Amazon.com Widgets

Friday, June 26, 2009

This appeared in Hebrew in Maariv. This translation (in full) has been circulating:

Tell us, where is everyone? Where did all the people who demonstrated against Israel's brutality in Operation Cast Lead, in the Second Lebanon War, in Operation Defensive Shield, or even in The Hague, when we were dragged there unwillingly after daring to build a separation barrier between us and the suicide bombers, disappear to? We see demonstrations here and there, but these are mainly Iranian exiles. Europe, in principle, is peaceful and calm. So is the United States. Here and there a few dozens, here and there a few hundreds. Have they evaporated because it is Tehran and not here?

All the peace-loving and justice-loving Europeans, British professors in search of freedom and equality, the friends filling the newspapers, magazines and various academic journals with various demands for boycotting Israel, defaming Zionism and blaming us and it for all the ills and woes of the world -- could it be that they have taken a long summer vacation? Now of all times, when the Basij hooligans have begun to slaughter innocent civilians in the city squares of Tehran? Aren't they connected to the Internet? Don't they have YouTube? Has a terrible virus struck down their computers? Have their justice glands been removed in a complicated surgical procedure (to be re-implanted successfully for the next confrontation in Gaza)? How can it be that when a Jew kills a Muslim, the entire world boils, and when extremist Islam slaughters its citizens, whose sole sin is the aspiration to freedom, the world is silent?

Imagine that this were not happening now in Tehran, but rather here. Let's say in Nablus. Spontaneous demonstrations of Palestinians turning into an ongoing bloodbath. Border Policemen armed with knives, on motorcycles, butchering demonstrators. A young woman downed by a sniper in midday, dying before the cameras. Actually, why imagine? We can just recall what happened with the child Mohammed a-Dura. How the affair (which was very harsh, admittedly) swept the world from one end to another. The fact that a later independent investigative report raised tough questions as to the identity of the weapon from which a-Dura was shot, did not make a difference to anyone. The Zionists were to blame, and that was that.

And where are the world's leaders? Where is the wondrous rhetorical ability of Barack Obama? Where has his sublime vocabulary gone? Where is the desire, that is supposed to be built into all American presidents, to defend and act on behalf of freedom seekers around the globe? What is this stammering?

A source who is connected to the Iranian and security situation, said yesterday that if Obama had shown on the Iranian matter a quarter of the determination with which he assaulted the settlements in the territories, everything would have looked different. "The demonstrators in Iran are desperate for help," said the man, who served in very senior positions for many years, "they need to know that they have backing, that there is an entire world that supports them, but instead they see indifference. And this is happening at such a critical stage of this battle for the soul of Iran and the freedom of the Iranian people. It's sad."

Or the European Union, for example. The organization that speaks of justice and peace all year round. Why should its leaders not declare clearly that the world wants to see a democratic and free Iran, and support it unreservedly? Could it be that the tongue of too many Europeans is still connected to dark places? The pathetic excuse that such support would give Khamenei and Ahmadinejad an excuse to call the demonstrators "Western agents," does not hold water. They call them "Western agents" in any case, so what difference does it make?

To think that just six months ago, when Europe was flooded with demonstrations against Israel, leftists and Islamists raised pictures of Nasrallah, the protégé of the ayatollah regime. The fact that this was a benighted regime did not trouble them. This is madness, but it is sinking in and influencing the weary West. If there is a truly free world here, let it appear immediately! And impose sanctions, for example, on those who slaughter the members of their own people. Just as it imposed them on North Korea, or on the military regime in Burma. It is only a question of will, not of ability.

Apparently, something happens to the global adherence to justice and equality, when it comes to Iran. The oppression is overt and known. The Internet era broadcasts everything live, and it is all for the better. Hooligans acting on behalf of the regime shoot and stab masses of demonstrators, who cry out for freedom.

Is anything more needed? Apparently it is. Because it is to no avail. The West remains indifferent. Obama is polite. Why shouldn't he be, after all, he aspires to a dialogue with the ayatollahs. And that is very fine and good, the problem is that at this stage there is no dialogue, but there is death and murder on the streets. At this stage, one must forget the rules of etiquette for a moment. The voices being heard from Obama elicit concern that we are actually dealing with a new version of Chamberlain. Being conciliatory is a positive trait, particularly when it follows the clumsy bellicosity of George Bush, but when conciliation becomes blindness,
we have a problem.

The courageous voice of Angela Merkel, who issued yesterday a firm statement of support for the Iranian people and its right to freedom, is in the meantime a lone voice in the Western wilderness. It is only a shame that she has not announced an economic boycott, in light of the fact that this is the European country that is most invested in building infrastructure in Iran. She was joined by British Foreign Secretary Miliband. It is little, it is late, it is not enough. Millions of freedom seekers have taken to the streets in Iran, and the West is straddling the fence, one leg here, the other leg there.

There is a different Islam. This is already clear today. Even in Iran. There are millions of Muslims who support freedom, human rights, equality for women. These millions loathe Khamenei, Chavez and Nasrallah too. But part of the global left wing prefers the ayatollah regime over them. The main thing is for them to raise flags against Israel and America. The question is why the democrats, the liberals, and Obama, Blair and Sarkozy, are continuing to sit on the fence. This is not a fence of separation, it is a fence of shame.

1 Comment

Very strong article -

Correct about the hypocrisy, I think it's a kind of racism. People don't expect better - yet Iranians, Arabs, Africans are as human as Westerners and deserve the same rights and their governments should be held to the same standards. One of the hypocritical arguments on the Left holds that values and human rights are relative - I do not buy that.

I do think it takes time for very old cultures to change. In Iran I think the old and the new are now in open conflict and I don't think the hardliners will go away in the near future. But maybe there's a crack in the wall?

The observation about demonstrations is obviously accurate. One can only imagine if Israel fired deliberately on unarmed peaceful demonstrators - it would be horrible - and Jews around the world would share in the blame even if they weren't there. Probably we would feel guilty about it too - I would.

I remember the Kent State shootings - it galvanized millions and millions of people - we were horrified.

As it is the IDF tries to be careful and even so a lot of people get hurt and this is in the context of a war - not civil rights demonstrations - yet the UN does hold the Israelis and the West to a higher standard and somehow attacks on Israel in particular are ignored or justified.

Indeed during the Lebanon and Gaza wars haven't we seen "peace" demonstrations where so-called progressives wore the flag of oppression? It doesn't make sense.

I think there's a bit of an error though in assuming it's the Left which is solely to blame for the general quietude about Iran. In fact a lot of people on the Left are upset (though some fools like George Galloway and John Wight are actually supporting the oppressors - go figure).

Many people are writing about this, the problem is nobody knows what to do to help.

There's some cognitive dissonance going on too - people are having to confront some assumptions and it might take awhile for all this to sink in.

Part of the problem with everybody else is a) a sense of impotence and b) Iran's resources and strategic locale.

I'd bet that people are afraid to upset the apple cart economically. That might sound weaseley and it is. On the other hand a global depression isn't a joke either. So the economically vested Right and the "realists" and so forth are in a bit of a bind too and anyway demonstrations aren't their style. Maybe they can do more behind the scenes.

At least President Obama finally spoke more forcefully, and Roger Cohen's latest article in NYT speaks on behalf of the women of Iran and argues against engagement at this time. It is quite an eloquent piece:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/opinion/27cohen.html?th&emc=th

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]