Friday, December 1, 2006
Very nicely written piece here by Rick Richman. When I saw Caroline Glick speak the other night (hope to have the audio shortly), she said Bibi (Netanyahu) was wrong, it's not 1938, it's 1942. Either date works.
Revisiting (and Reliving) 1938
But 1938 may be relevant in more ways than as a rhetorical device. Revisiting that year, through Winston Churchill’s compelling account in “The Gathering Storm,†is an instructive exercise, and one the Iraq Study Group might consider as it completes its deliberations.
* * *
February 20, 1938: Churchill spent the entire night without sleep, “consumed by emotions of sorrow and fear†-- the only time he went sleepless even after he became Prime Minister. He had received a call late that evening informing him that Anthony Eden had resigned as Foreign Secretary.
Eden, who shared Churchill’s views about Germany and Italy, had found himself almost isolated in the Cabinet, opposed by the Chiefs of Staff who “enjoined caution and dwelt upon the dangers of the situation.†Churchill was despondent over the resignation:
I must confess that my heart sank, and for a while the ark waters of despair overwhelmed me. . . . I watched the daylight slowly creep in through the windows, and saw before me in mental gaze the vision of Death.
A precipitating factor in Eden’s resignation had been Neville Chamberlain’s decision to enter into direct negotiations with Italy. Chamberlain’s position was that:
His Majesty’s Government would be prepared . . . to recognize de jure the Italian occupation of Abyssinia, if they found that the Italian Government on their side were ready to give evidence of their desire to contribute to the restoration of confidence and friendly relations.
For Churchill, it was evidence that “in the dawn of 1938 decisive changes in European groupings and values had taken place.†The Western democracies had “seemed to give repeated proofs that they would bow to violence so long as they were not themselves directly assailed.â€...
Worth reading in full. [h/t: isirota1965]
I understand '38 (e.g., Austrian Anschluss, Munich, Czechoslovakia's Sudetanland, Kristallnacht, Charles Lindberg's naive and/or anti-Semitic cooptation), but why does Glick note 1942, simply to note it's later than we think, or for other, more specific reasons?
I took her to mean that the war is already on, and we're considering withdrawing.
I'll be posting the audio of her talk shortly, and hopefully you can listen if you've got the time. Audio isn't perfect. Wish I had video. She's a firecracker.