Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, February 24, 2005

An emailer alerts me to this follow-up article in the J-Post on the World Council of Churches intention to pursue Israel divestment. See this post below for the original story.

There's another twist here, though. The interesting part is bolded.

JPost: 500 million Christians urged to divest

..."At a time when Israelis and Palestinians are engaged in a political process, returning to negotiations, this decision is utterly ill-timed. The WCC is apparently seeking to dovetail on the Presbyterian Church's campaign. But, while the Presbyterian Church is still deliberating, the WCC is charging forward... [but] a boycott of Israel will not bring the Israelis and Palestinians any closer to the path of peace," he added.

[WCC's international affairs expert Peter] Weiderud also said the WCC was unaware of any intimidation of Palestinian Christians by Palestinian terrorists or desecration of Christian holy sites. No churches under Palestinian control were large enough to qualify for membership in the WCC, although the body had indirect contacts with several churches there, he said...

Weiderud isn't paying attention.

Here is a lengthy report entitled The Beleaguered Christians Of The Palestinian-Controlled Areas. There's too much there to excerpt, but it enumerates the many, many ways in which the Christians of PA areas are suffering under Dhimmi status, including numerous incidents including the infamous siege at the Church of the Nativity.

Is the WCC willfully ignorant, or do they just not care?

It's not surprising that some ordinary parishioners may have a stilted view of the nature of the conflict, but Church leadership should certainly know better, or try to learn better. Here's how one Presbyterian Minister works the party line of the conflict into a sermon. What kind of impression would you come away with if this were how you had the conflict framed to you?:

Last week, I read the story of Shamia Leibovitz, the grandson of one of Israel's greatest thinkers. In 1994, Shamia became a Refusnik - a soldier refusing to follow his commanders' orders. You see, as a young soldier serving in the Israeli army, Shamia has been involved in the occupation of Palestine - shooting live ammunition at unarmed civilians, killing women and children, demolishing homes, arresting Palestinians without charge, arbitrarily destroying crops and property. He came to the point where he simply couldn't stand it anymore, and so, he refused to continue. Since then he has moved to the Untied States and is one of the most articulate critics of Israeli military policy, and all the American tax dollars that make that policy possible. In addition, Shamia is supporting those groups, like the Presbyterian Church, USA, who are calling for divestment from American corporations supporting Israeli policy. He, of course, is one of few Jewish voices calling for divestment, and so he has been called anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli because of this sentiment. Shamia's answer to his critics is right out of today's Isaiah text - the call to servant Israel to courageously work for justice. This former soldier says:

People abusing the concept of "anti-Semitism" in order to support the Israeli government's racist policy towards Palestinians do nothing less than desecrate the memory of those Jewish victims of real anti-Semitism...If the Jewish people are ever to become "a light to the nations" (Isaiah 42: 6), and return to their core values of justice and human dignity, Israelis and Jews of conscience must call now for effective measures to end the occupation of millions of Palestinians. (Jordan Times, 11/30/04, on internet)

You couldn't be blamed for coming away with some very strange impressions. It would be like learning about the elections in Iraq from one of the handful of US soldiers who have deserted to Canada.

It seems fitting that a guy who runs off and leaves his countrymen to deal with the reality of the problems he wouldn't face himself should be looked to for moral lessons by a Church which prefers to think of Jews as mythical Bible-people, and not the real, living people they are - facing real, living problems of governance and real survival issues in the face of living evil. Real people need to be held to real standards, not held up for comparison to people and standards that are meant to reflect the divine.

Some might say this is a flaw in Zionism - that the realities of having a State and the real-world issues that such State demands people face will necessarily sully and be a burden on Judaism. Far easier to be just one of many people among nations focussed only on the spiritual and let others worry about realpolitik and statecraft. The trouble is that the haters have never needed the excuse of a state to assign nefarious designs on the Jews. Where real temporal power was lacking, the anti-Semites have simply made it up - see all the fairy-tales of Jewish World Conspiracies and the widespread belief in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

No, better to have a State - a sanctuary to fight for. Fighting phantom conspiracies is difficult, almost impossible. How do you disprove an allegation that never had any basis of fact in the first place? But in Israel there is a reality to be learned about, there are facts on the ground and people can be educated to them in a way that honest people can relate to. Not everyone is a Jew, but almost everyone lives in a nation-state and wants peace and security for themselves, and protection from murder for themselves and their children - and they can understand the impulse in others. The willfull ignorance of groups like the WCC and the PCUSA, along with their empowerment of the forces of Judenhass, can be fought. It just needs a little light shined in the right corners.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]