Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, September 4, 2003

Peter D. Feaver has some excellent questions questioning the potential efficacy of UN involvement. Well knock me over with a feather, it may not be a great idea to get your hopes up over a UN mandate making things a lot better.

Will the U.N. Really Help? (washingtonpost.com)

...In taking this move, the Bush administration is making a large concession to its critics both domestically and abroad, who have been harping for a greater U.N. role. Thus far, however, those critics have largely invoked the U.N. as a matter of theological commitment, without making a persuasive case for how it could really help. In the next few months, we will see whether there is more to the U.N. option than a knee-jerk preference for the reassuring rhetoric of multilateralism or whether the critics have simply avoided dealing with six tough questions a larger U.N. role raises...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]