Thursday, March 30, 2006
Jeff Jacoby had part 2 of his two-part (part one here) reaction to the Walt-Mearsheimer essay. It certainly feels as though the authors, far from weakening the influence of "the Lobby," have actually stirred up an intellectual bee's nest and if anything, have enhanced it. Oh, and kudos to Jacoby and the Globe for using blog-style imbedded links in the online piece.
Jacoby posits several reasons for our close relationship, but I think this one is very wide-reaching:
''The US has a special relationship with Israel in the Middle East," President John F. Kennedy said in 1962, ''really comparable only to that which it has with Britain." Today, Kennedy's words are truer than ever -- even if the Kennedy School dean has yet to figure it out.
BTW, there was also a good news item in the Globe yesterday, 'Israel lobby' critique roils academe. It concludes:
''Their problem is not that a cabal is running US foreign policy," he said. ''It is that they would like to be in the cabal."
Yes! And the New York Sun reports that the Kennedy School will be publishing a rebuttal...
The response to the "Lobby" paper, written by the Kennedy School's Stephen Walt and a political science professor at the University of Chicago, John Mearsheimer, will be penned by a prominent Harvard law professor, Alan Dershowitz. Yesterday, Mr. Dershowitz told The New York Sun that the rebuttal "devastates" the Walt-Mearsheimer arguments, and challenges the authors to show that they did not cull the paper's quotes from hate Web sites.
I worry that Dershowitz goes too far with the "hate sites" business, but let's see what he comes up with. After all, I don't spend any time at such places.
See this piece by Alan Dershowitz from the NY Sun, reprinted on the British site, Engage:
http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=336
and also, in the comments section below the piece at Engage, links to a) the FT's crazy editorial about Walt & Mearsheimer, and b) a piece in the London Observer, in which the LRB's editor responds (as best she can, which is not very well) to criticism.