Amazon.com Widgets

Sunday, August 23, 2009

How satisfying to see someone in government dropping a bit of the diplomatic mask and telling it like it is: Lockerbie bomber: Letter from FBI director Robert Mueller

Dear Mr Secretary

Over the years I have been a prosecutor, and recently as the Director of the FBI, I have made it a practice not to comment on the actions of other prosecutors, since only the prosecutor handling the case has all the facts and the law before him in reaching the appropriate decision.

Your decision to release Megrahi causes me to abandon that practice in this case. I do so because I am familiar with the facts, and the law, having been the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the investigation and indictment of Megrahi in 1991. And I do so because I am outraged at your decision, blithely defended on the grounds of ''compassion''.

Your action in releasing Megrahi is as inexplicable as it is detrimental to the cause of justice. Indeed your action makes a mockery of the rule of law. Your action gives comfort to terrorists around the world who now believe that regardless of the quality of the investigation, the conviction by jury after the defendant is given all due process, and sentence appropriate to the crime, the terrorist will be freed by one man's exercise of ''compassion''. Your action rewards a terrorist even though he never admitted to his role in this act of mass murder and even though neither he nor the government of Libya ever disclosed the names and roles of others who were responsible.

Your action makes a mockery of the emotions, passions and pathos of all those affected by the Lockerbie tragedy: the medical personnel who first faced the horror of 270 bodies strewn in the fields around Lockerbie, and in the town of Lockerbie itself; the hundreds of volunteers who walked the fields of Lockerbie to retrieve any piece of debris related to the break-up of the plane; the hundreds of FBI agents and Scottish police who undertook an unprecedented global investigation to identify those responsible; the prosecutors who worked for years - in some cases a full career - to see justice done.

But most importantly, your action makes a mockery of the grief of the families who lost their own on December 21, 1988. You could not have spent much time with the families, certainly not as much time as others involved in the investigation and prosecution. You could not have visited the small wooden warehouse where the personal items of those who perished were gathered for identification - the single sneaker belonging to a teenager; the Syracuse sweatshirt never again to be worn by a college student returning home for the holidays; the toys in a suitcase of a businessman looking forward to spending Christmas with his wife and children.

You apparently made this decision without regard to the views of your partners in the investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the Lockerbie tragedy. Although the FBI and Scottish police, and prosecutors in both countries, worked exceptionally closely to hold those responsible accountable, you never once sought our opinion, preferring to keep your own counsel and hiding behind opaque references to ''the need for compassion''.

You have given the family members of those who died continued grief and frustration. You have given those who sought to assure that the persons responsible would be held accountable the back of your hand. You have given Megrahi a ''jubilant welcome'' in Tripoli, according to the reporting. Where, I ask, is the justice?

Sincerely yours,

Robert S. Mueller, III

Director

And the quest to discover just why this happened continue (It couldn't just be leftist European moral relativism, lack of cultural self-worth, froo-froo ideas of crime and punishment and a nonsensical set of feel-good trendy "values" that have replaced real religion could it?)

Lockerbie bomber: Lord Mandelson faces new questions over Libya links

New Questions in Lockerbie Bomber's Release

4 Comments

I was right with you, up until the part:

And the quest to discover just why this happened continue (It couldn't just be leftist European moral relativism, lack of cultural self-worth, froo-froo ideas of crime and punishment and a nonsensical set of feel-good trendy "values" that have replaced real religion could it?)

There are many liberals, including me, who were outraged by this decision, which was either a result of misplaced compassion or done with some political calculation. I think it was correct for Mueller to question MacAskill's judgment and to take him to task for that -- and not to go off on a rant about moral relativism, Europeans, or attempt to babble forth some incoherent cultural critique.

I didn't say liberal, I said "leftist," and if you'll spend a bit of time sampling the Euro-reaction to this decision you'll find it much different from the American. The "compassion" explanation plays much better over there. Apparently they haven't been through the same truth in sentencing and victim's rights battles we have.

And no, I don't expect the FBI Director "to go off on a rant about moral relativism, Europeans, or attempt to babble forth some incoherent cultural critique". If you find what I write such incoherent babble you can go find another web site to haunt.

With respect I don't think leftism is the culprit here.

I've been reading about this on Harry's and Scottish nationalism and the desire to assert it seems to be part of this. An aspect of that is the pleasure taken in sticking it to Uncle Sam and also embarrassing the English I think.

The other part, which I've been picking up in articles on Yahoo among other places, has to do apparently with warming relations between Britain and Libya - more precisely, between Britain and Libyan gas and oil reserves.

There is one final element and that is the ambiguity about the actual guilt of the person involved. There is widespread conjecture that Libya took the hit for a Syrian or Iranian-funded Palestinian operation.

But if that's the case there should be further investigation, not something like this which leaves the questions unanswered and justice unserved, and which also will serve to increase terrorism against innocents since the penalties for it are governed by our own "compassion".

Also, even though people are excusing the hero's welcome by claiming that people in Libya don't think he is guilty, we've seen this spectacle before - when the obviously guilty Kuntar was returned to Lebanon.

It's very upsetting:(

has to do apparently with warming relations between Britain and Libya - more precisely, between Britain and Libyan gas and oil reserves.

and corruption in the British government and aerospace company swept under the rug to keep the Saudis happy, etc., ydda, yadda

After all the literature that came out of this Isle denigrating Jews for money grubbing it seems we now have the mirror image.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]