Update: I haven't been watching (or in this case listening) to much of these hearings at all, having decided it had clearly descended into a partisan morass that had pre-determined its likely irrelevance - figured I'd wait for the end - sounds like I was right. Honest question to those who have been watching more closely: Was anyone else, particularly Richard Clarke, questioned in this adversarial a manner? It all seems like posturing to me rather than truth-seeking. What good can possibly come of this?
http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson200404080815.asp
VDH a Day early
Thanks for both pointers!