Sunday, September 14, 2003
Vouching for Children (washingtonpost.com)
Bill Clinton, who could cry out of one eye, was dry-eyed about the plight of D.C.'s poor: He vetoed a school-choice bill for them in 1998. He felt the pain of the strong, the teachers' unions who were feeling menaced by the weak -- by poor parents trying to emancipate their children from the public education plantation.
Boehner, who understands the patience of politics, began championing school choice as a state legislator two decades ago. Last Tuesday the House passed a small ($10 million) experimental school choice voucher program for at least 1,300 of the District's 68,000 students. This bill, skillfully managed by Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) passed, 209-208, only because two Democratic members, presidential candidates Dick Gephardt and Dennis Kucinich, were in Baltimore at a debate sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, proclaiming their compassion for poor people...
...School choice for poor children is, Boehner says, today's principal civil rights fight. The lottery of life, not choice, determines a child's parents and family situation. There should be choice about schools for children placed by life's lottery in difficult conditions. Otherwise, Boehner says, "It's like saying you can only buy bread in the grocery store closest to your house -- and the government will run the grocery store."...
Impression: George Will makes an impassioned case for school-choice in this WaPo piece. The points made certainly influence my thinking in a positive manner. It seems to me that one of the main arguments against school choice - that made by the separation of Church and State zealots (whom I am ordinarily sympathetic to) - is one based on a dogmatic agenda that ought to take a back seat to the first priority - educating kids. The trouble is that three elements of Democratic Party politics are working at unwitting odds - the anti-religion fetishists, the teacher's unions, and those working to help the poor. It sounds like in DC, the last of those is finally clueing in to the fact that the other two do not share their interests, and that it may be time for a separation.