Saturday, June 17, 2006
TigerHawk addresses Juan Cole's tendency to throw stones, including that "Likudnik" business: Juan Cole and argument by motive
...I'm not sure what "tied to the Israeli Likud Party" is supposed to mean -- that Ledeen and Rubin have friends who support Likud? -- but I do know that Michael Ledeen has never advocated war with Iran. He absolutely believes that Iran has been waging war on the United States directly and by proxy since 1979, and he also believes that we should be supporting Iranians who resist, or would resist, the regime of the Islamic Republic. There is no evidence, however, that Ledeen supports war with Iran, however extensive our moral or legal justification for war might be. Worried that I might have missed a call for war in Ledeen's voluminous writings, I confirmed his position by email this morning, something that Cole, who takes great umbrage when others (allegedly) mischaracterize his position, obviously did not do...
More.
Cole (and others) automaticl blaming of the "Likudniks" is comical in that wierd sort of way. I'm sure if you ask Cole (et. al.) what exactly the platform of the LIkud is, you'll get a blank stare and silence.
I saw some larouche supporterrs (Larouchenicks?) this morning when I was out for a walk and they too were banging the "Cheney is a Likudnick" meme.