Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, September 1, 2005

Here's another entry I wanted to bump up and emphasize. In Palestine Day in Connecticut - Part 2, I berated a Danbury, Connecticut paper, The News-Times for printing a completely uncritical story about an International Solidarity Movement terror dupe, Chris Towne, which probably contains not a single factual paragraph.

The response a reader got from The News-Times' Managing Editor (included in full in the comments of the original post) is stunning, though at this point, it shouldn't be. The Editor believes that since the piece appeared on what's something of an opinion page, the facts don't really count, and further, that really, since everyone has their own opinions...the facts don't really count. Besides, it's not his problem. A snip:

...About the only thing beyond dispute is that learned people on both sides of this epic conflict have wildly different views of the facts and of reality. I'm not prepared to silence voices simply because I dispute their view of reality. As I said before, my job is to allow as many viewpoints as possible in the paper, even those that you and I might find personally odious. In a democracy, a newspaper is a marketplace of ideas. Readers can accept the ones they like and reject the others...

But readers can't be expected to do the primary research necessary to always separate fact from fiction. We expect some level of gate keeping from our information providers, especially when no measure of skeptical voice is provided in the presentation. I don't believe the average reader understands the level of skepticism they need to bring to their news consumption. They have a right to expect some level of fact-checking, and they are left completely exposed when that doesn't occur.

It reminds me of much of what I discussed in my interview with Richard Landes below':

..."The point is that objectivity is a trap. There have to be judgments. We have to pay attention to different narratives and so-on, yes. I'm post-modern in that sense, but I don't think that because there's no objectivity, there can't be any honesty.

And honesty is what's gone out. The radical-relativists say, 'Hey, the Palestinians have their story.' Well I say, sure they have their story, and by all means listen to it. But how accurate is it? Just because you need to listen to it, doesn’t force you to believe it."...

But fear not, The News-Times provided space to follow-up letter responses -- one from a Rabbi critical of the article, and one from someone who states that Israel started the war in 1967. But hey, at least it's balanced...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]