Monday, August 1, 2005
The much-maligned Newsweek deserves credit for this article debunking recent studies purporting to report the extent of civilian casualties in Iraq -- particularly Iraq Body Count and the widely discredited Lancet study.
Truth is the First Civilian Casualty
But how often, really? The answer: not very often, in fact. And not nearly often enough to make the 150,000 U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq the leading scourge of Iraq's civilians. That dishonor goes, hands down, to the insurgents. Even one incident is bad, of course, and there have been many. But civilian killings by U.S. troops are not nearly as common as the critics of the war in Iraq would like us to believe. It has become an article of faith among them that American troops have been slaughtering Iraqi civilians indiscriminately, and that one of the consequences of the war has been an unconscionable loss of life among the civilian population. It just isn't true...
Via Tran Sient's Watch who writes: I can’t believe its Newsweek.
few things better illustrate the impact of prior beliefs and dogmatic commitments on data assessment than the body count in Iraq according to opponents of the war. All those English commentators who concluded that it was their country's killing of innocent civilians in Iraq that prompted the bombings in London never got around to noticing that the same jihadi believers who blew up the London (infidel) civilians also blow up Iraqi (Muslim) civilians. What does that mean?