Monday, July 11, 2005
But making their way to the battlefield slowly. There's much more in the pipeline beyond the sound cannon (see here and here). This article gives some hints. And of course, each advance in technology brings all new ethical considerations along with it.
CNN: Energy-beam weapons still missing from battlefield
Such weapons are now nearing fruition. But logistical issues have delayed their battlefield debut -- even as soldiers in Iraq encounter tense urban situations in which the nonlethal capabilities of directed energy could be put to the test...
Funny, I passed a Raytheon facility the other day and wondered what types of things they were working on. I know they used to do the Patriot Missile, but no more.
Military investigators say decades of research have shown that the effect ends the moment a person is out of the beam, and no lasting damage is done as long as the stream does not exceed a certain duration. How long? That answer is classified, but it apparently is in the realm of seconds, not minutes. The range of the beam also is secret, though it is said to be further than small arms fire, so an attacker could be repelled before he could pull a trigger...
Good thing CNN lets us know that this Bitar fellow is of Arab decent, otherwise, this might be trouble:
Basically, it fires a bolt of lightning. It can be tuned to blow up explosives, possibly to stop vehicles and certainly to buzz people. The strike can be made to feel as gentle as "broom bristles" or cranked up to deliver a paralyzing jolt that "takes a few minutes to wear off."
Bitar, who is of Arab descent, believes StunStrike would be particularly intimidating in the Middle East because, he contends, people there are especially afraid of lightning.
At present, StunStrike is a 20-foot tower that can zap things up to 28 feet away. The next step is to shrink it so it could be wielded by troops and used in civilian locales like airplane cabins or building entrances...
Could this be the future of combat:
Link