Friday, September 15, 2006
The Lamont campaign has been making a big push on the issue of Lieberman's missed votes. Greg Pallowitz at NRO notes:
I assume this means Ned Lamont will be quickly praising George Allen (0.3% missed), Mike DeWine (0.3% missed), Jim Talent (0.3% missed) and John Kyl, (0.7% missed).
Lieberman has also stated that many of those missed votes occured while he was running for President. If he wants those absences excused he'll need a note from his campaign manager next time, though.
Charles Walsh writing in the Connecticut Post has a decent take on the "Was Ned Lamont a 'teacher' or wasn't he?" kerfuffle: Lieberman, Lamont need some detention
Then again, putting yourself in a television commercial with of a group of enthusiastic young urban high school types, ostensibly your students, takes political license to the edge of the abyss would work here, but we've been in that hole for too long a time.
When it comes to who is and who is not a teacher, Lieberman's spinmeisters are strict constructionists.
In Lieberman-land, teachers are people who have been specifically trained, often at prestigious institutions of higher learning, to, well, teach. They are people who get paid to set up bulletin boards using colored paper, doilies and thumbtacks, most which they bought with their own money.
Are the people who assist elementary teachers with their classes teachers? No, they are teachers' aides. If they were teachers, they would be getting a living wage (though still not enough)...
Here's Ned's ad. You can decide whether he oversold his "teaching credentials" or not. I admit to being a bit confused when I first saw it, "He's a teacher?"
BTW, Joe gave a speech today. Ostensible topic: "An update on the War on Terror." Real topic: "I can work with both parties to get things done."