked last month by Israel's consul-general in Boston... Read More
So says that story in the North Shore Jewish Journal: Consul General Reaches Out to Constituents After Memo Flap The uproar over Israeli Consul General Nadav Tamir's leaked three-page memo in which he criticizes the Netanyahu government blew over more... Read More
What's Hoenlein's position on this matter? He seems strangely silent.
I guess Hillary Clinton bailed out of the anti-islamofascist regime of iran rally because with VP candidate Gov. Palin at the rally, it reminds Hillary that she was defeated by Barack Hussein Obama for the President candidate slot AND that she was snubbed for the Vice-President slot.
Rev. Wright must be rolling in the aisles laughing at Hillarys expense.
I spell current day Demoncrat - P-A-R-T-I-S-A-N and L-O-S-E-R.
Caroline Glick
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017359617&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
Dems would never dare back out, put this kind of pressure or make threats against the tax-exempt status of any other ethnic group.
If Ahmadinejad denied that blacks were ever slaves and threaten to annihilate Africa, Hillary wouldn't dare back out and the Dems, including all the lefty Jewish organizations, would be racing each other to try to be the first in line to condemn him.
So much for that all-powerful Jewish lobby that runs America and has the politicians in its back pocket. I'm sure Ahmadinejad will take this as further evidence of Jewish weakness that we are so divided and that lefty Jews hate conservatives more than they love Israel.
Nappy wants to know:
- How many went to the rally?
- What does the MSM say about the rally?
The short answers: (1) "Thousands" is all we know. Whether it's 2,000 or 20,000 is anyone's guess at this point. (2) They didn't.And now, the rest of the story about the stories.
Pamela at Atlas shrugs says only 2,000; she's among those who called for a boycott of the rally because of how the Dumbocrats' treachery and the organizers' screw-up. VoA doesn't say how many. JPost, Ha'Aretz, The Irish Times, the International Herald Tribune, Ynet and JTA all say "thousands." The Irish Times lists some of the world leaders Sarah Palin will meet with this week in New York. Ynet, Ha'Aretz and some blogs talk about the bullet-proof vest MK Dalia Itzik wore at the request of her security detail. Ynet goes so far as to say US security officials and her own security team advised against her speaking, but she insisted. Natan Sharansky spoke, but few of the sources mention it.
Nappy can't link to what the NY Times, The Washington Post, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSDNC, NBC, NPR, PBS or USA Today said because none of them showed up in the first pages of Google News search results. Once again, the left-wing MSM ignored it. Most of them covered the brouhaha leading up to the rally, but the rally itself? What rally? It never happened.
WCBS TV, the network's flagship station, covered it as local news. The web site's lead is that the major Jewish organizations are pissed that it turned into an anti-Obama rally. In fact, the web headline calls it an anti-Obama rally even though their story does not support that characterization. And that's the party line from the left-wing -- ignore the very real threat of a nuclear Iran and focus on divisive domestic politics. The most noteworthy aspects of the rally from WCBS's perspective is Jewish discord and disunity and Obama-bashing from a handful of those who attended. (Caroline Glick nailed it this morning: Your abortions or your lives!
Comment preview shows that mal already posted that link in #3. Hey! This was supposed to be comment #3!)
It's no surprise that The Tehran Times features those wack-job rabbis from Neturei Karta.
Elie Wiesel called for Ahmawackajob's indictment in the International Court of Justice for crimes against humanity. He addressed him saying "Go home and stay home." Nappy didn't actually read all the sites linked here, just skimmed them quickly. So Nappy's not saying no one reported what Natan Sharansky said, just that Nappy didn't see it if they did.
And there you have the latest installment of Nappy Nolledge. (In Lincoln, Nebraska, driving past the state university's football stadium at night, Nappy's host pointed out the big, red, illuminated letter N on Big Red's home and asked what it stood for. Should be obvious, right? Wrong. The N stands for Nolledge.)
Clyde Haberman of the NY Times had an op-ed about this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/23/nyregion/23nyc.html?ref=todayspaper