Wednesday, April 5, 2006
Just when I thought I'd had about enough of Mearsheimer and Walt, along comes this powerful piece by Eliot Cohen in today's Washington Post: Yes, It's Anti-Semitic
Oddly, these international relations realists -- who in their more normal academic lives declare that state interests determine policy, and domestic politics matters little -- have discovered the one case in which domestic politics has, for decades, determined the policy of the world's greatest state. Their theories proclaim the importance of power, not ideals, yet they abhor the thought of allying with the strongest military and most vibrant economy in the Middle East. Reporting persecution, they have declared that they could not publish their work in the United States, but they have neglected to name the academic journals that turned them down.
Inept, even kooky academic work, then, but is it anti-Semitic? If by anti-Semitism one means obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews; if one accuses them of disloyalty, subversion or treachery, of having occult powers and of participating in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments; if one systematically selects everything unfair, ugly or wrong about Jews as individuals or a group and equally systematically suppresses any exculpatory information -- why, yes, this paper is anti-Semitic...
Really, read it all.
Prof. Jeff Weintraub (U. of Pennsylvania) has compiled a list of rebuttals of W&M (the latest of which is Dershowitz's, which has now been posted on the Kennedy School site) at
http://jeffweintraub.blogspot.com/2006/04/some-rebuttals-to-mearsheimer-walts.html