Thursday, June 24, 2004
I must admit I've gone over this a couple of times and I'm not 100% sure of Spengler's ultimate point. Is he suggesting that in order to survive and stay vital, religion must ultimately be subject to the marketplace of ideas? That, in order to remain relevant, it must avoid having its strength sapped by too close a relationship with the state or some other too-successful ascendancy, so that, like a hot-house-flower, over generations, its power is reduced to a shadow for lack of a need to bear-up under pressure? Or something else entirely?
Asia Times - Spengler: No one expects the Spanish Inquisition
The remnants of Christian state religion rot and stink on the dying continent of Europe. Christianity cannot persist except as a continuing revival, a recurring conversion - as a sequence of singular events, rather than as an orderly process. Awaiting execution in Hitler's prisons, the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote that in a world come of age, the Christian religion no longer could exist as organized practice, but only as an expression of individual conscience.
America was created for precisely this purpose, to replace state religion on the European model with a religion of individual conscience. Such a religion must be schismatic, multi-sectarian, short on doctrine but long on inspiration. America's kaleidoscope of Protestant denominations, so bewildering to Europeans, constitutes the only type of milieu in which Christianity yet may flourish. Although Christian communities are burgeoning throughout the world, they will succeed only in emulation of the American version.
With right the Vatican may defend the record of the Spanish Inquisition, but it alters not a jot or tittle of the awful sentence - oblivion - that history has passed upon European Christianity.