Tuesday, April 13, 2010
[The following, by Ed Koch, is circulating in an email from Myths and Facts. Here in full. Also available online at Jewish World Review.]
I weep as I witness outrageous verbal attacks on Israel. What makes these verbal assaults and distortions all the more painful is that they are being orchestrated by President Obama.
For me, the situation today recalls what occurred in 70 AD when the Roman emperor Vespasian launched a military campaign against the Jewish nation and its ancient capital of Jerusalem. Ultimately, Masada, a rock plateau in the Judean desert became the last refuge of the Jewish people against the Roman onslaught. I have been to Jerusalem and Masada. From the top of Masada, you can still see the remains of the Roman fortifications and garrisons, and the stones and earth of the Roman siege ramp that was used to reach Masada. The Jews of Masada committed suicide rather than let themselves be taken captive by the Romans.
In Rome itself, I have seen the Arch of Titus with the sculpture showing enslaved Jews and the treasures of the Jewish Temple of Solomon with the Menorah, the symbol of the Jewish state, being carted away as booty during the sacking of Jerusalem.
Oh, you may say, that is a far fetched analogy. Please hear me out.
The most recent sacking of the old city of Jerusalem - its Jewish quarter - took place under the Jordanians in 1948 in the first war between the Jews and the Arabs, with at least five Muslim states - Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq - seeking to destroy the Jewish state. At that time, Jordan conquered East Jerusalem and the West Bank and expelled every Jew living in the Jewish quarter of the old city, destroying every building, including the synagogues in the old quarter and expelling from every part of Judea and Samaria every Jew living there so that for the first time in thousands of years, the old walled city of Jerusalem and the adjacent West Bank were "Judenrein" -- a term used by the Nazis to indicate the forced removal or murder of all Jews..
Jews had lived for centuries in Hebron, the city where Abraham, the first Jew, pitched his tent and where he now lies buried, it is believed, in a tomb with his wife, Sarah, as well as other ancient Jewish patriarchs and matriarchs. I have visited that tomb and at the time asked an Israeli soldier guarding it - so that it was open to all pilgrims, Christians, Muslims and Jews -- "where is the seventh step leading to the tomb of Abraham and Sarah," which was the furthest entry for Jews when the Muslims were the authority controlling the holy place? He replied, "When we retook and reunited the whole city of Jerusalem and conquered the West Bank in 1967, we removed the steps, so now everyone can enter," whereas when Muslims were in charge of the tomb, no Jew could enter it. And I did.
I am not a religious person. I am comfortable in a synagogue, but generally attend only twice a year, on the high holidays. When I entered the tomb of Abraham and Sarah, as I recall, I felt connected with my past and the traditions of my people. One is a Jew first by birth and then by religion. Those who leave their religion, remain Jews forever by virtue of their birth. If they don't think so, let them ask their neighbors, who will remind them. I recall the words of the columnist Robert Novak, who was for most of his life hostile to the Jewish state of Israel in an interview with a reporter stating that while he had converted to Catholicism, he was still a cultural Jew. I remain with pride a Jew both by religion and culture.
My support for the Jewish state has been long and steadfast. Never have I thought that I would leave the U.S. to go and live in Israel. My loyalty and love is first to the U.S. which has given me, the son of Polish Jewish immigrants, so much. But, I have also long been cognizant of the fact that every night when I went to sleep in peace and safety, there were Jewish communities around the world in danger. And there was one country, Israel, that would give them sanctuary and would send its soldiers to fight for them and deliver them from evil, as Israel did at Entebbe in 1976.
I weep today because my president, Barack Obama, in a few weeks has changed the relationship between the U.S. and Israel from that of closest of allies to one in which there is an absence of trust on both sides. The contrast between how the president and his administration deals with Israel and how it has decided to deal with the Karzai administration in Afghanistan is striking.
The Karzai administration, which operates a corrupt and opium-producing state, refuses to change its corrupt ways - the president's own brother is believed by many to run the drug traffic taking place in Afghanistan - and shows the utmost contempt for the U.S. is being hailed by the Obama administration as an ally and publicly treated with dignity. Karzai recently even threatened to join the Taliban if we don't stop making demands on him. Nevertheless, Karzai is receiving a gracious thank-you letter from President Obama. The New York Times of April 10th reported, "...that Mr. Obama had sent Mr. Karzai a thank-you note expressing gratitude to the Afghan leader for dinner in Kabul. It was a respectful letter,' General Jones said."
On the other hand, our closest ally - the one with the special relationship with the U.S., has been demeaned and slandered, held responsible by the administration for our problems in Afghanistan and Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. The plan I suspect is to so weaken the resolve of the Jewish state and its leaders that it will be much easier to impose on Israel an American plan to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, leaving Israel's needs for security and defensible borders in the lurch.
I believe President Obama's policy is to create a whole new relationship with the Arab states of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt, and Iraq as a counter to Iran - The Tyrannosaurus Rex of the Muslim world which we are now prepared to see in possession of a nuclear weapon. If throwing Israel under the bus is needed to accomplish this alliance, so be it.
I am shocked by the lack of outrage on the part of Israel's most ardent supporters. The members of AIPAC, the chief pro-Israel lobbying organization in Washington, gave Secretary of State Hillary Clinton a standing ovation after she had carried out the instructions of President Obama and, in a 43-minute telephone call, angrily hectored Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Members of Congress in both the House and Senate have made pitifully weak statements against Obama's mistreatment of Israel, if they made any at all. The Democratic members, in particular, are weak. They are simply afraid to criticize President Obama.
What bothers me most of all is the shameful silence and lack of action by community leaders - Jew and Christian. Where are they? If this were a civil rights matter, the Jews would be in the mall in Washington protesting with and on behalf of our fellow American citizens. I asked one prominent Jewish leader why no one is preparing a march on Washington similar to the one in 1963 at which I was present and Martin Luther King's memorable speech was given? His reply was "Fifty people might come." Remember the 1930s? Few stood up. They were silent. Remember the most insightful statement of one of our greatest teachers, Rabbi Hillel: "If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?"
We have indeed stood up for everyone else. When will we stand up for our brothers and sisters living in the Jewish state of Israel?
If Obama is seeking to build a siege ramp around Israel, the Jews of modern Israel will not commit suicide. They are willing to negotiate a settlement with the Palestinians, but they will not allow themselves to be bullied into following self-destructive policies.
To those who call me an alarmist, I reply that I'll be happy to apologize if I am proven wrong. But those who stand silently by and watch the Obama administration abandon Israel, to whom will they apologize?
I saw this at the HuffPo... the comments there are absolutely depressing. For the life of me I cannot understand the left's affinity for the Arabs.
Is there a natural alliance there that I'm missing? In observing the "Queers for Palestine" people, I don't see any obvious correlation with the alliance between the Iranian left wing and the mullahs in the '79 Iranian revolution... but there must me something that pulls them together.
It's irrational, but unfortunately it's becoming the hip position on the left that's default without having to know anything about the subject.
I'll be honest. I cannot stand to visit HuffPo anymore.
Check out the comments on this thread:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/13/israel-tells-its-citizens_n_535835.html
I've been thinking for quite awhile now that the left/liberal blogs have become focal points for propaganda not necessarily originating in the US.
Comments on the more mainstream Yahoo copy of the Sinai story were totally different, with most people expressing outrage at the terrorists.
What's depressing about the comments on HuffPo is the fact that people are claiming the terrorists have a right to kidnap people due to "the occupation" as though the Sinai is "occupied."
I'm not sure some of the posters know where the Sinai is.
Well ok so I went to HuffPo.
The comment thread isn't nearly as prejudiced and awful as the linked excerpts. There are some ridiculous and ugly statements, true, but also others in defense of Israel and the Koch piece.
Blind hatred of Western White European Christian bourgeois establishment, unites these folks. United in hate.
Some of our president's Jewish supporters are experiencing buyer's remorse as the scope of the monumental error of supporting him becomes clearer every day. Unfortunately, far too few have woken up to what this administration is trying to do and remain mesmerized by his charisma and rhetoric and are blinded by their ignorant disdain for his critics. Not clear where Koch stands. He's unhappy with BHO's ill-willed, bonehaded, immoral stance toward Israel but probably still supports him otherwise.
(No point in quibbling over details: the frieze on Titus's Arch in Rome depicts the destruction of the second Temple, not Solomon's Temple, about which see Zvi Koenigsberg's The Lost Temple web site.)
Btw, the piece was first published on Koch's blog in the Yonkers Tribune.
Oceanguy and Escape Velocity you have it totally wrong - don't you understand that it's really about trying to prevent the "ingathering" of Jews necessary for the second coming of Christ. Once that happens were all gonners.
Ocean Guy and Solomon:
According to Nick Cohen in "What's Left" Bertrand Russell noted this blindness in liberal/left circles in WW II era, and described it as a conferring of "superior virtue" on the "righteous oppressed".
In a way, it reminds me of the "noble savage" mindset of Europeans towards the aboriginal peoples of the New World. If there is a relationship, it is ironic as the free pass given to terrorism inspired by religious fanaticism is about as Eurocentric and occidentalist as it gets.
OK let me get this straight.
Antisemitism is about preventing the ingathering of Jews so the Second Coming won't occur, because if that happens we are all "gonners."
Hello?
Can we please stay in the reality-based community please?
Earth to EV: antisemitism isn't about hatred for the Western White European Christian bourgeois establishment.
Is it.
It is now....call it the Judeo/Christian bourgeois establishment. If you could darken your skin down quite a bit, you might be able to pass.
LIEla, your support of islamofascism makes you a gonner already.
EV, sometimes you outdo even yourself.
Sheese.
Talk about revisionism.
I wish we had one of those icons with the rolling eyes.
#7 Leila
It's obvious you've never met or talked with Christian Zionists.Although Evangelicals, in all their diversity, are the plurality, many CZ's come from "mainstream" denominations. Nappy has personally met Christian Zionists who are Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, Congregationalist, Methodist, Presbyterian and Unitarian, notwithstanding the obsessiveness anti-Israel militancy and demonization of Israel that often emanates from extremists in their denominations' leadership.
Yes, there are a few CZ's who are into the eschatology you mention, but the overwhelming majority are not. Some are offended by it and resent being tarred with that brush. They laugh ata the utterly absurd notion that puny man could force God's hand with a stupid human trick such as getting all the Jews to move to Israel.
(As for the ingathering of exiles, the Jewish Agency and Israel's Ministry of Absorption have done yeoman work with the waves of immigrants who've come to Israel in its short history. First, The Forgotten Refugees expelled from Arab and Muslim lands, Ethiopians and Russians.)
Forget all the smears from the MSM and such dim-bulb luminaries as Michael Lerner and Bill Moyers, to say nothing of David Brancaccio or Amy Goodman. Here are a couple of good books about Christian Zionism: Zev Chafetz's entertaining and very readable 2007 A Match Made in Heaven: American Jews and Christian Zionists and One Man's Exploration of the Weird and Wonderful Judeo-Evangelical Alliance or David Brog's more scholarly 2006 Standing with Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State.
EV,
It is now....call it the Judeo/Christian bourgeois establishment. If you could darken your skin down quite a bit, you might be able to pass.
A pity you haven't witnessed the attitudes of dark skinned Muslims to dark skinned Jews (Ethiopians) and not so dark skinned Jews from India, Yemen.
Nappy,
Your reference to Solomon's Temple should remind you that the PA has been using that to discredit the Jew's connection to Jerusalem even though the Second Temple was built well before Islam came into existence.
Nappy, I would love your comment, really I would and I could even follow your links if I weren't so stuck on your name. You don't sound like a "nappy-headed ho'" and I'm gonna guess you don't look like a "nappy-headed ho'" and you don't write like a "nappy-headed ho" but the fact that you identify yourself as a "nappy-headed ho'" really makes me wonder what you're trying to convey with that screen name. Because really, the fact that you identify yourself that way sounds like you're a racist, and yet you write like an intelligent person. Whas' up with that?
Leila, a small quibble.
Just because Nappy is obviously an educated and intelligent person doesn't mean she isn't, literally, what her name implies.
Perhaps she is in fact a prostitute with nappy hair.
So?
However, your suggestion that prostitutes with nappy hair are per se not intelligent or well-read is racism, is it not?
Sophia, please re-read what you posted. If you really believe what you wrote, then God bless you for having such a privileged sheltered life. If you really need it explained, go here:
[Link to "Leila"'s therapeutic personal-attack blog removed.]