..says this article in the DePaul student newspaper. Spinning hard and fast that it was Klocek's behavior, not his ideology that caused his troubles (in spite of the fact that the immediate complaints of the students involved and the Dean in charge talked ideology, not behavior) this student-written editorial aggressively toes the administration's party line. Goodbye, Klocek. Thanks, DPU [Marathon Pundit also comments on this piece.]

DePaul would have a lot more credibility if they allowed Klocek to have a say in his own words, or at least interviewed him to get his side of things, rather than continuing to report on only one side of the issue.

BTW, just in case you missed it, this article at the American Thinker does an excellent job of drawing the connection between what happened to Klocek and the ideological atmoshpere at DePaul: DePaul’s Jihad against academic freedom