Saturday, March 17, 2007
Debra Silberstein, Andover School Committee member, in the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune: 'Speakers policy' is not a teachers' union concern
Curriculum decisions rest primarily with school administrators. The committee, in its policy making role, has oversight responsibilities. Courts have consistently held that the right to determine curriculum rests with management. Teachers do not have a First Amendment right to deviate from the curriculum and to invite speakers into their classrooms without any oversight including relevance to curriculum. Neither policy nor curriculum decisions are mandatory or appropriate subjects for bargaining. The committee and the superintendent forsake their responsibilities by bargaining these matters.
In Andover, policy and curriculum decisions are the product of collaboration and input from teachers, students, parents and community members. The threat of litigation by a union against its own members for participating in the collegial process of determining policy and curriculum creates a chilling environment that inhibits the academic freedom of teachers. It also thwarts needed change and progress...
For those just joining in, the Andover School Committee has instituted a "controversial speakers" policy (now to be just a plain speakers policy, apparently), due to some radical teachers' utter lack of a sense of propriety or judgment. This has resulted in threats from the Mass Teachers Association (and more personal pressure amongst the teachers themselves) against to file suit against any teachers with the temerity to participate in the new process.