Amazon.com Widgets

November 2004 Archives

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Pat Sajak - Anti-Idiotarian

The Wheel guy becomes the latest person from Hollywood to (paradoxically) comment on Hollywood's quietude with regard to the Van Gogh murder. He chalks it up to BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome).

HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE :: A Hush Over Hollywood by Pat Sajak

...There’s another possibility; one that seems crazy on the surface, but does provide an explanation for the silence, and is also in keeping with the political climate in Hollywood. Is it just possible that there are those who are reluctant to criticize an act of terror because that might somehow align them with President Bush, who stubbornly clings to the notion that these are evil people who need to be defeated? Could the level of hatred for this President be so great that some people are against anything he is for, and for anything he is against?

As nutty as it sounds, how else can you explain such a muted reaction to an act that so directly impacts creative people everywhere? Can you conceive of a filmmaker being assassinated because of any other subject matter without seeing a resulting explosion of reaction from his fellow artists in America and around the world?

As I said, it’s a nutty-sounding explanation, but we live in nutty times.

Via Roger L. Simon who believes the silence is explainable in at least equal measure by good old fashioned ignorance - all those Hollywood poseurs who talk a good game but when you get right down to it, know very little.

Rather Rumors

From TigerHawk:

...This afternoon, a college classmate of mine who is also a producer of a news division show on a major non-CBS network and who once in his or her past worked for CBS News (such person, the "TigerHawk Source"), reported that he or she had heard that the evidence contained in the aforementioned preliminary report included emails from Dan and others on the show that revealed, shall we say, malice aforethought. Basically, the TigerHawk Source -- who characterizes his or her information as "rumor" -- says that these emails reveal a clear intention to nail the President. The TigerHawk Source believes that the final report will include these emails, or at least refer to them in detail. I further note for credibility-assessment purposes that the TigerHawk Source really dislikes the President and his administration, and actually has some sympathy for the plight of Mr. Rather.

If true, I would wonder why Rather would be allowed to move laterally within CBS and not rousted entirely.

Headline of the Day

Our fates in the hands of the IAEA and the UNSC

WaPo: Nuclear Agency Praises Iran

The International Atomic Energy Agency praised Iran yesterday for suspending its uranium-enrichment work and removed an immediate threat of sanctions against the Islamic republic, which built its program in secret over 18 years.

The resolution endorses an agreement Iran struck with Britain, France and Germany two weeks ago to suspend its nuclear activity in exchange for assurances that it will not be referred to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions...

... The passage of the resolution marked a new chapter for the Islamic republic, despite the questions about its nuclear ambitions, and made it clear there was little international support for the Bush administration's drive to ratchet up diplomatic pressure against Iran.

The Bush administration did not block the IAEA resolution but criticized it afterward and said for the first time that it is willing to take Iran to the Security Council on its own.

Meanwhile, Iran's leaders claimed the resolution as a diplomatic victory, while U.S. officials expressed disappointment the international community did not take a harder line.

Diplomats and nuclear experts said the resolution dramatically alters the way Iran will now be judged by the international community and could make it easier for the United States to report Iran to the U.N. Security Council if it violates the suspension, officials and nuclear experts said.

"This is really a win-win situation for the administration," said Robert Einhorn, who was assistant secretary for nonproliferation policy at the State Department from November 1999 to August 2001...

Is bitch-slapping in accord with diplomatic protocol?

... Ambassador Jackie W. Sanders said that "we believe Iran's nuclear weapons program poses a growing threat to international peace and security" and that "any member of the United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council any situation that might endanger the maintenance of international peace and security."

If the United States did so, Iran would be likely to highlight other wording in the resolution that says Iran's suspension is a "voluntary, non-legally binding confidence-building measure," giving Tehran legal maneuvering room to fight the United States.

"My government would like to state, for the record, our reservations about this resolution," Sanders said, adding: "Most of what the board is still requesting of Iran is sadly familiar. Indeed, we have been making such requests since June 2003."

Iranian negotiator Sirus Naseri fell asleep during Sanders's speech, according to diplomats in the room...


The 10th Brother

Hard times for the guy who refused to support Kerry.

And some people say these guys were in it for the money?

FrontPage magazine.com :: Kerry's Victim by Mary Laney

...Twenty-four hours later, Gardner got an e-mail from his company, Millennium Information Services, informing him that his services would no longer be necessary. He was laid off in an e-mail -- by the same man who only days before had congratulated him for his exemplary work in a territory which covered North and South Carolina. The e-mail stated that his position was being eliminated. Since then, he's seen the company advertising for his old position. Gardner doesn't have the money to sue to get the job back.

"I'm broke. I've been hurt every way I can be hurt. I have no money in the bank but am doing little bits here and there to pay the bills," he said.

All the millions of dollars raised by Gardner and his fellow Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, and all the proceeds from John O'Neill's book, Unfit for Command, go to families of veterans, POWs and MIAs.

And, even though Gardner is broke and jobless for speaking out, the husband and father of three says he'd do it all over again. He says it wasn't for politics. It was for America.


Muslims Against Terror - Yes, Really

A bold move.

FrontPage magazine.com: Holding Islamic Preachers Accountable by Kamal Nawash

The Free Muslims Against Terrorism (Free Muslims) have partnered with progressive Arabs and Muslims to hold religious leaders accountable for justifying violence and encouraging terrorism.

The Free Muslims are petitioning the UN Security Council and the United States government to establish an international tribunal to prosecute religious leaders, including clerics who issue “fatwas” which are religious opinions, edicts, rulings and conclusions that incite violence and justify the use of terrorism. These religious leaders are especially dangerous because some of their followers consider their opinions to be gospel.

This petition is a follow up to the recently adopted UN Resolution 1566 that reads in part:

"...[A]ll members of the Security Council to consider and submit recommendations... on practical measures to be imposed upon, individuals … involved in or associated with terrorist activities…bringing them to justice through prosecution or extradition, freezing of their financial assets..."

It is crucial to hold these religious leaders accountable because most terrorists who kill in the name of Islam rely on the fatwas and conclusions of these religious leaders to convince themselves that they are going to heaven after their death.

The Following is an example of a Fatwa that encourages terrorism:

"Sheikh Yousif Al-Qardhawi issued a Fatwa permitting the killing of “fetuses” (unborn) Jews, because (according to him) when Jews are born and grown-up they will join the Israeli army. Furthermore, on September 3, 2004, (at the Egyptian Journalist Union) Al-Qardhawi issued a fatwa to kill all American civilians working in Iraq. And on July 3, 2004, he issued another fatwa permitting the killing of Muslim intellectuals as being apostates, claiming that Islam justifies the killing of such apostates."

These extremist clerics continue to issue fatwas that incite terrorism under the false umbrella of Islam. Join us in stopping these religious leaders by signing this petition requesting the U.N. to create an International Tribunal to prosecute them.

This petition has been organized by Dr. Jawad Hashim (Iraq’s former Minister of Planning), Lafif Lakhdar (A Tunisian Intellectual), and Dr. Shakir Al-Nabulsi (A Jordanian writer and author). The Free Muslims Against Terrorism has joined this effort and we seek 20,000 people to sign this petition. More than 3,000 people have already signed.

All people are invited to sign this petition by sending your name, profession, country of residence and nationality to Jmhashim@hotmail.com and cc: President@freemuslims.org. Write “petition” in the subject line.

For more information visit our website at: www.freemuslims.org

This group is, as far as I know, a truly "moderate" Muslim organization.

Monday, November 29, 2004

Reuters: French troops fired on Ivorian crowds, Paris says - Updated

Update on the French at War. This still doesn't sound like a straightforward description of the events shown in the videos. The story makes it sound like the shootings came amidst a chaotic situation of "mob violence," but that is not consistent with the images shown.

Reuters: French troops fired on Ivorian crowds, Paris says

French soldiers opened fire on crowds of angry youths during days of mob violence and looting in Ivory Coast earlier this month, French Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie said.

French forces had previously said they fired warning shots during the unrest, but Alliot-Marie told France's RTL television on Sunday night the troops had most probably "made full use of their weapons" in some cases.

The mob violence erupted after government forces killed nine French soldiers and an American aid worker in a bombing raid on the rebel-held north, prompting the former colonial power to destroy most of Ivory Coast's small air force in retaliation.

The Ivorian government has repeatedly accused French forces of firing on crowds of unarmed demonstrators, particularly at the Hotel Ivoire in the main city, Abidjan. Paris has insisted the protesters were often armed with guns and machetes.

Alliot-Marie said the French troops sometimes had no choice but to open fire, particularly when they were returning from other parts of the country to protect French and other foreign nationals from attack in Abidjan.

"When they tried to stop our armoured vehicles from getting to Abidjan, to stop them from protecting our citizens and other foreigners who were victims of the violence, they had to fire," she said.

"Naturally, they fired warning shots and in some cases, most probably, they had to make full use of their firearms. That is the reality. There was nothing else that could be done."

Around 8,000 expatriates fled the world's top cocoa grower as militant supporters of President Laurent Gbagbo went on a looting rampage for several days. The government says 57 people were killed and more than 2,200 injured in the unrest.

Alliot-Marie said the troops had also fired to disperse crowds blocking two bridges linking residential and commercial parts of Abidjan to the airport.

She said the crowds were being forced to block the bridges by other protesters carrying arms.

"(The French troops) had to stop this crowd coming into contact (with the expatriates) otherwise there was a risk of a real massacre," she said.

The defence minister said the troops had remained calm throughout their mission.

"Faced with a crowd which was, after all -- this has not been said enough -- well-armed with Kalashnikovs (automatic rifles) and pistols and not just machetes, they showed composure and restraint," she said.

"[W]ell-armed with Kalashnikovs (automatic rifles) and pistols" does not describe the crowd as far as can be discerned from the video.

Update: More doubt on the French (and Reuters) spin (via LGF):

...Guiai Bi Poin said he was in charge of about 60 gendarmes outside Abidjan’s Hotel Ivoire to prevent demonstrators from storming the building.

He told AFP: “French troops fired directly into the crowd. They opened fire on the orders of their chief Colonel D’Estremon. Without warning.”

Guiai Bi Poin he said he was at the French colonel’s side in the hotel lobby throughout the night...

...Guiai Bi Poin said the crowd at the Hotel Ivoire was yelling insults but was unarmed.
“Not one of my men fired a shot,” he said. “There were no shots from the crowd. None of the demonstrators was armed — not even with sticks, or knives or rocks.”

He said that when he reported to the French commander on the day of the riot, he was told: “Colonel, my barbed wire has been crossed, and the crowd is getting excited. If they do not let us leave within 20 minutes, I am going to shoot.”

“Suddenly,” said Guiai Bi Poin, “there was a movement on our left and my gendarmes were pushed violently by the crowd. They fell back a meter or two. D’Estremon then said to me, ‘Colonel, the red line has been crossed. I am going to open fire. FIRE!’”

The officer said the French troops began shooting. “It was not a haphazard fusillade. It was carried out on the orders of their chief. And there was no warning.”

Guiai Bi Poin said he yelled at the French officer to fire in the air, to aim higher, “He did this but some of his men did not obey and some continued to fire on the crowd. I saw lots of people falling, but I do not know how many victims there were.”


Iran, Nukes, Sanctions, Consequences

Michael Ledeen continues to call for regime change in the face of a tidal-wave of appeasement.

Michael Ledeen: Europe’s Ritual Dance, The Western counterpart of Iran’s deception.

...wishful thinking is an important part of foreign policy. The idea that "we don't need to do anything, because so-and-so will do our dirty work for us" has in fact been central to Western strategy in the Middle East for quite a while. For example, it was practiced by Bush the Elder in 1991 at the end of Desert Storm, when the president openly mused that it would be simply wonderful if the Kurds and Shiites overthrew Saddam Hussein. They tried it, foolishly believing that if things went badly the United States would support them. But Bush the First was quite serious about his wishful thinking, and stood by as Saddam slaughtered them — the scapegoats of the hour — by the tens of thousands.

Similar wishful thinking is now at the heart of European — and probably a good deal of American — strategic thinking about the Iranian nuclear project. That it is a disgusting abdication of moral responsibility and a strategic blunder of potentially enormous magnitude is both obvious and irrelevant to the actual course of events.

I do not believe Israel will solve this problem for us, both because it is militarily very daunting and because successive Israeli governments have believed that Iran is too big a problem for them, and if it is to be solved, it will have to be solved by the United States and our allies. Whether that is true or not, I have long argued that Iran is the keystone of the terrorist edifice, and that we are doomed to confront it sooner or later, nuclear or not. Secretary of State Powell disagreed, and he was at pains recently to stress that American policy does not call for regime change in Tehran — even though the president repeatedly called for it. And the president is right; regime change is the best way to deal with the nuclear threat and the best way to advance our cause in the war against the terror masters. We have a real chance to remove the terror regime in Tehran without any military action, but rather through political means, by supporting the Iranian democratic opposition. According to the regime itself, upwards of 70 percent of Iranians oppose the regime, want freedom, and look to us for political support. I believe they, like the Yugoslavs who opposed Milosevic and like the Ukrainians now demonstrating for freedom, are entitled to the support of the free world.

Even if you believe that a nuclear Iran is inevitable, is it not infinitely better to have those atomic bombs in the hands of pro-Western Iranians, chosen by their own people, than in the grip of fanatical theocratic tyrants dedicated to the destruction of the Western satans?

And maybe it isn't inevitable. Faster, please.

We've all been reading the reports, and it sounds more and more like the routine of appeasement is bound to play itself out again. This is where we give the Mullahs what they want and long as they agree to certain conditions - cameras in the nuke sites, inspections... In return for which they get trade agreements and help with their economy.

What I keep waiting to hear from so many of the experts is what, exactly, happens when the Mullahs shut off the cameras, kick out the inspectors or cheat on their agreements. No one seems to have an answer to that.

The Europeans have made it clear once again that a military option will never be on the table, and if the EU, Russia and China have shown one thing it's that they are decidedly UNserious when it comes to consequences.

There's a problem with trade agreements and trade sanctions - both sides get something and both sides suffer when the deal-making breaks. That's what "trade" is. I give you something and in return you give me something. It's a two-way street. We're not talking here about a hand-out that could be cut off without consequence to the giver. Once the trading starts, it actually hurts both sides to stop it. And if there's another thing the EU, Russia and China have shown, it's that they will rarely if ever be serious about sanctions if it means any sacrifice on their own part - even if it means watching a fascist terror state ooze its way into the nuclear club.

All that will be accomplished by negotiating business deals with the Mullahs will be to strengthen their grip on power while watching them inecitably cheat on their agreements, become even more dangerous and betray the Iranian freedom lovers who look to us for help.

Sadly, I do wonder what choice the President has.

'Columbia Unbecoming' - Report


THE CAMPAIGN BY HITLER'S PROFESSORS AGAINST JEWS was fought nationally and internationally. The national campaign commenced in 1933 with the boycott and dismissal of Jewish faculty members by their non-Jewish colleagues. In Freiburg, for example, on April 1 the local Nazi paper, Der Allemanne, published lists of Jewish doctors and dentists who were to be boycotted, and a few days later a list of Jewish members of the university's medical faculty. On April 10 the rector of the university instructed his deans to dismiss all faculty members of Jewish religion or origin. The rector was one Martin Heidegger, who had just taken up his post. Since he had already, in 1929, said that Germany would have to choose between building up its own intellectual life or abandoning it "to growing Judaization in the wider and narrower sense," his action came as no surprise. When his girlfriend Hannah Arendt (as she is now known) asked her teacher in the summer of 1933 about "rumors" she had heard of his hostile attitude toward Jewish colleagues and students, he replied that he had given generously of his time to Jewish students, much as the effort disrupted his own work: "Who comes to me in an emergency? A Jew. Who insists on urgently discussing his doctoral degree? A Jew ... Who asks me for help in obtaining grants? Jews!!" (1) But even professors whose precious time was not so egregiously usurped by imperious Jewish students joined readily in the campaign to extend the anti-Jewish campaign from the economic realm (the April 1 boycott) to academic, scientific, cultural activity in its entirety. Not a single German professor publicly protested the boycotts and dismissals--or, for that matter, the drastic reduction in the number of Jewish students and the burning of books by Jewish authors...

-From Hitler's professors, Arafat's professors, by Edward Alexander

When I was a kid, we lived in the very WASPy (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant - the town is far more "multicultural" these days) town of Winchester, Massachusetts. Literally down the street from us was the beautiful Winchester Country Club. My father, having been an avid golfer since childhood attempted to gain membership but found it impossible due to his ethnic Jewish background. My mother told me about their humiliating experience in front of the Membership Committee. They oozed condescension - "You do understand art, don't you?" Likewise the local 'Boat Club.'

In the early '50's, when they were looking for a home, they wound up in Belmont because the owners of the home they wanted in Melrose wouldn't sell to Jews.

That's the political/social reality that still continues to inform the fears and priorities of the people of my parents' generation. Now in their 70's and 80's, it can be very difficult to grasp that times and priorities have changed. The problem is no longer the "Conservative" establishment. Membership at private, exclusive clubs is no longer a serious issue of concern (if it ever was). Housing in the neighborhood of choice is the rule now, not the exception.

What are some of the real, contemporary sources of antisemitism? You can begin your search on today's college campuses, the source of tomorrow's leaders and policy-makers, where the threat comes not from the political Right but from the Left. It's a difficult reality for some of the older generation, and much of the Jewish activist establishment, to come to grips with.

As I mentioned, last night I attended the first public showing of the David Project's film, Columbia Unbecoming (see the link for multiple media accounts). Columbia student Noah Liben, who appears in the film, as well as Dr. Charles Jacobs and Avi Goldwasser of the David Project were on-hand for the introduction and questions following the film.

Attendance was quite good with about 100 people there - and not solely gray-hairs as has been my experience at a number of these type of events.

First I must say that I'm very impressed with the tack and the tone of both the David Project and the students in question. Liben was clear - Columbia is still a great school - it simply has a few warts is all. The film was at first only shown to Columbia Administration, some students and some alumni. It was not shown publicly at all until about six to seven months after its making when it was shown to members of the press after quieter tactics achieved no results.

Columbia Unbecoming's purpose is to help the students' voices to be heard - not tossed aside with next year's class. Many appear anonymously for fear of retribution or of hurting a relationship with a particular professor.

Liben made it clear - the film is NOT meant to equate all anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. It is NOT meant to silence. It IS meant to help Jewish and pro-Israel students feel free of ridicule and intimidation just like students of any other minority group are allowed to feel.

Dr. Jacobs explained a bit about the background of the David Project and its founding two years ago in response to the rise in global antiSemitism. He explained that part of what we're seeing today is the marriage of convenience between the far Left and Islam - both of which target the United States and Israel particularly. This ideological assault masquerades as legitimate criticism, but it simply doesn't hold up. What's happened on campus is such that it's now considered unvirtuous to support Israel. One puts their academic career in jeopardy being pro-Israel - such is the atmosphere.

Mr. Goldwasser explained that they had come to Columbia not to make a documentary, but simply to support the students. The problem seems to be localized to a few professors in a particular department. The Jewish professors are silent for various reasons (They spoke to 10 different faculty members - none agreed to speak on the record.), the administration ignores the issue and the students aren't getting any support.

Once the media got involved the administration started speaking about the issue, but still not much has changed yet.

The film itself is a slick production. This is a polished product, with about 10 or so students giving testimony as to their experiences - some with their identities mosaicked out.

It's clear why these kids - and they are kids - have so much trouble getting their grievances heard. They're smart, but also young and pink-cheeked. The professors are older, more experienced and they can walk all over these kids like they were nothing. The classroom is the perfect hiding place for moral bullies.

And who is there to hold the bullies responsible? No one. Contrary to popular belief, educating students is not the primary business of the university. Students are a nuisance. The prime business of the university is business - fund raising. The students don't even pay their own tuitions in the majority of cases, nor do they give large endowments.

I remember as a student at BU, there was a famous incident between BU President John Silber and a fellow student who was complaining about the lack of respect she was receiving from the university. She started to say, "I pay x thousands of dollars to go here..." whereupon Silber stopped her and said, "YOU don't pay that money, your PARENTS do..." End of discussion.

So what about the parents? You think they want to make any more waves than anyone else? What, and risk the value of all that investment? Keep your mouth shut, get your paper and move on, son.

What's nice about the testimonials in the film is that they are not frivolous. These are not students complaining about the one time a professor gave them a funny look, or the time someone made fun of their yarmulke. Only serious accusations of intimidation are presented. There is one student's story of her approaching a professor and questioning his always referring to Israel as "Palestine," and the 30 minute red-faced shouting session it engendered. There is the Jewish student who was in attendance at a one-sided divestment conference who was turned to and told, "Just remember who are the oppressed and who are the oppressors - YOU are the oppressors" - this because he happened to be wearing a yarmulke. Another complains that whenever they put up posters for Israel or Jewish-related events, they are either torn down or defaced with swastikas.

It's all serious stuff and there's plenty more besides. They try to complain on their own, but who is there to complain to? The department head is a colleague of the professor being reported, or may even be the subject of the complaint! "There was no way around the polemic in the classroom." Individual students may have thought it was just them, and that may be how any one complaint may have seemed, but viewed in aggregate, one after the other, there is even greater weight behind them.

Like the representatives of the David Project, the testimonials in the film make it clear that they are not complaining about all the professors, nor even all the professors of Arab background. If we wish to play the last-name game, some Arab names were named as good, even-handed professors who teach their subjects but don't use the podium as a political pulpit to grind their axes upon.

It is mentioned that some professors were interviewed who corroborated the students' view of things, but they feared the consequences of appearing and would not do so. It's difficult to blame them when their livelihoods are at stake.

Students wonder: How can you choose to major in a department where you're going to spend all your time arguing?

They make it clear: The answer is NOT a pro-Israel Chair. The answer is applying the same standards of academic fairness and non-intimidation applied to other subjects, other groups, other minorities in the university. So far, the only minority groups unprotected at the university level are Israeli and Jewish students who don't toe the party line.

Nature abhors a vacuum. There are no Fascists or National Socialists anymore. That battle is over. They don't exist in the colleges, yet the university remains one of the few places where one can actually admit one is a Communist and be taken seriously. The far Left is alive and well and living in close quarters with the Islamist agenda. So what is there to counterbalance this? As I said, there is no far-Right, so the groups that take their place are moderates - moderates who advocate nothing more than a fair-hearing for Israel. Take note of recent events at San Francisco State University, where the student Republican Club was physically attacked by a Palestinian Student group. This is who the Left has adopted as their bogey-man? The Republicans and the kids in skull-caps?

It's important to emphasize what this film and effort are about: Fair-treatment, no more intimidation or racism and good scholarship instead of polemics. It is not about silencing dissent or a particular viewpoint, it is not about every single professor, nor every student.

It is about getting a fair hearing for fair complaints in order to heal the university. This is the environment our future policy makers will be emerging from. It is an issue of concern to us all.

If you are a Columbia student or alum who has an experience of your own to add, you can make your voice heard by emailing academicabuse@gmail.com. You can also find out the latest news by visiting the web site of Columbia's Pro-Israel Political Action Club, LionPAC.

Research Help

I'm a rotten Googler, so here's a question to my readers.

I remember reading not long ago a remarkable statistic about the number of German Jewish Nobel Prize winners prior to the second World War - that is, the number of German Nobel winners who were Jews was surprisingly high.

Can anyone point me to where I might see this statistic, or where I might have read it or read it now?

Thanks to anyone who comes up with the answer.

November 29, 1947 - November 29, 2004

This BlogBurst piece is cross-posted by participating websites, to commemorate a milestone in Israel's history. The list of the participating sites is appended at the end of this post.

November 29, 2004:

Anniversary of the UN vote on Resolution 181

Today is the anniversary of the UN vote on resolution 181, which approved the partition of the western part Palestine into a predominately Jewish state and a predominately Arab state. (It is vital to recall that the UN partition plan referred to western Palestine, to underscore that in 1921 the eastern part was ripped off the Jewish National Home by the British Government and handed over to the then Emir Abdullah.)

The partition plan was approved by 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions.

The 33 countries that cast the “Yes” vote were: Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Byelorussia, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Haiti, Iceland, Liberia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, Union of South Africa, USSR, USA, Uruguay, Venezuela. (Among other countries, the list includes the US, the three British Dominions, all the European countries except for Greece and the UK, but including all the Soviet-block countries.)

The 13 countries that chose the Hall of Shame and voted “No” were: Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen. (Ten of these are Moslem countries; Greece has the special distinction of being the only European country to have joined the Hall of Shame.)

The ten countries that abstained are: Argentina, Chile, China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.

On November 30, 1947, the day following the vote, the Palestinian Arabs murdered six Jews in a bus making its way to Jerusalem, and proceeded to murder another Jew in the Tel-Aviv - Jaffa area. This was a prelude to a war that claimed the lives of 6,000 Jews, or 1% of the total Jewish population in 1948. This toll is the per capita equivalent of today’s Canada losing 300,000 lives, or the US losing 3,000,000.

The object of the war, launched by the Arabs in the former Palestine and the armies of Egypt, Tansjordan, Syria and Lebanon (with help from other Arab countries), was to "throw the Jews into the sea". As the partition map indicates, however, rather than annihilate the Jewish population, the Arabs ended up with less territory than they would have gained by peaceful means.

In addition to the bloodshed in nascent Israel, immediately after the UN vote, Arabs attacks their Jewish neighbours in a number of Arab countries, the murders in Syria’s Aleppo being the best known.

Bruised and bleeding, Israel prevailed nonetheless. May our sister-democracy thrive and flourish.

List of participating sites, in alphabetical order of site name

Anti Idiotarian Rottweiler
Arkansas Bushwacker
Armies Of Liberation
Bama Pachyderm
Biurchametz
Blimpish
Blithered
Blog Willy
Blue Rev
Canadian Comment

Cao's Blog
Catholic Friends of Israel
Christian Patriot
Christian Action for Israel
Clarity and Resolve
Crusader War College
Cuanas
Danegerus
Daniel Davis
Flig

God Pigeon
Harald Tribune
Hatshepsut
Heretics Almanac
Hidden Nook
History Nerd
IceVikings
I Love America
Instant Knowledge News
Israpundit

Israel Commentary
JPundit
Jersusalem Posts
Leaning Right News
Lindasog
Letter From Israel
MCNS
Martinipundit
Mererhetoric
Motnews

Mugged By Reality
Mystery Achievement
Mystical Paths
Naebunny
NetWMD
Nice Jewish Boy
Peaktalk
Protect Our Heritage
Reaganesque
Red Tigress

Riteturnonly
Shimshon9
Solomonia
Spitball Defense
Supernatural
Tampa Bay Primer
Techie Vampire
Texasbug
Tex The Pontificator
The Autism homepage

The Conservative
The Homeland
The Seal Club
Wackingday
Weblog of a Wondering Jew
Who's Your Rabbi
Voxfelisi
Yoan Hermida

Sunday, November 28, 2004

Where I'll be Tonight: "Columbia Unbecoming"

I'll be attending the showing of the David Project's film, "Columbia Unbecoming."

Here's the notice I got:

Temple Israel of Natick’s Israel Action Committee is proud to announce:

SUNDAY Nov 28th @ 7:00 PM at TI

The New England Premiere Screening

Columbia Unbecoming

A David Project film about the hostile learning environment at Columbia University

Columbia Unbecoming features interviews with Jewish students at Columbia University on how professors in the school’s Middle Eastern and Asian Languages and Culture (MEALAC) department have created an atmosphere hostile to academic freedom inside and outside the classroom. The emotional testimony of Jewish students at Columbia shines a light on the growing anti-Israel atmosphere on American campuses. In the documentary, American Jews and Israelis studying at Columbia recount being silenced and intimidated by professors and classmates for holding views to sympathetic to Israel or simply for being Jewish.

Featured in the film is Columbia Univ. student NOAH LIBEN who will lead a discussion following the screening.

Previous post on the film is here: Are things so bad?

Also, see this NY Daily News article: Hate 101 - Climate of hate rocks Columbia University

Update after the event: Here's the report.

Saturday, November 27, 2004

Taming Sodom

Do not miss this letter describing the Battle of Fallujah from an Army Officer who was there. (via LGF)

2Slick's Forum: Letter from Fallujah

...In Fallujah, the enemy had a military-type planning system going on. Some of the fighters were wearing body armor and kevlars, just like we do. Soldiers took fire from heavy machine guns (.50 cal) and came across the dead bodies of fighters from Chechnya, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Afghanistan, and so on...no, this was not just a city of pissed off Iraqis, mad at the Coalition for forcing Saddam out of power. It was a city full of people from all over the Middle East whose sole mission in life was to kill Americans. Problem for them is that they were in the wrong city in November 2004.

Now that it's over, there is a lot of things that people back home should know. First of all, every citizen of Fallujah (non-insurgent) is getting $2,500 USD (that's a lot over here) to fix up their house or buy new things that may have been destroyed in the fighting. Insurgents took up positions in resident's houses so we were forced to destroy a lot of buildings.

There is over $100 million dollars ready to be spent to re-build the city. This may seem like a lot of money, but I can assure you that it is a small price to pay for the amount of evil people no longer alive, contemplating how to kill more Americans. The intelligence value alone is already paying huge dividends. Some of the 900 detainees are telling everything they know about other insurgents. And the enemy never expected such a large or powerful attack and they were so overwhelmed that they left behind all kinds of things, including books with names of other foreign fighters, where their money and weapons come from, etc.

I went into the city 3 times, but after a lot of the fighting had been done. It was amazing to see how the American military had brought the world's most evil city to its knees. I have an awful lot of pictures that I am going to upload to my webshots site...it will blow your mind to see what the insurgents forced us to do to win this fight. And seeing the pictures of what I saw first hand will make you very happy to be an American and know that our country has this might if evildoers force us to use it...

God only destroyed the city. We'll help rebuild it. I know a lot of people think an example should have been made of Fallujah. As to how that example is made and what specifically is done as far as the manner in which the fight is had and how much rebuilding help is given, I'll trust to the people on the ground for those decisions.

Read it all.

New Web Site Reports on Palestinian Arab Weapons Production and Smuggling

Arutz Sheva has a story about this new web site which keeps tabs on the arsenal of terror used in the territories. It's run by Aharon Etengoff, who "served in the Photography & Film and Public Relations Departments of the IDF Spokesperson’s Office from January 2003 to March 2004."

“WeaponSurvey.Com was established to dispel the infamous myth that the Palestinians ‘only have stones.’ On the contrary, the Palestinians have indigenous weapons production capability and maintain a sophisticated smuggling network.”

Check it out: http://www.weaponsurvey.com/

Somerville Divestment Update

Judith received an email of interest from a reader you might like to take a look at...

As a Somerville resident, I was interested to see your post about the divestment vote there, which I had known nothing about. What I did know of was that about two weeks ago, I walked out the door in the morning to find my street saturated with anti-Israel posters. The creepy aspect of it was that instead of being spaced along main streets, where any sane person would place them to advertise a political point, there were scores of them in a 3x3 square block of small, residential back streets, with multiple posters stapled to literally every tree and telephone pole...

Friday, November 26, 2004

The International Jew

Now on sale at a moderate Islamic Web Site near you, Henry Ford's infamous work, The International Jew. This is the complete version including the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Now, I'm all for this book's being available. It's a historical document and I'm against it being "disappeared." But let's take a look at the book description and see if the book is being sold for its historical value, with the vendor distancing themselves from the content, or is it being offered for some other purpose...

In an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the "Protocols of Zion" tersely and convincingly. He said: "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it NOW."

1920 marked the beginning of the publication of this research series, in the Dearborn Independent, the Ford Motor Company's weekly magazine. These articles were eventually collected in book form under the title, The International Jew. The book became a wide success. It is estimated that more than 10 million copies of the book were sold in the United States alone!

Yet today this book is almost impossible to find. You will not be able to buy it in your local bookstore, nor check it out at your local library. The truth is that in the so called "democratic, pluralist" America this book has been systematically suppressed.

The International Jew is a magnifying glass applied to the hidden sources of immorality, vide [sic?], degeneracy, and subversion. It is a threat - a threat to the international financiers who would prefer to keep information selective and geared towards a world oligarchy of self-interest. The lack of awareness of this insidious encroachment into lives of ordinary people increases by the day. By reopening this debate this book exposes the inherent danger of unchecked Zionism.

Emphasis mine. It sounds like an important item, doesn't it? And not just as a piece of history. I should also note that it does not appear that IslamiCity's book selections are "farmed out" to a third party. They have a limited selection of items of interest to Muslims. The International Jew appears under the "Socio/Political" heading. [Side note: Take note of this (apparently antiSemitic) page which claims that Ford's apology for publishing the works is a forgery - Ford actually planned to re-publish the book...so it says.]

Compare the above to this portion of the Amazon description. The "From the Publisher" portion is a bit...quirky, but still beats the above:

From the Publisher ...These articles are worthy of reproduction due to their historical value. In NO WAY IS THE PUBLISHER ANTI-SEMITIC. As a religious and philosophical publisher, we make old and scarce works available to the modern reader-regardless of their position on any certain topic. For the Jewish zealots who are outraged at this publication, consider that if anything stated herein is true, then the Jewish people must live with their history without remaking it or pretending it to be something different than what is the actual truth. If these articles are false and derogatory, then let the facts speak for themselves and condemn the editors of these articles. The truth will eventually surface to the benefit of both the Jewish zealot and those who would criticize the great Jewish people. Certainly in the twenty-first century, an advanced society can debate ideas on their own merit and prove any philosophy to be true or false without fanaticism from either side. No race or religion is above criticism. Conversely, no race or religion is worthy of condemnation and excoriation. It is not the words in a book that make or demean a people-only their actions. Every person and every race has their high and low moments. Only a fair minded soul can see the good in all peoples everywhere. Hopefully, you the reader, are such a soul. This book contains important historical information and as such, it is herewith reprinted.

Product Description:

...At the Nuremberg Tribunal, Baldur Von Shirach, Hitler Youth Leader, said he had been influenced through reading these books. The work was also quoted in Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.

This volume reprints the articles from May 22 to October 2, 1920.
This four-volume set is an important document in the history of anti-semiticism [sic] in America.

(The Amazon version seems to be from a different publisher - at least the cover photo is different. It would be interesting to know where IslamiCity gets theirs.)

And take note - while Amazon takes pride in stocking a huge variety of works (and we should be thankful for that), IslamiCity selects a far shorter list specifically for their audience. What they think is interesting and important...and why...is certainly illuminating.

(With thanks to emailer Miss Kelley for the pointer.)

Fighting the System in the New Iraq

Mithal al-Alusi: Still Kicking

Last month, I pointed to a news item about an Iraqi politician who visited Israel and had the audacity to suggest recognition of the Jewish State. For his efforts he was indicted for treason, drummed out of his party and his family.

But he's still around, and still calling for ties with Israel and the United States. And this time he has his own political party.

Haaretz: Iraq political party seeks relations with Israel

A new Iraqi political party calling for the establishment of diplomatic relations with Israel will compete in the upcoming elections in Iraq.

Mithal al-Alusi, an Iraqi politician who visited Israel a few months ago, heads the new Iraqi Nation Democrat Party. According to Alusi, 1,150 people have signed the party's request to the elections committee to participate in the elections.

"We are keeping Iraqi interests in sight. These interests includes strategic relations with the United States and also ties with Israel," Alusi Said.

Iraqis leveled bitter criticism at Alusi regarding his visit to Israel, which he made using his German passport.

Alusi was removed from his leadership position of his then political party, a warrant was put out for his arrest and he was forced to retreat within his home in the poor Shi'ite Sadr City area of Baghdad. Alusi himself is a Sunni.

Al-Hayat newspaper reported Friday that the Iraqi National Congress party, under the leadership of Ahmed Chalabi, will join Alusi's new party, since he has officially declared the demise of his previous party. He added that a few men of Muqtada al-Sadr, the extremist Shi'ite leader, have joined him as well.

"The style of rule of Sadaam Hussein must change in the direction of closeness with Israel," Alusi said. "The Iraqis need to deal with various Israeli companies - particularly those of the half million Iraqis in Israel - from the standpoint of supporting peace and Iraq."

Following his visit to Israel, Alusi delivered a detailed report to the offices of the Iraqi President Ghazi al-Yawer, Prime Minister Iyad Allawi and the Minister of Foreign Affairs Hoshyar Zebari. He has not yet received a response.

How much support will he get in the end? Who knows. But the fact that such a thing is even possible, that such a view is even able to have a voice is only due to...well, you know...

Human Sacrifice

Interesting word-choice in this Haaretz report. The front page headline and a quote in the text call it an attempted "sacrificial murder."

Isn't that what we've been seeing all along, really? A new form of human sacrifice? Jihadis on video tape removing the heads of their non-believer victims to appease and please their god and mothers sacrificing their children as shahads for the cause...just human sacrifice isn't it? If the Aztecs had CD-ROMs...

Haaretz - Israeli Arab admits attempting to kill Jewish man

A resident of the northern Israeli-Arab town of Umm al Fahm earlier this week gave himself up to police and admitted he attempted to murder a Jewish man ten days ago, police reported on Friday.

On November 16, a 23-year-old Jewish man from the West Bank city of Ariel was stabbed in his back while waiting in a bus stop at the Geha junction in the center of the country.

The man said the stabber had a Middle Eastern appearance and an Arabic accent.

Earlier this week, Mustafa Mahajna, 28, arrived at a police station in the Dan district and admitted he was behind the failed murder attempt.

Mahajna said he had mistakenly taken the man, who was wearing military trousers, for a soldier, and that he wanted to grab his weapon and open fire on nearby people.

Mahajna explained he "wanted to carry out the sacrificial murder because of his hate for Israel."

The Magistrate's Court extended Mahajna's remand until Sunday.

"They built high places for Baal in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to sacrifice their sons and daughters to Molech, though I never commanded, nor did it enter my mind, that they should do such a detestable thing and so make Judah sin." -Jeremiah 32:35

Thursday, November 25, 2004

Did the UN actually condemn suicide bombings against Israelis?

It's hard to tell from this Maariv story whether this is a true flying pig moment or not, actually. They use the word "condemn" in the headline, but the quoted text only uses the term "concern." Only in the surreal world of the UN and international politics are such distinctions anything but a laugh, and maybe it still is...but there it is. Anything would be better than the usual nothing, of course. I was unable to find the actual resolution on the UN site and I haven't seen it reported anywhere else, yet. I'll keep an eye on it. Expect something very, very milquetoast engendering thoughts of "that's the best you can do?" when I find it. (via Celestial Blue)

Maariv International: UN adopts resolution condemning suicide bombings against Israeli civilians (in full):

For years, Arab nations pass resolution condemning Israel. This year, EU demanded to add article on bombings “out of deep concern of loss of Israeli life”. -ilil Shahar

The United Nations General Assembly last night adopted for the first time a resolution that condemns suicide bombings against Israeli civilians.

The resolution states, among other things, the “deep concern regarding suicide bombings, which cause loss of Israeli life”. 142 nations voted in favor of the resolution, five voted against and six abstained.

For dozens of years, the UN has been adopting resolutions tabled by Palestinian or Arab representatives, which condemn Israel for its actions in the territories. Last year, such a resolution was again passed, supported by the majority of European nations.

This year, the EU demanded of the Palestinians to add an article condemning the suicide bombings. It was the first time the subject was mentioned in a typical pro-Palestinian proposal.

On Monday, the Third Committee of the General Assembly passed a resolution that called for "Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance".

The resolution was adopted with specific mention of anti-Semitism, despite the efforts of the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) to remove or amend references to anti-Semitism in the text.

Well they would do that, wouldn't they?

Burchill on Israel

The second of former Guardian Columnist Julie Burchill's travelogues from Israel. (The first is here.) Don't miss them.

Times Online - My nation of heroes, my chosen people . . .:

...It didn’t take a genius to see that the more Jews stood up for themselves, the less the world liked it, whereas other races were cheered on and drooled over as “freedom fighters”, no matter how bloody their hands got, I reflected. Could it be that anti-Semitism in England in particular was based on the fact that we had gone in the opposite direction to the Jews — from powerful to powerless — and felt great resentment about this fact? After all, they’d had a good deal more than loss of empire to deal with in the 20th century — the loss of one third of world Jewry, for instance.

And Israel is a country the size of Wales, which within the first 25 years of its re-establishment (remember, the Jews were in the countries of the Middle East some seven centuries before the Muslims even existed) — from the Declaration of Independence in 1948 to the Yom Kippur War of 1973 — single-handedly fought off murderous attacks from such neighbouring dictatorships as Egypt, Jordan and Syria. (The US, surprisingly, did not begin to aid Israel in any major way until the mid-1970s; the country was founded with arms from the Communist bloc, and the first Government comprised a coalition of the majority Socialist Mapai Party with the Stalinist Mapam Party to the Left and religious and liberal groups to the Right. Beat that for pluralism!) ...

(via OceanGuy)

Few things lower

This likely happens more often than you think...particularly when people are away at funerals. Be careful any time your whereabouts are announced in the paper.

CNN.com - Man burglarized slain reservist's home:

Apartment ransacked while widow was planning funeral

NORRISTOWN, Pennsylvania (AP) -- A man pleaded guilty Wednesday to ransacking the apartment of a newlywed Marine reservist killed in Iraq, breaking in while his widow was with family members planning his funeral.

Prosecutors said Kevin Selvoski, 24, and an alleged accomplice stole a computer and video games to buy heroin.

"You have an individual who paid the ultimate price for his country and they gave him a slap in the face by robbing him and his widow," said prosecutor Robert Sander...


'U.S., Iraqi forces find Falluja's 'largest weapons cache''

Where else? In a Mosque, of course.

It's nice to see "Iraqi Forces" sharing the headlines more and more.

CNN.com - U.S., Iraqi forces find Falluja's 'largest weapons cache'

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi insurgents in Falluja were storing a huge amount of weapons and explosives in a mosque, U.S. Marines said Thursday.

A statement from the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force called the find the city's "largest weapons cache to date."

The Marines said the Saad Abi Bin Waqas Mosque compound was also being used as a suspected safe house and planning site for insurgents in Falluja, according to the statement.

The statement didn't provide specific numbers of the weapons -- which were discovered by U.S. and Iraqi forces on Wednesday.

The statement did say that the mosque compound was "heavily laden with small arms, artillery shells, heavy machine guns, and anti-tank mines."

"Other buildings within the compound had mortar systems, rocket-propelled grenades, launchers, recoilless rifles and parts of surface-to-air weapons systems. Marines also found the barrel of an anti-aircraft gun outside one of the buildings."

Weapons and explosives also filled the mosque's main prayer building, the mullah's residence and, adjacent to the residence, a small shed that had been "rigged to explode," the statement said.

In addition, Iraqi forces and Marines found a vendor's truck full of explosives, grenades and bomb-making materials. The truck may have been used as a mobile bomb-making factory, the Marines' statement said.

Also, the mosque's rectory contained documents detailing "insurgent interrogations of recent kidnap victims," according to the statement.

Alleged Sunni Muslim rebel supporter Sheik Abdulla al-Janabi also had been using the mosque to preach anti-coalition rhetoric, the statement said...


Happy Thanksgiving!

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

Falling for 'Bin Laden's Rhetorical Gambit'

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross takes on the naive (and sometimes malicious) idea that somehow, if we were just to give Bin Laden and his Jihadist allies what they say they want, our troubles would disappear. Of course, anyone who keeps up with the bigger picture by reading blogs like this, or particularly Robert Spencer's Jihad and Dhimmi Watch sites knows that Bin Laden's stated reasons - US troops out of Saudi Arabia, stopping support for Israel, etc... - are for export only. They're just put-ups - a distraction from the real purpose...re-establishment of the Caliphate, and forced spread of Sharia law.

It sounds utterly bizarre to our modern, Western sensibilities...until you realize how deep the religious current runs in the Middle East, and how seriously so many people take such things. What Bin Laden and his kind do are not simply reactions to our supposed misdeeds. He has his own motivations.

Not everyone gets it, of course, and Bin Laden knows this. He's more than willing to play upon our desire for peace, our tendency to expect that our misunderstood enemy just wants the same things we do - if only we just understood each other better - our isolationist desires and yes, our petty hatreds and still thriving Judenhass, too. It's going to take a lot of continuing work to insulate us from the perfidious effects of these new, tempting, tactics.

FrontPage magazine.com: Bin Laden's Rhetorical Gambit by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross

...According to bin Laden’s new rhetoric, the way out of this protracted conflict is for Westerners to “look for its causes in order to prevent it from happening again.” In pointing to these alleged causes, bin Laden places his finger on issues that have some traction in the West. In particular, some factions in the West are attracted to the idea that – as bin Laden suggests – selling Israel up the river and adopting a policy of non-intervention in the Middle East would guarantee us security.

Such a strategy would not, in fact, guarantee us security because it conflates bin Laden’s short-term grievances with his long-term goals. Al-Qaeda was founded with the explicit goal of re-establishing the caliphate, a Muslim super-state encompassing the entire Islamic world that would be primed for perpetual conflict with the West.

Bin Laden’s caliphate would be ruled according to the strict version of shariah law typified by the Taliban, where homosexuals and those preaching non-Islamic faiths were executed, women were kept in burkas, and men were imprisoned if their beards were not long enough. Accommodation is a trap because withdrawing from the Middle East would make the attainment of such an Islamist super-state – and the greater danger it would pose – more likely.

Despite this, some influential Westerners seem ready to fall for this rhetorical gambit. Indeed, even prior to the October 29 videotape, some Western politicians and other noteworthies were already clamoring for negotiation with al-Qaeda and accommodation to their demands...

What the MSM Won't Show - The Real War Crimes in Fallujah

Be sure not to miss this slide-show of the real Fallujah War Crimes - torture chambers, mosques as firing points and weapons storage...CBS won't be running them.

The Donovan's Photo album.

Via The Donovan and LGF.

Update: And don't miss this, via Dean's World - relevant to Lefty doomsayers and Righty "we oughta just nuke the place" types alike:

I am also a professor at a military-related institution, and my little brother is an enlisted Marine (a sniper with 1-3) in Fallujah. This weekend he called for the first time since the battle began. He informed us that a large number of the residents of Fallujah, before fleeing the battle, left blankets and bedding for the Marines and Soldiers along with notes thanking the Americans for liberating their city from the terrorists, as well as invitations to the Marines and Soldiers to sleep in their houses. I've yet to see a report in the media of this. Imagine that.

Additionally, he said their spirits are high, but they would certainly appreciate any "care packages" that folks in the States would care to send their way (preferably consisting of non-perishable food items, candy, deodorant, eye-drops, q-tips, toothpaste, toothbrushes, lip balm, hand/feet warmers, black/dark undershirts, underwear & socks, and non-aerosol bug spray)

"The Effort" is about trying to empower the blanket leavers and protect them from the people who leave behind...well...this.

There but for the grace of God...

...go we. The events in Ukraine provide a stark warning for all those on every end of the American political spectrum - what can happen when the process is tampered with and people lose faith in it. Imagine if there weren't really any problems with the vote (as apparently there were), but one side just were just using people's suspicions for their own gain. It's not like it can't happen here. Once faith in the process starts bending, all bets are off.

WaPo: Rally Against Ukraine Vote Swells

... In the face of the protests and strong condemnation from the United States and the European Union, the government appeared to hesitate. President Leonid Kuchma, who supported Yanukovych, called for negotiations, and there was no sign of a general mobilization of security forces.

"We strongly support efforts to review the conduct of the election and urge Ukrainian authorities not to certify results until investigations of organized fraud are resolved," the White House said in a statement.

Russia, which backed Yanukovych, dismissed foreign charges of electoral fraud as premature and arrogant. "We cannot recognize or protest results that are not yet official," President Vladimir Putin told reporters during a state visit to Lisbon. "Ukraine is a state of law. It doesn't need to be lectured."

With 99.48 percent of precincts counted, Yanukovych had 49.39 percent of the vote compared with 46.71 percent for Yushchenko. The results were official but not final. Exit polls had put Yushchenko well ahead...

Uh oh, exit polls. And isn't it ironic that it may be the Communists who play the role of Kingmaker?

...The role of the Communist Party in parliamentary maneuvering remains critical and uncertain. Its leader did not endorse any candidate in the second round of voting despite pressure from Russia to back Yanukovych. But if it sides with Yushchenko, there would be enough votes to demand a review of the election and the 11,000 violations that the Yushchenko campaign claims to have documented.

Update: Anne Applebaum on "The New Iron Curtain," also in the Post:

...Russia is not the Soviet Union, and 2004 is not 1946. Ukraine is neither as turbulent, nor as violent, nor as physically cut off from the world as were the Central European states after the Second World War. The Ukrainian opposition put 200,000 protesters on the streets of Kiev yesterday, many of whom are too young to recall Nazi or Soviet totalitarianism, and who haven't experienced the intimidation and fear felt by their parents and grandparents. Most have access to communication and outside information -- through the Internet, satellite television, cell phones -- that would have been unthinkable during the Cold War.

The West, and especially Western Europe, can and should encourage them. To do so is not difficult, but it does require that we understand what is happening, call things by their real names, and drop any of our remaining illusions about President Putin's intentions in former Soviet territories. Beyond that, all that is needed is a promise -- even an implied promise -- that when the specter of this new iron curtain is removed, Ukraine too will be welcomed by the nations on the other side.


Tuesday, November 23, 2004

The Joke of the UN

Don't miss this post at The Diplomad for an inside view of the uselessness of the UN bureaucracy.

The Diplomad: Seeing the UN Plain: Corruption as a Way of Life:

Ah, yes, the United Nations.

As school kids we all heard the UN described as "the last best hope of mankind" and "if it hadn't been invented it would need to be." Even now as adults we hear calls for "sending" in the UN; getting UN approval; the need to "work with the UN"; and praise for its "technical and relief agencies." On its official website, the UN modestly states, "United Nations. It's Your World."

We at The Diplomad are here to ask you to forget all that misty-eyed blather. Our Diplomads have served at the UN, in New York, Vienna and Geneva, and worked with the UN in a variety of other posts, and can tell you from experience that the UN is a massive, expensive hoax that needs to be ended once and for all.

Those who don't rely on the "elite" MSM for all their information, know about the UN's "oil-for-food" scam that is slowly being uncovered, and could prove the most massive financial scandal in human history (even bigger than Massachusetts' "Big Dig.") The "oil-for-food" scam, huge as it is, flows logically from the ruling ethos at the UN. The UN system is built on corruption, on the principle of the shake-down; whatever lofty objectives might have existed at its creation, for the UN corruption now provides the means and reason to exist.

Let us explain.

The UN as an institution is the purest of pure bureaucracy: it is the thirty-year single malt of bureaucracies. We refer you to the UN website for details on careers there, but suffice it to say that if you want a job that is VERY well-paying, has lots of perks (first class travel; a generous pension; right to retire almost anywhere you want; tax free), and involves little actual work, the UN bureaucracy is for you -- unfortunately, if you're an American (or Israeli) you'll have a hard time getting it given the solid anti-Americanism (and anti-Semitism) of the UN Secretariat. The UN bureaucracy must have served as inspiration for a sci-fi story we vaguely recall about an ancient civilization that builds an elobrate machine that continues to operate even after the civilization itself has died. Subsequent generations -- in this case, in Europe and the boardroom of the NY Times -- have no idea what the machine does, but don't tamper with it, and, in fact, begin to worship it...


Signs of Life in the Seat Cushions

Scientific American.com: Martian Methane Resuscitates Hope for Life on the Red Planet:

It has been a while since you heard planetary scientists seriously talking about life on Mars. From the forbidding conditions revealed by the Viking landers of the mid-70s, to doubts about the origins of riverlike formations, to the meteoric rise and fall of the case for fossils in a Martian meteorite, researchers have learned the hard way not to get their hopes up.

So as several research teams announced over the past year that they had seen methane gas in the Martian atmosphere, the response has been so cautious that you'd hardly know just how revolutionary the discovery might be. For decades, methane has been near the top of scientists' list of biomarkers (substances whose presence is a possible sign of life). The idea of finding it on Mars seems so unlikely that many researchers assumed the discovery had to be some sort of mistake.

That reaction is no longer tenable. Last Thursday, at the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Division for Planetary Science (DPS), planetary astronomer Michael Mumma of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center announced hard-to-dispute evidence that the gas is really there. It may yet turn out to be nonbiological, but a living, breathing source is just as plausible. "I'll tell you quite honestly, I'm shocked," Mumma said to his colleagues. "We were not expecting this."

What makes methane so interesting is that the gas is unstable. On Earth, a methane molecule released into the air typically gets broken down by solar ultraviolet radiation in about 10 years. On Mars, farther from the sun, it lasts about 300 years. The persistence of the gas in our atmosphere indicates it is being replenished--in Earth's case, mostly by bacteria...


Monday, November 22, 2004

Ivory Coast Update

If you speak French, you may be interested in the links presented in this LGF post:

Video 1

Video 2

The reader who emailed these links from France included these comments:

It’s an interview in French, made on Swiss TV the 14th November.

With [the first] link you see the little reportage made by swiss journalists.

Swiss journalists says “we heard A LOT of witnesses. All are Swiss, no Ivory. All say the same thing: French army did shoot the crowd.”

It’s a little bit weird that this interview wasn’t aired in USA, France, or anywhere...

When an American soldier shoot someone, it’s on the whole planet in a few minutes.

The original post on this subject is here.

Update: Free Will Blog is following the situation closely.

Spengler and Van Gogh

Spengler: Muslim anguish and Western hypocrisy:

...As a matter of record, most European Muslim organizations declined to disavow the murder of van Gogh. During a November 19 radio interview, for example, Zahid Mukhtar, head of the Islamic Council of Norway, refused to condemn van Gogh's murder, creating a scandal out of proportion to Norway's small Muslim population. A Moroccan-born member of the Belgian Senate, Mimount Bousakla, received death threats after remonstrating with the umbrella organization of Belgian Muslims for its refusal to denounce the van Gogh murder. She since has gone into hiding.

In Germany, most of the country's Muslim groups refused to take part in this past Sunday's Muslim demonstration in Cologne against terrorism and violence. In fact, the Turkish government organized the 20,000-person demonstration without support from local Muslim organizations. Its sole sponsor was DITIB, the Turkish government's Muslim association headed by an appointee from Ankara. DITIB "already had tried in vain to organize a common declaration by all German Muslims against Islamist terrorism", noted Der Spiegel Online on November 19...

(via Roger L. Simon)

PMW: PA Press: US soldier is rapist and Rice is "Exterminator;" US committing "ethnic cleansing"

Here's the latest from Palestinian Media Watch

PA Press: US soldier is rapist and Rice is "Exterminator;" US committing "ethnic cleansing"
By Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook

Introduction
As the Palestinian media slowly return to their regular routine following Arafat's death, their well-documented hate promotion and incitement are likewise reappearing. One common theme that has quickly returned due to the war in Iraq is the depiction of the US, verbally and visually, as the cruel and inhuman enemy.

A cartoon in today's official PA daily, Al Hayat al Jadida, shows an American soldier raping a young girl, while the Arab world looks on with amusement and even offers support. The most recent Friday sermon on PATV depicts the US as the creator of international terror. In a third example, a vicious cartoons depicts US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as the exterminator of Arabs.

The following are the three anti-American items:

1.US soldier rapes young girl


[Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, November 22, 2004]

2. Friday sermon on PATV, Sheik Ibrahim Madiras, Nov. 19, 2004
"Fallujah is undergoing ethnic cleansing right now: Thousands of shahids [martyrs], hundreds killed every hour... You've seen with your own eyes the terrorism, the terrorism of the United States, who accuses the Palestinian people, the Iraqi people and all Muslims of being terrorists, while creating international terror. The U.S. is the one who creates terror."

3. Condoleezza Rice as "exterminator" of Arab people

Text on spray: "Exterminator" Text on man: "The Middle East" [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, November 21, 2004]

Look Who's Coming to Dinner

On November 17, an invitation appeared on the Islamic Society of Boston's email distribution list inviting everyone to a fundraising dinner on the 20th to be held at the Mosque for the Praising of Allah in Roxbury, Massachusetts. First among the featured speakers was Imam Siraj Wahaj.

Who is Imam Siraj Wahaj?

He's a board member of the Islamic Society of North America: American al-Qaida suspect's imam headed probed group - Congress poring over tax records of ISNA to see if Muslim nonprofit got Saudi money:

WASHINGTON – The California imam who helped convert an al-Qaida suspect to Islam headed a Muslim activist group under investigation here for possible financial ties to terrorist front groups.

Muzammil H. Siddiqi, former president of the Islamic Society of North America, ministered to a 25-year-old Muslim convert now the subject of an FBI manhunt.

Adam Gadahn allegedly traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan to train at al-Qaida camps following his conversion while attending the Islamic Society of Orange County in Garden Grove, Calif., in the late 1990s. Siddiqi is head of the mosque there.

Congress is reviewing the financial records of the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, as part of a post-9-11 investigation into alleged ties between tax-exempt Muslim organizations and terrorist groups...

...ISNA's website says its mission is to "advance the cause of Islam and Muslims in North America." It lists training imams as its No. 1 goal.
But critics say ISNA is an extremist group disguised as a moderate group.

ISNA "enforces Wahhabi theological writ in the country's 1,200 officially recognized mosques," said terror expert Stephen Schwartz, author of "The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism." Wahhabism, a puritanical, anti-Western strain of Islam, is the official religion of the Saudi government. It's also practiced by Osama bin Laden.

Members of ISNA's board include controversial New York imam Siraj Wahaj, named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the federal case last decade against terrorist Omar Abdel Rahman, a.k.a. the Blind Sheikh...

He has an agenda: Jihad Watch: Florida Islamic Conference Outed As Jihad-Fest:

In a similar vein, CAIR board member Imam Siraj Wahaj calls for replacing the American government with a caliphate, and warns that America will crumble unless it "accepts the Islamic agenda." Wahaj, it should be noted, served as a character witness for Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the Muslim cleric convicted for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.' Front Page Magazine March 5, 2003 – Wahaj was also a scheduled speaker at the Conference who now appears to be AWOL from the event.

He knows who his friends are: FrontpageMag: UCLA Sponsors of Terrorism:

The speaker Imam Siraj Wahaj, a member of CAIR’s Board of Advisors, was listed as a potential unindicted co-conspirator in the World Trade Center bombing case (List of unindicted persons who may be alleged as co-conspirators in United States versus Omar Ahmad Ali Abdel Rahman, Mary Jo White, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, February 2, 1995). He is the imam of the al-Taqwa mosque in Brooklyn, where he provided a platform for Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman. He later served as a defense witness for the Sheik in the World Trade Center bombing trial. In September 1991, Wahaj stated the following:

"…And he [Allah] declared ‘Whoever is at war with my friends, I declare war on them.’ Who is a friend of Allah? [He chants a passage in Arabic] Allah. Your true friend is Allah, the messenger, and those who believe. Americans and Canadians. Hear it well. Hear what I’m telling you well. The Americans are not your friends, hear what I’m telling you, hear it well. The Canadians are not your friends, hear what I’m telling you, hear it well. The Europeans are not your friends. Your friend is Allah, the Messenger and those who believe. These people will never be satisfied with you until you follow their religion. They will never be satisfied with you…"[1][9]

Here's that agenda again: Salon: Islam's flawed spokesmen:

Hooper then ended the interview, and refused to discuss questions about a series of 1994 meetings that CAIR coordinated for Bassam Alamoush, a Jordanian Islamic militant who told a Chicago audience in December of that year that killing Jews was "a good deed." Nor could he be asked about CAIR board member Siraj Wahaj. Wahaj, the imam of the Taqwa Mosque in Brooklyn, decried on TV the Sept. 11 attacks as "criminal" and "wrong." But Wahaj also had invited convicted terrorist Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman to speak at his mosque, and even testified on his behalf. Before then, in 1991, speaking to the Islamic Association of North Texas, Wahaj called Operation Desert Storm "one of the most diabolical plots ever in the annals of history," and that the war was "part of a larger plan, to destroy the greatest challenge to the Western world, and that's Islam." Just as the USSR fell, so too will the U.S., Wahaj said, "unless America changes its course from the new world order and accepts the Islamic agenda."

He has a vision for America:

...and those of Siraj Wahaj, "a top figure in the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Alliance in North America, and the Muslim Arab Youth Association,

"I have a vision in America, Muslims owning property all over, Muslim businesses, factories, halal meat, supermarkets, all these buildings owned by Muslims. Can you see the vision, can you see the Newark International Airport and a John Kennedy Airport and La Guradia having Muslim fleets of planes, Muslim pilots. Can you see our trucks rolling down the highways, Muslim names. Can you imagine walking down the streets of Teaneck, [New Jersey]: three Muslim high schools, five Muslim junior-high schools, fifteen public schools. Can you see the vision, can you see young women walking down the street of Newark, New Jersey, with long flowing hijab and long dresses. Can you see the vision of an area ... controlled by the Muslims?"

He's concerned about homosexuality:

Imam Siraj Wahaj, an African-American convert to Islam, and a prominent cleric and scholar of Islam in the United States was quoted as saying the following in 1992, in reference to the supposed opening of a gay mosque in Toronto: "I would burn down the masjid (mosque) myself, if I could."

He's interested in establishing a Caliphate:

From the non-Muslim perspective the militancy in Kashmir is any thing but a freedom struggle. The People who are engaged in this insurrection came from about 3 dozen Muslim countries and so did their funds, trainers, organization and planners. This fully establishes the foreign connection of the so-called Jihad. The declared goal of these Jihadistsis to establish a caliphate; the Qauranic concept of a world government based on moral principles laid down in the Sunnah. They urge Muslims world wide to strive for caliphate, as, without it, Islam is incomplete. Even Siraj Wahaj, a U.S. black convert to Islam declared in the recent past that "if only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional govt. with a caliphate. If we were united and strong, he said, we would elect our own emir and give allegiance to him. Take my word if 8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us."

With many thanks to emailer Miss Kelley who provided the links for this entry!

A class with Robert Spencer - Session 3 with Concluding Thoughts

Last Thursday was the final session of the three-part lecture series presented by Jihad-Watch's Robert Spencer. (Here are links to Parts 1 and 2.) My notes this time are pretty poor, so forgive me as this may be a bit dis-jointed. I wrote down some of the statements that stuck out at me, but this is far from everything.

The theme of this session was basically, "OK, so now that we know there's a problem, what can we do about it?" Spencer presented his "14 Points" that may add up to a solution. Of course, I didn't seem to get them all down, sorry 'bout that.

Here are some of my notes, skipping the introduction in which Spencer covered information he hit in the previous two sessions - read on or skip down to the end for a few musings of my own:

- Point 1) [My numbering is almost certainly wrong, and I've also missed a few, but for the sake of some sort of organization I've made a stab at it.] We still refer, and the President still refers to "The War on Terror," Spencer reminded us that terror is the tactic, not the root cause. Dutch Authorities have at least declared war on "Islamic Extremism." We're really fighting the same thing - the same people. The first thing we need to do is name the threat honestly. CAIR gives "sensitivity training" to the FBI. This is bizarre. It would be unthinkable that during WW2 a Nazi group could come build a place here - yet a group like the ISB comes and builds a mosque with absolutely no questions asked. We need to put pressure on them to get answers. "The moderates are the recruiting grounds for the radicals." If the Muslims won't open up, then we have no choice but to view all with suspicion.

- Point 2) We must bring people to realize that Islam has a socio-political as well as a religious character so it doesn't necessarily come under the same rubric as current domestic institutions - there are issues of tax-exempt status for instance.

- Point 3) Ismlamic schools - we must monitor the teachers, text books, curriculum - shut down those who teach hatred. Likewise with the nation's prison system - we must monitor who the Islamic Chaplains are and ensure they are not radicalizing the convicts. Same with the Universities - we must monitor what is being taught.

- Point 4) We must call on the moderates to back their words with actions. The moderates must help in self-policing, casting out the radicals from their midsts.

- Point 5) Terminate all aid to any Islamic nation that teaches or allows to be taught violent Jihad. Warn those countries that their relationship with the US depends on their treatment of their non-Muslim populations. (As recently as 1948, 15% of the Middle East was Christian, now it is 2%.)

- [I missed a bunch here as my notes pick up at #10] Redeploy US troops to face today's war, not yesterday's (we're already doing this to a great extent).

- Point 11) Support alternative energy sources - a new Manhattan Project would not be out the question here.

- Point 12) The Drug War - Understand the bag guys use drug sales for funding.

-Point 13 I missed, so Point 14) Seek after new International Alliances - threaten to withdraw funding to the UN unless it shapes up. It's not likely to happen any time soon - it will require a lot of pressure.

Sorry. This one isn't quite as illuminating as my previous reports of this nature.

I would now like to take a few paragraphs to muse over the long-term picture. Specifically, the unique role the United States may play in "moderating" Islam - or, more specifically, in facilitating Muslims' efforts to moderate their own religion. See if you can follow me.

Events in the Netherlands have lead to proposals on the part of the Dutch such as requiring all Imams who wish to preach in the Netherlands to have received their training there - no more importing of foreign Islamic preachers and their brand of heated Middle Eastern rhetoric. Following an undercover video investigation into a German mosque, there are actually calls being made for all preaching to be done in German rather than Arabic. Some in Europe are catching on to the problem.

But here's our problem: Such measures are utterly impossible to implement here in the United States due to our Constitutional protections of freedom of religion. The government cannot possibly prescribe the language of religious preaching, nor can it involve itself in the qualifications of religious instructors, nor can it have any say at all in such matters as go on inside religious institutions short of outright incitement to violence.

This sounds like a handicap for us, and perhaps it is as far as it goes. But on a deeper level, this is actually a strength. Not allowing the government direct involvement in religious affairs (and the right of assembly and conscience that go along with it) has served us very well for all these years, of course, but it may be reasonable to ask, is this not a new type of imported threat that our traditional protections are insufficiently vigorous in dealing with?

Not necessarily. With the government unable to become involved, it requires ordinary citizens to stay engaged and interested for themselves. It requires us to be involved and let it be known on a grass-roots level what is acceptable and what is not, and the moral pressures that may be applied can come more organically - from large sectors of society, rather than from the narrow scope of government involvement with the accompanying resistance that that engenders. Where better to effect social change, through widespread force of personality or the courts?

Europe is handicapped in that its well-meaning but utterly wrong-headed hate-speech laws have hobbled its ability to allow a true marketplace of ideas to emerge. The Dutch are just now starting to face up to this fact. While America has dipped a toe in the water in this regard, fortunately we have not gone down that path as far as our European brethren have. An unique environment exists in America that allows the free exchange of ideas without government interference. That means we are still able to criticize others, including their religion, and all we have to face in response is the PC police - powerful, yes, but still a far cry from the real kind they have to deal with much of Europe (and forget the rest of the world where the free exchange of ideas simply does not exist in any meaningful sense of the word).

Again, what this leaves us with is a unique situation here in America, with a strong government that can act as referee, prevent violence and facilitate an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged and moral pressure put without the fear of violence erupting. Muslim populations are still small enough that law enforcement can do so, while Constitutional protections exist to protect this small population from the line where pressure for actions and answers cross over into persecution - something no one should want.

Let me emphasize again that the American Government's power is highly limited. They should, indeed must, overcome the PC and legal protests to go in and monitor the mosques on the inside, but at the end of the day, they can only deal with direct threats of violence, not the more base-level ideologies from which these thoughts of violence emanate. The elimination of that must come from within, or the FBI and company will be forever playing a prevention game with no end. Changes of root ideologies must come from within and pressure from society at large demanding such changes can help push it along. We must be able to say, "We welcome you into the American pluralist system, but in order for us to continue to do so, we must be assured that you truly fit it."

Again, America, with its protections of free speech, its already existing multi-faceted pluralistic society with all manner of religious (where religion is still respected, not just tolerated) and even anti-religious thought to draw on is uniquely situated to provide the environment to serve as the agar in which a new germ of American Muslim thought could possibly emerge.

In much of the world today, Muslim reformers risk being branded apostates and killed - not just in the Middle East, but also in places like Europe with large Muslim populations. America may be able to provide the environment in which true reformers, willing to re-examine the tenets of their faith from the ground-up, can be seeded in a fertile ground through which they can prosper.

What results will have the benefit of being an organic - ground-up - outgrowth, coming without government interference - thus giving it deeper legitimacy and wider base of support. Just as Judaism, adapting to the fact that it was a minority religion, long ago forbade proselytizing in order to survive and prosper - to adapt to new circumstance - perhaps a new "American Islam" may also come about to adapt to the realities of surviving in a pluralistic society.

Our armed forces can face and destroy any armed force on this planet, and I have written at length previously about my support for the Administration's efforts to destroy physical threats abroad and try to implant the germ of Freedom inside the borders of Dar al-Islam (the House of Islam). We are trying to bring our secular freedoms along - freedom of the press, of speech, of conscience, of representation to the government and that is good. Further, much of the spread of Freedom has occurred without government involvement at all. How many people the world over yearn to live like Americans due to what they see in the movies and in images they see elsewhere and through our advertising. But these are mostly generic, secular, freedoms that do not speak uniquely to the Muslim World. Wouldn't it be ironic if, along with all that, America brought along and implanted the germ of a new form of tolerant, pluralistic Islam that was allowed to germinate and grow and multiply in the uniquely fertile ground only America can provide - a sort of ideological biological warfare on a massive and uncontrolled scale?

I conclude then with a list of a few of the things that need to happen, or continue to happen, in order for this to occur:

1) The government must see to its basic goal of protecting the citizenry. That means it must be supported in its efforts to resist the forces of Political Correctness, CAIR, the ACLU and the like and must make it its business to find out what is going on in the Mosques here at home. Preaching of violence must not be tolerated, and Mosques must not be allowed to serve as protected places for terrorist plotting under the protection of religious institutions.

2) Oppose hate-speech legislation of any kind. The free marketplace of ideas must be protected. Ideas must be able to be shared freely by a free people. Even offensive speech must be protected so that it can be examined on its merits, not made criminal on the whim of some bureaucrat or court.

3) Understand that Islam is here to stay - both in America and the world. We must hold a supporting hand out to the true, sincere and brave reformers, not drive Muslims underground and thus create a new breed of Maranos. Fighting Islam as a whole is as counter-productive as it is fruitless.

4) Keep watch for ourselves on what is going on in the Mosques - be particularly watchful of any foreign influences and interferences. What we want to do is reverse the flow of Wahhabi fundamentalist thought in on itself. Stop them from influencing us here by preventing them from visiting and discouraging domestic institutions from accepting their money. It should be the equivalent of a third rail to touch money coming in from the Arabian peninsula. We need to get that flow going in the other direction.

5) Speak out firmly but not hatefully while working to co-opt the forces of the Politically Correct. We need to define what is PC or not, not allow groups like CAIR, the campus race-merchants and others to define it for us.

6) Do what is necessary to encourage new religious institutions to comport themselves in a manner in keeping with traditional American values of religious openness and pluralism. Does that Mosque treat believers and non-believers the same?

This is going to be a long-term struggle, but I believe the conditions exist uniquely in America - in its society, its people and its Constitutional structure - to make it happen.

Sunday, November 21, 2004

Why We Like Him

You can have all the policy debates you want, hammer them all into the ground until they're unrecognizable...but this story and video are an almost perfect distillation of why so many of us have an instinctive affection for George W. Bush.

The Daily Recycler: Taking Charge

A quintessentially American moment. The Secret Service guy has a job to do - he's not a servant or a class apart from his boss, nor is he a prop. He looks out for the President, and in return, the President looks out for him.

Oh, and before anyone says, "Well, he was just scared to be without his bodyguard," I sincerely doubt Bush was frightened in the surroundings he was in.

Update:

The Washington Post has a description of this as well as a couple other chaotic happenings that took place at the event.

... Bush and the first lady walked into the beaux-arts banquet hall, and Chilean officers, who appeared to be waiting for the moment, stepped in front of Trotta, blocking him from entering.

U.S. officials said Chilean police had been chafing for a week about a demand by Secret Service agents that they control the president's space, even when he was on sovereign turf. Now, it was payback time.

In the fracas that ensued, amid a flurry of half nelsons, one Secret Service agent wound up jammed against a wall. "You're not stopping me! You're not stopping me! I'm with the president!" an unidentified agent can be heard yelling on videotape of the mayhem.

It took Bush several minutes to realize what was happening. The president and the first lady walked on through the door onto a big red carpet, looking relaxed. They greeted Lagos and his wife, Luisa Duran. "You want us to pose here?" Bush asked Lagos with a grin, and they turned to face a wall of flashes.

Then Bush either realized he was missing something, or he heard the commotion. The president, who is rarely alone, even in his own house, turned and walked back to the front door unaccompanied, facing the backs of a sea of dark suits. Bush, with his right hand, reached over the suits and pointed insistently at Trotta. At first the officials, with their backs to him and their heads in the rumble, did not realize it was the president intervening. Bush then braced himself against someone and lunged to retrieve the agent, who was still arguing with the Chileans. The shocked Chilean officials then released Trotta.

Trotta walked in behind Bush, who looked enormously pleased with himself. He was wearing the expression that some critics call a smirk, and his eyebrows shot up as if to wink at bystanders.

Bush adjusted his right cufflink and muttered something to Lagos, took the first lady's arm and headed into the dinner of grilled fish...

Mmmm...fish.

Rescuing the Rescuer

See the truck hoist the car out of the water. See the truck take its turn in the drink. Need a bigger truck.

From somewhere in Belgium?

Overheard in a Barber Shop

Don't miss this description of what the Viking Pundit overheard the guy next to him telling the barber about his son's experiences in Iraq:

...His unit was clearing a Mosque in Fallujah when they came upon an insurgent carrying a weapon. The Marine took two shots to the chest that were stopped by his flak jacket. Apparently, he noted that the insurgent was wearing what he thought was a protective vest and he (? or another Marine) put two shots into the guy’s neck. However, after the terrorist crumpled over, they discovered – to their horror – that it wasn’t body armor he was wearing but an explosive vest, which detonated. This guy’s son received shrapnel in the leg and arm and is blinded in the right eye (although perhaps not permanently – the doctors think it’s trauma from the explosion). They’re going to leave the shrapnel in the leg “as a souvenir.”

Then this...

Also, don't miss this letter home as well as this New York Times report (yes). [The last two links via Roger L. Simon.]

Saturday, November 20, 2004

The Globe and the Van Gogh Murder

This Boston Globe story is interesting for a few reasons. Yes, it starts and ends by somewhat portraying Muslims as victims, not the perpetrators - true as far as it goes, but an odd frame to provide the incident - and also somewhat frustratingly referring to the "alleged killer," (alleged? Come on.) but along the way we can observe a couple of things...

Boston.com: Killing fuels Dutch clash of cultures

UDEN, Netherlands -- They had gathered for prayers at a mosque on the final night of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan when someone shouted, ''Fire at the school!"

The community of devout Moroccan and Turkish immigrants in this town south of Amsterdam rushed to Bedir Islamic Elementary School as flames lit up the sky.

Among them was Emine Altun, 32, who stood shivering as the school that taught 120 children, including her two boys, was gutted in less than an hour on Nov. 9.

Scrawled in white spray paint were the initials of the hate group known as White Power.

''We could only cry," Altun said.

The attack was among the spate of bombings, fires, and vandalism at more than 20 mosques and Islamic schools and organizations in the bitter, violent atmosphere that has erupted after the Nov. 2 murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a suspected Islamic extremist. Several Protestant churches also have been attacked in a spiral of revenge.

Uh oh, the "cycle of violence" comes to The Netherlands.

The tumult of the past two weeks has jolted the Netherlands, long synonymous with tolerance and modern, secular values. Famous for its orderly bicycle lanes and its open society in which prostitution and cannabis are legal, and as home to the seat of international law in The Hague, the country has been transformed into a cultural battlefield.

The Hague, heal thyself!

Headlines around the world have trumpeted van Gogh's killing and the wave of violence as a clash of civilizations -- Islam vs. the West. But political scientists and religious scholars say they see it more specifically as the opening of a direct conflict between a fiery Islamic fundamentalist movement rooted in a disenfranchised Muslim immigrant community and a strident secular fundamentalism that is increasingly intolerant of any religious expression.

Interesting. Cracks of an admission that anti-religiosity can be as fundamentalist and intollerant as the religious variety.

Van Gogh was attacked on a crowded street in Amsterdam while riding his bicycle to work. He was shot eight times and stabbed, and his throat was slit.

A note was left on his chest, allegedly by his suspected killer...

"Allegedly by his suspected killer..." Don't commit yourself to anything there, Globe.

I didn't mean to fisk this, actually. Instead, I just wanted to point out a couple of interesting tid-bits that I think relate to some domestic political issues. Skipping ahead:

The Netherlands has 16 million people, including 1 million Muslims mostly from Turkey and Morocco. By many accounts, the country has mishandled immigration policy, failing to integrate newly arrived Muslim citizens and even second-generation citizens, into its society. Critics of government policies say, for example, that it erred with a well-intentioned but flawed approach to education that permitted religiously funded schools, isolating Arab speakers from the mainstream population and feeding on discontent and joblessness in the immigrant Muslim community.

Is it too much to point out that this is an indictment of bi-lingual education here at home? I don't think so. Allowing isolated communities to stay isolated feeds their lack of success and inability to integrate into the greater society. Learning English in school (here at home) and mainstreaming students with full English instruction ASAP is one of the solutions.

...Bouyeri bought into the mindset, according to dozens of messages he posted on several militant Islamic websites and in a community newspaper in the months before the attack. Authorities say he called for jihad against Europeans and Americans...

It's good to see Jihad being mentioned in a paper like the Globe without a disclaimer about true Jihad as a spiritual struggle rather than a physical one.

And here's an interesting argument against hate-speech laws:

...''From the perspective of our community, when a Muslim cleric called homosexuality a sin or spoke out against gay marriage, he was taken to court and sued and condemned by the government," Larouz said. ''But when van Gogh said these hateful things, he was defended for his right to freedom of speech. That . . . double standard fueled even more anger."...

Once you start making some citizens more protected than others, you instantly begin to risk feelings of second-class status in the others.

The French at War

From emailer Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi:

This is a rather large file and the scenes are brutal BUT the atrocities committed by French troops in the Ivory Coast is real proof of what liars and hypocrites the French really are. If you have the stomach to watch this, please do and forward it to every French person on they planet for them to see that when they talk about Iraq, what their own soldiers are doing to innocent Africans!

Radio Côte d'Ivoire Internationnal

Let me emphasize that portions of the video are very graphic. View at your own risk.

Update: (Via Instapundit who kindly links to this post) Captain Ed observes:

...From what I've seen thus far, it appears to show French troops shooting indiscriminately at African civilians. A number of deaths appear to have occurred at this incident, including several women. In fact, it seems like most of the dead were women, but that may have been because the cameraman focused on those victims. And that, just like the Marine shooting the faker in the mosque last week, may be the problem.

The video is highly subjective. Just like with any home movie, it starts and stops at different times with no particular purpose, and no time sequences are shown. When the firing starts, you can't see who's shooting, where it's aimed, or why. In fact, you never see soldiers shooting, at least in part II -- you just hear the shots and see the aftermath. Just as with the video in Iraq, the entire presentation lacks context. Who starts the shooting? Did anyone in the crowd have weapons and fire back, or fire first? So far, I can't tell.

Perhaps this might be the French Amritsar, but the video shown doesn't prove it; it merely suggests it. Before we leap to conclusions, we need a bit more evidence than these videos provide.

Quite true. Of course, before we get more information, there needs to be a bit of interest generated, and as Glenn points out, "I hope we'll see some reporting on the subject. Certainly Reuters would be all over something like this if U.S. troops were involved. . ." ...and not just Reuters.

Update2:

The same emailer points to this Reuters news report:

France rejects Gbagbo Ivory Coast beheading charge

PARIS, Nov 21 (Reuters) - France vigorously rejected on Sunday charges by Ivory Coast's president and its leading Roman Catholic cleric that French troops had beheaded young protesters there, dismissing the statements as outrageous disinformation.

Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie urged President Laurent Gbagbo to stop stoking anti-French hatred in the country, where French troops are trying to keep the peace between the rebel north and the south he controls.

Gbagbo said in a French Internet forum on Saturday that he believed that the charge, first made by Cardinal Bernard Agre on Vatican Radio last week, was true even though he had not visited morgues as Agre had and seen proof for the accusation.

"The outrageousness of the terms President Gbagbo has used rob them of all credibility," Alliot-Marie said.

"These charges amount to disinformation similar to President Gbagbo's doubts about the reality of the French military victims in Bouake," she told France-Inter radio, referring to nine French soldiers killed in a rebel raid on Nov. 6.

Asked about the charge that French soldiers had beheaded young Ivorians during protests in the capital, Gbagbo told the Internet forum run by the magazine Le Nouvel Observateur:

"This testimony by the prelate was reported by all the people who were present at the siege of the Hotel Ivoire by the French army and all those who were in the hospitals.

"I wasn't in the hospitals but everyone who went there said it. We can assume this testimony repeated by several people is true."

Agre told the French service of Vatican Radio on Nov. 11: "I've just come back from the hospitals, it's unbearable, these young girls decapitated by the French army, these people even lying on the floor."

Alliot-Marie accused Ivory Coast's leaders of manipulating crowds of protesters in an extremely dangerous way...

If this is related to the events shown in the video, then I can tell you having viewed it that it does not show anyone technically "beheaded," which makes it sound as though the Frenchmen purposefully chopped someone's head off, but in the most grizzly portion of the video, it does show at least one case of what can only be the effect of a high-caliber round on a human skull. It could easily, after the individual is removed to the morgue, wind up being described as the effects of "beheading."

Update3: A commenter at Captain's Quarters points to the first part of the video (a different file) and says, "There is another file, filmed much closer to the French troops which clearly shows a French soldier, firing into the fleeing crowd. He does not appear to be concerned about any incoming fire, and is making no attempt to find cover. He just stands there and blasts away. Nor do the other French soldiers in any of the footage appear to react as if they are in danger or taking fire."

I am downloading it now, but it is coming in very slowly.

Update4: OK, I've seen the first section of tape. There certainly isn't anything there that would appear to justify the type of carnage seen later. I saw no weapons of any kind in the crowd which did not appear to be there with violent intent, and in any case was mostly confined by their own organizers behind a self-imposed line demarcated by string. The only thing that's visible when the initial shooting erupts is two or three individuals that appear to get too close to the French line protecting the hotel - the French themselves being behind a large hedge, barbed-wire and among armored vehicles.

That, in any case, is what can be discerned from the video. More to the story? That's a question for the French to answer.

Friday, November 19, 2004

A long row to hoe

Even after the death of Arafat, there's going to be a lot of clean-up to do in Palestinian Arab society. Keep an eye on the PA media to see how sincere such efforts are...whenever they begin.

Here' the latest from Palestinian Media Watch (no permalink yet):

Mother on PATV: Son's Shahada -martyrdom, is a "wedding," time of joy by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook

Intoduction
The hope that the situation in the Palestinian Authority (PA) will improve dramatically with the demise of Yasser Arafat is based on the mistaken assumption that the problems in the PA stemmed mainly from Arafat as an individual and not from the society he created.

But an interview with a Palestinian mother on PATV yesterday indicates the depth of the PA society's worship of Death for Allah (Shahada), and support of suicide terror, which has not changed merely because of a change of leadership. In this program, a Palestinian mother of a suicide terrorist talks about how she and other mothers in her position see their sons Shahada death as a positive event -- like a joyful wedding.

The following is an excerpt from the PATV NOV. 17:

Moderator: "They [Israelis] accuse the Palestinian mother of hating her sons and in encouraging them to die. This is what we hear from Israelis. Is this true?

Mother Um Al-Ajrami: "No, we do not encourage our sons to die. We encourage them to Shahada [martyrdom] for the homeland, for Allah."

[She then talks about a group of women, all mothers of Shahids, who go to other mothers of Shahids during the period of mourning]:
"We don't say to the mothers of the Shahids, 'We have come to comfort you’, but 'We have come to bless you on the wedding of your son, on the Shahada of your son. Congratulations to you on the Shahada . . . ' For us, the mourning is joyous. We give out drinks, we give out sweets. Praise to God -- the mourning is joyous. occasion" [PATV, Nov. 17, 2004]

The "Islam Online" website (www.islamonline.org) points out that this woman, Um Al-Ajrami is quoted as saying, "I brought sweets and biscuits in order to change the day of joy to a new wedding, not mourning. I will sweeten anyone who will come to me to bless me on the occasion of the first holiday of the Shahada of my son."
[www.islamonline.org]


Palestinian Media Watch has frequently documented that the PA political and religious leadership has promoted the interpretation of Islamic tradition, that Shahada -death is not to be feared, but should be aspired and anticipated with great pleasure. Young men are taught by religious leaders and through video clips that if they die as Shahids, they will join 72 beautiful maidens in Paradise. (see sermon and video clip.) The Palestinian mothers' positive, even joyous, responses to their sons' deaths -- and their celebration of their sons' "marriages" to the maidens of Paradise -- is a result of years of PA indoctrination.

Thursday, November 18, 2004

HonestReporting: Palestinian 'Art' Exhibit

I've been too busy to put anything up today, and I'll be leaving shortly for Robert Spencer's lecture, but before I go, I felt compelled to re-post this latest entry from HonestReporting.com in full. Westchester County residents, make your voices heard. Fundraising for the moral supporters of terror is going on in your house.

Palestinian 'Art' Exhibit

A New York public facility hosts a fundraiser for an art exhibit that vilifies Israelis and extols suicide bombers.

This Saturday (Nov. 20), a fundraiser will be held at the Westchester County Center in White Plains, New York, raising money to bring a Palestinian art exhibit to the New York metro area. Here's one of the paintings from the proposed exhibit (previously shown in Houston, TX), portraying Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon collecting and boiling a young Palestinian's blood:

The painting rehashes the historic anti-Semitic blood libel, with Sharon as sadistic torturer and the United States his accomplice.

Suicide bombers are also praised in the 'art' exhibit -- the official introduction explains that

[t]o several of the artists, the subject of the martyrs is an all-important topic. A true martyr is anyone who gives his life in service of his people, including...suicide bombers that attack Israeli civilians.

One of the works (pictured at right) 'pay[s] homage to the first 13 martyrs in the current uprising.'

Though two state legislators and local Jewish groups urged Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano to cancel the fundraiser -- which will be held in a public building -- Spano has decided to allow Saturday's event to take place.

In the (NY) Journal-News, the protesting legislators clarify that

this isn't about free speech - it's about whether to allow [the fundraiser] on county property. Spano has banned gun shows from the County Center because he opposes such a use of the space, they argue, and he should exert the same discretion here.

Comments to Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano: click here (Please remember that polite criticism is far more effective.)

Update: Jeremy Brown, writing on Michael J. Totten's blog links to this post and writes:

...I can think of no greater insult to a nation, race, or creed than to purport to represent the soul of its culture through the words and images of its most sociopathic element. Let's see Palestinian art that tells ugly truths, that challenges comfortable assumptions, by all means. But -- does this really have to be said? -- let's please not make apologies for the murdering fascistic militants who are just as poisonous to the future of a free Palestine as they are to the future of Israel...

That's well said.

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

Reforming State

The Diplomad, a group blog written "by career US Foreign Service officers," has a whole lotta suggestions for how the new Secretary can reform the State Department. And when I say a lot, I mean...a lot. The fact that there would still be a Foggy Bottom left after implementing all those suggestions just goes to show how huge the State Department is.

...Slash and burn. At times it appears that half the FS is involved in making personnel decisions on the other half. The teeth-to-tail ratio is very poor. The assignment process must be streamlined; the seemingly endless negotiations for assignments must end; the protracted meetings and deal-makings must stop; show less sympathy for special needs, e.g., tandem couples. It can take a year or more to assign someone to a posting. Absurd. Reduce the size of the personnel (HR) operation. Put an end to the little empires that exist in HR, empires established by bureaucrats who "homestead" themselves in the HR system, spending years there accumulating power, establishing networks to reward themselves and friends and to punish "enemies." It is tempting to rely on these persons' "expertise," but resist it; rotate them out. Make them stand in a visa line in Mexico City. Get them out of Washington on a regular basis. It's the Foreign Service. They don't want to go? They can go work for the DMV.

Drastically reduce the layers of bureaucracy. Do we need so many staff assistants, special assistants, executive assistants, etc.? Flatten out the pyramid. Work on eliminating whole offices and bureaus. Have the Secretary go to Congress and argue for eliminating the annual human rights report exercise -- an enormous and wasteful enterprise that keeps hundreds of people employed to appease a handful of NGOs who don't like the reports anyhow. Kill off this requirement; eliminate the whole human rights bureau (DRL). Scrap the Undersecretary for Global Affairs (G): what the hell is that job anyhow? Cut the oceans and environment bureau (OES). Merge the three quasi- pol-mil bureaus and reduce their overall size. Beef up the INR function. Spin off USIA, again. Take a merciless look at the consular affairs (CA) bureau, and get rid of all those lawyers in that bureau! Do we need to baby long-term American expats who haven't lived in the US for years and years and often don't pay taxes? Split the CA bureau: hive off citizen services from visa issues...

The Froggy on the Fallujah/Marine Video

I haven't commented on this because it just seemed too obvious and aggravating. Anyone who spends any time reading military history or talking to veterans - or, more specifically trying to talk to veterans about their experiences knows it's like pulling teeth if that guy saw any combat. They just have trouble relating it and communicating their experiences to those of us who haven't seen the things they have. There's no way to explain it to us but this infamous video and the ensuing ruckus begins to explain why. Donald Sensing had a lengthy and interesting post up on the subject which I unfortunately can't find now.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,Than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and there are things that happen in war time that no law of war is ever going to cover to the letter and no every-day life moral context can really help us relate to enough to judge. You "have to have been there" to understand. So as far as this Marine's actions go - hey, whatever the US Marine Corps decides, I'm fine with that. Looks like the guy did the right thing to me. We don't have to wonder what the enemy would do to us, we've all seen the videos, and none of those terrorists are there to do their jobs and then go home to say "Would you like fries with that?" like our guys are. They're there to murder and terrorize and die in the process. They deserve to have at least a third of that wish granted.

I think the idea of embedded reporters is a good one, but it seems obvious that allowing photo and video releases without a vetting process is a bad idea.

Anyway, DO NOT MISS this post from former the former Navy Seal who writes at Froggy Ruminations:

Froggy Ruminations: They're Called Security Rounds:

Its a safety issue pure and simple. After assaulting through a target, put a security round in everybody's head. Sorry al-Reuters, there's no paddy wagon rolling around Fallujah picking up "prisoners" and offering them a hot cup a joe, falafel, and a blanket. There's no time to dick around in the target, you clear the space, dump the chumps, and moveon.org. Are Corpsman expected to treat wounded terrorists? Negative. Hey libs, worried about the defense budget? Well, it would be waste, fraud, and abuse for a Corpsman to spend one man minute or a battle dressing on a terrorist, its much cheaper to just spend the $.02 on a 5.56mm FMJ.

By the way, terrorists who chop off civilian's heads are not prisoners, they are carcasses...

Read the rest.

Robert Spencer Lecture - Reminder

Just a reminder that the third and final session will be taking place tomorrow evening at 8pm and Temple Reyim in Newton, Mass. The cost is $10 and is well-worth attending even if you missed the first two classes. My reports on those two sessions are here and here.

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

Half Life 2 in my hands

Replacing Arafat

Cal Thomas reviews the dismal options:

JWR: More killers for President!

It does not bode well for President Bush's newly announced Middle East peace effort that within hours of his stated optimism about the future of the "peace process," the first candidate to announce for the office vacated by Yasser Arafat's death was Marwan Barghouti, who is serving multiple life sentences in an Israeli prison for an attack that killed four Israelis and a Greek monk...

...The other possible candidates also reflect Arafat's strategy of using terror to eradicate the State of Israel and all Jews. There are no leaders who openly favor making peace with Israel because Arafat had them executed.

Three who have assumed senior leadership positions of the major Palestinian Arab institutions are Mahmoud Abbas (also known as Abu Mazen), Farouk Kaddoumi and Ahmed Qureia. A quick look at their resumes does not give confidence that these guys are the peace-loving democrat leaders sought by President Bush...

...Both The New York Times and Israeli Radio reported on March 31, 2003, that Abbas, a former Palestinian Authority prime minister, had offered Cabinet positions to leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad and praised Arab terrorists imprisoned by Israel as "political prisoners" and "heroes." Abbas is the author of a book that denies the Nazis murdered 6 million Jews...

...Two years ago, Kaddoumi declared "the PLO no longer recognizes Israel and adheres to its national charter." Thirty of the 33 clauses in the PLO charter call for Israel's destruction or violence against Israel. Numerous statements by Kaddoumi over the years have made it clear that he, like Arafat, has no intention of settling for anything less than all of the land and none of the Jews...

...Qureia has opposed action against terrorists, attacked President Bush for referring to Israel as a "Jewish state," declared his hope that Britain would "correct the historic mistake (it) committed against Palestinians through the Balfour Declaration in 1917" (which declared Britain's support "in Palestine for a national home for the Jewish people") and publicly trampled on Israel's flag.

The vision for Israel's future must be based on something other than fantasy. Hoping that these killers will suddenly beat their swords into ploughshares, or that the brainwashed "Palestinian people" will elect a true democrat or someone who would pursue objectives other than those of Arafat and his henchmen, is wishing upon a star.

Since Israel's establishment as a modern nation in 1948, pleadings for peace have traveled in just one direction. Peace can't be made in a vacuum. It takes two peoples committed to democratic longings and religious liberty. So far, only one side has demonstrated a commitment to such principles...

Update: Also see this JWR piece for a similarly gloomy view from Frank Gaffney:

Window for war?

You have to hand it to the Palestinians. They have gotten away with fabricating a nationality where none existed prior to Yasser Arafat's terrorism-backed strutting on the world stage. They have enjoyed global successes in staking historical claims to territory that clearly post-dated those of the Jews.

Now, notwithstanding the fact that they and other Arabs have waged war against Israel incessantly — via both conventional and unconventional means — ever since the modern Jewish State was founded in 1948, they have obtained the support of even President Bush for the ultimate reward: a sovereign state of Palestine.

Unfortunately, there is every reason to believe that such an entity will amount to something Mr. Bush would never knowingly countenance, let alone support — the creation of yet another state-sponsor of terror...



Monday, November 15, 2004

This Should Be Interesting - Rice as SecState

FOXNews.com: Rice Expected to Be Named Secretary of State:

WASHINGTON — White House officials said Monday they expect President Bush to name Condoleezza Rice to replace Colin Powell as secretary of state, sources told FOX News on Monday night.

If nominated and confirmed, Rice would be the second woman and the second African American to be the nation's top foreign policy representative...

Somerville Divestment Update

This just in from the JCRC:

Accomplishments in Somerville

Last Monday, JCRC joined 100 pro-Israel community members to deliver testimony and urge the Somerville Board of Aldermen to oppose a resolution to divest from Israel.

Members of local unions, Rep. Tim Toomey, and Somerville Mayor Jospeh Curatone clearly stated their opposition to the resolution. A similar statement was also read from Sen. Jarrett Barrios.

If you are a constituent, please send a short email or call Senator Barrios, Representative Toomey, and Mayor Curatone's offices to thank them for thier support of Israel and opposition to divestment.

Next Steps to Defeat Divestment

The Legislative Matters Committee will be voting on the divestment resolution at their December 7 meeting. In preparation for that meeting, they will spend the next few weeks reviewing their notes on this issue.

We have been invited to submit written testimony through the end of November. Statements can be sent to the City Clerk: John Long, at Somerville City Hall by email (see below) or by mail at: 93 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143.

Testimony should be no more than 1 page and focused on one reason that you oppose divestment and support Israel. Please be respectful of the Aldermen and their process.

We are encouraging people to focus on one of three areas: investment in Israel as an investment in democracy, debunking the comparison of Israel to South Africa, and personal stories of local residents connected to Israeli life under terror.

Somerville residents are also encouraged to join us on December 7 at Somerville City Hall. We suggest you arrive before the 7:00 start of the meeting to be sure you will be able to get inside the chambers.

To email John Long click here:

Sample Talking Points for Testimony

If you are sending testimony that focuses on Israel as a democracy, you can mention the following:

  • Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East.
  • Somerville's investments in Israel also benefit Palestinians, whose economy relies heavily on Israel.
  • 1.1 million Israelis are Arabs, making up 20% of the population, and have full voting, expression, and religious practice rights.
  • The Israeli Supreme Court, which recently voted to re-route the security fence, has both Arab and Israeli justices.
  • Israel is the only country in the Middle East where women are guaranteed equal rights, equal pay, and equal healthcare as their male counterparts.
If you are sending testimony that focuses on debunking the apartheid comparison:
  • A central goal of the South African apartheid system was to strip black South Africans of their citizenship. The 20% of Israeli citizens who are Arab Muslims and Christians to enjoy full voting rights and access to education and health care in Israel.
  • 10 of the 120 seats in the Israeli Parliament are held by Arab parties, thus ensuring participation in national goverment actions.
  • No Israeli government has sought to annex the West Bank or Gaza Strip. Once terror and violence ceases, Israel seeks the creation of a Palestinian state through negotations. Divestment only strengthens the hand of extremists who use violence to delegitimize the peace process.
If you are sending testimony focused on terror in Israel:
  • There is no excuse for Palestinian use of terrorism - the deliberate and systematic murder of civilians to inspire fear for political purposes. Israeli civilians in pizzerias, on buses, and at family holiday celebrations are the intended targets of terror attacks, and their deaths are used as political capital.
  • Palestinian terror is counterproductive. Instead of bringing more concessions, it makes Israelis less inclined to trust the Palestinian people and leadership. It is this use of violence that has caused the collapse of the peace process.
  • Israel is a country under constant attack, seeking to keep its people safe. In its efforts to limit the magnitude of attack by Palestinian terrorists, innocent civilians are occasionally caught in the crossfire. Like America, Israel is a country with accountability for loss of life in combat. The Israeli army has a strict code of ethics in place, and soldiers found responsible for deaths of Palestinians are held to the strict code of ethics and investigations.

Previous post on this subject with background is here.

Transformers with Modern Tech

Koffi's Arrogance - Updated

Will anything convince a critical number of people that the UN is an organization barely to be tolerated, let alone held in any esteem?

The Senate vs. the U.N.:

'The extent of the corruption is staggering,'' Sen. Norm Coleman told me. He is a freshman Republican from Minnesota completing his second year in Washington, and he was talking about the United Nations and its pious secretary-general, Kofi Annan. Coleman's comments are not the mere musings of an insignificant rookie senator, but the considered judgment of a committee chairman whose careful investigation reached the hearing stage today...

...Coleman said this week's hearings will show that ''the scope of the ripoff'' at the U.N. is substantially more than the widely reported $10 billion to $11 billion in graft. But more than money is involved. These hearings also should expose the arrogance of the secretary-general and his bureaucracy. At the same time that he has refused to honor the Senate committee's request for documents, Annan has inveighed against the Fallujah offensive sanctioned by the new Iraqi government while ignoring the terrorism of insurgents. This is an unprecedented showdown between a branch of the U.S. government and the U.N.

The scandal is not complicated. Money from Iraqi oil sales permitted by the Saddam Hussein regime under U.N. auspices, supposedly to provide food for Iraqis, was siphoned off to middlemen. Billions intended to purchase food wound up in Saddam's hands for the purpose of buying conventional weapons. The complicity of U.N. member states France and Russia is pointed to by the Senate investigation. The web of corruption deepened when it was revealed that Annan's son, Kojo, was on the payroll of a contractor in the oil-for-food program...

...Coleman has been joined in rare bipartisan cooperation by the subcommittee's fiercely liberal ranking Democrat, Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan. Coleman sent Levin a draft of a tough letter to Annan, and Levin signed it. The bipartisan letter demanded access to U.N. internal audits and key U.N. personnel. It also accused the Volcker committee of ''affirmatively preventing the subcommittee'' from investigating the scandal. A major point of dispute is the U.N.'s flat refusal to permit Lloyd's Register, hired by the U.N. to inspect Iraq's oil-for-food transactions, to provide any documents to the Senate.

The reaction by the U.N. bureaucracy has been an intransigent defense of its stone wall. Edward Mortimer, Annan's director of communications, publicly sneered at the Coleman-Levin letter as ''very awkward and troubling.'' Privately, Annan's aides told reporters that they were not about to hand over confidential documents to the Russian Duma and every other parliamentary body in the world.

But the U.S. Senate is not the Russian Duma. These are not just a few right-wing voices in the wilderness who are confronting Kofi Annan. ''In seeing what is happening at the U.N.,'' Coleman told me, ''I am more troubled today than ever. I see a sinkhole of corruption.'' The United Nations and its secretary-general are in a world of trouble.

(via Power Line)

Update: More at CNN:

Probe: Iraqi oil money estimates double:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Saddam Hussein's regime made more than $21.3 billion in illegal revenue by subverting the U.N. oil-for-food program -- more than double previous estimates, according to congressional investigators.

"This is like an onion -- we just keep uncovering more layers and more layers," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minnesota, whose Senate Committee on Government Affairs received the new information at hearing Monday.

The new figures on Iraq's alleged surcharges, kickbacks and oil-smuggling are based on troves of new documents obtained by the committee's investigative panel, Coleman told reporters before the hearing...


Payback in Fallujah

Sunday, November 14, 2004

A Bus 19 Search for Answers

I just received the following comment to my January post written in reaction to the suicide-murder aboard Jerusalem Bus #19 (See this post for photos of the bus as it is now.):

I am Yechezkel Goldberg's sister. He was murdered on Egged Bus 19. I am seeking first person accounts of the last moments and aftermath of his murder along with his fellow commuters. Please email me at carried@carrieon.com
Carrie

I thought I'd move that up to the top of the blog. Good luck in finding answers, Carrie.

Here we go? - Abbas survives assassination attempt in Gaza City

Jerusalem Post: Abbas survives assassination attempt in Gaza City:

Fatah gunmen stormed a mourning tent in Gaza City on Sunday evening and opened fire to protest against the presence of the PLO's Mahmoud Abbas and former security minister Muhammed Dahlan.

Two Palestinian policemen were killed in the ensuing gun battle, which lasted for more than 10 minutes. Abbas was unhurt, but his bodyguards threw him to the ground as the shooting intensified...

...PA officials expressed fear that the shooting attack would trigger internal fighting in the Gaza Strip and called for calm.

The attack occurred shortly after Abbas and Dahlan arrived at the tent to receive condolences for the death of Arafat.

Eyewitnesses said a group of 30 gunmen, clad in green and belonging to one of Fatah's splinter groups, raided the tent chanting slogans against the two, who were surrounded by dozens of armed bodyguards.

Fatah's armed wing Aksa Martyrs Brigades strongly denied responsibility for the shooting attack and called for an immediate investigation.

The gunmen who entered the tent shouted "Abbas, Dahlan, go away, you American agents." The gunmen, who were not masked, also chanted slogans in praise of Arafat.

"When they came close to Abbas, some of them opened fire from their automatic rifles," said a Palestinian journalist who was in the area.

"Then I saw a uniformed policeman lying in a pool of blood. He had been hit in the head. Another man was also shot and killed."

In addition to Abbas and Dahlan, a large number of senior Palestinian officials were inside the tent when the gun battle erupted. They included General Musa Arafat, overall commander of the National Security Forces in the Gaza Strip; General Amin al-Hindi, head of the General Intelligence; Saeb al-Ajez, commander of the Civil Police; and Nasser al-Kidwa, the PLO's representative to the UN, who is a nephew of Yasser Arafat...


The War of Leaks Continues

...at CIA. Watch how the Left, for whom the CIA is a constant whipping-boy, will suddenly come to stand as champion of convenience for the Agency as it is. Is there any other type of leak aside from the "I told them, I told them, but would they listen? Noooooo..." variety? This is going to get even more ugly before it gets better.

Washington Post: Goss Reportedly Rebuffed Senior Officials at CIA

Within the past month, four former deputy directors of operations have tried to offer CIA Director Porter J. Goss advice about changing the clandestine service without setting off a rebellion, but Goss has declined to speak to any of them, said former CIA officials aware of the communications.

The four senior officials represent nearly two decades of experience leading the Directorate of Operations under both Republican and Democratic presidents. The officials were dismayed by the reaction and were concerned that Goss has isolated himself from the agency's senior staff, said former clandestine service officers aware of the offers.

The senior operations officials "wanted to talk as old colleagues and tell him to stop what he was doing the way he was doing it," said a former senior official familiar with the effort.

Last week, Deputy Director John E. McLaughlin retired after a series of confrontations between senior operations officials and Goss's top aide, Patrick Murray. Days before, the chief of the clandestine service, Stephen R. Kappes, said he would resign rather than carry out Murray's demand to fire Kappes's deputy, Michael Sulick, for challenging Murray's authority.

Goss and the White House asked Kappes to delay his decision until tomorrow, but they are actively considering his replacement, several current and former CIA officials said.

Kappes, whose accomplishments include persuading Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi to renounce weapons of mass destruction this year, began removing personal photos from his office walls yesterday, associates said.

A handful of other senior undercover operations officers have talked seriously about resigning, as soon as tomorrow.

"Each side doesn't understand the other's culture very well," one former senior operations officer said. "There is a way to do this elegantly. You don't have to humiliate people. You bring in people with really weak credentials, and everyone is going to rally around the flag." ...


Bad History Sneaks Into The Post

This is almost a decent article in that the author's point is fairly taken - the Palestinian Arabs would do better with a fresher, more sophisticated face than Yasser Arafat's. The problem comes when she tries to sneak in a little bit of bad history:

Washington Post: The Truer Palestinian Face:

... The word "philistine" means "boorish and backward"; it comes from the word for "Palestinian." It is a derogatory word that demeans an entire culture, and it is used with relative impunity in this country.

But my grandmother, like so many Palestinians, was educated because she had to be. Because so many Palestinians are dispossessed of their land, they have to carry their culture and history in their heads...

The author has her facts reversed. The word Palestinian comes from the word Philistine. The Philistines were the ancient biblical enemies of the Jews, and after the final Roman conquest of of the Jewish Kingdom, the Romans applied the name to the region:

The term "Palestine" is believed to be derived from the Philistines, an Aegean people who, in the 12th Century B.C.E., settled along the Mediterranean coastal plain of what are now Israel and the Gaza Strip. In the second century C.E., after crushing the last Jewish revolt, the Romans first applied the name Palaestina to Judea (the southern portion of what is now called the West Bank) in an attempt to minimize Jewish identification with the land of Israel. The Arabic word "Filastin" is derived from this Latin name...

The ancient Philistines have no historic connection to the Arab peoples living there in modern times. Etymology and Word History: [see link for special characters]

ETYMOLOGY: From Middle English Philistines, Philistines, from Late Latin Philistn, from Greek Philistnoi, from Hebrew Pulist�m, from Puleset, Philistia.

WORD HISTORY: It has never been good to be a Philistine. In the Bible Samson, Saul, and David helped bring the Philistines into prominence because they were such prominent opponents. Though the Philistines have long since disappeared, their name has lived on in the Hebrew Scriptures. The English name for them, Philistines, which goes back through Late Latin and Greek to Hebrew, is first found in Middle English, where Philistiens, the ancestor of our word, is recorded in a work composed before 1325. Beginning in the 17th century philistine was used as a common noun, usually in the plural, to refer to various groups considered the enemy, such as literary critics. In Germany in the same century it is said that in a memorial at Jena for a student killed in a town-gown quarrel, the minister preached a sermon from the text �Philister �ber dir Simson! [The Philistines be upon thee, Samson!],� the words of Delilah to Samson after she attempted to render him powerless before his Philistine enemies. From this usage it is said that German students came to use Philister, the German equivalent of Philistine, to denote nonstudents and hence uncultured or materialistic people. Both usages were picked up in English in the early 19th century.

So the word "Philistine" is a word that has its origins in the Hebrew Bible as many Western cultural expressions of speech do. It is used with impunity as a derogatory word today because there have not been any Philistines or their descendants around to be offended by it in a very, very long time.

Saturday, November 13, 2004

Taming the CIA

The CIA and State have been hot-beds of brazen insubordination and press-leaks for four years now. They have been long overdue for a shake-up and it has been very frustrating to watch Bush's seeming inaction on the issue. I understood the political implications - a balance had to be acknowledged and found between the damage those two agencies have been doing with the damage and press field-day an overt series of internal executions would engender.

But now is the time to get it done. Read David Brooks today:

The New York Times: Op-Ed Columnist: The C.I.A. Versus Bush:

Now that he's been returned to office, President Bush is going to have to differentiate between his opponents and his enemies. His opponents are found in the Democratic Party. His enemies are in certain offices of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Over the past several months, as much of official Washington looked on wide-eyed and agog, many in the C.I.A. bureaucracy have waged an unabashed effort to undermine the current administration.

At the height of the campaign, C.I.A. officials, who are supposed to serve the president and stay out of politics and policy, served up leak after leak to discredit the president's Iraq policy. There were leaks of prewar intelligence estimates, leaks of interagency memos. In mid-September, somebody leaked a C.I.A. report predicting a gloomy or apocalyptic future for the region. Later that month, a senior C.I.A. official, Paul Pillar, reportedly made comments saying he had long felt the decision to go to war would heighten anti-American animosity in the Arab world.

White House officials concluded that they could no longer share important arguments and information with intelligence officials. They had to parse every syllable in internal e-mail. One White House official says it felt as if the C.I.A. had turned over its internal wastebaskets and fed every shred of paper to the press.

The White House-C.I.A. relationship became dysfunctional, and while the blame was certainly not all on one side, Langley was engaged in slow-motion, brazen insubordination, which violated all standards of honorable public service. It was also incredibly stupid, since C.I.A. officials were betting their agency on a Kerry victory...

There's a lot of people sweating the Bush win these days. The rest of the piece is in the extended entry for those without Times registration (I recommend doing it, though. It's free! What a deal.)

Update: More at Roger L. Simon, Power Line, and the Washington Post.

Update: Looks like a similar shake-up occured at the start of Clinton's second term.

Continue reading "Taming the CIA"

Friday, November 12, 2004

Dungeon Majesty

Uh...this seems to be hosted on an adult site, although I didn't see anything Not Work Safe...the link isn't porn...for most people.

Dungeon Majesty

As a former Live-Action Role-Player, I may not judge.

(Via Ghost of a Flea)

Freudian Slip at the Times

The Post - Heh

Thursday, November 11, 2004

The New Dutch Boy

Fighting Presbyterian Divestment

An interesting post at Ecumenical Insanity concerning the current status of the PC-USA's divestment plans, as well as information about a petition enabling Presbyterians who oppose their church's decision to make their voices heard:

The Presbyterian Church (USA) continues its campaign against Israel. At a meeting this week characterized by the PCUSA news service as "tense and not always polite," the Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment set criteria for deciding which companies to target...

I Still Want My Outrage Back

Way, way back when I first started the blog (you'll have to scroll way down to the bottom - Jan. 30 - I had no permalinks then), I put up an entry about Nelson Mandela and said, "To think I once admired this guy. I want my outrage back!" Well, it ain't getting any better. When I remember almost weeping when Mandela made a triumphal swing through Boston following his release from prison, and hundreds of thousands of people packed the Esplanade to cheer him...thinking back on that now...I feel like...red sauce is gonna come out of my mouth (That's suddenly become my four-year-old's expression for vomiting - go figure.)

Haaretz - Mandela: Arafat was 'outstanding freedom fighter':

World leaders marked the death Thursday of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat with a mixture of praise for his dedication to the Palestinian cause and regret for his failure to realize the dream of statehood for his people.

South African anti-apartheid hero Nelson Mandela on Thursday hailed Arafat as "an icon in the proper sense of the word" and urged new commitment to a Middle East settlement.

"Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of the Palestinian people," said Mandela, who met Arafat numerous times over the years.

"We honor his memory today. We express our sincerest condolences to his wife, family and the Palestinian people. It is with great sadness that one notes that his and his people's dream of a Palestinian state had not yet been realized."...

I have often said that the expression, "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter," begs the question: OK, so what kind of man are you?

Well now we know what kind of man Nelson Mandela is.

Looks like DEBKA Had One Right - Suha at the Trough

What DEBKA reported concerning Suha's pay-off seems to be true according to this Jerusalem Post report:

Report: Suha to receive $ 22m. a year from PA:

Yasser Arafat's widow, Suha, is expected to receive a sum of $22 million a year out of the Palestinian Authority budget, according to the Italian newspaper Corriere De La Serra.

The paper said Suha reached an agreement about the money during a meeting with Mahmoud Abbas, the PLO's newly elected chairman, who visited while she was staying next to her husband's bed in the French military hospital outside Paris.

It said Abbas personally promised Suha that she would receive $22 million a year to cover her expenses in Paris. The paper noted that in July Arafat transferred to his wife $11 million to cover her living costs for the first six months of the year.

Abbas and the Palestinian leadership were forced to strike the deal with Suha after she refused to allow them to visit her husband in hospital.

The Palestinian leaders reached the conclusion that it would be better to make a deal with her in order to solve the crisis surrounding Arafat's possessions and secret bank accounts.

According to Palestinian officials, the money that Suha is expected to receive will come from secret accounts held by Arafat and his cronies in various countries. They estimated that at least $4 billion were being held in these secret accounts.

Something Honest in His Wake

Well, at least Arafat's death leaves a little something more honest, if not noble, in its wake. The Al Aksa Matyr's Brigade - always controled by Arafat anyway - has renamed itself.

Jerusalem Post: Al Aksa now Arafat Martyrs Brigades:

The armed wing of Fatah on Thursday announced its decision to change its name from the Aksa Martyrs Brigades to the Brigades of Martyr Yasser Arafat.

The decision came as many young guard Fatah activists in the West Bank expressed dissatisfaction with the new division of powers in the Palestinian Authority and the PLO, saying they were once again being shunned by the old guard.

Most of the criticism is directed against Mahmoud Abbas, who has replaced Arafat as chairman of the PLO executive committee, and Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei, who took over as head of the National Security Council, a body that oversees the work of the Palestinian security forces...


Zapatero - Shunned

President Bush hasn't been taking Zapatero's phone-calls. The Spanish Prime-Minister deserves far worse.

Update: Looks like the Spanish haven't exactly endeared themselves to the Israelis, either.

Israel 'dismayed' at Spanish reaction

Israeli officials expressed "shock and dismay" at an official Spanish statement following Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's death which called him "one of the most relevant leaders of our time."

"The Spanish government expresses its great sadness at the death of Yasser Arafat, the president of the Palestinian National Authority, and winner of the Nobel peace prize," the statement read.

"Arafat's charismatic personality, the international status that he gave to the Palestinian nation and his unrelenting fight for recognition for his people makes him one of the most relevant leaders of our time," the statement read...

...Officials in Jerusalem said the Spanish comment was the "worst" reaction to Arafat's death to come from Europe because it completely ignored his involvement in terror.

"This reaction is without any proportion, and shows no empathy or understanding for what Arafat brought upon the Israeli public during his years of power," one official said. "The fact that there is no mention, not even a word, of Palestinian terror, or no mention of the fact that his hands were soaked with blood, raises questions about the objectivity of the Spanish government."

Spain's comment was held up in contrast to comments made by Australian Prime Minister John Howard, who in remarks to the media said emphatically that he will not be attending Arafat's funeral. Howard said that a "suitable representative" will be sent from Australia, but it will not be someone at the ministerial level...


Thank you veterans, how are you?

Boston.com: `Welcome home, how are you?':

...Last Memorial Day I mourned the soldiers who fell. This Veterans Day I want to thank the veterans who saved my life and ask that every American, especially those of my age, take this day to understand those of us who served.

When someone finds out I served in Iraq they always make a comment. A nonveteran will say, "Thank you," but a veteran will say, "Welcome home, how are you?" Thank you to everyone who asked that question. You helped me find that new person I didn't understand when I returned home. You helped me find the person I want to be in the future, a person who will always strive to make a difference in another veteran's life.

If there is a soldier you know who is overseas, send him an e-mail or a card or a package -- to let him know you care. Ask his wife if she needs help with the kids. Give her some telephone cards so she can call her husband overseas. On your day off, do more than just thank veterans -- act. If you help a veteran, you can make a difference.

Above all, today, don't just thank veterans for their service. Instead, ask them how they are.


Death of a Terrorist

From LGF:

At the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the names of his victims only since 2000! Do the right thing and take a moment to click on a couple and put a face with the letters on the page.

Jacques Chirac is quite put out: '"I have come to bow before president Yasser Arafat and pay him a final homage," he said after the 25-minute visit.'

CAMERA has a time-line highlighting many of Arafat's career "achievements."

Honest Reporting also has a detailed biography as well as a one-minute film.

Dean says: "Terrorist Scumbag Officially Dead"

Harry says: "While the Mainstream Media (and especially the BBC World Service) today swoon over the death of a murderous terrorist and kleptocrat, let's remember to thank the many who for many years and to this very day fight the totalitarians and the terrorists of this world."

OceanGuy says: "...In the coming days we'll be bombarded with the chimerical heroism of this cruel, corrupt, and evil man... It's already started..."

Roger says: "Looked at objectively, he had more contempt for the Palestinian people that anybody alive."

Big Trunk says: "...Over the final four years of his life he presided over the renewed terrorist war against Israel in which he funded and personally approved the suicide bomb operations that are his true contribution to civilization -- a contribution that made him a hero in European capitals from London to Berlin..."

Meryl has lots of links and says: "...know that Arafat's legacy of death will be his footnote in history, not the emergence of the palestinian state. He failed at his greatest goal. He could not destroy Israel, and he could not lead his people to independence...'

Dave also has lots of stuff, including some suggestions for Yasser's tombstone.

Another Dave says: "Even though he's been dead for an entire week Arafat died a couple of minutes ago." and points to this absolutely friggin' must-read piece by Jeff Jacoby, Arafat the monster:

YASSER ARAFAT died at age 75, lying in bed surrounded by familiar faces. He left this world peacefully, unlike the thousands of victims he sent to early graves.

In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless his soul."

God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed, with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity...

Tom Pain says: "No Virgins!?!"

Alisa says: "THIS IS AN EX-PARROT!!"

Chrenkoff says: "The curse of Chrenkoff strikes - I write about the guy and about an hour later he dies."

Who's Your Rabbi? finds that Yasser had a twin!

Max Boot explains How Arafat Got Away With It.

Andunie says: "A treacherous, murderous, thieving, genocidal maggot of a man is dead—and his passing was far too easy for the multitudes killed and maimed by his command, or for the people he supposedly led, but in truth exploited, robbed blind, and finally molded into a freakish and bloodthirsty death cult."

He points to this OpinionJournal piece by Bret Stephens: A Gangster With Politics - After Arafat, what's left of the Palestinian cause? Not much.

The World points to this round-up and notes: "This is a moment to remember his victims."

From a comment there I find that David Carr of Samizdata observes: "Reports from Paris indicate that there has been a marked improvement in the condition of Yasser Arafat.

He's dead."

Undercaffeinated makes use of some visual aids.

Mog: "...And the world mourns this man. That is so totally screwed up..."

Shai has a longish and worthwhile piece: "...No, I'd rather talk about Arafat the murderer, Arafat the liar, Arafat the thief, and Arafat the father of modern terrorism, our almost-constant plague for the last four decades. Yes, the man did take his peoples' cause and elevate it to international awareness. But the Palestinians made a devil's bargain: In return for the recognition, Arafat made the name of the Palestinians synonymous with hijacking, hostage-taking, terrorism, and murder. He took his society and led it down the road to becoming a large Islamic death cult..."

Two posts at the Head Heeb's: One from Danny: "...Still, when Arafat’s death was reported a week ago, I was hoping that he might live a while longer - on a gut level I hated the idea of him dying on November 4th, the day Rabin was assassinated. In 1993, when the Oslo agreement was signed on the White House lawn, I remember thinking to myself how disagreeable it must have been for Rabin to shake Arafat’s hand; I thought, half-jokingly, that Rabin should agree to shake his hand only if Arafat showed up bare-headed, clean-shaven, and wearing a suit..." and then from Jonathan himself: "...Seizure of the spoils, both political and financial, is common among such leaders, and all too often their people ultimately have to be liberated from them..."

Bjorn Staerk has a run-down and mini-fisking of stuff emanating from Norway: '..."Good riddance, and better luck with the next one." - Bjørn Stærk, web pundit. (Hm, how did that make it into the list? I blame nepotism!)'

[will update more later]

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Kristallnacht without the Jews (Several Updates)

Back in March I attended a talk by eminent Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis. During the question and answer session a questioner asked him about the odd phenomenon of Philosemitism that exists in some sectors. For instance, in Prague - who's Jewish community's structures were left in place by the Nazis to serve as a sort of museum to an extinct race - there occurs the odd spectacle of Jewish festival events held in which none of the actors are Jews, to which Professor Lewis sardonically quipped, "Yes, they like it that way."

I was reminded of that anecdote while reading this story of a Kristallnacht commemoration march in Norway - in which Jewish symbols were forbidden. (via Eurabian Times):

In some circles, the Holocaust is just a club of convenience - used to bludgeon political enemies and then cast away. If simple slogans like "We are against racism" run into the reality of real, living Jews and the real, living politics they bring with them, it's the people who are cast aside in favor of the slogans - and we all know what country the average European Leftist considers to be home to today's real racists.

The group's web page states that the group is a-political. But in effect, they've co-opted Kristallnacht - a particularly Jewish event - and sought to turn it generic.

It's wrong...but ironic. They've actually managed to erase the Jews, just like...well, you know.

Update: Sounds like something similar happened, unsurprisingly, in Sweden.

Update: Much more here.

Update: Yet more here.

Thought-control in Belgium

Beautiful Atrocities has a run-down of the recent Orwellian goings-on. Read.

Beautiful Atrocities: SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF BELGIUM

In a shocking bureaucratic coup d'etat, a court of socialist commissars in Brussels outlawed Belgium's largest (& conservative) political party, the Vlaams Blok, declaring it a criminal organization for politically incorrect thought crimes. The ruling effectively ends democracy in EU paradise Belgium, & is a boost for Islamists, since the Vlaams Blok was the only party addressing Belgium's immigration nightmare...

Haaretz - Report: Iran admits to supplying Hezbollah with drones

Haaretz - Report: Iran admits to supplying Hezbollah with drones

A senior Iranian official has admitted that Tehran supplied Hezbollah with the drone that spent several minutes in Israeli skies in the north of the country on Sunday, an Arab-language newspaper reported Wednesday.

Haaretz reported Tuesday that Iranian drone experts from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards took part in the launch from Lebanon of a Hezbollah drone that spent several minutes over northern Israel this week.

On Wednesday, the Arab-language Al-Shark Al-Awsat newspaper, which is published in London, quoted a senior official in the Revolutionary Guards as saying that the drone was one of eight Iran-produced unmanned airborne vehicles that the country gave Hezbollah in August.

Iran also supplied Hezbollah with surface-to-surface missiles that have a 70-kilometer range, according to the report.

The official also said Iran had launched similar drones over Iraq to garner information on American military activity there...

...What makes it unusual is that Iranian military experts from the Revolutionary Guards sent their people to a third country to act against Israel. They have usually supported Palestinian terror groups with money or weapons, but in this case, Iranians were involved directly in launching the drone and preparing it for its mission.

Lebanon also cannot wash its hands of the affair and pretend innocence. It is possible the Lebanese did not know about the activity and the preparations and did not know about the Iranian involvement, but since it took place on Lebanese territory, the Lebanese government is directly responsible for the act of aggression. Its arguments won't hold water if Israel decides to react to similar incidents in the future...

...Another lesson is that if Iran is ready to take the risk with such a direct involvement, it could slide into even riskier moves...

(via LGF)

The Successor

Pipes gives a run-down on the absurdity so far, but let's skip down toward the end:

Arafat's Bedroom Farce - article by Daniel Pipes

To make matters yet more interesting, rumors have swirled around Arafat's military hospital that he twice refused to speak to Mahmoud Abbas, the PLO's number-two, by telephone and instead has on the quiet made Farouq Kaddumi his successor. Who, you might ask, is Farouq Kaddumi? Erlanger explains that he is a founder of the Palestine Liberation Organization who
rejected the Oslo accords and refused to return with Mr. Arafat to the West Bank and Gaza. He still lives in Tunis, where he retains the title of P.L.O. foreign minister, despite the fact that Mr. Shaath holds the Palestinian Authority's title of minister for external affairs

Got that? The farce is complete, and Arafat dies as wretchedly as he lived.

I thought that name sounded familiar, so let's see where we saw him last...I remember! The last time we heard from Farouq Kaddumi, or "Farouk Kaddoumi," he was openly denying that the PLO had altered its charter to remove the call for the destruction of Israel and that when Arafat was talking about "resistance," he meant the armed kind. Oh, by the way, he's also responsible for supporting the Iraqi "resistance":

Farouk Kaddoumi, the PLO's hard-line "foreign minister," said Thursday that when Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat talks about the need to pursue the struggle against Israel, he is referring to the armed struggle. Kaddoumi said the armed struggle was the only way to force Israel to accept the demands of the Palestinians.

Kaddoumi's remarks were made in an interview with the Jordanian newspaper Al-Arab. He admitted that the PLO charter, which denies Israel's right to exist, was never changed.

In response to a question what does Arafat mean when he talks about the continuation of the struggle, Kaddoumi, who is one of the few PLO leaders still living in Tunisia, said: "Yes, the national struggle must continue. I mean the armed struggle. In the past we abandoned our political parties in favor of the armed struggle.

"Fatah was established on the basis of the armed struggle and that this was the only way to leading to political negotiations that would force the enemy to accept our national aspirations. Therefore there is no struggle other than the armed military struggle."

Commenting on Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, Kaddoumi said: "If Israel wants to leave the Gaza Strip, then it should do so. This means that the Palestinian resistance has forced it to leave. But the resistance will continue. Let the Gaza Strip be South Vietnam. We will use all available methods to liberate North Vietnam."

Kaddoumi revealed that the PLO leadership has entrusted him with being responsible for the "portfolio" of supporting the Iraqi resistance against the US-led coalition forces in Iraq. "There is no doubt that the Palestinian revolution supports the Iraqi resistance and we have seen demonstrations in the occupied Palestinian territories in backing the intifada and resistance in Iraq," he said. "I'm in charge of this issue and I condemn the American position." ...

Let me echo Pipes: Got That?! Arafat, that paragon of peace and reconciliation - the champion of the peaceful Palestinian cause has refused all the successors at home and, with his dying breath, has reached back to Tunis to call for another monster to replace him. His choice of successor about says it all, doesn't it?

Suha and Roger's Rare Show of Intemperance

Expressing outrage and disbelief at the almost unbelievable deal (Believe it! Though the details come from DEBKA, I doubt the truth is far off.) Suha Arafat seems to have cut for herself:

Roger L. Simon: Suha's Sweet Deal:

...Last July, Arafat sent his wife $11 million to cover her living expenses and those of their daughter for six months - $1.8 million per month. The new accord guarantees her the same allowance from the Palestinian Authority as a regular annual remittance, i.e. $22 million per annum, for the rest of her life. Abu Mazen and prime minister Ahmed Qureia (Abu Ala) signed on the dotted line, although they have no notion how the penniless Palestinian Authority faced with a people in dire poverty can possibly stump up this kind of money.

Well, "laisser manger humus," I guess we could say. I wonder how many of those starving Palestinians are aware of this settlement and, if they are, why they put up with this? It is a Stockholm Syndrome larger than Sweden itself. Instead of following the rais' funeral bier down the streets of Ramallah, they should be tearing him limb from limb, pissing down his mouth and tossing the remains in one of those HazMat recycling bins.

Of course, despite their well known proclivity for conspiracy theories, you can't expect the poor Paleos to know all that much about how they have been raped when the details are continually softened by European and even American news organizations. It was almost other-worldly listening to Juan Williams on Fox News last night calling Arafat a symbol of his people's liberation movement. I guess Juan confused liberation with enslavement. He's not the only one. The biggest enablers in this sadistic game are the Swiss (and other) bankers with their unmarked accounts, which allow dictators to rob their people blind, often with the tacit permission of their supposed "charitable" donors. Isn't it about time these accounts be opened up and declared illegal? Why don't we ask Kofi Annan's help with that?... Oh, yeah, forgot, sorry...



Heat in the Netherlands

Things are heating up in the Netherlands. Sounds like a lot of people are feeling that their tolerance has been abused. This is certainly a situation to keep a very close eye on.

Times Online - Film-maker's funeral sparks violence:

RELIGIOUS violence flared yesterday as thousands turned out to line the streets at the funeral of Theo van Gogh, the murdered film-maker and vocal critic of Islam.

Two Dutch churches were attacked by arsonists, in seeming retaliation for earlier attacks on mosques, while an opinion poll showing that 40 per cent of Dutch people no longer considered Muslims welcome underlined a rapid deterioration of tolerance in the previously liberal Netherlands. A Muslim school in the southern Dutch village of Uden was burnt down last night. The attackers left a message referring to the murder.

Mr van Gogh, whose last film, Submission, criticised the treatment of women under Islam, was cremated in a ceremony broadcast on large screens for the crowds outside an Amsterdam cemetery and live on national television. A sarcastic letter was read out to Mr van Gogh’s killer, promising “we will do our very best to learn more about your beliefs to prevent further misunderstanding” and apologising that the killing “had to happen in the middle of Ramadan”. ...

(via Jihad Watch)

Tuesday, November 9, 2004

Divestment in Somerville

[Note, if this seems like a boring story of local interest only, go ahead and skip down to the final lengthy quotation at the bottom of the post.]

The sleepy city of Somerville, Massachusetts...just outside Boston, one of the hotbeds of the American Revolution when the British enraged the citizenry by marching to seize the powder from the old Powderhouse there...is, in more recent days home to a new and less laudable radical element - the Chomskyite "Progressive" variety from neighboring Cambridge.

According to an update I received from the JCRC of Greater Boston, the latest fad to sweep college campuses and the Presbyterian Church is now threatening to infect a local municipality.

Here's the notice I received yesterday:

As many of you already know, the Somerville Board of Aldermen has a resolution before it to divest from Israel. The resolution before the Board calls for divestiture from the Israel Bonds held by the city, as well as investments in companies like GE, United Technologies, Caterpillar, Northrop Grumman, and others.

JCRC has been working with a dedicated group of Somerville residents and business owners, local Jewish and non-Jewish organizations, labor representatives, local elected officials, and religious leaders. Through our coordinated strategy to defeat this one-sided resolution, all of the Aldermen, the Mayor, and other local leaders have been contacted.

Tonight will be the hearing of the Legislative Matters Committee and the full Board will meet tomorrow night. We are encouraging Somerville residents to be there to speak out against the resolution. We will be there in support of their efforts and to help manage the process with local residents who requested we participate.

We have worked together to fight similar resolutions at local universities and we are confident we will be successful in fighting this one. We do not want the City of Somerville to begin a divestiture trend among local municipalities.

We thank you for your inquiries and ongoing support. Please join us in supporting the efforts of Somerville residents working tirelessly to defeat this resolution. If you know anyone who wants to make a written statement, please have them direct it to: Somerville's City Clerk, John Long, at Somerville City Hall. He can be reached by email at JLong@ci.somerville.ma.us, or by mail at: 93 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143.

Yes, the divestment effort has come to suburban (Is Somerville a suburb? It's a bit more urban than sub.) Boston. When I was a college student, the effort was to get the university to divest from South Africa - you know, like a real, actual Apartheid state? Today, "progressives" (hereafter referred to as "the forces of darkness") are directing their wrathful calls for collective punishment (I love that turnaround) to be brought down on America and Freedom's only true friend in the region, Israel - as if City Councils don't have enough to worry about with, you know, stuff like running schools and finding funds for police and fire. But who cares about that stuff, after all, Think Globally, Act Locally! The danger is, of course, that that stuff is difficult, but holding basically meaningless votes and hearings is easy, especially if the politicians feel they're pleasing a few constituents. You can't just ignore it, because while the idea of Somerville itself divesting is a relatively small matter, one victory of this nature can lead to a cumulative effect.

So it's good that the JCRC is rallying the troops to get out there and be heard. There was to be another hearing tonight, but according to the notice I received today, the divestment issue is not going to be discussed:

Last night, JCRC joined 100 pro-Israel community members to deliver testimony and urge the Somerville Board of Aldermen to oppose a resolution to divest from Israel.

Members of local unions, Rep. Tim Toomey, and Somerville Mayor Joseph Curatone clearly stated their opposition to the resolution. A similar statement was also read from Sen. Jarrett Barrios.

The Board of Aldermen will NOT be addressing this issue at tonight's meeting. Accordingly, it is not necessary for us to turn-out a large crowd tonight.

The Aldermen will be accepting written statements through the end of this month. Statements can be sent to the City Clerk: John Long, at Somerville City Hall by email at JLong@ci.somerville.ma.us, or by mail at: 93 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143

Here, BTW, is the email info for the entire Board of Aldermen if you'd like to politely make your own views known.

It seems the Mayor, at least, has his head on straight:

...�Fair and just treatment of the Palestinian people is essential to building peace in the region,� Curtatone wrote in his letter. �However, I also support Israel�s right to defend itself and safeguard its people.�

The resolution, which was submitted by eight of the Board�s 11 members, would recommend the city divest in Israeli bonds and any stock it holds in six companies: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, General Electric, United Technologies, and Caterpillar. The resolution notes that all of the companies supply military equipment to Israel, with the exception of Caterpillar, which, it says, �profits from bulldozers that are used by Israel to illegally demolish homes.�

In his letter, Curtatone said he opposed the resolution because Israel remains �an important democratic ally trying to survive in an often hostile environment� and he urged the board not to �take any actions that undermine the safety and security of the Israeli people.�

�[Israel] continues to be the target of ruthless and deadly terrorist attacks,� he said. �Many of its neighbors refuse to recognize its very right to exist and Al Qaeda has made Israel�s destruction one of its primary objectives.�

Curtatone said he supports efforts to ensure basic civil rights and liberties for the Palestinians living on the West Bank and in Gaza and he welcomes �the divergent views and robust debate we enjoy here in Somerville.�

�Somerville residents should speak out not only on local but also national and international issues,� he added. �But the complexity of the Middle East situation argues for extreme caution.�

Curtatone said the city�s retirement board is the only city agency that holds investments and he said the board�s chief responsibility is to secure the highest rate or return possible for the fund.

�In rare exceptions, the moral imperative is so clear and unambiguous as to warrant divestment,� said Curtatone. �In this case, the complexity of the situation makes granting an exception unwise.�

Good for him. I hope the JCRC isn't being gamed by the forces of darkness here since a couple of these mailings, including the Mayor's statement, indicate the issue is on the agenda for this evening. I suppose they know what they're doing, though.

I'll try to keep on top of posting updates on this issue.

Oh, but wait! There's more!

You see, the Forces of Darkness (FoD) are also rallying their troops. And guess who's rallying them? It should come as no surprise that the Islamic Society of Boston is behind the effort. Yes, the group behind the controversial multi-million dollar M osque project, recently mired in unanswered accusations of anti-Semitism (surprise!).

If you need a little more data on what's coming into our communities, take a look at what an emailer forwarded me (thank you!) from the Society's email list - their own call to action on the divestment issue [Edit: Let me be fair here. It appears to me that the mass email list the item below came from may be unmoderated. Draw your own conclusions as to how far the ISB's responsibility for it goes.] I admit, I read it and thought, "Holy Smokes." Read (in full - emphasis mine):

Night of Power for Somerville

By M aria H ussain, Editor
World View News Service

Dear Friends of Palestine,

Quite by accident, the Aldermen of Somerville, Massachusetts selected the night of November 9th, 2004 to vote on the Socially Responsible Investment Resolution which recommends that the city's retirement benefits investment plans be taken out of Israeli security bonds and companies such as Caterpillar which aid in the Israeli occupation army's war crimes against the civilian population of Palestine.

On the 9th of November, quite possibly the Night of Power, the American people will stand up to the Jewish community. Already, the Zionist telephone hate hotline has been busily threatening and trying to intimidate the Aldermen and their families. We hope that the Aldermen will not be swayed in their decision to avoid investing public money in controversial companies or in countries that the disregard human rights rulings issued by the World Court. There is every reason to believe that the truth will be victorious on that night, for it is the most holy night in the sacred month of Ramadan.

Allah says about the Night of Power: "Ah, What will convey unto thee what the Night of Power is! The Night of Power is better than a thousand months. The angels and the Spirit descend therein, by the permission of their Lord, with all decrees. Peace until the rising of the dawn." (Surat al Qadr 97:1-5). The Night of Power, the night when the Quran was first revealed to the Prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him, is called Laylat Al Qadr, and it is the night during which destinies are decided. (See Surat Ad-Dukhan 44:4). Laylat Al Qadr is a night in which angels descend to earth and ascend back to heaven, carrying with them the sincere prayers of the people who are awake.

It is a unique privilege to be able to experience Allah's mercy and forgiveness on this blessed night when Muslims all over the Boston area, and all over the world, will spend the night awake in prayer and reflection. To receive the Holy Spirit of Allah in this Night of Power is worth more than 84 years of life. The Prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him, said that he who seeks blessings and guidance from Allah on this Night of Power will have his previous sins forgiven: the ultimate liberation.

Inshallah, this Night of Power will go down in history like John Brown's uncompromising stand against slavery. Life's purpose is not just to find linguistic loopholes to evade the clear criteria given to us by our Creator which define right and wrong. For Allah has said: "I answer the prayer of the supplicant when he crieth unto Me. So let them hear My call and let them trust in Me in order that they may be led aright." (Surat al Baqarah 2:186).

Oh Muslims who are praying tonight, remember the good people in Somerville who want their city to divest from Israel, because they are coming up against the Beast, and they will have to make this jihad, but they are not alone. "Victory cometh only by the help of Allah. Lo! Allah is Mighty, Wise." (Surat Al Anfal 8:10).

If there is even one person in Somerville, Massachusetts, who is attending the Alderman meeting with the weight of a mustard seed of faith in his or her heart, I pray the sky open up and Allah's glory be made manifest for the sake of bestowing dignity and honor upon the keepers of the holy shrines in the holy land.

If Allah does not grant victory to the Palestinian people, the noble mosques and dignified churches in which the names of the prophets are recalled, will be bulldozed to the ground. If Palestine is crushed, so too will the spirit of humanity be ground into the dirt. Like Rachel Corrie, our back will be broken.

In a grave and deadly hour such as this, the Prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him, prayed for the safety of his companions in the heroic Battle of Badr. "Oh Allah, if this small band of Muslims is destroyed, You will not be worshipped on this earth." Early in the history of Islam, when it appeared that the enemies of Islam would mass murder the Muslims, the Muslims refused to submit to anything other than Allah. Therefore "Allah willed that He should cause the Truth to triumph." (Surat Al Anfal 8:5).

It is in such a perilous hour that we live today, when we have no choice but to stand up against the raging Beast consuming all that is beautiful and holy on this earth, because this is not just about doing our moral duty towards our brothers and sisters in Palestine, but this is about being willing to follow in the footsteps of the prophets. We all have to be willing to uphold universal principles of justice as defined by Allah through Moses, Jesus and Mohammed, peace be upon them, not justice as the pro-Israel public relations agents redefine it.

"Allah Almighty says: (When ye sought help of your Lord and He answered you, saying): "I will help you with a thousand of the angels, rank on rank." Allah appointed it only as good tidings, and ... remove from you the fear of Satan, and make strong your hearts and firm (your) feet thereby when thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying:) "I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who cover up the Truth. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger." (8:9-12).

The State of Israel is the primary threat to World Peace today, especially in that it controls American politics. The American people have a duty to break the neck of the State of Israel by cutting off its supply of funding. We must kill the stranglehold that the supporters of Israel have placed upon our throats. These criminals have destroyed our democracy with the Patriot Act, ruined our economy with useless wars designed to make Israel the world superpower, they have printed lies in the newspapers that resulted in thousands of innocent Muslims to be imprisoned indefinitely without charge, tortured, and degraded. These people would knowingly put another family out of their home, and then happily move into their house. These people, dual citizen Israeli-Americans, are willing and eager to put American lives at risk just so they can enjoy stolen real estate at bargain prices available only to themselves.

On the 9th of November, when the organized Jewish community will attempt to deny, justify, or downplay Israeli war crimes, the American people will say no to Israel's occupation of Palestine. I pray Allah give the good people of Massachusetts the right words to say, and the courage to declare total opposition to Israel's use of our money. We must all thank these good Americans for standing up for all Americans' right to make socially conscious decisions in regards to their investments.

Any of you who believe in angels, this is the night for us to wake up and believe there is such a thing as Truth. Allah will send down His reinforcements like He did in that great battle centuries ago. Allah will back us up with 1000 angels. The Battle of Badr showed the world that a small group of people armed with the truth can prevail against those who wish to prevent the truth from being spoken.

True peace is the submission of the heart to make the decision to do the right thing no matter what the cost. This kind of peace exists within, and is not dependent on the evildoers' willingness to cease bombing those who refuse to worship the Beast. For we know that we too could face torture like Jesus faced at the hands of the Romans, or like our friends in Guantanamo, Israel's prisons, and Abu Ghraib.

On this night the testimony will be made about the truth of Israeli war crimes on American soil, in a government building, on live TV. Whether we are in Somerville at the Town Hall, or saying a prayer in the masjid, or tucking our kids into bed on that night, we should all be clear that if we are ever to succeed in taking this first step towards divesting from Israel, this is the night we could really do it.

All of you who are seeking the victory of Allah on behalf of the Palestinian people who are hungry, afraid, and abandoned, in these holy nights at the end of Ramadan, God willing, this is the night for salvation, for victory, for success.

Now, if you read the above and think, "Yeah, so? That's one point of view," then this blog is probably not for you.

But if you read the above and your jaw drops a bit as you go, and you understand that this is something a bit out of the ordinary (to say the least) and that what this represents may be something that needs to be kept an eye on, coming as it does under the auspices of what is rapidly becoming accepted as another mainstream religious institution and that this message is designed to appeal to and motivate their adherents, then stick around...and keep your eyes open.

Oh, and buy some Cat products.

Update: I've done a bit of Googling on the author of the mass email above. She's a real beaut. [Again, I'm obscuring some of the links. I've no interest in appearing in one of those site's (an extreme Judenhass site) referrer logs. Sorry, you've got to copy and paste if you're interested.]

Allah�s Word Against The Jews - http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/hussain5.htm
How I Lost Two Jewish Friends in One Week - http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/hussain2.htm
Psychoanalyzing Pharaoh - http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/hussain3.htm
The End of Time Arguments Spread Fear

Update: Emails on the ISB mailing list now contain the following disclaimer:

DISCLAIMER: The I slamic S ociety of Boston unequivocally condemns all hateful, insensitive and divisive language. Therefore, postings including such language will be removed. Opinions expressed on Boston-Net mailing list do not necessarily reflect those of the I slamic S ociety of Boston.

Update: My emailer discovered the original source of the article.

The Ashcroft Resignation

I don't recall an Attorney General in my lifetime who was not vilified. Every single one. Americans are naturally resentful and suspicious of officials who wield so much discretionary power - particularly unelected officials. Suspicion often turns to fear and fear to hate.

He seems a good man to me (though clearly I don't know him) - a decent man in tough times who's given his health for the office. I hope he gets well soon and enjoys his next project. At the same time, it's not a bad time or place for some change.

CNN.com - Ashcroft, Evans resign from Cabinet:

...Ashcroft was treated for gallstone pancreatitis in March, and his recovery kept him out of the office for nearly a month. In his handwritten resignation letter, dated November 2, he told Bush the job has been "both rewarding and depleting." (Text of resignation letter)

"I believe that the Department of Justice would be well served by new leadership and fresh inspiration," he said. "I believe that my energies and talents should be directed toward other challenging horizons."

In a statement from the White House, Bush said Ashcroft "has worked tirelessly to help make our country safer" and "served our nation with honor, distinction, and integrity."...



Another Reason Michelle Malkin Is Cool

She's a gaming geek. (She also catches the MSM butchering an interview for their own purposes.)

Poor dear is "too busy" these days to play games. Personally, I have my copy of Half Life 2 on pre-order.

Monday, November 8, 2004

Big numbers for Bush in Beverly Hills?

Among the Jews? Roger L. Simon has some interesting gossip:

Roger L. Simon: Bush Not "Down and Out in Beverly Hills"

As most have heard, the current estimates of Jewish support for Bush in the election were 25%, up from 19% in 2000. This may be a serious underestimate. The following is only preliminary (more stats are being broken down) but it comes from ... of all places... BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA - perhaps the most Jewish incorporated city in the state and also the home of many of Hollywood's supposedly left/liberal personalities (as well as numerous Iranian Jews who would tilt to Bush). Bush's support in Beverly Hills was up 22 percentage points (more than double) from 2000. Caveat: these stats are still unofficial but they are obviously very significant.

Here is the breakdown for Beverly Hills:

2004 UNOFFICIAL

BUSH 42.38% KERRY 56.98% OTHER .64%

2000 OFFICIAL

BUSH 20.47% GORE 76.51% OTHER 3.02%

Gay support was also up 8% in West Hollywood according to this unofficial report.

Headache Inducing

Sunday, November 7, 2004

An online poll

Not that these things mean anything, but what the hell...

Please go vote no (yes, vote in bold-face) in this CNN online poll:

Should the Israeli government allow Yasser Arafat to be buried in Jerusalem? Yes/No

CNN Programs - Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer

Signs of the Fall

Sorry for the slow-down in processed info.

Here, have a picture! A sign of Autumn. Snow White sprints for the woods.

Saturday, November 6, 2004

Suspicions grow that Arafat is dying of AIDS

If true, and if he indeed got it from Homosexual activity...well, put that into the perspective of what happens to Gay men in the PA. Yet another example of the old buzzard living it up while his people wallow in shit.

israelinsider: diplomacy: Suspicions grow that Arafat is dying of AIDS

Former White House speechwriter David Frum has joined the growing chorus of pundits, medical experts, and intelligence operatives who claim Yasser Arafat is likely suffering from AIDS.

Frum, a key figure in Republican politics and the man who coined the terms "axis of evil," writes in National Review Online that Arafat's undisclosed illness is well-known, but has been kept under wraps by the mainstream media.

"Speaking of media bias, here's a question you won't hear in our big papers or on network TV: Does Yasser Arafat have AIDS?" asks Frum, who also writes for the National Post.

"We know he has a blood disease that is depressing his immune system. We know that he has suddenly dropped considerable weight -- possibly as much as one-third of all his body weight. We know that he is suffering intermittent mental dysfunction. What does this sound like?"

Earlier, John Loftus told John Batchelor on ABC radio on October 26 that Arafat is dying from AIDS. Loftus said the CIA has known this about Arafat for quite awhile and that as a result the US has encouraged Sharon not to take Arafat out because the US has known Arafat was about done. It was deemed better to have Arafat discredited as a homosexual.

Although homosexuality is rife in the Arab world, it is at least officially consider a sin and a crime, and regarded--especially in fundamentalist circles--as a mark of great shame and depravity...

Via LGF

'It's the Moderates, Stupid'

Democratic Pollster Mark Penn goes further to explain why it wasn't the Evangelicals, it was, after all the Security Moms...and more. Oh, it was the "values voters," sure, but the type of values that involve showing that you have some, that you have the moral courage to stand up for your convictions - or even that you have any convictions at all. And George Bush won handily in both categories among some groups of voters one might not have expected. I'm certainly not an Evangelical, but I certainly consider myself a "Values" voter in this sense.

It's the Moderates, Stupid (washingtonpost.com)

... Ten million more voters went to the polls this year than in 2000, but the percentage of young people 18 to 29 who voted stayed exactly the same, at 17 percent, and the much-ballyhooed "cell phone" vote never materialized. On the other hand, the percentage of voters who attend church every week also stayed exactly the same -- 42 percent.

So if the election cannot be explained by a massive upsurge in evangelical voters, what really happened? In this election, Bush received 3.5 percent more of the vote than he did in 2000. The exit polls show this movement to be almost entirely the result of changes in two disparate groups: Hispanics (who went from 35 percent for Bush in 2000 to 44 percent this year -- enough to move the entire popular vote 1 percentage point) and white women (who went 49 percent for Bush in 2000 and 55 percent this year -- enough to move the popular vote 2.5 percentage points). It appears that the bulk of the movement in the white women's vote was among married women, particularly those with kids, who may have gone as high as 2 to 1 for Bush.

Hispanics don't fit into the caricature of Bush voters as gun-toting, Bible Belt Republicans, nor do these moms. While the Hispanics who voted for Bush are religious and more pro-life than the average voter, their central concerns tend to be about aspirations: the success of their families and children. The modern moms also have family values and the success and safety of their kids as their chief concerns.

These new Republican voters were solidly Democratic in 1996. Bill Clinton won 72 percent of the Hispanic vote in 1996; Kerry got 53 percent. Clinton not only won female voters overall, he also won white women (48 percent to Bob Dole's 43), married women (also 48 percent to 43) and moms (53 percent to 38). Unlike the unreachable evangelicals, these voters are not far removed from the values of the mainstream of the Democratic Party. They voted Democratic on the basis of balanced budgets, a fair immigration policy, expanded educational opportunities and greater protections for their kids from the dangers of tobacco and other marketing.

So while liberals and conservatives can be motivated and brought to the polls in increasing numbers, the real battle at the end of the day is for the more moderate voters who this year slipped away to the Republicans, on the basis not of gun control and gay marriage but of security and secular values such as trust and standing up for your beliefs. They are the core of any winning national coalition and at the heart of our national values. These voters have chosen Democrats in the past, and as the Democratic Party rebuilds, they are the first and most important voters we must attract to win a majority in 2008 and beyond.


Friday, November 5, 2004

Gay Marriage Didn't Decide It

Some very interesting links from Instapundit arguing that, in spite of the media spin, terrorism, not "morality" was the issue of the day after all. The liberal-biased MSM is just too stuck in their elitist rut to be able to resist the religious nut narrative. "The red states are comprised of ignorant homophobes and the exit polling proves it." Apparently not, however.

Particularly take a look at this Slate article:

The Gay Marriage Myth, Terrorism, not values, drove Bush's re-election. By Paul Freedman:

...More to the point, the morality gap didn't decide the election. Voters who cited moral issues as most important did give their votes overwhelmingly to Bush (80 percent to 18 percent), and states where voters saw moral issues as important were more likely to be red ones. But these differences were no greater in 2004 than in 2000. If you're trying to explain why the president's vote share in 2004 is bigger than his vote share in 2000, values don't help.

If the morality gap doesn't explain Bush's re-election, what does? A good part of the answer lies in the terrorism gap. Nationally, 49 percent of voters said they trusted Bush but not Kerry to handle terrorism; only 31 percent trusted Kerry but not Bush. This 18-point gap is particularly significant in that terrorism is strongly tied to vote choice: 99 percent of those who trusted only Kerry on the issue voted for him, and 97 percent of those who trusted only Bush voted for him. Terrorism was cited by 19 percent of voters as the most important issue, and these citizens gave their votes to the president by an even larger margin than morality voters: 86 percent for Bush, 14 percent for Kerry.

These differences hold up at the state level even when each state's past Bush vote is taken into account. When you control for that variable, a 10-point increase in the percentage of voters citing terrorism as the most important problem translates into a 3-point Bush gain. A 10-point increase in morality voters, on the other hand, has no effect. Nor does putting an anti-gay-marriage measure on the ballot. So, if you want to understand why Bush was re-elected, stop obsessing about the morality gap and start looking at the terrorism gap.

That helps explain why I was growing increasingly uneasy with Kerry making the case in some circles that he would be a serious War on Terror candidate. That was still the issue that counted and the numbers, when analysed properly, not just gleaned for a desired conclusion, bear it out.

Also, don't miss this comment at Roger L. Simon's from a reluctant Bush voter. Go down his list of reasons for his vote and mark a "ditto" from me.

The view from inside

Don't miss this lengthy Newsweek piece written by some of the reporters who were inside the various campaigns, now unleashed to discuss some of the stuff they've witnessed.

I've pulled a few choice bits for you.

MSNBC - Teaming Up

Kerry's inability to make a decision:

...Kerry was fading fast. The press got wind of the infighting and began joking that Kerry's campaign was like Noah's Ark—two of everything—as Kerry straddled the advice given him and tried to please everyone. "I couldn't get the man to make decisions," said Jordan...

Teresa:

...Kerry seemed to be walking on eggshells around Teresa. He wanted her to be happy, in part because she was much more trouble on the campaign trail when she was unhappy. Teresa had a way of letting everyone know that Kerry was her second husband, and that she still loved her first, Sen. John Heinz, who died in a plane crash in 1991. (The portraits of the two Johns hang side by side in her Georgetown mansion.) Teresa above all valued her own candor. She wanted to be able to talk about her Botox injections and yak with women reporters about her views on reincarnation and the pros and cons of hormone-replacement therapy. She did not want to hear about "message discipline." Indeed, her frankness could be refreshing. Some crowds responded with "you go, girl" enthusiasm when she made fun of her husband and voiced a strong opinion on the trail. But others wondered why the slightly eccentric woman introducing the candidate was prattling on about herself in a difficult-to-understand accent. She was not one for the plastic, adoring smile of the traditional candidate's wife. On the other hand, Kerry's handlers wondered, did she have to look sullen?

At one point in the summer, as Dean was starting to pull away, Teresa called Jordan and demanded, "I want you to issue a challenge for me to debate Howard Dean." Jordan was less than diplomatic in telling her it was a crazy idea, and he had a little too much fun sharing the moment with other campaign officials...

The Dean Implosion:

...There were other omens that the race was far from over. Before the dinner, a curious event took place. The Dean campaign, eager to show off its vast army of Deaniacs, took reporters out on the skywalk in downtown Des Moines to watch 40-plus yellow schoolbuses rumble into town—shock troops in the Dean onslaught to get out the vote for the January Iowa caucuses, the first electoral test on the road to the nomination. One of the reporters noticed something odd. "Is it just me, or are they empty?" asked Liz Marlantes of The Christian Science Monitor. The other reporters tried to peer through the tinted-glass windows. All they could see was row after row of empty seats...

Gore makes his choice (Lieberman wasn't the only one he snubbed):

...On Dec. 9 Al Gore showed the political fingertips that lost him the 2000 election. He endorsed Howard Dean, probably at the precise moment when Dean had peaked and was about to head down. Gore's endorsement came as a blow to Kerry, who had thought Gore was his friend, or at least his political ally. When the Kerry camp heard the rumors that Gore was endorsing Kerry's opponent, Kerry tried to call the former veep to find out if it could be true. Kerry had Gore's cell-phone number and called him. "This is John Kerry," he said when Gore answered. The phone went dead. Kerry tried to call several more times and never got through. He was hurt. "I endorsed him early. I was up for consideration as his running mate," he complained to an aide...

Dean again:

...Dean had always been a loose cannon. In the summer of 2002, his aides had been relieved that no cameras had captured the would-be Democratic nominee, in full cry at a gay fund-raiser on New York's Fire Island, shouting out, "If Bill Clinton could be the first black president, I can be the first gay president!"...In December, Trippi told his aides, Dean had come to him and tearfully confessed that he had run only to shake up the Democratic Party and push for health-care reform, that he never cared about being president and never thought he could win. ("That's a figment of Joe's imagination," Dean told NEWSWEEK. "I mean, Joe just made that up out of whole cloth.")...

Karl Rove:

...In Esquire magazine, writer Ron Suskind recalled sitting outside Rove's office waiting for an interview to begin. Inside, he wrote, he could hear Rove bellowing at an aide, "We will f--- him. Do you hear me? We will f--- him. We will ruin him. Like no one has ever f---ed him!" (A White House spokesman has said that Suskind has a "hyperactive imagination.") But Rove was well aware of his reputation and cultivated it. On Halloween 2003, a NEWSWEEK reporter teased Rove for not wearing a costume. "I'm scary enough," he replied.

Rove made little attempt to hide his feelings. Poking his head into the crowded press cabin on Air Force One during a trip on a frigid day in January, he snarled, "Weenies!"...

McCain as a VP choice?

...McCain batted away the idea as not serious. But Kerry was intent, and after he wrapped up the nomination in March, he went back after McCain a half-dozen more times. "I can't say this is an offer because I've got to be able to deny it," Kerry told his friend. "But you've got to do this." To show just how sincere he was, he made an outlandish offer. If McCain said yes, he would expand the role of vice president to include secretary of Defense and the overall control of foreign policy. (The deal was reminiscent of the so-called co-presidency offered to Gerald Ford by Ronald Reagan at the 1980 Republican convention; the suggestion fell apart of its own weight.) McCain exclaimed, "You're out of your mind. I don't even know if it's constitutional, and it certainly wouldn't sell."

Mike the Headless Chicken

'Islamists Declared War on the US 25 Years Ago Today'

Rebuilding Iraq - from the ground up

Yet another part of Iraq devasted by Saddam.

CNN.com - Scientists fight to save Iraq's marshes

(CNN) -- Some have called it the Garden of Eden. At one time, the lush marshes of southern Iraq nourished a thriving array of wildlife and half a million people known as the Marsh Arabs.

Today, the region is not the "Fertile Crescent" it once was.

Twelve years ago, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein ordered the destruction of the marshes in retaliation for an uprising against his regime.

Satellite images and U.N. reports indicate that by 2002 about 7 percent of the wetlands remained. Experts began to fear that they would be gone by 2008.

Today, researchers hope that what Saddam destroyed, science can help regenerate. They are seeking to reverse the damage from years of damming and draining of the marshes.

Sitting at the confluence of four rivers, the vast Mesopotamian wetlands were once considered among the world's most important habitats. Sheltering migrating birds and spawning grounds for fisheries, they spanned about 8,000 square miles.

"Sixty percent of the fish consumed in Iraq in 1990 was from the marshes," said Dr. Azzam Alwash, director of the Eden Again project, one of the groups charged with rebuilding the wetlands.

Today, the marshes, which are critical for fisheries, have decreased by nearly 50 percent in some areas, said Dr. Curtis Richardson, director of Duke University Wetland Center...


Now We Know Why Dick Cheney's Daughter is a Lesbian

OK, not exactly, but now we know why both Edwards and Kerry were so desperate to find a way to remind everyone about it - second only to reminding the public that John Kerry served in Vietnam (how's that working out for you, btw?). Their internal polling must have showed that John Kerry was the type of guy that serious Christians would never vote for, combine that with the Gay Marriage issue as a multiplier that was sure to get those same folks out to the polls and you have a campaign desperate to find some wedge to keep those folks home. It didn't work.

A few random thoughts (this was meant to be a more substantive post, but I got interrupted in the middle of writing it and now several hours later I've lost the thread): I think the "judges" issue was a bigger factor than is being discussed, and the actions of the Massachusetts Supreme Court made it prominent in a lot of people's minds. It wasn't about being anti-Gay as is being pundited around. I have zero data to back this up, so don't yell at me, but I feel the issue of the type of judges that rule over us (and they do rule over us) had a big part to play in Tom Daschle's shuffling off this political coil.

Looking at the county-by-county vote and noting the veritable sea of red contained therein, Democrats are deluding themselves thinking it was all about "Evangelicals" and bigots that did them in. Ain't that many Evangelicals out there, kids. The fact is that by and large, a lot of otherwise ordinary people were motivated to come out - gay marriage might have done it, but please face the fact that just because people aren't ready to accept two men as "married" doesn't mean their bigots or religious nuts or homophobes. Some of the old-line liberal Democrats I have close at hand - people of the ilk that think 9/11 wouldn't have happened had Al Gore been elected (seriously) - are non-plussed, to say the least, at the idea of "homosexual marriage." As David Horowitz says in the piece I attach here (I strongly recommend it be read in full), I think most people would accept "civil unions," (I would) but "marriage?" Not so much. What happened is the backlash that gay bloggers like Eric warned some time ago against.

FrontPage: The Moral Factor in the Election by David Horowitz

...Sullivan is dead wrong about this. The American people – the American majority – is a compassionate majority, and minorities, including gays have gained many rights and other benefits in the last several decades as a result of the good will of that majority. The wound inflicted by this election on gay Americans who want to live in stable couples is self-inflicted. On the eve of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s reckless decision to defy a California marriage law that had been passed by a 60% majority of Californians and illegally “marry” gay couples, polls showed that a near majority of all Americans were in favor of civil unions for gays. I firmly believe that if the gay political leadership and spokesmen like Andrew Sullivan had pressed for the recognition of civil unions, which would have granted all those rights Sullivan refers to in his column, the American people would have granted them. It was the gay community’s contempt for the sensibilities of religious Americans who consider marriage a sacred institution and for others who don’t think that a 5,000 year old institution should be remade overnight by a handful of judges in Massachusetts and an arrogant mayor in San Francisco that led to the election debacle for gay Americans and for John Kerry...

Update: Read "Gay Gun-Nut" Jeff's take on the election here.

Update: Don't miss this post above with links supporting the idea that Gay Marriage was NOT the deciding factor.

Update: More here. I should mention that even though it's becoming increasingly clear that the Gay Marriage issue doesn't necessarily explain the election results, there's no reason the Kerry Campaign shouldn't have taken the religious vote seriously enough to attempt (and fail) to keep it home.

Thursday, November 4, 2004

Peaktalk: Holland's Evaporating Hope

Continuing interesting commentary on the Van Gogh murder from Dutch expat Pieter at Peaktalk. Here's the conclusion, but read it all.

...I have written extensively about the American-European divide on this blog but I think what happened this week puts it all into sharper perspective. Americans have elected a wartime leader whose policies are centered on a smaller role of government and more individual freedom to gain wealth. If that great system is under pressure from external or internal threats its members are willing to take up arms and defend it, whatever the cost. Europeans often not only do not want to recognize the threat – it would be too rude an awakening for many – no, they prefer to ridicule the man that has correctly identified the threat. Yet, a huge number of Dutchmen would be all too willing to do what their forefathers did and leave for a better world where elections are driven by a brighter tomorrow rather than a comfortable today. It means many Dutchmen have acknowledged the threat but sense that a battle is pointless when a majority of their compatriots prefer a comfortable and lethargic journey to nothingness. The Van Gogh murder is not a wake-up call, we’ve had too many of those already. It’s evidence that hope in Holland and in Europe at large is steadily evaporating.

Update: Charles points to a good Dutch blog (in English) which also has a lot of coverage of the Van Gogh murder.

What's the view from Iraq?

Read Greyhawk - a soldier writing to you...from there. (via Roger L. Simon, who writes: "...He gives us a compare and contrast between the NYT's and the Washington Times' vision of Marine attitudes there toward the election. As you recall, we're not supposed to trust the Washington Times because "they are owned by the Moonies." I'll keep that in mind. Who owns Greyhwawk, btw, has anybody asked him? Oh, he owns himself.")

Jeff Jacoby's Post-Mortem

Excellent.

Boston.com: Big loss for the Bush haters:

HATRED LOST.

For four years, Americans watched and listened as President Bush was demonized with a savagery unprecedented in modern American politics. For four years they saw him likened to Hitler and Goebbels, heard his supporters called brownshirts and racists, his administration dubbed "the 43d Reich." For four years they took it all in: "Bush" spelled with a swastika instead of an `s,' the depictions of the president as a drooling moron or a homicidal liar, the poisonous insults aimed at anyone who might consider voting for him. And then on Tuesday they turned out to vote and handed the haters a crushing repudiation.

Bush was reelected with the highest vote total in American history. He is the first president since 1988 to win a majority of the popular vote. He increased his 2000 tally by 8 million votes and saw his party not only keep its majorities in the House and Senate but enlarge them. And he did it all in the face of an orgy of hatred.

The smears and rancor were bottomless and venomous. Michael Moore accused Bush of being in cahoots with Osama bin Laden. George Soros said the president's policies reminded him of the Nazis. Cameron Diaz warned that if Bush was reelected, rape would become legal. Randi Rhodes told her radio audience that Bush, like Fredo in "The Godfather," should be taken out and shot. Whoopi Goldberg headlined a New York fund-raiser in which Bush was called a "thug" and a "killer." Howard Dean speculated publicly about the "interesting theory" that Bush knew what was going to happen on Sept. 11 but kept silent.

The novelist Nicholson Baker went so far as to publish a novel that revolves around Bush's possible assassination.

John Kerry never sank to that level of slime, but he never repudiated it, either. Instead of condemning the foul things said about Bush at that New York fund-raiser, for example, Kerry told the audience that "every performer tonight . . . conveyed to you the heart and soul of our country."

Continue reading "Jeff Jacoby's Post-Mortem"

Million Dollar Exhales

So Suha is keeping the machines pumping oxygen into her hubby while they figure out how to decipher the treasure map? The old pirate probably has the Swiss account numbers written on the back of a sheet of human skin with little blue numbers tattooed in the corner. Any of my taxpayer dollars in that lock-box? There's plenty of American blood on it.

So the announcement may come on Friday? Expect loads of riot police on the Temple Mount this weekend.

World Tribune.com--Mrs. Arafat keeps husband on life support - Where's his money? (via Jihad Watch):

RAMALLAH — Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat has died. He was 75 years old.

Israeli and Palestinian officials said Arafat died on Thursday in a military hospital in Paris. They said Arafat was deemed clinically dead, but is still attached to life support systems on the insistence of his wife, Suha.

"He is dead, but neither Arafat's wife nor the Palestinian leadership is ready to announce this," a PA official said. "The announcement could take place on Friday."

The problem is that Arafat is still the only Palestinian official who can pay the bills. And it is unclear who, if anyone, has access to the estimated $2-3 billion in his personal Swiss bank accounts, according to a report in the current edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com. Even his wife is said to be unaware of how to access the funds.

Arafat continues to hold the purse strings to the Palestinian finances. For the last decade, he has been the final, and often only word on payment to everybody from the suicide bomber to the janitor. Not a dime was paid without Arafat's okay...

...For Palestinians, the main question is where is Arafat's money?

Issam Abu Issa knows how Arafat appropriated and concealed money. Abu Issa was the founder and chairman of the Palestine International Bank from 1996 until he fled to Qatar in 2000.

"Rather than use donor funds for their intended purposes, Arafat regularly diverted money to his own accounts," Abu Issa said in a report for Middle East Quarterly. "It is amazing that some U.S. officials still see the Palestinian Authority as a partner even after U.S. congressional records revealed authenticated PLO papers signed by Arafat in which he instructed his staff to divert donors' money to projects benefiting himself, his family and his associates."

Arafat controls billions of dollars meant for the Palestinian people. In a word, he stole it, intelligence sources said, according to the Geostrategy-Direct report.

His personal fortune has been estimated at between $2 and $3 billion, most of it in Swiss bank accounts.

In 1997, the PA auditor's office said in its financial report that $326 million, or 43 percent of the annual budget, was "missing." ...


A class with Robert Spencer - Session 2

Sorry, this entry is a bit overdue, but here it is, as promised, my notes from the "Terrorism" lecture I attended last Thursday the 28th with Robert Spencer. My description of the first session is here.

Attendance this time was quite a bit better and topped out at around 40 people. Very good, relatively speaking, although a few younger faces would have been nice. The Red Sox were kind enough to defeat the Cardinals in four straight, so I had no moral dilemma in deciding whether to attend or not. I know that was on the mind of at least one emailer, as well.

My notes aren't quite as complete this time, so this may be more of a general recap with lots of holes in it. Spencer allowed questions as we went which disrupted the flow a bit as far as note taking went.

An initial request for a show of hands for those who had attended session #1 indicated that very few had attended that introductory class, so the first few minutes were involved with a background re-cap...

...the War on Terror is like a "War on Bombs." Terror is a means, a weapon. What is needed is an examination of the root causes - these are not the root causes we're used to, of course.

Any War on Terror must address the real root-cause - Jihad. It is the responsibility of Muslims to wage war on Christians and Jews until they convert or submit to Islam. Sayyid Qutb said that no government has any right to exist unless it obeys Islamic Law. Any other way is by definition a rebellion against God and must be defeated.

This Jihad is the reason we are fighting. Everything else is pretext. American troops in Saudi Arabia, the existence of Israel...these are all just put-ups - window-dressing that's taken down and replaced very quickly and at the Jihadis' convenience. When one pretext doesn't serve anymore, they just find another one. The Jihad remains.

Islam's raison d'etre is to depose the governments of the unbelievers.

"Nice" Muslims either ignore, deny or are unaware of these doctrines of Islam.



Secularism arose, after much tribulation, out of a Judeo-Christian context. Islam rejects secularism and the separation of Church and State. It was a political religion from the start.



Jihad-Watch shows what AP, Reuters, etc...don't - that fighters in a wide range of locations - Chechnya, Iraq, etc... - are all fighting the same basic fight (Jihad) in their own locales.



A comment on the recent reports of CAIR running "sensitivity training" for the FBI - the FBI is being trained by men who openly support Hamas and want the US to become an Islamic State.



Now we come to the principles of "Taqiyya" or "Kitman."

In addition to mandating warfare, Islam also mandates lying. Muhammed said, "War is deceipt."

Koran 3:28: "Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah..."

Koran 16:106: "He who disbelieves in Allah after his having believed, not he who is compelled while his heart is at rest on account of faith, but he who opens (his) breast to disbelief -- on these is the wrath of Allah, and they shall have a grievous chastisement."

10-15% of Muslims are Shi-ites. They developed out of the above verses the concept of Taqiyya as a defense against the Sunni majority. This so that they could pretend to be Sunnis and thus avoid retribution.

In more modern times, the Sunnis have also adopted this concept.

They use Taqiyya to divert attention from their true intentions. Hussein Ibish of the ADC, with whom Spencer has debated on television, is a master of this. For instance, he flat out stated that the business about apes and swine simply wasn't in the Koran, knowing that most Americans would simply never check, or would take a Muslim's word over Spencer's.

Stephen Schwartz says there's no need to re-write the Koran or the Hadith...so then how do you deal with all the bad stuff in there other than reinforcing "cultural literalism" (that what's in there was relevant for a certain time and place), but that only works when people don't - or can't - read the books.

Schwartz wouldn't argue the point when he appeared with Spencer however, saying instead that he had no obligation to answer questions from an ignorant non-believer. People use such ad hominem attacks because they work. These are Taqiyya tactics.

They play the victim, accuse others of being hate-mongers. They also use ambiguity - "We condemn terrorism...BUT..." CAIR bigwig Ibrahim Hooper never condemned Bin Laden, Al Qaeda or Hamas... It's all word games. Sheikh Tantawi might say he "condemns suicide bombing"...until you look up the exceptions and find he hasn't condemned anything at all.

An example of diversion from one of his debates with Ibish - "How can you condemn Islam when Hitler killed 6 million?" Spencer was unprepared with a good answer (that, in part, there's no global Christian Jihad network - no doctrine in Christianity to kill non-believers), so instead of discussing Islamic terror, they spent 20 minutes talking about Hitler. Mission accomplished for Ibish.

An example of the use of half truths: "Islam forbids suicide." We've all heard that...so why do people keep doing it? Because, of course, it's not suicide when you slay and are slain for Islam.

All major Islamic Jurists say that you can kill the non-combatants if they are aiding the foes of Islam. That is a broad mandate.

They exploit cognitive dissonance. They know we just don't want to believe the truth.



Asides: One of The State Department's weaknesses is that they simply don't "get" religion. They don't take it seriously or understand its power. No one had read a thing written by Khomeini when he took power in Iran.

John Paul Jones wrote about suicide attackers in the Mediterranean 200 years ago.

There are moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Moderate Muslims have no solid theoretical foundation upon which to base their beliefs.



That's where my notes end. The next, and final, session will be held on Thursday the 18th. I'm looking forward to it.

[I'd post scans of my notes, but my scanner seems to have screwed the pooch. Anyone know a good French doctor?]

NE Republican's Winners and Losers

I agree with his list:

New England Republican

Here is my list of the winners and losers in this election other than the candidates themselves...

Winners include Vietnam Vets, The Military, the citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq (and I'll add any future nations who might need to find themselves on the liberation list as liberating those two nations did not spell the candidate's death nell as it could have), etc...

Losers? The MSM, the Pundits, the Pollsters, more...

Update: Beautiful Atrocities has a list to check out, as does Michelle Malkin.

Jonah Goldberg on the 'Arafat Exception'

The Corner on National Review Online

I am generally sympathetic to the notion that you shouldn't speak ill of the dead. The recently dead, that is. I don't think there's anything wrong with speaking ill of the long dead. Woodrow Wilson was a terrible man, for example. But when political opponents go, the temptation is to score points. Most liberals behaved admirably when Ronald Reagan passed away and I would like to think that conservatives would do the same when various stars of the liberal pantheon depart.

But all that goes out the window with murderers and terrorists. This tradition is predicated on the assumption that ones opponents are not ones enemies. A poliical opponent shares a bedrock faith in political norms and (small L) liberal rules.

None of this applies to Yasser Arafat in my opinion. He's a bad man who's been terrible for his people and if there's any justice, when he dies he will receive 72 virgins who look exactly like him.


Arafat is Dead

Busy in my office, but I believe I just heard a reporter tell the President that Arafat is dead.

So now the world's oldest terrorist is also the world's deadest. Stay tuned for reaction.

Update: The Israeli newspaper sites seem to be getting hammered (Haaretz, Jerusalem Post, Ma'ariv), but sure enough, "He's dead, Abu":

JPost: FRENCH MEDIA: ARAFAT DIED IN PARIS HOSPITAL

Palestinian President Yasser Arafat died in the Percy military hospital near Paris, Proche Orient Info, a French newspaper that covers the Middle East reported Thursday evening.

Radio Monte-Carlo also reported on Thursday evening that Yasser Arafat is clinically dead.

Proche Orient reported that doctors decided to take Arafat off the artificial respirator on Thursday evening at about 5:30 p.m.

Channel two reported that the Israel Defense Forces received information Thursday from a "very reliable source" that Yasser Arafat died in hospital at about 5:30 p.m. Israel time.

At a press conference at Percy Military Hospital held at 6:30 p.m. officials said Arafat was not dead, but did not give his condition. The officials said Arafat was taken to intensive care so that "he could get the treatment required for his illness."

Senior Arafat aide Mohammed Rashid on Thursday eveing said Arafat is still alive, Channel 2 reported. PA Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei Mohammed Dahlan denied the reports, Al Arabiyeh reported.

The commanders of the Palestinian security forces have been summoned to an urgent meeting in Ramallah Thursday night following reports that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat was in critical condition.

PA Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei is expected to head to the Gaza Strip on Friday for talks with representatives of all the Palestinian factions on the latest developments surrounding Arafat's illness...

There seems to be some confusion over whether he's actually dead or just in an irreversable coma and as good as dead.


Wednesday, November 3, 2004

Back to the Jihad

Meryl Yourish is on the story of Palestinian students behaving badly at San Francisco State U with a little historical perspective from a similar incident a couple of years ago.

I remember when I was a student at BU in the late 80's, there was a program to bring a group of Lebanese students in from overseas to study. The one condition was that they were forbidden from participating in any form of political activity whatsoever. One student simply gave a newspaper interview and for that minor infraction was sent back to Beirut so fast it made your head spin. BU President John Silber was draconian enough and powerful enough not to give a damn about any carping about fairness and free speech. 'They were privileged to be here to study, not play at politics" was the attitude. You know the rules, violate them and back you go. I'd like to know how many of the people engaging in the misbehavior at SFSU are citizens of this country (probably a large number, of course).

I don't know what the solution is to these stories of problems that keep coming up - well, that's not exactly true. A few expulsions would certainly be in order, but I know that too much tolerance of too much bad behavior will lead inevitably to scenes like this:

Frontpage: Death of a “Blasphemer”:

Theo van Gogh was shot dead on an Amsterdam street on Tuesday morning. His assailant was a Dutch Moroccan who was wearing traditional Islamic clothing. After shooting van Gogh several times, he stabbed him repeatedly, slit his throat with a butcher knife, and left a note containing verses from the Qur’an on the body. Said Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende: “Nothing is known about the motive” of the killer.

Others were not quite so cautious. A Dutch student declared: “This has to end, once and for all. You cannot just kill people on the street in a brutal way when you disagree with them.” Job Cohen, the mayor of Amsterdam, declared: “We will show loud and clear that freedom of speech is important to us.”

Freedom of speech: Eight weeks ago, van Gogh’s film Submission aired on Dutch TV. The brainchild of an ex-Muslim member of the Dutch Parliament, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Submission decried the mistreatment of Muslim women — and even featured images of battered women wearing see-through robes that exposed their breasts, with verses from the Qur’an written on their bodies.

In poor taste? Insulting? Probably that was a bit of the intention. Van Gogh, the great grandson of Vincent van Gogh’s brother (“dear Theo”), was a well-known gadfly on the Dutch scene; in the past, he had attacked Jewish and Christians with enough vehemence to elicit formal complaints. But after Submission, the death threats started to come. Van Gogh, in the eyes of many Dutch Muslims, had blasphemed Islam — an offense that brought the death penalty. The filmmaker was unconcerned. The film itself, he said, was “the best protection I could have. It’s not something I worry about.”

His death shows that it’s something that everyone who values freedom should worry about...

Update: Several posts at Peaktalk regarding the Van Gogh murder:

ANOTHER ASSASSINATION IN HOLLAND
A FIFTH COLUMN
BACK TO VAN GOGH: HIRSI ALI REACTS

Not resounding...

...but a victory nonetheless. Listen to me, first I'm down in the dumps because it looks like I'll have to be looking at "First Lady" Teresa for the next four years, now the President is reelected with a convincing majority in both the popular and the electoral votes and it's still not enough. Well, I admit I did hope that the President would have had an even larger victory, but I suppose we'll just have to work on getting the message out even better for the next candidate. In spite of the massive efforts of the MSM and company against him (I'm also very interested in seeing how many of the reports of voter fraud end up having substance), the victory is big enough that we don't even have to worry about any court nonsense.

It will be very, very interesting to see how the vote broke down. I already understand that the entire "Rock the Vote" business was a failure. I'd like to know how the Jewish vote ended up shaking up.

Thankfully, I also understand Kerry will be conceding defeat at around 1pm today. He should have been out on the stage in front of his supporters last night - even if he wasn't ready to concede, it would have been just common courtesy to all those people who came out to see and support him.

Time for some serious soul-searching on the part of a whole lot of people - the MSM, the Coastal Elites (fat chance)...the Democratic Party is pulling out the shivs on each other even as I type. "Who's idea was it to put Jimmy Carter and Michael Moore up in the balcony at the Convention?"

Update: Oh yeah:

WOOOHOOOOOO!!


Tuesday, November 2, 2004

My voting experience

I was up early (for me) this morning so I decided to go over and vote. The voting place is in a church right down the street. At 7am, business was brisk at the polls. Short lines, but busy, busy, busy. The ballot was a single, large sheet. I believe there were five candidates for President/VP. Each race was separated by a thick, black line with a heading along the lines of "President/Vice-President Choose One." Fill in the bubble next to your choice with the provided black marker.

No ID was required. Just tell them your street and name to check in and get a ballot, fill it out, check out at the other end with the same process and put the paper in the auto-sucking machine - take your "I Voted" sticker, place on hat, leave.

Keeping fingers crossed.

Update: Blackfive didn't have such success. Disenfranchised in Chicago.

Update: To an emailer: I'm listening to a local radio guy - Jay Severin. Typical right-wing radio guy, but not a Bush stooge, much more of a Buchanan type (paleo-conservative). I'm in Massachusetts - solidly Kerry no matter what happens of course, so he has no reason - like a lot of others - to game the situation by being positive and getting people up to vote. He's full of shit on a lot stuff, but really knows his politics - political consultant for 25 years. Good analysis.

Hates Kerry, though doesn't love Bush.

He's been ready to slit his wrists all night listening to the polling, and particularly watching the HUGE voter turnout. In his opinion that's ALWAYS VERY BAD for the Republicans.

Update: But the blogs paint a more sanguine picture. My feeling is gloomy. Let's put it this way, I'm already pondering how my blogging is going to change over the next year without George Bush and the "neocons" to defend.

Update: The election-induced internet slog hasn't slowed the comment-spammers one bit. Despite having MT-Blacklist installed, I've been getting an inordinate amount today, and especially tonight.

Update: Feeling much better now (just short of midnight). I need this kind of excitement like I need to relive the 2003 Red Sox ALCS.

Update (12:10 am): Finally turned on the TV (I've been listening exclusively to radio and surfing the internet. This is the first time I've seen Lester Holt looking tired. He's human after all!

Update (12:58am): Drudge is headlining: BUSH WINS - (Even some of those mid-west states that were leaning Kerry are coming back closer to the Bush side now.)

Hey George Soros: "Ha Ha" /Nelson voice

Good night.

Monday, November 1, 2004

Twilight of the liberal hawks

Reason's Tim Cavanaugh on a subject that's been sticking in my craw recently. (via Glenn)

Reason: Desertion In the Field: Twilight of the liberal hawks

... More than that, the liberal hawks must consider the very real possibility that what is happening today in Iraq is not an unforeseeable disaster but the best outcome any reasonable person could have expected. When you say yes to war, the only certainty is that you're saying yes to rape, murder, theft, destruction, starvation, torture, madness and every other calamity flesh is heir to. Fewer than 2,000 dead, cooperation from some of the conquered country's most respected figures, and the dim prospect of elections are not the natural consequences of any war: They can only be regarded as freebies.

So if the liberal hawks honestly thought the war could be conducted without brutality, they were merely naïve. If, however, they are not so much disappointed in the war as tired of Bush, they are something worse. I'm not going to prescribe how anybody should vote, but are there any issues of greater moment than the invasion of Iraq? What is the case for turning out a president who delivered something of such importance to people who say they wanted it? That Bush supported the Federal Marriage Amendment? That No Child Left Behind is underfunded? That Michael Powell has been too rough on Howard Stern? Are these the same people who spent the last three years reminding me that there's a war on?

I realize that supporters of the Iraq war could use the very same arguments I'm making here. They're welcome to them. The old-fashioned conservative hawks may not be a very attractive bunch, but at least they have the courage of their convictions. If it eventually turns out the invasion of Iraq leads to an outbreak of peace and freedom in the Dar al-Islam (and I hope to be proven wrong on this matter), the liberal hawks will undoubtedly swoop back in to show they were on the right side of history. If that day ever comes, just remember one thing: When the going got tough, they were the ones who looked to Secretary of State Biden to bail them out.


Cox & Forkum: Decision 2004

The Duke Hate-Fest

I finally got to read this FrontpageMag report on the Palestinian Solidarity Movement Conference at Duke. Disturbing? Yes. Surprising? Not to those who are familiar with this stuff. A conference billed as an open, educational dialogue to which the press was barred, as were all manner of recording devices. What do you expect. Read all the way through to David Horowitz's letter at the end, or just skip straight down to there if that's all you have time for. Here's where your tuition money goes (and all of our money, Duke bring a tax-exempt institution).

FrontPage magazine.com :: Inside Duke's Hate Fest by Lee Kaplan

On October 15-17, in sunny North Carolina, a strategy session for radicals, anarchists, anti-Semites and communists took place in the halls of an elite institution of higher learning, while under the benevolent gaze of university administrators. Billed as an "open dialogue" on Middle East issues, the Palestinian Solidarity Movement Conference proved to be an indoctrination and tactical training session for activists dedicated to the destruction of the state of Israel and the support of Palestinian terrorists engaged in the effort to liberate the Holy Land “from the Jordan river to the sea.”

In previous solidarity gatherings at Berkeley and the University of Michigan, the organizers of these conferences have featured known (and now jailed) Islamic terrorists and led participants in chants of "Kill the Jews!" Duke's Conservative Union ran an ad detailing the organization's violent history and agendas in an effort to dissuade their university from disgracing itself by defending the charade that this event had anything to do with an academic curriculum. But despite the clear evidence as to who the solidarity movement represents and what its agendas of violence and hate may be, the Duke Administration represented by its Vice President for Governmental Affairs, John Burness, ran interference for the radicals and went out of their way to make sure the event would take place exactly as the organizers intended...


Plans that aren't difficult to unravel

Sometimes you don't need a degree in international relations to decipher a country's intentions.

CNN.com - Iran approves uranium enrichment

TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iran's parliament Sunday unanimously passed a resolution allowing the government to continue its uranium enrichment activities, despite recent efforts by European negotiators to curb the program.

After the vote was passed, several lawmakers stood up and shouted: "Death to America."

Iran has previously stated its nuclear program is intended for peaceful civilian uses. The Iranians have said they have every right to resume enriching uranium.

Enriched uranium can be a fuel for both nuclear energy and atomic weapons...

No kidding.

The man who has the support of about half the people in this country wants to supply uranium to these people.

(via Barcepundit)

Still got that bucket handy? The BBC weeps for terror.

You know, the one I advised you have handy while reading this post? Get it out again while reading this BBC (news? opinion?) piece on the departure of Arafat from what should have been his tomb. (Hat tip: Mike) I guess this is a bit of foreshadowing of the type of dreck we can expect when the old bastard finally kicks off.

Find that too harsh? There are few people alive on this planet responsible for as much misery, death, destruction and hatred as that one man. When the world's oldest terrorist finally fails to come down for breakfast I certainly won't be putting up any pictures of fireworks - my mind just doesn't work that way, and in any case, that particular failure to inhale will be far too long overdue to celebrate - but if any positive feeling may be attached to human death...find it here.

Unlike the BBC, I won't be crying. And you don't need to, either.

BBC NEWS | Programmes | From Our Own Correspondent | Yasser Arafat's unrelenting journey

To be honest, the coverage of Yasser Arafat's illness and departure from Palestine was a real grind. I churned out one report after the other, without any sense of drama.

Foreign journalists seemed much more excited about Mr Arafat's fate than anyone in Ramallah.

We hovered around the gate to his compound, swarming around the Palestinian officials who drove by, poking our microphones through their dark, half-open windows.

But where were the people, I wondered, the mass demonstrations of solidarity, the frantic expressions of concern?

Was this another story we Western journalists were getting wrong, bombarding the world with news of what we think is an historic event, while the locals get on with their lives?

Yet when the helicopter carrying the frail old man rose above his ruined compound, I started to cry... without warning.

In quieter moments since I have asked myself, why the sudden surge of emotion?

There is an entire post's worth of material behind speculating about the answers to that question, and what causes so many reporters' moral compass to start spinning like a top when in the presence of evil.

I got a particular chuckle out of this:

Despite his obvious failings - his use of corruption, his ambivalence towards violence, his autocratic way of ruling - no one could accuse him of cowardice.

Oh boy. If there's one thing Arafat can't be accused of, it's ambivalence toward violence.

Side note: Sorry for the lack of posts over the weekend. I was very busy and will probably be so much of today as well. I'll be catching up on some stories I wanted to point to that might be old news for blog addicts, but may not be so old (only a day or three) for 'regular' folks. I've also got those Spencer notes to get down...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]