April 2009 Archives
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Went this evening to a "dialogue" sponsored by the Newton Human Rights Commission between Israeli Consul General Nadav Tamir and the PLO's man Husam Zomlot entitled "Prospects for Peace Between Israelis and Palestinians." Brutal to sit through. Here are some quick impressions of how it went:
Tamir: I'm not here to make accusations or look backward. We need to look forward and I am optimistic that peace can happen. We are all friends. [Forward thinking, positive, but a man with sufficient excess of power to afford the luxury of graciousness.]
Enter the victim, stage right.
Zomlot: (I swear Adam Sandler studied this guy for his Zohan character) Occupation. Victimized we are. As poor unfortunate, impoverished, uneducated people, we can't be responsible for anything we do...not that we do anything. We were hopeful many times, but...occupation, bad Israelis. I'm pessimistic, but you can't blame me...for anything. Occupation?!
Questioner: What about those rockets those people keep launching from Gaza? I mean, there were soldiers out in the open but they just launched rockets over their heads at hospitals. What's up with that?
Zomlot: Occupation. We can't be responsible or criticized. We are occupied and starving. [Never address or even mention the word "rocket". Never admit any fault.]
Tamir: We are hopeful. Let's look forward.
Questioner: What about your support for Hamas? Have you read what they say about Jews in their charter?
Zomlot: Occupation. There wasn't always an H...thingy...people. We need to include everyone in a democratic process.
Questioner: What about the rise of Islamic fundamentalism? How does that figure in for prospects of peace?
Zomlot: What's wrong with people getting in touch with their religion? (Seriously.)
Tamir played it "above the fray" and never took on any of Zomlot's many distortions and many, many omissions.
Was that the right strategy? Largely tonight I doubt it mattered. Most of the packed house was well decided (and mostly pro-Israel). There were two International Relations students from UMass sitting in front of me who were nodding their heads off every time Zomlot played the "We can't be responsible, we're poor victims" card. Take that as you will.
Zomlot was also quite optimistic that the way things are in Europe politically will, sometime soon, be the direction things go in this country as well. Take that as you will, too.
More on that recent case of the Palestinian Arab who sold land to a Jew: PA court: Death to man who sold land to Jews
In the first case of its kind, a Palestinian Authority "military court" on Tuesday sentenced a Palestinian man to death by hanging after finding him guilty of selling land to Jews.
The verdict came shortly after the PA's chief Islamic judge, Sheikh Tayseer Tamimi, issued yet another fatwa (religious decree) banning Muslims from selling land or houses to Jews.
The death sentence is seen as an attempt by the PA leadership in Ramallah to deter Palestinians from conducting real estate transactions with Jews. It follows reports according to which Jewish individuals and organizations recently bought land and houses from Arabs in Jerusalem and some areas in the West Bank.
The man sentenced to death is Anwar Brigith, 59, from the village of Bet Umar, north of Hebron.
The three-judge panel found the defendant guilty of violating PA laws that bar Palestinians from selling property to "the enemy."
Phew. Glad we got that whole "enemies" thing straight. I thought the PA was aiming for being "friends" now. And note, the guy sold land to "Jews," not Israelis.
In its ruling, the court, which convened in Hebron, said that Brigith had acted in violation of a Palestinian "military law" dating back to 1979, which states that it is forbidden for a Palestinian to sell land to Jews.
The accused was also found guilty of violating a law dating back to 1958 that calls for a boycott against Israel, as well as another law from 1953 that bans trade with Israelis...
...The court also decided to confiscate Brigith's money and property.
Although the PA has never executed Palestinians accused of selling land to Jews, several "suspects" have been kidnapped and murdered by Palestinian security personnel or members of armed groups in the West Bank and Gaza Strip...
Yeah, this doesn't happen much because the case rarely gets this far before the guy is dragged out into the street and shot. I love the confiscation bit. That's always a comforting power when you're living in a state run by corrupt kleptocrats. Selling land to Jews then accusing others of doing the same and having them killed is a fine art that goes back at least to the Al-Husseinis who used to do that very thing.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
We are saddened to hear the news of the passing of Kentucky's oldest veteran, Robley Rex at the age of 107: Robley Rex, WWI-era vet, dies at age 107
Robley Henry Rex, a World War I-era Army veteran renowned and beloved for his volunteer service to other veterans, died today at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Louisville just four days short of his 108th birthday.
Rex was born May 2, 1901 [This is incorrect according to emailer JT Major. Rex lied about his age when he enlisted and was actually born January 2, 1903. I guess that would make him 106? -S] in Hopkinsville. He credited his longevity to his wife of 69 years, the former Gracie Bivins, who died in 1992 at age 91.
"I married the right woman," Rex always said. He called her "the smartest woman in the world."
The two met at Camp Taylor in Louisville in 1919 before he was sent overseas with the Army. They married in 1922 when he returned to the United States.
Rex was "delightful, bubbly and an energetic, fun guy to be around," retired Brig. Gen. Les Beavers, commissioner the Kentucky Department of Veterans Affairs from 1998 until December, told The Courier-Journal a few years ago. Beavers had shared the stage with Rex at many veterans ceremonies.
"Robley not only had a long life, but a quality life. It was an honor to know him," Beavers said....
Our thoughts and prayers go out to Robley Rex's family, and our thanks to Robley for an example of a life well-lived.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Adam Holland has more on the crazy friends of the hope of the Green Party, Cynthia McKinney: McKinney's fascist friends (continued). This is an expedition into the depths of crazy conspiracy theories, and they're all Cynthia's friends.
Telegraph: Stewardess sacked after refusing to wear Islamic robe
An air stewardess has been sacked after refusing her airline's demand to wear traditional Islamic dress and walk behind male colleagues in Saudi Arabia.
Lisa Ashton, who worked for BMI, was told that she was expected to wear the abaya, a long black robe that leaves only the face uncovered, when she was out in public in the Gulf state.
She was also told that she should walk behind male colleagues irrespective of their rank, in order to conform with the social codes of the conservative country.
Miss Ashton was instructed to consider the abaya as part of her uniform when flying to Saudi Arabia.
But she told her managers that she considered the requirement discriminatory, and was worried that Saudi Arabia was not safe to travel to because of the danger of terrorist attacks.
"It's not the law that you have to walk behind men in Saudi Arabia, or that you have to wear an abaya, and I'm not going to be treated as a second-class citizen," she said.
"It's outrageous. I'm a proud Englishwoman and I don't want these restrictions placed on myself."...
Hells yeah. Now as a matter of law, I think the airline should be able to require whatever they want to, but from every other angle, they at least should have let her keep her old rate of pay, and they should stop trying to be more Saudi than the Saudis. The airline ought to show at least as much pride as its employee.
It's all so very revealing. Mahmoud Abbas and his 'government' just can't acknowledge the basic fact of Israel as a Jewish State -- as though it's any of his business. Of course, he does consider it his business, because there has been no aspect of Palestinian Arab culture that hasn't demonstrated that it considers the "two state" solution as nothing more than a "one Arab state" solution. I love what the Netanyahu Government is revealing with one simple immutable position:
Following is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' response to remarks made today by Palestinian Chairman Mahmud Abbas relating to recognition of Israel as a Jewish state:
The recognition of Israel as the sovereign state of the Jewish people is an essential and necessary step in the historic process of reconciliation between Israel and the Palestinians.
The more the Palestinians assimilate this fundamental and substantive fact, the sooner the peace between the two nations will progress toward fruition.
Soccer Dad has an excellent roundup of links and commentary on some of the background: What's a jewish state got to do with it? It includes this observation from Barry Rubin:
...This is not the real issue. The real issue is this: much of the world wants Israel to agree in advance to give the Palestinian Authority (PA) what they think it wants without any concessions or demonstration of serious intent on its part.
The first problem is that the demand is totally one-sided. Does the PA truly accept a two-state solution? That isn't what it tells its own people in officials' speeches, documents of the ruling Fatah group, schools, the sermons of PA-appointed clerics, and the PA-controlled media.
The second problem is that PA compliance with its earlier commitments is pretty miserable, though this is a point that almost always goes unmentioned in Western diplomatic declarations and media...
What's it mean for the future when some denunciations are acceptable, and others aren't: Troublemaking Dissenters at Palestinian Solidarity Week
"Christians, Jews, and Muslims have a right to live in equality. But Israel has no more right to exist than the apartheid [had]."
These words were spoken by Mauri' Saalakhan, the author of the book The Palestinians' Holocaust: American Perspectives. Saalakhan was invited to speak at the University of Maryland's Palestinian Solidarity Week last month. Jewish students, supporters of Israel, and rational Americans in general may justifiably find these words inflammatory, hateful, or even morbidly ironic, yet it was not Saalakhan's speech that earned the condemnation of the university administration along with a criminal investigation instigated by the university's president. Rather, it was the fliers posted protesting Saalakhan's appearance that caused such an acute disturbance.
A member of the Muslim Students Association called the posters "Islamophobic" and other students described them as "menacing." The university's Diamondback newspaper characterized students who were unfortunate enough to lay eyes on the "propaganda" posters as "victims," yet this was the scariest description they could muster:
One such flier depicted a woman, wearing a traditional Muslim burqa and holding an AK-47 in one hand and a bomb-toting baby in the other. "What did she teach her child today?" was written above the picture.
Note that no one is disputing the authenticity of the photograph's content. Sadly, images of Palestinian parents grooming their children for resistance and "martyrdom" are widely accessible on the Internet. Apparently, the disturbing aspect of this flier was not the scene itself -- a mother shamelessly using her child as political fodder -- but that this authentic image was allowed to confront the sensitive university students with some of the less noble aspects of the Palestinian resistance during the sacrosanct Palestinian Solidarity Week.
University of Maryland police halted their investigation after determining that no crime had been committed, with a police spokesman calling the fliers "free speech ... plain and simple." Despite this legal exculpation, the fliers were declared to be in violation of the university's free speech policy, with Vice President for Student Affairs Linda Clement saying, "There's such a thing as free speech, but when you post things anonymously and make others feel threatened, that's not free speech."
Yet this university condemnation was not sufficient for the students behind Palestinian Solidarity Week. They said they were shocked by the amount of hate the fliers emitted even if they weren't against the law. One organizer, Sana Javed, promised to keep up the pressure on the university to "make sure it's not put on the back burner."...
Good thing free speech is protected whether anonymous or not. Too bad for Sana and friends. It's tougher to spread hate propaganda when people get educated to the truth.
The always readable Bruce Bawer has an excellent piece at City Journal on what's going on in Europe: Heirs to Fortuyn? Muslim immigration and sclerotic welfare states push Europe right (sort of). The whole thing is worth reading, but this paragraph has to be one of the best and most all-encompassing paragraphs I've read in a long time:
...The last few decades in Europe have made three things crystal-clear. First, social-democratic welfare systems work best, to the extent they do work, in ethnically and culturally homogeneous (and preferably small) nations whose citizens, viewing one another as members of an extended family, are loath to exploit government provisions for the needy. Second, the best way to destroy such welfare systems is to take in large numbers of immigrants from poor, oppressive, and corruption-ridden societies, whose rule of the road is to grab everything you can get your hands on. And third, the system will be wiped out even faster if many of those immigrants are fundamentalist Muslims who view bankrupting the West as a contribution to jihad. Add to all this the growing power of an unelected European Union bureaucracy that has encouraged Muslim immigration and taken steps to punish criticism of it -- criminalizing "incitement of racism, xenophobia, or hatred against a racial, ethnic, or religious group" in 2007, for example -- and you can start to understand why Western Europeans who prize their freedoms are resisting the so-called leadership of their see-no-evil elites...
The multi-culty welfare states of Europe are proving out as failures, yet America isn't getting this message. Instead we're sprinting over the cliff to repeat their mistakes.
This story is from a couple of days ago. It sounds like the sort of urban legend story that later gets exposed as false, but I don't see anything further on it. Anyone know? 'Iranian arms ship destroyed near Sudan'
An Iranian vessel loaded with weapons to transfer to Hamas via Sudan was recently sunk in the Red Sea by an unidentified missile ship believed to be Israeli, according to Arab media.
The vessel was attacked by either an Israeli or American ship and destroyed, according to a report Sunday in the Egyptian weekly Al-Usbua.
"The ship was destroyed at sea near the Sudanese coast," sources told the weekly, adding that the cargo was to be taken through the Sudanese and Sinai deserts. They said the incident occurred within the past two weeks.
The unidentified ship that fired missiles at the Iranian boat was "likely an Israeli" one, according to an Egyptian security source quoted on Saturday in the Amman-based weekly Fact International.
The Iranian vessel was completely sunk and all personnel on it were killed, an event "expected to lead to further tension in Israeli-Iranian relations," the paper said.
Last month, Sudan said it believed that Israel carried out air strikes on its soil in February that targeted weapons smugglers.
While Israeli spokespeople did not comment on allegations of the country's involvement, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert hinted that Israel carried out the strikes, vowing that it would hit terrorist infrastructure wherever it was.
Sudanese sources said that one of these strikes destroyed an Iranian ship, possibly on its way to Sudan.
Monday, April 27, 2009
John Rosenthal describes what's in a new German television investigation into the famous fauxtography: Who Really Shot Al-Dura? The Newest Evidence
...The boy in the additional footage is receiving CPR. He resembles the boy in the France 2 footage and is also dressed similarly.
The additional images are especially troubling, because Schapira's and Hafner's documentary in fact confirms and reinforces many of the elements that have been adduced by critics over the years for concluding that the original France 2 report was bogus. For example, on the very day of the episode at Netzarim, Mohammed Al-Dura was supposedly buried. The funeral procession was filmed and one can see the face of the boy whose body is being carried to the grave. Photos also exist of the corpse of what appears to be the same boy with a large wound extending from his stomach to his chest. The pictures were taken at Shifa hospital in Gaza. Schapira and Hafner, however, interview a specialist in biometrics who confirms that the facial features of the boy in question do not match those of the boy in the France 2 footage.
Similarly, Mohammed Al-Dura's father Jamal was supposedly struck by some twelve bullets during the Netzarim incident. In 2004, France 2 would film Jamal Al-Dura displaying his numerous scars. France 2 officials have cited the scars as "proof" of the authenticity of the Al-Dura episode. Schapira and Hafner, however, interview the Israeli surgeon Dr. Yehuda David, who confirms (as he has previously told Israeli media) that the scars displayed by Jamal Al-Dura are in fact the result of an earlier incident. Dr. David himself performed surgery on Jamal in 1994 in an effort to restore mobility to Jamal's right arm. The arm injury and other injuries were the result of an attack with knives and axes that occurred in 1992. The attack was apparently perpetrated by Palestinian militants. As Schapira and Hafner note, it bears all the hallmarks of the sort of punishment that the militants regularly inflict upon suspected "collaborators."...
...But if the France 2 footage was indeed staged and the boy was not shot during the Netzarim incident, then what is the significance of the additional footage that apparently shows the boy wounded? Asked about the images by New Majority, Esther Schapira explained that the footage comes from Palestinian sources. The stomach area, from which the boy appears to be bleeding, has been artificially obscured in the images. According to Schapira, this was already the case when ARD obtained the footage. Schapira remarked that she finds this "strange," since Palestinian media "usually are not so squeamish about showing people who are wounded or dead."...
Indeed, they're not. Curiouser and curiouser...
Sunday, April 26, 2009
This is a must-read from start to finish:
Survivors of the genocides in Rwanda and Darfur spoke in Geneva this week at the parallel conference on human rights to counter the UN Durban II event. Listening to them describe how they were systematically demonized by the killers made it clear that genocide does not happen in a vacuum. The hate condition of a population willing and anxious to commit genocide needs nurturing. Genocide must be framed positively to get the necessary broad public support.
Common to the framing of all genocide is a very specific kind of demonization. In Rwanda, the Hutus taught that the Tutsis were cockroaches and snakes. Tutsi women were portrayed as cunning seductresses who used beauty and sexual power to conquer the Hutus. In Bosnia, a fictitious news report said Muslims were feeding Serb children to animals at the Sarajevo zoo. Radio Rwanda repeatedly broadcast a warning that Hutus were about to be attacked by Tutsis, to convince the Hutus that they needed to attack first to protect themselves.
This demonization included two specific components. First, the victims had to be perceived as a clear and present threat, so that the killers were convinced they were acting in self-defense. Second, the victims were dehumanized, so that the killers convinced themselves that they were not destroying real human beings.
A decent person will not join in a murder of innocents, but a decent person might join in the killing of a subhuman who is threatening his very existence. Framing genocide as self-defense can turn decent people into killers. Protection of children and family can turn a calm neighbor into a passionate murderer, because self-defense is always justified.
In Darfur and Rwanda, all that was necessary to turn a society of ordinary people into killers was to convince them that they were in danger, and that the people endangering them were less than human...
You know where this is going:
...A poll after last year's murders of eight teenage yeshiva students found that "84 percent of Palestinians support the terror attack killing eight young students in a Jerusalem yeshiva on March 6, 2008" (Poll by Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, The New York Times, March 19, 2008). How can an entire Palestinian society support the murder of children? Clearly, the framing of Jews and Israelis as mortally dangerous to Palestinians has been totally successful.
Israel now faces a society that is very possibly past the stage of genocide framing and at the point of seeing the killing of Israelis, even teens, as justified. All that would be necessary for the population to go along with the final script, detailed so many times by its leaders, would be the means.
I've been saying for years that the Arabs have been psyching themselves up to do it, while the Europeans have been psyching themselves up to accept it.
'Prestigious' Israeli oranges sold in Iran cause Mullah's heads to explode (if only, eh?). Turns out, said oranges are actually Chinese knock-offs.
Implications cause temporal rift and micro-black hole, imperiling universe. Thanks a lot assholes.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Thursday night I attended the above titled lecture by Daniel Pipes. The event was well attended, with the too-small lecture hall unable to accommodate he number of people who showed, leaving many sitting in the aisles. Unfortunately, the majority were non-students. Those students who did show got a treat if they were paying attention. Pipes is always thoughtful, with a raft of good insight, whether you agree with him or not. There were no disruptions.
It's funny that one of Pipes' more controversial assertions is that the Palestinians need to be defeated, and most importantly feel defeated, before you can proceed with a meaningful peace process. This need not involve solely -- or even primarily -- military means (see the talk for more on this). This seems like perfect common sense to me. But more, this is, in fact, exactly what the other side has been doing for years and making no secret of (although in their case the goal is not a peaceful and co-existential end-game, but the peace of Jewish graves). In fact, the BC campus itself was and is partner to an aspect of this effort having just held a number of "Israel Apartheid Week" activities, and sending students to the area under the tender mercies of professors like Eve Spangler. The boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) 'movement' is simply the palatable and exportable version of what Hamas, Fatah, Hizballah and the various other terror groups pursue by other means. This is what they export to get Westerners involved. The goal is identical and coordinated. Iran's pursuit of nukes is part of the same effort to demoralize Israel so Israelis and Jews simply decide it's no longer worth it to go on.
Here is the video. Part 1 is Pipes' talk. Part 2 is the Q & A. Sorry for the shaky camera. That should only be in the first couple of minutes until I found a good position. You may need to crank the sound a bit. I may have an mp3 to post later:
...is different. Lefty Joanathan Chait on an Interesting Israel/Palestine Poll:
...Josh's read is pretty conventional. Both sides have their crazies, both sides need to make more compromises for peace, and so on. There's certainly some truth to it. But the most important dynamic at work is fundamentally not parallel. 71% of Palestinians say that it's "essential" that their state consist of "Historic Palestine," defined "from the Jordanian River to the sea" -- i.e., all of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The same poll showed that only 17% of Israelis thought a "Greater Israel" -- that is a Jewish state encompassing the same territory -- was essential.
That's the nub of the problem right there. The vast majority of Israelis are willing to live alongside the Palestinians in one form or another, and the vast majority of Palestinians are not willing to do the equivalent.
This is where the whole parallel-ist view of the conflict starts to lose touch with reality. It's true that both sides have elements that deny each other's historical legitimacy, that both sides have taken provocative acts, but the heart of the problem is that Palestinians are not willing to live alongside Israel...
...I think the point is crucial because it gets to the heart of my disagreement with many liberals over this question. The mistaken equation between Israeli rejectionism and Palestinian rejectionism produces the frequent mistaken conclusion that Palestinian rejectionism results from various Israeli misdeeds. If Palestinians are hijacking planes or embracing suicide attacks or launching rockets in the random direction of Israeli towns, it must be a response to this or that Israeli action. The reality is that Palestinian rejectionism is a authentic expression of Palestinian belief with a long history that has manifested itself in numerous ways, starting from the Palestinian rejection of the 1947 U.N. partition of Palestine into two states, running through the establishment of the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1964 (before Israel seized the West Bank and Gaza), and continuing through various tactics of killing Israeli civilians as an end in and of itself.
So, for instance, you frequently see it stated that Palestinians turned to Hamas in response to Israel's blockade of the occupied territories. Isn't it more likely that Palestinians turned to Hamas because Fatah ceased to be a credible vehicle for total rejectionism of Israel? Likewise, the energies of many liberals are devoted to the problem of getting to a two-state agreement -- a task I wholeheartedly endorse -- but they assume that such an agreement will stop or come close to stopping Palestinian attacks on Israel, something I hope for but sadly doubt...
Exactly. Stated another way, terrorism is an act of hope, not desperation. Arabs teach their children to sacrifice themselves not because there are no other options -- no peaceful end game possible -- but because doing so is envisioned as an effective means to an end.
[h/t: Sophia]
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Adam Holland discovers noted moonbat Cynthia McKinney peddling the conspiracy theories of a Malaysian anti-Semite (yes): Cynthia McKinney and the far-right. The red-brown convergence now includes the Greens.
Former U.S. Representative Cynthia McKinney and 2008 Green Party presidential candidate has joined those seeking to take advantage of the world economic crisis to promote anti-Semitism. McKinney has published a column promoting the conspiracy theories of the far-right anti-Semite Matthias Chang.
McKinney's column (read here), which accuses George Soros and Alan Greenspan of participating in a plot to deliberately destabilize the world economy in order to install a "one-world government", uses Chang's term for this purported conspiracy: "the Shadow Money-Lenders" (not coincidentally, the title of Chang's most recent book). Typical of such conspiracy theories, Chang and McKinney connect this to an ancient plot which took shape under the hidden hand of the Rothschilds...
Meanwhile, how's this for a moronic convergence? Coming May 17, The eighth annual walk for a just peace in Israel and Palestine [PDF]. Special guests include Bill Ayers, Reem Salahi, Cecilie Surasky (of Jewish Voice for Peace), Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Gee, wonder what this group considers a "just peace?" No need to answer. Always good to see the mask come off groups like JVP as they march with outright America Haters, terrorists and anti-Semites.
- Claims regarding incidents where UN and international facilities were fired upon and damaged during Operation Cast Lead. This investigation was conducted by Col. Itzik Turgeman.
- Incidents involving shooting at medical facilities, buildings, vehicles and crews. This investigation was conducted by Col.Erez Katz.
- Claims regarding incidents in which many uninvolved civilians were harmed. This investigation was conducted by Col. Tamir Yedai.
- The use of weaponry containing phosphorous. This investigation was conducted by Col. Shai Alkalai.
- Damage to infrastructure and the destruction of buildings by ground forces. This investigation was conducted by Col. Adam Zusman.
The web page includes a very well done animation of the difficulties the IDF faced in 'doing business' in Gaza. Here is the YouTube version, but the one of the web page above is higher res.
Particularly shameful considering the Weather Underground's particular attachment to Brandeis.
The Boston Globe reports: Ayers to speak at Brandeis despite dispute over his past
Michael Graham is all over it: Brandeis Hearts Terrorists
As we reported on The Natural Truth last week, the Boston Globe-Democrat is (finally) covering Bill Ayers' upcoming visit to Brandeis University. As usual, they start with a bogus premise ("Ayers to speak at Brandeis despite dispute over his past"--what dispute? He admits he blew stuff up!) and go downhill from there.
The same "free speech" smokescreen Boston College students tried to use is deployed once again. If you're still unable to understand why this isn't a free speech issue, all I can say is you should probably stick to listening to NPR.
What's fascinating about this Ayers visit is the locale: Brandeis.
When Katherine Ann Powers, Susan Saxe and Stanley Bond murdered Boston Police Officer Walter Schroeder, they were all attending... Brandeis University. Brandies is in Waltham, MA, where one of Officer Schroeder's daughters, Clare, serves on the police force.
Last year a mentally-unstable would-be terrorist, Aafia Siddiqui, tried to shoot two FBI agents while shouting "Death to America" slogans. Even after she was shot, she struggled against capture and reiterated that she wanted to kill Americans. Where did Siddiqui go to college? MIT and...Brandeis...
Also: Did The Weather Underground Kill Officer Schroeder?
The grown-ups are asleep at Brandeis.
The minutes of the Student Senate session that agreed to the event are online here. An article about the invitation in the student paper that discusses the controversy is here: Funding for Ayers visit still up in the air
Ayers is scheduled to appear on Thursday, a week from today.
Bert at Dutchblog Israel is desperately seeking funding for an interesting-sounding book project:
...While I am finally finishing my PhD thesis I am also preparing a new book project, quite ambitious, one that will take about 18 months to finish and deals with the peace process. Right now I try to raise funds for that project. If you happen to be able and willing to help me finance such a project ( or if you know an individual, organization or company that might be interested in sponsoring it ), send me a mail and I can give you more details. I promise you that - if I manage to arrange the financial side of the project - the book will be extremely interesting, and probably very newsworthy. It goes without saying that every sponsor will receive a copy of the book ( or more, depending on the kind and size of the sponsorship ), plus regular updates ( probably in the form of a newsletter, maybe podcasts ) during the research and writing process. Several types of Quid Pro Quo can be discussed.
So in the interest of helping a fellow blogger with his efforts, please give him consideration if you're the type of person who funds such things.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Judging from the number of views, I may be the last person to see this, but it's very cool -- the video and the music. Israeli produced, btw:
And here we agonize over dunking caught terrorists: Palestinian land dealer to be tried for treason
Hebron resident brought before special Palestinian tribunal discussing sale of lands to Israel. If convicted, he is expected to get death penalty
A special Palestinian tribunal on Tuesday discussed for the first time the sale of lands to Jews by Palestinians, which has made waves in the West since it was first reported by Ynet.
The first person put on trial was a Hebron resident suspected of selling lands to Israelis. The prosecution demanded that he be convicted of treason.
The court hearing lasted more than six hours and included a reading of the indictment filed against the man. The prosecution presented documents including the locations of the lands the suspect allegedly sold to Israelis in the Hebron area.
Sources in the Palestinian Authority said that if the man were to be convicted of treason, he would most likely be sentenced to death.
Ynet reported recently that many Palestinians suspected of selling lands to Jews - including Israeli Arabs living in east Jerusalem - were released following Israeli pressure, and that the investigations against them were closed.
Following the report, members of the Fatah faction in the Jewish area began looking for the person who issued the order to end the investigation against those suspect. At the same time, the Palestinians are conducting a media and political war aimed at preventing Israeli associations from purchasing lands and houses in Jerusalem.
Senior Fatah member Hatem Abdel Kader, who serves as Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad's advisor on Jerusalem affairs, clarified Monday that the Palestinian prosecution was continuing its investigations into dozens of land sale affairs...
...Abdel Kader added that the investigations focused on the sale of some 13,000 dunam (3,212 acres) in Jerusalem and its surroundings. He stressed that the PA was working firmly in to combat the sale of land to Israelis, adding that those who are found guilty of selling land to Jews should be executed.
Netanyahu compiles his list of who either didn't show or who walked out: Netanyahu thanks Geneva boycotters
...The states that chose to boycott the Geneva conference, in addition to Israel, are the United States, Germany, Italy, Holland, Poland, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. The states whose representatives walked out during President Ahmadinejad's speech are Austria, Ireland, Estonia, Bulgaria, Belgium, Britain, Denmark, Hungary, Greece, Luxemburg, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Slovenia, Slovakia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Spain, Portugal, Finland, Czech Republic, France, Cyprus, Romania, and Sweden.
The naughty list is everyone else.
Honest Reporting has a good wrap-up on the event: Disgrace at Durban 2
The latest from Divest This!
A number of people have seen talk of Boycott, Divestment and Sanction (BDS) breaking out on many campuses, Web sites and other forums (including the upcoming Durban II, which promises to be as big of a fiasco as Durban I), and express legitimate concern that the BDS campaign is a major threat facing Israel and its supporters.
But keep in mind that what seems like on BDS campaign is really two:
- The BDS noise machine consisting of people calling for boycott, divestment and sanction against the Jewish state, or using BDS as a hook to hang their propaganda regarding "Apartheid Israel"
- The BDS program of trying to get respected, well-known institutions to sign onto the boycott/divestment message, thus providing anti-Israel protestors the chance to say "Hey, it's not just us who say Israel is an Apartheid state! Look [fill-in-the-name-of-a-famous-university-church-union-city-or-other-institution-here] agrees with us."
In fact, a dispassionate look at where BDS stands today (vs. five years ago) vis-Ã -vis progress in getting respected institutions to sign onto their project shows a movement in retreat. Given the level of invective involved with the noise-machine noted above, dispassion on this subject is not the easiest thing to maintain. But if you look at where divestment was in 2004 vs. where it is now, you see a movement that has actually lost substantial ground, which is why it has to substitute pretend victories (Hampshire, Motorola) for real ones.
This is where the churches, notably the Mainline Protestant churches come in. In 2004, these churches (notably the Presbyterians and Methodists) were the anchor for the entire US divestment project. Yes, divestment petitions were drawn up on many campuses around the country, but actual divestment was immediately rejected by school leaders, which provided students (the vast majority of which also rejected divestment) to routinely out-petition divestment advocates ten to one. During this period, it was the official Presbyterian Church in the US (PCUSA), whose 2004 decision to explore "phased, selective divestment" of church retirement funds from companies doing business in Israel (a decision replicated by leaders of other Protestant groups) that gave divestment advocates a hook upon which to hang a story of success. Thus these churches provided divestment advocates the oxygen they needed to push their program into not just other churches, but also universities, cities and unions.
The reasons the Presbyterians became aligned with anti-Israel forces calling for divestment are complex and interesting (too complex to sum up in one blog posting, although two great resources on the issue are Will Spotts' Pride and Prejudice and Rabbi Yehiel Poupko's review of contemporary Christian attitudes towards the Jewish state "Looking at Them Looking at Us" which is unfortunately not available online).
For purposes of this discussion, the important point is that these churches walked away from their divestment stance in 2006 once church members (who hated divestment) were given the opportunity to address a pro-divestment position that had been supported primarily by official church leadership. Even after the Lebanon war, these churches showed no interest in returning to the issue, voting again in 2008 to reject divestment by overwhelming majorities. While a few pro-divestment holdouts still refer to the Presbyterians and Methodists as allies, this represents either wishful thinking that these churches will return to their 2004 position, or intentional deception which characterizes anti-Israel activism of a small number of individual churches with the church as a whole which rejected divestment (twice) by margins of 90-100% over the last two years.
This history provides important lessons now that BDS has once-again become the strategy of choice for anti-Israel agitators. First, the ability of divestment activists to capitalize on even a fragile victory (as the churches turn out to have been), demonstrate the need for eternal vigilance by members of civic organizations whose institutions have been targeted for manipulation. Secondly, that the greatest threat facing BDS programs is not the all-powerful-Israeli-lobby (booga, booga, booga), but the movement's own excesses and reputation of divestment as a political loser.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Roger L. Simon has another good report from the Durban II conference: Durban II Diary - Part 3: The Clowning of Ahmadinejad
It's clear now - the Durban Review Conference is not an anti-racism conference; it's a pro-racism conference, sponsored by the UN. But more of that anon. Meanwhile...
I have had enough of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to last me a lifetime. He's gone now, departed from this hotel with his entourage that I was told had taken forty rooms, the men with the machine guns vanished from the corridors and balconies. Earlier this evening there had been a party in the mezzanine for five hundred of his closest friends, which, goaded on by Claudia Rosett (she is more intrepid than I), we tried to crash. We didn't get very far but I suspect Claudia, the only woman in sight without a hijab, had as much chance of getting in as I do of flying a biplane to Jupiter...
Here's video of Ahmadinejad sycophants screaming "Zionazis!" as a bemused Elie Wiesel looks on:
Following is an excerpt from an interview with Egyptian-American writer Magdi Khalil, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on April 19, 2009.
Magdi Khalil: First of all, I think it is obvious that the deliberations are focused on Israel, based on what happened in South Africa in 2001. The second thing that is very clear is that the Iranian president is present. This racist president will attend [a conference] against racism. This president calls for the destruction of a state that is a U.N. member. How can this possibly be? How can the Iranian president possibly be invited to a conference that calls for tolerance and combating racism? How can this president possibly be invited?
Let me say very simply that the South African conference focused on the issue of Zionism, and on whether it is tantamount to racism. The truth is that we have a serious problem. Some people may believe that Zionism is tantamount to racism, but many people around the world believe that Islamic religious law, as implemented in Somalia, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia, is worse than racism.
At the weekly cabinet meeting:
We are currently formulating security-diplomatic policy. This process will conclude ahead of my trip to Washington in four weeks. In the framework of these deliberations, we will hold Cabinet and Government discussions. I would like to set one thing straight in advance simply because it has been in the media incorrectly today. We insist that the Palestinians - in any diplomatic settlement with us - will recognize the State of Israel as the national state of the Jewish people. The entire international community demands that we recognize the principle of two states for two peoples and we are discovering that this is two states but not for two peoples but two states for one people, or two states for a people-and-a-half. That is to say, there is no doubt that we are being asked to recognize the Palestinian state as the national state for the Palestinian people but there is doubt and not just doubt, it is clear from the quick check that we carried out that the Palestinians have no intention of recognizing the national state of the Jewish People. Of course, this is completely unacceptable. I will not now respond to the question of what will be the nature of the settlement, what will be its components and what authority the Palestinians will have. We reiterate that we have no intention of ruling over the Palestinians. We want for them to rule themselves, except for those powers that could threaten our security and our existence. But there is no doubt that we insist that they recognize the State of Israel as the national state of the Jewish People. We have never conditioned the start and existence of talks on advance agreement about this but neither can we see progress on a future settlement without their agreement to this condition. Therefore, not only have we not backtracked from it, we stand behind it strongly and I think that in this regard, we reflect a very broad consensus, not only around this table but among the entire nation, a great part of the nation, and rightly so.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Yes, it's been known for some time that Omar Barghouti, a leader of the international effort to boycott all things Israel, including and especially Israeli universities, has been pursuing a PhD at Tel Aviv University. It's good to see someone is finally doing something about it. Academic Watchdog Works to Expel Anti-Israel Activist from TAU
IAM, the Israel Academia Monitor organization, has set itself the goal of alerting the public to outspokenly anti-Israel professors and others in Israeli universities.
Its top project at the moment: A drive to have the positions of Tel Aviv University doctoral student Omar Barghouti - "clearly an enemy of Israel," IAM says - exposed and publicized.
IAM has initiated a petition against Barghouti, a member of the same clan that includes convicted terrorist murderer and Palestinian Authority leader Marwan Barghouti. The petition is addressed to the Rector, President, and supporters of Tel Aviv University, and states:
"Literally thousands of people all over the world are working very hard to demonize and de-legitimize Israel. An especially strident and persuasive voice is that of Omar Barghouti, whose devastating accusations against Israel can be found on dozens of internet sites, newspapers all over the world and even at international conferences. What makes his work especially repugnant is his wide use of half-truth, selective omission and outright lie. He is clearly an enemy of Israel.
"...Omar Barghouti is a founding member of The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel and has personally called, on countless occasions, for an international boycott of all Israeli universities as well as [cutting off] trade and cultural ties.
"...We can't help wondering at the logic of Tel Aviv University [providing] this enemy of Israel with the means to obtain a doctorate in Ethics. Can this indeed be true? Ethics!!! As Israeli citizens we are also deeply dismayed that an academic institution, which gets part of our hard-earned taxes to keep it going, is enabling such a person to use its facilities. We are sure a lot of Jews around the world who donate generously to academic institutions in Israel would be quite devastated to learn how their monies are used..."
Thus far, over 16,000 people have signed the Hebrew petition, including nearly 4,000 in the past 18 hours. The lesser-known English version has been endorsed thus far by more than 300 signatories...
A bit of a flying-pig moment: Gaza: Hamas Should End Killings, Torture
(Gaza City) - Hamas should end its attacks on political opponents and suspected collaborators in Gaza, which have killed at least 32 Palestinians and maimed several dozen more during and since the recent Israeli military offensive, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Human Rights Watch called on Hamas authorities in Gaza to hold those responsible accountable.
The 26-page report, "Under Cover of War: Hamas Political Violence in Gaza," documents a pattern since late December 2008 of arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, maimings by shooting, and extrajudicial executions by alleged members of Hamas security forces. The report is based on interviews with victims and witnesses in Gaza and case reports by Palestinian human rights groups...
The latest apologist-for-Islam guest to be honored by Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies is one Mark Perry, author, self-described "security consultant" and above all, raconteur (read "name dropper"): "When I was waiting outside Yasir Arafat's office..."
His topic at Cambridge's Baghdad-on-the-Charles was ostensibly the skinny on Hamas and Hezbollah. These days, the operative buzz-phrase among the academic cognoscenti is "multiple elective identities" (popularized by the Nobel Laureate economist Amartya Sen).
You see, we're supposed to look at Hamas, Hezbollah, Ahmedinejad and the Taliban as complex, nuanced actors with whom we can dialogue, and, ultimately, strike a deal with. There are no more monoliths, according to the university pooh-bahs. Except for one, of course. It's the tiny country in the Middle East that begins with I and ends with l.
There's no point in talking with Netanyahu or the settlers -- they have only one identity -- Zionists -- and we don't have to be told how evil that movement is. Hamas, on the other hand, according to Perry, is pro-democracy and anti-Shariah Law, hence it is possessed of multiple identities. Our academic betters are telling us to pay no attention to the mountains of corpses, flogged women or disappearing minorities in the Islamic world -- these folks are at heart just like us -- Progressives!
All of this academia-speak is intended to mitigate and to apologize for a growing Islamic hegemony and barbarism. One of the more absurd assertions Perry made was to claim that Hamas is practicing democracy in Gaza and has nixed Shariah Law. His audience, mostly morons straight from a Quaker Meeting House hugging session reacted with nodding heads.
Not content with his initial howler, Perry added that Hezbollah should not alarm us because it had been "marginalized" in Lebanon. A Lebanese woman sitting next to me simply couldn't contain her shock and laughter at his absurd assertion. She whispered to me that Hezbollah controls all of Lebanon, for all intents and purposes.
On a really surprising note, Sara Roy, the ringmaster of Harvard's bash Israel circus, became visibly squirmy at Perry because he obviously wasn't anti-Israel enough! At various points, he seemed to almost justify the Gaza incursion and rarely indulged himself in the standard Israel demonizations that mark Harvard's Middle East program. Ms. Roy and her mentor, Herb Kelman (one of those wonderful folks who brought us the debacle of Oslo) have traditionally brought in a surfeit of speakers whose constant theme is Israel as an "Apartheid State, brutal, Nazi occupier" etc... you know the drill.
On a positive note, two Middle Eastern audience members expressed deep skepticism over Perry's ludicrous statements, no doubt, also to the chagrin of Harvard's elite.
Roger L. Simon describes seeing Ahmadinejad walk through the lobby of their hotel (they are staying in the same hotel), as well as what happened when Alan Dershowitz tried to attend Ahmadinejad's conference (he was removed by security): Durban II Diary - Part 2: Sleeping with Ahmadinejad
Once Ahmadinejad started to talk, EU representatives, including Britain and France, got up and walked out.
Video:
See: UN Watch: Ahmadinejad speaks at Durban II; EU walks out
Haaretz: WATCH: Durban delegates storm out in protest of Ahmadinejad speech
JPost: Delegates walk out on Ahmadinejad at Geneva
Reuters: Ahmadinejad prompts walkout from U.N. racism summit
A dude in a clown wig heckled him:
JPost: Who interrupted Ahmadinejad's speech?
The three 'clowns' that interrupted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's speech in Geneva on Monday just as he was taking the podium gave the first cue to an appearance that was punctured by heckle calls. At its (anti-) climax, delegates from 23 EU countries left the hall.
The rainbow-colored wig-wearing youngsters were Rafael Haddad, Jonathan Hayoun and Jeremy Cohen, three Jewish French students from L'Union des Etudiants Juifs de France (UFJ), the union of Jewish French students.
They positioned themselves at opposite ends of the hall when Ahmadinejad took the stage, and as he uttered his first words whipped out the clown wigs from their pockets and yelled 'racist' at the Iranian president.
The students said they wore clown outfits in order to "show that this speech and the entire conference is a circus." One of the students expressed satisfaction that EU delegates left the conference once Ahmadinejad's speech turned to focus on Israel...
JPost: UN secretary-general slams Ahmadinejad
At TNR: Durban II Dispatch: Following Ahmedinejad
After Ahemedinejad finished his speech, he immediately went downstairs to give a press conference. But waiting for him in front of the press conference room, blocking the doors, were hundreds of protesters chanting "Shame! Shame! Shame!" and holding signs like "Respect Bahais and Minorities" and "Iran Funds Hamas and Hezbollah." Standing amidst the protesters were Holocaust survivor Elie Weisel and Iranian dissident (famously pictured on the cover of TIME) Ahmad Batebi...
Further on the story at the bottom of this post, which might get buried a bit. Here's the link again: UN Watch Turns Tables on Libyan Chair, Exposes Durban 2 Hypocrisy; Qaddafi's rep panics.
TNR has a nice description here: Durban II Dispatch: Libya on Trial. And here's the video of the confrontation:
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Among other things. Here's a good article describing what the bad guys are strategizing about in Geneva at one of the unofficial meetings: Forum slams 'Israeli swimming pools'
Creating a European "resistance model" based on Hizbullah and blaming Israeli swimming pools for guzzling water from Palestinian olive groves. These are just two ideas brought up at the pre-Durban II Israel Review Conference hosted by anti-Israeli NGOs Sunday in Geneva.
A parallel meeting to Durban II, held in a Geneva hotel, which was organized by the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, the International Coordinating Network on Palestine and the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Committee, kicked off Sunday, one day ahead of the UN's conference on racism...
Australia, Sweden(!), Netherlands, Germany, New Zealand...all limiting their involvement.
Not to worry UN fans, Switzerland is shmoozing with the Iranian loon: Morality in neutral
Switzerland is situated in the heart of Europe, surrounded by Germany, France, Austria and Italy. But unlike these EU-member countries, the Swiss are neutral in international affairs.
And under cover of neutrality, Swiss President Hans Rudolf Merz, who is both chief of state and head of government, was scheduled to meet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad last night over dinner in Geneva. The Iranian leader is in town to attend the Durban II "anti-racism conference," which opens today.
Israel's Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told Army Radio that the Merz-Ahmadinejad meeting "caught us by surprise." It shouldn't have.
The Swiss have their interests...
This will make you feel a bit better, though, it's excellent: UN Watch Turns Tables on Libyan Chair, Exposes Durban 2 Hypocrisy; Qaddafi's rep panics
Here's how it starts:
Thank you, Madame Chair.
I don't know if you recognize me. I am the Palestinian medical intern who was scapegoated by your country, Libya, in the HIV case in the Benghazi hospital, together with five Bulgarian nurses.
Section 1 of the draft declaration for this conference speaks about victims of racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. Based on my own suffering, I wish to offer some proposals...
[h/t: Sophia]
Another day, another example of why there's a security fence, and why Israel is always conducting those military ops. At Palestinian Media Watch: Hamas Racism: Jews are evil - "Their children will be exterminated."
A Hamas cleric who once participated in an international conference of "Imams and Rabbis for Peace" -- whose delegates vowed to "condemn any negative representation" of each other's religions -- has wholeheartedly espoused Hamas's racist ideology in a recent Friday sermon on Hamas TV.
...This imam, who is preaching the genocide of Jews, participated in the Second World Congress of Imams and Rabbis for Peace in 2006, which also featured many prominent rabbis from Israel. The final statement from the Seville conference included the pronouncement, ". . . We condemn any negative representation of these [religious beliefs and symbols], let alone any desecration, Heaven forbid. Similarly, we condemn any incitement against a faith or people, let alone any call for their elimination, and we urge authorities to do likewise."...
More.
Don't worry Frank. Everyone knows Chris Matthews is a dick. I haven't even watched him that many times, but even I've seen this pattern: Matthews argues with guest. Guest leaves. Matthews selects and interprets evidence to his own twist and proclaims himself the winner. In this case, it's not just what he says about Gaffney, but his characterization of Bush is utterly unhinged and dishonest: Gaffney slaps back at Chris Matthews
On Tuesday night, Frank Gaffney appeared on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews. After a discussion with Mother Jones' David Corn about the Spanish judge who was poised to prosecute six Bush Administration officials, Matthews egged-on the rabid fringe of the left by saying the following:
We've crossed that line at that West Point speech by President Bush, George W. Bush, up there in 2002 when he said 'we're going into countries and we're going to kick ass because they don't have democracy in those countries.' That's when he said 'we're going to kill people internationally because we don't like their form of government...He said 'we're going to fight for democracy in the world and kill people who get in our way,' and that's what he said... That's the problem; he was going to do mass killing...
In this clip, Frank Gaffney responds.
...by the notorious Jew-hating Carlos Latuff. The student who conducted the interview that the cartoons accompanied considered it a "privilege" to meet him. Latuff took second place in Ahmadinejad's Holocaust denial cartoon contest.
Honest Reporting Canada Denounces YU Free Press' Publication of 'Anti-Semitic' Cartoons
Toronto, April 19, 2009... HonestReporting Canada (HRC) denounced cartoons printed in the YU Free Press, York University's "alternative" campus newspaper this month as "grossly anti-Semitic" because of their portrayal of Israel using Nazi-like imagery, while urging York administrators to carry out a formal investigation and to remove this newspaper from the school's grounds.
Created by anti-Israel cartoonist Carlos Latuff, the odious cartoons were appended to a Q & A between Latuff and YUFP's Ali Mustafa who described having the "privilege of meeting" Latuff in person, while mentioning that his views were "very provocative." The first cartoon portrays menacing S.S. troopers summarily executing innocent Palestinians in open-air graves marked "Gaza," all while figures symbolizing the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and the world stand idly by. The second cartoon depicts an emaciated Palestinian dressed in a pinstriped uniform similar to those warn during the Holocaust, lying on the ground next to Israel's security barrier which eerily looks like the barbed wire fence of a concentration camp. The dangerous implication promoted by these cartoons is of an Israeli policy to perpetrate a Holocaust against the Palestinians...
More.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Nothing like waiting till the last minute. Notice how the AP report pits Blacks and Jews against each other. I'll be interested to see how that plays out: US to boycott United Nations racism meeting
The Obama administration will boycott "with regret" a U.N. conference on racism next week over objectionable language in the meeting's final document that could single out Israel for criticism and restrict free speech, the State Department said Saturday.
The decision follows weeks of furious internal debate and will likely please Israel and Jewish groups that lobbied against U.S. participation. But the move upset human rights advocates and some in the African-American community who had hoped that President Barack Obama, the nation's first black president, would send an official delegation...
In other Durban news, Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center will be blogging the event for the Huffington Post. The comments on his first couple of posts are already becoming a cess-pool.
Interesting and related, here's South African Rev. Malcolm Hedding of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, dismantling some myths:
[h/t: Mark N.]
An arrested journalist, a secret trial, and a long prison sentence. Roger Cohen take note: Iran sentences U.S. journalist to 8 years
A U.S. journalist in Iran was sentenced to eight years in prison for espionage, her father, lawyer and news reports said Saturday -- a sentence that prompted denunciation from the United States.
Reports in Iranian media, including an Iranian judiciary source quoted Saturday by the semi-official Iranian Students News Agency, confirmed the sentence of Roxana Saberi, a 31-year-old Iranian-American from North Dakota.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she was "deeply disappointed" by the news. "We are working closely with the Swiss Protecting Presence to obtain details about the court's decision, and to ensure her well-being," Clinton said in a statement...
...The case has unfolded as the Obama administration has signaled an inclination to engage diplomatically with Iran, America's long-term adversary. The countries have been at odds for years over Iran's nuclear program and Iranian actions and stances in the Middle East, such as the regime's links to Hamas and Hezbollah and its alleged support of insurgents in Iraq...
She's not the only American being held there:
... Earlier this month, at a conference on Afghanistan in Netherlands, Clinton sent a letter to the Iranian delegation asking for information on and the safe release of Saberi Esha Momeni, an Iranian-American student arrested in Iran last October.
Clinton also inquired about Robert Levinson, a former FBI agent who disappeared in Iran in March 2007.
One U.S. senator suggested earlier this year that Iran may be holding Levinson in a bid to exchange him for Iranian officials seized by U.S. troops in Iraq in 2007.
"On several diplomatic occasions when Bob Levinson's name has been brought up to Iranian officials, the standard answer is, 'We don't know anything about that.' But the next thing out of the Iranian officials' mouths are to discuss the matter of the Iranians held by the Americans in Irbil, Iraq," Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, told reporters in February.
,p>"You can draw your own conclusions," he said.
Also, AP: US 'deeply disappointed' as Iran convicts reporter
[h/t: Sophia]
Friday, April 17, 2009
Honest Reporting has another posting up with even more detail on the BBC's finding of bias against their own Jeremy Bowen: Special Alert: BBC Mideast Editor Guilty of Inaccuracy on Israel [Previous]. His history goes way back.
Worry not, Robert Fisk has come to his defense. A promotion is imminent.
Did you know for 40 bucks you can hire a guy to go out to the security fence and spray a custom message on it? CNN: Palestinian graffiti spreads message of peace
Emblazoned on a long, tall, concrete barrier in the midst of a rocky Middle Eastern landscape is this spray-painted message: "Mirror, mirror on the wall. When will this senseless object fall?"
It's one of more than 900 graffiti messages that have been spray-painted by Palestinians on the controversial wall that separates Israel and the West Bank.
The painters take orders through a Web site that lets customers get a message on the wall. For the equivalent of $40, a Palestinian will spray paint the message and send three digital photos of it.
Anything goes -- marriage proposals, jokes, notes to friends -- as long as it isn't extremist, hate-filled, or pornographic, said Faris Arouri, one of the founders of the site...
... Nieuwenhuis said he heard about the site through van Oel, a friend, and liked the idea right away.
"I thought it was a brilliant idea to have something beautiful written on an ugly wall," he told CNN...
You know what's even uglier? Body parts on pizzeria walls.
I wonder if they'd print some of these messages: "Homosexuality is not a crime!" "Israel is a Jewish State!" "We love the Jews!" "Jerusalem is Jewish land!" "Freedom means no death for apostasy!" Fill in your own blanks...
I hope we see them articulating Israel's positions and standing by them like this:
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman each met with American Special Middle East Envoy George Mitchell on Thursday. Netanyahu threw Mitchell a curveball: He said that Israel would be willing to talk about a two-state solution after the 'Palestinians' accept Israel as a Jewish state. That's a step that the 'Palestinians' are thus far unwilling to take.
Some of you may recall that Ehud Olmert made the same demand at Annapolis (albeit not as a precondition to discussing a 'two-state solution'), but the 'Palestinians' rejected it, because it would mean giving up their hopes of either recovering all of the land 'from the River to the Sea' and of flooding what remains of Israel after a 'two-state solution' with 'refugees' who would overwhelm Israel demographically...
Quite right. There have been too many one-way concessions. A 'two-state solution,' if it happens, should be an end point, not just step one on the way to the one state solution -- something it's clearly been up to this point.
They're mulling the idea:
[h/t: Israeligirl]
A vision of life in a shariah state, where marching for rights actually carries risk and means something: Women protesters against 'marital rape' law spat on and stoned in Kabul
A group of Afghan women who braved an enraged mob yesterday to protest against an "abhorrent" new Afghan law had to be rescued by police from a hail of stones and abuse.
The protest by about 200 women, unprecedented in recent Afghanistan history, was directed at the Shia Family Law passed last month by the Afghan parliament which appears to legalise marital rape and child marriage.
The rally, staged by mostly young women with their faces exposed, was a highly inflammatory act of defiance in a country as conservative as Afghanistan. It provoked a furious reaction from local men and a rapidly expanding mob threatened to swamp the demonstrators as they tried to approach the Afghan parliament.
"Go home if your mothers and fathers are Muslims," one Shia cleric shouted at the protesters, who were pressed into an ever-tighter huddle as the crowd surrounded them." These people will beat you if you stay."
Some of the women appeared cowed by the aggression, staring blankly at the ground, but one shouted back: "If you were Muslims, you wouldn't pass this law." As the protesters continued to chant slogans they were often drowned out by counter chants of Allahu akbar (God is greatest). "I am not afraid. Women have always been oppressed throughout history," Zara, an 18-year-old student, told The Times as men in the crowd lunged forward and screamed abuse.
"This law is against the dignity of women and all the international community opposes it. The US President calls it abhorrent. Don't you see that actually we are the majority?"...
The baying mob tore down banners, spat on demonstrators and hurled stones. As police struggled to maintain order, at one point the women appeared to be in danger of disappearing under a sea of shaking fists...
[h/t: Sophia]
Update: Phyllis Chesler (who lived in Afghanistan and was married to an Afghan man) comments on this issue here.
Watch what you're doing when the Google camera truck comes around: 20 Crimes Caught on Google Street View
Too bad, my wife loves to shop at Whole Foods. No More until this changes: Welcome to Palestinian "Fair Trade": Olive Oil Sold @ Whole Foods Funds Study @ Anti-Semitic, Pro-HAMAS Universities; Dr. Bronner's Soap, Too
...the people who lived in Israel and around the area when the Jews were exiting slavery in Egypt were the Canaanites. They're extinct. They warred with the Jews, and they lost. And even though any historian with any credibility and any archeologist of any worth will acknowledge that the ancient Canaanites are long gone (as in, for centuries), some Palestinians claim they are the Canaanites. It's blatant propaganda and fodder for a good laugh, considering that Arabs were not anywhere near the area at that time. Not even close.
Now, Palestinians are pushing this myth again, along with the "fair trade" concept. Only, their "fair trade" is slightly different. You see, they want special treatment for growers who basically all support Islamic terrorists. And--this is key--they want special treatment in the marketplace against more competitive Israeli and Arab products. Welcome to "Canaan Fair Trade," products made by terrorism supporters in the shadow of the "evil Zionists." And for that, you should pay a premium.
Their biggest, newest product is Canaan Fair Trade Olive Oil. Its label re-asserts the myth of the Palestinians as Canaanites and also asserts that "Palestine" is a country. And proceeds from the sale of the olive oil funds scholarships for study at anti-Semitic, pro-HAMAS universities, including An-Najah in Nablus and the Arab American University in Jenin.
An Najah's student council is controlled by HAMAS, and it openly endorsed homicide bombings on Israeli civilians. The school staged a re-enactment of the blowing up of the Sbarro pizza restaurant in Jerusalem, as well as staged mock explosions of Israeli soldiers, to the laughing and cheering delight of students.
Sadly, Whole Foods markets are selling this pan-terrorist olive oil. If you are a patron of Whole Foods, you should ask the store why it is selling olive oil made by terrorism supporters, which funds study at anti-Semitic universities, and why Whole Foods is tacitly taking a political stand by featuring products with labels claiming Palestine is a country and that Canaan is there...
Remember the scene from An Najah, when the students celebrated the mass murder at a pizza parlor:
The marketing is smart, but not very moral. The language of human rights being used to dupe the ignorant is widespread.
Must read follow ups: Whole Foods "Responds" to Schlussel Story on Funding Palestinian Terrorist U, Stands by Terror U Scholarship Products and When You Shop @ Whole Foods, This is What You Are Funding
Thursday, April 16, 2009
You've heard about these Tea Party things? Yeah? You know...named after the Boston Tea Party? Pretty big crowd in Boston yesterday, but if you read the Boston Globe, you'd never know: Michael Graham: Why It's Called The Boston Globe-Democrat, Part XXXVI
When the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz reported that the Boston Globe-Democrat hadn't run a single story on the national "Boston Tea Party" movement (key word: Boston), I'll admit I was surprised. Their blatant political bias is obvious, and every rational reader knows their "news" coverage is driven by their politics. But not one story? From a journalistic standpoint, it's utterly indefensible.
So I shouldn't have been surprised when I picked up the BG-D this morning--the day after thousands of BOSTON-are citizens gathered at BOSTON Harbor for a BOSTON Tea Party to protest (in part) the taxpayer abuse by our BOSTON-based state government...and found a single local story in the BOSTON paper. Buried on page A16 there was a small AP story with the dateline "Frankfort, KY."
I guess the Boston Globe-Democrat staff just couldn't resist a "KY" reference.
To add ignorance to incompetence, the AP story spreads the canard that our Tea Party was part of some national Republican effort. They link it to FreedomWorks and the GOP--neither of whom had anything to do whatsoever with our event...though I'd be happy to send them the invoice for our expenses.
Here's the Boston Globe-Democrat's model for journalistic success:
- Ignore a national story inspired by local Boston history for as long as possible;
- Refuse to cover the story when it becomes local;
- Misreport the story with a wire report from Kentucky;
- Then wonder why you're losing $1 million a week.
Remember all those stories featuring every anti-Iraq war protest, however many people showed up, with no concern for how many people or any examination of who was sponsoring the protests? I do.
I rather enjoyed calling to cancel my subscription to the Sunday Globe the other day. Even the coupons weren't necessary anymore.
Great stuff at Big Hollywood: Rock 'n Roll in the Obama Era: The Ass-Kissing Years
You know, when you do something really stupid late at night, like read Henry Rollins' Dispatches section on his website, and you come across his characterization of the tea parties happening around the country as "Small groups of grouchy white people acting out and being ridiculous," not only do you realize that Rollins is a self-hating grouchy white person, but also that we have entered a whole new era of Rock 'n Roll: The Ass-Kissing Years...
How far Black Flag has fallen.
A controversy has errupted: Chaplain's E-mail Sparks Controversy
Harvard Islamic chaplain Taha Abdul-Basser '96 has recently come under fire for controversial statements in which he allegedly endorsed death as a punishment for Islamic apostates.
In a private e-mail to a student last week, Abdul-Basser wrote that there was "great wisdom (hikma) associated with the established and preserved position (capital punishment [for apostates]) and so, even if it makes some uncomfortable in the face of the hegemonic modern human rights discourse, one should not dismiss it out of hand."
The e-mail was forwarded over Muslim student e-mail lists and later picked up by the blogosphere, sparking debate and, in many cases, criticism of Abdul-Basser from those who have interpreted his statement as supporting the execution of those who leave the Islamic religion.
"I believe he doesn't belong as the official chaplain," said one Islamic student, who asked that he not be named to avoid conflicts with Muslim religious authorities. "If the Christian ministers said that people who converted from Christianity should be killed, don't you think the University should do something?"...
Whatever the Chaplain meant to say, the fact is he can't simply write off the principle. Death for apostasy is a mainstream matter. Note that the student quoted can't even have his name used for fear of repercussions within his religion. Frightening reality. How do you have freedom, if you can't have the most basic freedoms of conscience.
More comment at Jihad Watch.
Update: Richard Landes has an in-depth look at the article and the original, controversial, in two posts: Harvard's Muslim Chaplain Notes the Wisdom of Killing Apostates and The Email of Taha Abdul-Basser, Harvard's Muslim Chaplain, on the question of death for Apostasy in Islam. Well worth checking out!
Vote early, vote often:
The Vilna Shul, Boston's enter or Jewish Culture (vilnashul.org) is one of 25 contestants in a Boston area competition sponsored by American Express and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. If the Vilna Shul can get the most people to visit the site http://www.partnersinpreservation.com/boston and vote for the Vilna Shul between April 14th and May 17th, the Vilna will win $100,000 to restore a full wall of murals in the sanctuary. The Vilna was featured in the Boston.com article http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2009/04/american_expres_1.html. So go vote right now and vote everyday until May 17. Please send this to all of your friends, and if you have ideas about how to get the word out, let us know.
Steven M. Greenberg Executive Director, The Vilna Shul 617-523-2324
From the "Letters to the Editor" section of the Star Ledger:
Most civilian police departments undertake undercover actions to eliminate organized crime syndicates, human trafficking, gangs, drug cartels, etc. Many of these operations are successful, resulting in the arrest and prosecution of the perpetrators.
It is rather mind-boggling as to why the maritime powers do not do the same. They now are spending millions of dollars to have dozens of warships patrol, mostly unsuccessfully, a vast area. Instead, they should let three to four small cargo ships heavily armed with concealed weapons cruise the sea lanes. When the pirates get near, the ships should open fire and send them to the bottom of the sea. No need to arrest them.
When the remaining pirates see that their cohorts are not returning home with a prize, they will think twice before go out to sea again. End of piracy.
-- N.M. Elliott, South Orange
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Very good news from CAMERA: BBC Trust Finds Bowen Violated Guideline Requiring Impartiality
...The BBC has determined that its Middle East editor, Jeremy Bowen, had violated the broadcaster's ethical guidelines calling for impartiality and accuracy. The finding is likely to amplify concerns that BBC news coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict is largely biased against Israel.
The March 31, 2009 decision by the Editorial Standards Committee (ESC), a unit of the BBC's top decision-making body, the BBC Trust, comes in response to a formal complaint filed by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), and a similar complaint filed independently by a member of the U.K.-based Zionist Federation.
CAMERA's complaint charged that Bowen's June 4, 2007 article about the Six-Day War and its aftermath was marred by "serious omissions, exaggerations and outright anti-Israel bias." The detailed complaint came before the ESC after the BBC News Web site and Editorial Complaints Unit defended Bowen's article...
CAMERA promises more complete details shortly. Commentary and lengthy discussion already ongoing at Harry's. Good news and the report should be interesting (Bowen has long been one of the stars of the BBC's rogues gallery), but we don't really expect much to change do we?
Martin Kramer says it's not too late to stop the tenure process: Too late to stop Massad? C'mon Marty, Columbia is Dar Al-Dhimmi.
Boston charitable event:
Could you help Gift of Life in our efforts to find a life-saving bone marrow donor for the little girl pictured on the attached flyer, and for many other patients whose lives depend on a transplant from a healthy donor?
I know that most of the entries on Solomonia are political, but, as you have seen from my correspondence with various fans, there is an important historical and demographic dimension to our work. You know the numbers: We are 13 million on a planet which numbers its population in the Billions. The six million slaughtered during the Holocaust translates into one third of our gene pool. They were killed before they could have children, grandchildren, all the generations that might have come after them. As a result, we need each other perhaps more than any other group on Earth.
It would be wonderful if you could post the flyer on Solomonia and encourage your friends and contacts to come to Harvard Street to sign up and maybe someday save a life.
Thanks so much,
Louise
PS In these days of intermarriage outnumbering in-marriage, the task of finding matches is even more complicated. Jewish haplotypes (dna markers) show up in patients who may never even have thought of themselves as Jewish, and we have had many patients whose family escaped murder in Europe by converting or pretending to convert to other religions. You never know who might be a match, and we welcome prospective donors of any ethnic background. We are also happy to help patients of any background to find their miracle matches!
YOU COULD BE HER MATCH!
Sunday, April 19th, 2009
10:30 am to 2 pm
Monday, April 20th, 2009
10 am - 3pm
Congregation Kehillath Israel 384 Harvard Street - Brookline, MA
A timely delivery from Regnery this morning: The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal (The Politically Incorrect Guides).
Good timing because I'm most of the way through Amity Shlaes', The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression. Fascinating stuff. Many, many echoes for today.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
No, seriously. Columbia Middle East Studies analysis. $35K+/year.
In Yemen, the Jewish Community shrinks, and shrinks: Yemen Times: Yemeni Jews gradually migrate to the US and Israel
The Jews of Yemen who preferred to stay in their country are guaranteed a decent life in line with all legal, constitutional, and religious rights. They are entitled to enjoy these rights in the same manner that other people in society do, regardless of their religious affiliations.
The land, history, and soil of this country have intertwined with their lives and made them who they are today. Their ordeals should be considered ordeals for all Yemenis and not just for Jewish citizens.
Aggression against Jews
The aggression and intimidation practiced against the Jewish population during the recent period brings to light a number of questions. Where is the role of the government and its security and judicial apparatuses? And why does the government relinquish its commitments toward its citizens?...
Jews defend themselves in the one country they have and are driven out of all the rest, but Israel is an apartheid state?
The Columbia University School of Law conference Candor or Respect: Talking About the Religion of Others, held on February 26, was supposed to focus on the treatment of all religions within the realms of the public sphere (governance, diplomacy, and journalism). It was not supposed to concentrate solely on Islam. But these days, when a discussion focuses on religion, and when panel members agree that "there is reason to believe that a failure of either candor or respect could be profoundly dangerous," the subject of Islam will tend to take center stage.
As several panelists noted, the association of religion with profound danger and abuse would not have occurred to the majority of the population ten years ago. But we all understand the concept now. Speaker Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society said, "We've seen a shift" in the concept of respect for religion since pre-Cold War times. The old definition, described in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, concerned the need to protect religious belief against coercion by the state. The religious defamation resolution that was passed by the UN Human Rights Council in 2008 defines respect of religion as the protection of Islam from "attempts to identify [it] with terrorism, violence, and human rights violations." As Mr. Leo noted, restraints on criticism of Islam were not just directed at states; they were also directed against individuals.
This definition of respect was put forward by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, an organization of 57 states that call themselves "the collective voice of the Muslim world." Flemming Rose, the Jyllands-Posten editor who published the "Danish cartoons," understood why the OIC demanded censorship in the name of "respect." As a former correspondent in the Soviet Union, he saw how the Russian government and mafia used intimidation to gain "respect." In his Washington Post article titled "Why I Published Those Cartoons," he said: "I am sensitive about calls for censorship on the grounds of insult. This is a popular trick of totalitarian movements: Label any critique or call for debate as an insult and punish the offenders. ... The lesson from the Cold War is: If you give in to totalitarian impulses once, new demands follow. The West prevailed in the Cold War because we stood by our fundamental values and did not appease totalitarian tyrants."
Lately, it's sadly obvious that most Western elites have changed their policies on appeasing totalitarian tyrants.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Here's a great piece on the history of talks by AEI's Michael Rubin. In this Wall Street Journal piece, Rubin explains what's going on, and wrong, with talking to Iran [Doh. I originally said "Barry Rubin," who's also written some excellent stuff on this subject.]: It's a game of diplomacy without sincerity
...While U.S. and European policy makers draw distinctions between reformers and hard-liners in the Islamic Republic, the difference between the two is style, not substance. Both remain committed to Iran's nuclear program. Former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, for example, called for a Dialogue of Civilizations. The European Union (EU) took the bait and, between 2000 and 2005, nearly tripled trade with Iran.
It was a ruse. Iranian officials were as insincere as European diplomats were greedy, gullible or both. Iranian officials now acknowledge that Tehran invested the benefits reaped into its nuclear program.
On June 14, 2008, for example, Abdollah Ramezanzadeh, Mr. Khatami's spokesman, debated advisers to current Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the University of Gila in northern Iran. Mr. Ramezanzadeh criticized Mr. Ahmadinejad for his defiant rhetoric, and counseled him to accept the Khatami approach: "We should prove to the entire world that we want power plants for electricity. Afterwards, we can proceed with other activities," Mr. Ramezanzadeh said. The purpose of dialogue, he argued further, was not to compromise, but to build confidence and avoid sanctions. "We had an overt policy, which was one of negotiation and confidence building, and a covert policy, which was continuation of the activities," he said.
The strategy was successful. While today U.S. and European officials laud Mr. Khatami as a peacemaker, it was on his watch that Iran built and operated covertly its Natanz nuclear enrichment plant and, at least until 2003, a nuclear weapons program as well...
So say editorials in both the New York Post (Columbia's New Low) and the New York Daily News (Untenable: Bullying Columbia professor does not deserve lifetime employment) in reaction to the rumor that Joseph Massad has received tenure.
Martin Kramer comments on the news here and here. Volokh's David Bernstein comments here.
I'm glad to see the incessant comparisons of Jews to Nazis that are the stock in trade of people like Massad are in themselves becoming part of the controversy and something that puts the speaker beyond the pale in polite society.
According to this FOX News Report, the U.S. military is considering attacks on Somali pirate bases on land and aid for Somalia to help stop the hijacking of ships off Africa's coast:
The plan would include helping Somalia create their own coast guard and train security forces, the officials, who requested anonymity, told Bloomberg.com.
Officials said the plan would be submitted to the Obama administration as they decide how best to tackle the increase in pirate attacks off the Somali coast.
That might not be such a good idea. Somalia is controlled, in part, by Islamists affiliated with al Qaeda. If the pirate mob didn't have connections to the Islamist mobs, it's not likely that they could survive in Somalia. If the pirate mob didn't have connections with the government, they also couldn't survive.
And the pirates may not be based in Somalia. According to a Kenyan commenter here:
Hi, I am from Kenya and we hear of these pests every other day. I really feel it for the hostages and my encouragements to their families. Amazingly what happens is that with the ransom money being paid in Somalia, the masterminds of piracy do not stay there.....for obvious security reasons. They stay in Nairobi, Kenya as "refugees". Here, in the capital, this money is laundered in real estate, where the "chief pirateers", own shopping malls, upmarket homes and huge oil import-export businesses. Of course this money is used to compromise authorities. The worst bit is the local indigenous Kenyan can no longer afford property due to sky-rocketing prices. They have laundered the ransom money and prices of property is totally out of reach for locals. It is unfortunate, if the US pays the ransom.....you will continue harming those downstream....the local, simple Kenyan!
If we wander back into the wilds of Somalia, we'd have to choose between supporting the pirates or the Wahhabis. In the worst case scenario, we'd be supporting both. If we choose to bomb the pirate's home base, we might have to target their properties in Kenya.
Then there's the Ethiopian question.
I'd guess that the best solution is the simplest one - patrol the high seas the way we used to before the British (and other nations) started fretting about the 'human rights' of pirates.
Add some tech improvements to good-old fashioned piracy patrols. In the last 200 pirate-free years, we've made use of airplanes, satellites, unmanned drones, transponders and GPS units. Let's make more use of them.
Provide armed guards and train sailors to defend themselves in dangerous waters. Self defense is a basic human right, and our reliance on legal authority legalisms and the imaginary benefits of international goodwill has taken away our ability to react rationally to aggressors. The remarkable heroism of Captain Richard Phillips, the Navy snipers and the crew of the Maersk Alabama reminds us of how things should be. Phillips' neighbor, Sheila Aiken, said:
"It's like it just changed the world back to the world."
As Mark Steyn writes in his essay "Our Reprimitivized Future":
As it happens, Somali piracy is not a distraction, but a glimpse of the world the day after tomorrow. In my book America Alone, I quote Robert D. Kaplan referring to the lawless fringes of the map as "Indian Territory." It's a droll jest but a misleading one, since the very phrase presumes that the badlands will one day be brought within the bounds of the ordered world. In fact, a lot of today's badlands were relatively ordered not so long ago, and many of them are getting badder and badder by the day. Half a century back, Somaliland was a couple of sleepy colonies, British and Italian, poor but functioning. Then it became a state, and then a failed state, and now the husk of a nation is a convenient squat from which to make mischief. According to Chatham House in London, Somali pirates made about $30 million in ransom and booty last year. Thirty mil goes a long way in Somalia, making piracy a very attractive proposition...
...Meanwhile, the Royal Navy, which over the centuries did more than anyone to rid the civilized world of the menace of piracy, now declines even to risk capturing their Somali successors, having been advised by Her Majesty's Government that, under the European Human Rights Act, any pirate taken into custody would be entitled to claim refugee status in the United Kingdom and live on welfare for the rest of his life. I doubt Pirates of the Caribbean would have cleaned up at the box office if the big finale had shown Geoffrey Rush and his crew of scurvy sea dogs settling down in council flats in Manchester and going down to the pub for a couple of jiggers of rum washed down to cries of "Aaaaargh, shiver me benefits check, lad." From "Avast, me hearties!" to a vast welfare scam is not progress...
In a world of legalisms, resistance is futile...
All nations and all citizens, on the high seas, in the suburban backyards of Kenya, London, Iraq's Anbar province and Middle America USA should be allowed to defend themselves against Islamist gangster aggression. Let's make the world the world again.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Bernard Goldberg doesn't even bother approaching university journalism programs anymore: Bernard Goldberg: Liberal Media Bias Detector
...Today's MSMers may be a lost cause. But what about journalism school professors? What do they think of Goldberg's books? Do they take his criticisms to heart? Or can they successfully poke holes in his arguments? These professors are molding the minds of tomorrow's media gatekeepers. What could be better than for them to engage their students with Goldberg's thesis? Even if they disagree with Goldberg, they could spark the kind of healthy debate all budding journalists should consider.
So I decided to ask some journalism professors myself. I spent the last month directly reaching out to more than 20 professors from across the country, as well as several university PR divisions, to get their take on Goldberg's critiques. I even turned to my Facebook and Twitter accounts to seek out anyone who might comment for this article. I should have expected the result.
Silence...
Read some of the comments, too.
Roger Cohen is using his space in The New York Times to flog his twin obsessions, Israel and Iran, again: Israel Cries Wolf. The article spans the range from the sadly absurd (that because Israelis have been warning of Iranian nukes for years means they have been lying about it) to the ugly (implying that America is a slave of Israel's). James Taranto has an excellent response in his Best of the Web column: Los Lobos Locos: Aesop's fables prove too deep for an anti-Israel New York Times columnist.
I'm not a Psychologist, or a Psychiatrist (there may, after all, be a chemical imbalance involved), but I did think it might be interesting to explore the mindset a bit.
There's a problem, you see. For those who share our viewpoint, if you take all of the evidence -- the history, the nature of the Iranian regime, their stated goals, their philosophy, their behavior, their expansionist tendencies, the nature of their rhetoric, their actions taken both through internal forces (like the Revolutionary Guards) and through various proxies like Hizballah and Hamas and others, their quest for nuclear weapons -- you take all this together, and you walk it through in your mind to some future point, and the future is, by all indications, a dark one. With any degree of historical literacy at all, it's not hard to imagine where this all is going to lead as a matter of, if not historical inevitability, at least strong future historical-likelihood.
It's a violent, confrontational future. It's dark. And if you look out the windshield with a clear forward view, it's like a wall not so far off in the distance that we're headed inevitably for. It's violence, it's war.
To leftists like Roger Cohen, there's nothing worse. Violence must be avoided at all costs. War must be delayed while there's still any chance of doing so, and there's always a chance of doing so.
You and I may see that wall of violence approaching somewhere on the tracks ahead and we may say, well, better a little violence now than something much worse later. Better a little friction on the way than allow the train to barrel down the tracks unimpeded.
Not so leftists like Cohen. They hope that if we ignore the wall, it will go away. They hope that if we can delay things long enough, some event will intervene before we hit to make the train turn aside, or make the wall disappear. All they need to do is buy time and keep fingers firmly crossed. If they're honest about what a country like Iran is all about, then, in their view, that brings the wall closer, so they can't be honest. After all, what's a worse sin, a little prevaricating for the sake of hope and peace, or having your words added to the risk of war? It's an easy choice for the unscrupulously ideological.
In this sense, Cohen is either dishonest or clueless. Either he really believes the things he says and is caught in a desperate Cassandra act, or he knows and sees what you and I know and see but is willing to lie about it (and sacrifice Israel's future) for the sake of hoping events catch up with and head off inevitability.
Can Cohen really be so clueless as to report, straight, the statements of Iranian Jews? Can he really not understand the unreliability of such testimony by members of a minority community in a totalitarian torture state, where handlers are present and at least one Jew (Habib Elghanian) has been hung for "contacts with Israel and Zionism?" Maybe. Ideology and fear of being the cause of a war (never forget how arrogant these Times columnist are, never forget how influential they think they are) can blind a man to much.
But whatever the psychology, there's no doubt that Cohen's writing muddies the water and makes a clear-headed analysis of events all the more difficult. What's worse, in times like these, to contribute to the view of Jews as warmongers -- the subtext of Cohen's entire run of pieces on the subject -- becomes something worse than just simple-minded.
Friday, April 10, 2009
We acknowledged the passing of Gygax, now Arneson is gone: Arneson, D&D Co-Founder, Dies
MINNEAPOLIS -- Dave Arneson, one of the co-creators of the Dungeons & Dragons fantasy game and a pioneer of role-playing entertainment, died after a two-year battle with cancer, his family said Thursday. He was 61 years old.
Mr. Arneson's daughter, Malia Weinhagen of Maplewood, said her father died peacefully Tuesday in hospice care in St. Paul. He is survived by Ms. Weinhagen and two grandchildren.
Mr. Arneson and Gary Gygax developed Dungeons & Dragons in 1974 using medieval characters and mythical creatures. The game known for its oddly shaped dice became a hit, particularly among teenage boys. It eventually was turned into video games, books and movies...
We raise our glasses of grog to Dave Arneson.
Considering the utter inability of the Muslims to pay even a passing B-grade movie actor's attempt at pretending to ever respect anything having to do with Jewish history in the Jew's holy land, including but not limited to, literally digging it out of the ground, chopping it into pieces, and throwing it in a garbage dump -- considering all that, the Israeli authorities would have to have their G.D. heads examined to do anything but spit on this: Palestinian PM wants Harper to scrap show, claims violation of international law
A planned Toronto exhibit of ancient Middle Eastern manuscripts is threatening to plunge Canada, along with the Royal Ontario Museum, into the thick of the long-running conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.
Beginning in June, the ROM will host a six-month exhibit of the famed Dead Sea Scrolls, organized in co-operation with the Israel Antiquities Authority.
But top Palestinian officials this week declared the exhibit a violation of international law and called on Canada to cancel the show.
In letters to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and top executives at the ROM, senior Palestinian officials argue the scrolls - widely regarded as among the great archaeological discoveries of the 20th century - were acquired illegally by Israel when the Jewish state annexed East Jerusalem in 1967.
"The exhibition would entail exhibiting or displaying artifacts removed from the Palestinian territories," said Hamdan Taha, director-general of the archaeological department in the Palestinian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities...
Update: Meryl makes another good point:
So, basically, the Jordanians, in partnership with the French and Americans, took precious Jewish artifacts away from the Jews to whom they belong. I do believe that Egypt just got back an ancient mummy from a museum in America, and I also believe that museums all over the world are negotiating the return of artifacts taken during the days of colonialism. So the Palestinians can just STFU, because those scrolls don't belong to the people who were on the land at the time of the discovery. They belong to the people who wrote the scrolls.
Once again, the weekly bloggers' National Journal poll is up and I've taken part. The questions: 1) On balance, has journalism been helped more or hurt more by the rise of news consumption on the internet?, and 2) What do you think of the coverage of Barack Obama so far this year?
Clark University canceled a campus talk scheduled for later this month by controversial Holocaust scholar Norman Finkelstein, saying his presence "would invite controversy and not dialogue or understanding," and would conflict with a similar event scheduled around the same time.
The Clark University Students for Palestinian Rights, a student-run group on the Worcester campus, had arranged for Finkelstein to speak on April 21, said Tom MacMillan, the group's president. School administrators, however, contend the topic and the timing conflict with a similar university-sponsored event.
In a letter to the university's campus newspaper, Clark's president, John Bassett, wrote: "The university remains committed to inviting a wide range of speakers to encourage diversity of opinions on controversial topics. My decision was predicated on its untimely and unfortunate scheduling."
Finkelstein's address would conflict with a similar conference hosted by the university's Strassler Family Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, scheduled for April 23-26, two days after Finkelstein's speech, Bassett said in his letter. That conference could draw Holocaust scholars who MacMillan said may disagree with Finkelstein...
May disagree? The Globe entitles the piece, "Clark drops Holocaust scholar," which is an odd choice of label for Finkelstein to say the least.
The Finkelstein phenomenon rolls on. Have you looked at the speaking schedule on his web site lately? The man travels more than the Grateful Dead in their prime. Lack of tenure seems to have given him a great deal of time for travel and the collection of speaking fees. Would anyone have heard of him if Finkelstein were a legitimate and serious scholar? There's a lot of notoriety to be had in being a loud-mouthed, politically-radical, bomb-throwing, terrorist-supporting, anti-semitic bozo.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Michael Totten provides a fascinating look at Sadr City after the Fall
"Do you know who they're buying them from in Iran?" I said. "Are they buying them from the government?"
"Who knows?" he said. "Maybe if we did know we could do something about it."
My Spanish colleague Ramon Lobo from El PaÃs in Madrid co-interviewed Major Humphreys with me.
"I think they get them from the Revolutionary Guards," he said.
"Right," I said. "Which is, of course, part of the government."
"According to Iraqi media," Major Humphreys said, "they're getting support from the al Quds Force."
The Quds Force is basically the special forces branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Its commanders report to "Supreme Leader" Ayatollah Khamenei. Their mission is the arming and training of guerrilla and terrorist organizations around the Middle East - especially in Lebanon, Iraq, and the Palestinian territories.
"One thing you'll notice on the map," Major Humphreys said, "is that all roads point toward the Green Zone."
"The roads were perfect launching positions," he said. "These guys built their launching pads, they had engineers who knew what they were doing, they knew the right angles, and they knew where they were going to launch from. They were very well-trained. Al Qaeda is mostly a bunch of thugs who are paid by people outside Iraq just to wreck havoc by dropping poorly made IEDs. They're not very well organized. But the Shia militias are used to working in a military manner with senior commanders, and with training sponsored by international forces in Iran. They have a sense of leadership. These guys knew what they were doing. They were launching these rockets from roads that are perfectly lined up to the Green Zone every day."
Not only did the Shia militias buy their rockets from Iran, they paid with cash extorted from businesses in the Jamilla market. So the Iraqi government had yet another reason to want them out of Jamilla.
"It's hard to block this whole area off," Major Humphreys said, "because there are so many nooks and crannies that people can get in and out of. So we started building the wall. And it took us about two months. It's a three-mile wall on what we call Route Gold. And it worked. As soon as the last barrier went in, the violence in south Sadr City almost completely stopped."
Mahdi Army senior leaders fled as soon as they lost their funding, resources, and territory in and around the market. Some went to Iran. Others went into hiding somewhere else in Iraq. They wanted to get back in, but they couldn't. So they made a face-saving deal with the government. They "agreed" to stay out of Sadr City entirely as long as American soldiers stayed on the south side of the Gold Wall.
Our co-blogger Hillel Stavis has a new piece up at Pajamas Media today:
A memorable line from a memorably funny movie called The Hot Rock with Robert Redford and Zero Mostel is delivered by a diplomat from a make-believe African country who has hired a band of bungling crooks to recover an enormous diamond stolen by the unscrupulous Mostel. After tripping over themselves time after time in vain attempts to procure the gem, the gang that couldn't steal straight is admonished by the frustrated African who has sunk too much money in what has become a fruitless enterprise: "I've heard of the habitual criminal, but never the habitual crime."
The Oslo so-called peace process could be the 21st century's leading candidate for the "habitual crime." Now approaching 16 years (takes your breath away, doesn't it?), unlike the proved process that produces American cheese, the Oslo process has produced nothing edible, but rather, it would seem, lots of poison.
One of the chief negotiators for Israel present at the destruction and a veteran legal expert for the Foreign Ministry, Daniel Taub admitted as much during a recent address to the elite of Harvard's Project on Negotiation (PON). He is currently on a North American tour promoting an initiative called "The Culture of Peace," launched by the Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information, an initiative that, judging from his laments over a failed peace process, should probably have been the horse which preceded the cart back in 1993...
Given the Ummah's propensity to demand every right and respect for themselves, but its rotten record on respecting those very same rights in others (Islam's Bloody Borders), certain lines in the sand are not uncalled for. To take a Human Rights perspective, a Helsinki Accord-like set of expectations, even if unilaterally observed by us ("this is what we expect") might not be a bad way of looking at things (remember when Human Rights Watch hadn't lost the thread and used to be known as Helsinki Watch -- before it forgot the difference between how you deal with free and unfree societies?)
Daniel Henninger: Will Islam Return Obama's 'Respect'?
Today is Holy Thursday for Christians and the start of Passover for Jews. This week was an opportune time for President Barack Obama to visit Istanbul's Hagia Sophia, which has been both a Byzantine church and Islamic mosque. In Turkey he spoke of seeking engagement with Islam based on "mutual respect."
The subject of this column is the status of minority faith groups, mostly Christian, living inside Islamic countries. That status is poor. In some cases it verges on extinction, after centuries of coexistence with Islam...
...In reality, the experience of Arab Christians living now amid majority Islamic populations is often repression, arrest, imprisonment and death.
Coptic Christians in Egypt have been singled out for discrimination and persecution. Muslim rioters often burn or vandalize their churches and shops.
In Turkey, the Syriac Orthodox Church (its 3,000 members speak Aramaic, the language of Christ) is battling with Turkish authorities over the lands around the Mor Gabriel monastery, built in 397.
Pakistan's recent peace deal with the Taliban in the Swat Valley puts at risk the 500 Christians still trying to live there. Many fled after Islamic extremists bombed a girls' school late last year. Pakistan has never let them buy land to build a church...
...In short, the "respect" Mr. Obama promised to give Islam is going only in one direction. And he knows that...
There's much more. Read it and explain why we shouldn't start noticing, admitting the truth, and taking our own stand.
The Weekly World News has the inside White House scoop:
WASHINGTON, DC - President Obama will host the first White House seder. Party organizers state, "Why is this night different from any other? 'Cause it's gonna be fierce!"
President Obama will make history yet again tonight as the first President to hold an official White House seder on tonight the second night of Passover. After a much publicized Easter celebration, plans for this seder were made at the last minute and announced only a few days ago.
The President wishes to reaffirm to Americans and the international community that all faiths will be respected by an Obama White House.
A team of Rabbis, Jewish Scholars, and Project Runway winner Christian Siriano were brought in to design the event.
At the beginning of the service a plate of traditional and symbolic foods will be at the head of the table. Fresh organic horseradish root will provide the bitter herbs symbolizing the bitterness of slavery, handmade adzuki paste will symbolize the mortar slaves worked with, along with three matzos symbolizing "slaves bread" made by Mario Battali and each costing $400...
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Technically, Geneva, but don't be picky. Yes, the superstar of hate himself will be there in person. Expect a rock star's reception. And why not? Iran is basically running the thing.
Eye on the UN reports (via email):
EYEontheUN has learned that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has announced his intention to attend the Durban II "anti-racism" conference. Durban II is billed by the UN as an occasion to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. But Ahmadinejad denies the Holocaust, has advocated genocide and openly seeks the annihilation of the state of Israel. In providing a hatemonger with a global platform - under the banner of an anti-racism conference - the United Nations has become an enabler of genocide.
Anne Bayefsky, Editor of EYEontheUN urged: "It is time for every decent self-respecting democratic state to withdraw immediately from Durban II - the platform for genocide."
The Iranian President had every reason to expect a warm reception from the UN. The UN Human Rights Council elected Iran as a Vice-Chair of the Preparatory Committee of Durban II. Iran has been the single most active participant in this week's preparatory sessions going on in Geneva. Iran has succeeded in denying a Jewish non-governmental organization accreditation to preparations for Durban II. At yesterday's negotiating sessions for a final document to be adopted formally at Durban II, the Iranian representative proposed sweeping limitations on freedom of expression and protection for "cultural diversity" as a vehicle for justifying Iranian laws that permit the stoning of women, the murder of homosexuals, and the torture of dissidents...
...As Bayefsky points out, "it can be expected that Ahmadinejad will use the opportunity of the UN Durban II global megaphone to continue his genocidal campaign. After all, the current draft text of the Durban II final declaration continues to single out Israel and condemn it as racist by reaffirming the words of the 2001 Durban Declaration."
Will the European Union, Australia, and the United States sit in their seats at Durban II and listen to the hatemongering and anticipated applause?
"Democratic states, having delayed a decision about participation until the final hour," said Bayefsky, "have encouraged Ahmadinejad to believe he has one more opportunity to spread antisemitism and demonize the Jewish state. It is long past the deadline for democracies to pull the plug on Durban II and stop legitimizing a racist anti-racism conference."
More of a run-down on just how bad this thing is getting, here.
The following, written by Avi Trengo, appears originally at YNet Hebrew, here. This translation was prepared for Solomonia by the Centrist, so many thanks to her.
Israel's current government is composed of persons whose worldview is more sober than that of their predecessors. They recognize the futility of the "peace process" (clueless European statesmen are enamoured with the term "process", but peace has not been advanced by it). Conversely, the clear-headed Right realizes that we must back away from dominating another people forever.
Netanyahu and Lieberman are holding in their hands the possibility of reversing the status quo. If Obama and the Europeans are so intent on the two-state solution, then, go ahead. Hamastan in Gaza can be regarded as a pilot scheme for a Palestinian state. Can it comply with the requisite conditions that would qualify it for gaining international recognition?
Israel can no longer afford to be perceived by the world at large as a peace rejectionist. Calls for economic boycotting of Israel gain momentum every day and in Europe many bodies implement a silent boycott. The one-state solution is being pushed by radical factions as the alternative to the two-state solution, which includes a no-win situation for Israel: allowing the vote to millions of Palestinians in the occupied territories, combined with the demographic increase of Israeli-Arabs, Israel will soon become a bi-national state.
This problem lead to Sharon's disengagement plan and turned him from one of the most hated leaders in the world to the darling of world leaders. Netanyahu and Lieberman can take the disengagement idea to its logical conclusion.
Israel should treat Gaza as a fully independent sovereign state, while putting to it and its neighbour to south (Egypt) clearly delineated conditions.
No one likes bullying, but the story here seems less about the religious aspect and more about the crazy costs of doing business in the age of lawsuits when there are insurance policies in play. Sounds like the school did everything they could, but ended up paying anyway:
The Washoe County School District in the Reno area will give Egyptian former student Jana Elhifny $350,000 and her non-Muslim friend and supporter Stephanie Hart $50,000 as part of the civil settlement.
Elhifny and her family came to Reno from Egypt in 2003, and the girl enrolled as a freshman at North Valleys High School.
She didn't finish the year after she told teachers and administrators that someone had threatened to kill her in the stairwell because of her Muslim hijab or head scarf, the district's independent attorney in the case, Robert Cox, told FOXNews.com.
Shortly afterwards, Cox said, Elhifny filed the lawsuit and returned to Egypt, where she married her fiancé....
The lawsuit, handled by U.S. District Court in Reno, alleges that Elhifny faced death threats and harassment and school administrators did nothing to stop the abuse.
Cox said that wasn't true, and the teen was unable to give any description of her tormenter -- including his or her gender, size and tone of voice...
...Cox said school officials couldn't confirm the stairwell death threat story.
"They tried to prove that, tried to track down who it was, but without a description ... that couldn't be done," he said. "The district did watch her constantly and had people in the hallway."
He said the settlement was agreed upon to end lengthy and "expensive litigation." The case has been fought in the courts for the past four years, according to Cox...
..."Ms. Elhifny and Ms. Hart had the courage to stand up for themselves and defend their right to a safe education," said Peter Obstler, a San Francisco attorney who handled the young women's lawsuits with the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.
Hart, a non-Muslim who says she was ostracized when she befriended Elhifny at North Valleys High School and also dropped out, will receive $50,000. Cox said she was a supporter of Elhifny's rather than a victim and never complained to school officials before getting involved in the lawsuit.
The settlement was announced early Wednesday. The monetary award will be paid by the district's insurance carrier.
[h/t: Phil]
Bir Zeit-on-Hudson is continuing to earn its name if this report by the Angry Arab is to be believed: Joseph Massad has tenure
I have a message to all the Zionist hoodlums out there: for all of you who campaigned and harassed and intimidated and who treated academic life like an aspect of Zionist thuggery, Joseph Massad has received tenure. He called me yesterday from Cairo to break the great news to me and I could not wait to report it to his enemies and mine. It is with great pleasure and gratification that I break the news to all of you. No matter what dirty tricks you (i.e. Zionist hoodlums) have resorted to, and no matter what sleazy methods you have employed and no matter what sinister propaganda you have resorted to, dear Joseph Massad deservedly received his tenure. I am looking forward to Joseph's contribution to Middle East studies at Columbia and elsewhere. And as 'Abdun-Nasser told the colonial power back in 1956, I say: if you don't like this news please feel free to go and drink from the Mediterrenean sea.
(The author, As'ad AbuKhalil, is a 'professor of political science at California State University, Stanislaus and visiting professor at UC, Berkeley,' BTW.)
Despite prior reports, it looks like the intervention by his supporters has worked. Columbia is making it a habit of tenuring cranks.
We've posted about the rantings of Joseph Massad many a time here. For a just a handful of his greatest hits, see this old post.
Update: Speaking of the way things are, looks like it's full speed ahead for the newly tenured Nadia Abu El-Haj and her racial explorations:
COLUMBIA CENTER FOR ARCHAEOLOGY BROWN BAG RESEARCH SEMINAR
Prof. Nadia Abu El-Haj (Barnard/Columbia):
"The Politics of Geneaology: from race science to genetic anthropology
FRIDAY APRIL 10, 12-1pm.
951 Schermerhorn Ext.
All welcome, bring your lunch.
And good luck keeping it down.
The latest word from Divest This!
Makers of low-budget movies have a simple trick to create a crowd scene without having to pay for extras. First, you find a parade taking place in a town near where you're shooting. Second, you run to the front of the parade with your own signs and roll cameras. Thus did legendary schlock filmmeister Ray Dennis Steckler manage to end his classic Batman parody Ratphink and Boo Boo in a massive "Ratphink and Boo Boo Appreciation Day" celebration (complete with marching bands and floats).
I thought of this technique after reading recently about another divestment "victory" regarding Motorola selling off a unit which manufactured bomb fuses to an Israeli company. "We win again!!!" seem to be the distillation of headlines on countless divestment blogs and Web sites around the world, hailing this as one more victory (alongside Hampshire College) on BDS's unstoppable march towards euphoric success over the hated Zionist oppressors!
Well with divestment's Hampshire "triumph" (which didn't involve Hampshire actually divesting from Israel, but did involve students pretending that they did) as backdrop, I decided to see what actually took place vis-Ã -vis Motorola by looking at less partisan sources, notably the business press. And according to the bland reports that usually accompany the sales of small businesses (the deal was essentially the sale of a tiny $20MM unit from Motorola to an Israeli defense corporation), "Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT) abandoned the electronic fuses business a long time ago, and only Motorola Israel still kept the business, whose primary customer is Israel Military Industries Ltd. (IMI)."
In short, a multi-national corporation that had gotten out of a certain business segment years ago finally got around to selling the one remaining unit that still wanted to continue to sell to an established customer base (i.e., the Israeli military). So rather than shut it down, they sold it off to get some quick cash (albeit a rounding error for a company the size of Motorola). Eyelids getting heavy... Mind drifting... Must stay awake to finish this blog entry...
Continue reading "Which Came First, the Rooster or the Sunrise?"Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Last night I attended a talk at Boston College entitled "Restoring Intellectual Integrity: The Truth About Apartheid in the Middle East." Held as part of the response to a series of smash Israel events on campus, the evening featured BC Professor Dennis Hale, BU Professor Richard Landes and CAMERA's Dexter Van Zile. The audience was small, well behaved, unfortunately with only a small number of students. There were a few challenging questions at the end. I may have a few things to say about that later, but for now I just wanted to get the video up.
Here are each of the three speakers. I haven't bothered with the Q&A for now. I have the transcript for Professor Hale's address and have posted that after the videos [Update: Have now added Dexter Van Zile's text.]. If I get the other speakers' transcripts I will post those as well. The BC students did an excellent job putting a short series of events together on very short notice.
BTW, I'm trying a new video hosting service, Blip.tv. Motionbox decided retroactively to start charging bucks for videos that got much traffic, so I've had to remove everything from there (Thanks to those who did a "view source" and took the embed code off the Geert Wilders video, in spite of the fact that I had it set to private and did not provide it. You helped put me over the limit). Let me know if you have any problem with these. YouTube's 10 minute limit makes it impractical for long events.
Here is Part 1 with Professor Hale. Parts 2 and 3 follow below.
Continue reading "Boston College: The Truth About Apartheid in the Middle East"
Obama's fine with them, now that he's the one doing it:
The Obama administration is again invoking government secrecy in defending the Bush administration's wiretapping program, this time against a lawsuit by AT&T customers who claim federal agents illegally intercepted their phone calls and gained access to their records.
Disclosure of the information sought by the customers, "which concerns how the United States seeks to detect and prevent terrorist attacks, would cause exceptionally grave harm to national security," Justice Department lawyers said in papers filed Friday in San Francisco.
Kevin Bankston of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a lawyer for the customers, said Monday the filing was disappointing in light of the Obama presidential campaign's "unceasing criticism of Bush-era secrecy and promise for more transparency."...
Disappointing that they couldn't figure this out before so we might have had a loose attempt at an honest campaign.
A proper response: Pro-Israel ralliers buy wine to stymie boycott
TORONTO -- A boycott against Israeli wine organized by Not In Our Name: Jewish Voices Opposing Zionism backfired on Sunday when hundreds of consumers staged a counter-boycott and bought up the Summerhill LCBO's entire stock of Israeli wine in a matter of hours...
Video of the event: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
Check out the guy in Part 3 at about 2:28 who quietly stuffs his keffiyeh in his pocket. Considering a quiet exit, stage left?
...at DePaul University: Shell-shocked in DePaul
I wasn't 30 hours off the plane from Israel to give a presentation at Chicago's DePaul University on March 16, before I was greeted with the kind of direct anti-Semitism that legitimizes Kassam rockets fired at Sderot.
Several anti-Israel posters draped the entrance to the building in which I began my presentation to a small audience of around 20. Then the room began filling with people not merely against Israel's political policies and action but in clear support of the Hamas terrorist organization.
When I invited a question-and-answer session following my presentation, the very right of free speech which I offered the audience - now numbering more than 100 - was denied me. One audience member verbally attacked me, declared his support for the firing of rockets into Israel and ended his anti-Semitic rant with a question irrelevant to anything in my presentation. I pointed out that the questioner was not simply criticizing Israel but was clearly expressing his support for Hamas.
Before I could finish answering, I was interrupted and silenced by the Hamas supporters. Then a student rose up in the front of the room and called me a "dirty whore" in Arabic. He then grabbed his crotch and screamed, "Here's your Kassam!" - in Arabic.
I wasn't able to utter a word, so the event was shut down. After I'd collected my belongings, the local police - teamed with university security - escorted me to my car. The combination of unceasing anti-Semitic chants, personal harassment and solidarity with a terrorist organization hijacked the event...
Alright to our friend Joel who asks a simple question and exposes an overly defensive Barney Frank. Talk about dodging, obfuscating, denying and deflecting. Uncomfortable much? Video: Harvard Student Takes On Barney Frank Over Economy
Has the singularity arrived? Not yet, but we can see it from here.
Metal/silicon based computers will probably not be able to mimic or replicate human intelligence in the near future. However, they are currently able to crunch enough numbers to literally read (and record) human thought processes. Since most thoughts, feelings and dreams can be seen and recorded by machines, it's possible that one's thoughts and one's emotional selfhood could, in the near future, be downloaded.
A computer's ability to read that kind of data implies that we may someday be able to download ideas and concepts onto a remote database in the same way we blog, without the annoyance of typing.
We've also made a lot of progress in the field of biomimetics (bionics). We're heading towards the point where we will be able to replace most parts of the human body, either through artificial implants or cloning.
We've already created a form of contact lens that can cure some forms of blindness. Other "bionic eyes" can transmit data across your field of vision, a kind of contact-lens iPhone. Combined with a subdermal implanted chip, it can also transmit information about one's health to a computer manned by medical technicians. In the not-too-far future, these kinds of lenses/subdermal chips could be used to record all information about a person's thoughts and emotional/physical well being. After a person dies, their accumulated knowledge could be stored, read, or transported.
I'm sure Google is working on this right now :-)
With the right combination of all the above technologies, annoying problems in space and time travel become solvable. It will probably take us centuries to be able to create an artificial intelligence that can think or emote the way we do (like the Cylons who improbably evolved from mindless robots to humanoids with reproductive ability in a ridiculously short period of time) but the ability to copy and download our existing consciousness from one storage unit to another could be do-able by the end of this century.
So, if we wanted to travel from point A to point B, instead of moving our delicate, high maintenance bodies, we could transmit the data from one bio-storage unit to another, from body A on earth to machine body B on mars. Machine body B explores mars while body A stays home, gets work done and analyzes data.
Or consciousness could be transmitted from body A in 2145 AD and immediately read by body B in 2147. Or vise versa. If we see space and time travel as the transmission of data/consciousness rather than as the transportation of bodies, all sorts of possibilities open up. Transmitting data through space is easier than transmitting cumbersome bodies, and it's likely that data could be transmitted through time as well.
While data/consciousness couldn't travel faster than the speed of light, it's more likely to be able to travel (and survive the trip) through "warped" space-times, wormholes or superluminal travel through a timespace curved.
In a recent episode of the "Sarah Connor Chronicles"*, the robot John Henry laments the fact that human souls can't be 'downloaded.' That really is the key to the transcendence of the singularity.
* The illustration above uses an illustration for the "Sarah Connor Chronicles" combined with NASA's image of "NGC 346 in the Small Magellanic Cloud".
Monday, April 6, 2009
We await British Teachers Union calls for boycott and sanction for this horrible abuse of an academic institution. In full, from Palestinian Media Watch:
Hamas Blood Libel: Jews drink Muslim blood
by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook
Jews drink the blood of Muslims and believe that God wants Jews to hate Muslims, according to a Hamas TV skit. Performed before a live audience at the Islamic University in Gaza, the segment features actors playing a father and son, in traditional Hasidic Jewish garb, discussing their God mandated hatred of Muslims.
The skit opens as the father instructs: "We Jews hate the Muslims, we want to kill the Muslims, we Jews want to drink the blood of Muslims." It is later explained that Jews wash their hands before prayer, not with water, but with Muslims' blood: "We have to wash our hands with the blood of Muslims."
Blood libels were a tragic part of Jewish history, as Jews were accused of using the blood of non-Jews for ritual purposes, especially the baking of Matzah for Passover. Blood libels created deep hatred and were an effective trigger for numerous pogroms and the murder of thousands. The Hamas accusation that Jews drink Muslim blood comes the week before Passover, the anniversary of many horrific blood libels.
This video of the Taliban flogging a girl who was seen with a man who was not her husband as she screams for mercy is emblematic of the reality of the world that exists independent of American Government apologies and campus good intentions events.
Perspectives on the Israel-Palestinian Crisis
Monday, April 6, 2009 Perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian Crisis:
Nabil Abuznaid
Charge d'affairs, PLO Mission, Washington, DC
4:30 PM, 041 Haldeman (Overflow in 031 Haldeman)
Co-sponsored by Hillel and Students Concerned for Palestine.
Abuznaid is the replacement for Afif Safieh who was fired for attending a pro-Hamas rally. That doesn't make him a friend. I guess there aren't enough good speakers to bring to campus, the local Hillel has to give a platform to the latest spokesliar.
When the United States abrogates its responsibilities as one of the few backbones the international order has, chaos tends to ensue as the vacuum is rushed. It's every country for itself when the sheriff decides to take a vacation (and the UN is NOT a sheriff). John Bolton on N. Korea's missile launch: Obama's NK Reaction: More Talks
...talks are exactly where North Korea wants to be. From them ever greater material and political benefits will flow to Pyongyang, in exchange for ever more hollow promises to dismantle its nuclear program.
So far, therefore, the missile launch is an unambiguous win for North Korea. (Although not orbiting a satellite, all three rocket stages apparently fired, achieving Pyongyang's longest missile flight yet.) But the negative repercussions will extend far beyond Northeast Asia.
Iran has carefully scrutinized the Obama administration's every action, and Tehran's only conclusion can be: It is past time to torque up the pressure on this new crowd in Washington. Not only is Iran's back now covered by its friends Russia, China and others on the U.N. Security Council, but it sees an American president so ready to bend his knee for public favor in Europe that the mullahs' wish list for U.S. concessions will grow by the minute.
Israel must also be carefully considering how the U.S. watched North Korea rip through "the international community." The most important lesson the new government headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should draw is: Look out for No. 1. If Israel isn't prepared to protect itself, including using military force, against Iran's nuclear weapons program, it certainly shouldn't be holding its breath for Mr. Obama to do anything.
Russia and China must also be relishing this outcome. They will have faced down Mr. Obama in his first real crisis, having provided Security Council cover for a criminal regime, and emerged unscathed. They will conclude that achieving their large agendas with the new administration can't be too hard. That conclusion may be unfair to the new American president; but it will surely color how Moscow and Beijing structure their policies and their diplomacy until proven otherwise. That alone is bad news for Washington and its allies.
Jeff Jacoby, one of the bright lights in print journalism take the press to task for its treatment of Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. Spot on: In Israel, a voice of realism
...Perhaps the world would more clearly understand the nature of Israel's adversary if the media weren't forever fanning moral outrage at the Mideast's only bulwark of freedom and democracy.
In recent weeks, the Palestinian Authority has warned Arabs that it is "high treason" punishable by death to sell homes or property to Jews in Jerusalem; shut down a Palestinian youth orchestra and arrested its founder because the ensemble played for a group of elderly Israeli Holocaust survivors; and celebrated the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel's history -- a PLO bus hijacking that left 38 civilians dead -- with a TV special extolling the massacre. On Thursday, after a Palestinian terrorist used an axe to murder a 13-year-old Jewish boy, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades -- a wing of the supposedly "moderate" Fatah party -- issued a statement claiming responsibility. [All of which we covered here at Solomonia, so see, you're a step ahead of being taken advantage of by the media by reading the blogs. -S]
There is no appeasing such hatred, and demonizing those who say so will not change that fact. "If you want peace, prepare for war." How refreshing, at last, to hear an Israeli leader say so.
It sure sounds like it: U.S. envoy: Arab peace initiative will be part of Obama policy
The Arab peace initiative will be part of the Obama administration's policy toward the Middle East, the United States special envoy to the region said.
The 2002 initiative offers to normalize relations between the entire Arab region and Israel, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories including East Jerusalem, the establishment of a Palestinian State and a "just settlement" for Palestinian refugees.
The envoy, George Mitchell, said the U.S. intends to "incorporate" the initiative into its Middle East policy. He made the statement at a meeting with Israeli, Arab American and European senior diplomats and officials in Washington a few weeks ago...
...The Arab representatives were reportedly satisfied with Mitchell's statement, but added that the initiative is a package deal and cannot be modified. Israel has yet to express a formal position on the Arab initiative.
The organizers of the workshop, which began March 17 and lasted three days, were former U.S. ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk and Danny Abraham, a Jewish-American businessman and peace activist. Indyk, who was a consultant for former U.S. president Bill Clinton, is considered a close associate of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The workshop dealt with the U.S. attitude toward Benjamin Netanyahu's new government.
Senior Palestinian sources told Haaretz that the U.S. State Department is preparing a plan to market the Arab initiative to Israelis, and will release a document highlighting the gestures that Arab nations have agreed to take under the initiative...
This post at Soccer Dad's traces some of the twists and turns in Obama's flirtations and denials with respect to the Saudi plan, but it's becoming clearer and clearer all the time that this is the direction the pressure will take.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Finally, an appropriate guest. We heartily endorse this visit over such luminaries as Jimmy Carter, for instance. At least Sasha Grey actually has a useful purpose in life, bringing pleasure to people. [h/t to Seva]: Porn star to visit Brandeis
In another coup for Brandeis film studies chairwoman Alice Kelikian, adult film star Sasha Grey is set to visit the Waltham campus this month. The 21-year-old porn star is coming to screen Steven Soderbergh's new film, "The Girlfriend Experience," in which Grey plays - wait for it - a prostitute. The film, which won raves at a test screening at the Sundance Film Festival, is having its world premiere April 29 at the Tribeca Film Festival. Grey will be at Brandeis the very next night, and will do a Q&A with film industry analyst and Brandeis alum Scott Feinberg. Grey is just the latest high-profile actor or director or writer to screen their work at Brandeis. In the past year, Kelikian has hosted Richard Jenkins, Melissa Leo, Michael Shannon, Kate Beckinsale, Alan Alda, Brian Goodman, Mark Ruffalo, Errol Morris, Werner Herzog, Barbet Schroeder, and "Friends" creator Marta Kauffman, who, we're told, will be coming to Brandeis soon to teach.
If you'd like to see samples of what Sash Grey is famous for, click (NSFW!!!!!) here (NSFW!!!!! Adults only link).
In full, from Palestinian Media Watch:
Hamas to kids: Death is honor and victory
by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook
Hamas continues its compelling message to children that death, not life, is the prime value. The following lyrics have been appearing regularly in a song on the children's program Tomorrow's Pioneers on Hamas TV:
"Teach the children that death is honor and victory.
Through death, we seek to bring the dawn and the day."
[Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas), March 20, 2009]
While the words are being sung, a young girl throws darts shaped like missiles at a target shaped like the Star of David, promoting another repeating Hamas message - violence against Israel. When the target is hit and the Star of David falls, the young girl raises her hands in victory.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
[Please welcome our newest poster and anti-divestment and pro-Israel powerhouse, Jon Haber. He'll be contributing from time to time.]
In a new blog (DivestThis), I've tried to document the struggles those calling for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) directed against Israel face in trying in reaching their goal. And that goal is to get large, respected institutions to publically support their program (allowing them to position BDS as the official position of Harvard, the Presbyterian Church or the City of Seattle, rather than the cause of a minority of obsessed cranks within those places).
Simply put, these institutions have told the BDSers "No" time and time again which is why the divestment crowd has had to turn to deception (as in the case of Hampshire College) or anti-democratic political maneuvering (as in the case of the British teacher's union) to show any semblance of progress for their unwanted advances.
To the extent that such desperate tactics are the choices of losers, this could be considered good news. The more institutions (even tolerant-to-a-fault Hampshire College) are exposed to the extremism and dishonest behavior of divestment advocates, the more inoculated they become to the BDS-crowd's pitch that they are simply "human rights advocates" seeing "peace and justice" in the Middle East.
Continue reading "Thuggery"In Commentary, Michael Totten writes:
A few weeks ago Britain decided to unfreeze "diplomatic relations" with Hezbollah, and the nonsensical phrases "political wing" and "military wing" have been used to describe the Iranian-backed militia ever since. Britain now says it's okay to meet with members of Hezbollah's "political wing" while maintaining the blacklisting of its "military wing," but these "wings" don't exist in any meaningful sense. If Hezbollah were actually two distinct entities with separate policies it might make sense for British diplomats to do business with one and not the other, but that's not how Hezbollah is structured. Of course Hezbollah's fighters and members of parliament aren't the same individuals, but Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah is the leader of the entire organization.
The Obama Administration knows better. One U.S. official wants Britain to explain "the difference between the political, social and military wings of Hezbollah because we don't see the difference between the integrated leadership that they see." "The US does not distinguish between military, cultural and political wings of Hezbollah," another U.S. official said, "and our decision to avoid making such a distinction is premised on accurate available information indicating that all Hezbollah wings and branches share finances, personnel and unified leadership and they all support violence."...
In his post "Winging it", Dave Rich says:
...When the FCO tries to explain its new policy to Middle Eastern audiences it is met with utter incomprehension. Bill Rammell went on al-Jazeera on 13th March, to discuss it with Dr. Sami Khiyami, the Syrian ambassador to the UK, and Palestinian MP Mustafa Barghouti. First the presenter, Sami Haddad, explained to Bill Rammell that Hezbollah is "an Islamic movement and a religious creed, that the scholars and men of religion control this movement, and therefore, there is no difference between the political and military wings to them." Then, when Rammell insisted that there is a difference, he was contradicted by Khiyami: "there is no difference between the political wing and the military wing of Hezbollah."
You could forgive Syria and Hezbollah for assuming that the attempt to create an artificial division within Hezbollah is just another example of the FCO's long tradition of divide and rule in the Middle East. If it is, nobody is falling for it this time.
Hezbollah is not like the IRA and Sinn Fein, two ostensibly different but connected organisations. Nor is it like Hamas, which, until relatively recently, maintained a cosmetic separation between Hamas itself and its military wing, the Izzedin al-Qassam Brigades. Pretty much every serious analysis of Hezbollah has come to the conclusion that all of its activities - military, political, social, welfare, educational and media - form a single organisation under a single unified leadership....
The British government isn't fooling anyone but themselves. Rich concludes:
...This is not just about foreign policy. The FCO has significant input into domestic counter-radicalisation work under the Prevent programme. This is one reason why Hezbollah MP Hussein el-Hajj Hassan was allowed into the UK this week.
Divide and rule in Lebanon is one thing. Do we really need the FCO doing the same in London?
It's an old law, but they're just reminding everyone. I wonder if Eve Spangler will be taking her students to learn about and fight this blatantly racist human rights violation... PA: Death penalty for those who sell land to Jews
The Palestinian Authority has issued yet another warning to Palestinians against selling their homes or properties to Jews, saying those who violate the order would be accused of "high treason" - a charge that carries the death penalty.
The latest warning was issued on Wednesday by the Chief [Islamic] Judge of the Palestinian Authority, Sheikh Tayseer Rajab Tamimi, who reminded the Palestinians of an existing fatwa [religious decree] than bans them from selling property to Jews.
Sheikh Tamimi's warning came in response to reports that Jewish businessmen from the US had purchased 20 dunams of land from Palestinians on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.
Warning the Palestinians against engaging in "suspicious real estate deeds," the religious leader said that according to Islamic teachings it was a "grave sin" to sell houses and lands to Jews.
He said that the ban also applies to real estate agents or middlemen who are involved in such transactions.
He warned that anyone who ignores the warning would be punished in accordance with Islamic teachings and would also be ostracized by his community and family.
Sheikh Tamimi also issued a ban on renting out property to Jewish individuals and organizations under the pretext that they would spread moral, political and security corruption there...
...amongst other things. This guy has decision making powers at NPR? De-fund them!
CAMERA: NPR Editor Jenkins Blames Israel for ME Deadlock
Loren Jenkins, foreign editor since 1996 at National Public Radio, ordinarily works behind the scenes where his extreme anti-Israel views aren't on public display. He does sometimes dispense bromides via the NPR Ombudsman's column about the network's devotion to getting the full story on the Middle East and not judging "who is right or who is wrong."
But an audience in Aspen, Colorado on February 17, 2009 got a full dose of his bias -- and "who is wrong" -- during a revealing extemporaneous discussion held under the auspices of Aspen public radio at the Given Insitute.
How extreme are the NPR official's views? In the past, Jenkins has depicted Israelis as imperialists and interlopers in the Middle East and even linked Jews to Nazis in his writing. In a 1983 Rolling Stone article entitled "Palestine, Exiled" he wrote, for example, that an Israeli-administered south Lebanon prison was, in the words of a nameless Red Cross official, "a concentration camp. There is nothing else to call it." PLO leaders, in contrast, were characterized admiringly as freedom-fighters, as "modest" people, speaking in "soft and warm" voices. Of Yasir Arafat he said: "it is his liquid brown eyes that impress one the most." PLO terrorism, while "abhorrent," was primarily deplored as a tactical blunder that caused "image" problems...
CAMERA's description of the event itself is well worth a read.
'Israel is back' is how Daniel Pipes concludes his laudatory piece on the arrival of Avigdor Lieberman to Israeli Foreign Minister: Avigdor Lieberman's Brilliant Debut
Avigdor Lieberman became foreign minister of Israel yesterday. He celebrated his inauguration with a maiden speech that news reports indicate left his listeners grimacing, squirming, and aghast. The BBC, for example, informs us that his words prompted "his predecessor Tzipi Livni to interrupt and diplomats to shift uncomfortably."
Too bad for them - the speech leaves me elated. Here are some of the topics Lieberman covered in his 1,100-word stem-winder...
He goes on to name some of the highlights of the speech. I suggest checking it out. It sounds great.
Lieberman's certainly pissing off all the right people, especially the press world-over which is just delicious. The British press has been suffering from adjective abuse making sure everyone knows he's the "Ultranationalist Lieberman," the "Right Wing Lieberman," etc... This is typical agenda-driven journalism. The BBC and others were also portraying Lieberman as abrogating previous peace agreements when all he's said is that Annapolis has no force of law, while, in fact, Israel will continue to honor its agreements under the Road Map (a move to the Left for Lieberman). He's going through trial by headline at this point and one must read through the entirety of the articles to get to some semblance of reality.
Israeli FM says concessions incur wars
New Israel FM strikes hard line on peace talks
Lieberman: Annapolis doesn't obligate us
You know, the Wang Center. Apparently the Boston Globe reporter who served as moderator (really more of an interviewer I guess, since there was no one sharing the stage with Gore...except maybe Satan...) managed to annoy the hell out of everyone. Yay, another reason to cancel your subscription! Review of the event at Unlikely Words: Al Gore at the Wang Center Boston.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
I previously discussed the case of Boston College Professor Eve Spangler and her course Social Justice in Israel/Palestine here: Boston College: Course Credit for Anti-Israel Activism. This is a BC course in which college students are indoctrinated in correct thinking on Israel, shipped off to the Middle East where they get a Birthright Unplugged-style tour, and then are expected to return home to engage in anti-Israel political activity.
If you didn't have enough information to get the point of what was happening by reading what was provided in that previous posting, as further evidence I offer into evidence the course syllabus which has been forwarded to me. Here is the Word doc. This course is such a blatant example of simple political indoctrination in the guise of academics that it's almost laughable. Someone at BC should tell the people at Birthright Unplugged to go get their own funding and stop trying to indoctrinate the kids on the back of tuition paying parents. In fact, some tuition paying parents should start saying something.
Take a look at the doc. It's actually worse than I imagined it would be. Far more blatant. Let's cite a few examples:
This seminar is designed to prepare students for a study/immersion trip to Israel/Palestine during winter break. We hope that the curriculum will accomplish three major tasks:
- The readings will present a variety of descriptive materials about a part of the world that is little known to most Americans. The selection of readings reflects the paradox that Israelis and Palestinians are equally stakeholders in a just peace and that relations between them are highly unequal - the relations of an occupier and the occupied.
Attention: We are here to learn, but we're going to establish the framework right from the start. We know who's to blame, and no dissent will be tolerated in this regard.
- The class discussions and written assignments will provide an analytic framework to help students ask and answer such basic questions as: what happened to set Israel/Palestine on a collision course? How could this long-standing conflict be transformed to produce a just peace? What would a healthy economy and a healthy state in Israel/Palestine look like? How do religious narratives create models of right living and responsibility toward others in the context of Israel/Palestine?
- The project that students are asked to design (in the seminar) and to implement (upon their return) should allow students to test their capacity for using their education to do good in the world.
There is a healthy economy in one 'Israel/Palestine' -- it's called the Israeli economy. Of course, I'd make some adjustments to the economy and state, but I somehow don' t think they're the same adjustments that Prof. Spangler would make. Oh, and when you come home, we expect you to put the indoctrination we put you through to work.
...On the trip, the primary form of service is bearing witness - to the sufferings and strengths of occupied communities and the courage and wisdom of dissidents...
Only Arabs are occupied. Only Israelis are 'dissidents.' Get the slant?
...While reading both Palestinians (Karmi, Khalidi, Jawad, Masalha, Said) and Israelis (Rogan and Shlaim, Morris, Kimmerling and Migdal, Segev) narratives, students should be asking themselves: "What happened here?" remembering not only that narratives trump facts, but that these narratives operate within a field of unequal power...
Narratives trump facts?!? Whoa Nellie. With that tendentious reading list I'm not surprised that narratives trump facts. Further slanted presentation of "facts":
A sustained, just peace in Israel/Palestine depends also on the development of a robust economy or economies. To study past and possible future economies in the region, we will be looking at the historic work of Alexander Scholch who documents an industrious and prosperous 19th century Palestine. From there we will look at trajectories of de-development (Roy), labor policy (Farsakh) and business development (Bahour). On the Israeli side, we will consider Friedman's analysis of Israeli capitalism and the alternative views of Klein and Halper, who emphasize the degree to which Israeli capitalism relies on militarism as its engine of growth.
We have all kinds of analysis here: We have the kind that blames Israel and the kind that holds Arabs blameless. Economics? Sure, we have Marxists, Anarcho-Syndicalists, Socialists, Leftists...you know, variety... This sort of slanted presentation is the theme, and becomes insidious when you realize how these facts are then to be regurgitated:
...Please be sure to use the reading materials in constructing your answer...
...still others argue that there is no "real" history, only competing narratives, in which power, not truth, determines the outcome. Drawing on our readings and discussion, how does the Israeli-Palestinian history illustrate each of these perspectives? Based on this, how do you now view the uses and abuses of history, using specific examples from our work...
...(1) We have examined three images of the Israeli occupation of Palestine: genocide, apartheid, and sociocide. Which of these organizing concepts, if any, do you find most persuasive and why?...
(2)...Please bear in mind, that your peace plan should reflect Rouhana's ideas (namely that reconciliation requires a sense of history, a sense of justice, and a sense of power) as well as Lederach's (that states, NGOs, and grass roots movements must all be involved and their actions aligned) .
(3) If you were advising the European Union or the Quartet, what would you urge them to do?
Please be sure to draw on the reading materials in constructing your answer...
On and on. See the pattern? We provide the slanted reading material and witnesses, then expect you to give back the expected answers. Garbage in, garbage out. Control the data and you control the range of possible conclusions that can be drawn. Even a curious and independent-minded student is limited by the rules of the game to stay on the path that's been marked out for them. Leave the path on risk of failure.
Students start this thing ignorant by definition, yet they emerge from this so called course of studies worse off than when they started. What's worse, they're then sent off into the world as an army of marching morons, sallying forth to influence policy and inflict their ignorance on the rest of us under the command of one unscrupulous "educator."
This is academic manipulation, fraud and malpractice at its worst. Eve Spangler should go off and recruit for the ISM in her spare time, not abuse her captive student audience to work out her personal demons at university expense.
Update: National Review's Phi Beta Cons picks up the post, and Fred Schwarz notes:
What's a little odd about this class is that the professor, Eve Spangler, is a sociologist whose main area of research is workplace safety. A while ago she started getting interested in anti-Israel activities, and eventually, being an academic, she decided to teach a class about her latest fascination.
It's no surprise Spangler has no academic grounds to be teaching this class, but that's fine as it's clearly not an academic class.
I've received a couple of emails from Firefox users that they can only see the background image (right now the planet earth on a star field) intermittently. Also, I've become aware of a serious issue with IE choking on some code. I believe I've narrowed that down to something having to do with the little social sharing links at the end of each post. I've removed those for now and the problem appears gone.
Please let me know if you have any issues viewing the site. Though I surf in FireFox, occasionally check in with IE, and hit Browser Shots from time to time, there are so many configs out there it's impossible to know things are always working so such input is always welcome.
Thanks!