Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Must read Jeff Jacoby today on the funding roots of the Islamic Society of Boston's stalled Boston Mosque: The Boston mosque's Saudi connection. Here's the meat:
It is against this background that the $24 million mosque and cultural center being built by the Islamic Society of Boston has generated such controversy.
Questions have been raised about the Islamic Society's past and present leaders, some of whom have supported Islamist terrorism or indulged in virulently anti-American and anti-Semitic rhetoric. There are concerns about the sweetheart deal in which the land for the mosque was acquired from the City of Boston for a fraction of its value. Especially disturbing has been the Islamic Society's response to its diverse critics: a lawsuit accusing them of anti-Muslim conspiracy and libel.
That libel, the lawsuit charges, included claims that the "ISB receives funds from Wahhabis and/or Muslim Brotherhood and/or other Saudi/Middle Eastern sources" and that "the ISB Project was supported financially by donors from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states 'with known connections to radical Islamists.' " Given the Saudi role in disseminating jihadist fanaticism, it might indeed be defamatory to falsely accuse the ISB of financial ties to Saudi Arabia.
But such ties are quite real.
According to financial documents supplied to The Boston Globe, major funding for the mosque is being provided by the Islamic Development Bank in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In December 2005, two payments of approximately $250,000 each were wired from Jeddah to the Citizens Bank account of the mosque's general contractor in Boston. Messages confirming the payments were faxed from Jeddah to the Islamic Society of Boston on Dec. 19; these refer to the payments as "USA-52" and "USA-53." Other documents suggest that subsequent payments have been made as well.
The Islamic Development Bank is a subsidiary of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, and each of the conference's 56 member nations are shareholders. But the largest shares are owned by Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Iran, which together control 48 percent of the bank's stock. Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Iran are also three of the world's foremost sponsors or incubators of terrorism. It is perhaps not surprising that the Islamic Development Bank, through its Al-Quds and Al-Aqsa funds, has become a leading funder of Palestinian suicide bombing, paying large financial subsidies to the families of terrorists.
The Islamic Society of Boston didn't return my calls, but its website notes that all donors are cross-checked against the government's terrorist watch list, and that funding is accepted only "with no strings attached." It notes too that it "rejects any interpretation of Islam that is considered fundamentalist, oppressive, radical, anti-Western, or anti-Semitic."
But questions remain. More questions will come. Suing the good people who ask them won't make the questions go away. Answering them candidly, on the other hand, just might.
Also, here is the hard news story in the paper by Charles Radin: Saudi bank's role in mosque is questioned
The Islamic society acknowledged yesterday receiving a $1 million loan from the Islamic Development Bank in late 2005 -- principal owners of which are Saudi Arabia, Libya, Iran, and Egypt -- after opponents of the mosque project provided the Globe with documents showing that the bank paid about $500,000 in mosque construction bills late in 2005.
Work on the mosque, which is being built at Roxbury Crossing, ground to a halt last autumn due to lack of funds. But work restarted this week using the unexpended portion of the loan, $1 million in donations raised locally during last year's Ramadan holiday, and $1,352,500 from the sale of Islamic society property in Cambridge, society spokeswoman Jessica Masse said.
Backers of the mosque say the bank is a legitimate financial institution that supports important projects in the Islamic world.
The 56 members of the Organization of Islamic Conference contribute in varying degrees to the Islamic Development Bank, which uses their money to finance a broad range of agricultural, industrial, and infrastructure projects in the Islamic world. But Saudi Arabia, Libya, Iran, and Egypt provide a majority of the funds. The bank also supervises and disburses money from special funds created to support Palestinian families, including the families of suicide bombers. Saudi Arabia is a major contributor to those special funds...
...The mosque project was originally budgeted at about $20 million. During early fund-raising efforts, according to the Islamic society, all donations came from individuals: about 40 percent from Massachusetts donors, 30 percent from Saudis, 12 percent from other Middle Easterners and 15 percent from Western Europeans.
Donations from these sources dried up, Islamic society officials say, because of what they allege was a conspiracy involving the Boston Herald, WFXT-TV (Channel 25), and individual activists, most of them Jewish, to block the project by accusing the society's leaders of terrorist associations. The alleged conspirators are now defendants in a defamation suit brought by the Islamic society...
Update: Miss Kelly comments on these developments, here: KSA Funding of the ISB Mosque
And say, come to think of it...since there's no interest on Islamic loans...don't they take equity instead? So does that make Saudi Arabia a part owner in this mosque? (A non-rhetorical question.) Is Sudan, a country where people own black slaves, a part owner in a mosque in Roxbury?
In my mind, this also raises questions about the reach of the ISB into other Islamic groups. There are many cross-connections. The ISB appears to have a great deal of influence in area mosques and organizations, some of which are showing a trend towards fundamentalism.
http://misskelly.typepad.com/miss_kelly_/2007/01/ksa_funding_for.html
A book written several years ago, needs to be
read to fully understand the Saudi connection.
It is titled 'Preachers of Hate'.
Saudi Arabia – Preaching and Exporting Hate
http://www.crusade-media.com/news45.html
It would be interesting to find out when the program of usurping control over the mosques got underway. I'm not a betting woman, but I strongly suspect that it started not too long after the Khomeini revolution in 1979 to ensure that the dread Shias didn't do it first.