Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, January 8, 2004

Interesting OpinionJournal piece on how a multilateral agreement based around countries who agree on their own initiative to specific action trumps the UN's ability to be effective. The problem with UN, of course, is that its bureaucracy includes all manner of nation with differing interests and desires - even the countries who may be subject to its sanction. Under such circumstances, multilateral agreements by countries which share specific goals (like NATO before the fall of the Soviet Union), cannot help but be more effective.

OpinionJournal - The New Multilateralism - How the U.S., with international cooperation, brought Libya to heel

The media have barely noticed, but the Bush Administration has embarked on a burst of "multilateral" cooperation. It's called the Proliferation Security Initiative, and in only a few months of existence it has already had more success than the United Nations in controlling weapons of mass destruction.

Just ask Moammar Gadhafi. As the Journal reported last week, the Libyan strongman finally agreed to open his country's weapons sites to arms inspectors only after the U.S. and its PSI allies halted the illegal shipment of uranium-enrichment equipment headed for Libya's nuclear-arms program.

It remains to be seen whether Gadhafi will actually dismantle his program, but at least it's been exposed--no thanks, by the way, to the U.N. agency charged with monitoring such things. Libya's nuclear program was news to the International Atomic Energy Agency, whose inspectors somehow missed it entirely--after they'd earlier missed secret programs in North Korea and Iran...


Current signatories include: Australia, Netherlands, Britain, Poland, France, Portugal, Germany, Spain, Italy, U.S., Japan, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Singapore and Turkey. Further, "more than 50 nations have signed on to PSI's principles and may be called on should their help be needed."

...But don't mistake PSI for a multilateral institution in the conventional sense. There's no headquarters, no secretary-general, no talkfests--and, perhaps most important of all, no French or Russian veto. "PSI is an activity, not an organization," a senior Administration official tells us. It's an action-oriented group that "needs to be agile and move fast."

As PSI grows, the U.S. official contemplates "dozens of other countries participating" in dozens of different ways. Call it mix-and-match multilateralism. Countries participate or not, depending on the need at hand and on their own capabilities. The one common thread is U.S. leadership...



Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: OpinionJournal: the Proliferation Security Initiative.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/1588

» Proliferation Security Initiative at the blog The Armchair Politician

In President Bush's speech this afternoon, he spoke about the current state of counterproliferation measures in the world today. One brief organization he touched upon is the Proliferation Security Initiative, a joint venture between the United States,... Read More

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]