Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Hillel Halkin, writing in the NY Sun, thinks it's time for Israel to take a formal war footing with the PA: An End To Ambiguity
And it is because of this, too, that the Israeli response to Sunday's raid should not be Chief-of-Staff Halutz's. Rather, it should be: "Fair enough! You fought this time like soldiers rather than like terrorists - we will treat you this time like soldiers rather than like terrorists."...
...Israel should therefore say to this government: "The charade is over. While we are willing to negotiate through neutral parties a prisoner exchange involving Gilad Shalit, we are also declaring war on you. From now on we will treat you as any country treats another country it is at war with. We will close all our borders with you, cease providing you with all services, and consider any branch of your government, any of its members, and anyone on your side contributing to your military effort, legitimate war targets. We will do our very best to avoid harming civilians, and we will expect you to do the same, but anyone else, from Prime Minister Ismail Heniya down, is from now until further notice a legitimate target. And when you're ready to sue for peace-and-quiet, let us know."
Rest assured that Hamas will sue fast. This time, though, Israel will have to insist that the quiet, if not the peace, be real and lasting.
I'm not resting assured. I'm not sure what the solution is here, I'm really not. Is Hamas really going to capitulate through force of arms or to avoid the agony of their people? Well, maybe to avoid their own agony, but not the people's. And is any sort of blockade really going to last? Look what's already happening. There's no "war industry" to bomb. You can't target the civilian population till they give, nor impose a government on them, nor expell them. Even if they wanted to capitulate they can't -- the Palestinian Arabs are far too useful as proxy soldiers to the Arab/Islamist war against a state that shames them.
Sorry to be so glum, but I'd like to read something that shows some real imagination and that can walk a realistic scenario out to some kind of better ending -- preferably something that shows how a more formal, legal state of war would change things both on scene and with regard to the international community. I think the grind isn't anywhere close to over.
I am also a little skeptical, but at least we can try to stop providing electricity and water for some time.
But that's just it isn't it? Why do things that just come off as petty cruelty and risk continuing to make your own side look bad when they don't lead to any conclusion? If it were one step on the road to the finish, fine, but just more of the same? I'd like to read a real war plan that encompasses the political dimension as well. If someone in the Israeli government would like to forward that along, I promise to keep it a secret...
I'm with you on this one, Mr. Solomon. The fact of the matter is that Israel is truly in a "no-win" situation here (which is exactly where the Arabs want it).