Wednesday, October 21, 2009
In the entire text? In fact, it goes out of its way to exculpate Hamas, and make any of its accusations generic. Elder of Ziyon has gone through it in detail: Goldstone Report does not condemn Hamas once. Not only does it not do so, but Goldstone himself has been running about lying about the fact. Hamas's Moussa Abu Marzouq is quite happy about this fact.
Jonathan Dohoah Halevy makes the same point at YNet: No wonder Hamas isn't scared - Despite his claims, Goldstone didn't hold Hamas accountable for terror
...Why aren't Hamas leaders worried by the report? The reason can be found in a speech Ismail Haniyeh made on October 14, 2009 to Palestinians wounded during the war. He said, "We bless the committee, we gave it everything it needed to investigate, as well as documents which helped publish it in its present form. Occasional comments here and there about the resistance (sic) and the right of the Palestinian people to defend itself do not mean that we do not support the Report."
In effect, he dismissed out of hand everything the report said about terrorist attacks and firing rockets into Israel, considering it lip service paid by the Committee and without practical importance for Hamas.
Reading the Goldstone Report shows that Ismail Haniyeh's interpretation was correct. The Hamas de-facto administration and its leaders are never accused of responsibility for terrorism and firing rockets. Rather, nebulous "Palestinian armed groups" are responsible. The theme is repeated in the report's few references to Palestinian terrorism. For example, Paragraph 1747, page 541, reads "In relation to the firing of rockets and mortars into Southern Israel by Palestinian armed groups operating in the Gaza Strip, the Mission finds that the Palestinian armed groups fail to distinguish between military targets and the civilian population and civilian objects in Southern Israel. The launching of rockets and mortars which cannot be aimed with sufficient precisions at military targets breaches the fundamental principle of distinction. Where there is no intended military target and the rockets and mortars are launched into civilian areas, they constitute a deliberate attack against the civilian population. These actions would constitute war crimes and may amount to crimes against humanity."...
Finally, this is a must-read from R. W. Johnson that goes back and shows that Goldstone has made a career of being a political-opportunist slime-ball since back in the South African apartheid (the real apartheid) days: Who Is Richard Goldstone?
Also related: Goldstone Backtracks to BBC