Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Islamism isn't the only problem we face going forward. The nexus of Islamism with Marxism is a mutation of the meme-virus making things even more difficult to deal with. The case of Turkey is going to be a real test of Natan Sharansky's theory that it's better to deal with a democracy that hates you than with a dictatorship that loves you. How deeply do you really believe it? Enough not to stay awake at night worrying?
This OpinionJournal editorial is disturbing:
The Sick Man of Europe--Again - Islamism and leftism add up to anti-American madness in Turkey.
Never in an ostensibly friendly country have I had the impression of embassy staff so besieged. Mr. Erdogan's office recently forbade Turkish officials from attending a reception at the ambassador's residence in honor of the "Ecumenical" Patriarch of the Orthodox Church, who resides in Istanbul. Why? Because "ecumenical" means universal, which somehow makes it all part of a plot to carve up Turkey.
Perhaps the most bizarre anti-American story au courant in the Turkish capital is the "eighth planet" theory, which holds not only that the U.S. knows of an impending asteroid strike, but that we know it's going to hit North America. Hence our desire to colonize the Middle East.
It all sounds loony, I know. But such stories are told in all seriousness at the most powerful dinner tables in Ankara. The common thread is that almost everything the U.S. is doing in the world--even tsunami relief--has malevolent motivations, usually with the implication that we're acting as muscle for the Jews.
In the face of such slanders Turkish politicians have been utterly silent. In fact, Turkish parliamentarians themselves have accused the U.S. of "genocide" in Iraq, while Mr. Erdogan (who we once hoped would set for the Muslim world an example of democracy) was among the few world leaders to question the legitimacy of the Iraqi elections. When confronted, Turkish pols claim they can't risk going against "public opinion."
All of which makes Mr. Erdogan a prize hypocrite for protesting to Condoleezza Rice the unflattering portrayal of Turkey in an episode of the fictional TV show "The West Wing." The episode allegedly depicts Turkey as having been taking over by a retrograde populist government that threatens women's rights. (Sounds about right to me.)...
I wonder how Turkey does in Sharansky's "Town Square Test"? Is Turkey still stable enough that you can go to the center of the town square and shout unpopular views without the fear of imprisonment or punishment? Or is it just that people - currently - choose not to?