September 2009 Archives
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Just messing around tonight and thought I'd resurrect my "Why There's a Fence" series. Click for larger version:
Previous in the series:
Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
Also, Why There Are Checkpoints, Part 1.
Played it? Good for kids, not only because it's Nintendo, which is very kid oriented, but the whole movement-centric controller scheme that gets you up and off the couch is also great for parents who are worried about their kids becoming couch potatoes. My daughter actually runs around the house doing the jogging bits in Wii Fit.
For those not in the know, the Wii is less graphically robust (the visuals aren't as stunning) than the PlayStation or the Xbox (though Playstation doubles as a Blu Ray player which increases the value).
I prefer the PC for "serious" gaming, but the Wii is excellent for family fun.
Yeah, so anyway, price drop at Amazon, and if you buy one (or anything else over there), wow, I get a cut! OK, so this is kind of an ad...but, yeah, it's kind of an ad...in the spirit of Billy Mays and all that...
OK, well actually, somebody else says Sarkozy thinks that, but it confirms what a lot of us think as well as other reports, so we'll go with it. Let's go to the Greta video (via Breitbart):
At MIT, where the eggheads sing, and Noam Chomsky rules with an iron fist from his blood-soaked throne of skulls, comes the concert event of the year: Boston Concert in solidarity with Palestine and Honduras
The Consulate General of Venezuela presents:
a concert in solidarity with Palestine & Honduras featuring:
Dame Pa Matala
revolutionary hip hop and folk music
and from Palestine: Sabreena Da Witch
with
The Foundation Movement, Natural Bliss & los trovadores por Honduras
FREE!
FRIDAY OCTOBER 2nd 8 PM
Kresge Auditorium
77 Mass Ave
Cambridge MA
more info: 781 724 0752
cosponsored by: Boston Boycott Divestment Sanctions
Proyecto Hondureño
and MLK Bolivarian Circle
I'm thinking they're not exactly on the same side of the Honduras thing as me.
It's not quite a flying pig moment, after all, they still find a way to blame the Israelis (themselves) for everyone else's hypercriticism, but still and all, this is a remarkable statement criticizing the Goldstone Report, considering that B'Tselem, for those not in the know, is considered a far-left group that basically labors for the other side:
The UN Human Rights Council and its recent Goldstone Report are either biased or mistaken respectively in some of their fundamental accusations against Israel, according to the director of one of Israel's main rights groups.
Even so, "Israel has only itself to blame" for its failure to investigate the accusations of abuses during January's Operation Cast Lead that led to the report, according to B'Tselem executive director Jessica Montell.
"There's no question that the HRC, which mandated the Goldstone [fact-finding mission into the Gaza fighting], has an inappropriate, disproportionate fixation with Israel," she said, adding that the Council was "a political body made up of diplomats, not human rights experts, which means that the powerful states are never going to come under scrutiny the way the powerless will. So China, Russia and the US will never have commission of inquiry, regardless of how their crimes rank relative to Israeli crimes."
Furthermore, the Goldstone Report itself, which was presented in its final version to the Human Rights Council on Tuesday, is "disagreeable" and mistaken in some of its gravest accusations against Israel, she believes. These include the claim that Israel intentionally targeted the civilian population rather than Hamas, and the "weak, hesitant way that the report mentions Hamas's strategy of using civilians [in combat]."...
Israel is going to release 20 Palestinians from jail before the end of their sentences for the privilege of seeing a video tape of kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit. The Red Cross has not visited Shalit. No UN resolutions have been passed on his behalf, no special raporteur has been dispatched: Hamas: Video will prove Gilad Shalit alive and well
A senior Hamas official said on Wednesday that a video to be released Friday will prove that abducted Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit is alive and well.
Musa Abu-Marzouk said that the video, to be given to Israel in exchange for the release of 20 female Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, will also include proof that it was filmed recently...
...Of the 20 female Palestinian prisoners to be released by Israel, Hamas has stated that four are members of Hamas, five belong to the rival Fatah faction, and three are members of Islamic Jihad. Only one of the prisoners is a resident of the Gaza Strip, the rest are from the West Bank.
The prisoners had all served at least two thirds of their sentences and none had more than two years left to serve.
Last week, Egypt's foreign minister urged Israel to release 1,000 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Shalit.
Egypt has been mediating a prisoner swap and Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said Israel needs to show flexibility.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Legal Beagles in Britain are doing the very important work of being Hamas's barristers, this time by seeking to have Ehud Barak arrested. Tom Gross at NRO: British lawyers seek arrest of visiting Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak:
Now that the Bush administration is no longer there to actively lobby for Israel, the situation for the Jewish state at the hands of the assorted Israel bashers and anti-Semites of the world is growing more and more grave.
Currently, the top-of-the-page headline on the home page of the influential left-wing British newspaper The Guardian is "Lawyers seek arrest of Israeli defence minister in UK for alleged war crimes."
Ehud Barak, who is the leader of Israel's Labor Party, is due to speak at a meeting at the British Labour party conference in the Southern English town of Brighton today. Barak is also scheduled to meet British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and David Miliband, the foreign secretary, for talks on the Middle East and Iran.
The Guardian notes that "The accusations against Barak are based, in part, on a United Nations investigation conducted by the former South African judge Richard Goldstone. It concluded earlier this month that Israel had committed war crimes."...
These are Goldstone's bastard step-children.
No surprise as to who's behind the funding of it, the usual combination of non-profits and European governments: Ford Foundation, European governments among those funding organization seeking to arrest Israeli Defense minister. The British court rejected the petition for arrest:
Westminster Magistrates court in central London on Tuesday evening rejected a petition to issue an arrest warrant for Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on the grounds that he committed "war crimes" by defending Israel from Hamas attack. The British government intervened on Barak's behalf, submitting legal briefs to the court, and thus avoiding what would have been the most serious clash between Britain and Israel since 1948.
The Jerusalem Post reports that Al Mezan is the organization behind the British arrest efforts. Al Mezan had instructed expensive London law firms to carry them out.
As noted by NGO Monitor, Al Mezan is funded by Sweden (1.1 million SEK), Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the Ford Foundation, the International Commission of Jurists, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Netherlands Representative Office, the International Human Rights Funders Group/co Mertz Gilmore Foundation, the Open Society Institute, Medico International and the European Commission, among others...
Phyllis Chesler has more here: Israeli Minister Barak Escapes Arrest in England
Barak M. Seener has a lengthy and important piece on the phenomenon at Middle East Quarterly: Targeting Israelis via International Law
...More recently, however, individuals and organizations with political grievances have started to make use of war crimes legislation in order to pursue a variety of officials from states equipped with well-run courts and tribunals, notably the United States, Great Britain, and--most of all--Israel. Should this matter to us? Aren't war crimes clear and cut; shouldn't those who commit them be pursued with the full force of the law? This essay tries to answer those questions and others...
Israel's Ambassador to the UK, Ron Prosor, writes in the London Times: A farcical attempt to paint Israel black - The UN Human Rights Council's report into the Gaza conflict is a shamefully biased document: "In the history of international organisations it is hard to conceive of an institution less fit for purpose than the absurdly titled UN Human Rights Council..."
Elder of Ziyon continues his investigation: Goldstone Report inaccuracies, part 16. In this he exposes the credulous acceptance of the testimony of Gaza police spokesman Islam Shahwan.
You remember Shahwan. UN Watch has another good reminder: Goldstone report cites same Hamas witness who claims Israel distributes libido-increasing gum. A real court would never put this guy on the stand...but that's the UN for you. It's not a real court.
UN Watch has more important information: Dramatic U.N. Clash; Israeli Rocket Victim Asks Goldstone: "Why Were You Silent?": "My name is Dr. Mirela Siderer. I am a gynecologist living in Ashkelon, Israel." There is video at the link. Her original testimony is posted here.
Prof. Elihu D. Richter, at the JPost, Goldstone, Rwanda, Hamas, Iran and incitement to genocide: "...I personally submitted a nine-page, annotated and referenced brief to the Commission last July. Goldstone's claim that the Commission was driven by the evidence is refuted by the fact that the Mission ignored my brief and its attached evidence..."
Daled Amos has a translation of an article by Prof. Amnon Rubinstein: Goldstone's Unconscious Humor. It's very good, but I disagree that Israel should go to any extraordinary measures to appoint a special investigation of its own to investigate allegations. They should (and are) go through their normal processes.
Yaakov is on fire: Richard Goldstone- Don't call him "Justice": "...This guy thinks it is about justice!?!?! Or at least that is how he couches it. Jews are not asking for justice- just the permission to defend ourselves against terror. The Palestinians are not looking for justice- How many times do they have to tell the world that all they desire is the annihilation of Jews?..."
Rabbie Jonathan Ginsberg goes after another member of the clergy: Brent Rosen's Tribune article 100% wrong: "I am disgusted by a piece that a Rabbi had published in the Chicago Tribune on Erev Yom Kippur. In a nutshell: He has it totally backwards: This biased, dishonest report of the UN distances us from a just and peaceful solution..."
At Volokh, David Bernstein has a quick look at the ongoing Human Rights Watch meltdown, this time in relation to the report: Congo, Sudan, and Israel: "...Check out [Sarah Leah] Whitson's latest quote: '"The Obama administration cannot demand accountability for serious violations in places like Sudan and Congo but let allies like Israel go free." Apparently, she can't, or won't, distinguish between what's been going on in Sudan and Congo from what happened in Gaza last Winter..."
The Israelis continue to have fun at Goldstone's expense:
Those of you enjoyed Netanyahu's UN address will also enjoy this short interview for Israeli TV in the hallway just following.
[h/t: Phil P]
Update: Related, CAMERA notes: Netanyahu U.N. Speech Buried by the Times
...No doubt the same editorial news judgment that neglects the obsessive attacks on Israel, prompted the Times essentially to ignore Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's September 24, 2009 address to the UN General Assembly in New York. The Israeli leader's speech (see in full below) was a call to action against one of the most grotesque propagandists of our time -- a Holocaust denier sworn to Israel's destruction whose regime is working to develop nuclear weapons to implement its aims. The Israeli leader also used the forum to expose Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's lies about the Holocaust as well as to challenge the distortions of the UN's new Goldstone Report related to the recent Gaza conflict. In addition, he warned of the peril the world generally faces should weapons of mass destruction fall into the hands of radical Islamicists.
The paper chose to bury reference to the Israeli leader's appearance in the second half of a story by Neil MacFarquhar at the bottom of page 6 entitled "With Bush Gone, Chavez Smells No Sulfur, While Netanyahu Assails Iran's Leader" (Sept 25). A small photo of Netanyahu was paired with one of equal size of Hugo Chavez...
Sunday, September 27, 2009
You do what you can to make your own luck, but this holiday, Yom Kippur, says that beyond a certain point, even when you've done everything it is humanly possible to do, there's a step beyond which it's just not in mortal hands to control.
A wonderful year for you and yours.
Melanie Phillips has kind words for Alan Dershowitz and her own broadside for the Human Rights industry: The 'human rights' witch-hunt, "...The terrible thing, as Dershowitz says, is that as a prominent and distinguished Jewish human rights lawyer Goldstone is a lethal weapon in the hands of the Israel-bashers and Jew-haters. But the much more terrible and devastating thing - which Dershowitz does not say -- is that in the person of the secular Jewish human rights lawyer, the Jewish people has in fact created its own nemesis."
And Alan Dershowitz himself: Goldstone report is an ad hominem attack, "The definition of the ad hominem fallacy is to respond to substantive arguments solely by attacking the person who offered them. The mirror image of this classic fallacy is to try to bolster arguments solely by praising the person who offered them. This is what is happening with respect to the notorious Goldstone report regarding Israel's conduct during the Gaza War..."
Quite right, too. I've never read such a volume of substantive criticism heaped on a report so quickly as I have with Goldstone's report that leaves Goldstone himself virtually unscathed. I don't think the West's enemies that support this report can believe it. They keep trying to say that the criticisms aren't substantive, and then falling immediately back to hiding behind Judge Goldstone's religion as if that makes up for the report's lack of substance. Remarkable.
Senators are preparing a letter: Senate letter aims to block any Goldstone-related actions against Israel
Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), both on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, are circulating a letter asking Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the State Department to block any punitive actions against Israel related to the Goldstone Report.
"As the State Department has stated, Israel is a democratic country, like the United States, with an independent judiciary and democratic institutions to investigate and prosecute abuses," says the letter. "The Israel Defense Forces have a reputation for investigating alleged violations of international law and its internal military code of conduct. As a law-abiding state, Israel is in the process of conducting numerous investigations for which it should be commended not condemned...
The full text of the letter is available at the link.
Finally, Maurice Ostroff (himself of South African origin) has continued his fascinating open exchange with Judge Goldstone: An appeal to Judge Goldstone to review the report of the mission to Gaza
Very effective short film from the AJC that YouTube had briefly pulled for objectionable content or some similar nonsense:
Saturday, September 26, 2009
It's a silent celebration of German Expressionism. From 1920, The Golem, then from 1919, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari. First we present, The Golem (Simpsons fans will note a resemblance):
Continue reading "Saturday Night Double Feature: Der Golem and Das Kabinett des Doktor Caligari"Just another Israeli provocation and aggression I suppose, as the IDF prevents terrorists from trying to kill them...by settling the terrorists first:
IAF Targets Three Terrorists Preparing to Launch Rockets 26 Sept 2009
Last evening, Friday, September 25th 2009, An Israel Air Force air-craft targeted and identified hitting three terrorists east of Gaza City who were on their way to fire rockets at Israel's southern communities.
The three terrorists hit were Palestinian Islamic Jihad operatives residing in Gaza City, and part of a terrorist cell that has been firing rockets into Israel for the past few weeks, including rockets that hit the city of Sderot during the holiday of Rosh HaShana (the Jewish New Year) a week ago. The names of the three terrorists are Mahmoud Mussah Rammadan Bana, Kamel Hamdan Ibrahim Dakhdukh and Mohamed Salem Barawi Marshoud.
Approximately 50 rockets and mortar shells were launched at Israel during the last three months, totalling more than 250 since the end of Operation Cast Lead and more than 750 in 2009. Throughout 2008, over 3300 rockets and mortars were fired from the Gaza Strip at Israel.
The IDF will respond harshly to any attempt to break the calm in Israel's southern communities.
I'm sure the next UN report will list them as UNRWA employees on their way to a baby milk factory.
The story continues with a new update from ALG:
Statement by Carter L. Clews to Steve Capus' "Stonegate Scandal" Comments
The increasingly hysterical responses by NBC news boss Steve Capus and NBC News itself to the escalating Stonegate Scandal are disappointing at best and chilling at worst. Here is a man who runs what used to be a highly respected major news bureau who now finds himself conjuring up gremlins in cyberspace to defend what appears to be horrendously bigoted behavior within his own news room.
Having spoken directly with Mr. Capus for nearly 15 minutes Friday afternoon, I want to once again repeat my offer to him: if you really don't believe that Ms Stone sent the "Bite me, Jew boy" email to ALG staffer Alex Rosenwald, we will be happy to work with you to track down who sent it from her Blackberry using her email address.
This is precisely the same offer I made to Ms Stone at 11:00AM Friday morning, when she denied having sent any such email to Alex Rosenwald. Now, Mr. Capus has changed her story to say that, yes, she sent an email on Thursday, but it did not say "Bite me, Jew boy."
Again, we are more than willing to help NBC resolve its internal problems, but Mr. Capus needs to work with those trying to ferret out the full story, not against, us. Tom Brokaw, one of Mr. Capus's closest friends has said of the NBC news boss, "He does have a little bit of a hair trigger. He could blow. But I could always walk in and close the door and say, 'Take a breath.' "
My message to Mr. Capus now is, "Take a breath, and let's try to get to the bottom of what has now become of your once-respected news organization."
Mr. Clews is the Director of Communications for Americans for Limited Government, the group that exposed the NBC email.
Over 5000 of them. As a commenter notes:
Now we know: Kineavy was deleting e-mails that relate to the public's business.
In the way we communicate today, this is the contemporary equivalent of shredding mounds of memos and letters. It is not a trivial matter, and even many of us who use e-mail as a lifeline to the world have underestimated what this says about the Menino Administration's lack of commitment to open government.
What this reveals, er, confirms, about the Menino Administration is its arrogance, insularity, and sense of entitlement to a public office. There's no sense of having done something wrong (at this juncture, it would be appropriate for Kineavy to step down), no sense of mea culpa (as in an apology for having made government less accountable). Instead, we get only a petulant 'tude of having been put upon...
As we've noted before, trouble following the public records law is a pattern with this administration. Like a lot of problems generally, but with Massachusetts in particular, electoral unaccountability causes rot.
Another must-read from Ben-Dror Yemini, originally in Hebrew, here, on the web in English, here, but hopefully a little more readable in full below.
GOLDSTONE IS THE CRIMINAL
Ben-Dror Yemini, Maariv, 25.9.09
Le''s start at the end. Richard Goldstone perpetrated a moral crime. Not against the State of Israel but against human rights. He turned them into a weapon for dark regimes. Goldstone was not negligent. He did this with malice.
The criticism that was made in the first days following the report was on the basis of preliminary study. But time passes. And the more that the details of this report are revealed, the more it becomes clear that it is a libel. A libel with legal cover. A libel that was prepared in advance to incriminate the State of Israel, in the service of Libya and Iran. Goldstone willingly took up the loathsome role. He supplied these countries with the goods. The claim that "the discourse of rights" has become the dark forces' most effective tool is a familiar one. The Goldstone report is the supreme expression of this. Its legal terminology is exemplary. It gushes about international human rights treaties. But it cannot hide the result: It is a libelous indictment of the State of Israel, in the service of the axis of terrorism and evil. Yes, there is marginal - very marginal - lip service regarding criticism of Hamas. Goldstone's ilk is a sophisticated lot. They now reiterate from every stage, and Goldstone does it well, that they were actually objective. Here, they also leveled criticism at Hamas. How enlightened of them!
Goldstone sold his soul for an endless series of lies. Even Mary Robinson, who is not known as an admirer of Israel, understood that, "This is unfortunately a practice by the [UN Human Rights] Council: adopting resolutions guided not by human rights but by politics. This is very regrettable." She refused to take the post. Goldstone took it and carried it out with excessive enthusiasm. If international law worked as it should, if the representatives of dark regimes did not have an automatic majority in it, Goldstone would have to stand trial. But this is impossible. And therefore, not only Israel but every moral person, every person for whom human rights are important, must declare Goldstone a criminal. Here is the proof.
***
Let's start with what is not in the report. In its almost 600 pages there is not one word - there simply isn't! - about Hamas's ideology. Hamas has a covenant. This covenant is the basis for the conflict between Israel and the demonic entity that has arisen in Gaza. This covenant is pure anti-Semitism. This covenant makes it clear that Hamas is no different from the Taliban. On the contrary, it is worse. The leaders of Hamas also declare - in their own voices - their solidarity with the Taliban, their desire to take over the entire free world, their hatred of Jews and their abrogation of the ceasefire with Israel. But there is not one word in the Goldstone report about this. Contrary to the general impression, Israel is not Hamas's main victim. As in other cases where radical Islam grows, most of Hamas's victims since Israel's withdrawal from Gaza - have been Muslims. Hamas's Kassam rockets, suicide terrorists, abductions and military operations do not stem from the occupation or the blockade, as the Goldstone Mission either claims or hints. All of these actions stem from an Islamo-fascist ideology that massacres mainly Muslims. Even during Operation Cast Lead, Hamas killed more Palestinians than Israelis. Goldstone and his cohorts did not hear about this.
Continue reading "Ben-Dror Yemini: Goldstone is the Criminal"Friday, September 25, 2009
I guess she didn't like getting a PR email: Americans for Limited Government Statement in Response to NBC "Bite me, Jew Boy" Email
Americans for Limited Government is appalled that an employee of the NBC news network apparently felt it was appropriate to send an email to an ALG employee, in response to a standard news release, saying, "Bite me, Jew Boy."
According to ALG records, the email came from the Blackberry and email address of Jane Stone, a producer for NBC's Dateline. The email was sent to Alex Rosenwald, the ALG Director of Media Outreach. The news release to which Ms Stone apparently responded was one in which ALG called upon Congress to defund ACORN.
Americans for Limited Government does not contend that NBC or its parent company GE, are anti-Semitic. What is highly disturbing, however, is that there clearly is a culture at NBC that has allowed this person who clearly has issues to go unchecked.
Ms Stone claims she did not send the offensive email. If that is not the case, we at ALG call upon her to help ascertain who did send it using her Blackberry and her email address. If Ms Stone did, in fact, send it, we at ALG call upon Ms Stone to apologize to Mr. Rosenwald, and we call upon the NBC hierarchy above Ms Stone to join her in issuing that apology.
NBC says the email is a fake: NBC News prez blasts ALG: 'reckless' and 'defamatory'
ALG replies that they did their due-diligence:
ALG Response to NBC Accusations on Politico: "We did our due diligence."
Carter Clews, Director of Communications, Americans for Limited Government
We at Americans for Limited Government are saddened that instead of helping us to get to the bottom of the hateful email that was indeed sent from NBC's server, and this can be verified, and was not tampered with, which can also be verified, that NBC President Steve Capus has instead chosen to circle the wagons and protect what is indefensible with hysterical, frantic accusations.
This email has left a digital footprint that is undeniable. We did our due diligence. We have confirmed that it indeed came from NBC's server and Jane Stone's email address.
As before, we renew our offer that we made to both Ms. Stone and NBC President Capus over the phone today to get to the bottom of who sent this email from Ms. Stone's Blackberry email address. That offer remains open, and we would like it very much if both Ms. Stone and NBC would issue an apology to both Americans for Limited Government, and Mr. Alex Rosenwald, who was the target of this hateful email.
There should be ways to sort things out if everyone comes clean. Did she or didn't she? Either way, someone is toast.
Update: For those emailing me saying the situation is not clear, let me sum up:
Americans for Limited Government (ALG), a typical conservative/libertarian(?) political action group, sends a rather typical mass-email press release (I get one from them almost every day, as I do from any number of other groups).
It is alleged that one of the recipients, Jane Stone of NBC, replies to the email tersely, "Bite me, Jew Boy." ALG is not a "Jewish" group, but the PR guy has a Jewish-sounding last name, "Rosenwald."
Chaos ensues as NBC denies that's what she wrote. It should be possible for a fairly simple forensic examination to derive the truth.
Update: Bite Me Jew Boy Controversy Slugs Through Another Day
And quite right. Turnabout is fair play. Who's watching the watchmen and all that... From NGO Monitor: NGO Monitor International Advisory Board Members Call for Full Independent Review of HRW
Founded over 30 years ago to protect political dissidents from repressive regimes, the leaders of Human Rights Watch have long since lost sight of the original ethos and values. On Middle East issues, HRW has degenerated into a political lobby, utilizing the façade of human rights and international law to promote a radical agenda.
As documented by NGO Monitor's comprehensive research report, HRW is a leading player in the international campaign to demonize Israel. Time and again, HRW's publications are shown to lack credibility or the impartiality necessary for moral judgments. In the Middle East region, which is dominated by regimes that violate human rights on a daily basis, HRW officials have chosen to consistently and disproportionately single-out Israel for condemnation.
Far fewer resources are devoted to Libya, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Saudi Arabia and Syria. And HRW's disregard of human rights in favor of hostility towards Israel is underscored by their virtual silence over the fate of Gilad Shalit, and a refusal to condemn Hamas' widely documented use of human shields during the recent Gaza conflict.
Recently, HRW's agenda was further exposed when senior officials from the organization held a dinner to raise funds in Saudi Arabia -- one of the world's most notorious human rights abusers. In making her presentation, Sarah Leah Whitson, head of the Middle East division, emphasized HRW's contribution in using the rhetoric of international law to isolate Israel, and the need to combat critics associated with "pro-Israel pressure groups".
In order for the organization to have any future relevance, we call upon HRW's board members to institute a full independent review and reform in the organization for which they are responsible. This should include the replacement of senior officials, particularly in the Middle East division, who have been instrumental in HRW's decline, and the adoption of firm guidelines to prevent such abuses in the future.
Signed by the following NGO Monitor International Advisory Board members:
Elie Wiesel
Prof Alan Dershowitz - Harvard University, lawyer and author
R. James Woolsey - Former Director of Central Intelligence (1993-95)
Elliott Abrams - Former US Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy
Douglas Murray - Director, the Centre for Social Cohesion
Prof Judea Pearl - UCLA and President, Daniel Pearl Foundation
Tom Gross - Journalist and international affairs commentator
From The Jewish Advocate: At potluck, breaking bread - and the ice. The article requires paid subscription (or a hard copy), but here are a couple of highlights:
Platters of dates and challah; bowls of hummus and curried apple soup; and plates of apples and honey and Egyptian noodles and rice--such was the fare at the Muslim and Jewish holiday potluck.
Shortly after the end of Ramadan and Rosh Hashanah, more than 60 Jews and Muslims in their 20s and 30s gathered at the Workmen's Circle in Brookline to share holiday traditions and food.
Monday's potluck kicked off an initiative by a new Muslim-Jewish leadership team that aims to promote interfaith relations and social justice...
...Margie Klein noted that from the standpoint of religious observance, many of the Muslims at the gathering appeared to have more in common with Orthodox Jews than with the less religious Jews who attended.
Klein is the founder of the Moishe/Kavod House, a Brooklinebased organization that promotes social justice. It sponsored the potluck along with the Boston Chapter of the Muslim American Society and the Workmen's Circle, a secular Jewish cultural center...
That's because Workmen's Circle is a secular leftist organization. The MAS, as you know, is the American face of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the group behind the Boston Mosque project.
Were all the Muslims at this event really radicals, consciously using their "Jewish" interlocutors as cover for the day when the pod people stage the final takeover? Uh. No. Of course not. But the problems with the MAS leadership are well known, and the Workmen's Circle's continued covering for them is equally well known. They're not just uninterested in the MAS's radical ties, they actively provide cover and excuses for them, and try their hardest to normalize relations with a group that has profound issues that other mainstream groups see clearly.
What sort of Judaism do the secular Jews in attendance actually practice? This bit gives a clue as to their priorities:
...While the participants Monday talked about religion, they tended to avoid politics. One exception was a Jew who cited protesting for Palestinian rights outside of synagogues over the High Holidays as a meaningful holiday experience...
Nothing like a little meaningful religious practice to cleanse the spirit at holiday time.
I'd be scared:
Reuters: Iran tells IAEA it is building 2nd enrichment plant
Iran has told the U.N. nuclear watchdog that it has a second uranium enrichment plant under construction, a belated disclosure sure to heighten Western fears of a stealthy Iranian quest for nuclear arms capability.
Iran told the International Atomic Energy Agency of the plant's existence in a letter to IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei on Monday just as six world powers and Iran prepare for rare talks on October 1 on its disputed nuclear drive...
...A senior White House official said President Barack Obama and the leaders of Britain and France, now at a G-20 summit of industrialized nations in Pittsburgh, would accuse Iran on Friday of concealing a sensitive plant from the IAEA for years.
Obama would demand that Iran allow an immediate IAEA inspection of the plant, the official said.
He said the nascent plant was believed to be designed for about 3,000 centrifuges for enriching uranium, nominally enough machines to produce material for one nuclear device in a year if run nonstop, although Iran does not appear to have mastered the sophisticated technology consistently yet, nuclear analysts say...
Super collector: Veil lifts on a trove of WWII treasures
World War II ended 64 years ago, but it comes to life every time Kenneth Rendell turns on the lights inside a squat, nondescript building in Natick. Amid the glitz of nearby shopping centers, the exterior is purposely plain to protect the anonymity of the place and its treasure - an evocative and jaw-dropping collection of more than 6,000 wartime artifacts Rendell has gathered over four decades.
For eight years, the Museum of World War II has been a preserve open only to a circle of Rendell acquaintances, historians, and military veterans or enthusiasts.
Within its walls, the museum houses a section of the sofa that Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun committed suicide on, silicon likenesses of the period's major figures outfitted in their actual uniforms, a Sherman tank, and a trove of historically significant letters and documents, including the complete plans for the invasion of Normandy and a draft of the 1938 Munich Agreement, with Hitler's handwritten changes.
No less an authority than Phil Reed, a former curator at Britain's Imperial War Museum, has said it "simply has no equal.''...
Photo gallery. Man has his own tank.
Somewhat related: A collection of stories, photos, art and information on Stalag Luft I. Art by POW's.
[via WWIIToday]
Here are a few links for today on the Goldstone Report:
Ehud Barak in The Wall Street Journal: At the U.N., Terrorism Pays - It was my duty as defense minister to stop Hamas rockets
...Israel is not perfect. As much as we as a society try to uphold the IDF's ethical code, mistakes sometimes happen and deviations from procedure occur. Whether we like it or not, Israel is one of the most scrutinized countries in the world. And when we are told that things may not be right, we check it out and, when necessary, prosecute those involved. We are now pursuing two dozen criminal investigations regarding events that occurred in Gaza. We don't need the Human Rights Council, Richard Goldstone, or anyone else to teach us how to maintain the democratic principles which are our lifeblood.
As sobering as the thought may be, terrorists will welcome this report. It has made their work much easier, and the work of their potential victims more difficult.
I believe that the time has come for us to put an end to this calculated erosion of common sense. The nations that share democratic values must not allow themselves to be handcuffed by the abusive application of lofty ideals. Democracies should be concentrating on defending themselves from extremism--not from accusations by kangaroo courts.
Elder of Ziyon is still at it: Goldstone Report inaccuracies, part 15:
The Goldstone Report pretends to investigate whether Hamas used Gazans as human shields. As it does so, it bends over backwards to give the impression that Hamas is innocent even as the evidence it brings shows the opposite...
CAMERA: Hamas Fighters Identified in Mosque, School, al-Sammouni and Abd Rabbo Incidents
The Goldstone commission has been dealt another blow to its already tattered reputation.
Jonathan Halevi, who recently detailed how over 90 percent of the Gazan policemen killed in the initial Israeli strike were members of Palestinian terror groups, has now published a report that provides the names and personal details of Hamas operatives and affiliated terrorists killed in each of four highly publicized incidents in which the Goldstone report alleges Israel targeted Palestinian civilians. Halevi's report deals with the strike on the Ibrahim al-Maqadma mosque, the shelling of the al-Fakhura UN school, the attack on the al-Sammouni home and the killing of Khaled Abd Rabbo's daughters...
Jeff Robbins discusses the charade of the UNHRC in general: Geopolitics, human rights and Israel
IN APRIL 2000, while serving as a US delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Commission (now called the Human Rights Council), I was asked to visit the ambassador of a Middle Eastern country in order to lobby his government on behalf of the United States.
The issue was the Chinese government's violation of international human rights standards. The Chinese government was aggressively moving to prevent discussion of its human rights record before the Commission. My mission was to urge the ambassador of this moderate Arab state to vote against the Chinese resolution to stifle discussion or abstain from voting on it.
The ambassador looked at me with a blend of affection and pity. "I don't think you understand,'' he said. The Chinese government had sent emissaries to his capital six months earlier with a basket of lucrative contracts worth tens of millions of dollars to his government, on the specific condition that it vote to block any discussion of human rights violations in China. The die had been cast, long before the ambassador's vote...
Finally, and perhaps most important, the Israeli Government has released a preliminary formal response: Initial Response to Report of the Fact Finding Mission on Gaza
Update: The report is being supported by the usual gaggle of fringe leftist and anti-Israel groups (for the most part).
Don't get between this man and a story, and never, ever, talk shit about the fighting soldier in his presence: Bullshit Bob
The latest international news from Divest This!
About two lifetimes ago, when I was a journalist covering Margaret Thatcher's third election victory in Great Britain, I remember tuning into the annual conference of the Trade Union Council (or TUC), the umbrella group which encompasses most of the British union movement (an even bigger tent than America's AFL-CIO).
A vote was cast and the speaker announced the results: 6,453,211 for and 3,290,150 against (or something thereabouts). "That must be one big conference hall!" I said to someone, before they corrected their Yank, rube colleague by pointing out that it's the union leaders who attend the conference and their votes are tallied as the vote of the entire union they represent. In theory, these leaders will only do what the membership wants, but in practice there is little to prevent a decision made on the floor of the TUC as being "voted on" by millions of workers who have never even been presented with the issue.
Thoughts of this structure came flooding back to me when I heard that the BDS crowd in the UK had finally, after several years of failed attempts, gotten the British Trade Union Council to pass some type of resolution supportive of a boycott of Israeli goods.
The vote was highly qualified, and only achieved after a huge amount of rancor and back-room politics, but it would be unfair to call this one a hoax, like the Hampshire College or TIAA-CREF frauds that have characterized most BDS "successes" this year. As I've mentioned before, Europe is different than the US with regard to support for divest-from-Israel projects (and attitudes towards the Arab-Israeli conflict in general). In fact, I've often wondered why calls for "even-handedness" in this conflict are always directed at countries (like the US) that are generally supportive of Israel, rather than nations or organizations (such as the UN) whose un-even-handed support for just one side of the conflict (and not the Israeli one) are never asked to budge in their beliefs.
Back to the TUC vote, this will no doubt be used by divestment activists around the world in the coming months as "proof" that British labor stands against Israel (with the corollary that other unions and similar institutions should do the same and boycott the Jewish state). And while those battling boycotts abroad can point to the qualified and non-binding nature of the TUC's boycott call, we cannot make the case that BDS has not worked its way into TUC policy (at least between now and when the group meets again in twelve months).
In this respect, the TUC is not like Hampshire College (which BDS activists claimed was a supporter when it actually wasn't). Rather, they resemble the Presbyterian Church in the US (PCUSA) which found itself making the same mistake just made by the TUC last week (Britain tending to follow American fashion trends about five years late).
Like the PCUSA, the TUC had divestment forced onto their agenda by a small, militant group (in this case the Fireman's union of all people) with a partisan agenda, but no actual stake in the Middle East conflict. And like the PCUSA, they felt that a measure that included mild boycott recommendations represented a compromise between opposing request of the membership. Like PCUSA, they will soon be surprised that their efforts at compromise with single-issue radicals will be portrayed around the world as "the TUC agrees that Israel is an Apartheid state." And like the PCUSA, they will have to deal with the anger of "comrades" (such as Britain's Labor Party leadership and fellow unionists in Israel, the US and even Europe) over what they've done not to Israel, but to the labor movement.
It's interesting that declining organization (such as the shrinking and aging Mainline Protestant churches or the struggling union movement in the UK) seem to be the ones that grasp at the Middle East conflict as a way to make themselves seem internationally relevant. For the truth is that these attempts to portray partisan hostility towards Israel as an example of solidarity (with fellow Christians or fellow union members) - while ignoring the plight of those same comrades in places like Egypt, Iran and Saudi Arabia (not to mention Gaza) - simply points out the hypocrisy and irrelevance of those who, like the TUC, managed to be tricked into thinking their deeply immoral position is an example of virtue.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
My Zionist masters at The David Project send along this picture of Iranian protesters wearing the shirts they distributed at the protest rally at the UN today:
Pro-Israel Jewish activists and Free Iranians making common cause? Not surprising at all.
Would regime change in Iran mean a complete turn around from Iran's culture of hate? Well, not overnight (depending on who takes over), but any turn toward freedom of expression can't help but to have long term positive effects.
It at least presents a future, while the present reality presents none.
No matter how many of these things you see, you are always shocked anew about just how bad it is. In full, from PMW:
The bear puppet host, Nassur, of a Hamas children's TV program used different words for "slaughter" to describe how to rid Israel of Jews.
First the bear explains that all Jews must be "erased from our land." Later in the conversation he adds, "We want to slaughter them, Saraa, so they will be expelled from our land." He repeats, "...We'll have to [do it] by slaughter."
He first uses the Arabic expression for "slaughter," "Nidbah-hom," and later on uses the word "Shaht."
The following is the transcript from the children's program Tomorrow's Pioneers:
Nassur: "There won't be any Jews or Zionists, if Allah wills. They'll be erased."
Saraa: "Chased away."
Nassur: "And just like we will visit the Qaaba [in Mecca]... everyone will visit Jerusalem."
[Seven-year old Palestinian child on phone tells how his father, a member of the Hamas Al-Qassam Brigades, "died as a Shahid (Martyr)."]
Nassur to child on phone: "What do you want to do to the Jews who shot your father?"
Child on phone: "I want to kill them."
Saraa: "We don't want to do anything to them, just expel them from our land."
Nassur: "We want to slaughter (Nidbah-hom) them, so they will be expelled from our land, right?"
Saraa: "Yes. That's right. We will expel them from our land using all means."
Nassur: "And if they don't want [to go] peacefully, by words or talking, we'll have to [do it] by slaughter." (Shaht) [Al-Aqsa (Hamas) TV, Sept. 22, 2009]
Via Carl, here is the full video of Benjamin Netanyahu's speech at the UN today. Very well done. He actually waves paper that means something.
No, not all the Arabs walked out, but I did notice the Palestinian representative (a seat they hold that represents yet another bit of unmerited international welfare) walked out part of the way through. You know, just before Netanyahu got to all those outrageous parts about a Palestinian state and all that peace and security stuff.
The text of the speech is here.
You can click through the remaining parts using the video, but just in case, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
CAMERA's Gilead Ini: Goldstone Commissioner Suggests Israelis Conditioned to Kill Children, "Months before the Goldstone Commission report was finished and publicized, one commissioner -- having clearly accepted as incontrovertible fact the most inflammatory and dubious accusations by Palestinian witnesses -- had made up his mind that Israelis are conditioned to kill children..."
Elder of Ziyon is still at it: Goldstone report inaccuracies, part 14. Regarding a strike near a UNRWA school: "...Given the facts that al-Qassam and DFLP terrorists were in the area, that mortar fire was coming from that area (according to reporters who interviewed witnesses), that the IDF responded without hitting the school itself, and that IDF return fire did indeed kill a number of terrorists far out of proportion to the report's characterization of a busy street with 150 civilians randomly scattered about (para. 698, using the Hamas witness again as their primary source,) it seems that Goldstone's legal analysis as to the military advantage of IDF returning fire is incorrect."
JTA reports that the Obama Administration has assured that the report isn't going anywhere: "The Obama administration will not allow the Goldstone report recommendations on Israel's conduct in the Gaza war to reach the International Criminal Court...the U.S. strategy was to "quickly" bring the report...to its "natural conclusion" within the Human Rights Council and not to allow it to go further..."
Susan Rice has called it "one-sided and unacceptable"
The Wall Street Journal notes the implications: The U.N.'s Anti-Antiterror Report - A biased 'finding' on Gaza could also apply to Afghanistan: "...a new report from a U.N. "fact finding mission" about January's war in the Gaza Strip marks a new low, employing logic and arguments that will be felt wherever the West confronts terrorism..."
Harvard's Center for Middle East Studies Department is kicking off the year where they left off - as apologists for radical Islam and Israel bashers.
On Monday, Professor Jocelyn Cesari presented Louise Cainkar, Chicago based "researcher" and author of Homeland Insecurity: The Arab American and Muslim American Experience After 9/11 which claims to be an objective study of discrimination against Muslim-Americans following the 9/11 attacks of 2001. She conducted her "research" among 106 American Muslims living in or near Chicago from 2004 to 2008. She concludes that rampant discrimination, identifying Muslims with terrorism, has occurred since 2001 in almost daily attacks, humiliations and depictions throughout the media and entertainment industry.
Since 9/11 there have been instances of inexcusable, discriminatory acts against Muslims by non-Muslims. Yet, the rapidity with which George W. Bush reached out to the Muslim community after 3,000 murders by devout Muslims on September 11th was unprecedented in American history. Ms. Cainkar chose not to mention Bush's appearances at The White House with numerous Muslim religious leaders including Imam Hassan Qazwini, an individual later connected anti-Semitic groups. She also failed to mention the Bush Administration's appointment of Grover Norquist, founder of The Islamic Institute and close advisor to the President who became Islam's foremost promoter in the White House. Nor did she mention the scores of public appearances by Bush at which he referred to Islam as "The Religion of Peace" and "A Noble Faith."
From 2001 until the end of the Bush years, the country saw the implementation of required Islamic "education" at many universities and even public schools, curriculum vilifying Israel taught in the same institutions and very few documented instances of hate crimes against Muslims. For example, for the year 2006, the FBI reported Hate Crimes against religious groups:
Of the 1,750 victims of an anti-religion hate crime:
- 65.4 percent were victims of an offender's anti-Jewish bias.
- 11.9 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.
- 4.9 percent were victims of an anti-Catholic bias.
- 3.7 percent were victims of an anti-Protestant bias.
- 0.5 percent were victims of an anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.
- 8.4 percent were victims of a bias against other religions (anti-other religion).
- 5.3 percent were victims of a bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group).
While anti-Muslim crimes are deplorable, for the last 8 years, they are at least 5 times less likely to occur than anti-Semitic ones.
As a matter of fact, the hard evidence reveals that there have been no homicides classified as Hate Crimes against Muslims in the past ten years while a number of Jews have been murdered by Muslims simply for being Jews (the Seattle Jewish Federation shooting in which Naveed Afzal Haq shot six women, one fatally, the Los Angeles shooting by 41-year-old Hesham Mohamed Hadayet at the El Al ticket counter which left three Jews dead, and the Brooklyn Bridge murder of Yeshiva students in 1994 by Rishad Baz, a Lebanese immigrant.
Needless to say, the alarming and growing Muslim phenomenon of honor killing in the United States went unmentioned by Ms. Cainkar. In the recent conviction of officials of the Holy Land Foundation, one of the nation's largest Muslim associations and a HLF funder, The Muslim American Association was forced to produce documents that espoused the demise of the U.S. Constitution to be replaced by the Koran.
In light of the widespread arrests and statements by radical Muslims advocating Jihad and antipathy for other religious groups and contempt for America's democratic values, the paucity of discrimination against Muslims in general is astounding and commendable.
Ms. Cainkar, however, presented her own selective, anecdotal data, concluding that hate for Muslims is lurking deep in the heart of America. Please.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
It's not really a blog carnival in the traditional sense, it's really more of a link dump. Lot and lots of commentary and analysis of the Goldstone Report. All quality.
Elder of Ziyon continues mining gold: Goldstone report inaccuracies, part 11, part 12, part 13.
Nile Gardiner at Human Events: The U.N.'s Anti-Israel Crusade Continues: "...In effect, the U.N. establishes a dubious moral equivalence between the legitimate defensive measures of the Israeli security forces and the terrorist activities of groups such as Hamas who are deliberately targeting civilians..."
Carloline Glick writes about Our irredeemable international system: "...It isn't that they [international institutions] don't function. They function just fine. The problem is that through their regular functioning, they advance goals antithetical to those they were established to achieve. Instead of promoting global security, human rights, freedom and international peace, they facilitate war and aggression, human suffering and tyranny..."
In the NY Post, Jay Sekulow & Brett Joshpe note that Goldstone is just part of A drive to create 'Israeli war crimes': "IT'S September -- prime time for Israel-bashing as world leaders and dignitar ies convene at the United Nations..."
Great paragons of respect for international norms, Hamas is psyched about the report: Haniyeh: World must back Goldstone's Gaza report. Do you really need to know anything else?
Even David Landau, the former Haaretz editor who once infamously remarked to Condi Rice that the US should rape Israel for its own good, is apparently nonplussed at the UN taking a shot at the same prescription: The Gaza Report's Wasted Opportunity: "...By approaching the Gaza war, and his report, from this perspective, Judge Goldstone could have opened debate and prompted reflection in Israel. Instead, by accusing Israel -- its government, its army, its ethos -- of deliberately seeking out civilians, he has achieved the opposite effect."
At Volokh, David Bernstein posts an analysis by legal scholar Avi Bell: Avi Bell on the Goldstone Report: "...the Report never refers to Hamas as a terrorist group or even hints that there might be a legal question. When citing Israeli references to Hamas as terrorist, it includes scare quotes..."
The Obama Administration has said that the report was unfair.
UN Watch notes that Canada slams U.N.'s Goldstone report for "pre-emptively assuming Israel's culpability": "...he so-called fact-finding commission was the creation of one of the United Nation's most flawed bodies, the Human Rights Council, which includes some of the UN's least democratic states..."
Law Professor Paul Robinson writes in the Wall Street Journal about Israel and the Trouble With International Law - Many restrictions on the use of force against aggressors make no moral sense
Alan Dershowitz goes into detail on his JPost blog: The Goldstone report is a barrier to peace: "...The Goldstone report has made it virtually impossible for the Israeli army to protect its citizens against rocket attacks from territory that is no longer militarily occupied. It encourages Israel's enemies to provoke Israeli self-defense measures, which they know will produce condemnation of the Jewish state..."
Soccer Dad looks into the case of the al-Samouni family in The goldstone standard part ii
Sammy Benoit at American Thinker notes that sauce for Israel will be sauce for the United States as well: Dangerous omen: "...If we allow the UN to persecute one country, it can persecute everybody. If we let the United Nations get away with trumping up charges against the IDF and Israel, the will come after the United States and our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan..."
Writing in Canada's National Post, George Jonas writes, Judge Goldstone -- "peace criminal": "Our generation hasn't injected more justice into politics than previous generations, but we've certainly injected more politics into justice. One pioneer in the lucrative field of politics in black robes has been Judge Richard Goldstone..."
Tom Gross has his own roundup, including, "Dachau survivor asks Goldstone: How dare you?", "Canada, Japan, Switzerland and the EU reject Goldstone report" and "Even Mary Robinson denounces Goldstone's report".
Maurice Ostroff has actually developed something of a correspondence with Richard Goldstone himself, see: Part 1 of an open response to the Goldstone report, Judge Goldstone's response to part 1.
Let's wind it up with a separate but highly related issue. Carl in Jerusalem lets off with another broadside at Human Rights Watch: HRW's lame evasion: "...In the 1940's, Soviet communism was criticized by both Nazis and Western democrats. Being criticized from both sides is not proof that HRW is doing things right. It's time for HRW to stop changing the subject and either answer its critics or accept their criticism."
Update: Jeremy Sharon writes at the LA Times: Goldstone report unfair to Israel: "...These details simply contravened the political agenda of the mission, and so the investigators either overlooked them, declared them to be irrelevant or found them to be inconclusive."
Netanyahu gives some good answers to Wolf Blitzer in Hamas and Human Shields: Is it a "human shield" if they're willing?, David Landau's Criticism of Goldstone: Even the Self-Absorbed See a Problem, and Leveling the Playing Field and the Retreat into Stupidity: george on Peretz on Goldstone.
I almost can't believe it: ADL: UNESCO Vote A Victory For International Understanding Through Culture And Education
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today welcomed the election of Bulgarian Ambassador Irina Bokova as Director-General of UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Bokova defeated Egyptian Culture Minister Farouk Hosni by a vote of 31-27.
Hosni has a long record of stymieing cultural relations with Israel, promoting censorship in Egypt, and making harsh anti-Israel and anti-Jewish statements. The 193 member states of UNESCO are slated to vote to confirm the election on October 15...
...In the days leading up to the vote, ADL issued an open letter to UNESCO foreign ministers urging them to reject Hosni's candidacy. "As Egyptian Culture Minister for over two decades, Mr. Hosni has a long history of expressing hostility toward Israeli culture and opposing cultural exchanges with Israel," the letter said. "These views are emblematic of the rampant anti-Jewish sentiment that pervades Egypt's cultural elites and is a trend UNESCO is meant to counter, not to legitimate."
JPost report, here.
Aww...too bad. Democrat money-man and J Street Godfather Alan Solomont is having trouble cashing in all his brown-nosing chits. Washington, where there's an actual opposition in residence. is a little different than the leftist Massachusetts Jewish community. This all stems from Solomont's role in the scandalous firing of inspector general Gerald Walpin. Solomont's the fall guy and he's having trouble collecting his candy: Walpin scandal update: Grassley blocks nomination, accuses administration of stonewalling
Republican Sen. Charles Grassley has blocked the ambassadorial nomination of Alan Solomont, currently chairman of the board of the government agency that oversees AmeriCorps, in retaliation for what Grassley says is the administration's stonewalling of Congress over documents relating to the firing of AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin. Specifically, Grassley has sought, and been denied, information relating to the White House's role in the decision to fire Walpin.
Solomont, a major Democratic donor, is chairman of the Corporation for National and Community Service, which includes AmeriCorps. His term ends in October, and President Obama has nominated him to be U.S. ambassador to Spain. The nomination was approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week and now moves to the Senate floor -- except that Grassley has placed a hold on it, meaning it will go nowhere until the senator's objections are resolved.
On June 12 of this year, shortly after Walpin was summarily fired, Grassley wrote to the Corporation demanding "all records, email, memoranda, documents, communications, or other information, whether in draft or final form" related to the firing. Among other things, Grassley asked for any contacts between the Corporation and the White House and between the Corporation and the United States Attorney's Office. Although the Corporation has provided information requested in other areas -- mostly internal documents involving Walpin -- Grassley says the Corporation has not responded at all to the request for information relating to the White House and U.S. Attorney's Office...
Maybe he could be a Czar instead. That would probably suit him better, anyway.
Must-read post on the subject. Fabian has done really remarkable work in laying out not only statistics, but using visual comparisons as well.
Belatedly, Egypt Spots Flaws in Wiping Out Pigs
CAIRO -- It is unlikely anyone has ever come to this city and commented on how clean the streets are. But this litter-strewn metropolis is now wrestling with a garbage problem so severe it has managed to incite its weary residents and command the attention of the president.
"The problem is clear in the streets," said Haitham Kamal, a spokesman for the Ministry of State for Environmental Affairs. "There is a strict and intensive effort now from the state to address this issue."
But the crisis should not have come as a surprise.
When the government killed all the pigs in Egypt this spring -- in what public health experts said was a misguided attempt to combat swine flu -- it was warned the city would be overwhelmed with trash.
The pigs used to eat tons of organic waste. Now the pigs are gone and the rotting food piles up on the streets of middle-class neighborhoods like Heliopolis and in the poor streets of communities like Imbaba...
...For more than half a century, those collectors were the zabaleen, a community of Egyptian Christians who live on the cliffs on the eastern edge of the city. They collected the trash, sold the recyclables and fed the organic waste to their pigs -- which they then slaughtered and ate.
Killing all the pigs, all at once, "was the stupidest thing they ever did," Ms. Kamel said, adding, "This is just one more example of poorly informed decision makers."...
Two lessons (at least) here. One is the gross but predictable inefficiency of top-down decision making and the horrible results on a society. They say that Mussolini made the trains run on time, but as was pointed out to me by a very smart person (where have you gone, The World?), this was never more than a marketing slogan. Fascism is never efficient, and doesn't make the trains or anything else run on time. The best mitigator of unforeseen consequences is a government that facilitates the millions of decisions of the people acting closest to consequences of the decision, not one that makes decisions for the good of those very same people from a cloudy height.
The second is the buried story (buried under rooftop stacks of garbage) of the Christians of Egypt, the Copts, the "zabaleen." If you need a reminder, I highly recommend you watch the video of their situation way back here. Remember that next time you hear an Egyptian official complain about living conditions in Gaza.
[h/t: Sara]
First he was denied, then they cried, then he came back for another try. Now he's in, because in the modern academy we don't keep score and there are no losers.
You know, things like this wouldn't happen if they'd just hire scholars and not polemicists in the first place, but because Columbia's Middle East department has made itself so political, it's impossible for them to conduct any sort of ordinary academic review process. The Massad saga goes on: Massad Got Tenure (Don't Tell Anyone)
Fourteen Columbia professors are protesting the university's apparent decision to award tenure to Joseph A. Massad, a controversial anti-Israel professor of Arab studies.
The professors are from the schools of law, business and public health. They expressed their concern in a five-page letter to the incoming Provost, Claude M. Steele. The letter asserts that the university's decision to guarantee Massad a life-time teaching post "appears to have violated" Columbia's own rules, thus raising profound questions about the university's academic integrity. The university's administration, weirdly, still refuses to confirm or deny that Massad won tenure, but yesterday the Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures department let the cat out of the bag---it announced a beginning-of-term party next week congratulating Massad on gaining tenure.
This week Provost Steele belatedly issued a polite, noncommittal response. In a four-paragraph "Dear Colleagues" letter to the fourteen professors, Steele, a former Stanford psychologist, says he would "welcome" a meeting to discuss their concerns. After he learns more about Columbia's tenure process, Steele writes, he may "want to make some changes in our procedures." But nowhere does he state that Massad has, in fact, been awarded tenure. Nor does he acknowledge that the professors raise deeply troubling concerns, that if true, go to the heart of what many regard as the core of a university's integrity...
What's new and interesting here is that, for almost the first time, faculty is willing to go on the record with their concerns. Brave, considering they know the conclusion is forgone, although that mitigates things somewhat since they can't be accused of going after Massad personally.
Well, they've noticed it before, but foreign policy is ultimately province of the Executive, and no matter who's in charge, they always seem to find a way to get around Congressional disapproval. Still, it's good they notice: 'Post' report sparks congressional anger
Leading Democratic and Republican congressmen expressed outrage following a report in Monday's Jerusalem Post that Saudi Arabia has been violating its promise to Washington to stop enforcing the Arab League boycott of Israel.
Democrat Howard Berman of California, Chairman of the powerful House Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Post from Washington that he had read the report in Monday's paper.
"This is a very disturbing report," Berman said, "particularly in light of the fact that US officials assured us four years ago that Saudi Arabia would abandon the boycott as the condition for its entry into the World Trade Organization."
Berman declared that he would take action on the issue.
"I intend to pursue this matter with the administration," he said.
Across the aisle, Congressman Mike Pence of Indiana, who chairs the House Republican Conference, also criticized Riyadh for its duplicity.
"Saudi Arabia's disregard of its 2005 pledge to end the boycott against Israel is unacceptable," Pence told the Post.
"Congress and the administration must hold Saudi Arabia accountable. The United States cannot stand by and continue to witness this mistreatment towards the peace-loving people of Israel," he said.
"Ending the Arab League boycott and establishing trade relationships with Israel would help foster much needed peace in the region," Pence added...
Sure it would, were they really interested in peace, but they're not. They want victory.
[via Carl]
Sunday, September 20, 2009
I'll hand it to them, uber-leftist Amherst, MA does take the N out of NIMBY:
AMHERST -Town Meeting this fall will consider only one citizen petition - a resolution to help in the resettlement of Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp detainees in Cuba.
The deadline for petitioned articles was Sept. 8 for the fall Town Meeting, that begins Nov. 2.
Part of the resolution urges Congress to repeal the ban allowing resettlement in this country. The resolution asks the town to assist in the safe resettlement of cleared detainees in the area once that happens. It is being brought to the meeting by a group called No More Guantanamos, said Town Meeting member Ruth F. Hooke.
She said the group has been working with lawyers and has two particular detainees in mind - one from Russia and from Algeria - who they would like to aid.
The group does not need Town Meeting approval, but she said the resolution is "an educational endeavor. We don't want to slip them in." Town Meeting provides the forum for education, she said...
Not to worry, these guys are cleared:
...About 50 detainees have never been charged and have been cleared for release but are unable to go home because they would be persecuted or killed, she said...
See? It's like adopting a puppy.
...The petition was signed by 140 registered voters - the signatures of 100 voters are needed for the petition article. She said organizers could have collected more signatures, but didn't want to overburden staff having to verify them.
Lefty causes on Charles Baker charity list
GOP gubernatorial candidate Charles Baker runs a charity that's funded ultraliberal outfits which have fought for tuition breaks and driver's licenses for illegals, accused American soldiers of torture and blamed Israel for "genocide" in Palestine, a Herald review found...
They're talking about MIRA, Physicians for Human Rights and the Haymarket People's Fund which in turn funds the Somerville Divestment Project. It's pretty minor stuff for a guy in charge of a big fund, but there's really no reason for any of these groups to get money at all. A bit embarrassing for a Republican candidate, but not much more than that. Be careful what you sign off on while accepting those board chairmanships (in this case The Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation). It's not all fun and cocktails.
I'm just glad to see that the SDP is still radioactive.
Sadly acting in a stereotypical manner...objecting to aid to Israel:
In this age of Barack Obama transparency, we need an open, wide-ranging public debate on U.S. Middle East foreign policy. John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt point out the hypocrisy of aid to Israel in their book "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy."...
Etc. [h/t: Adam Holland]
Well, this is just cool. That the object survived all the years, and that someone actually found it and appreciated it thousands of years after it was created:
A rare and surprising archaeological discovery at Tel Dor: A gemstone engraved with the portrait of Alexander the Great was uncovered during the 2009 season of excavations
A rare and surprising archaeological discovery at Tel Dor: A gemstone engraved with the portrait of Alexander the Great was uncovered during excavations by an archaeological team directed by Dr. Ayelet Gilboa of the University of Haifa and Dr. Ilan Sharon of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. "Despite its miniature dimensions - the stone is less than a centimeter high and its width is less than half a centimeter - the engraver was able to depict the bust of Alexander on the gem without omitting any of the ruler's characteristics" notes Dr. Gilboa, Chair of the Department of Archaeology at the University of Haifa. "The emperor is portrayed as young and forceful, with a strong chin, straight nose and long curly hair held in place by a diadem."...
...The significance of the discovery at Dor is in the gemstone being uncovered in an orderly excavation, in a proper context of the Hellenistic period. The origins of most Alexander portraits, scattered across numerous museums around the world, are unknown. Some belonged to collections that existed even prior to the advent of scientific archaeology, others were acquired on the black market, and it is likely that some are even forgeries...
Levin interviews Stephen Smith [via Ace]. Good stuff. Smith hasn't gotten the message I guess.
Nice:
In a little noticed interview with the Daily Beast (presumably little noticed because serious people don't read the Daily Beast), Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites -- the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace:
DB: How aggressive can Obama be in insisting to the Israelis that a military strike might be in America's worst interest?
Brzezinski: We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?
DB: What if they fly over anyway?
Brzezinski: Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren't just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.
Contrary to Brezinski's half-hearted disclaimer that no one wishes for such an outcome, there are plenty on the left who would delight in a pitched battle between the United States and Israel. Democrats in Congress routinely support resolutions affirming Israel's right to take whatever steps it deems necessary to assure its own national defense. And Obama has at least paid lip service to the concept. But hostility to Israel among the rank and file is very real on the left -- and among "realists."...
I'd correct that to read Left and Right, though closer to the mainstream on the left. Imagine the talk show invitations that Walt and Mearsheimer would receive in the aftermath of such an event. The scenario is unthinkable, of course, (not because it would be horrible, but because it's not going to happen) and some blame goes to the interviewer for pushing the question, but Brzezinski's a big boy and it was his choice not only to answer the question but insert the Liberty reference. It sort of shows what direction his thinking goes in.
For the record, the Israelis have always maintained that they didn't know the Liberty was an American ship, yet in the imagined scenario we would certainly know who we were shooting at. So what kind of a "Liberty in reverse" would this be, outside Zbig's fevered mind? While the US, even this administration, has always maintained it was up to Israel to determine what was in its best defense interests, American consistency hasn't exactly been of world-class caliber lately.
h/t to Eli Lake for the 'Tough Love' bit, and Omri tweets: 'MJ Rosenberg's next article: "It's 'pro-Israel' to shoot down IAF jets"' More truth than poetry, as, though the scenario itself is almost unimaginable, the argument in the aftermath by the J Street types -- and even the rest of the anti-democrats on the Israeli left -- is all too imaginable. 'They were saving the Israelis from themselves.' [cue the antisemites showing up to rant about the Liberty in 10, 9, 8...]
Saturday, September 19, 2009
I arrived at my office this morning to find the FiOS connection defunct (yes, I was in my office today). The pain, oh, the pain. You mean I might have to do real work? Fortunately, they sent out a tech in the afternoon (does that whole rigmarole they make you go through over the phone with unplugging and re-plugging the router ever workl?)...unfortunately the poor bastard took about three hours to diagnose and fix the problem (a failed run of cat5 cable). Such a helpless feeling.
Anyway, in other news you can see that I've been tinkering with the stylesheet again. Any issues, please let me know.
Also, if anyone out there connects through AOL, please let me know if you have trouble loading the page. Someone who does told me they do and I'd like to know if that's an AOL problem or something else.
Muchos gracias.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Truly repulsive. Aftonbladet's Donald Bostrom is traveling the world, enjoying fame and fortune: Bostrom expands blood libel against Israel. He's been treated to a hero's welcome in Algeria, including a cash reward of $5000. Blood libel for fun and profit.
Meanwhile, here's an Israeli-produced spoof video that seems to be all the rage:
Back stoey's here: Swedish anti-Semitism satire clip a hit
ADL has a collection of some of the Arab newspaper cartoons Bostrom's work has wrought: Arab Cartoons Suggest Israel Harvests Organs
"The first Jewish religious service broadcast from Germany since the advent of Hitler":
One of the stories behind the music: A Soldier's Voice Rediscovered
[h/t: wwiitoday]
Our friend Michael Graham (or is it now Michael "Code Talker" Graham?) has become the latest victim of the last refuge of a liberal (or is that the first refuge?) -- no, he hasn't been accused of racism...quite...but...cue drum roll...anti-Semitism. In this case for speaking a simple truth -- that Newton, MA is full of dopey liberals! I am reminded of the newspaper headline, "World to End Tomorrow, Women and Minorities Hardest Hit!"
In a post at lefty blog Blue Mass Group: Glen Beck and Michael Graham - The New Anti-Semetic [sic] Joe McCarthy's and Father Coughlins ?
Seems that both FOX Glen Beck [ I wear secret underwear LDS] and WTKK's Michael "Cracker" Graham have become the evil reincarnations of the drunken Joe "Tailgunner" McCarthy (R) Wisconsin and bigotted anti-semetic Roman Catholic priest Father Charles Edward Coughlin .
Beck is the out of control mimic of Tailgunner Joe saying he has a document proving so and so is anti-American each time he spews the venom from his mouth.
Graham "Cracker" just today used 'code words' to blame all his perceived problems on " those Newton Liberals"... read that the majority of people of the Jewish faith who live in Newton. This of course comes from a Fundamentalist who graduated from Bob Jones University who still believes in separating the races.
The world is going into retrograde.
Take that Graham, you racist...CRACKER!
All this for the brilliant job Graham did this morning in exposing the extreme hypocrisy of Newton's State Rep. Ruth Balser (apparently, but merely coincidentally, a Joo). For those not in the local know, the issue stems from the state legislature's own absurd flip-flopping on the issue of just what happens when the state loses a Senator. When Mitt Romney (R) was governor, the massively Democrat State Legislature voted to strip the governor of his power to appoint a successor (at the time it looked like John Kerry would be going to the White House...phew), but now that there's a Democrat in the corner office, and at the behest of a then dieing Ted Kennedy, the legislature wants to put the old rule back. How conveeenient.
Sadly for Balser, she got caught out as a flip-flopping hypocrite, and now liar, not just in the House roll call, but on TAPE as well:
...When Mitt Romney was governor, Rep. Balser voted against allowing a governor to appoint an interim US Senator, saying on the floor of the house "It's a job that by definition cannot be replaced except by a choice of the people," and "A governor cannot appoint someone who can represent the voters."
(Watch the video here--it's fantastic!) [Oh, do watch the video. -S]
Last night, she voted to allow Democrat Deval Patrick appoint a replacement US Senator.
When confronted by WBZ-TV, Rep. Balser--proving that her last name is no coincidence--said this: "I have not changed my position....I'm taking a very consistent position."
Her explanation for how "a governor cannot appoint" and "I'm voting to allow the governor to appoint" is consistent?
She doesn't have to. The voters of Newton are too dumb to notice, and the liberals at the Boston Globe-Democrat don't care.
Hey, dishing on liberals isn't my "thing," (seriously, look carefully) -- for various reasons but mostly because I find the term grossly inaccurate -- but then, hey, I'm not a radio talk show host -- for those guys it's bread and butter. But guess what? Doing so doesn't make you an anti-Semite (even if, by pure coincidence, Jews are "disproportionately affected" by said liberal-bashing). And I'll tell you something else, pointing out the simple fact that Newton is full of doofy liberals who will put this woman back into office year after year doesn't make you Father Coughlin incarnate, either. Hell, that's just unfair to Father Coughlin who was a real fascist-supporting anti-Semite -- no secret decoder ring necessary.
Everybody knows what type of Homo Sapien inhabits Newton and environs. Crack open any sedimentary rock and there are the bones (sorry Michael, no insult intended, but it's an evolution thing cracker-boy, you wouldn't understand): Species: Liberal, Genus: Limousine, as evidenced most vividly by the new High School project now rapidly closing in on a $200 million price tag (that's right, a 200 Million Dollar Public High School).
Now sure, Graham once asked if he could see my horns, and I had to explain that they only pop out on the Sabbath, and anyway I had mine permanently filed off so I could "pass" (I'm still saving for the rhinoplasty)...but really, LOTS of people from the South ask me that. (<= Note: Typical Northern bigotry against Southerners alert.)
Now I know what some of my critics are thinking, "Hey, but you call people anti-Semites (or antisemites if you prefer) all the time!" Yeah, because that's one of the things this blog concentrates on, we gather the examples from all over the world, and guess what? There are a lot of real, honest to goodness Jew haters out there. But guess what else? Michael Graham ain't one of them.
Michael, in his own response to this silliness, posts the following picture of himself:
Hands off the Jewish girls, hayseed! So it's the "Some of my best friends are hot chicks in the IDF" defense is it now? That's low. And how low do your hands go in that picture anyway? (How pathetic is my life that I spent more time staring at that picture than I did reading the accompanying text...I digress.)
All kidding aside, in my experience, if anything, Graham is a philo-Semite. He loves Jews, and he's as much of a supporter of the Jewish State as a self-described tall geeky white dude has any right to be. So let's stop being silly. It's not his fault that some people's Jewish identity is so tied up in "liberalism" that when he goes after the latter, some people think he's talking about they and their religion, personally.
I have some advice for any of you sensitive folk who did take offense. There is one sure way to have it so that people don't associate Jews with liberalism so closely in the future. Vote Republican! hth
And to Michael I am reminded of the words of Voltaire who said, "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it."
L'Shana Tovah!
More resources and reaction:
Richard Maize Creates Websites To Refute UN Israel Gaza Goldstone Report. Those web sites are UN Goldstone Gaza Report and The Association for Human Rights in Israel.
Amir Mizroch has a piece at the JPost that describes some of the backdrop, but perhaps the most interesting is what comes at the beginning:
During his investigations into possible war crimes committed by Israel and Hamas during Operation Cast Lead, Judge Richard Goldstone asked a group of prominent South African expatriates living in Israel to persuade government officials here to cooperate with his commission.
Goldstone told them the commission's findings and recommendations would be more balanced if Israel made its case.
The expats traveled to Jerusalem with the message, but after a relatively short briefing with Israeli experts, the delegation did a complete about-face and supported Israel's position of having nothing to do with the UN fact-finding mission.
The trick: Israeli officials briefed the visitors on what Goldstone's commission was already doing in Gaza, on the makeup of the UN Human Rights Council and on the rancid history of the HRC's deliberate targeting of Israel...
Mona Charen goes after our own administration's tepid defense of the Israelis: U.N. Disgraces Itself Again; Obama Helps, Shame appears to be in season. Jennifer Rubin does the same: Let the UN Human Rights Council Take Care of It!
J F Beck goes after some specific items in the report concerning reports of the munitiions used: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED: ISRAEL NAILED
Update: Samson Blinded comments at length: Goldstone report: the rebuttal
And, Mere Rhetoric reports that the dog and pony show at the ICC is on: MSM Outlets Pretty Psyched About Girl "Seeking Justice For Gaza" At ICC
Thursday, September 17, 2009
There's a new watchdog blog on the block: J Street Jive
JStreetJive was started to provide deep background information on the new organization, J Street.
While the majority of J Street grass roots supporters are indeed "Pro-Israel" in the sense that they believe in the Jewish people's need for and the right to its historical and sovereign homeland, J Street's leadership has demonstrated a cavalier attitude towards existential threats to Israel, a hyper-critical record against Israel and a virtually uncritical policy vis a vis Palestinians and Arab states.
Accuracy and accountability will be the watchwords of JStreetJive.
We welcome your comments and information.
If we all want peace and security in the region, let our words reflect a commitment to the truth.
Know it. Love it. Bookmark it.
No ABM's for you: Obama to Scrap Bush-Era European Missile Shield Plan. As the article explains, while this may be an appeasement move toward Russia, Gates is also making the argument that the alternative being deployed will be geared toward the short and medium range missiles that are the more likely short-term threat, and will also be able to be deployed sooner.
Nevertheless, it's not a great day for the announcement, as Jules points out, it's Happy Molotov-Ribbentrop Day!
The Poles and Czechs are not feeling the love.
Meanwhile, the secret is out at the IAEA, and Iran has the capability of producing nukes NOW, and is building the missiles, though the IAEA is denying this. [edited]
It'll be awhile before this passes. Here is some more substantive reading material by the people pushing back:
In the Wall Street Journal, NGO Monitor's Gerald Steinberg writes: U.N. Smears Israeli Self-Defense As 'War Crimes' - A one-sided report on the Gaza war lets Hamas off the hook
Dan Kosky writes in The Guardian (!): Goldstone's sins of omission
Richard Landes does his own link dance: Goldstone Commission Report, then does a must-read fisking of Goldstone's New York Times piece: Fisking Goldstone: What's happened to this man? And finally, he presents video evidence that Goldstone apparently couldn't find on YouTube: Hamas and Human Shields: Is it a "human shield" if they're willing?
CAMERA continues doing their annoying work of pick, pick, picking at the facts: Major Error in UN Goldstone Report Calls into Question Work's Credibility
Barry Rubin always has great analysis: The UN Goldstone's Report: A Victory for Terrorists and War Criminals
Meet the witnesses:
Who is Ghazi Hamad?
Palestinian Government Spokesman Dr. Ghazi Hamad said that Israel must be wiped off the face of the earth.
...Hamad added that "this is not a country of humans. These are animals and a group of gangs, and this country must be wiped off the face of the earth."...
Hamad is considered a moderate. I'm not kidding. Imagine the UN sending a commission whose mandate had already pronounced the United States guilty to Afghanistan to interview members of the Taliban and Al Qaeda and you start to get the picture of what happened here. [h/t: Judith Apter Klinghoffer]
Update: Alan Dershowitz: UN Investigation of Israel Discredits Itself and Undercuts Human Rights
Update: Judith Apter Klinghoffer: GOLDSTONE PLEASES TERRORIST HAMAS; EXPECT HIM TO CONTINUE TO DO SO
Max Boot: The Goldstone Report
After reading the Goldstone Report on human-rights abuses committed during the Gaza War (December 27, 2008-January 19, 2009), all I can say is, it's a good thing that the United Nations wasn't around during World War II. I can just imagine its producing a supposedly evenhanded report that condemned the Nazis for "grave" abuses such as incinerating Jews, while also condemning the Allies for their equally "grave" abuses such as fire-bombing German and Japanese cities. The recommendation, no doubt, would have been that both sides be tried for war crimes, with Adolf Hitler in the dock alongside Franklin Roosevelt. Actually, that may be giving the UN more credit than it deserves. To judge by the evidence before us, the likelihood is that the UN in those days would have devoted far more space to Allied "abuses" than to those of the Axis and would have recommended that FDR stand alone before the world court...
Pow.
Finally (for now), Marty Peretz: U.S. Is "Concerned" About the Goldstone Report on Gaza; Maybe Washington Should Turn Its Eyes on Afghanistan and Itself
Nope, one more: Elder of Ziyon: Goldstone report inaccuracies part 10
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Big event coming up in October at the Boston Mosque:
Light of Guidance
Fundamentals of Faith 101
October 16th-18th & 24th-25th, 2009
Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center
Taught by Sheikh Yasir Qadhi
Boston's First Double-Weekend Seminar
Al-Maghrib's Most Popular Seminar Right Here in Your Backyard...
You can see Qadhi pitching the seminar at YouTube, here.
You can HEAR Qadhi's feelings about Jews and Christians (filthy...filthy people. That's right, you don't get off so easy this time...), here, in the video of the Americans for Peace and Tolerance press conference from June (start in at around 3:40):
Americans for Peace and Tolerance June 25 2009 Press Conference from Charles Jacobs on Vimeo.
On June 26, Governor Deval Patrick and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino will be honored guests at the grand opening of the Islamic Society of Boston's Cultural Center in Roxbury, Massachusetts. Americans for Peace and Tolerance wish the Boston Muslim community well in their new cultural and religious center, and we celebrate the growing religious diversity it represents. We are deeply concerned, however, about the extremist leadership of this new institution. This video is from a press conference held to discuss our concerns.
Patrick Poole has an excellent piece on Qadhi and the Al Maghrib Institute, here: An Islamic Hate Speaker Comes to Town. A taste of Qadhi:
All of these Polish Jews which Hitler was supposedly trying to exterminate, that's another point, by the way, Hitler never intended to mass-destroy the Jews. There are a number of books out on this written by Christians, you should read them. The Hoax of the Holocaust, I advise you to read this book and write this down, The Hoax of the Holocaust, a very good book. All of this is false propaganda and I know it sounds so far-fetched, but read it. The evidences [sic] are very strong. And they're talking about newspaper articles, clippings, everything and look up yourself what Hitler really wanted to do. We're not defending Hitler, by the way, but the Jews, the way that they portray him, also is not correct.
Qadhi has been to Boston before. He'll be here again in October, and there's no reason to doubt he'll be here again in the future.
Holes continue to be poked in the UN Human Rights Council sponsored Goldstone Report. What's remarkable is that the criticisms go far beyond simply whining about the unfairness of it all, but go directly to the facts of the matters in questions to the very use the report makes of International Law. Let's have some links:
Carl uses video to reveal some of the absurdity of it all: The Goldstone Commission on human shields: Lies and damned lies
CAMERA picks apart the witness testimony: Goldstone Report Endorses Unreliable Witnesses
Melanie Phillips writes: The Moral Inversion of Richard Goldstone
Elder of Ziyon notes that Goldstone relied heavily, more heavily than they relied on Human Rights Watch, on a Hamas-run NGO, TAWTHEQ. I kid you not: Goldstone Commission problems, part 8
Honest Reporting has a concise resource: The Goldstone Report: Rewarding Palestinian Terror
Related, note this entry from Soccer Dad with British Colonel Richard Kemp commenting on the IDF's conduct.
And, in what has to be one of the more pathetic moments of the year so far, Nicole Goldstone, Richard Goldstone's daughter, seeks to assure us: 'My father is a Zionist, loves Israel'
Update: Elder of Ziyon: Goldstone report inaccuracies part 9: Gaza Police
Palestinian Media Watch throws open the archives from the war: Palestinian witnesses: Hamas used civilians as human shields in Gaza war
Israel Behind the News presents Comments on B'Tselem's Civilian Casualty Estimates in Operation Cast Lead by Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH and Dr. Yael Stein MD [DOC File]
NGO Monitor: Goldstone Report: 575 pages of NGO "cut and paste"
If you've been following the Boston Mayoral race lately, you'll be aware of the growing scandal involving the deletion of emails by city employees contrary to state law. The Globe notes that the Menino Administration was warned against this practice previously, but ignored the warning: Judge warned city on e-mails in 2008
Mayor Thomas M. Menino's administration was warned by a state judge late last year that city employees were deleting e-mails in apparent violation of state public records law, but city officials failed to halt the practice.
The judge's order, made in a lawsuit against the Boston Redevelopment Authority, shows that the problem of records destruction at City Hall has extended well beyond Menino's closest aide, Michael J. Kineavy, whose e-mails the Globe sought through a public records request this summer.
Superior Court Judge Ralph D. Gants wrote in a November court order that BRA employees had been permitted to delete e-mails without keeping hard copies or electronic backups.
"It is plain that the BRA failed to comply with its obligation to retain e-mails in accordance with [state law],'' Gants wrote. "Prior to 2007, the BRA frequently asked its staff to delete e-mails so that its e-mail storage load would not exceed what was desirable for the efficient use of its e-mail servers.''
State public records law requires municipal employees to save electronic correspondence for at least two years, even if the contents are of "no informational or evidential value.'' Penalties include fines of up to $500 or prison sentences of up to one year...
Adamg notes the case that the Globe is loath to remind us of, that is, The David Project's suit against the Boston Redevelopment Authority to discover records involving their shady land dealings with the Boston Mosque.
Well that settles that. From Divest This!
Just to confirm the fraudulence of the "TIAA-CREF divested from Israel" storyline still making its way around the Internet, TIAA-CREF has issued a second press release clarifying that the sale of Israel-Africa shares was done months before the organization received any communication from divestment activists as part of a "routine part of the indexing investment process."
That note about "the indexing investment process" makes claims that TIAA-CREF's decision has anything to do with the policies of the Israeli government vis-à-vis settlements (or anything else) even more absurd. As any investor (which includes most of us) know, indexing is a process whereby a group (or "index" of stocks is purchased based on a formula, with stocks in new companies added or removed, also based on a formula. The simplest case would be an S&P 500 Index fund which buys shares in every company on the S&P, selling (or "divesting") those shares if the company in question is taken off the S&P, and adding shares in new companies that join.
Israel-Africa was part of an MSCI Emerging Market Index which TIAA CREF tracks. While fund managers usually hold their indexing formulas close to the vest, one would guess that Israel-Africa's stock price and debt woes over the last year automatically placed them on a sell list. In other words, not only was the decision to "divest" in Israel-Africa not motivated by politics in any way, it looks like this was a decision that could have been made by a computer following MSCI's indexing algorithm with no human decision making (political or otherwise) involved.
Just to add insult to injury, the press release informs us that "...TIAA-CREF funds and accounts had investments in companies in Israel and around the world" (including hundreds of millions invested in Israel, as of their June report).
If we were following the BDS rules, the headline should read: TIAA-CREF confirms its continued support for the Jewish state in the face of pressure by those calling for it to divest in Israel. That certainly comes closer to the truth than what's being peddled online by a divestment "community" desperately seeking something they can pretend is a victory, in the face of nearly universal defeat here on planet earth.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Attractive officer, Horny sergeant. Roger that.
Informative post as always at Across the Bay: Is the Obama Administration Fed Up with Syria? Apparently previous reports about Washington sending a full Ambassador back to Syria are not likely to come to fruition, owing to the Syrians' unwillingness to change their spots.
Apparently the Administration is learning step by step that dictatorships like the Assads' lose their justification the closer peace and normalization come. Why bend for a few American duckets when the regime does perfectly well for itself sanctions or not, thank you very much. Read it all.
CAMERA: Osama Bin Readin! (Terrorist Endorses Texts by Carter, Walt and Mearsheimer)
Some writers get all the luck!
Really.
How unfair is this? Osama Bin Laden (or someone who pretends to be him) has endorsed Jimmy Carter's Palestine Peace Not Apartheid and The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt.
According to an entry in the New York Times' blog Bin Laden (or some fascimile thereof) recently issued a tape in which he exhorts his listeners to read the texts mentioned above along with a few other books, stating: "After you read the suggested books, you will know the truth, and you will be greatly shocked by the scale of concealment that has been exercised on you."...
You think Amazon delivers to caves? (or graves)
The Goldstone Report has been released today. Here is the lengthy PDF report.
You didn't need to be a Nostradamus to know where this was going to lead. A commission established by the totalitarian-dominated UNHRC, a UN body so bad that the United States refused to have anything to do with it for years, wasn't going to come out with a conclusion that actually supported a free civil society in its efforts to defend its people.
Elder of Ziyon has been combing through the report and has a series examining the innacuracies: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7. (You need bloggers to do this because the MSM isn't interested.)
Carl in Jerusalem comments here. "The 'Human Rights Council' wants Israeli blood."
Judith Apter Klinghoffer: Goldstone Report Empowers Terrorists - "...International terror just received an amazing shot in the arm. A UN appointed committee has placed Israel and Hamas on the same moral/legal plane. By so doing, it has further increased the effectiveness of the terrorist strategy of using human shields. What can be more beneficial to a Hamas, Taliban or Al Qaeda terrorist...'
The Israeli Government has a page of Gaza Facts which is another good resource. They have also released the following short statement:
Israel did not feel able to cooperate with the Fact Finding Mission because its mandate was clearly one-sided and ignored the thousands of Hamas missile attacks on civilians in southern Israel that made the Gaza Operation necessary. Both the mandate of the Mission and the resolution establishing it prejudged the outcome of any investigation, gave legitimacy to the Hamas terrorist organization and disregarded the deliberate Hamas strategy of using Palestinian civilians as cover for launching terrorist attacks.
The unbalanced nature of the resolution establishing the Mission was the reason that so many States on the Council, including all member states of the European Union, Switzerland, Canada, Korea and Japan, did not support it, and why many distinguished individuals, including former High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson, refused invitations to head the Mission.
Notwithstanding its reservations, Israel will read the Report carefully - as it does with all reports prepared by international and national organizations. Israel is committed to acting fully in accordance with international law and to examining any allegations of wrongdoing by its own forces. To date, the IDF has opened investigations into over 100 allegations regarding the conduct of its forces during the Gaza Operation. While most of these investigations were closed because the allegations were found baseless, 23 criminal investigations were opened and are still pending.
The Israel Project also has a good resource page: Press Resources for the Goldstone Commission on Gaza
Finally, here is a news search on the subject. [h/t: Soccer Dad]
Update: Gerald Steinberg in the JPost writes: Goldstone's kangaroo court report
...Goldstone's press conference in New York and the report's recommendations constitute another step in the Durban strategy, in which the language of human rights and international law are used as weapons in the political war to isolate and demonize Israel...
...Human Rights Watch is referenced 33 times, including the "Rain of Fire" report co-authored by Marc Garlasco. He was HRW's "senior military expert" (until yesterday's exposure of his Nazi memorabilia fetish), but his analyses are also tainted by false claims. Goldstone's long association with HRW essentially means that in this report, he is quoting his own highly problematic organization. More generally, the methodology used in the 36 incidents examined by the committee will give critics of the report and the commission the strongest basis for rejecting its conclusions.
If this was a real court process, and not a façade based on a political mandate from the inherently biased United Nations Human Rights Council, both Goldstone and Professor Christine Chinkin would have been disqualified from participating. As UN Watch noted in its 28-page legal brief to the UN, Chinkin's bias was reflected in statements that "categorically rejected" Israel's right to self-defense against rocket attacks from Gaza and accused Israel of "aggression" and "prima facie war crimes." But without any due process, this brief was simply dismissed...
...Near the end of his statement, Goldstone told his audience that they should "rejoice that we are living in a world today in which there is accountability for war crimes." The Hamas leadership and its supporters, including the Iranian regime, will indeed rejoice, but few Israelis will find this mission, its report and its recommendations as providing accountability or restoring the morality of the United Nations.
Dave takes note of Goldstone's Al Jazeera interview, here. "...Pay special attention to Goldstone's sarcastic response to the interviewer's mention that Israel had dismissed the report (0:36), his trivializing of Hamas rocket fire on Israel (5:42), and his reference to palestinian terrorists as "armed military groups."..."
Dave also finds at least one "progressive" blogger who's not ready to give up the ghost on HRW's Marc Garlasco yet.
Update: Seriously? Does Noam Bedein mean this literally? Israeli who testified to UN commission: Goldstone fell asleep
Noam Badin [sic: Bedein], one of six Israeli civilians who testified before the Goldstone Commission probing Operation Cast Lead blasted the investigation's report Tuesday for equating the actions of Israel and Hamas, saying it was "disgusting," Israel Radio reported.
According to the radio station, Badin said that Goldstone fell asleep when he was shown clips of Sderot children running for their lives after hearing a Color Red rocket warning siren.
Apparently, yes:
...I was flown to testify in front of the committee at the UN headquarters in Geneva and during my testimony, which included raw video footage of children running from rocket fire, Richard Goldstone fell asleep...
Update: Z-Word: UN Human Rights Council Report Distorts Gaza War
Monday, September 14, 2009
A leading human rights group has suspended its senior military analyst following revelations that he is an avid collector of Nazi memorabilia.
The group, Human Rights Watch, had initially thrown its full support behind the analyst, Marc Garlasco, when the news of his hobby came out last week. On Monday night, the group shifted course and suspended him with pay, "pending an investigation," said Carroll Bogert, the group's associate director.
"We have questions about whether we have learned everything we need to know," she said...
This was one of the "holy crap" stories of the year. I mean really, HRW's already tottering credibility given one more push by the revelations concerning the odd hobby (considering his employer) of one of its most prominent foot soldiers. You couldn't make this stuff up.
What's nice is that this has put the controversies involving HRW in front of an ever-wider and more mainstream audience. HRW has no one to blame but themselves.
Update: Excellent posts from Elder of Ziyon and David Bernstein.
RIP. Red Dawn? Come on. RED DAWN!? And The Outsiders. Road House? ROAD...HOUSE. The man made Buford Pusser look like a total pussy (no offense to Pusser).
And Point Break wasn't bad neither.
(I've never seen Dirty Dancing.)
Patrick Swayze rocks forever.
Continue reading "Patrick Swayze Rocks Forever"From Americans for Peace and Tolerance:
The film, "The Third Jihad" will be shown in Hunneman Hall at the Public Library of Brookline on Tuesday, September 15th at 7 p.m. Dennis Hale and Charles Jacobs will lead a brief discussion after the showing. Dr. Hale is a professor of political science at Boston College. Dr. Jacobs is president of Americans for Peace and Tolerance (APT). The program is free and open to the public. The library is located at 361 Washington St., Brookline.
The Third Jihad explores the phenomenon of radical Islam in America and the risk that homegrown jihad poses to national security and the American way of life. Narrated by Muslim-American Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, the 72-minutes film reveals how Islamic supremacists, driven by a religiously motivated rejection of western values, are engaging in a multifaceted strategy to overwhelm the West. In contrast to the use of violent jihad and terror to instill fear in "non-believers," cultural jihad is a means of infiltrating and undermining Western society from within, as the film shows.
The film is sponsored by Americans for Peace and Tolerance and co-sponsored by the Boston Israel Action Committee.
For directions to the library go to www.brooklinelibrary.org. For more information call 617-869-1202.
(Also on the Event Calendar)
Barry Rubin has a couple of must-reads on the ongoing Iran-engagement stumble/fumble. As the clock ticks on Iranian nukes, we are stuck by our own rhetoric in a diplomacy mobius-strip because the left's rhetoric has no exit strategy. There is simply no place to go outside of admitting that yes, Iran can fairly be described as part of an Axis of Evil, that they don't share the same values, and therefore the same goals, as we, and that many of the nations of the world are on their side. Facing reality and admitting that some of your political opponents had it right while you're still learning reality on the job can be a tough pill to swallow. An Introductory Guide To A Very Big Mistake: Analyzing the U.S. Decision to Negotiate with Iran's Regime and, with more detail, U.S Government Jumps Voluntarily into Iran's Trap, Pulls in Europeans, Too
Jennifer Rubin comments on the situation here:
...One wonders what Rep. Berman thinks now. The administration has made itself, and those who were banking on some onset of diplomatic sobriety, look foolish. Those in Congress who were moving forward with an array of sanctions to enhance Obama's bargaining position have been undercut by an administration that apparently doesn't want its bargaining position enhanced.
The administration has prostrated itself before the Iranian regime and afforded it still more time to continue with its nuclear-weapons program. It has signaled that it has neither the will nor the interest to set deadlines or enforce them, and that it has failed to lay the groundwork for sanctions...
Don't worry, though, at least Ahmadinejad won't be invited to dinner.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
I've been accumulating a load of links concerning the upcoming Goldstone Report, the UN 'Human Rights' Council's report on Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, as well as the Human Rights Watch ongoing cratering credibility fiasco. Here's a link dump for your browsing pleasure. There are a lot of resources and commentary of substance here:
Start with Melanie Phillips' excellent overview: The Goldstone show-trial
Judith Apter Klinghoffer has an entry exposing the manner in which the Goldstone Report is simply another shot in the BDS (Boycott Divestment Sanctions) war against the Jewish State: GOLDSTONE USED FOR ONSLAUGHT ON ISRAEL
NGO Monitor does their usual meticulous work, here: The Goldstone "Fact Finding" Mission and the Role of Political NGOs
Eye on the UN has a very useful resource page that basically fisks the entire effort, divided into subjects with red text inserted with expository commentary and emphasizing problematic aspects: THE GOLDSTONE INQUIRY: THE UN BLOOD LIBEL
A prominent list of 50 UK and Canadian lawyers have signed a statement taking issue with the prima-facie bias of the report: U.N.'s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for 'Bias'
An unprecedented team of fifty British and Canadian lawyers are challenging the refusal of a U.N. investigator to step down from an inquiry on the recent Gaza conflict, arguing that London School of Economics professor Christine Chinkin's participation on the panel - after she declared Israel guilty prior to seeing any evidence - "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report."...
Goldstone himself was compelled to respond, not well, to the Chinkin controversy: Goldstone defends Christine Chinkin from bias charge
There should be much more about the Goldstone Report forthcoming.
Now let's focus on Human Rights Watch. Regular readers already know that the issue of Marc Garlasco's collecting habit is only the latest straw on the camel's back.
NGO Monitor has a detailed report on HRW here: EXPERTS OR IDEOLOGUES? A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF HRW'S FOCUS ON ISRAEL [PDF]
Note, for instance, page 11, "HRW Staff and Board Members". The list of board-members is such that if you're a known far-leftist and/or anti-Israel activist you are more than welcome, otherwise forget it. The select few who don't fit this mold have already started criticizing.
The UK-based CST Blog has a very good post on the Garlasco controversy: Human Rights Watch - it is "absurd" to question motives of Nazi medals collector
NGO Monitor takes apart one of the most "celebrated" incidents of supposed Israeli perfidy here: HRW's Credibility Gap: 14 Versions of the Abed Rabbo "White Flags" Incident
...and on the Garlasco issue: Expert or Ideologues?: HRW's Defense of Marc Garlasco's Nazi Fetish
If you didn't notice, HRW has been sending out the sockpuppets to defend the honor of Garlasco and HRW. See here, for instance: HRW sends out the sockpuppets
And well they should be concerned, as his fetish has even leftist supporters of HRW expressing dismay with Elder noting one example above.
Garlasco himself finally responded with a piece at The Huffington Post, and you can follow that by starting here: Garlasco responds, poorly -- and here: Garlasco Responds -- and here: Marc Garlasco: Hey, Sorry If You Were Creeped Out By My Nazi Obsession, Which I'm Now Going To Pretend I Was Never Concerned About
In another useful general resource, the JCPA has come out with the following report: Palestinian "Policemen" Killed in Gaza Operation Were Trained Terrorists
Also, see: Who started the Gaza war? and Who Broke the Ceasefire? CNN's "Fact Check" Falls Short
Finally, in a piece of general interest concerning the cognitive war of which this entire exercise is a part, see Richard Landes in the JPost: Exposing the 'weapon of the weak'
Update: Another interesting post on Garlasco from UN Watch: HRW's Garlasco: "VERY nice Hitler signature selection"; "a visit from Hitler!"; "My Christmas wish is for peace in the Nazi collecting field"
And Israellycool: Garlasco-Gate: The Gift That Keeps on Giving
Quite sad. I heard he was going very well and showed a lot of promise: Ramon's fighter jet crashes near Hebron; cause still unknown
IAF officer Lt. Assaf Ramon, the son of Israeli astronaut Ilan Ramon who died in the 2003 fatal Columbia mission, was killed on Sunday after the F-16 he was piloting crashed into the southern Hebron hills.
IAF commander Maj.-Gen. Ido Nehushtan and head of the IDF Manpower Division Avi Zamir personally went to Rona Ramon's house to deliver the news.
The story of the crash and the identity of the pilot resonated widely throughout the IDF and particularly in the Air Force where Ilan Ramon was a legend.
"This is shocking," said one senior IDF officer.
The cause of the accident was under investigation and was complicated by the large crash scene. Officials said that the debris was spread over a large piece of land near the settlement of Pinei Hever.
Sunday's flight was his 47th flight since finishing the IAF pilots course in June, Channel 10 reported...
...Assaf Ramon announced his plans to follow in his father's footsteps shortly following the Columbia tragedy. In 2006 he enlisted in the IDF and successfully passed the IAF's grueling examinations and trials for the prestigious pilot's course.
Assaf was the valedictorian of his class which graduated in June. Several months ago, during a routine training flight in a Skyhawk A4, Ramon encountered a technical failure when the engine suddenly died. Instead of ejecting, like protocol dictates, Ramon, together with the flight instructor, succeeded in restarting the engine and safely returning to base.
More comedy gold from the boycott, divestment and sanctions aptly-named "movement." From Divest This!
To give you an idea of how powerful and effective the divestment project has become, they now have the ability to get companies to act on their demands four months before those demands are even made!
The latest 2009 divestment hoax (I'm starting to lose count) has to do with TIAA-CREF, the academic retirement fund, which allegedly responded to a September 10th letter sent by 50 members calling for the investment giant to remove Israel-Africa (or I-A, a holding group of 13 companies listed on the Israeli stock exchange) from its portfolio due to I-A's involvement with construction projects in Jerusalem's Har Homa neighborhood, yadda, yadda, yadda.
TIAA-CREF responded by noting that the organization no longer invests in I-A "following their [I-A shares] removal from an emerging markets index that the [TIAA-CREF] account tracks, as part of a regular rebalancing." For those not versed in investment-speak, Israel-Africa was part of a collection of stocks owned by an investment organization that maintains holdings in companies from "emerging markets" (such as the Middle East, Africa and former Soviet Union). TIAA-CREF owns shares in that emerging market fund, a fund which chose to sell its I-A shares back in June.
Now did this decision get made for political reasons, as divestment advocates are advertising? Well first, keep in mind that TIAA-CREF maintains over $300 million in investments with Israeli firms, and the Israel-Africa holdings in question amounted to just $250,000. In other words, this was a highly cautions investment, and with good reason. For Israel-Africa is primarily in the real estate business with property holdings in Israel, the US (including the old New York Times building) and Europe (mostly Eastern Europe).
Now in case you haven't heard, the real estate market has not been doing all that well over the last couple of years, and companies that are either in that market (particularly ones that borrowed heavily based on the alleged value of their property holdings) are not in particularly good shape. And Israel-Africa has been looking a lot like the nearly bankrupted nation of Iceland since the bottom fell out of the economy last year. With billions in debt, and few ideas as to how that debt can be paid (diversification into companies like Gottex, the Israeli swimwear maker - doesn't look likely to bail them out), I-A shares have taken a beating in the last few months, which is why wise investors have been either selling or taking a cautious approach to the company.
So while Israel-Africa may have created an incentive for investors to flee due to their wishful thinking that real estate would continue to rise in value indefinitely (an idiocy shared by many of us over the last decade), have they become an investment pariah for political reasons, as BDS advocates are claiming?
It's interesting that Israel Africa has only gotten onto my BDS radar over the summer. Before then, talk was primarily about Caterpillar, with some yammering in the spring about Motorola. And now, it seems clear why the divest-niks have taken a recent interest in the company. With the company in crisis, what was the likelihood that retirement funds and other investors would "divest" from Israel-Africa for reasons having nothing to do with politics? And, as with the case of Motorola, the BDS crew has shown a recent interest in finding or anticipating buy/sell decisions relating to Israel, and claiming those decisions were made for purely political reasons.
As I've asked before, can two play at that game? Does the sale of trillions of assets in companies doing business with Israel's Arab neighbors mean investors have woken up to the human rights abuses plaguing the Middle East? Does the hundreds of millions TIAA-CREF still maintains in Israel an unequivocal statement of support for the Jewish state? Or is it only the BDS crew that gets to run out in front of a torch wielding mob of investors and claim to be leading them?
As I've stated before, there is one and only one way to be sure that investment or divestment decisions are being made on political vs. financial grounds, and that is for the investor or company making the decision to actually say so in no uncertain terms. And in the case of TIAA-CREF/Israel Africa (as with Motorola and even Hampshire College) we only have divestment activists making self-serving claims regarding decisions made by others, claims that are either not supported or outright rejected by the organizations in whose names the BDSers are claiming to speak.
Given recent reversals with the churches, I can understand the need for the "I hate Israel" crowd to find some kind of win to crow over. But that raises the questions as to why these "victories" always seem to unravel or be exposes as outright hoaxes when subject to the slightest scrutiny?
Saturday, September 12, 2009
It's Saturday night at the movies with a couple of Vincent Price classics!
This one scared the hell out of me as a kid...The House on Haunted Hill (Warning: Contains images of cigarette smoking.):
And of course you know Vincent Price was the original Omega Man, the first I Am Legend...The Last Man on Earth:
Continue reading "Saturday Night Vincent Price Double Feature"Friday, September 11, 2009
?
[A Cox and Forkum classic.]
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Highly topical! This debate/discussion took place last Tuesday the 9th at the Harvard University Hillel. Audio by Hillel Stavis.
Dershowitz you know. Joel Pollak is our friend from the blog Guide to the Perplexed. He's the author of two books, Don't Tell Me Words Don't Matter and The Kasrils Affair: Jews and Minority Politics in Post-apartheid South Africa, and he's just graduated from Harvard Law.
Most of you, however, will remember him as the college student who asked Barney Frank a simple but revealing question.
Joel is also running for Congress in Illinois. Here is his campaign web page. Bookmark it for later. He promises a redesign shortly. His Facebook campaign page is here and has more content (for now).
Good luck to Joel in the campaign. I think you'll find the debate above interesting.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Human Rights Watch has been posting a response to revelations that one of their top staffers is an avid collector of Nazi memorabilia with a statement posted to a number of blogs, including this one. Click the link to read the statement. They are in heavy spin mode, as well they should be, because things are not getting any better. Here's a picture (I have obscured the child's face) and brief exchange [via Dave] from one of the forums Garlasco frequents [link via Carl]:
As commenter Paula notes, if Garlasco's "monograph" (the 430 page book he authored) was such an accomplishment, why isn't it mentioned in his HRW bio...or much of anywhere else? I understand other online statements indicate he knew it could be a problem.
And, contrary to the HRW spin, the fact is he's not a serious of collector of non-German items as far as I've seen. German stuff is his thing. Nor do I accept the spin (HRW spin no less) of this great separation between "Nazi" and non-Nazi items and admiration. I've heard that 1000 times and never bought it. They were all part of the same machine, if the Wehrmacht had won it would have been Hitler's triumph, and the Generals who turned against Hitler didn't do it until it looked like an impending disaster for the Reich. If either Garlasco or his gramps were such pacifists and so turned off by this militarism thing...then why on earth is he honoring gramp's memory by glorifying his army service? People do compartmentalize, and today we can separate the moral issues from the boyish interest in things military to a certain extent, but you can't seriously expect everyone else to do the same or to understand it.
I will state again that I, personally, do not find this hobby so horrifying in and of itself. Not at all. I'm sure you can pursue this without admiring or meaning to glorify Nazism (one way is to accept that justification that HRW tries to propagate and that I say I've never completely accepted in the paragraph above), and I'm certain that many, many people on the discussion forums Garlasco frequents are perfectly fine people who simply share an interesting hobby and don't mean harm. I'm also sure it attracts a lot of the wrong type of person and that the moderators there must be ever vigilant to maintain the proper tone on their forums.
A lot of other people feel differently, however.
Thing is, if you're going to do this to the extent he does, you are sort of limiting your future options somewhat -- like a neck tat. There might be situations you would want to recuse yourself from, at least for appearances' sake. I mean, can you imagine the scene in Human Rights Watch's office?
Ken Roth: Marc, can you come in please? Marc...very important....we've just had an incident in Gaza between Israel and the Palestinians and we need you to fly out at once.
Garlasco: Oh...uh...where did you say again?
Roth: Gaza. Incident with the Israelis...
Garlasco: That's what I thought you said. See...uh...well, there's something I've been meaning to tell you...and...say, got anything going on in Congo by any chance?
Roth: No. Gaza. Listen, what's the problem?
Garlasco: Well, see I have a potential issue...
Roth: What, knocked-up a Hamas girl did you? Hahahahaha! Listen, whatever it is, the Israelis (who we're gonna give a good screwing to, btw...get it? "Knocked-up...screw..." I kid...) will protect you. Don't worry, you're a human rights worker, it's not like you're a...a NAZI or something!
Garlasco: NO! Oh no...[aside] well, not exactly...
Roth: Well, whatever it is, I'm sure it can wait. Now get out there kid. We have complete faith in you!
He can't have been sleeping comfortably at night.
HRW now has to spend time in spin mode rather than just asking Garlasco to resign in the same way that if you owe the bank $100k, the bank owns you, but if you owe the bank $100million, you own the bank. Garlasco and HRW are so intertwined they can't just dump him now without a major shakeout.
Dave responds to HRW here:
HRW are (deliberately?) missing the point. The question raised by his Nazi obsession is valid: is there a connection between his Israel bashing and his obsession with memorabilia associated with Jew-hating mass-murderers?
Imagine for a second if someone claiming to be objective had a penchant for collecting IDF memorabilia. If this person came out repeatedly with reports favorable to Israel, wouldn't people have reason to question their objectivity?
You also have to question how someone working for a human rights organization - and claiming to really care about people - can look at Nazi memorabilia and not feel repulsed.
These are valid questions, and HRW's informal response is nowhere near adequate.
Elder of Ziyon has a good response, here. Read it all, but here's a snip:
... Saying that this is him doing "research" is an insult to everyone's intelligence. He is a collector of Nazi-era German objects like daggers, Iron Crosses, swastikas. He has written hundreds, maybe thousands, of posts on forums dedicated to the topic. He has written a 400 page book on the topic. Writing a monograph on German medals does not make one a "historian" in any real sense; it makes him a rabid collector. I am fairly sure that his purchase of many of these items would be illegal in many European countries. To deflect those disturbing facts by saying that he also owns a few American air force memorabilia is to dodge the real issue.
It is extraordinarily bad taste and truly offensive that the same person who habitually castigates the Jewish state to a worldwide audience has a creepy obsession with the symbols of those who tried to destroy all Jews...
Yaacov minces no words. A snip:
HRW Press office should be aware that form letters containing platitudes and bland denials do not work when real issues are on the table. The historical value of the flak 88 batteries medals is about as important as the historical value of recording the color of the manure of the Carthaginians' war elephants as they changed altitudes in crossing the Alps. The detailed immersion in the stylization and lurid imagery of the Nazi medals betrays a mania that is simply not explainable as a normal hobby- especially given the ideology and ethos they represent. These are not treasures nor are they of any historical value they are lustrous totems of an inhumane totalitarian regime that should be, rightly forgotten and dishonored rather than worshipped...
See? That's what I'm talking about.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Below you will find a translation of Ben-Dror Yemini's latest piece, from the Hebrew, here. Before that, I highly recommend Elliot Abrams from the Washington Post today: What Carter Missed in the Middle East. It is a grade-A smack-down that concludes thus:
Most inaccurate of all, and most bizarre, is Carter's claim that "a total freeze of settlement expansion is the key" to a peace agreement. Not a halt to terrorism, not the building of Palestinian institutions, not the rule of law in the West Bank, not the end of Hamas rule in Gaza -- no, the sole "key" is Israeli settlements. Such a conclusion fits with Carter's general approach, in which there are no real Palestinians, just victims of Israel. The century of struggle between moderate and radical Palestinians, and the victories of terrorists from Haj Amin al-Husseini to Yasser Arafat, are forgotten; the Hamas coup in Gaza is unmentioned; indeed the words "Hamas" and "terrorism" do not appear in Carter's column. Instead of appealing for support for the serious and practical work of institution-building that the Palestinian Authority has begun, Carter fantasizes about a "nonviolent civil rights struggle" that bears no relationship to the terrorist violence that has plagued Palestinian society, and killed Israelis, for decades. Carter's portrait demonizes Israelis and, not coincidentally, it infantilizes Palestinians, who are accorded no real responsibility for their fate or future. If this is "the Elders' view of the Middle East," we and our friends in that region are fortunate that this group of former officials is no longer in power.
Do read it all. Here is Yemini:
Carter enemy of peace
Ben-Dror Yemini
Like all "peace activists", the former president engages in revilement against Israel, which feeds Palestinian rejectionism
Israel has become a permanent stop in the travels of the former president of USA Jimmy Carter. It transpires that his approach to Israel is special. Two weeks ago he visited in Israel, this time in a special delegation of the Elders - the Elders of the world's tribe. As soon as he returned to the United States, he published an anti-Israel article in the Washington Post. In this article, Carter mentions the Hanun family, "who were evicted from the house when they had lived in East Jerusalem for 65 years". Really? In fact, the building belonged to Jews who were banished from Jerusalem during the War of Independence. The Jewish ownership of the house is not in doubt, and goes back to the year 1875. A Star of David is etched on at least one of the old structures there. The Hanun family however were not there 65 years ago. They are refugee family from Haifa. (By the way, Haifa Arabs were not banished but left voluntarily) Together with several other families, they were housed in the building in 1956 by the Jordanian authorities. The owners of the property petitioned to realize their property rights. Carter's article mentions not a word of the background.
In Carter's state, Atlanta, thousands of residents have been evicted from their homes because they had no money for mortgage repayments. The rights of the Smith family, who were thrown onto the street in Atlanta, are far more well-based than the rights of the Hanun family. But Carter is not looking for justice; he is seeking to revile.
Criticism of the eviction of the Hanun family can well take the form of justified criticism. Even if the eviction was justified, from the legal aspect, there is room for political criticism. But this is on the condition that if Carter wishes to deprive Jews of property rights, he must clearly state that Palestinians have no right to reclaim abandoned property either. In fact, the property that was confiscated from Jews in Arab countries as a result of legislation, pressure, persecution, flight and banishment exceeds the value of the property that was confiscated as the result of the (self-imposed) exile and banishment of the Palestinians. But there is one difference: The Palestinians suffered (self-imposed) exile and banishment because of a declaration of a war of annihilation against the Jewish state that had barely come into existence. The Jews in Arab countries suffered a similar fate - of banishment and confiscation of property - even though they had not declared war on Arab countries. So whose rights are greater?
Did Carter ever tell the Palestinians of this fundamental truth? We know the answer. Like other "peace activists", he relates to the Arabs as a whole and the Palestinians in particular as if they were retarded children. They must not be told the truth. They must not be told that if they are to have rights, then both Jews and Arabs must have these rights as well. And if not, neither do Jews nor Arabs have any rights. He does not tell them that in those years, the 1940s, tens of millions of people suffered the harsh experience of population exchanges, and there is no reason why the Palestinians, and only them, should have "the right of return". He does not tell on that more Jews fled Arab countries than the number of Palestinians who fled or were exiled from Israel.
It is quite legitimate to criticize Israel with respect to the settlement enterprise. Such criticism is sometimes justified. But Carter, like thousands of other "peace activists", is not bringing peace nearer. Their demonization of Israel is strengthening the position of peace rejectionists. Appearing in the same newspaper after all - the Washington Post - Was Abu Mazen's position on May 29. He stubbornly insisted on demands, which quite clearly imply objection to the existence of Israel. Officially of course, he naturally agrees to a two-state solution, but on condition that one of the states is a Palestinian state and that the other is Palestinian as a result of the realization of the right of return. He received an amazing offer from (former Israel Prime Minister) Olmert, which included the evacuation of 97% of the territories, but rejected it outright. Did Carter issue an announcement condemning Abu Mazen? We all know the answer.
Carter published an Israel-bashing article; one of many. Instead of acting as a critical but honest broker, Carter is becoming part of the incitement campaign against the State of Israel. He has succeeded in achieving success in other regions. For some reason, when he broaches the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he loses his sense of fairness and balance. This does not contribute to the advancement of peace. This is Carter's contribution to strengthening Palestinian rejectionism and making the chances of peace ever more distant.
Oh my. You must read this right away: Marc Garlasco - Is HRW's Anti-Israel Investigator A Nazi-Obsessed Collector?
The answer is, apparently, yes. Do read the whole thing.
Now, there's nothing wrong with German WW2 memorabilia per se, nor with sporting the handle "Flak88" on various collector forums, and he doesn't appear to have hidden it at all. It's just a hobby, right? (And more than a minor hobby...dude wrote a book.)
But was Human Rights Watch aware of this when they hired him? Did they do a moment's due diligence on themselves...say, 1/100 the "investigating" they supposedly do on so many others?
And if they did know, didn't it occur to anyone at HRW that it might cause appearance problems when this guy went and started to investigate Israeli actions? (Please don't tell me, "Well how did they know he would be investigating Israelis?" Come on, HRW has a bit of an obsession in that direction.) Add in the fact that his credentials for having the position he holds are questionable in the first place, and the resulting statements and reports he's been involved in have been repeatedly discredited...and you've got a formula for disaster.
Side note: Before you get too excited in your googling, there is no evidence that Garlasco is actually a Nazi. As Omri notes in a follow-up: No, The Stormfront.org Flak88 Guy Is Not Marc Garlasco.
This is about a guy with a serious thing for Nazi stuff issuing widely read reports on the actions of Jews defending themselves. It's about judgment, propriety, qualifications...and Human Rights Watch.
Update: Breath of the Beast comments here: Who is Watching the Human Rights Watchers? Yaacov has a nice picture of Garlasco's car...note the license plate. Heh.
IsraellyCool, here: The Day In Israel: Tues Sept 8th, 2009. He says: "Omri Ceren has posted a terrific (or should that be terrifying? ) piece...'
Carl in Jerusalem: HRW's Israel investigator a Nazi-obsessed collector? He notes: "...After the Saudis and Joe Stork, is anyone really surprised by this?..."
Elder of Ziyon (who found this connection in the first place): HRW researcher's disturbing hobby "While this may not be illegal or immoral, it does raise some disturbing questions about his Israel obsession."
CAMERA: Is HRW Investigator Garlasco An Avid Collector of Nazi Paraphernalia? "Human Rights Watch investigator Marc Garlasco accuses Rick Ayers of "Hiding in Plain Sight", but it is Garlasco who is apparently hiding in plain sight."
David Bernstein: Is Human Rights Watch's Marc Garlasco A Nazi-Obsessed Collector?, "Well, yes. But if you're going to hire pro-Palestinian activists to run your Middle East division, why not throw in an avid collector of Nazi memorabilia to be your military investigator for good measure?..."
Noah Pollak: The Latest Human Rights Watch Bombshell "The more we learn about Human Rights Watch, the more the mask slips. There is Sarah Leah Whitson, the intifada-era activist for Palestine and apologist for terrorism; Joe Stork, the radical leftist and anti-Zionist; and now Garlasco, the Nazi-memorabilia collector."
NGO Monitor: HRW "Military Analyst" Garlasco's Nazi Souvenir Fetish Reinforces Lack of Credibility
Monday, September 7, 2009
[via Shona D]
Will daven for ammo: Go ahead, make my high holiday - Mazel-tough guys gunning for terrorists
It's high noon for the high holidays.
Fearing jihadists will attack synagogues during Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, a group of badass rabbis has developed a program to turn your average shul-goer into a lean, mean fighting machine.
The group, which calls itself the International Security Coalition of Clergy, was founded by Rabbi Gary Moscowitz, who boasts a black belt in karate, teaches martial arts and was an NYPD cop for nine years.
He's teaching others basic and advanced fighting moves -- how to take down a terrorist by the neck, how to use a table as cover from gunfire and how to execute a nifty running somersault while drawing a gun -- that he says can be used by Jews if they're attacked by terrorists during prayer.
"Jews are not like Christians," Moscowitz said. "If I turn my cheek, I'm coming around to make a kick."...
[h/t: Eric D.]
Sunday, September 6, 2009
So someone brought a watermelon over for us today. It was one of those round ones like a bowling ball, yellow instead of red inside, and it has actual seeds. I haven't seen real seeds in a watermelon in years.
And it's funny, because my daughter, 9, is having a hell of a time eating the thing -- picking the seeds out with her fingers while I'm just doing surgery with my tongue and incisors and spitting when I bite too much and plowing through the slices. "Slow down daddy, I can't eat it so fast..."
So I try to explain that she should just bite small pieces and spit out the seeds, but she doesn't get it and is afraid of swallowing the seeds in spite of my assurances that this will not harm her.
And it occurs to me that she's never eaten a watermelon with seeds in it before. As long as she's been alive watermelon has been readily available sans seeds.
And I remember it wasn't so many years ago that my friends and I used to imagine a more perfect world -- a world in which watermelons did not have seeds, watermelons that could be simply chowed on with simplicity, no nibbling and spitting required. Imagine! 'Cause the seeds are always in the sweetest parts.
Yet we would scoff at this. After all, how could there possibly ever be such a thing as watermelon without seeds. Where would they get more watermelons from?
Seedless watermelon? Never happen. Can't happen. The mere thought is simply absurd. Do fewer bong hits and you'll get over it.
And yet, here's my daughter just a few years later and she's never had to deal with a watermelon that had seeds in it.
Just goes to show how time can make the impossible possible and the unthinkable routine.
More information continues to come out of Britain concerning the absolute mess that Megrahi's release has become. If it turns out that these two knew it was coming (and I have found it extremely surprising to think they didn't), it ought to be a huge scandal. They threw the Brits under the bus by feigning surprise...we can't wait for the leaks to come. The more heat the Brits take, the more they won't want to go down alone: No.10 turns on Obama and Clinton for criticising decision to release Lockerbie bomber
Downing Street has hit back at Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for attacking the decision to release the Lockerbie bomber.
President Obama and the US Secretary of State fuelled a fierce American backlash against Britain, claiming Abdelbaset Al Megrahi should have been forced to serve out his jail sentence in Scotland - but a senior Whitehall aide said their reaction was 'disingenuous'.
British officials claim Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton were kept informed at all stages of discussions concerning Megrahi's return.
The officials say the Americans spoke out because they were taken aback by the row over Megrahi's release, not because they did not know it was about to happen.
'The US was kept fully in touch about everything that was going on with regard to Britain's discussions with Libya in recent years and about Megrahi,' said the Whitehall aide.
'We would never do anything about Lockerbie without discussing it with the US. It is disingenuous of them to act as though Megrahi's return was out of the blue.
'They knew about our prisoner transfer agreement with Libya and they knew that the Scots were considering Megrahi's case.'
Mr Obama said Megrahi's release on compassionate grounds was a 'mistake' while Mrs Clinton phoned the Scottish administration to complain in person...
[Via Jeff Jacoby]
Indeed, and, as Herb Keinon points out, contrary to the warnings of Boston Consul General Nadav Tamir: Poll shows surge of support for Israel in US
In stark contrast to the cable leaked last month by Israel's consul-general in Boston saying support for Israel in the US has declined, a recent poll for The Israel Project shows support has bounced back significantly after slipping in the aftermath of US President Barack Obama's Cairo speech.
The poll, conducted by Neil Newhouse of Public Opinion Strategies and Stan Greenberg of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (GQRR), asked some 800 likely US voters the following question: "Thinking about the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in the Middle East, please tell me whether, in general, you consider yourself to be an Israel supporter, Palestinian supporter, or neither/undecided."
Some 59 percent of the respondents said they were Israel supporters, compared to 8 percent for the Palestinians. The poll was conducted by telephone from August 22 to 25.
This was a considerable jump in support for Israel since June, following the US president's speech in Cairo, when the same question was asked by the same pollsters and Israel's support was only 49 percent...
The poll goes on with more good news. Many of you will remember the flap caused by leaked letter that Tamir wrote to the Foreign Ministry warning of an erosion of American public support for Israel due to Netanyahu policies insufficiently subservient to Obama Administration desires. Many of us thought the letter was bizarre at the time and wondered, in effect, who had put him up to it. Many establishment Jewish figures were bizarrely and inappropriately supportive of Tamir personally at the time..almost like they had a stake in him and the outcome of how his advice was received.
I pointed out at the time that Tamir's remarks were indicative not necessarily of any reality outside the perceptions of the small circle of people he was speaking to - assuming the letter wasn't simply a complete put-up job.
What's interesting here is that this poll was conducted amongst Americans generally, not Jews specifically, and not Boston Jewish leaders, indicating once again that the Jewish establishment is either completely out of touch with the rank and file not only of average Jewish Americans, but also of Americans generally, or they know what the average is and don't care because they were once again demonstrating (as they did when they decided that Sarah Palin was a greater threat than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) that their number one priorities are really leftist politics, the Democrat Party and Barack Obama.
AIPAC has done an excellent job of taking average Americans, left and right, and channeling/reading their basic values, putting it through a process and coming out on the other end with support for Israel. They use our basic values and focus it on Israel support.
More and more it becomes clear that, for much of the Jewish leadership, the relationship is in exactly the opposite direction. They use (in the most negative sense of the word) the Jewish Community's support for Israel, and co-opt that into support for Democrats. That is the direction their priorities run.
[Update: Fixed first link to point to story about polling on Israel, not Iran. Thanks Fred.]
Consumers of the MSM hardly didn't know ye. Amazing isn't it? Also amazing is how he got into the White House in the first place.
The blogosphere is abuzz. Here are a few links to get you on your way:
Ed Driscoll: Van Goes Under The Bus
Michelle Malkin: The resignation (and coming MSM/left-wing martyrdom) of Van Jones
Power Line: Van Jones goes down swinging
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Just finally got around to watching Bill Whittle on the subject at PJM: Bill Maher, Barack Obama and the Truth About American Exceptionalism. On fire.
How pathetic is it that this guy can do a better job of pitching America than our own President?
I've finally gotten around to adding a fan Page at Facebook for the site. I hadn't bothered because I didn't see the point exactly before, but now I understand that there are people who primarily use Facebook for, well, everything, and having an outlet for the site in that format would be a good thing.
Feel free to "become a fan." I promise to broadcast updates only when I've got something really good.
The President will be personally chairing a Security Council meeting, and simultaneously ensuring it is even more useless than usual...all for the sake of his inflated ego and group hug diplomacy. Bring back Jimmy Carter! Anne Bayefsky: Obama's UN Gambit: King of the Universe and the Polls, He'll chair a Security Council meeting -- and pander to rogue states.
...No American president has ever attempted to acquire the image of King of the Universe by officiating at a meeting of the UN's highest body. But Obama apparently believes that being flanked by council-member heads of state like Col. Moammar Qaddafi -- who is expected to be seated five seats to Obama's right -- will cast a sufficiently blinding spell on the American taxpayer that the perilous state of the nation's economy, the health-care fiasco, and a summer of "post-racial" scapegoating will pale by comparison.
After all, who among us is not for world peace?
Unfortunately, however, the move represents one of the most dangerous diplomatic ploys this country has ever seen. The president didn't just decide to chair a rare council summit; he also set the September 24 agenda -- as is the prerogative of the state holding the gavel for the month. His choice, in the words of American UN Ambassador Susan Rice, speaking on September 2 at her first press briefing since the United States assumed the council presidency, is this: "The session will be focused on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear disarmament broadly, and not on any specific countries."
This seemingly innocuous language has two profoundly disturbing features. First, UN documents indicate that the Security Council is currently dealing with over 100 issues. While "non-proliferation" is mentioned, "disarmament" is not. Similarly, a UN Secretariat compilation "forecasting the Council's program of work" for the month of September -- based on prior activities and requests -- lists non-proliferation specifically in relation to Iran and North Korea and does not list disarmament. But in light of Obama's wishes, a tailor-made subheading will likely be adopted under the existing entry "maintenance of international peace and security." The new item will insist on simultaneous consideration of nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament and make no mention of particular states.
This is no trivial technicality. The linguistic formula, which Obama's confrere Qaddafi will undoubtedly exploit, shamelessly panders to Arab and Muslim states. It is a familiar recipe for stonewalling efforts to prevent Iran or other Muslim and Arab states from acquiring nuclear weapons until Israel is disarmed or Israel's (unofficial) nuclear capacity is exposed and neutralized. It is also a frequent tool of those whose real goal is to stymie America's defenses...
We see where this is going right? We see the roots? This falls perfectly in line with the Big Apology World Tour and Purification. We can't demand Iran to get rid of their nuclear weapons as long as we and Israel have them (because there's nothing exceptional about us), so we'll take Iran specifically off the agenda and make it a mutual thing.
But wait, there's more:
...At Ambassador Rice's news briefing, she gave "an overview of the principal important meetings" to be held in September on her watch. After finishing the list of subjects without mentioning Iran or North Korea, she added: "So those are the highlights. We also have . . . three sanctions regimes that are up for regular review, chaired by the heads of the sanctions committees. We have Sudan, Iran and North Korea, and these are, I expect, likely to be uneventful and routine considerations of these various regimes."
Even hard-boiled UN correspondents were surprised. Rice was asked to explain how the recent capture by the United Arab Emirates of containers of ammunition en route to Iran from North Korea could be construed as "uneventful and routine." Her answer highlights the administration's delinquency: "We are simply receiving . . . a regularly scheduled update . . . This is not an opportunity to review or revisit the nature of either of those regimes."
A brutalized Iranian population, yearning for democracy, has repeatedly been met by nothing but sad faces from this administration. An Iranian president installed by treachery has been legitimized by American recognition of his government, a decision that has sidelined other eminently justifiable alternatives. The leaders of this state sponsor of terrorism aim to annihilate the Jewish state and are on the verge of acquiring the means to do so. But instead of making the isolation and delegitimation of Iran the top priority for America's turn at the council presidency, the Obama administration has taken Iran off the table at precisely the time when top decision-makers will be present...
He's going to give the UN Presidential stature for the first time in history, then cement its irrelevancy, if not outright evil, with his own hand. Rogue states are laughing at us. The 24th should be quite a show.
We already had the paper trail, but Jack Straw has admitted it in an interview. Not ashamed of it, either, though he insists Gordon Brown wasn't involved (at least, says he, there ain't no proof of that):
...So the PTA [prisoner transfer agreement] discussions were running in tandem with talks on freeing Megrahi by other means? "I think it [talk of compassionate release] came later, but I can't be certain," he says.
Later in 2007, he wrote to Mr MacAskill saying that he could not exclude Megrahi from the PTA. In the letter, he cited "overwhelming interests for the UK". The unanswered question is whether those interests included trade and, in particular, the stalled BP deal that was signed off soon afterwards. For the first time he admits the link.
When I ask if trade and BP were factors, he says: "Yes, it was a very big part of that. I'm unapologetic about that. Libya was a rogue state. We wanted to bring it back into the fold and trade is an essential part of it -- and subsequently there was the BP deal."
Reports that the PTA exclusion was agreed by government colleagues including Gordon Brown, are wrong, he says. "I certainly didn't talk to the PM. There is no paper trail to suggest he was involved at all." So when did he first talk to Mr Brown? "I don't think I've ever talked to Gordon about Megrahi's release." Not even in the past week? "Oh, for sure in the past week," he says. Surely this vagueness adds to the impression that the Government is being evasive, if not duplicitous? "I think we have been very frank about it," Mr Straw says, none too convincingly...
We also find that Libya paid for medical advice that helped Lockerbie bomber's release, and there was quite a bit of effort put in to get the docs to give the "right" prognosis:
...Two of the three doctors commissioned by the Libyans provided the required three-month estimates, while the third also indicated that the prisoner had a short time to live.
This contrasted with findings of doctors in June and July who had concluded that Megrahi had up to 10 months to live, which would have prevented his release.
Professor Karol Sikora, one of the examining doctors and the medical director of CancerPartnersUK in London, told The Sunday Telegraph: "The figure of three months was suggested as being helpful [by the Libyans].
"To start with I said it was impossible to do that [give a three-month life expectancy estimate] but, when I looked at it, it looked as though it could be done - you could actually say that." He said that he and a second doctor, a Libyan, had legitimately then estimated Megrahi's life expectancy as "about three months". A third doctor would say only that he had a short time to live.
This weekend it was reported that Megrahi was moved out of an emergency care unit in Tripoli...
The Brits have practically broken their own arms patting themselves on the back for how much more enlightened they are than we simple Yanks and our eye for an eye mentality -- as though it's difficult to let a murderer out of jail for money. Yet it turns out this was never anything but a base, disgusting business and a set up from the start.
More: The Megrahi affair: the more we learn, the worse it gets
Lockerbie release: the British aid 'sweetener' to Libya
Terror chief helped secure release of Lockerbie bomber
Medical experts urged to predict bomber's early death
I'm probably the last reader of Sol's site to see Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds, so the last thing the world needs is one more review and political commentary on the film. But since when has a cow that has long-since left the barn ever stopped a blogger?
Like many, I've been a fan of Tarantino for some time, not just because of his hipster rep, but also because I share his film vocabulary having spent much of the '80s and '90s ferreting around video stores in ethic neighborhoods for Hong Kong action flix, Filipino Batman musicals and other treasures, back in the day when cult film sections of mainstream video stores consisted of two copies of Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.
Tarantino's gift for dialog is usually the first thing reviewers remark on, but I've always appreciated his patience as a film maker. In an age when Hollywood pictures ban any scene lasting for more than twenty seconds, Tarantino's scenes can stretch out 15-20 minutes and consist of nothing more than characters interacting with one another in complex ways (admittedly, with many such scenes ending in some spectacular bout of violence). This aspect of Tarantino's skill became apparent in Kill Bill, a four hour extravaganza which contains fewer individual scenes than ten minutes of Michael Bay picture. It's even more on display with the Basterds.
The director dispenses with time-travel tricks in his latest picture, eschewing back-and-forth chronologies for a linear storyline that switches between the Basterds (a group of Jewish operatives working behind enemy lines in World War II to terrorize the Nazis) and Shosanna Dreyfus, a Jewish girl who has escaped after the massacre of her family by Col. Hans Landa, the Nazi "Jew Hunter" (played brilliantly by Christoph Waltz). Now living in Paris under an assumed identity, Shosanna runs a cinema where the upcoming premiere of Josef Goebbel's latest film will be attended by the top Nazi brass (including Hitler himself), setting the stage for separate Dirty Dozen-style mass assassination plots by both Shosanna and the Basterds.
Another Tarantino strength is his willingness to kill off characters mid-picture, including characters you've been convinced are central to the plot. This unpredictability leaves you wondering whether the joint schemes to kill off the Nazi leadership will succeed, clash or cancel each other out. Suffice to say that this audience member was left guessing until the second to last scene.
As with his other pictures, Tarantino uses this film to show off his film knowledge, in this case with endless references to pre-war German and French cinema. The potential pretentiousness of the film-maker's indulgence is blunted, however, by the fact that Basterds has much more to do with 1940's American WWII shlock actioners than with the work of Leni Riefenstahl. (My personal favorite film in this category - whose name I've forgotten - features a group of Chicago gangsters sent behind enemy lines where they manage to use tommyguns and getaway cars to kidnap Hitler, tricking the SS into shooting their fuehrer by shaving off Hitler's moustache: "But I AM the fuehrer!" "Shut up you swine! " Pow!).
Sorry, where were we? Oh yes, onto politics!
There's been some controversy over a picture that features Jews taking glee in their brutal behavior towards their victims. But since those victims are all uniformed Nazis (not German civilians), this complaint only makes sense to me if you're willing to make a moral distinction between plain old Army Nazis and Gestapo Nazis (a la Hogan's Heroes). And the aforementioned Dirty Dozen pointed out years ago that decadent Nazis and their entourages at play (at a dinner party or film opening) are fair game.
At least one conservative critic is suspicious of the amount of German financial backing for the film, highlighting that both Shosanna and the Basterds play into a "vengeful Jew" mythos permeating German society. I won't pretend to understand German culture enough to say whether this trope is as widespread as the critic thinks, but I will point out that the first Jewish image in the film (consisting of a family of Jews hiding under the floorboards of a French house in justifiable fear for their lives) has been played out endlessly for film audiences over the last six decades, something that doesn't seem to have blunted European appetite for anti-Jewish fear and paranoia. If once every two generations a film features a Jew emptying a machine gun clip into Adolph Hitler's face, I can't say I see the harm in that.
Especially since we're talking here about an exploitation film, the type of movie which invites you to enter a cinema, throw your arms out to the screen and yell out "Pander to me!" After all, African American audiences got to spend a decade enjoying Black Belt Jones and other action heroes delivering roundhouse kicks to the head of bigoted Southern sheriffs. Is it too much to ask for Jews to be gifted a similar jolt in the movies once in the 64 years since the Holocaust?
I'll admit that many audiences, Jew and Gentile, don't quite know what to make of depictions of Jewish strength, power and heroism, especially when such strength involves use of a gun or a knife. Which is one more thing I appreciate Quentin Tarantino for challenging us with, even if he did so merely with the intention of delivering some explosive fun.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Via Jeff Jacoby, here's an excellent symposium on the subject at Commentary, with six commentators (Jacoby, David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol, and David Gelernter) reviewing Norman Podhoretz's upcoming new book, Why Are Jews Liberals? and taking their own shots at the question in turn. All are worth reading, with Jacoby, Wolpe, Sarna and Medved as standouts. I give Medved the prize for taking Occam's Razor and stabbing it straight into the heart of the matter:
For most American Jews, the core of their Jewish identity isn't solidarity with Israel; it's rejection of Christianity. This observation may help to explain the otherwise puzzling political preferences of the Jewish community explored in Norman Podhoretz's book. Jewish voters don't embrace candidates based on their support for the state of Israel as much as they passionately oppose candidates based on their identification with Christianity--especially the fervent evangelicalism of the dreaded "Christian Right."
This political pattern reflects the fact that opposition to Christianity--not love for Judaism, Jews, or Israel--remains the sole unifying element in an increasingly fractious and secularized community...
Ooooh...BINGO. Being against something is far more effective in bringing people together than being for something. Sarna correctly points out that most American Jews are Reform, and most Reform aren't very Jewish at all. They do know one thing, though -- they ain't Christian. A few more Jews who demand respect for Judaism should be ready to take the beam out of their own.
Neat stuff: 'Massive' ancient wall uncovered in Jerusalem
JERUSALEM (CNN) -- An archaeological dig in Jerusalem has turned up a 3,700-year-old wall that is the largest and oldest of its kind found in the region, experts say.
Standing 8 meters (26 feet) high, the wall of huge cut stones is a marvel to archaeologists...
...It was found inside the City of David, an archaeological excavation site outside the Old City of East Jerusalem on a slope of the Silwan Valley.
The wall is believed to have been built by the Canaanites, an ancient pagan people who the Bible says inhabited Jerusalem and other parts of the Middle East before the advent of monotheism...
Rick Moran has a nitty-gritty response to Pat Buchanan's latest bout of WW2 revisionism today at PJM: Pat Buchanan: Knave and Fool - Why is the conservative iconoclast defending Adolf Hitler?
Via Jeff Jacoby on Twitter comes this blast from the past, a 1991 piece in Commentary by Joshua Muravchik: Patrick J. Buchanan and the Jews. As fresh today as when Muravchik wrote it. In fact, at the time, Muravchik takes note of some simple 'hints' of a propensity toward revisionism in Buchanan's writing and speaking. Time has displayed those tendencies fully and openly. I think in retrospect it's pretty clear that William F. Buckley was too kind to Pat way back when. I wonder what he'd have to say now?
Among the many interesting moments in Muravchik's piece is a reminder that Buchanan has blamed Britain for the First World War as well as the Second, and on fairly similar terms.
Update: Via WWIIToday, here's Swedish metal band Sabaton commemorating the Battle of Wizna (9/7 - 9/10/39) in Poland:
Moonbats strike in force in Toronto: Artists protest Tel Aviv focus at Toronto film fest
The Toronto International Film Festival is under attack for its decision to present a series of films spotlighting the Israeli city of Tel Aviv, which a group of high-profile artists and celebrities say constitutes complicity in "the Israeli propaganda machine".
At issue is the festival's new City to City program, which will present 10 films focused on Tel Aviv.
The 34th edition of the festival will begin next Thursday.
Canadian filmmaker John Greyson last week pulled his documentary "Covered" from the festival in protest, and a statement published online on Thursday and signed by more than 50 artists, academics, and filmmakers likened the program to a celebration of apartheid-era South Africa.
"This program ignores the suffering of thousands of former residents and descendants of the (Tel Aviv) area who currently live in refugee camps in the Occupied Territories or who have been dispersed to other countries," say the signatories, which include actors Jane Fonda and Danny Glover, author Naomi Klein, and filmmaker Ken Loach.
They accuse the festival of taking direction from the "Brand Israel" campaign, which seeks to improve the country's image and has focused on Toronto as a test city...
Note that this is Tel Aviv we're talking about here. Not Ariel, or a Gush Katif retrospective, or even Jerusalem...Tel Aviv. (Oh, and note to Israeli hasbaraniks: stop announcing your stupid rebranding and PR efforts in the press. It sort of, you know, devalues them right from the start.)
Here's the "declaration" they all signed: The Toronto Declaration: No Celebration of Occupation (a snip):
...Furthermore, what this description does not say is that Tel Aviv is built on destroyed Palestinian villages, and that the city of Jaffa, Palestine's main cultural hub until 1948, was annexed to Tel Aviv after the mass exiling of the Palestinian population. This program ignores the suffering of thousands of former residents and descendants of the Tel Aviv/Jaffa area who currently live in refugee camps in the Occupied Territories or who have been dispersed to other countries, including Canada. Looking at modern, sophisticated Tel Aviv without also considering the city's past and the realities of Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza strip, would be like rhapsodizing about the beauty and elegant lifestyles in white-only Cape Town or Johannesburg during apartheid without acknowledging the corresponding black townships of Khayelitsha and Soweto...
This is, of course, absurd on several fronts. (In reverse order...) It's hardly any Israeli's fault, now or in the past, that they have chosen to build and succeed while Arabs have chosen eternal warfare instead. I don't think we need to dwell on that. This is the leftist mantra of 'success guilt' and there's no excuse for it. In any case, the film lineup does include films by Palestiinian Arab filmmakers. Jaffa is also well known as one of those locations where the Arabs weren't expelled, many left in fear and anticipation and under advice from the Arab Higher Committee. The fighting broke out when Tel Aviv was shelled from Jaffa and Jewish forces seized the city in return.
Finally, Tel Aviv was never built on the ruins of any Palestinian Arab villages. This possible refers to the mythical land of Tel Rabia which seems to have been a Hamas creation, or at least Hamas has been the one doing the most effective publicizing of the erstwhile Arab Atlantis. We first heard about it here out of the mouth of the grandfather of the now deceased Jew-hating mouse Farfour (Farfur): The Dead Mouse Speaks. Then it was Jew-eating giant Hamas rabbit Assud: First They Came for Farfur... Meet Hamas's Jew-Eating Rabbit (Update: Singing About the 'Zionist Filth'), and finally in a Hamas kids' puppet show: More Hamas Puppet Theater: Getting the Kids Ready to Expel Their Neighbors.
Which goes to show that the Tel Rabia myth is something ginned-up to get children to despise their neighbors and not complain when they're sent off to kill themselves in the name of reclaiming something they never had and didn't build. Good show to the artistes now lending their names to it. I suppose everyone sees what they want to. The Arabs see an excuse not to compromise, but I wonder what the film professionals see in their minds' eyes? Perhaps they figure Tel Rabia was some carbon-neutral wonderland, where actors and producers ruled as philosopher Kings over a multi-cultural polity that lived together in peace (except the Jews who very reasonably had to tend their neighbor's lawns for the privilege).
Most of the recognizable signatories (50 "prominent signatories" is more than a bit of an exageration) are flatly anti-Western idiot leftists, like Danny Glover, Jane Fonda, Eve Ensler, John Pilger, Alice Walker, Howard Zinn and Naomi Klein (who is reported as a signatory but whose name doesn't appear on the web list). Wallace Shawn say it ain't so. I'll never be able to watch The Princess Bride the same way again.
Ken Loach is the same guy who got the Edinburgh Film Festival to make fools of themselves, and now he's had a hand in doing the same thing in Toronto as the co-director of the festival has called Tel Aviv 'contested ground.' Tel Aviv isn't contested ground to anyone but those who want the Jewish State dismantled altogether.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
(Neptune is the page background if you didn't notice.)
Well, this is positive. Seems CAIR wasn't invited to the White House Iftar dinner the other night, but Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren and "a group of Jewish rabbis" were, bwahahaha. (They must have been some of those Rabbis who have agreed to hock Obamacare from the pulpit.) This is rich: White House Iftar, Muslim Leaders Absent:
...while the words of praise flowed, absence of Muslim community leaders was sorely noted during the event.
Leaders from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation's largest grassroots American Muslim civil rights and advocacy group, did not attend the Ramadan iftar for not receiving invitations. [Love that "for not receiving invitations" bit. -MS]
CAIR is not alone Other Muslim organizations were also not invited to the White House iftar.
Surprising, while Muslim leaders were absent, Israel's ambassador in Washington and a group of Jewish rabbis were among the guests.
Muslim leaders warned that not inviting them signals a continuation of the policies of former president George W. Bush, who used to shun many Muslim groups...
Lovely administration we have. Tough on friends, friendly to enemies, appeasing the strong, bullying the weak: U.S. cuts off aid to Honduras
The announcement comes on the day that ousted President Zelaya is at the State Department to meet with Hillary Clinton.
The statement below from spokesman Ian Kelly says the the restoration of aid to Honduras will depend on Honduras returning to "democratic, constitutional governance."...
Isn't that exactly what they were protecting by getting rid of Zelaya in the first place?
Today Britain declared war on Germany. Here's an original BBC broadcast which includes Neville Chamberlin's utterly chagrined declaration.
Spanish paper El Mundo remembers the day by including an interview with David Irving: Spanish paper: Irving 'expert' on WWII
First the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet cited freedom of the press as its justification for accusing IDF soldiers of harvesting Palestinian organs. Now the Spanish daily El Mundo is using the same argument to defend including Holocaust denier David Irving among its list of experts to be interviewed this week to mark 70 years since the start of World War II.
An interview with Irving, who served time in an Austrian prison for his Holocaust denial, is scheduled to appear in the paper on Saturday, a day after an interview with Yad Vashem's chairman Avner Shalev.
When Israeli Ambassador to Spain Raphael Schutz learned of the plans, he wrote a letter to the newspaper, saying it was obscene to include Irving in the list of experts and give him an esteemed platform. Such exposure, Schutz argued, lent Irving credibility.
Schutz's letter appeared in the paper on Wednesday.
Schutz wrote that one of the problems facing the post-modern age was an inability to recognize anything as true, saying instead that there were only "different narratives."
As such, Schutz wrote, there was no capacity to differentiate between truth and lies, between the important and the superfluous. And in this world void of truth, everything is at the same level - the murderer and the victim, the wise and the ignorant, Mozart's opera and the latest pop song.
Even freedom of the press, Schutz wrote, had limits. One sentence that was edited out of his letter was his charge that the paper was printing the interview to cause a sensation.
The paper's response, which was run under the letter, was not to endorse Irving's ideas, but rather to cite press freedom and the right for everyone to decide on their own...
Irving isn't just an anti-Semite, he's a serial prevaricator. That's double the reason he shouldn't be put forward as an expert on anything. El Mundo's silly excuse of letting the people decide on their own is absurd. The average person would have no ability whatsoever to weigh the conclusions of people put forward as experts. Even relatively well-informed individuals would be hard put to sort through an Irving's clever lies. Is El Mundo really so divorced from the idea of their own responsibility not to understand this? They are not alone as this is a common characteristic of the modern press with its J-School grads who are themselves expert at nothing but the craft of journalism.
[via: CAMERA]
This, by Dershowitz, is quite good start to finish. With UN complicity, Hamas is doing its level best to build another backward totalitarian state:
The so-called "spiritual" leader of Hamas has ordered that Palestinian children are not to be taught about the Holocaust.
Younis al-Astal - who is about as spiritual as Al Capone - has declared that the United Nations' proposal to include Holocaust education in a course on human rights would constitute a "war crime."
It would be "marketing a lie and spreading it," he said. Instead, he would have Palestinian children learn only about the so-called crimes of the Israeli occupation and the self-inflicted wound that Palestinians call the "nakba."
I am not so sure I would trust the United Nations, and especially its Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to teach anything relating to Jews, Israel or the Holocaust. That agency has been part of the problem, not the solution, by perpetuating the refugee status of Palestinians who could have been integrated into the Palestinian mainstream over the past sixty years."...
Cross posted from Divest This!
I'm occasionally asked about divestment activities that take place in Europe, such as the Norwegian government's recent decision to divest a state pension fund from a specific Israeli company. I must admit that the focus of my work has been primary North America (with an occasional foray into Great Britain), although I have noted in a piece on another subject that people often dress up decisions European firms make to take advantage of the large Arab market vs. the smaller Israeli one as some form of moral political choice. And politically, Muslim (and increasingly Islamist) politics is playing as big or bigger a role on the continent than Jewish politics plays in the US, especially now that Europeans have chosen to stop reproducing, creating demographic trends that should concern us all.
But that's not the point of today's posting. For every time some institution announces something that can be construed as a divestment success, we are once again told that divestment has the "Big Mo," that the BDS crowd has the wind at its back, and we must all hail this latest victory (even if it's a hoax, like Hampshire) as the wave of the future.
But there is a corollary to such an approach that almost never gets asked. In the last month alone, two of the remaining Protestant denominations (the UCC in Canada and the Lutherans in the US) have joined their colleagues in the Presbyterian and Methodist churches to give divestment the heave ho. If a Norwegian pension fund choosing to divest a few kroner from one Israeli firm is to be considered a victory for the other side, shouldn't the rejection of divestment by virtually the entire Mainline Protestant community be considered a massive triumph for our's?
It's sometimes too easy to let the BDS-ers set the terms of victory since, after all, they are seeking victory, whereas the ultimate goal for most of us is not winning but reconciliation and peace. But given that the divest-niks have chosen the battlefield, I think it's only fair that the rules they have created apply to both sides. And given the unending string of defeats divestment has faced in schools, unions, municipalities and now churches (to a point where they have to rely on obscure artists choosing to not attend little-known arts festivals alongside Israelis as their latest "win"), doesn't that say something about these institutions' positive attitudes towards Israel (or at least their negative attitudes towards seeing it punished economically, just because the BDS crowd says it must).
If that's the case, then every college, union, city, town and church in the country has voted YES on Israel, even if the other side has a Norwegian pension fund on its side (for now). Call me crazy, but I'll take that as a win any day.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
I was reminded by something I read recently of the old point that there's nothing in Zionism that precludes the acceptance of a Palestinian Arab state. The trouble is, Palestinian Nationalism does preclude the existence of a Jewish one. Evidence is this repeated indoctrination of the kids to consider cities definitively inside of what everyone (except they) considers part of Israel, as a part of something called "Palestine."
Palestinian Media Watch: Palestinian TV children's quizzes teach that there is no Israel:
Palestinian children are taught through formal and informal education to see a world in which "Palestine" exists and replaces all of Israel. Two children's quizzes broadcast last week on Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority television show how the PA routinely teaches its children to identify all Israeli cities as Palestinian cities.
In the two quizzes on PA TV, children were asked to identify "Palestinian" cities. The suggested answers were exclusively Israeli cities: Haifa, Jaffa, Acre and Tiberias.
The following are the transcripts of the PA TV quizzes:
Quiz 1: Haifa, Jaffa and Acre are "Palestine"
Host reads clue: "Where is Palestine's most important port, in Haifa, Jaffa or Acre?"
Child: "Jaffa."
Host: "Is it correct?" [Checks computer.]
Host: "Bravo!"
[PATV (Fatah), Aug. 26, 2009]
This may be particularly disturbing to Israelis who actually live in Haifa, Jaffa, etc...
More, including examples from textbooks, at
the link.
Ass: Pol nabbed on New Hampshire booze run
A Westport lawmaker who voted to hike the state sales and alcohol taxes was spotted brazenly piling booze in his car - adorned with his State House license plate - in the parking lot of a tax-free New Hampshire liquor store, the Herald has learned.
Michael J. Rodrigues' blue Ford Crown Victoria, emblazoned with his "House 29" Massachusetts license plate, was parked outside a Granite State liquor store on Interstate-95 South over the weekend, according to a witness who provided pictures to the Herald.
The witness, who requested anonymity, claimed he approached Rodrigues, noted his State House plate, and asked if he was on personal or official business. Rodrigues, who was loading booze into his car, snapped "mind your own business," the witness said...
...A member of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, Rodrigues did not return several phone calls yesterday. But in an online interview with The Standard-Times in New Bedford, he acknowledged buying the booze during a bathroom stop while he and his wife were on a weekend getaway in New Hampshire.
He also blamed the brouhaha on "Republican demagoguery."
"Unfortunately, I think that's why the Republican Party is in such bad shape in Massachusetts," Rodrigues is quoted as saying. "The electorate here is smart enough to figure out what they're up to."
The Westport Democrat, whose family owns a rug business, was among the lawmakers who voted in an unpopular 25 percent sales tax hike for Bay Staters. The increase pushed the sales tax to 6.25 percent and slapped that same levy on booze - the first time alcohol has been subject to retail sales tax...
Oh yeah, "I blame the Republicans." This guy is smooth. But revenge by digital camera is sweet and Rep. Rodgrigues is a hypocrite. [h/t: Pundit Review]
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
[The following, by Charles Jacobs, appears in this week's Jewish Advocate]
Osama Bin Laden wants Spain back. So do I. For him, the re-capture of what Muslims call "al Andaluz" is a religious requirement: Islam, according to the uber-terrorist, owns forever any turf it once ruled.
In my case, regaining the Spain I knew is not quite so monumental, but still....
About 40 years ago I spent a year at the University of Madrid. The whole year cost me about $1,000, money I'd earned working the previous summer -- at $2.89 an hour. I rented a lovely apartment, ate well, attended bull fights, concerts, the Prado, visited Paris, and trekked across most of the Iberian Peninsula. In the Sixties, three months of American minimum wages bought 10 months of middle class life in Spain. Alas, no more. There's been a Reconquista of sorts: a powerful Euro devours the once almighty dollar; there's been a near "expulsion" of American visitors.
This summer, my wife and I toured a hefty piece of Iberia, forking over $5.00 for each café con leche. (A great, secret hotel deal helped enormously. Don't ask.) The very few Americanos we saw were quite
noticeable: they were, almost to a man, women and child, overweight. The "Ugly American" you recall from the 70's classic -- an obstreperous boor, acting superior and foolish in foreign nations -- was emblematic of an energized if uncultured empire. Today, the "Overweight American" tip-toes obsequiously among slim, better looking, and seemingly wealthier Europeans.
Spain is a series of delights: spotlessly clean streets, deliciously architected buildings, happy, seemingly unstressed people, living so very well. The siesta works! In many places, businesses close for hours at mid day. People eat or sleep or wander and come back to finish up at 7 or 8, then graze and drink at tapas bars, and finally eat in groups of friends or families til midnight. It's like having two days in one.
But alas, it's a passing dream, for the Europeans have a problem bigger even than being fat. They no longer have children. In the 60's, Spaniards had large families and were seriously Catholic: Walk down the street snuggled next to a girl and a black-cloaked priest would publicly reprimand you. The Spanish were ethnically proud. Getting Spanish citizenship was a rare prize given only to a few Hollywood stars.
That Spain is no longer with us. Today, hardly any young people go to church. Many don't plan to marry. Spanish girls saunter in a serious state of under-dress. Meanwhile, the birthrate in Spain, like much of Europe, has fallen below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman. Modernism has trounced traditionalism. Euros are neo-pagans, living for the moment. And then there is the unassimilating Islamic immigration. No secular, skimpy-clad, childlessness here, Senores. Do the math.
In over thirty conversations (I'm fluent), every Spaniard acknowledged these facts. And all agreed this looming disaster was not part of public discourse: "We're afraid of 'being racist.' So they'll eat, drink and be merry, and sleep to their own demise. Visit now.
Whoa: Ahmadinejad's Imam: Islam Allows Raping, Torturing Prisoners
...In the wake of a series of publications worldwide regarding the rape and torture of dissident prisoners in Iran's jails, supporters of Ahmadinejad gathered with him in Jamkaran, a popular pilgrimage site for Shi'ite Muslims on the outskirts of Qom, on August 11, 2009. According to Iranian pro-democracy sources, the gathered crowd heard from Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi and Ahmadinejad himself regarding the issue.
According to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC), an independent Israeli intelligence analysis organization, Mesbah-Yazdi is considered Ahmadinejad's personal spiritual guide. A radical totalitarian even in Iranian terms, he holds messianic views, supports increasing Islamization, calls for violent suppression of domestic political opponents, and, according to the ITIC, "declared that obeying a president supported by the Supreme Leader was tantamount to obeying God."...
Q&A with the Imam:
..."Can an interrogator rape the prisoner in order to obtain a confession?" was the follow-up question posed to the Islamic cleric.
Mesbah-Yazdi answered: "The necessary precaution is for the interrogator to perform a ritual washing first and say prayers while raping the prisoner. If the prisoner is female, it is permissible to rape through the vagina or anus. It is better not to have a witness present. If it is a male prisoner, then it's acceptable for someone else to watch while the rape is committed."
This reply, and reports of the rape of teen male prisoners in Iranian jails, may have prompted the following question: "Is the rape of men and young boys considered sodomy?"
Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi: "No, because it is not consensual. Of course, if the prisoner is aroused and enjoys the rape, then caution must be taken not to repeat the rape."
A related issue, in the eyes of the questioners, was the rape of virgin female prisoners. In this instance, Mesbah-Yazdi went beyond the permissibility issue and described the Allah-sanctioned rewards accorded the rapist-in-the-name-of-Islam:
"If the judgment for the [female] prisoner is execution, then rape before execution brings the interrogator a spiritual reward equivalent to making the mandated Haj pilgrimage [to Mecca], but if there is no execution decreed, then the reward would be equivalent to making a pilgrimage to [the Shi'ite holy city of] Karbala."...
This guy's a real party. Axis of evil indeed.
Have the fine employees of the Israeli Foreign Ministry gotten the message that self-abasement is an ineffective diplomatic tool? Apparently not.
The Israeli Consulate of to New England is listed as a sponsor of a showing of the film Z32 by Avi Mograbi at the Harvard Film Archive:
Z32 is built around a confession-- a young man's account of his participation in the revenge killing of two Palestinian police officers by the Israeli army in the occupied territories...
A rather obscure film that I doubt many people have seen, I think we can get a taste for what the Israeli Government itself is sponsoring from a couple of the IMDB.com reviews:
A documentary about terrorists, where the criminals themselves confess their sins on camera, with their faces blurred so that no one can recognize them. As an idea, it's actually pretty interesting...
The director, Avi Mograbi, structures the film like this: on one level we have the Israeli terrorist who, encouraged by his girlfriend, tapes a confession where he expresses his regret for killing two Palestinian police officers during a reprisal operation. The girlfriend testifies on camera too, on the condition that her face be unrecognizable. On the other level, we have a series of Lynchian musical interludes, staged by Mograbi himself, which have no connection whatsoever to what's being told and seem to have been inserted simply to extend the running time. There are also additional scenes where the terrorist visits the crime scene with a friend, providing further insight.
Artistically speaking, the director might even have had an interesting point to make with this new, unprecedented approach to the subject of terrorism...
And...
Mr. Mograbi delivers another complex journey into the deep psyche of the Israeli murder machine. The filmmaker always thinks his projects all the way through and Z32 also lacks any ideological gaps. Z32 is the file number of one soldier's testimony of his unit's revenge mission where he ambushed and killed unarmed Palestinians. He agrees to do the film, but only if his face is not shown.
If the challenge of making a film based on an interview with one person without showing his face isn't enough, Mograbi decides that it should be a musical as well. The filmmaker sings in his living room throughout the piece, songs he wrote himself while making the film. Catchy lyrics include, "Put a mask on him so we don't have to see what evil looks like," "Am I harboring a murderer because it makes a good film," and "My wife said, 'Don't film him in our living room.'" The filmmaker once again dives into the village to show us the universal and isn't afraid of the absurdity intrinsic in the horror.
Mr. Mograbi and I had a brief but meaningful conversation after the film about Truth and Reconciliation Trials. In his words, "We have to say what we've done to each other."
Great. So the Israeli Government is sponsoring an "Israelis as terrorists" film, whose director feels he's doing a reconciliation job while the other side is still at war (barring someone who seen this thing stepping forward to say that the reviews and description are way off). Have the Hasbara genius diplomats of Israel's foreign service figured out that these kinds of confessional self-abasement sessions have bought them absolutely nothing, and not for lack of trying. Far from getting credit, the haters will take it and say, "Yes, you are evil, glad you finally noticed, thanks for confirming what we've been saying all along" and the people in the middle who don't know much will say, "Wow, the Israelis are really pretty bad themselves. The media HAS been lying to us." It's a double loss.
Making Israel's case is difficult, I know, but how about not doing the other side's work for them? Isn't that rule #1?
The fact that Israelis make such films, and that Harvard would show them, is the sort of dog bites man story that wouldn't even be worth a blog posting. But the fact that the Israeli Consulate would sponsor it makes it outrageous. Paging Consul Nadav Tamir...You're supposed to be a sharp guy, so what's going on in your house?
[h/t: Seva]
Here's a CBS News report of Hitler's speech from 70 years ago:
Here's an interesting collection of propaganda posters (as well as a bunch of other photo collections worth looking at), courtesy of Life Magazine: WWII: Intense Propaganda Posters. Some you will have seen, some perhaps you haven't. [via someone on Twitter.]
You know, when people used to joke about Pat Buchanan's speeches that they "sounded better in the original German," I used to think that was just some anti-conservative bias ('all conservatives are really Nazis'), but Buchanan, with his bizarro-world efforts to rehabilitate Adolf Hitler's reputation, is proving them right. Here: Did Hitler Want War? Buchanan's answer is, of course, no. After all, if only the world had acceded to his eminently reasonable demands, war (at least with Germany), could have been avoided. Are there people now getting their knowledge of history by reading Buchanan? Sadly, yes. [Update: Real Clear Politics has apparently yanked Buchanan's article (come on, RCP, tell us why!), but it is still up at Town Hall.]
Update: Via,The journalist who got the scoop: She was on her first Telegraph assignment and only 26 when she spotted German tanks invading Poland. Now 97, Clare Hollingworth talks to Malcolm Moore.
Seventy years ago, a sleek limousine crossed the border of Poland and Germany and sped along the autobahn between Beuthen and Gleiwitz. Inside was a 26-year-old reporter on her first assignment for The Daily Telegraph, who was about to break the scoop of the century.
Once past Gleiwitz, the road began to climb a hill. Clare Hollingworth, now nearly 98 years old, suddenly caught sight of 65 German motorcycle dispatch riders, who overtook her car and sped away with a roar. As she looked to the side, a gust of wind lifted up the hessian sheets that had been strung alongside the road.
That was when she spied hundreds of tanks, armoured cars and field artillery - von Rundstedt's 10th Army and its Panzer Corps - massed in the valley below, waiting to roll into Poland and begin the Second World War...
In an update to yesterday's story about Italy publicizing discussions to smooth over the Aftonbladet Blood Libel flap by coming out with yet another general EU condemnation of anti-Semitism, Swedish site The Local reports that Carl Bildt denies there has been any such discussion:
...in a further twist to this diplomatic crisis that swings from the bad to the farcical, Bildt - in Kabul for talks with international representatives and Afghan officials - has flatly denied that he and Frattini even discussed Sweden's standoff with Israel, according to the Swedish news agency TT.
Through the foreign ministry's head of communications, Cecilia Julin, Bildt denied that he and Frattini had discussed the disagreement between Sweden and Israel over the Aftonbladet article, or that they had discussed a possible resolution by the Council of Ministers.
"From the Swedish side we have no plans to handle this question through the informal foreign ministers' meeting in Stockholm," said Julin. She also conveyed that Bildt had suggested that the proposal must have arisen through an "Italian misunderstanding."...
It was going to be too little, too late anyway.
Honest Reporting has a good roundup on the subject (that stops just short of this latest): Swedish Blood Libel: The Aftermath, A roundup of commentary on Aftonbladet's organ harvesting outrage.
Also see Yossi Klein Halevi: Incitement to Murder, How Israel should fight the Swedish blood libel, who sees an opportunity.
Update: Also related: Helsinki Commission chiefs: Denounce Swedish article
The leaders of the U.S. Helsinki Commission urged European foreign ministers to unequivocally denounce an anti-Semitic article in a Swedish newspaper.
Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.), chairman of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, and co-chair Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) on Monday called on European leaders to condemn an article in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet that accused Israeli soldiers of harvesting the organs of Palestinian prisoners...
Update: Friction in Sweden. From Haaretz:
Now that Jerusalem has calmed down from the hysteria surrounding the organ theft article that appeared in the newspaper Aftonbladet, the Swedes have shifted from attacking Israel to self-criticism.
Swedish Chancellor of Justice Goran Lambertz published an article stating that that while criticizing the article's publication does contravene the law, the government may still criticize its contents.
The government can go further in criticizing the article without violating the Constitution, said Lambertz.
For example, one of the ministers could have said: "We have no reason to believe these allegations."
Lambertz said the decision not to react to the report stemmed from political considerations, not legal constraints.
Thorbjorn Larsson, editor in chief of Dagens Nyheter, Sweden's most respected newspaper, has said the crisis may have been inevitable, but that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt should have expressed a clearer position from its offset.
Larsson also believes ministers may react to articles clearly, without infringing on the right to free speech.
The editor also noted that Swedish prime minister Olof Palme, who was assassinated in 1968, did not hesitate to express his opinion about a controversial report accusing his justice minister of tax violations.
Meanwhile, back in Jerusalem, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman gave a ministry delegation permission to visit Sweden.
As a reminder, here is a link to Carl Bildt's blog, where you might leave a comment reminding him that the issue is not going away.
Awesome indeed: