Amazon.com Widgets

March 2010 Archives

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

What could one sentence spoken by a high-ranking U.S. official prompt a brilliant pro-Western Arab intellectual to go ballistic and say the following:

"How could America be governed and represented by such blazing idiocy? How is that possible? It's a parallel universe, I'm convinced. The biggest threat, I maintain, to global security is not terrorism. It's stupidity."

Well, this one. At his confirmation hearing, Robert Ford, ambassador-designate to Syria said:

"I do not see how instability in the region serves Syrian interests."

So here is Syria, a radical, anti-American regime allied with Iran, a major sponsor of terrorism, and Ford says that this government has no interest in stirring up instability and cannot receive any benefit from doing so? Of course, Ford rightfully does not want to criticize Syria before arriving there as U.S. ambassador. OK, understood.

But does he have to indicate such an appalling view in advance? Doesn't this throw away all U.S. leverage over Syria in advance? I can tell you that this is precisely the way Syrian leaders are portraying American policy nowadays. Of course, Ford is saying this because it reflects the thinking of this administration and the president.

Continue reading "High-Ranking U.S. Official: Enemies? Islamists? Revolutionaries? We Don't See Anyone Like That"

At NRO, Michael Rubin notes: Lockerbie and a Cure for Cancer

Abdelbeset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi -- convicted in Scotland for his role in the Lockerbie bombing, which killed 270 people, but released last August on humanitarian grounds because terminal prostate cancer left him only three months to live -- appears to be alive and well in Libya.

The local Scottish council is now abiding by Megrahi's refusal to release his medical records. I guess the logic is, "Terrorism is forgivable and justice is expendable, but how could we ever violate the privacy of a mass murderer?"...[More.]

For some reason, every time I read about this guy I'm reminded of that catchy end-title music from Portal, "Still Alive" (at risk of ruining the song by association):

Via Power Line, Evan Coyne Maloney has released a retrospective video: A Trip Down Memory Lane

Not too long ago, taking to the streets to protest your government was considered a patriotic act.

It's true!

But it seems that publicly airing your grievances stopped being patriotic right around noon on January 20th, 2009.

Once President Obama was sworn in, protesting became incitement to violence.

If you've opened up a newspaper or watched a cable news program in the past week or so, you've probably seen members of the media painting Tea Party activists as dangerous bigots. That's because disagreeing with President Obama on issues like government spending and high taxes makes you a racist, you see...[More.]

The video:

Some good stuff via the Twitter account of the National WW2 Museum:

Color footage of the British countryside in 1939:

World War II US D-Day invasion tank unearthed in France

wwII-tanker-404_676344c.jpg

...It is thought the tank from the 31st Tank Battalion formed part of the invasion force that liberated France from the Nazis more than six decades ago.

Residents recalled the tank entering the cathedral city where it had been carrying out reconnaissance when it either ran out of fuel or broke down.

When France was liberated it was pushed down a hole and buried, one resident said...

And: Pothole Reveals Possible WWII Underground Bunker

A mysterious room which could possibly be a World War II bunker has been discovered under the car park of a pub in Brandon.

Peter Otoka, owner and landlord of The Flintknappers public house on Market Hill, was informed of the appearance of a pothole at the weekend after a friends car became stuck in it.

Further investigation of the hole revealed it led to an old underground room, which contains furniture and a large amount of timber. Also noticeable towards the back of the room is what is believed to be electrical wiring...

...Mr Otoka told BrandonSuffolk.com "We don't know yet whether it's a bunker or a cellar. I was told there used to be a row of cottages there, so there could be a row of cellars as well"...

Pics at the link.

Some good stuff in this Avi Trengo response to Tom Friedman: Take your money back:

...February 17th, 2002 is a day I will never forget: It was during the Intifada, with the worse still ahead of us. I participated in an intimate Peace Now demonstration as an active member. For more than 30 years, I shared Friedman's view that a return to the 1967 borders is a magical solution. Yet during the rally, we were informed that a suicide bomber killed two children at a pizza parlor. The protestors observed a moment of silence, before the next speaker, a Palestinian "moderate," took the stage. His speech focused solely on accusing Israel while going back to the Nakba and early days of Zionism. The terror attack at the pizza parlor in Karnei Shomron was not mentioned at all. I left the rally with a sense of disgust...

...Of the $3 billion handed over by the US annually, only $690 million are transferred to Israel in practice. The rest - 75% of the aid - remains in the US and constitutes an indirect government subsidy to US arms manufacturers - Boeing, Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas etc. - thereby enhancing US employment.

Israel's acquisitions in the US are far greater than the American grant. Just recently we read about a $1.8 billion acquisition of Hercules aircraft from Lockheed. Does Friedman think there are no other global cargo plane manufacturers? Moreover, as result of the US grant, Israel has given up on the development of weapons that would compete with America's military-industrial complex. In addition, Israeli developments were integrated by American manufacturers, thus saving the lives of US troops on the battlefield...

...So take back the $690 million you gave us. We'll do just fine without it. It comes out to about NIS 400 (roughly $120) per every Israeli citizen - most certainly not something that would bring us down. We don't have to read claims about Jews and money in Friedman's writing. We could hear them for free, for 20 years, at Reverend Jeremiah Wright's sermons.

If Friedman still wishes to know what the US money contributes to the regional conflict, I learned about it when I escorted foreign journalists during a tour in the territories. A Palestinian industrialist told me: "There will be no peace between us until Palestine has a normal economy. I'm an industrialist and one of the only ones who produce something in Palestine. Yet what we have here is an economy unlike anywhere else in the world. It's not only the official budget of the Palestinian Authority, who receives about $2 billion annually from abroad and spends it on tens of thousands of needless internal security orgnizations and government jobs. The Americans and Europeans are completely crazy."...

Some interesting comments at 47, 51 and 63, too.

There are a lot of interests, not just Israeli, that want to keep that military aid flowing.

Since this blog was mentioned in Kerry Hurwitz's letter to the Newton Tab (online at Wicked Local), I've placed the links to the information on the issues discussed in this one convenient post. There are many other postings that involve Code Pink and other of the individuals and groups involved than posted here, but this should have most of what you need to understand the issues.

Kerry's op-ed, now causing such a stir on the letters page, is posted here: Newton's Other Terrorism Connection

The original post talking about the then upcoming march through Brookline is here: Sticking It To The Jews in Brookline: March and Counter-March This Saturday. Don't miss the comments.

After the march, there is a description and discussion here: What's Become of the Jewish-Zionist Press? Part Deux.

Then here: In response to Code Pink. Again, there is an extensive comment thread.

For posts on Code Pink's actual Gaza Freedom March, you can see these links: Church Hall of Shame: St. Peter's Episcopal Church in Central Square, Cambridge (Protest Report), Egypt Blocking the Gaza 'Freedom' March, Egypt Caves, Partially, On Gaza Group, Pausing to take a life, and Israeli Lefty: Of Course Hamas Controlled And Directed Code Pink's Gaza Freedom March.

On January 13, Code Pink organized a protest at the Israeli Consulate: Anatomy of a Protest - Part 1 (Updated with Photos) and Anatomy of a Protest - Part 2.

Here are some pictures from that march (from Part 1, above):

IMG_2544.JPG

Tom Arabia in pink pants. David Rolde holding sign.

IMG_2547.JPG

Skip Schiel

IMG_2550.JPG

Amy Hendrickson (yellow jacket with sign), Ian Chinich (Jews for Human Rights sign).

The red hand you see on the posters is directly reminiscent of the red hands used by Hamas kindergartners in a graduation ceremony recalling the lynching of two Israeli soldiers. See here:

...a 2002 kindergarten graduation by a Hamas charitable organization in Gaza featured 1,600 children carrying pretend rifles and a 5-year-old girl on stage reenacting the murder of two Israelis in Ramallah, according to the Israeli newspaper Maariv. The child dipped her hands in red paint and raised them aloft, mimicking hands the Palestinians dipped in the blood of murdered Israelis and proudly raised in victory to a mob after the notorious October 2000 killings...

...and here (about the actual lynching) to understand the horror behind the symbol and just how absurd it is for a "peace" group to display such a thing.

Ramallah-lynch01.jpg

Finally, concerning the Newton house party that Kerry wrote about: Last Night in Newton, MA: House Party for Hamas' Gaza

Thanks for visiting. Come back soon.

Update: Marilyn Levin is one of the "smash Israel" activists who write in on the same letters page as Kerry. She wants to make sure that her own group United for Justice with Peace (UJP) gets the credit for the Gaza Freedom March, not Code Pink. She claims, "Our efforts are not aimed at obliterating Israel." Yet, as if Levin's history of activism weren't enough, this bit from an address Levin made to a rally on October 17, 2009 puts the lie to that:

...We're here to agitate, not wait. When Washington talks of expanding war, not ending war, how can we not be out on the streets? When Washington spends trillions for war and bailouts, (not jobs and healthcare), we must march. When Washington rains cluster bombs on children, we must march. When Washington backs 60 years of occupation and the siege of Gaza, we must march. When our soldiers die or come home wounded in body, mind, and spirit, we must march...

Do the math. When people talk about 60 years of occupation, they're not criticizing Israeli actions, they're criticizing Israel's existence.

Also, I forgot to link to my posts on the group's First Night (New Year's Eve) activities: Gaza's Hamas Solidarity Brigades -- A Disaster From Egypt to Boston and More on the Boston First Night Hamas Marchers. Remember this lovely sign?

IMGP2138.jpg

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

So a group of Palestinian Arab journalists from both Gaza and the West Bank come to Israel for an event to meet Israeli colleagues and now they're being shunned and threated by both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. Do I have to point out what this means about the type of society these people operate in? What it means for those trying to convince people that all that has to happen is for Israel to give more and the PA will form a normal state like magic? That if these were Israeli journalists being treated like this all those oh so important groups supposedly protescting Israeli "civil society" would be out screaming like mad and saying the whole project wasn't worth defending anymore instead of sitting on the sidelines in utter silence? Palestinian reporters urged to 'repent'

Journalists who met Israeli colleagues face expulsion from Fatah-run syndicate.

Palestinian journalists who last week met with their Israeli colleagues and an IDF spokesman in Tel Aviv have come under fire from both Hamas and Fatah.

The trip was arranged by the non-profit Israel advocacy group The Israel Project, whose Web site described the group as "an international non-profit organization devoted to educating the press and the public about Israel while promoting security, freedom and peace."

The journalists met with Maj. Avichai Edri, head of the Arabic-language branch of the IDF Spokesman's Office.

Three of the journalists - Lana Shaheen, Mueen al-Hilu and Abdel Salam Abu Askar - are from the Gaza Strip, while another two are from the West Bank.

They now face expulsion from the Fatah-controlled Palestinian Journalists Syndicate on charges of promoting normalization with Israel.

The syndicate decided to establish a committee to question the journalists who went to Tel Aviv about their motives and the identity of the party behind the invitation.

The syndicate is also planning to hold an emergency meeting next week to discuss punitive measures against Palestinian journalists who defy a ban on normalization of relations with Israel.

Hamas has also condemned the Palestinian journalists as "collaborators." Hamas officials claimed that some of the journalists were known as supporters of Mohammed Dahlan, a former Fatah security commander in the Gaza Strip...

It's essential that a totalitarian state not allow "normalization" among the proles or it would undermine their ability to keep the war going and maintain their power.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report. This is a disturbing one.]

Friedrich Nietzsche famously said, "That which does not kill me makes me stronger." A good Middle East equivalent, at least among the anti-democratic forces, would be: That which does not scare me makes me bolder.

Can things get worse with the Obama Administration's foreign--and especially Middle East--policy? Yes, it's not inevitable but I have just seen personally a dangerous example of what could be happening next. In fact, I never expected that the administration would try to recruit me in this campaign, as you'll see starting with paragraph seven.

First, a little background. One of the main concerns with the Obama Administration is that it would go beyond just engaging Syria and Iran, turning a blind eye to radical anti-American activities throughout the region.

To cite some examples, it has not supported Iraq in its protests about Syrian-backed terror, even though the group involved is al-Qaida, with which the United States is supposedly at war. Nor has it launched serious efforts to counter Iran's help to terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan or even Tehran's direct cooperation with al-Qaida. We know about many of these points because of General David Petraeus's remarks, buried in his congressional testimony but not trumpeted by the mass media.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Just Say 'No': I Get Personally Invited to Help the Obama Administration Engage -- and Thus Strengthen -- Terrorists"

Brought to you by the World Council of Churches...nothing like using biblical imagery to bash Jews for defending themselves: Defying the Wall, Palm Sunday demonstrators break out of Bethlehem

...The march began with a small group at Manger Square in central Bethlehem. As the crowd, accompanied by music and carrying signs or Palestinian flags, moved through the town, more and more people joined until it numbered about 150 Palestinians, Israeli activists, journalists and internationals.

The march was to protest the limitations placed upon Palestinians - Christians and Muslims - to travel to Jerusalem for worship at the holy sites in the city.

The march was supposed to have stopped at the checkpoint, but once the group reached the checkpoint gate for vehicles, approximately 100 protesters made their way through the gate. Apparently the security guards were unprepared: they were far too few to be able to stop the demonstrators who managed to walk through the second gate and on to the road to downtown Jerusalem, still being led by the donkey and the horse.

About a hundered meters down the road, the Israeli police realized what had happened and blocked the way. The demonstators stopped, although they easily could have marched on as there were only a few police officers on the scene.

In response, the checkpoint was closed for all vehicles and foot traffic attempting to enter Jerusalem. According to Ma'an News, eleven Palestinians have been detained; four Israeli activists and one international person were detained and later released.

The following day, Checkpoint 300 - the main Bethlehem checkpoint - remained completely closed. All of the checkpoints along the security barrier were only open to a limited number of people (international citizens, school children and Palestinians with specific work permits, worship permits or medical permits) for the Jewish holiday of Pesach...[Etc...]

So let me get this straight...a mob pushes their way through a security checkpoint, causing the Israelis to tie down security more tightly and that's Israel's fault, as though those checkpoints just exist to inconvenience people and not serve a deadly serious purpose.

And here's another hint for our leftist Christian friends. If you have a political issue with the modern Jewish State, try engaging on the issues and try leaving the biblical Christian imagery and all its ugly history, out.

[h/t: Dexter]

Watch this video from MEMRI, as some Egyptian rockers defend themselves from the accusations of some "intellectual" who rants on and on about the evil influences of international Zionism and the Protocols of Zion like some caricature straight out of Nazi Germany. Tell me peace is right around the corner if only the Israeli would only give up more. [via Mick]

MEMRITV: Egyptian Heavy Metal Fans Reject Accusations of Satan Worship, Collaboration with Zionism (video)

...Tuhami Muntasir, former advisor to the Mufti of Egypt: It has become clear that this is being funded, and that it is sponsored organized Zionist activity. They get money from various sources - maybe from Cyprus, maybe from Israel... What they do at their parties...

Interviewer: Do you get money from any source?

Karim 'Ammad: If we did, would we be in such a poor state? What money? This is the first time I'm hearing this claim.

Tuhami Muntasir: I am talking about confessions of people who were caught...

Karim 'Ammad: What you said sums it up. You're talking about the past. Today there's nothing...

Tuhami Muntasir: I am talking about confessions of people who were caught... I am not done yet.

Bassem Ali: Go ahead, finish.

Tuhami Muntasir: Let me tell you that the phenomenon that we are witnessing right now is a clear manifestation of a well-funded Zionist campaign, which is based on a "constitution" - The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. With your permission, I am not done yet. Protocols of the Elders of Zion - that founding constitution... What does Zionism want to accomplish? You are an intellectual, and you know this. It wants to rule the world.

Interviewer: Let's be reasonable.

Tuhami Muntasir: It wants to rule the world. Let me finish. It wants to rule the world. Zionism has means to do so, and it has priorities. The Zionists say: We will establish clubs and we will draw people, who have certain characteristics and who are willing to collaborate, and we will bring them to the top of the pyramid...[More.]

[The following, by Bataween, is crossposted from Point of No Return.]

Eugene-Rogan.jpg

Dr. Eugene Rogan

The fixation with Israel's 'settlements' as the leading obstacle to peace in the Middle East has spawned a worrying trend: a false linkage between Israeli settlers and Palestinian Arab refugees.

In December, Ray Hanania, in his manifesto as Palestinian presidential candidate, put forward a proposal linking Jewish settlers and Arab refugees.

Now it's the turn of the director of the Middle East Centre at St Antony's College Oxford, Eugene Rogan. Rogan brightly unveils a plan, in an article for the Financial Times (28 March) Refugees for settlers is the way forward for Israel, proposing an exchange between Israeli settlers in Judea and Samaria and Palestinian refugees living in Syria and Lebanon.

While Jewish settlers would be allowed to stay in territory that will become a Palestinian state, descendants of Palestinians from refugee camps in Syria and Lebanon, Rogan argues, should be permitted a 'right of return' to their 'ancestral homes' in Israel proper.

"The only way forward is to put a real price on settlements that might make the Israeli government pause before expanding them," Rogan writes.

There are several things wrong with Rogan's plan. It is nothing more than a proposal to allow a Palestinian 'right of return' to Israel by subterfuge - a red line Israel has always refused to cross. Assuming that principle is enshrined in international law - a dubious proposition - why limit that 'right of return' to Palestinians from Syria and Lebanon? What about Palestinians in Jordan? Egypt? Kuwait? Chile? An influx of hundreds of thousands, largely radicalised, Arabs displacing current occupants from their 'ancestral homes' in Israel (assuming these homes still exist) would be a recipe for chaos and violence.

Continue reading "False settler linkage denies Jewish refugee rights"

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

pike.jpg

Take Your PAC $$ and...

Why I broke with J Street by Doug Pike

Months ago -- after a lot of reading, briefings and reflection -- I clearly stated my support for Israel in a position paper. Yet my convictions as a candidate for Congress have not gotten through. The reason for this confusion is my endorsement by J Street's political action committee. When I accepted it, I didn't realize how different J Street's approach is from mine on some key points.

One example is the 2009 Goldstone Report on the war in Gaza. This deeply flawed report to the United Nations Human Rights Council was absurdly critical of the Israeli Defense Forces, and unbelievably soft on the Palestinian militants.

Among its unfair aspects, the Goldstone Report gave short shrift to the militants' routine use of innocent civilians as human shields. The report also failed to put the fighting in the appropriate context of Israel's 2005 withdrawal from Gaza -- a withdrawal followed by relentless missile attacks from Gaza against innocent civilians in Israel.

I strongly agree with a resolution that the House of Representatives passed by a 344-to-36 vote last November, calling the Goldstone Report "irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy." So I was troubled to learn that J Street was slow to reject the biased report -- and that the group worked to soften the resolution that Congress passed overwhelmingly.

Continue reading "He Dared to Speak Out [Hillel]"

Monday, March 29, 2010

I wrote a comment on Pajamas Media in response to an article there, as well as the appended thread. I thought I'd post my statement here along with a link to the article, because obviously I am worried both about the polarization of Americans in general but also about pro-Israel Americans increasingly being referred to as "traitors."

That's frightening.

Here's the link to PJ and also a copy of my response:

With respect to all, I don't think ad hominem attacks either on Obama or on liberals including liberal American Jews serves to illuminate the real problems we're confronting.

Speaking as a very liberal American Jew who voted for Obama, I do not see myself as a threat to America because I think we should have health care and work to protect the environment.

I also don't see myself as a traitor to America because I've worried that the current hard line on Israel, particularly regarding Jerusalem, is probably going to be counterproductive and may even result in further violence. Of course doing nothing will also probably result in further violence. I myself don't think the current situation is either moral or sustainable.

That said - will withdrawal from more territory bring peace? Will creating a Palestinian state bring peace? History says this isn't very likely UNLESS there is true reconciliation between people and an understanding of each others' history. I don't see this mutual understanding being promoted or nurtured.

Continue reading "Dissent is now 'treachery' [Sophia]"

I've referred to the Ungar case numerous times before here. (Hurting Americans should hurt back, Palestine must pay terror victims, Good Legal News: Terror Victims Can Chase the PA to Israel, Judge Upolds $116 Million Judgment Against PLO in Ungar Case)

The Ungars, American citizens, were murdered in 1996 and their relatives sued. The PLO (Palestinian Authority) tried simply ignoring the matter, but that didn't work...at first. Since the Ungars received a default judgment, the PA asked for another bite at the apple -- since the first gambit didn't work, they decided they'd switch and actually defend the case. As reported previously, the judge involved recognized the basic cheat and said, in effect, "No Dice."

Sadly, an appeals panel, including retired Supreme Court Justice David Souter, has given the terrorist government another shot at the Ungars and sent the matter back for reconsideration, allowing them to change strategies all these years later and delaying justice for this family.

Here is the court decision [PDF].

I don't see how you call this "process delay" anything other than a gross miscarriage of justice.

[H/T: Adam Gaffin]

From Jeffrey Goldberg, discussing the Laura Rozen piece in which certain anonymous sources are quoted as questioning Dennis Ross's loyalty: Politico Story Suggests Dennis Ross is Treasonous

Laura Rozen allows an anonymous Administration official to hijack her blog and accuse the National Security Council's Dennis Ross of dual-loyalty...

...An alternative explanation might be that Ross, who is a well-known critic of Netanyahu's, understands the internal dynamics of Netanyahu's dysfunctional coalition, and is looking for smart ways for President Obama to manipulate the situation so that progress -- not merely rhetorical progress, but actual progress -- can be made, both in bringing about the territorial compromise needed for peace, and in stopping Iran from going nuclear. But in today's neo-Lindberghian climate, if a Jewish Administration official suggests a course of action that can be interpreted in any way as sympathetic to Israel, he will be called a dual-loyalist, in this case by a coward hiding behind a screen of anonymity erected by Politco.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

Has the Obama Administration, against U.S. interests, declared diplomatic war on Israel?

Up to now my view has been that the U.S. government didn't want a crisis but merely sought to get indirect negotiations going between Israel and Palestinians in order to look good.

Even assuming this limited goal, the technique was to keep getting concessions from Israel without asking the PA to do or give anything has been foolish, but at least it was a generally rational strategy.

But now it has become reasonable to ask whether the Obama White House is running amuck on Israel, whether it is pushing friction so far out of proportion that it is starting to seem a vendetta based on hostility and ideology. And if that's true, there is little Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or any Israeli leader can do to fix the problem.

A partial explanation of such behavior can be called, to borrow a phrase from the health law debate, a "single-payer option" as its Middle East strategy. That is, the administration seems to envision Israel paying for everything: supposedly to get the Palestinian Authority (PA) to talks, do away with any Islamist desire to carry out terrorism or revolution, keep Iraq quiet, make Afghanistan stable, and solve just about any other global problem.

What makes this U.S. tactic even more absurd is doing so at the very moment when it is coddling Syria and losing the battle for anything but the most minimal sanctions on Iran.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Has the Obama Administration, Against U.S. Interests, Declared Diplomatic War on Israel?"

I've had a few more things to say about the Berkeley divestment debate here and here. It sounds as though messages urging the student senate to over-ride last week's veto are coming in at a rate of 50 per hour (so much for this being just a simple on-campus issue that takes no sides in the Arab-Israeli conflict).

Needless to say, our old friends at Jewish Voices for Peace/Muzzlewatch have chimed in on the matter. Some thoughts on their involvement appear here.

Martin Solomon adds: CUFI is running an effort to contact the ASUC Sentate at Berkley. You can help by clicking here.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Melsa.jpg

Chinkin.jpg

Goldstone Report Commissioner Christine Chinkin

Palestinian and Muslim students have long been used to having their way on American campuses. Employing a number of intimidating tactics for decades ranging from the application of "third world" guilt to disruptive shouting and heckling, they virtually rule the roost from Berkeley on the west coast to Harvard in the east. Invariably, their one-sided events are populated by mainly women in hijabs whose role is to conflate a false image of middle east feminism with ululating outrage at "western" arrogance. Last Friday was no exception.

Watch the short video carefully and you will notice the young woman wearing a hijab being instructed to shut down my video of the lecture. Keep in mind this was a lecture open to the public and no signs or prior notice were given prohibiting recording.

Continue reading "Playing Chinkin at Harvard Law School [Hillel]"

[The following, by Eamonn McDonagh, is crossposted from Z Word.]

1.

AIPAC has "... for years molded the policies of the government of the United States in the Middle East, for example, the invasion of Iraq."

2.

AIPAC put a 39 page long document on its website with support for Israel written by 9 senators and 47 members of the House of Representatives, divided almost equally between Democrats and Republicans, something that confirms how it operates; by financing the campaigns of those who support its policies. How else to explain the support of supposedly democratic legislators for a government that practises ethnic cleansing and a peculiar form of apartheid?

3.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu wants Iran to be "wiped off the face of the earth."

4.

Who am I quoting here? It's not the President of Iran and neither is it George Galloway. It's the Argentine poet Juan Gelman writing in his column Pagina/12. Let me tell readers unfamiliar with it a little about Pagina/12. It's an Argentine national daily newspaper and it strongly supports the government of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. The word "support" may not be putting it strongly enough, only those with very finely tuned political antenna can hope to detect its very occasional and very highly nuanced murmurs of doubt about the overall brilliance and perfection of the present administration and all its works. The paper is rewarded for its attitude by generous subventions from the state in the form of government publicity in its pages.

Now imagine you work in the Iranian Embassy in Buenos Aires. You know that the facts about Pagina/12 are as I have just set them out. You've just read Gelman's column with your morning coffee and you are about to write your weekly dispatch for your masters in Tehran. How seriously do you think they ought to take the Argentine governments attempts to secure the extradition of the AMIA case suspects wanted by Argentina and sheltered by your country?

[The following, by Louis, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

CIF's Israel attack dogs went wild when British Foreign Minister David Miliband announced on Tuesday that he had expelled an Israel diplomat in retaliation for Mossad's alleged cloning of British passports. Former Ambassador to Libya Oliver Miles - who is on record as believing that Jewish historians have no place on the UK Iraq War Enquiry - sanctimoniously welcomed the expulsion as 'action, not words' suited to a country that "continues to flout international law and ignore any UN condemnatory resolution that does not suit it."

But look what happened in an arguably precisely analogous case in Israel, to one of the Guardian's favourite sons, Alastair Crooke.

Crooke used to work for MI6, the UK equivalent of Mossad. Now he is the Beirut-based Director of Conflicts Forum and as someone who showed disregard for the opposition demonstrations in Iran after the elections, is even too extreme for Mark Perry (who started last week's malicious misrepresentations of what General David Petraeus really said about Israel). Perry quit as a Director of Conflicts Forum - started by Crooke - in protest.

Crooke was was sent to Israel, as part of the British consular delegation in Jerusalem, ostensibly to oversee Israeli Palestinian relations on behalf of the UK Government.

Continue reading "The UK's Disproportionate Response"

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

The New York Times has now crossed the line from being a grossly slanted newspaper in its Middle East coverage to being one so partisan, blinkered, and defensive as to lose its value altogether. I do not write this lightly and have no wish to exaggerate. But the newspaper's editorial of March 26 is so mendacious, so made up to suit the political purposes of the Obama administration without any reference to the facts that it is a work of politically tailored fiction.

Basically, the themes or omissions are as follows:

--Israeli policy is the result of extreme right-wing politicians.

--Most Israelis support Obama rather than their own government.

--The U.S.-Israel agreement of last October never existed.

--The Palestinians don't exist and one doesn't need to mention their actions or the administration's total catering to them.

--Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has done something so awful that it proves he doesn't want peace. What did he do? Precisely what he told the U.S. government he was going to do five months ago and which it then called a major step toward peace!

The Administration's and Times' goal is to portray the issue as not being one of Obama versus Israel but rather Obama plus the Israeli majority against a relatively small number of right-wing extremists who have hijacked the country.

If only such tactics were used against America's enemies.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: NY Times Defends Obama, Not U.S. Interests; Blames Israel, Not White House or Palestinians For All Problems"

Well, I've made a few Garlasco jokes lately, and, speak of the Devil, here's a very good article in Times Online all about Garlasco and the controversy now surrounding Human Rights Watch and its priorities: Nazi scandal engulfs Human Rights Watch. The Garlasco thing is interesting, and important, but what's interesting is HRW itself:

...In June 2006, Garlasco had alleged that an explosion on a Gaza beach that killed seven people had been caused by Israeli shelling. However, after seeing the details of an Israeli army investigation that closely examined the relevant ballistics and blast patterns, he subsequently told the Jerusalem Post that he had been wrong and that the deaths were probably caused by an unexploded munition in the sand. But this went down badly at Human Rights Watch HQ in New York, and the admission was retracted by an HRW press release the next day.

Since the Garlasco affair blew up, critics of Human Rights Watch have raised questions about other appointments. An Israeli newspaper revealed that Joe Stork, the deputy head of HRW's Middle East department, was a radical leftist who put out a magazine in the 1970s that praised the murder of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics. In 1976 he attended an anti-Zionist conference in Baghdad hosted by the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

As Kenneth Roth pointed out to me, this was all three decades ago, Stork was just one of seven editors of the magazine when its editorial praised the massacre, and he later became a staunch critic of Saddam Hussein. Certainly, he no longer spices up reports with talk of "revolutionary potential of the Palestinian masses." That said, when Stork was hired by HRW in 1996 he had never worked for a human-rights group, had never held an academic position, and had a history of anti-Israel activism...[Much more.]

Saturday, March 27, 2010

With the imminent release of Clash of the Titans, we hearken back to the original 1981 version, by posting the film that inspired a young Ray Harryhausen on to greatness, the 1925 silent classic, The Lost World:

Stop-motion, bitches.

Free enterprise...run amok...

Shop owner defends sale of 'Holocaust' soap

The owner of a Montreal collectibles shop is defending his decision to sell a bar of soap he advertises as being made of the fat of Holocaust victims.

Jewish groups in Montreal are denouncing the shop in the city's Plateau-Mont-Royal neighbourhood where the beige bar of soap is displayed.

The soap is inscribed with a swastika and displayed in a glass case with a card that says "Poland 1940."

On Friday, Abraham Botines, a Spanish-born Jew who has operated the quirky boutique since 1967, admitted he has no idea whether the soap is really made of human remains.

"I'm 73 and I was collecting things from the Holocaust and from World War II because I belong to that period," Botines told The Canadian Press in an interview Friday in the cluttered shop.

"In my lifetime I got a lot of curiosity items -- that is, things that are hard to find ... and my things, my children, they don't have any interest."

But Botines is adamant he's selling a collectible item and not hateful ideology.

After reporters began descending on the store Friday morning, the controversial bar of soap was put aside.

Botines said it can now be seen only by serious collectors...

Insert requisite Marc Garlasco joke here. [h/t: The Flea]

I'm always reminded of the final moments of The Caine Mutiny when I read about something like this:

"'Scuse me, I'm all finished, Mr. Keefer. I'm up to the toast. Here's to You. You bowled a perfect score. You went after Queeg, and got him. You kept your own skirts all white and starchy. Steve is finished for good, but you'll be the next captain of the Caine. You'll retire old and full of fat fitness reports. You'll publish your novel proving that the Navy stinks, and you'll make a million dollars and marry Hedy Lamarr. No letter of reprimand for you, Just royalties on your novel. So you won't mind a li'l verbal reprimand from me, what does it mean? I defended Steve because I found out the wrong guy was on trial. Only way I could defend him was to sink Queeg for you. I'm sore that I was pushed into that spot, and ashamed of what I did, and thass why I'm drunk. Queeg deserved better at my hands. I owed him a favor, 'don't you see? He stopped Hermann Goering from washing his fat behind with my mother.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from Rubin Reports.]

This year, my son -- who is attending the fourth grade at an American public school -- has been subjected to an unending barrage of anti-Americanism, especially around the issue of racism and to large extent for some reason related disproportionately to alleged American racism toward the Japanese in World War Two. Literally not a single positive word has been spoken about America during the entire school year.

At the same time, I have been watching a number of American films about the Pacific theatre during World War Two, not seeking them out but merely because they have been shown on television. The controversy over Tom Hanks's statement and his new series on that war has added to the interest.

One thing very clear to me is that American films about the Pacific theatre are remarkably free of vicious or "racialist" incitement. On the contrary, it is remarkable how restrained they are. In many films that focus on combat -- say, "Wake Island" or "They Were Expendable," among the first wartime films, there is virtually no emphasis on demonizing the Japanese. They are an enemy who is being fought and, if possible, killed, but there is no racialist message.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Some Truths About America's Anti-Racist History: Portraying the Japanese in World War Two Films"

Friday, March 26, 2010

Hamas has been laying low, blaming other groups for rocket launches and the like. So what's it mean that they are bragging about this one? For some reason they are feeling emboldened: Two IDF soldiers killed in Gaza clashes

Two others wounded, one seriously; at least 4 Palestinian terrorists killed; unusually, Hamas claims responsibility for 'ambush' of IDF troops.

Major Eliraz Peretz, 31, from Eli, deputy commander of the Golani Brigade's Battalion 12 and Staff Sergeant Ilan Sviatkovsky from Rishon Lezion, were killed in the southern Gaza Strip on Friday evening, the IDF announced several hours after clashes occurred near the town of Khan Younis there...

...Peretz and Sviatkovsky were killed when a team of soldiers from Golani's Battalion 12 entered the Strip around 2:40 p.m. after several men were spotted placing what seemed to be explosive devices near the Gaza border fence on Thursday night.

The force was then attacked with mortar shells and gunfire from inside the Strip, as well as an explosive device that went off nearby. In the fire exchange that ensued, at least four Palestinians were killed and several others wounded.

But the soldiers were not killed by the explosive device but by gunfire, when the grenade in one of the soldiers' vests was hit by a Palestinian bullet and exploded on his body.

The military was uncertain whether the incident was a prepared ambush or if the fire exchange began because the soldiers crossed the border fence into Gaza.

The IDF was using helicopters and mortar fire against the Palestinians, who reportedly belong to the Jaljalat, an extremist al-Qaida inspired group. The group is not affiliated with Hamas.

Palestinian sources reported five IDF tanks and two armored bulldozers entering Gaza strip firing shells at targets near the town of Khan Younis. The tanks were still in place firing occasional rounds around midnight Friday.

But later on Friday evening, the Hamas Website said the group's gunmen were involved -- a departure from the Islamic terror group's tendency over the past year to avoid confrontation with Israeli forces.

Hamas spokesman Abu Obeida told Hamas radio that IDF forces "fell into an ambush" set by Hamas terrorists east of Khan Younis. He did not elaborate. He said IDF troops entered 500 meters into Gaza "but our men preempted them."

He also said the action was taken in revenge to the killing of Hamas official Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh, which Hamas pinned on Israel.

Islamic Jihad also claimed responsibility for the attack, saying that the attack was intended to kidnap a soldier.

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

Jeremy Ben Ami thought that Doug Pike, Democratic congressional contender to unseat Jim Gerlach (R - District 6 in Philadelphia), would fall into line with his other "Pro Israel" cash recipients like Keith Ellison, (MN) , Donna Edwards (MD) and Maurice Hinchey (NY) - all three of whom possess some of the worst voting records on support for Israel. Surprise! Mr. Pike, partly as a result of the current public whipping of Israel by Ben Ami's master, President Obama, released the following statement as he rejected J Street PAC funds and its endorsement:

"Belatedly, I got a clearer sense of the important points where J Street looks at things differently than I look at things," Pike said in an interview. "Also, people simply assumed when they heard that I was endorsed by J street that I agreed with them on everything. The endorsement was an impediment to my being able to explain my convictions about Israel's security."

Oddly, over at J Street's "News" tab on their website, Mr. Pike is not mentioned today. Ben Enemy, however - classy as ever - had this to say about a man who stood up to the blatant anti-Israel messages coming out of The White House:

"We wish Doug Pike well, but are pleased to see him return the funds provided to his campaign, as it is our purpose only to support politicians with the courage of their convictions."

"We wish Doug Pike well..." Oh yeah, and your check is in the mail... I would say that in refusing $6,000 of J Street cash, Doug Pike is eminently a man of conviction.

Martin Solomon adds: More info in the linked article: In Turnabout, Politician Says 'No' to J Street, and Jonathan Tobin at Commentary: J Street Loses a Congressional Recruit

Including Jimmy Carter. Here are some lnks:

Legal Insurrection: It's 3 a.m. and the Prime Minister of Israel is Calling:

...The enemies of Israel -- who just so happen to be the enemies of the United States -- will be emboldened. Iran, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Aksa Martyrs Brigade, Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda and their compatriots are smiling right now, and preparing for war.

The left-wing academics, bloggers and NGO lawyers are dusting off their computer keyboards for renewed attempts to delegitimize Israel, and the despots who run the UN Human Rights Council are preparing new anti-Israel resolutions.

Our President does not realize that by trying to impose his peace on his terms he is increasing the likelihood of war. A sense of Israeli encirclement and a need to strike first because of uncertainty led to the 1967 war...[More.]

Via Lynn, from The Australian: Obama's anti-Israeli hysteria dangerous and destructive:

BARACK Obama's anti-Israel jihad is one of the most irresponsible policy lurches by any modern American president. It rightly earns Obama the epithet of the US president least sympathetic to Israel in Israel's history. Jimmy Carter became a great hater of Israel, but only after he left office...

Power Line fisks the AP: The Moral High Ground (there's something refreshing about an old-fashioned fisking), and discusses Israeli public opinion: Obama fools nine percent of Israeli Jews.

Rich Lowry calls it The Coming Europeanization of American Foreign Policy

...Like the Europeans, Obama is adopting the Arab narrative of the Middle East, wherein Israeli perfidy is responsible for all that ails the region. The administration's broadsides against the Jewish state could have been delivered by Finnish foreign minister Alexander Stubb, who's always up for a good chiding of the nasty Israelis.

The Europeans congratulate themselves on the realism of their "evenhandedness." But it is the realpolitik of weakness. It heaps scorn on an embattled outpost of the West while appeasing the terror states and tin-pot dictators that assail it...

Walter Russell Mead has another thoughtful piece: Settling Zion, he understates the degree to which continued building maintains the pressure for the other side to get to the table already. Sadat's vision of Israeli creation of facts on the ground is what brought him over.

Finally (for now), here's video of Ralph Peters (from Media Matters. ha)


[Update: Obama's full-court press on Israel.

From Divest This!

Apologies if I gave the impression that the Berkeley divestment story was over. According to some West Coast friends, the student government constitution still provides a mechanism whereby a two-thirds vote of the Student Senate (or 14 votes) can override yesterday's veto. And as one West Coast Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) supporter put it when commenting on the Daily Californian story on the veto: "It's all a formality. We have the ASUC [the Berkeley Student Senate] in the bag."

Now it remains to be seen whether the Senate is in truly "in the bag" of the local branch of SJP just because more than the 14 Senators needed to override the veto voted for the original resolution.

After all, student senators, like many Berkeley students, have strong feelings about the Arab-Israeli conflict, human rights and many other domestic and international issues. But student government representatives also have a responsibility to represent their constituents and the student body as a whole.

Continue reading "Berkeley: Not Over til It's Over [Jon]"

Thursday, March 25, 2010

[The following, by Zach of The Brothers of Judea, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

Richard Greener is a Huffington Post blogger who is relatively new to the Israeli/Palestinian situation. He has recently arrived in the "World" section with an essay entitled, "Israeli Settlements: What Are They Really?" As you might expect from the Huffington Post, he has a negative view of the settlements, and there is nothing redeemable about them. Some of Greener's facts, however, seem to be a bit off. I thought I'd take a minute to take a look at his work.

What immediately jumps to mind is Greene's now expected use of the legal argument to declare all the settlements illegitimate. Here is the critical quote:

"Article 49 is simple, clear and is not a subject of controversy. It forbids an occupying power from moving its own civilian population onto occupied lands as permanent residents. Despite this prohibition Israel has constructed settlements outside and beyond its borders for more than 40 years."


"Moving" the civilian population? No, Mr. Greener, the Geneva Convention doesn't say that. What it actually says is the following (and thanks to readers for pointing out that in the original publication I had originally misquoted):

Continue reading "Richard Greener on Israeli Settlements"

[This entry, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

The United States is at war with al-Qaida. Al-Qaida carried out the attack on the World Trade Center that killed 3,000 Americans. Al-Qaida is killing Americans in Iraq and elsewhere. So one would think the fact that al-Qaida has found a powerful ally would be a big story in the American media and by a big priority for setting off U.S. government anger.

And this would be especially so if that was explained by one of the most respected men in the country, a man who has access to the highest-level intelligence.

Not at all.

In the same testimony which created lots of discussion regarding remarks on the Israel-Palestinian issue, General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, revealed a bombshell story that has been ignored: Iran is helping al-Qaida attack Americans.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: White House Ignores Iran's Help to al-Qaida in Its Passion over Jerusalem Apartments"

The story in the The Telegraph actually has more dirt than the Time Online article I quicklinked below. Very disturbing stuff that belies the idea that Washington is ready to put this behind them.

Unfortunately, the demonstrated proclivities of this administration also argue against a Washington descent into reason. We have just watched the spectacle of a wildly unpopular health care bill (unpopular in substance and in process) being flogged into existence against all reason in the interest of achieving a determined end point. The disturbing part of this matter is that despite what conventional wisdom dictates -- that everyone should start putting the matter behind them and move on as quickly as possible -- we have an Administration that has a demonstrated suicidal streak when it sees a goal that might make people forget the process used to get there.

Obama snubbed Netanyahu for dinner with Michelle and the girls, Israelis claim

Benjamin Netanyahu was left to stew in a White House meeting room for over an hour after President Barack Obama abruptly walked out of tense talks to have supper with his family, it emerged on Thursday...

The Israeli prime minister arrived at the White House on Tuesday evening brimming with confidence that the worst of the crisis in his country's relationship with the United States was over...

...Mr Obama...immediately presented Mr Netanyahu with a list of 13 demands designed both to the end the feud with his administration and to build Palestinian confidence ahead of the resumption of peace talks. Key among those demands was a previously-made call to halt all new settlement construction in east Jerusalem.

When the Israeli prime minister stalled, Mr Obama rose from his seat declaring: "I'm going to the residential wing to have dinner with Michelle and the girls."

As he left, Mr Netanyahu was told to consider the error of his ways. "I'm still around," Mr Obama is quoted by Israel's Yediot Ahronot newspaper as having said. "Let me know if there is anything new."

For over an hour, Mr Netanyahu and his aides closeted themselves in the Roosevelt Room on the first floor of the White House to map out a response to the president's demands.

Although the two men then met again, at 8.20 pm, for a brief second meeting, it appeared that they failed to break the impasse. White House officials were quoted as saying that disagreements remained. Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, added: "Apparently they did not reach an understanding with the United States."...

..."There is no humiliation exercise that the Americans did not try on the prime minister and his entourage," Israel's Maariv newspaper reported. "Bibi received in the White House the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea."...

The rumored turn against Israel by General Petraeus that was supposedly one of the factors behind the Obama/Netanyahu fracas has been stomped on by none other than General Petraeus himself. Mark Perry was the huckster behind this supposed scoop, and it has caused quite a stir and controversy. Here are some of the posts here that relate: Ramat Shlomo and the Silence of the Lambs (I called it from the start, thanks.), Mark Perry's Big Scoop: No There There, Max Boot: A Lie: David Petraeus, Anti-Israel, and The Insult, Decoded.

Via Carl, here's video from last night at St. Anselm College where Petraeus is asked about the flap by The American Spectator's Phil Klein (you will have to crank the volume):

Note that Petraeus says that nothing about the original (Mark Perry) blog post was correct, and he says he actually called Gabi Ashkenazi to assure him there was nothing to it and he even sent him Max Boot's Commentary post saying it had the story correct.

Philip Klein writes about it here: Petraeus Sets the Record Straight on Israel

... Petraeus continued, "So we have all the factors in there, but this is just one, and it was pulled out of this 56-page document, which was not what I read to the Senate at all."

In an effort to tamp down the controversy, Petraeus said, he spoke to Gabi Ashkenazi, chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, and reassured him that the reports were inaccurate. He also said he sent Ashkenazi a blog post written by Max Boot of Commentary, which he said "astutely" picked apart the erroneous information that's been floating around.

When asked about the claim that the perception that the U.S. is too reflexively pro-Israel puts American soldiers at risk, Petraeus said, "There is no mention of lives anywhere in there. I actually reread the statement. It doesn't say that at all."...

Max Boot must be pretty pleased with himself: From the Horse's Mouth: Petraeus on Israel

JPost story here, which takes not of the fact that Petraeus referred to Ashkenazi as "Gabi" as a sign that they are still tight: Petraeus apologizes to Ashkenazi [Update: JPost headline changed to a more appropriate, "Petraeus clarifies words to Ashkenazi"]

Update: Ben Cohen notes that there are many more than Mark Perry who have wound up with egg on their faces.

I'm running out of ways to title pieces like this one (from Divest This):

Well Berkeley's divestment "policy" barely lasted a week before it was undone via veto by student government President Will Smelko last night. No doubt a number of Berkeleyans are shaking their heads as these events unfold on their campus. But as someone who has followed divestment activities for years, I can attest that the Berkeley story is playing out along lines so familiar I can practically set my watch to them. To whit:

1. A divestment resolution is brought before a representative body of a large respected institution (such as the Berkeley Student Senate, the Aldermen of the City of Somerville, or the professional leadership of the Presbyterian Church) by a group of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) activists.

2. Because most members (and leaders) of the BDS group come from outside the community being asked to divest, local activists are given a high profile to make the divestment action seem as though it is welling up from the community itself.

3. Discussions of divestment are carried out behind closed doors or are rushed in hope that a divestment vote can be taken before the wider community becomes aware of what is being voted on in their name.

4. At some point, word gets out regarding what is happening and a controversy, often leading to a last-minute public hearing, ensues.

5. At the hearing, BDS activists do what they do best: zeroing in on a few, emotionally charged issues (the suffering of Palestinian Arabs, complete with bloody photographs), the flushing of alternative facts and history down the memory hole, and demands that support for BDS is the only democratic and moral choice for the institution considering divestment.

6. Hastily organized opponents of the measure do their best to publically respond, although their messages tend to be all over the map (refutation of the other side's facts, history lessons, passionate condemnations of the divestment resolution as unfair, etc.)

7. The body considering divestment either votes it down immediately (in which case, skip to step 12) or passes it.

8. If passed, word immediately goes out on a hundred Web sites, 200 blogs and 500 Facebook pages that the institution is now in full agreement with the real message of divestment advocates: that Israel is an Apartheid state alone in the world deserving economic punishment.

9. People in the community wake up one morning to discover that a tiny minority has handed the reputation of the institution over to a single-issue, partisan group that is now leveraging their name for their own narrow political ends.

10. Outrage ensues, both from inside the community (which was never consulted before their representatives signed the institution up to join the BDS bandwagon) and externally.

11. Responding to the outrage, and appalled at how the decision is being portrayed publically (despite assurances by BDS advocates that a divestment vote was a simple, uncontroversial human rights matter), the institution finds a way to vote down or otherwide undo the hasty, controversial decision.

12. The BDSers howl at their reversal of fortune, throwing a public tantrum if divestment is voted down at a public hearing, and impotently threatening electoral revenge against those who decided the reputation of the organization should not be handed over to divestment crew, just because they demand it.

13. Because of divestment's short-lived success, the institution is falsely listed as a divestment supporter for months or years to come in hope that other organizations will follow this now-pretend example.

14. Despite their threats, the BDSers move on, leaving the local leaders alone to deal with the bitterness and wreckage this entire incident has caused.

15. Wash, rinse, repeat at the next institution.

I'll have a bit more to say about matters specific to the Berkeley story in the next day or so. But suffice to say, Berkeley has joined a long line of organizations which has flirted BDS only to discover it is not so much a political movement as an opportunistic virus, delivered by an organization that may still be hoping that Berkeley does not have antibodies strong enough to resist it.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Sometimes religion involves sacrifice: Hockey team forced to forfeit over holiday

Parents and players of the Dollard des Ormeaux Midget B Civics are furious they will have to forfeit a regional semifinal hockey game that falls on the first night of Passover.

Team manager Eva-Lynn Gross was told by organizers it would be "easier to move Passover" than to reschedule a playoff game.

At least 10 of the team's 15 players are Jewish and are not willing to miss the first Seder on Monday night.

"The kids are very disappointed," said Gross, who has made appeals to the Dollard des Ormeaux and Lake St. Louis hockey leagues. "They should work around stuff like this."

Games can't be rescheduled during regionals, Lac St. Louis executive director Sylvain McSween said. "There are 700 hockey matches in less than three weeks, and we can't have any changes. One special case leads to another and another. There's nothing we can do."...

I was less than sympathetic, after all, this isn't the math test that the teacher can simply give on another night, and seriously, you want religion...live it. Then again, there's this:

Parents are even more upset that organizers wouldn't allow them to switch places with another team that offered its spot so the Civics could play at a time that wouldn't conflict with Passover.

"Lac St. Louis said no to that, too," said Earl Eichenbaum, the team's assistant coach. "The kids are very upset because they earned the right to play in this tournament. To be denied to progress seems unfair."

But if the league allows one team to switch times, everyone will ask for the same consideration, McSween said...

Hmmm...reasonable accommodation if someone is willing to switch and it doesn't effect the tournament...

Our friend Daveed Gartenstein-Ross takes a look at the latest Saudi terror arrests and just what that means about the terrorists tactics: Large-scale arrests in Saudi Arabia illustrate threat to the oil supply

...The reason plots against Saudi oil installations are of such concern is the possibility that a catastrophic attack on a key facility could have a devastating effect on the world economy. Former CIA case officer Robert Baer famously wrote in his 2003 book Sleeping with the Devil:

A single jumbo jet with a suicide bomber at the controls, hijacked during takeoff from Dubai and crashed into the heart of Ras Tanura, would be enough to bring the world's oil-addicted economies to their knees, America's along with them. Indeed, such an attack would be more economically damaging than a dirty nuclear bomb set off in midtown Manhattan or across from the White House in Lafayette Square.

It is unclear if the present plot was intended to be catastrophic or merely disruptive. The tactics and weaponry involved (suicide bombers, explosive belts) are more suggestive of a disruptive attack. But that should not distract from the fact that these arrests are a reminder of the oil supply's vulnerability.

/bites nails. [More.]

For you Photoshop users, this should be a wow...

Wait till you see him remove that entire tree (starting at about 2:50). Very exciting stuff.

[Via KA-CHING!]

[The following, by Israelinurse, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

It really is quite difficult to decide which was worse; the below the line comments on Mick Dumper's piece of March 10th or the above the line article. There is a degree of tedious predictability about many a CiF commentator, but to be frank, one would expect more from a professor of Middle East politics at Exeter University. Even though Professor Dumper is undoubtedly extremely learned and has written several books on Middle East politics and on Jerusalem in particular, as we know from many examples (Dumper's Exeter colleague Ilan Pappe being a case in point), that is no guarantee of either impartiality or accuracy.

Surreal as it may sound, Exeter University receives funding from the Muslim Brotherhood and on the advisory board of one of the university's research centres sit such characters as Muhammed Abdul Bari - head of the Muslim Council of Britain and chair of the East London Mosque of recent 'Dispatches' fame. Also on the same advisory board is Basheer Nafi; a former senior operative of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad who was deported from the US in 1996 for visa fraud and indicted in that country in 2003 for racketeering on behalf of the Islamic Jihad.

One does have to wonder if the research coming out of an establishment with such funders can be described in all honesty as non-partisan and whether academics such as Dumper and Pappe, who clearly have a very definite political agenda, are attracted to such places because of a certain political climate which exists there, or whether it is people like them who are magnets for funders with an Islamist agenda. Either way, Exeter's funders must have been very pleased by Dumper's article.

Continue reading "Dumper Truc(ulent)"

[This post, by The Brothers of Judea, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

One of our favorite bloggers, MJ Rosenberg, has come out with another exemplary work. His latest blog post on the HP, AIPAC Conference: Who Are These People?, is a paragon of the kind of self-assured, self-promotional writing we've come to expect. Mr. Rosenberg, who is Jewish, has taken it upon himself to inform all of us what American Jews are really like (hint: they are nothing like the people at AIPAC).

Mr. Rosenberg attended the AIPAC conference in Washington D.C., and I did not. However, I believe I can still challenge some of his experiences there, or at least point out the fact he did not provide adequate evidence to support his sweeping statements. Let's examine one:

"AIPAC can be summed up in the words of an American college student on their promotional video. And the sentiment is repeated over and over again..."I love Israel, and I love the US-Israel" relationship." Get it. American kids, born and bred in America -- whose grandparents and grandchildren are or will be Americans -- love America because America is Israel's friend...Who are these people? Have you ever met a Jewish college kid like that?" (emphasis added)

Mr. Rosenberg has taken the statement "I love Israel and I love the US-Israel relationship" and simply made up the "fact" that these American students love America because America is friends with Israel. Such a statement is simply absurd and has no factual evidence to back it up. In fact, it is worse than a lie, it is the classic accusation of dual loyalty that has plagued Jews since time immemorial and of which the Dreyfus Affair is the most famous example. Mr. Rosenberg is accusing this college student (and AIPAC in general) of disloyalty to America solely because the student "loves Israel". But the lies don't end here.

"Why do they scream, as one, over one poor captured Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, but give no indication of caring very much about the 4000 Americans killed In Iraq and Afghanistan. (Of course, most of them were for the Iraq war and are now pushing for crippling Iran sanctions that could lead to war)."

As I said, I was not at the AIPAC Conference. But unless Mr. Rosenberg went around and interviewed a significant sample of the people there, he cannot make the claim that these American Jews don't care about the Americans killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Here again, we see the baseless accusation of disloyalty to America based solely on the fact that these American Jews support Israel. I've always felt that support for Israel is a bi-partisan issue (and Congress' voting record supports that point of view), and AIPAC lobbies Republicans and Democrats alike. To make sweeping statements about the AIPACers' views on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars shows a willingness to stereotype that seems to cross the line into dishonest journalism.

"So why are we the way we are? And why is the AIPAC fringe like it is? I'll tell you one thing. It is not primarily because we are better Americans. It is because we are better Jews, even better Zionists. They are...something else."

It's entirely possible that some of the people at AIPAC are less than kind when it comes to the issue of Palestinian suffering. In fact, some of them are probably downright racist. But this kind of rhetoric is exactly the kind of thing we could expect to see from the far-left or far-right spokespeople: "If you don't agree with us, you're not American!" It is true that 80% of American Jews voted for Obama, but I could also point out Obama came off as a pretty strong pro-Israel candidate before he was elected. To declare himself and "American Jews" to be better, and different, from AIPAC, Mr. Rosenberg showcases the kind of arrogance and moral extremism he claims to be condemning AIPAC for.

In this article, Mr. Rosenberg showcases two different points of view, his and AIPAC's. He claims, without any evidence, that his point of view is the mainstream one and AIPAC's is the "fringe". But he offers no evidence to this conclusion beyond his own colossal arrogance.

Mr. Rosenberg challenges the reader at the beginning of the article to call him a "self-hating Jew". I don't think he's a self-hating Jew, it's clear he loves himself and the kind of Jew he is. But I do think he's something else entirely. At worst, he's an anti-Semitic Jew, willing to accuse other Jews of disloyalty and inhumanity without any evidence or doubt. At best, he's a foolish dreamer, unable to understand why the whole world doesn't see things the way he does and unaware that his words provide fodder for the anti-Semites among his readership. Good luck, Mr. Rosenberg, I hope someday your mind will open to other points of view.

UPDATE: MJ Rosenberg has removed the first paragraph I quoted above, about the college student loving America only because of the US-Israel relationship. Baby steps, Mr. Rosenberg, baby steps.

And they announced it on the front page of the PA's AL Quds newspaper. INN reported previously that Mahmoud Damara (also spelled Damra, aka Abu Awad) was to be promoted while in prison: Abbas to Promote Jailed Terrorist

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas plans to promote terrorist Mahmoud Damara, the former head of the PA's elite "Force 17," to the rank of Major-General. Damara is serving time in an Israeli prison for his involvement in multiple murders. The promotion was publicized in the PA daily Al-Quds.

Damara served in Force 17 and later in the presidential guard. He was wanted by Israel since 2000 for terrorist activity, and was arrested in 2006.

As head of a cell of Tanzim terrorists, Damara, also known as Abu Awad, initiated several terrorist attacks targeting soldiers and civilians...

Below, I have provided an image of the Al Quds article as well as a translation. I have also provided a translation from the Arabic news site NablusTV.net that contains more detail. Sorry, everything is in images captured from the PDF sent to me. Click each to expand.

The important point is not simply the continued glorification of terrorist murderers by the Palestinian Authority, but to emphasize the fact that several of Abu Awad's victims, including Esh Kodesh Gilmore and the Kahanes, were American citizens. Unfortunately, making excuses and covering up for PA terrorists in order to keep the "peace process" going is nothing new, and it happens even if the victims are American citizens.

The Al Quds article:

alqudsabuawad.jpg

Translation:

alqudsabuawadtranslation.gif

And here is the translation of the NablusTV story:

nablustvtranslation1.gif nablustvtranslation2.gif

abuawadlauncher.jpg

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

This is not the first time news has come about this station shutting down, but whatever. As I've noted in the past (previous: Bethlehem Christians fear neighbors, Only Christian TV station in Holy Land closes), the Samir Qumsieh (also spelled Samir Qumsiyeh) is the cousin of arch-anti-Israel activist, Mazin Qumsiyeh, who spends his time traveling the world trying to convince people that Israel ought to be removed in place of one big Palestinian Arab state. Yeah, I know, crazy: PA closes only Christian TV station

The owner of a private Christian TV station on Tuesday accused the Palestinian Authority of silencing the voice of the Christian minority in the Holy Land by forcing him to go off the air.

Samir Qumsieh, owner and director of Al-Mahed (Nativity) TV, which was founded in Beit Sahur, near Bethlehem, 14 years ago, said PA security officials who raided his station last week told him that the decision to close it down had been taken because he did not have a proper license.

"It's strange that they are closing us down now after we have been broadcasting for the past 14 years," Qumsieh said. "This is a breach of freedom of speech and an attempt to silence the media."...

...The Christian broadcaster was one of several private radio and TV stations that were closed last week under the pretext that they had been operating without a proper license from the PA's Ministry of Information and Ministry of Interior.

Most of the stations have been operating for over a decade.

The move drew a wave of protests by the owners and many journalists, who accused the PA government of seeking to silence the independent media in the Palestinian territories.

Some of the owners said they weren't able to renew their licenses because of the high fees requested by the PA authorities...

The other part of the article discusses the extent to which recent corruption scandals have taken hold in the consciousness of the PA residents, despite Abbas's attempts to silence the whistleblower. We're once again throwing our hopes behind an entity with no ability to deliver.

Update: The article has been updated and the title now reads: PA backtracks over Christian channel

The Palestinian Authority appears to have backtracked on its decision to close down 10 TV stations, including a private Christian channel.

The PA had taken the stations off the air, claiming they did not have proper licenses, but announced Wednesday that the networks would be given one month to sort out the issue.

Nevertheless, the owner of the Christian station said he would not reopen the channel until the PA apologizes...

How off was Hilary's ascription of the glorification of terrorist Dalal Mughrabi to Hamas alone? In Hillary Clinton's unfortunate mistake, Palestinian Media Watch piles up the evidence so high that it can't be simply an unfortunate error:

...Palestinian Media Watch has documented the continuous Mughrabi veneration by Abbas and the Palestinian Authority in recent years, both in connection to the square near Ramallah on the West Bank and in many other contexts. The following are 15 examples of the glorification of this one particular terrorist, Dalal Mughrabi. Five by Abbas himself, five by the Palestinian Authority or its leaders, and five by Fatah or its leaders:

  1. It was Abbas himself who defended the naming of the square after Mughrabi: "I do not deny it. Of course we want to name a square after her." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Jan. 17, 2010]
  2. It was Abbas himself who on December 31, 2009 honored that same terrorist Mughrabi by sponsoring a celebration of her birthday. [PA TV (Fatah) News, Dec. 29, 2009]
  3. It was Abbas's Fatah youth movement who prepared the Mughrabi square for the ceremony. [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 8, 2010]
  4. It was Abbas himself who funded a computer center after that same terrorist. "Present at the event were President Mahmoud Abbas's advisor... inaugurating the [Dalal Mughrabi] center, funded by a contribution from the President's [Abbas's] Office." [Al-Ayyam, May 5, 2009]
  5. It was Abbas who sent his Secretary General of the Presidency, Tayeb Abd Al-Rahim, to speak in his name, and called the terrorist the "bridge over which we pass on the way to our freedom." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 9, 2010]
  6. It was Abbas himself who sponsored high school graduation ceremonies in honor of the same terrorist Mughrabi at which "the representative of the President [Abbas] ... reviewed the heroic life of [Mughrabi] the Shahida (Martyr)." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (Fatah), July 24, 2008]
  7. It was Abbas's Minister of Culture, Siham Barghouti (Fatah) who defended naming the square after the terrorist: "Honoring them [the Martyrs] this way is the least we can give them, and this is our right." [Al-Ayyam, Jan. 11, 2010]
  8. It was Abbas's PA TV that opened its broadcasting this month on March 11, the anniversary of the attack, by praising the terror attack as: "A glorious chapter in the history of the Palestinian people." [PA TV Fatah March 11, 2010]
  9. It was not Hamas but Fatah, the party headed by Abbas, that decided to go ahead and dedicate that square after "a terrorist who murdered innocent Israelis." It was Fatah leaders who held up a banner that read: "On the anniversary of the Coastal Road Operation we renew our commitment and our oath that we will not stray from the path of the Shahids (Martyrs), Shahida (Martyr) Dalal Mughrabi Square, Shabiba (Fatah) students' movement" [Al-Quds, March 12, 2010]
  10. It was Abbas's Fatah Central Committee member Tawfiq Tirawi who said at the square's dedication: "We shall not submit to any threats, and we are here today to celebrate our history and our battle in naming the square after Mughrabi." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 12, 2010]
  11. It was Abbas's Fatah spokesman Dr. Faiz Abu Aytah who emphasized "the right of Fatah, of the Palestinian Authority, and of the Palestinian people to celebrate the anniversary of her [Mughrabi's] Martyrdom... Fatah is proud of Dalal's affiliation with it as a movement." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 11, 2010]
  12. It was Abbas's PA TV that interviewed the sister of the "terrorist who murdered innocent Israelis," on the anniversary of the terror attack and introduced her as follows: "Now, dear viewers, we move on to a glorious chapter in the history of the Palestinian people... Dalal Mughrabi, the Palestinian Shahida (Martyr), has become a symbol and model." Rashida Mughrabi, sister of terrorist Dalal Mughrabi responded: "This is a day of glory and pride for our Palestinian people." [PA TV March 11, 2010]
  13. It was Abbas's PA that held a soccer tournament named after the same "terrorist who murdered innocent Israelis." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (Fatah), Aug. 8, 2008]
  14. It was Abbas's Fatah that held a summer camp named after the same Mughrabi "out of honor and admiration for the Shahida (Martyr)." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (Fatah), July 23, 2008]
  15. It was at the ceremony of the Sixth General Conference of Abbas's Fatah movement that Fatah leaders responded with applause when former PA Prime Minister Abu Alaa (Ahmad Qurei) honored Mughrabi and her co-terrorists: "We have in our midst the hero Khaled Abu-Usbah, hero of the operation [terror attack] led by the Shahida (Martyr) Dalal Mughrabi [applause]. We salute him and welcome him. And [we salute] the hero, the Shahida (Martyr) Dalal. [He shouts:] All the glory! All the glory! All the glory! All the sisters here are Dalal's sisters." [PA TV (Fatah), Aug. 4, 2009]

Most of the above terror glorification by Abbas and Fatah has happened in the last few months, and it has all happened in the last two and a half years under Abbas. All this has been reported by Palestinian Media Watch. Yet tragically, people in the US State Department are not giving Secretary of State Clinton accurate information about PA Chairman Abbas...

Ouch. The rest is here.

ovalofficemeeting3.jpg

OK, it's a slight exaggeration (click for larger).

(Original)

Update: A couple of possible captions:

"Get Jeremy Ben-Ami on the line. Tell him it's good news."

"Does Hillary have the burqa on yet? OK, tell her she can come in, but make sure she stays quiet."

jimmymyers_largephoto.jpg

WTKK Talkmeister, Jimmy Myers

jeffklein pal flag.jpg

Jeff Klein, Once-a-Jew, Now Palestinian Die-Hard

If you're still doubting the impact of the recent CENTCOM briefing before the Senate and the Obama administration's incendiary attacks on settlements, listen to yesterday's Boston talk show with host Jimmy Myers - yes, his host station, WTKK, is a conservative media outlet.

Mr. Meyers' guest was a local agit-propper named Jeff Klein, self-described "former Jew", labor organizer, Pro Palestinian, Pro Hamas, George Galloway cheerleader who never saw an Arab atrocity against Jews he couldn't "understand." In the course of the half hour rant against Israel, Mr. Meyers crossed the line to thinly-veiled Jew hatred. Describing Jews as "arrogant", his rhetoric and fury were redolent of a Father Coughlin or a Gerald L.K. Smith of the 1930's and '40's. Listen, if you can stomach it:

Here are some of the video highlights from the AIPAC conference, including Netanyahu, Lindsey Graham, Richard Kemp, Alan Dershowitz...Hillary Clinton... (complete page of videos here).

Bibi (transcript):

Graham:

Continue reading "AIPAC Video"

From Palestinian Media Watch: A UNICEF-supported program's advertisement
features a giant ax splitting the Star of David

Donor organizations to the Palestinian Authority have been challenged for years to prevent their well-intentioned contributions from being directed towards hate promotion by the PA, its institutions and its NGOs.
Boycot Israe_ UNICEF032010.JPG

This advertisement is another example of the misuse of UN funding. An ad by a Palestinian youth organization, PYALARA, which is funded by UNICEF, shows an axe destroying a Star of David. The UNICEF logo is right on the ad. The large Star of David that has been destroyed has on it pictures of stars and stripes, presumably representing the USA, and an additional smaller Star of David.

The organization PYALARA (Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership and Rights Activation) has been funded by UNICEF since the year 2000: "PYALARA has been chosen by UNICEF as a major strategic partner in Palestine." [PYALARA website]

On the axe that destroys the Star of David is the word: "Boycott!" in the imperative tense. Youth are invited to watch the PA TV program calling for a boycott of Israel. In the program the host acknowledges that they are aware that the boycott is illegal but they have chosen to ignore this:

"We know that the Palestinian Authority is tied to a number of agreements that prohibit it from completely boycotting Israel... we call upon all the youth, to all the residents, to all businesses and stores, to completely boycott the Israeli goods in their stores."

The program started as follows: "The program Speak Up has decided to dedicate this program to a theme which is a national obligation upon each of us - the topic of boycotting Israel in all ways." [PA TV March 21, 2010]

The ad reads that the weekly youth program Speak Up is "produced in cooperation with PBC (PA TV) with the support of UNICEF."

Continue reading "UNICEF supports Palestinian Hate Ad "

[The following, by Israelinurse, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

Were the canapés at the JNews launch last week really so delicious that guest Matt Seaton felt the need to commission two CiF articles on the subject in 5 days? On March 15th Miri Weingarten waxed lyrical about her new project and a few days later Keith Kahn-Harris pitched in with one of his signature cloyingly naive articles. Mr. Kahn-Harris may be in for some disappointment; there's nothing to suggest that JNews is "a potential voice for peace" as stated in his piece, unless of course one considers the undermining of a sovereign state to be peaceful.

So what do JNews claim they will do according to Director Miri Weingarten?

"JNews will bring to public attention the authentic voices of those directly affected by the conflict and highlight the problems facing migrants and asylum seekers in Israel, the poor and the dispossessed, Arab-Palestinian citizens and the Bedouin. More generally in Israel-Palestine it will focus on the conditions of prisoners and detainees, the status and treatment of women, and the political and civil rights of Palestinians living under occupation and under the control of the Palestinian Authority."

Translation: JNews will push to the fore stories which highlight the viewpoint of everyone except the Jewish Israelis.

Continue reading "Nothing New about JNews"

[The following, by Kerry Hurwitz, appeared originally in Wicked Local, Newton.]

Newton -- The buzz about the aldermen's decision to invite a released Guantanamo Bay prisoner to live in Newton has died down, but the concerns it has raised have not. There are already residents of this fair city who share ideologies with terrorists and supporters of terrorists, and who act on these beliefs. So far, their actions have been legal and nonviolent. But be aware -- some of our neighbors are more sympathetic to terrorism than you would ever guess. Most do not fit the stereotypical image of terrorist supporters. They are not youthful jihadists, but seemingly ordinary citizens who claim to support "equality" and "freedom." Unfortunately, the facts belie their words.

Just a few weeks ago, a member of the anti-Israel, anti-American organization Code Pink held a fundraiser in her Newton home to benefit the "Gaza Freedom March," a Hamas-linked attempt to end the Israeli "occupation" in Gaza. (Note to Code Pink: Israel ended its presence in Gaza five years ago when it forcibly removed 8,000 Jews from their homes and businesses, thereby ethnically cleansing the area and making in Judenfrei).

The "Freedom March" is backed by a combination of radicals, anti-Semites and "useful fools," including the discredited George Galloway (banned from Canada, removed from the British Labour Party and suspended from Parliament), last seen handing bags of cash to Hamas for "political" purposes, and his group, Viva Palestina, which is designated a terrorist organization by Canada as well as investigated for theft and fraud in the U.S. and Great Britain, respectively. Every single one of the march's organizers, including its "official sponsor" Code Pink, wants to abolish the State of Israel and thereby subject its inhabitants to a regime which officially supports the genocide of the Jewish people. This aim is so horrible that it boggles the mind -- it's almost impossible to believe anyone would actually want this. But these groups do, although they disguise it in terms like "binational state" (where Jews would soon be a minority among peoples who voted into power the genocidal and totalitarian Hamas and the equally genocidal though slightly less totalitarian Palestinian Authority) and "right of return," which would permit each and every one the 4 million descendants of almost any Arab who left Israel or the West Bank for any reason after 1948, most of whom have no connection to the area at all, to not only become citizens but to expropriate land, buildings and businesses from Jewish and Christian Israelis. (About 6 million Jews and 1.5 million Arabs currently live in Israel.)

Continue reading "Newton's Other Terrorism Connection"

Monday, March 22, 2010

Oh great. Just when I start feeling like there's a shred of hope, here comes the "national right to resistance" which I think means violence, if one is to judge by the past.

Ah %*$#.

[Crossposted with additional material from JStreetJive. JStreetJive portion edited 3/23 9:43am]

hillary-clinton.jpg

Dalal Birthday 1PATV12_09a.jpg    dalal mughrabi busa.jpg

Ramallah Town Square Named for Terrorist.......And Her Proud Work.

Just moments ago, speaking - some might characterize it as pandering - to the national AIPAC Conference in Washington, D.C, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton erroneously attributed the outrageous naming of a town square near Ramallah in the memory of Dalal Mughrabi, the 1978 terrorist who murdered 37 Jews including 13 children - to only HAMAS! The commemoration ceremony was well attended by members of Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah Party. One Abbas lieutenant described Mughrabi as a "courageous fighter who held a proud place in Palestinian history." Tawfiq Tirawi, a member of the Fatah Central Committee declared, "We are all Dalal Mughrabi!" Consider the import of this monumental gaffe. Abbas and the PA constitute Israel's only legitimate negotiating partner and the Administration's "Partner in Peace." By condemning the commemoration, even if in error, Hillary is condemning that peace partner.

"When a Hamas-controlled municipality glorifies violence and renames a square after a terrorist who murdered innocent Israelis, it insults the families on both sides who have lost loves ones in this conflict."

At first hearing, Hillary's condemnation seems sincere and strong. It elicited a predictable, sympathetic response from her AIPAC audience. But her well-rehearsed indignation at HAMAS' role in honoring a terrorist (in reality it was FATAH that orchestrated the memorial) was a calculated, no-risk statement intended to compensate for the Administration's uncompromising demand to dry up all Israeli settlements - in effect, to ethnically cleanse the West Bank of Jews while Arab settlements in Israel and the West Bank grow and thrive without comment or criticism from the President.

But let's look a little more closely at her words: "Innocent Israelis" Did other terrorist (NPR calls them "activists") attacks kill "guilty" Israelis?

"It insults the families on both sides who have lost loved ones." That one needs a lot of explaining, Madame Secretary. How does the familiar pattern of Arabs murdering Jewish civilians - including children - "insult the families on both sides?" Was it an insult to the family of Dalal Mughrabi, the terrorist or to the families of the FATAH officials who presided over the event? Not an insult - a triumph.

Madame Secretary, can you point to the town square in Israel named for Baruch Goldstein? Can you remember the last Jewish suicide bomber who hijacked a PA bus and murdered 37 "innocent" Arabs? Hillary's performance was made easier in front of an audience that desperately wanted to applaud her before her act began. Of course, there were plenty of skeptics in the crowd, but the AIPAC leadership made it clear that it would brook no public disapproval.

Hopefully there is a growing challenge to the Administration's doctrine of "the infernal equal sign": the murder of Jewish civilians is equal to the murder of Arab civilians...the insult to Jewish families is equal to an insult to Arab families...Palestinian terror is equal to the building of Jewish apartments...and on and on. Only when thinking Jews and non-Jews understand the fallacy of this kind of logic will the stark reality of the epochally dangerous policy of the Obama Admninistration sink in.

If she acknowledged her omission of Mahmoud Abbas' party's role in terror and its glorification, she would be compelled to acknowledge the genocidal intent of ALL major Palestinian Arab "Peace Partners." Unless, of course - and this is a distinct possibility - AIPAC leaders gloss over the statement lest it be perceived as "disrespect' for the Secretary of State. In that case, it will be dismissed as an innocent naming error or a "misstatement". Hopefully, we haven't heard the end of this story.

Martin Solomon adds: Hilary's error was not. It was clearly an intentional choice to name Hamas and not Fatah in order to continue to cover for the supposed "peace partner." I suppose the excuse is that Abbas has little choice and between he and Fayyad they are doing all they can with the best of intentions given the culture they're dealing with. But that culture will never change if they're never responsible for anything. This is a matter of pushing for preordained conclusions before anything is ready and disaster is the only possible result.

Hillary's statement was so patronizing it was a damned insult. To stand on the stage and condescend in such a blatant manner ought to have given the AIPAC audience (who was well coached to treat her with the utmost respect) wild.

Jennifer Rubin comments: The Wages of Moral Equivalence.

Carl in Jerusalem: Clinton decides that Hamas controls Ramallah

Elder is spot-on here: Hillary: Worse than clueless?

Finally, Barry Rubin: Hillary Clinton's AIPAC speech: Find the Glaring Contradiction

Hillary's address was extremely disturbing. The puffery was the usual, the substance was scary. The fact that AIPAC had to turn itself into a Stepford lobby shows how dependent it is on those in power and not the other way around.

Abbas is, of course, continuing to stick to a hard line and is even reserving the right to "popular resistance."

This article is a must read all the way through.

I especially ask those of you who seem to equate all the people of the East, including our Arab cousins, with Nazis (shame on you).

It is true that clerics with extremist agendas have great power particularly but not only in Saudi Arabia. However it is also true that people there have long and great traditions of literacy and particularly of poetry, and that people including women are beginning to stand up and speak.

Hissa Hilal read her 15 verse poem, speaking out against the clerics and their violent messages, to thunderous applause in Dubai.

She has advanced to the final round of a poetry contest there. Notably, poets in the Arab world can attain the status of rock stars here.

So I would be extremely careful about underestimating their culture or assuming there's nobody among the Arabs with whom we can communicate.

Indeed there is a long tradition of Jewish poetry in Arabic and Jewish and Arabic music are so closely intertwined, especially among Sephardic, Yemenite and Mizrachi Jews, that it's often impossible say who wrote what. And the quarter tone scale even appears in Western music via the Azkenazim - so people who claim we have nothing in common with the Oriental world are all wet.

Here's an excerpt:

Hilal's 15-verse poem was in a form known as Nabati, native to nomadic tribes of the Arabian Peninsula. She criticized extremism that she told AP is "creeping into our society" through fatwas.

"I have seen evil in the eyes of fatwas, at a time when the permitted is being twisted into the forbidden," she said in the poem. She called such edicts "a monster that emerged from its hiding place" whenever "the veil is lifted from the face of truth."

She described hard-line clerics as "vicious in voice, barbaric, angry and blind, wearing death as a robe cinched with a belt," in an apparent reference to suicide bombers' explosives belts.

The three judges gave her the highest marks for her performance, praising her for addressing a controversial topic. That, plus voting from the 2,000 people in the audience and text messages from viewers, put her through to the final round.

"Hissa Hilal is a courageous poet," said al-Amimi. "She expressed her opinion against the kind of fatwas that affect people's lives and raised an alarm against these ad hoc fatwas coming from certain scholars who are inciting extremism."

snip

Please read.

Now, I hope those of you who call me "Chamberlain" because I think we can talk to people like Hilal will reconsider and also reconsider whether you should be dismissing Arab people like her and calling them en masse "Nazis".

With all due respect, you are not only insulting the peacemakers but you are committing the same crime as people who damn the Jews.

And that's both blind and wrong.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

3212010_gekko.jpg

From RedPlanetCartoons.

That's all the stomach I have to post about health care for the moment. If I see Nancy Pelosi's Stepford rictus grin one more time I'm going to jump through the TV and box her behind the ears with a staple remover.

Update: A valiant missive to Congressman Capuano, one of the more liberal members of a liberal Massachusetts delegation: For What It's Worth. Far too much sense.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

While the Obama Administration is fiddling over the construction of apartments in Jerusalem, the Middle East is burning. Yet these other issues don't attract the attention -- and certainly not the action -- required.

1. Iran is now allied with al-Qaida: General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, revealed a bombshell story that has been ignored: Iran is helping al-Qaida attack Americans.

Iran, he said in military-speak, provides "a key facilitation hub, where facilitators connect al Qaida's senior leadership to regional affiliates." Translation: Tehran is letting al-Qaida leaders travel freely back and forth to Pakistan and Afghanistan, using its territory as a safe haven, while permitting them to hold meetings to plan terrorist attacks for attacking U.S. targets and killing Americans. While nominally Iran sometimes takes these people into custody, that seems, Petraeus says, a fiction to fool foreigners.

Oh, and Petraeus added that Iran also helps the Taliban fight America in Afghanistan. Regarding Iraq, the general explains, "The Qods Force [an elite Iranian military group within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] also maintains its lethal support to Shia Iraqi militia groups, providing them with weapons, funding and training,"

So, Petraeus pointed out that Iran is helping al-Qaida against the United States and also, at times, Shia groups intended to be Iran's proxies for spreading its influence in Iraq. In effect, the Tehran regime is at war with the United States. Yet this point is not being highlighted, nor does it stir rage in the hearts of White House officials or strenuous attempts to counter this threat.

Meanwhile, Iran isn't just building apartments but nuclear weapons' facilities.

2. Lebanon being further integrated into Iran-Syria alliance

In an interview with al-Jazira television, Walid Jumblatt, formerly the roaring lion of the opposition, turns into a mouse and apologizes to Syrian dictator Bashar al-Asad:

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Other Than Apartments in Jerusalem, What Else is Going on in the Middle East?"

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word.]

Now this is where tragedy turns to farce. Sari Hanafi is an academic at the American University of Beirut. He recently visited the UK to participate in "Israel Apartheid Week," which gave him a platform to promote the recent book he co-authored on the "anatomy of Israeli rule in the occupied Palestinian territories." Halfway through his visit, Hanafi was forced to return to Beirut in order to face a furious gathering of AUB faculty and students who denounced him for collaborating with Israel. The basis for this charge? The co-authors of Hanafi's book were two Israelis, Michael Givon and Adi Ophir. Because of this heinous act of betrayal, an Arab academic whose book is energetically promoted at a global event which marks the highlight of the boycott movement's calendar finds himself condemned for breaking the very same boycott through the very same book.

More on this here and here. Most instructive is this statement put out by Hanafi's supporters - "We strongly sense that a normative and literal application of the rules may sometimes produce paradoxical outcomes" - which is another way of saying that the boycott can make you look extremely silly indeed.

But don't take my word for it. Here are the Pythons:

Saturday, March 20, 2010

How could I have let pass uncommented-upon the passing of Fess Parker on Thursday. The man played both Daniel Boone AND Davy Crocket. Beat that. And those theme songs!

I originally wrote this in response to the discussion about the possible withholding of arms for Israel.

This evolved into a discussion of arms trade involving Israeli inventions, the US prevention thereof and some other issues that got me thinking about democracies, especially small ones versus great powers and also the morality or rather amorality of "interests:" So I decided to make a separate post. I apologize that it's kind of long but I'm trying to pull some ideas together here because I think we're seeing a lot of overlapping issues.

So - I started out by venting about the canard about Israeli power relative to ours:

Look. The baloney about America being controlled by Israel is ridiculous, it is obviously the other way around, to the point of saying what they can and cannot sell or build or live or even if they will have the capability to defend themselves. That is the harsh reality. There are some discussions on TNR about why Obama isn't being tough on Russia for example which clearly isn't acting in American interests as a rule, so why is he beating up the Israelis.

Well it's pretty obvious - Russia is big and powerful and rich in resources and Israel is small and dependent on us. So duh. It sucks but there it is. PS so much for defending minorities not to mention honoring democracy in practice.

Continue reading "Guns, Butter, Democracy and 'Interests' And How Little Nations Like Israel Get Squashed In The Middle [Sophia]"

"Why yes, we are f*cking Nazis. Why do you ask?"

nazipals.jpg

Palestinians hold a sign depicting a swastika during clashes at Qalandiya checkpoint near the West Bank city of Ramallah March 19, 2010. Stone-throwing Palestinians clashed with Israeli security forces in several locations in East Jerusalem and the West Bank amid tensions over Israel's recently announced plan to build houses in East Jerusalem.

Just another image of the Obama Intifada.

Congratulations to our friend Pedro Zuquete, co-author (with Charles Lindholm) of the new book The Struggle for the World: Liberation Movements for the 21st Century:

What do Mexico's Zapatistas, the French National Front, Slow Food, rave subculture, and al-Qaeda all have in common? From right-wing to left-wing to no-wing, they all proudly proclaim their mission to defend their distinctive identities against modernity's homogenizing processes. This controversial book establishes fundamental similarities between anti-globalization "aurora" movements that aim to destroy the modern world and bring a radiant new dawn to humankind.

While these groups often despise one another, they nonetheless share many fundamental characteristics, goals, and attitudes. Drawing on the original writings and actions of various anti-globalist groups, the authors reveal a common tendency toward charismatic leadership, good versus evil worldviews, the quest for authentic identity, concern with ritual, and unbending demands for total commitment. These movements, however they pursue world transformation and personal transcendence, are a prominent and continuing aspect of our present condition. This book is a strong reminder that, no matter what the cause, revolution is not a thing of the past and the fervent search for another world continues.

Update: There is a Facebook fan page for the book, here.

michelle_mcgee_jesse_james_nazi_07_full.jpg

I mean, now that he's no longer with Human Rights Watch he'll need a new job...maybe as an expert on some sort of Extreme version of Antiques Road Show. I wonder if he digs chicks with forehead tats? (That goes a bit far for me.)

[For those not keeping up with their celebrity gossip, this is the woman Jesse James cheated on Sandra Bullock with.]

The Boycott/Divestment/Sanctions crew built a "wall" out in Amherst, MA. Judging by the results, one could be lulled into a false sense of security concerning the dangers of the BDS "movement." Rather pathetic: Take Down This (Extremely Silly) Wall (please!)

Erecting eye-sores and annoying people is no way to start a revolution, kids.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

The United States is at war with al-Qaida. Al-Qaida carried out the attack on the World Trade Center that killed 3,000 Americans. Al-Qaida is killing Americans in Iraq and elsewhere. So one would think the fact that al-Qaida has found a powerful ally would be a big story in the American media and by a big priority for setting off U.S. government anger.

And this would be especially so if that was explained by one of the most respected men in the country, a man who has access to the highest-level intelligence.

Not at all.

In the same testimony which created lots of discussion regarding remarks on the Israel-Palestinian issue, General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, revealed a bombshell story that has been ignored: Iran is helping al-Qaida attack Americans.

Continue reading "White House Ignores Iran's Help to Al-Qaida in its Passion over Jerusalem Apartments"

Friday, March 19, 2010

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

Now That's an Insult.

The Obama Administration must have been reading from its Marxist playbook (Groucho, of course) when they escalated a non-event into the most serious breach in American Israeli relations since Gen. George Marshall wished for the stillbirth of the Jewish State in 1948. Just imagine - Joe Biden, Barack Obama, David Axelrod, Ram Emanuel, Hillary Clinton - all children of the 60's - irreverant and iconoclastic - suddenly and grievously "insulted" by the announcement that Jews will expand a community in the capital of their own country. Imagine the effrontery! Imagine their injured pride!

And yet, for some inexplicable reason, Joe Biden was apparently not insulted or bothered by his other "peace partner", Mahmoud Abbas, when he dedicated a town square in Ramallah in the memory of Dalal Mughrabi, the terrorist who, in 1978, commandeered a bus and murdered 37 Jewish civilians including 13 children. No "slap in the face" there. As a matter of fact, Joe gave Mahmoud a great big hug when he visited Ramallah last week.

The "insult" has spawned international outrage at Israel for her impertinence of wanting to build apartments in her own capital city. Maureen Dowd and Thomas Friedman of the New York Times penned op-eds condemning the action and the same paper's Ethan Bronner even played the race card in smearing Israelis. In the ensuing feeding frenzy, Ben Cohen of the American Jewish Committee was man-handled on CNN by an unabashed Ben Ami supporter; J Street could not hide its delight at its Presidential Messiah leading the charge. The EU is now demanding more stringent concessions from Israel and insists on a complete settlement freeze including natural growth. There can be no other interpretation of a ban on "natural growth" than ethnic cleansing.

Continue reading "The Insult, Decoded. [Hillel]"

[The Huffington Post is the major competitor of "Comment if Free" in the blogosphere. Interestingly the Huffington Post seems to be afflicted with the same malaise of its sister blog across the Atlantic. This is a guest post by Zach of TheBrothersofJudea, a blog that tracks antisemitism at the Huffington Post. This is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

The internet newspaper the Huffington Post has long had the reputation of a breeding ground for anti-Semitic attitudes. Though I have only been "watching" it for a few months now, I have already seen a lifetime's worth of anti-Semitic hatred and anti-Israel slander on the talkback threads. Although the multiple bloggers who write for the Huffington Post are almost all critical of Israel, few have crossed the line into unvarnished anti-Semitism. That is, until December of last year.

Michael Carmichael is a Huffington Post blogger, who according to his bio is a "senior political consultant, historian, author and broadcaster" based in Oxford, England. He normally writes about such topics as American politics, business, Karl Rove, and Avatar. Which only made his column on December 16, 2009 even more shocking.

Carmichael wrote a story about healthcare reform with the inflammatory title, "Kill the Bill." To those who follow the healthcare reform debate, Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn) is not in favor of healthcare reform as it currently stands. He doesn't want a public option and said that he will help to filibuster any bill that included it. This has led to one of the most prominent Jewish senators losing even more popularity from the Democrats, and from the American people in general. All this is background, though, because Carmichael's article isn't really about healthcare reform, it's about Israel, and how Israel controls America.

Carmichael takes two parts of Joe Lieberman's political views (namely, that is he is an advocate of Israel and is against the current healthcare bill) and combines them. He concludes that because Joe Lieberman is an Israel advocate he must be acting in Israel's interests. Carmichael's only evidence for this classic accusation of Jewish dual-loyalty is that Prime Minister Netanyahu "threatened" to "undermine Obama's presidency." But even this supposed "evidence" is questionable - the Ha'aretz story used by Carmichael said only that, "Senior officials in the Obama administration also accused Netanyahu of suggesting that he had the power to pressure Obama with various lobbies within the U.S. political arena." The word "threatened" was not used, nor was Obama's presidency ever discussed.

Things only became more interesting from there. When Carmichael wrote the article, and in the original Huffington Post publication, the article contained the following sentence:

"Netanyahu's agent, Senator Joseph Lieberman, provides the poison to the chalice of health care reform and - at the same time - accomplishes the mission of his ultimate master: the Prime Minister of a government of a foreign nation whose relations have proven to be more than burdensome for the American people."

Accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel or to Jews worldwide than their own countries is a staple of anti-Semitic literature, and can be lifted right out of the definition. It even stretches back to the Dreyfus Trial. This sentence by itself shows that this article's key point is one of blatant anti-Semitism, even ignoring the other attacks on Israel contained within the article.

Carmichael concludes with a call for America to remove all ties with Israel based on his manufactured conspiracy theory:

"It is time to sever the umbilicals of nation, state, government and military ties between the USA and Israel that protract the crises in: the Middle East, the global economy; the US Congress; the clinics, surgeries and hospitals of America and the promised lands of Judea, Samaria and Gaza."

The story doesn't end there, however. The Huffington Post reacted to this story in a number of ways. While the article was in the spotlight, so to speak, the moderation on it was increased twentyfold. Comments like, "This article is anti-Semitic," or "Easier just to blame the Jews, eh Mr. Carmichael?" were not cleared by the moderators to be posted, though they did not violate any terms of use. If you look at the article now, you will see that there are only four comments. No comments pointing out the blatantly anti-Semitic nature of the content remained for very long, if they ever were able to make it through moderation in the first place.

The Huffington Post staff followed this by attempting to restrict access to the article. Carmichael's page and article archive does not include "Kill the Bill," nor does the Huffington Post's "World" page. It can still be found with a Google search, however. Some might consider this to be a positive sign; the Huffington Post staff realized that the article was anti-Semitic and tried to limit its exposure. But if that's the case, why didn't they just simply delete it? The actions of the Huffington Post staff might be an attempt to remove a clearly inflammatory article from their readership, but it might also simply be a coverup.

This would seem to be confirmed by the fact that, if you look at the article as it currently reads, you might notice a subtle difference. The sentence quoted above about Lieberman as Netanyahu's "agent," the "icing on the cake" of the anti-Semitism in the article, is no longer there. Compare it with a reprint of the article in the "Center for Global Research," and you will see that Carmichael's words were changed from what they were. Probably by the Huffington Post's editors. And yes, when the article was originally posted it was included in full.

To conclude, here we have the best (though not the only) example of anti-Semitism on the Huffington Post so far. The Huffington Post staff reacted to this in a half-hearted attempt to cover it up, including changing the author's words, though they fell short of taking the final step and removing the article itself. Michael Carmichael is still on the Huffington Post blogroll, though he has not published an article since January. The Huffington Post has often come under fire for a encouraging and even endorsing anti-Semitic attitudes, and this story is unlikely to help them shake this image.

As some of you may have heard, the Student Senate at Berkeley University pass a divest-from-Israel resolution a couple of days ago. As you might expect, I have a few words to say on the subject. Normally, I'd cross-post the entire thing here, but I've added my first poll to Divest This which I hope the good people here at Solomonia might respond to after reading about what all this California BDS activity adds up to here.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Including bunker busters? There's some "explosive" stuff in this article at World Tribune, if true. BUT, it feels like I've heard this sort of thing before, and it's the type of thing that gets exaggerated easily. Is this really the sort of thing that can be kept quiet from all but the formidable World Tribune? Hmmm...Obama blocks delivery of bunker-busters to Israel

The United States has diverted a shipment of bunker-busters designated for Israel.

Officials said the U.S. military was ordered to divert a shipment of smart bunker-buster bombs from Israel to a military base in Diego Garcia. They said the shipment of 387 smart munitions had been slated to join pre-positioned U.S. military equipment in Israel Air Force bases.

"This was a political decision," an official said.

In 2008, the United States approved an Israeli request for bunker-busters capable of destroying underground facilities, including Iranian nuclear weapons sites. Officials said delivery of the weapons was held up by the administration of President Barack Obama.

Since taking office, Obama has refused to approve any major Israeli requests for U.S. weapons platforms or advanced systems. Officials said this included proposed Israeli procurement of AH-64D Apache attack helicopters, refueling systems, advanced munitions and data on a stealth variant of the F-15E.

"All signs indicate that this will continue in 2010," a congressional source familiar with the Israeli military requests said. "This is really an embargo, but nobody talks about it publicly."...

dodgunboom.jpg

U.S. Navy Aviation Ordnanceman Airman Recruit Chanda Axton fires a salute battery during a live-fire exercise aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) while under way in the Pacific Ocean March 12, 2010. Nimitz and embarked Carrier Air Wing 11 are en route to the United States after an eight-month deployment to the Arabian Sea in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class John Philip Wagner Jr., U.S. Navy/Released)

memriibrahimimosque.jpg

Indoctrinate the kids and then get 'em out and fight...and note the threat to the kids themselves...stay in line, or else.

MEMRITV: Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV Children's Puppet Show: 'We Must Rise Against the Zionist Criminals, the Enemies of Allah, and Liberate Jerusalem and All the Holy Places' (Link to transcript.)

...Uncle Hassan: "Unfortunately, 'Alloush and dear children, the Arab and Islamic nation is in a slumber. A deep slumber. We must stand up. We must awaken. 'Alloush and dear children - each one of you must tell his father, his grandfather, and the rest of his family that they should all arise as one. They must rise up against the criminal Zionists, who are planning to destroy Jerusalem, and to turn the Islamic waqf into something bad. We must rise against the Zionist criminals, the enemies of Allah, and liberate Jerusalem and all the holy places. We should liberate them. Do you hear, 'Alloush?"

'Alloush: "Ah, now I get it. I thought the Jews wanted to enable people to visit the Ibrahimi Mosque, but it turns out that they want to steal it."

Uncle Hassan: "That's right, 'Alloush. It's a good thing that you got it. Did you tell this to anyone else, or just me?"

'Alloush: "Just you."

Uncle Hassan: "Very good. You didn't make us look bad. Do you know what people would accuse you of, if you said this in the street?"

'Alloush: "Of what, Uncle Hassan?"

Uncle Hassan: "They would accuse you of being a collaborator. They would think that you are a Zionist collaborator. I would like to tell you two things, in conclusion: We must think before we speak. Get it? We should be familiar with all our Arab and Islamic holy places, okay?"

'Alloush: "Okay."...

The video is here.

It's David T., over at Harry's Place: Now I'm Being Sued By George Galloway!

Read the whole thing, but apparently Galloway is actually claiming to have been defamed due to his having been associated with Hamas through a comment David T. left at another blog. Get it? Galloway, who does, in fact, associate with Hamas, is claiming damages because someone pointed it out.

I believe in American court such a claim would be absurd, but in this case it's Britain, so who knows. As David T., I smell shades of Lipstadt/Irving should it go on.

Americans for Peace and Tolerance has released an excellent new video. Must watch:

New Video Shows Radical Islamic Network in New England

Americans for Peace and Tolerance (APT) today released an 8-minute online video clip describing a network of Islamic radicals operating in New England. The video focuses on the October arrest - and the response to that arrest - of a Sudbury, Massachusetts resident who the FBI charged with planning to machine gun shoppers in a New England mall.

"The arrest of Tarek Mehanna was shocking," said APT President, Dr. Charles Jacobs. "It occurred just two weeks before the murder of 13 Americans at Fort Hood.

Jacobs said "What is especially disheartening, given the historical moderation and success of Boston Muslims, is the current groundswell of support for Tarek within a segment of the Boston Muslim community and its virulent response to his arrest."

Continue reading "Video: From Sudbury to Mumbai: The Boston Terror Plot"

This comes as no surprise to those of us who have read Richard Evans' Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial, but it's good to see this reaching out in to a wider audience. Bad history is so annoying:

...A commission of historians confirmed earlier findings that up to 25,000 people died in the firestorm unleashed by British and US bombers on February 13-15, 1945.

The study was meant to resolve a dispute that has raged in Germany for decades, with far-right groups claiming that up to 500,000 people were killed in the attack. Critics of the raids have sought to have them classified as a war crime, arguing that they were strategically unnecessary because Germany was already on its knees, and that they targeted civilians rather than military objectives.

In recent years a consensus has emerged among most historians that between 25,000 and 40,000 were killed in the bombing of one of the most beautiful Baroque cities in Europe. However, the reaction to yesterday's exhaustively researched figure suggested that many in Germany still believe that the death toll was significantly higher...

...During five years of research the Dresden Historians' Commission reviewed records from city archives, cemeteries, official registries and courts and checked them against published reports and witness accounts. The figure of 25,000 matches conclusions reached by local authorities immediately after the war, in 1945 and 1946...

Where did the higher numbers come from? Largely from Holocaust denying, Hitler-admiring David Irving, who was simply using numbers originally put forward by the Goebbels propaganda machine:

...The inflated death toll was partly the work of the far-right historian David Irving, who in his 1963 book The Destruction of Dresden called the bombing a deliberate war crime. He based his figures on a Nazi document that reported 202,400 dead: the historian Frederick Taylor said the document had been faked by the Nazis, who had simply added a nought to each total...

Via Oliver Kamm, who also comments here.

Lee Smith has been on a roll with good material lately. Here he is with a very positive look at that Lefty Jewish bogey-man, the Evangelical Christian: Evangelical Christians have emerged as Israel's staunchest allies--even as some American Jews are made uneasy by the show of support

...While escorting evangelicals through the landmarks of their faith, Brog introduces his charges to the modern Middle East. The Galilee, where Jesus lived and worked, is where Hezbollah rains rockets down on the villages from which Jesus recruited his disciples; Jerusalem, where he died for man's sins, is protected by a security barrier against the suicidal designs of the enemies of God's chosen people. And for evangelicals, even as the Jews rejected Jesus, God never rejected the Jews, who remain God's chosen people.

The Biblical verse that inspires American evangelicals' love for the Jews, the nation that gave them their savior, is Genesis 12:3: "I will bless them that bless thee," God told Abraham, "and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." Their philo-Semitism is a reversal of the millennia-old Christian tradition of replacement theology, or the belief that God's covenant with the Jews was superseded by his covenant with the church through Jesus Christ. Central to this understanding is the interpretation of the word "Israel." "Evangelicals read the Bible literally," says Brog. "If you take Israel to mean Christ's church, then this can be used as an example of God rejecting the Jews. But if you believe Israel means the Jews, then the Bible becomes a Zionist book."

The fact that sacred history is alive to evangelicals can make them powerful advocates for the modern state of Israel. Their witness extends beyond the congregations, small churches, and mega-cathedrals spread throughout the country and now reaches all the way to Washington, D.C., where Brog shows them how to put their philo-Semitism to practical use. "When they come up to meet with their congressmen or senators," says Brog, "we share with them the details of timely legislation like the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act." That is to say, they show them how to support it...[More.]

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word.]

In my earlier post (here or join the debate at Harry's Place,[Also here, below. -MS]) I mentioned that my appearance this week on CNN was introduced with three clips about the evils of the Israel Lobby featuring Rami Khouri, Stephen Walt and Loretta Napoleoni. I added that I'd never heard of Napoleoni, but one of the Harry's Place commenters, David Thompson, has. And he points out this miserable apologia for the late, unlamented Al Qaeda terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi which Napoleoni published in Socialist Worker, no less!

Here's a flavor of what she has to say: "He showed strong leadership qualities and organisational skills. The inmates elected him their leader. People were impressed by his determination and his kindness. Once he personally bathed a mujahideen who had been injured and had lost a leg."

Got the kleenex out yet?

Apparently, CNN International believes that this apologist for Zarqawi, the murderer of American troops and Iraqi civilians, both Shi'a and Sunni, can simultaneously be presented as an authoritative analyst of Middle East politics.

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word.]

To anyone who knows the medium of television, the statement that a news program is probably the last place to have a serious discussion about a serious matter is hardly a revelation. The allotted timeframe, generally three or four minutes, precludes any in-depth analysis. Discussants are acutely aware that they have to communicate in soundbites, so rather than engaging with each other, they artfully twist the presenter's questions into answers that emphasize the talking points they arrived at the studio with. That's how it's always been.

A key assumption here is that the anchor will keep a respectful distance, editorially-speaking, between his or her guests. The anchor will allow each guest equal time to speak. Whether the anchor is in passive listening mode or acting like an amphetamine-fueled interrogator, the accepted norm is that all guests will receive the same treatment.

True, this conception of the anchor's role now seems almost quaint, a throwback to the days when journalism placed a supreme value on objectivity. Nonetheless, it remains valid, particularly when it comes to straight news shows (as distinct from the more charged talk show environments.)

Keeping the above template in mind, I want to relate what happened to me when I appeared, in my capacity as AJC's Associate Director of Communications, on CNN International earlier this week. In a segment anchored by Jim Clancy, Jeremy Ben Ami of J Street and myself were discussing the diplomatic row between the US and Israel sparked by the announcement, during Vice President Biden's visit to Israel, of a new housing development in the east Jerusalem district of Ramat Shlomo.

I expected a rough ride as I watched the introductory clips: Palestinian propagandist Rami Khouri, Israel Lobby author Stephen Walt and some Italian journalist I'd never heard of called Loretta Napoleoni, all waxing lyrical about the inordinate power of the Israel Lobby. There was no dissenting view.

When it came to the "discussion," Clancy was extremely deferential toward Ben Ami, beginning and ending the segment with him and not interrupting him once. In marked contrast, he interrupted me no less than ten times in a three minute segment. Moreover, he insisted on portraying AJC - a decidedly centrist organization that has long supported a two-state solution - as a collection of wild-eyed fanatics.

For my part, the most telling moment came when I tried to raise the ten-month moratorium on West Bank settlement announced by the Israeli government last November. This is what transpired:

Ben Cohen: ...one thing Jeremy did not mention is that there has been a 10-month moratorium on settlements by the Netanyahu government, that was a very important concession...

Jim Clancy (interrupting): ...Now wait a minute, settlements...Ben Cohen, you're drawing lines here that are absolutely false, you know well when you say that that Israel continues to build in occupied east Jerusalem. Ok, I know it is not completely sorted out, but there is no sense in you looking the audience straight in the eye and not telling the truth....

BC: I am looking the ...

JC (interrupting): The last word here, I've got to give it to Jeremy.

BC (sarcastic): Of course you do, Jim.

Had Clancy allowed me to continue, I had planned to say that the announcement was significant for two reasons: firstly, because it came from Netanyahu, in spite of the fragile coalition he heads and his long-standing reputation as a hardliner, secondly, because when the announcement was made, it was explicitly welcomed by the US, even though east Jerusalem was outside the terms of the freeze.

By any standards, what I wanted to say was reasonable and relevant, even if not everyone would agree with my analysis; yet I was rudely shut down. Why this happened is really the heart of the matter - much more than the personal discourtesy shown towards me, which resulted in an apology from Clancy when he called me the following day.

Recall the three clips I mentioned which introduced the segment: all the speakers advanced the thesis of a shadowy, unaccountable "Israel Lobby" that runs policy and "controls the discourse," as Mearsheimer and Walt put it in their shabby book, "The Israel Lobby." It's a thesis which has pierced the mainstream to the point where it has become unremarkable, despite its psychedelic assertion that a cluster of loosely-connected non-governmental agencies exercise more power over Middle East policy than the White House, the State Department and The Pentagon.

Once you buy into this thesis, you cannot help but regard any representative of one of the "Lobby's" constituents as a born liar whose prime loyalty is to the West Bank settler movement (as Clancy said to me, before I'd addressed the substantive point he put to me, "you're drawing lines here that are absolutely false...there is no sense in you looking the audience straight in the eye and not telling the truth.")

Therein lies the paradox: just as those who indignantly deny that antisemitism is a problem are usually the same people doing their utmost to promote it, those who protest that the "Lobby" is muzzling honest debate are invariably the first to close down the viewpoints they object to, on the grounds that these viewpoints must really be lies. In other words, they do to us what they accuse us of doing to them.

There is plenty to think about here, and not only for those of us doggedly combating the portrayal of Israel as the source of every ill, whether a terrorist bomb on a Madrid commuter train or a slain American soldier in Afghanistan. J Street also needs to ask itself whether it wants to be the "good Jew" in a universe of "bad Jews." I certainly don't blame Jeremy Ben Ami for what happened to me on CNN; he was there to put across his own position, and he did so in an accomplished manner. That notwithstanding, does he want to be regarded as an ally by those whose objection is not to Israeli policy, but their bigoted, half-baked conception of what Israel is?

Martin Solomon adds: Peaking of CNN, take a look at what happened when Rick Sanchez was interviewing Wolf Blitzer, and live responses to Sanchez's Twitter feed were scrolling along the screen...take a look at the type of thing that made the air: From CNN's lower third: 'Jewish lobby runs America'

Three Israeli parents who lost children to terrorism have an excellent op-ed in yesterday's LA Times. This is the kind of thing that is going to prevent Obama's intended use (and instigation of) the current crisis coming to anything: Dalal Mughrabi helped kill 38 innocent men, women and children in Israel. Palestinians named a square after her.

Vice President Joe Biden took umbrage last week when Israel announced during his visit that it had approved new housing construction in East Jerusalem. But another contentious incident that took place during Biden's visit got far less scrutiny.

March 11 marked the 32nd anniversary of the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel's history, and this year the Palestinian Authority decided to honor the 19-year-old leader of the attack, Dalal Mughrabi, by naming a square in a town outside Ramallah after her. The commemoration was scheduled for the anniversary.

The official ceremony was ultimately canceled to avoid antagonizing Biden during his visit, but the square was nevertheless named for Mughrabi, and several dozen Palestinian students from President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah movement gathered in her honor for an unofficial dedication.

So what was the deed that deserved this commemoration? On a Saturday in March 1978, the squad of Palestinian terrorists led by Mughrabi entered Israel by boat from Lebanon and made their way to the main road between Haifa and Tel Aviv. By day's end, they had murdered 38 innocent men, women and children.

The first person Mughrabi and her gang of terrorists encountered was Gale Rubin, an American photojournalist taking photos of birds near the beach. They killed her and continued on their deadly path.

They then hijacked a bus full of happy families returning from a Saturday excursion. On their way to Tel Aviv, the terrorists shot at passing cars and killed more innocent people.

The terrorists tied all the men's hands to the bus seats. When Israeli security forces stopped the bus, the terrorists ran out while throwing hand grenades into the bus, setting it on fire. The men inside were burned alive.

The three of us writing this article each have experience with Palestinian terrorists. Seven years ago this month, on March 5, 2003, our children were killed by a Palestinian suicide murderer who exploded the bomb he was carrying on a city bus in Haifa. Seventeen people, mostly children on their way home from school, were killed.

Our children were just beginning their lives when that bomb exploded. Tal Kehrmann was 18 years old. Yuval Mendelevich was 13 1/2 . Asaf Zur was almost 17 years old.

We don't believe people who murder children should be held up as heroes. Though the official Ramallah ceremony was canceled, Mughrabi's name will remain on that square. And she is already commemorated in Hebron, where a girls school is named after her...[The rest.]

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

From an email from Barbara L. This is a little visual on what it's like to be a minority in a Muslim land [Update: Yes, this is actually in Israel itself]. Where are the Western Churches?:

From a friend visiting Israel: One marked point I noticed was the intolerance of the Muslims in Nazareth... their banners boldly proclaiming that Allah is God and that he has no "begotten son" across the Church of the Annunciation there. If we dared to state that Jesus was the last prophet from God near a Mosque there would be WWIII. It's so biased. I am glad that I can see first hand how small the nation of Israel is, the land mines the Syrians planted in the Golan (Our guide is a Jewish lady from Russia that shared how a child recently had his foot blown off from the mines the Syrians had planted there.)

ar 113.jpg

ar 115.jpg

youths.jpg

A Palestinian youth throws a petrol bomb at Israeli soldiers during clashes at Qalandia checkpoint between the West Bank city of Ramallah and Jerusalem on March 16, 2010. Hundreds of Palestinians clashed with security forces in east Jerusalem and the West Bank as tension boiled over Israel's announcement last week of plans to build 1,600 new Jewish settler homes in mainly Arab east Jerusalem, while a senior Hamas leader called for a new 'intifada,' or uprising.

demonstrators.jpg

Palestinian demonstrators prepare to battle Israeli border policemen during clashes in the Shuafat refugee camp on March 16, 2010. Hundreds of Palestinians clashed with security forces in east Jerusalem as tension boiled over in the city and a senior Hamas leader called for a new 'intifada,' or uprising.

I've been getting quite a few emails on this little confrontation, as Chris Matthews pulls out the race card...no, that's not quite right, he hints, and the New York Times' Ethan Bronner gives him what he wants... CAMERA's Andrea Levin has an excellent post on the subject, with video of Bronner's appearance. Honestly, these guys really need a new storyline, the whole "racism" thing is getting so old: NYT's Bronner Smears Israel as Racist on MSNBC

BRONNER: I would say that there is some level of prejudice about the fact that he had some Islamic background through his stepfather. But I think it has to do more with the fact that when he came into office a year ago, he wanted to recalibrate the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world. And the easiest and clearest way of doing that was to put some distance between the United States and Israel, and he did that. And that made people nervous. I think there's also some sense here that--some degree of racism, to be perfectly honest.

The problem here is that the left is still worshiping Obama to such an extent, and is so ill-informed as to what his critics are saying -- that, or they tend to write it off so quickly that is never registers -- that they look for the irrational where the rational does just fine. In fact, as Levin notes, Israelis were fine with Obama...up until he got into office and they experienced him in actions:

...On what does Bronner's "honest" allegation of racism rest? Are there polls to show Israelis are less favorable toward the president because he's African-American?

There are polls - but they reveal something very different. Multiple polls in Israel before Obama's election showed him the favorite over John McCain. In July 2008 a Maagar Mohot Survey found 37% preferred seeing Obama elected, compared to 28% for McCain. In November, just after the election a Shvakim Panorama poll found 63% said they were not concerned about the election of Barack Obama.

In May 2009 a poll by the Begin-Sadat Center found Israelis remained positive about the U.S. president, with 38% perceiving he had a friendly attitude toward Israel and just 7% an unfriendly view. Similarly, despite expressing uncertainty about his possible policies, a full 60% expressed favorable opinion about the president.

A Smith Research poll found a similar number of 31% in May perceiving Obama being friendly toward Israel. These attitudes plummeted though in June, by which time only 6% of Israelis considered Obama friendly. That dropped even further by August 28 when 4% found him favorable to Israel.

What happened between May and August? On May 18, at a joint White House press conference with Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Obama appeared to sidestep the Oslo Accords saying: "Settlements have to be stopped in order for us to move forward." Responding later to questions about this, Netanyahu spokesman Mark Regev said: "The issue of settlements is a final status issue, and until there are final status arrangements, it would not be fair to kill normal life inside existing communities."...

More, including video, here.

One group of merchants is doing just fine: the gold merchants:

GAZA CITY -- Gaza's borders are closed and its economy in shambles, but the glittering alleys of the territory's centuries-old gold bazaar are packed with young brides to be.

The market has experienced an unlikely renaissance in recent years as Gaza's Islamist Hamas rulers have championed weddings and Israeli closures have crippled the local economy, making gold an attractive investment.

"Not only have we not been hurt by the Israeli blockade, but our business has actually gotten better," gold merchant Iyad Basal says as people cram into his crowded family-run shop.

"We have not stopped working since the blockade because the gold comes to us through smuggling and Hamas encourages marriage," he adds...

gold in gaza.jpg

Yossi Klein Halevi has a very good piece at TNR worth reading in full, but here's a significant taste (let me know if you can't see this behind a subscription wall and I'll see what I can do):

...not even the opposition accused Netanyahu of a deliberate provocation. These are not the days of Yitzhak Shamir, the former Israeli prime minister who used to greet a visit from Secretary of State James Baker with an announcement of the creation of another West Bank settlement. Netanyahu has placed the need for strategic cooperation with the U.S. on the Iranian threat ahead of the right-wing political agenda. That's why he included the Labor Party into his coalition, and why he accepted a two-state solution--an historic achievement that set the Likud, however reluctantly, within the mainstream consensus supporting Palestinian statehood. The last thing Netanyahu wanted was to embarrass Biden during his goodwill visit and trigger a clash with Obama over an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood.

Nor is it likely that there was a deliberate provocation from the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, which runs the interior ministry that oversees building procedures. Shas, which supports peace talks and territorial compromise, is not a nationalist party. Its interest is providing housing for its constituents, like the future residents of Ramat Shlomo; provoking international incidents is not its style.

Finally, the very ordinariness of the building procedure--the fact that construction in Jewish East Jerusalem is considered by Israelis routine--is perhaps the best proof that there was no intentional ambush of Biden. Apparently no one in the interior ministry could imagine that a long-term plan over Ramat Shlomo would sabotage a state visit.

In turning an incident into a crisis, Obama has convinced many Israelis that he was merely seeking a pretext to pick a fight with Israel. Netanyahu was inadvertently shabby; Obama, deliberately so.

According to a banner headline in the newspaper Ma'ariv, senior Likud officials believe that Obama's goal is to topple the Netanyahu government, by encouraging those in the Labor Party who want to quit the coalition.

The popular assumption is that Obama is seeking to prove his resolve as a leader by getting tough with Israel. Given his ineffectiveness against Iran and his tendency to violate his own self-imposed deadlines for sanctions, the Israeli public is not likely to be impressed. Indeed, Israelis' initial anger at Netanyahu has turned to anger against Obama. According to an Israel Radio poll on March 16, 62 percent of Israelis blame the Obama administration for the crisis, while 20 percent blame Netanyahu. (Another 17 percent blame Shas leader Eli Yishai.)

In the last year, the administration has not once publicly condemned the Palestinians for lack of good faith--even though the Palestinian Authority media has, for example, been waging a months-long campaign denying the Jews' historic roots in Jerusalem. Just after Biden left Ramallah, Palestinian officials held a ceremony naming a square in the city after a terrorist responsible for the massacre of 38 Israeli civilians. (To its credit, yesterday, the administration did condemn the Palestinian Authority for inciting violence in Jerusalem.)

Obama's one-sided public pressure against Israel could intensify the atmosphere of "open season" against Israel internationally. Indeed, the European Union has reaffirmed it is linking improved economic relations with Israel to the resumption of the peace process--as if it's Israel rather than the Palestinians that has refused to come to the table...

Related: David Rothkopf at Foreign Policy: The fake U.S.-Israel crisis: Obama's flawed response to an ally's gaffe

A big win in California (from Divest This):

On Monday evening, the forces of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) were handed a major defeat when the Davis Food Co-op, located in Davis California, turned down demands by BDS activists to put a boycott of Israeli goods to a Co-op wide vote.

While this story may not be big enough to hit the national press, the details surrounding the decision make this as significant an event in the continuing annals of BDS failure as the Presbyterian Church's 2006 decision to abandon divestment altogether (a decision which changed the threat level of BDS from "potential issue" to "serious loser").

As backdrop, the Davis Food Co-op is a highly successful, member-owned cooperative with a nearly forty year history and over 9000 member-owners. Given the nature of the organization, the institution takes understandable pride in its progressive values and responsiveness to members needs, connections to the community that have contributed to its decades of success.

Sadly, it was these very qualities that made the organization a target for the local branch of the BDS movement, a movement whose two major tactics involve: (1) dressing up their mission of de-legitimization and demonization in a progressive/human-rights vocabulary; and (2) abusing the openness of organizations like the Co-op for their own narrow, political ends.

The Co-op recently reduced the number of members needed to put an issue to a Co-op-wide ballot from 15% to 5%, which gave local BDS organizers the impression that less than 500 signatures were needed to put their proposed ban on Israeli food products to a vote. And so their project kicked off with ongoing "tabling" at the Co-op featuring petitioning backed up by the usual context-free, anti-Israel propaganda (where Israelis were assigned the role of bullying tyrants, the Palestinians that of pristine victims, and the rest of the Middle East and all of history dumped down the memory hole).

Fortunately, large numbers of Co-op members chose to not take this challenge lying down, organizing their own tabling to educate members about the issues, and working with the leadership of the Co-op (with help from the local Jewish community) to inform the Co-op about the true nature of BDS.

What happened next was an exact replay of what's gone on whenever the boycott project tries to insinuate itself into an open-minded organization. This included all of the bitterness and divisiveness of the Arab-Israeli conflict spilling out into the community, forcing neighbors to take sides in one of the world's oldest and most complex disputes lest they be accused of betraying their progressive values.

The key to understanding the decision that was taken on Monday is that the Co-op by-laws require that member initiatives must be based on requests that were of a "lawful and proper purpose," a clause that they agreed would be more "stringently interpreted and enforced" once the threshold for a membership vote was reduced from 15%-5%.

Early in the debate over the proposal, the Co-op's board focused primarily on the "lawful" part of that phrase, seeming to reject the ballot request due to potential that it might place the organization in legal jeopardy. Now I've written before on the issue of whether or not BDS could be considered illegal based on current US anti-boycott legislation, concluding that the matter is murky (or, at least, open to interpretation).

Had the Co-op chosen to nix the boycott on the ground of potential legal risk alone, this would have been within their rights, and certainly would constitute a win over the boycotters. But the Co-op decided to do more than that. Much more.

If you look at the response they released on Monday, (click on the March 15, 2010 Resolution link of this Wiki) their entire reasoning for rejecting the boycott proposal was based on whether the proposal fulfilled the requirement regarding "proper purpose." And in over a dozen "Whereas-es" (some multi-part), the organization's leaders made it clear in no uncertain terms that a boycott does not come close to meeting that threshold.

Needless to say, the boycotters complained that, unlike matters of legality, what constitutes "proper purpose" is undefined, and thus open to the interpretation of the organization's leaders. But that is exactly why the decision made by the organization is so significant.

In this case, "proper purpose" meant the organization deciding which matters were in the community's interest and which were not. It meant grappling with the core values of the organization, and determining which issues need to be debated in the context of a cooperatively owned supermarket and which didn't. It meant looking at the obligations the organization owed not just to its membership at large, but also to the wider world. And in each and every case, the institution explained in clarifying detail why BDS did not belong at the Co-op, and why individual choices (like whether or not to buy Israeli oranges) are best left to individuals, not be subject to a majority vote.

All of this is, needless to say, incomprehensible to those behind the boycott attempt since a lack of propriety (i.e., a willing blindness to what constitutes "proper purpose" for themselves and others) is one of the key weapons of anti-Israel activists, giving them license to insert their political project (under various guises) into all manner of civic organization, regardless of what pain or damage this might cause to the institution they are trying to infiltrate.

But on Monday night, the leadership of the Davis Co-op laid down the law in terms that cannot be interpreted as anything other than a sweeping rejection of BDS.

Does this mean that Davis has suddenly become a hotbed of Zionism? Of course not. Political opinions on the Middle East vary within the Davis community on this and other issues as much as they've always done. But in making their decision, the Co-op was not making a statement on the Middle East conflict, but was instead taking a stand (based on their own rights and principles) to not be dragged into that conflict just because a group of single-issue partisans tried to exploit the organization's openness for their own ends.

No doubt, the BDSers who put so much time and effort into this project saw the Davis Co-op as one of the few institutions in America that might be vulnerable to their boycott calls, and hoped to be able to leverage success there to bring the message generated by this debate to other food co-ops and potentially other food retailers across the country.

And in this one case they were absolutely correct that the message from Davis must travel far and wide, warning similar organizations across the land of what happens to an organization when BDS comes knocking.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

As Max Boot relates, Mark Perry's big scoop of a supposed Petraeus briefing that lead to the big blow out between Obama and Bibi and promised a subsequent ushering in of the great Age of Aquarius where anti-Zionist academics, Arabist diplomats, and Jewish Lobby paranoiacs strode the planet like Philosopher Kings...well, that day is looking to be disappointingly (for them) still remote. It's much ado about not very much: Is General Petraeus Behind Obama's Dressing Down of Israel?

...I further queried this officer as to whether he had ever heard Petraeus express the view imputed to him by Mark Perry -- namely that Israel's West Bank settlements are the biggest obstacle to a peace accord and that the lack of a peace accord is responsible for killing American soldiers. This officer told me that he had heard Petraeus say "the lack of progress in the Peace Process, for whatever reason, creates challenges in Centcom's AOR [Area of Responsibility], especially for the more moderate governmental leaders," and that's a concern -- one of many -- but he did not suggest that Petraeus was mainly blaming Israel and its settlements for the lack of progress. They are, he said, "one of many issues, among which also is the unwillingness to recognize Israel and the unwillingness to confront the extremists who threaten Israelis."...[More.]

Boot also links to this Josh Rogin piece at Foreign Policy which would seem to be another straw putting paid to Perry's fantasy: Petraeus: I never formally asked for command of the Palestinian territories

Perry allowed himself to be made a fool, and it's been pretty obvious from the start, as I said in my first post on the subject. The story was just too perfect, designed to market directly to a certain mindset just waiting to consume this type of tale.

dodlandingcraft.jpg

A U.S. service member directs a landing craft, air cushion carrying Marines and equipment onto the beach in Djibouti on March 4, 2010. The Marines, who are assigned to Battalion Landing Team, 1st Battalion, 9th Marine Regiment and Combat Logistics Battalion 24, attached to the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit, are in the area to conduct training and live-fire ranges. DoD photo by Sgt. Andrew J. Carlson, U.S. Marine Corps. (Released)

[The following, by Bataween, is crossposted from Point of No Return.]

rehovgraetz.jpg

The house on Rehov Graetz

With thanks: bh

In 1948, Munir Katul, now a retired Oregon urologist, lost his house on what is now Rehov Graetz in the German colony in Jerusalem: his is a sad story of displacement resulting from the Arab-Israeli conflict, repeated many times over in the region. The Jerusalem Post waxes lyrical:

Before he left his one-story, stone house for the last time, he looked down at the Persian rug lining the formal living room where he had played with his brother, George, 18 days earlier, as his father, Jibrail, huddled over the console radio, listened to the UN General Assembly vote on the partition of Palestine.

As he walked from the now empty living room, across the colorful tile porch, and passed the green-shuttered windows to the waiting taxi, he studied the pine trees and green gardens around him in the German Colony.

He remembered how he loved to get lost in all that backyard greenery, with his best friend, Leila Itayyim. After school they played tag and hide-and-seek, built dirt castles, raced their pet turtles and helped his father tend the garden. He took one last look at his favorite tree, where he loved to hide high up in the branches to see everything without being seen, and wished he was sitting there instead of leaving.

Two aspects are striking about Munir's story: the first is that his Greek Orthodox parents and grandparents were born in Lebanon and came to Palestine because of the greater economic opportunities, thus giving the lie to the idea that Arabs have always lived in Palestine since 'time immemorial'. Munir's family fled back to Lebanon, yet the component of Munir's identity most important to him today is 'Palestinian'. Even today, aged 72, he chooses to line his hallway with photographs of the house on Rehov Graetz. Is this normal, or has Munir made a fetish of the 'wrong' Israel committed against him? It means that he can never feel at home anywhere else: he is not prepared to abandon his goal of repatriation to his old home in Jerusalem (although, to be fair, he also recognises this might be impractical):

Continue reading "Jews Still Owed Lion's Share of Lost Property"

[This entry, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center. I was going to include it in the link round-up below, but decided it was so good in a general sense it needed to be pulled out on its own.]

General David Petraeus is a smart guy, one of the smartest in the U.S. government at present. But he's no Middle East expert. Let's examine two remarks he made in his congressional testimony. Before we do, though, promise me you will read paragraph 17 because there's a very explosive point made there you won't find anywhere else. Agreed? OK, let's go.

Please note, by the way, that what he actually said is far milder than earlier leaks claimed. In addition, of course, Petraeus has to support White House policy, whatever he really thinks or knows. The Defense Department's recent Quadrennial review, also written to please the White House, contained not one mention of Iran's drive to get nuclear weapons or the threat of revolutionary Islamism. And he also has advisors who tell him the wrong stuff.

Statement One:

"A credible U.S. effort on Arab-Israeli issues that provides regional governments and populations a way to achieve a comprehensive settlement of the disputes would undercut Iran's policy of militant 'resistance, which the Iranian regime and insurgent groups have been free to exploit."

On the surface this makes a lot of sense. But let's examine it closely. Let's assume there is a comprehensive settlement to which the Palestinian Authority (PA) agrees. It isn't going to happen but this is for demonstration purposes.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Why What General Petraeus said is Wrong about the Middle East (or is it just being misinterpreted?)"

An awful lot of electrons have been sacrificed in the name of the Jerusalem/DC spat. I thought I'd do another roundup of links.

First a few impressions: Something of a consensus is emerging that, whatever the mistakes made in Jerusalem, the Obama Administration has badly overstepped by continuing to push the matter with what is increasingly being called a disproportionate response. They are responding in a way to mimic a strong man, but in fact is more the behavior of a wounded tiger. Weak friends are often more dangerous than strong enemies, and Obama has behaved in the manner of a weak man overcompensating for something. Almost everyone in the mainstream is calling for everyone to stand down.

Obama is weak. My Israeli friends should know that this matter is a tempest in a tea pot on the American scene. The ongoing self-immolation of the Democratic Party over Health Care is the issue of the moment and is sucking all the air out of this controversy...literally. I listened to talk radio all day yesterday, and even hosts like Prager and Medved, who usually have no hesitation discussing Middle East issues mentioned not one word of this. The Boston Globe, which usually never misses an opportunity to cast Israel in a bad light had one article on something like page five with a headline along the lines of Netanyahu Tries To Calm Situation (sorry, too busy to look for it now, but that's the idea). [Update: Exception: Fox has been horrible on this in their few news mentions.]

Why? Because even his friends know that this is a no win for Obama. So worry not my Israeli friends, and understand very well that any of your own pundits who are still at this late date blaming Netanyahu for the continuing trouble are not doing real analysis and are simply pushing their own agenda.

On to the links:

The Washington Post comes out questioning Obama's actions:

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S Middle East diplomacy failed in his first year in part because he chose to engage in an unnecessary and unwinnable public confrontation with Israel over Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Over the past six months Mr. Obama's envoys gingerly retreated from that fight and worked to build better relations with the government of Binyamin Netanyahu. Last week the administration finally managed to strike a deal for the launching of indirect Israeli-Palestinian talks. So it has been startling -- and a little puzzling -- to see Mr. Obama deliberately plunge into another public brawl with the Jewish state...

Continue reading "The Jerusalem/Obama Battle Continues...Yet Another Obama Overreach"

Monday, March 15, 2010

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

ramat shlomo3.jpg

Jewish Housing - As Dangerous as Iran's Bomb?

Q: What is J Street's definition of other Jews wanting to start new families and exercise their right to live in peace anywhere they want?

A: "A Slap in the Face", "An Affront", "Provocative", and "Arrogant"

And so, Jeremy Ben Enemy, in typical sing- song imitation of his boss, Obama, is still smarting from the incredible slap in the face.:

Israel's recent announcement of 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem wasn't just a slap in the face to Vice President Joe Biden.

It was a wake-up call to us all that business-as-usual peace processing is bringing us no closer to ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And now it may derail or delay the proximity talks just announced by Special Envoy Mitchell...

Clearly reveling in the moment, Axelrod declared on ABC's This Week, "Well, look, what happened - there was an affront. It was an insult, but that's not the most important thing. What it did was it made more difficult a very difficult process..."

Picking up on Axelrod's cue, ABC's Senior White House Correspondent, Jake Tapper, went even further: "I hate to say this, but yes or no, David, does the intransigence of the Israeli government on the housing issue, yes or no, does it put U.S. I believe that that region and that issue is a flare point throughout the region, and so I'm not going to put it in those terms.troops lives at risk?"

Axelrod: "I believe that that region and that issue is a flare point throughout the region, and so I'm not going to put it in those terms."

Well, I guess that was a "yes" from Axelrod. Now the stage is set. The next time a U.S. soldier is shot by a Sunni fanatic in Kandahar or an Iranian mob calls for "Death to America", we can lay the blame at Israel's door. But why stop there? Obviously, when a Jordanian devotee of Shari'a law kills his sister, it's Israel's fault. When a Jihadi blows up a jetliner over America, it's Israel's fault. If only all those offensive Israeli Jews could learn to be Citizens of the World like Jeremy Ben Ami.

Continue reading "J Street is Slap Happy. [Hillel]"

So says The Sun: Megrahi can live for FIVE YEARS

THE Lockerbie bomber was at the centre of a fresh row last night after it emerged he is taking a cancer-busting drug that could keep him alive for FIVE more years.

Terminally ill Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi was prescribed chemotherapy treatment Taxotere after returning to Libya.

But yesterday reports claimed Megrahi wasn't given the drug while he was in Greenock prison - amid claims he could have been kept behind bars if he had taken the medication.

Last night Tory justice spokesman Bill Aitken demanded answers from Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill.

He said: "Was the existence of a drug which is reportedly now extending the life of the Lockerbie bomber included in any of the reports Kenny MacAskill read before making the decision to release him?

"Alex Salmond's government is still refusing to publish the independent advice upon which they based their decision."

Megrahi - sentenced to life for the 1988 jet bombing that killed 270 people - was freed on compassionate grounds seven months ago and returned home to Libya.

Yesterday it emerged the prostate cancer sufferer's condition has now stabilised.

A source close to the 57-year-old said: "After his treatments, he can be unwell for two or three days but then enjoys a period when he's quite well."

[h/t: Fred]

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word.]

logo_Egyptair.jpg

As David Axelrod might put it, this is an insult and an affront. Visit the online route map of EgyptAir, the airline owned by the same state which signed an historic peace agreement with Israel in 1979, and you will see, once you click on the "Middle East & Gulf" section, that Israel has, well, disappeared.

The area between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan has been divided down the middle - shades of a "Greater Syria" fantasy here, now that I think about it - and Amman appears to have moved several hundred miles to the west. No Tel Aviv, no Eilat, no Haifa. It's like they never existed.

Perhaps that's the point. Meanwhile, I wonder what impact this will have on relations between Egypt and the country that provides it with around $2bn annually in assistance.

The JPost has the story of a new independently done report responding to the Goldstone Report: 'Hamas used kids as human shields'

Hamas gunmen used Palestinian children as human shields, and established command centers and Kassam launch pads in and near more than 100 mosques and hospitals during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip last year, according to a new Israeli report being released on Monday that aims to counter criticism of the IDF.

The detailed 500-page report, obtained exclusively by The Jerusalem Post, was written by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (Malam), a small research group led by Col. (res.) Reuven Erlich, a former Military Intelligence officer who works closely with the army.

The IDF and the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) cooperated with the report's authors and declassified hundreds of photographs, videos, prisoner interrogations and Hamas-drawn sketches as part of an effort to counter the criticism leveled at Israel in the UN-sponsored Goldstone Report.

Work on the Malam report began immediately after former judge Richard Goldstone issued his damning report of Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip in September...

The report is here [PDF].

Robin Shepherd has a take on the new report: New report shows Hamas used more than 100 mosques and hospitals to fire rockets during Cast Lead

...Well, it will be interesting to see how extensively this report is covered in the western media. At the time of writing this article, the BBC website did have a report up on the use of human shields in Gaza...about Israeli soldiers allegedly using Palestinians as human shields.

Amazing. Some clarity on the issue of Arab rejectionism.

Goldberg and Yglesias confer.

Read it all.

And note: this rejectionism isn't a "past tense," but continues to this day and has made real progress - settlements or no settlements - just impossible when it comes down to it.

Let's assume a best case scenario, in which the PA and Israel agree to a mutually satisfactory deal.

What about the factions that just plain refuse to accept Israel's existence period?

Note I don't think this means we shouldn't try but it's hard not to be pessimistic especially in view of the several good offers and even the spectacle of Gaza, where Jews where literally dragged out of their homes, even out of their graves - this could have been a real beginning for Palestinian statehood and self-determination and instead resulted in a disaster, and the bloody takeover of the Strip by Hamas, the attacks of Israel and ultimately Cast Lead which killed and harmed so many Palestinians and also damaged Israel, perhaps irretrievably, in the world's eyes.

Meanwhile I think this is an important observation by Yglesias who is quoted in the Goldberg piece:

...Well...I don't want to re-litigate Camp David (I'm sure you know the back-and-forth on this as well as I do) but suffice it to say that they had a much better offer on the table from the UN 60 years ago and rejecting it clearly wasn't part of some bargaining strategy...

Here's a position I think we'll agree on: One of the key psychological/political impediments to a deal is the unwillingness of Arabs today to embrace any kind of regret about the position they took on the partition plan. The "naqba" narrative, as conventionally presented, is a form of regret that the Arabs lost the war. You're never going to get Arabs to celebrate Israeli independence day, but I think it's plausible and necessary to have the disaster understood as one that was in large part of their own making...

Hallelujah.

There's some very interesting and disturbing news in this Haaretz story. While Netanyahu has been trying to cool things off, the Obama Administration appears to be trying to push the crisis for all it's worth: Israel envoy: U.S. ties at their lowest ebb in 35 years

Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, has told the country's diplomats there that U.S.-Israeli relations face their worst crisis in 35 years, despite attempts by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office to project a sense of "business as usual."

Oren was speaking to the Israeli consuls general in a conference call on Saturday night...

...Netanyahu consulted Sunday with the forum of seven senior cabinet ministers over a list of demands that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made in a telephone conversation Friday.

Clinton harshly criticized the announcement last week of plans to expand the Ramat Shlomo neighborhood in East Jerusalem while U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was visiting Israel.

Haaretz has learned that Clinton's list includes at least four steps the United States expects Netanyahu to carry out to restore confidence in bilateral relations and permit the resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians.

1. Investigate the process that led to the announcement of the Ramat Shlomo construction plans in the middle of Biden's visit. The Americans seek an official response from Israel on whether this was a bureaucratic mistake or a deliberate act carried out for political reasons. Already on Saturday night, Netanyahu announced the convening of a committee to look into the issue.

2. Reverse the decision by the Jerusalem District Planning and Building Committee to approve construction of 1,600 new housing units in Ramat Shlomo.

3. Make a substantial gesture toward the Palestinians enabling the renewal of peace talks. The Americans suggested that hundreds of Palestinian prisoners be released, that the Israel Defense Forces withdraw from additional areas of the West Bank and transfer them to Palestinian control, that the siege of the Gaza Strip be eased and further roadblocks in the West Bank be removed.

4. Issue an official declaration that the talks with the Palestinians, even indirect talks, will deal with all the conflict's core issues - borders, refugees, Jerusalem, security arrangements, water and settlements...

Continue reading "The Jerusalem Spat Continues (2 Updates)"

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Palestinian Authority whistleblower Fahmi Shabaneh has now had his home "effectively" siezed by the people who set him out on his job: PA takes whistle-blower's Jericho house

Palestinian Authority security personnel over the weekend seized a house belonging to Fahmi Shabaneh, the former Palestinian intelligence official who exposed a series of scandals that have seriously embarrassed the PA leadership.

Shabaneh told The Jerusalem Post that the security forces raided his house in Jericho, destroyed furniture, knocked down walls and confiscated equipment and personal items.

He lives in Jerusalem and holds an Israeli ID card like all permanent Arab residents of the city.

Shabaneh said that the raid was carried out by a joint force belonging to the PA's General Intelligence Service and the Civil Police.

Until recently, Shabaneh, a lawyer, was head of the anti-corruption unit in the General Intelligence Service...

...The PA issued an arrest warrant for Shabaneh last month after he exposed a sex scandal involving Rafik Husseini, director of PA President Mahmoud Abbas's bureau. The PA has accused Shabaneh of "high treason" and "collaboration" with Israel although he served in the Palestinian security services for nearly 15 years...

Oh, but wait, this part is reaaalllly interesting:

...Shabaneh, meanwhile, has threatened to expose a new scandal involving Sheikh Tayseer Bayoud Tamimi, chief judge of the Islamic Courts in the PA.

Shabaneh told the Post that he has issued an ultimatum to Tamimi, the highest-ranking Islamic figure in the PA territories, to resign within a week or else he would publish allegations of sexual misconduct against him.

Shabaneh said that when he was still in his job he received a number of complaints against the sheikh and other judges working in the Shari'a courts in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

He also released a recording of a phone call from last week in which Tamimi pleads with him not to expose details of the scandal he's allegedly involved in.

"After I publish the case against Judge Tamimi, he will be forced to resign because he has brought shame on the Islamic courts in Palestine," Shabaneh said. "His fate will be similar to that of Rafik Husseini, whom we filmed naked in the bedroom of an Arab woman from Jerusalem."

Shabaneh added that he also had incriminating material against a former PA minister who lives in the Jerusalem area. "He will be the next in line," he said. "This minister has also been begging me not to expose his file."

Tamimi is a scum-bag of international proportions (See, for instance, here and here, among many others). It would be a thing of beauty to see him go down ugly.

I thought this description of the visit of Navi Pillay to the Italian Parliament was very interesting. Here in full, slightly edited for format: Fiamma Nirenstein: A strange encounter with human rights

Dear friends,

This morning Mrs Navanethem Pillay, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, spoke before the Permanent Committee on Human Rights of the Foreign Affairs Committee, where I sit as Vice President.

I would like to voice my surprise for what I heard from Mrs Pillay - a feeling that I expressed very clearly to her - still thanking her for her informative visit. The Commissioner interpreted the meeting as an opportunity to harshly criticize Italy's policies on immigration and what she considers as the criminalization of illegal immigration.

She voiced the same criticism on the policies concerning the Roma people and invited the Members of the Chamber of Deputies to justify themselves, indeed to clear themselves. This request was rejected by both the right and the left wing. Indeed, many members felt the need to ask the Commissioner some questions about the Organization where she serves, because it is deemed to be extremely problematic for its poor performance and its intolerable partisanship.

I reminded the Commissioner that the UN Human Rights Council, which reports to her, stems from the discredited Commission on Human Rights. This Commission from 2003 was also chaired by a human rights champion such as Libya and was dissolved by Kofi Annan in 2006 after having devoted much of its work to defend almost all dictators in the world rather than dissidents.

Continue reading "Italian MP on the Visit of Navi Pillay"

Here's some more on the "spat." (Previous: Is Israel a Banana Republic with a Banana History? Obama Seems to Think So.)

Power Line has a pair of good posts: Obama's latest pretext for attacking Israel and Condemn This. Lots of links in those, but I wanted to emphasize a couple that make points I also wanted to highlight.

First Rick Richman makes the point that the neighborhood in question, Ramat Shlomo, is going to be a part of Israel in any conceivable future (or proposed past) peace plan, revealing the entire exercise as a worthless farce, and Carl goes on to note the extremely strategic nature of the are.

Robin Shepherd notes that in order to continue with this farce, the media must be complicit with their stilted coverage: The rationale behind censorship: "Moderate" Palestinian leadership honours mass terrorism as Joe Biden leaves town. And the BBC's response is? Here is the type of extreme incitement that media of all stripes has been complicit in covering up and thus removing ALL CONTEXT from what's going on: PA calls Arabs to 'defend al Aksa' That's the kind of thing that gets and is intended to get, people killed, and the Palestinian Authority is doing it itself without a word of protest from Washington. Off to the slaughter in silence.

Related is Bruce Kesler's piece involving the Hurva Synagogue: Netanyahu is being Sharoned by the Obama Administration

Also, at Z Word: Meanwhile, in Ramallah...

Update: Via Soccer Dad, Mark Perry says it all started with a briefing from our military: The Petraeus briefing: Biden's embarrassment is not the whole story. Mark Perry is the ultimate name-dropping insider, and this is just the type of story he'd love to show how in the know he is, but I would question whether this was really something all that unusual. This can hardly be the first time someone told an administration that appeasing Arabs was the new direction we should be taking. So the questions are: Did it "take" this time? Why? Did this briefing really happen and was it as significant as Perry makes it out to be, or is someone just using Perry to circulate another manipulative rumor? Far more data is necessary.

Jeffrey Goldberg, declaring a moratorium on responding to the ranting of Andrew Sullivan, also makes this remark:

...There is another benefit to disengagement. As Goldblog readers know, I'm deeply distressed by many currents in Israeli society and politics, the continuing, disproportionate power of the settlement movement being chief among my concerns. But I find myself hesitant to criticize Israel these days because my words are inevitably used by people who don't have Israel's best interests, or the best interests of American Jews, at heart. So I want to find a new way to write about these issues...

Well, that becoming attitude is what separates mainstream left commentators like Goldberg from the nuts on extreme.

This article is full of ironies, not least of which is the fact that there are only a handful of Jews left in Egypt:

...Egypt's Jewish community, which dates back millennia and at its peak in the 1940s numbered around 80,000, is down to several dozen, almost all of them elderly. The rest were driven out decades ago by mob violence and persecution tied in large part to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Egypt and Israel fought a war every decade from the 1940s to the 1970s until the 1979 peace treaty was signed.

Despite that treaty, Egyptian sentiment remains deeply unfriendly to Israel, and anti-Semitic stereotypes still occasionally appear in the Egyptian media...

So, it's nice that holy sites are being restored, now that the Jews are gone and the Copts are under attack.

I'm also glad to see this article, which mentions the Egyptian Jews. Hooray. This subject receives so little attention and it's actually very significant to any discussion of the Arab/Israeli conflict.

Martin Solomon adds: And look who's still at the center of things -- Zahi Hawass. See also Point of No Return: Egypt finds excuse to cancel Maimonides ceremony.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

In 1994, Israel asserted, and the PLO accepted, that construction would continue on existing Jewish settlements. For the next 15 years, negotiations were never stopped by that building.

In January 2009, the Palestinian Authority (PA) stopped negotiations because Hamas attacked Israel from the Gaza Strip and Israel defended itself. Of course, Hamas is also the PA's enemy and the PA would be delighted if Israel destroyed that group. But for public relations' purposes, the PA had to pretend inter-Palestinian solidarity.

Then came President Barack Obama who demanded a stop to all construction on settlements in 2009. Israel finally complied but announced that it would keep building in east Jerusalem. The United States accepted that arrangement and even highly praised Israel's policy as a major concession.

But the PA refused to return to negotiations. Why, because the construction offended it? No, because the PA's radical forces don't want to make a peace deal because they believe they can win total victory and destroy Israel. The more moderate forces are too weak to make a deal because of Hamas and their own radicals, though they also have some problems with mutual compromise.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: The Palestinian Authority Walks Out of Talks with a Big Smile on Its Face"

This guy in Malmo has his head in the sand...no, that's too kind...he's a willful ignoramus: Swedish Mayor Ilmar Reepalu Lied About Having No Knowledge of Antisemitism in Malmo...

...the city council of Malmö that Reepalu heads, had been informed about the rise of antisemitism on repeated occasions, beginning with a motion submitted by Karlsson in January of 2008, November of 2009 and as recently as this January of 2010. Reepalu was seated in a meeting where the SD representative brought the matter up. This exposes Reepalu not only as a liar, but also as a totally unreliable politician that cannot be trusted to seriously address the growing problem of antisemitism in his city...

Much more. Europe is sinking and some of the people in the lifeboats are pretending not to notice the other folks floating in the water and waving their arms.

Could the people who have been complaining about the "timing" of the Israeli announcement of 1600 new Jerusalem apartments -- which includes pundits on both left and right -- please now adjust their commentary? We've now found that the Obama Administration is continuing to hammer the Israelis over, not the timing of the announcement, but the substance of Jews building living space. I supposed there's something positive in that. It's illuminating, liberating even. Let's get down to substance and skip the cosmetics and the diplomatic dance. Good! Unfortunately, what it says about the direction the Obama Administration is taking is nothing good.

Like the living death of the never-ending Health Care forced march, the Administration decided early on that peace in the Middle East lays through Israeli concessions and constant pressure on Jerusalem (Israel's capital, right?) and they are proceeding down that road no matter the results or the consequences.

Let's review. Pressure and demands on Israel have produced...? Increased Arab demands and complete intransigence, including a simple refusal to come back to the table. So we should continue this...why?

So now we have some pissant in the State Department using language like, "undermined trust and confidence in the peace process, and in America's interests" to condemn Israel. That last bit is very loaded language, straight out of the Walt and Mearsheimer/Buchanan/paleo-con school. Very intentional stuff there. And George Mitchell is running around thinking he can dictate to the Israelis like they were some banana republic, which we've been reminded before, they are not. And -- pay attention people, this is for those who are thinking we should have voted for the lady -- this includes Hillary.

Our government is unconcerned with the Palestinian Authority naming public places for terrorist killers. Why? They don't take that seriously. They think that won't matter when finish drawing lines. They still think it's just about drawing lines on maps, when all they're doing is drawing the starting lines for the next Arab-initiated attack.

And even the EU is getting in on the act -- a bit of insanity that could be written off in the past, but must be taken more seriously now. They can't manage a thing against Iran, but Israel they can threaten with trade sanctions.

I'm glad to see Foxman's ADL speaking out. That ought to be something of an antidote to what I'm sure is J Street's despicable cheerleading: Administration's Dressing Down of Israel is a 'Gross Overraction'

We are shocked and stunned at the Administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel on the issue of future building in Jerusalem. We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a friend and ally of the United States. One can only wonder how far the U.S. is prepared to go in distancing itself from Israel in order to placate the Palestinians in the hope they see it is in their interest to return to the negotiating table.

It is especially troubling that this harsh statement came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly and privately explained to Vice President Biden the bureaucratic nature in making the announcement of proposed new building in Jerusalem, and Biden accepted the prime minister's apology for it. Therefore, to raise the issue again in this way is a gross overreaction to a point of policy difference among friends.

The Administration should have confidence and trust in Israel whose tireless pursuit for peace is repeatedly rebuffed by the Palestinians and whose interests remain in line with the United States.

Politico's Laura Rozen, on the other hand, is stuck on yesterday's stupid with Martin Indyk.

For better, see Jennifer Rubin here and here, and Noah Pollack has a very disturbing take on things, here.

Obama, not Netanyahu, is busily driving US/Israel relations to new lows (and, incidentally, more personally responsible for the Republican/Democrat opinion divide on support for Israel than any other single factor). Now we have the spectacle of Netanyahu staying away from the re-opening of Jerusalem's Hurva Synagogue -- a seminal event in the history of the Jewish People in the Holy Land -- for fear of insulting the Americans (in fairness, I have heard conflicting reasons for this). This is a shameful moment for the history books.

Update: More Jennifer Rubin with more Congressional criticism of the Administration and this note:

...And let's not kid ourselves: the rest of the world is watching, just as other nations looked on as we shoved the Hondurans under the bus when confronted with a lackey of Hugo Chavez, and just as we did to the Czech Republic and Poland in an effort to ingratiate ourselves with the Russian bear. This administration has an unseemly habit of trashing our allies so as to prevent conflicts with our foes. In the end, we will be low on allies and our foes will be emboldened. As for our standing in the world, I suggest it's about to reach Jimmy Carter-like depths. That's what happens when friends come to regard the American president as untrustworthy and motivated by personal pique. (So much for the president with the "superior temperament.") Let's see if the administration can undo the mess it has made. It won't be easy.

Exactly right. This is becoming another example in the egregious list of bullying or slighting allies and coddling enemies. It's bully behavior. Shoving around friends is risk of blood-free. Not so with enemies.

See: US State Department summons Ambassador Michael Oren

See also Barry Rubin, on the quality of media coverage: How Bad is the Quality of Media Coverage? A Small Example

And, a little levity from Pillage Idiot: Joe Biden works his magic in the Middle East

Update: Is Bibi as vulnerable this time as he was with Clinton? Don't bet on it.

Friday, March 12, 2010

You've been reading it here and at JStreetJive. Now readers of Boston's print paper, The Jewish Advocate, are getting an eye-full of the news of CJP's funding of controversial groups (Once again, those previous posts are: Guess Who's Dining at CJP's Trough?, What We Should Expect From CJP, and Combined Jewish Philanthropies: Worse Than Originally Suspected...). There is one news item, one editorial, and one column. Let's start with the column by Charles Jacobs, here in full, then I'll post excerpts of the other two (sorry, paid subscription is required to read in full).

Charles Jacobs: Enough with the 'big tent'

There were reports last week that the Combined Jewish Philanthropies is distributing funds to organizations most Boston Jews would define as anti-Israel. The money is not part of CJP's community funds, but comes through a separate program: Donor Advised Funds. DAF's are an important part of CJP community services, used by donors to save taxes and administrative costs. Boston Jews write checks to the CJP, then recommend distributions to specific charities. The vast majority of the organizations on CJP's approved list serve the community. Many are important pro-Israel groups. But, given last week's revelations, CJP needs to revisit its DAF lists.

It was Hillel Stavis, the veteran pro-Israel activist and businessman, who researched and posted this story on his blog, www.jstreetjive.com. Hillel cited 10 DAF organizations he thinks work against Israel's interests:

  • The American Friends Service Committee
  • Democracy Now!
  • The Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
  • The Tides Foundation
  • Media Matters
  • The New Israel Fund
  • Brit Tzedek v'Shalom
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility
  • The Workmen's Circle
  • Amnesty International

The Unitarians!? Maybe a naive Jewish donor saw some Unitarian program that feeds starving children, but surely we can choose philanthropies that don't support our enemies. If any Jewish money got to the UUSC - even a little - that would be a mistake. On March 14, the Utilitarian church in Cambridge will host an "Israel Apartheid Week" program featuring a film on Israeli "racism" and a talk by the loathsome Noam Chomsky.

Not one Jewish dime should go to the American Friends Service Committee, a determined battler against the Jewish state. Not a nickel for Democracy Now!, which hectors Israel, promotes the Goldstone Report and is outraged that Israel might have assassinated the Hamas monster in Dubai. Media Matters posts articles bashing Congress for not condemning Israel for its "disproportionate use of force" in Gaza. CJP, according to Stavis, directed $200,000 to them in 2007.

Continue reading "Combined Jewish Philanthropies Expose Makes a Stir"

k07_00000008.jpg

If you didn't know who Kim Jong-Il was, or what North Korea was about, then you might think today's photos at The Big Picture were purely banal, pointless even. Yet these are chilling in their simplicity.

From an Israeli web forum:

Young supporters of the Islamic Jihad movement march during a rally in Gaza City, 10 March 2010, showing solidarity for the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem

111gj.jpg

222zr.jpg

333yv.jpg

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

I'm not going to bash or rant about a Newsweek article about Turkey by Owen Matthews-shocking and dangerous as it is--but rather talk about what is wrong and inaccurate about it. That article is part of a new wave of defeatism sweeping the West, though it still remains subordinate to the more ostensibly attractive idea that there is no real conflict or at least one easy to fix by Western concessions.

Here's the title: "The Army Is Beaten: Why the U.S. should hail the Islamists." Yes, we should thank the Islamists for taking over Turkey. But wait a minute! The ruling AK party says it isn't Islamist. Indeed, I have been viciously attacked by them in the Turkish media for saying so. Up until now the line--including that from the regime itself--has been that we shouldn't be afraid of them because they are really just democrats. But now some are willing to face the truth and still sugarcoat it.

Matthews writes:

"The political logic should be simple. The arrest of a shadowy group of generals for allegedly plotting a bloody coup should be a victory for justice. The end of military meddling in politics should be a victory for democracy. And greater democracy should make a country more liberal and more pro-European."

Each of these sentences makes a false assumption and must be examined a bit.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: How to Make Defeatism Look Good: Let's Give Up and Cheer the Islamists"

hawass.jpg

You know, I've seen this guy on History Channel or Discovery or one of those things all the time when I'm flipping through the channels. He's always there in his brown fedora when they're x-raying a mummy, or excavating a newly discovered tomb...and I've always wondered, I mean, given what you know about how things are in Egypt...what does this guy think about the Jews? Well, MEMRI has an answer: Renowned Egyptologist Dr. Zahi Hawass, On Egyptian TV: 'The Jews Went to America and Took Control of its Economy... They Have a Plan... They Control the Entire World'

In June 2009, internationally renowned Egyptologist and Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities secretary-general Zahi Hawass[2] made headlines when he gave U.S. President Barack Obama a personal guided tour of the Pyramids.[3] In February 2010, Dr. Hawass was in the news following the culmination of the two-year international and interdisciplinary investigation into King Tut's death that he led.[4] A New York Times article last week noted his role in the restoration of one of Cairo's most historic synagogues and the yeshiva of Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, or Maimonides. The article quoted Dr. Hawass as saying, "It's part of our history. It's part of our heritage," and states that he also promises that six more synagogue buildings in Cairo will be restored within two years.[5]

Yesterday, Dr. Hawass attended a Washington, DC ceremony at which he collected a stolen Egyptian sarcophagus that had been seized by U.S. Customs officials (above).[6] He praised the U.S. for its role in recovering the sarcophagus and other stolen Egyptian antiquities.[7]

According to his website, Dr. Hawass holds an honorary doctorate from the American University in Cairo, and was one of Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People of 2005.[8] He is spokesman for CNN on archaeological news in Egypt, is Explorer-in-Residence of the National Geographic Society, received the 2000 Distinguished Scholar of the Year Award from the Association of Egyptian-American Scholars, was awarded a Mellon Fellowship, was a Fulbright scholar, and received an Emmy for his performance in a documentary.[9] He frequently briefs members of the entertainment industry[10] including Shakira at Giza,[11] Samuel L Jackson at the 33rd Cairo International Film Festival,[12], and actor Vin Diesel. He has presented copies of his books to former U.S. First Lady Laura Bush,[13] and given President Obama a replica of his own hat.[14]

In February 2009, Dr. Hawass asserted on Egyptian TV that the Jews control the entire world, stating that it was their "unity that gave them this power" (to view this clip, visit http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/2049.htm ). Just last month, in February 2010, he stated that he had said to "the rabbi in Washington... [that] under no circumstances will I open a Jewish [antiquities] museum" until "the Palestinians get their rights" (to view this clip, visit http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/2406.htm).

Following are the transcripts of the two clips...[More.]

Another breath of fresh air: Is This Lobby Different From All Others?

...The problem is particularly tough for hard core realists who believe that the behavior of every state is determined by the nature of the international system. For these thinkers, domestic politics don't matter; states do what they must. States are like billiard balls; they move when struck. It doesn't matter what the billiard ball thinks; it rolls where it's pushed.

So what about the red, white and blue ball on the pool table that keeps cozying the blue and white ball with the Star of David no matter where you push it? Why does it behave so strangely?

The scholars seek a theoretical explanation which can accommodate this peculiar case, but they are looking for a small explanation -- one that reaffirms the general theory of billiard ball realism even as it explains the exceptional case of the United States.

The simplest, most elegant answer to this problem to say that the Israel lobby is different from all other lobbies. It is the one and only exception to the rule that domestic politics don't matter: The Jews are so rich, so focused and so good at what they do that they have built a lobby that is unique in the world.

There are only two problems with this approach. The first is that the idea of a uniquely powerful Jewish lobby is catnip for anti-Semites. As I've repeatedly said, you don't need to be an anti-Semite to hold this view, but this idea (that the Jews have a wealthy, well connected and ruthless power lobby that is like no other and that this cabal manipulates the political system the way that a puppeteer dangles marionettes) draws angry loners and anti-Semites like ants to a jelly jar.

Hint to the youth: Anytime a young intellectual is trapped in a nasty spot like this, squatting in a foxhole with anti-Semites and assorted tinfoil hatters, your first thought should be, "Where did I go wrong?"

The quest for truth leads us all on some strange journeys, but the 'discovery' that a Jewish conspiracy explains some otherwise inexplicable historical development is one of the great dead ends of all times. It provides a faux eureka moment, the illusion of earthshaking discovery just as you fall into the pit. August Bebel called anti-Semitism the 'socialism of fools'; he could have gone further. It's the economics of fools, the sociology of fools, the theology of fools, the history of fools and, sadly, the geopolitics of fools as well...

Read it all.

[The following, by Israelinurse, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

Abe Hayeem launched a virulently anti-Zionist tirade on the virtual pages of CiF on March 11th in which, in his usual Pravda-like style, he contorts reality to fit his political message. His gripe this time is Jewish immigration to Israel; by no means a new phenomenon, but one which Hayeem now seems to have decided is a negative one. In sneering terms he describes the work of the Jewish Agency and Nefesh B'Nefesh and then reveals to his audience that "The "community aliyah programme" shown in the pamphlet calls on UK Jews to "start a new life in a vibrant Israeli city" but of these, only three - Haifa, Modiin and Yad Binyamin - are within Israel proper. The other five are Jerusalem (evidently including the illegally annexed eastern part); Ariel, "located in the centre of Israel" (sic); Maaleh Adumim; Efrat (the capital of Gush Etzion); and the Gush Etzion bloc as a whole, which spreads south of Jerusalem into the heart of the West Bank."

Obviously Hayeem was counting on the fact that the average Guardian reader has a very selective memory when it comes to Middle East history and would therefore not pull him up on the fact that Gush Etzion's towns and villages were all built on land bought and paid for by the Jewish people long before Israeli independence or make reference to the massacre of 1948.

"The Etzion Bloc, or Gush Etzion as it is called in Hebrew, is located on the main road from the south to Jerusalem, northwest of Hebron. The Etzion bloc was settled and resettled three times, on land purchased by the Jews, beginning in 1927. Each time, residents were forced to abandon their homes in the face of Arab violence. The final saga of the Etzion bloc included two separate massacres and a prolonged and stubborn defense against hopeless odds. The bloc was finally overrun by soldiers of the British armed and officered Jordan Legion, who were responsible for the final massacre of surrendered defenders, a war crime."

Hayeem's contortions reach a comical level when, in the space of three paragraphs, he manages to assert that "Jewish people from any part of the world can be housed anywhere they choose within Israel and West Bank" and yet also tries to invoke the strawman of Article 49 of the Geneva convention "an occupier may not forcibly deport protected persons... or transfer parts of its own civilian population into occupied territory".

Continue reading "Larger than Hayeem"

Here's another video, by The David Project, of some of the hate being spewed in New York the other day (Previous: Video: Protesters Shout 'Jesus Killers' at Anti-Israel New York Protest). Such lovely people:

So says her sister in this Haaretz article (h/t: Mickey S.): Corrie's sister to Haaretz: U.S. encouraged family to sue Israel

...Asked whether the family was getting support from the U.S. government, Simpson said it was a U.S. government official who first encouraged them to sue the Israeli government.

The family has met with many senior American officials, she added, and more than 70 congressmen signed a letter demanding a serious investigation.

Wouldn't it be nice to know who that official was?

Then there's this, FWIW, in a suspiciously well written story at Ma'an News filed from Hanover, NH(!?): Corrie parents to Ma'an: We want accountability

...The White House apparently supports the Corries' position on the matter. Biden's aides told them that President Barack Obama shares the view of the Bush administration, that Israel's military probe was insufficient...

I suppose a lot will depend on the judge in the trial. Not knowing how the Israeli courts work, I'd think if I were a government attorney I'd want to introduce evidence concerning the nature of the ISM and the extreme political nature and unreliability of the witnesses.

Update: Ah, this explains the Hanover, NH dateline: American journalist opts to leave Israel

An American journalist working for a Palestinian news agency voluntarily left Israel on Wednesday after being detained for a week and risking deportation, his lawyer said.

Castro Daoud said his client, Jared Malsin, chose to leave because "he could no longer endure the conditions of his detention."...

...Interior Ministry Spokeswoman Sabine Hadad said Malsin raised security suspicions during an initial investigation upon his arrival...

...Malsin, a 26-year-old graduate of Yale University from Hanover, N.H., was the English-language editor of the Maan news agency in the West Bank. The agency said Israel has accused him of anti-Israel reporting and that it fears Malsin withdrew his appeal under duress.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Received from a reader:

[This] is written by an acquaintance of mine, and older woman who is Catholic. Who somehow got roped into attending something that from her description sounds like some Friends of Sabeel meeting. And she came away very upset, disappointed and confused. She wrote down her thoughts and sent them to me. I would like to see them out there...

Happy to oblige...

To Christians of the Holy Land:

I do not understand why the Christians of the Levant choose to continue to cast their lot with the Moslem Arabs rather than with the Israeli Jews. They should EMBRACE the Israelis: learn from their history, their drive and their sense of identity. The history of the Jews of Israel shows that a culture and language and be revived and invigorated. And that is what the Christians of that area should do.

The Palestinian Christians are descended from the first followers of Jesus in Roman Judea. They are not Arabs -- Arabs are from the Arabian peninsula and invaded the Christian lands many centuries ago. They forced an alien language and writing system on the indigenous Christian population, and many were forced to convert. Christians spoke Aramaic or Greek before they were conqured by the invading Arabs. They spoke the languages of Jesus and of the New Testament.

Christianity and Judaism are siblings. Jesus was a Jew, and Christianity rose out of the Jewish Religion. His earliest follwers were Jews, and early Christianity was decidedly a Jewish sect. The Hebrew Bible is a holy part of the Christian Canon. Many Greeks living in the holy land were also drawn to Christ and to Christianity. Monotheism appealed to their intellect in a way that the naturistic polytheism of the Roman Empire could not, and they had flirted with Judaism, but found it too constraining to convert outright. Christianity lacked the barriers they felt that Judaism had, and many flocked to the new religion. And it is the Judeo-Christian and the Judeo-Greco traditions that have shaped our modern world. And much of that is rooted in the Land of Israel. Which is another reason why the Christians of the Holy Land should embrace their Israeli Jewish brothers. They are the only two people who have an historic claim of many centuries to this corner of the world.

See how Bethlehem has declined over the last fifteen years, under modern Moslem rule of the Arabs! But look at how Nazareth and Capernaum have thrived under Israel sovereignty--clean modern cities, yet you can still feel the presence of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. But over Bethlehem, He weeps ... The Via Dolorosa begins in a madrassa! The keys to the Chruch of the Holy Sepulchre are held by Moslems! See how your Christian brethern in Egypt and in Iraq are being murdered by those with whom you have chosen to cast your lot as Palestinians. Shouldn't you stand with your family in Christ? Why do you not!? The Moslems hate the Jews, and you are the brothers of the Jews. Yet, you persist in standing with those who support Hamas and Hezbollah, and you revile your Israeli brothers. As Christ was a Jew, these, too, are your brothers in Christ. How Jesus's heart must ache when his followers from his homeland do this!

Christians of the Holy Land--Embrace your OWN history! Your OWN language! Your OWN culture! Throw off the yoke of the foreign language and culture of your Arab conquerers! Embrace your Israeli brothers and learn from your Jewish brethren how to do take back your history and identity! Remember Christ and your history and His history!

Another good one. I love this meditation on the intersection of Jewish and Gentile power and how AIPAC fits in (and why J Street doesn't and never will): The Israel Lobby and Gentile Power

...A group like AIPAC enjoys power and recognition not because it controls or even represents the votes of Jews. AIPAC's power rests on gentile ideas and support; if a politician gets loudly and publicly labeled anti-Israel by AIPAC and its allies that politician will get hammered in the next election because so many American gentiles want their politicians to support the Jewish state. AIPAC works like the NRA; it is the publicly accepted voice on an issue about which the public has strong views.

Politicians don't fear the loss of National Rifle Association PAC money nearly as much as they fear the loss of millions of pro-gun votes at the next election. This, I think is why AIPAC is so powerful. To be convincingly labeled an anti-Israel politician is the kiss of death almost everywhere in the United States -- just as to be anti-gun is the kiss of death. American gentiles consider AIPAC and those affiliated with and endorsed by it to be reliable guardians of pro-Israel policy; politicians don't want to cross a force with this kind of hold on the public.

AIPAC has the power that it does because it has been in effect deputized by American pro-Israel gentiles to guard the frontiers of our Israel policy...

Read the rest.

Via Dave, here's a lovely video of some of the protesters outside the Waldorf Astoria protesting the event Phyllis Chesler wrote about here. It's only three minutes. You should watch the whole thing:

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Got some information from an activist who attended the Sabeel conference in Marin County that I'm sure many of you will find interesting. First of all the list of speakers on the linked page should show immediately the agenda of Sabeel generally -- you couldn't put together a worse group of people...a worse group wouldn't be allowed in the United States as they'd be on the terror list (well, one would hope).

Anyway, I'd like to focus on what ISM/Free Gaza (the boat people) bigwig Paul Larudee talked about. You certainly can't say he doesn't have grandiose plans. Amazing the lengths that these people go to abuse the privileges of a free society (which they claim doesn't exist) in order to destroy it (demopathy). It's really quite sick. If Israel were to create the perfect society, with the most idealized civil societal protections for all, rest assured these fanatics would concoct schemes to abuse it to destroy it. Case in point, what's stated in this PDF. Excerpt:

...The plan

On May 14, 2010, more than 100 Palestinians and supporters will fly to Lid airport (Ben Gurion International Airport). They will take a variety of routes and arrive on different flights. Both the Palestinians and their supporters will be nationals who do not ordinarily require visas to visit Israel. However, they will be selected from among those who have personally been denied permission to enter.

The nationalities of the volunteers will qualify them to board the flights. However, Israeli customs authorities will probably stop them upon arrival, place them in detention, and try to deport them as soon as possible. El Al flights should be avoided, where Israeli security would probably prevent boarding.

The volunteers will nonviolently resist deportation, through non-cooperation and by refusing to comply with airline passenger requirements. Previous resistance of this type has shown that the captain of the aircraft will refuse to accept such passengers, who will then be returned to detention.

Lawyers will be arranged in advance, who will argue that the volunteers should be permitted to exercise their right to enter, and to remain at least until their cases are heard. Some cases may be appealed to the High Court and possibly to the International Court of Justice, if there is a means to do so...

I don't know what they're doing now, but if they're not already, the Israeli courts need to start assessing the freak brigade some major fines. Further, doesn't Sabeel operate in Israel? Why aren't they going after the mother organization's funds directly?

Anyway, here's more. Apparently Larudee thinks the boat trips have been very successful. He has bigger plans. He wants to take to the air. From my contact:

Continue reading "Next Step for the Gaza Boat Trip: A DC3"

At Tundra Tabloids:

Recently the hate crimes in Malmö and Skåne County have come under increased surveillance as the numbers have doubled since last year. According to the Swedish daily newspaper Expressen, "During the year of 2009, 270 hate crimes were reported in Skåne County and about 25 percent of these were aimed towards Jews."

One of those exposed to anti-Semitic hate crime is Rabbi Shneur Kesselman of the Malmö Jewish community. He states in an interview with Expressen on March 5th that "ever since I came here people have been shouting 'fucking Jew' and 'heil Hitler' at me."

What is worth noting about Rabbi Kesselman's statement in Expressen is that out of the 65 incidents in 2009, according to the Skåne police, three of these incidents were directed at Kesselman. Yet according to Kesselman, 15 separate reports were filed concerning anti-Semitic hate crimes aimed towards him. The worst incident involved someone trying to run him over with a car. Apparently, the authorities have a different method for calculating these figures, as the full number of incidents does not appear in the Skåne police statistics...

Yeah, things are bad. [More.]

Another great posting, this time focusing on the founding of the State, and how things might have been different if the Jews really were running things:

Many people think that Jewish lobbying, pressure and influence dragged a reluctant Uncle Sam into the Middle East.  Think again.

Now it's true that American opposition to Zionism has a long and distinguished pedigree.  In the 19th century, American missionaries built a network of colleges and hospitals across what was then the Ottoman Empire and what today we call the Middle East.  The missionaries and their students helped develop modern secular Arab nationalism. The idea was that if Arabs stopped thinking of themselves as Muslims and Christians, but developed a communal inter-religious identity, this would allow Christian Arabs to play a larger role in political life and, the missionaries hoped, one day open the doors to present the gospel to the Muslims.  Many of the great leaders of Arab secular nationalism, including the (French-educated) Michel Aflaq, founder of the Ba'ath Party that once ruled Iraq and still rules Syria and whose beautiful tomb in Baghdad (at right) was built by Saddam Hussein, were Arabs of Christian origin.

For these missionaries, the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine looked like a disaster. It radicalized and fragmented Arab politics and introduced the motifs of religious struggle that to this day divide, for example, the Palestinians between religious parties like Hamas and secular ones like Fatah. Zionism was especially polarizing in modern Syria, Lebanon and Palestine -- where some of the highest concentrations of Arab Christians were. Moreover, the American missionaries in the Arab world identified with the Arab struggles for independence first from the Ottomans, and later from the British and the French. They generally had a great deal of respect for Arab culture and looked to establish a close relationship between the United States and the rising Arab peoples. The missionaries and their successors believed that the smart choice for the United States in the Middle East was to make friends with the Arabs; American support for the Jews was a foreign policy disaster that ran clearly counter to our obvious national interest...

Read the rest.

According to Miss Kelly, the Imam has taken a second wife:

...According to my sources, Hafiz Muhammed Masood is back in Lahore, Pakistan, where he is the imam of an important mosque in Lahore controlled by Jamat e Dawa (the new face of the terrorist group Lashkar e Taiba). Masood reportedly recently celebrated a second marriage to a lady in Lahore. It was quite a big event, I'm told.

Masood's lawyer said this of Masood back in Ocotber 2008, "He is totally petrified of going back to Pakistan." And "he was heartbroken about leaving his wife and eight children and returning to a country where he could be in danger because he preached peace in the United States, said his lawyer, Norman S. Zalkind of Boston." Sounds like Masood is doing just fine though. What do his interfaith supporters in Sharon think of the second wife? What do his own wife and children think?

Meanwhile, Masood's first (?) wife and family are still living in the Islamic Center of New England estate in Sharon, MA, and they are facing deportation charges too.  The family applied for political asylum in the U.S., but it was denied.  How do you say "chutzpah" in Urdu?  That deportation case continues. [More.]

Life is cruel.

Khaled Abu Toameh: For Israel's Arabs It Is Not Apartheid

An Arab member of the Knesset who goes all the way to the US and Canada to tell university students and professors that Israel is an apartheid state is not only a hypocrite and a liar, but is also causing huge damage to the interests of his own Arab voters and constituents.

If Israel were an apartheid state, what is this Arab doing in the Knesset? Doesn't apartheid mean that someone like this Knesset member would not, in the first place, even be permitted to run in an election?

Fortunately, Arab citizens can go to the same beaches, restaurants and shopping malls as Jews in this "apartheid" state. Moreover, they can run in any election and even have a minister in the government [Ghaleb Majadlah] for the first time.

In this "apartheid" state, the Arab community has a free media that many Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip envy. Ironically, an Arab newspaper in Nazareth or Haifa that is licensed by Israel enjoys more freedom than the media controlled by Hamas and Fatah, as well as most corrupt Arab dictatorships.

Ironically, this Knesset member who is complaining about apartheid enjoys more privileges than most Jews and Arabs in Israel. As a parliamentarian, he is entitled to do many things that an ordinary citizen cannot do, thanks largely to the immunity he enjoys as an elected official...[More.]

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

Last September, President Barack Obama said before a large audience at the UN that within two months there would be intensive, direct, final status talks between Israel and the Palestinians. Sort of a Camp David III. Now, six months later we are back in the pre-1992 era of indirect talks.

Yet reporters still ask, and write, that this might be the prelude to some grand breakthrough and a comprehensive peace deal. When will they ever learn? Never, apparently.

Note that it is important for the two sides to meet but the reason is to deal with far more immediate tasks: coordination on economic and security issues particularly. I guess I'm going to have to go on for decades saying that there won't be a comprehensive peace agreement for decades.

Before we start, though, one more point that is very important. When I say that the continuation of the conflict is mainly the fault of the Palestinian side, I'm not doing that to score political points. Who cares? The world will go on in precisely the same way whatever people think after reading articles.

You need to understand whose fault it is because it's impossible to understand what's going on without comprehending that reality. Nothing makes sense. After all, if Palestinians yearn for their own country and are suffering so horribly, why do they keep rejecting a peace agreement on the basis that they might--at worst--have to give up, say, five percent of the territory they claim?

But to return to the timeline, a simple reminder about one small point regarding Israel-Palestinian issues tell more than 100 op-eds. The Palestinian Authority (PA) will now probably engage in indirect talks with Israel and this will be hailed as a great step forward by Western media and governments, a triumph for the Obama Administration.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Going Backward? Understanding and Attempts to Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict"

[Crossposted from JStreetJive with additional material.]

CJP Haymarket Grant.jpg

haymarket.jpg

When we did our original analysis of The Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Boston cash grants to organizations that demonstrated extreme animus towards Israel (Guess Who's Dining at CJP's Trough?, What We Should Expect From CJP) -- and in some cases -- advocated the dissolution of the Jewish State - we missed possibly the most extreme, anti-Israel group of all - The Haymarket People's Fund. This group maintains an extremist agenda against Israel.

The Haymarket People's Fund has bankrolled the Somerville Divestment Project (SDP) for years. They have tried in vain to convince the voters of that city close to Boston to:

Reduce the military and political support given to Israel by the U.S. in order to end the military occupation of Palestine and instead have their country support human rights of Palestinians including the Right of Return. They use grassroots organizing and education to advocate for human rights of all Palestinians.

One of the founders of the SDP was one Ron Francis (no longer in New England), an Andover High School teacher whose virtual every waking moment was spent in demonizing and attempting to harm Israel.

Most shockingly of all, while the Boston Jewish Community Relations Council was participating in the campaign opposing the Somerville Divestment Project, its parent, the CJP, was funding (most likely, indirectly) the SDP through the Haymarket grant! Even if the grant was earmarked for another Haymarket project, the overall, intensely anti-Israel nature of the charity should have been recognized. After all, no mainstream Jewish philanthropy would fund Hamas' "social service" wing and then claim that no money was given to the "military" wing.

Of course, we don't believe that CJP is anti-Israel. They fund and organize wonderful and indispensable programs in Haifa and other Israeli cities. They support strongly pro-Zionist organizations directly and through their Donor Advised Funds as we have noted. They were instrumental in defeating the SDP ballot initiative.

But who's minding the store at 126 High Street? Spending roughly one minute googling Haymarket People's Fund will reveal their extreme, anti Israel agenda. Funding an organization like Haymarket is beyond the pale. Can you imagine the NAACP funding a white supremacist organization?

SDP ron francis.jpg

SDP Rally in Boston

CJP has to get its act together. The donor guidelines we suggested in a previous posting should provide a basis for ensuring that the organization is not working at cross purposes. Donors who wish to channel their charitable contributions through CJP to groups like Haymarket must be informed about their lethal goals or have their offers rejected.

Here's a short video of the kind of activities CJP should not be funding, even indirectly or inadvertently:

Martin Solomon adds: Charles Baker, Republican candidate for Governor, was caught up in a controversy over his firm's charitable contributions that included a much smaller contribution to the Haymarket People's Fund and, in turn, the SDP: MA Governor Candidate Haunted by His Foundation's Donations. The linked article is now offline, but here's the operative section:

...The foundation gave $200 in 2006 to the Haymarket People's Fund, an "anti-racist and multi-cultural foundation" that in turn gave $12,000 in grants to the Somerville Divestment Project. That group opposes what it describes as "Israel's military occupation of Palestine."

On its Web site, the Somerville group calls Israel's policies toward Palestine a "genocide" and a "holocaust." The site also features a cartoon depicting a mother and child emblazoned with the words "Gaza" being stalked by a jack-booted, sword-toting Israeli soldier pushing a Star of David with shark teeth...

I mention this to show that the Haymarket/SDP connection is an odious enough association that even the non-Jewish media consider a much smaller contribution problematic.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

[The following is a guest post by Alexander Maistrovoy.]

Welcome to the Holy Land: Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi in Hebron, Bilal Ibn Ribah mosque in Bethlehem and Al-Burak Wall...

The Israeli government announced that it would include the Cave of the Patriarchs (Me'arat HaMachpelah) in Hebron and Rachel's Tomb in Bethlehem as part of a comprehensive plan to preserve Israel's national heritage and religious sites ("Moreshet"). The reaction of the Arab (and all Islamic) world to the decision has once again shown the real essence of the "Arab-Israeli conflict", which actually is the holy war that Arabs had proclaimed against the Jews.

Any conflict can be resolved if the conflicting parties recognize each other's right of existence. It becomes basically irresolvable if one of parties refuses to recognize the other. The key questions of borders, the status of Jerusalem and refugees are difficult but could be resolved in case Arabs recognized the right of the Jews to live in their land.

Arabs do not recognize it. All their policy, strategy, and ideology is directed to depriving the Jews of any connection with the land of Israel: virtually, and then physically to uproot the Jews from the history of the Holy Land. Jews have neither antiquities nor holy sites, they have no past. In other words, they do not belong to this land and have no right to exist at all.

Continue reading "Alexander Maistrovoy: Jews in the Holy Land ? What Jews?"

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

According to the latest communication from Boston's Combined Jewish Philanthropies, in response to our discovery that that organization had funded such overly anti-Israel groups as the Unitarian Universalist Association and the American Friends Service Committee, a representative maintained that their vetting process was "sound." Considering an organization's mission statement as definitive in regards to its policy and activities vis a vis Israel is naive at best.

We beg to differ. There is nothing "sound" about funding groups that:

  • Actively support Hamas support groups like The International Solidarity Movement (UUA).
  • Actively support BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanction) campaigns (AFSC).
  • Actively support Israel Apartheid Week (UUA).
  • Refuse to allow pro-Israel groups and speakers a place at their events (UUA and the AFSC).

We do not believe that our CJP intentionally supports these anti Israel groups. The temptation of accepting funds earmarked for groups that routinely denigrate and de-legitimize Israel must be resisted. Donor Advised Funds (DAF's) must conform to the overall mission statement of the CJP itself: "Our Israel agenda will focus on advocacy, connection and impact."

Chaos engulfed the San Francisco Jewish Community Federation earlier this year when it supported the screening of the  the intensely propagandistic anti-Israel film, "Rachel", by the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival, which selectively recounted the life and tragic death of Rachel Corrie, an ISM member accidentally killed in Gaza while shielding weapons smuggling tunnels.  Daniel Sokatch, CEO of the SFJCF and supporter of the film's screening, has since moved on to become CEO of The New Israel Fund and was a keynote speaker at last October's J Street Washington conference.

ISM Activist Rachel Corrie burning American Flag.png

sokatch250.jpg

Daniel Sokatch of the New Israel Fund

Hoping to avoid such divisive controversies in the future, the SFJCF has since adopted governing support and funding of organizations that conflict with the organization's mission statement on Israel.

We believe that the Boston CJP must adopt and enforce similar safeguards against the support and funding of overtly anti-Israel groups, including donations via Donor Advised Funds.

These must include donations and support for organizations that:

  • now, or in the past, have - through publications, speeches, films and other presentations - directly or indirectly supported the elimination of Israel as a Jewish state.
  • have hosted predominantly anti-Israel speakers and failed to host a balanced number of pro-Israel speakers.
  • have advocated the "one state solution" (which implicitly advocates the elimination of Israel as a Jewish state).
  • have advocated and/or supported Boycott, Divestment or Sanctions (BDS) initiatives or petitions against Israel.
  • presented or supported anti-Semitic speakers or events.
  • have funded - directly or indirectly - individuals and/or organizations that support U.S. State Department designated terror groups such as Hamas.
  • have depicted Israel as "an Apartheid state" and/or participated in "Israel Apartheid Week."

Considering the groups that CJP has funded recently who are clearly anti-Israel (as a Jewish and democratic state), adoption and enforcement of such guidelines are essential to maintaining CJP's mission of defending and supporting Israel at a time of unprecedented existential threats.

(Previous: Guess Who's Dining at CJP's Trough?)

[Martin Kramer answers his critics in the most devastating manner -- using their own words against them. Here he continues the response to the controversy started by his Herzliya Conference remarks. Previous: I Believe This Is the Foreign Affairs Version of Playing the Race Card (re: Martin Kramer) and The Boston Globe's Contribution to Israel Apartheid Week. This post, by Martin Kramer, is crossposted in full from Martin's blog.]

Q: Martin Kramer spoke of Gaza's "superfluous young men." Is anyone in Gaza "superfluous"?

A: "I don't mind if Gazans continue producing babies, but they will have to move somewhere else. They simply will not fit into their current geography--forgetting about feeding and employing them, too.'" (Dr. Hassan Abu Libdeh, president, Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 2000.)

Q: Okay... Well, if that's the situation, wouldn't it make sense for Gaza's government to promote family planning?

A: "Unlike the West that practices family planning, we encourage having children for political reasons." (Dr. Abd al-Aziz Rantisi, co-founder of Hamas in Gaza, 2003.)

Q: Political reasons? For couples having children?

A: "Marriage is the same as jihad. With marriage, you are producing another generation that believes in resistance." (Muhammad Yousef, member of the Qassam Brigades in Gaza, the Hamas underground, 2008.)

Continue reading "Gaza Q&A: Palestinians Answer"

[The following, by Bataween, is crossposted from CiF Watch. For an eyewitness account of the destruction of the Hurva Synagogue and Jewish Jerusalem, click here.]

hurvasynagogue.jpg

Rising from the ashes like a phoenix, the rebuilt Hurva synagogue is about to be inaugurated in Jerusalem's Jewish quarter.

hurva-destroyed2.jpg
The synagogue, restored to 19th century magnificence with its finely carved wooden pillars, gilt ornamentation and frescoes of Jerusalem, is a rare symbol of the revival of Jewish life after Israel's post-1967 reunification of the city. The synagogue was razed to the ground in 1948, dynamited by the Transjordanian Arab Legion, along with scores of other synagogues. The old city was depopulated of thousands of its Jewish inhabitants, their homes looted, the Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives desecrated and its tombstones used for latrines and as paving stones. Continue reading "If you can't learn from history you deserve to have it repeated"

He did! Mead is continuing his series of excellent blog posts: The Night Yasser Arafat Kissed Me. Mead continues to pick at the issues of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.

...Frankly, those who think they can make substantive changes in American policy toward Israel by attacking the Jews and the Israel lobby remind of some bulls I once saw at the bull fights in Madrid. Bull after bull went for the red cape, not the matador. Bull after bull went down in the dust as the crowds cheered and threw flowers. That is pretty much what has happened to those who want to distance the US from Israel; they go for the highly visible and attractive target of the Israel lobby, and time after time they go down. I don't think this is smart, but don't let me stop anybody's fun.

I'll get into the reasons why I think the Israel lobby is more matador's cape than matador going forward, but there's one difficult subject that needs to be addressed up front, and that issue is anti-Semitism. This form of prejudice is as deeply embedded in western Christian history as racism is in American culture. As a native South Carolinian born back in the days of legally-enforced racial segregation, I have learned a lot about the subtle qualities and stubborn persistence of racist images and ideas that you take in unconsciously from the culture that shapes you...

Read it all. Yes, he falls a little too quickly into the "both sides share blame" thing for my tastes, but this is well worth a read.

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word. It also includes a guest contribution by habibi from Harry's Place.]

A group of friends in London alerted me to this grubby little piece by a British Labour Party Member of Parliament, Bob Marshall-Andrews, concerning his recent visit to Gaza. Upon reading it, I was struck by various thoughts, not least the degree to which Marshall-Andrews words will be welcomed by the Hamas cheerleaders who compose the Palestinian solidarity movement, in marked contrast to the fierce condemnation with which this blog, and others like it, will greet his compendium of antisemitism-laced falsehoods. Why bother to refute such lies, one might ask, when those of us who defend Israel are at irreconcilable odds with those who demonize her, when any charge of antisemitism we make is bound to be dismissed as another tired attempt to muzzle debate? The most satisfactory answer I can come up with is that some things - and Marshall-Andrews article is one of them - are so odious that they cannot pass without rebuke.

To work, then. Here's how Marshall-Andrews sets the scene:

"Bags of cement are slit open by grinning ringletted guards. Having destroyed they maintain the destruction."

The "ringlets" he refers to are known, in Hebrew, as pe'ot, the sidelocks worn by ultraorthodox Jews. Now, I've spent a great deal of time in Israel and I can tell you that most Israeli soldiers don't wear pe'ot. So what visual image is Marshall-Andrews trying to conjure up here? One of a people that rejoices in radical evil, their grinning faces framed by those unmistakeably Jewish ringlets. Something a little like this, perhaps:

nazileaflet.jpg

But of course, he's not antisemitic. That's just a device to smear supporters of the Palestinians.

Continue reading "Lying in Gaza"

By Lenny Ben-David. Effective: The Upcoming Rachel Corrie Trial: Go After Her Real Killers

Craig and Cindy Corrie, I welcome you to Israel where, I understand, you plan to bring a civil suit before an Israeli court on March 10 "to put on public record," the British Guardian wrote, "the events that led to [your] daughter Rachel's death in March 2003."

I thank God for the well-being of my children and grandchildren, and I cannot imagine the pain and anger you feel over the loss of your daughter, Rachel.

My sons have served as combat soldiers, and may have actually fought on the very ground where your daughter died. The area was laced with tunnels to smuggle weapons and explosives for use against Israelis. My children are Israelis who ride in buses and eat in pizzerias, and by the grace of God they have been spared attacks by the suicide bombers your daughter championed.

Some may see the irony in your using the courts and the free press of Israel in your attempt to pursue and denounce the nation your daughter loathed. I see the tragedy in your allying with the International Solidarity Movement -- the very people and organization who led and, in a sense, really pushed Rachel to her death.

According to news accounts, Israel will permit four of Corrie's colleagues from the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) to enter Israel to give testimony on what occurred that day. Actually, I believe it's a good decision to permit the four into Israel's jurisdiction where the ISM members could and should be arrested for reckless endangerment, fraud, manslaughter, aiding terrorists, and a host of other charges. The public may also discover who paid for your lawsuit and the expenses of bringing you and ISM witnesses to Israel...[More.]

Sorry, I was going to note this on Sunday, but lethargy took over before I could make it to the keyboard. Jesse Singal was back with a Boston Sunday(!) Globe op-ed on the eve of the Oscars. I've had two cups of coffee now and have not only made it through the piece but still have enough will to live to post. Jesse notes that...wait for it...Avatar carries an anti-US foreign policy message! I know, insightful. I almost zoned out before making it there, but he ends up relating Avatar's success, including particularly overseas numbers, to Obama's great and continuing apology tour. Somehow Avatar's take at the box office is related in some vague way with the success of Obama's shift in tone in foreign affairs....or something. Of course, most people, while thrilling at Avatar's visuals, have rightly derided the film's story -- as our friends in the UK would have it -- as utter wank (or would that be bollocks? Or some combination?). Sadly, that's about the level of substantive success the new Administration's policies have experienced as well.

Singal no longer works for a Soros-funded outfit. Not surprising, really. Soros probably expects a certain value for his money. The Globe? Not so much.

Oh, here's the Globe piece: Foreign policy: Diffusing arrogance in 'Avatar'

Monday, March 8, 2010

dodeyewash.jpg

U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Terina Miller, a security forces member with the 130th Airlift Wing, recovers after being sprayed with pepper spray as Master Sgt. Hobert Smith, the security forces first sergeant, assists her during training in Charleston, W.Va., March 7, 2010.

This would appear to be part 2 of this.

Erdogan slams Israel list of Jewish sites

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem and the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron and the Mosque of Bilal Ibn Rabah, "will forever be Islamic and will never be part of the Jewish heritage." In an interview to a Saudi paper published on Sunday, he said: "Palestine is our case did it is not out of our agenda in any given day."

Erdogan, who described Palestine as an open prison, urged Palestinians to unite and end their internal division "because it is not in favor of the Palestinians, but in the the interest of their enemies. He added:" I love my brothers in Fatah And my brothers in Hamas wherever they are."...

Too much to comment on. What else do you expect from an Islamist? Even from the Great Muslim Hope of Turkey.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

From Palestinian Media Watch: PA to name square for murderer of 37 on anniversary of her attack

Another chapter is unfolding in the ongoing confrontation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority over the naming of a square after the terrorist Dalal Mughrabi. In December, Palestinian Media Watch publicized that the Municipality of Ramallah planned to name a public square in honor of the terrorist Dalal Mughrabi, who led the worst terror attack in Israel's history when she and other terrorists hijacked a bus and murdered 37 civilians in 1978. Prime Minister Netanyahu immediately protested to the US and sharply criticized the PA for its intention to name the square in Ramallah "after a terrorist who killed dozens of Israelis."

The official PA daily newspaper reports today that the PA has chosen to ignore PM Netanyahu's criticism and protests to the US. Not only does it still intend to name the square after the terrorist, but the date chosen for the inaugural ceremony is this Thursday, March 11, the 32nd anniversary of the terror attack.

Since PMW's exposure of the story, PA leaders have repeatedly rejected PM Netanyahu's criticism while defending the practice of honoring murderers, whom they honor as Martyrs (Shahids). PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas also referred to the terror attack as "military activities."...[More.]

Saturday, March 6, 2010

'Islamic nations will back Iran strike'

An Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would be quietly supported by a wide coalition of Islamic nations, including a number of extremist states, Deputy Minister of the Negev and Galilee Ayoub Kara said Saturday.

Kara, speaking at a Beersheba event, said that though none of them would admit to it publicly, Islamic nations had conveyed messages to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu that they would back military action against Iran by Israel and the US.

Kara said that Israel would strike "if there is no option."...

Pffffffft. "The lurkers support me in email." Support in private is totally and absofuckinglutely useless. Shove it. The Arab states have always privately supported one Israeli move or another. They're happy to have the Israelis (or the Americans) do their dirty work, encourage them in private and then denounce them in public while they pander to their ignorant slavering streets. Anyone who's using this backdoor approval in their calculations for whether Israel should go ahead on an Iran strike is making a big mistake. The Arabs would be perfectly happy to arrange it so both Iran and Israel are removed from the picture.

Christopher Hitchens decries anti-Semitism in lecture at UCLA

Christopher Hitchens, an internationally known columnist, intellectual and author whose provocative books and essays in Slate, Vanity Fair, the Atlantic and other publications have hammered at organized religion, the Clintons, Winston Churchill and Mother Teresa alike, appeared Wednesday, March 3, before a packed audience at UCLA to portray anti-Semitism as "the godfather of all other forms of racism" and "the gateway to the tyranny of fascism and war."

Alternating between black humor, biting sarcasm and insightful analysis, Hitchens took over the podium at Korn Convocation Hall to deliver the eighth annual Daniel Pearl Memorial Lecture at UCLA to an audience of more than 400 people, including Pearl's father, Judea Pearl, an emeritus professor of computer science at UCLA and president of a foundation formed to continue his son's mission of promoting cross-cultural understanding through journalism and music.

Daniel Pearl, a prominent Wall Street Journal reporter and the paper's South Asia bureau chief, was kidnapped and murdered by terrorists in Pakistan in 2002...

The "wrongful death" lawsuit by the family of deceased International Solidarity Movement activist Rachel Corrie is moving forward, as Israel has allowed several ISM activists into the country to serve as witnesses (now there's a reliable group): Corrie witnesses testify next week

The hearing of witnesses in the civil tort filed by the family of Rachel Corrie - a member of the pro-Palestinian International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who was crushed to death by an IDF bulldozer in 2003 - is due to begin next week in the Haifa District Court.

The plaintiffs - Corrie's father, Craig; her mother, Cynthia; her brother, Christopher; and her sister Sarah Simpson - are suing the state for $324,424 in damages in what they charge was her wrongful death, caused by the use of "deliberate and utterly unreasonable force by the bulldozer driver" who ran over her over.

Corrie, who came from Olympia, Washington, was 24 years old when she died on March 16, 2003. She was stationed at the time with other ISM volunteers in Rafah, at the southern tip of the Gaza Strip.

The IDF Southern Command conducted an investigation of the incident and closed the file without taking measures against any of the soldiers involved...[More.]

Steven Plaut has written a little background and an open letter to the Corries: A Two Person Anti-Israel SWAT Team. Argue with his tone all you like, and initially I, like many, was extremely sympathetic to the parents -- how could you not be -- but quite frankly, they have made themselves into real political activists and at this point it's more about keeping other people's kids alive than anything else.

For some more background on the Rachel Corrie story, you can see my review of the play with resources linked at the end, here: Earnest Ignorance: My Name is Rachel Corrie at the New Rep

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

There has been a huge international controversy about the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a leading Hamas terrorist, in Dubai on January 19. I have no idea who did it but have some points to make on the subject.

1. Generally speaking, media coverage almost never (in Europe) or only minimally (in the United States) talks about what Mabhouh actually did to merit his end. The New York Times had the following paragraph at the very end of its story:

"Mr. Mabhouh had a role in the 1989 abduction and killing of two Israeli soldiers, and was also involved in smuggling weapons into Gaza, Israel and Hamas have said. Israel officials say the weapons came from Iran."

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: When It's Necessary and Desirable to Assassinate Terrorists"

What? You didn't know? It happened veeewy quietly... After 'Post' query, HRW says top military analyst quit

A Human Rights Watch spokeswoman told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday night that its embattled senior military analyst Marc Garlasco resigned nearly three weeks ago, even though, according to NGO Monitor, he was still listed on HRW's Web site as an employee earlier in the day.

HRW suspended Garlasco with pay in September, "pending an investigation," after allegations surfaced that he was an avid collector of Nazi memorabilia.

Yet according to NGO Monitor, since Garlasco's paid suspension, no word had been given regarding his employment status with the organization or any investigation into the allegations made against him. Additionally, Garlasco's name remained on the organization's online list of employees.

After HRW was queried regarding Garlasco's status on Thursday evening, the group's communications director, Emma Daly, responded in an e-mail stating, "Human Rights Watch regretfully accepted Marc Garlasco's resignation on February 15th [and] he is no longer listed as a staff member on Human Rights Watch's Web site."...

This was inevitable, but Garlasco was only the most glaring of HRW's problems. The real problem is systemic, and that remains.

For some of the background, see: Human Rights Watch's Marc Garlasco a Nazi-Phile, Human Rights Watch Responds to Garlasco Revelations, Human Rights Watch Suspends Garlasco with Pay.

Here's a good one I missed on Walter Russell Mead's excellent blog (via Jeffrey Goldberg): Middle East 'Realists': Anti-Semites or Just Dumb?

...Now in case any of my readers have missed the census news since 1790, there are not now and never have been all that many Jews in the United States. Less than two percent of the roughly 300 million people in the United States are Jewish. This means that Jews can at most account for two of that 63 percent of the population who sympathize with Israel. Pro-Israel gentiles in America outnumber pro-Israel Jews by a factor of 20-1, and ever since polling on this issue began, the overwhelming majority of the Americans who support Israel against its enemies haven't been Jewish.

This brings us to a problem: why do so many people, especially self-described 'realists' when it comes to Middle East policy, find it mysterious that American foreign policy supports Israel? Surely in a democratic republic, when policy over a long period of time tracks with public sentiment, there is very little to explain. American politicians vote for pro-Israel policies because that is what voters want them to do. Case closed, I would think. Late breaking news flash: water runs downhill.

Yet many otherwise intelligent people are drawn over and over again to the idea that a mysteriously powerful Jewish lobby is somehow thwarting democracy to bend American foreign policy to its nefarious will. Polls, reason, history, none of this matters. America supports Israel because of 'the Jews'...[Read the rest.]

Some good thoughts here from Irwin Cotler from Hadar-Israel:

The real apartheid in the middle-east is the rejection of the legitimacy of a Jewish State, according to Irwin Cotler, the featured speaker at Hadar's second public forum February 24 on Lawfare: Fighting False Legal Actions and Boycotts that Demonize Israel. Cotler, former Justice Minister of Canada, a Canadian MP and a renowned international human rights lawyer also told the packed hall at the Menachem Begin Heritage Center that groups like Hadar that mobilize citizen engagement are of vital importance in "delegitimizing the delegitimizers."

The delegitimization of Israel - while not a new phenomenon - has been "laundered" under the banners of human rights, the UN, and the fight against racism, Cotler explained. The Palestinian narrative with its many falsifications has been adopted as the human rights narrative and Israel is portrayed as an international outlaw. In addition, the recent Goldstone commission was corrupt from its creation by the fundamentally biased UN Human Rights Council, Cotler said...

Friday, March 5, 2010

OK. This is getting ridiculous. I speak of course of The Mystery on the Orient - I mean - Dubai.

Now, Dubai Police Chief Tamim is demanding the culprits present themselves for DNA testing despite the fact that there's no clue who the culprits actually are. Personally I think it were James Bond, no less - or maybe - The Bourne Identity or should we say, "identities," since all good spies have safes full of phony passports as we all know from watching the movies.

Meanwhile, though, Israel stands accused, which isn't exactly unusual.

So - does the chief expect the entire nation of Israel not to mention the Irish, French, Brits, Germans, Australians etc who were supposedly involved, some of whom do not even exist -plus of course the million or so helpers allegedly assisting Mossad, to go downtown and open up for a swab?

Or what?

Also given Hamas statements on the matter I think we'd have to include Fatah, some Hamas insiders who might have betrayed the poor terrorist, plus Egypt and Jordan in the equation.

This could keep CSI Miami busy for years. Just sayin'.

In fact, I say we do the testing here in the US. It could improve the economy!

Besides that - how on earth can one explain how even the omnipotent Mossad managed to lock and chain the door from inside and then just vanish?

Well ok they didn't entirely vanish. Dubai has a couple of Palestinians in custody which is proof positive teh Jooz done it.

Right. Besides that little detail - what I'd like to know is how?

From al Jazeera via AP:

"Tamim told Al-Jazeera the suspects that entered al-Mabhouh's room to kill him left the room tidy and locked the door from inside -- and latched the chain lock -- when they left to make it look like he died in his sleep.

"'They made the room look as if there had been no struggle," he said. "Everything was in order, as if the man was asleep. They left and closed the door perfectly and put the chain lock on as if the man had shut it himself.'"...

[The following is crossposted from JStreetJive]

steve_cohen.jpg

"I Cannot Tell a Lie - I Wrote it."

For nearly ten months questions have swirled around the country about the identity of the speechwriter responsible for Obama's controversial address to the Muslim and Arab world delivered at Cairo University on June 4, 2009. In attendance was the Grand Sheikh Mohammed Sayyid Tantawi of that other great seat of learning and tolerance (and co-host of the speech), Al Azhar; the Sheikh has stated that there are "good Jews and bad Jews": "The good ones convert to Islam...the bad ones do not."

The much ballyhooed speech, originally scheduled for Morocco, was changed to Cairo to have the greatest impact in "correcting" the perceived Muslim hostility to the U.S.engendered by  George.W. Bush.  The Wall St. Journal and Politico guessed it was the product of Ben Rhodes, Obama's only foreign policy speechwriter (and erstwhile novelist: "The Oasis of Love") who traveled with him for his first major European speech, often dubbed the "Blame America First" speech.

Well, speculate no more. The writer wasn't Ben Rhodes or Chris Brose, former foreign policy speechwriter for Condoleeza Rice. If we can believe him - and there is no reason to doubt his word - it was Stephen P. Cohen. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel called Cohen a week before the trip and asked him to prepare a first draft for the speech, "A New Beginning."

That's right! BHO chose a Jew to write the most important address by an American President -- in the middle of a war against Islamic terrorists -- to the Muslim world.

Steve Cohen, founder of the Institute for Middle East Peace and Development, Harvard PhD, visiting professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Princeton and other high powered institutions, recently spoke at Harvard's Center for Middle East Studies beneath the smiling portraits of Harvard's stellar contributors to the landscape of failed foreign policy initiatives, notably, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski. We all remember "Zbig", the guy who helped weaponize the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan along with someone called Osama Bin Laden. Now that was a brilliant move.

Continue reading "Revelation at Harvard: Who Wrote Obama's Cairo Speech? [Hillel]"

The Boston Globe is continuing to try to milk every last drop of juice out of the Delahunt/J Street story. This time it's on the op-ed page with a piece by Jesse Singal. Singal is a regular contributor to the Globe, but what they don't tell you is that he works for and blogs at the Center for Campus Progress, a project of the Center for American Progress, a Soros funded affair -- so basically, Singal is doing J Street's work as one hand washes the other, only they don't feel the need to tell you that: The new American Jew on Israel

WHETHER IT was a major diplomatic slight or a minor one overblown by media coverage, what happened to Representative William Delahunt in a congressional trip to Israel last month was telling.

Because the trip was sponsored by J Street, a "pro-Israel, pro-peace" organization that has criticized the Israeli government, Israel's minister of foreign affairs, Avigdor Lieberman, and his deputy, Danny Ayalon, refused to meet with the five congressmen as long as J Street and another pro-peace sponsor was present. The message was clear: Your traveling companions have criticized us, so we won't sit with you unless you keep them away from the table...

The other " pro-peace" (so-called) group was CMEP, and I'm almost getting tired of reminding people what they are really about. Yet again we're reminded that J Street isn't so much regretful of what happened, as they are fully aware that they are a pressure-, not pro-, Israel organization.

What kind of a person is this supposed "new Jew" that Singal is writing about? One that, he tells us, is more comfortable criticizing Israel than defending, presumably:

Continue reading "J Street's Provincial Priorities"

After a week of watching the BDSers wave their arms around during "Israel Apartheid Whatever" I thought Sol's readers might want a little (numerical) reality check (from Divest This):

Given that the theme of this year's increasingly fraying "Israel Apartheid Week" is Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS), I thought it might be useful to summarize the progress of the BDS movement since it began a decade ago. Because so much of the BDS project is based on words, including competing claims of success and failure, I thought it best to provide a summary based primarily on numbers which (as I recall from my business days) are the only things that tend to get preserved as information travels up or through an organization.

Since these numbers need to be "scored" against some criterion, I've decided to abandon my usual critique of the BDS narrative and, in this instance, accept as a given their primary thesis: that economic activity related to Israel translates to political approval or disapproval. Now some people may say this is overly generous in that it allows them to continue to claim that purely economic decisions are actually fueled by partisan considerations. But if we accept (albeit temporarily) their founding principle on a micro level, then they must also be willing to be judged along the same criteria on a macro basis. And regarding that macro basis, here is Exhibit A:

Israeli GDP.jpg

My goodness! During the very period when BDS was supposedly on the march, the size of Israel's economy (as measured by GDP) nearly doubled from $110B to $190B. Now given that the BDS project is based on their activity having economic consequence for the Jewish state, the takeaway from this chart seems to be that such consequence has been an explosion of growth in the Israeli economy.

Continue reading "BDS by the Numbers"

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Peace partners who want not just a piece, but all of you... Palestinian Media Watch: PA TV teaches children that all of Israel is "occupied Palestine"

Official Palestinian Authority TV continues to teach children that all of Israel is "occupied Palestine."

On the latest episode of The Best Home, a PA TV program for young children, the host says that Israeli Arab children living in the Israeli cities Lod, Nazareth and Be'er Sheva are living under occupation. She addresses Israeli Arab viewers: "Dear children... we will always remain in contact with you, because you have the right, and this program is certainly yours too, just as it belongs to every Palestinian child, since you are part of occupied Palestine."

The host repeatedly avoids using the name "Israel" on the program, referring to the land of the State of Israel alternately as "the occupied territories," "the 1948 territories" or "occupied Palestine."

Palestinian Media Watch has repeatedly documented the Palestinian Authority policy of depicting a world in which Israel does not exist...[More.]

There's a good report on the Israel Apartheid Week event at Columbia University last night, here: What the Jihadis at Columbia Said. The event featured Ben White -- an anti-Semite in Christian garb.

There is video here.

And for a Christian response to IAW, with a focus on Ben White, see: Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) a Christian response?

In order to help some of the student- and other local activists continue to take apart what's developing into the most farcical "Israel Apartheid Week" yet, I chose to do something I've sworn off for the last dozen or so years: a Noam Chomsky event.

I used to go to quite a few of these during the Windows 3.1/BC (Before Children) era when I was just getting into the activist game. And while I was ready to enter similar territory to where I've been in the past, nothing prepared me for the Biblical-level Déjà vu on display at Boston University that evening.

It wasn't just the audience consisting of the usual anti-Israel bobble-heads wearing t-shirts emblazoned with 100-year-old slogans made this scene so familiar. Point of fact, I recognized over a dozen of the non-students in the audience as faces I've seen at every anti-Israel event I've attended over the last two decades. And Chomsky always draws a crowd of student admirers ready to lap up his every word (especially since their understanding of history was informed entirely from books written by or referencing the MIT prof).

No the thing that truly caught me by surprise was the talk itself which did not veer one angstrom in word or tone from what I saw Chomsky yammering on about 15 or more years ago. There it all was (again). The hyper-critical microscope focused on every Israeli or American word or deed, coupled with a Pollyannaish taking of every voice critical of the US or the Jewish state at absolute face value. The denial of documented historical facts, coupled with an understanding that his audience would accept anything coming out of his mouth as Gospel. And, most importantly, the countless sentences starting with "Of course...," "As everyone knows...", "As has been proven again and again...", "As is widely recognized..." all delivered in the same, drawling grumble that's been Chomsky's trademark since the Beatles first took the stage on Ed Sullivan.

And then it struck me. In the decade and a half since I'd last put myself through a torturous Chomsky performance, a character has emerged from literature who at last can describe the Sage of the MIT: Harry Potter's Professor Binns.

Potterphiles will remember Binns as the teacher who died one night while taking a nap by the fire in the Hogwarts teacher's lounge, but whose ghost decided death should not prevent him from giving the same mind-numbingly dull lectures he'd tortured students with for decades previously.

Suddenly, the world made sense! Chomsky has not inhabited the landscape of political discourse for these many years so much as haunted it. It doesn't matter what events happen in America, the Middle East or anywhere else that prove him wrong. It makes no difference how many Palestinians die following his advice to stand firm in the battle against Israeli and "US imperialism." It's irrelevant how many times his predictions are proven wrong and his recommendations prove disastrous. No matter what, Professor Binns-Chomsky will continue to drone on about his version of The Globlin Wars, with the You-Know-Whos playing the role of the goblins ("of course").

[The following is crossposted from JStreetJive. Note addition at end.]

IAW_2010poster_Toronto.jpg

More Than an "Analogy"

Following this blog's noting J Street's silence on the blood libel of Israel Apartheid Week (on Solomonia, here), Jerermy Ben Ami has finally published a response. In typical, studied, tortured and almost diplomatic prose, the statement nowhere rejects the substance of the campaign, namely, that Israel IS an apartheid state.  IAW is not constructing analogies - it defines "Israel as an apartheid system."

Rather than simply and emphatically stating that Israel is NOT an apartheid state, J Street nibbles at the edges by saying: "We also reject comparisons of Israel to South African apartheid. The analogy clearly implies that Israel is illegitimate." (our emphasis).

There is no "analogy" - according to IAW, Israel IS an apartheid state, clear and simple. Continuing, the J Street statement criticizes the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanction) crowd by claiming that they are: "making no distinction between West Bank settlements and Israel proper, and refusing to support a two-state solution..."

In other words, J Street would probably be quite delighted were the BDS movement to target the "settlements" per se. Moreover, if IAW would only sign onto J Street's idee fixe of the two state solution, then they might go along with them.

Clearly and irrefutably, Israel - including the "settlements" - are not "apartheid states". Why won't J Street come out and unequivocally state that obvious fact? Because they have the agenda juggernaut of "no settlements and a two state solution".

I suppose we must issue a muffled congratulations to Ben Ami, but nibbling at the edges of this modern blood libel will not suffice.

[Martin Solomon adds: At first I thought Hillel might be a little harsh in his judgment, but then I saw that Charles Radin, in his Jewish Advocate column this week, corroborates the view of J Street having a tepid attitude in an otherwise friendly piece: The word on J Street (paid sub required):

...Two notes were off key. Let's deal with them first.

The first was his answer to what should be done in response to Israel Apartheid Week. It's actually Israel Apartheid Fortnight - 14 days of primarily campus-based Israelbashing boycott promotion that began March 1.

Ben-Ami said he did not think it worthwhile to spend time screaming "How dare you use the A word?" at another side that was screaming "Israel is an apartheid state." He noted that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak had actually used the A word at the most recent Herzliya Conference.

Ben-Ami glided by the fact that Barak said apartheid is in Israel's future if the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories don't get to be self-governing. The Apartheid Week-niks say it exists now, and it is quite clear from the tsunami of stuff in which they are drowning the Internet that they do not see any place for a Jewish state in the region now or in the future.

There may be no magic right answer to how to respond, but blowing off the issue is not going to place J Street in the common-sense center or moderate-left of the overall debate...

[The following is a guest post by Ann Green.]

I recently returned from CPAC. It's great to be home, where I can't tell anyone about the three exhilarating days I spent in D.C. It was nice to be with people who wear their patriotism on their sleeves, are proud of our military, and, except for the Ron Paulers, support Israel.

Please don't tell my most of my friends. And definitely don't tell my extended family. I need to be able to go about my business in the People's Republic of Massachusetts. Especially here in Newton, which went for Coakley and wanted to invite a terrorist to settle down and enjoy some kosher Chinese at Tam China.

This conference was perfectly timed for me. It seems as though everywhere I turn someone is mumbling about Dick Cheney as the incarnation of evil and Sarah Palin as a moron. Of course it's assumed that everyone within earshot agrees. Every medium groans with the same tired trope, in novels, movies, TV someone comes out with a clever variation on the line, "I just don't want my child to grow up to be a Republican!" In Washington I was with people who did not assume that Republicans are monsters or that those of us who choose to be Independents are monster wannabees, so I got to relax. It was very cool to be in the audience when Dick Cheney made a surprise appearance after his daughter Liz's speech. Some, I suppose, would think me to have been in the belly of the beast.

One speaker proclaimed, "Americans don't bow!" and people went wild. Referring to our Homeland Insecurity Department, former Pentagon specialist on Islamic law and extremism Stephen Coughlin said, "You can't defeat an enemy you can't define." Why is he "former?" He was fired, of course. Americans have no idea of the extent to which radical Islamists have infiltrated the armed forces as well as the FBI, police departments, the prison system, etc. It was spoken about openly at CPAC. "Man-caused disasters" anyone?

One morning a man walked by with a tee-shirt that read "Thank you troops." Try wearing that in the Chestnut Hill Mall.

Of course there were some nutbags, people who were so libertarian they would repeal the law of gravity. But then there was Allen West, a retired Army Lieutenant Colonel running for Congress in Florida's 22nd district. "If the truth is hate speech you might as well lock me up, because I'm not shutting up," announced the colonel. "When I can go to Saudi Arabia with my bible and cross in my hand, then I'll be good to go." He was also not embarrassed to say, "This is a great nation." Other speakers on the subject of, dare I say it? -- the War on Terror -- pointed out that "When tolerance becomes a one-way street, it's cultural suicide." and "Profiling is simply trend analysis, and it works."

I got goosebumps listening to a former slave from the Sudan tell the audience "I'm proud to be speaking as a free man to free people in a free nation." He was kidnapped by Arabs when he was a child. He went on to describe how Arabs slaughtered Christians in the 1956 war, long before the "Not on My Watch" signs for Darfur went up on suburban lawns. I hear more about slavery in the U.S. two hundred years ago than about slavery under Arabs in the 21st century. Check your kids' history textbooks.

Wafa Sultan is a former Muslim who speaks all over the world about the dangers of radical Islam and has been rewarded with fatwas on her head. She was warmly received at CPAC. Does anyone think she could speak at Harvard or maybe the University of California at Irvine?

The best part of the conference was seeing so many people who are running for office for the first time. People have had it, and they are stepping up to the plate. I met Doug Hoffman, who came from nowhere to almost winning in the 23rd district in New York. He is a very unassuming guy. It must have taken a lot to get him out on the campaign trail - the destruction of the best health care system in the world comes to mind.

Of course there was criticism of Democrats, but rarely did I hear the hatred and ridicule which Republicans and other conservatives endure from the other side. In the words of Amity Shlaes, author The Forgotten Man, a history of the Depression which debunks myths about government programs, "When someone attacks ad hominem, it's because he lack a coherent idea." Speaking of the media...

They made lots of noise about Ron Paul winning the straw poll. It was not exactly a scientific sampling, but that's all the media need to go off and misinform. I watched a left-wing blogger chase Andrew Breitbart around the hotel, asking him to respond to charges that James O'Keefe's pimp outfit was racist. And when did he stop beating his wife? Let's not address the ACORN issue, shall we, let's just change the subject! I heard Breitbart speak several times at the conference. What passion! What a price he must be paying in his personal life! We should support this guy.

It was both fun and sad to be in the middle of an event while watching the media distort it at the same time. Kind of like those science fiction shows when they have an episode about an alternate reality. So, here I am back in Massachusetts, the model for health care "reform." Beam me back, Scotty!

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

ShalomLife has further detail on the cancellation of pro-Israel events at Canada's York University, and the apparent double standard with regard to the far lower hurdle anti-Israel activists are being required to jump over to get their events on campus: Pro-Israel Event at York Canceled.

Sounds like York is at a severe loss to explain itself. (Where was York security when this was going on?)

Previously: The Heckler's Veto Works in Canada, and David Frum: Something's seriously wrong at York University.

Sounds like this guy fits right in over there: Police probe man's anti-Semitic posts - York student investigated for 'Filthy Jew' site

I have already said all that I have to in substance about Martin Kramer's remarks at the Herzliya Conference regarding overpopulation in the Gaza Strip (see: I Believe This Is the Foreign Affairs Version of Playing the Race Card (re: Martin Kramer)). Bringing the issue out once again is today's Boston Globe, which has published a truly despicable screed by Yousef Munayyer, 'executive director of The Palestine Center in Washington': Gaza's youth not 'superfluous'.

Munayyer's piece is as expected -- crying racism when in fact Kramer said nothing that hasn't been said 1000 times in discussions of welfare policy before, blaming the economic conditions in Gaza on Israeli defensive measures rather than the terrorists who were elected to run the strip, calling those defensive measures a siege when they aren't, blaming everyone but Gazans themselves for a lack of family planning and the economic hardships it entails while mentioning nothing of the massive welfare payouts the Gaza Arabs receive...you know the drill.

Here's the thing, and with all due respect to Martin Kramer, I doubt the average Globe reader has heard of either he or Harvard's Weatherhead Center. The controversy surrounding an academic and a policy speech no one's heard of and no one's heard, respectively, is hardly the type of thing to make an op-ed page. In fact, we've been gifted with the Globe's contribution to Israel apartheid week. It's all the calumny that's fit to print.

I linked below to a Guardian story about the anti-Semitic messages received by the Israeli embassy in Spain. I had linked purely for the news value and not, for once, as a matter of examining the media semiotics. Silly me, this is The Guardian after all. Norm points out:

On the website of the liberal newspaper formerly known as the Guardian, you will find the report of a complaint made by Israel 'after its embassy in Madrid received postcards from nine-year-old schoolchildren accusing it of killing Palestinian babies and waging war for money'. The complaint is about anti-Semitism among other things, and from the report itself it would appear to be well-grounded. In any case, someone at the liberal newspaper formerly known as the Guardian has chosen a pictorial comment on this story and you may judge its suitability for yourself.

Here's my judgement of it. We can score another one for the viewpoint: it may be anti-Semitic, Mum, but that doesn't mean it's altogether bad. (Notice, too, the scare-quotes in the headline.)

I guess I'm so used to such things, I had scanned right past the picture and caption the paper had chosen to illustrate the story.

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from the GLORIA Center.]

International relations isn't a popularity contest. But public opinion polls can be useful in countering myths and examining the impact of policymaker, elite, and media campaigns on the masses.

Which brings us to Gallup's latest poll measuring how Americans feel about different countries. The more one examines the results, the more amazing they are. Americans two favorites are, not surprisingly, fellow English-speakers Canada and the United Kingdom. Then come-Americans are very forgiving-two former enemies, Germany and Japan.

And next on the list is Israel. Even the basic numbers-67 favorable, 25 percent unfavorable-are impressive. But that's only the beginning. Around 10 percent of Americans don't like anybody, and only one-fourth of those 25 percent nay-sayers on Israel, that is 6 percent, are really hostile.

In other words, the percentage of Americans who hate Israel is only 6 percent and the number who single out Israel for partly unfavorable views among other popular countries adds about 10 percent more.

Continue reading "Barry Rubin: Americans Love Israel Even More Than You Think"

Comic relief dept:

Israel Cricket Association cited for cross-border program bringing together Jews, Bedouins

Anat Shalev Published: 03.02.10, 07:42 / Israel Culture

The Dubai-based International Cricket Council has awarded the Israel Cricket Association with a prize for a cross-border initiative bringing together Jews and Bedouins in the southern Negev desert.

The winning project was initiated by Stanley Perlman, the Israel Cricket Association's chairman...

In other news, Dubai Police Chief Dahi Khalfan wants to arrest Netanyahu.

Well, he does know al-yahoud when he sees him.

(rolls eyes)

Hamas says the Arabs did it (but who cares, even if they did it we are guilty).

Meanwhile, the UN has asked Egypt to stop shooting at Africans who are trying to reach Israel, aka The Apartheid, Racist, Colonialist/Imperialist Zionist Entity, known in Iran as "The Small Satan," because the Egyptians have killed 60 Africans fleeing to said horrible entity so far.

And, just to complete the meshugas, the dead terrorist had a Jewish Israeli relative but that's only just now being reported by Ha'aretz and I don't have any details.

However, it figures.

Could this world be any stranger?

I gotta say though, this would make Al-Mabhouh the utlimate "asajew."

Richard Silverstein, eat your heart out.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

You might remember Canadian author Howard Rotberg from the incident recounted in this post from 2008: Canadian Author Called a F**king Jew...And HE'S the One Being Called a Racist. Now Rotberg gas taken a personal stand and made a public matter of returning his degrees to U Toronto, the home of Israel Apartheid Week. He writes: My letter to the President of University of Toronto re: returning my two degrees as a protest against Israel Apartheid (sic) Week

Dear President Naylor:

I am a graduate of University College (1973) at which time I had the honour of standing first among the students in the Department of History. I received an excellent education, specializing in the history of values and ideologies. Then I attended, and graduated from, the Faculty of Law, in 1976.

I have tried to live a life of ethics, respect for individual human rights and social justice, and service to my profession and the community. I have won awards for my service to my municipality in volunteering on municipal committees and for my development of affordable rental housing for low income working people. I have a record of writing about race relations and participating in conferences meant to accomplish respect for diversity in the context of adherence to foundational Canadian values.

I am ashamed that University of Toronto hosted the first Israel Apartheid Week, and continues to make its facilities available to this distortion of "free speech and respect for diversity". I read your February 24 remarks on freedom of expression and diversity, and sadly, I feel that you misstate the basic issues. My university is now known as the birthplace of this vile hatefest.

The University would never allow an "Islamic Apartheid Week" because of course the speakers would be violently attacked by mobs of illiberals who have brought with them to the University no respect for free speech but only a respect for their upbringings where they were taught that Jews and the Jewish State are evil, and inferior.

I am disgusted that in a time of war against our liberal values, University of Toronto chooses to support one side, and that is the side that supports the war against our freedoms and our civilians from Sderot to Manhattan, from London to Madrid, and from Buenos Aires to Mumbai.

I myself have had my lectures shouted down and my books effectively banned. See here.

I know that freedom loving writers like myself no longer have the freedoms that you are so proud of extending to people who support the murder of Jewish children, less than a century after the Holocaust...

The rest is here. He comments further here.

Here's more on that Spanish grade school that sent anti-Semitic messages to the Israeli embassy (previous: Spanish School Kids Send Anti-Semitic Messages to Israeli Embassy): Israeli embassy complains over 'antisemitic' postcards from Spanish children

..."The connection between Jews and money is an old stereotype, and killing babies is also a stereotype that was used in Spain in the dark ages," he added. "We thought it was part of the past, but obviously it is not."

Joan Malonda, the head teacher of El Castell primary school in Almoines, today confirmed that the hand-drawn cards had come from his pupils.

He denied the children were being indoctrinated, adding: "A lot of this work was done at home and reflects the atmosphere in their own social environment. They were simply asked to write a postcard on the subject.

"We try to teach the children to have a critical attitude, but we also want them to contrast their criticism against other points of view."

Malonda, who received the backing of parents when he fought off attempts by local authorities to remove him from his post last year, said he would welcome an approach from the Israeli embassy.

"We haven't heard back from them," he said.

Disturbing point number one is that this came from whatever environment is going on at home. We've talked about the problem with schools is the lack of parental engagement. This would appear to be a contrary example.

Disturbing idea number two is the idea that nine-year-olds can be taught contrasting points of view on contentious and complicated international issues and somehow divine some sort of meaningful truth out of it. Nine year old children! They can barely tell time at that age! Shear idiocy.

[The following, by Ben Cohen, is crossposted from Z Word.]

As the event known as "Israel Apartheid Week" (IAW) kicks off, here are some resources to combat the antisemitic, Soviet-inspired slander that Israel is an apartheid state.

Here are three good pieces which came out today. Robbie Sabel has written a detailed paper published by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs debunking the apartheid analogy. Richard (don't confuse him with Roger!) Cohen has an incisive column in today's Washington Post. And, in a searing editorial, Canada's National Post points out that [a motion denouncing] IAW has been unanimously passed in the Ontario provincial parliament (H/T: Robin Shepherd.)

Going further back in the archives, Z Word published a path-breaking essay by South African writers Rhoda Kadalie, a South African Human Rights Commissioner, and Julia Bertelsmann which challenged the analogy from the perspective of those who directly experienced apartheid in South Africa. I also wrote a monograph for AJC entitled "The Ideological Foundations of the Boycott Campaign Against Israel" much of which is devoted to exposing the the blatant falsehood that Israel is an apartheid state.

Be sure to visit the "apartheid" tag on the Z Word blog, where you will find, among other pieces, including Jonathan Hoffman's guest post, "Lies, Damn Lies and the Apartheid Analogy."

Finally, here's another chance to see the film I produced last year, "Vilified: Telling Lies About Israel." The faslsehoods we uncovered here will doubtless be repeated at the various IAW events.

Via Daniel Halper, Ben Smith reports on Lynn Cheney's group, Keep America Safe's new video:

The problem is not necessarily that there are lawyers there who represented a detainee in the course of their work -- that might even be valuable experience for a prosecutor -- but that we know that there are lawyers out there who seek out this type of defendant because they share aspects of their mind-set. It would be nice to know who these attorneys are so we can see what category they fit into.

[The following, by Israelinurse, is crossposted from CiF Watch.]

Male, late twenties, mother tongue: English, fairly recently arrived in Israel and based in Yaffo, self-declared 'expert' on the I/P conflict and a CiF 'tame' Israeli. If you're thinking 'Seth Freedman' that is understandable, but you would be wrong because we have a new kid on the block who goes by the name of Jesse Rosenfeld. So who is he? Well, here are his own words:

"My Jewish last name and identity became a weapon I used against the Zionist justification of Israeli legitimacy and the actions of the state of Israel. If Zionists could spin Jewish history, I could use my socially assumed Jewish identity to strike back.

I became an active anti-Zionist and Palestinian solidarity activist, going to weekly demonstrations in front of the Israeli consulate and arguing in my high school classes about the daily violent Israeli repression of Palestinian demands for self-determination.

As the Israeli repression of the Second Intifada intensified, with the Army routinely using live ammunition against Palestinian youths throwing stones, I got involved with a Toronto group called Jewish Youth Against the Occupation. I was determined to stop Zionism from speaking in the name of Jewish liberation, and the only form of Jewish identity I could associate with was one in opposition to Zionism."

Like several others in the CiF stable, Rosenfeld has written for such outfits as Electronic Intifada and the Palestine Monitor and seems to be a bit of a one-trick pony in that all his articles have the same simplistic and stereotypical message of 'Zionists behaving badly', whilst the Palestinians are always poetically noble harvesters of ancient olive trees. Predictably, he's already had a star turn in Ha'aretz and runs a rather curiously named blog.

Continue reading "Eeek! They're Multiplying! (Yet Another Anti-Zionist at Comment is Free)"

[The following is crossposted from JStreetJive and is a follow up to the previous post, Guess Who's Dining at CJP's Trough?]

A number of readers have inquired about DAF's (Donor Advised Funds) in relation to targeted grants bestowed by the CJP. Briefly stated, DAF's are charitable giving vehicles administered by a third party and created for the purpose of managing charitable donations on behalf of an organization, family, or individual.

Rather than setting up your own foundation, DAF's provide a means of charitable giving that avoids the lengthy and expensive (tax and administrative costs) process inherent in direct giving. Other than the basic requirement of fiscal due diligence, the administering non-profit may or may not reserve the right to reject targeted grants.

CJP reserves that right as stated on its website [PDF]:

"CJP reserves the right to reject grant recommendations for purposes contrary to its mission or to organizations that fail to maintain proper standards of financial oversight or accountability. CJP may request the return of grants that are discovered to be in conflict with its mission, or in violation of the guidelines in this section."

Moreover, as CJP states:

"Contributions to your DAF are irrevocable gifts to CJP. In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, CJP owns the assets in each DAF outright and retains exclusive legal control over these assets for the charitable purposes of CJP. Donors may not restrict the absolute rights of CJP as owner of the assets. This is the basis for your eligibility for a federal income tax deduction."

These two paragraphs essentially say it all. "CJP reserves the right to reject..." And as "exclusive" controllers of these funds, ultimate responsibility for approving grantees resides with the CJP. Do cash grants to organizations like the American Friends Service Committee and Media Matters conflict with its mission? I believe they do. Let the debate begin.

Monday, March 1, 2010

AJC has released a new episode of their video series, Reality Check:

Here's the latest video from AJC Reality Check, focusing on how the prejudices of one of Richard Goldstone's lieutenants, Desmond Travers, played a key role in the distortions which followed in the Goldstone report.

Civics Quiz. Some of the questions are a little tricky, but it's the type of stuff most American should know. I know that "college educators" are often specialists, but when the average American scores 49% (itself a pretty good number considering what you hear, but I wonder how "average" the person who took the test was), you might expect a little more of a gap there.

[Via Jeff Jacoby on Twitter]

[Crossposted at JStreetJive.]

The Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston is one of the nation's highest funded charitable groups. With assets approaching half a billion dollars and annual revenues approaching two hundred million dollars, they are chartered to dole out lots of money to groups whom they deem worthy causes. In addition to providing valuable social services to local Jewish and non-Jewish communities, one of their central activities, they claim, is support for israel.

Their mission statement declares:

"Our Israel agenda will focus on advocacy, connection and impact."

I find that statement quizzical, to say the least, but designed to accommodate groups like The Workmen's Circle (whose support for Israel has been demonstrated by hosting any and every anti-Israel group they can muster) and the likes of J Street and The New Israel Fund. The NIF received close to $42,000.00 in 2007.

Each year the Boston CJP provides cash grants in compliance with federal regulations governing the operations of a 501(c)(3) non-profit.

We thought you might be interested to see just who receives the CJP's largess, ostensibly in keeping with that organization's strong support for Israel. For the latest reporting period, here are some of those recipients:

Continue reading "Guess Who's Dining at CJP's Trough? [Hillel]"

Dubai is going to screen arrivals to "weed out" Israelis:

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - Following the assassination of a Hamas operative, Dubai police will use voice and face profiling to detect Israelis arriving on foreign passports, the police chief said Monday.

Israelis have always been forbidden from traveling to the United Arab Emirates on their passports, but dual-nationals could use their alternative passport to enter the country.

Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim said that now travelers suspected of being Israeli will not be allowed into the Gulf country even if they arrive on another passport. The Emirates will "deny entry to anyone suspected of having Israeli citizenship," Tamim said. Dual nationality is fairly common in Israel...[More.]

They don't have any proof that Mossad did in the Hamas terrorist but even if they had such proof treating all Israelis as though they're guilty is de facto collective punishment.

Meanwhile,they aren't screening Arabs to see if they're connected to terrorist organizations. But Israelis are per se guilty, including diplomats, scientists, businesspeople, artists and athletes who enrich the world. The Arabs have been boycotting for decades now, based on ethnicity/religion - this began in the early 1930's and it ought to be illegal - isn't it apartheid?

Hypocrites.

By the way this has a familiar ring to it, no? Kinda like, "Let's play 'finger der juden!'"

Where have we heard this before?

At Frontpage: See No Anti-Semitism, Hear No Anti-Semitism

Frontpage Interview's guest today is Dr. Charles Jacobs, a columnist for the Boston Jewish Advocate who is concerned about the failure of leadership in America and in the Jewish community to deal with anti-Semitism. He has done a series exposing the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for failing to deal with Islamic anti-Semitism. He's been widely published, including in The New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Jerusalem Post, and the Encyclopedia Britannica. He has appeared on local and national television and radio, including NBC, CBS, NPR, CNN and PBS. He received his doctoral degree in social policy from Harvard. In 2007, he was named by the Forward newspaper as one of America 's 50 top Jewish leaders.

FP: Dr. Charles Jacobs, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Tell us about the series you are doing on the ADL and its failure to deal with Islamic anti-Semitism. What have you discovered?

Jacobs: Thanks, Jamie. Let me provide some context. The Jewish community has come under siege. We have had a wonderful 50 years after the end of WWII but the world has changed and unfortunately some of our leaders seem not to have recognized this. Given our small size and our sizable foes, the Jewish community has always valued unity. Unity is important, but I reluctantly decided to become critical of some of our leaders because of the seriousness and urgency of the current situation.

A few months back, I decided to break what is in effect a gentlemen's agreement among Jewish leaders not to criticize each other in public. At the end of an op-ed about Wafa Sultan, the courageous Muslim reformer who risks her life daily to fight real threats posed by Islamists to us all, I chided ADL for its relative silence on this, the greatest threat to Jews today. When Abe Foxman responded with a letter to my home town Jewish paper attacking me, I began a series of articles on the ADL's failure, and I proposed a list of key principles for beginning a serious effort against Islamic anti-Semitism.

Continue reading "See No Anti-Semitism, Hear No Anti-Semitism: Frontpage Interview with Charles Jacobs"

Students who will be exposed this week to the so-called "Israel Apartheid Week" need to understand that the entire framework behind the Israel-Apartheid accusation is based on a cover up.

During the 1980s when the Apartheid government of South Africa needed 15 million tons of oil to fuel its military and its economy of repression, virtually all of that oil was imported to Apartheid South Africa from the Middle East. South Africa paid a premium - in gold mined by black slave labor - for that oil, the lifeblood of their racist regime. As the Kenya Daily Nation said at the time "Arabs are buying South African gold like hotcakes, thus helping to sustain that country's abominable policy of Apartheid."

It was during this period that the accusation that Israel was an "Apartheid State" was born, an accusation designed to throw the unknowing off the track as to who was truly oiling the wheels of Apartheid.

Flash forward to today when organizations like Hamas regularly incite genocidal hatred, yet simultaneously accuse Israelis of doing what they openly advocate (at least in Arabic). For these organizations, the legal segregation of Jews from the rest of the world (their own version of global Apartheid best exemplified by their so-called "Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions" or BDS program) is of less interest than outright extermination.

Those who join in the activities surrounding Israel-Apartheid Week in the name of devotion to human rights seem to have adopted intentional or unintentional ignorance regarding who really practices Apartheid in the Middle East today. Repression of women (or gender Apartheid) is enshrined in national and even religious law in one Arab country after another. Brutality against homosexuals (or sexual Apartheid) has been behind legalized murder of scores of gays and lesbians across the Muslim world. The repression of religious minorities (or religious Apartheid) is considered legal (even sacred) by those who accuse Israel of repression and racism. And speaking of racism, the practice of slavery directed against Black Africans still finds a home in the 21th century in Sudan, a nation which is a proud member of and protected by the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

And so the cover up of who truly supports and practices Apartheid continues behind an incessant propaganda campaign directed against the only country in the Middle East that has free speech, free elections, an independent judiciary, human rights for women and homosexuals, and the most varied population of racial and ethnic types in the world: Israel.

Unless and until those behind this month's Israel Apartheid Week's activities take the time to explain these contradictions, students are free to assume that everything taking place on campus this week and next are simply exercises in low-rent propaganda based on Apartheid Week advocates' assumption that students are nothing more than a bunch of ignorant suckers.

Note to Apartheid Week's organizers: We're not!

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]