Wednesday, August 10, 2005
The Star Tribune's reader rep is to be applauded for getting it mostly right on the use of the term "terrorist":
Whether suicide bombers and others deliberately blow up children and their parents in Oklahoma City, New York, Baghdad, London, Netanya in Israel or Sharm el-Sheik in Egypt, at that horrific moment the perpetrators become terrorists, wiping away all complexity and nuance regarding their cause.
In situations that unambiguous, the newspaper shouldn't shy away from the truth of plain language or hide behind the policies of the wire services.
On the other hand, an emailer informs me that the response from the editors of the paper to their request that the use of the term "terrorist" be more consistent resulted in a reply indicating that they have no intention of changing their current uneven standards, for which they should be condemned.
Previous related posts: What Kind of People Edit the Boston Globe? and Washington Post takes on the T word.