Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Hitchens: Stand up for Denmark! Why are we not defending our ally?
...The incredible thing about the ongoing Kristallnacht against Denmark (and in some places, against the embassies and citizens of any Scandinavian or even European Union nation) is that it has resulted in, not opprobrium for the religion that perpetrates and excuses it, but increased respectability! A small democratic country with an open society, a system of confessional pluralism, and a free press has been subjected to a fantastic, incredible, organized campaign of lies and hatred and violence, extending to one of the gravest imaginable breaches of international law and civility: the violation of diplomatic immunity. And nobody in authority can be found to state the obvious and the necessary—that we stand with the Danes against this defamation and blackmail and sabotage. Instead, all compassion and concern is apparently to be expended upon those who lit the powder trail, and who yell and scream for joy as the embassies of democracies are put to the torch in the capital cities of miserable, fly-blown dictatorships. Let's be sure we haven't hurt the vandals' feelings...
In the end, Hitchens calls for a practical show of solidarity:
...Surely here is a case that can be taken up by those who worry that America is too casual and arrogant with its allies. I feel terrible that I have taken so long to get around to this, but I wonder if anyone might feel like joining me in gathering outside the Danish Embassy in Washington, in a quiet and composed manner, to affirm some elementary friendship. Those who like the idea might contact me at christopher.hitchens@yahoo.com, and those who live in other cities with Danish consulates might wish to initiate a stand for decency on their own account.
Personally, I'm not a "let's organize and march" kind of guy (I'd wait for someone else to do it), but it's not a bad idea.
"... a system of confessional pluralism"
Hitchens answers his own question with this little phrase. It's the confessional, self-abnegating pluralism of "latent prejudice" and static definitions of victim/oppressor that have led to this upside-down lionization of thuggery... because they are brown and non-European by the rules of Western "confessional pluralism"...