Amazon.com Widgets

June 2006 Archives

Friday, June 30, 2006

Why is Israel back in Gaza?

Bowdlerizing the murder of a kid

Harry at Squaring the Boston Globe catches the Globe in a sin of omission: Whitewashing the Facts of Murder

...Of course observe that the Globe report is technically 100% correct. The PRC did threaten to kill Asheri. The Globe just doesn’t report the fact that the PRC cell killed him (details!) or how they did it, or why they did it, or how the killers were rewarded. They do run the picture of Asheri’s shrouded body…but on page 14. The Globe carried an AP story with some of these details on 28 June. So why are the above facts unmentionable or not newsworthy only 2 days later?

This utter whitewash of the facts concerning the kidnapping and murder of a young Jew is enough to make any Jew paranoid. I wonder if B’nai B’irth accepts Catholics as members?

See his post for the details and links.

I'm tired of reading that this kid was a "settler." He was an Israeli. Period. What the hell has being a settler to do with anything? It's somehow less of a sin to murder this kid? (They didn't execute him because of the Gaza situation, they planned to kill him and trade his corpse. Sick.) Because someone didn't like where he was living? Would Israelis be somehow less morally liable if they kidnapped and killed Arabs building illegal housing in Jerusalem?

If you're noticing that you've been hearing more and more about the "Popular Resistance Committees" of late, that's because it's effectively Hamas under a different name. Hamas supports them but let's the "PRC" claim the credit so Hamas can keep up this silly facade of a "truce" up. It's an illusion for export only.

Back to the old grind...

The "new" UN Human Rights Council is picking up where the old one left off: New UN rights body targets Israel

The new UN Human Rights Council voted Friday to make a review of alleged human rights abuses by Israel a permanent feature of every council session.

The resolution, which was sponsored by Islamic countries, was passed by a vote of 29-12, with five abstentions. It effectively revives a practice of the UN's dissolved Human Rights Commission, which also reviewed alleged Israeli abuses every time it met.

Israel protested Friday's vote, calling it a perpetuation of "the old infamous habits" of the widely discredited commission.

The resolution requires UN investigators to report at each council session "on the Israeli human rights violations in occupied Palestine."

The resolution also said the council "decides to undertake substantive consideration of the human rights violations and implications of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and other occupied Arab territories at its next session and to incorporate that issue in its following sessions."...

...Besides Arab and other Muslim countries, "yes" votes were cast by African nations, Brazil, China, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, India, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia and Sri Lanka. Canada and European Union members on the council voted against it...

What a joke.

[via LGF]

Meryl also comments.

Pieter W. Van Der Horst: Tying Down Academic Freedom

Very interesting story of academic sensorship, "for your own good.": Tying Down Academic Freedom

Earlier this month, after 37 years of teaching, I retired from the chair of Early Christian and Early Jewish Studies at Utrecht University. In my valedictory speech, "The Myth of Jewish Cannibalism," I intended to trace the accusation that Jews eat human flesh from its Greco-Roman origins through the Christian Middle Ages and the Nazi period to the present-day Muslim world. Much of the Islamic vilification of Jews has its roots in German fascism. Hitler's "Mein Kampf" has been on the best-seller lists in many Middle Eastern countries. The sympathy for Nazism goes back to the Führer's days. Palestinian leader Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, even closely cooperated with Hitler. He spent the war years in Berlin and visited Auschwitz, a trip that inspired his plans to build a concentration camp in Palestine.

In the Middle East of today, the demonization of Jews has reached unprecedented levels. Jews are accused of every evil under the sun, from cannibalism to the attacks on the Twin Towers, to causing the tsunami, the bird flu, AIDS and so on. At the end of my lecture I wanted to point out that it is our shared duty to combat this kind of anti-Jewish propaganda in the Muslim world. Nothing too controversial for a speech at a European university -- or so I thought.

Much to my surprise, though, the dean of the faculty asked me to delete the passage on Islamic Jew hatred. When I refused, she referred the matter to the highest university administrator, the rector magnificus, who summoned me to his office to appear before a committee of four professors (including the rector himself). The committee presented three reasons for removing the Muslim passages.

They claimed it was too dangerous to give the complete lecture because it might trigger violent reactions from "well-organized Muslim student groups" for which the rector could not take any responsibility. The committee also said it feared my speech would thwart efforts at bridge-building between Muslims and non-Muslims at the university. Finally, they claimed my lecture was far below the university's scholarly standards, especially because of some sarcastic remarks about Dutch public figures (whom I criticize for their anti-Jewish position). "We feel we have to protect you from yourself," I was told. The rector said I had 24 hours to drop the controversial section. If not, he would have to assume his "rectorial responsibility." I wasn't sure what this meant, but it sounded very threatening...

Much controversy ensued. [via Martin Kramer]

Divestment waits in the wings and Massachusetts considers investment

This article in the Jewish Week has a run-down of recent divestment happenings -- mostly positive -- but warns that divestment proponents have nothing better to do: Divestment Not Seen Dead [h/t: Judith]

Jewish leaders are bracing for the next move by anti-Israel forces within mainline Protestant churches, now that the divestment bandwagon has been effectively derailed by the Presbyterian Church (USA).

Last week the PC-USA, which jump-started the divestment movement with its 2004 decision to target Israel, voted overwhelmingly to reverse that decision. The resolution, which passed overwhelmingly and survived a last-minute motion to reconsider, also conceded “flaws in our process” on the divestment issue and acknowledged the “pain that this has caused,” a statement widely seen as an apology to an infuriated Jewish community.

But divestment advocates “have a lot invested in this process. They are not going away,” said Yitzhak Santis, director of Middle East Affairs for the Jewish Community Relations Council in San Francisco.

Santis said divestment advocates are already planning to revive the issue at the next Presbyterian General Assembly in 2008...

You can take that to the bank. For those campus watchers out there, there's this:

...Early this week, some divestment supporters said that language left open the possibility of divestment actions in the future.

“The vote at the Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly was neither a total setback for those seeking economic sanctions as a lever against the occupation nor a complete victory for the Jewish organizations who pressed the Presbyterians to abandon economic sanctions,” said Joel Beinin [Booo, Hissss], director of Middle East Studies at the American University in Cairo and leader of Jewish Voice for Peace — one of a handful of Jewish groups that supports divestment. His group was prominently featured at last week’s Presbyterian convention.

“The strategies of selective divestment, boycotts and other forms of non-violent pressure to isolate Israel internationally are now on the table and cannot be removed,” he said. “Israel has already lost the battle for international public opinion. Sooner or later it is going to face economic sanctions as well.”...

Meanwhile, in good news, Massachusetts State Treasurer Tim Cahill says that he's definitely considering the likelihood of possibly putting his influence behind the strong possibility of perhaps investing state funds in Israel. All kidding aside, this would be quite positive: State treasurer eyes investment in Israel

Massachusetts State Treasurer Tim Cahill returned last week from a pension managers’ trip to Israel with an upbeat assessment of investment prospects in the country.

“I would use whatever influence I have to convince my board that if the right opportunity comes up, we should consider it,” Cahill told the Advocate this week, referring to the possibility of investing some of the $30 billion in the state’s Pension Reserves Investment Trust. “The stability that is [in Israel] now makes it more attractive than in the past, as does the pool of intellect and talent there.”

Cahill was part of a 25-member delegation that included state comptrollers, treasurers and chief executives presiding over large pension funds, representing in total more than $1.5 trillion dollars of possible investment. Among the leading state pension investors in Israel are California and New York, which alone has invested nearly $1 billion in Israel-based companies.
Packed into the four-day trip, which was organized by the World Pensions Forum, were meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, several government ministers, former president Shimon Peres, King Abdullah of Jordan, and business and high-tech executives...

Two years on, dangerous Temple Mount ramp will finally be removed

It's taken two years because they fear Muslim rioting, in spite of the fact that there has already been one accident that only by chance didn't hurt anyone.

Haaretz: Two years on, dangerous Temple Mount ramp will finally be removed

The Israel Antiquities Authority will begin removing the Mugrabi ramp in a few days, despite the fear of Muslim riots.

The ramp, which leads from the Western Wall plaza to one of the Temple Mount Gates, is located in one of the most sensitive places in the world, and plans to carry out excavations under it have therefore been held up by the Shin Bet security service and the prime minister's military secretary for the past two years, for fear of Muslim riots.

...The need to remove the ramp arose in February 2004, when one of its supporting walls collapsed into the West Wall plaza. Fortunately, no one was hurt, but the city eng ineer said that the ramp was unstable and must be removed soon...


Israel's Response to the Prisoners' Document

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a reponse to the Prisoners' Document that covers the concerns quite well: The Palestinian "Prisoners' Document": Stepping away from peace - A Text Analysis

The objective behind this document had nothing to do with advancing prospects for peace with Israel. The goal was to promote a Palestinian consensus.

1. The announcement by representatives of Hamas and Fatah that agreement had been reached on this document has been perceived by some as being "a step in the right direction" in terms of efforts to achieve peace between the Palestinians and Israel. In reality, it constitutes a step in the wrong direction.

2. The objective behind this document had nothing to do with advancing prospects for peace with Israel. The goal was to address internal Palestinian interests, promote a Palestinian consensus, and avoid a decline into confrontation between the various Palestinian factions.

3. The document fails to meet the requirements of the Roadmap and the three basic conditions of the Quartet: recognition of Israel's right to exist, ending terrorism, and adherence to all existing agreements between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

4. Explicitly supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state within all the territories "occupied since 1967" does not mean recognition of Israel...

More.

MEMRITV: Lebanese TV Channel Questions Number of Holocaust Victims and Hosts Norman Finkelstein, Author of "The Holocaust Industry"

Ward Churchill certainly has nothing on DePaul's Norman Finkelstein. Where Churchill is a silly buffoon -- the campus version of the village idiot -- Finkelstein travels the world spreading his filth. Here he is on Lebanese TV peddling his "Holocaust Industry." I don't know whether or not he was aware of the introduction they ran before him -- which should have been enough for any sensible person to either denounce or walk out -- but this man who's heralded the heroism of Hizballah certainly knows what the effect of his words will be, and the purposes to which they will be put on Lebanese TV. It is jaw-dropping to watch. To summarize what one Marxist reviewer of his work noted, Finklestein must be the only Marxist capable of shedding tears for Swiss bankers. As between the bankers and the Jews, Finkelstein sides with the bankers. Now why would that be do you think?

MEMRITV: Lebanese TV Channel Questions Number of Holocaust Victims and Hosts Norman Finkelstein, Author of "The Holocaust Industry"

Report: "The 'Holocaust' is the Jewish term for burning the sacrificial offering to ashes. Never has there been an issue subject to as many contradictions, lies, and exaggerations regarding the number of victims as the issue of the Jewish Holocaust. The number of people killed in the Holocaust was estimated, in the film Night and Fog by the French director Alain Resnais, to be between eight and nine million, on the basis of documents invented by the Jews. The number dropped to four million Jews in the Soviet report to the Nuremburg trials. The figure dropped further, to 300,000 victims, according to British historian David Irving, and reached only 50,000, according to Raul Hilberg the Jew.

"Given the statistical contradictions in the number of Holocaust victims, the French intellectual Roger Garaudy asks how the truth can be determined. The Holocaust Industry, by Dr. Norman Finkelstein, recounts how the Jews of the world have turned Jewish suffering at the hands of the Nazis into a political and ideological industry in order to garner support for Israel, and into a source of economic extortion, which has yielded inconceivable sums for the Jews and their organizations, using as a pretext the so-called victims of the Nazi annihilation operations."...

...Finkelstein: "Well, one of the points I tried to make in the book is that there has been a gross inflation of the number of survivors of the Nazi Holocaust. In fact, as all the historians have shown, Hitler's extermination of the Jews was very efficient. It was like a factory, an assembly line. Jews were processed to be murdered. When you have such an efficient system there can't be very many survivors. In fact, the best estimates show that by May 1945, that is, at the end of World War II, about 100,000 Jews had survived the death camps, the ghettos, and the labor camps. If 100,000 Jews survived the camps and ghettos in 1945, then 60 years later - that is, roughly around now - there can't be more than a few thousand survivors still alive."...

...Finkelstein: "But the Holocaust industry wanted to blackmail Europe in order to get compensation moneys. And in order to blackmail Europe they said there were hundreds of thousands of needy Holocaust victims who were still alive, and they started to inflate the number of survivors in order to blackmail Europe."...


Yes, Ron Francis was there

Here's an update to the post from a couple of days ago, 'Pro-Palestinian' group disrupts community organizing event over presence of Jewish group, which described the crashing and disruption of a gathering of local grass-roots community organizations by a group of 'pro-Palestinian' protesters due to the presence of the Jewish Community Relations Council. I have had it confirmed by someone who was there that Andover High School physics teacher Ron Francis was indeed among the disruptive protesters at this event. Whether he was one of those who actually entered the hall and had to be escorted out by police is unclear. The story in the latest issue of The Jewish Advocate newspaper about the event itself describes the protesters simply as "a familiar group."

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Blogger Meetup

Had a great time tonight meeting up for a nice Thai dinner with some other local bloggers. In no particular order: Richard Landes, Miss Kelly, Sisu and spouse, neo-neocon, New England Republican, Harry Forbes, Teresa and our special non-blogging guest for the evening, The Boston Globe's shining light, Jeff Jacoby. Jeff's a great guy. Very down to earth, and hearty thanks to him and to everyone else for showing up. If you're a local blogger (in shooting distance of Boston) who'd like to be included in future meetups, drop me a line.

Update: Neo wrote about the event, here.

Update: Sissy has her post up with pic of special guest. Teresa's post is here.

Abduction As A Weapon

Steve Lipman in The Jewish Week details the history of the "most prominent" hostage taking events in the name of Palestinianism. I guess the question of "prominence" accounts for why the list looks a lot lighter than I would have expected: Abduction As A Weapon

As far back as the Munich Olympics of 1972, Palestinian terrorists and their supporters have used kidnapping as a political tool, abducting Israeli civilians and soldiers to be used in potential prisoner swaps and to obtain other concessions from Israel. Following is a chronology of prominent Israeli kidnappings and MIA cases:

1972: Members of the Black September terrorist group sneak into the Olympic Village in Munich and take 11 members of the Israeli delegation hostage. All 11 are killed.

1979: An Israeli soldier who was captured the previous year when he accidentally entered an area of southern Lebanon controlled by the PLO is exchanged for 76 terrorists.

1982: Three Israeli soldiers disappear in the Battle of Sultan Yakoub at the start of the War in Lebanon. Despite decades of rumors about their fate and alleged behind-the-scenes negotiations, Zvi Feldman, Zachary Baumel and Yehuda Katz are still considered missing in action.

1985: Israel trades 1,150 Palestinian prisoners for three soldiers captured in Lebanon and held by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command...

You'll notice as you look at the entire list just how lopsided the exchanges are. That's because, as the terrorists so often remind us, the Israelis love life, the terrorists love death.

Video Thank You to the troops

Watching Gaza

For those who haven't seen it yet, Israellycool has been doing a very good play-by-play on what's happening in Gaza. So has Vital Perspective.

Jed Babbin makes a good point here: Into Hamastan

...Israel can never settle the Palestinian problem by dealing only with the Palestinians just as we cannot ever settle Iraq's problems by dealing only with Iraqis. Because Israel's neighbors, and Iraq's, are the sources of their problems, so they must be the focus of the solutions. They are regional problems. If they are not solved throughout the region, they will not be solved at all.

Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal - operating from his headquarters in Damascus -- ordered the raid in which Gilad Shalit was kidnapped. Meshaal, and pretty much every other terrorist leader other than Usama bin Laden, operate from Syria with impunity because Bashar Assad's Syria - the Syria he inherited from his father, and which has been on the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism since 1979 - is entirely stable. He has no fear that through American or Israeli action his support for terrorism will be interrupted. From Syria money, weapons and terrorists flowed into Iraq for months before and ever since the American invasion of 2003.

Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon said that Meshaal - even in Syria - was a target for Israeli action. We should encourage Israel to strike into Syria, and not just to capture or kill Meshaal. Destabilizing Syria, and thus destabilizing its support for terrorism in Israel and Iraq is the goal. If anyone chooses to equate "destabilization" with "regime change", we should do nothing to encourage or dissuade them. It's time to put the terrorist genie back in the bottle. If the genie won't comply, we may soon have to smash the bottle all to pieces.

[h/t: jeremayakovka]

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Fearing Christians

Here's the second of those two essays.

Fearing Christians
"…may that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity."
-Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address

George Bush takes a beating from the Left for his use of religious language, but he's a piker when compared to Presidents past, even next to an apotheosis of the "wall of separation" crowd like Jefferson. After all, the current President simply ends his speeches with a "May God continue to bless America" - Jefferson actually assembled his own version of the Gospels for use in proselytizing the Native Americans. Imagine the fun the pundits would have with an edition of the Bible containing a George Bush by-line!

The fact is that the Left simply doesn't "get" religious Christians. In fact, they fear them. A recent Reuters report entitled "Bush's faith worries Albright," released on the occasion of the publication of Madeleine Albright's new book, "The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God, and World Affairs" presents a perfect case-in-point.

Reuters, of course, is a Britain-based wire-service, and any opportunity to cast our president as a narrow-minded religious fanatic is ideal grist for their mill - portraying George Bush as an ayatollah in red, white, and blue being a virtual European pass-time, after all. Albright provides the ideal chance and quotes they could have written themselves.

Albright is quoted as saying, "President Bush's certitude about what he believes in, and the division between good and evil, is, I think, different [than Carter's or Clinton's]…" Well good on him for it. Such certitude is always frightening to moral relativists, State Department jet-setters, and those who put a tad too much weight on what European elites say about us. The fact is that a solid grounding in a personal morality provides a president with a solid keel - an important foundation for the ship of state he captains, individual policy decisions aside. It comes as no surprise that a former Clinton Secretary of State and a news organization known for an editorial tendency to entomb the word "evil" in scare-quotes would have trouble with the concept.

Reuters now: "Bush, a Republican, has openly acknowledged his Christian faith informs his decisions as president. He says, for example, that he prayed to God for guidance before invading Iraq." Now help me out here, I thought George Bush invaded Iraq because the "neo-cons" told him to. I know Paul Wolfowitz is good, but he's surely not God. Or was it for oil? Or to avenge daddy? I have even heard it was because Iraq was starting to accept euros instead of dollars for oil. The fact is that there are many, many reasons for every governmental decision. The fact that a man should pray to God and consider his Christian faith for a moment (hopefully more than one) of personal reflection and introspection before making the monumental decision to go to war should disturb no one. On the contrary, it should comfort.

This President's faith is not absolutist. On the contrary, he understands that he leads a multi-cultural, and multi-faith, nation. At a White House event in 2004, Bush responded to a questioner thus, "I want you all to hear me on religion right quick. It is very important for this country to honor religion this way: You can be religious, or you can choose not to be religious, and you're equally American. You have a right in this country to worship freely. It is a fundamental right that must never change. And if you choose to worship the Almighty, you are equally American if you're a Christian, Jew, Muslim or Hindu."

Unlike Yasser Arafat, infamous for saying one thing in English for public consumption and another later, in Arabic, for the home team, Bush says the same to his base. In a 2004 interview with a number of Christian editors and writers and published in Christianity Today magazine, Bush said, "My job is to make sure that, as President, people understand that in this country you can worship any way you choose. And I'll take that a step further. You can be a patriot if you don't believe in the Almighty. You can honor your country and be as patriotic as your neighbor."

Hardly the caricature of the absolutist Christian some like to paint, is it?

Albright has, by her own account, "a very confused religious background." According Reuters she was "[b]orn and raised a Roman Catholic in Czechoslovakia, Britain and then the United States … converted to Anglicanism when she married and only later in life discovered she had Jewish roots." To Albright, "doubt is part of faith," and Reuters holds this in contrast to Bush who, it insists "has alienated Muslims around the world by using absolutist Christian rhetoric to discuss foreign policy issues."

The fact is, it's not people of self-assured faith that endanger us with our enemies abroad - our enemies have strong beliefs and respect others, even Christians and Jews, who also possess strong beliefs and self-assurance. It is, instead, the wishy-washy relativists, filled with self-doubt and even a little bit of self-loathing - weaknesses they can smell like carrion birds sense wounded beasts -- that fill our foes with contempt and endanger us all.

Immigration and Learning English

Well, I was under consideration for a fill-in gig as a local paper's "conservative" columnist, but I've just heard back that they've gotten someone else -- someone known for publishing their writing on paper, no doubt...on paper! Can you believe it? Welcome to yesterday, pal! Just kidding...I appreciated the opportunity and all that...yada, yada...

Anyway, the two items I wrote "on spec" to see if I was on the track they wanted have been sitting around for a month now collecting dust which is agony to a blogger -- when you spend all that time writing, you want to get it up on the site as soon as possible.

So, at least I can post them now. No need to let all that content go to waste. Here's the first one. I'll put the second into another entry. They were supposed to be about 800 words (I exceded that by a bit), pertain to domestic issues and hit "Jewish" and "conservative" angles. I had forgotten to give them titles, so I'll add that now.

Expecting Immigrants to Learn English is Not Racism
"This amendment is racist. I think it's directed basically to people who speak Spanish."

Thus spoke Harry Reid (D - Nev.) during the debate over whether English should be affirmed as our "national language." He, along with 33 of his colleagues - including both Senators from Massachusetts - voted against the measure. Perhaps it's past time for someone to take the Senator aside and explain what happened to his predecessor in the minority leadership when he began drifting too far to port…he suffered a fate shared by few - he lost to a newcomer. Unfortunately, no such fate need concern our own representatives who's positions appear to be secured until the next ice age, but be that as it may.

It is neither racist nor mean-spirited to make clear to new arrivals to our nation that they are expected to learn the English language and that it is they who must begin to adapt themselves to their new host country, and not the country that needs to adapt itself to them. On the contrary, what could be more heartless than to patronize our new neighbors by implying they are incapable of learning, and by encouraging them to remain in linguistic ghettos and stunt their integration into the majority English-speaking community with all its opportunities? If we are truly a society that cares about and is willing to accept new members without regard to skin color or national origin, then clearly articulating what's expected of them and making such expectations achievable is simply fair. It's fair to new residents, and it's fair to us.

It has been the long-time strength of American multiculturalism that we have expected immigrants to integrate while not interfering in their choices for private association and celebration. Students may attend religious schools but must still meet State standards, or they may attend State schools and their cultural, religious or language schools in their spare time without concern that the government will stop them. In America, all people may maintain personal identities while coming together over shared American values. Fortunately, America still has a strong and proud enough culture and sense of civic pride that we still correctly feel we have something of value to indoctrinate new immigrants with.

This is in direct contrast to our friends in Europe, where post-colonial guilt and an unwillingness to publicly criticize or articulate expectations of minority group behavior for full acceptance has resulted in massive ghettoization across the continent. Immigrants from North Africa and Asia are heaped into their own neighborhoods, shut in behind artificial walls of non-integration mortared in by both themselves and a society at large too paralyzed by political correctness to properly make clear what is expected of them to be included for full membership, and too full of self-doubt to enforce it if they could articulate it (As an aside, perhaps there's a bit of unspoken intent there in keeping the immigrants out of the mainstream - perhaps there's yet a bit more racism alive in the Old World than some would like to let on. But that's a subject for another day). Astoundingly I, as the grandson of Russian immigrants could, by European parlance, be referred to as a "third generation immigrant," rather than simply as "an American." Author Shelby Steele offers one explanation for this timidity on the part of society at large -- "White Guilt":

…I call this white guilt not because it is a guilt of conscience but because people stigmatized with moral crimes--here racism and imperialism--lack moral authority and so act guiltily whether they feel guilt or not.

They struggle, above all else, to dissociate themselves from the past sins they are stigmatized with. When they behave in ways that invoke the memory of those sins, they must labor to prove that they have not relapsed into their group's former sinfulness…

One need look no further than the out of control rioting and mayhem in France and the terrorist bombing and murders committed by "disaffected" Muslim youths elsewhere on the continent to witness the inevitable end result of this societal weakness and self-doubt.

Conservatives and our sensible friends on the Left recognize this and are concerned. "Custom Tailors," "Independent Workmen's Circle," "Immigrants Mutual Aid Society," "Roxbury Mutual," "Chevra Kadusha," "Vilno" … a walk through our old Jewish Cemeteries is a trip into a past when self help and mutual assistance were necessary and expected -- not resented. Immigrants came, helped each other, worked hard and were themselves or their children integrated by an American full of sin but not yet burdened with too much self-doubt. It was an America yet strong and sure enough of itself to take in such disparate newcomers and not fear losing its identity to them.

The mutual aid groups of the past are, along with that essential concept of self-help, now mostly lost in the mists, destroyed by a welfare society which waits for and expects government to take care of our needs. Today's organized immigrant advocacy groups, rather than overseeing and easing their integration and seeing to the basic needs of the new generations they supposedly represent, seem more concerned with assuring that their groups receive their "fair share" of the entitlement pie, and that they are sheltered from too many expectations, if any at all. This serves no one's interests.

A little guilt for past misdeeds and a little self-examination are good things, healthy things. They indicate the presence of a morally aware and concerned body politic. But taken too far they reach a point of self-abrogation, and thus become a self-destructive pathology. Europe may have hit that point, but there's still time for us yet. Those who recognize this ought not be stigmatized with the universal debate ender of being labeled "racist," or "xenophobic." We owe it to our American forefathers, ourselves, and those newcomers working hard to achieve the American dream not to fall into that trap.

Church Divestment: two steps forward, one back

Martin Peretz on divestment, and the Episcopal and Presbyterian climb-downs: PROTESTANTS RECANT

Readers may recall my obsession with the antagonism of the Presbyterian and Episcopal churches towards Israel. These denominations are two of the mainstream denominations in American Protestantism, and they are pillars of the National Council of Churches of Christ, headquartered in New York. The Council has its own foreign policy, and the smaller the membership in its constituent sects has become the more ambitious and reflexive are its criticisms of the United States. Actually, the process may be the reverse. Its positions came first; then came the defections. This is a very old business. The hysteria about Israel came later. I first noticed the phenomenon when three of the bishops in the Episcopal diocese of Massachusetts began a virtually non-stop picket of the Israeli consulate in Boston. I then found out that a rector of the beautiful Christ Church at Zero Garden Street in my home town of Cambridge, where George Washington worshipped on December 31, 1775, had been the one who had--how shall I say this?--motivated his superiors in taking a nasty and uncompromising stand against Israel.

The rest is history. Several churches leapt on to the "divestment" tactic as a way of expressing their disapproval of Israel and their support for the Palestinians. What they supported in the Palestinian polity was never quite clear. The tactic of terror against Israelis which retains, as of mid-June, a 56 percent majority among the Palestinians, up from 52 percent in March, perhaps. The Presbyterians and Episcopalians (along with the United Church of Christ, linear descendants, among others, of the Congregational Church composed of American Zion Puritans, who were Hebraists and in the nineteenth century supported the Jewish restoration to Palestine) were among the first to climb onto this bandwagon, with much righteous self-satisfaction.

But the issue festered among many in the clerisy and, perhaps more important, in the rank-and-file of the churches' congregations...

Meanwhile, in the two steps forward, one step back department, the Toronto Conference of the United Church of Canada has voted to boycott Israel altogether.

[Links via UCCTruths]

They said they'd do it, they did it.

Re-Targeting Hamas (updated)

Yossi Klein Halevi thinks a military incursion isn't enough, but that Israel should resume targeting the Hamas leadership. It strikes me that the old system is insufficient at this point, and that some sort of formal declaration of war (can you declare war against an "Authority"?) -- giving some finite goals and basis for negotiated ending -- would be helpful now, but I'm not a lawyer.

Why Israel's Attack On Gaza Isn't Enough

...Resuming assassinations against Hamas's political echelon is, of course, a declaration of war against the Hamas regime. But given its official sanctioning of kidnapping, Hamas has already declared war against Israel. Hamas's adoption of the tactics of Al Qaeda in Iraq comes as no surprise. After the killing of Zarqawi, Hamas issued a statement mourning his death and urging continued "resistance," thereby making the Hamas regime the world's only openly pro-Al Qaeda government. Unfortunately, the international media missed the significance of that moment.

That lapse in media judgment is worth recalling in the coming days, when much of the media will be presenting the "prisoners' document"--a set of demands drawn up by Hamas and Fatah members imprisoned in Israel--as a historic Hamas concession, offering "tacit" recognition of Israel. In fact, the document does nothing of the sort. Nowhere does the document recognize the right of Israel to exist. Instead, it calls for Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders, followed by the "right" of Palestinian refugees to resettle in Israel and demographically overwhelm the Jewish state. The prisoners' document, in other words, is a plan for the phased destruction of Israel--precisely why Hamas can endorse it.

Driving on the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway, I saw this graffiti: "Olmert, gadol alecha"--which roughly translates as, "Olmert, the job is bigger than you are." For Olmert to disprove that growing suspicion among Israelis, he must commit himself to the destruction of the Hamas regime. Sooner or later, Israel will have no choice but to adopt that policy. The only question is whether Olmert will still be prime minister when that happens.

[h/t: isirota1965]

Update: Michael Oren has a more in-depth look, but comes to the same conclusion as Halevi:

...There is, however, one way to avert a public relations disaster for Israel, to limit casualties, and to restore Israel's deterrence power: Israel must return to the targeted-killing policy that enabled Mr. Sharon to triumph over terrorist organizations. Israel must target those Palestinians who order others to fire rockets from within civilian areas but whose families are located safely away from the firing zones. No Hamas or Islamic Jihad leader should be immune from such reprisals--neither Prime Minister Ismail Haniya nor Khaled Meshal, who masterminds Hamas from Damascus. Though there is certain to be some international backlash, the damage to Israel's image will likely be temporary. Who today remembers Abdel Aziz Ranitisi and Sheikh Yassin? Those responsible for causing injury and death to both Israelis and Palestinians must pay the ultimate price. Only then can quiet be restored to Israel's borders and progress toward either unilateral or negotiated solutions resumed.

Dear Steve Duin

Asher Abrams, blogger, Marine Corps vet, responds to a newspaper op-ed that rubbed him the wrong way: Steve Duin of "The Oregonian" Gets an Earful on Iraq

I am 43 years old, a Portland resident since 2000, and a combat veteran of Desert Storm. I served with the 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion, 1st Marine Division, from 1989 to 1993. We were among the first to cross the border from Saudi Arabia into Kuwait, and we took the first combat casualties of the ground war. (It was a double fratricide incident near Khafji on the night of January 29, 1991; two of our vehicles were destroyed by friendly missiles. We lost seven men.)

Whatever the stereotype of the "typical Marine" may be, it's probably safe to say I'm not it. (In truth, very few Marines are.) I was raised in an intellectual, liberal, Democratic family, and to this day I consider myself a "liberal" although I vote Republican now. I was among the 52% who voted for President Bush in 2004, and I guess I am among the 29%, or whatever figure the polls are giving, who still support him now. I was poised to write a poison-pixel email in response to your last column, but instead followed my better instincts as a blogger and waited until some of the anger had subsided and I could write a little more calmly.

Your column from last Thursday, concerning the brutal killings of Tucker and Menchaca, at least implicitly acknowledges some value in the "military objective in toppling the regime of Saddam Hussein", which is more than can be said for many of your journalistic colleagues; this, however, is all that can be said in its defense.

First, there is the general premise of your column, summed up in your lurid conclusion that "the weight of the coffins and the gravestones and the dead flowers would crush the cynical and sentimental notion that this war will end well." By this logic, every war that ever brought with it coffins and gravestones and dead flowers, which is to say every war ever fought, must end badly. Do you really believe this? If so, then you must believe that the American Revolution, the Civil War, and the Second World War all ended badly. Are you prepared to justify that conclusion? If you are a strict pacifist, that's your business, but please be plain about it...

All the rest...

[h/t: isirota1965]

Amazonian Stonehenge

Interesting: Did ancient Amazonians build a 'Stonehenge'?

SAO PAULO, Brazil (AP) -- A grouping of granite blocks along a grassy Amazon hilltop may be the vestiges of a centuries-old astronomical observatory -- a find archaeologists say indicates early rain forest inhabitants were more sophisticated than previously believed.

The 127 blocks, some as high as 9 feet, are spaced at regular intervals around the hill, like a crown 100 feet in diameter.

On the shortest day of the year -- December 21 -- the shadow of one of the blocks disappears when the sun is directly above it...

...Cabral has been studying the site, near the village of Calcoene, just north of the equator in Amapa state in far northern Brazil, since last year.

She believes it was once inhabited by the ancestors of the Palikur Indians, and while the blocks have not yet been submitted to carbon dating, she says pottery shards near the site indicate they are pre-Columbian and maybe older -- as much as 2,000 years old.

Last month, archaeologists working on a hillside north of Lima, Peru, announced the discovery of the oldest astronomical observatory in the Western Hemisphere -- giant stone carvings, apparently 4,200 years old, that align with sunrise and sunset on December 21...


Spirit of America looking for donations for Horn of Africa

Special Operations Forces in Africa are looking for supplemental donations to help their work. Donations will buy soccer balls, school backpacks and supplies and solar lanterns. See here for details:

...The Combined Joint Task Force in the Horn of Africa encompasses about 1700 American men and women engaging in an unconventional and little known part of the global war on terror. The efforts focus on Kenya, Ethiopia, Somalia, Uganda, and Djibouti and they use drinkable water, food, medical care and even sports equipment as their weapons against terrorist recruiting and extremism.

Sergeant Joe Roberts with the 96th Civil Affairs Battalion is serving with the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, stationed in the Gode/Ogaden Region of Ethiopia. SoA will use the donations to this project to provide for the supplies outlined by Sergeant Roberts below and similar requests in this region.

Email from Sergeant Joseph Roberts:

"Here's an example of one way SoA may be able to assist. We [were] able to build some schools and clinics with our funds but have to find other organizations to provide desks, chairs, blackboards, uniforms etc...

More details and a way to donate, here.

The Ford Foundation and Gaza Beach

NGO-Monitor has a look at the role of politicized NGO's in the aftermath of the Gaza Beach incident. Note the role of Ford Foundation grantees: NGO Political Agendas Distort Reports on Gaza Beach Incident

...Miftah's press release called on the international community to stop "Israel's state-terrorism" and stated that the casualties were caused "when an Israeli navy vessel fired 3 shells at them." Miftah, which received a $250,000 grant from the Ford Foundation in 2005, also called the incident a "brutal massacre" and called on the international community to "hold Israel accountable for its war crimes against the Palestinians."

Al-Mezan, which is also funded by the Ford Foundation as well as the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and International Commission of Jurists among others, said in its press statement that the incident was a "savage massacre." Al Mezan accused Israel of responsibility for the attack based on evidence gathered by "TV channels [which] reported that shells were fired from a naval ship located close to Beit Lahia beach." Al Mezan added that the incident "highlight[s] Israel's organized killing of Palestinian civilians."...


Interactive Israel Map

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

'Pro-Palestinian' group disrupts community organizing event over presence of Jewish group

You think you're safe...attending a grass-roots community organizing event...sure it's organized by a Jewish group, but from the looks of it, you'd expect to be ensconced in a left-of-center designated safe-zone. Not so fast. Mr. Goat has a very interesting report: Mostly-white group disrupts community organizing event...for Palestine?

...So then as the event is getting underway, a local rabbi is talking about community organizing work with Haitian nursing home workers, a chant starts coming up from outside: “Free, free Palestine!” I’m not sure where this rabbi stands on Israel/Palestine issues, though I know that his synagogue (Temple Israel in Boston) hosted an Israeli military refuser, who spoke to a packed sanctuary about four years back, much to the consternation of the right wing in this and other congregations. But it was utterly irrelevant to the focus of the evening’s events: local community organizing for racial, economic, and social justice. So the rabbi plugged on beyond the relatively weak chants of what sounded like rather few people. After he spoke, there was a time for people to explore the tables and mingle, and the sound of conversation drowned out whatever chanting there may have been outside.

After that, Ron Bell got up to speak. Bell has a long history as a community organizer in Boston, most prominently as the founder of Dunk the Vote. Formed in the wake of the Charles Stuart episode, when the rights of so many African-American men were systematically smashed, Bell used Dunk the Vote to build community power through voter registration in the Black community, registering some 35,000 people. As Bell spoke, a man walked in, made his way through the crowd, and stepped in front of the speaker with a big sign revealing the reason for the protest that evening, urging that next time, the organizers don’t invite the JCRC.

The JCRC, you see, is the Jewish Community Relations Council, and they were one of the 18 or so organizations represented at the event. They do a lot of organizing in synagogues, largely through the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization. Another wing of their organization focuses on Israel and Palestine, and many in the Jewish community and beyond find their positions pretty conservative. [There are a lot of people inside and outside JCRC who would get a grin at that description.-S] There has been much discussion, wrestling, protest, etc. over these positions throughout the years...

Oh, do be sure to read the whole thing. There's another description here: "Free Palestine" neo-Nazis, or: African Americans and Jews have a LOT in common. I can't say, of course, but I am skeptical that the "disruptors" were the brownshirt types the author of that one thinks. Check it out, though. And finally (for now), there's this one: Mostly White Group Shouts down Ron Bell at Cambridge Community Organizing Event

Too bad nobody has any pictures. I bet there would be a lot of familiar faces.

[h/t: AdamG]

Update 6/30/06: I have had it confirmed by someone who was there that Andover High School physics teacher Ron Francis was indeed among the disruptive protesters at this event. Whether he was one of those who actually entered the hall and had to be escorted out by police is unclear. The story in the latest issue of The Jewish Advocate newspaper about the event itself describes the protesters simply as "a familiar group."

The Cult of International Law

Interesting post by Volokh's Bernstein:

I've noticed in a variety of contexts that there are some rather well-educated, articulate individuals out there who have what seems to me to be a fanatical, quasi-religious belief in "international law", and the idea that it should trump any other conflicting consideration. In the constitutional law field, this is reflected in the argument that the president and the courts should ignore domestic law and the Constitution if they conflict with international law--even if the United States isn't a party to any binding international agreements on the particular subject at hand.

On a more personal level, I've had a few email conversations with Volokh Conspiracy readers along the following lines:

Reader: Israel is illegitimate because it violated international law by not allowing Palestinians who fled Israel during the War of Independence to return.

Me: I'm not an expert on international law, but I do know something about Israeli history. There is no practical way Israel could have permitted the return of most of these refugees. First, the Palestinian and broader Arab leadership remained committed after the war to Israel's destruction. The Arab community within Israel's border had participated in the war against Israel. The immediate result of allowing hundreds of thousands of generally hostile Arabs back into Israel (which had well less than a million Jewish residents at its founding) would have been constant intercommunal violence and ultimately another war. You can't expect Israel to have committed national suicide...

Much more, including long discussion thread, here. (via Instapundit)

'Thank you for your thoughtful - and very welcome - email.' -- Some Times Leak Links

Ah, the dangers of auto-responders. At PowerLine:

Dear Mr. Keller:

I want to thank you personally for breaking the story on the government illegally using the SWIFT system to track money.

This administration is always breaking the law. They all belong behind bars. Just remember, it's your duty to make sure they're kicked out of office, in the most humiliating way possible. Republicans are killers of poor people all around the world. Crimes against humanity should not go unpunished.

Keep up the good work.

Henry David

Also embarrassing for the Times, this editorial from 2001:

Organizing the hijacking of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon took significant sums of money. The cost of these plots suggests that putting Osama bin Laden and other international terrorists out of business will require more than diplomatic coalitions and military action. Washington and its allies must also disable the financial networks used by terrorists.

The Bush administration is preparing new laws to help track terrorists through their money-laundering activity and is readying an executive order freezing the assets of known terrorists. Much more is needed, including stricter regulations, the recruitment of specialized investigators and greater cooperation with foreign banking authorities. There must also must be closer coordination among America's law enforcement, national security and financial regulatory agencies...

Michelle Malkin has a good round-up here: Treasury To Keller: "Irresponsible;" Murtha, Kean, Hamilton Intervened (includes the letter from Treasury Secretary Snow), as well as here: New York Times Flashback

Hamas: Islam will conquer US and Britain

From Palestinian Media Watch: Hamas: Islam will conquer US and Britain

A Hamas video just released on their web site focuses on the broader Palestinian Islamic ideology, promising the eventual conquering and subjugation of Christian countries under Islam. The way Israel "ran" from Gaza after terror is presented as the prototype for future Israeli and Western behavior in the face of Islamic force.

The video is a collection of statements by Hamas terrorist leader, Yasser Ghalban, killed last week by Palestinians, in the ongoing internal fighting.

The following is the transcript of selections from the Hamas video:

"We will rule the nations, by Allah's will, the USA will be conquered, Israel will be conquered, Rome and Britain will be conquered…The Jihad for Allah... is the way of Truth and the way for Salvation and the way which will lead us to crush the Jews and expel them from our country Palestine. Just as the Jews ran from Gaza, the Americans will run from Iraq and Afghanistan and the Russians will run from Chechnya, and the Indian will run from Kashmir, and our children will be released from Guantanamo. The prisoners will be released by Allah's will, not by peaceful means and not by agreements, but they will be released by the sword, they will be released by the gun".

The video identifies itself as from the "Al-Qassam Brigades Media Office." "Al-Qassam Brigades" is the name the Hamas calls its military wing. (www.palestine-info.net) June 22 2006:

More.

Islam's Greatest Hope

Meant to link this the other day. Neo notes some changes in a San Francisco mosque: Islam: tear down this wall.

San Francisco is one of the most "progressive" (read: liberal) cities in the US. And, as this NY Times article describes, there's a movement there to modernize Islam, at least in a small way.

As part of renovations to the Darussalam mosque in San Francisco last fall, a wall separating the women worshippers from the men was demolished and not reconstructed. This was the result of a campaign by what the Times calls "a small if determined band of North American Muslims, mostly younger women," to change practices they feel are discriminatory, and not a necessary part of Islam.

The rest.

Like I've always said, America is Islam's greatest hope.

Now War?

Hillel Halkin, writing in the NY Sun, thinks it's time for Israel to take a formal war footing with the PA: An End To Ambiguity

...if you are a suicide bomber sworn to die anyway, why not trade your bomb for a gun and open fire on soldiers, who are not exactly difficult to find in Israel? The only real answer to this question is that the Palestinian organizations have wanted to kill civilians rather than soldiers because this is precisely the message they have wished to deliver - namely, that their enemy is not specifically the Israeli "occupation," nor even the Israeli army, but the entire Jewish population of Israel.

And it is because of this, too, that the Israeli response to Sunday's raid should not be Chief-of-Staff Halutz's. Rather, it should be: "Fair enough! You fought this time like soldiers rather than like terrorists - we will treat you this time like soldiers rather than like terrorists."...

...Israel should therefore say to this government: "The charade is over. While we are willing to negotiate through neutral parties a prisoner exchange involving Gilad Shalit, we are also declaring war on you. From now on we will treat you as any country treats another country it is at war with. We will close all our borders with you, cease providing you with all services, and consider any branch of your government, any of its members, and anyone on your side contributing to your military effort, legitimate war targets. We will do our very best to avoid harming civilians, and we will expect you to do the same, but anyone else, from Prime Minister Ismail Heniya down, is from now until further notice a legitimate target. And when you're ready to sue for peace-and-quiet, let us know."

Rest assured that Hamas will sue fast. This time, though, Israel will have to insist that the quiet, if not the peace, be real and lasting.

I'm not resting assured. I'm not sure what the solution is here, I'm really not. Is Hamas really going to capitulate through force of arms or to avoid the agony of their people? Well, maybe to avoid their own agony, but not the people's. And is any sort of blockade really going to last? Look what's already happening. There's no "war industry" to bomb. You can't target the civilian population till they give, nor impose a government on them, nor expell them. Even if they wanted to capitulate they can't -- the Palestinian Arabs are far too useful as proxy soldiers to the Arab/Islamist war against a state that shames them.

Sorry to be so glum, but I'd like to read something that shows some real imagination and that can walk a realistic scenario out to some kind of better ending -- preferably something that shows how a more formal, legal state of war would change things both on scene and with regard to the international community. I think the grind isn't anywhere close to over.

Following Londonistan Around

Miss Kelly has some links and commentary on conditions in London these days, including a look at some of the more disturbing Pew poll numbers: Londonistan/ Pew Poll of Muslim Attitudes

'We said we accept a state (in territory occupied) in 1967 — but we did not say we accept two states.'

Former PLO Ambassador to Vienna Ghazi Hussein on the Holocaust, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Rule of the World

Meet the former Ambassador to Vienna, Austria, Ghazi Hussein. Imagine if an Israeli or American diplomat were to say these things? Imagine if Arab diplomats were held to the same civilized standards that Westerners are held to...

MEMRITV: Former PLO Ambassador to Vienna Ghazi Hussein on the Holocaust, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Rule of the World

...Judaism divides the world into Jews and non-Jews. Judaism is hostile towards Christianity and Islam. In accordance with the resolution of the Zionist Congress conventions, including the secret resolutions of the first Zionist Congress, which some call "the Protocols of the Elders of Zion," they want to spread internal strife in all countries, and to generate disorder and unrest, so that ultimately, they will rule the world.

I call dibs on Australia.

Taxes for thee, not me

James Taranto notes that Warren Buffet's largesse has resulted in his avoiding much of the taxation that he believes you and I should be liable for:

Warren Buffett, the chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., will give most of his $44 billion in Berkshire stock to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, entrusting his philanthropic legacy to the only person richer than him," Bloomberg reports.

You can see why Buffett would want to give his billions to charity. The federal death tax is currently being phased out, but it will reappear in 2011 unless Congress acts--which means that if Buffett lives that long, the government will confiscate 55% of his assets upon his death.

But wait. Buffett is, as a New York Sun editorial notes, "an avowed supporter of the estate tax."...

...When billionaires back the death tax, keep in mind that they have no intention of actually paying it. They are being "generous" with other people's money. This is the way in which the superrich wage class warfare against the merely affluent.

For my part, I cannot help considering the personal in something like this. How would just the barest lick of that fortune benefit me? Instead, Gates and Buffett get their jollies crossing their streams. Makes ya wanna cry.

A Conservative Blogger Visits the Boston Globe

Harry of Squaring the Boston Globe got a personal guided tour of his frequent object of scorn (and what would Harry have to Square if there were no Globe?), and writes about it: In the Belly of the Whale: A Conservative Blogger Visits the Boston Globe

He was also beaten by the rent a cops at Globe security while James Carroll and Derrick Z. Jackson stood around pointing and laughing...ok, that didn't happen, but how cool would that be?

Monday, June 26, 2006

What were they thinking at Brandeis -- An Award for a Sabeel Activist

Between the hiring of controversial Palestinian Arab pollster Khalil Shikaki, the granting of an honorary degree to Tony Kushner, and the showing, then removal of an anti-Israel children's art exhibit, Brandeis University had a sometimes rocky '05-'06 academic year in the eyes of the public at large.

Here's another one to add to the "What were they thinking?!" pile.

In May of '05, Brandeis bestowed a "Social Justice" award upon Catherine Nichols for her work with the World Council of Churches' Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI). The WCC's far-leftist proclivities are well known, and as for the EAPPI, well, this photo from their main web page should give some hint as to where their concerns lie:

From their overview:

The EAPPI is an initiative of the World Council of Churches under the Ecumenical Campaign to End the Illegal Occupation of Palestine: Support a Just Peace in the Middle East. Its mission is to accompany Palestinians and Israelis in their non-violent actions and concerted advocacy efforts to end the occupation. Participants of the programme are monitoring and reporting violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, supporting acts of non-violent resistance alongside local Christian and Muslim Palestinians and Israeli peace activists, offering protection through non-violent presence, engaging in public policy advocacy and, in general, standing in solidarity with the churches and all those struggling against the occupation...

At the time of the award, Nichols had returned full time to...wait for it...the Sabeel Ecumenical Center for Liberation Theology, a "local partner" of the EAPPI.

Nichols is a member of the Disciples of Christ denomination -- one of the Protestant groups who have passed resolutions opposing Israel's security fence -- along with the United Church of Christ (UCC) through their shared Common Global Ministries. Here is Nichols sharing a stage with Peter Makari [PDF]. Makari is one of the prime behind-the-scenes movers of divestment.

Again, we must ask, what were they thinking at Brandeis?

The Crescent

I don't know if this is what you had in mind, Daniel, but this is what came to me. The anti-Semites love this picture. May as well update it for them. (Click to see the original.)


Chem/Bio in Palestine

You've probably seen this before, but it's worth noting again: Al-Aksa claims chemical capabilities

The Aksa Martyrs Brigades announced on Sunday that its members have succeeded in manufacturing chemical and biological weapons.

In a leaflet distributed in the Gaza Strip, the group, which belongs to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah Party, said the weapons were the result of a three-year effort.

According to the statement, the first of its kind, the group has managed to manufacture and develop at least 20 different types of biological and chemical weapons.

The group said its members would not hesitate to add the new weapons to Kassam rockets that are being fired at Israeli communities almost every day. It also threatened to use the weapons against IDF soldiers if Israel carried out its threats to invade the Gaza Strip.

"We want to tell [Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert and [Defense Minister Amir] Peretz that your threats don't frighten us," the leaflet said.

"We will surprise you with our new weapons the moment the first soldier sets foot in the Gaza Strip."

How is it that a group has gotten to the point that they feel that they can maintain sympathy for their cause by threatening the use of chemical and biological weapons? No need to answer. Once upon a time I think we all would have laughed at the idea of a terror group making such claims...oh, what are they going to do, tie a box of used kleenex to a rocket?...but no more.

And what would happen if they began routinely launching such weapons? What do you do with a population that supports such things? Would the world, would Europeans in particular become more or less sympathetic to Israeli concerns and responses?

A Jewish perspective on illegal immigration

There are some interesting points on illegal immigration in this essay at The Forward (though the piece carries a title I wouldn't have given it): Open Borders Threaten Jewish Clout

...Substituting knowledge for Jewish sentimentality regarding immigration means debunking myths reflecting ignorance of Jewish immigration's uniqueness. Unlike many other newcomers to America, Jews were refugees and asylum seekers escaping religious persecution, tyranny and pogroms. Most immigrants, by contrast, are not refugees: They come to make money.

Unlike many others, Jews migrated one way. Jews did not remain loyal to antisemitic countries of origin; most learned English immediately and embraced Americanism. Millions today immigrate for economic gain while despising America and maintaining loyalty to home countries.

We can best honor our immigrant experience by advocating for more generous policies for real refugees and asylum seekers — not by pushing for legislation that betrays America's workers, devastates America's poor, exploits Mexicans, threatens America's social cohesion and endangers Jewish interests.

(h/t: Andrew Bostom)

A Blind Spot for Hamas and the KSA

Michael I. Krauss & J. Peter Pham at NRO:

...How does this terrorist group continue operating despite the international boycott? An incident on June 13 involving PA Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar is telling. The Hamas leader was briefly stopped, but otherwise unhindered, as he transited through the international airport in Cairo with seven suitcases stuffed with an estimated $20 million. At the Rafah crossing-point from Sinai to Gaza, European monitors asked al-Zahar to explain the small fortune in his luggage, but did not detain him when he proved unresponsive. Then Palestinian Force 17 militiamen aligned with Fatah and President Abbas asked him to sign a guarantee that the money would be deposited in the Palestinian exchequer. Al-Zahar told them that he would think about it, then drove off. The foreign minister is the third Hamas official to enter at the Rafah crossing into Gaza carrying large amounts of cash. Last month, a Hamas lawmaker passed through with $4.5 million in banknotes. Before that, a Hamas spokesman brought in $800,000. Not a single dollar of these cash deliveries ever reached official Palestinian national coffers. Rather, Palestinian sources report that the cash covered the wages of Hamas’s militiamen and “security forces” — that is, the hired killers of “one of the deadliest terrorist organizations in the world today.”

And the provenance of this money? Ironically, given President Bush’s pledge that “those who do business with terror will do no business with the United States,” much of it comes from a country whose princes are regular guests at the Crawford Ranch.

According to Israel’s Center for Special Studies, as of 2003, up to 60 percent of Hamas’s annual budget came from Saudi Arabia, including from official sources, government-sponsored telethons, and government-run charities, as well as from Saudi individuals and organizations. The Saudi flow of money to Hamas has been so great, historically, that long before he became PA president, Mahmoud Abbas was complaining about it, as attested to by a December 2000 letter he wrote to Prince Salman, governor of Riyadh, discovered by Israeli forces during Operation Defensive Shield in April 2002...

(h/t: Andrew Bostom)

France's Dan Rather still out spinning

He's actually a bit worse than Dan Rather.

Richard Landes catches France 2's Charles Enderlin (the Godfather of the al Durah affair) still out on the spin: Gaza Beach Pallywood Flushes out Al Durah Scammer in chief, Charles Enderlin

The Gaza Strip scandal has had its secondary fallout. Enderlin, the journalist without whose credulity or dishonesty the Muhammad al Durah affair would never have seen the light of day, and with whose expert help it lit up the world of anti-semitism and Jihad, ran this latest Pallywood footage with his usual professional negligence. One viewer, Emilie Dorra, 23, a close reader of Philippe Karsenty’s Media Ratings, a (rare) media oversight organization in France which has taken on the Muhammad al Durah affair with great courage, immediately sensed something was wrong...

Ouch. Read the rest here.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Yard Blogging - Roses

Saw Cars this moring. Cute. In the afternoon I attended an organizational meeting for a new group of Christians and Jews getting together to support Israel. Very interesting.

Now how about we relax with some nice pictures of roses? I took these the other day. Click for larger versions.


More Prayers for the Assassin

Jeff Jacoby reviews Robert Ferrigno's excellent novel, Prayers for the Assassin (has that guy gotten more publicity for a novel than anyone in recent history or what?) in yet another clear-headed Jacoby look at what America has in store if the terrorists really were to win: Life in an Islamist US

AFTER THE terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, it became a cliche that if we didn't do X, Y, or Z -- usually some normal peacetime activity -- then ``the terrorists will have won." For example, the president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences justified the decision to proceed with the 2001 Academy Awards by declaring that ``if we give in to fear, if we aren't able to do these simple and ordinary things, the terrorists have won the war."

In truth, though, most Americans have never thought about what it would mean if the terrorists really did win -- if militant Islamists were to succeed in their quest for political control of the United States. It isn't something that elites in academia, government, or the media generally like to talk about, for fear of being branded racist or ``Islamophobic." American Islamists themselves are careful not to speak too candidly about their supremacist goals.

Life in an Islamist United States would be largely unfree and intolerant, if the experience of countries where radical Muslims have achieved power -- Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, and Afghanistan -- is any guide. What would that mean in American terms? That's the question a remarkable new novel sets out to answer...


Episcopalians curb anti-Israel rhetoric

Looks like the Presbyterians haven't been the only ones shifting things around the past few days. This report about some Episcopal moves sounds like a bit more of a mixed bag, though.

Episcopalians curb anti-Israel rhetoric

The US Episcopal Church has taken a significant pro-Israel turn at its triennial General Convention, joining the Presbyterians in abandoning pro-Palestinian rhetoric and adopting a resolution repudiating anti-Jewish interpretations of the New Testament...

...The new materials would seek to "root out" the teaching that Jews were "Christ killers" and reawaken the knowledge and affirm an appreciation of the church's Jewish origins, supporters argued.

Bishop Edward Little of northern Indiana also asked church to apologize to the Jewish people for its "consistently unbalanced approach to the conflict in the Middle East." "Virtually all General Convention resolutions concerning the Middle East, and all public policy pronouncements by Episcopal agencies, have relentlessly criticized the state of Israel, portraying the Jewish state as an oppressor nation and the Palestinian people as victims of Israeli oppression," he argued.

Opponents of the resolution argued the church should apologize instead to the Palestinians for the US government's support for Israel.

However, Rev. Bruce Chilton, professor of religion at Bard College in Annandale-on-Hudson, New York stated, "Terrorism is a war crime. If we fail to say that, how can we claim any moral ground whatsoever?"

The church's international peace with justice committee amalgamated Little's call for an apology with three resolutions asking the church to condemn the "wall," calling for dismantling settlements on the West Bank and supporting Palestinian human rights.

The committee rejected the term "wall" to describe the separation barrier, and modified its blanket condemnation to call for the removal of the "barrier where it violates Palestinian territory."

It also urged the US government to pursue a two-state solution and support the human rights of both Palestinians and Israelis, denounced terrorism, called for an eradication of anti-Semitism, supported a withdrawal from the territories to the 1967 borders, asked both sides to recognize the "elected leadership" of the other, supported positive financial investments in the region and advocated the " elimination of corruption within the Palestinian Authority and appropriate financial transparency to better serve human and economic rights of Palestinians."...


The harshest images were edited for TV

More data on the Gaza Beach incident, especially important for those doing analysis. Never make firm judgements without the raw footage.

The Palestinian Arab photographer complains in the story that just because they're Palestinians, people question what they say, but given their track record and the fact that they live in an un-free society where those who do not toe the line are at fear for their lives, skepticism is highly warranted.

The harshest images were edited for TV

GAZA - When Zakaria Abu Arabid, a journalist with the Ramatan news agency, arrived at Al-Awda Hospital in Gaza's Jabalya refugee camp two weeks ago on Friday to photograph casualties of an incident in the Beit Lahia area, a staff member told him that Israel had shelled the Lahia beach. He headed to the spot.

Two weeks later, Abu Arabid and Haaretz view the now-famous tape of Huda Ghalia as she runs along the beach and finds the body of her father. The most gruesome images, it turns out, were censored for television...


'A non-Jewish foreigner is a different question'

Forming another Arab apartheid state: PA minister: Settlers not welcome in Palestine

What he says about "settlers" is at least arguable (from his perspective), but they go beyond settlers. It's the death penalty for selling land to a Jew in the PA now, and that won't be changing.

Palestinian minister Sheikh Nayef Rajoub says Olmert’s statement that West Bank settlers could live in Palestinian state is clearly unrealistic. ‘We don't want them, and I'm sure that they, considering their arrogance and violence, don't accept the idea either’ ...

...[YNet:] But not all the settlers are the same. Not all are violent and not all of them live in the West Bank because of ideological reasons. And besides, if a foreigner wants to live here you wouldn’t let him?

[Rajoub:] "A non-Jewish foreigner is a different question. We aren’t against the Jews as Jews, as a religion. We are against those settlers because of their behavior and the immense suffering they have caused us, and the large number of victims their conduct has cost. Settlers’ behavior did not leave us with the option to classify who among them is extremist and who is moderate."...

(via OceanGuy)

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Green-Rainbow Party Suffers Backlash After anti-Israel Endorsement

A little over a week ago, I mentioned that the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts was endorsing an anti-Israel protest to be held in opposition to the Talk, Walk and Rock for Israel family-day at City Hall Plaza, called by the notoriously anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic and anti-American New England Committee to Defend Palestine. If you think that's over-stating it, just have a look around their web site, and at the pictures of the event itself.

It seems, however, that not everyone with a Green Party membership was so thrilled as their Administrative Committee was. In fact, they lost a couple of people over it (and the Greens don't have many to lose). Good for those few:

I am and will continue to be a strong supporter (and voter) of green-rainbow. But I take strong exception to the decision to endorse this protest, especially given the inflammatory language of the flyer. This is NOT how you build a rainbow coalition...

Please remove my name from your mailing list - I can not support this one sided stance on Israeli Palestinian relations. To support one oppressive corrupt and violent side against the other equally corrupt and violent corporate military regime is unconscionable! This "Green-Rainbow Party Statement on Palestine" is Bull shit!...

While I can agree with the intent, I will not be sending the protest flyer on Israel anywhere. What kind of political party are we trying to be? I see nothing in the Green-Rainbow Party Statement that relates to racism, in the Middle East. Are there not historical links between the People of Palestine and the People of Israel. As a Black man long engaged in the struggle against racism I don't take up the word lightly, and I feel it is out of context here.

As a Political Party I want us to be taken seriously, we need to set our standards higher. I believe there has to be accountability on all sides. The blood of innocents has been spilling for generations on all sides.

I would never know there is any kind of Peace Movement ongoing in the State of Isarel from the leaflet we are asked to support. Many in Israel have taken risk to support the rights of the People of Palestine...


Continue reading "Green-Rainbow Party Suffers Backlash After anti-Israel Endorsement"

Former Moderator Tried to Amend anti-Divestment Resolution

If you want an indication of just how much the "professional class" at the Presbyterian Church (USA) did not like the repudiation the 217th General Assembly just handed their prize issues (see: PC(USA) General Assembly ACCEPTS Committee Report -- Removes Divestment Language -- Live Blog and Presbyterian General Assembly Votes to Declare Suicide Bombing a Crime Against Humanity Over Objections of Social Witness Policy Committee), take a look at what the Moderator of the 216th GA, Rick Ufford-Chase, tried to do the day after: Ufford-Chase's bid to reconsider divestment resolution is defeated

BIRMINGHAM - After an adjournment-eve midnight express that lasted until 12:30 a.m. Thursday, during which a batch of social and political policies was approved with scant debate, the 534 commissioners of the 217th General Assembly returned from a brief rest to handle a few items and adjourn.

The remnants included 216th General Assembly Moderator Rick-Ufford Chase's unsuccessful attempt to convince the commissioners to reconsider a resolution on the Middle East because it called on the denomination to restrain from telling other nations not to protect their borders.

That wasn't the way Ufford-Chase wanted the resolution to read. He said the Presbyterian Church (USA) should not abandon its prophetic right to tell nations what to do.

He was addressing one of the statements in the new General Assembly policy that replaced the 2004 resolution favoring Palestinian interests over Israel's defense of its borders, including military occupation in some Palestinian areas and a separation barrier that has been credited with significantly reducing terrorists' suicide attacks on Israeli civilians.

The General Assembly approved the policy, written by its Peacemaking and International Issues Committee. It begins with an apology for the actions of the 216th General Assembly, which adopted a resolution calling for phased selective divestment of denominational holdings in multinational corporations doing business in Israel. That resolution included no similar sanctions against the Palestinians.

The new statement also defended Israel's right to construct a barrier to protect its citizens, while the 2004 resolution condemned that barrier.

Ufford-Chase wanted the statement defending Israel's right to build the wall extracted from the committee reports. But the majority of the assembly seemed to prefer the advice of Noel Anderson of San Joaquin Presbytery, who noted that the committee carefully considered that part of the report and approved the statement almost unanimously, and asked the commissioners to reject Ufford-Chase's request. They did...

That was just the type of thing some folks were afraid of -- that the higher-ups would try to circumvent the committee report by some maneuver or other. This was a fairly weak effort, and fortunately it failed. The system worked.

Further evidence: Some Presbyterians are noting that the PC(USA) house organs are misreporting (spinning hard) what went on.

Friday, June 23, 2006

Fun with Photoshop and The New York Times

Inspired by this and this.


(yes, yes, I'm aware not all the press sits in the green zone with their feet up)

More coming.

Update:

Another:

And:

Last one:

Canada calls for arrest of Iranian at human rights conference

At least they're saying something...

The clamour for action against an Iranian official implicated in the murder of Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi is growing.

Saeed Mortazavi is Iran's prosecutor general. In 2003, Mortazavi ordered the detention and interrogation of Kazemi, who was tortured and later died of her injuries.

This week, Mortazavi resurfaced as part of Iran's official delegation to the inaugural meetings of the new UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

Iran can't even get into the new human rights club, since it failed to win election to the council. It decided to show up anyway, and sent a team of observers to the council's first meetings in Switzerland.

George Gordon-Lennox of the press freedom group Reporters Without Borders was shocked to see Mortazavi. His role, said Gordon-Lennox, has been "putting journalists in prison."

But there are also accusations of torture, and in the case of Kahzemi, involvement in both her murder and the subsequent coverup.

"What it says to us about the council is that the council is not getting off to quite as good a start as anyone would hope," said Gordon-Lennox...

...Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay said in a news release that he is disgusted by Iran's action.

Mortazavi ordered the arrest of Canadian photographer Zahra Kazemi (shown in an undated file photo), who later died in Iranian custody. Mortazavi ordered the arrest of Canadian photographer Zahra Kazemi (shown in an undated file photo), who later died in Iranian custody.

"The presence of Mr. Mortazavi in Iran's delegation demonstrates the government of Iran's complete contempt for internationally recognized principles of human rights," he said.

The Canadian government has also demanded Mortazavi's arrest...


Pallywood or No?

Wiesenthal Center Praises PC(USA)

The Wiesenthal Center has taken note of the PC(USA)'s declaration of suicide bombing as a crime against humanity. Sad it is that the obvious should need to be spelled out, but the import of this resolution on the part of the Presbyterian Church cannot be understated: Wiesenthal Center; Presbyterian Church's Resolution Declaring Suicide Bombing 'Crime Against Humanity' Boosts International Campaign To Curb Scourge Of 21st Century

The Simon Wiesenthal Center described the adoption by the U.S. Presbyterian Church (PCUSA) National Assembly of a resolution confirming any suicide bombing, 'a crime against humanity,' - "A significant step forward in the campaign to curb what has emerged as terrorists' most deadly tool of mass terror and murder."

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Wiesenthal Center said, "If this resolution were adopted by the international community it would create a legal tool to go after those who incite, plan, and abet such activity. It would further empower victims and their families to take legal action against the food chain of terrorism."

"The Wiesenthal Center calls on all churches and NGOs to follow PCUSA's lead and work together for the adoption of this important initiative," concluded Cooper.

Rabbi Cooper, Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein, the Center's Director of Interfaith Affairs and Dr. Judea Pearl, father of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal writer murdered by jihadists in Pakistan attended the PCUSA National Assembly to urge that anti-Israel divestment resolution be rescinded. It was replaced by resolution calling for proactive actions to benefit both Palestinians and Israelis.

Since 2003, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has spearheaded a campaign to have suicide bombings declared a 'Crime Against Humanity.' The goal of the campaign is to create a legal tool for victims to go after sponsors and those who inspire this deadly culture of mass murder worldwide. To this end, Center officials have brought the initiative to European Union head Javier Solana; His Holiness, the late Pope John Paul II; Turkish Foreign Minister Abdallah Gul; former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and diplomats from 20 other countries...

Update: More praise: The Coalition for Responsible Peace in the Middle East commends the Presbyterian Church (USA) for Overturning Divestment and for Declaring Suicide Bombing a Crime Against Humanity

Anti-Semitism in the Arab Media

From the ADL:


Tishrin, June 14, 2006 (Syria)
The Arab is shouting: “Land for Peace,” while the Jew is thinking of controlling the whole world.

Worst People in America

I drew a blank when I submitted my answers for John Hawkins' poll seeking out the top twenty (or is that bottom?) worst people in America: Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select The Worst People In America I'm ashamed of how many names I forgot, though I think I did manage three of the top five -- Moore, Kennedy and Sheehan.

Saudis still boycotting

Gee, the Saudis are ignoring the World Trade Organization obligations and no one is doing anything about it? What a surprise.

Petition to Support Thomas Klocek

Scholars for Peace in the Middle East has posted a petition to support the case of DePaul Professor Thomas Klocek

To: Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, C.M., Ed.D., President and Susanne M. Dumbleton, Ph.D., Dean of the School for New Learning, DePaul University

We, the undersigned faculty members from around the world, stand solidly with Professor Thomas Klocek, a Roman Catholic, who was dismissed by DePaul University for allegedly offending Muslim students when discussing Christian interests in Israel, disputing that Israeli treatment of Palestinians was akin to the Nazi treatment of the Jewsand then terminating the discussion when it appeared that the students were more interested in Israel-bashing than discussing the issues.

We believe this case sheds serious questions on the commitment to academic freedom and civility in academic discussion with this egregious termination. We further believe that this action by administration has separated DePaul from the academic community...

Over 900 signatures as of now. They're looking for 2000. I'd sign but it appears you're supposed to be a faculty member somewhere?

A Conspiracy? Or Are Jews Just Smarter?

Steven Pinker examines some very controversial study results: THE LESSONS OF THE ASHKENAZIM - Groups and Genes

...The appearance of an advantage in average intelligence among Ashkenazi Jews is easier to establish than its causes. Jews are remarkably over-represented in benchmarks of brainpower. Though never exceeding 3 percent of the American population, Jews account for 37 percent of the winners of the U.S. National Medal of Science, 25 percent of the American Nobel Prize winners in literature, 40 percent of the American Nobel Prize winners in science and economics, and so on. On the world stage, we find that 54 percent of the world chess champions have had one or two Jewish parents.

Does this mean that Jews are a nation of meinsteins? It does not. Their average IQ has been measured at 108 to 115, one-half to one standard deviation above the mean. But statisticians have long known that a moderate difference in the means of two distributions translates into a large difference at the tails. In the simplest case, if we have two groups of the same size, and the average of Group A exceeds the average of Group B by fifteen IQ points (one standard deviation), then among people with an IQ of 115 or higher the As will outnumber the Bs by a ratio of three to one, but among people with an IQ of 160 or higher the As will outnumber the Bs by a ratio of forty-two to one. Even if Group A was a fraction of the size of Group B to begin with, it would contribute a substantial proportion of the people who had the highest scores...


Thursday, June 22, 2006

Presbyterian General Assembly Votes to Declare Suicide Bombing a Crime Against Humanity Over Objections of Social Witness Policy Committee

You read that correctly. A day after removing the language of divestment, this General Assembly continues getting the job done. The folks on the floor are doing their thing against the clearly desired results of the elites on the permanent committees. I'll have some closer examination of this later, but here's a quick snapshot. The bureacratese is here, in full: Commissioners' Resolution. On Declaring Suicide Bombing a Crime Against Humanity.

Below is the resolution they passed. Note that the committee in charge of the Middle East issues proposed this resolution after passing it amongst themselves. If I'm reading this correctly, the General Assembly voted it down in the original form, added a condemnation of "terrorism" (the changes are shown in bold brackets below) and then passed the resolution. This may be slightly problematic as "terrorism" in this context also includes "state-sponsored" terrorism, but this strikes me as a somewhat cynical nit-pick at this point. This is a striking resolution for this denomination to pass:

We, the 217th General Assembly (2006) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) declare that any suicide bombing, no matter who is the perpetrator or the target, constitutes a crime against humanity.

While international law, through various treaties and international consensus affirms the criminality of such acts when linked to a government, it is crucial that the church and the world affirm the culpability of individuals and groups that assist in carrying out suicide bombings [and terrorism] through financial or logistical support and that civil or military authorities who fail to exercise adequate powers of control over perpetrators and fail to take appropriate measures, be held accountable. The international community and faith community as a whole are obligated to prevent and call for international judicial prosecution of all those aiding and abetting these crimes.

We instruct our Moderator and Stated Clerk to encourage our leaders in the U.S.A., our ecumenical partners, our interfaith partners, the National Council of Churches, the World Council of Churches, and the United Nations Security Council to make suicide bombing a matter of declaration and legislation under national laws, and to raise this issue with all appropriate international agencies as appropriate.

We hereby pledge and instruct the Stated Clerk of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), the Washington Office of the PC(USA), and the Presbyterian UN representatives to take every opportunity to publicly and officially condemn suicide bombings [and terrorism] and to help empower victims of such attacks to be able to bring those who plan and inspire suicide bombings to the bar of international justice. Further to instruct the Stated Clerk to notify the United Nations, the World Court, the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other appropriate human rights organizations of the 217th General Assembly (2006)'s position on this topic, and ask for their collaboration in amending international law, especially international criminal court elements of crime; Article 7 entitled "Crimes Against Humanity."

Note also on that page that this resolution passed against the desire of the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy (ACSWP) and the Advocacy Committee for Racial Ethnic Concerns (ACREC) who both advised against this condemnation. My correspondent notes:

The ACSWP's objections included assertions that it was one-sided and that the General Assembly had alread condemned violence in any form and that "The biblical witness on suicide and war is complex. It includes Saul's suicide and Samson's pulling down a Philistine temple on himself and others." -- This last argument is straight from Naim Ateek's essay on suicide bombing, by the way.

This is remarkable and contains much to chew on. Again, congratulations to the people in the pews at the PC(USA) who are finally getting their voices heard and showing that the 216th GA (the last one two years ago that passed divestment) really overreached. Two years ago, the PC(USA) made itself into a club which nefarious forces could use to bash Jews and the Jewish State. This General Assembly is in the process of removing that weapon.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

PC(USA) General Assembly ACCEPTS Committee Report -- Removes Divestment Language -- Live Blog


The committee recommendation is multifaceted. This post from Monday had a run-down with multiple links: Presbyterian Divestment -- Where do we stand? The basic gist is that the "divestment" language has been successfully removed. A hearty congratulations on everyone, especially our Presbyterian friends who worked so hard on this.

Here is the official result with the full language of the recommendation of the committee: On Rescinding and Modifying Certain Actions of the 216th General Assembly (2004) Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Here's some of the language on the divestment issue:

"We acknowledge that the actions of the 216th General Assembly caused hurt and misunderstanding among many members of the Jewish community and within our Presbyterian communion. We are grieved by the pain that this has caused, accept responsibility for the flaws in our process, and ask for a new season of mutual understanding and dialogue.

To these ends, we replace the instructions expressed in Item 12-01 (Minutes, 2004 Part I, pp. 64-66) item 7, which reads

"7. Refers to Mission Responsibility Through Investment Committee (MRTI) with instructions to initiate a process of phased selective divestment in multinational corporations operating in Israel, in accordance to General Assembly policy on social investing, and to make appropriate recommendations to the General Assembly Council for action."

with the following:

To urge that financial investments of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), as they pertain to Israel, Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank, be invested in only peaceful pursuits, and affirm that the customary corporate engagement process of the Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment of our denomination is the proper vehicle for achieving this goal."

No serious trouble was seen in the floor debate. Below is a very rough live-blog based on the live video-feed. My apologies to anyone who's name I butcher, or who's picture I assign incorrectly. Corrections are welcome. [I will be editing and cleaning up this post for awhile without comment. done]

New York Commissioner McLeod recommends an ammendment. Concerned about conflict with the Barman Declaration and the issuing of an apology...wants to withdraw apology language...


McLeod

Noel Anderson, committee member, speaks against the motion...with all respect to Mr. McLeod...please vote no on the ammendment and accept...we worked very hard, prayerfully, etc...


Noel Anderson
Continue reading "PC(USA) General Assembly ACCEPTS Committee Report -- Removes Divestment Language -- Live Blog"

Al Gore...Cui Bono?

This is great...Inconvenient Truth, Indeed

...Now Al Gore, of course, will say that his plan to put the house of Saud and heirs of Khomeini into penury is motivated out of concern for the shrinking polar ice caps and his fervent hope to insure that numerous cities, many American, remain unflooded. But a clear-eyed observer need only ask whom all this altruism benefits to uncover the former vice president's real agenda.

No, all of this greenhouse gases and carbon emissions mumbo-jumbo is cover for a Zionist-Likudnik-neocon plot. If the Gore plan catches on and American citizens start demanding engines free of fossil fuel and candidates dedicated to overtaxing gasoline and forcing car manufacturers to meet European air quality standards, it will be worse than 20 Projects for a New American Century, 50 Weekly Standards, a hundred Charles Krauthammers.

Do I jest? I only suggest that an America powered by alternative fuels is a disaster to Middle East Studies as we know it. Who will endow university chairs reserved for professors who compare Israeli policies to Syrian ethnic cleansing if Saudi Arabia's chief export is sand? Who will pay for all those Council on Foreign Relations studies demanding endless negotiations with Iran or reenergized peace processes, if the big oil companies suddenly no longer care about canoodling with the Arab and Persian despots? What will become of the diligent CIA operations officer when he wants to retire if there are no more oil companies or family owned oil kingdoms to employ him? Realist foreign policy may never recover from Al Gore's environmentalism.

That's just the impact in Washington. If Saudi Arabia falls, consider the devastation to the Madrassa start up business on the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan. If Iran's petroleum profits dry up, where will Hezbollah fighters receive their spiritual guidance, let alone their small arms and phony passports? Mr. Gore's Daily Kos fans may eventually wake up to the prospect that his vision could stop Hugo Chavez of Venezuela from using his oil profits to tip the balance of Latin America's elections in favor of anti-American populists.

The netroots should have seen this one coming. I say, the moveon.org speech for Mr. Gore was only a ruse. If you look back at the man's career, he has been consistently in the pocket of the Israelis. Aipac lobbyists used affectionately to call him the third senator from New York. In the 1980s, Mr. Gore had the audacity to press for a resolution demanding that Arafat be made to account for his role in approving the assassination of a former American ambassador in Khartoum, just as American Jews were beginning to meet with members of the Arafat organization in Oslo, Norway...

...So when people talk about an inconvenient truth and let them talk about who really benefits from Al Gore's crusade against global warming? The only thing stopping the Israelis for now is the internal combustion engine foisted off on the American people by none other than Henry Ford. The case is rested.

It makes as much sense as 90% of the analysis out there.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Free the Palestinian Political Prisoners!

PA plans to weed out 'collaborators'

The Palestinian Authority security forces have been instructed to resume their campaign against Palestinians suspected of "collaboration" with Israel, PA officials disclosed on Monday.

The officials said the order comes in the wake of Israel's ongoing policy of targeted assassinations against Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah members, especially in the Gaza Strip.

...The PA already has about 100 suspected "collaborators" in its prisons in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, including six who are on death row...

...At a closed meeting of the Palestinian Legislative Council's Security Affairs Committee earlier this week, the Fatah and Hamas legislators put aside their differences when the issue of the "collaborators' file" was raised. The committee is headed by former Fatah security commander and minister Muhammed Dahlan, who himself has been repeatedly accused by his rivals of collaborating with Israel and the US.

The parliamentary committee, whose job is to oversee the work of the various branches of the PA security forces, decided that the time has come to launch a massive crackdown on "collaborators." The members of the committee also decided to issue instructions to the judiciary system to pass death sentences against those found guilty of working for the Israeli security services...

...At least seven Palestinians have been killed in the past two months in the West Bank after being accused of collaboration with Israel. All of the killings were carried out by Fatah militiamen belonging to the group's armed wing, Aksa Martyrs Brigades. The victims, who were executed in public squares, included two women from Nablus aged 28 and 50...

Paging Human Rights Watch...

Palestinians fire at school bus

3 Israelis lightly injured in West Bank shooting

Three young Israeli women were lightly wounded by shrapnel Monday afternoon, after Palestinians opened fire at the bus they were riding near the settlement of Ofra. Two other women suffered from shock.

At about 3:30 p.m., gunmen opened fire from the direction of the village of Sanjil at an Israeli bus traveling near Ofra carrying students
of the Ofra "Maaleh Levona" girls' high school. Owing to the fact that the bus was armored, the teens sustained only light injuries caused by shrapnel. The three were evacuated to a Jerusalem hospital for treatment.

Magen David Adom, police and army forces arrived at the scene and began searching for the shooters.

Hezi Tzuri, an MDA paramedic told Ynet: "When we arrived we saw the girls getting off the bus panicking and shouting. Two teens complained of back pains and we found several shrapnel wounds on their body. They were given initial treatment and taken to the Hadassa Ein Kerem Hospital. Two other students who suffered from shock were also evacuated to the hospital."...


Presbyterian Live Video

There is a live video feed of the PC(USA) General Assembly, here. The divestment-related stuff will be happening some time after 2pm tomorrow, Wednesday.

Pop some popcorn and get comfortable.

Pre-removed shrapnel from Gaza victim

A press release from Tel Aviv's Sourasky Medical Center:

Rania Niham, who was wounded in the Gaza beach incident on 9.6.06, and who was brought to the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center for treatment, has regained consciousness. She suffers from injuries to her upper limbs and stomach; her condition is still defined as serious.

She arrived at the hospital in Tel Aviv in very serious condition, unconscious, suffering from severe injuries and with numerous cuts over her entire body as a result of surgical interventions prior to her arrival at the hospital and which do not correspond to the injuries she suffered.

In response to questions that have been directed to the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in recent days by various media outlets, we would like to make it clear that no fragments were found in her body except for one fragment that is inaccessible to surgery; it is also clear - beyond all doubt - that part of her injuries were caused by fragments.

This combination is not routine and does not correspond to our accumulated medical experience as a result of having treated hundreds of patients who were wounded in terrorist attacks and by bombs and who usually arrive with fragments in various places throughout their bodies.

In such cases, standard medical practice is not to search for or extract the fragments unless they constitute an immediate danger to the patient.

This is also the reason that, in most cases, fragments remain in the patients’ bodies, frequently for the rest of their lives.

The Jerusalem Post translates this "careful-speak" in an update to an earlier story (via Judy who also comments on the media's unwillingness to correct their earlier breathless coverage of this incident):

...Strengthening claims that the IDF was not responsible for the explosion, the Tel Aviv hospital said that no shrapnel was found in her body, except for one piece that was not reachable by surgery and would have to be left there. The damage to her body was "without doubt" caused by shrapnel.

Ichilov hospital did not accuse Shifa Hospital in Gaza of directly of removing shrapnel for no medical reason, but it said that it had never received a patient who was in an explosion with all the shrapnel removed (except for one unreachable piece).

"This is surprising and raises questions" about the care she received in Shifa, the Ichilov spokeswoman said. Asked whether Ichilov surgeons had contacted Shifa doctors who treated the patient to ask the reason for the incisions to remove shrapnel, the spokeswoman said: "We are not in such close contact with Shifa. We received the medical report on the patient, and that's all."

Israeli authorities say the chances are "one-in-a-billion" that she was hurt by an Israeli missile...


ICRC Dithers, Soccer Player Frets

So Muslim nations are continuing to keep Israel out of the International Committee for the Red Cross, by delaying even the compromise symbol of the Red Crystal to go through. And don't miss the travails of the Ghanan soccer player who dared honor his Israeli fans by waving their flag -- sounds as though his next stop is in a rubber room if some people have their way.

Push-me/Pull-you at CUPE

Meryl has several links noting some push-back on the part of Jewish groups and individuals (why only Jewish?) against the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees for their stance calling for a boycott of Israel. Don't worry though, CUPE has already cobbled together an ad-hoc group of Jews to front for them, and trumpets it loudly on their web site.

The X-Ray Project

Inside terrorism:

About the artist, Diane Covert:

The idea for Inside Terrorism began coalescing in my mind in 2002 as a personal response to terrorism and to my discomfort with the way terrorism has been justified in some circles. This is a documentary of survivors of terrorism. Much like photographer Mathew Brady documented the Civil War, people in emergency rooms today are documenting the effects of terrorism. The exhibit is another form of "straight" photography - that is photographs made with an unaltered spectrum of light. With that technology, we are able to look inside terrorism...

[via motnews]

Monday, June 19, 2006

Presbyterian Divestment -- Where do we stand?

By now you've heard that the committee responsible for examining and rendering a recommendation on the PC(USA)'s divestment policy has recommended that the General Assembly remove language of divestment from the PC(USA)'s policy: Committee recommends replacing language calling for divestment

The recommendation - passed by a 53 to 6 vote, with 3 abstentions - says:

"We acknowledge that the actions of the 216th General Assembly caused hurt and misunderstanding among many members of the Jewish community and within our Presbyterian communion. We are grieved by the pain that this has caused, accept responsibility for the flaws in our process, and ask for a new season of mutual understanding and dialogue.

To these ends, we replace the instructions expressed in Item 12-01 (Minutes, 2004 Part I, pp. 64-66) item 7, which reads

"7. Refers to Mission Responsibility Through Investment Committee (MRTI) with instructions to initiate a process of phased selective divestment in multinational corporations operating in Israel, in accordance to General Assembly policy on social investing, and to make appropriate recommendations to the General Assembly Council for action."

with the following:

To urge that financial investments of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), as they pertain to Israel, Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank, be invested in only peaceful pursuits, and affirm that the customary corporate engagement process of the Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment of our denomination is the proper vehicle for achieving this goal."

The two-page recommendation contains additional items, including affirmative investment opportunities, an end to all violence and terror against Palestinian and Israeli citizens and interfaith cooperation.

Yes, there's a lot of wiggle-room in there. Yes, MRTI still has a strong raison d'etre and can pretty well continue doing what they've been doing -- is Caterpillar a peaceful investment? Yes, Presbyterians will still have work to do and a watch to keep. On the wider issue though, since the battle over divestment was always really a rhetorical battle, the fact that "divestment" is being affirmatively removed is a victory. The PC(USA), should this recommendation be adopted, will no longer be an advocate of it, and cannot be used as a club with which to beat Jews.

Joel Mowbray, writing in to Power Line, is very positive:

The leftist/Palestinian political push for divestment from Israel--in other words, to institute the campaign waged against apartheid South Africa in the 1980's--is on the verge of being dealt a severe body blow...

...While full assembly embrace of the committee vote would be a huge defeat for pro-divestment forces, it is clear that significant animus toward Israel exists among some conference delegates. Many Presbyterian officials seemed apologetic not about the vote for divestment itself, but rather the "hurt feelings" and "misunderstandings" it caused. Still, disavowing divestment as the explicit aim of the church represents a sea change from just two years ago.

One thing is certain: the full Assembly ratifying the committee action would be devastating for the divestment forces. "The big mo" is critical for any nascent movement, thankfully including those who want widespread demonization of the Jewish state.

The final vote of the General Assembly is Wednesday, and no one should count any chickens before the final vote is in given the experience in the United Church of Christ of late in which divestment was re-inserted at the last moment under similar circumstances.

Should this go through as is, it looks like some people should give themselves a pat on the back, especially considering the resistance at the highest level of insiders. It's not everything we could have hoped for, but it is very, very positive.

Committee member Noel Anderson blogs on the discussion that lead to the decision [a snip -- emphasis mine]:

...There were good speakers and bad. The worst speakers by far were the representatives of the permanent GA committees. ACREC (Advisory Council on Racial Ethnic Concerns) put forward a Palestinian member who wants the committee to make a clear statement to the effect that all the trouble is the ultimate result of Israel's "illegal occupation." So, after all the peace-loving talk, our ACREC wants us to just blame Israel. The committee will disregard this advice. Another speaker was the chair of MRTI (MIssion Responsibility Through Investment). Generally, this committee seeks to ensure that Presbyterian investments "do no harm" and if possible, do some kind of good in the world. Unfortunately, it has become a lair for leftist political interests. As the chairperson spoke (and I could be mistaken here, but when I lived in Cambria and met several members of the "Dykes on Bikes" motorcycle club, I met her twin sister), she flagged in zeal over MRTI's wonderful work. There was no acknowledgment whatsoever:
1. That the "divestment" statements of 2004 were a blunder.
2. Of the public relations snafus associated with these bad choices.
3. Of the need to make amends and/or reparations for the above mistakes.
4. Of the need to re-establish a positive connection with American Jews...

Gossip from sources on the floor:

"I was sitting right behind Noel Anderson and I agree with his commentary. Bill Somplatsky-Jarmin on the Staff of MRTI had the most condescending and arrogant attitude towards the Presbyterians who ultimately pay his salary. It was like: "How dare you question my right to harass whatever corporation I choose."

Presbyterian blogger James Berkley also has a good post on the meeting: Failing grades on the test of truth

...Yesterday [during the open hearings in committee], we heard some statements that simply don't meet the test of truth. Let me name a few.

We heard that "Israel has shown no willingness to give up land." Wrong. Israel HAS given up land several times, including Gaza recently.

We heard, "Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and so doesn't need a security barrier." Let me get this straight: Do we expect or want Israel to combat snipers and suicide bombers with nuclear weapons? Not me!

We heard, "Israeli actions have devastated the Palestinian economy." That's scapegoating! Graft, corruption, and armed battles between Hamas and Fatah gunmen will ruin any economy.

We heard, "Commissioners are just scared of offending the Jewish community." Such statements demean your faith and courage as commissioners. How false to make this out to be a case of mean Jews making Presbyterians cower in fear! PRESBYTERIANS are offended too, not just our Jewish friends!...

There's more there.

More gossip from the floor:

I observed this "face time" discussion between Susan Andrews and a representative (Evan Feltson?) of the Jewish community. My second hand information about this discussion is that at a noon luncheon on Saturday, Susan Andrews had been heard to say to a couple of GA commissioners that Jonathan Swartz of AJC had agreed with the Rick Ufford-Chase proposal to create a 7 person study team and that MRTI would continue their divestment action. Susan Andrews had apparently told those GA commissioners it was a done deal and that is the way the GA would be voting---no matter what the committee recommended.

Here's the "face time" my source is talking about: Former moderator declares her argument with adversary in public hallway was private

Former General Assembly Moderator Susan B. Andrews became embroiled in a loud argument Saturday with a Jewish man over the divestment resolution approved by 216th General Assembly.

The argument occurred in the large and open hallway outside of the room where the 217th General Assembly's Peacemaking and International Issues Committee was considering whether to rescind the divestment proposal, which has been condemned internationally by Jewish groups.

When reporters heard about the argument, they joined a small throng around Andrews and began taking notes. Realizing their presence, Andrews responded harshly, declaring that she was having a "private conversation" and reporters were not allowed to quote her...

...Andrews was arguing that the denomination's divestment policy was intended to pressure Israel to support a two-state solution for the warring Israelis and Palestinians. She also repeated her strong opposition to Israel's defensive wall that was built to protect Israeli citizens from terrorist suicide-bombers.

Her opponent was arguing that Palestinians must cede to Israel's right to exist and to maintain the defensive wall to protect its civilians. She and he agreed that the Palestinians had suffered during their long conflagration.

Andrews was at the committee meeting to lobby, along with 216th General Assembly Moderator Rick Ufford-Chase, for a proposal that called on the General Assembly to approve a small task force to advise the General Assembly Council on Jewish-Christian-Muslim relationships.

With that advice, which would not have derailed the move toward divestment, the council would have made a proposal to the 218th General Assembly.

But the Peacemaking and International Issues Committee gave scant attention to the General Assembly Council's proposal, choosing instead to craft its own recommendation...

Remember that the powers that be had sought to circumvent the whole process by appointing a committee to study the issue and not face this fight at the GA, thus allowing the process to go forward for another two years as-is until that new committee was able to issue a report at the next General Assembly. So it sounds like someone is, indeed still thinking to go around this committee's recommendation.

Therefore, the book is not closed, but we're almost there. If someone pulls a last-minute parliamentary trick in order to smother the committee report it will look very bad for the PC(USA), but so far, so good.

This just in. Jim Berkley has an excellent report on the whole thing, here: Presbyterians May Dispatch Divestment

Doubt on Gaza Beach (Important Update)

Update: Both Judith and Judy are noting that Human Rights Watch is now -- while still saying there are unanswered questions -- backing off its accusations and praising the Israeli investigation: HRW: We can't contradict IDF findings

...Human Rights Watch conceded Monday night for the first time since the incident that it could not contradict the IDF's exonerating findings.

On Monday, Maj.-Gen. Meir Klifi - head of the IDF inquiry commission that cleared the IDF of responsibility for the blast - met with Marc Garlasco, a military expert from the HRW who had last week claimed that the blast was caused by an IDF artillery shell. Following the three-hour meeting, described by both sides as cordial and pleasant, Garlasco praised the IDF's professional investigation into the blast, which he said was most likely caused by unexploded Israeli ordnance left laying on the beach, a possibility also raised by Klifi and his team...

...Meanwhile Monday, The Post learned that the IDF was currently inspecting a second piece of shrapnel doctors had retrieved from one of the Palestinians wounded in the blast and currently being treated at Soroka Hospital in Beersheba. A first piece of shrapnel, examined by the IDF as well as by an independent academic institute in Beersheba was found to not have come from a 155 mm shell, the type used in IDF artillery attacks on Kassam launch sites in the Gaza Strip. The second piece of shrapnel, sources said, was currently being examined in an IDF lab.

Garlasco told Klifi during the meeting that he was impressed with the IDF's system of checks and balances concerning its artillery fire in the Gaza Strip and unlike Hamas which specifically targeted civilians in its rocket attacks, the Israelis, he said, invested a great amount of resources and efforts not to harm innocent civilians.

"We do not believe the Israelis were targeting civilians." Garlasco said. "We just want to know if it was an Israeli shell that killed the Palestinians."

Lucy Mair - head of the HRW's Jerusalem office - said Klifi's team had conducted a thorough and professional investigation of the incident and made "a good assessment" when ruling out the possibility that an errant IDF shell had killed the seven Palestinians on the Gaza beach.

'We differ when it comes to other pieces of information from other sources that don't relate to the military strike such as the timing and the type of injuries," Mair explained. "While they [the IDF] made a very good presentation, we still think there are enough unanswered questions that have not been examined by Klifi's team…and that is why we believe there should be an independent investigation."

End of update. Original post continues:

Judith Apter Klinghoffer quotes an Israeli surgeon, Dr. Michael Bayme:

...There is now incontrovertible proof that Israel did not cause the tragedy - shell fragments extracted from one bomb victim match the types of bombs made by Hamas - and not Israeli artillery shells. How do I know? I received the victim last Sunday (at 2:00 am), operated on her until 5am, and have re-operated every night since. Now she's out of danger, and will survive to rejoin her family...

Also, be sure to read this translation of a skeptical German media report on the Gaza beach incident:

...In view of the contradictory statements, great importance is attached to Harbed's television pictures. These however raise more questions than they contribute to clarifying. The original photographs are in the meantime so doubtful that CNN shows them only in abbreviated form at its Website.

To the Sueddeutche Zeitung, Harbed explains that he had been informed afterwards about the explosion and driven to the scene by the rescue medics in the ambulance. In his pictures however, Harbed films the hysteria of the ten-year Huda, as if he were a witness of the detonation. Also he films the arrival of the medics, as though he was at the beach beforehand. Additionally, some of the dead and wounded are covered with cloths - who did that?

Harbed claims that Huda escaped serious injury, since she was bathing in the sea. In his photos, however, Huda is running around in dry street clothes. Harbed runs several minutes of the crying Huda and afterwards turns his camera to the dead and injured.

Suddenly a man beside Huda's dead father can be discerned, until now covered and motionless, who appears with a machine gun in his hand. In the pictures of the cameraman one can recognize both medics in green OI clothes as well as dozens of men, most with typical Hamas full beards, apparently securing pieces of evidence...


Sunday, June 18, 2006

Talk, Walk, Rock for Israel -- Report with Pics (2 Updates)

It was a glorious day for a Talk, Walk and Rock with Israel rally, if a little warm -- well into the 90's. This was the third year I've attended. (Previous years: 2004, 2005) I didn't attend the start at Copley Square, nor did I march in the parade this year since I wanted just to head down to City Hall and get pictures as the marchers came in.

Overall, the event at City Hall itself was better than last year I'd say. There was a lot more to do, look at and eat, with various groups manning tables, and moonbounce and other stuff for the kids. As a guess I'd say attendance was down just a bit. A good time was had by all, though. Heck, Greg even managed to get me to do Tefilin with the Chabad Rabbi.

"Gaby" has left a comment in the thread below, and I've pasted his message into this post. He relates that for some reason, organizers wouldn't allow the marchers to bring their signs and banners into the event past the security checkpoint. That seems rather odd. It almost seems that the moonbats, who were once again allowed to hang right there at the entrance and harrass people as they went in and while the event was ongoing, who had their own amplification, and who were even given their own spritzer tent (the little tents with a water mist for hot days like today)...it almost seems that in a way they were running the show.

And what a show it was! Lets get on with some photos and video. (I've focused a lot on the freak show at the front gate, but that's something of a false impression. You could go right in and ignore them...but where's the fun in that? Or the blog post?) Moonbats ahoy!

I've got a gallery set up with all of my photos of the event, but here are some of the high and lowlights. Oh, there are also a couple of videos taken with my digital camera down toward the bottom of the post. I have video taken with my regular video camera, but that will take a little longer to get posted. I will update. Also, if you were there and took pics or have a blog post on it, let me know and I'll link.

Apparently, the Greens thought better of bringing their banner, because I never saw it, although they did officially "endorse" the protest, and Andover High's Ron Francis did attend.

Click any thumbnail for a larger version.

Boston City Hall is right behind the Holocaust Memorial:

City Hall Plaza through the glass wall of the Holocaust Memorial. Am Yisrael Chai. You can see some of the blue and white decorations, but no one has arrived yet:

No wind, but a friendly flag flies on the center pole to the left of America's:

The protesters (most appeared to be from the New England Committee to Defend Palestine) got their start out on the sidewalk.

Hey, I thought these guys were supposed to be anti-racist. What's all this about Arab land?


Continue reading "Talk, Walk, Rock for Israel -- Report with Pics (2 Updates)"

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Israel will cooperate with int'l probe on Gaza blast 'five minutes after similar probe on Qassam fire on Sderot is concluded'

It's an anonymous source, but hey, it's a good quote:

YNet: Official: Int’l probe? Investigate Qassam fire first

Top government official says Israel would cooperate with int’l probe on Gaza blast ‘five minutes after similar probe on Qassam fire on Sderot is concluded’

Responding to calls for an international investigation into the recent Gaza beach explosion that left seven Palestinians dead, a senior government official said Saturday that Israel would cooperate with such a probe “five minutes after a similar investigation into the Qassam fire on Sderot is concluded.”

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was among those demanding an investigation be launched into the Gaza incident...

...A day after receiving the findings of the IDF probe into the blast, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said in Paris that the findings apparently prove Israel was not involved in the beach explosion, adding that he hopes those countries that condemned Israel immediately following the incident would refrain from doing so in the future without waiting for an investigation’s conclusions.

“Our enemies are not Palestinian children or mothers,” Olmert said. “We do not want to harm innocent civilians.”

During his meetings with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other top UK officials, Olmert stressed the fact that tragedies may accidentally occur during Israeli self-defense activity, adding that the difference is that Palestinian Qassam rocket fire toward civilian targets in Israel is intentional...

Note this beach scene description at Meryl's:

...Gaza beach, just to the south of Beit Lahiya beach, the scene of an explosion last Friday that killed seven family members and orphaned 11-year-old Ghalia Huda, was yesterday bustling with daytrippers.

Kids frolicked seemingly free of fears of more shells. Some peddled chocolates to passers-by...

...But as a boy ran through the sand to launch his kite, a more sinister launching took place behind him.

Out of the sand dunes burst a Qassam rocket, soaring skywards towards Israel through a brilliant blue sky.

The children froze in their tracks and looked for their parents. Some started to run, the ghosts of the week before still fresh in their minds. A mother called out to them and their panic quickly stopped.

“She said the Israelis won’t send their bombs again,” a small girl said before scampering back to her sandcastle...


Call to Rally

For those of you attending tomorrow's rally, I give you the final call from the New England Committee to Defend Palestine trying to get their people out to protest. The rhetoric here is fairly mild for them, actually, but should you choose to slog through it, it will give you an idea of who and how far out there they really are. Note the plea that the membership please ignore the real Nazis (yes, there will probably be some real Nazis there) and keep focused on the Zionists. You'll also see that there's a good reason that there are only American flags on one side at these things -- they're not just anti-Israel, they're anti-American as well. Bon appetite...

Why anti-racists should stand with Palestinians on June 18th at Government Center:

We support a unified movement against racism and colonialism. Such a movement requires active opposition to racists who attack indigenous people, immigrants, New Afrikans, and other oppressed and colonized people.

Both as material reality and as ideology, white supremacy shows itself across the entire spectrum of US life--from KKK and Nazi groups at the "right-wing" margin, to Minutemen, to racist police and Homeland Security, to the current inheritors of a doctrine of "manifest destiny" who sit at the very center of economic and political power in the United States. Viewed from the radical lens of the indigenous people of this continent, the same ideology shows itself in large portions of the "left" who still cling to European ideas of "progress" as a justification for colonialism, or who fail to recognize the magnitude of colonial crimes against indigenous people here and around the world. This same racism can be seen in the refusal to recognize the legitimacy of resistance to settlers, whose colonization of land means genocide against the indigenous people.

The history of Palestine offers a good window for understanding how, in the history of colonialism, the extreme right, the liberal center, and the radical left often take positions that overlap so completely as to be objectively the same for indigenous people. In Palestine, Zionist followers of Jabotinsky in the Revisionist Movement--a movement that was allied with Italian fascism in the 1930s, had training camps in Mussolini's Italy, and that offered support to Hitler on the grounds of a shared ideology around the concept of the totalitarian organization of society to enforce racial or ethnic purity (the movement of Israeli Prime Ministers Menachim Begin and Yitzhak Shamir), worked hand in hand with "left-wing" Zionists (including those Marxist and anarchist currents who took part in the Kibbutzim) in eradicating Palestinian villages in 1948 and dispossessing some 80% of the population. The groups differed in their concepts of how Zionist society should be organized; they were nearly unanimous in their policies toward indigenous Arabs.

Continue reading "Call to Rally"

Keith's letter home

Frequent guest poster Tom Glennon's nephew is back in the Army Reserve, doing training in the southwest US before deployment to Afghanistan with his MP unit. Tom's posted what will hopefully be one of many notes home from nephew Keith decribing what they've been doing. Yesterday: Riot Control training.

Not a 'Jews Only' road

CAMERA's blog, Snapshots, points out that the road upon which an Arab man was murdered a couple of weeks ago is often referred to by detractors (including Haaretz) as a "Jews only" road. Sort of a sad object lesson in the falsity of that label isn't it?

Human and Truth Casualties on 443

Lobsters...basically an insect

Boston Globe: Sellers shrug at lobster ban

A day after Whole Foods Market stopped the sale of live lobsters in its stores, local chefs and wholesalers brushed off worries that New England's iconic crustacean would go the way of fur or foie gras.

The upscale natural foods chain said that lobsters are not treated humanely enough en route from the boat to the dinner plate. The company said for now it would only sell frozen lobster products that meet standards for humane treatment.

Chef Jasper White, whose four Summer Shack restaurants sell $4 million to $5 million worth of lobster each year, called the decision ``pure silliness" and a ``PR move" to appease animal-rights activists. Some 10,000 families in New England and maritime Canada depend on lobstering for income, he says, and Whole Foods should be more concerned about them than about an animal that he called ``basically an insect."

``People first, lobsters second," White said. ``Lobsters are for dinner."...


Palestinians Try to Abduct Two Teenage Israeli Girls in West Bank

YNet: 2 teenage girls escape kidnapping attempt

Three Palestinians from Jenin try to force teens into car at gunpoint at West Bank bus station; girls resist abduction, one teen sustains light injuries in incident. Gunmen apprehended following pursuit carried out by IDF forces

Two Israeli teenage girls escaped a kidnapping attempt Thursday at a hitchhiking post located at the Rahelim Junction in Samaria.

An initial investigation carried out by the IDF revealed that three Palestinians from Jenin arrived by car to the bus station and tried forcing the girls into the car at gunpoint.

The two resisted and one of the girls, 15-year-old Emuna Shachar of Jerusalem, sustained light injuries as a result. The gunmen were apprehended following a pursuit carried out by IDF forces...


Likudniks here, Likudniks there...

TigerHawk addresses Juan Cole's tendency to throw stones, including that "Likudnik" business: Juan Cole and argument by motive

...I'm not sure what "tied to the Israeli Likud Party" is supposed to mean -- that Ledeen and Rubin have friends who support Likud? -- but I do know that Michael Ledeen has never advocated war with Iran. He absolutely believes that Iran has been waging war on the United States directly and by proxy since 1979, and he also believes that we should be supporting Iranians who resist, or would resist, the regime of the Islamic Republic. There is no evidence, however, that Ledeen supports war with Iran, however extensive our moral or legal justification for war might be. Worried that I might have missed a call for war in Ledeen's voluminous writings, I confirmed his position by email this morning, something that Cole, who takes great umbrage when others (allegedly) mischaracterize his position, obviously did not do...

More.

Paging Sheik Al-Qaradhawi...

Presbyterian Live Reports

Will Spotts at Truth in Love is cranking out live reports form the Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly in Birmingham, including a run-down of every person who addressed the committee considering divestment and what they said. Head on over and keep scrolling.

Bearing-Witness also has new essays up.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Fatwa Time with Salah Soltan

It's fatwa time with Ohio Imam Salah Soltan (click name for background posts) at IslamOnline:

NameAbdAllah -
Profession 
QuestionI live in France but there is jihad in my land. I am going to get married, but I'm afraid that maybe I will love this world too much and will change my mind and decide not to go to jihad. What is your advice for me?
AnswerIn the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.

Your question lacks details, therefore I cannot give you a specific answer. But generally speaking, marriage does not prevent someone from participating in legitimate jihad, it should increase his reward even as it would mean sacrifice of family and children. But whether this jihad is legitimate and worthy of sacrifice this what needs to be decided on getting to know the country and circumstances and needs of the people.

Allah Almighty knows best.

What a country. What an immigration system.

(h/t: Miss Kelly, who also comments)

The wise and the foolish

For those with registration to the pay portion of the Wall Street Journal, here's a good op-ed by a Presbyterian, Jim Roberts, concerning the turns his church has taken: Turn Left at the Presbyterian Church. [Update: Here is the piece in full.] Quote from the pay portion:

...How did the church fall so far so fast? In June 2004, with scant attention and without fair debate, the leadership foisted a divestment resolution on an unsuspecting church. While the action was likened to similar divestment from South Africa under apartheid in the 1980s, attempts to draw analogies between that country then and Israel now are factually indefensible. Only a few months later in the fall of 2004, senior church leaders were among a contingent that met with Hezbollah in Lebanon and praised them -- the same international terrorist organization that has killed thousands, including Americans, without remorse over several decades, and that receives major funding from Iran.

The church also funds fiercely pro-Palestinian committees, sends representatives to Palestinian advocacy conferences, and has written obsequious congratulatory letters to the terrorist leaders of Hamas on their recent election victory. Simultaneously, the church remains remarkably docile on profoundly serious issues such as genocide in Darfur, the Iranian nuclear buildup and mistreatment of Christians in communist and Muslim countries...

...Instead of admitting in 2006 that the Middle East has changed dramatically since 2004 -- the rise of a land-for-peace consensus in Israel, the election of Hamas to the Palestinian government, and the equally (if not more) disastrous election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Iran -- the Presbyterian Church clings stubbornly to flawed policies that are now all the more embarrassing...

By "falling fast," Roberts is talking about the massive loss of membership and funding the PC(USA) has, along with other denominations taking similar turns like the UCC, taken. Interestingly, however, as far as money goes, the PC(USA) need not worry over-much. Look what just happened: Surprise announcement electrifies Assembly - PC(USA) receives historic $150 million gift for church growth

A Colorado businessman and elder has contributed a historic $150 million gift to the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) aimed at helping presbyteries start new churches, transform struggling congregations and develop new racial-ethnic congregations.

The money from Stanley W. Anderson of Denver, Colo., for the new Loaves and Fishes Church Growth Fund will be distributed to presbyteries through grants ranging from $250,000 to $1 million each...

Hey, it's Mr. Anderson's money...but there's a reason the denomination is losing members and funding. In fact, one of the only means the folks in the pews have to make their voices heard to what's become an elitist hierarchy is to vote with their wallets in the hopes that the folks in the bureaucracy listen. Mr. Anderson has just removed that check on the brass, that one measure of accountability the rank and file could exercise. There's been a tendency to shift farther and farther off away from the values of long term members, and the folks at the top haven't cared much, letting the "dissidents" go (and it stretches the definition of the word since there are a lot of them) in favor of their ideological agenda. Expect that trend to accelerate.

McKinney's Off the Hook

Not being indicted, that is: Grand jury declines to indict Rep. McKinney

A District of Columbia grand jury has declined to return an indictment against U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Georgia, accused of assaulting Capitol Police Officer Paul McKenna in an April altercation.

An incident report filed last month by the Capitol Police said McKenna was "physically assaulted" by McKinney, who hit him with a "closed fist." The confrontation occurred at a security checkpoint in a congressional office building after McKenna failed to recognize the six-term Georgia Democrat and tried to stop her from bypassing a metal detector, which members of Congress are allowed to do...


Saudi Police Arrest Four East African Christians

While the Presbyterian Church debates divesting from Israel, and activists hog the mics at the Caterpillar shareholders meeting...

Saudi Police Arrest Four East African Christians

Ten Saudi Arabian police armed with wooden clubs raided a private Christian worship meeting in the coastal city of Jeddah on June 9, arresting four East African citizens leading the service.

At press time the two Ethiopian and two Eritrean Christians remained in the city’s deportation jail.

More than 100 Eritreans, Ethiopians and Filipinos were gathered for worship in a home in Jeddah’s Al-Rowaise district at 11 o’clock last Friday morning when a group of Saudi police entered the meeting, wooden clubs in hand.

The startled worshippers brought chairs to seat the policemen, who sat and waited for the three-hour worship service to conclude. None used their clubs or physically mishandled the worshippers...

...But after the June 9 weekly praise and prayer service finished, police arrested four leaders of the group: Ethiopian Christians Mekbeb Telahun and Masai Wendewesen, together with Eritrean Christians Fekre Gebremedhin and Dawit Uqbay.

The four were jailed in the Jeddah Terhil (Deportation) Center, where guards have since permitted an acquaintance to bring them all a change of clothes. Three of the men are married; Wendewesen is single.

A Christian who spoke with the detainees by telephone reported they were “doing fine, with okay morale.” But he said he did not know how they were being treated, or whether they were undergoing interrogation...

...Typically the Saudi government deports expatriate Christians caught conducting worship meetings in their homes or privately owned villas, forcing their employers to terminate their work contracts.

Under the kingdom’s strict interpretation of Islamic law, public non-Muslim worship is prohibited, although members of the royal family insist that Christians are free to worship within their own homes...


Beheaded reporter's father urges anti-divestment vote

The Layman reports: Beheaded reporter's father urges anti-divestment vote

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- The father of a Wall Street Journal reporter who was beheaded in Pakistan by Islamic terrorists appealed to the 217th General Assembly Thursday to end the divestment policy of the Presbyterian Church (USA) that favors the Palestinians over Israel.

Dr. Judea Pearl, a professor at the University of California in Los Angeles, made his appeal during an impromptu press conference at the booth of End Divestment Now in the exhibition hall of the Birmingham Civic Center. His son, Daniel Pearl, was murdered in 2002.

"I implore you to rectify this wrong," Pearl told a group of about 40 people who stopped to listen to him and three other speakers condemn the divestment resolution that was approved by the 216th General Assembly in 2004...

...Pearl, who has established a foundation in his son's name to pursue peace efforts and dialogue on Mideast issues, said the resolution has abetted Hamas, a terrorist group that recently won election to power in Palestine, and that it will discourage Israeli peace efforts in the Mideast.

He urged the Presbyterian Church to adopt a policy of neutrality. He said he could forgive God for allowing his son to become the victim of terrorists, but that he could not forgive the church if it continues to show favoritism toward radical Muslims who call for the destruction of Israel.

Pearl said his son was a humanitarian who gave voice to the very people who beheaded him. Now, he added, he feels betrayed by the PCUSA. "Take a stand against the hate of terrorism that took over our planet," he urged.

The root cause of violence in the Middle East, he said, is not Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory. "The root cause is the total rejection" of Israel's right to exist. "The idea that Jews will have a state in the Mideast is unacceptable" to terrorists. "This is a reality."...


State -- Terror Enabler

Judith Apter Klinghoffer has a very good post musing on the implications of the revalations that State has known all along that Black September was an organ of Fatah and commanded by Yassir Arafat: "STATE" - THE SECRET WEAPON OF THE MURDERERS OF AMERICANS. A snip:

...Robert F. Kennedy was murdered on the first anniversary of Six Day War. In his pocket, Sirhan Sirhan was carrying a newspaper article describing RFK as a Vietnam dove and a Middle East hawk. But Lyndon Johnson insisted that he did not "know the reason for the attack on Senator Kennedy.

A "top official" told reporters on June 7, 1968:

We cannot permit a wave of anti-Arab sentiment among the American public at a time when we are trying to restore good relations with friends in the Arab world.

How did those friends respond? NYT reported on June 7: "Initial Arab reaction today deplored the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, but several newspaper editorials here asserted that the crime could not be isolated from United States policy in the Middle East."

Sounds familiar? It should. The same type of editorials were written after 9/11. And why not? Those editorials were not a product of a free press but of government mouthpieces. Arab governments dared blame the victim and discovered that they not only can get away with murder but that Foggy Bottom is there ever ready to help them do so. Indeed, together they've worked to convince the world that the fact that Arabs kill more and more Americans is proof positive of greater and greater American (not Arab) mendacity...


Report from the Caterpillar Shareholders Meeting (Updated)

From the folks at StandWithUs:

Reporting Immediately After the Caterpillar Shareholders Meeting We are in Chicago, where the annual Caterpillar shareholders meeting has just ended. As expected, there were people sitting all over the room who kept raising their hands, asking to speak, and their questions and comments were anti-Israel. The chairman of the meeting Jim Owens, was gracious, giving each person three minutes (plus) to speak. He repeatedly asked people for business related questions until it became clear that the majority of the questions were sadly, going to be political in nature and more specifically anti-Israel.

Rachel Corrie's parents were in the room. Both of them spoke. Others brought up how caterpillar used bulldozers in Jenin and created rubble. Some talked about being "socially responsible..." which would necessitate that Caterpillar stop selling bulldozers to Israel. They came from a variety of different, manipulative angles. "I have come here out of LOVE for caterpillar. It is my love that motivates my request to you that you stop selling bulldozers to Israel."

I am sitting here at this computer completely grateful that we came here today, so that Israel's side of the story could be represented at this meeting. What follows are our two brief presentations that were made by us at the meeting. There was only one other person at this meeting who stood up during the hour and a half meeting, on behalf of Israel. He is a grandparent who said that his grandson had just returned from Israel and that Israel has a right to defend her citizens.

Roz Rothsteins speech at the Caterpillar shareholders meeting:

Continue reading "Report from the Caterpillar Shareholders Meeting (Updated)"

Andover Teacher Won't Condemn Terrorism - Andover Parents Snooze

Another very illuminating article has appeared in the Andover Townsman with further information on the activities of Andover High School teacher Ron Francis. (see background here, here, here and here)

Here are a few short snips and comments, but those who are interested should read the entire thing. Any bolding in quotes is mine.

Ex-Francis student: Our views were our own

One of the four former students who worked for Andover High School physics teacher Ron Francis' Somerville Divestment Project says Francis never promoted an anti-Semitic political agenda - a charge made by Francis' political opponents.

Francis, the leader of a controversial organization that protests the policies of the Israeli government, is also the informal adviser of the unofficial after school student group Students for Middle East Justice. While respected by colleagues and students as a physics teacher, Francis has angered some opponents of his politics who believe he has used his role with SMEJ to promote an "anti-Semitic" political agenda with students.

Josh Weiner, a former member of SMEJ who is also Jewish, says "that's absolutely false."

"There was no anti-semitism at all," said Weiner, a 2005 graduate...

There are several issues worth noting here. First, the most obvious is the idea that Francis is simply against the policies of the Israeli government. He and his groups clearly are not. They are against the existence of the State of Israel. One of Francis's affiliated groups, the NECDP (New England Committee to Defend Palestine), places the word "Israel" in quotation marks, for instance, and their goals are obvious, even to the point of extending support for the statements of Iranian President Ahmadinejad:

"...Bringing an end to the racist state of "Israel" and ending the American and British invasion and occupation of Iraq are the only solutions that will bring justice to this region."

I'll not belabor the point with Solomonia readers concerning where the line is drawn between being anti specific Israeli policy and anti-Semitic. That's an argument we're all familiar with, and wherever it may lie, the SDP and affiliated groups and individuals are on the record as well over it. I will remark that I know some pretty thick-skinned Somerville residents who were appalled -- to put it mildly -- at what SDP had brought into their community.

Further, the student's response in the article and the responses in the comments of the first thread on this subject are an object lesson in why Francis's form of politics is wholly inappropriate to the high school setting. High school students simply do not have the experience to know what "radical" really is when they see it, or even when they're swimming in it.

Fringe groups like SDP are not in the education business. Such activist groups are, instead, in the indoctrination business. They do not exist to provide a resource, they exist to accomplish an objective, and if that objective requires using a few people along the way, then so be it.

Look, I understand that any high school student reading this might be offended by this, I certainly would have been when I was younger, but it's a fact. Young people try on different personalities, points of view and interests, they wear them for awhile to see how they fit and change them like the latest clothing. It's all part of the learning and growing process...the gaining of life experience.

Privileged high schoolers are told they're smart, participate in activities guided by adults, and seek and earn praise from their peers and mentors -- it's an environment custom-made for a predator like Ron Francis to step in with a glad hand, a friendly smile, a complimentary word and a gateway into the adult world with a promise of even more respect and real achievement in the world outside high school...the real world, the world of "purpose." It's not long before you're bragging about your demonstrated ability to make rational argument, while all you've really been doing is repeating someone else's political cant.

Once kids turn 18 and go off to college or work, they're more or less on their own. There's nothing you can do. But in the captive, sheltered world of the high school, the standard for those given access to our kids must be different.

Francis admits he recruited the kids to work for SDP, recruiting that wasn't coincidental, didn't happen because the kids opened the Yellow Pages and found him listed, and didn't happen because the stars aligned properly, it happened because Francis has access to these kids at the high school:

...Last summer, Weiner and three other Andover High students who were in the after-school group worked on behalf of the Somerville Divestment Project, a non-profit organization that stirred controversy in Somerville by trying to force the city to divest its financial holdings in Israel with a petition drive. Francis, a board member of SDP and a Somerville resident, said the organization is a pro-Palestinian human rights group. Some other Somerville residents called SDP anti-Semitic, and expressed concern that Francis was recruiting Andover High students to work for the group. Francis admitted to asking the students if they wanted to work for SDP, and said they were paid $8 to $10 per hour to canvass door to door...

Astoundingly, it sounds as though Andover parents have been quiescent so far:

...The Andover School Committee is not conducting an official investigation into the matter, as personnel issues are handled by the school administration, but some members worry Francis is violating school policy.

"I have no problem with political views no matter how radical they are," said School Committee member David Samuels. "But I would have a big problem if I found those views being disseminated on school property to students of the school system."

There is no investigation by the administration into Francis' involvement with the after-school group SMEJ, and the community is not asking for one, said Superintendent Claudia Bach.

"Based on my communications with the principal, there is no reason to believe there is any inappropriate conduct," said Bach...

Andover parents, where are you? Bureaucrats don't make work for themselves without pressure.

I'll now skip down in the article to where Francis expresses his own views:

Francis expressed his views on America, Israel and Hamas in an recent interview with the Townsman. Below are excerpts from what he said.

"People living in the United States are severely compromised when judging the actions of the Palestinian resistance because we are funding with our tax dollars the relentless racist oppression of Palestinian people, which meets the international definition of genocide. Our first responsibility is to stop the violent attacks against non-combatants done by Israel and funded by us. That has to come before we raise any questions about the choices Palestinians make," said Francis.

"If you aid and abet a rapist, can you comment on the choices the woman makes to stop the rape from occurring? Because the woman may use a tactic that you oppose on principle, should that make you any less insistent that the rape cease? Don't make the excuse that she used a tactic that you oppose as an excuse to justify the rape.

"I oppose violence against non-combatants, but it is completely understandable that some Palestinians and other people in the world, having exhausted every non-violent approach to end their oppression, would choose violent acts against non-combatants. ["I don't approve of beating your wife, but I understand it..."-S]

"I do not condemn the Palestinian people because the actions they are taking, given the circumstances they face, (are) completely understandable and within the bounds of normal human behavior. I have to ask myself, would I be any different?

"I do condemn the Israeli attacks because they are the ones responsible for stopping the oppression. Under international law, the occupying power is responsible for the people under occupation."

Again, lots here one could address, but I think most of it has been handled elsewhere -- this is familiar rhetoric. If you find my title on this post harsh, the fact is that while Francis states "I oppose violence against non-combatants," every other statement he makes belies that principle. While he may oppose violence against non-combatants in principle, it's quite clear he does not oppose them in practice.

The rape metaphor is particularly illuminating. Extremists often justify themselves by speaking from this highly removed perspective, where "Israel" becomes the rapist, and "Palestine" the victim -- yet somehow, where the rubber of this extraction hits the road, it becomes actual Israeli and Palestinian childrens' guts on the floor in the war Francis provides the advocacy for. It's not they, after all -- Francis, his groups, his students -- who'll run Palestine if he gets his way...it's Hamas.

Finally, this sort of extreme rhetoric has a nasty habit of throwing off its restraints and escaping far beyond the field that it was intended for. For what would you do to someone who was supporting a rapist in the midst of the act? What would you stop at?

That is where the danger in our towns becomes more than abstract arguments over events thousands of miles away, and more than just about intellectual malpractice and some mislead kids.

Update: I missed it when she first wrote it, but Boker tov, Boulder has a post in reaction to my first on this subject that's worth a look.

Breaking: Church panelist compares Israelis to Nazis

JTA: Church panelist compares Israelis to Nazis

A panelist at the Presbyterian Church USA’s forum on the Middle East compared Israelis to Nazis.

Salam al-Maryati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, said Thursday that Israel was crowding Palestinians into conditions “like the Warsaw Ghetto,” said Ethan Felson, assistant executive director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, who was in attendance.

The forum took place a day in advance of the Presbyterian Church USA’s 217th General Assembly in Birmingham, Ala., where the group is slated to vote on its 2004 resolution to begin a “phased, selective divestment” from companies that do business with Israel.

Mark Pelavin, associate director of Reform Judaism’s Religious Action Committee, who also served on the panel, said the Presbyterian Church has not taken into account the effects of Hamas taking over the Palestinian Authority government.

An opening speaker from Human Rights Watch called Israel’s occupation and settlement activity illegal and labeled terrorism a crime against humanity.


Krauthammer: Who Is to Blame for Grief on a Beach?

Excellent. Read in full, but here's a snip:

...An expert at a local chapter of a human rights group disputes the Israeli claims. Okay. Let's concede for the sake of argument that the question of whether it was an errant Israeli shell remains unresolved. But the obvious question not being asked is this: Who is to blame if Palestinians are setting up rocket launchers to attack Israel -- and placing them 400 yards from a beach crowded with Palestinian families on the Muslim Sabbath?

Answer: This is another example of the Palestinians' classic and cowardly human-shield tactic -- attacking innocent Israeli civilians while hiding behind innocent Palestinian civilians. For Palestinian terrorists -- and the Palestinian governments (both Fatah and Hamas) that allow them to operate unmolested -- it's a win-win: If their rockets aimed into Israeli towns kill innocent Jews, no one abroad notices and it's another success in the terrorist war against Israel. And if Israel's preventive and deterrent attacks on those rocket bases inadvertently kill Palestinian civilians, the iconic "Israeli massacre" picture makes the front page of the New York Times, and the Palestinians win the propaganda war.

But there is an even larger question not asked. Whether the rocket bases are near civilian beaches or in remote areas, why are the Gazans launching any rockets at Israel in the first place -- about 1,000 in the past year?

To get Israel to remove its settlers, end the occupation and let the Palestinians achieve dignity and independence? But Israel did exactly that in Gaza last year. It completely evacuated Gaza, dismantled all its military installations, removed its soldiers, destroyed all Israeli settlements and expelled all 7,000 Israeli settlers. Israel then declared the line that separates Israel from Gaza to be an international frontier. Gaza became the first independent Palestinian territory ever.

And what have the Palestinians done with this independence, this judenrein territory under the Palestinians' control? They have used their freedom to launch rockets at civilians in nearby Israeli towns...

(h/t:isirota1965)

Hamas and the appeal to its Jihadi base

You can argue with the gloomy conclusion of this lengthy assessment in Haaretz, but there's a lot of interesting stuff along the way.

Lost innocents

Ahmed Yousef, the political adviser to Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, is soon going to publish a new book, in English. Its title: "The End of the Jewish State: Just a Matter of Time." The new work will be a sequel to an earlier book by Yousef, one of the leading policy advisers to Haniyeh in Gaza, "The Binational State." The nattily dressed adviser, who is considered a characteristic representative of the moderate wing in Hamas, says he does not hate Israelis or Jews; he just believes Zionism is approaching its end and that in its wake the idea of the Jewish state will also wither and fade.

"Your state is temporary, but the Jewish people will continue to live," Yousef said consolingly this week to an Israeli guest in his office, which is adjacent to the Prime Minister's Bureau. "You will be able to live with us here, in one state, as you lived peacefully under the flag of Islam for hundreds of years."

In recent weeks the idea of a binational state under Islamic rule has been enjoying renewed popularity among Hamas spokesmen. "The Golden Age of the Jews was in Andalusia," they recall. "The Muslims never did you harm." A long-term interim settlement with Israel can also be considered, Yousef believes. The terms? "We will give you a hudna [cease-fire] for 50-60 years. You will give the right of return to all the 1948 refugees, to their homes."

It is unlikely that Hamas is deluding itself into believing this to be a realistic plan, but the aggressive declarations are aimed inward, at the traditional supporters of Hamas, rather than at Israel and the international community. In any event, prospects for negotiations with Israel look faint at the moment, and as far as the veteran members of Hamas are concerned, the fact that the organization has not perpetrated attacks on Israel for more than a year and a half is detrimental to its prestige.

"People are calling us traitors," Salah al-Bardawil, spokesman of the Hamas faction in the parliament, told Haaretz this week. "We are being accused of having become a group of power-hungry people and of having forgotten the precept of the jihad."...

(h/t:isirota1965)

Action Needed on Episcopal Resolution

Here's an interesting one sent out on the JAT network concerning the Episcopal meeting going on right now. You will see that our friends within the Churches need our help, too. Everything below this line is quoted material.

SUBJ: Immediate Action Needed on Episcopal Resolution!

This alert should be given top priority, as it concerns a matter that will take place this Saturday.

The alert is based on one we received from CAMERA. We urge JAT members to join this initiative.

Recently we alerted you to happenings at the Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly, and now we're calling your attention to a POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT at the Episcopal General Convention taking place right now in Columbus, Ohio.

ACTION
------

Immediately send email or fax letters voicing your support of the resolution described below to:

The Most Rev. Frank G. Griswald
Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church

Email: pboffice@episcopalchurch.org
Fax: 212-490-3298

Messages need to be sent ASAP because the resolution is slated to be addressed in committee on Saturday morning.

Remember, it is better to send a very short note rather than fail to send any note at all. The text can be as simple as, "I urge the Episcopal Church to enact Bishop Little's resolution."


BACKGROUND
----------

Episcopal Reverand Authors Resolution Calling on Denomination to Apologize for its "Consistently Unbalanced Approach to the Conflict in the Middle East."

The Rt. Rev. Edward S. Little, Bishop of Northern Indiana has put the Episcopal Church, USA on notice by authoring a resolution (see below) that calls on the denomination to apologize to the Jewish community for its "consistently unbalanced approach to the conflict in the Middle East."

Continue reading "Action Needed on Episcopal Resolution"

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Christians for Fair Witness call on Naim Ateek to Repent in Full

The Episcopal Peace Fellowship is bestowing its peacemaking award on Naim Ateek of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center -- a sort of combination of Palestinian Arab Nationalism, Marxism and Christianity (sometimes it seems to run in that order, too) -- at their convention in Ohio. (see previous posts: A Reward For Naim and Peace awards will include controversial Palestinian)

Christians for Fair Witness on the Middle East are commenting from the scene: FAIR WITNESS CALLS ON REV. ATEEK TO REPENT [in full -- emphasis mine]

Columbus, Ohio, June 15, 2006 - Christians for Fair Witness on the Middle East condemns the Episcopal Peace Fellowship for bestowing a peacemaking award on the Rev. Canon Naim Ateek during the Episcopal General Convention in Columbus, Ohio. Ateek is the founder of Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center in Jerusalem and has portrayed Israel as crucifying the Palestinian people.

"The use of this imagery against the Jewish state is inexcusable," says Sister Ruth Lautt, O.P., Esq., National Director of Fair Witness. "This language is not the language of peace and justice. It does not uplift the Palestinians, but demonizes Israel."

In a recent article in the Columbus Dispatch, Rev. Richard Toll, Sabeel's chairman in the U.S., admitted that Rev. Ateek has toned down his rhetoric, demonstrating awareness that this imagery is unacceptable. Nevertheless, a more robust repentance on Ateek's part is necessary says Rev. Dr. Bruce Chilton, Bernard Iddings Bell Professor of Religion at Bard College in Annandale, New York. "Anti-Semitic language is sinful. If Canon Ateek wishes to put his past rhetoric behind him, I welcome that, but he should repent of what he has done and express an intention to change. By the same token, if he wishes to acknowledge today that his previous suggestion of dismantling the State of Israel was destructive, the way of repentance is open to him."

On repeated occasions, Ateek has expressed support for a one-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, which would effectively mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state, says Dennis Hale, Ph.D., a professor of Political Science at Boston College.

"An acknowledgement of Arab refusal to admit Israel's right to exist behind safe and secure borders is the bottom line to any legitimate peace campaign," Hale said. "The Palestinians have been offered a state of their own on numerous occasions, but have turned it down in favor of a fantasy of destroying Israel. Church leaders who do not acknowledge this reality are not serving the interests of peace."

Dexter Van Zile, a member of Fair Witness' executive committee, says churches embrace Ateek's agenda at their own peril.

"A number of churches have asked Israel to take down the security barrier without asking the Palestinians to stop terror attacks," Van Zile said. "Unfortunately, all these churches rely on Ateek for guidance."


The Boo-Hoo Insurgency

Austin Bay comments and provides links on the "treasure trove" of information found after (or was some of it before -- see below) the Zarqawi raid: After Zarqawi– raids kill 104 insurgents/Iraqi gov: AQ planned to use Iran-US confrontation (via TigerHawk)

Here's an AP report on the very interesting info (h/t:isirota1965): Papers show 'gloomy' state of insurgency

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A blueprint for trying to start a war between the United States and Iran was among a "huge treasure" of documents found in the hideout of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Iraqi officials said Thursday. The document, purporting to reflect al-Qaida policy and its cooperation with groups loyal to ousted President Saddam Hussein, also appear to show that the insurgency in Iraq was weakening...

...Although the office of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said the document was found in al-Zarqawi's hideout following a June 7 airstrike that killed him, U.S. military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said the document had in fact been found in a previous raid as part of an ongoing three-week operation to track al-Zarqawi.

"We can verify that this information did come off some kind of computer asset that was at a safe location," he said. "This was prior to the al-Zarqawi safe house."

The document also said al-Zarqawi planned to try to destroy the relationship between the United States and its Shiite allies in Iraq.

While the coalition was continuing to suffer human losses, "time is now beginning to be of service to the American forces and harmful to the resistance," the document said.

The document said the insurgency was being hurt by, among other things, the U.S. military's program to train Iraqi security forces, by massive arrests and seizures of weapons, by tightening the militants' financial outlets, and by creating divisions within its ranks.

"Generally speaking and despite the gloomy present situation, we find that the best solution in order to get out of this crisis is to involve the U.S. forces in waging a war against another country or any hostile groups," the document said, as quoted by al-Maliki's office.

According to the summary, insurgents were being weakened by operations against them and by their failure to attract recruits. To give new impetus to the insurgency, they would have to change tactics, it added...

Thirty Years Too Late -- State Dept. Admits Arafat Did It

The State Department has finally released documents revealing that Yassir Arafat was personally responsible for the kidnapping and murder of US diplomats Cleo Noel and George Curtis Moore 33 years ago in Sudan. Just astounding. How might history have been different if the US hadn't covered Arafat's ass and told the American people the truth? They must have known that the American people would never have let them hold the old murderer's hand all these years, so instead they kept it quiet.

Three years ago, ex-NSA analyst James J. Welsh came forward to state that it was he, personally, who heard Arafat giving the order to kill Noel and Moore via electronic intercept, but the US government, long after there was any danger of compromising sources or methods stayed silent.

For thirty years Arafat's paws spun the Middle East while the world played politics and covered for him instead of telling the truth and letting the chips fall.

US Dept. of State: THE SEIZURE OF THE SAUDI ARABIAN EMBASSY IN KHARTOUM

...The Khartoum operation was planned and carried out with the full knowledge and personal approval of Yasir Arafat, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and the head of Fatah. Fatah representatives based in Khartoum participated in the attack, using a Fatah vehicle to transport the terrorists to the Saudi Arabian Embassy.

Initially, the main objective of the attack appeared to be to secure the release of Fatah/BSO leader Muhammed Awadh (Abu Da'ud) from Jordanian captivity. Information acquired subsequently reveals that the Fatah/BSO leaders did not expect Awadh to be freed, and indicates that one of the primary goals of the operation was to strike at the United States because of its efforts to achieve a Middle East peace settlement which many Arabs believe would be inimical to Palestinian interests. [Note: So actually working to achieve Middle East peace made (and makes) the US a target. -S]

Negotiations with the BSO terrorist team were conducted primarily by the Sudanese Ministers of Interior and of Health. No effort was spared, within the capabilities of the Sudanese Government, to secure the freedom of the hostages. The terrorists extended their deadlines three times, but when they became convinced that their demands would not be met and after they reportedly had received orders from Fatah headquarters in Beirut, they killed the two United States officials and the Belgian Charge. Thirty-four hours later, upon receipt of orders from Yasir Arafat in Beirut to surrender, the terrorists released their other hostages unharmed and surrendered to Sudanese authorities.

The Khartoum operation again demonstrated the ability of the BSO to strike where least expected. The open participation of Fatah representatives in Khartoum in the attack provides further evidence of the Fatah/BSO relationship. The emergence of the United States as a primary fedayeen target indicates a serious threat of further incidents similar to that which occurred in Khartoum.

So they also knew that the events in Khartoum meant more diplomats were at risk. Still, they kept quiet, at least in public.

See also: Uri Dan: Covering up for Arafat

Update: Scott Hinderaker at Power Line, who's covered this issue for some time, has a must-read post on this subject (and kindly links here): Cold River: A case study

Wisconson SS Man Builds Hitler Shrine

What a country. We refrain from shooting this prick, only to have him come to this country, buy a farm, have a long life...and dedicate his land to a Hitler shrine.

Marathon Pundit comments on story at CBS 2 Chicago: Farmer Builds Memorial Honoring Adolf Hitler:

A retired Walworth County farmer is turning his back 40 acres into a memorial to a detested leader he claims is misunderstood.

The memorial to Adolph Hitler is causing quite a stir in Wisconsin and beyond.

Eighty-seven-year-old Theo Junker says he served in a branch of German paramilitary unit in World War II. Junker says he hopes his memorial will clear up inaccuracies about the war and the role of Adolph Hitler.

"Adolf Hitler is the greatest guy, so you don't know the other side," Junker said.

Junker spent $200,000 and five years building this shrine to the fuehrer and in a sense, to himself.

"They told everybody like we was monsters. They thought, 'The SS, they are bad guys,'" Junker said.

An inscribed plaque accuses the Allies of atrocities during the war.

"Not a single person in the Third Reich was gassed," Junker said...

Maybe David Irving can go to work scrubbing the museum toilets when he gets out of the clink.

What a country.

There is this, though:

...Meanwhile, those still on the hunt for Nazi war criminals may be taking a close look at the past of the 87-year-old man who says he was a proud member of the dreaded Waffen SS...

Do you know this man?

Update: Looks like the shrine won't be opening to the public just yet. No permits.

Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: Kerry was supported by homosexuals and nudists

OK, so he may be on to something for once. But seriously, let's see what else our favorite sheik has to say:

MEMRITV: Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: Homosexuals Should Be Punished Like Fornicators But Their Harm Is Less When Not Done in Public

Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: Kerry, who ran against Bush, was supported by homosexuals and nudists. But it was Bush who won [the elections], because he is Christian, right-wing, tenacious, and unyielding. In other words, the religious overcame the perverted. So we cannot blame all Americans and Westerners...

The Sheik assures us that there is disagreement as to how gays should be punished (note: not whether they should be punished of course):

Interviewer: How should a homosexual or a lesbian be punished? We mentioned the story of the people of Sodom and how Allah punished them, but how should someone who commits this abomination be punished today?

Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: The same punishment as any sexual pervert - the same as the fornicator...

...The schools of thought disagree about the punishment. Some say they should be punished like fornicators, and then we distinguish between married and unmarried men, and between married and unmarried women. Some say both should be punished the same way. Some say we should throw them from a high place, like God did with the people of Sodom. Some say we should burn them, and so on. There is disagreement...

...The important thing is to treat this act as a crime.


Egyptian Parliamentarian: DaVinci Code Based on Zionist Myths

I knew it.

Egypt: Da Vinci Code based on Zionist myths

Egyptian authorities will confiscate copies of the best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code and ban the film based on the book from showing in Egypt, the culture minister told parliament on Tuesday.

To applause from members of parliament, minister Farouk Hosni said: "We ban any book that insults any religion... we will confiscate this book."

Parliament was debating the book and film at the request of several Coptic Christian members who demanded a ban.

Georgette Sobhi, a Coptic member, held up a copy of the book and the Arabic translation and said it contained material which was seriously offensive.

"It's based on Zionist myths, and it contains insults towards Christ, and it insults the Christian religion and Islam," she said...

I read an illustrated version and the binding was clearly circumcized.

Marine Wins City Council Seat Campaigning From Iraq

Former Red Sox Manager John McNamara's son, Mike, just won a seat on his local North Dakota City Council...campaigning from Falluja, Iraq where he's on duty with the Marines.

Internet campaign from Iraq wins Dakota election

GRAND FORKS, North Dakota (AP) -- While Maj. Mike McNamara was in Iraq, his family handled much of his city council campaign for him: They handed out fliers, held a campaign rally and put up signs around town.

Meanwhile, he answered voters' questions from Falluja by e-mail.

The strategy paid off this week when the Marine reservist won a seat on the Grand Forks City Council. McNamara, 48, beat four other candidates with 49 percent of the vote in the city's second ward, despite serving thousands of miles away.

McNamara said he will take part in council meetings via speakerphone until he returns to North Dakota in about 90 days. He said he could not have won the race without his family, and he would encourage others serving in Iraq to run for office.

"When I grew up, everyone was a veteran and they really, truly understood what service to the nation was," he said by phone from Iraq, where he works in a combat operations center. "The country is straying from that. When you come here and see young men get killed, and the terrible ways they get killed, it consecrates democracy for you."

McNamara, son of former Boston Red Sox manager John McNamara, said he is not affiliated with a political party. He has served a total of 15 months in two tours of duty in Iraq...


Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Greens, a High School Teacher and a City Councillor United in Hateful Protest

Oh boy, get a load of this. This one involves the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts, City Councilor Chuck Turner, and Andover High School teacher Ron Francis who's on the record recruiting in the school for his hobbies.

The Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts is encouraging people to come out and protest the Talk, Walk and Rock for Israel event this Sunday: Protest Racist Celebration of "Israel" in Boston - Sun 6/18, 11 AM [note that the text on the page scrolls off to the right]. Take note of the fact that Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner is also encouraging people to attend and take a look at what he had to say about it according to a posting on the Green's email list [all emphasis in this and other quotations are mine]:

Green-Rainbow people please come out for this protest if you can. "Boston Celebrates Israel" (or "Talk Rock and Walk with Israel" as they are calling it this year) is possibly the largest racist hate-rally that goes on in Massachusetts. It is important for us to have a large turnout to oppose it. Mystic River Green-Rainbow Action (the Cambridge/Somerville GRP group) is an endorser of the protest. GRP member Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner spoke at the New England Committee to Defend Palestine's forum at Roxbuy Community College last Saturday, a forum that was called to encourage people to come to the protest. Chuck pointed out that Zionism is a form of white supremacy that was developed with the input of christian white supremacists in the USA in the late 19th century. Chuck went on to say that cutting the ties between the USA and Israel would be a crucial step in bringing about the downfall of worldwide white supremacy (including racism inside the USA). Opposing Israeli Apartheid in Palestine is an important issue. I hope a lot of you can come out.

You can't make this stuff up. You'll remember loony-left Turner as the City Councilor who smeared our troops by trying to pass off downloaded porno pictures as evidence of rape committed by American soldiers...resulting in the Boston Globe's printing said pictures. See here, and here (following is a quote from a Globe editorial published at the time):

THE RECENT actions of Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner were reckless and inflammatory. With no regard for truth or consequences, Turner unveiled graphic photographs at a Tuesday press conference, suggesting that the images portrayed the rape of Iraqi women by US soldiers. The display was an all-time low for a member of the City Council. Turner, now in his third term, used twisted logic to justify the photo array. While stopping short of claiming authenticity, Turner argued that "the American people have a right and responsibility to see the pictures" in light of recent revelations regarding abuse of Iraqi prisoners.

Turner's photos appear to match ones found on a pornographic website. Yesterday the Globe apologized for including a photo showing the images with the article about Turner's claims...

So now the call has gone out to the Green-Rainbow people...and guess who's pushing their participation? None other than Andover High School physics teacher and Hamas supporter, Ron Francis (see here, here, and here):

We should endorse this protest...

The "celebration" is of the ethnic cleansing and subsequent denial of refugee rights for the 5.2 Palestinians around the world who are recognized by the UN as refugees.

It's a racist event should be protested. Jewish priviledge nature of the state of Israel is apartheid (legalized racism) plain and simple and it must be ended. [I expect they'll be protesting other racist celebrations by the Italian and Japanese communities next...not. -S]

If we do endorse, let's bring the GRP banner to make our support known.

are there any concerns ???....

One concern may be from Andover parents and tax-payers who don't like the fact that Francis has been preying on their kids by recruiting them for his activities:

Hi Membership folks,

I talked with a social studies teacher at my school (Andover Public High school) and he is amenable to having students earn credits to do internships similar to what Michelle did as a community organizer.

There may be other teachers as well. I will probably try to get Michelle to make a brief presentation to the social studies class and maybe help her to enlist more students in using the "West Somerville" model that Michelle executed and refined, post-execution,

I both hope and suspect that several students will be interested... we need to find anchors....

Ron

Nice.

Recall, as I mentioned before, what's happening this Sunday is a family day -- face-painting, moonbounce...all that good stuff. The bizarre hatred these people pour out on families is pathological.

I hope a lot of you regular folks, supporters of Israel and the Jewish Community can come to the event. You don't have to be Jewish to show your support and enjoy the day. In spite of my focus on the negative here, the event is a good one for families. Bring your American and Israeli flags, march in the parade or just come to the plaza and ignore the voices of hate (who are kept at a distance and surrounded by police anyway, and can be ignored after you enter). Solomonia operatives will be taking photos and video of the bad guys so that you don't have to.

Presbyterian Resources

As we come into the start of the PC(USA)'s General Assembly this weekend, here are some of the anti-divestment blogs and web sites of note:

Bearing-Witness.org will be updating on a daily basis, starting with today's essay: Votes

Concerned Presbyterians has a lot of information.

Blogs: Truth in Love, Classical Presbyterian, Moral Science Club, Full Court Presby, Quotidian Grace, and Noel K. Anderson (one of the Commissioners who will be considering the divestment issue).

A more in-depth look at the Pew poll

TigerHawk has a very interesting post taking a much closer look at the Pew poll referred to in the post below (see: French Opinion Toward Israel on Upswing): Annotating the latest Pew Global Attitudes Project survey

Notable quote:

...The intersection of opinions in Jordan and Egypt, two countries that have made peace with Israel in form even if not in attitude, is perhaps the most troubling data in the survey. In both countries around 45% of the population actually favor Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, and sizable majorities (65% and 61%, respectively) believe that Iran would use those weapons to attack Israel. Pew does not give us the data, but it is virtually certain that a significant percentage of the population in both Jordan and Egypt want Iran to get nuclear weapons so that it will attack Israel. Should we be surprised that the New York Times decided not to report this fairly newsworthy data? No, but we should be disappointed...

Self Help for French Jews

French Jews, apparently tired of late and ineffective police response, have banded together to form their own version of the JDL (via Yourish): French Jews set up own defense league

When a wave of rioting erupted across France last fall, a Jewish youth group swung into action to guard synagogues and community centers from possible anti-Semitic spillover violence.

Many Jews feel that such a reflex is needed these days in France, home to the largest population of both Jews and Muslims in western Europe and sporadically simmering with tensions...

...Formed in 2000, the Jewish Defense League - which has no ties to the U.S. Jewish Defense League - groups about 100 to 150 Jewish teens and young men to protect their community, experts say.

"Jews are fed up," said a league member named Maxime who refused to give his full name, saying he feared for his safety. "We've been nice for 30 years. Now, we gather and fight back."

Maxime, a 22-year-old waiter, admits his group is not afraid to take justice into its own hands if need be. He bragged about a 2003 incident in which a Jewish Defense League member beat up pro-Palestinian university students, injuring one.

"If a (Jewish) kid gets beaten up at school a few times, we go there and talk to the guy who beat him up," he said. "If he does it again, we go back and it's another story."

"Investigations are useless," Maxime said. "We're a second police."

Group members are unarmed but train in Krav-maga, a form of close combat developed by the predecessor of the Israeli Army. Apparently tolerated by authorities, they patrol Jewish neighborhoods such as Paris' Marais and keep watch in community centers and even synagogues to keep any subversives at bay.

Members wear scarves or masks but not uniforms and move quickly to protect Jewish sites when they feel it necessary, like during the riots that spread through poor French suburbs last fall...


Party at CAIR headquarters tonight

Their efforts to smear the Marines are having great effect, at home and abroad. Charles has lots of links, here and here. [Update: and here}

Al Aqsa Official Tells Truth, Gets Canned

WND: Al Aqsa official: Jewish temples existed - Says proof passed down over the centuries by mosque custodians

JERUSALEM – Contradicting most of his colleagues, a former senior leader of the Waqf, the Islamic custodians of the Temple Mount, told WorldNetDaily in an exclusive interview he has come to believe the first and second Jewish Temples existed and stood at the current location of the Al Aqsa Mosque.

The leader, who was dismissed from his Waqf position after he quietly made his beliefs known, said Al Aqsa custodians passed down stories for centuries from generation to generation indicating the mosque was built at the site of the former Jewish Temples.

He said the Muslim world's widespread denial of the existence of the Jewish temples is political in nature and is not rooted in facts.

"Prophet Solomon built his famous Temple at the same place that later the Al Aqsa Mosque was built. It cannot be a coincidence that these different holy sites were built at the same place. The Jewish Temple Mount existed," said the former senior Waqf leader, speaking to WorldNetDaily from an apartment in an obscure alley in Jerusalem's Old City.

The former leader, who is well known to Al Aqsa scholars and Waqf officials, spoke on condition his name be withheld, claiming an on-the-record interview would endanger his life.

While the Islamic leader's statements may seem elementary to many in the West, especially in light of overwhelming archaeological evidence documenting the history of the Jewish temples and description of services there in the Torah, his words break with mainstream thinking in much of the Muslim world, which believes the Jewish temples never existed.

"I am mentioning historical facts," said the former leader. "I know that the traditional denial about the temple existing at the same place as Al Aqsa is more a political denial. Unfortunately our religious and political leaders chose the option of denial to fight the Jewish position and demands regarding Al Aqsa and taking back the Temple Mount compound. In my opinion we should admit the truth and abandon our traditional position."

The leader said his conclusion that the Jewish temples existed does not forfeit what he calls "Islamic rights" to the Temple Mount and Al Aqsa Mosque.

"Yes, the temple existed. But now it is the place of the mosque of the religious who came to complete the divine religion [that started with Judaism] and to improve humanity," said the leader.

"We believe that Islam is the third and last religion. It came to complete the monotheistic message. The mosque is here at the place of the temple to serve for the same purpose, for the work Allah"...

[via OceanGuy]

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

An Academic Review of 'Facts on the Ground'

I've been asked to post this review of Nadia Abu El Haj's book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society, generally only available through university sources, and I'm happy to oblige. Readers will be familiar with El Haj -- see previous posts here, here, here, here, here, and here.

First is the short version that was actually published: Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society, Alexander H Joffe. Journal of Near Eastern Studies. Chicago: Oct 2005. Vol. 64, Iss. 4; p. 297. Those interested can read it here, in PDF.

The much longer version can be found, in full, in the extended entry below.

Continue reading "An Academic Review of 'Facts on the Ground'"

Philadelphia 'English-only' eatery to face probe

Outrageous:

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - A civil rights watchdog agency has decided to open an investigation into a Philadelphia cheese steak restaurant that posted a sign saying "This is America - when ordering, speak English."

The Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations will file a complaint later on Monday, effectively opening an agency case against Geno's Steaks of South Philadelphia, said Rachel Lawton, acting executive director of the agency.

The Philadelphia controversy has fed a national debate over immigration in which the U.S. Senate passed a bill that would declare English the national language and politicians have raised objections to a Spanish version of the national anthem.

The sign may violate the city's Fair Practices Ordinance, which bans businesses from discriminating on the basis of nationality or ethnicity, Lawton said.

"The complaint will say that the sign discourages patronage by non-English speakers because of their national origin and/or ancestry," said Lawton, whose agency enforces the city's anti-discrimination laws.

Geno's will be given a up to two weeks to respond and, if the agency determines the sign has violated the city ordinance, will be ordered to take the sign down. If the restaurant refuses, it will be subject to a $300 fine, Lawton said.

Geno's owner Joey Vento, the grandson of Italian immigrants, said he has no plans to remove the sign.

"I don't see why I should have to. It's freedom of speech," said Vento, 66, who opened the restaurant 40 years ago.

Damn straight.

He said no one is refused service and no one is discriminated against. The sign, which has been displayed for about six months, is meant to encourage immigrants to learn English, he said.

"If you don't speak English, the sign means nothing," he told Reuters on Monday.

Ha, good point. Check out the weird construction of these last few paragraphs:

Roberto Santiago, executive director of the city's Council of Spanish Speaking Organizations, said he received around 50 "hate" e-mails in response to his criticism of the sign.

One from California said groups like his should be banned for representing "filthy, illegal alien invaders", he said.

"This is dividing this nation," he said. "I'm really saddened by these individuals who are upset by having to be tolerant. I'm glad I'm living in an America where comments like Mr. Vento's are out of order."

What comments of Mr. Vento's are out of order? It sounds like either Reuters of Santiago are trying to smear the guy.

French Opinion Toward Israel on Upswing

A little over a week ago, preliminary results of a poll of European "opinion elites" showed support for Palestinians 'crashing'. Now a new Pew poll of French public opinion shows a similar shift: French sympathies swing towards Israel

French attitudes over the Middle East conflict have swung dramatically over the past four years, with the public equally dividing its sympathies between the Palestinians and Israel, a turnaround from four years ago, according to a Pew research survey released Tuesday.

France has long been widely perceived as a special ally in the West to the Arab world, the fruit of its historical roots in the region. A survey four years ago appeared to bear up that assumption, denied by French officialdom. At the time, French respondents to the survey sympathized with the Palestinians over Israel at a roughly two-to-one ratio, 36 percent sympathizing with the Palestinians compared to 19 percent placing their sympathies with Israel.

Today, however, sympathies have undergone a swing in France, home to western Europe's largest Jewish and Arab populations, the latest Pew Global Attitudes survey suggests.

It showed sympathies in France to be equally divided among the public, with 38 percent placing their sympathies with the Palestinians and the same number placing their sympathies with Israel.

Nine percent of those surveyed said their hearts were with both sides, while 12% opted for neither side and four percent said they did not know how they felt on the subject.

"I've always said that the sympathy quotient toward Israel was always much stronger than we imagined, notably in the (French) provinces and outside the intellectual milieu," said Jean-Yves Camus, of the Institute for International and Strategic Relations.

He suggested that two events, the November 2004 death of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the illness of former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, might be contributing factors in the change of heart.

The French media and the elite, which tend to set the tone, put a more positive light on Sharon once he suffered an incapacitating stroke in January, Camus said.

With Arafat's death, "lots of opinion-makers, journalists realized" his role in the deadlock of peace negotiations and in the Palestinian Authority's internal problems, Camus said...


CAIR smears Marines

CAIR is smearing the Marines by literally making a federal (and international) case out of a dopey video of a US Marine (it appears) singing a dopey song called "Hadji Girl." I considered posting about this last night but held off -- why help publicize it -- but now that it's hit LGF on down, there's no reason for this little blog to hold back. PipelineNews has the low-down: Hadji Girl - CAIR Conducts Email Jihad Against Marines

The video itself has been pulled from where it was posted at YouTube, but not to worry, CAIR has continued to helpfully make it available on the front page of their web site -- they are, after all, only worried about America's image to the rest of the world...yeah right.

According to this CNN story (which is also helpfully entitled "Marines Corps investigates song about killing civilians" -- see the Pipeline article for how innocuous the song actually is), the Marine Corp is investigating -- I suppose they have to. I love you military guys, but really, you gots to be more careful about what you guys post on the internet...yeesh. The enemy is watching, and they'll twist anything for their nefarious purposes.

Expect Nihad Awad to go on a tour of the Arab world any moment to start drumming up outrage when he doesn't get the response he wants.

Update: Charles has a round-up of links showing how the press has simply held a megaphone to CAIR's press release (and yes, he has the video).

Looks like Nihad won't need to travel out of the country. Our press is going to do it's best on his behalf.

Unraveling the images on the Gaza beach (5 Updates)

The Washington Post has actually picked up an AP story on the Gaza Beach incident that presents the Israeli side in a non-skeptical manner, and actually includes context for Israeli shelling in general (unlike most of the early reports that simply repeated Palestinian claims and added no context). This is good. Note the picture accompanying the article. Large size photos have already been distributed among the Palestinian Arab people for effective foreign-press photo-ops.

Israel: Gaza Blast Not From Israeli Shell

JERUSALEM -- An Israeli investigation into what caused an explosion on a Gaza beach that killed eight Palestinians will conclude that the blast was most likely caused by a mine planted by Palestinian militants and not an Israeli shell, military officials said Tuesday.

The Palestinians had blamed an Israeli shell for the killing of the civilians in the northern Gaza Strip on Friday, and had recognized as a hero a Palestinian girl whose image was broadcast around the world crying over her father's body at the scene.

While Israel had originally left open the possibility that it was responsible and expressed sorrow for the deaths, senior officials had suggested that Palestinian militants could have planted explosives on the beach and the army opened an investigation.

The military committee looking into the blast is expected to issue its findings later Tuesday.

The committee will announce that Israel was almost certainly not involved in the explosion and it was caused by explosives planted by the Hamas militant group, military officials said on condition of anonymity since the results were not official yet.

The blast occurred on the outskirts of the town of Beit Lahia, not far from where Palestinian militants frequently fire rockets toward Israel. Israel often shoots artillery in the area to prevent the rocket launchings.

According to the findings, shrapnel taken from two wounded Palestinians who were evacuated to Israeli hospitals showed that the explosives were not made in Israel, the officials said. In addition, the last Israeli shell fired toward Palestinian rocket launchers who operate in the area was seven minutes before the blast and landed 250 yards from the scene, the officials said.

Also, after the blast, Israeli military viewed Hamas militants collecting the shrapnel from the area, in an apparent effort to prevent authorities from revealing that the explosion was caused by explosives it had laid, the officials said.

The results of the investigation are also based on threats by Hamas to stop Israeli naval commandos from landing on the beach after group militants were killed in the area in an ambush by Israeli navy divers last month, the officials said.

The army has accounted for five of six of the shells that it fired in the area Friday evening before the blast, the officials said. The one shell that is not accounted for was fired before the five others _ more than ten minutes before the blast that killed the Palestinians _ and apparently landed further away than the shells that were fired later, the officials said.

Note, however, that so far the skeptical voice is only in reporting what Israelis are saying, while initial reports of Israeli culpability were constructed in such a way that they simply were "apparent" from the facts. Will future reports say that the explosion was "apparently" caused by Hamas's own munitions? That will be the question.

Defense Minister Peretz is promising action:

...Defense Minister Amir Peretz said that Israel would launch a "propaganda offensive" across the globe to prove its innocence if indeed the investigation exonerated the IDF of any blame for the explosion.

"I am aware of international officials to whom the truth is unimportant, nevertheless, Israel will try its best to explain its policies."...

And it looks like the uproar isn't cowing Peretz at all (looks like the Defense Ministry position is giving the mainstream Israeli left a chance to show they can be tough, too): 11 dead, including 2 kids, as IAF strikes Gaza Katyusha cell

Israel will no longer exhibit restraint toward Palestinian terrorists involved in anti-Israel operations, Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Tuesday following an Israeli air strike in Gaza that targeted a car carrying Islamic Jihad cell members on their way to launch GRAD-model Katyusha rockets at Israel. 11 people died in the strike and, according to the IDF, at least three of them were Islamic Jihad members.

"We will act with all our might and use all our means against any group that acts against us," Peretz said.

"We showed the necessary restraint in light ... of the international uproar that resulted, but it's over," Peretz continued...

...The Islamic Jihad said earlier that two of its operatives who were killed were Hamoud Wadiya, the group's top rocket launcher, and Shawki Sayklia. Seven Palestinian civilians, including two schoolchildren, were also killed Tuesday when the single missile fired by the IAF detonated the Katyushas inside the car. The army said it had proof that only one missile had been fired and that the terrorists were the only target in the strike...

Update: Meryl notes -- surprise! -- a biased Reuters headline and more: The spin begins: Media credulous on IDF report

Update 2: Roger L. Simon notes that The Guardian (who else?) took particular glee in swallowing the entire Palestinian line to demonize Israel.

Palestinian Media Watch draws the direct line between the faked footage (whatever the facts behind what happened on the beach, it's clear that the footage the PA broadcast was a fictional montage) of this latest incident and their same act after the al Dura incident: PA TV falsified Mohammed Al Dura clip as it falsified Gaza beach video

Finally (for now), Honest Reporting has a report and round-up of media irresponsibility: Gaza Beach Libel

This CNN report, while it conveys the Israeli findings, gives Human Rights Watch the final word stating that their "investigation" has drawn the opposite conclusions: Israel: Palestinian explosives caused beach deaths

Update 3: Judith Apter Klinghoffer goes after the Human Rights Watch statements: MARK GARLASCO IS AT IT AGAIN

Update 4: An "unofficial" recap of Israel's press conference is here.

Update 5: Charles has a series of links, including a take-down of Garlasco. The Human Rights Watch report is here.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Finkelstein will be watching

Norman Finkelstein will be on hand to keep a personal eye on the goings-on at the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s General Assemblym and The Witherspoon Society is giving him publicity to help him organize others: Dr. Norman Finkelstein will visit GA to observe Committee 11 deliberations on divestment. All you commissioners better behave.

'The root causes of the Darfur conflict are the doing of the Jewish organizations who financed this armed rebellion'

Jihad Watch notes: 'Jihad' threatened if U.N. force comes to Darfur

EL FASHER, Sudan (AP) -- The U.N. Security Council found strong opposition to sending a U.N. force to replace African Union peacekeepers in conflict-wracked Darfur on Friday, with one tribal chief threatening a "jihad" if non-African troops come to this vast Muslim region...

...Mowadh Jalaladin, a representative of the Barty tribe, which he said has about 250,000 members, said handing over to a U.N. force "would inaugurate foreign occupation and intervention" and remind Sudanese of the colonial past, echoing earlier government rhetoric that has fanned anti-U.N. sentiment...

...The cry also has been taken up by international extremists. Al-Jazeera satellite channel on Friday broadcast a videotape by the deputy leader of al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, in which he said the U.N. Security Council visit to Sudan was "to prepare to occupy and divide it."

In a tape aired on Arab television in April, al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden urged followers to fight any U.N. peacekeeping force in Sudan.

If a U.N. force comes to Darfur, Jalaladin said, "We are declaring jihad against it.

"It means death. It means defending Sudan and Islam," Jalaladin said.

"The root causes of the Darfur conflict are the doing of the Jewish organizations who financed this armed rebellion," he claimed. "We don't want the Security Council to be an instrument of the ugly undertakings of the United States of America."...

No doubt they mean that if a UN force comes to Darfur, they will turn to a deep struggle of introspection and self-improvement.

UN-funded Hate

Anne Bayefsky describes the way the UN continues to flout its own charter (and abuse your tax dollars) by providing support to NGO's that push everything from divestment to the outright destruction of Israel: Spreading Hate, Destruction & Terrorism - The U.N.-NGO cadre.

...The following is a sampling of direct quotes taken from the sites of U.N.-accredited NGOs. (Some of the sites contain generic disclaimers though the pieces have been deliberately featured.) The U.N. website links to some of these NGOs directly. They draw an inexorable line between anti-Semitism, belittling Jew-hatred or appropriating anti-Semitism, rejecting the legitimacy of a Jewish state, making wild-allegations against Israel of human-rights atrocities akin to the Nazis (starting with Israel’s creation and not a 1967 occupation) and justifying armed struggle, murder, and terrorism. And for what has not been achieved by military force, there is the boycott.
  • “That Star of David, which we are told is originally a religious symbol, symbolized hate and evil. Even today, I couldn’t imagine a more hateful sign.”
  • “[M]any Americans and westerners, long misinformed by the Zionist-controlled media especially after the events of September 11, 2001…”
  • “[S]o-called ‘anti-semitism’…has now become the single most important element of Jewish identity.”
  • “[A]nti-semitism has been taking place for 100 years in Palestine, against the Palestinian Arab semites, by European Jewish colonialists. A mini-holocaust.”
  • “Zionism is against true Torah Judaism. But Zionism is even more than that; Zionism and anti-Jewish feelings are faces of the same coin of racism. In fact Hitler…talked about the “great movement” of Zionism (because both he and they agreed that Jews have no place in Europe)...”
  • “Zionist apartheid, racism, and settler-colonialism in Palestine… is violative of the most basic human standards…Thus, the Palestinian resistance is justified…”
  • “What do you think of the suicide bombings?...First of all we don’t call it a ‘suicide attack,’ we call it a ‘martyr attack.’”
  • “[I]t is not only correct to call Israel an apartheid state but it is more imperative that we Americans stop funding and investing in such an oppressive regime….Some would argue that we would be singling out Israel or taking sides…We also did not say we took sides when we divested and boycotted…Nazi Germany (a boycott which was actually only violated by the Zionist movement in their collaboration with the Nazi regime…”
...

What is a "Reactionary"?

Report: Chances slim that IDF shell killed Gazans on beach

Good to see the IDF getting on this fast.

The IDF probe investigating the deaths of seven Palestinian civilians from an explosion on a beach in Gaza on Friday evening concluded that chances were slim that the accident was caused by IDF shelling.

According to Channel 2, the findings, expected to be formally released on Tuesday, showed an inconsistency between the shrapnel found in the body of one of the wounded babies and the metal used in IDF artillery.

Moreover, the investigation noted the absence of a crater at the site of the explosion, as would be expected if an IDF shell had landed there.

The third observation casting doubt on the possibility of IDF shelling was the gap between the time when the army shot the artillery and when the commotion on the beach began. According to the probe's findings, several minutes past after the shelling, before the Palestinians on the beach reacted.

The leading theory currently entertained, suggested that an explosive charge, buried by Palestinians on the Gaza beach to prevent Israeli infiltration, was behind the explosion.

Throughout the whole investigation, army officials complained at the lack of Palestinian cooperation. Unconfirmed reports further suggested attempts by Palestinians to remove shrapnel from the bodies of the wounded, treated in Israeli hospitals, thus impeding the investigation.


Visualizing

Rockets on Sderot

At least 54 Qassams have rocked Sderot since Friday

...At least 54 Qassams have hit Sderot since Friday, and the attacks from the Gaza strip are having a detrimental effect on the merchants and residents of this economically disadvantaged Negev town...

And in Gaza, a "stray" Qassam fell in an Arab house and wounded four people, including three children. And the world yawned.

Gaza at the UN

Yes, we can all know what the UN will be keeping themselves busy with for the next few days.

NY Sun: Is Annan Jumping the Gun?

The secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, was "deeply disturbed," he said in an official statement on Friday, at the killing of women and children picnicking on a Gaza beach, committed "reportedly by Israeli forces."

Eyeless in Gaza, Mr. Annan carelessly relies on heart-wrenching press photographs juxtaposing Israeli shelling with a child crying over her dead mother's body. Israel, meanwhile, fears inflaming the region where myths about the supposed Jewish thirst for innocent Arab blood quickly translates into a war cry for billions of Muslims around the world...

...Now the Israel Defense Forces, while quick to express regret over the death of seven members of the Ghalia family on the Gaza beach on Friday, vows to conduct a thorough investigation into the incident. "Our expression of sorrow does not imply taking responsibility for the incident," the IDF's chief of staff, Dan Halutz, stressed on Saturday.

Investigators have tracked all shells fired during the Friday Israeli raid against Gaza rocket launching sites. They have concluded that IDF air and naval firing did not land where the deaths occurred, while a single artillery shell has yet to be accounted for. The IDF, however, does not exclude the possibility that the deadly explosion's source was a land mine, put in by Palestinian Arabs fearing an Israeli invasion, or a locally made bomb.

The Palestinian Authority has refused to cooperate with the IDF's investigation. Tell-tale shrapnel hitting those among the 70 injured who were transferred to Israeli hospitals has been painstakingly removed by Gaza medics as key evidence. "Some in the Palestinian Authority would rather see this as a propaganda tool," said Israeli Foreign Ministry's spokesman, Mark Regev...


PMW: PA TV falsifies video of Gaza deaths

Palestinian Media Watch reports that the PA media is doing exactly what they did in the al Dura case - splicing in video of guns firing at another time with later footage of the beach scene in order to create a more compelling and inflamatory story.

PA TV falsifies video of Gaza deaths

Palestinian Authority TV has been repeatedly broadcasting a falsified video clip of the events surrounding the deaths of seven family members on the Gaza beach on Friday. In an attempt to blame Israel's navy for the deaths, PA TV took unrelated video of an Israeli missile boat firing at Gaza earlier in the day and edited them into the scenes, creating the impression Israeli responsibility.

The following is the time frame of the PA TV editing and falsification:

00 - :32 Seconds: PATV clip introduces the scene by showing an Israeli missile boat firing on the Gaza coast. Audio of ambulance siren is added to visual to create false impression that boat was shooting at same time as ambulances were present.

0:32 - 1:05: Scene switches directly to the victims, creating a false connection between the events.

1:05 – 1:09: PA TV returns to the naval vessel showing sailor with binoculars looking at shore, again creating the false impression he is observing the evacuation.

1:09 – 2:00: The evacuation scene continues ending with the word "Why" on the screen only in English, indicating a foreign target audience, possibly media.

The video of the Israeli navy was unrelated to the deaths, having been filmed earlier in the day and had already released to the media and to the internet by the Israeli army at 4:00 PM, an hour prior to the deaths.

Comment: It should be noted that not only is the video falsified, but the beach scene clearly backs the Israeli contention that the deaths were not caused by an Israeli shell. Any Israeli shell would have left a giant crater and spread sand over the entire area, as well as on the victims. There is no crater and the beach scene is not disturbed in a way that indicates an Israeli shell could have landed nearby.


Homes who flew American Flag vandalized with PLO Graffiti on Memorial Day

Look out Brooklyn [all emphasis mine].

Homes Defaced Of Those Who Flew Old Glory

Police have charged a 12-year-old boy with a Memorial Day graffiti attack in which the acronym for the Palestinian Liberation Organization was written on the homes of some Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, residents who were displaying American flags.

A police spokesman, Detective John Sweeney, described the boy only as "male, 12-years-old, Arabic." He was charged with criminal mischief and making graffiti, misdemeanors that will be handled in family court.

On Memorial Day, patriotic residents of Senator Street between Fifth and Sixth avenues in Bay Ridge awoke to see the letters PLO painted on a garage, four trees, and a van. Only the houses on the block that displayed the American flag were attacked.

Tensions were already high among some residents of the area. On May 14, about 200 Brooklyn Palestinians marched through Bay Ridge in an anti-Israel protest. Many held up signs denouncing America's support of Israel and chanted "Shame, shame, U.S.A."

News of the arrest has done little to comfort many Bay Ridge residents, who perceive the political message allegedly sent by the 12-year-old as only a small piece of a growing cultural conflict resonating in the small corner of south Brooklyn...

...Out of fear of further retribution, members of one family living on Senator Street in Bay Ridge said they have stopped displaying the American flag. Other residents decided to leave Old Glory up, but not without hesitation.

"I believe they were trying to intimidate us," a resident in one of the houses whose front yard tree was defaced by vandalism, Ayed Eskander, said. "They sent a message to six houses. Four of them on the tree, one on the fire drain, and one on a van. Only the homes that displayed the American flag were attacked. The homes that didn't have the flags up were left alone."

Bay Ridge has seen a rise in its Arab population over the past three decades and at times there have been signs of contentious relations with new Muslim immigrants.

According to some residents, the tensions with the Muslim community were at a boiling point during the days after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, but have since cooled off.

Tensions resurfaced after the recent conviction of Shahawar Martin Siraj, 23, who was found guilty of a conspiracy to bomb the subway station near Macy's at 34th Street. Police arrested Siraj and a co-conspirator just days before the city hosted the 2004 Republican National Convention.

Some in the Muslim community viewed the trial as proof that police tried to entrap and prosecute innocent Arabs.

Not everyone is convinced that the relationship between the Muslim community and other local residents is strained. But Mr. Eskander, who moved to Bay Ridge from Egypt in 1980 to "raise his children in freedom," wonders whether the PLO graffiti is only the beginning.

The Egyptian-born Mr. Eskander also brought his flag inside, although for a fairly innocuous reason.

"I brought it in because it had a small tear," he said. "I replaced it with a bigger flag. I want everyone to see it. That is my flag now and this is my country."

Are You Sane -- Mourning for Zarqawi

Mohammed at Iraq the Model looks at the reaction of non-Iraqi Arabs to Zarqawi's death and almost can't believe what he reads: Some are sad just because we're happy

Hamas's reaction to the death of Zarqawi caused the contempt of so many Iraqis. The printed and watched Iraqi media lashed out vigorously on Hamas, politicians and ordinary people on the streets are just equally angered by some Arabic official and media reactions which spoke of the criminal as if he were a hero.

It is totally unimaginable why someone would describe the head chopping, children murdering terrorist as a hero. It's disgusting and infuriating beyond words.

This wrongful description of evil is a major reason for misery in this region and it only contributes to justifying more unjustifiable death and violence. This makes one sometimes whishes that Iraq is somehow lifted away from these perverted sociopaths who surround us...


A Closer Look at Gaza Beach

Richard Landes (who's in Jerusalem right now) is taking a very close look at the Gaza beach events with a "Pallywood" eye, here: Is it Pallywood?: Thoughts on the Footage from the Gaza Beach

The media has responded like Pavlov's dogs to this, as with the incident in Haditha, it plays into their own preferred narrative. Whatever happened, it deserves close scrutiny and careful language.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Egyptian Outlook

The Sandmonkey is ranting over continuing US support for the Mubarak regime, and even more loudly, the continued scape-goating of the United States. Well worth reading.

A few quick notes after reading:

1) As the Sandmonkey says, the US is only omnipotent in the conspiracy fantasies of the Left, the Middle East and elsewhere. In fact, we do not have the ability to raise or destroy regimes with a wave of the hand and an email to the CIA (which would then be forwarded to the press).

2) Mubarak has successfully staved off real democratic reform by failing to protect free expression and stifling secular parties leaving only the religious extremists as a viable opposition. Without government protection it is very difficult for secular thought to circulate as it can be stifled much more easily than religious expression can. The religious groups can proselytize through their mosques and traditional distribution channels -- something the government has a difficult time suppressing. Further, it causes much more of a stink jailing a religious figure than a secular loudmouth. Without a viable secular alternative, who is there for the US to back?

3) 5000 people in the street isn't enough to overthrow the Boston City Council, let alone the Egyptian government. Again, who would you back if you were the US? The choice is between Mubarak, the Muslim Brotherhood or chaos. There is no alternative. Egyptians themselves simply aren't ready to pick up the ball. The forces of modernity and democracy are simply no where near any sort of tipping point that the United States could seriously consider giving the final shove to. Who's fault that is is a bigger question, but the fact remains.

4) People complain that we give $2 billion a year to Egypt and seem to get very little for it. That's true. It makes us look bad in the eyes of some of the forces of reform by backing a repressive regime. That's also true. But there's a flip-side. Accepting American money also taints Mubarak's regime in the eyes of the religious fascists and prevents him from playing the "Saladin," or in this case the "Nasser" card -- hero of pan-Arabism. To them he's a US tool. The money we give serves as an innoculation against his aquiring an even worse disease. So given the alternative, it may be all we can do at this juncture to keep him on something of a leash, albeit a long one.

Haveil Havalim #73

Gaza Beach Explosions (Upates)

I haven't commented yet on the explosion on the Gaza beach. I'm not inclined to follow early reports with either rely completely on Palestinian Arab testimony (something notorious for being inaccurate and creatively self-serving), or news reports which range from utterly credulous to such claims without including any explanation of context (most of it), to at best including some formulaic "cycle of violence" rhetoric (the Boston Globe included this gem: "Near-daily Israeli artillery barrages over the past month have come in response to near-daily rocket launches from Gaza into Israel.").

The Israelis better figure out what happened, fast, and refrain from prostrating themselves with premature apologies that not only accomplish nothing but harm them. Barring the unlikely possibility of an individual soldier acting unlawfully, this tragedy is the fault of those who have made sure that Gaza remains a war zone by launching rockets from it. Period.

Meanwhile, some people are keeping a close eye on things. Richard Landes is cautiously using the expression "Pallywood" with regard to some aspects here, and has a post well worth looking at.

It looks at this point like there has been a tragedy, including deaths on the beach. Who's weapons caused them, where they came from, why (was the a Qassam crew there before the shells fell?), how there happened to be a camera crew there to take very effective photos so quickly...all of this remains a mystery, and the Palestinians are refusing to cooperate with the Israeli investigators. If this sounds like cynical thinking, you're right. Blame it on the fact that we're dealing with a society known for using the tragedy of innocents for propaganda purposes, and caring little for the lives of those innocents if the propaganda value is high enough.

Update: Judith Apter Klinghoffer notes that Israel is, in fact, denying any reponsibility:

A top Israeli general says the country's armed forces didn't cause the explosion that killed eight Palestinians on Friday and ended the fragile ceasefire in the region.

Hamas, which leads the Palestinian Authority parliament, blamed the deaths on Tel Aviv as its military branch resumed attacks on Israel for the first time in 16 months.

But Israeli Maj.-Gen. Yoav Galant said Sunday the military can prove it wasn't Israeli fire that hit the beach in Gaza, killing eight people.

Galant, who commands Israel's southern command, said Israel stopped firing 15 minutes before the explosion...

She also notes that the BBC has been calling Qassam rocket attacks "symbolic."

Update2: Gissin: Don't blame Israel first

Israelis are doing themselves a gross disservice, and playing into the hands of the Palestinians, by presuming that an Israeli shell caused the deaths of seven Palestinian civilians Friday in Gaza, Prime Minster Ehud Olmert's Foreign media advisor Ra'anan Gissin said Sunday.

"We are repeating the same mistakes of the past in taking responsibility when there are other possibilities about who is responsible," Gissin said.

He said that Friday's tragedy on the Gaza beach may indeed be similar to the shooting of Mohammed al-Dura in 2000, the "Jenin Massacre" in 2002, and the killing of 21 people at the Jabaliya refugee camp last September. While the Palestinians originally pinned the blame for all these incidents on Israel, it has since turned out that al-Dura may have been killed by Palestinians, that there was no "Jenin massacre," and that the deaths in Jabaliya were caused when Hamas activists "mishandled" explosives at a mass rally.

Gissin said that Israel should immediately have raised doubts after Friday's incident about the Palestinian version of events that placed the blame squarely on Israel.

"We jumped to conclusions before the evidence, and we immediately assumed that it was probably an Israeli shell," Gissin said. "But we don't know that for a fact. The Palestinians moved in and destroyed all the evidence. People should be asking themselves, 'why?' "

Just as Israel is conducting an investigation, Gissin said that the international community should also be demanding that the Palestinians conduct an investigation. But rather than doing that, he said, the Palestinians are removing evidence from the scene.

"We look at the area as a battle zone," Gissin said, "while the Palestinians view it as a crime scene, and are interested in making the evidence look like Israel carried out an atrocity," he said.

Gissin said that the evidence "didn't add up" in Jenin to equal a massacre because there were not enough bodies, and in Jabaliya there were too many witnesses to what happened to buy the Hamas line that the explosion in 2005 was the result of missiles fired by an IDF helicopter.

"But now we have a classic case where there is no real evidence, and all we have is a picture of a crying girl on the beach," Gissin said of Friday's incident in Gaza. "Nobody knows how the people there were killed. If it was an Israeli shell, why didn't the Palestinians invite the press to see the remnants of the shell, why have they been so quick to remove the evidence?"

Gissin bemoaned a situation where he said that instead of waiting for the investigation, the Israeli press jumped to the conclusion that it was an errant Israeli shell and reflexively began calling for an end to artillery fire on Gaza...

Update 3: Israel News Agency reports:

An Israel Defense Forces intelligence officer has confirmed that the explosion that killed eight Palestinians on Friday, was caused by a stockpile of Hamas explosives.

"Shortly after we stopped defensive firing at Hamas rocket launch pads which were deployed behind Palestinian human shields, members of Hamas scrambled to fire more rockets at our positions," said Col. M. "We have eyes on every meter of Gaza, from the sky, from the ground and from the sea. One of their rocket tripods collapsed inadvertently setting off an explosion of a stockpile of Qassam rockets. The Palestinians killed their own children. And this was not the first time."

Hamas terrorists fired rockets and mortar bombs from a crowded Gaza beach at southern Israel. Some of the rockets fell near the Israel city of Ashkelon. Some 17 rockets were fired between Saturday and Sunday morning. A man at a school in the Israel town of Sderot was wounded, Israel officials said.

Israel Maj.-Gen. Yoav Galant said today that the Israel Defense Forces has additional evidence that it wasn't Israel artillery that hit the beach in Gaza. Galant, who commands Israel's southern command, said Israel stopped firing 15 minutes before the explosion. It's all on secure videotape from both sides of the conflict. Israel Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he was sorry about the deaths, which included three children...

...The Israel Colonel who confirmed that a Hamas explosives stockpile killed innocent Palestine children on a Gaza beach, added: "It should be noted that the Hamas rockets which killed those kids came from Iran. For many in Palestine, Iran and Syria, those children are now merely good "martyrs" and serve as blood food for the Islam terror propaganda machine."

I'd like to hear or preferably see some more about that proof. UAV video footage of the beach would be nice. It's going to take some pretty solid stuff and a united, firm, prompt and loud response on the part of the Israeli authorities to break through the din of repetition already building. Oh, and it has to be accurate, too. No, it's not fair, but that's the way it is.

Meanwhile, Richard Landes is updating with emails from Second Draft readers.

Castro Hearts Zarqawi

Castro: Al-Zarqawi Killing a 'Barbarity'

HAVANA - President Fidel Castro called the U.S. airstrike that killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi a "barbarity," saying he should have been put on trial.

The United States acted as "judge and jury" against the leader of the al-Qaida in Iraq, Castro said late Friday.

"They bragged, they were practically drunk with happiness."

"The accused cannot just be eliminated," he told a literacy conference. "This barbarity cannot be done."...

Because we all know that Castro knows how to conduct a trial. Maybe he's just worried someone might have forgetten by now the deal that's protected him since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

[h/t: isirota1965]

Peace awards will include controversial Palestinian

That's putting it mildly. Here's more on the award Sabeel's Naim Ateek will be receiving from an Episcopal group (previous: A Reward For Naim). As long as you advocate destroying Israel with a quiet voice, and with someone else's fist, that's good enough for a peace award these days.

Peace awards will include controversial Palestinian

An Episcopal peace group will give an award in Columbus next week to an Anglican priest who once likened Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians to Jesus’ crucifixion.

That remark and others by the Rev. Naim Ateek have sparked criticism of the plan to honor him during the Episcopal Church USA’s General Convention. He’ll be named a co-winner of the Episcopal Peace Fellowship’s John Nevin Sayre Award, along with Madeleine Trichel, founder of the local Interfaith Center for Peace.

Ateek, a Palestinian and an Israeli citizen, is the founder of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center in Jerusalem. He encourages Christian churches to divest holdings in companies dealing with Israel.

The Rev. Bruce Chilton, an Episcopal priest at Bard College and rector of St. John the Evangelist Church in Barrytown, N.Y., said giving Ateek the award "strikes me as making a mockery of the process."

"His ultimate goal includes the removal of the state of Israel, which is not a vision of peace at all but a matter of forcible elimination," said Chilton, chairman of the Episcopal Diocese of New York’s committee on Episcopal-Jewish relations.

"He has spoken very warmly of the tactic of suicide bombing, explaining it as a logical outcome of the difficult situation in which many Palestinians live."...

...Ateek’s statements have included a 2002 article in Cornerstone, the Sabeel newsletter, in which he condemned suicide bombings. But he said that such bombings are the result of Israeli oppression.

Similarly, in a May article in Joint Advocacy Initiative magazine, Ateek said the Hamas group elected to govern the Palestinians must become nonviolent.

"People, however, need to remember that Hamas’ violence was provoked by Israel’s policies against the Palestinians as well as Israel’s contempt of international law," he said.

He raised ire in April 2001 when he said in his Easter message to Sabeel supporters: "In this season of Lent, it seems to many of us that Jesus is on the cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him. ... The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily."...


Saturday, June 10, 2006

James Woolsey to Address Presbyterian General Assembly

This is good news. James Woolsey (who knew he was a Presbyterian?) will be addressing the big PC(USA) meeting on divestment.

Clinton’s CIA Director to Address Presbyterians on Israel Divestment

R. James Woolsey will deliver a lecture on “Energy, Security, and the Long War of the 21st Century” at the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) General Assembly in Birmingham, Ala. This address by former President Bill Clinton’s Director of the CIA will be held at 12:30 p.m. on Friday, June 16th, at the Medical Forum (third floor), adjacent to the Sheraton Hotel. The public and press are invited to join Presbyterian commissioners and observers at this free lecture.

Woolsey is not only an attorney and public servant, having held presidential appointments under four administrations, two Democratic and two Republican. He is also a member of Chevy Chase Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C. As such he is concerned with the implications of a denominational decision two years ago to institute a process leading toward divestment from corporations doing business with Israel. His talk will address the issue of Israel, Palestine, and Presbyterians. It will touch on the multiple items of business the General Assembly is considering that would end divestment and move the church toward actions to promote peace in the Middle East...


USS Cole Back at Work

I meant to note this yesterday. The USS Cole is back at work. Navy ships don't sit around collecting workman's comp, they get patched up and put back out to sea.

CNN: USS Cole leaves on first Mideast deployment since attack

NORFOLK, Virginia (AP) -- The USS Cole left port Thursday for its first Middle East deployment since a 2000 terrorist attack blew a hole in its side and killed 17 sailors.

The Cole, along with five other ships and a submarine, left the East Coast to conduct security operations in support of the war on terrorism.

The destroyer had been refueling in Yemen's port of Aden on Oct. 12, 2000, when al Qaeda-linked militants in a dinghy packed with explosives attacked.

The explosion blew a hole in the side, but the ship remained above water and eventually underwent $250 million of repairs.

No sailors from the 2000 crew are still aboard the Cole.

The crew of 320 that left Thursday is expected to be gone for six months, officials said.

In less happy time:


Pipes' Beard Flows On

It seems right to follow the story of the shearing of Juan Cole with one about his nemesis, Daniel Pipes, receiving a "Guardian of Zion" award in Jerusalem. The article includes a must-read interview with Pipes. Love him or hate him, Pipes' ideas are important to consider. I include a snip of the interview below. Despite the brickbats of his foes, Daniel's beard grows on in full trim.

Interview: 'I watch with frustration as the Israelis don't get the point'

...What about "occupation"? What is its role in all of this?

The Palestinians hold the notion of occupation dear to them, to the point that no matter what Israel does - even withdraw forces completely from Gaza - they say the occupation continues. Israelis are trying to "un-occupy," in terms of currency, utilities and much else, and the Palestinians are saying, "No, we're your unwanted stepchild, and we're yours."

They found that this word, ihtilal (occupation), is a very useful one, domestically and internationally.

What is the ultimate Palestinian war goal, then, statehood or the elimination of Israel?

Oh, definitely the elimination of Israel. That is to say, there is far wider agreement on this than on the notion of a Palestinian state. Recall that making the region Israel controls into southern Syria drove Arab politics in the early 1950s. Then came the heyday of Pan-Arab nationalism in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Today, Hamas strives for an Islamic state whose boundaries need not be those of Mandatory Palestine. All of these outlooks agree on the need to eliminate Israel but disagree on what should replace it.

There is much talk now about the regimes in Egypt and Jordan being in danger of destabilization as a result of the chaos in the Palestinian Authority. If so, why are these countries more actively siding with the PA than with Israel?

The Palestinian cause is a challenge to most Arab leaders - something they ride at their peril. It has a potential to challenge their regimes from the outside. So they handle the issue with great caution. Most Arab leaders, especially those of Jordan and Egypt, would like to end this conflict. Indeed, in both cases, their predecessors tried, by signing formal peace agreements with Israel, to pull out.

Why did that not succeed?

In both cases, the population said no. They had given their proxy to their governments and said, "Here, leaders, you're in charge of anti-Zionism."

When the leaders betrayed them by signing formal peace agreements - Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994 - the popular reaction was, "We're taking back our proxy; we've got to do this ourselves."

You see a ratcheting up in popular attitudes toward Israel.

I lived in Egypt for three years before the signing of the peace agreement with Israel, and Israel was hardly ever a topic. Egyptians did not engage in economic boycotts of firms that were dealing with Israel or rumored to be sending money to Israel. No songs celebrated hatred of Israel. Political cartoons were nasty toward Israel, but just politically, not religiously.

I conclude that we see a far deeper anti-Israel sentiment in the post-1979 period than before then. The same goes for Jordan, where the king signed a particularly warm agreement with Israel, the popular reaction to which was, "No! We will not have trade. We will not have other forms of contact with Israel."

What does this imply?

That, contrary to common perception - according to which Arab governments foment trouble with Israel as a cheap way of diverting attention from their own malpractices - the issue of Israel is a grass-roots issue that scares them. We witnessed this, for example, during the violence of late 2000-early 2001, when massive demonstrations took place on Arab streets and the governments dealt with them very gingerly. A prime minister might head a demonstration in a show of solidarity, but he was clearly nervous about it...


Cole Wrap-Up

The Jewish Week has a good recap of the now-failed Juan Cole effort to join the Yale faculty, including a focus on the controversy behind his final rejection: Middle East Wars Flare Up At Yale

There's a lot there, but I wanted to just comment on one piece of it:

...Those op-eds had little to say about Cole’s academic background, focusing most of their criticism on what the Michigan professor had written on his blog. Both pieces appeared to blur the distinction between American Jews and some Bush administration officials. On Aug. 29, 2004, for example, Cole wrote a blog entry calling several Bush neoconservatives “pro-Likud intellectuals” who wish “to use the Pentagon as Israel’s Gurkha regiment, fighting elective wars on behalf of Tel Aviv.”

Referring to the entry in his op-ed for the Yale Daily News, Rubin contends that Cole “accuses Jewish Americans of using the Pentagon as Israel’s Gurkha regiment.” Similarly, Webber and Johnson claim that “according to Mr. Cole, American Jews both inside and out of government are primarily loyal to Israel and subvert American interests for those of the Jewish State.”

“These articles,” said Cole, “attempted to make my critiques of the Likud, on both sides of the Atlantic, look like an attack on American Jewry in general, which is manifestly not the case. For these people, Likud equals Israel equals Jews, so all criticism of revisionist Zionism and Greater Israel expansionism is anti-Semitic.”...

This is the typical Cole dodge. Cole uses the term "Likudnik" as an imprecise smear (he means it as a smear) against anyone to the right of him (a lot of territory). I've commented before on the absurdity of claiming not to be anti-Israel while at the same time smearing the political party Israelis have chosen (at the time) to lead them. Further, most of the people Cole smears in this way ("Likudnik," "neo-con," etc...) couldn't tell you what the party platform of Likud was with a gun to their heads. The idea that they simply accept a line of argument that does not come dictated from Jerusalem never occurs. This is like calling anyone to my left an "ISM-nik" -- descriptive, but so imprecise as to be meaningless. Cole's consistently tendentious pronouncements should be a signal to keep him away from any academic position where he will be sought out for his interpretations of the modern Middle East.

Note this as well:

...One university insider familiar with the case said that there may be several reasons why the tenure committee shot down Cole’s appointment.

First, according to the source, most of Cole’s scholarship pertains to the Baha’i faith and is limited to the 18th and 19th centuries, a liability for a professor charged with teaching about the contemporary Middle East.

Second, the source continued, Cole appears to lack in collegiality, as his penchant for combative blog entries and personal spats with detractors might make him an unnerving fixture on Yale.

Finally, Cole’s politics may have played a role, though a less important one than the other two factors, said the source...

Finally, Martin Kramer's comments are, as always, worth a look: Take It Like A Man

Professor Juan Cole has produced another offensive quote, which appears in an article about the academic boycott of Israel: "If Israelis want to be a state, they, both genders, should take the criticism like men and stop being crybabies about 'anti-Semitism.'"

Here is news for Cole: Israel has been a state for nearly sixty years. Its founders included victims of the worst antisemitism. But Israelis of both genders earned their statehood not by whining like crybabies, but by fighting "like men" and women against neighbors bent on their destruction. Because Israel is a Jewish state, it remains a lightning rod for genuine antisemites, who do exist outside scare quotes, and who also lurk in the darker recesses of academe. When they make criticisms of Israel that invoke antisemitic themes (such as Jewish mind-control of America), they deserve to be denounced for what they are...


Israel attempts to deport California man

Israel is attempting, rightfully, to deport a member of the International Solidarity Movement (and a son of a Presbyterian minister as it happens) who was trying to get into Israel to practice his trade of "piano tuning." The article is completely credulous with regard to the ISM's claims. Israel attempts to deport California man

El Cerrito, Calif., resident Paul Larudee is being held at a cell in the Ben Gurion airport in Israel while appealing an effort by the government to keep him out of the country.

The Israeli government attempted to deport Larudee after he landed at the airport outside Tel Aviv on Sunday, said Greta Berlin, a member of the International Solidarity Movement, which documents the occupation of Palestinians in the West Bank.

Larudee also is a member of the solidarity movement but was in Israel primarily to practice his trade as a piano tuner.

"He said `I have a skill, something that can contribute to the occupied Palestinians,"" Berlin said. ""I will offer piano-tuning services to people who want their pianos tuned.""

Jarad Bernstein, the director of media relations for the Israeli Consulate in San Francisco, confirmed that Larudee is awaiting a hearing before a judge to decide whether he can stay in Israel. That court date has not been scheduled.

While the solidarity movement considers itself a peaceful organization, Bernstein said the group has an agenda that sometimes "interferes with Israel's agenda of providing security to its citizens." However, he could not provide any examples except to say that members once blocked construction of a security fence in the West Bank.

"The threat we are to Israelis is we tell the truth," said Berlin, adding that the movement has no leaders or headquarters.

Larudee was born in Iran, the son of an Iranian Presbyterian minister and a New England missionary. He lived in Saudi Arabia and Lebanon on and off for about 12 years in various administrative posts before returning to the United States in 1993...

The ISM has only one purpose -- to disrupt Israeli attempts to defend themselves and make it easier for their Palestinian leaders to see out their goal of destroying the Jewish state. No country should be required to take in people for any length of time whatsoever who belong to a group dedicated to its destruction.

This article in the Contra Costa Times written by Alan Lopez is nothing but propaganda for the ISM.

Friday, June 9, 2006

Iraqi Women in Uniform

Women Join Iraqi Police

IRBIL , Iraq — Women's rights might not be the first thing one thinks of when someone mentions Iraq , however, some officials in the Kurdish provinces in northern Iraq would like it to be.

According to Irbil Minister of Interior Karim Sinjari, equality is very important for the residents of the Kurdish provinces.

“We are working very hard to be progressive and set the standard for human rights in Iraq ,” he said.

According to Sinjari, changing the country's view of women is an important step to separate themselves from the old way of thinking.

Although women throughout Iraq have been given the right to vote and are accepted in the army and police academies, the city of Irbil was the first city to allow women to hold positions of power.

Iraqi Police Lt. Narseed, is one of the first female officers in the city.

She wanted to be a police officer at a very young age but thought that the career field would not be open within her lifetime. That all changed when the Coalition removed Saddam from power. She said she had already graduated college and was becoming a lawyer when she made the decision to become a police officer. “When I heard that the doors had opened for women to become officers, I jumped at the chance and then went to the police academy.”...

Explaining the targeted assassination double standard

Neo-neocon comments on Alan Dershowitz's statement addressing the double-standard toward targeted assassinations the world has shown with regard to the death of Zarqawi. I think she makes some good points that certainly figure in, but perhaps understates the pure chauvinism involved in the double-standard. If Hamas were related to the IRA, for instance, no doubt the British attitude would have been different than the one Dershowitz quotes, but as long Hamas sticks to killing Jews and keeps the rest of their program (blowing up American diplomats and encouraging suicide bombers in Iraq) at a level quiet enough to be ignored in the Western press (and the Western press seems able to ignore quite a damn lot), they enjoy a level of protection they don't warrant.

neo-neocon: Targeted assassinations and Zarqawi: he's really most sincerely dead

...But, although I pretty much agree with Dershowitz that an enormous double standard is always applied to Israel, certainly the international community is not ordinarily in the habit of cutting the US much slack, either.

So I believe something additional is involved here, and that is the fact that Zarqawi was a terrorist whom even extreme leftists and Hamas apologists have had trouble wrapping their minds around. He resembled nothing more than the bogeyman, a figure of horrific brutality more appropriate to the nightmares of childhood...

Readers will be perversely entertained by the first comment.

About that trip to Israel 23 years ago...

What the...? Did Pete McClosky suddenly take over at the State Department?

How Israel Trip Came Back to Haunt an Aide

A veteran State Department employee contends that a month-long trip he took to Israel more than two decades ago has contributed to the suspension of his security clearance, stalling and perhaps ending his career in the foreign service.

After serving in 10 overseas posts, Daniel Hirsch has spent the last three and half years behind a desk at Foggy Bottom or elsewhere in Washington as agents from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security have scoured his past to determine whether he is trustworthy and loyal enough to be allowed access to government secrets.

Mr. Hirsch told The New York Sun yesterday that the investigators have seized on a trip he took in 1983, at age 23, with a group called Volunteers for Israel. He said he was already working for the CIA at the time and cleared it with the agency before going.

"At that time, it was no big deal," Mr. Hirsch said. "Nobody gave it a second thought until a quarter of a century later. Now, it's a big deal."...


LGBT Group Says No To Boycotters

Judeosphere reports:

Jack Gilbert, former president of the World Congress of Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual and Transgender Jews, says: “The boycotters aren’t interested in the violent and degrading homophobia in the Palestinian Authority, or in creating understanding between cultures. They’re interested in bashing Israel. Their campaign is anti-Semitic in content and homophobic in effect.”

Outrage’s Peter Tatchell called the idea a “a tragic betrayal” ... “For all its faults, the Israeli state does not jail and torture [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people] because of their sexuality. The Palestinian state does. We find it shocking that much of the Left is silent about this violent victimisation of Palestinian queers."

More here.

Justice in the PA

In Iraq they'd use this as evidence that we're losing and need to get out: Al Aksa Brigades kills suspected collaborator

A Palestinian suspected of collaborating with Israel was found dead on Thursday, shot seven times, on a street in the West Bank city of Nablus, witnesses and doctors said.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades said it had killed the man, Nihad Hashash, claiming that he had confessed to cooperating with Israel on a video they took. Hashash had informed on 20 Al Aqsa members to the Israelis, who later killed or arrested them all, group members said.


Zarqawi's Role Model

Richard Minter and Daveed Gartenstein-Ross take a look at Zarqawi's idol, Nur ad-Din Zanki (1118-1174), and wonder how this knowledge could have been used to run him down earlier. In the fight against his replacements, they suggest similar examinations may help in the future. Zarqawi and His Role Model - The lessons of two parallel jihadist lives

HISTORY NEVER REPEATS ITSELF precisely, but it often rhymes. Coalition forces killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in a safe house just outside Baghdad. More than 800 years earlier, the life of Zarqawi's role model, Nur ad-Din Zanki (1118-1174), came to an end in Damascus, another power center of the ancient Islamic world. The long overlooked connection between the two men should provide a note of instruction for the future in dealing with the Iraq insurgency.

Most tyrants and terrorists are inspired by a charismatic figure who triumphed in a heroic past. Hitler looked back to Napoleon and Frederick the Great. Lenin measured his achievements against the record of the Paris Commune of 1870.

Zarqawi's role model was twelfth century Arab fighting king Nur ad-Din Zanki. Zanki had two missions in life: to drive the Crusaders from Arab lands and to crush Shiite rulers. Few understood the importance that Zarqawi placed on him. In interviews with Iraq and Zarqawi specialists at the State Department, Defense Department and West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, we found no one who understood the importance that Zarqawi placed on Zanki...


A Call Against the Boycott of Palestine

Snark in the blogosphere is in great supply these days, I'm afraid. Yet occassionally satire is still one of the best way to make a point. Here is a look at the NATFHE and CUPE boycotts cleverly done from the Left: Unions: Don't boycott Palestine

The decisions by major unions in the UK and Canada yesterday to promote peace in the Middle East by encouraging boycotts have come in for a lot of criticism. But I want to understand the reasons behind the decisions by the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education (NATFHE) and the Ontario section of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) to boycott Palestinian products and academics.

The Canadian union's Ontario branch called for a policy of boycotts, divestment and sanctions against the Palestinian Authority until it recognises the Jewish people's "right to self-determination".

The election victory for Hamas, which rejects the Oslo accords, the road map, the 1947 UN partition plan and basically every other suggestion of ways in which Israelis and Arabs can live together side by side is a worthy target for the Canadian unionists.

And they've really hit the nail on the head by singling out this issue of recognising the other side's rights. Israel under Ben Gurion accepted the UN partition plan back in 1947 and most Israeli governments right up to the present day have agreed to one form of compromise or another -- most recently the complete withdrawal of all settlers and soldiers from Gaza. In the face of one side's refusal to recognize the other's right to exist, I can see where those Canadian unionists were coming from...

The rest is here.

[h/t: LTeperman]

Suing the Mayor of London

Post round-ups

Soccer Dad has a nice round-up of posts from around the blogosphere, here.

Also, the 194th Carnival of the Vanities, which I haven't linked to in some time, is up, here, at Punny Money. They've done a very nice job of it.

To murder or not to murder?

That is the question on the table for the Somerville Divestment Project's members at this coming Sunday's dinner meeting. The question, as related by SDP Coordinator Ron Francis, will be to address the SDP's position on "Attacks on Noncombatants in the Middle East." The proposal on the table takes a "balanced" view [emphasis is mine]:

For this position statement, a non-combatant is a person who, at the moment in question, is not an active-duty member of the Israeli military and not engaged in using physical force in oppressing Palestinians as part of the apartheid system. (A soldier in uniform or a settler using a gun to ward off Palestinians would be examples of combatants. A non-uniformed person at a bus station would be a non-combatant)

SDP supports the Geneva conventions and therefore opposes the killing of non-combatants, on principle and in all circumstances. We therefore oppose attacks made by US-supported Israeli military forces on innocent civilians [This is, of course, something that the Israeli military does not do, unlike Hamas. They target terrorists who shield themselves amongst civilians -- itself a war crime. -S]. We also oppose the attacks on non-combatants by Palestinians–even non-combatants who politically support the apartheid regime that oppresses Palestinians.

We also believe, however, that it is hypocritical to use Palestinian attacks on non-combatants as an excuse for supporting the apartheid Israeli government’s racist discrimination against Palestinians, just as it would have been hypocritical in 1831 to use the fact that a slave rebellion in the American South (led by Nat Turner) killed innocent white children as an excuse for supporting slavery.

Continue reading "To murder or not to murder?"

Thursday, June 8, 2006

National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus Speaks

The National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus has weighed-in to the Commissioners of the next PC(USA) General Assembly in a rather predictable manner. No link, but they attempt to take a measured tone -- you know, drawing equivalencies between the violence of the cops, and the violence of the criminals by opposing "all" violence and all that...

First, we find it necessary to briefly comment on the roots of, and the tragedy that has become, the Israeli-Arab conflict. We recognize, with great distress and grief, the horrific suffering of the Jewish people over the past two millennia (particularly in Europe at the hands of Christians), which wretchedly culminated in the Nazi persecution and Holocaust. Further, having been ourselves minorities in the Middle East, we are acutely aware of the discrimination suffered by Jews in the pre-World War II Middle East. We recognize the importance and legitimacy of the efforts to ensure an end to Jewish suffering after the Holocaust. Yet, we regret that the solution was implemented with little regard to the rights of resident Palestinian Muslims and Christians as the state of Israel was established in mandated Palestine. Given the development of events over the past few decades, however, we recognize the state of Israel as the expressed right of the Israeli people for self-determination. At the same time, and with equal conviction, we recognize the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, a right that has been given much lip service and little genuine support, a right that is yet to be officially recognized by the state of Israel, which has been created on Palestinian land and at Palestinian demise.

We condemn all forms of violence, be they terrorist activities or state-sponsored. We especially condemn attacks against civilians, Palestinians and Israelis, be they suicide bombings or indiscriminate military strikes. We condemn all forms of injustice, including destruction of homes, confiscation of property, illegal appropriation of territories, and the illegal occupation of Palestine...

You get the picture... They support divestment, of course. Where the piece gets rather laughable is where they try to show that really, they have legitimate Jewish support for their positions...

...Many Jewish organizations (such as Gush Shalom, Jewish Voice for Peace, Tikkun, Not in My Name, and European Jews for a Just Peace) as well as other Christian denominations and ecumenical bodies (including the World Council of Churches, as well as many American, European, and African denominations) agree that a carefully thought-out divestment process could have positive effect in persuading Israel to change policies toward the Palestinians that are contrary to international law, formal resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, and biblical principles of justice...

As my emailer points out, this is really weak stuff. It probably would have been better to leave this part out rather than to draw attention to the fact that divestment is supported only by the tiny minority of extremists represented by the groups named above, as opposed to the bulk of the mainstream Jewish groups who stand against divestment.

Further, the letter is signed by Rev. Fahed Abu-Akel, who's own background contains some disturbing incidents, notably with his invitation of a rabid anti-Semite to give a college speech. See: The Layman: PCUSA's choice of anti-Semitic speaker prompts college apology, as well as Former PC(USA) moderator slanders, dodges, and Presbyterian anti-Semitism and Responses.

'It’s over for Jews in France'

Nidra Poller describes an absolutely astounding series of events in Paris that certainly remind one of what may have played out on the stage in the early warning days of the 1930's. When I saw Poller speak some weeks ago, an audience member asked if this is what it was like in the 1930's in France. Another astute audience member replied that no, it's not like the 1930's, because now there's a place called Israel. We'd better make sure it stays that way. Read this in full, but here are some choice snips (via Kesher Talk).

The Wrath of Ka - Black anti-Semites storm Paris’s old Jewish quarter

On the last Sunday of May, 30 angry black men stormed into the heart of the old Jewish quarter, terrorizing residents, shopkeepers, and Sunday strollers. The self-styled militia of the Ka Tribe, a black separatist group originally connected to the no-longer funny black comic Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, embodied the worst fears of a Jewish community exposed, since January 2006, to a new rise in anti-Semitic attacks...

...Eyewitnesses concur about the incursion: 30 men in paramilitary formation stormed into rue des Rosiers, shouting threats and insults against Jews. Some wore boxer’s mouthpieces and leather gloves with brass knuckles. They burned with anger and itched for a fight. Frantic calls to the police met with laconic replies: “Yes, we have been informed.”...

...Men, women, and children felt totally defenseless, delivered up to a storm of uncontrollable rage. Some witnesses report seeing baseball bats, sticks, knives; others suspected their presence under thick black jackets; all believed that these men were capable of committing a massacre. The police did not come until the militia had left. They did collar some members of the group later, close to their Belleville headquarters; they questioned and released them...

...Outside the ORT school, where the minister met with residents, a dapper gray-haired shop owner said, with dignified regret, “It’s over for Jews in France.” And added, “The police told me . . . they said it’s over for us . . . they can’t handle this problem. . . . It’s too late.”


Israel Makes Hamas Personel Decision

The man who said, "We have only one enemy. They are Jews. We have no other enemy," is dead: IAF kills PRC head Sahamdana, 3 others in Rafah

Hours after Defense Minister Amir Peretz threatened to assassinate terrorists involved in rockets attacks against Israel, an IAF aircraft fired missiles at a Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) training camp in the southern Gaza Strip late Thursday night killing four terror suspects including Jamal Abu Sahamdana, head of the PRC and responsible for most of the Kassam rocket attacks against Israel.

IDF sources confirmed the attack, claiming that Sahamdana and the other terrorists were in the midst of training a terror attack they planned to perpetrate against Israel when the missiles struck. Earlier in the day, Peretz ordered the IDF to step up the targeted killings of Palestinians involved in Kassam attacks against Israel.

"No terrorist from any of the organizations will be immune if they engage in anti-Israel terror activity," Peretz said during a meeting with security officials in Tel Aviv.

Abu Samhadana was a key player in rocket attacks on Israel and a suspect in the fatal 2003 bombing of a US convoy in the Gaza Strip. His recent appointment as director general of the Hamas-led Interior Ministry infuriated both Israel and Hamas' Fatah rivals, led by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

A spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees vowed revenge.

"The Zionists and Israelis have opened the gates of hell by assassinating Abu Samhadana," spokesman Abu Abir said...

I fear that Mr. Abir may be the subject of a future headline. More on Samhadana here and here.

Muslims Who Kill

Interesting post by an Iranian-Canadian blogger: Muslims Who Kill

Azadeh and I rushed to talk to an Iranian friend when we heard the news, then rejected, that Iran is planning to force minority religious groups to wear badges. With her face decorated with a smile she replied very gently, like she is talking about the arrival of geese, “it wouldn't be a big deal even if it was true”. To make us more surprised she continued “you know it is mentioned in Quran that followers of other religions, whom are allowed to live in the land of Islam, should pay Jezie...” I asked for more information. She added “you know, they have to come forward each year with their hands on their chests with a posture which shows their respect and humility and pay their annual fee”. “For that they have to put all of their wealth and then the Muslim governor will decide which portion to take”.

My friend is living in Winnipeg, Canada and has a graduate degree. Yet, to her it is nothing less than obvious that Muslims can behave other people very much like animals. When we asked her what would her reaction be if she was asked to do something similar by the Cristian authority, she looked at us as if we had asked what if geese ask you to pay them tax. Probably for her the world is very simple; there is a minority of Muslims, much better if Shia, and then there is the rest of the world. The minority, while numbers do not matter, is supported by the creator of the whole world and is helped out by his almighty.

Our friend is not devil. In contrary she is very kind and hospitable. She cooks very well and loves her flowers. She has got A+ on all her courses and you would never hear her saying anything bad behind anybody, even non-Muslims. She is the most tender extremist I have ever seen...

The rest. [via Judith Apter Klinghoffer]

Dear Commissioners and Advisors...

OK, so in that corner is Norm Finkelstein, and in this corner are the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, Hadassah, American Jewish Congress, Jewish Labor Committee, B'nai B'rith International, National Council of Jewish Women, Union for Reform Judaism, Jewish Reconstructionist Federation, and the Jewish War Veterans: Dear Commissioners and Advisors to the 217th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA): [PDF]

Since your last General Assembly in 2004, representatives of the Jewish Community have been actively involved with your church concerning the use of ‘phased, selective divestment’ as a means of addressing the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis. These past two years have seen an animated debate on this critical issue. In fact, many of the overtures that have been submitted to the 217th General Assembly concern divestment. Several encourage rescinding this policy, others seek a change to positive investment in peace and confidence-building projects, and some call for implementation of the spirit of the overture presented at your last assembly. As you prepare to represent yourselves, your presbyteries, your synods and your church, we would like to reiterate our concerns. We pray that you will understand the importance of this issue to the Jewish community, and appreciate that we have faith in our ongoing dialogue. Our hope is that the church avoids a position that will harm our ongoing relations, harm the very people you hope to protect, and harm the prospects for a peaceful two-state solution for the Palestinian and Israeli peoples...

Dershowitz on the targeted assassination of Zarqawi

Excellent:

As the civilized world justly celebrates the long overdue killing of Abu M Zarqawi, it must recall that his death was brought about by what has come to be known as "targeted assassination" or "targeted killings." This is the same technique that has been repeatedly condemned by the international community when Israel has employed it against terrorists who have murdered innocent Jews. When Israel targeted the two previous heads of Hamas, the British foreign secretary said: "targeted killings of this kind are unlawful and unjustified." The same views expressed at the United Nations and by several European heads of state. It was also expressed by various Human Rights organizations.

Now Great Britain is applauding the targeted killing of a terrorist who endangered its soldiers and citizens. What is the difference, except that Israel can do no right in the eyes of many in the international community. Surely there is no real difference between Zarqawi on the one hand and terrorist leaders from Hamas and Islamic Jihad on the other hand. If it is argued that Sheik Yassin was merely a spiritual leader of Hamas (a total lie since he explicitly authorized numerous terrorist acts), then it must be noted that one of the people targeted by the United States was Sheik Abd-al-Rahman, who was also described as a "spiritual advisor."...


Jewish professor of political science writes in support of divestment

Not. But that's the headline, anyway. An object lesson in how to lie with data.

A reader reacts to the fact that a "progressive" Presbyterian web site has posted Norman Finkelstein's letter to the 700 commissioners of the upcoming PC(USA) General Assembly in a laudatory and "must read" manner:

Doug,

I was frankly surprised to find a letter from Norman Finkelstein featured with approval on the Witherspoon Society page.

Finkelstein is a sort of crackpot intellectual, the fact that some of his ideas are congenial is no excuse for mistaking describing him as a responsible scholar.

Your headline, "Jewish professor of political science writes in support of divestment," further misleads in giving the impression that Finkelstein's opinions are in any sense representative of the Jewish community. Support for divestment among Jews is extremely low. Among Jews with an affiliation beyond the mere accident of ancestry, support for divestment drops to nearly zero.

Your description of Finkelstein as "work(ing) for lasting peace between the two nations," is extremely odd. To say that someone has "worked for... peace" applies some positive activity. Finkelstein is a critic, not a worker. And he is not an evenhanded critic of "the two nations." He is an angry, intemperate, vicious critic of Israel alone.

Finkelstein is a well known Holocaust minimizer and anti-Israel propagandist whose writing is popular in neo-Nazi circles. For those of your members who are not familiar, here are a few, random Finkelstein quotes:

'I can't imagine why Israel's apologists would be offended by a comparison to the Gestapo.'

"All opinion-leaders, from the left to the right, are Jews…"

Finkelstein has made intemperate allegations that Holocaust surviviors are bogus, "I'm not exaggerating when I say that one out of three Jews you stop in the street in New York will claim to be a survivor."

"Elie Wiesel [is] resident clown of the Holocaust circus."

According to the highly regarded University of Chicago historian, Peter Novick, "No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts, no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate." "(Finkelstein) "displays a paranoid belief in some sort of global conspiracy of the Jewish elites in the U.S."

While I understand the impulse to advertise the opinions of your political allies, it really does the Witherspoon Society no credit to ally itself with a man like Norman Finkelstein.

Sincerely Yours,
xx

Israel offers medicines, PA demands cash

YNet: Foreign minister meets with US assistant secretary of state, tells him Israel sought to aid Palestinians with medications worth NIS 50 million but was turned down

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni on Wednesday updated US Assistant Secretary of State David Welch that the Palestinians refused to receive aid in medications from Israel.

Livni told Welch that Israel sought to transfer to the Palestinian Authority medications worth NIS 50 million (about USD 11 million), but the Palestinians asked that the sum be delivered in cash from their tax money.

Israeli defense officials said that "the Palestinians' stance reveals that there is no real health crisis in the PA and that they are trying to use the money for other needs."...

Ah yes, "other needs."

...State officials said Wednesday evening that 34 trucks loaded with medications have entered the Gaza Strip in recent days. The Israel Defense Forces also enabled the delivery of 119 additional donations through shipping containers loaded with medications expected to enter the Strip in the near future...

More on Andover High School teacher and Hamas supporter, Ron Francis

Boston's Jewish Advocate newspaper picks up on the story of Andover High School teacher Ron Francis (see: The Andover Teacher Who Supported Hamas -- and Got His Students to Help) and adds some interesting tidbits: Controversy over activist teacher and his views on Israel

The Andover School Committee is looking into the actions and behavior of a high school physics teacher and his possible role in coaching student’s political views against Israel.

This action comes four months after Andover High School teacher Ron Francis posted an article on the Somerville Divestment Project Web site defending Hamas from media bias. Francis’ alleged actions have prompted phone calls and e-mails to the school from parents concerned about how he may have recruited and coached four students in an after-school club and paid them to collect signatures on behalf of the Somerville Divestment Project last fall.

“We really need to find out all the information we can before we take any position at all,” said Andover School Committee member David Samuels, who along with the other members was only recently made aware of the four AHS students who participated in the signature drive. “We’re all elected public officials and it’s our job to know what’s going on before we jump to any conclusions.”...

...According to a number of Somerville residents, including Tom Champion, communications director for the city, one of the signature collectors engaged him in a heated debate when he refused to sign the divestment petition last year.

“I think it would be accurate to say that the mention of [Francis’] name still evokes a strong negative reaction from everyday employees at City Hall who were there during the height of this controversy,” Champion said.

While Francis maintains that his positions are backed by a large number of people in the world and there is no reason to hide his views, Champion suggests that “his methods are not how you make friends and influence people.”...

...Francis insists, as he is quoted in the May 25 Andover Townsman: “There’s a difference between criticizing the policy of the Israeli government and being anti-Jewish.”

Yet witnesses at pro-Israel rallies, where Francis has protested, suggest a different line of thinking. According to a member of the Andover community who wished to remain anonymous, “He’s a fanatic and comes from a point of hate. I don’t feel a love or concern for the Palestinians in his actions and writing but a hatred of Israel.”...

More interesting data in paper's editorial: Scrap politics from school

...Francis, a Somerville resident and a coordinator of last year’s Somerville Divestment Project, is an informal advisor to an unofficial after-school club called Students for Middle East Justice, a student-led group. While Francis told the Advocate that students who participate in this group are influenced by many sources – in other words, he does not “coach” them, he said – one of those sources is undoubtedly him. After all, four teens from this club participated in a petition drive last year to prompt the city of Somerville to divest from the state of Israel, an effort that Francis vociferously led. The attempt failed and angered many Somerville residents when Francis similarly turned his back on the American flag during a number of city alderman meetings...

...Would you want a teacher educating your kids who protests at an Israel rally by chanting, “Long live the Intifada?” Even though Francis is alleged to have chanted those words outside of a school setting, the allegations have wound their way into Francis’ physics classroom. That’s more than distracting. That’s wrong.


Huffington Post = Spammer

Anyone else getting spam from the Huffington Post? I recently started getting daily briefs I supposedly asked for -- yet I did not ask for them. And what sets this aside from the usual batch of stuff labeled something along the lines of "You might be interested in this" is that it is not coming to my blog email, it's coming to my general-purpose spam email. So this is vanilla spam rather than a blog pointer.

Zarqawi's Last Lunch

CENTCOM has released gun-cam video from the air-strike that slayed the beast, here.

Michael Yon has a phone interview with Command Sergeant Major Jeffrey Mellinger in Iraq, as well as his own comments, here.

And Pajamas Media has an extensive round-up here, including a phone interview between Richard Fernandez and Omar of Iraq the Model.

Wednesday, June 7, 2006

Muslim Zionists -- and Japanese

Daniel Pipes writes on the Muslim co-optation of the Zionist spirit in his piece, Muslim Zionism, and declares it stronger than the current zeal of true Zionists -- at least as far as Jerusalem is concerned. Pipes means the term ironically, of course, but there are some actual Muslim Zionists, like Sheik Palazzi (here, here, here), and there are Zionists in other places, as well.

I happen to be reading The Fugu Plan: The Untold Story Of The Japanese And The Jews During World War II at the moment (I bought the more expensive paperback version -- who knew the book had gone back into print since I added it to my wish list?). It's a terrificaly interesting book about a plan by some folks high in the Japanese hierarchy leading up to World War 2 who, had been exposed to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion but, not being infected with the European-form of anti-Semitism, took the lessons of the book quite differently.

Some enterprising Japanese decided that it would be wise to use this powerful and mysterious people -- their connections with America, their business connections, their enterprise -- rather than simply persecute and destroy them. Thus the term "Fugu" -- named for the blowfish who's meat, a delicacy, must be prepared carefully lest it kill the diner. The Jews were, so these Japanese thought, a potentially powerful, but also dangerous ally. And so they settled and protected them -- in Manchuria, Shanghai, and in Japan itself.

Another interesting note: When some of the Jewish refugees arrive in Kobe, on the Japanese mainland, they encountered a Japanese Christian group known as the Holiness Church who believed the Japanese were decendants of the 10 lost tribes of Israel, pray three times a day for the survival of the Jews and their return to Palestine: (p. 134)

About a month ago, we had a bunch leaving for Palestine. Who should turn up at the train station but Bishop Nakada -- he's the leader -- and about a hundred of his followers, waving little Zionist flags and shouting, 'Banzai!' And as our boys were boarding the train, they started singing the Hatikva.

This was 1940.

I'm not sure if it's the same group of Japanese Christians or not (I believe they are different from what I have been able to find), but the travelling choir (pictured above) of such a group just came through Boston recently. I wasn't able to make it, unfortunately, but here's some background on the group: Japanese Hebrew chorus sees Jews as chosen people

The choral group, the Shinonome Chorus (Makhelat Hashachar), is part of a Japanese religious movement called Beit Shalom (House of Peace) or Japan Christian Friends of Israel. Its followers are Christians who recognize Jews as the chosen people. Their mission is to pray for the Jewish people, peace in Jerusalem and the coming of the Messiah...

...Beit Shalom's adherents neither want to convert Jews to Christianity nor convert to Judaism themselves, Weiss explained. Their goal is world peace, which they believe will come through the state of Israel and world Jewry...

...many Beit Shalom followers displayed a Mogen David outside their homes, Judaica inside and photos of famous Israelis on the walls. In areas where Israeli guests are housed, all signs are in Hebrew. Some of the priests speak fluent Hebrew.

The religion's founder, Takeji Otsuki, had a revelation from God in 1938 when he was told to pray for peace in Jerusalem and for the Jewish people. Otsuki was also told that within 10 years there would be a Jewish state. Thus, Beit Shalom was born.

Although it got off to a slow start, today Beit Shalom has more than 100 churches and 10,000 followers in Japan. Otsuki, 91, who sermonized in the videotape, is passionate about his mission.

Followers of Beit Shalom do not observe Jewish holidays or practice Jewish rituals, according to Weiss. Their interest is Israeli culture.

Participants study modern Hebrew and many go to live in Israel for a time. They have planted a forest in Sha'ar Hagaion, along the road between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Two years ago, Beit Shalom built a Holocaust education center in Fukiyama, a city near Hiroshima. Outside the center, roses called "Anne's roses" bloom. Named for Anne Frank, these are the same strain that grew outside the house in which the Frank family hid in Amsterdam. These roses were sent to Otsuki by Otto Frank...

Some more tidbits of information can be found here: The Jews Of Japan

A War Crime

In case you missed this the other day...

Kids brandish guns to test IDF vigilance

A group of Palestinian children were sent towards the Gaza Strip border fence holding toy guns on Thursday in order to test the vigilance of the soldiers on duty.

From a distance, troops noticed four apparently armed Palestinians approaching the border north of the Kissufim crossing.

When the four were some 400 meters from the fence, the soldiers realized that they were children, who looked to be about 13 years of age, and that their guns were toys...


'Little more than a compendium of press clippings'

Fausta has the dirt on the latest accusations of secret CIA prisons in Europe: Secret prisions investigation? yes; evidence? no

Who needs evidence when the accusation is so convenient...

Falling...With Style

'Batman Wings' Developed for Covert Army Missions

Military scientists are putting the finishing touches to a Batman-style set of 'wings' that could enable troops to glide undetected into enemy territory.

According to a statement by the developers of the new technology, German firm ESG, the wings can enable paratroopers to glide up to 25 miles after being dropped from a height of over 30,000 ft.

"Parachutists can penetrate into areas that are difficult to reach without their transport planes having to fly into a danger zone," a spokesperson for ESG explained.

This will be augmented when new technology is developed to attach small turbo rockets to the wings, which would mean that soldiers would not need to be dropped from such a height in order to achieve the desired range...

[h/t: mal]

Tuesday, June 6, 2006

D-Day

Blackfive has a round-up.

Seawitch's entry on the Higgins Boat reminded me of my entry on the same subject from a little over two years-ago, "He won the war for us.", a must-read if there ever was one (if I do say so myself). My D-Day post from that year had a few good moments, too.

Calling Reporters Without Borders...

...and the rest of the international humanitarian establishment...

Here's your Hamas, the group Andover High School physics teacher Ron Francis thinks just gets a bad rap in the Western media:

Trashing the Palestine TV office for reporting a way they don't like: Haaretz: Gunmen shoot up Palestine TV office; Hamas man killed in blast

Dozens of Hamas gunmen stormed an office of Palestine TV in the Gaza Strip town of Khan Yunis on Monday, firing bullets into broadcasting equipment, employees said...

..."Dozens of Hamas gunmen and members of a back-up force of the Interior Minister ... are setting equipment on fire," said Mohammad ad-Dahoudi, director of Palestine Television, which is under the control of President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah.

The gunmen shouted accusations against the network, alleging its reports favoured the rival Fatah movement. There were no reports of any injuries during the incident.

Two employees said they were beaten by the gunmen...

They're firing rockets into Israel: IDF believes Hamas members behind Qassam attack on Sderot

Israel Defense Forces sources on Thursday said Hamas militants were behind the two Qassam rockets fired on Wednesday which landed near the Sderot house of Defense Minister Amir Peretz.

Experts say the rockets belonged to the kind developed by Hamas who have a larger warhead and are more precise than those held by Islamic Jihad.

IDF intelligence believes the rockets were fired by members of Hamas acting on their own initiative in defiance of orders from above to avoid carrying out terror attacks against Israel...

One rocket landed on a child's bed: Sderot: Qassam lands on child's bed

Finally, Hamas "scientists" are working on adding new chemicals to their suicide vests: Hamas operatives working on adding toxic chemicals to bombs

Hamas operatives in the West Bank have experimented with adding toxic chemicals to their bombs, security sources told Haaretz Monday.

The sources said the experiments have involved relatively simple chemicals, and as far as is known, the organization is not yet able to integrate such agents into its bombs effectively. However, they said, Hamas' West Bank cells include several skilled bombmakers who are investing great effort in trying to upgrade their weapons.

The organization also is amassing large stocks of explosives so operatives will be ready to launch attacks immediately should its leadership decide to end the security "lull," the sources added...

...In Gaza, Hamas operatives often assist attacks carried out by Islamic Jihad and the Popular Resistance Committees. The rockets fired at Sderot last week, for instance, were made by Hamas, and "rebellious" members of the organization helped launch them. The Shin Bet security service also accused senior Hamas operatives of having helped the Popular Resistance Committees prepare a attack in April at the Karni crossing between Gaza and Israel. That plan was foiled by PA security personnel.

There is also one type of attack to which Hamas' leadership has given its unequivocal blessing: attempts to kidnap Israeli soldiers or civilians for use in negotiations over the release of Palestinian prisoners in Israel...


Guest Blog: Dress Codes -- Then and Now by Tom Glennon

Dress Codes -- Then and Now

by Tom Glennon

When I entered the business world in the 1960’s, there was not much discussion about dress codes in American offices. Men were expected to wear white shirts and ties, with a business suit. Women wore dresses, or skirts and blouses. These were the expected norms, and accepted by most office workers.

The youth movements of the time began to infiltrate this stratified world with our female coworkers demanding that pant suits be accepted attire for them. The advent of the mini skirt brought another ripple into the business world, as companies began to define how short a skirt could be and still be acceptable. It was then a short trip to the once a month casual day, and then the spread of the ‘Casual Friday’ concept. By the time I left the world of office attire, ‘Business Casual’ was accepted by most corporate entities, including the most conservative banks and investment houses.

As a supervisor and manager, the most contentious discussions I had with employees concerned dress code provisions and penalties. To be honest, I never treated this part of management responsibility as a life or death matter. My sometimes cavalier attitude caused me more grief from senior management than most employees could have ever imagined. When discussing approved skirt lengths for instance, one senior manager said that four inches above the knee was the shortest a skirt should be. I first asked how that could be measured without risking a sexual harassment complaint. My second comment was to ask if the four inch rule would apply to a female employee who was 5 ft 10 inches tall with a 40 inch inseam, as well as a 4 foot ten inch employee with a 26 inch inseam. You don’t have to be a math major to understand that an arbitrary standard length would have a significantly different result on these two examples. I was accused of not taking the matter seriously, to which I admit guilt.

The last discussions I sat in on were to determine the acceptability of jeans with strategically placed cuts and rips. I suggested issuing non form fitting jumpsuits to all employees, in standard gray pinstripe. A small company logo over the breast pocket, and a rank insignia on the left sleeve identifying their job classification would complete the look. I was invited to leave if I had nothing constructive to add. That ended my participation in dress code meetings.

Continue reading "Guest Blog: Dress Codes -- Then and Now by Tom Glennon"

Minister opposes Israel divestment

A pat on the back to Rev. Hurmon Hamilton of Roxbury Presbyterian Church:

JTA: Minister opposes Israel divestment

A Presbyterian minister in Boston denounced the Presbyterian Church USA’s resolution to divest from companies that do business with Israel. Speaking at the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston’s annual meeting last week, the Rev. Hurmon Hamilton of Roxbury Presbyterian Church and the president of the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, said he would work within the church and with interfaith allies to rescind the national church’s stance on divestment.

The Presbyterian Church USA is meeting in Birmingham, Ala., later this month to revisit the issue.


Bernard Lewis and Islam

Bernard Lewis doesn't concern himself much with the concept of "Dhimmitude," nor does he think the Armenian Genocide was as bad as sometimes reported. Andrew Bostom casts a critical eye on the otherwise distinguished scholar's record: Bernard Lewis and Islam

Monday, June 5, 2006

Frogs

I was just wondering what had become of Dan Duquette

You know, former GM of the Red Sox...apparently he's been named director of player development for a new, speculative start-up Israeli baseball league! Very interesting...

Businessman aims to have Israel in 2009 WBC

JERUSALEM -- Israel has few world-class baseball players, its fan base is minuscule and the country has only one full-size baseball diamond.

Yet American businessman Larry Baras is determined to bring professional baseball to Israel, and already has scheduled opening day for next June.

Baras is fielding a high-powered team -- including a New York Yankees executive, a one-time Red Sox general manager and a former ambassador to Israel -- intent on bringing the sport to the Holy Land.

Baras envisions bringing in dozens of Jewish-American players to compete in a two-month summer league. He hopes the league will help develop local talent along the way, enabling Israel to put together a team to compete in the 2009 World Baseball Classic.

"I'm under no illusions as to what I have here. But I think it can be done," Baras said during a recent trip to Israel. "This is a long-term project. It will be brick by brick."

Baras, who owns a Boston-area baking company, spent his visit scouting out potential venues throughout the country, returning home even more optimistic than when he arrived.

He said Israel's only full-size diamond -- located in the Baptist Village near Tel Aviv -- is virtually ready for action, while another field at Kibbutz Gezer -- between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem -- easily can be enlarged for games. A number of soccer stadiums could be converted for baseball use, he added.

"I fell in love with the place," he said, describing the rolling hills, vineyards and fragrant flowers that surround Gezer's field. "You just feel you're sitting and watching something so breathtaking."...

... Intent on building up a local talent base, the league has named Dan Duquette, former general manager of the Boston Red Sox, as its director of player development.

Duquette, who now runs a sports academy in Massachusetts, plans to open a similar facility in Israel to train young baseball and softball players. He hopes to build a national team -- comprised of Israelis as well as Jewish-American players - that can compete in the 2009 World Classic.

"I understand it's a challenge," Duquette said. "I've had a knack for turning around baseball organizations with good players and development operations. This project is along those lines." ...

[H/T: BornIn1965]

Black Eyed Peas in Israel

Israellycool points to this tale of the Black Eyed Peas in Israel:

...From a direction we could not expect, something comes to fan long-buried Zionist faith back to life.

The Black Eyed Peas, for example.

We didn't know what hit us. The expectations of the thousands in that stadium, and the tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands following the live concert broadcast on Army Radio, ran in a very different vector, pointing squarely at the hip hop nation of the City of Angels, a mesmerizing funk-til-death backup band, by-your-throat rhythm cascades, assault rifle bursts of knowing, glowing, mow-down rhyme riffs and inexhaustible energy in human motion. That's what we'd come for.

What we didn't expect, was Zionism.

"We've been here for five days," vocalist-rapper Will.I.Am called to the crowd. "And that's been the best five days of our lives."

"Check this out," he went on, ticking off the ways he found himself loving the country, from the landscape, to the tight-knit character of family life, to "the most beautifullest women on the planet.

They stopped at nothing. They spoke about the possibility of moving to Israel to live. "Y'see, I brought my mom and my grandma. You know, we're Christian, but I think I'm gonna convert to Judaism ..."

The audience, which came knowing every syllable of every infinitely complex song, was caught entirely unprepared. They were witnessing a full-blown Revival Meeting of that old time Zionism, and it was their turn to testify.

Testify they did.

In seconds, they were delirious.

The band broke into a horn driven, Mussel Shoals-seasoned "Hava Nagila." The crowd, already bananas, roared so loud it would have surprised no one had it been capable of levitating itself through sheer animal delight, and a peculiarly local version of loud, proud, surprised, oddly patriotic, unedited love.

Fergie, the group's woman singer, flew in the face of every conceivable assumption, as well as every tenet of political correctness, by calling Israel "one of the most fun places on the planet." But the crowd, knowing exactly what she meant, loosed yet a larger paroxysm...


Sunday, June 4, 2006

Israel Day in New York -- And a note on who to thank for this year's protesters in Boston

Atlas has pics of the parade.

An emailer reports:

I went to the NYC Salute to Israel Parade.

What a Pleasure.

It was a pleasure to watch thousands of enthusiastic young people march up Fifth Avenue, proudly carrying banners and singing in Hebrew. they came in groups. dozens of day schools. synagogues. youth gorups. Adults marched and rode on floats, Hadassah, the Federations, Magen David Adom. A contingent of El Al pilots stopped every couple of blocks to sing and dance. One group carried a twenty foot long model of the Temple at Jerusalem. Several carried American or Israeli flags the size of the one that flew over Fort McHenry in 1812.

But the great pleasure, by contrast with the annual Boston event, was the absence of the anti-Semites. For this we owe thanks to the New York City Police. The Israel-haters and the anti-Israel Jews did show up. There was the daughter of a well-known Boston Rabbi who walked along the parade route handing out Jews Against the Occupation brochures. She had the decency to blush when I hugged her and asked how her parents are. She dashed off after muttering something about being "on the wrong side." But for the most part, the spewers of hate who some years make the Boston event unpleasant were roped into a "few speech zone" in front of the Plaza Hotel at 59th and Fifth. I was told that about twenty crackpots from Neturei Karta were there, along with several dozen assorted racists who want to abolish the Jewish state. But the NYPD kept them in their pen and the rest of us could enjoy the day without seeing them or hearing them.

We could stand lining Fifth Avenue on both sides several people deep for over a mile, smiling toddlers with baloons, proud grandparents with little Israeli and American flags entwined on their lapels, and watch wave after wave of Jewish youth march past singing out their pride and solidarity with Israel.

My emailer is right...with much love and respect to the Boston Police who do a great and courteous job every year, my one criticism is that they allow the various haters way too close to the marchers. Though they did finally push them back later in the day, they've been a bit slow in that, and this past year they also allowed them to use amplification which should be a no-no without a permit. Free speech is one thing, intentionally ruining a family day out is another. There is a way that everyone can have their rights upheld. It sounds like they figured it out in New York. I truly hope they're prepared this year here in Boston.

By the way, those who are going to be participating this June 18th in Boston can thank the Islamic Society of Boston in part for the protesters they'll be seeing. They allowed their Muslim-American Society moderated email list to be used to distribute the New England Committee to Defend Palestine's (no link -- I did that enough in this post) call to "Protest [the] Racist Celebration of "Israel" in Boston" which angrily announced, "Don't let them hold this racist march in Boston."

Just remember who helped and who didn't as you run your kids through the freakshow on your way to the moonbounce, face painting, and balloon artists.

Boycott Reaction -- Pushback and Hand Out

Shalom Lappin addresses the various anti-Israeli academic boycotts (emphasis mine):

...The terms of the various boycott resolutions that have been proposed at the AUT and NATFHE conferences make it clear that their object is not an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and the establishment of a just two-state solution based upon Israel’s withdrawal to the 1967 borders (or their full equivalent), mutual recognition, and reconciliation between the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples. The leaders of the boycott campaign have made it clear in their public statements that they regard Israel as an “illegitimate state”. The purpose of their proposed boycott is, then, not to end the occupation but to delegitimise Israel as a country and to stigmitize its people as a collectivity. Given this view, it is obvious why they refuse to propose sanctions of a similar kind against academics in countries committing human rights abuses on a far greater scale. They do not question the right of these countries to exist, but reserve this distinction for Israel alone among nations. The academic boycott is, then, nothing more than a contemporary version of the traditional Arab League boycott from the 1950’s and 1960’s, and it should be treated as such.

As in the case of the creationists, there is little point in pursuing a debate with the boycotters when they do not accept the basic principles of non-discrimination and universal access to academic institutions which form the basis of our opposition to their campaign. There are, of course, people of good will who may have been misled by the boycotters’ propaganda, particularly by the false and misleading comparison between their movement and the boycott of apartheid South Africa. It is important to engage these people in constructive dialogue. However there is no point in expending valuable resources in an enervating ritual that leaves us permanently on the defensive in a debate controlled by our adversaries. It is futile to attempt to persuade bigots that they are mistaken. One’s main concern should be simply to prevent them from implementing their ideas in a manner which disadvantages innocent people.

There are, I think, two elements worth pursuing in a more efficient strategy for dealing with the boycott. First, individuals and institutions that engage in acts of discrimination against Israeli (or other) academics on grounds of nationality or location should be exposed and vigorous legal action taken against them using current anti-discrimination legislation. If these actions are successful, they will set important precedents that will deter boycotters in the future...

And Norm (from whom, the link) is exactly right when he says:

...The argument...is to persuade people who are open to persuasion, and one doesn't always know in advance who they are. This in no way negates the strategic focus which Shalom suggests, but it does mean we'll need to keep on making the arguments.

The leaders and Stalinist opinion-determiners are beyond hope, but they do not represent the marginal case, who should always be considered and likely represents a very large number of people. The bigots have in many cases coopted the language of human rights and liberalism. There is a reason for this -- it works. It resonates. The people honestly taken in must be helped out, not pushed off.

Mark Twain on the Jew

Mark Twain writing on "the Jew" in 1898:

...He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are also away out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvellous fight in this world, in all the ages; and has done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of himself, and be excused for it.

The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?

Read more in a very interesting post at OceanGuy's. Take time to follow the links. I'll have to make some time to do so later. And while you're there, Tolstoy, too.

Sudanese Refugees in Israel -- and the Arab League Sleeps

A couple of good ones at Augean Stables. First: Arab League Refuses to Condemn Darfur

A piece by Mohamed Buisier, a Libyan-American political activist, in the Wall Street Journal points out what should be obvious to everyone: The Arab League has no moral values...

Second, and an interesting issue on several levels: Sudanese Refugees Want to go to… Israel

The Scotsman has an interesting article on Muslim Sudanese refugees making their way to Israel. (Hat tip: Antidhimmi)

It illustrates a key point that James C. Scott makes in his book Domination and the Arts of Resistance: what people say as part of the public transcript is often contradicted by what they say in private. This recalls what happened when the Phalangist massacres of Palestinian refugees at Sabra and Shatilla started. The Palestinians ran to the Israeli posts for protection, thereby showing that, when the chips are down they knew Israelis don’t massacre, no matter what Arab leaders and media told them. One can find similar examples of the massive gap between what an “honor-shame” propaganda-oriented public sphere continually repeats for the sake of its own self image, and what people know privatley, but won’t contradict publicly...

Much more at the links.

A Science Cartoon Contest for the Pure of Heart

The Union of Concerned Scientists is sponsoring a cartoon contest, Science Idol:

Prepare to be creative and have the chance to win some great prizes!

On issues from air quality to global warming, government science is being censored, manipulated, and distorted on an unprecedented scale. Scientists and citizens alike have helped UCS put the issue of political interference in science squarely on the public agenda. Now here's your chance to show off your artistic and comedic talents in support of independent science—it's said that a picture is worth a thousand words, but what about an editorial cartoon?

This is Science Idol!
The Union of Concerned Scientists is hosting Science Idol: the Scientific Integrity Editorial Cartoon Contest. We're looking for your creative take on the issue of political interference in science. Submit one-panel or multi-panel, print cartoons that address the misuse of science on a specific issue or in general...

Of course, scientists themselves could never be motivated by politics! Perish the thought! They are pure. Celebrity judge #1 will be none other than Philidelphia Inquirer cartoonist Tony Auth, who's work a couple of years back bore an unfortunate resmblance to that of a not-so-bygone era (link goes to original post with side-by-side comparison of prior propaganda):

I'm guessing cartooning of the Cox and Forkum variety is not going to go far in this contest (click photo for larger with original context):


The Andover Teacher Who Supported Hamas -- and Got His Students to Help

Readers will recall efforts over the past year or so to have the City of Somerville, Massachusetts divest itself of holdings in investments in the State of Israel. See multiple posts here.

Well, Somerville divestment was defeated, but one of its leading lights, Andover High School physics teacher, Ron Francis, is still making headlines.

It starts with a short essay by Francis on the Somerville Divestment Project's web site decrying 'Media Bias on Hamas.' Here's a snip:

As usual the media coverage of Palestine is ridiculously biased:

Hamas is consistently called a terrorist organization while Israeli actions funded by the US, representing far more and far worse violent "terrorist" activities go virtually unmentioned - and I have listened to and read many stories on this matter.

It is never discussed why it is that many people around the world view Israel's colonial project since fall of 1947 - ethnic cleansing followed by apartheid with subsequent denial of fundamental rights including the right of return - as fundamentally illegitimate. A distinction is never made between questioning the existence of "apartheid Israel" and "Israel"; the question of the validity of a Jewish-priviledge state is never raised.

Virtually the whole world knows that the Right of Return if one of the key issues if not THE key issue in the conflict...

It's no surprise to find a leader of the SDP defending Hamas's interests. The SDP is, by many accounts, dominated by a group so radical that it's driven some of their long-term supporters away -- the New England Committee to Defend Palestine [NECDP]. The NECDP is a group who's goal is unequivocal -- the destruction of Israel. Among other things, they think Iranian leader Ahmadinejad's call for the destruction of Israel is a sensible idea, for instance.

A description of the scene after the Somerville Board of Aldermen voted down divestment the first time may help illustrate the extreme nature of the SDP and their tendency towards zealotry:

... As soon as they did Ron Francis and Christina Bolton stepped up to the podium and began singing the Anthem of the African National Congress. Simultaneously, other supporters began placing a statement from Desmond Tutu and poet Mahmoud Darwish in front of the Aldermen. Though dramatic and cathartic, it may not have been effective. Denise Provost, the one supporter from the committee and President of the Board was chairing the meeting and standing at the microphone screaming that “you have been offered every courtesy by this board”, and asked police to remove all those disrupting the meeting. Several police officers carefully escorted Ron and Christine out of the hall while roughly 30 others walked out with them. From the hall they spontaneously began chanting “Free Free Palestine”...

Get the picture? Let's fast forward to today, or this April to be exact, when a former student of Francis' wrote a letter to the Andover paper, the Townsman (what follows is a significant excerpt -- follow the link and scroll down for the complete letter): Former student questions teacher's views on Hamas

Continue reading "The Andover Teacher Who Supported Hamas -- and Got His Students to Help"

Saturday, June 3, 2006

Treacherous Muslim Shop Supports Israel

In America, Jewish groups like the ADL and AJC labor to keep the Jewish Community together under a wide (some would argue, too wide) definition of what it means to be Jewish, or even Zionist. They then advocate and provide support for a wide range of Jewish causes and interests to outsiders. That's their activism -- directed outward.

Apparently, Muslim advocacy groups in Europe are just as prepared to direct their attentions inward against anyone who fails to toe the party line. Get a load of this from MPACUK [the whole thing is worth checking out -- not long -- but here's a snip]:

Breaking News: Muslim Shop Reported In Jewish Chronicle Treacherously Supporting Israel

After recent events regarding a Muslim store, Sabar brothers, and their fondness of selling Israeli produce, MPACUK carried out a SUCCESSFUL campaign to remove Israeli produce from the store. We thought the campaign was done and dusted. Alhamdollillah, the store had acknowledged their error after a campaign by us and scores of complaints flooding in, they had backed down and had agreed to boycott Israeli products (or so we thought...)

However, we were unprepared for the unimaginable - we came across an article in the Jewish Chronicle dated 31.05.06, stating how this particular “shopkeeper is defying one of Britain’s biggest Muslim lobbying groups by continuing to sell Israeli produce.” MPACUK were flabbergasted to say the least...

...MPACUK are deeply outraged and will not relent on our firm stance to boycott Israeli products. In this mission we have even come across Muslims - those who should find it innate within them to defend the Ummah with our wealth, possessions and deeds - who ignore the Palestinian’s plight. We will continue to hold to account and expose those who continue with their quest to fund Israel. Any Muslim store or business who is indifferent to the suffering of the Ummah and who refuses to acknowledge our sincere, polite naseeha as to why they should boycott Israeli products, will be held accountable by MPACUK and will be exposed here on Britain's Biggest Muslim website; we will ensure the wider Muslim community hears about it, so stay tuned in...

Ah, building bridges of understanding the MPACUK way...The attitude reflected by this mainstream Muslim group is really remarkable.

JPost: European support for Palestinians 'crashes'

Very interesting report in the JPost: European support for Palestinians 'crashes' [h/t: David Boxenhorn]

New public opinion surveys conducted among "opinion elites" in Europe show that support for the Palestinians has fallen precipitously, according to a leading international pollster, Stan Greenberg, who has been briefing Israeli leaders on his findings in the past few days. There has not necessarily been "a rush to Israel" but there has been a "crash" in backing for the Palestinians, he noted...

...Greenberg told The Jerusalem Post that the shifts in attitudes reflected in the surveys were so dramatic that he "redid" some of the polls to ensure there had been no error.

He singled out France as the country where attitudes had changed most dramatically. Three years ago, 60 percent of French respondents said they took a side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and of that 60%, four out of five backed the Palestinians. Today, by contrast, 60% of French respondents did not take a side in the conflict, and support for the Palestinians had dropped by half among those who did express a preference...

...At the root of the change, said Greenberg, was a fundamental remaking in Europe of the "framework" through which the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is viewed.

Three years ago, he said, the conflict was perceived "in a post-colonial framework."

There was a sense "that Europe could cancel out its own colonial history by taking the 'right' side" - the Palestinian side. Yasser Arafat was viewed as "an anti-colonial, liberation leader." The US was seen as a global imperial power, added Greenberg, and the fact that it was backing Israel only added to the "instinctive" sense of the Palestinians as victims.

France, with the largest Muslim population - moreover an entirely Arab Muslim population - with the direct experience of Algeria and the most anti-US positions, was most prey to this mindset.

Today, by contrast, the Europeans "are focused on fundamentalist Islam and its impact on them," he said. The Europeans were now asking themselves "who is the moderate in this conflict, and who is the extremist? And suddenly it is the Palestinians who may be the extremists, or who are allied with extremists who threaten Europe's own society."

An increasing proportion of Europeans are concluding that "maybe the Palestinians are not the colonialist victims" after all.

Furthermore, the pollster said, the question of which side held "absolute," uncompromising positions had also shifted - to Israel's benefit. The sea-change in attitudes, he said, had been accelerated by the fact that former prime minister Ariel Sharon, who had been widely regarded as an ideological "absolutist," had surprised Europe with his disengagement initiative. And at about the same time, the Palestinians had chosen the "absolutists" of Hamas as their leadership...

European elites wriggling out from under the "post-colonialist" rock they've been under -- or at least redefining the roles? Credit for the Gaza pullout? Actually noticing the choices, even the "painful choices" being made by the various parties? Remarkable if it pans out.

And in London...

Nervous informant who gave details of new terrorist device

THE informant told MI5 that they did not have much time to stop another lethal terrorist attack on London.

The details he passed on were so precise and so terrifying that intelligence agents had to drop some of their other investigations to concentrate on what was supposedly happening behind the net curtains of a neat terraced house in an East London suburb.

The belief was that the authorities had only days to act. Surveillance had to be hastily organised, the police and other agencies had to be told, along with ministers, that this time the terrorists were expected to use chemicals and not explosives to murder their victims.

The nervous informant claimed to have seen the chemical vest that the terrorist would use, and while he didn’t understand how the device would work, he did pass on a description and the address where he saw it. The man also offered a list of names.

Some elements of the story he had to tell agents bordered on the incredible, but security sources said that they dared not ignore this alert...

Lots of links from Allahpundit here: 250 British cops raid suspected chemical bomb-making factory (Report: It was a chemical suicide vest — and it’s missing)

And of course don't miss the -- what's the word? seditious? -- behavior of MPACUK (are they related to our own domestic MPAC?): MPACUK: "We Hope Muslims Will Rise Against the Tyranny"

Terrorists in Canada

Terror arrests in Canada. Apparently opposition to the Iraq War isn't a guarantee of protection from violent Jihad.

CNews: Major terror bust in Ontario

A series of terrorist attacks plotted against unspecified targets in southern Ontario were "inspired by al-Qaida," a CSIS official said Saturday, adding that the ring of suspects arrested posed a "real and serious" threat.

Three tonnes of ammonium nitrate, a commonly used fertilizer used to make explosives, were recovered by police, who say that's three times the amount used in the bombing of a government building in Oklahoma that killed 168 people.

"It was their intent to use it for a terrorist attack," RCMP assistant commissioner Mike McDonell told a news conference.

"If I can put this in context for you, the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City that killed 168 people was completed with only one tonne of ammonium nitrate."...

...Of the adults, six are from Mississauga, just outside Toronto; four are from Toronto itself and two are from Kingston in the eastern part of the province.

Most were Canadian citizens or residents. Police described them as coming from a broad "strata" of society. Some are students, some are employed, some are unemployed. The adults range in age from 19 to 43...

Names of the 12 adults arrested. There were more, but five minors' names are not released.

Analysis of the general threat here: Nevermind foreign terrorists, why is Canada growing its own extremists? [via LGF]

There are very few excuses here. These people are certainly persecuted by that good old infamous Canadian racism and intolerance, they are not desperately impoverished, and the only oppression they could possibly be the victims of are purely the variety that exists in their own heads.

Yet here they are with three tons of explosives and a plan to use them.

Update: PJ Media has an extensive roundup, here.

Presbyterians Bearing False Witness

Here's an excellent piece by Diana Appelbaum in The American Thinker: Presbyterians Bearing False Witness

It's a tough piece to excerpt, but Appelbaum recounts the disturbing tendency among PC(USA) "peacemakers" -- low and high in the hierarchy -- to repeat the most vicious innuendo against Israelis and Jews without much care as to their factual content or context.

...Rev. Clifton Kirkpatrick, Stated Clerk of the PCUSA, has not, as Rev. Suggs did, circulated atrocity stories tied to particular alleged incidents. Rev. Kirkpatrick has, however, freely and repeatedly used language portraying Israelis as immoral monsters, accusing Israel of “indiscriminate shooting of children and adults on the streets,” “merciless attacks,” “violent madness,” inflicting “terror,” “invasion of hospitals,” “rocket attacks on apartment buildings containing innocent civilians,” and “brutal attacks on Palestinian police and civilians, including women, men and children inhabitants of refugee camps.”

That the leader of the Presbyterian Church USA would use, in describing Israelis, the kind of language that angry, intemperate people use of enemies in time of war is shocking. It can, perhaps, be partially explained by understanding that for many years influential members of the church hierarchy have viewed the Middle East through the eyes of Arabs opposed to the existence of the state of Israel. As PCUSA missionary and missionary-in-residence at Louisville Marthame Sanders put it, as regards the Middle East “balanced is absolutely not the right approach.” ...


Friday, June 2, 2006

Ressentiment

Richard Landes "puts France on the couch" by fisking an essay by French Sociologist, Jean Baudrillard, written in the early months following 9/11. Too difficult to excerpt, the piece is extremely thoughtful and worth checking out: Baudrillard on 9-11: American Derangement Syndrome and the Ideology of Resentment.

And while your there, check out Landes's also thoughtful post on the LGF/Reuters death threat business: Inayat Bunglawala and the Western Press: Studies in Demopathy

Voices from within the PC(USA)

Seraphic Secret has a nice post on the upcoming Presbyterian Church General Assembly and their reconsideration of divestment, as well as a discussion of the great Norm Finkelstein mailing and a couple of letters from friendly Presbyterian voices. Also, be sure to check out the comments section for a recommendation on contacting your local PC(USA) denomination and making your polite voice heard.

Seraphic Secret Reveals Secret Divestment Tactics

Podcast with Bill Roggio in Afghanistan

Belmont Club's Richard Fernandez interviews Bill Roggio live from Afghanistan in PJ Media's latest podcast, available here. You'll get a lot better background on the latest unrest there than you will with most of the mainstream media. Let's say it's a little deeper than "bad American drivers."

Must Read: Not with a whimper, but a bang

Thanks to Cynic in the comments for this link. Must read of the day and a story who's implications it should not be necessary to belabor.

Treppenwitz: Not with a whimper, but a bang

...A Palestinian girl from Hevron was recently brought to Hadassah Ein Kerem Hospital and diagnosed with cancer (I believe Leukemia). After some initial testing it became clear that she was a good candidate for a bone marrow transplant... and that her father was a perfect match as a donor.

So, the procedure was scheduled to take place at Schneider Children's Medical Center in Petach Tikvah.

So far so good, right?

Well, a couple of wrinkles quickly appeared in the plan. First of all, this little girl is not an Israeli citizen and is therefore not covered by the national health plan. By rights she should have been treated in a PA hospital.

What's supposed to happen when a Palestinian ends up in an Israel hospital (such as after a car accident or some other emergent occurrence), is that the care is provided and the bill is then submitted to the PA Ministry of Health for reimbursement...

...The Schneider Medical Center agreed to absorb a large chunk of operation's cost, as did the Peres Center for Peace. Of the $58,000 price tag, Schneider Hospital and the Peres Center each agreed to pay $24,000, while the PA was asked to kick in only $10,000. Not a bad deal considering how the rising cost of rocket components and guns has the Palestinian Authority in a bit of a financial crunch just lately.

So what happened?...

...Anyway, knock me over with a feather... Abu Mazen (Dr. Abbas' nom de guerre) agreed that the PA would pay its share for the operation and forwarded the bill to his Minister of Health, Dr. Bassim Na'im (who actually is an MD).

Well, it seems Dr. Na'im had a bit of a conflict when presented with the bill. You see, in addition to being a physician ('First do no harm'), he's also a member of Hamas ('First, do no good').

Guess which side won this Faustian tug-o-war? You got it... Dr. Na'im refused to write the check for the PA's share of the bone marrow procedure because, "...it would be seen as cooperating with the Zionist enemy."...

Do not fail to read the whole post.

Two More on the Boston Mosque

TNR has a very good run-down on all that's gone on to date with the Islamic Society of Boston and their Boston Mosque project, here: Boston Marathon: A Long Fight Over a Controversial Mosque [note: TNR links are flukey...sometimes they require subscription, sometimes not. I can get in today for the full article, yesterday I couldn't.] [via Miss Kelley]

There are some particularly interesting bits, like:

...For his part, Fitaihi was the source of an embarrassing turn of events for some members of the Jewish community in Boston. The long-time ISB trustee attended interfaith dialogue meetings on behalf of his group with Temple Israel in Boston. But around the same time, in 2001, he authored anti-Semitic statements in British and Egyptian Arabic-language papers in which he praised suicide bombings against Israel and said Jews are "murderers of the prophets" and would be punished for their "oppression, murder, and rape of the worshippers of Allah." After undergoing an internal review of Fitaihi's writings, and considering their "historic and linguistic context," the ISB later apologized in letters to Temple Israel and other Jewish groups for offending, and said the words of its trustee--who has since moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia--"were not meant to incite hatred of an entire faith or people."...

That "apology" was quite a bit too little and very, very late by the way. (Aside: See Sissy Willis's entry on "speaking with forked tongue" [via Miss Kelly's comments) Also here:

...Places of worship in America often evolve out of the desire of religious groups in given neighborhoods or areas to have gathering points for prayer in their communities. But according to an ISB document, three trustees live abroad--in Saudi Arabia or Qatar. A fourth--Kandil--lives part-time in Egypt, part-time in Virginia, according to an affidavit submitted by Kandil. This has unsettled citizen groups and individuals who have been critical of the land transfer, including the David Project, CPT, and Sapers, leading them to question the motives of absentee leaders. Specifically: If such leaders have weak ties to Boston, is their intent to simply provide a gathering place for Boston Muslims? Or is it to proselytize an extremist brand of Islam to a vulnerable community? Another leader, board of directors chairman Yousef Abou-Allaban, who filed the lawsuits with Kandil, was forced to flee the United States "out of concern for his safety and the safety of his children" and is now residing in the United Arab Emirates, according to the ISB suit. Two ISB leaders signed the deed for the land in 2003 at the American consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia...

The other article on the subject appearing recently is this one, at CBN: Fear of Islamic Extremism Keeps Boston Mosque in Limbo

Israeli academic boycott 'anti-Semitic', says Harvard president

Larry Summers, who's previous statements against an anti-Israel academic boycott some credit with being a factor in his ouster from Harvard, is apparently bowed but not broken:

FT: Israeli academic boycott 'anti-Semitic', says Harvard president

The decision by the country's biggest lecturers union to boycott Israeli academics has been denounced as "anti-Semitic" by the president of Harvard University.

Larry Summers attacked the decision by members of Natfhe on Monday to support a boycott of Israeli academics who fail to dissociate themselves publicly from Israel's "apartheid policies".

He said: "There is much that should be - indeed that must be - debated regarding Israeli policy. And all views can be, should be and will be expressed by those in academic life.

"However, the academic boycott resolution passed by the British professors union in the way that it singles out Israel is in my judgment anti-Semitic in both effect and in intent [emphasis mine]."

He added that he hoped the decision would be repudiated "in the strongest possible terms" by scholars around the world...

Interestingly, Stephen Rose gets the last word in both this and the Haaretz article I read on the boycott. In both cases he is lauded for his academic credentials, not for his anti-Israel activities which are his real claim to fame. Intentional bias in framing the story? You be the judge.

...Professor Steven Rose, a distinguished neurobiologist at the Open University and a leading light in the boycott campaign, said Mr Summers's remarks were "grotesque".

"There is nothing anti-Semitic about putting pressure on Israeli institutors and their academic staff to fight against the illegal and anti-human-rights policies of the Israeli state.

"When Israeli academic institutions and staff protest for the academic freedom of their academic colleagues in Palestine then I will feel more sympathetic to them."


Thursday, June 1, 2006

Remembering the Farhud

Before 1948, a massacre of Jews took place in Baghdad. Remember.

Remembering the Farhud

Today marks the 65th anniversary of the Farhud. Arabic for "violent dispossession," this is the word used to describe the infamous pogrom of June 1, 1941, against the Jews of Baghdad. In its wake, the Farhud left some 200 dead, 2000 injured, and 900 Jewish homes destroyed. It was the beginning of the end of the Jewish community of Iraq, a community that had existed for twenty-six centuries, preceded Islam by a thousand years, and once numbered over 125,000 souls.

Today, not a single Jew is left in Iraq [I had thought there was a small handfull of elderly folk.-S]. Arab apologists trace the dismantling of the Jewish communities of the Arab world (Mizrachim) and of North Africa (Sephardim) to anti-Jewish sentiment growing out of the creation of Israel. Implicit in this is the imposition of collective responsibility, as if the Jews of the Arab world and North Africa were directly responsible for whatever Israeli Jews did or did not do...

Read the rest. Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el Husseini makes an important appearance.

Edward Said as Morally Consistent Exemplar?

Martin Kramer notes that Said's negative feelings toward Hamas were at least intellectually consistent -- unlike many of those who have come after and are willing to compromise principle for their anti-Israel goals.

Hamas of the Intellectuals

The late Edward Said, the Palestinian-American icon, described the role of the intellectual as "speaking truth to power." In that spirit, many Palestinian academics and thinkers broke with Yasir Arafat and Fatah, accusing them of corruption and compromise.

These intellectuals are nearly all secularists, who've long insisted to the world that the cause of Palestine is also the cause of revolution, equality, and democracy. So now that Hamas rules, are these intellectuals speaking the same truth to (and about) the Islamists who've become the new power?

No one knows what guidance Edward Said would offer were he alive today. But during his last decade (he died in 2003), he made occasional reference to Hamas (and Islamic Jihad). When these references are assembled, as they are below, they convey a consistent message. Palestinian intellectuals seem to have ignored it, as they rush headlong to embrace an Islamist regime...


Israeli Apartheid

There is currently a discussion among the Wikipedians to delete this entry from Wikipedia. If you are a participant at Wikipedia, or savvy and interested enough to join and participate, you might want to head over there and cast your vote to delete this entry from Wikipedia's listings. The folks who want to delete are currently a majority, but need more support to have the entry removed altogether. Wikipedia is an important resource, and sometimes internet listings create reality.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]