Tuesday, January 16, 2007
See, here's why you don't bring "controversial" people in to a reputable venue just for the sake of it, or just for the selfish reason of using them for your kids when there are other methods of achieving the same thing available.
Now the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune has decided to print an entire Op-Ed from that doofus Qumsiyeh: Zionism keeps Israelis, Palestinians apart
The Wheels of Justice brings eyewitness accounts to occupations in Iraq and Palestine. Our speakers come from various political backgrounds; the only requirement is that they support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and support nonviolence as an alternative to war and injustice. We also recognize that to achieve peace anywhere in the world, the root causes of injustice, racism and oppression must be addressed. We also have speakers who are Jewish and even Holocaust survivors (e.g. 80 year-old Hedy Epstein)...
Blah and blah and blah...you can read the whole thing yourself if you like. Amazingly dishonest drivel. I know the response letters are coming in. For instance, this one, from Jon H.:
I'm betting you there's a very good reason that WoJ plays their schedule so close to their chest...because once the authorities find out who they really are and what they're really about, they're far less likely to want anything to do with them. They get in and get out...fast.
Here's one from Franck S.:
For the rest, Mr. Qumsiyyeh’s piece is redolent with the usual hackneyed anti-Semitic screed that hardly merits the 1000-word column-space in the Tribune, let alone the virtue of a response.
The Eagle-Tribune itself had it right in their December 14 editorial where they said:
Andover High Principal Peter Anderson reversed his previous decision and now will allow the controversial anti-Israel group Wheels of Justice to speak to students without the presence of opposing views. Six social studies teachers had invited the Wisconsin-based group to visit the school in October. But Anderson canceled that visit after the Anti-Defamation League and Rabbi Robert S. Goldstein of Temple Emanuel raised concerns about the group's agenda.
Based on our own experience with the group, we agree with Rabbi Goldstein's assessment that the visit by Wheels of Justice will be "worthless" and of "questionable educational merit."
Wheels of Justice says it opposes the "occupation" of Iraq and Palestine and promotes "nonviolent education." But in our 2004 meeting with the group, members spoke only of the evils of the United States and Israel.
They should have stuck with that and figured there's no point in publishing op-eds by people who's opinions you don't respect.
Here's a great letter from the pages of the Andover Townsman that gets right to the point:
Most of you are, individually, fine teachers. But, sadly, your collective image is that of the leaders of your union.
When the leaders of your union coerced Andover High School into exposing our children to the one-sided propaganda barrage of the Wheels of Justice, in the classroom, you must share the shame.
When the leaders of your union coerced the ACLU into threatening Andover with a lawsuit that would have cost the town hundreds of thousands of dollars from the education budget, a lawsuit based on an extreme interpretation of the First Amendment, you must share the responsibility. When negotiations begin for the next teaching contract, the School Committee must view the premium Andover traditionally pays its teachers in the light of the actions of the leaders of your union.
You have a right to choose the leaders of your union, and you must accept all of the results of your choice.
Amen. This one's good, too (at the bottom of the page):
Why was this group permitted to hand out propaganda to, as well as collect the names and contact information of, our underaged students? Does it bother anyone else that dozens of "anti-Zionists" were imported from Somerville for a self-described "Battle for Andover?" And could somebody please explain to me how the never-ending "Rap Song of Death" fits into the lesson plan? Surely the Andover High School social studies (and physics?) department can do better. Unless maybe (gasp!) this is more about promoting someone's self-aggrandizing political agenda than it is about providing a solid education. In that case, three cheers to teachers Ron Francis, Pat Patterson and Tom Meyers for a job well done. I couldn't help but notice the support their cause has gotten from National Vanguard, "a group of racially-conscious Whites who seek to maintain the cultural and biological qualities of their race," through eugenics. (Look it up, kids!)
Vanguard relates to the AHS curriculum in much the same way as Wheels of Justice and folks there certainly understand First Amendment rights. I'll bet representatives of this organization would be thrilled to lecture at AHS. What's to stop our teachers from inviting them next?
Worry not. Francis is still pursuing an agenda the National Vanguard would love:
Our Party is explicitly against a Jewish Priviledge (racist) state however and therefore cannot support him. Individuals can do what they want to do but our party supports the right of return and is opposed to the internal apartheid laws in Israel (which Carter accepts and even goes furhter to call Israel a democracy ! ... note the US was a democracy when slaves had 3/5 and women could not vote at all !). Our position is distinctly different than Carter's.
We can call Carter and ask him if he is willing to change his position to be in compliance with human rights and international law...
The Tribune wouldn't give a neo-Nazi group or the KKK free space, but somehow it's OK for the Wheels of Justice to be given space to promote their beliefs that Zionists (aka Jews) control the media and politicians, that terror against Jews is acceptable and that the Jewish state of Israel is the only modern Nation-State that has no right to exist?
Eric Danis
Certainly the rest of Mr. Qumsiyeh's piece...should be read with an understanding that the writer could not seem to get past his first sentence without telling a lie.
Heh, that's a great line. I'd say though that either "Franck S." has no idea what the millet system was or he does a horrible job of explaining it. It was closer to the opposite of what he's describing.
The way to deal with this is to comb the article for errors, and demade that the newspaper correct each error. Editors of the Providence Journal and the New London Day had to run such corrections after running Qumsiyel op-eds. The Day printed several Qumsiyeh op-eds, but stopped because they were so error-filled.