Marathon Pundit does a little digging and finds a couple of interesting things concerning the Klocek case and the school paper's reporting.

First, the letter from a colleague defending Professor Klocek - the only DePaulia piece printed that defends the professor - already edited, is no longer present on the paper's web site (that he could find) [note: 5/19/05 - It's back up.], while the latest letter attacking Klocek is still there. I'd like to know where the friendly letter went. A technical quirk, or an intentional redaction on the part of the paper or the administration?

Further, the author of that letter fails to disclose (or the paper fails to disclose it) that he is an officer in one of the groups responsible for getting Klocek dismissed - UMMA (United Muslims Moving Ahead).

See Marathon Pundit's post, here.