Monday, June 21, 2004
The Democrat perspective on why Kerry's pursuit of John McCain makes no sense. The whole excercise just confirms the impression people have on Kerry - he has no core beliefs.
WaPo: Kerry and the Mark of McCain by Colbert I. King
• Voted against a bill declaring the third Monday in January a federal holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
• Voted to cut off federal assistance to public schools that prohibit prayer in school.
• Voted to strike provisions of the Racial Justice Act that would prohibit the death sentence in state and federal cases if a defendant could prove with statistical or other evidence that the race of the victim played a role in sentencing.
• Voted against a 1996 bill to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
• Voted against measures to increase the minimum wage, against a woman's right to choose, and with Bush 91 percent of the time last year.
What's more, in wooing McCain, Kerry sought to put on the Democratic ticket a GOP senator who voted for articles of impeachment that would have sent President Bill Clinton packing from the White House.
So why did Kerry pursue McCain?
The Massachusetts senator obviously feels a need to compensate for his liberal voting record. What better way to do that, I suppose, than to tap a conservative budget hawk such as McCain who also appeals to mainstream, suburban independent and Republican voters?...
While a dream story for columnists and TV pundits, the fact remains that Americans vote for President, not Vice-President. It's the man at the top of the ticket that counts. There's only so much weakness you can compensate for with a VP candidate, and if John Kerry is so weak, and the Democratic Party so hollow that he needs to go outside the Party for his first choice, then that's a very bad sign for Mr. Kerry.