Wednesday, August 13, 2003
statesman.com | U.S. abandons plan for greater U.N. role in Iraq
Instead, the officials said, the United States would widen its effort to enlist other countries to assist the occupation forces in Iraq, which are dominated by the 139,000 U.S. troops there.
In addition to American forces in Iraq, there are 21,000 troops representing 18 countries. At present, 11,000 of that number are from Britain. The United States plans to seek larger numbers to help, especially with relief supplies that are coming from another dozen countries.
Administration officials said that in spite of the difficult security situation in Iraq, there was a consensus in the administration that it would be better to work with these countries than to involve the United Nations or countries that opposed the war and are now eager to exercise influence in a postwar Iraq.
"The administration is not willing to confront going to the Security Council and saying, 'We really need to make Iraq an international operation,"' said an administration official. "You can make a case that it would be better to do that, but, right now, the situation in Iraq is not that dire."[...]
Impression: Good. As long as the Administration deems that we have the appropriate personel on the ground, I fail to see what adding another whole set of bureaucracies at this point could accomplish. I'd be willing to bet that the US and British forces themselves have garnered a tremendous amount of experience to this point. It would have to be to the point of desperation to allow the UN in at this point beyond anything more than a token presence.
It would have to be to the point of desperation to allow the UN in at this point beyond anything more than a token presence.
Can you spell D-E-S-P-E-R-A-T-E?
LOL
Nooooooooooooooooo!