Amazon.com Widgets

Saturday, March 18, 2006

...yeah, that's the ticket. Mediacrity, Power Line and Ranting Profs are all over the New York Times and their tendency to all-too-quickly accept testimony that fits their agenda.

Convenient thing about guys in hoods...anyone can claim to be them.

Mediacrity:

The New York Times today ate a massive feast of crow, in an embarrassing front-page article and editor's note admitting that it had been suckered by a liar who claimed he was the famous "man in the hood" at Abu Gharib.

But while dining on a smorgasboard of black bird, the Times still doesn't get it. This piece, like an earlier unsigned article on the subject, still doesn't acknowledge the distinct possibility -- if not probability -- that nothing this man said was true and, again, obscuring his motive, which was clearly monetary. He is, after all, suing the government.

(See original for links.)

Ranting Profs:

The bottom line is that while the real man in the picture is living quietly, this man figured out exactly what Western media outlets and human rights organizations would want to hear. And that's what he told them.

Power Line:

As the old newsman's adage goes, some stories are just too good to check. Besides, there was someone in the photograph. So I suppose the Times could say its story was fake, but accurate.

1 Comment

It was me!

I am spartacus!

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]