Amazon.com Widgets

December 2005 Archives

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Happy Deathstalker New Year!

Friday, December 30, 2005

Humility in the face of complexity

'Democrats' For Jihad and Jizya

You could also subhead this 'Demopaths' -- elections alone do not a democracy make. Andrew Bostom writes in The American Thinker:

...Responding to an uncharacteristic European Union threat to terminate its own de facto jizya, i.e., “aid” payments to the Palestinian Authority, should Hamas gain significant Parliamentary seats in the January elections, Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal warned about the dangers of “playing with the values of democracy and freedom”. What a bitter irony that a murderous jihadist organization has co-opted the rhetoric of true liberal democracies in order to impose the totalitarian Shari’a “democratically”. As writer Diana West noted appositely,
“It is vox populi. And just because the people have spoken doesn’t mean we should applaud what they say.”

Democracy – mere popular rule – should not be our primary objective for the Muslim world, but rather Muslim societies and governments who share our values, so we can safely share this planet.


Why There Are Checkpoints - Part 1

I felt it was time to re-animate the Why There's a Fence series of graphics with a slightly new theme (though this easily could have been the fifth in the same series):

Click picture for a larger version.

Haaretz: Islamic Jihad claims Thursday's West Bank suicide bombing

The Islamic Jihad militant group claimed responsibility Friday for a suicide bombing in the West Bank that killed one soldier and two other Palestinians.

Islamic Jihad activists in the West Bank village of Atil, near Tul Karm, announced on loudspeakers that their bomber, Sohieb Ibrahim Yassin, 19, carried out Thursday's attack.

Army sources said the suicide bomber who killed an Israel Defense Forces officer and two Palestinians at an army checkpoint near Tul Karm Thursday was apparently planning to blow himself up at one of the many children's events taking place in Tel Aviv during this week's Hanukkah holiday.

Had the bomber not been stopped at the checkpoint, the attack would have been far more deadly, said the sources...

..."For every suicide bomber that succeeds, we have stopped dozens who did not reach their targets," said Colonel Aharon Haliba, commander of the Ephraim Brigade. "We've hurt them [the Jihad network] badly, but it still has an active infrastructure. There is no decline in the volume of its attacks."

"I don't want to speak of a miracle," he continued, "but with all my sorrow over Ori, I have to tell the truth: He and his soldiers, with their bodies, prevented [a far more serious] attack. That is their job; that is our job."

Binamo, who was laid to rest in Haifa on Friday morning, was considered an outstanding platoon commander. On Wednesday evening, just a day before the attack, his battalion commander had been asked to name his best platoon commander and unhesitatingly chose Binamo. "We have to convince him to remain in the army and become a company commander," the battalion commander said that evening.

Haliba said that the Palestinian Authority was also partly to blame for Thursday's attack, because "its security services are simply doing nothing."

Due to warnings of other attacks, the high alert along the seam between the West Bank and Israel will remain in force.


He can't even quote himself honestly

Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards

Please note the graphic in the side bar for the Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards, hosted by Israellycool and The Jerusalem Post.

After last year's debacle of being in the initial running in several categories and then getting blown out in the final round of voting, I had intended to declare myself above it all and stay away this year, however, some kind people have taken it upon themselves to nominate me in several of the categories and I feel it would be churlish of me not to express my gratitude and make an effort at at least a reasonable showing. So...thank you to those who nominated this blog (sorry, I didn't pay attention to the nomination threads to know who it was). It is nice to be recognized.

Voting doesn't begin until January 9th. In the mean-time, you can surf over to the nominations page and click around some of the blogs you may not already be familiar with.

Presbyterian Campground to Host Jihad Camp

[Update: From Larry at Truth in Love: "I have received word that Cedarkirk has been closed to all activities for this weekend. Each of our presbyteries now has an opportunity to fully understand the mission of the Muslim American Society." Good news.]

A campground operated by two PC(USA) churches in Bradenton and Tampa Bay, Florida will be hosting a "camp" sponsored by the Muslim American Society (MAS) over the New Year. [Corrected to clarify who's doing the hosting.]

As Joe Kaufman explains, among the speakers will be a Hamas supporter and a Muslim Brotherhood admirer: A New Year's Jihad Retreat. You can also see Joe debating the issue on FOX here (only works in IE).

For more info on the MAS and their connection to the Muslim Brotherhood, see Daveed Gartenstein-Ross's article here: What the Muslim American Society Reads

The PC(USA) Elders over at the Truth in Love blog are on the case with posts here and here, including an exchange with the "Moderator-elect" (head honcho) of the Peace River Presbytery -- one of the groups responsible for the site.

For the record, Peace River is one of the PC(USA) Presbyteries that moved to rescind the divestment resolution, so there's a measure, in the words of Truth in Love contributor Will Spotts, of 'the right hand not knowing what the left is doing.'

Merry Christmas to you too, Hugo

Chavez: Chavez makes anti-Semitic slur

Venezuela’s president said in his Christmas speech that “the descendants of those who crucified Christ” own the riches of the world.

“The world offers riches to all. However, minorities such as the descendants of those who crucified Christ” have become “the owners of the riches of the world,” Chavez said Dec. 24 on a visit to a rehabilitation center in the Venezuelan countryside.


They bid for the priviledge

Before taking a combined $40 million in Wahhabi money from Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, Harvard and Georgetown actually had to campaign for the money.

Here's an excerpt from a New York Times magazine interview with the Prince (the link is pay only). Best part: Questioning why the Prince doesn't use some of that cash to educate Saudi kids with tolerance for Christians and Jews.:

Big Imam on Campus by Deborah Solomon

Q: You just gave $20 million to Harvard and another $20 million to Georgetown to advance the study of Islam, and some are concerned that you are trying to increase the on-campus influence of the Saudi royal family, of which you are reportedly the single wealthiest member.

I don't have control, and I don't want control. Period. They approached us with a proposal. Harvard, Georgetown, University of Chicago, University of Michigan and several of the Ivy Leagues.

But your investment company, Kingdom Holding, invited the schools to submit the proposal, didn't it?

Whom else did you approach? Please. Keep the other universities out. I'd rather not embarrass them. The two winners were Georgetown and Harvard.

Since you're said to be worth more than $20 billion, with major holdings in Four Seasons Hotels, Saks Fifth Avenue and Murdoch's News Corporation, why not give an unrestricted gift instead of such a narrowly focused one?

The gift is unrestricted!

No, it's not. It has to be spent on Islamic studies. Georgetown is renaming a center after you, and Harvard is naming a program after you.

Well, sure! The studies that concern me and fit my overall global vision - they're Islamic studies. As you know, ever since 9/11, we have been trying to bridge the gap between West and East.

Continue reading "They bid for the priviledge"

Thursday, December 29, 2005

It's not all bad news

It's too bad there aren't more guys like this. Or, more specifically, the conditions of free expression don't exist such that more guys like this can flourish, find each other, and create more.

MEMRI TV: Iraqi Politician Iyad Jamal Al-Din:The Arabs Use Israel as a Pretext for Their Backwardness, But Don't Really Want Democracy

Al-Arabiya TV, October 10, 2005:

Iyad Jamal Al-Din How come this country (Israel) has developed a democratic regime, although it too has been at war and is surrounded by enemies, whereas the Arabs have not developed democratic regimes, using the existence of Israel as a pretext? How come Israel is not using the Arabs as a pretext for delaying its democratic development, its free economy, and its free press? Are they better, smarter, or stronger than us? We have oil, we have water, we have land, we have great minds - we have it all. Nevertheless, we have backward, tyrannical, and dictatorial regimes - and the peoples readily accept this. There is no real demand for democracy in Arab countries...

...Of course, we are grateful to America for ridding us of school curricula which promote hatred and animosity. There are no indications of the reforms coming from within...

Is there really a conflict between American interests and our own interests - as individuals and as peoples? Some people whine about Iraq's natural resources and about its oil. They say that America has come to plunder Iraq's resources. I ask them: Were Iraq's resources ever yours? Did you ever benefit from these resources? We hear about this oil, but never see it. There has always been a gasoline shortage. Our countries are rich, yet our peoples are poor...

Al-Fayhaa TV, November 30, 2005:

Islam has various interpretations. Some of these interpretations are completely divorced from humanity, let alone from Islam itself. The well-known ideology of accusing others of heresy is an ideology of terrorism. Who turned Al-Zarqawi into a criminal murderer? Who? He was just a little boy crawling into his mother's arms, but then, out of his love for the religion and the mosque... He began to go to the mosque, and the imam got hold of him, and turned him into what he is. He didn't emerge from his mother's womb as a murderer, or as someone who makes car bombs, and so on.

We face a bloodthirsty religion, or rather, a bloodthirsty interpretation of the religion. This is the truth. Some people's interpretation of Islam is bloodthirsty, while others' interpretation of it is civilized and human. There is an abyss between the two...


The African Union like the United Nations before it

We're all well familiar with the spectacle of watching countries like Sudan, Cuba and Iran passing time on the United Nations Human Rights Commission, exposing the sham of a UN for what it is. Something similar is happening with the African Union (and the Arab League, but we already know that particular body serves no positive purpose). The AU is currently charge of "peace keeping" as the regional solution settled on so as not to ruffle any feathers or draw accusations of imperialistic or crusading tendencies were "outsiders" to have the audacity to come in and try to save local lives. They are also there in an apparent attempt to ensure that nothing is accomplished, either.

Writing in The New Republic, Eric Reeves exposes the fact that both the AU and the Arab League will be holding upcoming summits in Khartoum -- putting Sudan in line to be the next chair of the African Union at the very time when the AU is supposed to be holding Sudan to account.

As I noted before, so much of the world has blood on its hands, it's almost impossible to imagine anything ever being done about this, and that bloody world, with the help of the few who's hands are mostly clean, spend their free hours handcuffing one of the few nations that could and probably would do something about it, the United States of America.

TNR: SUDAN AND ITS GUESTS - Host of Problems

Why does genocide in Darfur continue? One reason is that there is no real international pressure on the architects of the genocide--the National Islamic Front security cabal in Khartoum--to bring the killing to a halt. On the contrary, as the genocide enters its fourth year, the international community continues to defer to Khartoum, or even to suggest disingenuously that the regime has somehow reformed itself. Either way, the clear implication is that the lives of Darfur's civilians are not worth the diplomatic price of confronting Sudan's brutal leaders.

There is no more appalling illustration of this phenomenon than recent announcements by the African Union and the Arab League that both groups will hold their upcoming summits in Khartoum. These summits will represent symbolic triumphs for Sudan's genocidaires. And they will reinforce in very public fashion what Khartoum already knows: that none of its neighbors really cares what it does in Darfur.

Of the two, the African Union summit is certainly the more disturbing, if only because it is the organization's own troops that are, in theory, supposed to be establishing security in Darfur. To be sure, this mission has been woefully ineffective from the start. The A.U. force has been deliberately undercut by Khartoum since it was first deployed in summer 2004, with Sudan denying fuel to the African Union for its essential helicopters, blocking A.U. deployments within Darfur, and refusing to allow critical equipment and personnel into the region. For its part, the African Union hasn't committed enough resources or manpower; and key African countries have either reneged on military commitments (South Africa) or deliberately obscured Darfur's terrible realities and Khartoum's responsibility (Nigeria).

(balance in the extended entry)

Continue reading "The African Union like the United Nations before it"

Call it what it is

This is a 90-second flash-fundraiser for Honest Reporting, but it stands on its own, really. Worth a click.

Palestinian Media Watch: "Be gone. Die anywhere you like, but don't die here."

Here's the latest from PA Media Watch. I'm not sure if this is really "new levels" -- it's always been pretty bad -- but this is just further indication that there is no serious movement for peace, even in state controlled media.

Palestinian Media Watch: "Be gone. Die anywhere you like, but don't die here." - PA hate TV reaches new levels

PA TV program on Jaffa (Tel Aviv):

"It is time for you [Israelis] to be gone. Live wherever you like, but don't live among us. It is time for you to be gone. Die wherever you like, but don't die among us. We have the past here. We have the present, the present and the future. So leave our country, our land, our sea, our wheat, our salt, our wounds. Everything. And leave the memories."

These words of hate are the parting moments of yet another program on Palestinian Authority television calling for the destruction of Israel. The words, calling for the expulsion of every last Israeli from Israel, are spoken while the screen is showing Jaffa-Tel Aviv, Israelis and Israeli flags. Official PA TV has aired this twice in recent months.

To view this clip, click here

The program about Jaffa opens with a revision of history, by casting the ancient Canaanites as Arabs. By doing this, the more than 3,000 years of Jewish history in the area are pre-dated by a fabricated Arab history. (The Arab Conquest actually took place in the seventh century of the Common Era.)

Jaffa, a part of Tel Aviv, is defined as a Palestinian city, and all of Israel's coastal cities, Acre, Haifa, Caesarea, Ashdod, Ashkelon and Jaffa, are said to be situated in what is "known today as Palestine." According to this PA program, Israel is already non-existent.

The final words of this television program are those of Israeli-Arab poet, Mahmoud Darwish, calling for the expulsion of every Israeli: "Die wherever you like, but don't die among us."

More, including a transcript, at PMW.

Hamas to bring back the poll tax on non-Muslims

That's what they'd like, anyway. I always have to laugh when people try to tell me that a Muslim majority would actually be something not to worry about in Israel, and that somehow a modern standard of human rights and democracy would be preserved. As proof of concept, they point to the historic good treatment of religious minority populations in Muslim lands -- leaving aside the dubious idea that this was even a historic truth, the idea that "dhimmitude" or "protected status" (of which the poll-tax, or "jiziyah" is an integral part) -- a sort of legalized protection racket -- is compatible with any modern sort of concept of human rights and democracy is beyond bizarre.

The obviously dhimmi behavior of a beleaguered Palestinian Christian community ought to be cause for outcry on the part of people of good will in the West, instead they take the statements of people under the gun at face value.

This story at Italiam site Chiesa is a must-read:

The Mayor of Bethlehem is Christian, but It’s Hamas That’s in Charge

...The general plan of Hamas also includes the imposition of a special tax, called al-jeziya, upon all of the non-Muslim residents in the Palestinian territories. This tax revives the one applied through all of Islamic history to the dhimmi, the second-class Jewish and Christian citizens.

In an interview with Karby Legget, published in the December 23-26 edition of “The Wall Street Journal,” Masalmeh, the leader of the Hamas contingent at the municipal council of Bethlehem, confirmed: “We in Hamas intend to implement this tax someday. We say it openly – we welcome everyone to Palestine but only if they agree to live under our rules.”

Batarseh, the mayor, doesn’t agree. He doesn’t want the tax, and says it will never be introduced.

He knows well that living with Hamas is difficult. But he says he is convinced that “the only way to make Hamas more moderate is to bring them inside the system.”...

Why should they change, when their current methods are so successful?

Israel is routinely blamed for the dwindling Christian population in areas under PA control, but if they are to blame, why then is it that the Muslim population continues to expand? This is always left unexplained.

Judith Apter Klinghoffer has more.

(H/T: Andrew Bostom)

B+

Spent the middle of the day at Disney Princesses on Ice at the Banknorth Garden (nee Fleet Center, nee Boston Garden). Though my wife thought Nemo on Ice was the best show we've seen, I'm giving this one the nod. Disney knows how to put on a show, and this was a solid two hour performance with all your favorite Princes and Princesses...dreamy. The cost was reasonable at about $35/seat -- don't give them too much credit for that, though, they Hoover your wallet of 20 dollar bills for an endless parade of souvenirs and over-priced snacks from the second you get there. We were in the first row of the loge, which is actually fourth row overall -- great seats. Best of all, I'd give this one a solid B+ on the "for the dads" scale.

Turn offs: It took a solid hour to get out of the parking garage. I kid you not.

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Are 500,000 Keys to Paradise Enough?

Matthias Kuntzel discusses Germany's idea of confrontation with Iran:

Are 500,000 Keys to Paradise Enough?: Germany "Confronts" Ahmadinejad

In pondering the behavior of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, I cannot help but think of the 500,000 plastic keys that Iran imported from Taiwan during the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-88. At the time, an Iranian law laid down that children as young as 12 could be used to clear mine fields. Before every mission, a plastic key would be hung around each of the children’s necks. It was supposed to open for them the gates to paradise...

Chew on that for a bit. Imagine the concept of "deterence" as applied to a country with that kind of history -- a country that sends its children off by the thousands to clear mine fields, that routinely brags that, and supports groups which boast that while the West values life, they value death.

And they mean it, and they've shown they're willing to act on it.

How much moire dangerous and unstable an enemy is this than our previous partner in nuclear standoff, the USSR?

Kuntzel:

...Germany is today by far the most important supplier of goods to Iran and its exports are increasing at a steady 20% per year. In 2004, German exports to Iran were worth some €3.6 billion. At the same time, Germany is the most important purchaser of Iranian goods apart from oil and Iran’s most important creditor.

Since, however, Ahmadinejad provided the world with such a stark reminder of the ideological foundations of the Mullah-dictatorship – Holocaust denial, anti-Semitism, and the destruction of Israel – Berlin is in a tight spot. On the one hand, Berlin would not like to put in danger Germany’s special relationship with Tehran. On the other hand, it does not look particularly good when the country from which came the Holocaust practitioners now collaborates with the regime of the Holocaust deniers. On 11 December, Germany’s new deputy Chancellor, Franz Müntefering of the SPD, indicated the way out of this dilemma: “Berlin Demands a ‘Reaction’ to Ahmadinejad” ran the headline in the following day’s edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (12 December 2005). This sounded surprisingly forceful. But whoever read the small type quickly understood the actual meaning of the headline: “ Berlin demands a ‘reaction’ to Ahmadinejad from everyone else”. The deputy Chancellor was cited as follows: “We cannot do it alone. Rather this has to be frankly discussed in the framework of the European Community and it must in the clearest possible terms be discussed in the framework of the United Nations”.

Excuse me? Germany can do nothing on its own? Only the German government can abrogate the 2002 investment agreement between German and Iran...

Worth reading in full.

Where are today's Cromwells?

BBC: 350th anniversary of the re-admission of Jews to Britain

Jews in the UK have begun a series of special events to mark the 350th anniversary of their re-admission to the British Isles.

During 2006 Jewish communities throughout the country will be celebrating one of the most remarkable turning points in British history.

They will come together under the banner '3andahalf Centuries of British Jewish Life' for a stream of landmark events to celebrate Jewish life including exhibitions, concerts, plays, and dinners.

Expulsion

Britain became the first European country to expel Jews in 1290 after a long period of persecution.

Jews were accused by their Christian neighbours of ritual killings, desecrating the host, poisoning wells and spreading the plague. Each fresh claim gave rise to new massacres.

It wasn't until the 17th century after Oliver Cromwell came to power that Jews were allowed back to Britain...

I'm not so sure of how great things are in Britain today -- home of the blood libel. Further, it was 366 years between expulsion and re-admission, and over 500 years between expulsion and formal emancipation. Will it take that long for the Arab and Muslim world to work it out?

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

If you've ever played Prince of Persia...

Notable for the Caption

Hamas Kid's Page -- Muslims must liberate Seville, Spain

Hamas has a kid's web page. Apparently on this page here, they're calling on Muslims to liberate Seville, as well as the rest of Spain, from infidel rule.

As Meryl says, 'Sure. They’re definitely going to change their tactics once they get control of the PA, and the billions of dollars in international aid that comes with. I’m sure not a penny of that aid will be spent on weapons and bombs.'

Rocket falls on kindergarten -- range getting longer

Rockets fell neat an Israeli kindergarten, and the Palestinian Arabs are getting better, longer-range munitions, probably smuggled in from Egypt.

Details are here:

JPost: Terrorists threaten to upgrade missiles by Khaled Abu Toameh

Three armed Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip on Monday threatened to continue their attacks on Israel and said they have long-range missiles capable of reaching more Israeli towns and cities.

One of the groups belongs to Fatah, the ruling party headed by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. The two others are the Popular Resistance Committees, an alliance of various armed groups, and al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of Islamic Jihad.

PA officials in Ramallah expressed deep concern over the threats and said Israel was responsible for the latest cycle of violence...

But of course.

Munich mastermind spurns Spielberg's peace appeal - has 'no regrets'

I'm sure this is a big misunderstanding. This fellow couldn't really be spurning a sincere hand of peace. I'm also certain that he, even more than the Mossad agents that bumped off his compatriots, must really, really regret what he did all those years ago, doesn't he?

After all, we all have similar goals and motivations, all we need to do is be sincere toward each other...or not.

Munich mastermind spurns Spielberg's peace appeal

GAZA (Reuters) - The Palestinian mastermind of the Munich Olympics attack in which 11 Israeli athletes died said on Tuesday he had no regrets and that Steven Spielberg's new film about the incident would not deliver reconciliation.

The Hollywood director has called "Munich," which dramatises the 1972 raid and Israel's reprisals against members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), his "prayer for peace."

Mohammed Daoud planned the Munich attack on behalf of PLO splinter group Black September, but did not take part and does not feature in the film.

He voiced outrage at not being consulted for the thriller and accused Spielberg of pandering to the Jewish state.

"If he really wanted to make it a prayer for peace he should have listened to both sides of the story and reflected reality, rather than serving the Zionist side alone," [IOW, he should have continued our work for us. -S] Daoud told Reuters by telephone from the Syrian capital, Damascus...

...Several Israeli historians have also complained about what they see as a moral symmetry in the film between slain Olympians and the Palestinians assassinated by the Mossad spy service [At your service!].

"Spielberg showed the movie to widows of the Israeli victims, but he neglected the families of Palestinian victims," said Daoud. [Always the victims, even of this.] "How many Palestinian civilians were killed before and after Munich?"

Continue reading "Munich mastermind spurns Spielberg's peace appeal - has 'no regrets'"

Back to the Moon

What means 'we?' I haven't even been there once.

Why We're Going Back to the Moon

The recent release of the details of NASA's proposed plans for human return to the moon in response to President Bush's "Vision for Space Exploration" last year has drawn much comment -- some positive, some negative and some simply perplexed.

Although the reasons for undertaking the program were clearly articulated in the president's speech, it is important to reexamine why the moon is its cornerstone and what we hope to achieve by returning there.

The moon is important for three reasons: science, inspiration and resources. All three are directly served by the new lunar return architecture. This program has the potential to make significant contributions to our national economy and welfare...


Stuck on stupid Vietnam

The familiar image above is the graphic that accompanies H.D.S. Greenway's Globe op-ed today, and it tells you all you need to know about the content of the piece: How will the Iraq war end?

A half page editorial of predictable hash. This is the product of an ageing left's pathology, not analysis. Wishful thinking carried through to the front and editorial pages. No matter how successful the Iraq effort is, Globe readers will never know, because that image there is the paradigm that it will all be framed through.

Simplistic analogies are easy, but not always accurate. To take one example from the piece: "But Bush today, as did Lyndon Johnson before him, vows to fight on until victory, and some of the same ridiculous rhetoric prevails -- such as that we are fighting them there so we won't have to fight them at home." Well, yes, somehow I think every leader of every war has much such vows of victory...so what? The choice to compare Iraq to Vietnam in this case says nothing about our reality, and everything about the psychology of the author.

This kind of thing reminds me of those oh-so-clever essays exposing the hidden sexual content of everything from The Lord of the Rings to children's nursury rhymes. Look hard enough and you can find it. One might expect a higher level of mature analysis in a half-page Globe opinion piece...or not.

Teaching Genocide

Here's an interesting article on the teaching of the Armenian Genocide in Massachusetts schools. Should alternative views be allowed into the curriculum, and who should decide, students, teachers or courts?

Those who rank knowledge of the Holocaust as important should pay attention to this issue. As we know, Holocaust denial is a growth industry even in the West, and as more and more people immigrate from the Middle East, it will continue to grow and live as a phenomena. Now it is considered settled history in the United States. Will it remain that way?

Some of the issues the Armenians are facing today are the same issues we could be facing tomorrow.

Boston Globe: Suit opens old wounds - Teacher, student seek all views in 1915 deaths of 1m Armenians

History teacher Bill Schechter and high school senior Ted Griswold believe their lawsuit is about a worthy and innocent educational principle: presenting different views of a tricky and disputed historical topic. The Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School teacher and his student believe that when Massachusetts high school students learn about the deaths of at least 1 million Armenians in Turkey during the early part of the 20th century, they should be taught that, while many historians call it a genocide, there are some who disagree.

But to the Armenians caught up in those horrific events and their descendants, the lawsuit dishonors the people who died in massacres and forced deportations committed by the Turks. They say presenting opposing views of those events is like denying the Holocaust or saying the earth is flat. And they say the case has reopened a battle many Armenians in Massachusetts thought they had already won...


Getting something done for Darfur

This op-ed, co-authored by Barack Obama and Sam Brownback, strikes the right tone of nudging the administration on the issue of Darfur.

Policy Adrift on Darfur

For two years the Bush administration has made commendable efforts to improve the lives of people in Darfur. Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick has become personally invested in the crisis, recently completing his fourth trip to the region in the past seven months. The United States has spent almost $1 billion aiding refugees and displaced persons who might otherwise have died of disease or starvation. And the U.S. military has helped airlift and fund African Union troops stationed in the Darfur region of Sudan.

Yet, despite American engagement, Darfur's humanitarian, security and political conditions are deteriorating. If the United States does not change its approach to Darfur, an already grim situation is likely to spiral out of control...

Impression: I cannot help but be struck by the parallels between Darfur and Iraq. Darfur, like Iraq, is (as Iraq was) a place that politicians and press are pressuring for more active attention to. Like Iraq, strenuous action in Sudan threatens to unite Muslim and other Third World demagoguery against the United States, despite our best intentions. Like Iraq, some will complain that if we act in Sudan, should we not be acting in the thousand other humanitarian trouble-spots around the world? Like Iraq, an exit strategy is difficult to set out at the start, in fact, it seems even more difficult to determine when the end of an American presence would come. Like Iraq, once we start in, our real motivations will begin to be questioned, no matter how pure our intentions. Like Iraq, Sudan also has friends in high places as well as low in the UN who have their own business (oil) interests to protect (China, for instance), humanitarian realities be damned, and like Iraq, once American bodies start coming home, support will evaporate faster than a dew drop in the Sahara, especially since, unlike Iraq, direct American interests are even more remote and obscure.

All of this threatens to combine to turn a sure-fire American "good guy" mission into a disaster waiting to happen, leaving Uncle Sam, once again, slapped in the face wondering what happened.

I keep remembering this article, about two African Union peace keepers killed in Sudan, and wondering how the reaction would have been had they been Americans.

One thing's for sure, involvement in Sudan has to be handled carefully, and by proxy (through the AU, for instance) as much as possible. The "save Darfur" movement would also be well-served using balanced rhetoric like that in the Obama/Brownback piece above, and less that falls into the old Leftist "protest and bitch" paradigm like that I saw at the last "Rally to Save Darfur" I attended.

George Bush is one of the only people on this planet that can really accomplish something serious there in Sudan. If people really want to save Darfur, and not just make themselves feel good bashing the administration, they should be all about showing that administration that there is a solid and reliable political upside to taking action, and that that upside will still be there when the UN and other predictable critics both foreign or domestic start screaming.

Brian Golden from Brighton to Baghdad and Back

In this interview, Greg Margolin of the Jewish Russian Telegraph blog has spoken with returning Army reservist Brian Golden, former State Representative from Brighton, MA. Like many of those returning, Golden has gripes with the press coverage, and none with his own service:

...GM: What happened to embedded reporters? It looks like the mainstream media is trying to shape everything according to Iraq is Vietnam paradigm.

BG: It's a good question. In the beginning of the war,the media was accused by the left of a pro-war bias. When the war is new, there is excitement.There is a certain enthusiasm, the instinctive reaction to rally. But the real goal is to sustain this level of support long term. With time the adrenaline wears out. There is failure to find WMDs and it all becomes a political blood sport. In the beginning there was interesting media drama in how swiftly and certainly the Baathist regime was swept out of power. With time, other stories became more interesting, and the media started showing violence all the time. I don't begrudge anybody who disagrees with the war, but it would be nice if our accomplishments in Iraq got 10% of the media attention...

Read the rest, here.

[X-Posted at Hub Politics]

65% of Palestinians Support Al-Qaeda Attacks in the US and Europe

Palestinian Media Watch explains why.

...This week's European-sponsored poll, showing an overwhelming majority of Palestinians supporting the murder of Christians by Al-Qaeda, comes at a time when US and European financial and political support for the Palestinian Authority is very high and widespread. It seems that if Palestinians have to choose between appreciating the financial and political support of the US and Europe, or hating them because of religion, religion will win.

This commitment to religious teachings among the Palestinian population is consistent with recent findings. In a poll this year, 79.9% of Palestinians want the PA to follow the Shari'a - Islamic religious law (68.6% wanted only Shari'a, while 11.3% wanted both Shari'a and laws of the PA Legislature).
[Palestinian Center for Research and Cultural Dialogue, March 3, 2005]

What is striking, though, is the willingness of Palestinians to turn against even the Western countries upon whom they are so totally dependent in order to progress. The poll underscores what Palestinian Media Watch has been documenting for years - the profoundly negative impact hate education has had on PA society...

Monday, December 26, 2005

Can anybody read this?

Remembering Mississippi

Karen, Mississippi resident, frequent commenter and blogger at Thoughts by Seawitch, writes:

...The news media has pretty much relegated the destruction that occurred to my state as a footnote to what happened in New Orleans. I know the figures by heart for my state: 238 precious lives lost, 68,000 homes destroyed, 38,000 that will have to be demolished, 20% of the apartments unlivable. Between 300,000 to 400,000 Mississippi residents were affected in some manner by Hurricane Katrina. Our industries along the Mississippi Coast were devastated. Some of those are: the seafood industry, the Port of Gulfport, and Northup-Grumman shipbuilding...

...I am asking a favor. The newsmedia for the most part has regulated the story of Mississippi to a footnote to New Orleans. Even the Weather Channel fails to name Mississippi in it's look back at the most devastating natural disasters for the past year.

My local newspaper published an editorial a couple of weeks ago entitled The Invisible Coast, pleading that the newsmedia stop relegating our story to a footnote...

If you could find some way to publish this editorial I would appreciate it. In my own little circle of acquaintances and friends, I know 20 people who had their homes destroyed outright and a further 10 whose homes had so much water damage, they still cannot live in them. The American people have not forgotten us but the newsmedia has with the exception of MSNBC's website which has a daily update on people from Waveland and Bay St. Louis.

I feel so strongly about this because the people in Mississippi who are still living in tents, those whose homes have been replaced by FEMA trailers, those who are unemployed, and those who died are not footnotes...

Happy to oblige. The complete text of that editorial is in the extended entry.

Continue reading "Remembering Mississippi"

Ethopian Advocates

Interesting story here about using Israelis of Ethiopian background to help bridge the ever-growing gap between the Jewish and African-American communities:

Bringing African-Americans and Israelis together

...One of the things we realized very early on was that the Ethiopian Israelis had a story to tell that affected audiences here in a very profound way. When they told people that Israel was not the racist state it was portrayed to be, it made much more of an impression then when a white Israeli would say that.

The story of the Ethiopians' struggle to reach Jerusalem and The Holy Land was so moving that you really had to have a heart of stone not to be moved by it. I decided that the Ethiopian issue would be at the top of our agenda...


Abbas: Rockets are 'Israel's problem'

The picture this Haaretz article paints is almost more that of the last days of Mussolini than the present days of Abu Mazen:

Haaretz: Military sources: Abbas at political low point

...Senior Israel Defense Forces officials and Shin Bet security service officials have said recently during internal discussions that Abbas is impotent to enforce his directives, especially on the security front.

Abbas is barely on speaking terms with some security officials, and when he succeeds in issuing an order it is not implemented, they said.

Abbas even said that the Qassam rockets being fired from the Gaza Strip at Israel are "Israel's problem" and that he does not intend to interfere. "Let the Israelis deal with it," he said.

The Israeli officials say that apart from deploying national security forces along the border with Israel in northern Gaza, no action has been taken against the Qassams. Even though there are nearly 30,000 men in arms under the PA's banner, they have not been able to enforce their will on the Islamic Jihad and the other militant groups involved in launching the rockets.

The Israeli officials attribute the continuing launches, including the recent focus on Ashkelon and environs, to specific directives from the headquarters of the Islamic Jihad in Damascus.


More than Munich

I've more or less had enough of Munich for the moment, but this New York Times(!) piece has some good generic points I thought were worth posting up (thanks to an emailer).

Seeing Terrorism as Drama With Sequels and Prequels

...The theory asserts that terrorism is a violent and extreme reaction to injustice - the last resort of the oppressed. Typically, this injustice theory is used to explain left-wing terrorism. It not only coincides with the justifications offered by terrorists themselves, but it also accompanies a belief that a just cause lies behind the terrorist attack. The theory is never applied to right-wing terrorism - whether of the brown-shirt or Timothy McVeigh variety - and thus pre-selects its proofs.

Accepting the theory also leads to other convictions. If terrorism is solely the result of injustice, then without the injustice there would be no terrorism. So the best response is to work for justice. Threats, vengeance, security strictures - anything other than the addressing of legitimate grievances is ultimately futile. In particular, since killing terrorists does nothing to alter injustice, it will do nothing to alter terror. Instead, it only leads to more injustice, turning the victims of terrorism into mirror images of the terrorists themselves...

Continue reading "More than Munich"

David Project Responds

David Project head, Charles Jacobs, had a letter to the editor published in yesterday's Boston Globe reponding to their front page article on the controversy surrounding the new Boston Mosque. Jacobs' letter provides a bit more flesh and immediacy to the original and somewhat sterile Globe article. The David Project is one of the defendants in the ISB's lawsuit:

THE STORY on the lawsuit filed against us by the Islamic Society of Boston (''Praised by beacon, mosque project stalls amid rancor," Page A1, Dec. 18) did mention that the society's founder, Abdurahman Alamoudi, raised money for Al Qaeda and is in jail (in connection with a plot to assassinate a Saudi prince). But the story omitted even more worrisome facts.

The society's leaders have praised suicide bombers and called for attacks on Americans. A website in Qatar associated with society trustee Yousef al-Qaradawi, an internationally known leader of extremists, calls for gays to be executed by either stoning or burning. Al-Qaradawi has been barred from the United States. The society website praises as ''very good" a book that refers to the women's liberation movement as a ''Jewish plot" to corrupt society and argues that wife-beating is at times necessary. The library of the society's current Cambridge mosque contains literature containing vitriol directed against Christians, Jews, and Americans. While mosque spokesmen speak of ''dialogue" and tolerance, Qaradawi says ''there is no dialogue between us [and the Jews] except by the sword and the rifle.' "

As citizens, we were concerned. We wanted the society to answer simple questions, questions that it took pains to avoid answering. As a result, we have been sued by the society and forced to spend tens of thousands of dollars to defend ourselves. This is not a case about Boston bigots with discriminatory suspicions. It is a case of citizens rightfully worried that their city might be importing -- and subsidizing -- hatred and misogyny with links to terror.

CHARLES JACOBS
President
The David Project
Boston

[X-Posted to Hub Politics]

Saturday, December 24, 2005

Whatever side of the debate you fall on...

Have a very Merry Christmas:

and a Happy Hanukka (and all spelling permutations thereof):


Iran's Annihilationist Jew Hatred

Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims, writes in concerning the entry below, Don't tell me, tell him -- Iran's hard line in the Globe:

Sol, the problem with Iran is that it has a PROVEN history of annihilationist Jew hatred...Areas of Iran during the Safavid and Qajar dynasty Shi'ite theocracies (the basis for the current iteration of a Shi'ite theocracy since Khomeini seized power in 1979, and restored the "status quo" which existed from ~1502-1925, interrupted only by a period of Sunni Afghan conquest and internecine struggle from 1725-1794) were rendered JUDENREIN---by slaughter, forced conversion, and deportation.

I have a very long discussion of this truly ugly legacy here:

The Ayatollahs' Final Solution?

which concludes as follows:

Conclusion

An ethos of Jew-hatred, including paroxysms of annihilationist fanaticism, has pervaded Persian/Iranian society, almost without interruption (i.e., the two major exceptions being Sunni Afghan rule from 1725-1794, and Pahlavi reign, with its Pre-Islamic revivalist efforts, from 1925-1979), since the founding of the Shi'ite theocracy in 1502 under Shah Ismail, through its present Khomeini-inspired restoration. Having returned their small remnant Jewish community to a state of obsequious dhimmitude 61, Iran's current theocratic rulers focus their obsessive anti-Jewish animus on the free-living Jews of neighboring Israel.

Holocaust scholar Daniel Jonah Goldhagen has argued persuasively that the Nazis melded centuries of annihilationist Jew hatred to a state machinery capable of implementing the systematic, mass murder of Jews.62 Former Iranian President Rafsanjani's December 2001 "Al Quds Day" sermon threatened, explicitly, the nuclear annihilation of the largest concentration of autonomous Jews in history- the Jewish State of Israel. Four centuries of "najas-inspired" Jew hatred in Shi'ite Iran, accompanied by pogroms, forced conversions, and other less violent, but continuous forms of social and religious persecution, surely meets Goldhagen's Nazi standard of an established "annihilationist" mentality. Iran must not be permitted to acquire a nuclear weapons capability, certainly now, under the current mullahcracy, and into the foreseeable future.

By the way, if you'd like to see a video interview with Dr. Bostom, he's posted a two-parter at his site, here.

Press Release: Democrat Scrooge Boots Republican operated Homeless Shelter

This just in from the folks at the Liberty Film Festival:

Dear Friends,

The Dome Village, a center for the homeless here in LA, is being forced out of its current location because the landlord, a Democrat, discovered that Ted Hayes, the leader of Dome Village, is a Republican. Ted Hayes is one of LA's most prominent advocates for the homeless, and is also a ceaseless worker for African-American civil rights. He spoke at the Liberty Film Festival this fall. It is outrageous that the Dome Village would be forced out of its location simply because of Ted Hayes' conservative politics. Please read the press release below for full details.

Govindini Murty
The Liberty Film Festival
http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com
--
December 22, 2005

PRESS RELEASE

Dome Village Threatened With Closure

Continue reading "Press Release: Democrat Scrooge Boots Republican operated Homeless Shelter"

Friday, December 23, 2005

Now Posting at Hub Politics

I've decided to accept an invitation from Aaron Margolis, operator of two blogs, Hub Politics and Pardon My English, to join the Hub Politics posting team. Aaron's brother, Matt, runs Blogs for Bush and GOP Bloggers.

This should be a nice opportunity to contribute to the local political scene, while pushing me to focus slightly more on the local stuff and hopefully getting a few more eyes on the home blog here.

This will not affect anything here. I will likely be crossposting items of local Massachusetts interest over there as they come up, so the time commitment should be minimal (it takes all my time just keeping the content going here as it is).

I just put up my first post over there, a cross-posting of the item below: Boston City Councillor to hold hearing on Mosque land sale.

Thanks to Aaron for the invitation.

City Councillor to hold hearing on Mosque land sale

The Jewish Advocate has a front page article on the Islamic Society of Boston and their Boston Mosque concerning City Councilman Jerry McDermott's plan to hold hearings on the bargain-basement land deal the ISB received: City councilor wants hearing over mosque in Roxbury (emphasis mine)

Boston City Councilor Jerry McDermott imminently intends to call for a public hearing on the Boston Redevelopment Authority’s sale of land in Roxbury for the construction of a large mosque to the Islamic Society of Boston, which has been dogged by charges of links to Islamic extremists.

The hearing comes at the urging of the lawyer for the David Project, the pro-Israel group currently being sued by the ISB for defamation, who sent a letter to McDermott and local media earlier this month alleging that the ISB trustees’ current president had signed a petition in support of the pre-trial release of Abdulrahman Alamoudi. The founder of the ISB in 1982, Alamoudi is now in prison in Saudi Arabia on terrorism funding-related charges.

Continue reading "City Councillor to hold hearing on Mosque land sale"

Some wire-tap links.

Saudi Boycott Continues

Contrary to earlier reports, the Saudi boycott of Israel continues despite the KSA's entry into the World Trade Organization according to this report in Arab News:

First-Degree Boycott of Israel to Continue

JEDDAH, 22 December 2005 — Saudi Arabia announced yesterday that it would maintain its first-degree boycott of Israeli products despite joining the World Trade Organization (WTO).

An official at the Commerce and Industry Ministry denied reports that the Kingdom had lifted the boycott. “The Kingdom has lifted only the second and third degree boycott of Israel in accordance with a decision taken by the GCC summit 10 years ago,” the official said, adding that the Saudi accession to WTO was not linked to the lifting of the boycott.

Wow, boycotts in the first, second and third degrees. How about the double-secret boycott?

Some days they sound evil, other days just childish. Who would be more dangerous in charge of a country, I wonder? An evil man, or a petulant child?

Munich Mediocre

An emailer writes:

Went to see Munich.

Didn't pay. They were giving out free preview tickets to Jews, probably to counter all the negative talk.

The shock was: this is a really boring movie. Really. Part way through, I was looking at my watch to see if it would be over soon. It's very tense, every few minutes I was holding my breath in terror. But it never went anywhere. Felt like it was four hours long - somewhat over two, actually.

The moral equivelance theme is there, overshadowed by the violence only generates more violence theme: When Israel takes out murderers, it causes more murderers to arise. But I would say more moral muddle than failure of morality. It wasn't clear what Spielberg was trying to say. except that death and murder are bad. Well, duh.

I have a feeling the furor over this movie is going to prove itself unnecessary. I'll end up seeing it when it comes out on DVD I'm sure. Here's the thing. Whatever Spielberg and the rest of the Hollywood chest-beaters may think, the enemy got the message...you kill our people, we'll kill you. It's as true now as it was in the '70's, and it's going to stay that way until Spielberg becomes Prime Minister.

In the mean-time, here's another lesson the enemy can take away: Not only do the Jews kick your ass, but they feel real bad about having to do it. I mean, go ahead and kill me, but just don't patronize me afterward. I'm risking going off on a tangent here over a film I haven't seen, but there's a whole other post behind the idea that killing killers (people who know damn well what their future has in store for them) perpetuates anything.

The trouble for Spielberg is that those of us who understand how important it is for the West to stand firm can't stomach people like him who seek to undermine that. It may be a decent film on its merits, but when he made the choice to make the film a political statement (much like the director of Paradise Now), he opened the door to having it judged on the same basis.

Here are a couple of unenthusiastic reviews: Haaretz: A 'Munich' to remember - or not and StarTribune: Movie review: 'Munich' too much, too slow

Judith has a series of posts on the factual basis of events and the film, here.

Don't tell me, tell him -- Iran's hard line in the Globe

Meryl Yourish emails to alert me to this op-ed in the Boston Globe:

Behind Iran's hard-line on Israel By Karim Sadjadpour and Ray Takeyh

IRAN'S BELLIGERENT foreign policy toward Israel is among the more puzzling issues in international relations. At a time when most Arab governments, including the elected Palestinian leadership, have come to accept Israel's existence as an unalterable fact, non-Arab Iran continues to call for eradication of the Jewish state. Over the course of the last several weeks President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran attacked Israel as a ''tumor" that should be ''wiped off the map of the world" and asserted that the holocaust was a ''myth." Despite widespread international criticism, the Iranian president has been unrepentant, saying, ''Western reactions are invalid. . . . My words are the Iranian nation's words." In actuality, however, the Middle-Eastern country where Ahmadinejad's declarations resonate least is Iran...

Overall, this isn't a terrible piece, if more than a little Pollyana -- "most Arab governments, including the elected Palestinian leadership, have come to accept Israel's existence as an unalterable fact"? Come on. That's far too pat a statement to make about a far more arguable proposition.

And here, as Meryl points out, is more:

...Whatever the calculations of Iran's new president, throughout nearly three decades of calls for the ''liberation of Jerusalem," Iran's revolutionary regime has never come to terms with an essential reality: There exists no inherent reason why the Israeli-Palestinian struggle should be an overriding concern to the average Iranian. Iran has no territorial disputes with Israel, no Palestinian refugee problem, a long history of contentious relations with the Arab world, and an even longer history of tolerance vis-à-vis the Jewish people. To this day, the Jewish community in Iran is the largest in the Middle East outside of Israel...

"There exists no inherent reason why the Israeli-Palestinian struggle should be an overriding concern to the average Iranian." I agree with that, and I think a regime change in Iran would be a promising proposition -- promising, if not exactly the perfect antidote. BUT, then there's this: "...an even longer history of tolerance vis-à-vis the Jewish people. To this day, the Jewish community in Iran is the largest in the Middle East outside of Israel." Not so fast.

The Jews of Iran entry at the Jewish Virtual Library tells you what you need to put the perspective on Iranian tolerance and that "largest Jewish community in the Middle East" right there in the sub head:

1948 Jewish population: 100,000
2003: 11,000

So yeah, 11,000 is a large Jewish community by current standards, but it also stands as an object lesson in how to lie with statistics. You can also get an idea of Iranian (or at least Islamist) tolerance by reading the entry. Why is there still such a relatively large population in Iran now compared to other Muslim nations? I'm not sure, but it could be that while other countries kicked their Jews out, Iran made it more difficult than the others. Here's a possible clue:

...At least 13 Jews have been executed in Iran since the Islamic revolution 19 years ago, most of them for either religious reasons or their connection to Israel. For example, in May 1998, Jewish businessman Ruhollah Kakhodah-Zadeh was hanged in prison without a public charge or legal proceeding, apparently for assisting Jews to emigrate.

Of course, the main problem with the article is that it's in the wrong newspaper. It should be distributed in Iran. Someone needs to let Mr. Ahmadinejad know that the old sport is being utterly irrational don't you know.

Georgetown to host this year's Palestine Solidarity Conference

Somewhere back in the recent archives I noted that there hadn't been any announcement for a Palestinian Solidarity Movement conference this year.

Well, the announcement has come, and it comes as little surprise that, hot on the heels of a $20 million Saudi gift, this year's location will be Georgetown University.

The press-release, full of utterly disingenuous language calling for peace and reconciliation (the PSM is an absolute front for a plethora of anti-semitic, 'smash Israel by any means necessary' groups), is below, and continues in the extended entry.

Palestine Solidarity Movement to Hold its Fifth Annual Divestment Conference at Georgetown University, February 17-19, 2006

Washington, DC, December 23rd, 2005 – The Palestine Solidarity Movement (PSM) announced today that its fifth annual conference will be held February 17th through 19th at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. The annual conference comes to Georgetown’s campus, which possesses a Catholic and Jesuit identity, on the heels of a series of bold initiatives taken by the decision-making bodies of various Christian denominations to consider the use of divestment as a tactic to non-violently influence a just resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The event will be hosted by Georgetown University’s Students for Justice in Palestine (GU-SJP) on behalf of PSM, a coalition of North American organizations dedicated to implementing divestment and boycott strategies as a component of human rights activism in order to realize both equality and justice for all people residing within Israel/Palestine.

Continue reading "Georgetown to host this year's Palestine Solidarity Conference"

The 500 year old Secret Synagogue

Here's a neat story. What's behind that secret wall in your basement?

Priest's hunch finally uncovers Porto's hidden holy scrolls

... In the 16th century, a thick-walled granite house that still stands in a row of narrow buildings along a cobbled street held a dangerous secret. At the back, steep steps lead down to a warren of alleys ideal for conspiratorial comings and goings that helped keep an outlawed religious ceremony hidden.

Four centuries later, the secret of the synagogue is out. The mystery began unravelling when Fr Agostinho Jardim Moreira, a Catholic priest, bought the four-storey house for use as an old people's home for his parish. When construction workers told him they had come across a false wall, he told them to pull it down - sensing a hidden tale.

He had studied the city's Jewish history and knew his parish had been a Jewish quarter in the 15th and 16th centuries. He also knew that, after they were forced to convert to Catholicism in 1496, many Jews privately kept their faith and worshipped in secret. "I suspected that false wall was hiding something," said Fr Moreira. "I knew there had to be some kind of Jewish symbol behind it."

A worker's sledgehammer proved his hunch right. Beyond the wall was a room with a medieval holy ark - a nook in the wall of a synagogue where Torah scrolls are kept. Only two other arks from the period have been found in Portugal...

Interview with former terrorists

You can listen to a radio interview with ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat and friends Ibrahim Abdullah and Zachariah Anani on 'The Jersey Guys' show here.

Abdallah is a Dearborn, Michigan-born Palestinian who, indoctrinated here in the United States, travelled to the Middle East to engage in terror.

Holocaust Denial in the News

Here's a two-fer. First, hat-tip to Daily Scorecard for pointing out this NY Sun article on the Egyptian editor who penned a Holocaust-denying editorial to the tune of no protest -- 'they have received no letters to the editor' (see this entry for MEMRI's story).

It's nice to see this in the MSM, it would just be nicer to see it in the New York Times rather than the New York Sun (no disrespect intended to the Sun).

Meet the Egyptian Editor Who, Once Aided by U.S., Denies Holocaust

CAIRO, Egypt - Hisham Abd al-Rauf, the foreign editor of Egypt's largest-circulation afternoon paper, would like the readers of The New York Sun to know that he does not hate all Jewish people. But that nonetheless, he is entitled to his opinions that the Holocaust never happened, that the Romans did not destroy the Second Temple in Jerusalem because it was never built, and that Jews ordered President Bush to unseat Saddam Hussein.

But as for the Jews, Mr. al-Rauf grew up with many in his Cairo neighborhood before the Six-Day War. His father's jeweler was Jewish. In 1993, he met many more Jews, whom he claims to genuinely like, on an American government program to train foreign journalists in Boston. "I have even met some rabbis. I liked them," he said in an interview yesterday where he defended a recent column praising the Iranian president's recent remarks questioning the historical truth of the Holocaust...

And second, there is this in Reuters, about the head of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood (the organization from which our own domestic Muslim American Society was formed) and his Holocaust-denying statements:

Egypt's Brotherhood leader calls Holocaust a myth

CAIRO (Reuters) - The head of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, the main opposition force in parliament, echoed Iran's president on Thursday in describing the World War Two Holocaust of European Jews as a myth.

"Western democracy has attacked everyone who does not share the vision of the sons of Zion as far as the myth of the Holocaust is concerned," Mohamed Mahdi Akef said in a statement.

Akef cited as evidence of Western intolerance the cases of French writer Roger Garoudy, who was convicted in France in 1998 of questioning the Holocaust, and British historian David Irving, who faces similar charges in Austria next month...


'Half of the Israeli terror fatalities in 2004 came from attackers who entered Jerusalem from Bethlehem'

From Honest Reporting:

Christmas In Bethlehem - Media exaggerate Bethlehem's demise and under-report anti-Christian violence by Palestinians

After quoting assertions in The New Statesman and The Baltimore Sun, HR states:

According to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, each one of these points is factually incorrect:
  • There is no barrier (completely encircling) Bethlehem. There is only a fence where the Bethlehem area interfaces with Jerusalem and close to the 1949 armistice line. Only a very small segment of the fence is a concrete wall preventing terrorists from shooting at motorists.
  • The economy has actually improved significantly. While 110,000 tourists visited the city during 2004, more than 218,000 have already visited Bethlehem during 2005 - an increase of around 100%. There have been corresponding increases in Bethlehem's main industries: Textiles 50%, Stone and marble export 40%, commercial transportation 20%. These increases have brought millions of dollars into the local economy.
  • The IDF has decided to take a "calculated risk" to make access easier for tourists. According to IDF Lt. Col. Aviv Feigel in the Jerusalem Post, "The military will try to speed the process by not checking every tourist bus, but conducting spot checks of random buses instead."

Israel is taking these steps despite the fact that "Half of the Israeli terror fatalities in 2004 came from attackers who entered Jerusalem from Bethlehem."...

(H/T: isirota1965)

'First you wanta kill me, now ya wanna kiss me...blow'

Just in case you missed it... (Besides, I couldn't resist using that line. No-Prize to whoever recognizes the reference!)

Palestinians boot Jews, now beg them for help -- Arabs unable to reproduce successes in area greenhouses

The Palestinians who took over the Jewish greenhouses in the Gaza Strip when Israel withdrew its communities from the area now are asking expelled farmers for advice after reportedly failing to reproduce the region's famous insect-free vegetables, WND has learned.

Prior to Israel's August withdrawal, the residents of Gaza's Gush Katif slate of Jewish communities ran greenhouses known for producing high-quality insect-free vegetables. The Gush Katif gardens featured some of the most technologically advanced agricultural equipment and accounted for more than $100 million per year in exports to Europe. The greenhouses also supplied Israel with 75 percent of its own produce.

The hothouses were passed to the Palestinians in September in a $14 million deal brokered by former World Bank President James Wolfenson and several wealthy Jewish Americans.

Earlier this month, the Palestinians now running the greenhouses reportedly told the Israeli-Palestinian Economic Cooperation Fund they failed in their efforts to grow bug-free produce.

Now the Palestinian owners have asked the United States Agency for International Development, which has been involved in reconstruction efforts in Gaza, to hire former Jewish Gaza greenhouse owners as consultants for their declining vegetable businesses...

...Asked if she [Tucker] would serve as a consultant for the new Palestinian owners of her former greenhouses, Tucker said, "Probably not. We see the terror coming out of Gaza, coming out of the neighborhood I used to live in, and it's just horrible. Hamas has taken over different parts of Gush Katif and are firing rockets into Israel. I am not saying the Palestinian farmers are involved, but it seems they are not doing enough to stop the terror."

Haderi, who says he already has been asked by U.S. AID to consult on greenhouse technology, said, "I am still thinking about it. It's a very difficult decision."


'I wonder how long it is before he disappears to Hezbollah-land or Syria'

Not long.

Washington Times: Diver's killer set free in Lebanon

U.S. officials yesterday said the killer of a U.S. Navy diver had been released from "temporary custody" in Lebanon but refused to rule out bringing him to the United States by force.

The Lebanese government criticized Washington's request to hand over Mohammad Ali Hamadi, saying the militant already had served a prison sentence for the 1985 murder of Robert Dean Stethem of Waldorf, Md.

Hamadi, a member of the Hezbollah guerrilla group, was taken into custody upon returning to Lebanon after his release from a German prison Thursday. He had served 18 years for hijacking a TWA plane to Beirut and fatally shooting Petty Officer 2nd Class Stethem, who was 23 when he was killed.

"What I can assure anybody who's listening, including Mr. Hamadi, is that we will track him down, we will find him, and we will bring him to justice in the United States for what he's done," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said...


Mobile Closet Space

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Wherein I Rant of Project Runway, Episode 4

Last night's Project Runway was an abortion! Santino's designs weren't lingerie, they were costumes. Besides, he's a big baby. I agree with the decision to give the victory to Daniel V.'s team, but the departure of Daniel Franco in favor of the prima dona Santino could only have been a case of the producers stepping in and guiding the judges' results. Santino is definitely good TV, but the decision was unjust, and was reminiscent of what happened last season as "the person everyone loved to hate," Wendy Pepper, kept hanging in there time after time even though it would have seemed a fair-judge would have long ago given her the boot. Daniel Franco's designs were good (if, yes, a bit similar to each other), and his departure classy (if a bit reticent and teary-eyed, still, he did offer himself for dismissal which was honorable), while Santino whined and argued with the judges -- he even managed to almost make me sympathetic toward my least favorite judge, Nina Garcia. Michael Kors, not present for some reason, was sorely missed.

I predict that there will not soon be another opportunity to bid farewell to Santino, as he is clearly one of the most talented designers, and, I will admit, his antics are entertaining.

You can be the judge, here. This was a team challenge. Three designs each from four teams.

Chinook Diplomacy -- Hearts and Minds in Pakistan

There are dividends to reap from humanitarian missions according to this report from Brett Stephens:

OpinionJournal: Chinook Diplomacy - The U.S. military wins hearts and minds in Pakistan

...U.S. helicopters have flown 2,500 sorties, carried 16,000 passengers and delivered nearly 6,000 tons of aid. Just as importantly, the Chinook has become America's new emblem in Pakistan, a byword for salvation in an area where until recently the U.S. was widely and fanatically detested. Toy Chinooks (made in China, of course) are suddenly popular with Pakistani children. A Kashmiri imam who denounced the U.S. in a recent sermon was booed and heckled by worshippers. "Pakistan is not a nation of ingrates," a local businessman told me over dinner the other night. "We know where the help is coming from."

The extent of the U.S. military's assistance, well-known to Pakistanis, barely registers on the radar screens of most Western news outlets. That's a pity, because it overlooks one of America's most significant hearts-and-minds successes so far in the Muslim world. The assistance also illustrates another frequently overlooked fact: When it comes to foreign aid, the Department of Defense is one of the biggest contributors, and what it provides is something no other country can replicate...


Yasser Abbas

Here's a "read it all" recommendation by Tom Gross in the Wall Street Journal:

On the very day that five Israelis were murdered and over 60 injured outside a shopping mall in the coastal city of Netanya earlier this month, the official Palestinian newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida reported that Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas had approved fresh financial assistance to the families of suicide bombers. The family of each "martyr" will now receive a monthly stipend of at least $250 -- a not inconsiderable amount for most Palestinians. Altogether, the families of these so-called martyrs and of those wounded in terrorist attempts or held in Israeli jails might receive $100 million, according to Al-Hayat Al-Jadida.

Around 30% of the Palestinian Authority budget comes from international donations, including a hefty amount from the European Union. If an Arab government funded stipends to the families of the London or Madrid bombers, it would probably be pretty big news. But this is the Palestinian Authority, and no matter how little it does to discourage terrorism, or to educate its people to coexist with Israel, it can rely on excuses being made on its behalf by an army of sympathizers throughout the West -- in the press, on college campuses and, most disturbingly, in foreign ministries.

For over a year now, since Mr. Abbas succeeded Yasser Arafat, his boss of 40 years, many in the West have done their utmost to "explain" or ignore Mr. Abbas's failings. But if Americans and Europeans are genuinely interested in promoting Palestinian-Israeli peace, it is time for them to take a realistic look at his record...

Judging from the story below, Senators push to exclude Hamas from elections, there are some people willing to do so, but are they really willing to go all the way and face what they'll inevitably find: That, stripped of its Jew, Israel and America hatred, there is precious little "Palestine" left to work with. What then?

(via LGF)

Senators push to exclude Hamas from elections

Reuters: Senators push to exclude Hamas from elections

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Seventy U.S. senators on Wednesday called on President George W. Bush to make it clear to Palestinian leaders that Hamas and other groups that the United States wants terrorist organizations to disarm or be banned from upcoming Palestinian elections.

The senators in a letter to Bush said the United States "would have little choice but to reevaluate all aspects of our relations" with the Palestinian Authority if Hamas "or such groups" were brought into it.

The Senate letter follows a resolution passed overwhelmingly last week by the House of Representatives that also urged the exclusion of Hamas from the January 25 parliamentary ballot.

The House resolution said Hamas' participation could undermine the ability of the United States to provide assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

Senators said they were "deeply disappointed" that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas "has yet to do what the Palestinian Authority has committed to doing on numerous occasions -- asserting its control over the terrorist groups that operate freely within the West Bank and Gaza."...


Tracking Santa

I wasn't aware of this back story:

NORAD Observes 50th Anniversary of Tracking Santa

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo., Dec. 22, 2005 – The North American Aerospace Defense Command is observing its 50th anniversary of tracking Santa Claus on his annual rounds, NORAD officials said here.

The tradition of tracking Santa began in 1955, when a local Sears, Roebuck and Co. store ran a newspaper ad urging children to make a phone call on Christmas Eve and talk to Santa Claus. As fate would have it, the phone number was misprinted and, instead of reaching Santa, youngsters found themselves talking with Air Force Col. Harry Shoup of the Continental Air Defense Command at Cheyenne Mountain.

Rather than hanging up, Shoup and his troops answered every child's call that night with a report of Santa's location. CONAD personnel kept up the practice until 1958, when NORAD was formed and took over Santa-tracking duties. NORAD has continued the Santa tracking tradition for several reasons, according to Air Force Master Sgt. John Tomassi, co-director of Santa-tracking operations.

"I think in the initial stages, back in the '50s and '60s, it was just a novelty kind of thing," he said. "A lot of people - children and their families - do this tracking Santa as a tradition in their family. We've recognized now that people have taken this program as a tradition, and what we can do is educate them...

...Last Christmas Eve, volunteers at Cheyenne Mountain answered nearly 55,000 phone calls and 35,000 e-mails from children around the world. During December 2004, the NORAD Tracks Santa Web site had 912 million hits from 181 countries. This year, about 500 volunteers - most of them U.S. and Canadian military personnel and their families - will report for telephone-answering duty on Christmas Eve. But already, youngsters are sending messages to Santa via the NORAD Tracks Santa Web site.

"E-mails are arriving from India and Ireland and all over the world already from children with their wish lists who want to talk to Santa," Tomassi said. "We receive, on average, 200 e-mails a day."


Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Arnold's Pre-emptive Strike

Apparently, Austrians don't like the death penalty. Socialists and Greens particularly don't like it, so when Arnold got wind of the fact that the City Council in his home town of Graz was going to remove his name from the "Arnold Schwarzenegger Stadium" over the execution of Tookie Williams, Arnold finally had enough.

SacBee: Governor tells off his hometown

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sent a pointed letter to the mayor of his hometown in Austria on Monday demanding that his name be removed from the local soccer stadium.

Angry over local politicians' threats to rename "Arnold Schwarzenegger Stadium" in protest of the execution of Stanley Tookie Williams, the governor promised the mayor of Graz a follow-up letter from his personal lawyer.

"I expect the lettering to be removed by the end of 2005," Schwarzenegger declared in the letter released by his office, "and in the future, the use of my name to advertise or promote the city of Graz in any way is no longer allowed."

Schwarzenegger, who makes regular trips back to Graz, told the mayor he's even returning his coveted Graz "Ring of Honor." The award was given him during an elaborate City Hall ceremony in 1999 for the "pride and recognition" he brought his hometown.

During the ceremony, which is on his Schwarzenegger.com personal Web site, he called the ring "the most precious award I ever got."

That was before he learned the Graz City Council was considering stripping Schwarzenegger of that honor, too.

"It was a beautiful day in 1999 when I received the ring at City Hall, and I assumed at the time that it would be a token of sincere friendship between my hometown and me," he wrote Mayor Siegfried Nagl.

"Since, however, the official Graz appears to no longer accept me as one of their own, this ring has lost its meaning and value to me. It is already in the mail."...

Also see the Telegraph: I won't be back, says Arnie as home town attacks him over execution

Good for Arnold. When someone's about to kick you (and, in fact, has kicked you before), kick 'em first.

MEMRI TV: Iranian TV Blood Libel: Jewish Rabbis Killed Hundreds of European Children to use Their Blood plus Holocaust Denial

I know it's getting repetitive. It is repetitive. Holocaust denial and the demonization of Jews are as common on Arab and Iranian television as MASH reruns used to be here. When will people wake up to this? It's not the conflict with Israel and the West that causes this hatred, it's this hatred that causes the conflict with Israel and the West.

MEMRI TV: Political Analysts on Iranian TV: The Jews Killed Children and Used Their Blood for Passover

The following are excerpts from a TV discussion with Iranian political analysts Dr. Hasan Hanizadeh(1) and Dr. Ali-Reza Akbari, which aired on Jaam-e Jam 2 TV on December 20, 2005. The discussion began with the subject of the denial of the existence of crematoria at Auschwitz, and went on to explain in detail how Jewish rabbis in Europe used to kill children and take their blood for use during the Passover holiday...

Ali-Reza Akbari: ..."Perhaps the reason... In my opinion, the people who say that the phenomenon of burning Jews on German soil during the World War II crisis is similar to a holocaust do so as a result of propaganda and due to psychological reasons.

"In any event, a case of burning people has been registered in history, when many human beings were burned because of their beliefs. The people who were burned then were, in fact, Christians. They were burned by the people who ruled Yemen, who were Jews. This event took place 400 years before the advent of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula. Since then, the burning of human beings has been termed 'holocaust.'"

Host: "Were there six million Jews at all at that time, who could have been annihilated in the crematoria?"

Hasan Hanizadeh: "First of all, this figure is greatly exaggerated. The number of Jews in the world does not exceed 12 million. Only now, 57 years later, has it reached this figure. Clearly, at that time, considering the dispersion of the Jews, there could not have been six million Jews in Europe alone. In any event, the Zionist lobby and the Jewish Agency use this issue as a club with which they beat and extort the West.

"Unfortunately, the West has forgotten two horrendous incidents, carried out by the Jews in 19th-century Europe – in Paris and London, to be precise. In 1883, about 150 French children were murdered in a horrible way in the suburbs of Paris, before the Jewish Passover holiday. Later research showed that the Jews had killed them and taken their blood. This event caused riots in Paris back then, and the French government found itself under pressure.

"A similar incident took place in London, when many English children were killed by Jewish rabbis. These two incidents still haunt the minds and souls of the Europeans, but due to the growing influence of the Zionist lobby in Europe – or to be precise, the influence of the Jews – these two incidents are, unfortunately, never mentioned."

The sick minds that create, broadcast and cultivate these fantasies are more than just the enemies of the Jews.

Update: David Boxenhorn emails this relevant post by Jonah Goldberg at The Corner: The Ironic Virtue of Holocaust Denial

...The need to deny the Holocaust establishes the importance of the Holocaust. Ahmadinejad and his ilk need to call it a myth because if such a horrror actually happened the moral consequences would be too enormous to ignore. Why else say it's a myth? Denying the historical reality of the Holocaust concedes the moral arguments which flow from it. In much the same way hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue, Holocaust denial is the homage evil men pay to absolute standards of good and evil.

The deniers in the Arab world often tacitly acknowledge this by adding the contradictory argument that if it happened then Israel should set up shop in Austria or Germany.

Of course, all of this doesn't take place in a vacuum. There are other arguments for why Israel should be where it is and there are other reasons why people deny the Holocaust. But a more logically consistent anti-Israel stance would simply accept that the Holocaust happened and, well, so what? But they understand they can't make that argument, at least not on the world stage. We all know that for internal consumption, the Nazis still get a lot of applause in the Middle East...


United Church of Christ Leader has Members Seething

Lydia Veliko, Ecumenical Officer, United Church of Christ posted her report of a recent trip to the Middle East at the Global Ministries Website. In it, among other things, she defends Reverend Naim Ateek of Sabeel, and the way she does so has some UCC'rs hopping mad.

UCCTruths reports on the issue (no permalink, but look for the December 21 entry, "Theology of Suffering" -- UCC Leader Rationalizes Deicide on Trip to Israel entry, now at the top of the page) and says, in part (emphasis mine):

...What is this nonsense - talking about apologies and repentance and then defending that which we should be apologizing and repenting for? Veliko's comments are disturbing on a number of levels - but most importantly, her rationalization of deicide based on our "theology of suffering" is not only inaccurate, it is repugnant no matter what your opinion is of the conflict in Israel...

...In spite of all of the problems we see in the leadership in the UCC, we have never called for the resignation of anyone - until now. Veliko's comments are so wrong and so damaging that she must be called on to resign immediately and without hesitation. As Veliko notes in her article, charges of deicide have been used historically to harm Jews. No UCC leader has the right to promote a theology that can be used to harm others and rationalizing deicide this way does embolden those who would harm Jews. The UCC leadership, and specifically UCC President John Thomas, must repudiate Veliko's comments and immediately ask for her resignation...

Check out the post at UCCTruths for the specific quote that has them up in arms.

Also, do not miss this report by Dexter Van Zile, also at UCCTruths and concerning Sabeel and the UCC: Call Me Caiaphas. It is also worth reading in full, but here is a snip:

Unrepentant, persistent and defiant are the best words to describe Anglican priest Naim Ateek and his supporters in the United Church of Christ. For the past few months Ateek, a Palestinian Christian who has long been one of Israel’s most ferocious and unfair critics, has come under fire for his ongoing campaign to portray Israel as a baby-killing and Christ-killing nation that blocks the political salvation of the Middle East. Ateek and the officials in the UCC who defend him assert that he is just using the language of the Cross to describe what is happening to the Palestinians.

On the contrary, Ateek has used crucifixion imagery to describe Israeli behavior, not Palestinian suffering. He has portrayed Israeli government officials trying to defend their citizens from terror attacks as modern day Herods, intent on destroying the innocent baby Jesus. He has written that the Israeli crucifixion machine operates daily in the disputed territories and has compared the occupation as the stone blocking Christ's tomb. Language like this is not about Palestinian suffering; it is about Jewish savagery...


DePaul Forbids Student Group to Protest Ward Churchill

According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education:

A student group that protested a campus appearance by University of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill has become DePaul University’s latest victim of censorship. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) intervened after the university banned its College Republicans from posting flyers protesting Churchill’s visit and actually changed its own rules to prevent the organization from attending a workshop that he would be leading...

...Churchill, who made news earlier this year for describing victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center as “little Eichmanns,” was scheduled to lecture and lead a workshop for student groups on October 20 and 21. In protest, DePaul’s College Republicans (CRs) printed flyers that quoted some of Churchill’s controversial remarks. DePaul’s Office of Student Life banned the CRs from posting the flyers, citing a remarkably vague policy prohibiting “propaganda.” The CRs, understandably confused as to how quoting a speaker’s own words could be “propaganda,” put up some flyers anyway, leading to a formal warning from DePaul.

DePaul’s Cultural Center went even further by actually changing the attendance requirements for the Churchill-led “Multicultural Human Rights Education Workshop” to exclude the CRs. Although the event was initially advertised as open to “student organizations,” after the CRs expressed interest in attending, the Cultural Center altered its website to limit the event to “Student Organizations which are supported by the Cultural Center’s Allocation Fund,” which the CRs are not.

On November 23, FIRE wrote to DePaul President Dennis Holtschneider to protest the university’s actions, urging the Catholic institution to reject “policies that place students’ individual rights and personal integrity at the mercy of university officials who are free to censor students at will.” Holtschneider replied on December 12, incorrectly claiming that the word “propaganda” is not part of any policy at DePaul. Nevertheless, he defended DePaul’s policy, insisting that it “is enforced equally for all topics and positions. Advertisements of speakers are posted. Denunciations of speakers are not posted.” Yet FIRE’s research shows that the policy was amended to reflect this only after the College Republicans’ flyers were denied approval...


Iran receives 12 Ukrainian cruise missiles with 3000km range

In the Haaretz article, MI chief: Int'l pressure delayed Iran's nuclear bid by two years, comes this:

The diplomatic pressure the international community has exerted on Iran delayed the Islamic state's nuclear development plan by two years, Director of Military Intelligence Major General Aharon Ze'evi (Farkash) said on Tuesday...

...He also said that today Iran's nuclear aspirations constitute a real threat to western countries.

Ze'evi said that Iran had recently received 12 cruise missiles with a 3,000-km range, which are capable of carrying nuclear warheads. 18 such missiles were transported from Ukraine to Russia, of which 12 had somehow managed to end up in Iranian hands. The other six were received by China...

"Somehow" ended up in Iranian hands. I wonder how that could've happened.

Technology Cuts Two Ways

Telegraph: Insurgents 'using Google Earth'

Insurgents could be using satellite images from a popular website to mount attacks on British and American bases in Iraq, defence experts said last night.

Google Earth allows users to zoom in on almost any location in the world to such close range that cars can be recognised. The site even provides latitude and longitude co-ordinates for buildings.

Bill Sweetman, a technological warfare expert with Jane's, the military and intelligence specialist publisher, said the images could enable terrorists in Iraq to pinpoint targets inside military bases...

I just uninstalled this the other day. Once I went and found my house I lost interest. The danger from such programs is obvious, but what is there to be done about it? Nothing much, it seems to me.

Navy diver's killer held in Beirut

Good to hear this, but I wonder how long it is before he disappears to Hezbollah-land or Syria.

Washington Times: Navy diver's killer held in Beirut

The Lebanese killer of a U.S. Navy diver was in custody in Beirut yesterday, according to U.S. officials who decried his release from a German prison last week and pledged to bring him to the United States for trial.

Relatives of the victim -- Waldorf, Md., native Robert Dean Stethem -- said yesterday they were "devastated" to learn of the killer's release and urged the Bush administration to demand an explanation from Germany...

...The decision to free Hamadi came just before the reported release of a German hostage in Iraq, Susanne Osthoff, but Berlin rejected suggestions that the developments were related.

The Stethem family, however, was skeptical.

"We feel pretty strongly [the hostage-taking] made his release happen much faster," Richard Stethem said. "I think the new [German] government ... thought it was an easy out to give him back to Lebanon."

A U.S. official agreed privately that Hamadi "could have been held longer" and said Berlin's explanation was "not good enough."

"There was no reason for him to be tried in Germany in the first place," said Patrick Stethem, Petty Officer Stethem's other brother. "He should still be tried here for the crimes he committed against a U.S. service member."


Giving Iran the Candle

Emanuele Ottolenghi is suggesting a world-wide effort to hold Hanukka candle-lighting ceremonies in from of Iranian embassies this December 27. A very nice, rather poetic idea. I don't think there's any Iranian diplomatic presence anywhere near Boston, however.

The Light of the World - ’Tis the season to celebrate the triumph of liberty over tyranny.

...So here's an idea that ordinary citizens can adopt as a reminder to governments that in the end, for any hope to survive, we need freedom to triumph over tyranny. This year, Hanukkah coincides with Christmas. On December 27, the third night of Hanukkah, Hanukkah candles should be lit in public ceremonies across the streets, in front of Iranian embassies around the world. Jewish communities should organize a lighting ceremony in all those capital cities where Iran has an embassy, and in New York it should be done in front of the U.N. building, right beside the Iranian flag. According to Jewish law, anyone can light the Shamash, the candle that is used to light all others. Prominent leaders with bipartisan support should be invited to perform this symbolic act to reaffirm the light of freedom over the darkness of tyranny. And other public figures should endorse this initiative as a message to the Iranian authorities.

The idea was recently launched by two London activists, and is already gaining support and sympathy elsewhere. Rome may soon follow, and so should other capitals of Europe and the Western world.

Since the free world's leaders remain unwilling to give a strong and decisive answer to Iran's tyranny, ordinary citizens should perform this simple gesture of defiance, which for centuries Jewish families and communities across the world have done. This is a reminder that in the end, despite the odds, the light of freedom must, and therefore can, triumph over the darkness of tyranny.

(H/T: Jerusalem Posts)

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

'Why did they do that to Muhammad Al-Dura?'

Of course, they didn't do "that."

Feeling the love amongst the Palestinians on Saudia Arabian TV. Sick, sick, sick.

MEMRI TV: Iqra TV Interviews Toddler: We Don't Want Peace with the Jews

Following are excerpts from an interview with a Palestinian child, aired on Iqra TV on December 7, 2005.

Interviewer: Why did they do that to Muhammad Al-Dura?

Palestinian Toddler: Because they are Jews, villains, dogs. You see? That's why. They shouldn't do that, because it's called killing. They shouldn't do this. We are not their friends. They shouldn't do this. We are Palestinians, and they are Jews. They should not shoot people.

Interviewer: Is it possible that we will reconcile with them one day, and there will be peace between us?

Toddler: No.

Interviewer: Don't we want peace with them?

Toddler: We don't want anything. We don't want anyone, not the Jews... We want to live in security, see? We don't want Jews, thieves, or villains.

I don't like hearing such news. It makes me very sad, because the martyrs die. It's no joke, they die for real, by live bullets or rubber bullets, see? Rubber bullets have iron inside them. If a rubber bullet hits somebody, like that, he might...

Interviewer: Do you want this war to continue or stop?

Toddler: I want it to stop. I don't want war or anything.

Interviewer: Why?

Toddler: Because if the war continues, and there is a big battle, the Jews... The Jews - we will drive them out of their homes. We will do it to the Jews. What they did to us we will do to them.

When are people like Spielberg going to understand that all the answers to the region's problems aren't found by looking in the mirror? Hate like this doesn't happen because of what we do, it happens because of what they teach and tell each other.

Remember the Straights of Hormuz?

Oceanguy does. He was there back in the '80's and reminisces on Iranian military effectiveness and the growing Iranian nuclear threat:

An Iranian Weapons Story

In the mid 1980's, during the Iran-Iraq Tanker War, I was deployed to the Arabian(Persian) Gulf aboard one of Her Majesty's frigates. The small group of HM Ships was there both to show the flag and to help keep the international waterways open, particularly around the Straights of Hormuz.

Often, from a distance, we encountered Iranian Naval vessels, what would commonly be called "gunboats." These gunboats, at least the ones we were concerned about, carried medium range surface-to-surface missiles which the Iranians used to target oil tankers.

Although a British warship would not have been a target for those missiles, they were still extremely dangerous. Quite a few times, while sailing in the vicinity of an Iranian gunboat and a merchant vessel, our crew was called to Action Stations, or what we American's call, General Quarters. It was never a drill.

The gunboats were not usually in tip-top fighting condition. It appears that the commanders were not technically savvy enough to make sure their systems were in proper working order. More than once, these calls to Action Stations were the result of our sensors detecting an Iranian fire-control radar had locked on to our ship... whether it was sad, humorous, or just plain stupidity is up to you...


About Mike

A father who's lost his son writes in to The Mudville Gazette:

"Came across your blog this morning, and thought I'd share my thoughts as the dad of an American Soldier killed in action four months ago..."

Don't miss it.

The Globe's Dark Spin

Harry finds the Boston Globe putting the most negative spin possible on the Iraqi election. Shocker!

Squaring the Boston Globe: Bring Back Saddam!

"...Shi’ites and Sunnis and Baathists – OH MY! These democratic processes certainly are messy and risky, aren’t they!..."

Don't miss the coverage at Iraq the Model, where many updates do indicate problems (or so it appears at this point) with the election handling itself.

Klocek in the Trib

Larry Summers' Lashes

Greg at JRTelegraph wonders, now that Harvard is taking money to learn tolerance from Saudi Arabia, when will President Larry Summers be receiving his just-deserts?:

Will Larry Summers Get Lashes?

Remember how Harvard President Larry Summers, in a free academic discussion, speculated about men and women having different abilities for math and science? Remember how all hell broke loose? Poor Larry Summers was almost kicked out of Harvard. Think about it! To say such terrible things about women!

At the time we predicted that he would survive. He did. And we were right. We just could not predict the price Larry would pay. First he agreed to lay $50 million dollars on the altar of political correctness to teach "diversity on campus". That is protection money was paid to the mob of cultural marxists. You would think that would be a high enough price, it was not.

Larry Summers has to learn tolerance from the Saudis. In order to be able to do that, he accepted $20 million from Prince Ali Walid Bin-Talal...

Read the rest of Greg's humorous (but not so funny, really) take (and the imbedded links), here.

Totten Interviews Big Pharaoh

Widely posted and deservedly so. Very, very interesting conversation between Michael J. Totten and Egyptian blogger, Big Pharaoh. Don't miss it.

Nasser’s Biggest Crime

The Reporter Who Came in From the Cold

Solomon2 wonders if the MSM is starting to turn. I'd say this is an example of a fairly typical story -- the MSM reporter who goes to Iraq and has their mind blown. It doesn't seem to stand the filtering process between the Middle East and the editors in the US. Be glad for the fad(?) of the blog:

Reporting from Iraq - Embedded with the 172nd Stryker Brigade - The view from on the ground

...Everything I thought I knew was wrong.

Maybe not wrong, but certainly different than the picture in my head.

I liken it to this; It was real struggle for me to choose to see the Harry Potter movies. I had read the books and loved the pictures I had in my mind of the details I read. I didn’t need to see a movie; I had a movie playing in my head of exactly how I perceived the stories.

I had similar notions about Iraq, Mosul, the war and what exactly soldiers do. And it was handily shattered like glass today by a group of soldiers, half of them younger than myself...

...I have a slight hesitation; I need to keep balanced. I can’t be a cheerleader, even if I have a soft spot for the hometown troops, especially after the welcome they’ve shown me. I still need to be truthful and walk the centerline and report the good or bad.

But then I realize it’s not a conflict of interest. If I am truly unbiased, then I need to get used to this one simple fact; that the untold story, might in fact, be a positive one...

(H/T: Daily Scorecard!)

Monday, December 19, 2005

Now the EU is talking tough?

I don't know what to say about this. I'm incredulous. The Europeans have resisted calling Hamas a terror group, they have never forcefully and unequivocally assaulted their hate propaganda and demonization -- a way of life rampant in the region...I suppose I should be saying it's "better late than never" to be taking a stand like this (for as long as it will last), but frankly, it's too late.

EU Warns Palestinians Against Hamas Win

Europe's top diplomat warned Sunday the European Union might cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority if Hamas militants win next month's parliamentary election, reflecting international alarm over the Islamic group's strong showing in West Bank local voting.

Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief, said during a tour of the region that European taxpayers would have a hard time supporting the Palestinian government if it included a party that supports violence and advocates Israel's destruction.

The U.S. House of Representatives approved a similar declaration Friday. The Palestinian Authority counts on foreign aid for half its budget...

I suppose you could imagine that they are at least hoping that Hamas moderates itself as it moves into legitimate circles, but that's a whole lot of shifting they're hoping for (and won't happen any time soon -- read: decades, if ever). Tis a consumation devoutly to be wished, and wished, and wished. They coulda/shoulda started years ago.

In somewhat related news, Meryl noted something missing in yesterday's Presidential Address.

No Racism in Death

Yes, I know you've probably seen this, but it deserves wide coverage:

LA Times: Katrina Killed Across Class Lines

The well-to-do died along with the poor, an analysis of data shows. The findings counter common beliefs that disadvantaged blacks bore the brunt.

The bodies of New Orleans residents killed by Hurricane Katrina were almost as likely to be recovered from middle-class neighborhoods as from the city's poorer districts, such as the Lower 9th Ward, according to a Times analysis of data released by the state of Louisiana...

...New Orleans was the site of most of Katrina's fatalities; the state reported that 76% of storm deaths statewide occurred in the city. Of the 380 bodies from New Orleans that have been formally identified, a moderately disproportionate number are white. New Orleans' population was 28% white, yet 33% of the identified victims in the city are white and 67% black.

"The affected population is more multiracial, multiethnic and multicultural than one might discern from national media reports," said Richard Campanella, a Tulane University geographer who has studied which parts of the city were hit the worst by flooding. His research showed that predominantly white districts in the city were almost as likely to flood as predominantly black ones...


Your daily dose of Arab Holocaust Denial

(only once a day?)

MEMRI: Columnist for Egyptian Government Daily: The Nazis Did Not Massacre the Jews

In an article titled "Israel's Lies" in the Egyptian government evening paper Al-Masaa, columnist Hisham Abd Al-Rauf wrote that there were no massacres of the Jews during World War II, and that the gas chambers were intended for disinfecting clothing. Hitler, he wrote, was not against the Jews, and had even permitted Jews to emigrate to Palestine during his first years in power. [1]

The following are excerpts:

"The Execution Chambers Were No More Than Rooms for Disinfecting Clothing"

..."We've had enough of the lies and the falsification of the facts with which the [Israeli] textbooks are replete. The most serious lie is the Jews' Holocaust, which they have exploited in order to extort global solidarity.

"When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad refutes this lie, the entire world is up in arms, and the Iranian president is inundated with accusations of madness, fanaticism, and falsification. [Ahmadinejad] was inundated with these accusations even though he did nothing more than state the truth, which a number of honest researchers have [also] reached.

"What this truth means is that these massacres, which Israel alleges that the Nazis perpetrated against the Jews, never happened. The famous execution chambers [i.e., the gas chambers] were no more than rooms for disinfecting clothing."...

Two things: 1) This is not a fringe opinion. 2) There is no such thing as a free press in Egypt.

Real Consequences for Meeting with Hizballah

Earlier, I noted that some members of the Chicago City Council were expressing extreme displeasure with the fact that a local group of Presbyterians [PC(USA)] had met, once again, with Hizballah. See: Chicago City Council Blasts Local Presbyterian Leader.

According to this article in The Layman: Chicago Presbytery's visit with Hezbollah threatens condominium tower project, and this article in the Chicago Tribune (reposted at Coalition for Responsible Peace in the Middle East): Mideast meeting upsets 2 aldermen - Support for church rezoning questioned, there may be a real blow-back of consequences for the local Presbytery. From The Layman:

... Fourth Presbyterian Church on North Michigan Avenue has asked the City Council to rezone some of its land for private construction of a 745-foot condominium tower. No financial terms have been revealed, but real estate along Michigan Avenue is some of the most expensive in the city.

The Chicago Tribune reported today that "two influential Chicago aldermen say they may oppose rezoning for the proposed tower" because of their anger over the delegation's meeting with Hezbollah.

The newspaper quoted Alderman Edward Burke as saying, "I don't know how willing I will be to vote in favor of the zoning change ... at the same their leader is out meeting with Hezbollah. I think we ought to reevaluate the whole relationship."

Burke was referring to the Rev. Bob Reynolds, the presbytery executive, who led the Presbyterian Church (USA) delegation on its trip to the Middle East. Since returning, Reynolds has expressed his regret over the trip and said Hezbollah used it for political purposes.

Another City Council member was also irate over the presbytery's role in damaging relationships with Jews in the city. The Tribune quoted Alderman Bernard Stone, one of the council's three Jewish members, as saying Reynolds "is not going to get any favors from me. I'll be damned if I'll [support] anything that would benefit someone who meets with terrorists opposed to peace in the Middle East." Stone is a member of the city's zoning committee...

It may be of interest to note that the gentleman with the appeasing quotes in the articles, Pastor John Buchanan, who actually heads the Chicago Presbytery, is editor of The Christian Century, a publication with a strong anti-Israel tilt. See: The Christian Century calls Hamas and Hezbollah 'Nongovernmental Groups' and: James M. Wall on the Stump.

According to the Trib article, as well as an article in my recent Presbyterian roundup, Presbyterian Divestment Roundup (Updated), the Chicago Presbytery is "split" on divestment. I'm still not sure if that means they've rejected it outright or not. As The Layman puts it:

With the condominium project at stake, the leaders of Fourth Presbyterian Church have been particularly sensitive to Jewish-Christian relationships. They registered their opposition to the PCUSA General Assembly's 2004 resolution calling for divestment of funds in corporations that do business with Israel.

When there are actually consequences, people tend to think a bit more deeply about some of their more narcissistic activism.

Qaradhawi's Moderate Stances

MEMRI reports on a recent Jerusalem Day address given by anti-American, anti-Jewish Muslim scholar, Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi. The Islamic Society of Boston characterizes Qaradhawi as "recognized world-wide as a leading Muslim scholar and cleric" and agrees with the Washington Post's observation that he is "one of the most celebrated figures in the Arab world" , and that, "the Egyptian cleric is seen as a voice of moderation."

Read MEMRI's report to see what the "voice of moderation" has been saying lately:

Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi on Hamas Jerusalem Day Online: "We are a Nation of Jihad and Martyrdom"; "The Resistance in Palestine, Iraq, and Lebanon Must Go On"; "We Stand Alongside Our Brothers in Hamas and Islamic Jihad"

...Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi himself was among the prominent figures giving speeches, via the Internet, in honor of Jerusalem Day, together with senior Hamas officials such as Khaled Mash'al and Mahmoud Al-Zahar.(3) Information on Al-Qaradhawi's participation in these events and a link to his speech were posted on his site www.qaradawi.net, along with a link to www.hamasna.com.(4)

It should be noted that on the Jerusalem Day page at www.hamasna.com, there is a link to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion that reads "Start Reading the Protocols Now,"(5)

In a sharply-worded speech, Al-Qaradhawi praised Palestinian suicide operations, encouraged terrorist movements such as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, and called on the Arab countries to aid the Palestinian resistance with funds and weapons...

..."We Stand by Our Brothers in Hamas and Islamic Jihad"

"We stand by our brothers in Hamas, our brothers in [Islamic] Jihad, our brothers in [the Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs] Brigades, our brothers in the Popular [Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)] and in the Democratic [Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP)]. We stand by them all. We want them to stand in a single trench, and never let a Palestinian fight a Palestinian.

"We will not let the hand of a Palestinian aim at the chest of another Palestinian. All efforts and weapons must be directed against the common enemy, who is still acting with trickery and does not want to give us anything but talk. This is false talk, and to date we have seen nothing on the ground.

"We Will Not Abandon the Resistance as Long as One Inch of Palestine is Occupied"

"Oh brothers, our weapons must remain in our hands. We will not lay down our weapons. We will not abandon the resistance as long as one inch of Palestine is occupied...

"If the enemy has usurped a piece [of land], whether narrow or broad, whether it be small or large, the people living in it must resist this enemy. The Islamic jurists treat this as a commandment incumbent upon the residents of the land. If the residents of this land cannot resist [the enemy], then it is incumbent upon their neighbors, and then their neighbors help them with funds, weapons, and men. When all the neighbors are not enough, it is a duty incumbent upon the entire Muslim nation."...

There's so much more.

Ours to Fight For: American Jews During the Second World War

An emailer writes that the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York has a special exhibition: Ours to Fight For: American Jews During the Second World War running through January 5. I'm told it's worth seeing if you're in the area. The online exhibit at the above link is pretty good, too, with flash exhibits and video.

Sour on Second Draft

Israpundit's Ted Belman thinks the presentation at The Second Draft is too equivocal:

...Second Draft should make the charge first to provoke maximum interest and then go on to prove it. It should not ask a question. It should start with an assertion it wants everyone to accept. "The French colluded with the PA to produce the biggest blood lible of the twenty first century with disasterous effect." for example. Instead, you end it with "Judge for yourself". Right away you are showing your evenhandedness to allow for a difference of opinion...

Sunday, December 18, 2005

Why hasn't he done this more often?

Bush has needed an address like this for awhile now. I hope he makes a habit of it (but not too often). This is how you frame the debate. There is something to be said for staying above the fray and keeping yourself on a level above the ankle-biters, and there is a time for striking back, or at least striking out and forward and communicating your purpose and reassuring everyone you have it in hand. That can be done without being petty and without elevating the critics. It can be done in a way that shames them, in fact. It's delicate balancing act to know when to stay aloof and when and how to speak. I think this President has trouble finding that line. One has to say that tonight was better late than never, however.

Bush needs to be a presence to give his supporters something to hang their hats on, something to follow. He failed in that around the time of the Miers nomination and really lost the thread. He's been getting it back on track recently, and tonight's address helped. The country needed this.

Here is the transcript.

Update: Reynolds makes an interesting point:

...Bush went out of his way to take responsibility for the war. He repeatedly talked about "my decision to invade Iraq," even though, of course, it was also Congress's decision. He made very clear that, ultimately, this was his war, and the decisions were his.

Why did he do that? Because he thinks we're winning, and he wants credit. By November 2006, and especially November 2008, he thinks that'll be obvious, and he wants to lay down his marker now on what he believed -- and what the other side did...

I noticed the responsibility thing, too, and there was no follow-up. "I take responsibility..." and...? The paragraphs weren't constructed right if you know what I mean. Something was left hanging. I sort of dismissed it as me putting myself too deeply in the shoes of the opposition -- viewing it as they would view it ("Oh sure, he takes responsibility...what does that mean? He should resign then!"), but I think Glenn's point is an interesting one, and may just be correct.

Update2: Michelle Malkin did a live-blog, and noted some of the FOX punditry.

Update3: Roundup of reaction at PJ Media, here.

Jeff Jacoby: Obsessive anti-Semitism

Be sure to read Jeff Jacoby today:

Jeff Jacoby: Obsessive anti-Semitism

...That coin -- virulent anti-Semitism -- circulates throughout the Muslim Middle East, not just in Iran. Ahmadinejad's ugly outpourings were condemned in the West, but they provoked almost no protest in Arab and Muslim countries, where Jews are routinely portrayed as evil subhumans fit only for extermination. In much of the Islamic world, Jew-hatred saturates the airwaves, spills from the mosques, fills the classrooms, permeates the press. Jews are represented as pigs and monkeys, as liars and connivers, as vile, hook-nosed scum who deliberately infect children with AIDS and poison Palestinian water. In their quest for power and world domination, they are said to be ruthless and devious. They were behind the 9/11 attacks, for example, and tipped off 4,000 Jews to stay home from the World Trade Center. And, of course, they concocted the ''hoax" of the Holocaust, as part of an elaborate plot to establish a beachhead in the Middle East and extort money from the world.

Outsiders are rarely aware of how intense the Muslim world's Jew-hatred is. ''What has surprised me is the virulence of this new anti-Semitism throughout all the Muslim countries," the distinguished journalist and editor Harold Evans wrote in 2002. ''It is frenzied, vociferous, paranoid, vicious, and prolific, and is only incidentally connected to the Palestinian conflict." Obsessive anti-Semitism almost always characterizes the most dangerous threats to America and the West. Nazism, Communism, Islamofascism -- all have been intensely anti-Semitic. Which is why Ahmadinejad's strident rhetoric should be setting off urgent alarms. Dictators who talk about wiping nations from the face of the earth generally mean what they say. We should know by now that it isn't only Jews who are endangered by the mullahs and their threats. All of us are. And time is wasting.

One of our problems is that we've come to think everything is so relative, everyone has the same motivations if we can just sit down and talk about it, that we don't know what to do when we come across a growing evil. George Bush did, and look at the thanks he's gotten. As this post at LGF points out, Iran is testing the limits of tolerance...and finding out it runs deep: Multiculturalism Intersects with Holocaust Denial

Boston Mosque makes the front page

The story of the Mosque project of the Islamic Society of Boston has made the front page (below the fold) of today's Boston Globe. It's not that detailed, but the fact that the story is making the front page is somewhat significant. Also significant is the fact that the project is now stalled out. The various controversies have dried up funding, and the lawsuit concerning the land purchase has given the banks cold feet about providing any loans -- which the ISB pursued out of necessity even though charging and paying interest is forbidden in Islamic law.

Praised as beacon, mosque project stalls amid rancor - Allegations said to harm funding for Roxbury center

Boston's new Mosque and Cultural Center was meant to be a beacon of tolerance, a symbol of understanding between Muslims and non-Muslims. Instead, the unfinished red-brick shell at Roxbury Crossing has become just the opposite.

Conceived before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and blessed by the city, the mosque has been beset by challenges. A Mission Hill man is suing the city, alleging that the land deal that got the project underway was unfair. Others have accused officials of the Cambridge-based Islamic Society of Boston, which is building the mosque, of sympathizing with Islamic extremists.

The accusations have battered the project. Donations have slowed to a trickle and Islamic society officials blame the allegations of extremism, which they have vehemently denied, for deterring benefactors. The funding difficulties have all but halted construction and forced the society to seek bank loans to complete the project, a step they had long hoped to avoid, given Islam's prohibition on charging and paying interest. However, those loans were denied, society officials said...


Solomonia Interview: Richard Landes Part 2 -- al Durah launch

[Update: Don't miss this full announcement of the new material release at Pajamas Media.]

I last interviewed BU Professor Richard Landes on the occasion of the launch of his media watchdog web site, The Second Draft -- a site that uses raw footage from mainstream media cameras to expose the Pallywood phenomenon -- that is, the way mainstream Western news outlets have been manipulated by a canny Palestinian Arab propaganda machine.

The Second Draft has just released some new footage. To say it will have some impact would be, to put it mildly, an understatement.

According to Palestinian Sources II: The Al Durah Affair has been released. One of the most infamous images of the past five years has been given the full Second Draft treatment, complete with mini documentary/expose, along with the release of raw footage, relevant interviews, documentation and essays. This is really not to be missed.

Start Here. If you'd like to go straight to the al Durah film, go to this page and look for "The Birth of an Icon," but be sure to watch the Pallywood movie available on the same page first if you haven't already seen it. This is very important to understanding the context of the images you will see in the new film.

On this occasion, Professor Landes has been kind enough to do a second interview (the first one is here), this time conducted via email.

Sol: Are you satisfied with the success of Second Draft? It seems to have found some audience.

Richard Landes: I'm quite happy with the reception, although we haven't yet made it beyond cyberspace and into the MSM. As I've noted at your blog recently, MSM is not known for its openness, especially to something so highly critical of its own flaws. It's not like we expected people at the main news services to hear about Pallywood and go check if the footage they had from their Palestinian cameramen were laced with Pallywood. As one person at a major network put it, "I'm not sure how much appetite there is for this here."

So, no I didn't expect much more than I got from MSM, but I was delighted with the response in cyberspace, especially in the blogosphere. One of the more exciting parts of attending the OSM launch was meeting all these people who had seen the video-essay and visited the site. For these folk the MSM bottom has already fallen out. They don't have a huge armor of conventional thinking (cognitive egocentrism and political correctness) that prevents them from understanding what they were looking at.

Continue reading "Solomonia Interview: Richard Landes Part 2 -- al Durah launch"

Saturday, December 17, 2005

More Arab than the Arabs -- Norwegian County Boycotts Israel

At a time when some Arab states are starting to increase trade with Israel (see: YNet: Egyptian-Israeli trade soars 130 percent), one Norwegian County has taken a step backward.

Trøndelag County decides to boycott Israeli products

Trøndelag County council, in Norway, voted on Friday in support of a decision to boycott the Israeli products; the county includes the third largest city on Norway, Trondheim, which is inhibited by 270000 residents. The total population in Norway is 4.600.000.

The notion was filed by a member of the Red Coalition (Communist Factions) and was supported by members of the Christian Progressive Party.

The support provided by the Christian progressive Party is considered huge shift in positions, especially since it is known of ideology which does not support the Palestinians, and in took several positions which were considered by some countries as anti-Arab and anti-Muslim.

Also, the Labor parties, leftist and central parties supported the proposal.

The approved decision binds all municipalities in the county not to buy or sell Israeli products, which are widely spread there.

This development was considered a dramatic shift in Norway, especially after the County council considered the Israeli occupation similar to the apartheid regime which existed in South Africa.

Recently, campaigns to boycott Israeli products in Norway have showed effective presence after it was scaled down in the last period. It started to develop again after the Left regained control over the country...


DoD: Navy Seaman Missing from Pearl Harbor Attack is Identified

DoD: Navy Seaman Missing from Pearl Harbor Attack is Identified

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that the remains of a U.S. Navy seaman missing in action from the Dec. 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor have been identified and will soon be returned to his family for burial with full military honors.
Continue reading "DoD: Navy Seaman Missing from Pearl Harbor Attack is Identified"

Anti-Semitism in Egypt...widespread but not universal

Daily Scorecard points to this must-read post and comment thread at The Sandmonkey's, or you could go over to Daily Scorecard and read a couple of the comments that Mike has extracted directly. Don't miss them.

Bush Hits Back on "Spying" Leak

I heard the President's radio address earlier today and I though he did a good job getting his side of the story out. Here's the transcript.

Of course, the later news briefs merely said that Bush "admitted the reports were true," while omitting any of his explanation for the policy.

My only question is when do the criminal investigations of all these leaks over serious national security matters begin?

See also Power Line: Bush Slams Critics, Senate Democrats

I believe this will be another pseudo-scandal that the Left will overplay and be left wondering why it isn't getting any traction for them. Most people are going to hear that the NSA was listening in on international phone-calls and say, "Yeah? So? That's it?" The legalistic details that are really where any possible "scandal" lays are just not going to impress most people. Most people would expect the government to be doing this, especially in the post 9/11 world, and the President's side of the issue will get out, even if the MSM doesn't give it the play it deserves.

Attempt on the life of Ahmadinejad

The Other Side of Wal-Mart

As I mentioned in the entry below, Jewish Fifth Graders Protest Wal-Mart, there's another side to the "Wal-Mart bad...grunt" debate. Here's an article that makes a few of the pro-Wal-Mart points:

New York University economist Jason Furman says Wal-Mart is getting a bad rap from liberals and environmentalists

It does more to help poor people financially than the Salvation Army; it is generally good for the environment; and, according to some studies, it increases overall employment almost everywhere it goes.

Yet, other than perhaps Halliburton, it is the single business most despised by the American left.

The company in question is Wal-Mart, and a Nov. 28 report by New York University economist Jason Furman concludes that the mammoth retailer is getting a bad rap from his fellow liberals. Wal-Mart, argues Mr. Furman, is a "progressive success story"—a business with razor-thin profit margins that nonetheless brings high productivity, low prices, and coveted jobs to the masses.

He brings together several different studies to make his case, and the numbers he cites are staggering. Just considering food, Mr. Furman shows that big-box retailers like Wal-Mart save a typical family in the poorest fifth of U.S. incomes 25.8 percent on their grocery bills—or about 6.5 percent of their incomes. When all products are taken into account, Wal-Mart by itself saves American families about $263 billion, or about $895 per person and $2,329 per household. These savings mostly help poor and middle-class families, since the average Wal-Mart shopper earns about $35,000...

Much more at the link, of course.

I don't know what the bottom line on the net total effect in human terms of Wal-Mart is. I suspect it's not really knowable, frankly. I have a sneaking suspicion that economic statistics can be used to make them say whatever you want them to, and that's what's often done with Wal-Mart.

I know that Wal-Mart is often blamed for the demise of the American downtown. Sorry, but that process started with the introduction of strip-malls back in the 1950's. Then along came the indoor malls and it was all downhill at an accelerated pace after that. Wal-Mart is the "mall" in some areas. The downtown's days were numbered long before Wal-Mart.

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Well, some of that is hard to quantify. I think there's something to be said for there being more owners and fewer employees in a community. The old days were better in that regard, but it'll never show up on a balance sheet.

Who's fault is it all? If Wal-Mart is a net "bad," is there anything we can do that won't make it worse? I doubt it. I'm reminded of the inter-chapter sections of The Grapes of Wrath -- it's just the system. In that regard, Wal-Mart is just reflecting a change that's already taken place. Society has changed and Wal-Mart has surfed the wave of that change effectively. George hasn't run down the streets, past the shops of Bedford Falls in a long time. Our Town is gone or fading.

Besides, taking action requires having answers that no one can settle on definitively, so take whatever side you want, but leave the kiddies out of it.

Update: Just who's fault is it, anyway? Food for thought at Peaktalk.

Japanese Cultural Videos

Here are a couple of Japanese cultural videos for you. They're probably dog-eared from making the rounds, so sorry if you've seen these already. Many people will find them useful.

First, the proper way to fold a shirt.

Second, the proper way to eat sushi.

That second one really brings back the memories, having worked in the office of a Japanese restaurant and having met my wife that way. But especially, after having heard and read more than my share of pretentious know-it-all Westerners who spent a few months in Japan and think they're the encyclopedia of "just the right way" to eat sushi. One more of those types and I'm gonna stick their head in a rice cooker. Oh, and here's a clue. When reviewing sushi, don't ever use the word "yummy." I don't care how good it is, raw fish should never, ever be described as "yummy."

They need to watch that video, because it plays like they sound.

Friday, December 16, 2005

Just saw The Chronicles of Narnia and I have something to tell you

I've accepted Aslan as my personal Lord and Savior.

Seriously, it was a very nice film. Fun for the whole family, other than a few scenes which were a little intense for my five-year-old.

People worrying about the religiosity in the background, or worse yet, suing over it, really need to get a life. You have to try very, very hard to find obtrusive religious themes here. It's all quite standard and classic, and to the extent that what happens in the story coincides with the religious, well that's because so many of the common themes of Western Civilization owe so much to the Judeo-Christian religious tradition [Edit: Though in this case more Christian than Judeo, of course.]. There's no way to untangle the two, and very little reason to do so.

Sure, the scene where Aslan gets nailed to a cross is a little bit in-your-face, and that part where he's whipped in close-up with the blood and the Roman soldiers laughing and all that...it's a little intense -- sort of a Passion of the Qui-Gon when you think about it...but aside from that...

It's been a long time since I've read the book, so the story was more or less new to me again, and while a little long at points, it really did not drag. What child doesn't dream of finding a different world in the back of the closet?

Oh, and I don't care if she is evil. I'd share a robe with the White Witch any time.


MEMRI: Hizbullah Al-Manar TV’s Children's Claymation Special: Jews Turn Into Apes and Pigs, are Annihilated and Cast Into the Sea

MEMRI: Hizbullah Al-Manar TV’s Children's Claymation Special: Jews Turn Into Apes and Pigs, are Annihilated and Cast Into the Sea

In its Stories from the Koran series, Al-Manar TV, which is affiliated with the Lebanese terrorist organization Hizbullah, aired an Egyptian claymation children's special by the well-known filmaker Dr. Zeinab Zamzam.

...Shamloun: "Don't you fear that curses and torments will befall you for working on the Sabbath, Habakkuk?"

Habakkuk: "It seems that working on the Sabbath is permitted to us, and was prohibited to our ancestors, because they killed their prophets. [Laughs]"...

...Pinhas: "Step right up and buy your Sabbath goods. We trade on the day that the Lord once forbade, and get rich. Come, step right up, all you who do not believe in curses."

Shamloun: "Shamloun is inviting you. Check out my merchandise, and don't be afraid of anyone. You won't be punished - not from the earth nor from the skies."

Habakkuk: "Step right up. It is me, Habakkuk. I am, as you can see, safe and sound. The only illness that has struck me is wealth. Come here. How nice it is to work on the Sabbath. How nice it is to work on the Sabbath. I am working on the Sabbath, and I challenge the will of the heavens."

[While jumping up and down, Pinhas, Shamloun, Habakkuk, and others in the marketplace turn into apes. The boy and his grandfather open a door in the wall and step to the other side with some other villagers.]

Grandfather: "Look, my child, the young among them have turned into apes, and their elderly have become pigs."

Boy: "They should know that the Lord speaks the truth and punishes severely."

Grandfather: "Praise the Lord, who has saved us. They remained in this condition for three days, and then were annihilated. The wind has cast them into the sea."

[Music plays as the apes and pigs are cast into the sea.]

Narrator: "In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful. When they disregarded the warning that had been given to them, We rescued those who forbade Evil; but We visited the wrong-doers with a grievous punishment because they were given to transgression. When in their insolence they transgressed prohibitions, We said the them: 'Be ye apes, despised and rejected.' Behold - thy Lord did declare that He would send against them, to the Day of Judgment those who would afflict them with grievous penalty. The Lord is quick in retribution, but he is also oft-forgiving, most Merciful."

This is a truce?

I was going to round up some of these stories of Kassam rockets, drive-by shootings and PA police complicity in terror attacks, but now I don't have to because Meryl has already done it.

A few Iraq Elections links

Here is the wrap-up post at Pajamas Media. Hopefully they will combine their posts into one easier to access package. Their guys on the ground did a great job.

Here is an impassioned posting at Iraq the Model.

Finally, as I mentioned before, here is DoD's photo page with 102 pictures from the elections.

It wasn't a "turning point" -- we've had enough of those. But it was another rung on the ladder. (Big, inclusive, 'all the good guys' We here:) We're winning.

As today's OpinionJournal notes:

...We're increasingly confident that victory in Iraq is not only possible but likely. The biggest threat to winning now is in Washington, D.C. Let's hope that with their tremendous vote yesterday Iraqis delivered faint-hearted U.S. politicians the necessary dose of fortitude.

Canada better on Israel? Not so fast.

Alastair Gordon of the Canadian Coalition for Democracies says it's too early to declare a shift in Canada's UN position toward Israel (as we thought may be happening a couple of weeks ago):

JPost: Canada 'shifts' on Israel? Not really

...A year ago, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations Allan Rock announced that "resolutions [against Israel] are often divisive and lack balance," and hinted that he would improve the situation. The following day, Canada voted against Israel five out of six times on that year's first batch of anti-Israel resolutions.

IF I were a Muslim, I would be grateful that Canada's support is unwavering:

- On Jerusalem, Canada holds that any actions taken by Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City are illegal. It believes Israel has no jurisdiction over any part of Jerusalem. Earlier this year, Canada withdrew all passports that had "Jerusalem, Israel" as a place of birth.

- In April 2002 Canada endorsed the "Jenin massacre" hoax and has yet to apologize.

- Canada has called upon Israel "to cease obstructing the movement of the staff, vehicles and supplies of [UNRWA]." Canada endorsed this "free movement" after wire service videos showed UNRWA ambulances being used to transport terrorists, and an admission by UNRWA's secretary-general that some of their paid employees may be Hamas members. There has never been a call for UNRWA to end its involvement in terror...[snip]

- Canada endorses the idea that Palestinians have a right to their own state without obligating the PA to end terror.

...Canada should not legitimize the perversion of UN resolutions which has transformed a tool for even-handed criticism of all member nations into a crude mechanism for bullying just one of them.

So the next time Canada's prime minister makes a speech, check the facts before jumping for joy.

(H/T to Canadian reader, isirota1965)

Krauthammer: In Iran, Arming for Armageddon

Everyone's appropriately abuzz over this Charles Krauthammer op-ed today. (H/T's to isirota1965 and OceanGuy for starters) Read it all, of course (though I think he's a little unfair to James Watt including him in this company):

Washington Post: In Iran, Arming for Armageddon

Lest you get carried away with today's good news from Iraq, consider what's happening next door in Iran. The wild pronouncements of the new Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have gotten sporadic press ever since he called for Israel to be wiped off the map. He subsequently amended himself to say that Israel should simply be extirpated from the Middle East map and moved to some German or Austrian province. Perhaps near the site of an old extermination camp?

Except that there were no such camps, indeed no Holocaust at all, says Ahmadinejad. Nothing but "myth," a "legend" that was "fabricated . . . under the name 'Massacre of the Jews.' " This brought the usual reaction from European and American officials, who, with Churchillian rage and power, called these statements unacceptable. That something serious might accrue to Iran for this -- say, expulsion from the United Nations for violating its most basic principle by advocating the outright eradication of a member state -- is, of course, out of the question.

To be sure, Holocaust denial and calls for Israel's destruction are commonplace in the Middle East. They can be seen every day on Hezbollah TV, in Syrian media, in Egyptian editorials appearing in semiofficial newspapers. But none of these aspiring mass murderers are on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons that could do in one afternoon what it took Hitler six years to do: destroy an entire Jewish civilization and extinguish 6 million souls.

Everyone knows where Iran's nuclear weapons will be aimed. Everyone knows they will be put on Shahab rockets, which have been modified so that they can reach Israel. And everyone knows that if the button is ever pushed, it will be the end of Israel...

I must include the conclusion:

Negotiations to deny this certifiable lunatic genocidal weapons have been going nowhere. Everyone knows they will go nowhere. And no one will do anything about it.

Quite so.

Here is the same article at Jewish World Review which does not require any registration.

Chicago City Council Blasts Local Presbyterian Leader

Council Adopts Resolution Blasting Top Presbyterian Cleric in Chicago For Meeting With Terror Group

Alderman Edward M. Burke (14th) joined fellow colleagues today in introducing a City Council resolution that won approval condemning the Reverend Robert Reynolds, the head of the Chicago Presbytery of the Presbyterian Church USA, for his recent controversial meeting with a Hezbollah commander in the Middle East.

Hezobollah is a terrorist organization which has attacked American embassies, hijacked an American airliner, kidnapped American hostages and is responsible for "innumerable assaults on innocent people," the resolution noted.

The meeting took place last month with Hezobollah terror chief Hassan Nasrallah, and has ignited widespread outrage among the Chicago Jewish community and religious leaders of all faiths. While Reverend Reynolds said the purpose of the meeting was to hear from the terrorists about their "own reality in their own words," Alderman Burke reacted in disbelief.

"I cannot fathom why a top Chicago religious leader would lend legitimacy to a terror organization which has committed so many atrocities against innocent people," Alderman Burke said...

..."All of Chicago should be aghast that Reverend Reynolds would display such a total lack of judgment," Alderman Stone added. "Perhaps he should have taken the time instead to talk to the families of those many innocent people who have been killed by Hezbollah in terror attacks so that he could hear firsthand about the pain and loss that Hezbollah’s actions have brought to their families."

Alderman Smith urged fellow council members to adopt the measure which also calls for the City of Chicago to examine "any programs of the City which provide service or financial support to the Chicago Presbytery and to reevaluate the propriety of continuing such services or financial support."

Wow.

BBC: Holy Land Christians' decline

It's good to see this issue getting some play at the BBC of all places.

BBC: Holy Land Christians' decline

Church leaders have long voiced fears that Christian communities may be dying out in the land where Jesus was born, lived and died.

Conflict, lack of economic opportunities and the pull of the West have been driving a steady haemorrhaging of Christians for several decades, while low birth rates ensure that those who stay live as ever-shrinking minorities...

To pick a nit:

"In my neighbourhood, where I was raised, most of my neighbours are in the United States, and Europe. They just left," said Nashat Fellemon, director of the Palestinian Bible Society, who lives in East Jerusalem.

The causes of emigration are complex.

"Christians here are between two fires. We are between the fire of occupation and discrimination by the state of Israel - and the fire of living in a community where the majority are Muslims," said Mr Fellemon...

Get the active language used to describe what the Israelis do (they occupy and discriminate) and the passive language used to describe what the Arabs are (they are a majority). In one case, that's just the way it is -- nothing to be done or necessarily bad in being a minority -- and in the other case, there's something that can be done because, according to this individual, it's Israeli behavior that's to blame. So what signal does that send to those on the outside? Who should we be putting our pressure on? What would turn out to be the wrong side, of course.

Fortunately, the rest is rather more useful. There's this interesting section:

...The group [Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group] does, however, support the widespread accusation that Islamic militants specifically chose Christian homes as firing posts during fighting near Bethlehem in 2002.

"The belief of Islamic extremists that Westerners sympathize more with Christian suffering has led some militants to initiate shooting from Christian areas like Beit Jala, in order to force an Israeli reprisal," the group wrote in a 2004 report.

For Mr Eid, a Muslim, the root of the problem is "the lack of a culture of minority rights" in the Palestinian territories.

"Muslims believe in resistance - and Christians also do, but in a non-violent way. We know they are less violent than the Muslims. It seems we are not giving the Christians the opportunity to express their opinion," he says.

"It makes me sad that they are suffering from their Palestinian brothers, as well as from the occupation."...


Navy Seaman MIA from World War II is Identified

DoD: Navy Seaman MIA from World War II is Identified

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that the remains of a U.S. serviceman, missing in action from World War II, have been identified and returned to his family for burial tomorrow with full military honors.

Seaman 2nd Class Dee Hall, of Syra, Okla. He is to be buried at the Ft. Sam Houston National Cemetery in San Antonio.

Hall was one of seven crewmen aboard a U.S. Navy PBY-5 Catalina that took off from Kodiak Island, Alaska on June 14, 1942, to attack Japanese targets in Kiska Harbor, Alaska...

Continue reading "Navy Seaman MIA from World War II is Identified"

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Armenia refuses to condemn Iran

Mick Hartley has a series of links on secularist concerns over the creeping Islamization of Turkey...

...which leads me to mention something else, actually. You see Turkey has never acknowledged the Armenian Genocide, and they've managed to avoid any real international pressure to do so, mostly due, it would appear, to reasons of realpolitik. No one wants to ruin their relationship with the Turks by pushing too hard on the issue.

So it's with more than a small dose of irony I note this entry (thanks to David Boxenhorn for the pointer) on an Armenian blog that Armenia itself refuses to condemn to recent ravings of Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad...for obvious reasons of realpolitik.

Yerevan Reluctant To Condemn Iranian Leader For Holocaust Denial

Armenia on Thursday pointedly declined to add its voice to a chorus of international condemnation of Iran’s hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for his repeated denial of the Holocaust and other anti-Israeli remarks.

Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said his government sees no need to react to Ahmadinejad’s statements because they are irrelevant to its close ties with Tehran.

“We have always refrained from evaluating this issue,” Oskanian said. “We view our relations with Iran only within a bilateral framework. Such issues have never been discussed in our bilateral relations.”...

...Official Yerevan is apparently anxious not to damage its political and economic relations with the Islamic Republic. They are currently being cemented by joint multimillion-dollar energy projects implemented by the two neighboring nations. Ahmadinejad reportedly called for an intensification of the Armenian-Iranian ties “in all areas” when he received President Robert Kocharian’s chief of staff last month.

The obvious reluctance to publicly deplore a high-level denial of the Holocaust contrasts with Armenia’s regular condemnation of another neighboring state, Turkey, for its refusal to recognize the 1915-1918 massacres of Armenians as genocide. Armenian leaders have drawn parallels between the Armenian genocide and the Holocaust.

Oskanian, for example, delivered an emotional speech last January at a special session of the UN General Assembly dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the biggest death camp set up by Nazi Germany to exterminate Jews and other "inferior" peoples. “After Auschwitz one would expect that no one any longer has a right to turn a blind eye or a deaf ear,” he said. “As an Armenian, I know that a blind eye, a deaf ear and a muted tongue perpetuate the wounds.”

I guess sometimes a blind eye and a deaf ear are necessary for convenience's sake.

A meal to remember with Hezbollah - "We know where you live"

Don't miss Michael J. Totten's piece in LA Weekly on his meeting with Hezbollah: Guess Who’s Coming to Iftar - A meal to remember with Hezbollah. This piece single-handedly demonstrates why it's so difficult to trust any reporting coming out of totalitarian states.

Free Barghouti!

Meryl figures that will be the next rallying cry of the Israeli left. Not just the Israeli, I'm sure.

Left Wing Protestant Denominations aren't the only ones with clueless politics...

...some Jewish organizations are joining in, too. Most recently (and prominently) it's the Union for Reform Judaism and their anti-Iraq War/anti-Bush letter. Judith has the scoop, here: Reform Jews talk back:

The latest brouhaha in the Jewish world results from a resolution adopted by the Reform movement at their annual convention, to wit, a Resolution on the War in Iraq which reiterates most of the false premises and misstatements of the antiwar movement...

Jewish Fifth Graders Protest Wal-Mart

This is really a disgrace. There are many sides to the Wal-Mart issue, very few of which are accessible to a fifth-grader. I also doubt they're even being presented with a side of things that the adults that are using them don't want them to have...and getting ten-year-olds involved to such an extent that they have to be removed from the store by the police? There oughta be a law.

Read some of these quotes from a ten-year-old. Surreal.

Kids shooed away

FRAMINGHAM -- Police escorted a group of fifth-grade protesters from the Rte. 9 Wal-Mart yesterday after the youngsters decried what they say is the retail giant’s use of sweatshop labor.

"Wal-Mart, instead of letting in what we’re telling them, they’re not listening," said Newton 10-year-old Owen Weitzman. "We’re not going to stop until they listen."

Armed with colorful balloons, the fifth-graders from the Workmen’s Circle Jewish Sunday school in Brookline protested the superstore’s wage and employee practices...

...After students gave speeches on low Wal-Mart employee wages and the history of Jewish sweatshop labor in the United States, about a dozen fifth-graders marched into the store, accompanied by adults and photographers. They asked the store manager to give a letter they wrote to company CEO Lee Scott.

The store manager Nicky, who wouldn’t give her last name, asked the group to leave the store, and spoke with them outside the main entrance. She said she couldn’t accept the letter due to company policy, but gave the group an address where they could mail it.

She asked the group to leave store property. A second store manager came outside and told the kids she would call the police if she had to.

The children refused to leave the property until their letter was accepted, and young Weitzman read the letter despite the warning. The letter called the company’s use of sweatshops overseas "outrageous," and made six requests of the company, including, adhering to living wages and allowing "workers to go to the bathroom whenever they need."...

A few minutes later, a Framingham Police car pulled up, and the officer asked the protesters to move along. They walked back to the shopping plaza entranceway, with the adults and students grumbling, and rejoined the rest of the group...

...Sunday schooler Lucian Cascino said the youngsters will protest until they see results. "We’ll hammer Wal-Mart until they give in and start listening to us," the 10-year-old Boston student said...


New Statesman: City Planning = Genocide

There truly is a sickness on the European Left (though I realize some readers will protest the qualifier "European").

Honest Reporting: New Statesman Demolishes the Truth

Legitimate Israeli actions against illegal structures falsely compared with acts of 'genocide' and 'ethnic cleansing'

In 2002, the New Statesman, a British left-wing journal, gave us an infamous front cover entitled "Kosher conspiracy" featuring a Star of David standing on top of a Union Jack, for which the editor was forced to apologize following widespread condemnation.

So perhaps it is unsurprising that the New Statesman's latest edition compares Israeli actions to those of the Nazis during Kristallnacht, the destruction of mosques by Bosnian Serbs, and the eradication of entire villages by Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the Sudanese regime in Darfur...

What Israeli actions does the New Statesman condemn so roundly? The removal of illegally-built Arab homes -- actions any government anywhere would take. (Note that this is not the same demolition that occurs as an economic sanction against the families of suicide bombers -- they are two separate issues that critics enjoy confusing.)

Read the rest for some very useful info on this issue.

A Mosque Grows in Boston

Dean Barnett of Soxblog has one of the best backgrounder/story to date pieces yet on the Islamic Society of Boston and their Mosque project and associated lawsuits in the Weekly Standard, here: A Mosque Grows in Boston. . . but not without multiple lawsuits. The strange story of the Islamic Society of Boston's new mosque.

The Status of Jerusalem

Further on the issue below, PA calls Jewish connection to Western Wall 'a fabricated heritage', here is a usefull resource for you (and a taste). (H/T: Mal)

In Discussing Jerusalem, History Matters by Jenny Grigg

...LEGAL STATUS

From a legal perspective, the departure of the British in May 1948 left Jerusalem's status undetermined. The end of the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli war found the western part of the city in Israeli hands, and the eastern part (including the Old City) controlled by Jordan. In 1949, Israel and Jordan signed an armistice, dividing Jerusalem into two demarcated zones. These lines, however, were seen by both sides to be temporary -- until a peace treaty could be concluded; neither party viewed the cease-fire lines as permanent borders.

As late as 31 May 1967, Ambassador Al-Farrah of Jordan told the United Nations Security Council:

There is an Armistice Agreement. The Agreement did not fix boundaries; it fixed the demarcation line. The Agreement did not pass judgment on rights -- political, military or otherwise. Thus, I know of no boundary; I know of a situation frozen by an Armistice Agreement.

Under the armistice agreement, Jordan promised to allow "free access to the Holy Places... and use of the Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives." It further guaranteed Israel free access to Hadassah Hospital and the Hebrew University on Mount Scopus. These rights, however, were denied.

Despite the commitments under the armistice agreement, no Jew, from any country, was allowed to pray at the Western Wall. In fact, no Israelis -- of any religious persuasion -- were allowed to pray at the sites sacred to them. The Jewish Quarter of the Old City was systematically destroyed. The Jewish cemetery was desecrated and its tombstones were used to pave a path to the latrine of a Jordanian military installation. Christian education was restricted in the part of the city controlled by Jordan; Christian schools were forced to close on Friday, the Muslim day of rest. Christians were also forbidden to acquire land in or near Jerusalem. The economy of eastern Jerusalem was devastated and political expression was severely limited; no Palestinian Arab newspaper was allowed to publish...

PJ Media Iraq Election Coverage

PJM has bloggers across Iraq "dialing in" with live election coverage. Roger says:

To get more, use the nav bar on the left side of the site - even more at the archives button. Sorry that some of this is kludgy, but we are in the process of improving site, which could not be accomplished before the election.

Very exciting.

Update: DoD has a large collection of election photos here.


Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Project Runway - Season 2

I've started in on a new season of Project Runway tonight. I still can't believe it, but this show is addictive. (My farewell to last season is here.)

Heidi Klum is still annoying, although I think there are more annoying contestants this season than there were last time around, so it's balanced a little. I was going to say that Santino was this season's Kara Saun, but I'm not sure about his personality yet -- correction, decided: He's an a-hole. What is this business of getting PO'd if he doesn't come in first? Kara wouldn't have behaved that way. Marla Duran is this season's Wendy Pepper (without the bitchy attitude so far). Judges: Like: Michael Kors. Can't stand: Nina Garcia. Who let the dogs out award for homeliest models (in order): Grace, Danyelle, Eden. Cool dude: Tim Gunn.

Until next week...

PA calls Jewish connection to Western Wall 'a fabricated heritage'

The Israeli government is planning renovations and improvements to the area of the Western Wall: Cabinet to approve Western Wall renovation

...The plan is valued at approximately NIS 68 million (USD 14.7 million).

As part of the development, the complex will undergo a series of renovations and a number of projects will be established, including a modern visitors' center, a new police station, information center and new entrance to the site.

The government is to be presented with a police report showing an all-time high of 5 million people who visited the site in 2005. The Prime Minister's Office is hoping the renovation will bring about an even greater increase of traffic to the site...

So, of course, the Palestinian Authority is engaging in extreme projection and claiming that Israel is going to undermine Al Aqsa:

Israel Funds Construction Acts beneath Al Aqsa Mosque at the Cost of NIS 68 Million

Al-Aqsa Association for the Reconstruction of Holy sites said in a statement that the Israeli government allocated a sum of money works at 68 million INS (around 15 million Dollars) for construction works beneath Al-Aqsa mosque and its periphery, particularly around Al-Buraq wall.

"It could be never called into question that the Israeli establishment poses the even greater threat against Al-Aqsa mosque, especially, given its history which is riddled with canny attempts to undermine the holy mosque," the statement mentioned.

It also added that mosque is not only targeted by the extremist Jewish groups, but also by the Israeli government. "The real danger of destroying Al-Aqsa mosque is directed by Sharon's office."...

Equally disturbing, in addition to this incitement, the PA is continuing their drive to delegitimate Jewish ties to the site:

...The construction works are planned to be financed by several ministries; phased over five-year period. These include propping up what is called as "Heshmonaem Tunnel" - a tunnel that passes under Al-Aqsa mosque - and building a befitting infrastructure for it, in addition to air-conditioning installation; restoration works of Al-Buraq wall, setting up additional arrival halls to receive the tourists who come to visit Al-Buraq square; constructing a heritage centre - dedicated to show a fabricated heritage that might will help them to deceive the foreign visitors into believing Jerusalem as a historical place of the Jews; building a police station; carrying out a marketing project to encourage the Jewish soldiers and students visit the Islamic holy square of Al-Buraq along with Al-Aqsa mosque.

Also, an Israeli government statement mentioned that Al-Buraq wall which is allegedly called by the Israelis as the "Wailing wall" would be part and parcel of the Jewish religious and historical heritage...

You know, I don't know why anyone, not just religious Jews, would even consider support for Arab control over Jerusalem until they can demonstrate something less than complete contempt for other traditions...and historical fact. Is this a demonstration of Muslim respect for non-Muslims? It would appear so.

Then there's this rather bizarre conclusion:

...Al-Aqsa association inquired the Arab and Islamic Nation to enforce the decisions which were taken in the Islamic summit as saying "We found the results of the exceptional Islamic summit auspicious as it decided on establishing consecrated places that would help out with the defending Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa mosque."

Are they saying here that they're creating holy spots to have something to lay claim to? How brazen.

Red Ken Livingstone gets off on a technicality

Livingstone cleared of first 'Jewish slur' charge

Ken Livingstone's description of a Jewish reporter being "like a concentration camp guard" was acceptable, a tribunal ruled today.

The Mayor of London was cleared of a misconduct charge on the grounds he was speaking as a private individual rather than in his official capacity.

Mr Livingstone still faces a second misconduct charge, of bringing his post into disrepute, which will be heard by the Adjudication Panel for England tomorrow. If found guilty he could be disqualified from office...

...The Adjudication Panel decided that because Mr Livingstone had left the reception and was on his way home he could no longer be said to be working in his official capacity.

Under the terms of the conduct rules, Mr Livingstone would have to be speaking as Mayor to justify the charge of failing to "treat others with respect".

However, the charge of bringing the Mayor or Greater London Authority into disrepute can be made irrespective of whether an elected official is on duty or off duty.

There is some discussion over at Harry's Place as to whether such laws should even exist, and, since they should not, therefor Livingstone should be aquitted.

I agree that such laws should not exist, and are an offence against democracy. However, since they do exist, they must be enforced, and especially now that the wheels are turning, he must be judged on the offence or it will give the appearance that what Livingstone did was acceptable. This is a dangerous shifting of responsible decision making out of the hands of ordinary people and into the hands of elite decision-makers -- a bad system that we do not suffer from quite as badly here in the US as they do in Europe with their more intrusive speech rules and hate laws. (I have written more on this before but can't put my finger on the essay at the moment.)

Let's see what the next charge against Livingstone referred to in the article brings.

MEMRI: Lebanon's Largest Government University Hosts Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV Symposium Calling to Wipe Israel Off The Map: "Just Like Hitler Fought The Jews…We Too Should Fight The Jews and Burn Them"

This is a forum run by the TV station of a group that many mainline American Protestant groups believe is a worthwhile interlocutor in the Middle East. Also note that, according to MEMRI, this is taking place at 'Lebanon's only government-run university and the country's largest.'

MEMRI: Lebanon's Largest Government University Hosts Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV Symposium Calling to Wipe Israel Off The Map: "Just Like Hitler Fought The Jews…We Too Should Fight The Jews and Burn Them"

The following are excerpts from a symposium of students at Universite Libanaise, hosted by Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV and broadcast on November 29, 2005. The symposium marked the anniversary of November 29, 1947, the day the U.N. General Assembly passed the Partition Plan which is marked annually in the Arab world with ceremonies of solidarity with Palestinians. Al-Manar's TV symposium was devoted to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and participants included Shafiq Al-Hut, a former PLO representative in Lebanon, and Palestinian, Lebanese and Syrian students....

...Hisham Sham'as: "There is no such thing as unrealistic. Just as Israel... Just like Hitler fought the Jews – We are a great Islamic nation of Jihad, and we too should fight the Jews and burn them."...

Student 2: "Avian flu hit the entire world, and they are trying to find a cure for it now. As for Israel – the only cure for it is to wipe it off the map."...

Mediator: "What's your name?"

Student 3: "Mahmoud Fakhri. I hope what I have to say is not too inciting."

Mediator: "Go ahead and incite. This is what we're looking for. We want some action."

Mahmoud Fakhri: "In all honesty, the Arab people should overturn the disappointing regimes."

Mediator: "Now you are really inciting..."

Fakhri: "In all honesty, any disappointing government that wants to normalize relations with the Zionist enemy and to sell out the Arab cause, and especially Jerusalem – the people must topple this regime and have its say."

Go ahead and incite, as long as it's hatred focused outward. These students certainly know what answers are expected of them, what's acceptable. According to the Sharansky theory, these attitudes would have a chance to change if there were an actual free exchange of ideas possible without fear of retribution. These answers, of course, provide precise insight into the attitudes of the people asking the questions and controlling the potential retribution for dissident views -- they are, with no need for hyperbole, Nazis.

Saudi PR and the Alwaleed Connection

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross on Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal's $20 million gifts (each) to Georgetown and Harvard (He knows where his friends are):

...There are other signs of the Saudi PR machine gearing up. Qorvis Communications has expanded and made some significant personnel additions in recent months. There are slick ads for Saudi Arabia in such glossy magazines as The New Republic. Interestingly, the December 12 cover story by Spencer Ackerman explaining why Islam in the United States is moderate is sandwiched around a 6-page special advertising section paid for by the Saudi Arabian embassy. And the donation to Georgetown will serve more of a PR function than most people probably realize at first glance. John Esposito, CMCU's director, has for years been one of the U.S.'s foremost apologists for radical Islam, and he's already stated that a large part of Prince Alwaleed's donation "will be used to beef up the think tank part of what the center does." Esposito's explanation of the "think tank part" of the Center shows that he has a heavy PR component in mind:

Up to now, he said, the center has not had enough resources "to respond to the tremendous demand that is out there, from the government, church and religious groups, the media and corporations to address and answer issues like, 'What is the actual relationship between the West and the Muslim world? Is Islam compatible with modernization?' Now we can run workshops and conferences [on these subjects] both here and overseas."...

Also see: Buying Fox News By Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld and Alyssa A. Lappen (Via Daily Scorecard)

Soldiers say media miss Iraq story

You don't say. Credit to Anderson Cooper for saying a few of the right things here:

CNN: Soldiers say media miss Iraq story

...The unit I spent the day with is one month shy of going home. The commander, Capt. Patrick Moffett, was very optimistic about progress in Iraq, and by some accounts Baquba is a real success story. Attacks have dropped 30-40 percent since last year, and the Iraqi police in the city actually are able to conduct some operations on their own...

...I'm always incredibly impressed by the U.S. service members I meet here. They are not all as optimistic and supportive of the mission as the captain I spent time with today, but they are all dedicated to their units, devoted to their fellow troops. I think a lot of us in the states forget how difficult it is for the families of these soldiers and marines, airmen and sailors.

They are away for so long. Multiple tours in Iraq are not uncommon.

Every soldier I talked to today said the media hasn't done a good job of telling the full story from Iraq. It's a complaint I've heard before, and certainly understand. I do think television tends to focus on the bombs and the bullets, the most dramatic headlines. So much of what happens here never makes the nightly news....

Presbyterian Divestment Roundup (Updated)

First, this article in the Chicago Sun-Times:

Rabbis furious after Presbyterian meets with terror leader

Leaders of the Chicago Board of Rabbis have lambasted the head of the Presbyterian Church USA in the Chicago area for meeting with members of a terrorist organization last month in Lebanon.

In two letters -- one sent to local Presbyterian congregations and a second, more biting missive sent to the Rev. Robert Reynolds, executive presbyter of the Presbytery of Chicago -- Rabbis Victor Mirelman and Ira Youdovin, president and executive vice president respectively of the board of rabbis, said they are outraged by the meeting Reynolds had with a Hezbollah commander while on a fact-finding trip to the Middle East with a delegation of other Presbyterians.

The Jewish leaders' ire has been further raised by Reynolds' statements to the media indicating he might consider meeting with Hezbollah again.

"Our outrage is by no means a manifestation of 'Jewish hypersensitivity,' " Youdovin and Mirelman wrote in their letter to Reynolds. "Your meeting last October has done serious damage to an 18-month-long process of Jewish-Presbyterian healing in Chicago. ... How can Chicago's Jewish community continue to seek strong relations with the Chicago Presbytery when its chief executive meets with terrorists bent on murdering Jews and annihilating the Jewish state?"...

[Much more in the extended entry with bonus UCC material.]

Continue reading "Presbyterian Divestment Roundup (Updated)"

Jordanian admits human smuggling - 200 Iraqis and Jordanians illegally entered U.S.

Hopefully they only came to...pick oranges or something. That's OK for illegal immigrants to be here for, right? (Not in my view, but be that as it may...) Even if they were all college professors and intellectuals, no one should be entering this country, especially from the Middle East, withour a big-time background check.

Jordanian admits human smuggling - More than 200 Iraqis and Jordanians illegally entered U.S.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A Jordanian citizen has pleaded guilty to helping operate a multimillion dollar human smuggling ring that brought hundreds of illegal immigrants from Iraq and other Middle East countries into the United States, authorities announced Tuesday.

Thaer Omran Ismail Asaifi, 35, admitted in U.S. District Court to participating in a conspiracy in which about 200 Iraqis and Jordanians paid as much as $20,000 each to enter the United States.

Authorities said they were given false documents and traveled from Amman through Peru and Ecuador to Washington's Dulles International Airport. Officials said they found no link to terrorism.

The smuggling operation began months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and continued through 2004, authorities said. After the attacks the smugglers more than doubled their price.

Under the plea agreement, Asaifi faces a sentence of six to eight years in prison, and then will be deported...


NRO reviews The Legacy of Jihad

James S. Robbins reviews Andrew Bostom's, The Legacy of Jihad:

Going Medieval - The nature of jihad and this war we’re in

...The nature of jihad is of course one of the central questions of the conflict. Frequently I have had students from Muslim countries explain very passionately that our understanding of jihad is flawed. That what we think of as jihad — violent struggle to extend the domain of Islam — is actually the “lesser jihad.” True jihad is a moral struggle within each person to enjoin the good and resist evil, what is called the “greater jihad.” Some say further that the idea that force can be used to convert is not Islamic; it would make the greater jihad impossible because the convert would not sincerely believe. All this may be true, in their understanding of the faith, and I have no quarrel with it. Would that everyone felt that way.

Nevertheless, not all Muslims are as interested in this spiritual quest, and some of the more radical adherents of the faith are convinced that nonviolence is not an option. Andrew Bostom’s book shows comprehensively the historical roots of this school of thought, and its continuity over the centuries to the present day. It helps one understand jihad operationally; its use, its claims to legitimacy, its perceived inevitability. Whether this is or is not the way most Muslims view the concept of jihad in its totality is not particularly relevant because people sincerely engaged in “greater jihad” are not a national-security threat. Likewise, those terrorists who have made “lesser jihad” their avocation have no use for fellow Muslims who are seeking only to bring themselves closer to God’s ideal as they understand it. As the Ayatollah Khomeini said of those who argued that Islam was a religion of peace that prevents men from waging war, “I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”...


Toronto Star: But right on Israel...

This is very good.

Hypocrisy alive and well at the UN

...Welcome to a typical year at the United Nations.

The Organization of the Islamic Conference — 56 Islamic states, almost 30 per cent of the UN membership — ensures that a mountain of resolutions and resources are devoted every year to demonizing Israel.

Take, for example, the UN Commission on Human Rights. In the past two years, Israel has had 101 human rights resolutions passed against it...

...in 2003, the UN called three emergency sessions to condemn Israel. In addition, in the same year, the General Assembly passed 18 resolutions that singled out Israel for criticism. The entire rest of mankind — 190 countries, about 6 billion people — drew only four resolutions.

Last year was similar. The assembly, once again, looked at abuses around the globe. If you recall, both Darfur and Zimbabwe were in the news a lot. Nevertheless, proposed resolutions relating to Sudan/Darfur and Zimbabwe couldn't make it; they were defeated.

However, simultaneously, UN delegates, without too much trouble, were able to adopt nine resolutions condemning Israel.

Israel's policies are, of course, fair game for legitimate criticism; but the UN seems to be highly selective with its outrage.

You would think, however, that when it comes to children, the situation changes, and the UN would agree that the death of a child — any child — is a tragedy. Evidently not.

A resolution was adopted in November 2003, calling for the protection of Palestinian children from "Israeli aggression."

Israel, too, sought a resolution of its own, calling for the protection of Israeli children from terrorism. The Israeli resolution was not defeated; it could not even gain enough support from the assembly to come to a vote...

(H/T: BornIn1965 in the forum)

Toronto Star: Silly on climate change...

It's all American's fault...

America's shame in Montreal

...At least the Americans' shameful foot-dragging did not bring the entire process to a complete halt, and for this the other industrialized countries, chiefly Britain and Canada, deserve considerable praise. It cannot be easy for America's competitors to move forward with costly steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while the United States refuses to carry its share of the load. Nevertheless, the Europeans and other signatories to the 1997 treaty limiting greenhouse gas emissions promised to work toward new and more ambitious targets and timetables when the agreement lapses in 2012.

For its part, the Bush administration deserves only censure. No one expected a miraculous conversion. But given the steadily mounting evidence of the consequences of climate change, one would surely have expected America's negotiators to arrive in Montreal willing to discuss alternatives...

I'm not ashamed, and I'm glad that the Star admits the world is a competition (even against Canada and Britain), and not a kumbaya feel-good party. Britain and Canada might deserve praise, but no one else does, and there's no reason we should disemploy people for treaties that accomplish nothing.

Eyeball

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

Augean Stables: Muhammed al Durah alive? Who knows?

Richard Landes translates a Hebrew-only article from Maariv: IT MAY BE THAT MUHAMMED AL DURAH IS ALIVE

Findings that were presented by the head of the committee to investigate the death of child managed to raise doubts for the head of the National Security Council.

“The boy Muhammed al Durah didn’t die at all, he is living in Gaza,” so claims the physicist and right-winger Nahum Shahaf, who presented his findings recently before the head of the National Security Council, General (res.) Giora Eiland. The investigation claims that the photos documenting the death of al Durah were staged by the Palestinians for propaganda purposes.

The head of the National Security Council said to Maariv that after reviewing the findings, he did not rule them out. The right-wing physicist also tried to convince Eiland that Israel take the official position that the child did not die. However, in the words of Eiland, “It is difficult to remain indifferent in light of Shahaf’s findings, however, there is no ablsolute proof that the findings of the investigation are correct.”...

Don't miss the rest of the article, as well as Landes' commentary (including Maariv's seeming obsession with Shahaf's location on the political spectrum): Muhammed al Durah alive? Who knows?

Did I Find King David's Palace?

Here is the PDF of a complete Biblical Archeological Review article (including photos) by archaeologist Eilat Mazar: Did I Find King David's Palace?. This find has really been shaking things up -- see, Why Palestinians prefer bulldozers to shovels and brushes, for instance.

Bolton (and Pipes) on maps without Israel

James Taranto on John Bolton:

...At a dinner last night (no link; we were there), Bolton told the Zionist Organization of America to expect more such unilateral veracity. He singled out for criticism a recent U.N. conference at which Israel was literally wiped off the map (well, wiped off a literal map anyway). U.N. watchdog Anne Bayefsky has a photo of the map of "Palestine" that was used in last month's annual U.N. Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People.

Bayefsky has a photo of Kofi Annan on the dais with the map in the background. The Simon Wiesenthal Center issued a press release Friday in which it "condemns the participation" of the secretary-general in a conference that denies the existence of a U.N. member state.

We would like to know where the 43 senators--42 Democrats plus the lachrymose George Voinovich--who blocked a vote on Bolton's confirmation, forcing President Bush into a recess appointment--stand on all this. One could wave away such outrages, and indeed we're inclined to do so, on the ground that the U.N. is a hopelessly corrupt and worthless institution whose expressions count for nothing. But that is an awkward position for Bolton's detractors to take, since they claim to believe in the U.N.

They don't really believe in the U.N., of course. As we noted in April, in 1991 many of them voted to defy the U.N.'s request for troops to liberate Kuwait from Saddam Hussein's Iraq. They are "pro-U.N.," it seems clear, only when the U.N. is anti-U.S. But again, if the U.N. has "moral authority" when it takes Saddam Hussein's side over ours, how about when it seeks the obliteration of Israel?

(Via Daily Scorecard)

Also see, Daniel Pipes: [Kofi Annan and] Eliminating Israel Politely

There is a right way and a wrong way, strangely, to call for the elimination of Israel.

The secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, provided an example of both ways in recent weeks. When the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated on October 26 that "the regime occupying Jerusalem must be eliminated from the pages of history," Mr. Annan replied by expressing "dismay." Again on December 8, when Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be moved to Europe, Annan responded with "shock."

But dismay and shock at Ahmadinejad's statements did not prevent Annan from participating on November 29, just between the Iranian's outbursts, in a U.N.-sponsored "International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People."...


Iraqi Priorities

Judith Apter Klinghoffer points to some important poll data you won't see in MSM headlines:

...When asked what would be the worst thing that could happen to Iraq in the next 12 months, only 8.9% chose "occupation not leaving Iraq."

When asked what would be the best thing that could happen to Iraq in the next 12 months, only 5.7% chose American forces leaving Iraq.

One thing is sure, American media fails to reflect the reality reflected in this poll.


He's OK

Interview with artist Hyman Bloom

I'm happy to link over to this bit of original blog reporting: Tzemach Atlas interviews artist Hyman Bloom.

The Alter Vitebsker have been asking me to go up to New Hampshire to see "the giant, the most important expressionist of the past hundred years" Hayman Bloom.

Richard McBee writes Hyman Bloom's Journey: "In 1950 he is one of seven artists, including Arshile Gorky, John Marin, Jackson Pollack and Willem de Kooning to represent the United States at the Venice Biennale."...


WND: U.S. reporter denied entry to Syria because he's a Jew

Daily Scorecard points to this story more people should hear about.

WND: U.S. reporter denied entry to Syria because he's a Jew

WASHINGTON – Aaron Klein, WND's Jerusalem bureau chief, was prevented today from entering Syria, where he planned to interview officials from Syria, Lebanon and the U.S., as well as co-host ABC Radio's nationally syndicated "The John Batchelor Show," because, according to at least one official in the Syrian embassy, he's Jewish...

...when the trio arrived in Amman, they were told there was a problem with the application. They met with Eyad Alarfi, assistant to consul general in Amman, who could provide no information about what was holding up the visa. Later, Alarfi said approval for visas were granted for Batchelor and Mason, but not for Klein.

By telephone, Klein spoke to an official from the Ministry of Information in Damascus who declined to provide his name. At first he refused to suggest why Klein had been singled out and prevented from entering the country. Later, however, he asked: "What religion are you?"

Klein said he refused to answer.

"You know what you are," said the official.

Mason, who made the initial arrangements for visas with Syrian media representative al-Arsan, said a red flag was immediately raised when Klein's name was mentioned.

He reportedly told her it would be better if Klein did not go. She asked if it was because he is Jewish. Al-Arsan replied: "Yes, it is."

Batchelor and Mason decided to leave the Syrian embassy without their visas...

Good for them.

So far, the White House has nothing to say.

Update: Banagor comments here.

Politics: Hamas Style

Palestinian Media Watch: Hamas Election Video: Armed struggle until destruction of Israel

In a new Hamas pre-election video, the terror organization again declares that it will not give up its armed struggle until Israel is destroyed. The Hamas message likewise celebrates its love of death as superior to Israel’s love of life. It also expresses support for those Israeli Arabs that wish to destroy Israel “from within.” Hamas looks forward to a day when their flag will fly over not only Jerusalem, but over all Israeli cities, including Acre and Haifa.

The Hamas election video calling for Israel’s destruction

The release of the new video on the Hamas website, reiterating its goal of destroying Israel, coincides with two polls this week showing Hamas turning into a major political force, with between 32% - 45% of Palestinians saying they will vote for Hamas in January’s parliamentary elections. What are the implications for peace, should nearly 50% of the Palestinian Authority parliament be open supporters of Israel’s destruction?

It will be interesting to see if the continuing Hamas election campaign calling for Israel’s destruction will prompt a change in United States or European Union policy. Presently the US State Department has made clear that while it continues to transfer hundreds of millions of dollars of support to the PA, it will make no demands on it to prevent the Hamas from participating in the upcoming elections. The EU and United Nations have also agreed that Hamas can participate in the elections.

The following are the words on the new Hamas video:

"We succeeded, with Allah's grace, to raise an ideological generation that loves death like our enemies love life. We will not abandon the way of Jihad and Shahada [Martyrdom] as long as one inch of our holy land is in the hands of the Jews.

"Congratulations to our people of 1948 [Israeli Arabs] on the liberation of Gaza. You wish to destroy them [the Israelis] from their interior. We will never forget you, and never leave you. A day will come when our flag will fly above all the quarters of our land. Our flag will fly on the minarets of Jerusalem, and the walls of Acre, and the quarters of Haifa".
[Hamas website, December 12, 2005]

Video available at the link.

Vladimir Jabotinsky's Remarkably Good Novel

Jabotinsky: Neo-con before neo-cons were neo or cons.

THR: Sacrifices - Vladimir Jabotinsky's Remarkably Good Novel by Hillel Halkin

...It was after the war that Jabotinsky broke with the Zionist left that had gained control of the political and economic institutions of Jewish Palestine, and formed his "Revisionist" opposition to it. Two things pushed him to this. One was his feeling, starting with the tepid British reaction to anti-Zionist riots in Jerusalem in 1920, that the Mandate government was tilting toward the Arabs, and that the left, concerned more with its own hegemony in Palestine than with the worldwide fate of the Jews, was turning a blind eye to the erosion of the Balfour commitments. The other was his revulsion at the brutality of the Bolshevik Revolution. Convinced that its root cause was the intrinsically coercive nature of economic collectivization, he abandoned his socialist views and moved rightward.

It was not long before he became the recognized head of the Zionist right, and the increasingly maligned rival of the World Zionist Organization's two great leaders, David Ben-Gurion in Palestine and Chaim Weizmann in London. (Although the charges of fascism hurled against him were baseless, some Revisionists were indeed attracted to the model of Mussolini's corporate state. Nor did the hero worship of many of Jabotinsky's followers, or the brown-shirted uniforms and military-style parades of the Revisionist youth movement Betar, help him to defend himself against the accusations.) Barred by the British from Palestine in 1930, he spent the last decade of his life headquartered in Paris, and traveling constantly to Jewish communities all over Europe, and as far as South Africa and the United States, to preach his message. He was a masterful orator who could address his audiences in a half-dozen languages.

Jabotinsky was now possessed by a growing sense of urgency: he was certain that Europe's Jews were faced with an unprecedented conflagration, and that only the emigration of millions of them to Palestine, which was opposed by the British and viewed as impractical by the Zionist left, could save them. At the time of his death from a heart attack in 1940, the outbreak of war having scuttled his hopes that anti-Semitic governments in Central and Eastern Europe might pressure the Mandate into accepting the wholesale evacuation of their Jewish populations, he was seeking to repeat the success of the Jewish Legion by obtaining British agreement to raise an international force of a quarter of a million Jews to take part in the battle against Hitler. For his admirers, he died a heroic figure, a martyr to the petty politics of a socialist Zionist establishment blind to the sweep of his vision and the prescience of his warnings. For his enemies, he was at best a quixotic dreamer, at worst a dangerous demagogue ready to make common cause with darkly reactionary forces...

Quick Book and Film Reviews - Updated

Recent rents:

OK, let's see. I recently watched Batman Begins. I enjoyed it. Cool story, Christian Bale was good in the title role and it was a fun film overall. The dude who played Scarecrow was kinda freaky looking (without the mask), and the way they did the technology and all to make it somewhat "realistic" was decent. For some reason I did not like Katie Holmes. She annoyed me for reasons I can't explain and I think she's too young looking for the role, but maybe I'm just getting old. No, it has nothing to do with Tom Cruise or any of that business. In fact, I wasn't even sure of who she was until the ending credits. Anyway, this one's worth the rental and I'll be looking forward to the next installment if there is one (please re-cast the Katie Holmes role, though).

Also, Fantastic Four found its way into the DVD player. Again, I enjoyed it, thought it was well-cast, although I thought it took too much of the movie to have the four "discover themselves." In the next episode at least they can skip the "wow, look what I can do" and get straight to the superheroing. Very cool effects. Jessica Alba is distractingly gorgeous as Sue Storm, although she's going to need to keep an eye on her thigh girth. Cellulite's a bitch. I'd recommend a little liposuction touch-up. Michaell Chiklis was a good Ben Grim (Jewish, BTW) -- hmmm...I didn't know he was the voice of Chihiro's father in Spirited Away, I always thought that was Alec Baldwin. I'm not sure about the Reed Richards characterl. He looked OK, but acting-wise...? He could have been a little more professorial. And how is that they have all those unpaid bills but still manage a giant high-rise loft with construction teams to build multi-million dollar custom equipment for them? What's up with that? I'd like to know their financial secrets. Anyway, another worthy rental.

Recent reads:

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades) by Robert Spencer: I don't consider myself enough of an expert on either Islam or the history of the Crusades to criticize the book in substance. It's well laid out and easy to read. Full disclosure: I have met Robert Spencer, like him, and think he does an enormous service through his writing, speaking and web site. This would be a great gift book for the moonbat in your life. The side-bar juxtapositions of the statements of Jesus and Muhammed that recure throughout the book are eye-opening. It leaves you wondering how Christianity and the world would be different if the example of Christ's life were different -- if he had been a warrior, a leader of armies and an orderer of massacres? Don't have time to read Jihad Watch every day? Don't have the patience or time for longer works like Andrew Bostum's, The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims? Read this book.

The Plot: The Secret Story of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by Will Eisner. This is a solidly done graphic novel (really non-fiction, though) by one of the masters of the genre who died just recently. The history is surprisingly solid and this version is accessible and well recommended for anyone looking for a history of the slander but who doesn't have the patience for a more scholarly work like Norman Cohn's, Warrant for Genocide. In fact, I think the information in Eisner's graphic novel is even slightly more up-to-date.

The Da Vinci Code, Special Illustrated Edition by Dan Brown: Am I the last person on the planet to read this book? I picked up this edition that includes photos of all the places they visit for cheap at B.J.'s Wholesale and the pictures were a big plus, although I accidentaly saw the picture at the very back that ruined the last few pages for me, but that's OK. I think this boook is worth the hype. I enjoyed it a lot. No, I'm not going to use it as a history text, but it does leave me wanting to go out and find what was accurate and what was nonsense. Great story with only a twist or two that I didn't care for but can't discuss as almost anything you say about it would be a spoiler.

Update: Left off two other recent rentals.

March of the Penguins: I was suprised about this. I didn't know what to expect and found out it's just a penguin documentary. Well, good for Disney for lifting up something that could have disappeared into Animal Planet history and making a big hit out of it. The extra featurettes on the DVD were pretty good, too.

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Maybe it's just me, but this one didn't do it for me. I was a big fan of the books and the old, campy, low-budget BBC production, and maybe that's what it takes to make this better -- it needs to be cheesy. The production values were too good on this new version, and I found it fairly boring, actually. Maybe it's me that's changed, but the humor just didn't work. On the plus side, this is one of the few times I've liked Henson puppets -- the Vogons were very, very well done, but that didn't save it for me.

Monday, December 12, 2005

MAS Targets Michael Graham Again

You remember Michael Graham. He was the Washington radio talk host who said:

Because of the mix of Islamic theology that - rightly or wrongly - is interpreted to promote violence, added to an organizational structure that allows violent radicals to operate openly in Islam's name with impunity, Islam has, sadly, become a terrorist organization. It pains me to say it. But the good news is it doesn't have to stay this way, if the vast majority of Muslims who don't support terror will step forward and re-claim their religion.

Overly strident...perhaps, but not so horrible, right? Well he was consequently s**t-canned for saying it. Read Andrew McCarthy's piece in NRO, here, for more details. (Also see here and here.)

Well, he's landed on his feet here on the radio in Boston, and the local Muslim American Society isn't pleased. This just came out on their email list:

MAS FREEDOM FOUNDATION URGES MUSLIM COMMUNITY TO CALL FOR THE DISCONTINUATION OF MICHAEL GRAHAM AT WTKK FM IN BOSTON

"We are at war with a terrorist organization named Islam”.
- Michale Graham -

In August of 2005 Michael Graham was fired from WMAL-AM because he refused to apologize for saying on-air "We are at war with a terrorist organization named Islam”. Recently WTKK FM radio in Boston has hired Graham as their new afternoon drive host. Grahams comments are a blatent example of bigotry that has been able to creep into the American Society after September 11th which has been mainly fueled by racist talk radio.

MAS Freedom Foundation is looking for volunteers to monitor WTKK FM 96.9
Monday -Friday 3-7pm.
If you can contribute a few hours a week please contact us in order to coordinate our efforts...

Be careful, Michael, the MAS is watching.

Say the wrong thing, and you too could be fired, rendered unemployable or sued.

The Dhimmi and anti-Dhimmi Winners!

ISB in the Freep

Here's a pretty decent write-up in Boston University's independent student newspaper, The Daily Free Press on the Islamic Society of Boston and the lawsuit controversy surrounding their proposed Boston Mosque:

ISB refutes ties to terrorism - Muslim group sues Herald for alleging ties to al-Qaeda

Even porn-peddling City Councilor Chuck Turner gets a statement in: "I thought the stories in the Herald and FOX25 were slanderous, because they take very right-wing conservative stances..." Of course! Conservative = Slanderous. Turner recently made waves in Boston for his role in a voting-rights march organized by 40 different groups where the speakers had agreed in advance to stay focused on the issue at hand -- Turner, of course, used his opportunity on the stage to rant about Palestinians.

Anyway, the Freep article is a decent "he said, she said" for those interested in the issue.

(H/T: Miss Kelley)

What the Muslim American Society Reads

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross has an important piece in yesterday's Dallas Morning News concerning the Muslim American Society and its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as details of its illuminating "suggested reading list." Sorting out the extremists with friendly faces is never easy or obvious.

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross: Extremists among us?

...Today, MAS' leaders admit that the group was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, but claim that MAS has evolved since then. For example, former MAS Secretary General Shaker Elsayed told the Tribune, "Ikhwan [Brotherhood] members founded MAS, but MAS went way beyond that point of conception." If true, perhaps MAS could help counter extremism, despite its radical origins.

However, the available evidence suggests that MAS has not moved away from the Brotherhood's extremist principles. MAS has an internal educational curriculum consisting of literature that Muslims must read in order to advance to a higher membership class – a syllabus that gives the group's game away...

This also looks like another good opportunity to link Scott Burgess's translation of The Project -- purportedly a secret Muslim Brotherhood document -- he has a central post where all the parts of his expose are collected, here.

For various reasons (including site registration that tries -- but fails -- to prevent BugMeNot from working), I'm going to risk pasting the entire Gartenstein-Ross piece into the extended entry.

Continue reading "What the Muslim American Society Reads"

Poll Shows Nine in 10 Iraqis Want to Vote Dec. 15

If only our own enthusiasm for democratic participation were so strong (although, reading some sectors of the blogosphere and beyond, my cynical side tells me we should be happy the participation numbers aren't higher).

DoD: Poll Shows Nine in 10 Iraqis Want to Vote Dec. 15

BAGHDAD, Dec. 11, 2005 – Almost 90 percent of Iraqis want to vote in Dec. 15 national elections, according to an Iraqi poll.

A total of 89 percent of respondents to the poll indicated they want to vote in the election of a permanent democratic government.

The intent to vote is strong across ethnic and religious lines. The Kurds have the highest percentage, with 95 percent telling pollsters that they want to vote. Sunni Arabs have the lowest percentage, but that is still pegged at 87 percent. A total of 91 percent of Shiite Arabs, the largest religious group in the country, said they will vote...


Ex-Terrorists on O'Reilly

Here is the transcript of the appearance of Walid Shoebat and Zak Anani on The O'Reilly Factor posted at American Congress for Truth. It's good to see these guys getting face time in front of a big audience. (H/T: Mike)

Former Terrorists Speak Up On Bill O'Reilly

...O'REILLY: It's my thesis that the American people don't know the danger, don't realize the danger because the American media underplays it all the time. Am I wrong?

SHOEBAT: Absolutely. You're absolutely right. You're absolutely right. The media -- I don't see anything in the media. I stopped watching the media.

The media is the streets of what's happening over in the West Bank. Can I go to Ramallah, stand in the street corner, and have a pamphlet saying suicide bombing is wrong. I will be executed within seconds.

They don't show in the media the killings galore that happens in Manger Square, the dragging of other Palestinian bodies.

O'REILLY: Right.

SHOEBAT: .in the streets. They don't show these things...


40 Most Obnoxious Quotes

Revisionism in the Tehran Times

Marathon Pundit points out this editorial in the Tehran Times by Holocaust "revisionist" Mark Weber: Holocaust commemoration strengthens Jewish-Zionist power. John takes particular interest in the fact that Weber points approvingly to the writings of DePaul professor Norman Finkelstein (on the tenure track at DePaul while Thomas Klocek languishes in limbo). Do you think any of the academics so approvingly cited in such a piece may take it as an opportunity for some long-overdue introspection?

Naaaahhh...

Hatred for the Jewish state a proxy for anti-Semitism at Sabeel conference - Updated

[Update: The Judeo-Christian Alliance has a new Sabeel backgrounder available, here: Sabeel's One State Agenda]

This piece appears in the most recent issue of Boston's Jewish Advocate newspaper. The author, Lawrence Muscant of The David Project, kindly sent along a copy.

Muscant gained entry to the same Toronto Sabeel conference that his David Project colleague Dexter Van Zile was barred from entering (see here, here and here for background) and reports on what he saw. This is important stuff and the short article appears below in full.

Reporting from Inside a Hate Fest

I went to Toronto, Ontario last week to attend the anti-Israel conference sponsored by Sabeel, the organization that is driving a divestment campaign in Protestant churches across America and Canada. I wanted to see for myself.

I had heard talks against Israel before: I was a student at Concordia University in Montreal, where Jews and Israel supporters were harassed on a daily basis, sometimes physically. It never ceases to amaze me how new allegations against Israel seem to emerge out of thin air, as if someone woke up in the morning and devoted all of their time to finding another way to demonize the Jewish state. But this time I was to hear something I had not heard before: Reverend Naim Ateek, founder of Sabeel did not hide his hatred for Jews under the veil of criticizing Israel.

I knew that Ateek wrote things about Israel that were straightforwardly anti-Semitic. In 2001 he wrote “Jesus is on the Cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him…The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily.” But most Churches have dismissed the use of anti-Semitic, deicide imagery after the Holocaust, and I wondered what Ateek would do here.

As I sat in the chapel of the Bloor Street United Church, waiting for Ateek to speak, the crowd grew to roughly three hundred people. Ateek’s topic was “morally responsible investment” -- his euphemism for divestment from Israel.

Reverend Ateek began his presentation by labeling Israel as an apartheid state, whose policy is to “oppress the Palestinians through occupation.” His language for Israel was harsh. I’ve heard it all before. He rehearsed the Palestinianist line, effectively. But his contempt for modern Judaism shocked me. He seemed proud to point out the “flaws” in Judaism.

Continue reading "Hatred for the Jewish state a proxy for anti-Semitism at Sabeel conference - Updated"

Spielberg: Cognitive Egocentrist

Richard Landes begins with a riff on Steven Spielberg's pronouncements about his new film, but this lengthy and worthwhile piece goes far beyond that into what makes guys like Spielberg tick. Highly recommended reading.

Augean Stables: Spielberg: Cognitive Egocentrist

...The problem of course, is that when you bring Arab concerns with honor and shame to the attention of egocentrist liberals, they try as hard as possible not to further bruise that wounded pride, not to embarrass them, not to criticize them publicly. It may work for children some of the time perhaps, but not with hostile adults who take our unwillingness to criticize them and our corresponding eagerness to “affirm” them through our own self-criticism, as an invitation to further violence. And the demopaths and their enthusiasts know how to play on our unwillingness to confront the touchy Arab pride, know how to mobilize our moral indignation with accusations of racism, apartheid and colonial subjection not about their own morally base behavior, but Israel’s.

(I remember vividly a session in an Arab-Israeli dialogue group I was in during the worst of the suicide terrorism. I was looking to the Arabs to condemn it simply and clearly, and not excuse it or explain it. In vain. And when I voiced my opinion that encouraging children to blow themselves up in the midst of civilians was a moral abyss that linked child-abuse to mass murder, one of the nicer participants got vehemently indignant, and accused me of de-humanizing the Palestinians. I thought I was pointing our how the Palestinian leadership was dehumanizing its people; the Israeli/Jewish participants jumped on me for being so critical, for not validating our Arab interlocutors.)...

Spielberg's film itself is coming in for some criticism from those who have seen it: See here, here and here, for instance. (H/T to Mike for those links.)

Update: Also, see this NY Sun piece which pretty well rounds-up the criticism of the film: Spielberg's 'Munich' Is Criticized

Andrew Bolt: The Media War on Israel

Andrew Bolt is a columnist (not Jewish) for the Australian Herald-Sun. These are notes from a talk he delivered recently and are well worth reading.

Andrew Bolt: The Media War on Israel

Andrew Bolt opened with an aside, noting that there is a problem currently with speaking out about some contemporary issues in Australia owing to the Racial and Relgious Tolerance Act which is now used often to suppress factual statements and reasoned opinion, and almost never to enhance such. Discussion of religious issues in the news could be illegal. For example, open discussion of the events of the past week of Lebanese gangs attacking life savers at Cronulla beach south of Sydney could be risky. This legislation has led to the stifling of discussion.

Bolt asked whether any of the Jews in the audience in hindsight consider their original support of that legislation to have been a mistake. He suggested that Jews should rethink their support for these laws and work to have them repealed as they (Jews) have nothing to fear from open debate based on facts. He said that the contribution of Jews in Australia is unparalleled. He went so far as to say that unofficially he has heard that Jewish peak body support for the legislation is an important factor preventing its repeal.

Bolt then turned to the official topic of the talk, giving his analysis of the reasons Israel is cast as the villain by the media today...


Tim Priest: The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime in Australia

As near as I can figure, this is a speech by a retired police officer delivered in Sydney, Australia in 2003. It's long, but fascinating, and is not only relevant to what's been happening recently, but has echos in it of how police and community standards begin to slip as the police are emasculated.

Tim Priest: The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime in Australia

...In 1994 I was stationed at Redfern. A well known Lebanese family who lived not far from the old Redfern Police Academy were terrorising the locals with random assaults, drug dealing, robberies and violent anti-social behaviour. When some young police from Redfern told me about them, curiosity got the better of me and I asked them to show me the street they lived in. Despite the misgivings of the young police, I eventually saw this family and the presence they had in the immediate area. As we drove away in our marked police car, a half-brick bounced on the roof of the vehicle. The driver kept going.

I said, “What are you doing, they’ve just hit the car with a house brick!”

The young constable said, “Oh, they always do that when we drive past.”

The police were either too scared or too lazy to do anything about it. The damage bill on police cars became costly and these street terrorists grew stronger and the police became purely defensive. You see, the Police Royal Commission was about to start and the police retreated inside themselves knowing that the judicial system considered them easy targets. The police did not want to get hurt or attract Internal Affairs complaints.

Call me stupid, call me a dinosaur, but I made sure that day that at least one person in the group that threw the brick was arrested. I began by approaching the group just as that magistrate had lectured me and the other police involved in the Croydon search warrant. I simply asked who threw the brick. I was greeted with abuse and threats. I then reverted to the old ways of policing. I grabbed the nearest male and convinced him that it was he who had thrown the brick. His brave mates did nothing. By the time we arrived at the police station, this young fool had become compliant, apologetic and so afraid that he kept crying.

You may not agree with what I did, but I paraded this goose around the police station for all the young police to see what they had become frightened of. For some months after that, police routinely rounded up the family whenever it was warranted...


Sunday, December 11, 2005

Lee Kaplan on the lead-up to the Three Ex-Terrorists

At first I thought Kaplan was being a little tough on what are, after all, just some doofy college kids afraid for their academic careers, but after reading his account of his experiences in trying to help organize the Princeton appearance of Walid Shoebat and friends, assuming his account is a fair one, it's tough to blame him.

Read for yourself, here:

Israpundit: Three ex-terrorists speak in Princeton

...The head of the Walid Shoebat Foundation and a donor then met with a Dean Dunne who is responsible for student activities at Princeton. He advised them that there was no way such an event would ever take place on the Princeton campus and that it was cancelled. Given Princeton’s background for Arab sponsored fellowships against the existence of Israel, and a Middle East Studies department that invites lecturers and fellows who always speak of terrorism as “legitimate resistance” that they claim is “legal” under “international law,” this abrupt cancellation, while a denial of freedom of speech, is really no surprise. Having former terrorists speaking out against the murder of Israelis was sure to get the hackles up of the Middle East scholars at Princeton who are funded by Arab interests.

I was informed my first day there by the Foundation that Princeton was not allowing the event to go forward on campus. Furthermore, pressure had been placed on the PIPAC students to toe the party line for Princeton—or else. While PIPAC students have tried to deny this, one of them finally broke ranks and admitted this was the case. The students were intimidated by Princeton’s administration. And Princeton, in order to spin the situation more, stated the event was not really cancelled just a few days from occurring, but only “postponed.” When asked if the college had received threats from Arab interest groups, Ms. Liatt replied that she had received “some calls.” She also made clear she did not want national media attention for the event...

See previous posts, here, here, here and here.

(H/T: Mal)

Saturday, December 10, 2005

Loyalty, Lies and Video Tape

Here are a couple of very interesting posts for you. Judy's thoughtful post, A tale of shame and darkness, riffs-on and links to Lisa's post, Dilemma, about a Palestinian cameraman's filming of the murder of a "collaborator" and his questions over what to do with the footage.

Judy quotes Ben-Gurion (among many other things, but I wanted to pull this):

There is no compromise, no equivocation. The way of terror, or the way of Zionism, gangsterism or an organised Yishuv (community); murder from ambush and banditry in darkness, or the voluntary self-discipline of youth movements, of farmers and industrialists, a union of freedom and co-operation in argument, decision and act.

Whenever and wherever there is a self-governing community of free men, gangsters find no place. If gangsters rule -- free men are homeless.

Take up your choice -- violence and repression, or constitutional liberties...let us rise up against terror and its agencies, and smite them. The time for words are past.

There's a lot of meat here -- shades of al Durah and the sometimes difficult to untangle mix of motivations and pressures that makes Palestinian Arab society so difficult to sort.

Emailer: 'I have watched Greater Boston on PBS for the very last time in my life tonight'

'Miss Kelley' emails:

I have watched Greater Boston on PBS for the very last time in my life tonight. Too bad, because I like Emily Rooney and think she usually does a good job as moderator. One of the topics tonight was the hearings in DC this week about the anger of some black Louisianans about the federal response to the hurricane. Particularly the claim made by some that the federal government bombed the levees. Ethnic cleansing, attempted genocide. Sigh.

Callie Crossley said (paraphrasing) "This story demonstrates the depth of black anger. No reporter can really know if it did happen or not. The sources a reporter would go to for information are federal agencies, and they obviously can't be trusted. After all, black men in a Tennessee prison in the 1920's were given syphilis, and that was by the federal government." Pause. I expected some "Oh come on, Callie" from somebody, anybody, but it was not forthcoming. Instead John Carroll said (something like) "Well, it could be true, but if it was, it would have been for urban renewal, not for ethnic cleansing." I'm still shaking my head, thinking he COULDN'T have said that, but he really did say something that bizarre.

Not one person on the show tonight said "Of course our federal govenment didn't bomb the levees." Not one!

That's it, I'm done with that show! PBS hasn't gotten any money from me lately, and this seals the deal. Not one dime. Not a frickin' penny. What is wrong with these people????

Arghhhh!!!

They're just respecting the narrative, respecting the narrative. The fact that they won't criticize an obviously baseless conspiracy-theory is far more patronizing, insulting and ultimately irresponsible than expressing even a teaspoon of skepticism. That never occurs to them.

A view from Bangladesh

Friday, December 9, 2005

Qaradawi Endorses Democracy As Only He Can

Friend of London Mayor Ken Livingstone, and marketing tool of the Islamic Society of Boston (because he's a very popular man in the community), Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, encourages Iraq's Sunnis to vote (good), while condemning Jews and Americans (bad) in this sermon from MEMRI:

Leading Islamist Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi: "We Will Be Victorious, Allah Willing - Despite Set By Judaism & Crusaders"

..."We are now under a siege that resembles the Siege of the Trench, the Siege of Akhzab.

"But we will be victorious, Allah willing - despite the traps set by Judaism and the Crusaders, and despite the deeds of those who set traps and who deceive...

..."The Prophet besieged them for 25 days until they surrendered and agreed to accept his reign. The Prophet called upon them to choose a judge, and they chose Sa'd bin Mu'az, who had been their ally in the Jahiliyya [the pre-Islamic era]...

..."He decided that the only treatment they merited was to have their fighters killed, their women taken captive, and their property seized as booty...

..."Some Orientalists claim that Muhammad was cruel to the Jews, but this is how determination should be. One must be firm when firmness is warranted, and gentle when gentleness is warranted...

..."I pray for Allah to open our brothers' eyes, to make the present in Iraq better than the past, and the future better than the present. I pray for Allah to protect Iraq from overt and covert civil strife, to protect it from the evils of divisiveness and racism, and to protect it from the whispers of all satans, the human satans, the satans among the djinn, the American satans, and other satans."

Video here.

JTA: Iraqi 'code' bans Israel

When Iraq can pass Sharansky's 'Town Square test,' and there is a legitimate and protected marketplace of ideas, will this attitude change? I think it's a long, long way off. Those of us who have high hopes for the ability of a free Iraq to truly have an effect on the region and the world have to face that.

JTA: Iraqi ‘code’ bans Israel

A “code of honor” binding a number of Iraqi parties vows never to normalize relations with Israel.

Signed by factions belonging to followers of Shi’ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi, Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Ja’afari, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and the Sunni Iraqi Consensus Front, the code brings together Shi’ite and Sunni factions. It also demands a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S.-led occupation troops and condemns terrorism while upholding the legitimacy of “resistance.”

Elections are next week, and the code suggests how the various parties might align. Al-Sadr was the driving force behind the code, The Associated Press reported.


Iraqis turn in 'Butcher of Ramadi'

DoD: Citizens Turn Over 'Butcher of Ramadi' to Iraqi, U.S. Troops

The terrorist known as "the Butcher of Ramadi" was detained today, turned in by local citizens in the provincial capital of Iraq's Anbar province, U.S. military officials in Iraq reported.

Amir Khalaf Fanus -- listed third on a "high-value individuals" list of terrorists wanted by the 28th Infantry Division's 2nd Brigade Combat Team -- was wanted for criminal activities including murder and kidnapping. Ramadi citizens brought him to an Iraqi and U.S. forces military base in Ramadi, where he was taken into custody.

Fanus was well known for his crimes against the local populace. He is the highest-ranking al Qaeda in Iraq member to be turned in to Iraqi and U.S. officials by local citizens...


Schroeder's new boss: Vladimir Putin

Talk about an unKosher odor:

David's Medienkritik: It's All About Gas

Germany's former chancellor Gerhard Schroeder apparently has a new boss: Mr. Vladimir Putin.

Germany's Schroeder Joins Russian-German Gas Pipeline Project

Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder will lead the shareholders committee for a German- Russian gas-pipeline project to pump gas under the Baltic Sea, OAO Gazprom Chief Executive Alexei Miller said today.

State-controlled Gazprom began building the more than 4- billion-euro ($4.7 billion) North European gas pipeline project today in the town of Babaeyvo in Russia's Volodga region, north of Moscow.[snip]

On September 8, 2005, Schroeder - then still German chancellor - attended the signing of the contract for the pipeline, together with Putin. The pipeline had a clear political background - the contract needed the approval of the German as well as the Russian government. The deal increased Germany's already dangerous reliance on Russian gas deliveries...

More at David's.

A Change in Terminology

This sounds reasonable:

Iraqis Want Coalition Vocabulary Change

BAGHDAD, Dec. 9, 2005 – Changing perceptions and perspectives here mean changes in vocabulary: "Sunni insurgents" is out, "Saddamists" is in.

American officials here said Iraqi officials have asked by them to stop calling groups opposed to the coalition "Sunni insurgents." The idea is that a great many Sunni Arabs are moderate and want democracy for Iraq, officials explained.

Coalition officials have hit on the term "Iraqi rejectionists" to refer to those people who want to participate in the election process, but still launch attacks on coalition forces.

Coalition officials also said many Iraqis want to change the perception that all Baath Party members are evil people. Saddam Hussein, of course, ruled through the Baath Party. Iraqi officials maintain that millions of their countrymen and women joined the party simply to get or keep a job.

Coalition officials now are using the term "Saddamists" to refer to die-hard Baathists who want a return to the bad old days of Saddam's rule, officials said.


The Dhimmi and Anti-Dhimmi Awards

Robert Spencer has set up the polling for his Dhimmi and Anti-Dhimmi Awards for 2005.

Here are the direct links to the categories and the choices for each:

American Dhimmi of the Year 2005: George W. Bush, Noam Chomsky, Ramsey Clark, John Esposito, Karen Hughes, Condoleeza Rice

Dhimmi Internationale 2005: Kofi Annan, Tony Blair, Prince Charles, Jacques Chirac, George Galloway, Chris Patten

Anti-Dhimmi Internationale 2005: Edouard Ballaman, Bat Ye'or, Oriana Fallaci, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, John Howard, Anders Fogh Rasmussen

American Anti-Dhimmi of the Year 2005: Michael Graham, Thomas Klocek, Mitt Romney, Debbie Schlussel, Tom Tancredo, Andrew Whitehead

Al Arian Links - Updates

[2 Updates (H/T: Mike): Debbie Schlussel: Why Al-Arian Walkedand Victim's Father: Try Al-Arian Again]

Here are a few links concerning the al Arian trial that I found interesting.

First, this post at Volokh questions the press spin which characterizes the trial as a test (and failure) of the Patriot Act, which seems bizarre to me. What it shows is that the Patriot Act is just another information gathering tool for the Government, and not the fearful boogy-man it's so often made out to be.

Next, this editorial (via BornIn1965 in the forum) in the Bradenton Herald points out that al-Arian may have been found "not guilty," but innocent he certainly is not. Deport Al-Arian

...Al-Arian's own words on tape and in e-mail records show him deeply involved in and sympathetic with the terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The PIJ is dedicated to the destruction of Israel through holy war and is believed responsible for as many as 100 deaths in Israel and Gaza, including at least one American.

Here, for example, is what prosecutors said was Al-Arian's response to an e-mail from the PIJ office in Damascus reporting results of a Nov. 11, 1994, suicide bombing in which three Israeli soldiers were killed and 15 others injured: "Pride and glory overwhelmed us. May God bless your efforts and accept our martyrs."

Notice the use of pronouns: "us" and "our." Al-Arian, who founded the think tank at USF that was a cover for anti-Israel activities and whose one-time director became head of the PIJ, was one with the terrorist organization...

Also via Volokh is this article in the St. Petersburg Times explaining that part of the problem with the case was its complexity: Case too complex to get a conviction

Finally, via Jihad Watch, is this article at Frontpage which, among other suggest reading (another way of saying "read the whole thing"), reminds us of that Muslim FBI agent who, shortly after 9/11, refused to tape-record fellow Muslims, and how that may have played into al-Arian's aquittal: Sami's Guardian Angel

...the FBI's Tampa field office asked Abdel-Hafiz to follow up by asking al-Arian several questions related to a counterterrorism case they were building against him -- and secretly record his answers. Abdel-Hafiz agreed to speak to al-Arian by phone but said he would not record the conversation without al-Arian's knowledge. The lead Tampa agent on the case, Barry Carmody, was scandalized by his refusal, calling it "outrageous."

Then Abdel-Hafiz met, unexpectedly, with al-Arian at an American Muslim Council conference in Washington and wrote a summary of their conversation, which he had not coordinated with Tampa. The report he filed was not well received by Carmody and his team of investigators in Tampa -- or by FBI agents John Vincent and Robert Wright, whose Chicago investigation dovetailed with the al-Arian case.

"After Gamal had a conversation with Sami al-Arian, he made a lot of self-serving statements for al-Arian and denigrated the FBI agent (Carmody) who was investigating the case," says Vincent, who also had a run-in with Abdel-Hafiz over his refusal to wear a wire to record another Muslim under terror investigation -- Soliman Biheiri, who is tied to al-Arian (investigators found the his phone number in Biheiri's computer address book). Abdel-Hafiz tried to explain to Vincent that a "Muslim does not record another Muslim."...


BRA to review deal with Islamic Society of Boston - Updated

Hat tip to Miss Kelley for links to these two [Updated: Here's a third: Israpundit: Miasma in Boston: What Lies behind the Expanded Libel case of the Islamic society of Boston? by Jerry Gordon -- written a few weeks back but still relavent.] articles on the latest regarding the ISB and the Boston Mosque project.

Boston Globe: Critics of mosque plan seek review - They question ties of society founder

Critics of the Islamic Society of Boston's efforts to build a mosque on land purchased from the Boston Redevelopment Authority asked the City Council yesterday to review the deal, citing new information linking a fund-raiser for the Al Qaeda network to the society.

Jeffrey Robbins, the lawyer representing a research group and a Boston College associate professor who oppose the project, asked Councilor Jerry P. McDermott to order hearings based on a US Treasury Department document issued in July that indicates that a man who helped found the society in 1982 raised about $1 million for two groups associated with Al Qaeda.

In the statement issued July 14, the Treasury Department stated that Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was sentenced to federal prison in 2004 for involvement in a plot to assassinate the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, had raised the money in the United States for the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia, which provides material support for Al Qaeda, as well as Saal Al Faqih, a group that controls the Movement...

Also, this New York Sun article has a lot more meat and background to it. Since Sun articles tend to expire, I'm going to take the risk of pasting the whole thing in the extended entry below.

Treasury Department Tars Alamoudi, Founder of the Islamic Society of Boston

WASHINGTON - Concern is mounting over the connections between a Boston Islamic group and a high-profile Muslim activist, Abdurahman Alamoudi, after a recent statement by the federal government that Mr. Alamoudi had a "close relationship" with Al Qaeda and that he raised money for Al Qaeda in America.

Alamoudi - who is serving a 23-year sentence in federal prison after having pleaded guilty in 2004 to participating in a Libyan plot to assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah - is also a founder of the Islamic Society of Boston. The society is now embroiled in a bitter legal dispute over the society's efforts to build a mosque with the aid of public subsidies.

That lawsuit, according to journalists and terrorism investigators, is part of a larger trend of litigation by Muslim groups that, they say, is having a "chilling effect" on the ability to report domestic ties to terrorism.

Continue reading "BRA to review deal with Islamic Society of Boston - Updated"

Live Blog of Shoebat Event

IRIS has an update and report on his attendance at the Walid Shoebat and friends talk at Princeton. Very important to read. Here:

Reporting Live from the Princeton Ex-Terrorist Event:

...Each of the ex-terrorists have either killed or seriously injured people. Each of the ex-terrorists has had attempts on his life. One of the panelists mentioned he has been attacked 15 times and has had his daughter injured as a retaliation for his speaking. One of the panelists (Ibrahim Abadallah) was born and raised in Dearborn, Michigan.

Each of the panelists agree that recruitment by terrorist organizations was not significant to their having become terrorists. Rather, terror is part of the "fiber of the culture" and joining terror organizations was organic and natural. They agreed that terror indoctrination permeates Muslim society. Fortunately, they were all able to deprogram themselves, primarily through conversion to Christianity.

Here are some quotes from the panelists:

Walid Shoebat: "There is no wall in the area where I grew up that was not filled with grafitti, with slogans such as 'we knock on the gates of heaven with the skulls of Jews.'"

Zak Anani: "The problem is not land. It is generations of hatred passed from one generation to the next."

Ibrahim Abadallah: "My hatred for the Jews permeated my heart. I hated the Jews with all my heart, my soul and my passions. Anything I could do to harm the Jewish state, the Jewish people, I would do."

[Ironically, Abadallah had attended a Quaker school in Dearborn.]...

The Panic Over Iraq

Excellent Norman Podhoretz: The Panic Over Iraq:

...Paine did not limit his anguished derision to former supporters of the American War of Independence whose courage was failing because things had not been going as well on the battlefield as they had expected or hoped. In a less famous passage, he also let loose on another group:
'Tis surprising to see how rapidly a panic will sometimes run through a country. . . . Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses . . . . [T]heir peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain for ever undiscovered.

Thus, he explained, "Many a disguised Tory has lately shown his head," emboldened by the circumstances of the moment to reveal an opposition to the break with Britain that it had previously seemed prudent to conceal.

The similarities to our situation today are uncanny. We, too, are in the midst of a rapidly spreading panic. We, too, have our sunshine patriots and summer soldiers, in the form of people who initially supported the invasion of Iraq-and the Bush Doctrine from which it followed-but who are now abandoning what they have decided is a sinking ship. And we, too, are seeing formerly disguised opponents of the war coming more and more out into the open, and in ever greater numbers...

Long and very good.

(H/T: Mal)

A Very Beazley Christmas

Thursday, December 8, 2005

Interview with Lisa Ramaci

Fayrouz has an excellent interview with Lisa Ramaci, widow of murdered author Steven Vincent, the man who's blog deserved to be voted most missed. He certainly is.

Q: What message would you like to tell the Iraqi people?

A: I would like to ask the Iraqi people to please not forget Steven, and what he was trying to do for them. Steven loved Iraq, and he loved the people he met there, and he wanted more than anything for that country to finally know peace and prosperity in a democratic state. I would like them to remember that, and to also remember that he gave his life in an effort, as small as it may have been in the overall picture, to try and make it happen. I would hope someday he would be written about in Iraqi history books, so the children of Iraq can learn about him and about the difference one person can make.

The rest is here.

Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards

Dave will be hosting the JIB Awards again this year, this time in cooperation with the Jerusalem Post which is really quite a coup. It should be a good way to get aquainted with some new sites.

A Vietnam MIA Comes Home

Air Force Sergeant MIA from Vietnam War is Identified

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that the remains of a U.S. serviceman, missing in action from the Vietnam War, have been identified and will be returned to his family for burial with full military honors.

He is Tech. Sgt. Patrick L. Shannon of Owasso, Okla. Funeral arrangements are yet to be set by his family.

Shannon and 18 other servicemen operated a radar installation atop Pha Thi Mountain in Houaphan Province, Laos, approximately 13 miles south of the border with North Vietnam. The site, known at Lima Site 85, directed U.S. bombing missions toward key targets in North Vietnam.

In the early morning of March 11, 1968, the site came under attack by a force of North Vietnamese commandos. The enemy force had scaled the sheer mountainsides in the hours before the attack and overran the site. During the attack, some Americans made their way down to ledges, but survivors reported that several were killed...

Continue reading "A Vietnam MIA Comes Home"

Bolton, Arbour and Human Rights Day

Judith Apter Klinghoffer on Bolton, Arbour and Human Rights Day:

...when the Pakistanis approached her as representatives of the Organization of Muslim Countries currently meeting in Mecca to complain that the Danish newspaper publication of Muhammad cartoons represented an "encroachment on Islam," she did not remind them that offering a bounty for the head of the cartoonists is an "encroachment on the Danes lives" or that freedom of the press is also a human right. Oh, no. She promptly promised to investigate the racism of the Danish cartoons."

Moreover, "Arbour told reporters she chose the theme of "terrorists and torturers" to mark Saturday's annual commemoration of the U.N.'s adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 because of concerns that the absolute ban on torture, once believed to be unassailable, is under attack." If you think her concern is with the kidnapping of "peace advocates' in Iraq or with concentration camps in North Korea, you will be mistaken. Her theme is designed to support the charge hurled by Islamists and their enablers that there is a moral equivalency between terror and the American led war on terror between rendition and torture...

Also see Captain's Quarters, I Guess The UN Has Closed Its Sex Camps:

...Eighteen months after reporters and investigators began finding evidence of exploitation of refugees in almost every camp run by the UN, Arbour makes an odd choice by attacking the United States. UN-run refugee camps have turned into seraglios for UN staffers, with women and even little girls forced to give sexual favors to staffers and peackeepers alike in order to get food and medicine. It routinely selects countries like Libya and Cuba to sit on and lead its committees on Human Rights, akin to putting the inmates in charge of the asylum. In some sick and twisted way, it makes sense for Arbour to use the occasion of Human Rights Day to attack America rather than focus on all the ways the UN has promoted and allowed human-rights abuses over the past decade or more.

Bolton has it right. This demonstrates the lack of serious thought for reform at the UN. Arbour should have spoken out of humility about the UN's proven track record of abusing those under its protection and what the organization intended to do to correct it...


Letter to Spielberg

JPost: Snap Judgment: Dear Steven Spielberg

...Steven, I can't imagine who in the world you believe thinks about the Munich massacre "only in political or military terms." Nor is there any real evidence that the Israeli agents who carried out the retaliatory attacks "gave way to troubling doubts."

One such agent was the Mossad's legendary blonde femme fatale Sylvia Rafael, who took direct part in the most undeniably tragic episode of that mission - the 1974 killing in Lillehammer, Norway, of an innocent Moroccan waiter mistaken for Ali Hassan Salameh, the Black September's operations chief in Europe. Even though Rafael expressed deep regret for that error after she and five others were subsequently caught and jailed in Norway, she went to her grave last year in her native South Africa never having expressed any doubts, public or private (according to her husband, the Norwegian lawyer who represented her in the Lillehammer case), about the overall worth of her mission...

Judith has a round-up of Munich info (the real event) on her old site, here: The 30th anniversary of the Munich Olympics Massacre (Here new site is here, btw)

Also, see Judith's post at Winds of Change and the comment thread as well.

Shoebat Update

IRIS blog has several updates to the story of the cancelled Walid Shoebat lecture.

See here and scroll down for new material.

No Word on Crowd Reaction

Nobel laureate slams Bush, Blair

STOCKHOLM, Sweden (AP) -- Nobel literature laureate Harold Pinter has slammed U.S. President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair in a harsh award lecture, saying they should be prosecuted for the invasion of Iraq.

In a prerecorded lecture presented at the Swedish Academy in Stockholm on Wednesday, the British playwright said Bush and Blair should be arraigned before the International Criminal Court...

I'm thinking it didn't make him unpopular with the crowd.

Peggy Noonan: What does it mean that your first act on entering a country is breaking its laws?

This is very good:

The American Way: What does it mean that your first act on entering a country is breaking its laws?

...What does it mean that your first act on entering a country--your first act on that soil--is the breaking of that country's laws? What does it suggest to you when that country does nothing about your lawbreaking because it cannot, or chooses not to? What does that tell you? Will that make you a better future citizen, or worse? More respecting of the rule of law in your new home, or less?

If you assume or come to believe that that nation will not enforce its own laws for reasons that are essentially cynical, that have to do with the needs of big business or the needs of politicians, will that assumption or belief make you more or less likely to be moved by that country, proud of that country, eager to ally yourself with it emotionally, psychologically and spiritually?

When you don't earn something or suffer to get it, do you value it less highly? If you value it less highly, will you bother to know it, understand it, study it? Will you bother truly to become part of it? When you are allowed to join a nation for free, as it were, and without the commitment of years of above-board effort, do you experience your joining that country as a blessing or as a successful con? If the latter, what was the first lesson America taught you?

These are questions that I think are behind a lot of the more passionate opposition to illegal immigration...


Finkielkraut Round-up

Wednesday, December 7, 2005

Bolton Unchained

Very nicely done by our UN Ambassador. How shameful that his had to be a recess appointment.

VOA: US Blasts Security Council for Failing to Condemn Terror Attack in Israel

Washington's ambassador to the United Nations has criticized the Security Council for failing to condemn the latest terrorist attack in Israel.

The envoy singled out Algeria for blocking a U.S. drafted statement.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton issued a statement Tuesday unequivocally condemning the bomb attack in the Israeli town of Netanya that killed at least five people. The unusual action came after a U.S. attempt to have the statement issued by the Security Council was rejected.

Diplomats attending the meeting say several Council members raised concerns about language in the U.S.-drafted document. Ambassador Bolton, however, blamed Algeria for quashing the measure by objecting to a passage urging Syria to close offices of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which claims responsibility for the attack. "Other governments had questions about particular language. We were perfectly prepared to engage in discussions about constructive suggestions, but Algeria categorically refused to name Syria and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad," he said.

The U.S. envoy later read the text of the statement to reporters, and lashed out at the Council for what he called "failing to speak the truth".

He said "you have to speak up in response to these terrorist attacks. It's a great shame that the Security Council couldn't speak to this terrorist attack in Netanya, but if the Council won't speak, the United States will."

(H/T's: Michael B., Daily Alert and American Future)

PC(USA) Leadership Uses Hostage Situation to Take a Shot at the US

From the letter posted at the Presbyterian News Service and signed by Rick Ufford-Chase, moderator, 216th General Assembly (2004) and The Rev. Clifton Kirkpatrick, stated clerk of the General Assembly:

...Many Presbyterians in the United States are aware that four volunteers with Christian Peacemaker Teams in Baghdad have been held without communication for almost a week. We are gravely concerned about their safety, as well as the safety of all people, both Iraqi and United States, whose lives have been endangered because of the United States’ war against Iraq.

The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has spoken forcefully about our conviction that there was no justification for the U.S. Government’s invasion of Iraq. Presbyterians pray daily for the innocent Iraqi civilians, U.S. soldiers, and all others whose lives are at risk at this time. Further, we have spoken clearly about our grave concern for those who have been detained by U.S. forces, and for their families...

This article in The Layman pulls no punches:

Moderator, stated clerk blame kidnappings on U.S.

Blaming the United States for its military role in Iraq, the leaders of the Presbyterian Church (USA) have made an appeal to Iraqi kidnappers to release four peace activists who are members of a group called Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT)...

The PCUSA leaders' statement was unusually harsh in condemning U.S. involvement in Iraq – even when compared with pleas for the release of the hostages by the National Council of Churches and Islamic groups...

The NCC and Faithful Americans did not, like the PCUSA, blame the plight of the CPT members on the U.S. involvement in Iraq...

The Presbyterian leaders alone blamed the "United States' war against Iraq" for endangering the hostages. Currently, there is no "war against Iraq." The U.S. involvement, whether supported or denounced, is focused on protecting a fragile Iraqi democracy against Iraqis and insurgents who oppose democracy.

The four peace activists were kidnapped by a heretofore unknown group, the Swords of Righteousness. The group has said it will kill the four on Thursday if all prisoners in Iraq are not released by then.

The Presbyterian leaders, after emphasizing their opposition to the U.S. role in Iraq, did mildly state their opposition to the kidnappings by the Swords of Righteousness. "We believe that all violence is wrong, and that the action of kidnapping cannot be justified under any circumstance," they said.


'Palestinian soccer union plans to punish 'Peace Team' players'

This is nothing surprising. So many people continue to trumpet their cooperative efforts -- efforts which continue to go completely unreciprocated by the Palestinian Arab establishment -- who, in fact, continue to punish anyone who has the audacity to challenge the enforced Palestinian "national concensus." You would think that the Palestinians would have far more to lose than the Israelis, and they do, yet there is never a price to be paid. This is a people ready for peace? It's not promising.

Haaretz: Palestinian soccer union plans to punish 'Peace Team' players

The Palestinian FA plans to punish players under its jurisdiction for participating alongside Israelis in a "Peace Match" in Barcelona, an official said on Wednesday.

A 'Peace Team' of Israeli and Palestinian players lost 2-1 to Barcelona at the Nou Camp last week in front of 31,820 spectators, including many dignitaries.

"The Palestinian FA will form a committee to investigate the players who participated in the match ... everyone involved will be punished," senior FA official Jamal Zaqout told Reuters.

"We act in accordance with the attitude of our people who are against normalization (of relations with Israel) before the end of the occupation," Zaqout said, referring to Israel's hold over lands captured in the 1967 Middle East war.

Fifteen Israelis, including many internationals and 12 Palestinians from the occupied West Bank joined up for the match sponsored by Israeli statesman Shimon Peres' Center for Peace foundation...


Palestinian Resistance Committee needs "indispensable man" insurance

The Israelis have been practicing Cliff May's strategy.

JPost: IAF guns down terrorist in first raid since Netanya bombing

Two days after the green light for targeted assassinations was given, an IAF aircraft fired a missile into a moving vehicle in the Gaza Strip killing a prominent terrorist commander from the Popular Resistance Committees.

The IDF identified the target as Mahmoud Arkan, a 29-year-old commander of the PRC in the Rafah area behind most of the attacks there in the past months...

Update: Also, see: JPost: Jihad slams PA for arresting members

...Hours after the attack [The Netanya bombing. -S], PA security forces tried unsuccessfully to detain a Jihad terrorist in Jenin. The man, who was not identified, was shot in the shoulder during the attempt to detain him.

Eyewitnesses said scores of Fatah and Islamic Jihad gunmen, backed by many civilians, foiled the attempt to apprehend the terrorist and take him to a prison in Jericho.

Local members of the Aksa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's armed wing, voiced support for the suicide attack, pledging to use force to thwart any attempt by the PA to detain Islamic Jihad officials. The group's commander, Zakariya Zubeidi, was among those who welcomed the attack, saying it was "a natural response to Israeli violations of the truce."

Another attempt to detain Jihad activists in the Balata and Askar refugee camps near Nablus also failed after dozens of gunmen drove back the PA security forces after pelting them with stones...

Birds Of Baghdad

Iran to go to war with Cuba

I believe that's the inevitable result of this, no?

Step One: Offer the Kafir the chance to convert to Islam.
Step Two: Failing that, demand that they submit to Dhimmitude and pay the Jizya (poll tax)
Final Step: Failing that, go to war

I'd be careful if I were Castro. The Mullahs play even rougher than the CIA.

MEMRI: Iranian Clerics Invite Fidel Castro to Convert To Islam; Iranian Satirists React

Following recent reports that Cuban President Fidel Castro had received an invitation from Iranian clerics to convert to Islam, [1] and following a statement by Iranian Guardian Council Secretary Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati that "non-Muslims are animals that chew their cud and cause corruption on Earth," [2] two Iranian websites operating outside Iran posted satirical articles...

It's nothing personal to the cookies...they're just being 'anti-Zionist'

Denmark's Muslims don't like "Jewish cookies" (thought there's nothing Jewish about them but the name):

Denmark’s offensive Jewish cookies

A group of Danish Muslims refuse to eat traditional “Jewish” cookies because they feel offended by the name.

According to the daily Danish newspaper B.T., Ole Poulsen, head of the public food consumer department said that the Muslim refusal to buy the cookies could have an effect on sales...

..Jewish cookies, which are made with cinnamon and hazelnuts and actually have nothing particularly Jewish about them, are very popular in Denmark during the pre-Christmas period.

Denmark’s chief rabbi, Bent Lexner, said that he did not see any problem in a name change.

“There is nothing Jewish in it and I wouldn’t mind another name, but I think that it would be better to educate Muslims to respect the culture of the majority in Denmark, if they want the majority to respect their culture".

Most of Denmark’s “Jewish” cookies are not kosher and they are therefore not consumed by a large part of the Jewish population.

(H/T: BornIn1965 in the forum)

Meanwhile, Danish authorities cracked down on a "charity" that was funneling money to Hamas. I remember it wasn't so long ago that the Europeans refused to call Hamas a terror organization.

Danish Muslim group charged with funding terrorism

COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - Denmark charged a Muslim organization, the Danish Al-Aqsa Association, on Wednesday with funding terrorism by channelling funds to Palestinian militant group Hamas, the prosecutor said.

"We have today charged the organization and two of its members, and seized some of its funds," Henning Thiesen, special prosecutor for serious economic crime, told Reuters.

The Justice Ministry said an investigation launched in 2002 showed the two Al-Aqsa members had collected money in Denmark and transferred it to "Middle Eastern organizations which are part of or have connections to the terror organization Hamas."...

The Danish Al-Aqsa Association was founded in 1999, taking its name from Jerusalem's most important mosque. It has in the past denied it has links to militant organizations in the Middle East, saying it supports orphans in Palestine...

Via LGF, where Charles appropriately quips:

"That should be 'supports the creation of orphans in Israel.'"

Short Your Al-Qaeda Stock

A good point from Cliff May:

SHORT YOUR AL-QAEDA STOCK: Abu Hamza Rabia was reportedly killed in an explosion in the North Waziristan tribal area of Pakistan over the weekend.

"Rabia, an Egyptian in his 30s, was responsible for external planning of terrorism, including terror strikes against the United States. ... he replaced Abu Faraj al-Libbi, a top al-Qaeda leader, who was captured earlier this year.

"I can hear people saying: "But they'll just replace him with someone else!"

Sure they will. But when you eliminate the vice president in charge of planning attacks against the U.S., then eliminate his successor, the chances are that whoever is next in line for this position may not have the education, maturity and experience necessary to achieve al-Qaeda's corporate goals.

Do you think Microsoft's stock wouldn't sink if Bill Gates and his top deputy suddenly disappeared? Why would it be different for an enterprise producing death and destruction for export?

Meanwhile, in Iraq, it is vital that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, CEO of al-Qaeda's Mesopotamian branch, be eliminated, along with whoever replaces him. And so on and so on...


What's a North Korean Film Like?

And what do their actors get paid? An extra ration of acorn pie? One relative out of the gulag?

Kim Jong-Il is looking to his film "industry" to create a salable product:

Washington Times: Kim casts North as movie magic

PYONGYANG, North Korea -- Watch out, Hollywood. North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, a longtime film buff, has ordered his nation's tiny film industry to begin competing in the big leagues.

Mr. Kim, known to his countrymen as "the Dear Leader," recently paid a visit to North Korea's Pyongyang Film Studio to give auteurs the benefit of his "on-the-spot guidance."

His message was combative.

"He said we are not competing with U.S. and European films. We have to beat U.S. films," Kim Man-sok, the head of the studio's foreign sales division, told foreign reporters.

In North Korea, what the Dear Leader wants, the Dear Leader gets. So the first potential international blockbuster already is in the pipeline...

They'll have to do better than this.

(H/T: Mingi Hyun)

Terrorist at the Crossing

So the PA takes control of the Rafah crossing...and proceeds to put a terrorist's face on top of it. This is the type of thing that hardly inspires Israelis to make further concessions for peace. Why make concessions to people who continue to glorify their murderers?

PA Media Watch: PA on Terror: "Condemns" on paper, praises in practice

...The case of the veneration of Fatah terrorist Al-Moayed Bihokmillah Al-Agha is a good example. When the PA opened the Rafah Crossing (between Gaza and Egypt) last week, many in the West saw it as a concrete step towards Palestinian statehood. For the PA, however, it was another opportunity to turn a murderer into a hero.

Al-Agha was killed when carrying out an attack at the Rafah crossing, in which five Israelis were killed, in December 2004. The PA's ruling party Fatah features Al-Agha in a clip that glorifies violence and terror, and still shows the murderous attacks on its Fatah Falcons website a year after the attack.

The American news network CNN's coverage of the crossing's reopening last month showed footage of a giant sign erected over the site, which declares the crossing's name to be in honor of the Shahid (martyr) Al-Agha, and refers to his murderous attack with the thrilling name, "Volcanoes of Rage."

That the PA allowed such a sign to be erected at the site is a powerful message to Palestinians, emphasizing once again that terrorists are heroes...


Myth-Busting the Armed Forces

Myth 1: Military recruits are less educated and have fewer work alternatives than other young Americans.
Myth 2: The military tends to attract people with lower aptitudes.
Myth 3: The military attracts a disproportionate number of poor or underprivileged youth.
Myth 4: A disproportionate number of recruits come from urban areas.
Myth 5: The military isn't geographically representative of America.

The answers are here:

DoD: Official Debunks Myths About Military Recruits

Bible Quiz

I'm not a big religious scholar, but some might be interested in this page with a pretty nicely done flash bible quiz on it. Five and a half years of Hebrew School and I know nothing.

The Bible Quiz

Tuesday, December 6, 2005

Girls in Uniform

Whose Internet is It Anyway? (Part 2)

There was a follow-up of yesterday's "Blogjam" at PJM concerning UN control of the internet, this time it's among four pure bloggers -- Tobias S. Buckell, Stephen Green, Laurence Simon, YAYsports!. In some ways it's more interesting than yesterday's session, although less serious at points. Even though he was outnumbered (being a UN supporter) overall, yesterday's input by Peng Hwa Ang with his knowledge of nuts and bolts issues was important.

Do take a look at today's chat if you're interested in the issue: Whose Internet is It Anyway? (Part 2)

Europe's "Good Jews"

Here's an excellent piece in Commentary by Emanuele Ottolenghi:

Europe's "Good Jews"

...Unlike the case in pre-Enlightenment Europe, present-day anti-Semitism does not expect Jews to abandon their religion. Today’s Europe is a self-consciously multicultural society. Although it cherishes secularism above all, it respects, if somewhat warily, religious pluralism. What the enlightened sector of today’s Europe would like Jews to do, in exchange for fully approved membership in the circle of approved opinion, is to renounce a core component of their identity: that is, their sense of Jewish peoplehood as expressed through their attachment and commitment to the democratic state of Israel and to the Zionist enterprise.

What remains constant is that, as in both pre- and post-Enlightenment Europe, today’s European elite has its good Jews and its bad Jews. There are the Jews whom it embraces, encourages, and celebrates; and then there are the Jews whom it chastises and condemns. For the former, there will always be a place of honor in the European sun. On the latter, today’s officially pluralist and tolerant Europe has turned its back. Is it any wonder, then, that some "good Jews" have chosen to live in the light, stopping only to burnish their qualifications by noisily joining the chorus that has consigned their fellow Jews to the dark?

Flawed narrative history, shame, self-doubt, and the human need to belong have created some very damaging psychologies in some otherwise intelligent people.

PC(USA)-Hizballah Backgrounder

The Judeo-Christian Alliance has released a backgrounder concerning Presbyterian Church (USA) contacts with Hizballah.

Here it is in PDF

Since June 2004, officials from the Presbyterian Church (USA) have met at least three times with representatives from Hezbollah, an Iranian- and Syrian backed terror organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the U.S. and to the creation of an Islamist state in Lebanon.

Some Presbyterian leaders have attempted to characterize these meetings as efforts to promote peace in the Middle East. In fact these meetings legitimize a group that murders Israeli civilians and which seeks to turn Lebanon into a radical Islamist state.

The Presbyterian Church (USA) is not the only church whose officials have met with Hezbollah, but it is by far the worst offender. Despite Hezbollah’s undeniable efforts to kill Israeli civilians, officials from the Presbyterian Church (USA) have continued to meet with this group...


Shoebat Update

Terror Insurance

Not for you, but your tax dollars (and EU money) are going to support it. Here's more on the Palestinian Authority's payments to "martyr" families and prisoners (see also here). 10% of the PA's budget, 10% is going to be going to subsidize the war against Israel and the West and our aid is going to pay for it. Congress should do something about it now.

The PA's New Terror Law

...Enacting a special law to financially support terrorists will ensure that this kind of activity continues. Each shahid’s family will receive a monthly stipend of at least $250. The family of a married shahid will receive an additional $50. Parents will receive an additional $25, and each additional child and/or brother or sister will get another $15.

This new budget to support the families of suicide bombers comes on the heels of the recent approval of another new law providing more than $50 million per year to support Palestinian terrorists in Israeli prisons and Palestinian terrorists wounded while attacking Israel.

According to the latest figures from the Palestinian Authority, 3,746 Palestinians were killed to date during the second Intifada (September 2000 - December 2005). Many of them were killed while engaging in terrorist attacks against Israel. The budget for this group alone is more than $11 million per year.

Add the financial support now enacted by law to the families, spouses, children and siblings and the budget will increase by at least $20 million annually. This new law is not limited only to the suicide bombers of the second Intifada, but includes all the Palestinian suicide bombers since this practice began – thereby, adding many more millions of dollars to the budget for more terrorists. For example, covering the basic monthly grant for the 1,533 Palestinian terrorists who participated in the first Intifada (1987 - 1993), will total more than $4.5 million per year.

This law provides legitimacy to the “armed struggle” and elevates terrorists to the status of “national heroes.” [But we knew that already, didn't we? -S]

According to official Palestinian sources, the PA is transferring $4 million every month to Palestinian terrorists held in Israeli prisons. In total, support for the “martyr families,” prisoners and the wounded could reach more than 10 percent ($100 million) of the PA’s national $1 billion budget...

When you subsidize, you get more, when you provide a safety-net, you remove risk and get more of the same. We should not be contributing.

Rumsfeld on progress and message

Donald Rumsfeld made an important speech yesterday, worth reading in full, but here's a snip. (H/T Mal):

The Future of Iraq (Paul Nitze School of Advanced International Studies)

...Consider this: You couldn’t tell the full story of Iwo Jima simply by listing the nearly 26,000 Americans that were casualties in a brief 40 days at Iwo Jima; or you couldn’t explain the importance of Grant’s push into Virginia just by noting the savagery of the battles. And they were savage. So too, in Iraq, it is appropriate to note not only how many Americans have been killed -- and may God bless them and their families -- but what they died for -- or more accurately, what they lived for.

So I suggest -- and I take for granted the good intentions of the people in the media -- I suggest that we ask: how will history judge -- if it does -- the reporting some decades from now when Iraq’s path is settled?...

That's very gentlemanly of him, I'm sure. But I'm not sure that what he takes for granted is really true, is it? Many in the media, believing that American "Imperialism" must be curbed and not rewarded (I include many in the American media here, of course), really do wish ill for our efforts. It's just the cold truth.

Our country is waging a battle unlike any other in history. We are waging it in a media age that’s unlike any war that war fighters have ever known. Think of it. This is the first war of the 21st Century. It’s the first war to be conducted with talk radio, and 24-hour news, and bloggers, and emails, and digital cameras, and Sony video cams, and all of these things that bring so much information near instantaneously to people. And in this new century, we all need to make adjustments -- government and the media alike. And change is hard -- let there be no doubt.

The "and bloggers" part? See you don't know this, but when he said that, he scratched his nose, which is our secret signal that he was talking about Solomonia.com. Yeah, it's true.

He who pays the piper...

...calls the tune. Here's the story of how relative "moderates" become radical. Worth reading in full. (via Jihad Watch)

Expert: Saudis have radicalized 80% of US mosques

Mainstream US Muslim organizations are heavily influenced by Saudi-funded extremists, according to Yehudit Barsky, an expert on terrorism at the American Jewish Committee.

Worse still, Barsky told The Jerusalem Post last week, these "extremist organizations continue to claim the mantle of leadership" over American Islam.

The power of the extremist Wahhabi form of Islam in the United States was created with generous Saudi financing of American Muslim communities over the past few decades. Over 80 percent of the mosques in the United States "have been radicalized by Saudi money and influence," Barsky said.

Before the 1970s, she explained, "Muslim immigrants who came to the United States would build a store-front mosque somewhere. Then, since the 1970s, the Saudis have been approaching these mosques and telling them it wasn't proper for the glory of Islam to build such small mosques."

Continue reading "He who pays the piper..."

Sarkozy Backs Finkielkraut

Straight-shooting Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy has come out strongly in defense of French philospher Alain Finkielkraut:

France's Sarkozy backs beleaguered Finkielkraut over Muslim riot comments

Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Sarkozy said: "Monsieur Finkielkraut is an intellectual who brings honor and pride to French wisdom ... If there is so much criticism of him, it might be because he says things that are correct."

The minister was asked about Finkielkraut because several reporters saw similarities between the conservative views the philosopher expressed about the recent riots in France and the tough stance the minister took in dealing with the agitators who took to the street night after night...

...Sarkozy appeared ready to take on the media. He had been following the attacks on Finkielkraut for two weeks and was waiting for a suitable opportunity. "What do you want of him?" he asked the media representatives. "M. Finkielkraut does not consider himself obliged to follow the monolithic thinking of many intellectuals, which led to Le Pen winning 24 percent in the elections. The philosophers who frequent the salons and live between Cafe de Flor and Boulevard St. Germain suddenly find that France no longer bears a resemblance to them."

This is an unprecedented attack on the left wing by the very person who is seen by many French as being the only one capable of preventing the disintegration of the republic. The cafes and bistros of Boulevard St. Germain and the narrow alleyways of St. Germain-des-Pres were traditionally frequented by members of the left, led by Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, who would take their morning coffee and read the newspapers there. When the socialists came to power under Francois Mitterand in 1981, the celebrations there were legendary. But of late, the area has lost some of its left-wing color...

Update: H/T to Michael B. in the comments for the pointer to this excellent article at Transatlantic Intelligencer that sheds even more light on the subject (and puts heat back on Haaretz and Le Monde): Is Freedom of Thought Under Threat in France? BY Michel Gurfinkiel

Monday, December 5, 2005

Fact Checking Chomsky

Power Line reports that a third-year Harvard Law student has fact-checked many of the claims made by Noam Chomsky in his recent debate against Alan Dershowitz. Well worth checking out.

Webber fact-checks Chomsky

...I'm working on compiling a list of verifiably false remarks that Chomsky made at the debate on Tuesday. Please note, I'm distinguishing objective factual errors from Chomsky's run-of-the-mill ludicrous theories about US-Israeli "rejectionism," media conspiracies of silence, and nefarious plots to destroy Iran. For example, I'm not including Chomsky's support for this comment including Ronald Reagan among "an iconic group of mass murderers -- from Hitler to Idi Amin to [Shimon] Peres." That's a matter of opinion, no matter how outrageous. I'll stick to the facts...

Venezuela Roundup

Robert Mayer of Publius Pundit has an excellent roundup of Venezuela election coverage over at PJM. It sounds a lot like the last Iranian election -- no confidence from the masses and wide-spread boycotting. The only thing missing this time around is Jimmy Carter showing up and declaring everything okalie-dokalie...

UN Control of the Internet

There's an interesting live "Blogjam" going on at PJM right now, here.

Participants: Michael Barone of US News & World Report, Perry De Havilland of Samzdata, Franklin Cudjoe of Imani Ghana and Peng Hwa Ang of the UN’s Working Group on Internet Governance and Dan Gillmor of Grassroots Media Inc.

Islam’s mystical claim on Jerusalem

James M. Arlandson writes at The American Thinker concerning Muslim claims to Jerusalem, with particular emphasis on the Christian perspective: Islam’s mystical claim on Jerusalem

Three faiths have claimed ownership over Jerusalem. Plain ancient history favors Jewish ownership over the holy city. Christians claimed control of it at various moments in history, but no sound theological or historical claim can or should be made for ownership. Yet many Muslims today claim Jerusalem as theirs. Islam’s claim on Jerusalem can be questioned because of two dubious reasons and because these shaky reasons come too late in history...

Also of interest is the companion piece, The Truth about Islamic Crusades and Imperialism

(via Dhimmi Watch)

Also, see these three articles by Daniel Pipes:

If I Forget Thee: Does Jerusalem Really Matter to Islam?
Jerusalem Means More to Jews Than to Muslims
The Muslim Claim to Jerusalem

Because it can't be all politics all the time

Nidra Poller on l'affair Finkielkraut

Nidra Poller has some more in-depth background on l'affair Finkielkraut in this Tech Central column:

The Riot Act

...A slapdash French (re-)translation by notorious Israel-bashers Michel Warshavski and Michèle Sibony was rapidly posted by the French Jewish Union for Peace (UJFP) under the title, "They're not miserable they're Muslim." Once the sharks had drawn blood a motley crew of French journalists, scholars, and all-purpose intellectuals rushed to devour the man who dared to speak his mind, inadvertently exposing their own mental and ethical poverty in the process.

Here in France, where no accusation against America or Israel is too scurrilous for official dissemination and mass consumption, Finkielkraut was beaten almost senseless for developing, with utmost precaution, a thoughtful analysis of the riots...

For background see these previous posts: Finkielkraut: Left Behind, Finkielkraut doesn't recognize himself and finally, OK, maybe Finkielkraut didn't recant...?

(via Roger L. Simon)

Update: Nidra has a special report at PJM today from Paris. I admit I'm not sure if it's a literal report or a metaphor. Can anyone clarify?

Princeton Cancels Appearance by Walid Shoebat and Friends - Too Inflammatory

What a load of you-know-what. The campuses are full of Jew haters and Israel-smashers, and three men willing to step forward and tell it like it is from their own experiences are the ones who get shut out. Disgusting.

From Walid Shoebat's site:

Princeton U Says Campus Event Against Terrorism is "too inflammatory"

PRINCETON, NJ: In clear violation of free speech, Princeton University has cancelled a speaking event by three former Middle East terrorists because it says that the use of the word "terrorist" in the promotion for the event is "too inflammatory."

The speakers will hold a press conference near the campus on Thursday, Dec. 8, at 6:00 p.m. The location will be announced in an updated media release the morning of the press conference.

"We believe Princeton is using red tape to stop the event," said Keith Davies, the executive director of the Walid Shoebat Foundation.

The event organizers planned to bring Walid Shoebat, Ibrahim Abdallah and Zak Anani to the Ivy League school to lecture on the terrorist mindset and how they were indoctrinated into terrorism.

Walid Shoebat is from a prominent family in Bethlehem. After joining the PLO, he took part in numerous acts of violence against Israel including the bombing of a bank. He was also involved in the attempted lynching of an Israeli soldier. Feature stories on Mr. Shoebat have aired on the BBC, FOX News, MSNBC, CBS and have been published in the Telegraph and Calgary Sun.

Zak Anani was a leader of the most notorious Arab gangs prior to Lebanese civil war. Before he age 16, he killed numerous Arabs in gang warfare and hated the West.

Ibrahim Abadallah was born and raised in Dearborn Michigan to a Jordanian father. At 17 he emigrated to Israel, where he joined the PLO. He injured many Israelis while rioting and throwing Molotov cocktails at them.


Red Crystal

Here's more on MDA and the new symbol. Yes, there are benefits to the acceptance, and yes, there were other groups wanting in, and yes, the MDA will still use the star, albeit within the red diamond:

JPost: Red Cross to adopt new neutral symbol

Magen David Adom, Israel's rescue, blood supply and first-aid organization, has waited more than half a century for this: On Tuesday, the International Red Cross Movement in Geneva is due to approve the addition of a neutral "crystal" symbol, alongside the Red Cross and the Red Crescent, leading to the inclusion of MDA and other unrecognized national agencies as full-fledged members.

MDA chairman Dr. Noam Yifrach said Monday that he hopes the international organization approves the new symbol, because no organization can become a member without an official symbol. MDA, he said, has already carried out a long series of organization changes including a change in its constitution, in order to meet its requirements.

Yifrach added that with its expected membership in the international organization, MDA will receive various grants and allocations that will make possible the improvement of its rescue services in Israel. Thus Israeli residents will gain from the long-awaited step...

...In 2000, a compromise was reached in which the International Red Cross agreed to adopt a third, neutral red symbol shaped liked a diamond but called a crystal. Any national society - not only Israel but also Eritrea and Kazakhstan - could accept it and become members with full rights...

Yes, the world is still full of bigotted, pin-headed crap. Yes, this may still be an example of it, but I have a hard time ranting about it at this point. We'll just remember how long it took even to get to this compromise point and what it says about the so-called "international community."

El Baradei: Iran only months away from a bomb

But don't actually do anything about it...

JPost: El Baradei: Iran only months away from a bomb

IAEA chairman Muhammad ElBaradei on Monday confirmed Israel's assessment that Iran is only a few months away from creating an atomic bomb.

If Teheran indeed resumed its uranium enrichment in other plants, as threatened, it will take it only "a few months" to produce a nuclear bomb, El-Baradei told The Independent.

On the other hand, he warned, any attempt to resolve the crisis by non-diplomatic means would "open a Pandora's box. There would be efforts to isolate Iran; Iran would retaliate; and at the end of the day you have to go back to the negotiating table to find the solution."

You know what? I hate to say it, but he's right. International sanctions are always too leaky to work, especially with a "black-cash" flush country like Iran. A showdown will lead nowhere. There is no viable military option. There's no ability or will for an invasion, nor target for a surgical strike. No matter what, it'll be back to the round and round at the negotiating table. If there really were something called a "United Nations," something could be done, but since the idea of such a thing in reality is pure fantasy, Iran's nuclear program is going to go ahead. That's just the way it is.

(H/T to BornIn1965 in the forum)

Update: DailyPundit has some important linking and commentary.

Five Dead (for now) Many More Wounded

Another major terror attack:

Suicide Bombing Kills at Least Five in Israel

JERUSALEM, Dec. 5 -- A Palestinian man detonated an explosive device Monday morning outside a crowded shopping mall in the seaside city of Netanya, killing at least five Israelis and himself while wounding more than 30 others.

The suicide attack was the first in Israel [successfully carried out -S] since late October, when a bomber killed six Israelis at an outdoor market in the nearby city of Hadera, and the second to strike Netanya's Hasharon Mall this year...

...Witnesses described a huge blast that shook the walls of the glass-and-steel mall and left bodies scattered in the intersection at the eastern entrance to the city, which sits about 10 miles from the West Bank border marked by Israel's separation barrier.

"An enormous mushroom cloud of smoke rose from the place," Zion Vatouri, the owner of the Auto Plus car dealership across from the mall, told the Israeli news Web site Ynet. "The injured were screaming. The image etched in my mind was of a man wearing a light-blue shirt lying there, not moving. Only after they covered him with a blanket did I know he was dead."

It was initially unclear who was responsible for the attack, which occurred around 11:30 a.m. local time. But it appeared to be the work of Islamic Jihad, a small radical Palestinian faction that rejects Israel's right to exist.

An official for the group asserted responsibility for the bombing in a telephone call to the al-Manar satellite television channel. The station is owned by Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite Muslim movement at war with Israel, which like Islamic Jihad receives a portion of its funding from Iran...

Abu Mazen said:

"Those who are responsible should be hunted down by the Palestinian police. The Palestinian Authority will have no tolerance for such actions."

But as Judith Apter Klinghoffer points out:

This week, he approved the budget designed to take care of families of such terrorists to whom the PA refers to in official documents as Shahids, i.e., "martyrs." Each family will get $250 a month from the PA. Married ones get an extra $50 and children $25 per child. All in all, $11,000,000 will be paid by these official terror paymasters to the families of men they supposedly condemn. Of course, these families receive additional sums from "charities."

WaPo: Democrats Find Iraq Alternative Is Elusive

WaPo: Democrats Find Iraq Alternative Is Elusive

Around the country, many grass-roots Democrats are clamoring for a quick withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. On Capitol Hill, Democratic politicians have grown newly aggressive in denouncing the Bush administration's war strategy and outlining other options.

But among the Democratic foreign-policy elite, dominated by people who previously served in the top ranks of government, there are stark differences -- and significant vagueness -- about a viable alternative...

Y'think?

The Cabal Meets

Israel continues to live under an existential cloud, antisemitism is resurgent worldwide, a major American Muslim group is abusing the courts to stifle criticism, and this is what the most powerful American Jewish groups decide to hold a meeting over? Good grief.

Washington Times: Jewish leaders to devise strategy

A group of Jewish leaders meets in New York this week to develop a response to the religious right, which they say is eroding civil liberties and planning to "christianize America."

Led by Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, the private meeting is set for today, said an assistant to Mr. Yoffie.

Both men were unavailable for comment Friday, and neither organization would divulge details of the meeting, including who else is attending and where it is being held.

But the meeting is the culmination of a month of attacks by Mr. Foxman and Mr. Yoffie on conservative Christian groups, starting with Mr. Foxman's speech Nov. 3 at an ADL function in New York.

"We face a better-financed, more sophisticated, coordinated, unified, energized and organized coalition of groups in opposition to our policy positions on church-state separation than ever before," he said. "Their goal is to implement their Christian worldview. To Christianize America. To save us."

The horror.

4th Annual Warblogger Awards

John Hawkins of Right Wing News has posted the results of the latest blogosphere popularity contest. He had kindly asked me for my votes and I'm always frustrated to read the final tally and realise how many good blogs and columnists I forgot to include. You may want to take a look yourself.

Sunday, December 4, 2005

Not optimistic on Munich

Spielberg on his new film according to Drudge:

"The director tells TIMES [sic - that's Time] he's very proud of the fact that MUNICH doesn't demonize either the Israeli or Palestinian side."

It does not inspire confidence that the maker of a film about the massacre of Olympic athletes is proud that his work fails to demonize anyone.

The Second Draft Blog

Haveil Havalim #47

Moving South and East

CNN: Romania to set up U.S. air bases

Romania and the United States will sign a deal Tuesday to set up U.S. military bases in the Black Sea country, the Foreign Ministry says.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will sign the accord in a brief visit to Bucharest during a European trip which also includes stops in Germany and Brussels.

"Signing the Access Agreement is an essential step in consolidating the strategic partnership between Romania and the United States," the ministry said in a statement Friday...

...Romania, which joined NATO in 2004, is grateful to Washington for supporting its bid to enter the Atlantic alliance, and has been a staunch ally of U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The ministry did not give the exact location of the bases, but President Traian Basescu has said possible sites included Babadag, close to the Danube delta, Mihail Kogalniceanu near the Black Sea and Fetesti, 200 km (125 miles) east of Bucharest...

...Washington aims to pull about 70,000 troops out of Europe and Asia during the next decade. It will shift its European focus eastwards and will close Cold War bases in favor of small, flexible facilities closer to hot spots such as the Middle East...


Marriott Caves to Pressure

(Actually, my title isn't quite right. There was no pressure -- just fear.)

The Marriott Hotel chain has refused to host a conference of The People's Truth Forum. CAIR they're OK with, however.

Hey, you know what, they probably do risk more hosting PTF than they do CAIR, and that should serve as a warning for the future.

Details here, at Dhimmi Watch, Kaufman and Epstein: CAIR Hotel Hell

(Hat Tips: Jerusalem Posts and Daily Scorecard)

Fallout for the PC(USA)

The blowback continues for the Presbyterian Church (USA) following the latest reported meeting between a group of Presbyterians and the Lebanese terrorist group Hizballah. (See this entry for a link to the MEMRI report on the latest meeting.)

PC(USA) officials are now busy one their phones and faxes distancing themselves from any official sanction of the trip and meeting. The ADL (and AJC) has even taken a break from punishing our friends and rewarding our enemies to strongly condemn the trip with laudable zeal:

...It is unconscionable that Presbyterian leaders would meet with Hezbollah, which our government designates as a foreign terrorist organization. Hezbollah (Party of God) has a track record of terror that is unambiguous. It pioneered the use of suicide bombing in the Middle East. It is committed to the destruction of Israel, opposition to the West and the establishment of an Iranian-style militant Islamic fundamentalist state. Prior to Sept. 11, Hezbollah had murdered more Americans than any other terrorist organization...

..Hezbollah's reign of terror continues today. Just last week, Hezbollah attacked northern Israel in an attempt to capture Israelis. Hezbollah's satellite TV station, al-Manar ("The Beacon"), continues to broadcast messages of hate and violence, including raw anti-Semitic charges like the blood libel – the charge that Jews murder non-Jews to use their blood in religious ceremonies.

Hezbollah is interested in murder, not co-existence. It is an obstacle to peace that must be opposed at every opportunity. As America wages a war on terror, we cannot understand why Presbyterian leaders would meet with terrorists who have the blood of innocent people on their hands.

Continue reading "Fallout for the PC(USA)"

Friday, December 2, 2005

The Rope to Hang Us

Saddam's biggest weapons sugar daddy (what, you thought it was the US?) is getting busy with the Mullahs now.

AP: Russia to Sell Missiles to Iran

MOSCOW - Russia has agreed to sell more than $1 billion worth of missiles and other defense systems to Iran, Russian news media reported Friday, a move expected to draw a heated reaction from the United States.

The Interfax and ITAR-Tass news agencies cited unidentified sources in the Russian military-industrial complex as saying that Russian and Iranian officials had signed contracts in November that would send up to 30 Tor-M1 missile systems to Iran over the next two years.

Interfax said the Tor-M1 system could identify up to 48 targets and fire at two targets simultaneously at a height of up to 20,000 feet.

The news agency quoted its source as saying the two countries had reached a deal on modernizing Iran's air force inventory, as well.

(via LGF)

Edit: Of course, it probably pays to remember that Russian equipment, highly vaunted or not, hasn't had much success when it's come to open warfare with the West.

Update: Don't worry, though: Russia: Weapons supplied to Iran for defensive purposes only

Good gig. First you help turn Iran nuclear, then you sell them the weapons to protect the product.

This is Second Draft material

PJM has a collection of links on the hoax "insurgent takeover" of Ramadi that AP (and Reuters?) stringers propagated to a credulous Western press. In fact, Reuters still appears not to have reconsidered their story.

Ranting Profs:

And what is AP saying about this?

Ironically, if you go to AP's home page and click on "Iraq" for latest stories, you find this, but nothing about APTV having possibly passed off a hoax to their subscribers.

Interesting, no? Whether or not paying for the placement of accurate stories should be a scandal, two things are true: first, it is now a scandal, and no one is questioning the stories' accuracy. Here we have a situation where one of the two wire services that all six American news networks rely on overwhelmingly for their footage, and therefore for their reporting (television being, indeed, a visual medium) and therefore one of the primary sources shaping the perception of the American people of the war in Iraq may well have just passed on a hoax, and not just any hoax but an enemy information operation.

This is exactly the type of thing that The Second Draft is all about. It wasn't just that day at Netzarim Junction, it's an ongoing phenomenon.

Good on Bolton...and Canada

This adds more to yesterday's welcome story, Pushing for balance at the UN:

Bolton Says Palestinian Resolutions Demonstrate UN Irrelevance

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said the United Nations General Assembly demonstrated its irrelevance today by adopting six resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including non-binding calls for Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and Golan Heights.

The General Assembly, consisting of all 191 member governments, passed resolutions very similar to measures introduced annually by Arab nations for at least 30 years. The U.S. was joined by no more than seven other nations in rejecting the resolutions, which won up to 160 votes.

``These resolutions are purely symbolic,'' Bolton told reporters at the UN. ``It is one reason why many people say the UN is not really useful in solving actual problems. We have been making enormous progress toward solutions in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and that progress has benefited from UN participation, but it does not benefit from needless repetition of meaningless resolutions in the General Assembly.''

Bolton, who has pressed UN member governments to reduce the number of General Assembly resolutions, said it was up to them to ``decide they want to do things that are relevant.''...

And this, from our occasional friends north of the border is also a welcome sign (Hat Tip to BornIn1965 in the forum):

Ottawa set to reject anti-Israel resolutions

...Canada has traditionally abstained on a slew of resolutions introduced annually in the United Nations General Assembly, but, this year, it signalled it will join the United States and only a few other countries in voting against three of them, arguing they are one-sided and unhelpful for the peace process...

...In a speech in the General Assembly yesterday, Gilbert Laurin, Canada's second-in-command at the UN, said Ottawa is unhappy with the body's tradition of passing numerous resolutions that only add to the rancour in the region.

The language of the resolutions "creates a sense of imbalance, and seems to suggest that it is only Israel that has obligations," said Mr. Laurin, who spoke because Ambassador Allan Rock was travelling.

"The responsibilities of other actors, including Palestinians, are often not sufficiently emphasized, nor are references to Israeli security needs. Canada will not support resolutions that use emotive and provocative language in place of the straight facts."

Took 'em a while to catch on. Hope it sticks and spreads.

Films you won't see at Sundance

The films of French filmmaker, Pierre Rehov, according to this article at FrontPage: A Filmmaker for Israel by Michael Margolies

...Disappointingly, a prestigious festival such as Sundance seems to go out of its way to present only one side of the Israeli/Palestinian story. So despite Rehov’s record of accomplishment, which includes some international recognition, particularly with “The Road to Jenin”, Lisa Magnus, Rehov’s North American representative, fellow editor and collaborator, told me that Sundance will not even return her calls or even pay her the small courtesy of acknowledging receipt of public relations packages...

Unfortunately, Rehov's films don't seem to be available at NetFlix.

Here is an entry I wrote after seeing Rehov's film, The Silent Exodus, in the presence of Bat Ye'or and David Littman back in March of ''04.

(Hat Tip: Jerusalem Posts)

What if you don't accept the premise?

NE Republican reports that Massachusetts Congressman Marty Meehan will be holding two town-meeting style events on the Iraq War in Hudson and Concord:

Nearly three years after being misled into war in Iraq, the United States still does not have a plan to succeed and bring our troops home. The Bush Administration says we should stay the course in Iraq. I disagree. But, I want to hear your thoughts.

I'm thinking there'll be a lot of like-minded Volvo drivers showing up.

Starting 'em young in Germany

Ray D. reports on the way in which young Germans are prepared for a future life of anti-Americanism.

David's Medienkritik: Germany's Lilipuz: Indoctrinating Tomorrow's Little America Haters Today

"Is there some law against reporting on positive things happening in Iraq in the German media? It would certainly seem so..."

An Evening with Abu Toameh

Hat tip to Mal for the pointer to this article about a recent visit by Jerusalem Post reporter Khaled Abu Toameh to a Philly Temple.

Through Arab Eyes - An Israeli-Arab journalist's unique and surprising perspective

When challenged as to Israel’s “hidden agenda” in perpetuating the violence, Abu Toameh responded to the questioner:

“Explain to me what the Israeli occupation has to do with the total absence of a free Palestinian press;

“Explain to me what the occupation has to do with the Palestinian Authority funneling off $6.5 billion in international aid to their own personal bank accounts?

“Explain to me why, after years of misery and billions of dollars of aid money made available, not one hospital, not one housing project, has been built in the Palestinian refugee camps?

But hasn’t there been a dramatic change in the Palestinian Authority following Arafat’s death? The way Abu Toameh sees it, Mahmoud Abbas is probably a decent man, one who would like there to be real change and movement toward peace. But the problem is that although Arafat is dead, Arafatism lives...

... In mid-November U.S. Secretary of State Condeleeza Rice spoke at a press conference in Israel and praised Abbas for reducing incitement in the Arab media, Abu Toameh said he laughed. In his hands he was holding three different Palestinian papers, all of which had as their headlines, “Israel setting free wild pigs to drive Arabs from their land.”...

Thursday, December 1, 2005

Co-opting Human Rights at UMass -- an Update

Remember that lecture by Dr. Alice Rothchild of Visions of Peace with Justice in Israel/Palestine that the local University of Massachusetts chapter of Physicians for Human Rights sponsored? I posted about it here: Co-opting Human Rights at UMass. You may not remember the post, but maybe you'll remember this graphic from the poster:

I've been forwarded a letter sent from two UMass students to the college administration following the talk. To say they were none-too-pleased might be an understatement. I've snipped their names from the end since I haven't gotten the OK to print them yet. I've also included a portion of another less-formal on the scene report. I was going to save this stuff for another time, but as my emailer reminds me, it's important to get this stuff on the record, and I think this is interesting on its own. It's not Human Rights work, it's political propaganda.

Everything's in the extended entry.

Continue reading "Co-opting Human Rights at UMass -- an Update"

Are secular substitutes an acceptible stand-in for actual Judaism?

I am blessed with some really great commenters, emailers and guest bloggers here. Here's an email I thought I'd bump up (with the author's permission) to its own post. Some very good food for thought here, and a view of the internal Israeli debate (and dispora Jewish debate for that matter) that's well worth your time. Don't be fooled by the title. This isn't a topic only of interest to the religious.

Background: This comes as a continuation of an email exchange that also surfaced in the comments to this post: 'Colleges see anti-Semitism rise'.

"Ben-David" writes:

Post-Enlightenment Jewry turned desperately to various "alternative Judaisms" that would ease their path to assimilation. Both nationalism - membership in a modern democracy - and socialism were trumpeted as containing the core moral messages of Judaism, with none of the onerous ritual burdens.

Then the "National-Socialists" (AKA NaZis) came and proved these Jews wrong.

Now the final "substitute Judaism" - liberalism - is turning in on the Jews who first framed its modern agenda of "human rights",
"standing up for the underdog" and "social justice".

All these slogans are now turned against the Jews.

How about trying Judaism?

To which I responded:

Interesting point, and I see what you are getting at both here and in the email you sent (which I still haven't had a chance to do justice to yet). Good food for thought.

I would say my feeling that religion functions in our society as a sort of Constitution of moral behavior, and the consequent great distaste I have for the various and gratuitous attacks on religion I've been seeing going on in American (and European) society is my way of actualizing this realization.

This would all be fodder for another post or two, but in short, I can't practice rituals I don't feel, but I can at least respect them when others practice them. (As far as practicing formal Judaism goes.)

You've expressed your point very well, though, and I'm with you in spirit.

This prompted a very thoughtful email response that you will find included in full in the extended entry.

Continue reading "Are secular substitutes an acceptible stand-in for actual Judaism?"

The Real Gulag, North Korea Version

A few days ago I finished reading The Aquariums of Pyongyang, by Kang Chol-Hwan. The book is the memoir of a young North Korean boy who, along with his entire family, is shipped off to the North Korean gulag of Yodok. He describes their time there, their subsequent release and his escape over the border into China and finally to freedom in South Korea.

The reading experience was reminicent of Anne Applebaum's, Gulag : A History-- both books extremely important, though Kang's is more personal and shorter. I excerpted small selections of Applebaum's book in a series of seven entries you can find here if you missed them.

In that spirit, here is a very short quote from Kang's memoir (p. 87):

...There were only seven outhouses with four places each for an entire village of two to three thousand people. We did our business Turkish style, squatting over a tank we did our best not to dwell upon. No paper, of course. Each visitor had to come prepared with his own supply of sufficiently wide leaves. Bean and sesame leaves worked best. In July, during the rainy season, there was the danger of overflow; but it was much worse in winter, when the excrement froze and gradually built up toward the lip of the latrine. The detainees then were forced to choose between chiseling away at the growing mountain of excrement with a pickax or getting up in the middle of the night and diffing a new hole of their own. If you chose the latter, it was worthwhile keeping track of the location, because you might later want to retrieve what you buried and use it to fertilize your vegetable bed.

Applebaum's book is a tribute to memory, but Kang's book is the story of life as it is being lived right now. His description of life in North Korea -- one of the world's largest open-air prisons -- is hard to imagine, and this is before the famine of the late 90's. To give you an idea of how tough life in the North was and is, when Kang crosses over into China, he's amazed by the extraordinary wealth and freedom he finds there.(!!)

Consider giving The Aquariums of Pyongyang a try. It's a quick, but important, read.

Update: Just noticed this timely post at Mick Hartley's.

The Incredibles

Just watched the whole thing again and all I can say is "brilliant." Truly great filmmaking. The voice casting, the story, the pace...the composition of the shots and the motions of the characters...brilliant.

Thanks for the Azure

Thanks to the reader who got me a dead-tree subscription to the Israeli magazine, Azure. My first copy arrived, very nicely wrapped in brown paper. It's a very meaty magazine. Much appreciated.

Pushing for balance at the UN

JTA: U.S.: Shut down Palestinian committees

A senior American adviser at the U.N. General Assembly called for the elimination of two bodies that support the Palestinian agenda at the United Nations.

The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and the Division of Palestinian Rights within the Secretariat “perpetuate a skewed and biased approach to the Middle East conflict,” said Robert O’Brien, senior U.S. adviser to the 60th session of the General Assembly.

O’Brien made his remarks Wednesday, a day before the General Assembly was scheduled to vote on extending the mandates of three so-called Palestinian committees and on other resolutions regarding Israel and the Middle East. “Endorsing resolutions that condemn Israeli actions but that fail to address Palestinian actions or inactions have real consequences,” he said. “One-sided resolutions such as these before us today undermine the ability of the United Nations to play a constructive role in furthering peace.”

Think Bolton had anything to do with this? How about disolving the UNRWA into the UNHCR? That would be another nice start.

Update: Hat Tip to Michael B. in the comments (which I have to pay more attention to!) for the link to this article with much more info: Move to Shrink Palestinian Programmes Spurs Protest (via IRIS)

Fighting the Israeli Islamic Movement

I received a fund-raising mailing from an Israeli legal group, Shurat HaDin, that seeks to use the Israeli legal system 'the way the Southern Poverty Law Center in the United States brought the Klu Klux Klan and the neo-Nazi hate groups to an operational standstill' against the Israeli-Arab Islamic Movement -- something they characterize as a fifth column. I think the issue is interesting enough, and the mailing informational enough, to link to, but since I can't find it on the group's site, I've included the entire text of the email in the extended entry below (sans graphics).

Continue reading "Fighting the Israeli Islamic Movement"

When is a Jew Allowed to be a Jew?

Another Banagor rant, this time on the issue of the limited acceptance of Magen Dovid Adom (Israel's Red Cross - the Red Star of David) into the International Red Cross movement: When is a Jew Allowed to be a Jew?

...Think for a moment how any Muslim would feel if the ICRC told the Islamic nations that the red crescent is seen as a symbol of a swastika by Jews around the world, and could they please change it? There would be an uproar. Suicide bombers would be blowing themselves up left and right because of the “insult” to Islam. And does anyone truly expect that the red cross will change to accommodate the over-sensitive feelings of Muslims around the world? Would Christian nations as a whole allow that sort of thing to happen?

But Jews are different because everyone expects them to be good little Jews. They were once told to wear that symbol as a humiliation and mark them as different and lower than anyone else. Then it was fine for everyone to see a Jew walking around with that badge on their coat or arm, and no fuss was ever raised. And now, they are told not to wear it, because it is offensive to see Jews as free people with a land of their own...

I find this to be a very sticky issue. Of course we never want to compromise our principles, and seeking to expose hypocrisy wherever it may dwell is an important thing. But the MDA also has a bigger job that may go beyond the day-to-day issues of Jewish acceptance -- a job that goes on whether they are accepted, or even if they are hated -- that is their purely humanitarian mission. It seems obvious to me that MDA has compromised principle slightly in order to further thier humanitarian mission, and I'm not going to second guess them for that. That shouldn't stop the rest of us pointing out the fact that they had to make such a compromise and why and also what that says and means, however.

Two Views of Muhammad

Ali. The boxer.

First, a very positive review of the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Kentucky in OpinionJournal:

Inspired by the Champ - A visit to the new Muhammad Ali Center.

...As an athlete, Mr. Ali had the magical ability to attract interest in his bouts from those who were not ordinarily boxing fans. However, a fascination with boxing will certainly enhance a visitor's experience of the center. Though there are many exhibits that would fit well in a civil-rights museum and others that explore the debate over the Vietnam War, the boxing-related presentations (such as the robe that Elvis Presley gave Mr. Ali) pack the real punch. Many are just plain fun. There is a mock-up of Mr. Ali's Deer Lake training facilities in which visitors can learn to hit a speed bag, and there is a strange contraption that conveys an impression of the force of a heavyweight punch...

And then there's the other side, presented in this piece by Daniel Pipes - the second of two:

Muhammad Ali's "Beautiful Soul"

o Ali knowingly betrayed Malcolm X, a betrayal that led at least indirectly to Malcolm's assassination.
  • Ali publicly turned his back on his press secretary, Leon 4X Ameer, which led to Ameer's death.
  • When Nation of Islam activists executed five friends and family of the Hanafi sect—four of them children—Ali did not quit the Nation or even publicly protest. Nor did the media ask him to.
  • For at least four years running Ali publicly degraded Joe Frazier, often along the crudest racial lines. "There's a great honor about Joe," says baseball great Reggie Jackson. "That was evident in the way he fought. And Muhammad ridiculed Joe; he humiliated him in front of the world."
  • Ali also verbally and physically abused Floyd Patterson and Ernie Terrell, two men who did not deserve it...

Etc...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]