Tuesday, December 26, 2006
Not exactly, but this article in The Australian takes an innocuous statement of possibility from a clearly unprepared IDF spokesman and stretches it like taffy to fit Mark Dodd's editorial agenda. The subtext here is a clear resentment of the blogosphere's work -- note the dismissive tone when referring to Zombie's now famous report. Of course, the IDF is not without some responsibility here, as they should long since have investigated and had a definitive position on this incident.
Israel admits it may have hit ambulance
The claims centred on a controversial July 23 attack in southern Lebanon in which two Red Cross ambulances were destroyed, either by artillery or missiles - injuring at least six Lebanese, including one man whose leg was later amputated.
Initial media reports claimed the Israeli Defence Force targeted the vehicles, firing a missile directly through the roof of one ambulance using the international Red Cross symbol as a target marker.
Others blamed Israeli artillery or armed unmanned drones.
An Israeli army spokesman has now gone closer than ever before to admitting responsibility.
"We (IDF) certainly do not target ambulances but in a combat zone, we cannot always co-ordinate their safety," Captain Benjamin Rutland said. "It (the ambulance) could have been struck by our mortar or artillery.
"There was (Israeli army) shelling in the vicinity of the ambulance, but we do not have UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) footage and we don't have access to the ambulance so we cannot tell for sure."
He made the comments during an Israeli army-hosted inspection of the South Lebanon border given to a group of Australian reporters earlier this month.
While admitting the possibility of a tragic mistake, Captain Rutland cited several incidents during the recent Lebanon conflict in which Hezbollah fighters had stage-managed or misrepresented evidence of civilian casualties.
In August, Mr Downer slammed Australian and international media for not checking facts and branded reports of the alleged attack on the ambulance a hoax.
His comments were based on unverified evidence carried on an unattributed right-wing website, Zombietime.com...
[h/t: Joe H.]
Update: Far more interestingly, Human Rights Watch has come out with a detailed report claiming the Israelis did, in fact, strike the ambulances. Allahpundit also comments, here. Zombie promises a response.
Glad you picked up on this. The Australian was well and truly caught out over this story and it obviously still stings, with their staffers picking up anything that can be distorted to 'prove' they were right all along, and not merely hoaxed (as they were).