Friday, September 22, 2006
Another commander may have made a different decision, but the fact is that a concern for civilian casualties is a part of our calculus...not theirs: General Explains Decision to Refrain From Targeting Taliban Funeral
At a Pentagon news conference today, the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan said the rules of engagement provide all the flexibility needed to take the fight to the enemy and to protect coalition forces, but the decision in this case was not as simple as it might appear to be.
Army Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry said the intelligence available to the coalition commander on the ground did, indeed, support the belief that the gathering was for the funeral of a mid-level Taliban operative. “It was also reasonable to believe that, as he looked down at that photograph or looked down at the video, that a number of the people that were standing there at that funeral were Taliban fighters,” the general added.
But it’s what the picture didn’t show that ultimately led to the decision not to strike, Eikenberry said. Just outside the frame, he said, was an Afghan village.
“And it also was reasonable for the commander to conclude from that village that there were probably innocents -- maybe sympathetic to Taliban, but innocents, noncombatants -- that had moved to participate in that funeral,” the general said. And the photo couldn’t rule out the possible presence of women and children, he added.
“So that commander made a decision, based upon our values as a people, based upon our values as a nation, that he would not strike,” Eikenberry said.
The general noted that the enemy has no such values...
[via Jihad Watch]
I respect the judgement to not move on a gathering containing civilians. It does indeed show humanity in the face of the brutality of war.
However, I must admit that had I been the one calling the shots, I would have called in a B52 strike and done away with the Taliban elements. I am firmly of the opinion that you don't win by simply killing the guy with the gun, you have to beat the people supporting the guy with the gun or you have a continual fight. An eternal war usually of low level yet high impact, you know kinda like we have now.
I feel ya. I don't mean to judge this one way or the other, as I simply don't have sufficient facts. I did want to emphasize this incident for the record, though, just to show...what it shows (no need to belabor it).