Amazon.com Widgets

Sunday, November 13, 2005

James M. Wall, senior contributing editor at The Christian Century, is on the stump for divestment again.

Mr. Wall was previously featured here after referring to Hamas and Hezbollah as "Muslim nongovernmental groups" and assuring us that "...suicide bombing is anathema to Islam..." to which I quipped, "That certainly is a relief. Now if someone would only explain that to Hamas and Hezbollah."

Wall and The Christian Century have their own page at CAMERA.

In his latest piece, entitled, Divestment, Wall takes aim at our friend Dexter Van Zile and tries to white-wash the divestment movement, and Sabeel's place in it:

In mid-October, those attacks included picket lines in front of the first of Sabeel's annual series of conferences in the U.S., presented this year in Chicago, Denver, Toronto, and Cedar Rapids, Iowa. After attending the Chicago conference, Dexter Van Zile, Boston-based David Project's Christian outreach director, wrote on the Stand with Us Web site that "to these folks, the Jews are the new Nazis." That comment, designed to evoke the Holocaust, has no basis in fact. (I attended the Chicago conference; no such statement was made or implied.) Sabeel describes the "moral basis" for its work this way: "We acknowledge the sufferings and injustices committed against Jews by the West, especially those inflicted in the Holocaust. Nevertheless, anti-Semitism does not justify the injustices committed against Palestinians."

Fortunately, Dexter can speak for himself on this, and states in part:

...James M. Wall quotes me (accurately) as writing that "to these folks the Jews are the new Nazis," continuing: "That comment, designed to evoke the Holocaust, has no basis in fact. (I attended the Chicago conference; no such statement was made or implied.)"

In fact, such a statement was made and implied by Marc Ellis during his presentation on Saturday morning. During his presentation, Dr. Ellis displayed, in a Powerpoint presentation, a letter written by his son Aaaron, the full text of which can be found on pages 81-82 of the September/October 2003 Issue of Church and Society. The two relevant passages of the letter, sent to the Israeli consul in Houston, are:

"If you are too ignorant to step out of your postion for one second and see that the Israelis are using brute force to oppress the people, just as the Nazi regime once used against the Jewish people, then I don't think you can be helped." (I have faxed a copy of this page to Mr. Heim and have mailed a copy of the page directly to James M. Wall).

A few paragraphs later, this letter states:

"If you say that Palestinians must move out because you are more military (sic) developed than they are, then you are creating a totalitarian government much like that which was created by Germany in the 1930s. You are saying in essence, that those with the most powerful thugs - Gestapo, army or secret police - should ruile, no mattter what their poltical views. This is exactly what led to the extermination of many thousands of fellow Jews and others. It is what is also happening to the Palestinians, even as you read this, only on a smaller scale."

Clearly, these passages, offered during a presentation in which Ellis states that the Jewish identity must now include misdeeds perpetrated by Jews of Israel demonstrate that indeed, James M. Wall was not paying very close attention to Marc Ellis' talk and that indeed, statements comparing the Jews to Nazis (a current anti-Semitic trope that is making the rounds in anti-Israel circles) were made at the conference in Sabeel...

Sometimes nothing hurts so much as the truth.

(Hat tip to UCCTruths)

3 Comments

In this sad, hilarious Christian Century article Wall seems to (accidentally?) admit what divestment is all about.

In a paragraph invoking comparisons between Martin Luther King, Gandhi, and Presbyterian divestment, Wall asks: "Is divestment the best tactic to use in trying to change American public opinion? I cannot say for certain."

It seems to be clear to Wall that divestment, rather than being an act of conscience, or an attempt to bring economic pressure to "end the occupation", or a masterful stroke for peace in the Middle East, is clearly an attempt to affect popular opinion. Translation: divestment, for Wall is a propaganda tactic.

Most of us have known this all along, but it's nice to have a divestment booster admit it.

That's a good catch. Very true.

The anemic and more mendacious (no one can be that innocently naive) levels of analysis by these superficial Christians trafficing in moralistic pretense and bravado is more than regrettable, it's reprehensible. Unquestionably, their constituencies in the pews and elsewhere should be holding them to account for their actions and their statements, apparently they are not doing so. That too is far more than regrettable, at some point it begins to reflect a decisive culpability, roughly at the point where the mendaciousness turns into a naive or not so naive support of the malevolence.

Given the disposition of the MSM - the occlusions, elisions, distortions, etc. - along with the simple fact people are busy supporting and attending to their families, not every Joe Six-Pack Christian can stay suitably informed. Still, while moral clarity is not a particularly easy achievement in this situation, it remains an imperative nonetheless and a response from those in the pews very much should be forthcoming.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]