Friday, September 24, 2004
That's what I think after reading the entire OpinionJournal piece linked to at LGF , Guess Who's a GOP Booster? While reading the first part I reveled in the idea of Dan Rather cracking walnuts between his butt-cheeks upon hearing that Sumner Redstone was voting for George Bush, the remainder of the article makes leaves one far less sanguine.
The chairman of the entertainment giant Viacom said the reason was simple: Republican values are what U.S. companies need. Speaking to some of America’s and Asia’s top executives gathered for Forbes magazine’s annual Global CEO Conference, Mr. Redstone declared: “I look at the election from what’s good for Viacom. I vote for what’s good for Viacom. I vote, today, Viacom.”
“I don’t want to denigrate Kerry,” he went on, “but from a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on. The Democrats are not bad people. ... But from a Viacom standpoint, we believe the election of a Republican administration is better for our company.”
Sharing the stage with Mr. Redstone was Steve Forbes, CEO, president and editor in chief of Forbes and a former Republican presidential aspirant, who quipped: “Obviously you’re a very enlightened CEO...
First of all, Sumner's protestations ring like BS from the start, since there's no way that someone can actually think that standing on a stage and saying that "from a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal" is an effective endorsement of George Bush. Second, you read on and find out...
Redstone is doing a CYA in overdrive.