Amazon.com Widgets

October 2003 Archives

Friday, October 31, 2003

Paul Wolfowitz's Appearance on C-Span

(Via Mike on Roger Simon's comments) C-SPAN.org: Search Results - "Winning the Battle of Ideas: Another Front in the War on Terror."

Follow the above link to see the CSpan broadcast of Paul Wolfowitz's appearance at Georgetown, where he gave a talk following his recent trip to Iraq. Of particular interest is the question and answer session following the speech. Wolfowitz is amazingly poised as several students take the opportunity of directly questioning one of the top guys in the War on Terror by instead flaunting their ignorance and childishly grandstanding with their own political statements. Instead of decending to their level, Wolfowitz takes the opportunity to calmly and rationally respond to their remarks, showing himself as the mature, thoughtful statesman he is. That's why I'd never make it in politics. I have way too much of the wise-guy in me not say exactly what was on my mind. BTW, I am fairly certain that none of the students was either expelled, imprisoned or lowered into a plastic shredder following the talk.

Victor Davis Hanson - Blog Reader

(Via Power Line) Victor Davis Hanson writes about "Those Jews" today at NRO. In addition to being his usual indispensible self, I find the themes that run through this one interesting on another level. I know Hanson has said he reads Little Green Footballs, and any regular political blog reader will find all the issues here familiar - Easterbrook, Mahathir, Judt, Joe Leiberman being heckled...all familiar blog themes of late. Anyway, read the whole thing. No one covers it all like VDH.

Victor Davis Hanson: “Those Jews”
If only Israel and its supporters would disappear.

...What links all these people — a Muslim head of state, a rude crowd in Michigan, an experienced magazine contributor, and a European public intellectual — besides their having articulated a spreading anger against the "Jews"? Perhaps a growing unease with hard questions that won't go away and thus beg for easy, cheap answers.

A Malaysian official and his apologists must realize that gender apartheid, statism, tribalism, and the anti-democratic tendencies of the Middle East cause its poverty and frustration despite a plethora of natural resources (far more impressive assets than the non-petroleum-bearing rocks beneath parched Israel). But why call for introspection when the one-syllable slur "Jews" suffices instead?

And why would an Arab-American audience — itself composed of many who fled the tyranny and economic stagnation of Arab societies for the freedom and opportunity of a liberal United States — wish to hear a reasoned explanation of the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian war when it was so much easier to hiss and moan, especially when mainstream observers would ignore their anti-Semitism and be impressed instead with the cadre of candidates who flock to Michigan?

How do you explain to an audience that Quentin Tarantino appeals both to teens and to empty-headed critics precisely because something is terribly amiss in America, when affluent and leisured suburbanites are drawn to scenes of raw killing as long as it is dressed up with "art" and "meaning"?

How could a Tony Judt write a reasoned and balanced account of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict when to do so would either alienate or bore the literati?

So they all, whether by design or laxity, take the easier way out — especially when slurring "Israel" or "the Jews" involves none of the risks of incurring progressive odium that similarly clumsy attacks against blacks, women, Palestinians, or homosexuals might draw, requires no real thinking, and seems to find an increasingly receptive audience...

The Power Line item also points to two other articles of note. The first is Diana West's piece in the Washington Times, Bush and the Muslims, about Bush's Ramadan dinner. West takes Bush to task for a bit of Islam-washing. In a perfect world she's right, of course, but in the real world being politic is a necessary fact of life. West is also an internet afficionado, by the way, citing robertspencer.org and IMRA

...The impulse to hide the truth about Islam — about its connection to terrorism and its disconnection from Western civilization — is a shocking fact of the "war on terrorism." Addressing reporters on the day of his Ramadan dinner, Mr. Bush said Muslim leaders have asked him: "Why do Americans think Muslims are terrorists?" Instead of answering, "Because an unending pattern of catastrophic terrorism against the United States has been perpetrated by Muslims, that's why," Mr. Bush replied: "That's not what Americans think. Americans think terrorists are evil people who have hijacked a great religion."

Preaching on Saudi state television from the holy mosque in Medina, Shaykh Salah Bin-Muhammad al-Budayr recently hailed Ramadan, concluding his sermon (according to a translation at www.imra.org.il): "O God, support Islam and Muslims and destroy the enemies of Islam, including Jews, Christians and atheists. . . . O God, deal with the Jews for they are within your power. . . O God, shake the land under their feet, instill fear in their hearts and make them a booty for Muslims and a lesson to others."

Such sermonizing — quite common in the Muslim world — may show a commitment to something, but religious freedom isn't it..

The other noteworthy article is another excellent Frontpage Symposium, Islamic Anti-Semitism.

Itamar Marcus Testifies Before Senate - Hillary Gets One Right

According to their latest email update, Palestinian Media Watch's Director, Itamar Marcus testified before the US Senate Appropriations Committee. Groups like PMW, with the help of the internet are sooo important to informing us about what's really going on over there, it's a great sign that a guy like Marcus is showing up in front of the Senate with an armfull of facts and information. And surprise, surprise, Hillary Clinton showed up, and it sounds like she's got it right. Here's a snippet of the report, but read the whole thing (PMW actually has the update posted at their web-site in time with the email this time).

PMW Director Itamar Marcus - Testifies at US Senate Hearing - PMW Documentary Screened at the Hearing

PMW Director, Itamar Marcus testified yesterday in a US Senate hearing, in Washington D.C. The hearing of a sub committee of the Senate Appropriations Committee was examining whether US financial support to the Palestinians was directly or indirectly funding the Palestinian Authority [PA] hate indoctrination, that has been documented by Palestinian Media Watch [PMW]. At the hearing Mr. Marcus described the many means the PA uses to indoctrinate children to see hatred, violence and suicide terror as values. The hearing opened with the screening of the PMW video documentary - "Ask for Death" - depicting how the PA has indoctrinated its children to seek Shahada - Death for Allah - through music videos and other means.[To view the video click here]

The committee is Chaired by Sen. Arlen Specter. Sen Hillary Clinton, who is not a member of the committee, requested to participate after her meeting last week with Mr. Marcus, and seeing the documentation of the nature of PA indoctrination of their children. Her strong statement condemning PA education appears below.

Due to the importance of the topic the entire hearing, including the video documentary, was broadcast on C-Span

The following are the story in today's Jerusalem Post and the formal statement submitted by Mr. Marcus as a summary of his opening remarks...


Thursday, October 30, 2003

This can't be true...

...after all, everyone knows that Saddam's people are secular, and al-Qaeda are religious fanatics. They would NEVER work together.

FOXNews.com - Top Stories - Official: Saddam Confidant Linked to Terror Group

WASHINGTON — A senior member of Saddam Hussein (search)'s ousted government is believed to be helping coordinate attacks on American forces with members of an Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group, a senior defense official said Wednesday.

Two captured members of Ansar al-Islam (search) have said Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri is helping to coordinate their attacks, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

That information is the first solid evidence of links between remnants of Saddam's regime and the non-Iraqi fighters responsible for at least some of the attacks on U.S. forces and their Iraqi allies, the official said.

Pentagon officials say Ansar al-Islam, which operated in northern Iraq before its camp was destroyed during the war, poses one of the greatest threats in Iraq. Military commanders have said they believe hundreds of non-Iraqi fighters from Ansar have entered Iraq to fight the U.S.-led occupation, many of them through neighboring Iran.

Al-Douri is No. 6 on the most-wanted list of 55 Iraqis and was vice chairman of Saddam's Revolutionary Command Council. He was one of Saddam's few longtime confidants and his daughter was married to Saddam's son, Uday (search), who was killed in a raid by U.S. forces in July.

NBC News first reported the al-Douri link to Ansar al-Islam Tuesday night. Asked Wednesday about the report, Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said he did not know anything about it...


Blog-Iran Update

Boston Herald continues Hub Mosque Coverage

Yesterday, the Boston Herald continued its examination of the new, proposed, $20 million Boston Mosque (part one is here). Connections to terror in this installment are a bit more tenuous, and project backers are making the correct noises about tolerance and the like - good for them, but once the mosque is up, who's even going to look again? I hate to be a paranoid, but experience is a bitch.

Under suspicion: Hub mosque leader tied to radical groups

The leader of the local Islamic organization preparing to build a major new mosque in Boston is allegedly linked to a network of Muslim companies and charitable groups in Virginia suspected by federal investigators of providing material support to Islamic terrorists.

The chairman of the board of trustees of the Islamic Society of Boston, which has city approval to construct a $22 million cultural center and mosque in Roxbury, was also a leader of an Indiana-based Muslim organization known for its anti-Western rhetoric and for providing a platform for radical Islamists, some of whom have been linked to terrorism.

The chairman, Osama M. Kandil, has been a leader of the Islamic Society of Boston for more than a decade. In addition to serving on the group's board of trustees for many years, public records show he has been a trustee of the group's real estate arm since 1993, when it purchased property for its current mosque in Cambridge.

Outside Massachusetts, however, Kandil is identified in a federal government affidavit as a member of what U.S. investigators have dubbed the ``Safa Group,'' a complicated array of individuals and interlocking for-profit and non-profit entities allegedly involved in financing Islamic terrorism...

In his defense, later in the article Kandil explains his association with the Safa group, and explains his tie as tenuous at best. Read the whole thing.

Today's installment focusses on another past Director:

Islamic leader: Views not mine

A leader of the Islamic Society of Boston has disavowed an English version of an incendiary, anti-Jewish article published in the Arab press under his name, claiming it was mistranslated and distorted.

The article by Dr. Walid Fitaihi was published in the daily newspaper al-Hayat shortly after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, and then translated into English and circulated on the Internet.

According to one translation, Fitaihi's article attacked the ``Zionist lobby'' in America, claiming it has incurred ``Allah's wrath'' and would evetually lose the support of the American people.

Fitaihi, who recently moved back to his native Saudi Arabia, is a longtime director of the Islamic Society of Boston, which plans to build the largest mosque in the Northeast in Roxbury...

[Emphasis Mine.]

The MEMRI translation of Fitaihi's letter is here. Is it an accurate and fair translation? I don't know. Lazy reporting on the Herald's part. How difficult would it have been to get a copy of the original and have their own translation done? Fitaihi does call any translations "unauthorized" - a bit of a guilty man's argument.

Bottom line seems to be that any large American Islamic group is going to have ties, maybe strong ones, to the Middle East, and contrary to media portrayals, what's going to come out will likely be moderate and pluralist despite it's roots, if moderate and pluralist at all.

The mosque will be built. Maybe it will be a good thing, "Americanizing" Islam. In spite of what our European friends may believe, we have a strong culture here...but it will bear watching, and that will tend to buck our own priciples of toleration.

I say toleration and trust are good things, but as Reagan said, "Trust...but verify."

Thomas Friedman gets it right

Thomas Friedman gets it 100% (ok, 99.5%) right today, as does Roger Simon (although I've left behind a lot more of my left of center baggage than Roger has).

It's No Vietnam

...Let's get real. What the people who blew up the Red Cross and the Iraqi police fear is not that we're going to permanently occupy Iraq. They fear that we're going to permanently change Iraq. The great irony is that the Baathists and Arab dictators are opposing the U.S. in Iraq because — unlike many leftists — they understand exactly what this war is about. They understand that U.S. power is not being used in Iraq for oil, or imperialism, or to shore up a corrupt status quo, as it was in Vietnam and elsewhere in the Arab world during the cold war. They understand that this is the most radical-liberal revolutionary war the U.S. has ever launched — a war of choice to install some democracy in the heart of the Arab-Muslim world.

Most of the troubles we have encountered in Iraq (and will in the future) are not because of "occupation" but because of "empowerment." The U.S. invasion has overturned a whole set of vested interests, particularly those of Iraq's Sunni Baathist establishment, and begun to empower instead a whole new set of actors: Shiites, Kurds, non-Baathist Sunnis, women and locally elected officials and police. The Qaeda nihilists, the Saddamists, and all the Europeans and the Arab autocrats who had a vested interest in the old status quo are threatened by this...

Simon decries the vapidity of the current crop of Democratic hopefulls, and despite his left-of-center domestic views, will be supporting GWB until further notice.

Here's what I wrote on Simon's blog:

"It seems to me that while many on the Left like to lecture Americans on their myopic self-centeredness - that we don't know or care about the world beyond our shores - what we have with this current crop of liberal Democrats is just the opposite. They seem to have this idea that the American Behemoth can just sit pat and not take these foreign threats seriously, that we can just absorb body-blows without taking action, and that what's more important is that we look inward and find newer and more interesting ways of redistributing wealth. Their foreign policy theory seems to be about as deep as trying to get France and Germany to praise us and wring their hands on our behalf and that that's all we need. They just don't seem to get that the pipsqueak who's blows we've been shrugging off is now starting to load a pistol and all the hand wringing and jaw-jabbering in Europe won't be of any damn use once he's done."

In the interest of full-disclosure, it's easier for me since most most of my domestic politics have gone over to right-of-center, although to call Bush's policies "radically conservative" as Friedman does seems to me absurd, that's neither here-nor-there. Even if I supported any of the Democratic candidate's domestic agendas, how could I trust them on it seeing how alternatively clueless and duplicitous on foreign policy they are? They don't "get it" in the War on Terror, so how is it that I could expect them to seriously stand for anything of consequence on any front when it doesn't simply involve the basest pandering politics?

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

Laser Cannons and Corner Shootin' Pistols

Couple of interesting tech items on the joint US/Israel funding agenda:

CNN.com - Anti-rocket laser cannon gets funding - Oct. 29, 2003

JERUSALEM (AP) -- Israel and the U.S. are to spend at least $57 million for development of a laser cannon that can shoot down short-range missiles, an Israeli legislator and security officials said Tuesday.

A recent Israeli delegation successfully lobbied Congress to approve the new funding package for the joint U.S.-Israeli Nautilus laser weapon project, said Israeli lawmaker Yuval Steinitz, who was part of the delegation.

Israel wants the Nautilus to help protect its northern border towns from Katyusha rockets, fired by the Lebanese guerrilla group Hezbollah during Israel's 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon that ended in 2000. Israel claims that Hezbollah now has 11,000 rockets aimed at Israel.

Congress approved $57 million to fund the project, and Israel will also contribute funding, Steinitz said, but could not say how much...

Also Tuesday, the Maariv daily reported that a U.S.-Israeli company has developed a gun that can fire at right angles.

According to the report, the pistol, produced by the Florida-based Corner Shot Holdings, is being tested by the Israeli military and has already been bought by a number of special forces around the world.

A spokesman for the Israeli branch of the company refused to comment on the report.

Pictures of the weapon show a gun composed of two parts -- the front, that can swivel from side to side, containing a pistol with a color camera mounted on top, and the back section which consists of the stock, trigger and a monitor.

The unique weapon allows the soldier to remain behind cover, with only the barrel of the rifle exposed in the direction of the hostile fire, even at a sharp angle.


Well, this is actually a good news story...

Looks like the Bush Administration is finally getting wise about who deserves to be invited to the White House. The journalist who did the article might have done a little investigation into why the groups in the article haven't been invited to the White House (who's had directors indicted for supporting terrorism, who's got extremist views, who's being funded by unsavories from abroad...), but instead she took the easier path and just reported what "a group of American Islamic leaders said," thus granting importance to individuals and groups who may not deserve it. Anyway, that's an effort at "neutrality" I suppose. Who knows, but given the state of things, the guest list was still probably too large. My non-expert eyes see one stand out, anyway.

Muslims scold Bush over outreach - The Washington Times: Muslims scold Bush over outreach

...At issue was last night's "iftaar" dinner at the White House celebrating Ramadan, the holy month for Muslims that began Monday. Participants fast during daylight hours of Ramadan, breaking their fast each day with an "iftaar" meal — beginning with dates and water— at sundown.

Although the guest list included 92 persons, several Muslim organizations who differ vastly with the White House on political and religious issues complained they were left off the list.

Passed over, Mr. Bray said, was the Muslim Students Association, American Muslims for Jerusalem, the Islamic Society of North America, Project Islamic Hope, the Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations of Greater Washington and the Council on American-Islamic Relations...

...Most of the guests were ambassadors from Muslim countries. Also invited were a few Muslim college professors, businessmen and representatives from Islamic organizations such as Karimah, a human rights group for female Muslim lawyers; the American Task Force on Palestine; the American Muslim Council; the Islamic Supreme Council of America; the Council of American Muslim Understanding; the Islamic Free Market Institute; and the Islamic Center in the District...

Syrian TV at Ramadan: A Time for the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Not only is Ramadan apparently a good time for some to launch renewed sucide attacks, it also seems to be a good time to show anti-semitic TV shows! Pull the shades, pop the popcorn, gather round the home entertainment system and turn on Hizbullah's satellite channel to watch the latest Syrian-produced entertainment program, 'Diaspora' - yet another Arab TV program with a basis in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Ocean Guy points to the MEMRI item:

Episode 1 is preceded by the following statement in text: "Two thousand years ago, the Jewish sages established a global government, aimed at ruling the world, subjugating it to the precepts of the Talmud, and segregating Jews completely from the other peoples. Then, the Jews turned to inciting wars and internal strife and the [various] countries condemned them. They falsely presented themselves as persecuted, and waited for their savior, the 'Messiah,' who would complete the vengeance upon the 'gentiles' that their God Jehovah had begun. In the early 19th century, the Jewish global government decided to escalate the conspiracies. It dissolved itself in order to create a new secret Jewish global government headed by [Mayer] Amschel Rothschild."[...]

Following these two announcements, the series begins. The first scene, set in Frankfurt in 1812, shows the death of Amschel, the patriarch of the Rothschild family. Amschel Rothschild lies on his deathbed in what appears to be a cave illuminated by candles in Jewish candelabra. He instructs his "illegitimate" son to summon his four brothers, and when he leaves to call them, the following narration is heard: "Kill the best of the non-Jews, destroy their religion, annihilate their lands. Israel will not survive if the foreign peoples survive, the Jews are the offspring of God like the child is the offspring of his father. As man has hegemony [over the lower animals], thus the Jews are superior to all the peoples of the world, because the seed of strangers is like the seed of the ass. The delivering Messiah will not come until the peoples that are not Jews are extinct and control will be in the hands of the Jews alone."[...]

Just another sad episode from a sick society worth nothing more than to be ignored? Norman Cohn called his definitive book on the Protocols, Warrant for Genocide...and with good reason. Episodes like this, coming from nations like Syria - still one of the backbones of the Arab world, and in position to do great harm or great good, just scream out to be paid attention to. The trouble is, the world outside of a certain section of politically aware people is largely still sleeping.

King and Country - The Hashemite solution for Iraq

Bernard Lewis and James Woolsey suggest an old solution for turning over sovereignty in Iraq - start with the 1925 Constitution and install a Hashemite King...much like the allies did after the Great War. Now, I'm not one to argue with the eminent Bernard Lewis, but I seem to recall that Faisel Husseini never did get much traction, always being looked at as the outsider and colonial puppet he probably was. Seems to me sticking with a pluralist Council is the way to go for now, but really, what do I know? I'm not talking to any of the interested parties myself. Read...

OpinionJournal - Featured Article

Following the recent passage of the Security Council resolution on Iraq, the key issue continues to be how quickly to move toward sovereignty and democracy for a new government. The resolution's call for the Iraqi Governing Council to establish a timetable by Dec. 15 for creating a constitution and a democratic government has papered over differences for the time being.

But there are still substantial disagreements even among people who want to see democracy and the rule of law in Iraq as promptly as possible. The U.S. sees the need for time to do the job right. France, Germany and Russia want both more U.N. participation and more speed--a pair of mutually exclusive objectives if there ever was one. Some Iraqis call for an elected constitutional convention, others for a rapid conferring of sovereignty, some for both. Many Middle Eastern governments oppose democracy and thus some support whatever they think will fail...


Back to the Moon?

Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk

A report by Space Lift Washington and published by NASA Watch suggests a major new space policy initiative is under consideration and may be announced by US President George Bush at celebrations planned for the centenary of flight at Kitty Hawk in North Carolina December 17th. As the full implications sinks in of funding three decades of a space program with no serious long term policy planning, Congress has become increasingly hesitant to offer NASA a blank check anymore.

From a variety of backgrounds and constituencies, pressure is being placed on Congress and the Bush Administration to get serious about space.

Arguing that the problem is not so much any perceived threats from China, many seasoned industry professionals are pointing to the public fiscal responsibilities of Congress to oversee NASA's spending, and the mounting pressure from the commercial sector that wants a new deal for space vendors that sees the cosy big aerospace dominance of the industry - and funding - broken up.

In among all this is the assumption that the US cannot end its human spaceflight program. And if the money is to be spent, then it should be spent with specific national technology and industry goals in place - including measures to encourage new suppliers to offer services at what is hoped will be lower prices.

According to Space Lift Washington, President Bush may announce at Kitty Hawk a return to manned lunar exploration but without any specific massive new funding, forcing NASA to get serious about what it wants to do with it considerable human spaceflight assets and decades of experience.

The initiative by Bush follows a year-long review of the future directions of the American space program in the immediate decades ahead.

Space Lift's Frank Sietzen quoting Washington sources writes that a central recommendation maybe the "resumption of manned lunar flights to develop advanced technologies that can support U.S. astronauts working beyond Earth orbit to not only the Moon, but eventually to near-Earth asteroids and Mars."...

Exciting stuff, if true. We certainly have needed a large, detailed and long-term re-examination of our space program for some time. If that comes to mean a return to the moon, then that's great. The days of going just to show we could are long-gone, of course, but if it's part of an overall, well thought out program, so much the better. Wonder if they need any bloggers in the program...

Tuesday, October 28, 2003

New Boston Mosque has Wahabi Roots

An investigative report on the front page of the Boston Herald today looks into the funding and some of the connections of the new $22 million mosque being built right here in the Hub. And guess what? Surprise, surprise, much of the funding is coming from Saudi Arabia, and some of the early backers include terror supporter Dr. Yusuf Abdullah al-Qaradawi, who is barred from entering the US, and indicted terror-supporter Abdurahman Muhammad Alamoudi. See here for info on Alamoudi. See here for info on Qaradawi.

Should we be concerned about where the money for the mosque is coming from? Yes. Extremists in Saudi Arabia aren't funding mosques world-wide to spread a liberal, tolerant form of Islam. They take advantage of the West's liberal, pluralist impulses to get their footholds in, and Bostonians should be concerned about a Trojan Horse in our midst, with funding from abroad. We certainly should stay open for the possibility of real, welcoming Muslims who practice a form of Islam compatible with Western values, unfortunately, that breed appears fairly scarce these days. They're not where the money is.

Radical Islam: Outspoken cleric, jailed activist tied to new Hub mosque

The Islamic organization poised to build the largest mosque in the Northeast on a site in Roxbury has long-standing ties to an Egyptian cleric who praises suicide bombings and a Muslim activist indicted last week in a terrorism financing probe.

The Islamic Society of Boston, which has city approval to build a sprawling $22 million Islamic cultural center and mosque on Malcolm X Boulevard, has had a long association with Dr. Yusuf Abdullah al-Qaradawi, whose vocal support of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas prompted the State Department to bar him from entering the U.S. four years ago.

The local religious organization, now headquartered on Prospect Street in Cambridge, was founded by Abdurahman Muhammad Alamoudi - a high-profile Washington, D.C. activist who has publicly supported Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations.

Alamoudi was arrested Sept. 28 at Dulles International Airport in Virginia and charged with making illegal trips to Libya and accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Libyan government in violation of U.S. law.

Last Thursday, Alamoudi was indicted for his dealings with Libya and portrayed by prosecutors as a key financier for militant Islamic groups and terrorist organizations.

In that case, the U.S. government alleges Alamoudi funneled more than $230,000 to two front organizations for terrorist Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, as well as more than $100,000 to groups funding Hamas.

A lawyer representing the Islamic Society of Boston said the local group is not militant or extremist, and is in no way connected to Islamic terrorism.

However, public records indicate Al-Qaradawi and Alamoudi have both held leadership positions with the Islamic Society of Boston...

...A project update in the Islamic Society of Boston's May 2000 newsletter reported that in the previous month alone, the group raised $2 million in Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states.

One source familiar with the project who spoke on the condition he not be named said the leaders of the Islamic society have made it clear that virtually all the financing for the cultural center is coming from Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other Gulf states.

Many mosques and Islamic institutions in the U.S. are funded by wealthy individuals and foundations in Saudi Arabia. Those financiers are almost without exception followers of Wahhabism, a harsh Saudi-based fundamentalist interpretation of Islam, and they make sure the American mosques they bankroll adhere to the sect's anti-Western ideology...

The city is giving the land for a bargain-basement price, and by doing so has a responsibility to keep an eye on what's going on there.

...U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Somerville) also attended the ceremony. He said the new Islamic cultural center will ``help to create a dialogue between Muslims and non-Muslims so we may learn more about each others' traditions.''

In May, the BRA sold the 1.9-acre lot to the group for the bargain price of $175,000, but construction has yet to begin. The Islamic Society of Boston's own newsletter said the land is worth $2 million.

Farrah said the ambitious project has been in the works for a decade. Now, he said, the Islamic Society of Boston has all the necessary building permits from the city and the start of work on the site is imminent...

Respecting and encouraging our city's multi-ethnic character is important. Making sure the people we're encouraging do the same is even more so.

Update: Of course, LGF also has the story.

The Unwelcome Truths of North Korea

Melanie Kirkpatrick writes about North Korea in today's Opinion Journal. South Korean administrations have basically pursued a policy of not pissing off Kim Jong Il, which puts them often behind the rest of the world in pressuring for the rights of North Koreans, and sometimes their own citiznes.

OpinionJournal - Unwelcome Truths - As North Koreans die, South Koreans look the other way

...The four or five South Koreans in jail in China for helping refugees have received little help from their government. In contrast, Japan aggressively sought--and got--the release of two of its citizens arrested in China for helping refugees. It's a powerful deterrent for South Koreans who want to help to realize that their government won't come to their aid if they are arrested...

Life for defectors isn't so happy, when considering the fate of those they left behind:

...Information doesn't readily make its way out of North Korea. But when it's useful to his purposes, Kim Jong Il makes sure certain news is delivered. And so the word has filtered back to Mr. Hwang in Seoul about the fate of the family he had left behind. His wife committed suicide. So too, the reports say, did one of his daughters. She is said to have jumped off a bridge to her death while being taken to a prison camp. Two other daughters and a son are lost in the gulag.

This is the reality of life in North Korea--and the truth that Mr. Hwang will be telling in Washington this week.


Monday, October 27, 2003

Light Blogging Today

Sorry 'bout that. Was actually busy in the office today, and spent my computer time laying out a new brochure for my company. Maybe I'll post a pic after I get it printed. Now that I'm home, I'm being way too pestered by that...what's it called...oh yeah, "family," and concentrating on making witty comments and sterling insights ain't happening this evening...y'know, like the kind of stuff you usually...find here...*cough*. Maybe later, but for now I've just added a few things to the right "headlines" sidebar, and now I'm off to play a few rounds of something that's made for short attention-spans, otherwise known as Max Payne 2.


See ya latah suckahs!

Sunday, October 26, 2003

Gratuitous Bunny-Rabbit Pic

"US Correspondents from German Newspapers Acknowledge Anti-American Bias"

Hub Blog finds two interesting links on anti-Americanism in the German press, and how said anti-Americanism is finally failing to help up Herr Shroeder.

Says Hub Blog:

‘In the German press the picture of the United States has been ...’: Next time some weenie tells you how the European press is sooooooo much better than ours, refer them to the Davids Medienkritik blog. At a recent conference at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, German newspaper correspondents tell all about the ‘mechanisms of anti-Americanism in their editing.’ (Scroll down for the English translation.) ... Good for the Boston Globe reporter (unnamed) who apparently didn’t take the self-righteous Euro guff at the conference. ... Everything is sooooooo much better in Europe. How much better? Why, they’re practically dancing in the streets over the superiority of their non-crass democracy. ... Via Instapundit.

Rumsfeld: Take the Fight to the Terrorists

Donald Rumsfeld keeps at it today again in this WaPo piece. This continues the pattern of trying to keep out there, reminding everyone about the fight we're having - what it's all about, where it came from and where it's going - as well as the fact that those in charge, like Rumsfeld himself, know what they're doing and have a reason for their actions.

This one reminds us of one of the early battles in this war, the Beirut Marine barracks bombing, what lessons we took from it and what it instructs us to do today.

Take the Fight to the Terrorists (washingtonpost.com)

Last week marked the 20th anniversary of the suicide bomb attack on the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut -- a blast that killed more than 240 Americans. Soon after that attack, President Reagan and Secretary of State George Shultz asked me to take a leave of absence to serve as presidential envoy for the Middle East. That experience taught us lessons about the nature of terrorism that are relevant today as we prosecute the global war on terror.

President Bush has made clear that the only way to win today's war is to carry the fight to the enemy and roll back the terrorist threat to civilization, "not on the fringes of its influence, but at the heart of its power." He has it right. To understand why, one might consider what happened in Beirut two decades ago...


After Action Report on Syrian Strike

The Jerusalem Post has an after action report of the strike against that terrorist base target in Syria. Interesting stuff.

Israel News : Jerusalem Post Internet Edition - Anatomy of an air force raid into Syria

And of course, when Syrians feel humiliated, they threaten to murder civilians.

Telegraph: Syria threatens to attack Golan settlers if Israel strikes again

(Via Power Line)

Stephen Cohen: A new US movement for Middle East peace

Stephen Cohen brings his appeal for what is apparently his new "Leftist" American Jewish political group to the pages of the Boston Globe. Focussing on settlements and the new Geneva Accord, all this looks like is an attempt to bring the Israeli Left to America and give it a pretty face. In their efforts for peace, I wish them luck. In so far as I think many of their efforst will simply make things worse, I wish them misfortune. And frankly, at least Israeli Leftists are monkeying with their own desitinies. Americans putting external pressure on democraticly elected leaders in favor of those who were kicked out by wide margins is simply obnoxious meddling - and that's charitable. Israel is a democracy. They don't need to saved from themselves.

Boston.com / News / Boston Globe / Editorial / Opinion / Op-ed / A new US movement for Middle East peace

...Most American Jews and other Americans agree that suicide attacks must be abandoned. Yet there has been a persistent small voice that has argued that one cannot hope to stop terror unless one also provides the Palestinians with the hope for a just political solution...

Well, we've been down this path of examining what the real cause of suicide terrorism is, and I'm not going to go over that ground again in this post, but this statement does beg the question: What is it that Palestinians would consider a "just political solution?" Answer that with an honest appraisal of what the Palestinians are really prepared to accept, not simply write on a slip of paper, and you'll find the ultimate hopelessness and meaninglessness of Cohen's stance.

Pipes: Deadly Denial [of Muslim Anti-Semitism]

Daniel Pipes weighs in on Mahathir and endemic Muslim anti-Semitism.

Deadly Denial [of Muslim Anti-Semitism] - article by Daniel Pipes

The prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad, informed the world this month, among other things, that "Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them." Condoleezza Rice, the U.S. national security adviser, described Mahathir's comments as "hateful, they are outrageous."

But she then added, "I don't think they are emblematic of the Muslim world." If only she were right about that.

In fact, Mahathir's views are precisely emblematic of current Muslim discourse about Jews - symbolized by the standing ovation his speech received from an all-Muslim audience of leaders representing 57 states. Then, a Saudi newspaper reports, when Western leaders criticized Mahathir, "Muslim leaders closed ranks" around him with words of praise ("very correct," "a very, very wise assessment")...


Update: LGF offers the following article as a good complement to Pipes:

Accepting the reality of Islamic anti-Semitism By Dr. Charles Jacobs

The problem of Islamic anti-Semitism is one that the Jewish community has largely ignored over the past decade, although it recently has been getting more attention.

Why? I see 4 general reasons:

1. Psychological denial. Who wants to think, 60 years after the Holocaust, that a new, religious campaign against the Jews could be taking shape? We liked to think the hatred from the Arab world was "street talk" that would dissipate "when peace came." It probably won't.

2. Media's selective reporting: The media is reluctant to discuss the religious dimensions of the conflict in the Middle East, because its preferred prepackaged view is that this is a secular struggle for national liberation. It is also reluctant to report negatively about Islam. Steve Emerson is boycotted by PBS.

3. Jewish Politics: Many in the Jewish community want very much to think that the war in Israel is primarily over borders, where compromise is possible. To think that the conflict is about the Jewish right of self-determination in the Islamic realm is daunting. They are also concerned that examples of Islamic anti-Semitism may be used to justify certain Israeli policies.

4. Political correctness: We are a liberal people and do not want to speak badly about a race, religion or a people. We seem unable to distinguish between simple factual truth and bigotry. I our multicultural society, we have not yet developed a public language to describe Islamic anti-Semitism without potentially being accused of insensitivity or prejudice.


Et Tu Jim?

Fences And Fairness (washingtonpost.com)

The usually sensible Jim Hoagland joins the chorus against the path of the security fence as well as Israel's targeted killings.

I skip straight to the finish:

Security demands neither land grabs nor a foe's total humiliation and destruction.

Well, actually, it just may, if you don't want to keep fighting forever. It's certainly what we did with Japan and Germany at the conclusion of World War 2. "Unconditional Surrender" was as much about not having to fight the same war a thrid time as it was about a temporary halt to hostilities. And that was in a conflict where the direct stakes to America were far lower than they are to Israelis in their war.

I skip up a sentence:

But such approaches will be stillborn if the United States remains a silent partner in efforts by Sharon to dispossess and break the Palestinians as a people.

The conflict, brought about through Arab choices, is what has made the Palestinians a people. Ending it, one way or another, should be everyone's business, not affirming any particular people's self-actualization. Further Sharon has responsibility to the Israeli people. To the non-Israeli Palestinians he has as much responsibility as Truman had to the citizens of Japan and Germany. Any responsibility felt is purely owing to enlightened self-interest. Nothing more.

Broder: The Myth Of Antiwar Democrats

Howard Dean isn't winning in New Hampshire because of his "anti-war" stance.

The Myth Of Antiwar Democrats (washingtonpost.com)

...Since Dean has emphasized his early opposition to the war in Iraq as his calling card in the race, it is easy to assume that his antiwar stand and his criticism of Lieberman, Gephardt, Kerry and Edwards for supporting the resolution authorizing the use of force must account for his strong showing -- especially in New Hampshire.

Wrong. When the Democracy Corps team asked whether voters in those three states wanted a Democratic nominee "who opposed the Iraq war from the beginning" or one "who supported military action against Saddam Hussein but was critical of Bush for failing to win international support for the war," voters in all three states chose the second alternative. Dean's position was preferred by only 35 percent of the likely voters in the New Hampshire Democratic primary -- fewer than supported it in Iowa or South Carolina -- while 58 percent chose the alternative...

There isn't really much that separates this position from mine, that of the soft, neo-con Republican, when you get right down to it. I don't support George W. Bush out of any loyalty to the Republican Party - I had none up until recently. I support the Republican Party because at the moment, of the two big parties, it comes the closest to representing my point of view and positions, while the Democrats have abandoned me. That's how the system works, you choose the candidates that best represent your views. Now if I ran the party, it might be different. I might have some ability to directly influence the course of things, but as it stands, and is likely to stand into the forseeable future, I don't.

What separates me from this particular, "soft," form of the anti-war position - the one that says, "I support the war, but not how we went about it," is that I don't blame George W. Bush for the lack of international support. I believe it's pretty clear that the failure is not the Bush Administration's, it is the failure of certain international institutions, as well as pandering foreign politicians and an international press-corps that's stuck in an outmoded rut.

One of America's many strengths, when measured against the rest of the world, is our ability to recognize and adapt to new situations. "American Ingenuity" as paradigm...and that's exactly what George W. Bush has done ni the post-9/11 world. A President with isolationist tendencies was shaken awake and turned on a dime to react and listen to different voices who had been doing a good job on reading the signals blowing in the winds of the world.

This new spirit is best exemplified by the now famous leaked Rumsfeld memo which shows once and for all that the entrenched bureaucracy of years past is, at least in one part of the Administration, dead and buried. It's the best of American corporate culture brought into the government and taking a whip to the old ways. The Vietnam days of an American Behemoth unable to shift and adapt are gone, hopefully forever, but at least for as long as this administration inhabits the oval office.

The trouble is, most of the rest of the world can't keep up. They're lagging behind America's ability to recognize weakness and innovate. They're stuck with their own Vietnam-era-like inertia, combined with a culture chained down with Socialist tendencies so that they've allowed even their corporate ability to innovate atrophy while they wait for solutions to be handed to them on a silver platter, or "just happen."

You see, it's not just a matter of working with the rest of the world, and getting them to go along with us or, failing that, going along with them. It's a matter of examining the reasons we're often at odds these days. America blazes the trail and the rest of the world is having trouble keeping up. And that examination, that accounting if you will, shows a large credit in George Bush's account. Sadly, our own Democratic Party is a purely reactionary entity as well - reactionary against Bush policy without an identity of their own. Fanciful scenaries of international cooperation aren't a plan, it's wishful thinking. What if the "Plan A" of seeking more international support had failed? What was the "soft anti-war" Democratic's Plan B? I believe we've seen it, and it's exactly what GWB has done.

Ignatius: Tikrit Tests Plan A

In today's Washington Post, David Igantius follows Paul Wolfowitz around Tikrit and concludes, in effect, there is no Plan B if we fail the course we're on. And he's right, if we don't succeed, THAT will be a tragedy.

Tikrit Tests Plan A (washingtonpost.com)

...The generals understand this is also a struggle for hearts and minds. They're talking to sheiks and tribal leaders. They're building schools and youth centers and Internet cafes and establishing women's rights councils. They're repairing power and water treatment plants. They're reopening hospitals and schools. During the holy month of Ramadan, Odierno's commanders will be meeting with religious leaders, repairing mosques, releasing prisoners and limiting patrols of urban areas.

And yet the attacks on Americans continue -- growing in number and sophistication. It's hard to fault Wolfowitz's Plan A. But after the reversals of the past six months, it's disturbing to realize that if it fails, there isn't a good alternative.


Blog-Iran Update

Here's the latest:

(*)Path to Mideast peace via Iran?

There is a political solution to three grave Mideast dangers facing the United States and its allies. These risks include expanded terrorism, the new Iraq coming under the control of pro-Iranian Shi'ite extremists and an Iran already armed with ballistic missiles obtaining nuclear weapons. Rather than using military force or relying only on diplomacy, providing political assistance to help the people of Iran establish constitutional democracy would be consistent with their wishes and would move the entire Middle East in a positive direction.
Rest of article.

(*)Intelligence: Divisions Inside Iran

The foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany last week congratulated themselves for persuading Iran’s ruling ayatollahs to “suspend” a suspected uranium-enrichment program and allow international inspection of dubious nuclear sites. But in Washington, even moderate Bush advisers question whether Iranian ministers and clerics who agreed to the deal have the power to deliver Tehran’s end of the bargain.
Rest of article.

(*)Of Mullahs and Their Nuke

A deadly problem out of Iran -- Until last spring, it seemed as if Iran and the United States were moving toward a discreet dialogue designed to defuse more than two decades of antagonism. Now, however, with the release of fresh evidence that Iran may be pursuing nuclear weapons, tensions between the old adversaries have reached a new high.
Rest of article.


Friday, October 24, 2003

Zionism As A Reluctant Nationalism

Excellent piece by Nelson Ascher. (Via Roger Simon and Andrew Sullivan.)

Tony Judt’s despicable and by now notorious essay Israel: The Alternative, a text preaching the destruction of the Jewish state that was published in the New York Review of Books, has been criticized from almost every possible angle.

But there are still many things to be said about it. First and foremost that, coming from a historian, it is bad history, and that’s not only because the facts he presents are usually wrong or twisted, but because even those he gets right are framed in a misleading way.

Here is his most misleading affirmation:

“The problem with Israel, in short, is not—as is sometimes suggested—that it is a European "enclave" in the Arab world; but rather that it arrived too late.”

This represents a total lack of understanding and an almost scandalous misreading of several facts that have to do with the birth of the modern nation-state and nationalism according (not only) to the European pattern...

The Left vs. An African-American Justice

Henry Mark Holzer lays out the case for Justice Janice Rogers Brown's appointment to the US Court of Appeals. I hope the Republicans will do a better job of advocating for her than the did with Miguel Estrada. It's time for someone to stand up to the Democrat's interference with rightful executive authority.

Marmot: Fisking the Hani

The Marmot's (Final) Hole: Fisking the Hani

The Marmot translates an anti-American editorial from a Korean paper, and fisks away. Where else but the blogosphere can you get this stuff!?

Today's Hankyoreh ran a column by Prof. Kim Yeon-ch'eol of Koryo University's Asian Research Center entitled "The Dispatch of Combat Troops to Iraq is a Catastrophe." Needless to say, I found it objectionable on several levels. Anyway, without further ado, let the fisking begin.

[Marmot's note: column translated into English by yours truly - reader beware]...


Andres Gentry on Mahathir

Via The Marmot - Andres Gentry has one of the best, most in-depth, analyses of Mahathir's disturbing speech to the OIC. It's long, but worth it, and although I could quibble with a detail here or there - I think the author over-emphasizes the top-down theory of Israel's creation, without recognizing the existing civil-society already extant providing the internal push for the state's creation, for instance - it really does become a quibble given the scope of the piece. Go check it out, you'll learn something.

water :: andrésgentry: Exegesis

Thursday, October 23, 2003

Jesus actor struck by lightning

OK, good thing I'm the skeptical type, or I might take some sort of message from this.

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Jesus actor struck by lightning

Actor Jim Caviezel has been struck by lightning while playing Jesus in Mel Gibson's controversial film The Passion Of Christ. The lightning bolt hit Caviezel and the film's assistant director Jan Michelini while they were filming in a remote location a few hours from Rome.

It was the second time Michelini had been hit by lightning during the shoot.

Neither of them was badly hurt, according to the film's producer Steve McEveety.

Michelini had previously been struck during filming in Matera, Italy, when he suffered light burns to his fingers after lightning hit his umbrella.

Describing the second lightning strike, McEveety told VLife, a supplement of the trade paper Variety: "I'm about a hundred feet away from them when I glance over and see smoke coming out of Caviezel's ears."[...]

OK, the guy playing Jesus was struck once, but the assistant director has been struck twice this shoot, making three times total...so far. You think future films he's involved with might have insurance issues?

Bummer, Rerun Died

New York Daily News - Daily Dish & Gossip - TV's 'Rerun' dead at 52

Fred Berry - the bulb-shaped, beret-wearing comic best known for his bit as Rerun on the 1970s sitcom "What's Happening!" - died at his home in Los Angeles. He was 52. The county coroner was investigating the cause of death, but friends said Berry suffered from diabetes and had recently suffered a stroke.

The past few years, he had been doing comedy at his club and played himself in an episode of NBC's "Scrubs." He also played himself in the David Spade comedy "Dickie Roberts: Former Child Star."

Berry was 25 and a member of the pioneering break dance troupe the Lockers when "What's Happening!" cast him as the red beret-wearing, suspender-clad high schooler Rerun. After the 1976-79 series, Berry briefly reprised the role in the '80s.

Berry, who in recent years was 100 pounds lighter than in his prime-time heyday, said life after Rerun was a struggle.

"The stress of success got to me. The fat jokes got to me. And I got heavily into drugs and alcohol. I was empty inside," he told an interviewer in 1996.

Leo Standora

I used to watch that show. Even as a kid I thought something was a bit off - one of the worst acted shows on TV. But "Rerun" was the stand-out and the comic-relief, and the show was enjoyable. The whole cast belongs on some version of "where are they now?" In fact, they appeared on a couple. The article here makes Fred's life after the show sound pretty sorry, which is too bad, as I had thought he seemed to be doing pretty well, with his own acting school - certainly no sorry case.

Farewell, Rerun. It was fun.

Daimnation: Al-Jazeera gets desperate

Hey, you see a four-year-old child, I see four cases of fresh matza.

Daimnation!: Al-Jazeera gets desperate

This is so pathetic I don't know whether to laugh or cry: Al-Jazeera, the scrupulously unbiased "Arab CNN," got its hands on a photo of an American soldier frisking an Afghan child, and they're acting like the soldier was planning to eat the child. (Or hand him over to the Joooooos, so they could use his blood in their religious rites.)...

If the linked story is the worst they can catch American soldiers doing, we're doing pretty damn well.

Update: Best of the Web has more.

Jeff Jacoby: Rousing Muslim bigotry

There's been a ton written already about the Mahathir Moonbattery, but it wouldn't be complete without reading what the Boston Globe's voice of reason has to say.

Boston.com / News / Boston Globe / Editorial / Opinion / Op-ed / Rousing Muslim bigotry

...Mahathir's speech raised no storm of controversy among most Muslims because the Muslim world by and large has no problem with anti-Semitism. Even in the United States there was little shocked repudiation of Mahathir's venom by American Muslim leaders. A Nexis search turns up just one mild quibble: When CNN invited the head of CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, to comment, he said only that he doesn't believe Jews run the world, "so I see that statement as a misguided opinion."

On Tuesday I asked six American Muslim organizations -- CAIR, the American Muslim Association, the Islamic Circle of North America, the Islamic Institute, the Islamic Society of North America, and the Muslim Public Affairs Council -- whether they had any reaction to Mahathir's words. Three never replied; two replied by saying they had no comment. Only MPAC condemned Mahathir for his "extremely offensive, anti-Semitic comments."

The Muslim world suffers from many problems, but none is more crippling than its culture of intolerance. Rampant anti-semitism anywhere is always a sign of grave moral sickness. Until more Muslims are prepared to confront and conquer that sickness in their midst, the Muslim world will remain the benighted backwater that so many Muslims deplore.


Blog-Iran Update

Here's the latest:

(*)DJ Persia's Regional Briefing - WindsOfChange.net

(*)U.S. University Lecturer Still Being Held..
Authorities in Iran have arrested an Iranian-born lecturer at a top US university on suspicion of espionage and have been holding him for at least three months, colleagues said.

Rest Of Article.

(*)Iran Still Has Nuclear Deadline, U.S. Says

The Bush administration intends to press Iran to comply with an Oct. 31 deadline for opening the books on its past nuclear activities, senior officials said yesterday, as U.S. skepticism grew toward this week's surprise agreement by Iran to stop enriching uranium.

Rest Of Article.

(*)Al-Qaida in Iran - A glance [Which Members Are In Iran?]

A listing of some of the senior al-Qaida operatives who may be in Iran, according to U.S. officials:

Rest Of Article

(*)Bush: Even if Iran Comes Clean -- It Won't Be Enough..President George W. Bush said Wednesday he welcomed the news that Iran has said it will stop producing fissile material and will allow international inspections, but he stopped short of saying this alone will improve relations with the U.S.

Rest Of Article


BlackFive: 'Me and My Muslim Friends Neighbors'

Via Mike in the comments:

The following is a spell-binding tale of conspiracy-threory and narrow escape.

Blackfive - The Paratrooper of Love: Me and My Muslim Friends Neighbors

...Masood's younger brother just came right out with what everyone of them was alluding to...: "The f-cking Jews controll everything."

Me: "Come on. Do they control your family's restaurant? Do they control your alderman? Mayor Daley?"

Masood's older brother: "They want nothing to do but destroy us. My restaurant does well inspite of their attempts with the Mayor and lobbying the Congress to discriminate against Muslims. You Christians just never see it."

Masood, surprising the hell out of me, was nodding his head in agreement: "Just like 9-11."

Me: "What?"

Masood: "Just like 9-11 where the Mossad flew planes into buildings."

WTF?!...

Read the whole thing. "BlackFive's" friend isn't an ignorant guy - quite the opposite. He's highly educated and intelligent, but he believes in the craziest conspiracy-theories out there, and he's surrounded by those who believe the same.

Conspiracy theory and other odd belief (of which a certain form of anti-Semitism is a sub-set), is not the exclusive domain of the uneducated. There's a certain wishful-thinking that it's only ignorance that breeds odd beliefs that seem to fly in the face of objective evidence, but the above link will give one a shining example of the incorrectness of that hope.

BlackFive's friend is a highly-educated and intelligent guy, yet he's right in lock-step with all those around him who believe the weirdest anti-Semitic theories - from the Jews control City Hall to the Mossad knocked down the World Trade Center. Hell, even some of the smartest people believe the craziest things. Conspiracy-theory epidemics are known to spread like wild-fire in soil made fertile for them by cultural conditions conducive to their spread. Witness the spread of urban legends in the inner-city.

So how do you stop the spread of crazy ideas? Education and reasonable engagement alone won't work. You've got to undertake a long-term project of changing the underlying conditions that spread crazy beliefs. The liberation of Iraq is just the very, very start of that work for change.

In the case of anti-Semitism, I'm not optimistic. It is the world's oldest hatred, after all. And besides, how do you fit a couple billion people on the psychiatrist's couch?

Wednesday, October 22, 2003

A Reason For Hope

After yesterday's bleak news, causing a Solomonia spiral of worry and angst, comes some perhaps heartening news - a leaked memo from Don Rumsfeld to his top people, pointed to by Roger Simon who links to this Virginia Postrel take.

This is the Donald Rumsfeld we know and love. This is the curmudgeonly Rumsfeld who doesn't suffer fools easily, poking and prodding his underlings' brains behind the scenes, forcing them to keep thinking in innovative ways. This leak makes me feel better. We begin to see where the idea for that "Terrorism Futures Market" from a couple months back came from. Ideas! We need ideas. That's what Americans do. We need people like this at the wheel.

USATODAY.com - Defense memo: A grim outlook

..."Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror?" Rumsfeld asks in the Oct. 16 memo, which goes on to cite "mixed results" against al-Qaeda, "reasonable progress" tracking down top Iraqis and "somewhat slower progress" in apprehending Taliban leaders. "Is our current situation such that 'the harder we work, the behinder we get'? " he wrote.

Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita declined to comment specifically on the memo, but he said Rumsfeld's style is to "ask penetrating questions" to provoke candid discussion. "He's trying to keep a sense of urgency alive."

Among Rumsfeld's observations in the two-page memo:

• The United States is "just getting started" in fighting the Iraq-based terror group Ansar Al-Islam.

• The war is hugely expensive. "The cost-benefit ratio is against us! Our cost is billions against the terrorists' cost of millions."

• Postwar stabilization efforts are very difficult. "It is pretty clear the coalition can win in Afghanistan and Iraq in one way or another, but it will be a long, hard slog."

The memo was sent to Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; Marine Gen. Peter Pace, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs; and Douglas Feith, undersecretary of Defense for policy.

Rumsfeld asks whether the Defense Department is moving fast enough to adapt to fighting terrorists and whether the United States should create a private foundation to entice radical Islamic schools to a "more moderate course." Rumsfeld says the schools, known as madrassas, may be churning out new terrorists faster than the United States can kill or capture them.

The memo is not a policy statement, but a tool for shaping internal discussion. It highlights a Rumsfeld trait that supporters say is one of his greatest strengths: a willingness to challenge subordinates to constantly reassess problems. The memo prods Rumsfeld's most senior advisers to think in new ways about the war on terrorism at a time when many are preoccupied with the 7-month-old war in Iraq...


Update: Lots of links at Instapundit.

Tuesday, October 21, 2003

They Never Did Figure Out For Sure Where That Anthrax Came From

This one's tough to pull a quote from. Read the whole thing, but here's half.

Unresolved anthrax enigma By Jack Kelly

...the anthrax in the letters sent to the senators was vastly more sophisticated.

Miss Mylroie explains:

"Ordinarily, anthrax spores contain an electrostatic charge that makes the microscopic spores stick together in clumps that are too big to be inhaled into the lungs. But these spores had been coated with a Teflon-like substance containing silica. ... When U.S. Army experts tried to examine them, the spores refused to stay put on the glass microscope slide. ... It behaved like no sample the Army scientists had ever seen. ...

"The weightless, almost gaseous quality made this batch of anthrax particularly effective as a weapon. ... The Army's premier anthrax expert, John Ezzell, was especially worried. The evident level of expertise involved in the production of this weaponized anthrax powder suggested that the United States had been attacked by a sophisticated, ruthless and formidable foe."

Had the anthrax in either of those envelopes been put into the ventilation system at the World Trade Center, it would have killed more people than the hijacked airliners did.

On Oct. 25, 2001, an article in The Washington Post said only the U.S., Russia and Iraq were capable of weaponizing anthrax in the form found in the letters to the senators. And as we have seen, the FBI has been unable to duplicate it.

The Washington Post's editor Bob Woodward wrote in his book, "Bush at War," that CIA Director George Tenet believed the anthrax attacks were made by al Qaeda, with the backing of a state. Vice President Dick Cheney agreed, but said it was important not to talk about state sponsorship, "because we're not ready to do anything about it."

Miss Mylroie deftly summarizes evidence linking 9/11 hijackers to the anthrax letters. Mr. Woodward quotes Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Mr. Cheney's chief of staff, in explaining why the administration did not acknowledge an al Qaeda link, even though it thought there was one: "If we say it's al Qaeda, a state sponsor may feel safe and then hit us, thinking they will have a bye, because we'll blame it on al Qaeda."

The FBI's bizarre focus on Mr. Hatfill — against whom not a shred of evidence has been found — may be less political correctness run amok than a deliberate deception, a means of calming Americans until the real source of the problem can be dealt with.

If al Qaeda could all by its lonesome have produced the anthrax in the letters to the senators, surely they would have attacked us again by now.

But if the anthrax were manufactured by Iraq, we apparently have yet to find evidence of where and how. If Saddam didn't do it, we need — urgently — to find out who did.

I'm damn glad Saddam is gone. Thank you, Mr. Bush. It was the right thing to do for so many reasons, but now we're stuck in the mud over there - no, not a quagmire of Iraq reconstruction, but a quagmire of the entire War on Terror. The memory of the anthrax mailings is fading, and we don't have the will to go on any farther. It's going to take more Pearl Harbors to get us unstuck and show us which way to go, and that's a scary prospect. The momentum has gone out and inertia has set in.

Pakistani nukes filling the void left by US Withdrawal from Saudi Arabia?

I dunno, I read about a lot of scary stuff, but I find this to be one of the scariest things I've read in some time.

lgf: Pakistan to Supply House of Saud with Nukes?

And this story on the sidebar doesn't help: Gabriel Schoenfeld: The Terror Ahead - A nuclear attack? Be very afraid.

Ha'Aretz: IDF video contradicts claims bystanders killed in Gaza raids

Haaretz Article

Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat on Tuesday urged world leaders to take immediate action over Israeli helicopter gunship strikes that killed 14 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip Monday.

Army Radio on Tuesday evening quoted military sources as saying that seven of the 14 Palestinians killed in the air strikes were positively identified as Hamas operatives. The other casualties were believed to be non-combatants.

Palestinians said the seven dead were civilians killed by an Israeli missile fired into a crowd at the Nusseirat refugee camp, while the Israel Defense Forces said only militants had been struck and released a video indicating there was no one on the street near the vehicle targeted in the attack.

According to video footage provided by the IDF, the target areas of at least two of the air force raids were empty of Palestinian bystanders at the time of the missile strikes.

The army released the video - filmed by a remote-control pilotless-plane flying above Gaza and screened on Israeli television news programs Tuesday evening - showing two missiles hitting a car about a minute apart after a brief chase.

"We didn't see any massive gathering of people. We will not allow munitions to be launched when there is a massive gathering of people," said a senior air force officer, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The grainy video showed a crowd gathering around the car about two minutes after the second strike, and the video ended some 40 seconds later. The military said an additional 10 minutes were recorded but didn't release the additional footage.[...]

From Naomi Ragen's mailing list:

Friends,

You have probably been watching the news channels with their reports of dozens of Palestinian injuries from targeted bombs yesterday in Gaza (I'm not talking about what happened tonight in Ramallah where Israel is finally going after all the terrorist scum hiding out in Arafat's compound.) Yesterday, the Palestinians "reported" how the bombs injured and killed dozens of innocent bystanders. Saed Erekat told a gullible Fox News reporter it was one of the worst crimes ever committed. Members of the Knesset even offered to pay the poor victims.

Tonight we in Israel saw aerial photos released by the army of this attack. The car was alone on the road. A car containing terrorists and a suicide bomber equipped to go. No bystanders at all anywhere. It was targeted and hit. It rolled backwards. An ambulance came by. The plane waited until the ambulance passed. Then it hit the car again. Three bodies were seen after the attack.

Well, why aren't we surprised? Spread the word.

Naomi


Taheri on Mahathir: Obscene Excuses

(Hat tip: Mike) The indomitable Amir Taheri takes Mahathir to task.

New York Post Online OBSCENE EXCUSES By AMIR TAHERI

...Mahathir's "us-and-them" dialectics belongs to a tribal mentality that has no place in the modern world. He forgets that the Iran-Iraq war, in which a million people died, was not an "us-and-them" conflict. Nor was it "the other" who tried to wipe Kuwait off the map in 1990.

Are Jews raiding Algerian villages at night to massacre entire families, including babies?

Are Jews murdering thousands of Muslim women each year in the name of "honor-killing"?

Are Jews throwing acid at girls who do not wear the hijab?

Is it "the other" who has arranged for Muslim countries to have almost half of all political prisoners in the world?

And who is carrying out those thousands of executions, sometimes by chopping people's heads in public or stoning them to death?

Are Jews preventing Muslims from choosing their governments in free elections? Are they arranging those elections in which government candidates always win with 99.99 percent of the votes?

Are Jews controlling the economies of the Muslim nations - or should we look to our own ruling elites, whose greed knows no bound? People often talk of the need for the separation of mosque and state in Muslim countries. A more urgent need is the separation of business from government.

Mahathir says Jews have persuaded others to fight and die for them. Who does he mean by "others"? If he means the West, let us not forget that Americans and Europeans fought and died to save the Muslim peoples of Bosnia and Kosovo from extermination. Not a single Muslim state provided any help.

Yet who was getting a hero's welcome at the Muslim summit? The Russian President Vladimir Putin, who publicly takes pride in having flushed Chechen Muslims "down the toilet."

During years of war, Putin's army has killed more than 100,000 Chechens and turned a further 300,000 into refugees. That is almost half the Chechen population. Yet Russia was admitted as associate member of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, where Putin received a hero's welcome. Yet the same group refuses to admit India - which has more Muslims than all the Arab countries combined.

Mahathir presented Palestine as a religious conflict. He did not apply the same logic to Chechnya, Kashmir, Mindanao, Burma, Cyprus and East Turkestan, among the many places where Muslims are in conflict with non-Muslims...


Iran to allow spot checks of nuclear program

Israel News : Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

Iran will suspend uranium enrichment and allow spot checks of its nuclear program, but set no date for the steps, an Iranian national security official told reporters Tuesday after talks with British, French and German envoys.

The secretary of Iran's powerful Supreme National Security Council, Hasan Rowhani, said Iran would sign an additional protocol to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty that would allow inspectors to enter any site they deem fit without notice.

"The protocol should not threaten our national security, national interests and national pride," he said...

I can't wait to see how this will be implemented. "Yes, spot checks, of course...you can check that spot, and that spot...but not that spot over there, or that one there..." Real, or should we expect to see inspectors politely roaming the countryside trying not to offend by being too agressive?

AP: 'Russia concerned about 'disproportionate' use of force'

Israel News : Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

Russia's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday voiced concern about Israeli raids on the Palestinian territories and warned that the "disproportionate" use of force would further fuel confrontation.

A series of Israeli airstrikes killed at least 12 Palestinians and wounded about 100 others in the Gaza Strip on Monday. The military said the raids targeted members of a Palestinian terrorist squad.

The Foreign Ministry's statement offered condolences to the families of the civilian victims of the Israeli strikes.

"The disproportionate use of weapons as well as an exclusive emphasis on force won't bring peace to either the Palestinians, or the Israelis, and they won't stop terror," it said. "Just the opposite, it will trigger another round of confrontation, bring new tragedies and suffering."

The statement urged both Israel and the Palestinians to show political will and fulfill their obligations under a U.S.-sponsored "road map" peace plan for the region.

Russia co-sponsors the Mideast peace process along with the United States, the European Union and the United Nations.

All of which begs the obvious question: How many thousands (or is it tens of thousands?) has Russia killed in Chechnya to date?

Gaffney: Know thy enemy

Jewish World Review: Know thy enemy - By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

The biggest imponderable concerning the war on terror is whether the American people and their leaders are clear on a central question: Exactly who is the enemy in this war? We are, after all, not fighting some abstraction called "terror." The truth is we are engaged in a death struggle with people who use terror — usually involving the deliberate murder of innocent civilians — as an instrument to advance their agendas.

As to precisely who those people are, the past twenty-five months have brought to light a bewildering array of terrorist organizations pursuing a variety of stated objectives, usually with help from this or that rogue state-sponsor. But one thing should be clear post-9/11: The most determined, numerous and dangerous of these enemies are radical, violent Muslims known as "Islamists." [...]

And according to Gaffney, you're either with us, or you're with the Islamists. And guess who's with them? Why CAIR, AMC, etc...

Brian Mulroney: 'A Canadian for liberating Iraq--and reforming the U.N.'

Writing today in OpinionJournal, Brian Mulroney calls for understanding on the part of Canada for America's war in Iraq, and calls for reform at the UN.

OpinionJournal - Leading From the Front - A Canadian for liberating Iraq--and reforming the U.N.

The new and overriding predicate of American policy--foreign, defense, security, domestic--is to ensure that 9/11 never happens again. If the terrorists managed to mount a second such attack anywhere in the U.S., the consequences would be destructive for the nation and calamitous for the administration. The dominant unspoken thought of the president of the U.S. must therefore be: "I will take whatever action is required to protect America from attack so that it will not be said of me 50 years from today that I was asleep at the switch at a seminal moment in our history."

It is out of these new realities that the doctrine of unilateral pre-emption--so condemned by many allies--emerged. I believe an accurate translation of the doctrine is this: "If the U.S. has persuasive evidence that a country is either contemplating an attack on the U.S. or its allies, or harboring terrorists who might strike out at the U.S. or its allies, then the U.S. will--with Security Council approval or without--pre-emptively act to remove the offending government from office." And why is this doctrine so offensive to so many? Some fear the precedent, others the erosion of multilateralism, and others still a negative impact upon the United Nations.

Although the reality of pre-emptive action is new, so was the terrorist strike on America. What is also new is the suggestion that Security Council approval is--and has been--a sacrosanct precondition to action against a hostile state. The historical record is to the contrary. In any event, I would never have agreed to subcontract Canada's international security decisions and our national interest to 15 members of the Security Council. This would be a surrender of national sovereignty to which I'd never consent...

Exactly right, and as an aside, I can't think of one use of American military power against another state since the Second World War where we were responding to an imminent threat against United States territory.

Mulroney goes on to call for a San Francisco II - a major revision of the UN system. Sounds like the least we should do, but I'd still be damn skeptical that even a convocation of our "friends" (we have those?) would come up with anything more than yet more ways to handcuff the US. We need to look to methods of retaining our sovereignty, while protecting ourselves from friends who so lack worthwhile convictions that they'd rather fight against us than the true dictatorships that are still so easy to find.

Monday, October 20, 2003

When Protestors Attack

Evan Coyne Maloney has the finished version of his video up. (Previous item here.) Witness, from the camera's perspective, as Evan is whacked with protest signs, threatened by pro-Palestinian speakers and screamed at by Stalinists. The guy has guts, I must say.

Evan, y'know, when nature photographers want to film the fauna in their natural surroundings, they often construct camouflaged huts some distance from the creatures themselves, and use telephoto equipment to give the impression of closeness. Just saying.

bt: When Protesters Attack Video

BoTW: 'The Easterbrook Kerfuffle' and 'He Is Such a Jew' Lieberman

James Taranto has a couple of good items (at least) again. On Easterbrook he has a little run-down of "the story 'till now" as well as yet another interesting take:

...Well, allow us to explain. Easterbrook's essay was an expression not of anti-Semitism but of a lesser, though still insidious, form of prejudice. Call it liberal condescension. This sentence from his apology reveals all: "How, I wondered, could anyone Jewish--members of a group who suffered the worst act of violence in all history, and who suffer today, in Israel, intolerable violence--seek profit from a movie that glamorizes violence as cool fun?"

"Members of a group": This is the language of liberal identity politics. And note that this is a philo-Semitic prejudice, not an anti-Semitic one. Easterbrook's premise is that the suffering of the Jewish people ennobles Jewish individuals--or should--even if those individuals have not themselves suffered. Thus he presumes to hold Jews to a higher moral standard by virtue of their Jewishness--though in fact all he's doing is asking them to agree with his highly debatable opinion (does it really make any sense to liken stylized Hollywood violence to the Holocaust?).

Ideologically, Easterbrook's earnest criticism of Jewish studio executives is of a piece with Maureen Dowd's racist rant against Clarence Thomas. Because Thomas is black, Dowd, like other liberals, expects him to conform to liberal orthodoxy and thus treats his conservatism as a far greater offense than that of, say, Antonin Scalia. This kind of prejudice may not lead to pogroms and lynchings, but it's divisive and often ugly all the same.

He also has quite a bit on the disturbing appearance of Senator Joe Lieberman in Dearborn, Michigan this weekend, where he was heckled by an Arab-American audience. Howard Dean was apparently cheered for saying some of the same things.

From the NY Sun:

[The conference] saw a former Jesse Jackson aide, Robert Borosage, appear on a panel and say, "one of the reasons that we have been unable to talk sense about the Middle East is that we had a very organized Jewish community that made it known to legislators that if you stray, we are going to punish you." . . .

"When Joe Lieberman got up, my blood was boiling," said a Republican from California, Michael Farah, who is chairman of the American Lebanese Chamber of Commerce of North America. "The Israelis, if they want to build a wall, let them build it on their own damn land."

Mr. Farah referred to "the Israeli PAC, which is extremely powerful."

He wasn't the only one in attendance who seemed to have trouble differentiating between American Jews and Israelis. Samear Zaitoon of Baton Rouge, La., a civilian translator of Arabic for the Department of Defense who just returned from six months of service in the Middle East, sat next to this reporter Friday night at a dinner addressed by [Dick] Gephardt and by the chairman of the Democratic National Committee,Terry McAuliffe.

"You don't know about Americans of the Jewish faith having two passports?" Mr. Zaitoon asked. By way of explaining the Israeli-Arab conflict, he said, "Our problem is a civil war inside Judaism between Orthodox and Reform, and it's spilling over." A quick check of the Internet turns up a letter to the editor from a Samear Zaitoon of Baton Rouge, La., asserting that "the Zionists--Jewish and their misguided so-called 'Protestant Christian' supporters (who are really Jews in church pews)--have succeeded in hijacking not only Palestine but also America. . . . Jewish Zionist terrorists have hijacked two whole countries!"

Daniel Drezner: 'Odds & ends on anti-semitism"

Daniel Drezner has a passle of links on the subject today, including a link to my post here, on Chirac's "oops" letter to Mahathir, and don't miss the Daily Times of Pakistan editorial he links to, asking what the big deal is, after all, Jews do control the world don't they?

Jews, Malaysia, Blood-Libel, Etc...

Via Normblog via Europundits:

A bit more background on the Mahathir comments, just when it all began (that is, before the intifadah), where it comes from, and where it's going. Beware the whiplash, Monsieur Chirac.

Interesting article:

Anti-Semitism: The blood motif

The anti-Semitic outburst by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad at the Islamic summit conference he was hosting last week is not surprising. Back in 1984 Malaysia - a country in which there are no Jews - prevented a visit by the New York Philharmonic Orchestra because of its intention to perform a work by a Jewish composer (Ernst Bloch's "Schelomo - A Hebrew Rhapsody") and this even before the intifada and with no connection to Israel. In 1997 Mohamad blamed Jewish billionaire George Soros for the currency crisis in his country.

Therefore, what is more worrying than the statement itself is a different phenomenon: that Mohamad's claim that, among other things, the Jews control the world, received the blessing of the Egyptian representative and aroused no reservations among the 57 states that participated in the conference and supported the renewal of the boycott of Israel. Indeed, the attitude of the Muslim world - Arab and non-Arab - toward both Israel and Jews, has become threateningly more extreme. Anyone who believes that it is necessary to make a supreme effort to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or to reduce its dimensions, will see in this development yet another reason to do so.

However, Arab-Muslim anti-Semitism also has an independent source and therefore it is difficult to believe that it will disappear even if the conflict ends...


And the Reuters Headline of the Day Is...

Bush Tells Mahathir His Jew Remarks Are 'Wrong'

[Italics mine.] Two impressions: Good on GWB for saying something to Mahathir one-on-one and can I have some of whatever the hell Reuters' headline writers are smoking?

Via LGF.

Blog-Iran Update

Here's the latest from the crew at Blog-Iran:

The following are important news as well as a MAJOR EVENT in Washington DC this Saturday (October 25th) that you can alert your readers too..

(*)::::SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, Freedom Rally Against Terror & Tyranny:::::

WEST FRONT OF CAPITOL, WASHINGTON, D.C. SATURDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2003

You can also take the image from http://www.activistchat.com/images/troops.gif and post it on your blog!!

::NEWS ALERTS:: ::NEWS ALERTS:: ::NEWS ALERTS::

(*)IRANIAN TV OFFICE IN BAGHDAD RAIDED

US troops assailed the Iranian Arabic TV network, Al-Alam's office in Baghdad Sunday morning...The move was sparked as the TV network aired footages of an American soldier who had been killed on Saturday, the US officials alledged...(It's likely this station was spreading propoganda and attempting to exert the Islamic Regime's Clerical influence and create problems for the coalitions efforts)
Link

(*)IRAN OPPOSED TO TURKISH TROOP DEPLOYMENT WITHOUT UN, IRAQI CONSENT.

Iran on Sunday for the first time voiced its reservations over the deployment of Turkish troops in Iraq, saying such a move should not be made without the consent of the United Nations or Iraqi people. (Of course they don't want Turkish troops in Iraq --- another sign of the beginning of the end to the Islamic Mafia Clerical Regime of Iran!)
Link

(*)PROGRESS EXCEEDS PROGNOSTICATION IN IRAQ.

FORT BRAGG, N.C. – 'This may not be Vietnam, but boy, it sure smells like it," said Sen. Tom Harkin recently. The Iowa Democrat is but one of
a host of critics in Washington politics and the media who claim that US troops and administrators are "bogged down" in Iraq.

Having covered the war as an embedded reporter, having conducted the first national poll of the Iraqi people (in concert with Zogby International), and having remained in close touch with the military men and women who are temporarily the princes running the land of the Tigris and Euphrates, I believe this gloomy view is incomplete and inaccurate.
Link

(*)AL-QAEDA SUICIDE WILLS APPEAR ON NEW AL-QAEDA WEBSITE

The SITE Institute has tracked a new al-Qaeda website airing an unseen videotape of some of the bombers involved in the May 12, 2003, car
bombings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in which 25 people were killed. Amazingly, after speaking entirely in Arabic, two of the al-Qaeda bombers address the camera in English, threatening Americans. It appears to be the first time an al-Qaeda fighter reads some portions of his will
in English.
Link

(*)THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC HOODLUMS SNAP THEIR FINGERS AND THE THREE THIEVING STOOGES OF THE EU JUMP.
Link

(*)IMPORTANT ZAHRA KAZEMI PETITION

GOOD LUCK EVERYONE AND CONTINUE THE GREAT BLOGGING!!!!

In Unity & Struggle,
ActivistChat.com


Jeff Jacoby: Palestinian terror, American blood

Jeff Jacoby is angry about the Americans - 51 in the past ten years - who have killed by Palestinian terrorists encouraged by the Palestinian Authority.

Jewish World Review - Palestinian terror, American blood

...For years, sermons preached in Palestinian mosques and aired on Palestinian radio and television have rhapsodized about inflicting pain on the United States. "Oh, Allah, destroy America, for she is ruled by Zionist Jews," proclaimed Sheik Ikrima Sabri, the Arafat-appointed mufti of Jerusalem, in one such sermon. "O God, destroy the Jews and their supporters . . . destroy the United States and its allies," implored Sheik Ibrahim al-Mudayris in another. And from a third, Sheik Ahmed Abu Halabiya: "Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, in any country. . . . Wherever you meet them, kill them. Wherever you are, kill those Jews and those Americans who are like them."

A few months ago, Palestinian officials renamed the central square in Jenin after Ali Jafar al-Na'amani, the Iraqi suicide bomber who killed four US Marines at a checkpoint in Najaf on March 29. That is what Arafat and the Palestinian Authority think of spilled American blood.

There is only one rational response to the murder of Branchizio, Parson, and Linde last week: the destruction of the Palestinian Authority, a network of killers masquerading as a government. If that doesn't happen, this much is sure: the 49th, 50th, and 51st Americans to lose their lives to Palestinian terror will not be the last.


Sunday, October 19, 2003

The Solomonia Fall Collection Has Arrived!

Yes, that's right, Solomonia logo merchandise is now available through our gouging friends at CafePress! Now you can show off your manly biceps, or womanly charms with a genuine, official Solomonia T-Shirt! Don't worry, yours is guaranteed to arrive wrinkle-free!

You can wear it with your hat:

Or you can wear it without your hat:

Imagine the flexibility! The logo on the front is the Solomonia logo from my old, non-blog site. How white, how tight, how out of sight!

And to go with your T-shirt, you can also piss off the squares around your office (with apologies to Peter Bagge) with this smokin' Solomonia coffee mug!

It says you're on the right side of history, and thus implies that everyone else is on the WRONG side. How Manichean of you! Muhahahaha!

And the best part is, if anyone actually buys something, I get a dollar! A whole dollar! Wow! I may end up actually being able to buy a single battery out of the several I'll need to go with the new digital camera and iron I also need!

Go here now! But wait! There's more! Oh wait...no there isn't. (More items coming soon.)

My Baby Just 'a Wrote Me A Letter

Jacques Chirac, perhaps having a bout of second thoughts after blocking an EU condemnation of Mahathir Mohamad's remarks at the OIC concerning Jews and World Ruling and then being thanked publicly by PM Mahathir, has written PM Mahathir a letter condemning the remarks in the strongest of terms.

A day late I'd say - better than nothing, but first reactions say much, don't they? Instructive as to the type of "leadership" France intends to provide to Europe. The heartening thing about this is that there was still enough sense in the world to pressure Chirac into doing this. No, France, and Europe generally, hasn't quite become the 58th member of the OIC. Perhaps there's only so much patience in the world even now for jetting around the world and pandering to hate and dictators.

We can only hope.

Haaretz Article - Chirac personally condemns Malaysian PM's remarks on Jews

PARIS - French President Jacques Chirac sent an unusually frank letter Sunday to Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad personally condemning his comments last week that Jews "rule the world by proxy."

"Your remarks on the rule of Jews gave rise to very strong disapproval in France and in the world," said the letter. It added that "these remarks can only be condemned by all who
preserve the memory of the Holocaust."

Numerous nations and the European Union have condemned the remarks Thursday by Mahathir who said that Jews "rule the world by proxy" and suggested that Jews get "others to fight and die for them."

However, France came back with force Sunday after reports in Malaysian newspapers that Mahathir had expressed his gratitude to the French president for his "understanding" of Mahathir's speech, given at the opening of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference...


US Continues Plan to Reduce Forces in Korea

The Marmot points out this AP story. Damn good news. We've been hearing rumblings about this for some time, but now it sounds as though it's actually going to happen. The US will reduce its force strength on the peninsula by about a third, and move most of what's left off the DMZ to positions south of Seoul.

..._The number of American troops in South Korea (news - web sites), now about 37,000, likely will decline. The Americans want a reduction of perhaps one-third, or about 12,000 troops, which would be the biggest cut in decades. It's one that makes the South Korean government nervous.

_The forces that remain will be more "expeditionary." They would be positioned in ways to enable American commanders to send them elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific region. It's a major change, reflecting Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's view that the fight against terrorism requires a more flexible approach to use of U.S. troops worldwide.

_Though smaller in number, the U.S. military presence would be more capable in important ways. By moving farther south of the Demilitarized Zone that has separated North and South Korea since the war ended in 1953, the U.S. Army would be able to respond more quickly to an attack by the North. As currently positioned, the Army would have to withdraw south of Seoul first, while in range of the North's long-range artillery, before organizing a counteroffensive.

"No longer will our forces be based near the DMZ as a political `trip wire,'" Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense, told Congress this summer...

Mahathir Says Reaction Shows Power of Jews - Thanks Chirac

Someone needs to tell PM Mahathir that if you want to compliment the Jews, basing your compliments on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is probably not the way to go about it. "No, no, no, you don't understand, I really very much admire how the Jews control the world! We should try to be more like them!"

And it's just too tasty hearing him thank Chirac for blocking an EU condemnation. snort

Haaretz Article - Malaysia says reaction on Jews remarks misplaced

SYDNEY - Malaysia said on Sunday widespread anger over comments about Jews by the country's prime minister was terrible, and insisted Mahathir Mohamad's remarks were only an accurate reflection of the undeniable power of Jews worldwide.

Mahathir provoked an outcry when he said that Jews controlled Western powers by proxy. The United States, Israel, Australia and the European Union accused Mahathir of anti-Semitism.

"It's most unfortunate, the reaction that has come out is terrible," Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar said in an interview on Australian television.[...]

Mahathir has thanked French President Jacques Chirac for blocking a European Union declaration condemning his comments on Jews, news reports said Sunday.

Chirac, backed by Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis, stopped the EU from ending a summit Friday with a harshly worded statement deploring Mahathir's speech...

The French presidency denies supporting the Malaysian prime minister.

But Malaysian newspapers said Mahathir had expressed his gratitude to Chirac for his "understanding" of the speech he made at the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference, the world's largest Muslim grouping, in Malaysia last Thursday.

Mahathir said he had feared Muslims would be more angered by the speech, which was also critical of Muslims.

"I never thought the Europeans would be against me," the New Sunday Times quoted him as saying.

"I can't understand them. I'm glad that Chirac at least understands. I would like to thank him publicly."...


Chief Wiggles' Operation Give is Back in Business

There's a new address for this worthiest of endeavors!

Operation Give
7155 Columbia Gateway Drive
Columbia, MD 21046

Saturday, October 18, 2003

JPost: 'Geneva Accord' Palestinians called to US for talks

I wonder what's going on here. A little dog and pony show for PR, or something darker?

Israel News : Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

Three senior Fatah leaders, one of whom helped reach a deal with Israeli opposition figures last week, were to leave for Washington early Sunday for urgent talks with top US officials, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

The invitation, which came as a surprise to the Fatah officials, was extended on Saturday evening. Ahmed Ghnaim, Kadoura Fares, and Hatem Abdel Kader were issued visas by the US Consulate-General in Jerusalem. A fourth, Muhammad Hourani, was invited but did not plan to go.

Fares and Hourani were both key figures in the Palestinian delegation that hammered out the Geneva Initiative with an Israeli delegation comprising politicians and intellectuals led by Yossi Beilin in Jordan last week.

The invitation to Washington came a few days after Israel protested against the Swiss involvement in the initiative.

Former Labor Party leader MK Amram Mitzna said that the Israelis involved, including himself, would likely also travel to Washington in the coming weeks to discuss the initiative with top officials...

Hmmm...the Ha'Aretz article has a few more details, and it sounds like they're coming to meet unnamed Democratic Congresspeople and low-level officials. Hmmm...has anyone seen Dennis Kucinich around? Stay tuned...

Gregg Easterbrook Fired from ESPN

Roger L. Simon has news forming the latest chapter in the Easterbrook controversy. Easterbrook has been fired from ESPN, with some commenters pointing to ESPN's sensitivity, and others that Disney, who's CEO Michael Eisner was one of the Jewish executives criticized in the Easterbrook's piece, owns ESPN. Oops. I would not have thought Easterbrook's writing would be something to be fired over. Again, because I think no one should be fired or tarred forever for saying one stupid thing."

Previous Easterbrook items here and here.

Update: Instapundit has craploads of links.

Friday, October 17, 2003

Victor Davis Hanson: The Vision Thing - Convincing Americans to stick with a crazy Middle East

Friday is for Victor Davis Hanson.

Various Syrian foreign ministers, speaking on behalf of a recognized terrorist state, recently warned Israel for fostering "instability" throughout the region by taking out the supposedly empty infrastructure of a killers' training base on Syrian soil. Eliminating such a haven is now deemed inflammatory; habitually blowing up innocent children in Haifa is accepted as pretty much normal business in the Middle East.

Occupy an entire country like Lebanon and the world snores, but bomb a terrorist camp and it snarls. Still, for all the bluster on spec, the "Arab world" is not sure it wishes to send its jets to sure paradise merely to avenge the honor of Bashar al Assad, who can't even provide air cover for the murderers' base that he subsidizes and whose ruins are off-limits to reporters. Disgusted with all this, most Americans flip the channel when any spokesman from the "Arab League" appears on screen to warn about "repercussions" to come.

The "world community" wishes that the dispute would simply go away — so messy, so disturbing are these televised images of body parts, charred gristle, and human hair that blow out from the flaming cafes of Tel Aviv or Jerusalem, followed by macabre pronouncements and atrocious home videos from an array of primordial terrorist groups on the West Bank. Americans seek to interview Palestinians to offer them subsidized travel and study; as thanks they are blown up, and their rescuers stoned as they reach the murder scene — this from our "friends" to whom we give millions of dollars in aid and who cheered the news of 9/11...


God is dead.

Thursday, October 16, 2003

Allah on Easterbrook

Amazingly (or maybe not), Allah has an amusing and spot-on observation on an aspect of the Easterbrook controversy.

...Easterbrook Akbar! Kufr, the potential for this double standard is limitless! Recent European history alone ought to cause Israel to experience second thoughts about having a strong military. Recent European history alone ought to cause Zionists to experience second thoughts about their own territorial integrity. Recent European history alone ought to cause Jewish barbers to experience some pretty fucking serious second thoughts about their career choice. Try it, infidels! There must be a million and one hysterical analogies that can be drawn from Nazi crimes against Jews in order to handicap the modern Jew! In fact, now that Allah thinks about it, criticizing the Jew on the basis of atrocities committed against his own people is another kind of double bonus, is it not? EASTERBROOK AKBAR! As far as Allah can see, the only flaw in Easterbrook's idea is that it is not always possible to determine who should be subject to the double standard based on their name or appearance. Perhaps some enterprising jihadi will one day figure out a way to identify them. In the meantime, Allah shall pray day and night for a triumph of the will in Hollywood that brings the mujahedeen to power. Can you imagine if Osama ran Universal Pictures, kufr? "Schindler's List" would have been a very different movie, Allah can tell you that...

Read the piece at the source for more and for the embedded links!

"Funding Hate" - A Study of the Ford Foundation's funding of anti-Israel Activism

This may be old news, but part 1 was just printed in todays Boston Jewish Advocate newspaper. It's a fascinating investigation of the Ford Foundation's involvement in funding the Durban anti-Racism debacle, that turned into an anti-Israel, anti-Semitism hate-fest, as well as their support of various Palestinian NGO's and the lack of useful accounting that's lead to all sorts of graft and funneling-off of funds.

JTA Investigative Series: FUNDING HATE

'EU demands action from Arafat after roadside bombing in Gaza"

Wow. EU ministers almost talking tough. It's just like they were real men! I know it doesn't look right - "EU," "Demand" and "Action" in the same headline!

Haaretz Article - EU demands action from Arafat after roadside bombing in Gaza

...EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana called Arafat following the attack Wednesday. Solana's spokeswoman Cristina Gallach said the message was "condolences and emotion won't do, we need action."

EU leaders in a summit meeting Thursday and Friday were expected to release an unusually tough statement condemning the attack and demanding action by the Palestinian authorities.

Officials said the EU wants Arafat to "deliver on security" or hand over control of the security forces to the government led by Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia.

"I realize that Arafat is very sorry, but he has to change the system," said Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moeller. "It's not good enough." [...]

Seriously, could this finally be one of those events that forces the world to start to face what they've created in the West Bank and Gaza? It seems like it at the moment, but one loses a bit of hope reading the second half of the article all about how the Palestinians don't like the US (wow! really?), because of lack of "even-handedness." Yes, in some people's minds, vetoing silly UN resolutions is a mitigating factor in slaughtering a diplomatic mission.

Update: Charles Johnson notices the same thing.

...But according to our mainstream media, it’s US policies that make them want to kill us. It’s our own fault for supporting Israel. Never mind that this diplomatic convoy was on the way to interview young Palestinians—just like 17-year old Jihad—for scholarships to study in the US, on the US taxpayer’s dime. We deserved it because we won’t do anything to stop Israel from destroying the smuggling tunnels that bring in the explosives they use to blow us up...

And while you're there, check out this item displaying the PA's real feeling on the event.

Jacoby: "The hole in selecting Nobel Peace Prize winners"

Jeff Jacoby on the disconnect between the careful Nobel science and literature selections, and the often trendy Peace Prize:

Boston.com / News / Boston Globe / Editorial / Opinion / Op-ed / The hole in selecting Nobel Peace Prize winners

...Most Nobelists don't have to wait 50 years for their achievements to be honored, but gaps of a decade or two are typical. Consider:

Max Planck's revolutionary paper on quantum theory was published in 1900; he received the Nobel Prize for it in 1918. Albert Einstein's discovery of the photoelectric effect -- a 1905 achivement -- earned him the Nobel Prize for physics in 1921. James Watson and Francis Crick figured out the structure of DNA in 1953; they didn't receive the Nobel Prize for medicine until 1962.

It is much the same with the literature Nobels. They aren't given for new writing or to an author in the first flush of acclaim. Almost always the prize has been made in recognition of a significant body of work produced -- and assessed -- over many years. In fact, many of the laureates received their Nobel only at the end of their lives. Albert Camus, Andre Gide, Pablo Neruda, and Boris Pasternak, to mention just a few, died less than five years after winning the prize.

All in all, there may be no testamentary instruction more regularly flouted than Alfred Nobel's stipulation that the annual prizes go to the people who had conferred the greatest benefit on mankind "during the preceding year." And a good thing, too. It means that before a scientist, author, or economist receives a Nobel Prize, his work has been sifted, weighed, put to the test of time. Its importance has been established, often through years of peer review. As a result, the science, literature, and economics Nobels rarely end up looking foolish or naive.

But the same can't be said of the peace prize.

While the other Nobels are awarded by committees of Swedish scholars and scientists, the peace laureate is chosen by a committee of Norwegian politicians. Like politicians everywhere, the peace prize committee tends to be more interested in what the headlines will say tomorrow than in what historians will believe 20 -- or 100 -- years from now. And unlike their Swedish counterparts, the Norwegians often intend their choice to have a political impact...

Read it all. It explains why guys like Arafat end up getting the prize and discrediting the award.

"Kennedy to assail Bush over Iraq war"

Boston.com / News / Nation / Washington / Kennedy to assail Bush over Iraq war

WASHINGTON -- Ratcheting up his criticism of the war in Iraq, Senator Edward M. Kennedy accuses the Bush administration of telling "lie after lie after lie" to defend its policy in a fiery speech prepared for delivery today on the Senate floor.

"The trumped up reasons for going to war have collapsed," Kennedy says in a speech that underscores his opposition to President Bush's request for $87 billion to fund military operations and rebuilding in Iraq and Afghanistan. An advance copy of the speech was obtained by the Globe.

"The administration still refuses to face the truth or tell the truth," Kennedy says, accusing the White House of misleading the public about every aspect of the war, from the financial costs to the motivation and the aftermath. "Instead the White House responds by covering up its failures and trying to sell its rosy version of events by repeating it with maximum frequency and volume, and minimum regard for realities on the ground."

Asked about the senator's planned remarks, White House spokesman Trent Duffy said, "The United States and the world are safer today because of the actions that were taken in Iraq, because Sept. 11 taught us that we need to confront new threats before they reach our shores."[...]

Impression: It seems Kennedy has failed to take a lesson from his own experience - viscious rhetoric just turns people off. Ted Kennedy and the Kennedy's in general have been attacked in the strongest manner for years here in Massachusetts, and yet they go on to win election after election.

Further, this seems to me just another step in the suicidal Democratic march to defeat. It might engergize the Democratic base, but that's not going to win elections, and it's going to turn a lot of people off. Here's to hoping. It might sell in Massachusetts, though.

I say President Bush should offer to name the "Edward M. Kennedy Torture Chamber" in Abu Ghraib Prison.

What a putz.

Wednesday, October 15, 2003

Shirin Ebadi Arrival In Tehran - Gallery of Photos

FOX Rules Again - The Next Joe Millionaire

Joe Millionaire

I am sooo looking forward to this. For those who don't remember, the premise of the first one was that they took a guy, an "Average Joe" construction worker - salary about $18k, flew him out to a chatteau in France and matched him up with 20 women who had the chance to woo him. Thing is, the ladies were told that "Joe" had actually recently inherited $50million or some similar amount - total BS. The ladies were eliminated episode by episode, survivor style, until the final one was chosen and told the truth.

Classic entertainment, and FOX did a great job with the production to add to the entertainment value. It was a complete laugh.

Well, how can you repeat the act? Easy, move the whole show to Europe, and find a bunch of Euro-birds who've never heard of the thing!

Close-up on good-looking blonde with French accent: "...e'z filthy RICH!"

Voice-over: "Does anyone know how to say, 'Sucker' in French?"

Bwahahaha!

This is gonna be good.

Listen, TV can't be all documentaries.

A Good Day at Power Line

I enjoyed everything at Power Line Blog today. Have a scroll around.

Erring on the side of slander - a blogger finds a disturbing pattern in what NPR has had to correct.

Why a fence - Abraham Foxman writes about why the Security Fence is necessary.

Bush Blames PA for Gaza Attack - Damn glad to read this one.

"We Don't Know" - Stephen Hayes writes about the Saddam/al Qaeda connection and some disturbing problems at CIA in "Dick Cheney Was Right"

Jewish anti-semitism - David Frum writes about leftist professor Tony Judt

Racism at the New York Times - "Michelle Malkin slices and dices the Times' editorialist Adam Cohen, who wrote a condescending piece in the Times about Bobby Jindal, the top vote-getter in Louisiana's gubernatorial primary election"

Best of the Web - The Rachel Corrie Memorial Massacre - Archibishop of Moral Turpitude

James Taranto is on fire today. The first two items are particularly good, and you'll forgive me quoting them in full here. Do feel free to go there to read it all.

The Rachel Corrie Memorial Massacre
Remember Rachel Corrie? She was a mixed-up 23-year-old lass from Olympia, Wash., whose hobbies included playing in traffic and burning the American flag. Last March the former pastime cost her her life. She stood in front of an Israeli bulldozer, but was in the driver's blind spot and was accidentally crushed to death.

Corrie's fatal game of chicken was the product of malice as well as idiocy. Her goal was to promote Palestinian terrorists' murderous campaign against Jews by obstructing Israeli efforts to destroy tunnels that are used to smuggle weapons and explosives from Egypt into the Palestinian "refugee camp" in Rafah, on the Gaza Strip.

Today Palestinian terrorists murdered at least three Americans on the Gaza Strip, reports the Jerusalem Post:

A massive explosion demolished a US armored jeep carrying US diplomatic and CIA officials Wednesday, killing at least three Americans and critically wounding one.

Minutes after 10 am, a large road side bomb went off under a convoy of 3 US diplomatic vehicles, backed by a Palestinian police escort, driving pass a gas station on the outskirts of the town of Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip.

Israeli security sources confirmed the explosion killed at least three Americans, identifying them as US citizens acting as security guards in the targeted vehicle.

And where did the bombs come from? Here's a report from the Israeli group IMRA:

Brig. Gen (res.) Zvi Poleg told Israel Radio in an interview after the attack that the explosives could have been smuggled from Egypt through the smuggling tunnels. Poleg charged that Egypt was violated its treaty obligations in allowing the smuggling of weapons, explosives and ammunition from Egypt to the Palestinians via smuggling tunnels. He noted that members of the Egyptian Army have been involved in the smuggling and that the Egyptians are well aware of the operations but have not acted to stop the operations. He noted that over 60 smuggling tunnels were located and destroyed by Israel in the last year.

The Egyptians, who receive billions in American foreign aid as a reward for making "peace" with Israel a quarter century ago, have a lot of explaining to do. And it appears terror advocates like Rachel Corrie now have American as well as Israeli blood on their hands.

'Serious Moral Goals'
Somehow this is more infuriating than all the idiocy spouted by all the Michael Moores and Susan Sarandons and Noam Chomskys over the past two years. From the London Daily Telegraph:

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, yesterday urged America to recognise that terrorists can "have serious moral goals."

He said that while terrorism must always be condemned, it was wrong to assume its perpetrators were devoid of political rationality. "It is possible to use unspeakably wicked means to pursue an aim that is shared by those who would not dream of acting in the same way, an aim that is intelligible or desirable."

He said that in ignoring this, in its criticism of al-Qa'eda, America "loses the power of self-criticism and becomes trapped in a self-referential morality."

In the same speech, Williams denounced the liberation of Iraq. So let's see if we have this straight: The head of the Anglican Church is telling us that the wanton murder of thousands of innocent people is a sign of "serious moral goals," while the liberation of millions from one of the world's most vicious dictatorships is, as he has put it, "immoral and illegal."

Is this really what Christianity is all about?


Of Anti-Semitism in TNR and Revisionism in Germany

A few raw links here to a couple of interesting issues that are loosely related:

Roger L. Simon points to Gregg Easterbrook's piece attacking Qentin Tarantino at The New Republic's site. Read Easterbrook's piece, then read the Simon take and comments. Thought provoking. I had a semi-coherent comment in there somewhere, which was probably re-stated more clearly by others further down. For some reason, I'm having trouble getting as excercised as some with the Easterbrook piece. Is it anti-Semitic? Probably. But it just strikes me as more of a sloppy, lazy anti-Semitism, than the overt, intentional stuff, or overt apologetics for (like the type of thing you'll find in the average Leftist British paper, for instance). This is the type of stuff that presents on opportunity for dialogue and education, rather than raving, it seems to me. I could be wrong! I'm interested in Easterbrook's response to this little tempest, if any. That will tell a lot. He certainly makes a stupid error in labeling a couple of Jewish executives by their ethnicity, then arrogating himself the right to dictate what they ought to be concerned with therefore, and tossing in the Holocaust (in not so many words) on top of it, in a "you'll be responsible for what you get" sort of way. Those are things that should only be addressed in carefully crafted pieces, not poorly-done, sloppy blog screeds. Easterbrook was begging for trouble - and maybe a little attention.

OK, as I write this, my heat meter is beginning to rise a bit, and that should tell me something.

On another subject, Simon points to this Anne Applebaum piece concerning a bit of German self-pitty and their penchant for conspiracy-theory. Hans Ze Beeman has some interesting observations from the ground in Germany.

Turkeys in the backyard

Palestinian Media Watch: PA Promotes, Then Condemns Killing of Americans

Here's the latest from Palestinian Media Watch exposing Yasser Arafat's laughable condemnation of today's Gaza Bombing against an American target. It might be helpful in both a practical sense and in the sense of taking Arafat's pronouncements more seriously, if the PA would stop sponsoring anti-American propaganda.

PA Promotes, Then Condemns Killing of Americans

by Itamar Marcus

Introduction
PMW has been documenting the duplicity of the Palestinian Authority towards the United States for years. In its English statements, the PA presents itself as an American ally, while its Arabic messages incite its people to hate and kill Americans. Never has this hypocrisy been more striking than today, after the Palestinian ambush that targeted and killed three American diplomats in the Gaza Strip. The official PA rushed to condemn the attack -- even as the PA-controlled media continues its relentless campaign of anti-American indoctrination.

[Click here to view examples on Web site of hate America indoctrination broadcast on PA TV.]

During the war in Iraq, the PA actively endorsed the killing of Americans, and even produced a music video celebrating the deaths of US soldiers that was broadcast repeatedly on official PA TV. [Click here to view video] In the months before the Iraq war, the official PA daily published calls to Saddam Hussein to turn Iraq into a graveyard for American soldiers. At a pro-Iraq rally they “praised the role of Iraq and the Commander Saddam Hussein, and stressed that Iraq’s land will be a graveyard for the American soldiers...” [Al Hayat Al Jadida, Dec. 19, 2002]

Since the war, hatred of the USA has continued unabated in the official and tightly-controlled PA media. This morning’s political cartoon in the official daily Al Hayat Al Jadida attacks the US for trying to “paint” the entire world American.

[Click here top see PMW web site examples of hate - America cartoons in the PA press.]

A recent sermon on official PA TV described the US as “the foremost enemy of the Muslim nation” compared to Pharaoh of the Bible saying: “There is no God besides me”. [PA TV February 21, 2003]

This past Friday, the PA sermon broadcast on official PA TV included the following threats and warnings to the US:
“We hear statements by the little American President, oppressive statements. He says Israel has the right to defend itself… These statements carry destruction for America itself… This president sees himself like one who has ascended to the mountaintop and like one expecting someone to push him so that he falls into the abyss, he and his people with him. We warn the American people that this president is dragging them to the abyss… [Allah] take vengeance on Your enemies, our enemies, enemies of religion.” [PA TV Sheikh Ibrahim Madiras, Oct. 10, 2003]

A recent sermon on official PA TV told Muslim believers to anticipate the destruction of the US:

“If we go back 1400 years in time, we find that history is repeating itself, worshippers of Allah. The Prophet Mohammed was besieged by two powers, Persia in the east and Rome in the west. These represent the Soviet Union and America of today. Persia represents Russia in the east, and America stands for Rome in the west. Persia fell first in the east, just as Russia fell first in the east, and America will fall, may it be Allah’s will, just as Rome fell…”
[Official Sermon PA TV, September 5,2003,Sheikh Ibrahim Madiras.]

Clearly, the American diplomats were murdered today by Palestinians fulfilling their role in their war against Americans, as they have been taught by their leaders, through years of hate-mongering and calls for violence against Americans.

[Click here to see PMW reports reviewing years of PA promotion of hate of America.]

to SUBSCRIBE to PMW's reports send an empty e-mail to reports-subscribe@pmw.org.il

And we're supposed to lobby Israel on behalf of "Palestinian interests?" We're supposed to be more "even-handed?" Give me a break. The Palestinians know what side they're on, and so should we.

Japan commits 1.5 billion dollars to Iraq

Japan ponies up a bit of dough.

Mainichi Interactive - Top News - Japan commits 1.5 billion dollars to Iraq

Japan will give 1.5 billion dollars (165 billion yen) to Iraq in 2004 to help rebuild the war-torn country, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda announced Wednesday.

The chief government spokesman told a news conference that the money would be used to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure such as electricity and water supplies, as well as to restore basic services, including health care and education.

The commitment came just two days before the planned arrival of U.S. President George W Bush in Japan. The Bush administration has repeatedly called Tokyo to provide assistance for Iraq's rehabilitation.

Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi hinted that the government was determined to show its commitment to Iraq before Bush's visit and an international donor's conference on Iraq to be held in Madrid later this month.

"We cannot fail in the reconstruction of Iraq. The decision (to commit 1.5 billion dollars) has nothing to do with the forthcoming general elections. We are prepared to do what's necessary. We thought it would be better to make the decision sooner rather than later," Koizumi told reporters Wednesday night...

The story goes on to say that they will also be providing $4billion in loans.

In related reconstruction news, the US Senate has voted down a proposal to have the Iraqis pay back part of the new $87billion funding bill.

Senate votes down proposal requiring payments from Iraq

WASHINGTON - Handing a preliminary victory to the White House, the Senate on Tuesday rejected a Democratic proposal to require Iraq to finance its own reconstruction rather than the U.S. providing the $20 billion President Bush has requested.

The 57-39 vote, defeating an amendment to an $87 billion bill to fund military operations and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan, was the first test of the full Senate's sentiment on a financing idea that the White House has fought.

Just before the vote, the administration called about two dozen senators to the White House, urging them to reject that amendment and other proposals to have Iraq pay for some of the reconstruction.

Advocates said $87 billion was a high price for the United States to pay at a time when it is running deep in deficits.

But opponents of the amendment argued that it did not make sense to put additional financial burdens on Iraq

"There is no possibility that the Iraqi people could pay back any debt in the short term," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "It will send the wrong signal at the wrong time."

Amen, Senator McCain.

The Washington Post has it right here:

...It would be intellectually consistent, though wrong, to argue against both military and reconstruction funding. But to present oneself as a supporter of money "for our troops" and an opponent of reconstruction is contradictory and counterproductive. Paying to improve life for Iraqis will help create a safer environment for U.S. troops and will hasten the day when they can leave. Rebuilding the electricity grid, fixing the water supply, getting the oil flowing, maintaining public safety -- all this is central to hopes for stability and representative government...

Edwards, Kerry and Dean (remember those names) have it wrong:

...One of the Democratic presidential candidates who will be called on to vote on the request, Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), said yesterday that he will vote against the aid for this reason, and Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) seems inclined to follow this irresponsible course. Former Vermont governor Howard Dean's position -- yes, but only if the president comes up with a way to pay for it -- is similarly faulty. As much as we would like to see some tax cuts rolled back, that's not going to happen, at least as part of the current debate. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) had it right the other day, saying that, despite misgivings and his desire to undo some of the tax cuts to pay for it: "We have no choice but to finance this program."

And finally, Canada is considering giving $200million to a UN fund for reconstruction, in addition to the $100million they've already given to UNICEF, CARE and the Red Cross, though they refuse to donate it through the Coalition's fund, prefering a UN-administered account. Apparently, they aren't that picky in how their money is spent.

Three Americans killed as U.S. convoy bombed in Gaza - plus Swine of the Day Award

Haaretz Article - Three Americans killed as U.S. convoy bombed in Gaza

A massive bomb demolished an armor-plated jeep in a convoy carrying U.S. diplomats personnel in the Gaza Strip Wednesday, killing three Americans.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the incident, the first deadly attack on an official American target in the three years of the intifada. Three months ago, a roadside bomb was detonated beside an American convoy traveling in the same area, but without injury, Israel Radio reported.

The American officials were headed Wednesday to discuss the awarding of study grants to Gaza Palestinians.

The victims of the blast were security men hired from a private company, not U.S. government officials. Israel Radio reported that one of the victims was identified as an East Jerusalem resident who was the driver of the vehicle.

The blast went off around 10:15 A.M. Wednesday as a three-car U.S. diplomatic convoy drove near a gas station on the outskirts of the town of Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip, along the main north-south road.

Both the militant Islamic Jihad and Hamas movements denied responsibility for the attack...

...Later in the day, American security officials investigating the bomb attack left the scene abruptly after Palestinian youths threw stones and rocks at them. The investigators were taking pictures of the bloodied, twisted remains of the van when half a dozen kids threw stones and rocks at them as about 200
Palestinians looked on.

Palestinian police fired in the air to chase away the stone throwers, and U.S. officials rushed into their cars and sped off. Palestinian police beat some people in the crowd, while pushing the spectators back...

It's always illuminating to see how people react to events like this. I heard a clip of Wesley Clark on the radio this morning blaming this event on the Bush Administration and their "failed policies" for Middle East peace. I guess that's in contrast to every other American Administration. All I could think was, "what...an...asshole." Clark is clearly attempting to cement his position as political opportunist of the coming century. And this guy is the Democratic front-runner. Yikes. I'll post the exact quote when I can find it.

Tuesday, October 14, 2003

Blog-Iran Update

Here's the latest:

Dear Blogging Compatriots -

This may be the beginning of something big...Lets cross our fingers! Nobel Peace Prize winner and human rights activist Shirin Ebadi has returned to Tehran.. It appears from the latest news reports that thousands of women and others have descended on Tehran's Mehrabad airport for her homecoming... The masses have begun demonstrating in the face of the regimes killers (basiji) with slogans such as "Marg bar Estebdad" (Down with Dictatorship) "Rafsanjani boro gom sho" (Rafsanjani get lost) "Edalat, Azadi" (Justice, Freedom)...

Here are the latest news releases:

(**)Nobel winner Ebadi back in Iran, demands freedom for political prisoners

Nobel Peace Prize winner and human rights activist Shirin Ebadi returned to Tehran, immediately giving a call for the freeing of political prisoners as she was mobbed by thousands of well-wishers. "I hope that all political prisoners will be freed," Ebadi, the first Muslim woman and first Iranian to win the prize, told reporters after she stepped off an Iran Air Boeing 747 from Paris.
Rest of Story.

(**)Thousands descend on Tehran airport to greet Nobel laureate

As the area surrounding the city centre Mehrabad airport was brought to a standstill by bumper-to-bumper traffic, people were seen abandoning their vehicles and covering the final few kilometres (miles) on foot.
Rest of Story.

(**)Welcome Demonstration - END THE REGIME!!!!

Mehrabad Airport today at the 20:50 Local time was center of focus for Iranian who are fed up with this regime. Thousands of welcoming audience are present at the airport but the welcoming ceremony for the winner of Noble Peace Prize is just excuse. They are strongly asking for the end of Islamic Regime. Thousands of protesters are marching in the open area of airport and chanting slogans...
Rest of Story.

Stay tuned to ActivistChat.com for late-breaking developments!!!!

In Unity & Struggle,
ActivistChat.com Team

Defending Amir Taheri

The following is a reply to my item from last month entitled Amir Taheri: Iraq's Odd New 'Friends'. Since the post is old it's likely the reply (in response to another commenter) would never be seen, and since I enjoyed it and its author's conclusion so much, I've decided to post it up here at the top.

I am scandalised by those who attack a person instead of discussing his or her views.

The personal attack against Amir Taheri, one of the most distinguished writers in the Muslim world today,by the gentleman who signs himself as "Ali" is both unjustified and irrelevant to the debate over Iraq.

For years Taheri fought on behalf of the oppressed in Iraq. Although an Iranian, he never allowed his judgement to be clouded by the memory of the war that Saddam Hussein launched against Iran in 1980.

This is why many Iraqis regard Amir Taheri as an honourary citizen of the liberated Iraq.

As an Iraqi I believe that the liberation of my people from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein was a heroic and generous act on the part of the United States and Britain.

To be sure they may have had their own national interests in mind, which is only normal. But in this case their national interests perfectly coincided with ours which was to get rid of the butcher and his regime.

I will judge the US and UK to be " imperialists" only when and if they refuse to leave Iraq after being asked to do so by a freely elected Iraqi government in Bagdad. Jamila Sherian


Chief Wiggles Lives

This front page article from Utah's Deseret News proves it. The volume of stuff The Chief was getting may have temporarily overwhelmed the Army's shipping ability, but things are getting back in hand.

Be sure to keep an eye on the Chief's site for the latest info. According to the site, it's only a matter of days before there's a new US address to ship to. It's become quite an amazing effort. And you can always give straight cash at OperationGive.org as well.

"Geneva Accord: it's not right and certainly not left"

Dov Ivry sent me a pointer to his take on the new Geneva Accord. He's actually got an interesting run-down on the meaning of the Israeli Left and Right in there as well.

When Cuckoo's Nest meets Clockwork Orange

...There is no left-wing in Israel. The rough definition of left and right is related to feelings about property vs poverty; the right protects property and the left tries to do something about poverty. When people in a democracy feel conscience-stricken they vote left. But programs cost money, taxes go up, corruption increases, and when the majority feel they're getting hammered by all the do-gooding, they vote right...

Monday, October 13, 2003

Wasn't Enter the Dragon Set in Rome?

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Martial arts expert kills two raiders

Philip Willan in Rome Monday October 13, 2003

A Chinese martial arts expert was in custody yesterday after turning the tables on four burglars armed with knives, killing two of them and seriously wounding a third.
The 28-year-old man, known as "the doctor" for his practice of acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, managed to seize one of the two knives carried by his assailants and saw off the entire group with the ferocity of his reaction.

Magistrates in the central Italian town of Empoli are now seeking to establish whether his self-defence constituted an excessive use of force.

The butchery, worthy of a Quentin Tarantino film, began shortly before midnight on Friday when the four men knocked at the apartment of a Chinese hairdresser in the centre of Empoli.

The hairdresser, her assistant and "the doctor", who operated from the same premises, were reportedly overpowered and tied up before the group, all thought to be in their 20s and 30s, ransacked the apartment.

Disappointed by their meagre booty, the attackers allegedly threatened to rape the two women unless they told them where the rest of their money was hidden.

At this point the doctor managed to free himself, seize a knife from one of the aggressors and deliver a series of lethal stab wounds.

Investigators found the body of one man, who had been stabbed in the heart, sprawled on the staircase and another man bleeding to death in the street from a wound to his leg. A third man is recovering in hospital from a punctured lung.

The doctor was found crouching in the entrance to the building with cuts to his shoulder, face and hands.

Investigators are trying to determine whether he inflicted the injuries while defending himself inside the apartment, or hunted down the burglars after they had fled.

Yes!

Senator Jay Rockefeller is Swine

Overstating? Maybe, but I'm a bit trapped by my own words.

In my post on Wednesday entitled "What I Think," I wrote (amongst other things):

I think the invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do.

I think that anyone who also thought so, but abandons George Bush or Tony Blair after the fact to score simple political points is swine.

My perception of Senator Rockefeller during the build-up to the War was that he was a pretty good guy. His utterances on FOX and elsewhere struck me as non-partisan and pretty fair to the Bush Administration.

My perception since has been along the lines of "What the hell happened?" He's struck me as one of those guys who let Bush provide the leadership and take the risk, and is now out scoring cowardly BS political points.

Seems I'm not the only one to notice. Matthew Hoy has the goods on an exchange between the Senator and FOX's Tony Snow, who had the goods on Rockefeller. Bravo to Tony Snow.

Link via Instapundit who has another link of interest as well.

Attempted Censorship at Rutgers Rally

(Via Instapundit) Evan Coyne Maloney describes attempts to foil him in his coverage of a pro-Palestinian rally at Rutgers. Evan's previous videos of anti-war rallies, available at his site, are classic material. I can't wait to see the footage of this one.

Lileks fisks Colleen Rowley

Roger L. Simon points us on over to a wonderful James Lileks fisking of FBI whistleblower Colleen Rowley's editorial going after, who else, John Ashcroft. Do yourself a favor and read it!

Blog-Iran Update

Here's the latest from the Blog-Iran crew:

::NEWS ALERTS::

Human Rights Violations in Iran: an Update Blatant violations of human rights marked the end of September 2003.

With the parliament elections five months away, it appears that the hardliners, holding most positions of power (the judiciary, for example), are bent on stepping up their policy of repression against intellectuals, writers, students and political activists, especially those associated with the reformist bloc.

To Continue Reading Visit:
http://activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=287

(**)
EU to Call for Probe in Canadian's Death

European Union foreign ministers are set to ask on Monday for an investigation into the role of the Tehran prosecutor's office in the death of a Canadian journalist, a draft EU document seen by Reuters shows. Iranian human rights lawyer Shirin Ebadi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, agreed to represent in Iran's courts the family of photojournalist Zahra Kazemi, a Canadian citizen of Iranian descent killed in custody in Tehran in June.

[NOTE: sign important petition]

To Continue Reading Visit:
http://activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=289

(**)
Terrorism Headlines of the Week- 10/10/03

*A Strategy for Stemming Terrorists' Financing
*Homeland Security Dept. Planning 7 Offices Overseas to Screen Visas
*FBI Sent Money to Hamas in 1990s
*7 Canadians accused of links to terror still in foreign custody
*Report: Australia may boost funding for pro-Western schools in Indonesia
*US Says Former Suspect Tied To Chechen Terrorists
*Belgium investigates role of suspect Muslim couple in Al-Qa'idah network
*Italian-Moroccan gets 15 years jail for terrorism
To Read Complete Report:
http://activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=288Reports:

(**)
Shirin Ebadi - BIOGRAPHY
[Source: The Norwegian Nobel Committee]
http://activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=279

(**)
A Chance for Change in Iran

With its continued defiance of major international laws and world public opinion, is the international community prepared to confront the immediate threat that the clerical regime in Iran poses?
To Continue Reading Visit:
http://www.activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=260

For Daily News Updates Visit http://www.activistchat.com - and if you
know a blogger who supports the Iranians in their struggle inform him/her of the BLOG-IRAN Grassroots Campaign at http://wwww.activistchat.com/blogiran/


Foggy Bottom's Friends

This Joel Mowbray piece on the State Department relationship with the Saudis is a good read.

It's puzzling to me that Ambassador Joseph Wilson's status as a paid agent of Saudi Arabia through the Saudi-backed Middle East Institute doesn't get more attention. I suppose it's so common, and the people who are in the "Who cares about Wilson/Plame" would rather not bring the entire boring subject up at all, and the people who think the "scandal" is a scandal want to get off of Wilson as an issue, so no one has any real incentive to bring it up. Besides, it'd be unseemly to be seen as smearing the guy at this point wouldn't it?

Foggy Bottom's Friends - Why is the State Department so cozy with the Saudis?

The Middle East Institute, officially on the Saudi payroll, receives some $200,000 of its annual $1.5 million budget from the Saudi government, and an unknown amount from Saudi individuals--often a meaningless distinction since most of the "individuals" with money to donate are members of the royal family, which constitutes the government. MEI's chairman is Wyche Fowler, who was ambassador to Saudi Arabia from 1996-2001, and its president is Ned Walker, who has served as the deputy chief of Mission in Riyadh and ambassador to Egypt.

Also at MEI: David Mack, former ambassador to the United Arab Emirates and deputy assistant secretary for Near Eastern affairs; Richard Parker, former ambassador to Algeria, Lebanon, and Morocco; William Eagleton, former ambassador to Syria; Joseph C. Wilson, career foreign-service office and former deputy chief of mission in Baghdad; David Ransom, former ambassador to Bahrain and former deputy chief of Mission in Yemen, the United Arab Emirates and Syria; and Michael Sterner, former ambassador to the UAE and deputy assistant secretary of Near Eastern affairs.

For Meridian and MEI, at least, the House of Saud is not the only government entity lining up to fund them; Foggy Bottom is as well. Meridian does significant amounts of work with State, particularly in coordinating the International Visitors Program, which determines the individuals and groups invited--and not invited--to Washington for a chance to curry favor with State officials in person. MEI last year was slated to handle a conference of Iraqi dissidents--which was going to exclude the umbrella organization of pro-democracy groups, the Iraqi National Congress--in London. (The conference was cancelled after public outcry over MEI's role.) The grant for holding the conference was a staggering $5 million--more than three times MEI's annual budget.

The money, the favors, and State's affinity for Saudi elites over the decades have all helped contribute to the "special relationship" between State and the House of Saud. Notes Hudson Institute senior fellow Laurent Murawiec, "This is a relationship that has been cemented by 40 years of money, power, and political favors that goes much deeper than most people realize."


Staying Gold

Nothing Gold Can Stay

Nature's first green is gold,
Her hardest hue to hold.
Her early leaf's a flower;
But only so an hour.
Then leaf subsides to leaf.
So Eden sank to grief,
So dawn goes down to day.
Nothing gold can stay.

-- Robert Frost

Frost's beautiful poem is an ode to life's changes. Many will recognize it from its effective use in the film The Outsiders. The point being that nothing living stays pristine and new forever. Life goes on, the flower wilts, the sun goes down, the young man gets wrinkles...nothing gold can stay.

Israeli politics got a piece of gold this week as a group of opposition politicians met unofficially with a group of Palestinians to draft their own peace plan. Leave it to Israeli politics to come up with something odd.

This is like Al Sharpton and Ramsey Clark going off to Miami to negotiate a trade agreement with Cuba.

You know your peace plan has problems when even Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak are saying it's a bad idea.

Peres:

Labor Chairman Shimon Peres refused to take part in the agreement because it makes reference to UN Resolution 194 that the Palestinians see as the basis for their “right of return,” and which Peres described as a danger to Israel. Earlier Sunday it was reported that the Palestinians had relinquished their claim to a “right of return.”

Barak:

The unofficial draft peace agreement cobbled together by Palestinians and Israeli left-wing opposition members is "delusional," former prime minister Ehud Barak said Monday.

Barak - who has not returned to the Knesset since he left office in 2001 after offering the Palestinians far-reaching concessions for peace during his tenure as Labor leader - told Israel Radio he was sorry that the Labor Party had permitted a few of its members to formulate such a "delusional" peace plan as the Geneva Accord.

"This is a fictive and slightly peculiar agreement... that clearly harms the interests of the State of Israel," said Barak.

"Fictive"...heh. Well, it's true. This is the Ivory Tower fantasy writ large. The only possible purpose to this agreement is to discredit the government the Israeli electorate overwhelmingly selected in favor of the one they overwhelmingly rejected. A group of people with no power to implement negotiating with another group of people with no power to implement - even if they would or could, which is by no means certain. Cracks already show:

Also Monday, former Palestinian prisoner affairs minister Hisham Abd al-Raziq was quoted in the Al-Quds newspaper as saying that the unofficial draft peace agreement completed Sunday does not include a Palestinian concession on the right of return. Abd al-Raziq was a member of the Palestinian negotiating team.

Such a concession, which the Palestinians have agreed to exchange for Palestinian sovereignty over the Temple Mount, comprises the core of the agreement, known as the Geneva Accord.

In reaction to Abd al-Raziq's remark, Meretz MK Haim Oron, a member of the Israeli negotiating team, said the Palestinians had agreed to concede the right of return and to solve the "refugee" issue outside the borders of Israel, Israel Radio reported.

However, Abd al-Raziq's statement appears to be partly a semantic comment on what the "right of return" actually means. Israel Radio quoted Abd al-Raziq as saying that those "refugees" who do return to Israel would be able to do so only with Israeli agreement, and that some Palestinians will remain in the countries where they now live or be absorbed by the Palestinian Authority - precisely the terms of the accord.

The agreement, though, also explicitly calls for the Palestinians to concede the right of return, and says that a decision to allow the limited number of Palestinians to settle in Israel will not be defined as realization of the right of return.

On a substantive level, Abd al-Raziq seems to be committing to the same treatment of "refugees" as the agreement specifies. However, his explicit rejection of a Palestinian concession of the right of return, despite the equally explicit wording of the agreement demanding such a concession, could be interpreted as a contradiction of the peace draft.

It would seem fairly important to get such "semantic" issues settled early on, and the fact that there are already disputes as to terminology despite explicit language in the agreement is not a good sign. This is the type of thing that can and has scuttled such agreements. In real, implemented agreements, seemingly small differences loom large. Where the rubber hits the road is where the skid begins. Fortunately, odds are that this one's never going to leave the show room.

We can look for other danger signs in the agreement that might instruct as to how things would work out if it did get out on the city streets:

* The Palestinians will pledge to prevent terror and incitement and disarm all militias. Their state will be demilitarized, and border crossings will be supervised by an international, but not Israeli, force.

The Palestinians are already under such an agreement, in substantial part. They are even now required to end incitement and disarm the "militias." Leaving aside the more difficult disarmament, an end to incitement ought to be the easiest thing possible and is in direct control of the PA. They could stop incitefull broadcasts, and curb the cult of Jew-hatred and suicide bombing they have created. Of course, they have taken no steps toward these things.

There is an elected government in Israel who is responsible for implementing policy and the Israeli electorate will determine whether that government is carrying out their will properly or not. Fantastic agreements entered into by an Israeli Left desperate to be used again ought not to be allowed to make the task of the government more difficult than it already is.

Hopefully this new "Geneva Accord" will be printed on beautiful and expensive acid-free paper stock, and hung in lovely frames for all to see and marvel at - a piece of printed artwork. It would be fitting, I think, because it is certainly destined to 'Stay Gold' forever.

Sunday, October 12, 2003

"Najaf Witness - Key to Ayatollah Hakim's Murder"

I received the following in an email. I'm not sure of where it's copied from, but I thought it might be of interest:

> Najaf Witness - Key to Ayatollah Hakim's Murder

Amir Farshad Ebrahimi, is an ex-vigilante who repented from his past after the student uprising in 1999. His video of confessions which was given to the Iranian Nobel Peace Priize winner, lawyer and human rights activist Shirin Ebadi made the headlines, but also resulted in Shirin Ebadi's suspended sentence and ban from her profession.

Amir Farshad Ebrahimi escaped from the Islamic Republic few months ago. In this revealing interview he sheds some light on the role of Islamic Republic of Iran in the current wave of terror and assassination in Iraq, and in particular the assassination of Ayatollah Hakim.

Hakim was hosted by the mullahs in Iran during the Saddam years but welcomed the overthrow of Saddam by the Allied forces.

The following interview was carried out with AFE on 9th October.

Q- You said on Thursday that you received information from a person who was directly involved in the assassination of Hakim. How exactly did you receive this information?

A- I received an email a couple of days ago from someone whose name was familiar but I really got to recognise him from his photo. With more
correspondence I got to know more about him. He is one of the officers of the Ghods division. We were together during the training period. For now I just refer to him as the Najaf Witness.He claims he was part of the team that carried out the assassination of Hakim and his entourage.

Q- What does the Najaf witness claim?

A- He claimed that the Ghods division received a mission from the Supreme Leader's office within the framework of the "Abedoon" project. The project was to ensure that the Shiite clergy in Iraq remain under the influence of the Supreme Leader. Najaf Witness claims he and three others were assigned the task of assassinating Ayatollah Hakim.

They entered Iraq via the land borders under the cover of State Radio and TV broadcasting reporters. On the very last day of the mission another person joined their group and provided them with the explosives.

Q- Why has the Najaf witness now escaped from Iran?

A- He claims one month after the assassination he has witnessed the suspicious deaths of the three other members of the assassination team. The first died in Baghiollah hospital from food poisoning. The second one died in a driving accident in Babayii Highway on his return from the military college. The third one apparently died when accidentally shot by a guard.

After hearing about these suspicious deaths he decided to flee Iran and save his life. I also know the third person who was killed. His name was Asgari and he was also with me in the military college. The Kayhan daily also printed the
announcement of his wake.

Q- How genuine is his claims in your opinion?

A- There is no doubt that he is an officer in the Ghods division, he was in the military college with me during training and had I stayed on I would have been the same rank as him. I also sent his photo to Ayatollah Hakim's brother. They confirmed that they met up with him before the Friday prayer which led to Hakim's death.

Q- What information do you have about the present situation of the Najaf Witness?

A- I am in constant correspondence with him. He is extremely scared and is in hiding. He is convinced that his former colleagues have the orders to kill him too.

Regards,

P A


Another One Bites the Dust

Arafat has driven another puppet who wouldn't play along from power.

Palestinian PM Says He Won't Keep Job

JERUSALEM (AP) -- Interim Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia told the ruling Fatah party Sunday he does not intend to seek the job when a new Cabinet is formed in three weeks, Fatah officials said.

Speaking after a meeting of the Fatah central committee, Qureia would only say that a new government would be formed in three weeks "with a new prime minister, too."

Qureia currently heads an emergency Cabinet appointed a week ago by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Over the past week, though, he has clashed bitterly with Arafat about who would be the new security chief and whether Arafat had the power to appoint a Cabinet by decree.

On Sunday, Qureia told Fatah officials he did not intend to stay on as prime minister when the emergency government's term expires in three weeks.

If Qureia follows through, he would be the second Palestinian prime minister to give up the job since last month.

His predecessor, Mahmoud Abbas, resigned last month after just four months in office, caught between Israeli demands for a crack down on militants and Arafat's refusal to give up any power over security forces.


Will: "Don't Count on Oil Spoils"

George Will says we ought not to be relying on oil revenues alone in Iraq, that Iraq has other assets, human assets, and that rebuilding with loans is a bad idea.

Don't Count on Oil Spoils (washingtonpost.com)

...Iraq's second asset, what McPherson calls "an entrepreneurial spirit you can still feel," is a rarity -- a pleasant postwar surprise. It exists partly because of an unpleasant aspect of prewar Iraq -- pandemic corruption. That was a hard school, always in session, teaching participants how to operate in the interstices of rules and in the shadowy conditions of the black market. McPherson notes that unlike the Soviet Union, Hussein's Iraq never nationalized retailing, which was a whetstone that kept commercial skills sharp.

Oil will eventually lubricate Iraq's financial revival. At least it will unless it provokes shortsighted American parsimony that could have costly political as well as economic consequences...

...It would be fun to forgive the debts contracted by a regime that ruled against the interests of the Iraqi people, money owed to nations that opposed the liberation of those people who are saddled with the debt. Fun, but improvident: Chaos in international finance would result from making the validity of nations' debts contingent on the virtues, or continuity, of nations' regimes.

Besides, McPherson says he has spoken with many Iraqis, and "they do not say we came to steal their oil. But if we load them with debt payable by oil revenues . . ." Enough said.


Red Sox Idiocy

Boston.com / Sports / Baseball / Red Sox / More ugliness gives teams, game black eye

Jackie MacMullan has it about right in this piece about last night's Red Sox insanity. I've seen this so many times - the Sox get all crazy, they lose their composure, get emotional, and it NEVER works in their favor. Nobody looked good last night, and the score was the worst part. People thought it would be different this year? Ha! It's the same old story.

...Martinez was out of line for throwing at Garcia. Zimmer was certifiably crazy to try to be Rocky Balboa at his age. Ramirez overreacted to Clemens's pitch, and looked all the worse for it after he struck out on the same at-bat. No Red Sox employee should be waving towels in the Yankees bullpen. No New York relievers should be punching anybody for waving a towel.

It's the same old story. The Red Sox behaved badly, and lost. The Yankees behaved badly, and won.

Which team would you rather be?


"Bosnia offers lesson in nation building"

Now I had thought that the American-lead reconstruction in Iraq was actually going better than what was happening with the UN-lead Bosnia reconstruction. But that's not the implication of this thinly-veiled Boston Globe editorial masquerading as hard news ironically sub-titled, "Perseverance, patience pay off."

Boston.com / News / World / Europe / Bosnia offers lesson in nation building

The relative success of the peacekeeping mission in Bosnia, officials here say, provides valuable lessons as the United States and its allies debate how to reverse the increasingly deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Is it really deteriorating? Spectacular events continue, such as last night's car bombing in Baghdad, but us it really getting worse? It doesn't sound like it. And who are these "officials" who's remarks the Globe correspondent chose to build his story around? Why, UN officials, of course.

Nevertheless, the Bosnian experience illustrates the importance of international legitimacy, a multinational approach, a long-term commitment of money and resources, sufficient troop numbers, and close military-civilian coordination, officials and analysts say.

It also demonstrates that unglamorous workaday efforts -- like training a competent police force, judiciary, and civil service; building functioning educational and health care systems; and assuring that basic public services are delivered -- require as much advance planning and strategic thinking as a military campaign...

So, every experience is different, unless we need some ammo to bash the Bush administration, then we'll be sure to throw around some buzz-words like "international legitimacy" and "international approach" so you can make your own conclusions.

For the other side of just how effective the UN can be in reconstruction efforts, check out this Stephen Schwartz piece on the UN's efforts in Kosovo.

Saturday, October 11, 2003

Austrians in praise of Arnold

It's amazing what one has to put up with when one gets into politics. This article should help in setting the "Arnold, Nazi or no?" debate to rest.

OpinionJournal - Our Hometown Boy - Austria raises a toast to Arnold Schwarzenegger By Alfred Gerstl And Albert Kaufmann

GRAZ, Austria--Those of us from his hometown here who have known Arnold Schwarzenegger a long time--indeed consider him a friend--never had any doubt that he could win the California election to become governor.

First, America is the land of immigrants: Where else but in America could an immigrant, a former bodybuilder turned Hollywood star, become governor? Second, as we know well, the word that defines Arnold is "discipline"; what he sets his mind to he gets. He would not be derailed by the lies that were told about him or by those dismissive of his abilities.

About the lies, let's be done with those right away. Not only is Arnold not a Hitler sympathizer; he actively helped both of us in our battles against neo-Nazis here in Austria. This help began very early in Arnold's teenage years and continued after he became a Hollywood star. Arnold did not forget us or his obligation to his hometown.

One of us (Alfred Gerstl) was a leader of the partisan resistance against the Nazi occupation and his grandfather was Cantor at a New York synagogue. On being released from prison in 1945, I determined to always make sure those around me understood the evil of Nazism. As Arnold was growing up, he used to listen intently to what I had to say. He worked out with my son Karl, and they and their friends would congregate at the Gerstl house afterward.

Once, in 1964, I took Arnold to see a lecture on Nazi crimes that a professor had organized here in Graz. Arnold was very affected by what he heard. Neo-Nazis had organized a demonstration against this professor, and I put together a counter-demonstration. There was an altercation, which was a foolish move for the other side since at that time Arnold had already begun working out with weights.

...Now a word about America. No one here was in the least surprised that America has embraced an immigrant in this way. America freed us from the Nazi period; America liberated the concentration camps. We Austrians are not just very fond of America, we admire it too. Nor is this just a generational thing for people with memories of the war. Our youth watches MTV and is every bit as influenced by the U.S. as we were. Our societies are very similar. So in Graz we're raising a toast to Arnold, our hometown boy, who now leads one of the most powerful states in our most important ally, the U.S.


What the invasion stopped

Norman Geras points to this Washington Post article about the Abu Ghraib prison. When you hear people trying to make the humanitarian case against the invasion, remember the complaints about the sanctions, and remember Abu Ghraib...

...In the interrogation room, the hoods were removed. The prisoners had their hands tied behind their backs with cuffs and rope; Faraj's wrist is still cross-hatched with scars from when he was bound. They were then hoisted by a rope attached to a hook in the ceiling so they dangled above the ground, the tendons in their shoulders tearing under the strain. The ball and socket in the shoulders of some prisoners completely rotated, Attar said.

The prisoners were lashed with cables. Clips were attacked to their earlobes, nipples and genitals and they were administered electric shocks. When they passed out, as they almost invariably did, they were dragged back to the corridor and cuffed again to the radiator, a dozen former prisoners recalled in interviews.

This torture continued for several days, hours at a time, even after the prisoners broke. Nearly all eventually signed forced confessions put in front of them and stamped them with a single fingerprint, their hands lifted to the paper by the guards because the prisoners no longer had the strength.

Prisoners who held out longer than expected were subject to further horrors. Faraj saw his mother dragged in front of him. His mother's gown was roughly lifted, exposing her bare legs and underwear as the police said they would rape her. The humiliation, he said, was unbearable. Kharqani and two other inmates were forced to watch three other prisoners killed with acid...


Friday, October 10, 2003

Shoah

Claude Lanzmann's epic 9-hour Holocaust documentary, Shoah has finally been released on DVD. I had never seen the film, so I added it to my NetFlix queue. I received the first disc of the film yesterday and popped it in the DVD player just to check it out for a moment. About an hour and a half later I decided it was time for bed so I turned it off, only to return to finish this first (of four, apparently) part up when I got home this evening.

Lanzmann's film is subtly, but deeply riveting. There are no action scenes here. There is no stirring score. It's just people talking and views of the places as they exist now - no reconstructions. People talk - the survivors, their kids, the guards, the men who drove the trains, the people who farmed the fields around the camps and the residents of the towns. It's difficult to turn away. The editing is simple and effective. The length is fine. This is an important subject and the viewer wants nothing left out. I can always skip around later if I choose, but I want to know every little bit has been recorded, and I want to determine for myself what parts are important and what could be cut. Believe me, the clock flies as you watch.

I think that everyone should have the experience of watching such a film. I'm anxious to receive the next disc.

Reuters and the *ISRAEL OUT* Phenomenon

Krauthammer: WMD In a Haystack

Krauthammer says Saddam was a master of just-in-time manufacturing.

WMD In a Haystack (washingtonpost.com)

...Ekeus theorizes that Hussein decided years ago that it was unwise to store mustard gas and other unstable and corrosive poisons in barrels, and also difficult to conceal them. Therefore, rather than store large stocks of weapons of mass destruction, he would adapt the program to retain an infrastructure (laboratories, equipment, trained scientists, detailed plans) that could "break out" and ramp up production when needed. The model is Japanese "just in time" manufacturing, where you save on inventory by making and delivering stuff in immediate response to orders. Except that Hussein's business was toxins, not Toyotas.

The interim report of chief U.S. weapons inspector David Kay seems to support the Ekeus hypothesis. He found infrastructure, but as yet no finished product.

As yet, mind you. "We are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapons stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone," Kay testified last week.

This is fact, not fudging. How do we know? Because Hussein's practice was to store his chemical weapons unmarked amid his conventional munitions, and we have just begun to understand the staggering scale of Hussein's stocks of conventional munitions. Hussein left behind 130 known ammunition caches, many of which are more than twice the size of Manhattan. Imagine looking through "600,000 tons of artillery shells, rockets, aviation bombs and other ordnance" -- rows and rows stretched over an area the size of even one Manhattan -- looking for barrels of unmarked chemical weapons...


UPI: Saudi Arabia on verge of U.S. blacklist

Saudi Arabia on verge of U.S. blacklist - The Washington Times: United Press International

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 (UPI) -- The United States is trying to keep Saudi Arabia from falling into a status that would prompt an arms embargo against the kingdom, a report said Friday.

In what Middle East Newsline called a "last ditch effort," the Bush administration dispatched a senior State Department official to Riyadh earlier this week to discuss a draft of a report that detailed major Saudi violations of religious rights.

The envoy was said to have sought assurances from the Saudi government it would change its policy.

The State Department was to have relayed its annual International Religious Freedom Report to Congress by Sept. 30. The report was meant to have addressed demands by a panel mandated by Congress to deem Saudi Arabia as a "country of particular concern," a term reserved for a leading violator of religious freedom.

But, officials now say the State Department report will be delayed until at least mid-November.

How would you keep a nation like Saudi Arabia, one of the most religiously represive in the world, off of such a list? Simple. Don't publish the report.

House panel OKs $86.9 billion for Iraq efforts

Hopefully this result presages the results in the full House.

House panel OKs $86.9 billion for Iraq efforts - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics

Top Republicans, led by President Bush himself, yesterday turned back efforts to make Iraqis pay to rebuild their country, as the House Appropriations Committee approved an additional $86.9 billion to help create a Muslim democracy in the Middle East.

The measure still faces additional hurdles on the House floor next week and more in the Senate. But if the bill, which passed the committee on a 47-14 vote, succeeds, Americans will shoulder the entire burden for continued military occupation there, as well as for rebuilding Iraqi roads, water systems and hospitals...


Thursday, October 9, 2003

Thomas Friedman is still insane

That's the only way I can explain this latest ode to appeasement from the Times columnist, and this fresh off Sunday's appeal to raise the gas tax.

Now that Syria is nervous, and Iran is paying attention, Friedman believes it's time to ease up on all of them and appeal to their better natures. In the hope that bringing them into the fold will turn them into sheep, Friedman advocates using the nervous feelings Arafat, the Syrians and Iranians must have now to get them to start helping us with the stabilization of Iraq and resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Yeah, and monkeys might fly outa my butt. We all do understand that none of the afformentioned entities have any interest whatsoever in a stable, democratic Iraq, right? That it's in their natures to double-deal?

Friedman seems to imply from his article that we are doing nothing but sabre-rattling toward the axis of Middle-East evil, but there's little doubt that action is already going on behind the scenes. What does Friedman think, that we're on the verge of a Syria/Iran invasion? If only.

Friedman's suggestions are pregnant with Oslo-era wishful thinking and straw-man creations of a simplistic Bush foreign policy, not to mention a silly cheap shot against Sharon's military policies, which Charles Johnson correctly points out are, in fact, working. Friedman never actually tells us how we're supposed to get the bad guys to do what we want, merely that we should try, as if it hasn't all been tried before. Wonderful.

This column, with its simple "tell us what we don't already know" logic is simple fluff, and when you add in the Oslo redux subtext it's dangerous fluff at that.

MEMRI: "Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Editor: Iran's Nuclear Weapons a Threat to Arab and Islamic Countries"

MEMRI: Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Editor: Iran's Nuclear Weapons a Threat to Arab and Islamic Countries

MEMRI with a translation of a translation of an editorial appearing in a London-based Saudi daily suggesting that the real threat from Iranian nuclear weapons is not toward Israel or the USA, but towards the other states in the region.

The Primary Target: Pakistan

"If you want to be foolish, you have to believe that Iran is producing its nuclear bomb in order to attack Israel; you'll turn into a complete idiot if you believe it's producing it in order to confront the U.S. The Iranians are enriching uranium to produce nuclear weapons aimed, essentially, at its neighbors, mainly Pakistan. However, the danger encompasses the other neighboring countries as well, such as Saudi Arabia, Oman, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan, which share with Iran a land border of 5,400 km and a sea border of 2,400 km.

"I don't need anyone to remind me that nuclear bombs are not artillery fired from across a border, and that with [suitable] launching facilities they are capable of reaching the end of the world. What I mean is that it is hard to believe the claim that Iran's purpose in producing nuclear weapons is to attain balance with Israel due to the enormity of the Israeli arsenal and [Israel's] technological superiority. Likewise, it is inconceivable that we believe Iran will do what the Russians – with the second largest nuclear arsenal in the world – were incapable of doing, and will enter into nuclear confrontation with Washington." ...

'We Have Used Conventional Weapons More Against Each Other Than Against Israel'

"We have used conventional weapons more against each other than against Israel, and this situation will not change tomorrow if we add nuclear bombs to our arsenals. I understand Iran's motivation for producing nuclear bombs. Iran saw the world's indifference over neighboring Pakistan's acquisition of nuclear weapons. And Pakistan itself produced them after India revealed its own nuclear arsenal. [These were considered by Iran as] sufficient reason to achieve regional balance. However, Iran, unlike the two countries of the Indian subcontinent, realized… that it is sitting on one of the most important and sensitive international centers of conflict.

"It would be a mistake to come to the defense of our neighbor Iran out of ignorance and on the pretext of deterring Israel. The Iranian nuclear danger threatens us, first and foremost, more than it threatens the Israelis and the Americans."

Saddam killed more Muslims than Israel or the USA ever did. It doesn't take a great deal of creative thought to imagine that the Mullahs might end up doing the same.

JPost: 'Report: Arafat has 'stomach cancer''

Israel News : Report: Arafat has 'stomach cancer'

The recent working diagnosis is that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat is suffering from stomach cancer, Time Magazine reportrf Thursday, basing its story on a source inside Arafat's compound.

"Our source has been reliable in everything he's given us in the past," said a Time correspondent.

On Wednesday, The Guardian quoted an unidentified aide close to Arafat as saying he had a "slight heart attack" last week, adding that the incident was kept secret for fear of creating panic. A senior aide said however that "the report about the heart attack is a complete lie."

At the beginning of last week, Arafat was visited by doctors from Jordan after a three-day illness, reported to be flu.


Sign of the Yeti?

Looks more like Roy's revenge to me.

BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Siberia find revives yeti legends

Siberian scientists say they have a discovery on their hands which raises the possibility that the local legend of the yeti - the abominable snowman - is more than mere fiction. According to Russian TV, the well-preserved furry limb of a mystery creature was found some 3,500 metres up in the permafrost of the Altay mountains, in Russia's remote Siberia region.

"I turned the limb over and examined the sole of the foot, and I thought it looked unsual," Sergey Semenov, the mountain-climber who made the find, said.

"So I decided to bring it back with me."

Scientific tests and X-rays show that the bones are several thousand years old, but attempts to identify the creature they belonged to remain inconclusive.

Local opinion on the find, described as "surprisingly well-preserved", is divided.

There is a long tradition of alleged sightings in the area of what might - or might not - be the abominable snowman...


Wednesday, October 8, 2003

Good Start!

Sox 5
Yankees 2

They needed that. Good confidence-building. Grab that first win in Yankee Stadium and do it with Wakefield, not Martinez. Wakefield either has a very good night, or a very bad night, and tonight he had a very good night. The knuckleball was dancing away. The bullpen has begun pulling its weight as well which is a great sign.

David Ortiz may have the largest head ever seen on a human being. It was great to see him finally pull out of his hitting funk with an absolute monster, no-doubt homer. I love it when they beat Mussina, who certainly had an off night.

The Sox defense was solid and good to watch. Doug Mirabelli did a stellar job catching Wakefield, and had a hit. He's my man, and deserves more playing time, as does Gabe "Super-Jew" Kapler. Thank you.

Todd Walker's shot off the foul pole (or off the dope-hand) was a homer all the way. Yankees fans need to learn to keep their cotton-pickin' hands OUT of the field of play.

Bret Boone of the Seattle Mariners was the extra guy in the booth for FOX. He didn't add too much. Speak up more boy! We want to hear your "active player" insights. If you think someone's a chump, say they're a chump. If you liked something, tell us. Advice to FOX: If you're going to use these players for for interesting commentary during the game, keep some booze in the booth and let them have a few pops. That'll keep things loose!

Now do it again!

Norman Geras: "For Shame"

Norman Geras takes on one of the Left's disturbing moral lapses:

...The suggestion that suicide bombings are 'about' the injustices done to the Palestinian people and the grievances arising from these is a miserable piece of apologetics, half saying what it doesn't have the courage to say openly. Yes, suicide bombings arise in the same political context as the context McGreal invokes by saying that that is what they are about, but the context doesn't justify them - any more than the war against terrorism justifies the use of torture (if it is true that the Americans are handing over people for torture to other national agencies). Suicide bombings are not just carried out by aggrieved people. They are part of a planned and co-ordinated strategy by Palestinian political organizations, directed against a civilian population. This makes them crimes against humanity according to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court - endorsed as being such by Human Rights Watch. It bears repeating and then repeating once more. Suicide bombings are crimes against humanity, the concept of which emerged during the twentieth century precisely in order to put moral constraints upon what states and other organized political entities could do or require in pursuit of their objectives. Not even the struggle on behalf of a just cause legitimates them. They should be unreservedly condemned by everyone with civilized values and not 'understood', unless in the non-condoning sense of that word, where the effort of understanding is in order the better to oppose and combat them. Suicide bombings are no more 'about' the occupation or 'about' Jewish settlements than genocide is 'about' war...

What I think.

I think that Affirmative Action probably seemed like a good idea at the time.

I think that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.

I think that a marriage should be judged by the level of commitment of the partners, one to another, and not the genitalia of the partners.

I think it doesn't matter if you call it a marriage or a domestic partnership.

I think that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and that it matters what kind of man you are.

I think that people in public office hold a sacred trust.

I think it's great when non-career politicians run for political office.

I think patriotism is important.

I think it's important to keep an open mind, but not so open that just anyone can throw their garbage in.

I think capitalism is a great system, and that it is a system who's morals are informed by its practitioners, and that morals should never be divorced from the system.

I think no one should be fired or tarred forever for saying one stupid thing.

I think the decision to drop the atomic bombs to end WW2 was justified and correct.

I think Israel is justified in building a fence or taking any other action they feel is necessary to protect their citizens and their country.

I think that both America and Israel are very reluctant to go to war, but that when either does, considering their abilities, they run the most humane conflicts the world has seen in war.

I think the invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do.

I think that anyone who also thought so, but abandons George Bush or Tony Blair after the fact to score simple political points is swine.

I think it's at least possible Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11.

I think the War in Iraq was a necessary step in shaking up the Middle East and making terrorism expensive to its sponsors.

I think there's no such thing as Neo-Colonialism unless "neo" means "not."

I think there's no such thing as Cultural-Imperialism unless people are forced at gunpoint to adopt another culture.

I think the government should take steps to seriously curb illegal immigration, and work out new immigration rules if necessary for economic reasons.

I think that when the government subsidizes something, they are encouraging that thing, and that that includes single motherhood, split families, under-employment and poverty.

I think a basic social safety-net is a good thing, but that generally speaking, a welfare state is a bad thing.

I think Communism is a religion and as murderous as Nazism without the racial element.

I think a religion like Judaism with a history of thousands of years must serve some element of human nature in a positive manner to have survived so long.

I think organized religion doesn't really do it for me, but that I have nothing against religious people as long as they would make a good next door neighbor.

I think Darwin had it basically right, and that religion and science ought not to be mixed in the classroom.

I think that no flying saucer crash-landed at Roswell, New Mexico, and that it's very unlikely that anyone claiming to have been kidnapped by aliens really was.

I think that the human mind is very good at seeking-out patterns, and that there is no future-history built into the Pyramids of Egypt and that Nostradamus couldn't have predicted the next day's weather, let alone prophesied the future.

I think that people's pursuit of "the golden mean" is one of the biggest obstacles to finding working solutions to serious problems.

I think a woman should have the right to choose.

I think that it's important to vote on the basis of good public policy, and secondarily on what's good for me, personally, because good policy will be good for me.

I think the spread of unconventional weapons is one of the biggest threats we face in the future.

I think that people who serve the public, such as police, firefighters and soldiers are heroes, but that it doesn't excuse them when they break the law.

I think that guilty murderers deserve to die, but I worry greatly about an innocent person being executed.

I think this list has gone on long enough...for now.

Turkey approves peacekeeping troops for Iraq

Turkey approves peacekeeping troops for Iraq - The Washington Times: World

Turkish lawmakers yesterday overwhelmingly approved a U.S. request to send peacekeeping troops to neighboring Iraq, despite the deep misgivings of senior members of the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council.

The 358-183 vote in the Turkish parliament seemed certain to improve ties with Washington that were badly strained by Turkey's failure to back President Bush in the war to oust Saddam Hussein...

But the Iraqi Governing Council is not thrilled:

..."The Governing Council's stand is against the presence of troops from neighboring countries without exception, and Turkey is one of these countries," said Nabeil al-Moussawi of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), whose head Ahmad Chalabi had been a leading U.S. ally in the run-up to the war and now sits on the IGC.

"We believe any interference from a neighboring country, either north, south, west or east, is unacceptable," Mouwafak Al-Rabii, a Shi'ite council member and longtime human rights activist, told reporters in Baghdad. "This interference is unacceptable."...

We'll see how it plays out...

Palestinian Media Watch Bulletin - Official PA TV: Israel will be destroyed through violence

Via email from PMW. Not online yet, so I've reproduced it here in full.

Official PA TV: Israel will be destroyed through violence

by Itamar Marcus


Introduction
While the Palestinian Authority (PA) gives lip service in English to condemning PA terrorism, in Arabic its official TV continues to promote and glorify violence, presenting it this openly last week as the means to destroy of Israel.

PA TV started re-broadcasting a short clip that reaffirms the fundamental PLO- PA message, that the goal and end result of Palestinian violence will be Israel's destruction. In this visually powerful clip, the PA conquest of Israel is depicted by visual symbols accompanied by verbal messages in song.

The Visual depicts three stages.

Stage 1- A heart is dripping blood beneath a formation in the shape of Israel, symbolizing pain, loss or sacrifice because of or linked to Israel's existence.

Stage 2- Arms grasping stones sprout from the land all over Israel, symbolizing violent attacks throughout Israel.

Stage 3- The PA flag appears, covers all of Israel and then rests above Israel, symbolizing the PA conquest of all of Israel.

The words sung while the PA flag hovers over Israel, include:

"Allah Akbar! [Allah is Great] Oh, the young ones,
Shake the earth, raise the stones
You will not be saved, Oh Zionist,
From the volcano of my county's stones.
You will not be saved, Oh Zionist,
From the volcano of my county's stones.
You are the target of my eyes"

Click here to see the full video

This video was broadcast twice on PA TV** this week. [Sept. 29-30 2003]

[**PA TV is owned and totally controlled by the Palestinian Authority.]


Tuesday, October 7, 2003

South Park Republicans

Huh...Upon reading Classical Values, I find that I just may be a South Park Republican.

South Park Republicans are true Republicans, though they do not look or act like Pat Robertson. They believe in liberty, not conformity. They can enjoy watching The Sopranos even if they are New Jersey Italians. They can appreciate the tight abs of Britney Spears or Brad Pitt without worrying about the nation's decaying moral fiber. They strongly believe in liberty, personal responsibility, limited government, and free markets. However, they do not live by the edicts of political correctness.

The South Park Republicans are an incredibly diverse group encompassing a variety of nontraditional conservatives, such as the Terminator, Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bruce Willis supported Republicans because of their commitment to lower taxes and fiscal discipline. Rap artist and movie actor LL Cool J recently endorsed NY governor George Pataki.

Here's me as a South Park character:

You can do your own self-portrait here.

Monday, October 6, 2003

I Almost Dropped Dead

Couldn't they just come out and put up ten runs in the first inning? Y'know, get it the hell over with quick so we can like, relax? Sweet lord almighty.

The collision between Johnny Damon and Damion Jackson was freakin' ugly. I couldn't believe they kept playing it over and over again. It...looked...painful.

Yeah, Manny hotdogged his homerun a bit, but please, announcers, get over it already. The guy's been sucking, and in his childish enthusiasm he went a little overboard. (C'mon Psycho Lyons, like you never did anything dippy.)

Jason Varitek has gigantor catcher thighs.

Derek Lowe needed that victory. That should give him confidence for anything. I couldn't believe he came back with that same pitch for the third out he got the second one with. It had to be perfect and it damn well was.

This year feels right...but I'll believe it when I see it.

BTW, my dad swears he saw Theo Epstein in Temple this morning here in Boston.

Totalitarian Point - No Counterpoint?

A reader has sent the following letter to NPR and forwarded me a copy. This brings up the issue of Western journalists' use of sources and voices who live in societies where speech is not protected, and either failing to inform the audience of the fact, or failing to provide any voice in counterpoint. The news consumer needs to be so very savvy these days. It's very dangerous to let any particular program or even a particular source inform one's views.

Attached is a letter I sent to NPR about their use of Lebanese quislings as if they were real journalists. Feel free to use it if you think it worthwhile.

Despite my google skills I cannot find the names of the murdered editors.

Contemporary discussion of Lebanese press freedom seems to be about minor trivia in a system that is entirely subservient to the Syrian secret police.
===
Dear Ms. Wertheimer:

Sunday morning 10/5/03 you interviewed Ziad Haidar, a Lebanese "journalist" based in Damascus.

As you surely must know, the free lebanese press was annihilated in the 1970's by Syrian secret police/Ba'ath party death squads that operated with impunity inside Lebanon in the period immediately preceeding that country's civil war.

In particular, the two leading moderate democratic newspaper editors/publishers--pillars of Lebanon's multi-cultural society-- were abducted and tortured to death. And unlike the situation in Argentina, where the torturers carefully concealed their crimes out of concern for world opinion, the Syrian death squads actually advertised their unspeakable actions. They dumped the bodies in downtown Beirut so that the marks of torture were plain for all to see. The rest of the press had to chose either flight or collaboration.

And now a generation later, here you are on NPR stepping over the mutilated bodies of those editors so you can interview one of the collaborators. By presenting this Quisling to your listeners as a free journalist you create a grossly misleading impression of Arab society, and you defile the memory of those Lebanese editors who gave their lives for freedom of the press.

Addendum:

Before I could finish composing this letter, you did it again. Bob Edwards interviewed Rami Khouri--an EDITOR in Beirut. No doubt these Lebanese "journalists" are articulate, urbane and seemingly moderate.

And this apparently is sufficient for you to ignore the fact that they serve at the pleasure of those who butchered their predecessors in full view of the world press.

-[x]
Salem, Oregon

My own Googling turned up the following interesting item from CAMERA which also provides some informative reading.

In the Palestinians’ Pocket: Journalists doing PR for the PA:

In a revealing episode, Italy’s state television network RAI has had to recall its correspondent from Jerusalem after he sent a letter to the Palestinian Authority stressing his support for the Palestinian cause. The journalist, Riccardo Cristiano, explained that, contrary to rumors, his station was not responsible for video of the brutal October 12th murder of two Israeli men by a Palestinian lynch mob at the Ramallah police station. The letter, apparently intended to be confidential, was published Monday in the official PA newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida. (AP, October 18, 2000)

Cristiano asked that Palestinians be informed that it was a rival Italian network, the privately owned Mediaset, that had shot and broadcast the footage. He assured the PA that his network would never act in such a way:[...]

California Recall Musings

Roger L. Simon says he'll be holding his nose and voting for Arnold, after all, at least he's awake, while Gerard Van Der Leun plants one right on the chin of a certain California Governor in this colorful piece Preparing for the American Political Priesthood.

...Our sermon for today is "What doth it profit a man to gain the office of dogcatcher or above, if he must bid adieu to his sexuality in late childhood?" It obviously has profited Gray Davis since he has no discernible sexuality whatsoever. Wrath would seem to be his sin, but wrath well hidden. With no photos of his frothing rage or tape of his highly pungent obscenity streams this sin gets a pass by the media. Besides since they really can't put it on the air in family hour, what good would it do? Indeed, the only sexually charged photo ops for Davis involve being seen with proven sexual predators of the Clintonian persuasion to enhance his prospects of clinging to his job. But since neither knows what the meaning of is is, another hall pass is issued by the media...

I'm with them, not that it matters.

Instapundit's Positive News From Iraq

Examining Food Aid to North Korea

Via The Marmot: Big Hominid is compiling an examination of the utility of food aid to the NorKs. Lengthy post very much worth reading. Look for future installments.

David Kay Interview on FOX

Read Tony Snow's interview with David Kay here. Kay is bewildered by the spin.

TONY SNOW: Let's take a quick look at some of the headlines from this week characterizing your report. I want to get your reaction to them.

Here we see The New York Times: "No Illicit Arms." The Washington Post: "No Banned Weapons." The Los Angeles Times: "No Illicit Iraqi Arms." USA Today: "No Illegal Weapons."

Is that what you found?

DAVID KAY: Well, we certainly found that — have not yet found illicit arms. But that's not the only thing the report says. In fact, I'm sort of amazed at what was powerful information about both their intent and their actual activities that were not known and were hidden from UN inspectors seems not to have made it to the press. This is information that, had it been available last year, would have been headline news...


Striking Syria - Is Saudi Arabia Next?

David Bedein asks. It appears, we can hope, that the days that countries like Syria can double-deal, host terrorists in their territory and run proxy-wars against Israel and the USA in Iraq, then run back to the UN or their great-power ally for protection when they suffer the inevitable may be waning.

Yesterday, Israel struck at what they say (and I believe them) is a terrorist base not far outside Damascus. Predictably, the Syrians (who are on the Security Council!) did go running back to the UN for help. In a positive development, the US has refused to condemn the attack, instead turning the criticism back at Syria:

“We have repeatedly told the government of Syria that it is on the wrong side in the war on terror and that it must stop harboring terrorists,” a senior administration official said. “That is still our view.”

This is the perfect time for both Israel and the US to turn the pressure on Syria, as both country's interests coincide - as they always have, but this moment, with terror attacks inside Israel and fighters still coming across the border into Iraq, is a singular moment for action.

Bedein says this represents a return to the Dayan doctrine:

...which was in effect between 1967 and 1973: To hit Arab terrorists at the source of their support: in the neighboring Arab states who remain in a state of war with Israel since 1948.

He goes on to suggest that Saudi Arabia may be next. Saudi Arabia has continued to support terror groups and moved American-made F-15's to a base in northwestern Arabia in contravention of the agreement they made when the jets were purchased. Further, Saudi Arabi is said to be supporting the Sunni insurgency inside Iraq:

...Middle East News Line, relying on CIA reports, noted that the Saudis have been named as a leading financier of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq. A CIA report on threats in Iraq has identified Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria as the leading supporters of the Sunni insurgency against the U.S. military. The report asserted that the three countries have contributed insurgents and funding to a range of groups, including al-Qaeda and Hizbullah. The report was disclosed by Kurdish sources in Iraq to the London-based Al Hayat daily. Al Hayat, owned by members of the Saudi royal family, reported in Auguest that the CIA report cites the activities of major Islamic insurgency groups in Iraq and their state sponsors. The CIA report marked the first time that Saudi Arabia was specifically identified as a supporter of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq. It's about time that Israel took action against Syria. If Saudi Arabia continues its present course of action, military action may be necessary there next.

Could we be seeing a shift in doctrine? With regard to Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran, America and Israel have such close interests that they're virtually indistiguishable. Israel may be able to perform actions that the US doesn't have the diplomatic credit or will to perform.

Back to the MSNBC article on the US reaction:

...U.S. and Israeli officials said Israel did not warn the Bush administration it was planning the attack. “You don’t ask for a green light and you don’t get a green light,” an Israeli official said...

No green light necessary. It's "do what you have to do" time. My only fear is that there really is no planned doctrine shift behind this, and that what we have are simply more half measures.

In any case, expect more carping from the usual suspects about the lack of respect for and continuing undermining of the United Nations, whining about Israeli agression and America not controlling her ally.

Sunday, October 5, 2003

Is Thomas Friedman Insane?

Please don't answer that.

Thomas Friedman, acknowledging that OPEC's attempts to keep gas prices high will stand in the way of economic recovery has an even better suggestion - one that will not only help drive revenue into the Federal coffers, but will also force us into finding a serious energy policy, AND make us more popular in Europe. Oh, and by "better," what I really mean is "whacky."

Yes, what we really need is a $1/gallon gasoline tax!

Here's the logic: The two things OPEC hates most are falling oil prices and gasoline taxes — and the Patriot Tax would promote both. The reason that OPEC hates gasoline taxes is that if anyone is going to benefit from higher prices at the pump, OPEC wants it to be OPEC, not the consuming countries. It drives OPEC crazy that the Europeans pay roughly twice as much per gallon as Americans do, because their governments slap on so many taxes.

We'll show those Arabs how to screw us over! We'll do it ourselves!

A $1 a gallon gasoline tax, phased in, would not only be a huge revenue generator (even with tax rebates to ease the burden on low-income people, farmers and truckers) but also a huge driver of conservation and reduced oil imports. Not only would it mean less money for Saudi Arabia to transfer to Wahhabi clerics to spread their intolerant brand of Islam around the world, but it would radically improve America's standing in Europe, where we are resented for being the world's energy hog.

President Bush could even say that this tax is his long-promised alternative to Kyoto, because the amount of energy conservation it would produce would result in a much greater reduction in U.S. energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions, than anything Kyoto would have mandated.

I have a better idea: Leave big rocks next to the filling-station pumps, and with every gallon you pump, you have to whack yourself in the head with the rock. That should curb consumption even faster.

Way to find another way to screw the average, middle-class American, Tom.

Does Thomas Friedman drive himself to work every day do you think?

Update (5 minutes later): OK, perhaps I overstate my rant, but not by much. It's possible a gas tax of some sort could be part of an overall energy policy, but reaching for a gas-tax FIRST, and then hoping the policy follows is flat insane. It simply won't happen. The burden will be on the average middle-income American (both through the gas for the cars they drive and additional costs on the goods they purchase), the money won't be spent on any targeted item (tax increases passed ostensibly to go for something specific almost never do), and all we'll be left with is one more financial burden. Nuts.

Israel Strikes Terrorist Base in Syria

Israel Strikes Terrorist Base in Syria

JERUSALEM - Israeli warplanes bombed what the military called an Islamic Jihad training base in Syria on Sunday in retaliation for a suicide bombing at a Haifa restaurant. It was the first Israeli attack deep inside Syrian territory in more than two decades.

The attack _ one day after an Islamic Jihad bomber killed 19 people _ threatened to widen three years of Israeli-Palestinian violence into neighboring countries and marked a dramatic new strategy in Israel's efforts to stop terror attacks.

Israel, which accuses Syria of harboring and funding Islamic Jihad, said it would strike at terrorists anywhere in the region. A statement from the military also accused Iran of funding and directing Islamic Jihad, saying Israel "will act with determination against all who harm its citizens."

"Any country who harbors terrorism, who trains (terrorists), supports and encourages them will be responsible to answer for their actions," government spokesman Avi Pazner said.

Syria's Foreign Ministry issued a terse statement saying it plans to lodge an "urgent complaint" against Israel with the United Nations. A Jihad spokesman denied the organization has any bases in Syria...


Saturday, October 4, 2003

Self-Circumcision...Lego Style


"The young man did not hesitate to do this, because he took delight in Jacob's daughter, and he was the most honored in his father's house." Genesis 34:19

"When you care enough to give the very best."

The Old and New Testaments in Lego here.

Explosion at Israeli Restaurant Kills 19

FOXNews.com - Top Stories - Explosion at Israeli Restaurant Kills 19

JERUSALEM — A female suicide bomber calmly walked into a popular Israeli restaurant early Saturday and detonated a 22-pound deadly device that killed up to 19 people, three of them said to be children.

The early-morning blast rocked the ultra-popular Maxim restaurant off its heels, completely toppling the establishment which sat near Haifa (search)'s beach promenade on the southern edge of the city.

Paramedics estimated that at least forty others were injured in the bombing, several of them seriously. Authorities said the bomber walked into the restaurant with the device strapped to his body and, without warning, quickly pulled the plug on it.

Initially there were conflicting reports as to whether or not the assailant was also armed, shooting to death a security guard before entering the building. Police said they are still investigating that theory.

Hours after the explosion, the militant group Islamic Jihan claimed responsibility for the attack. Not long after, speculation grew that the attack could spark Israel to take action against Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. The Israeli Cabinet threatened on Sept. 11 to "remove" Arafat, implying either expulsion or assassination, and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon suggested action would be taken against the Palestinian leader if there was another major suicide bombing with heavy casualties.

The incoming Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia (search), condemned Saturday's bombing as an "ugly attack" and urged all Palestinian groups to stop violence against civilians. The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, said he appealed to international mediators to ensure that Israel does not retaliate. "We don't want Israel to add fuel to the fire," he said...

I wonder what this means for Arafat. I wonder what Israel will do now, if anything. And I wonder why the hell even Fox News decides to editorialize negatively about the Fence in the entire final third of this particular story.

It is probably not the best day for Colin Powell to be criticizing the Fence. Or maybe it is, as his comments carry less weight than they usually do.

Update: 'This restaurant was a symbol of coexistence' via Israpundit.

Who's Vulnerable?

Fred Barnes says Bush's poll numbers are no big deal at this juncture.

Bush's slump in the polls is no big deal.

The media's new word for President Bush is "vulnerable." A Gallup Poll last week found he trails Democrats Wesley Clark (49% to 46%) and John Kerry (48% to 47%) in presidential race match-ups. His job approval rating dipped to 49% in a Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey. The consensus in the press is that President Bush is in deep political trouble, and many Democrats and some Republicans share that view.

A more accurate word for President Bush's political condition is "normal." Mr. Bush has slumped in his third year in office just as most recent presidents have. A slump is the rule, not the exception...


Blown Away By The Spin

(Note: Some of the following amounts to a reminder of where we've been, but it feels important at this point, as we get caught up in the headlines, to render such a reminder.)

Roger L. Simon points to this CNN article which says that:

Two Iraqi scientists were shot, one fatally, after helping the United States search for weapons of mass destruction, according to chief U.S. weapons inspector David Kay.

And asks:

So let me ask all those people who are now busy playing the blame game for their own advantage or justification, why were these scientists shot if there are no WMDs? Target practice???

I hope for all those ambitious politicians now screaming at the top of their lungs that those weapons don't end up in Chicago. I hope that for all our sakes.

Every major headline I've seen so far has trumpeted that "Weapons Inspector Says No Weapons of Mass Destruction Found in Iraq..." Is that really what they're coming away with as the main theme of Kay's report?

The CNN article also goes on:

Kay's 1,200-person team has found two new facilities near a prison where it believes biological weapons tests were conducted on prisoners.

"We have taken senior Iraqi leaders in detention to them," Kay said. The leaders were those who evidence indicated had been involved in the experiments.

"They were clearly shaken up by being taken there," he said, adding they were afraid that "we would make them face a lineup" of victims.

Get that? These guys are afraid they're going to have to face some of the people they conducted biological experiments on.

That's the kind of enemy we had all those years we were at war with them. Remember, the end of Gulf War I was only a cease fire, and hostilities were ongoing to a greater or lesser extent all the way through to the run-up to 2003. That's the kind of enemy that was agitating against us and our allies all those years. That's the kind of enemy some of the President's political opponents have been running around saying we had nothing to fear from - that we should have bet our lives that a religious fanatic like Bin Laden would never cooperate with a secular leader like Saddam. But, of course, no one thought a Commie-hater like Hitler would ever make a secret deal with Stalin, either. Would you bet your life that no partnership of convenience would ever crop up between the two? I wouldn't. 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' as they say...

Would you bet that Saddam himself would never do anything rash with those weapons once he got his hands on them? Given the nature of Saddam and his regime, that would be a sucker's bet. In his book, The Theatening Storm, Ken Pollack writes of Saddam:

Saddam's foreign policy history is littered with bizarre decisions, poor judgement, and catastrophic miscalculations. When confronted with a problem, he has generally reacted with aggression and justified his offensives with distortions and convoluted logic. All too frequently, Saddam has reached conclusions that no Western leader would have reached; constructed scenarios that are fantastic when recounted; and taken risks that everyone around him (let alone outside observers) has found inexplicable.

Kay's report is making clear that Saddam had never given up his dream of becoming the Middle East's hegemon by force. This unpredictable monster with unconventional weapons in his hands and a view of the United States as the nation standing between him and his continuing quest for power is a nightmare scenario - a nightmare scenario the world need no longer face due to the leadership of Messrs. Bush and Blair.

Most of the news outlets and Democratic partisans presently doing anything in their power to discredit this President now that the battle has been fought and won - a battle none of them would have had the leadership or character to see through - would have truly, deep down, wanted to take the risk of facing that scenario. Most Americans certainly didn't, hence the widespread support for the war.

But now they'll feign agony over the aftermath since the danger has passed. They'll bend and clutch their backs in pretended pain as they weild their mops to sponge up the water left behind now that the fire is put out - a fire they didn't have the guts to fight.

Read through the report. It's obvious that Sadam had a long-term ongoing program in a spectrum of weapons procurement and research. The War in Iraq removed one of the most insidious regimes extant at the turn of the 21st century - both in the evil it committed to its own citizenry and the infection it spread throughout the region. It should be viewed as the great success it has been so far on a number of levels - both in the humanitarian realm and by removing a physical threat, as well as the political virus a totalitarian demagogue like Saddam embodies.

Instead, the President's enemies would rather blatantly mischaracterize the findings of this report (and it is still interim!) and score petty political points. They'd rather put the entire project at risk and undermine the public's willingness to see the effort through to the end. They'd rather handcuff this President from being able to face the ongoing problems in Iran, Syria and North Korea.

Look, if it were true, that would be one thing. If Kay truly had nothing of interest to report, if they found nothing - no programs, no weapons, no materials, then that would be one thing. Sadly, for the sake of partisan politics, and worse, for selfish "I told you so" reasons, the petty back-biters, the nit-pickers and non-leaders will do what they often did to Bill Clinton (yes, that's right) - find any rhetorical cudgel they can heft to cripple the ability of our President to conduct his foreign policy properly. It's self-defeating and sad. It's sophistry at best and harms us all. There were weapons...there were weapons programs...and yes, there were mass graves.

The spin's the thing, and it's a disgrace.

Update: Roger also points to this excellent Andrew Apostalou piece at NRO.

...Of course, Saddam knows better than the media — as does David Kay. Far from being a failure, Kay's interim report is an important breakthrough. Kay has validated the reason for going to war: Saddam's regime was not in compliance with its U.N. obligations.

Kay has actually done more than simply justify the war to oust Saddam by demonstrating a past history of Iraqi violations. Kay has shown that Iraq never had any intention of complying with the demands of the U.N. inspectors....


"Controversial Cleveland murals are protected"

(Via LGF: Antisemitic Murals in Cleveland) Cleveland Jewish News: Controversial Cleveland murals are protected

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of expression, no matter how offensive, from government interference.

With that in mind, Louis Brandeis, the first Jew to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, uttered the famous quote that still resonates today: "The remedy for bad speech is more speech."

For those offended by murals painted on the outside walls of Brahim "Abe" Ayad's East 55th Street deli, "more speech" might be the only recourse.

Ayad, 37, a Palestinian-American who owns Grandpa's Kitchen, has had dozens of controversial images painted on his business establishment over the last few years. Public officials and Jewish Clevelanders say these murals are blatantly offensive and antisemitic.

The newest signs, painted over the spring and summer at the deli, include a group of skullcap-wearing Jews counting money at a table while Jesus hangs on a cross above them, and a supposed talmudic endorsement of pedophilia. In the latter, a Jewish priest holds a small boy in his arms. The priest is quoted as saying, "Silly man, this is not my son, he's my wife." Below this is an alleged line from the Talmud. "Like the tear comes to the eye again and again so does ... virginity to a child under 3 years and 1 day."

Above this mural is contact information for Cong. Stephanie Tubbs Jones for those seeking reparations from Israel. The congresswoman's image has also unflatteringly appeared on past murals. Ayad was angry she never followed up on a letter she sent him over two years ago, claiming she would help him get back his father's land.

Another new sign shows Hitler with the Star of David branded into his upraised and bleeding hand. A larger Star of David superimposed with a swastika is painted to the right of this image.

In the past, Ayad's signs have portrayed Jews as monkeys and pigs, and repeated canards such as Jews control the media and Jews were behind the 9/11 terror attacks. The first signs appeared on a car wash Ayad owned at E. 55th and Cedar. The images were painted over after the City Mission bought the building.

Ayad, a father of eight who lives in North Olmstead, has said he does not support violence against Jews. The murals, he notes, are a protest against "evil-doing Zionists" who, among other offenses, he claims, took away his Palestinian father's land to make way for the state of Israel...

I can understand all the free-speech arguments. I just have one question: Who the hell eats at this guy's place? How many people are handing him their money that he can continue to operate and support eight kids? That's what's frightening.

What a way to go

Yahoo! News - Man Dies After Wife Crushes Testicles

ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - An enraged Ethiopian mother of five will be tried for the murder of her husband who died after she crushed his testicles in a fight, police told the state-run Ethiopian News Agency.

Police said on Friday the man was so embarrassed after the incident that he declined to seek treatment for the injury, and died days later.

"Following a disagreement over the husband's spending habits, his wife refused to give him his dinner and also decided to sleep alone," police in the western region of Wellega said.

"The husband was so angered by this affront by his wife that he tried to beat her. In the melee that followed, the wife grabbed and twisted his testicles causing serious damage."

Police said the unnamed woman, a resident of Wayu-Tuka district in Wellega, had had several arguments with her husband about the amount of money he spent on booze.


Friday, October 3, 2003

And the feel good pictures of the day are...

Take a look at these pics over at Dean's World.

Dean:

I can think of nothing more vile, nothing more flat-out evil, than cutting and running on these people right now.

Amen! Have you sent any toys yet?

Andrew Sullivan and the Kay Report

Andrew Sullivan is all over the Kay Report I posted about last night and the press's attempts to spin. Start here and scroll. I'm feeling more positive by the moment.

Minorities support 54

California's Prop 54, which promises to prohibit the State from even asking about a person's race, is looking good for passage...and in no small measure due to the fact that individual members of minority racial groups (NOT racial organizations, who's elite status and raison d'etre are anchored in keeping race fetishism alive) support it. Majorities of Blacks, Hispanics and Asians favor the measure. Prop 54's time has come.

California Goes Colorblind? Minorities support 54 - By Deroy Murdock

California voters Tuesday will pick a winner in the surrealistic pillow fight for the governor's office. They also may bring the ideal of colorblindness closer to reality.

Proposition 54, the California Racial Privacy Initiative, occupies a quiet corner on the boisterous recall ballot. With limited exceptions, RPI would forbid state and local governments from ethnically classifying residents for public education, employment, or contracting. Although it has been overshadowed by the gubernatorial brawl, RPI enjoys surprising support among the Golden State's minority voters.

The 2003 Multilingual Survey of California Voters found that every ethnic group polled favors RPI. Hispanics endorse it 46 percent to 33 percent. Asian-descended voters are pro-RPI, 42 percent to 40, while blacks back it, 41 percent to 33. Whites, interestingly enough, support RPI 31 percent to 25 with a hefty 44 percent undecided.

Still, as Miami-based pollster Sergio Bendixen told the Sacramento Bee: "Mathematically, it is impossible for Proposition 54 to be defeated unless minorities oppose it." Bendixen's private company interviewed 1,608 voters between September 6-16 in Cantonese, English, Korean, Mandarin, Spanish, and Vietnamese.

"This poll gives me hope that a broad coalition of individuals can think outside the box and reject the racialist company line," says San Franciscan Kevin Nguyen, RPI's official proponent and a Saigon native whose father spent six months in a Vietcong reeducation camp...


Victor Davis Hanson: "What’s It All About? - Playing high-stakes poker like never before."

Victor Davis Hanson says our foes think we'll fold - that the West won't stick it out. But they're not banking on our leadership, and the resources we can bring to bare.

Victor Davis Hanson on War on National Review Online

...Again, the logic of it all is straightforward. Democratic liberal societies (terror seems always to be directed at liberal states, which threaten autocracies and tribes) have created so much material comfort and liberty that they purportedly abhor sacrifice and any potential interruptions of the good life, whether material, spiritual, or psychic. Thus they are willing to appease, tolerate, or ignore terror, preferring instead — after the obligatory cruise missile and saber-rattling speech — to pay some type of blackmail, grant some type of political concession, or simply vacate the premises. And our enemies are right — if the embassies in Africa, the Iran hostage-taking, the Beirut bombing, the USS Cole attack, and a host of other assaults on assorted individual Americans, embassies, planes, and ships are any indications.

Their devilish methods are entirely parasitic. Hamas or the Baathists can no more craft on their own an RPG, a tactical missile, or a nuclear weapon than they can build a cell phone or a Honda. Uday's stash of pills and cars was the logical counterpart to Saddam's imported arsenal — Western material goods without the inconvenient cargo that was responsible for their creation, whether democracy, rationalism, secularism, or individual freedom.

What then are the ultimate aims of terrorists and state killers? What exactly does a crackpot Iranian mullah, a crazed Taliban, the sons of Saddam, or one of bin Laden's executioners really want with us? A sort of alternative existence to the West, upon which they both feed and prey, like some sort of toadstool that, with sufficient rain and neglect, sprouts up amid an otherwise lush green lawn...


Thursday, October 2, 2003

NYT Summary of David Kay Testimony

NYT: What Inspectors Saw, and Didn't See

Tomorrow's New York Times will have some interesting info on the still ongoing David Kay investigations into Iraq's WMD programs.

Some highlights:

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS

• Inspectors have not yet determined whether the research was tied to large-scale military weapons or to biological terror weapons.

Scientists reported that work was under way with surrogate organisms that could have been adapted to organisms suitable for weapons.

One vial was found containing the organism C. botulinum Okra B, from which a biological agent can be produced. It was hidden in a scientist's house.

• Inspectors were unable to prove that Iraq had mobile biological production trailers, but could not rule it out. "We are confident we will be able to get an answer," Mr. Kay said.

CHEMICAL WEAPONS

• Much of Iraq's ability to produce chemical weapons was destroyed during and after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, and there is little information so far on how many chemical weapons might have been retained.

"Multiple sources" have suggested that Iraq "explored" the possibility of resuming production, perhaps as late as this year.

• The inspectors have not found evidence that Iraqi military units were prepared to use chemical weapons against invading American and British troops.

NUCLEAR PROGRAMS

• There is no evidence so far of significant steps to build nuclear weapons or produce fissile material for them.

Scientists have said, "Saddam Hussein remained firmly committed to acquiring nuclear weapons."

Iraq appeared to be maintaining the expertise to resume nuclear research, and may have considered rebuilding a centrifuge enrichment program.

DELIVERY SYSTEMS

Ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and perhaps unmanned aircraft were being developed that, if completed, would have had ranges beyond the 90-mile limit imposed by the United Nations, perhaps up to 600 miles.

(Emphasis mine.)

A mixed bag not anywhere near as negative or empty as some of the rumors may have lead us to believe it would be. We'll see what the future holds, but it certainly seems that what Kay will end up presenting is an analysis of WMD programs, etc...not any of the stockpiles themselves. I believe politically that will be enough to blunt the blow to the administration of the missing chemicals, but it's still too soon to say.

And don't read this Reuters editorial news item unless you've taken your blood pressure pill. Apparently, everything is going down the shitter. U.S. Suffers U.N. Setback Over Iraq; No WMD Found

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration suffered a string of setbacks over Iraq on Thursday ranging from a rebuff for its proposals on a U.N. role from U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan to an opinion poll showing Americans thought the war had not been worth it.

Compounding Washington's problems, the CIA official directing the weapons search in Iraq reported to U.S. lawmakers that no chemical or biological arms -- the main reason cited for the U.S.-led invasion in March -- had yet been found.

In Baghdad, the top U.S. general in the country, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, said guerrilla attacks had become more lethal and casualties would continue rising...


"Schoolboy's Photo Amazes NASA"

First thought to be the remains of a meteor burnout, scientists are still trying to decide on what this is really a picture of. At first blush it seems to be a fireball, but it is clearly at high altitude, catching the sun's rays at dusk. The vapor is still present, but dissipating, a minute or two later.

BBC story here.

NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day (with larger versions) here.

Perspective on Wilson/Plame

This Washington Times article provides some welcome perspective on the Wilson/Plame affair, giving background on Ambassador Wilson's partisan past as well as putting a more modest spin on the allegation itself:

Wilson, wife have tight ties to Democrats - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics

...After her name appeared in Mr. Novak's column, the CIA was obligated under the law to request an investigation by the Justice Department. In late July, it sent what is called a "crime report" to Justice on the possible violation of federal criminal law concerning an unauthorized disclosure — in this case Mrs. Wilson's name and occupation.

The CIA sends about 50 such referrals per year. Few, if any, such probes ever identify the leaker in a way that results in public criminal charges. The Wilson referral was sent by the CIA's general counsel, not by agency Director George J. Tenet.

The CIA follows up such referrals with a second letter to Justice answering 11 standard questions, such as what damage was none to national security and who in government knew of the information. The CIA sent this letter in mid-September...

And of course, James Taranto has info worth checking out at Best of the Web.

Allah's Listing Has Been Moved...

...from the generic "Blogs" category on my left sidebar, to the "Israel/Jewish Blogs" category. That should fix 'im.

BTW, this is very good (Hat Tip: King):

"Ramallah, Saturday Morning"

My son is in front of the TV
Watching American cartoons
About a good man with a rifle,
A bit slow but committed,
Trying to destroy an enemy
Who taunts and confounds him.
I sit at the dining room table,
Testing the charges, packing
In the rat poison and screws,
Hearing him laughing at
The Zionist propaganda,
Sympathizing with the prey
Instead of the hunter.
I know better. In those cartoons
Is the fate of our people:
1967 all over again
Each time the hunter sticks his gun
Down a hole and it comes up
Behind him, and shoots him
Right in the ass.
The device is ready. I stand up and
Press it to my waist to measure.
Small, much too small--but then
It wasn't made for me to wear, was it?
I call my son over and try to explain
In terms he can understand. He starts
Crying and screaming, but I know
What to say to him now, I know
How to calm him now, and as I
Lean in to tighten the belt 'round
His tiny waist and press the bus
Schedule into his tiny hands, I whisper
To him the words that will change
His political sympathies in a heartbeat:
"Be vewy, vewy quiet. You're hunting wabbits."


Larry Elder: "To Ariel: In memoriam"

Touching piece by Larry Elder at TownHall.com.

Larry Elder: To Ariel: In memoriam

...Several months ago, I received an e-mail from Ariel Avrech's father, Robert. He told me that his 22-year-old son, at Cedars Sinai, lay awaiting a lung transplant. Ariel and his father, while in the hospital, often listened to my show, and discussed and debated many of the issues I brought up.

Robert told me that, through the radio, I became something of a -- I don't know the right word -- influence, inspiration, a hero to his son. Would I, asked Robert, take time from my busy schedule to visit his son?...


Pipes on O'Reilly - Update and Transcript

The Guantánamo Arrests - What Do They Mean?

The transcript is now posted from the Daniel Pipes appearance on the O'Reilly Factor the other evening. The email also came with some explanation that's relevant to the discussion we had here.

Dear Reader: I usually send out transcripts without commentary, but I feel impelled to say a few words to introduce the transcript that follows:
Eltantawi and I are interviewed sequentially here because I refuse to debate her or other representatives of the militant Islamic lobby. Who the television producers put on after me, however, I do not attempt to control.

Eltantawi says some pretty interesting things. Perhaps most so is her nonchalance that "less than a quarter of a percentage of American Muslims" serving in the U.S. military are accused of criminal violence.

The most amusing point is when Eltantawi gravely insists that "the Defense Department and the FBI know more about this [problem of Muslim criminality] than people like Daniel Pipes" and O'Reilly laughingly replies "Obviously they don’t. We have three people arrested at Guantánamo Bay at the terrorist camps. Obviously, the FBI doesn’t know."

And the most inaccurate point is when Eltantawi ascribes to me the view that "all American Muslims be suspended from their positions until they can, quote, prove their loyalty." What I wrote in my column this week was that "presently employed Muslim personnel who got their jobs through those [suspect] institutions" should be suspended until their loyalty can be confirmed. Even after O'Reilly demurred from her version of what I said, she insisted "It’s a quote from his article, Bill. It is a quote from the article."

Yours, Daniel Pipes


I personally feel that Pipes makes a mistake not preparing for and taking these people on head-to-head, but that's something he's obviously already considered and decided against for whatever reason. Perhaps he's just decided that there's no way for him to come off well in such a mud-slinging debate. I think O'Reilly was wrong to allow Pipes to be impugned when he knew he wasn't going to be responding, but again, maybe the fact that most of the response was an ad hominem against Dr. Pipes spoke for itself.

New Site: Front Line Voices

Front Line Voices

Front Line Voices Introduction

Since, as the saying goes, perception is nine-tenths of reality, those who control what we learn about the war in Iraq and other conflicts have an immense power. They can spin a victory into a failure, and a perceived failure in the fight against tyranny can only strengthen the resolve of tyrants.

It has increasingly been the complaint of many troops that the picture that the media is painting of the progress in the War on Terror is far from reality. The mission of this site is to get out the full story by posting first-hand accounts as written by men and women who have actually been to Iraq and Afghanistan. There is no editing or commentary by those who run this site, and we will print any letter or story submitted by a legitimate source who has served overseas. Our only goal is to offer you the opportunity to read these stories and to find out what the reality is.


Wednesday, October 1, 2003

60 Minutes and Press Responsibility

(Via Instapundit) This sounds like an exchange I wish I'd seen:

Joey the Lemur: 60 Minutes of idiocy

I don't watch the network news often. I got home late from work tonight & flipped on the TV and my wife had left it on CBS. Being after 7 PM, 60 Minutes II was on and they were talking about Iraq.

What I saw and heard next was simply unbelievable. Scott Pelley interviewed an Iraqi who claimed to be part of the Fedayeen. This cretin went on to describe why he wanted to kill Americans and shared that he had been involved in 4 attacks already (my guess is that it's probably more). He went on to explain that he would cut the head off of any American soldier he might capture. It would make him "so happy". Though I didn't time it, this SOB had several minutes to spout his beliefs and Pelley was baiting him with questions like "what would you tell the American people?"

I have 2 cousins in Iraq & have one question for Pelley: Whose fucking side are you ON??!!

This moron (an American, in case he forgot) sat across from an enemy of America & DID NOTHING (aside from letting him spout his propoganda).

Cut to an interview with Paul Bremer & the exchange went something like this:


Pelley - I spoke with a man who claimed to be with the Fedayeen & was avowed to kill American soldiers. He...
Bremer (interrupting) - Did you arrest him??
Pelley (clearly taken aback) - Uh, we don't have the authority to arrest anyone.
Bremer - Did you turn him over to the authorities or military??
Pelley - Uh, we're just here to report...
Bremer - Well, listen. Next time you find someone like that, call me & I'll come arrest him.

Yea Paul!!! Give it to him!![...]

This war, the lead-up, the event itself and the aftermath have certainly brought a plethora of media issues to light.

My fictional conclusion to the exchange:

Pelley: Well, we in the press need to remain impartial...

Bremer: Impartial? You expect me to nod and say I understand...that it's OK. Well I don't understand, and it's not OK. Are you an American or not? That man said he wanted to cut your neighbor's throat and you did nothing about it.

Pelley: But if we take action, it would put us at risk. We wouldn't be able to get such interviews and bring in such stories.

Bremer: Why is it so important for you to be the one who interviews that man? Why not let the reporters from Al Jazera talk to him and get the film from them? I ask again. Are you an American or not? What side are you on? Believe me, Al Jazera knows what side they're on. The bottom line is, we won't agree on this. You expect me to validate you in your feigned impartiality and I won't. Now ask your next question.

The press wants to operate by its own set of moral laws, and that leads to all sorts of situations like the one above, like Eason Jordan's admission of CNN's coddling of Hussein, like John Burns' revelations on the behavior of journalists, and like the infamous Wallace/Jennings exchange and on to the "sexing up" of reports by the BBC and all sorts of agenda-driven story-writing. Maybe the press will just have to accept the fact that they operate on their own set of morals - a set of morals that a lot of the rest of us simply won't validate for them. Maybe that's OK for them - that's their decision to make. I know we all want the story, but maybe there are some things that are just beyond the pale - some things that just ought not to be done. After all, doctors don't do certain types of experiments on human subjects. It's unethical. The press needs to re-examine its standards. Maybe "get the story"...no matter what...is just not acceptable.

LGF: Breaking WMD News

It'll be interesting to see how this pans out. Most other "Wow" headlines have turned out to be overhyped and I stopped posting them, frankly, but this is the first one like this I've seen in awhile.

lgf: Breaking WMD News

Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Siyassah is reporting that Kuwaiti security forces have intercepted smugglers with $60 million worth of Iraqi chemical and biological weapons—on their way to Europe: Kuwait foils Iraqi-WMD smuggling attempt.

Carnival of the Vanities #54 is Up

PopPopPop

Toys For Iraq - You Can Help

There is a way for you to contribute directly toward the reconstruction and the "winning of hearts and minds" in Iraq - more satisfying and direct than government taxes, and it need not be expensive.

There is a US Army soldier in Baghdad with the pseudonym, "Chief Wiggles." He has a web log located here: http://chiefwiggles.blog-city.com/ (It's a great blog you should be checking out regularly, anyway.)

The Chief blogged through the war and he's still there in Iraq dealing with POWs and whatever other responsibilities he has.

The Chief has started a toy drive, whereby he and the other soldiers he is there with will distribute items directly to the Iraqi kids they come in frequent contact with. No matter how you felt about the war, this is a no-lose situation. The Iraqis win, the soldiers win (they very-much enjoy distributing the stuff) and you can contribute to the rebuilding effort by helping foster these positive exchanges.

Last of all, it's cheap. There's a military address set up to send the stuff to. For people in the US, it's just the same as domestic shipping!

They need almost anything. Basic school supplies are particularly being requested - pens, paper, pencils - very basic stuff. Also toothbrushes, toothpaste - ANYTHING kids can use, and all stuff you can pick up on the cheap at a $1 store. I went down to the local wholesale place and bought a big pack of colored construction paper, some essay pads, a big box of basic #2 pencils and a big box of Bic pens. My wife went through my daughter's collection of stuffed animals and other toys and clothes she never plays with or wears anymore and came up with a whole bunch of stuff. It'll all be getting put into a big box for shipment. Here's a pic of what we're sending:

Be sure to read the list of NO toys. Here is the list and shipping address from the site, but go there to look for more yes and no ideas:

First mailing addresses. Please note, the main address has slightly changed. For those that have sent packages, DON'T WORRY. This is a clarification that will help the packages be delivered properly, but those that have already been sent will make it there. There is also an address for anyone mailing items from Australia. We are doing our best to add addresses for other countries.

Chief Wiggles
c/o CPA Chaplain
CPA-C2, Debriefer
APO AE 09335

Address for those mailing from Australia

Chief Wiggles
CPA Chaplain
CPA C2
AFPO 20, CHTF-7 CPA
ADF NSW 2890


A website will soon be available for those that want to "one stop shop" and have your items sent to the Chief. More on this will be available soon.

Please note the buttons available for those that want to link to the toy drive on their site. Here, and here.

Some wonderful people created a flyer to pass out. Here is the flyer if you are interested. Again, thanks to Ree-C (mom), Libby Maddie and Jack (the kids).

Some no no toys:

Any guns of any kind
No violent action hereos
No violent toys
No barbie dolls or dolls skantily dressed
No toys that shoot something, no projectiles
No water guns
Lets just keep it simple, simple toys, just the basics, these kids have
nothing.
Crayons might melt, so probably not the best thing to send. It was 107 degrees in Baghdad today.
Quick update from the first comment, Colored pencils would be wonderful!


Conservatives on Campus Redux

More on anti-conservative bias in the academy over at the Volokh Conspiracy. (Previous item here.) This time, contributors David Bernstein and Randy Barnett chime in.

Wilson, Plame, blah blah blah

Roger L. Simon has about as good a current scenario as anyone converning the "Plame Affair."

Roger L. Simon: NOT TOO WORRIED (OR "GOING HOLLYWOOD")

After reading Bob Novak's column today, I think even his surmises may be overstated.

What I wrote at Roger's blog:

...Roger, I think you've given as good a scenario as anyone has. Please, let's have an investigation, let the system punish the offender and let's get on with life. Call me if anyone has any proof (or even a strong allegation) that Bush or someone truly 'high up' breaks the law by obstructing something. Until then, this is just Laci Peterson writ large - a media frenzy about a serious matter without the substance to back the quantity of reportage. Reporters reporting on other reporters is not news, and neither are articles full of anonymous sources and grandstanding political partisans.

I must admit to bias, however. I admit that even if GWB were caught on camera holding a Mac-10 on his staff and demanding they "get that bastard Wilson whatever it takes," I'd still be throwing objects at my TV and shouting, "OMFG! They're still talking about the GD yellowcake! Turn it off!!"

This whole thing stinks of partisan weaseling (as Wilson's original trip did, as well) top to bottom, and the continuing inability in some quarters to get over the "16 words" (or get over the fact that most of us could keep those 16 words in their proper perspective and figure things out for ourselves).

Update: OpinionJournal unravels the other thread of purpose driving the story here: Karl Rove.

We've been knocking our heads trying to figure out how a minor and well-known story about an alleged CIA "outing" has suddenly blossomed into a Beltway scandal-ette. The light bulb went off reading Monday's White House press briefing.

Right out of the box, Helen Thomas asked if "the President tried to find out who outed the CIA agent? And has he fired anyone in the White House yet?" OK, the point of this exercise is to get President Bush to fire someone. But whom? That answer became clear when the press corps quickly uttered, and kept uttering for nearly an hour, the name "Karl Rove."

Of course! The reason this is suddenly a story is because Mr. Rove, the President's political strategist and confidant from Texas, has become the main target. Joseph Wilson, the CIA consultant at the center of this mini-tempest, had recently fingered Mr. Rove as the official who leaked to columnist Robert Novak that Mr. Wilson's wife works for the CIA. Mr. Wilson has offered no evidence for this, and he's since retreated to say only that he now believes Mr. Rove had "condoned it." The White House has replied that the charge is "simply not true." But no matter, the scandal game is afoot.

The media, and the Democrats now slip-streaming behind them, understand that the what of this mystery matters much less than the who. It's no accident that Tony Blair's recent and evanescent scandal over WMD evidence concerned his long-time political aide and intimate, Alastair Campbell. We're also old enough to recall what happened to Jimmy Carter's Presidency once his old Georgia friend Bert Lance was run out of town. If they can take down Mr. Rove, the lead planner for Mr. Bush's re-election campaign, they will have knocked the props out of his Presidency...


WaPo: Putin Foes See Erosion Of Liberties - Terror War Mutes Criticism by U.S.

Putin Foes See Erosion Of Liberties (washingtonpost.com)

MOSCOW, Sept. 25 -- After Russia's most reputable polling agency reported last month that support for President Vladimir Putin's war in Chechnya had fallen to 28 percent, the messengers were targeted by a state-ordered purge. Soon the center's founder and research team were out, replaced by a 29-year-old who once campaigned for Putin's political party.

"I've heard that we provide data they might dislike, that public opinion has to look better for the government than the way we represent it," lamented Yuri Levada, who created the government-owned All-Russia Center for the Study of Public Opinion, which for 15 years until last month enjoyed unusual autonomy to put out numbers that often irritated the Kremlin.

Putin called it a simple financial dispute, but many reformers and political analysts saw it as emblematic of a broader rollback of democratic gains of the post-Soviet period. In the past few months alone, the last independent national television network was shut down, new rules drastically restricting political coverage were imposed on surviving news organizations, challengers to the Kremlin favorite in next month's election in Chechnya were driven out of the race and a spate of investigations were launched against an oil tycoon who funded rival political parties.

Few if any of these issues will take a prominent place on the agenda when Putin meets President Bush at Camp David for a summit Friday and Saturday, according to officials from both governments. In the two years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Putin has positioned himself as a chief ally in the U.S.-led war on terrorism and, while he disagreed with Bush on the invasion of Iraq, the Russian president still occupies a special place in the White House's hierarchy of foreign friends...

It makes you appreciate what we have here in the US. It also makes you concerned, or should, that our kids are learning about what it is that makes us special so that what we have can be preserved and perpetuated.

Remember Russia's media reabsorption when you hear people complain about the Bush Administration lack of openness. Remember the slaughter in Chechnya and the complete media blackout there and compare it to the precision munitions, billions in reconstruction dollars and embedded media experience in Iraq.

It doesn't take much looking around in the world to give one a very positive perspective on what America is all about.

"Take Out Al Jazeera"

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. suggests viscerally appealing but utterly impractical solutions.


FrontPage magazine.com

...Under present wartime circumstances, though, the United States has the ability -- and, indeed, an urgent responsibility -- to take more comprehensive action against Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya. Unless the two networks adjust their behavior so as no longer to act as the propaganda arm of our enemies, they should be taken off the air, one way or another.

To those who will decry this as censorship, they should be reminded of President Bush's injunction shortly after we were attacked two years ago: In the War on Terror, you are either with us or with the terrorists. It would be no more sensible for us to construe the masquerading of enemy propaganda, the communication and amplification of its calls to jihad and the legitimacy that attends transmission of such messages and images via television than it would be for us to regard bin Laden's messages, or Saddam's, as mere "news."

If we are serious about this war, we need a totally revamped information policy -- replete with much more concerted and effective efforts to win the hearts and minds of people who have no reason to fear us, let alone to attack us, but are being told to do so by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya. A place to start would be to rapidly start up a satellite television service of our own, capable of reaching millions of currently unserved viewers in Iraq.


Guantanamo Translator Arrested

Frontpage: Guantanamo Translator Arrested by Fox News

Another person has been arrested in a possible espionage ring based at the U.S. prison camp for terror suspects at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base.

Ahmed Mehalba, a civilian translator at the camp in Cuba, was arrested Tuesday at Boston's Logan International Airport after it was found that he was carrying classified documents.

He is the third person to be detained for possible security breaches at the naval base, where a largely Muslim, non-English-speaking population of about 660 suspected Al Qaeda (search) and Taliban (search) fighters are being held.

At a brief hearing Tuesday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Boston, Mehalba entered no plea and was detained pending a probable cause hearing scheduled for Oct. 8. On the charge of making false statements, he could face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 if convicted.

Mehalba, wearing jeans and an orange golf shirt, said nothing during the hearing, except to tell the judge that he could not afford his own attorney.

Mehalba previously worked as a Boston cab driver. Two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks he applied for a job as a Logan Airport gate guard and was turned down, said Jose Juves, a spokesman for Massport, the agency that operates Logan.[...]

The bad news is that this multi-breach must have been going on for some time. Who knows the damage that's been done?

The good news is that Logan security is actually stopping suspicious characters now rahter than, you know, like, letting them on the airplane to, y'know, slam it into a building. Of course, he was an arrival, but still...baby steps and all.

We can only hope that this is causing the Government to reexamine its security policy. Maybe they'll actually start to focus on members with an Islamist background, rather than pretending to this PC silliness by reviewing all 2800 military chaplains (for instance) equally.

Breaches will happen as long as we live in a free society and not a police-state, even in the military, but it's up to the people in charge to take sensible steps to prevent it.

They caught one by luck this time. How many more are out there?

Update: Don't miss Michelle Malkin's article, Christian soldier, Muslim soldier, at Townhall:

There's something terribly wrong when an American soldier overseas can't receive Scriptures in the mail, but a Muslim chaplain can preach freely among al Qaeda and Taliban enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay.

This is a story of two soldiers, one Christian, one Muslim. It's a cautionary tale that suggests how religious double standards and politically driven hypersensitivity threaten not only our troops, but us all.

Six months ago, Jack Moody tried to send his son, Daniel, a care package containing a Bible study and other Christian religious materials. Daniel is a 21-year-old Army National Guardsman serving in the Middle East. He had written home requesting spiritual support while he risked his life abroad. The literature his dad packed included Christian comic books. But when Daniel's dad approached the post office in the family's hometown of Lenoir, North Carolina, he was told he would not be allowed to send the items...


World Beard and Moustache Championships

Heinz Christophel
Heddesheim, Germany
Palatinate Beard Club
Category: Full beard, freestyle

These guys don't have beards, they have lifestyles. I'd like to grow a goatee, but every time I start I begin to be pestered to death by my family. I end up feeling like a belly-up fish in the tank that the other fish start taking bits off of.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]