Amazon.com Widgets

September 2006 Archives

Saturday, September 30, 2006

Columbia Watch: Bashir Abu-Manneh

Another prize catch at Columbia (Barnard College, to be specific): Meet Bashir Abu-Manneh.

Who is this guy? A radical-leftist himself, and an expert in "postcolonial theory," Abu-Manneh has taught a course called Cultures Of Colonialism: Palestine/Israel: "The significance of colonial encounter, statehood, and dispossession in Palestinian and Israeli cultures from 1948 to the present..."

Abu-Manneh is a frequent contributor to radical Z-Mag -- "The Spirit of Resistance Lives." Here are a few selections:

Continue reading "Columbia Watch: Bashir Abu-Manneh"

Debating the Lobby...sorta

Ah, a "debate." On the "Israel Lobby." Speaking of much waving of hands and no light shed...in this corner, the scholar who started it all (Mearsheimer), a man who thinks Israel was a mistake (Judt), a serial prevaricating affirmative-action hire (Khalidi), vs. two Clintonistas (Indyk and Ross) and Shlomo Ben-Ami who, if he's the "pro" Israel side, you got balance issues (read his book to see what I mean). I wonder if they even managed to define what anyone meant by a "lobby." The New York Sun has the story: 'Israel Lobby' Caused War in Iraq, September 11 Attacks, Professor Says

A tenured professor at the University of Chicago last night blamed the "Israel Lobby" in America for both the Iraq war and the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Speaking to a crowd of hundreds at the Cooper Union, he was met mostly with support from two other professors, Tony Judt of New York University and Rashid Khalidi of Columbia.

"The Israel lobby was one of the principal driving forces behind the Iraq War, and in its absence we probably would not have had a war," said the University of Chicago professor, John Mearsheimer, at a forum organized by the London Review of Books.

Later, in response to a question from the audience, Mr. Mearsheimer claimed that the "animus to the United States" of Qaeda terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed "stemmed from U.S. foreign policy toward Israel."

This, Mr. Mearsheimer asserted, "Simply can't be discussed in the mainstream media." He appeared to have forgotten the article that ran on September 20, 2001, on the op-ed page of the largest circulation American newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, that began with the sentence: "Is American support of Israel behind the hatred of this country that pervades the Arab world and that literally exploded into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Sept. 11?"...

On and on. Say, think there's any significance in the fact that Mearsheimer finds himself allied in these things with people who don't think Israel should exist, period? Nah, couldn't be. You know for someone who should be suffering under the lobby's jackboot, Tony Judt sure does get around.

For the "oh, this is exciting" view of the debate, see the NY Observer blog. I've tried to avoid turning this entry into yet another discussion on the issue of W&M's thesis, and keep it a news item on the debate itself, but I cannot help but quote one commenter there, which pretty well sums it up:

'Yet: No one could leave the hall unconvinced that there is an Israel lobby.'

So? There's an Environmental lobby, a Womens lobby, a Muslim lobby, a Fat lobby. What's your point?

Ooooooohhhhhhh... I get it. When Jews lobby, they must be trying to manipulate government. When everyone else does it, it's a sign of a healthy democracy.

[h/t's: Norm and Adam Holland]

Jewish Voice for Equivalency with Hizballah

It's like a James Carroll piece only even more poorly written. New England's answer to Al Guardian, The Boston Globe, trots out their favorite lefty, Alice Rothchild, cochairwoman of Jewish Voice for Peace in Boston. In the style of Carroll, Rothchild presents a disjointed laundry list of Middle East horrors, all piled on as some sort of supposed indictment against George Bush and any Israeli with the temerity to defend themselves against Hizballah rockets, as though listing bad stuff is the same as presenting an argument. Don't seek in the pages of the Globe for explanations or prescriptions to complicated problems.

There is a positive here. Once again we see that the Jewish Community is varied and contains all sorts of voices -- even if they represent a tiny , if not negligible, constituency -- and newspapers in the West are willing to put just any sort of tripe in print for the sake of balance.

But as to substance, this is purely a zero calorie business, and that's a shame. The Middle East conflict is a mystery to most people. Wasting space on pieces that provide not a photon of illumination, and worse, cloud the issue over, ought to be a crime.

Here's the piece: Mideast chaos, grief resound in the air

Friday, September 29, 2006

Liquid Sculpture

Torturing Metaphors

Always worth a read, Steven Pinker reviews George Lakoff's latest, Whose Freedom?: The Battle Over America's Most Important Idea, and labels it "a train wreck." How he gets there (or, goes on from there) is an entertaining and educational read: Block That Metaphor! [Posted in the forum if you can't access the article]

Lakoff is the guy who thinks that what "liberals" have done wrong is to not take control of the language and labels debate -- that the images in our political language have tilted too far to the advantage of conservatives, and that the solution is not in the form of the details of the things themselves, but simply in reframing the debate around expressions and images. To an extent, I think the meat of Pinker's argument is this:

...even if the intelligence of a single person can be buffeted by framing and other bounds on rationality, this does not mean that we cannot hope for something better from the fruits of many people thinking together--that is, from the collective intelligence in institutions such as history, journalism, and science, which have been explicitly designed to overcome those limitations through open debate and the testing of hypotheses with data. All this belies Lakoff's cognitive relativism, in which mathematics, science, and philosophy are beauty contests between rival frames rather than attempts to characterize the nature of reality...

A rose by any other name. The problem for the left isn't the labels, the problem is more real than that, and not easily dismissed by simply crafting new buzzword memes. The filler of the article is all quite good, as well, like here:

...Bush has capitalized on the concept of freedom in two ways. He has preserved the perception that Republicans are more economically libertarian than Democrats, and he has waged war against a foreign movement with an unmistakable totalitarian ideology. This still leaves his opponents with plenty of ammunition, such as his hypocritical protectionism and expansion of government, and his delusion that liberal democracy can be easily imposed on Arab societies. But his invocation of "freedom" has a semblance of coherence, and, like it or not, it resonates with many voters.

The same cannot be said for Lakoff's conception. "What I am calling progressive freedom," he writes, "is simply freedom in the American tradition--the understanding of freedom that I grew up with and have always loved about my country." Such an equation fails to acknowledge the possibility that Lakoff's preferences and the American tradition may not be the same thing. His understanding is pure positive freedom, while acknowledging none of its problems. It consists of appending the words "freedom to" in front of every item in a Berkeley-leftist wish list: freedom to live in a country with affirmative action, "ethical businesses," speech codes, not too many rich people, and pay in proportion to contributions to society. The list runs from the very specific--the freedom to eat "food that is pesticide free, hormone free, antibiotic free, free of genetically modified ingredients, healthy, and uncontaminated," to the very general, namely "the freedom to live in a country and a community governed by the traditional progressive values of empathy and responsibility."

"You give me a progressive issue," Lakoff boasts, "and I'll tell you how it comes down to a matter of freedom"--oblivious to the fact that he has just gutted the concept of freedom of all content. Actually, the damage is worse than that, because many of Lakoff's "freedoms" are demands that society conform to his personal vision of the good (right down to the ingredients of food), and thus are barely distinguishable from totalitarianism. How would he implement "pay in proportion to contributions to society through work"? Will a commissar decide that an opera singer deserves higher pay than a country singer, or that a seller of pork rinds should earn less than a seller of tiramisu? And his freedom not to be harmed by "hurtful language" is merely another name for the unlimited censorship of political speech. No doubt slaveholders found the speech of abolitionists to be "hurtful."...


Now Showing: PJM Interview with Joe Lieberman

Pajamas Media's interview with Joe Lieberman is now up at the PJM site. Quite well done.

Viewing begs the question...separated at birth? PJM's Roger L. Simon...

...and State's Richard Armitage?


Israel Supplying UAV's to India

The Telegraph (Calcutta): Remote warriors for IAF (Indian Air Force) eyes in sky

New Delhi, Sept. 27: The Indian Air Force is raising a special cadre of “remote control warriors” that will be dedicated to flying Israel-supplied unmanned aerial vehicles after practically junking an Indian-made drone that has been found to be good enough for target practice only.

The air force sees the need for a committed cadre of at least 300 for the Israeli-made Searcher Mark II and the Heron UAVs — the IAF’s “eyes in the sky” — that are also now being used for internal security operations with two deployed for surveillance in Naxalite territory in Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. The cadre will increase with the expansion of the UAV fleet.

The acquisition of the Israeli-made UAVs is being done alongside dismal results that the IAF has reported with the Nishant Remotely Piloted Vehicle made by the Defence Research and Development Organisation’s Aeronautical Development Establishment in Bangalore.

So poor has the feedback on the Nishant been that the IAF has quietly been using it as only target aircraft. IAF fighters hone their shooting skills by firing at the target aircraft version of the Nishant — called the Lakshya...


UN report says U.S. breaking Qaeda

That's how the Daily News characterizes the report, anyway: UN report says U.S. breaking Qaeda

A United Nations report on Iraq echoed many of the dire predictions in an American assessment, but was also more optimistic about the fight against Al Qaeda.

Like the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate released this week, the survey for the UN Security Council made public yesterday concluded the Iraq war has "provided many recruits and an excellent training ground" for Al Qaeda.

It also said the war has increasingly exported deadly new tactics to Afghanistan.

"New explosive devices are now used in Afghanistan within a month of their first appearing in Iraq," the report said.

But the UN report was more upbeat than the National Intelligence Estimate.

It claimed Al Qaeda "may see more losses than gains" in Iraq.

The flow of foreign fighters into Iraq hasslowed to a trickle, and the slaying of Al Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi may have confused the uprising, the UN revealed...


U.S. Congressmen: 'Are U.S. tax dollars funding terrorists through UNRWA?'

We all know the answer to that question.

U.S. congressmen accuse UN agency of sponsoring terrorists

Two United States congressman on Thursday accused a United Nations agency that gives relief to Palestinians of allegedly distributing funds to members of terrorist organizations.

Representatives Steve Rothman (D-NJ) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) lambasted the United Nations Relief Works Agency for allegedly appropriating money to employ members of Hamas and for distributing funds to Palestinian refugees with connections to terrorist groups.

In a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the congressman called for "stricter oversight" of the more than $100 million in U.S. foreign aid provided to United Nations humanitarian programs each year.

"We know that Hamas supports the indiscriminate killing of civilians. We know that UNRWA cannot account for large amounts of money it has spent. And we know that UNRWA does not check Palestinian beneficiaries against a list of known terrorists," said Rothman.

"With all of this information known, the United States must find out what is unknown: Are U.S. tax dollars funding terrorists through UNRWA?"...


Wither the Jewish Democrats?

Speaking of the disturbing specter of a rising anti-semitism under Hugo Chavez, Ed Lasky at The American Thinker: Democrats and the anti-Semitism of Hugo Chavez

Various Democrats have looked with favor upon the anti-American Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez over the years, his record of deepening anti-Semitism notwithstanding. Ex-president Carter helped him secure his position by certifying election results that others have cast doubt upon.

In 2002, 16 Democratic Congressmen, including senior Judiciary Committee member John Conyers of Michigan, voiced their support for Chavez when they sent a letter to President Bush complaining that America was not protecting Chavez from internal opposition to his authoritarian and increasingly erratic rule.

In that same year, Representative William Delahunt of Massachusetts established a “Venezuelan Caucus” to show “friendship to President Chavez”.

More recently, Congressman Edward Markey (also of Massachusetts) joined with Delahunt to accept cheap heating oil for their constituents from Chavez under a program Chavez rolled out to curry favor with certain Congressmen in America. The program, awkwardly called “From the Venezuelan Hearts to the US hearths”, has several political aims. It is geared towards minority communities in America as a way to garner support for Chavez among these groups. By doling out oil at a 40% discount in liberal congressional districts and allowing the incumbent representatives to take credit for it, Chavez is hoping to influence the makeup and policies of Congress and place these Congressmen in his debt.

This same discount oil has lured a Kennedy, ex-Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy III (also of Massachusetts), to hook up with Hugo. Chavez supplies discount oil for Kennedy to run through his Citizens Energy Corporation. Jose Serrano (D-NY) is also a Representative who will benefit as his constituents receive this discount oil. While Chavez’s most recent rantings and ravings at the United Nations brought forth some expressions of disapproval from some Democrats (Congresswoman Pelosi and Congressman Rangel), others like Delahunt downplayed it, and Iowa’s Senator Harkin actually supported Chavez.

The discount oil program appears to be an end-run around the federal law prohibiting foreigners from financially contributing to political candidates. Chavez is clearly accepting these losses (in effect donating the “lost profits” to these districts) in order to help elect Congressmen who will support him.* It is reminiscent of the big city political machines which used to hand out turkeys to voters at Christmas...

Much more.

Everything old is new again in the Ivy

Reviving a shameful Ivy League legacy

...Thanks to recent groundbreaking research by Prof. Stephen Norwood of the University of Oklahoma, the shameful details of this Ivy League flirtation with the Nazis is a secret no longer. Perhaps it makes their recent invitations to Iranian officials seem less surprising.

In May 1934, the Harvard administration played host to Nazi Germany’s U.S. ambassador, Hans Luther. He visited Harvard’s Germanic Museum and Widener Library. The following month, Harvard president James Conant rolled out the red carpet for Hitler’s foreign press chief, Ernst “Putzi” Hanfstangl. A graduate of the class of 1909, Hanfstangl came for the June 1934 commencement and his 25-year class reunion. He had been a close ally of Hitler’s since the early 1920s, and in his new position was responsible for spreading Nazi propaganda abroad.

President Conant received the Nazi official at a tea for the Class of ‘09 in his home. The student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, even urged the administration to award Hanfstangl an honorary degree “as a mark of honor appropriate to his high position in the government of a friendly country.”

Later that year, the Harvard administration hosted Germany’s Boston consul-general, Baron Kurt von Tippelskirch, at a ceremony honoring Harvard graduates who had died while fighting in the German army in World War I. The consul’s wreath included the infamous Nazi swastika.

Meanwhile, at Columbia, president Nicholas Murray Butler in 1933 invited Nazi ambassador Hans Luther to speak on campus, and also hosted a reception for him. Luther represented “the government of a friendly people,” Butler insisted. He was “entitled to be received … with the greatest courtesy and respect.” Ambassador Luther’s speech focused on what he characterized as Hitler’s peaceful intentions.

Three years later, the Columbia administration announced it would send a delegate to Nazi Germany to take part in the 550th anniversary celebration of the University of Heidelberg. (Harvard did likewise.) This, despite the fact that Heidelberg already had been purged of Jewish faculty members, instituted a Nazi curriculum and hosted a burning of books by Jewish authors...

...Universities are uniquely positioned to shape public attitudes. As the pillars of America’s educational system, they are looked upon as exemplars for our society. But what example did they set in the 1930s, by hosting officials of the Hitler regime and expelling a student for the ‘crime’ of leading an anti-Nazi rally? What message do they send today by welcoming leaders of a regime that sponsors international terrorism and threatens to annihilate five million Israeli Jews?


Columbia Watch: The Litmus Test of the Left

Poor folks...they want to protest the "horrors" of the rebuilding of Iraq, but that pesky Jew-hate gets in the way: Questioning the Anti-War Coalition

As liberals and members of the reality-based community, we are firmly opposed to the war in Iraq. It's awful; it's pointless; and it is a tragic waste of human life that flies in the face of every American ideal. That's why, two weeks ago, one of us went to a meeting of the Campus Anti-War Coalition (CAWC) to try to organize an active anti-Iraq movement on campus. It seemed like an easy enough task. Most Columbia students, like most Americans, oppose the war. Because the war is so baseless and infuriating, it should not have been hard to provide good reasons to convince other people to join the cause. But at this meeting, which was called to talk about ways to organize opposition to the war in Iraq, there was only one idea that people wanted to discuss: protesting Israel.

This sad fact leaves us and most other liberals on campus in a bit of a bind. We support Israel. Israel is a liberal democracy in a part of the world that is decidedly illiberal and pointedly undemocratic. The groups attacking Israel are usually armed religious fundamentalists. Just like our opposition to the war in Iraq, our support of Israel flows naturally from our progressive values. And what CAWC told us is, "To work with us on Iraq, you have to work with us against Israel."

This isn't just wrong on a moral level (and boy, is it wrong there). It's wrong on a pragmatic political level. In order to accomplish anything politically, people have to form coalitions. Since everyone can't agree on everything, strong majorities can only be formed if people look past some of their differences. For the sake of an irrational ideological purity test, CAWC turned away people eager to help with their main cause. There are thousands of students on campus who oppose the war in Iraq. But because of their stance on Israel, CAWC will never get support from more than a few dozen people.

Today, CAWC is having its first major event of the year: a commemoration (read: celebration) of the second Intifada. For those who don't know, the Intifada is an organized movement to stop the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and destroy Israel through terrorist attacks and the murder of innocent civilians. To join CAWC in opposition to the War in Iraq you now not only have to oppose Israel, you have to support terrorism...

Related: Here's the pro-terror event in question: Passions Flare at Intifada Rally

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Project Runway: Season 3, Episode 11

Yes, I know, I promised more Project Runway posts, and I really meant it at the time, but you know how it is...

Anyway, we not know who the final three are...or make that final four. Man, what a nail-biter. Thanks to a spoiler I saw out there on the internet someplace, I knew that Jeffrey was in, so when it came down to he and Michael, I was super bummed. Michael has been one of the best performers and most likable characters all season, and it would have been a shame to have had him lose out at the last moment, especially seeing that one note Laura and her constantly exposed and sunken chest (think Crypt Keeper with a plunging neck-line) get in to the final.

As it is, the four finalistswill present a diverse show. I'm pulling for Michael.

BTW, I'm so glad to see the too-soon-dismissed Malan with his own video blog. These Project Runway people really know how to do ratings, including on the internet. The PR site is full of videos, blogs and all kinds of stuff.

Can't wait for next week's reunion episode. I wonder if anyone will get shitfaced and walk out this year.

Lieberman/Lamont Notebook: Lamont Still Behind in the Polls, Interview with Jewish Ledger...

· And now it's personal: PJ Media's Roger Simon has an interview with Joe Lieberman (not at the link yet, I guess they're still editing the video) that scored a Drudge link and crashed the site for awhile. This has the Lamont people hoppin' mad:

Joe Lieberman’s initial public foray into the blogosphere comes in the form of an exclusive interview with the right wing ideologues behind the miserably-failing-despite-the-hype “Pajamas Media.”...

Ouch. I wonder if "miserable failure" will lose to "beaten by an independent" in a Googlefight a couple months from now. We shall see...

· The big news of the day is, of course, the new Quinnipiac Poll that shows Lieberman leading Lamont by 10 points among likely voters

...Lieberman, a three-term Democrat running as an independent after losing the party nomination in a primary, is favored by 49 percent to 39 percent over Lamont in the three-way race. Republican Alan Schlesinger trails with 5 percent.

The race has tightened slightly since an Aug. 17 poll that showed Lieberman leading 53 percent to 41 percent...

Some interesting numbers here:

...The Quinnipiac poll showed that Lieberman has higher favorability ratings among likely voters, 51 percent to Lamont's 31 percent. While Lamont has slightly higher favorability numbers among Democrats (47 percent to 43 percent), Lieberman far outdistances his challenger among likely Republican and unaffiliated voters. Seventy percent of Republicans view Lieberman favorably compared to 12 percent for Lamont, and 48 percent of independent voters view Lieberman favorably compared to 30 percent for Lamont.

Unaffiliated voters outnumber Democrats and Republicans in the state.

"Lamont wins among those who say Iraq is the most important issue to their vote, but that is only 35 percent of the electorate," Schwartz said. "Lieberman wins on all the other issues voters say matter most to them, including terrorism and the economy...

· Joe has gotten a nice boost here: 50 former Congressmen, Senators, Clinton vets launch 'Dems for Joe' Lieberman

...founding members include former Sens. David Boren (Okla.), Bob Kerrey (Neb.), John Breaux (La.) and Dennis DeConcini (Ariz.); former Reps. Mel Levine (Calif.) and Leon Panetta (Calif.), who served as chief of staff to President Bill Clinton; former Clinton Agriculture Secretary and former Rep. Mike Espy (Miss.); and former Clinton CIA Director James Woolsey...

Meanwhile, the Lamont blog is touting its own endorsements from Mark Warner and Wesley Clark, as well as People For the American Way.

· Finally, readers may be interested in this interview with Ned Lamont appearing in the Jewish Ledger. Some of the more interesting questions they ask: "Where did you stand in terms of Israel and its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon? Do you think we should be negotiating with them and with Hamas? -- Two people who did not support Israel during the recent conflict were Reps. Maxine Waters and Marcy Kaptur. Both declined to back a House resolution denouncing Hezbollah and its terrorist actions against Israel. During the conflict, these women came to the state to campaign with you. What do you say to Jewish voters who, as a result, question your support for Israel? -- Along the same lines, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton - who have had a rather contentious relationship with the Jewish community over the years - campaigned for you very prominently during the primary. What would you say to those who question your relationship with the Jewish community because of this?"

You can read the answers in the full interview, here.

[The Lieberman/Lamont Notebook is part of my ongoing coverage of the race for Pajamas Media.]

The Genocide Lie

This is the blogosphere at its best. Imshin translates a lengthy article by Ben Dror Yemini that she calls "extremely important" and she's right. Highly recommended in its own rights, and an excellent resource to keep bookmarked. Here's a snip, but the index to the three part posting is here: And The World Is Silent

...The total count reaches about 60,000 Arabs killed in the framework of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Among them only several thousand Palestinians, although it is because of them, and only them, that Israel is the target of the world’s anger. Every Arab and Muslim death is regrettable. And it is okay to criticize Israel. But the obsessive and demonic criticism emphasizes a far more amazing fact: The silence of the world, or at least relative silence, in the face of the systematic extermination of millions of others by Muslim and Arab regimes.

The blood price of the Muslims

From here on we must ask: How many Arabs and Muslims have been killed in those same years in other countries, for instance, in Russia or in France, and how many Arabs, Muslims and others, were killed in those same years by Arabs and Muslims. The information gathered here is based on various research institutes, academic bodies, international organizations (such as Amnesty and other bodies that follow human rights), the UN, and governmental agents...

[via OceanGuy]

ADL's Cartoon of the Week

Pro-Chavez Newspaper: 'The Jewish race is condemned to disappear...'

Venezuela News has a translation of a highly disturbing piece that appeared recently in a pro-Chavez newspaper: The Zionist Jews

Zionists, the destructive sect of radical Jews, are again impregnating the Jewish community with its animosity towards humanity. The genocide they executed in Palestine and Lebanon is similar to the Holocaust which the Nazis executed against them, and they will undergo another Holocaust because of the global hatred they are accumulating. If the Jews have charged the Nazis for their victims, they will have to pay Lebanon for their killings. The Jewish race is condemned to disappear, because if they continue marrying among themselves they will continue to degenerate; if they open their marriages they will racially dilute themselves, so they only recourse is to stay united, to provoke wars, and auto-genocides.

Israelis are lying when they say they are the favored people of God; on the contrary, because they are always at war and without their own land, it seems that they are marked for having destroyed Jesus Christ...

There's more, and it doesn't get any better. It appears that Chavez is creating exactly the society one would expect from a totalitarian demagogue.

[h/t: isirota1965]

20 Greatest Americans

Right Wing News has the results opf another one of their blogger polls up. The results are pretty interesting: Bloggers Select The Greatest Figures In American History

Out of all the titans in American history -- Presidents and generals, inventors and entrepreneurs, reformers and revolutionaries -- have you ever wondered who the best of the best were? Well, RWN decided, for the first time in more than 3 years, to email more than 225 right-of-center bloggers to get their opinions. Representatives from the following 41 blogs responded...

My personal policy is not to overthink these things, but just to respond and see who I missed in the final results. My list was:

Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Audie Murphy, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Martin Luther King, Thomas Edison, FDR, Albert Einstein, Neil Armstrong

In the final results, I was pleasantly surprised at how high on the list John Adams finished, as he's often one of the most under-appreciated founders. I was also pleasantly surprised that Audie Murphy at least got an honorable mention with 6 votes. I included him as a sort of distinguished "ordinary man" of great honor and duty rather than a President or leader of a movement. I'm annoyed that I left Mark Twain off my list. John also has a link to the same poll he conducted three years ago and the results are interesting to compare.

EU monitors to close Rafah crossing due to continued alleged smuggling

EU monitors to close Rafah crossing due to continued alleged smuggling

The European monitors stationed at the Rafah crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt have informed the Palestinian presidency of their intention to close the crossing and not resume their work due to continued violations by Palestinians of the Crossings' agreements, Palestinian reliable sources have declared.

According to the source, the observers from the European Union have complained about Palestinian Legislative Council (Hamas) member, Marwan Abu Ras, who they say 'smuggled' US $1 million into the Strip in the last 48 hours against the monitors' wishes.

The Palestinian presidency has placed the blame directly on all those who continue to 'smuggle' money through the crossings and not respect the agreed agreements. The presidency said that these people are taking the Palestinians "hostage to this illegal behaviour ".

Meanwhile, Israeli intelligence has warned that Palestinians 'smuggled' 19 tonnes of explosives through the border from Egypt into the Strip...

Who are they going to 'blame' for this one?

A Corner Turned in Sweden?

According to the story, foreign affairs played little role in the elections, but the results may have positive implications in any case: Barely hidden joy in Jerusalem over Swedish election

Nobody will admit it formally, but a few government officials in Jerusalem are dancing a jig over the defeat Sunday of Sweden's Social Democratic government.

For years, said Zvi Mazel, a former Israeli ambassador to Stockholm, the Swedish Social Democratic government has promoted an unabashedly "pro-Arab, anti-Israeli" position.

Mazel said that the centerright parties, headed by 41-year-old prime minister designate Fredrik Reinfeld, who ousted Prime Minister Goran Persson, made supportive comments about Israel while in the opposition.

"We had good relations with them in the past, and hope it will continue," Mazel said.

Mazel - who in 2004 wrecked a display at the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm that glorified a suicide bomber - said that Sweden has for years been among the most critical countries in the EU towards Israel, along with Ireland and France.

He said that the new government was likely to bring Sweden's Middle East policy from the far left into the center in the EU, and that he believed the new government's public declarations about Israel and the Middle East would be far less critical.

Mazel's optimism was shared by Gunnar Hokmark, a Swedish member of the European parliament from one of the central-right Swedish parties. Hokmark, chairman of the Israel-Swedish Friendship League, said from Brussels that he thought the new government would "chart a more balanced policy," toward Israel...


Cool Military Pic of the Day


(Click for larger.)
This photo was taken by a soldier in Afghanistan of a helo rescue mission. The pilot is a PA Guard guy who flies EMS choppers in civilian life. Now how many people on the planet you reckon could set the ass end of a chopper down on the roof top of a shack on a steep mountain cliff and hold it there while soldiers load wounded men in the rear??? If this does not impress you ... nothing ever will. Gives me the chills and a serious case of the vertigo ... I can't even imagine having the nerve ... much less the talent and ability ... God Bless our military!!!!!

The picture is real, but the explanation is slightly off. Thanks to Tom Glennon for forwarding it.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Lieberman/Lamont Notebook: Dueling over the NIE

Been a few days, so let's have aquick catch up...

· Joe's not ashamed of his religion, as his campaign blog announced that he and his family were celebrating Rosh Hashanah this weekend.

· Lieberman gave a "major address" on the Iraq War yesterday, in which he separated himself from the Administration by calling on Donald Rumsfeld to resign, among other things.

· Lamont started touting the new National Intelligence Estimate in an open letter to Joe Lieberman a day ahead of his speech. Events may have caught up with that letter faster than expected, but that didn't stop several blog posts on the subject. Too bad Lamont isn't running for Senate for the year 2000, the NIE indicates leaving Iraq now may not be a great idea.

· The Lamont folks are right about one thing, though, Joe. Please turn the auto-play off on the video at your site.

[The Lieberman/Lamont Notebook is part of my ongoing coverage of the race for Pajamas Media.]

YNet: Christian leaders show support for Israel

Not just Jews

Knesset’s Christian Allies Caucus, All Nations Convocation to host 50 Christian politicians from Europe, South America, Asia and Africa in third annual Christian Government Leaders’ Luncheon

The third annual Christian Government Leaders Luncheon hosted by the Knesset’s Christian Allies Caucus (KCAC) and sponsored by “All Nations Convocation” will take place Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 13:00 in the Knesset Members’ Lunchroom.

Fifty Christian politicians from Europe, South America, Asia and Africa will join with Members of Knesset from the entire political spectrum to declare their solidarity with the Jewish State and her leadership.

KCAC issued a statement saying “In light of Israel’s recent war against Hizbullah, this international delegation of members of parliament, senators and ministers finds it especially important to support Israeli leadership in this forum. This event serves as an opportunity for Members of Knesset and Christian parliamentarians from around the world to break bread together, renew their spiritual ties and strengthen the common values and heritage that bind them together.

“Leaders from both faiths will discuss ways in which Christians and Jews can together face the ominous challenge of radical Islam and extremism in the 21st century,” the organization said...


The Dark Side of New Europe

Do the books of Jan Gross do for the Poles what Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust did for the Germans? Ruth Franklin reviews Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland After Auschwitz in this disturbing TNR piece about a slice of European history and current events that some of us who put great hope in "New Europe" may otherwise wish to ignore: The Epilogue. Link requires subscription. Here's a very short snip. (article also posted in the forum -- requires free registration to access and you need to email or PM me so I can give you access if your account is new, but this is a one time process)

...The police and the military entered the building and forced its inhabitants outside for the crowd to attack with pipes, stones, and their bare hands. Once they saw the soldiers engaged in violence against the residents, the mob let loose. One policeman testified that "Jews were brought from the building into the square, where the population cruelly murdered them, and the armed soldiers ... went back into the building and kept bringing out other Jews." A Jewish woman deposed two days later recalled that a policeman threw two girls off a third-floor balcony "and the crowd in the courtyard finished them off." The head of the Jewish Committee was shot in the back while telephoning the Security Service for help. Despite efforts from individual army commanders to restore order, the violence went on all morning. A second surge began when workers from a nearby foundry showed up on their lunch break to join in. Injured Jews lucky enough to escape were assaulted in the hospitals by other patients and even the staff. A Polish nurse who came from a town more than seventy miles away to help--only she and a single Jewish doctor were willing to minister to the victims--testified that some of the patients had been treated so cruelly that when she first approached them, they tried to hide under their beds.

The violence spread throughout the city: according to one historian, up to one-quarter of Kielce's adult population was actively involved. Anyone who appeared to be Jewish was in danger. There was no coordination; in many cases, people who banded together to carry out attacks did not even know each other. The incidents that Gross reports are unbearable to read. Regina Fisz, a mother with a newborn baby, was taken from her home, along with a male friend, by an impromptu gang of four men, among them a police corporal. The men had no plan for how to dispose of their victims, so they flagged down a truck driver to ask for a ride, telling him, in the corporal's words, "we had Jews whom we wanted to take out to kill. The driver agreed, he only asked for a thousand zloty, and I said, 'It's a deal.'" (It is worth remembering that the "Jews" in this case consisted of a man, a woman, and a baby.) The driver took them to a forest outside the city, where Fisz and her baby were shot, while the friend escaped. Afterward, the four men left the bodies for locals to bury and adjourned to a restaurant with the truck driver, where they enjoyed a meal together and split the proceeds from the sale of the two adults' valuables...


Pushing Back in Ireland

Is YouTube Deleting the Anti-Jihadist Accounts?

Pajamas Event in Washington

The National Intelligence Estimate -- Should We Cut Our Losses?

CNN has sent me the same Breaking News twice. Here's what it says:

Key conclusions of a report assessing the state of global terrorism are released after President Bush ordered its declassification. One assessment is Iraq is shaping a new generation of terror leaders.

Oh you can tell so much by what we include to tell. Here's the section of interest in the short report that that sentence comes from:

We assess that the Iraq jihad is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives; perceived jihadist success there would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere.

• The Iraq conflict has become the "cause celebre" for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of US involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement. Should jihadists leaving Iraq perceive themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight.

One thing's for sure, you can show your agenda real quick by quoting -- or selectively quoting -- this report. It's got red meat for everyone.

If you accept the narrative that the War on Terror has only bred terrorists, then you must accept the responsibility for our limp-wristed response to past terrorist provocations -- no more finger-wagging in Chris Wallace's face -- since we'd have to accept that a vigorous response would provoke resentment and recruiting opportunities for Jihadists. You just can't have it both ways. If a military response to terrorist acts provides a recruiting stage for terrorists, as would any perceived "imperialist" interference in the affairs of the Muslim world, then what you have is a recipe for paralysis.

In fact, the report can be used equally to justify exactly what the Administration and the "neocons" (and some of the Generals and others who have been calling for Rumsfeld's head, for that matter) have been arguing all along -- that taking action carries dangers, but that if we're willing to see it through, victory will discredit the Jihadist movement and the establishment of at least some semblance of liberal democracy in the region will poison the well for them as a more permanent and far-reaching solution.

If democratic reform efforts in Muslim majority nations progress over the next five years, political participation probably would drive a wedge between intransigent extremists and groups willing to use the political process to achieve their local objectives. Nonetheless, attendant reforms and potentially destabilizing transitions will create new opportunities for jihadists to exploit.

Is this great bureaucratese or what? One sentence for one side of the debate, another for the other side. The key here is that once you decide on a course of action, you've got to see it through for the long-haul. There are many paths to success, but it does not seem to me that any argument can be made from this report for a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, and one should be particularly suspicious of anyone caught using only part of this report to justify their "Iraq is a disaster" story line.

Oh, here's another bit the New York Times and CNN won't be spending a lot of time on:

The jihadists regard Europe as an important venue for attacking Western interests. Extremist networks inside the extensive Muslim diasporas in Europe facilitate recruitment and staging for urban attacks, as illustrated by the 2004 Madrid and 2005 London bombings.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Vox

Just got back from a sort of launch party/intro to the new blogging service from Six Apart (the people behind MovableType, TypePad, etc...) called Vox. It was held, appropriately enough, at a restaurant called Vox Populi in Boston's Back Bay. Some of the folks from Six Apart were there, including founder Mena Trott.

They were showing off the new free service, and I'd say it looks pretty spiffy. Definitely good for those who want to establish some personal space on the web without going into coding...or paying money. It's a little like a cleaned-up version of MySpace (as I understand MySpace to be -- never used it), where you can establish links to friends and choose to make your postings available to the entire web-surfing public or create content viewable only by those people you choose to allow to view it -- good for keeping in touch with friends or posting personal stuff you don't want the world to see. It also integrates well with YouTube, Flikr and allows you to upload your own photos and stuff with no storage limits (so far).

And I'm not just saying all this stuff because they plied me with an open bar and tasty hors d'oeuvres. Met a bunch of bloggers and folks considering getting into blogging. Bloggers are always interesting people (and so are blog readers!). Met this guy, and this guy and this guy...and some others...can't remember their sites.

Presbyterian leaders meet with Ahmadinejad

But it's not what you might expect. If it went as it sounds, this is the way you're supposed to meet with a leader like that. Mainline Truths has the story.

Finally got it right.

MEMRITV: Iranian TV Report Exposes "Zionist" Companies - Coca Cola, Pepsi, Marlboro, Hugo Boss, MacDonald's and more

This is actually a conspiracy-theory (what "PEPSI" stands for) that I saw uttered on the streets of New York in Marc Levin's movie, Protocols of Zion (review here, here and here). All 'round the world it is...here it is in Iran, courtesy of MEMRI, but this time not being peddled by some goof on the street:

Iranian TV Report Exposes "Zionist" Companies - Coca Cola, Pepsi, Marlboro, Hugo Boss, MacDonald's and more

...The Zionists are the largest share-holders of the world's drink manufacturers. They make hundreds of thousands of billions of dollars from this annually. This way, they export their colonialist schemes with this product, at no additional cost.

Take, for example, the Pepsi drink. Do you know what Pepsi stands for? "Pay Each Penny Save Israel."...

...Well-known companies worldwide have Zionist investors. Coca Cola - besides its clear, continuous support of the Israeli government - had announced its willingness to invest billions of dollars to topple the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Sara Lee, the manufacturer of Champion sportswear and L'eggs pantyhose - this company owns 30 percent of the shares of Delta Galil, the most important textile company in Israel...

On and on...

A Letter to Zarqawi

CETCOM has released the text of a letter from a senior al-Qaeda leader, "Atiyah," to Abu Mus’ab al-Zarqawi that was capured in what was left of Zarqawi's house after it was bombed. It's long.

The folks at West Point, quoted by CENTCOM, say:

...According to `Atiyah, Zarqawi’s widening scope of operations, culminating with the November 2005 hotel bombings in Amman, Jordan, has alienated fellow Sunnis and reduced support for the global al-Qa`ida movement. In this vein, `Atiyah instructs Zarqawi to avoid killing popular Iraqi Sunni leaders because such actions alienate the very populations that al-Qa`ida seeks to attract to its cause.3 `Atiyah also encourages Zarqawi to forge strategic relationships with moderate Sunnis, particularly tribal and religious leaders, even if these leaders do not accept Zarqawi’s religious positions.

`Atiyah instructs Zarqawi to follow orders from Usama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri on major strategic issues, such as initiating a war against Shiites; undertaking large-scale operations; or operating outside of Iraq. `Atiyah goes on to criticize Zarqawi’s board of advisors in Iraq for their lack of adequate political and religious expertise, and he warns Zarqawi against the sin of arrogance. Because al-Qa`ida is in what `Atiyah calls a “stage of weakness,” `Atiyah urges Zarqawi to seek counsel from wiser men in Iraq— implying that there might be someone more qualified than Zarqawi to command al-Qa`ida operations in Iraq.

`Atiyah closes with a request that Zarqawi send a messenger to “Waziristan” (likely, Waziristan, Pakistan) in order to establish a reliable line of communication with Bin Laden and Zawahiri. `Atiyah confirms in the letter that al-Qa`ida’s overall communications network has been severely disrupted and complains specifically that sending communications to Zarqawi from outside of Iraq remains difficult. Interestingly, he explains how Zarqawi might use jihadi discussion forums to communicate with al-Qa`ida leadership in Waziristan...


Google Down?

Monday, September 25, 2006

Would You Buy What These Guys Are Selling? Somerville Divestment is Back.


Peter Lowney and David Rolde out on the stump last Tuesday the 19th

Back on September 6, Somerville News warned:

It seems like those idiots – the Divestment People - are back and actually got enough signatures (only 200 were needed) to be on the ballot in November here in the City. They only got it on the ballot in one State Rep District, and you probably won’t be surprised either to find out that it’s Denise Provost’s district. Although it is a ballot question that the City of Somerville should divest funds from Israel, hopefully the residents of the district send these whackos a firm and resounding no...

Indeed, the folks from the Somerville Divestment Project, the folks who just can't take NO for an answer are back, and they've narrowed their focus a bit, this time offering a couple of stealth questions in a particular State Rep. District that amount to a stealth effort to get the public to ratify something, anything, from their agenda, while hiding it behind rather mild language. Don't be deceived. It's the same people, same agenda.

Long time readers will be familiar with the issue of Divestment in Somerville, Mass., and the failed efforts of this group to use Somerville in the global effort to destroy Israel (not an exageration, I'm afraid). Here's a search on Somerville on this blog for those who would like to wade into the background (start with the 11/04 posting). See also Jon Haber's site, Somerville Middle East Justice for lots of cogent background.

We never thought they'd just fade away, and sure enough, they're back. The SDP had the polling stations in the 27th District covered with sign-holding adherents (see pics). While it was only a primary election, and thus the questions were not on the ballot yet, this was a way for them to start "educating" likely voters. Let's let Somerville News explain it (and don't miss the comments):

A controversial group that was unsuccessful in getting a question on the ballot in last year’s municipal elections was successful this time around in placing two questions on the November ballot in the 27th Middlesex District.

The Somerville Divestment Project (SDP) announced this week they had gathered the required number of signatures to place two questions concerning Israeli and Palestinian relations on the ballot in state Rep. Denise Provost’s district...

The first question asks voters to call on Provost to support the state of Massachusetts issuing a statement in support of the right of return for Palestinian refugees. The second question asks voters if they support Massachusetts divesting from Israeli bonds and military companies tied to Israel’s occupation.

Provost said she felt a public discourse on United States policy in the Middle East could be useful but questioned the phrasing of the questions put forth by SDP.

“I don’t think these questions are particularly helpful,” Provost said...

...Somerville, through Caterpillar Tractor, profits off illegal attacks on Palestinian homes, schools, ambulances, and the destruction of millions of Palestinian olive trees – an economic mainstay of the Palestinian population, [Andover High School teacher Ron] Francis said [see photo - Francis is on right].

Maryna [sic - Marya] Axner is a Somerville resident who has worked to defeat SDP’s goal of local divestment. She said the resolution on the ballot divides people with common goals.

“The resolution gives people information that is erroneous in its facts and works against Middle East peace rather than bring people who have common areas of interest together towards a peaceful solution,” Axner said.

Alan Ronkin, President of the Jewish Community Relations Council, said SDP is an extreme, radical group and its proposal to divest Israeli bonds in Somerville will benefit no one...“It’s just a symbolic move to demonize Israel.”

Ronkin said Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone and U.S. Congressman Michael E. Capuano, D-Somerville, also oppose divestment...

As did the entire Somerville Board of Aldermen. But can they accomplish their -- purely symbolic -- goal by picking an individual district and trying to sell their bill of goods under the rubric of "human rights?" Not if people are paying attention. Let's hope they are when November rolls around. Yes, "our friends" working against this effort had people at some of the polling stations for part of the day, speaking to people and handing out quickly-made fliers. But as I understand it, SDP had every station covered all day long. They have paid staff.

Stay tuned.

[Extra: Here's the announcement of the new effort in the Green-Rainbow Party's paper, Bridge News.]

Hamas: Pope is Nazi, arrogant, stupid and criminal; Allah will punish Pope in due time

Here's the latest from Palestinian Media Watch (not online yet, in full):

Hamas: Pope is Nazi, arrogant, stupid and criminal; Allah will punish Pope in due time

by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook

A cartoon in the current issue of the official Hamas weekly "Al Risala" features Pope Benedict holding a Swastika while wearing a scarf of US and Danish flags. Meanwhile, on Fatah-controlled PA TV, a Hamas religious leader called the Pope "criminal and arrogant," "ignorant and stupid," and then warned the Pope to await his punishment. Allah doesn't necessarily punish the wicked immediately, but waits "until a day when eyes will stare (in terror)."


Text: "The Pope and those who live under his cloak"
[Al-Risala, September 18, 2006]

From the Friday sermon by Hamas religious leader, Dr. Osama Al-Mazini:

"The second message is for the criminal Benedict the 16th, the Vatican Pope. For this ignorant and stupid Pope, who has no one to attack besides Islam and the Prophet [Muhammad], may the Creator have mercy on him and protect him. He [the Pope] characterized Islam as a cruel religion, and characterized Muhammad, may the Creator have mercy on him and protect him, as a cruel man, spilling blood, who strove to kill. This hostile Pope refuses to apologize to Muslims; and, instead of apologizing he blames the Muslims for not understanding, thereby adding crime upon crime. This arrogant Pope sees the Muslims as too inferior that he should apologize to them. To this arrogant Pope - criminal and arrogant - this message is from Allah the Elevated and the Exalted, as it was said: 'Think not that Allah is unaware of what the wicked do. He but gives them a respite until a day when eyes will stare (in terror).' [Sura14:42]"
[Palestinian Authority TV, September 22, 2006]


Irish academics urge Israel boycott

Demonizing the Jews on the Emerald Isle.

About 61 Irish academics from all over the world have called for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions "until Israel abides by UN resolutions and ends the occupation of Palestinian territories.”

The move marks the third attempt by European academics to shun their Israeli counterparts.

On September 12, the Irish Times published a letter signed by 61 academics urging academic institutions all over the world[?] to boycott Israeli institutions of higher education.

"There is widespread international condemnation of Israel's policy of violent repression against the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, and its aggression against the people of Lebanon,” the letter read.

"We feel it is time to heed the Palestinian call to take practical action to pressure Israel to comply with international law and basic human rights norms. Many national and European cultural and research institutions, including those funded by the EU regard Israel as a European state for the purposes of awarding grants and contracts," it continued.

"We call for a moratorium on any further such support to Israeli academic institutions, at both national and European levels. We urge our fellow academics to support this moratorium by refraining, where possible, from further joint collaborations with Israeli academic institutions. Such a moratorium should continue until Israel abides by UN resolutions and ends the occupation of Palestinian territories," the academics concluded...

[h/t: Adam Holland]

'Baroness Tonge evoked a classic anti-Jewish conspiracy theory...'

Gavish Family Pushing Forward

Request to dismantle Hamas because they didn't pay compensation

Gavish family, who lost their grandfather, mother, father, and brothers in terror attack in Alon Moreh, demands Hamas to be dismantled because it didn't pay compensation to family as ruled by Jerusalem District Court...

A request to dismantle Hamas was submitted Monday morning to Jerusalem District Court. The request was submitted by the Gavish family, who lost four family members in a terror attack on their house in Alon Moreh, Passover 2002.

The district court ruled last February in favor of the Gavish family, who sued Hamas. The court ruled that Hamas must pay the family NIS 92 million (USD 21.2 million). Judge Aharon Farkash noted that he was convinced by the lawsuit's claims, according to which terror attacks must receive more compensation than other types of incidents. But, of course, the sum was not paid and Hamas didn't request to cancel the ruling.

The request to dismantle Hamas was submitted by Attorney Nitzana Darshan Leitner, head of the Israel Law Center. She claimed that Hamas showed insolvency: "A court in Israel can dismantle any unionized body, be it in or outside of Israel. Hamas is such a body, and therefore, the court has jurisdiction to dismantle it." In this manner, the Gavish family is asking to try and make Hamas bankrupt.

In the request it was noted that on March 28, 2002, Hamas murdered four members of the Gavish family. David and Rachel Gavish were killed, and with them, their son Avraham, and grandfather, Yitzhak Kanner.

The rest of the children were saved after they managed to escape from the house. "It cannot be that a body that caused the murder of four family members will continue to exist. If Hamas doesn't pay at its own initiative, it will be stripped of its assets. Such a body is not permitted to exist even one more moment," said Attorney Darshan Leitner.


How to Kill an Israeli

MEMRITV: Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi Explains His Fatwa Sanctioning the Killing of Israelis Visiting Egypt. He's very discriminating.

...I said that these Israelis... I specified the Israeli Jew, not just any Jew. I said, word for word, that these are American Jews, Dutch Jews, and Jews from all other nationalities - and to them this does not apply. He must be a Jew and an Israeli, and not just any Israeli, because there are Israeli Arabs, there are Muslim Israelis from the 1948 Arabs, there are Christian Israelis... He must be an Israeli Jew, and, in parentheses - a Zionist. This was the first condition to my fatwa. The second condition is that he must be a combatant - in other words, a reserves soldier in the Israeli Defense Forces...

...The third condition was that this action must cause no damage. I even said that it was entirely forbidden for someone to wear an explosives belt and blow himself up, and destroy a car in the street, just in order to kill an Israeli...

...The fourth condition I mentioned was that no innocent person be killed. If we apply these four conditions of the fatwa in order to kill an Israeli, one must make sure that he is a Jew, an Israeli, and that he is between 21 and 54, the age of the reserves, and if she is a woman, she must be between 21 and 34, which is the age of the reserves [for women], and even then, he must make sure that she has no children, because a woman of this age with children is no longer a soldier in the IDF...


GRP's Grace Ross to enter debate with legitimate candidates Tonight!

The Massachusetts Gubernatorial candidates will be facing off in a televised debate tonight on FOX25. Participants will be:

Deval Patrick (Democrat) Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey (Republican) Christy Mihos (Independent) Grace Ross (Green-Rainbow)

Yes, that's right, the Grace Ross that attended a fund-raiser for the "resistance" a week ago Sunday. The Grace Ross whose party officers and prominent members have a history of taking disturbing anti-semitic stands. The Grace Ross whose national Green Party supports a comprehensive boycott of all things Israeli.

Here is a search for the term Green Rainbow on this blog. Here's a search for "Ron Francis" that is also relevant here.

Finally, here is a page at FOX25's site where one may submit questions for the candidates.

Here are some potential questions for Grace Ross:

Do you agree with your party's stand on Divestment and Sanctions for the State of Israel?
Do you support a two-state solution in the Middle East?
Do you support the right of self-determination for the Jews of the Middle East, and for the State of Israel to set its own immigration standards?
Why does your party expend so much energy on matters of international relations? What does that have to do with the environment or our state?
If membership in your party is open to all, why is it dominated by Hamas supporters, those who want to boycott Israel and those who believe Zionism is racism?
Do you believe Zionism is racism?
Do you repudiate those in your party who hold these positions?
Why, on Sunday the 17th, did you attend a fund-raiser for "the resistance?" Isn't it at best unseemly, and at worst illegal for a candidate for office to attend a gathering where violence was called for not only against American allies, but America itself?
How do you repond to the accusation that your party is "the most openly anti-Semitic party operating in the American political mainstream today?"

I'm sure you can think of others.

[Oh, BTW, Grace, it's "Healey." Note the spelling.]

Post debate update: Was there a debate? I was too busy staring at Deval Patrick. He's dreamy. Seriously, I just want to ask all the candidates (except Grace Ross) if I can have 100 bucks. C'mon, they're loaded. OK, really seriously, big win for Grace Ross (and Deval, though not because it was good for Grace, that was bad for Deval). Being on the stage with real people and avoiding having to answer for her and her party's anti-semitism can't help but be good for her.

Michael Graham live blogged.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Happy New Year!

Temple in the Morning, Terror in the Evening...

If you can believe it, last Sunday the 17th, Grace Ross of the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts accepted a breakfast invitation to speak at a local Jewish Temple. Considering the GRP's blatant anti-Semitism and their record on Israel, extensively documented here, some may consider her acceptance the very definition of chutzpah.

The Temple issued invitations to all the candidates, but Ross and one Independent candidate for Lt. Governor were the only ones to accept. Even when informed of the Ross's record, the Temple refused to cancel the invitation, claiming the law required them to treat all the candidates equally, even though the GRP candidate was not invited to an interfaith event the same day due to low polling numbers. So it appears there would have been an out had they truly wished to cancel.

Temple organizers were well aware of the problematic nature of Ross's party as activists have been contacting them since the invitation became known. When the day came, members of the Jewish Community and friends were there, ready to greet those coming to see Ross. While many members were interested in what they had to say, the Temple "authorities" were less than cooperative. One of those who was there says:

The Temple's leadership was very hostile to us today and refused to allow us to hand out flyers on their property with information on the anti-Semitic and anti-Israel nature of the GRP, while hosting the most anti-Semitic Party since World War II inside.

Grace Ross showed up with a photographer to make sure to get the most bang and most spin out of this invitation and her being hosted by a respectable Temple

While the group of protesters were told to leave the premises, they stayed on just off the property. Another attendee reports:

...We had a huge 7ft Israeli flag and signs that said "We Support Israel" and "No Forum for GRP Hate Spin" and "Boycott GRP Jew Bashing". Others from our ad-hoc group attended the breakfast with materials to debunk any GRP lies and spin.

For the record, only those cars that stopped and rolled down their windows did we approach to alert them of GRP's anti-Israel record and ask if they wanted our materials. The vast majority of visitors to the shul that morning, as there were other events, were unaware of the GRP's hateful record on Israel and many thanked us for the info...

Another:

...I'm told the pro-Israel demonstrators this morning were threatened with having the Lexington Police called. A pity, not only because that was unnecessary, but wouldn't you think T. Emunah and the small cohort of protestors would not, for all appearances, be on opposite sides of the fence about standing for Israel?

Somebody, a woman (the Exec Director?) would not let the good guys leave fliers at Emunah, leaflets that simply quoted some of the GRP's vile statements...

Two people did enter the event itself, including our Pest, Seva Brodsky, ready to ask tough questions. The organizers did their best to suppress them. Why they felt they not only had to invite Ross, but cover for her and provide a congenial welcome on top of it is anyone's guess. Questions were only submitted in written form, and the tough questions submitted were condensed into one rather milquetoast question on the GRP's stand on divestment (they support it, locally and nationally) which Ross dodged and obfuscated like a pro.

That lead to our Seva's standing up and demanding answers and refusing to stand down even when the organizer called the proceedings to a close. Now, I don't necessarily agree with Seva's manner, but I certainly understand his outrage at a Temple playing gentle host to an anti-Semite while a bunch of Jews trying to educate people on what they were doing were left out on the sidewalk like trash.

Adding to the astounding nature of the day, and multiplying the shame of those Jews who would give a pleasant platform to the GRP is the fact that that very same evening, Ross attended a fund-raising event to support terrorists: In memory of Black September. [photo: Ross arrives at terror event.]

The Green-Rainbow's paper, The Bridge, brags about a successful event, here: Solidarity event raised funds for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel

The fund-raising event for the "resistance" took place on the fifth floor of a place in Chinatown, and our Mr. Seva Brodsky was there, camera in hand, as usual. He was not allowed in the door of the event. In fact, our boy Seva was manhandled by the terror-supporters and "escorted" back into the elevator, shirt ripped, but otherwise none the worse for wear, fortunately.

Here is the audio of Seva entering the building and then being tossed out. (approx 3 minutes)

Worry not, however, freelance operatives were present inside the fundraiser and have reported back, despite the fact that one of the organizers (Robin Long of the NECDP) stated that everything was off the record, members of the press were to identify themselves immediately, as were any members of federal, state or local law enforcement or other agencies and no photos were allowed (nice company you keep, Miss Ross).

Don't take my word for any of this, though, let's look at what a recent email from NECDP itself says:

...Ahmad Kawash said that since the U.S. and Israelis don't care about international law, the only way to free this imprisoned society is through organized resistance, as exemplified by Hizbollah and Hamas...

...Pacifism, human rights, and feminism are often co-opted to attack anti-colonial resistance and deny its legitimacy. Always bombarded by colonial propaganda, we sometimes echo that anti resistance language disguised as progressivism, as if it were some universally held truth.

In the case of Puerto Rico, the American "leftists" who swoon over the Cuban revolution, quote Che Guevara, and supported the Sandinistas, argue that armed struggle would be a bad option for us, because it would alienate the American "working class;" a working class that has always been complicit with the U.S.'s colonial projects.

In the case of Palestine, the "Israeli" and American left reject armed struggle, because they see the settlers as "innocent" "civilians;"...

...Who are the left Zionists? They're the people who fill books and give long speeches about the suffering of the Palestinians, and don't mention a word about the absolute legitimacy of armed resistance to the colonizers who caused this suffering...

Reports from the event tell me that it was made clear by more than one speaker that a model lesson could be taken from Hizballah and Hamas with regard to how to free "political" prisoners here in America. Chilling.

Temple in the morning, terror in the evening. Ain't we got fun?

Update: A reliable witness claims they saw Andover High School teacher and recent GRP co-chair, Ron Francis at this event as well.

Boston Redevelopment Authority Refuses to Turn Over Emails

The Islamic Society of Boston has been busy subpoenaing documents and emails, but the BRA doesn't want to play by the same rules:

Critics of a Roxbury mosque project mired in litigation are demanding the Boston Redevelopment Authority turn over e-mails written by a high-ranking official who was involved in the project’s controversial land deal.

A letter to the BRA, dated Wednesday, accuses the agency of violating the state public records law by withholding e-mails from the government account of Muhammad Ali-Salaam, the BRA’s deputy director of planning, who has been a private proponent of the Islamic Society of Boston’s mosque plan.

“These are public records,” said Jeffrey S. Robbins, an attorney for the David Project, a Jewish group being sued by the ISB for defamation. “What, did they just disappear?”

The Herald is also named in the society’s defamation suit.

“It’s distressing to see the multiple requests for public records going unanswered by the BRA,” said Allston-Brighton City Councilor Jerry McDermott, who has tried unsuccessfully to hold public hearings on the BRA land deal.

The BRA said it has turned over all materials requested by Robbins’ law firm, Mintz Levin, but declined to address the e-mails.


Lieberman/Lamont Notebook: Race Bait, Debate, TV Ads and more...

· The Lamont folks are pushing heavy (it's front and center at nedlamont.com as I type) on this GQ article written by a strong Iraq War opponent that, surprise, does its level best to show Lieberman and his campaign in a bad light: The Kiss Of Death. It's an interesting article for what it shows about the behind-the-scenes of a major campaign, but I'm not sure it's quite the club the Lamont people think it is. People understand that major political races are pretty rough and tumble, and poor wealthy Ned Lamont is hardly a sympathetic victim, nor is he coming to the battle of "machines" unarmed. Having Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson out campaigning for you, as Lamont has, hardly makes you a man of the people, and complaining about "race-baiting" for pointing it out, as the author of the piece does, is a bit of a stretch:

...his spokesman, Dan Gerstein, strikes the new race-baiting note that will be central to the first week of Joe's general-election campaign by labeling Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton "two of the more divisive and problematic figures in the Democratic Party,"...

Accusing the Lieberman folks of "race baiting" for pointing out that a Sharpton endorsement is a double-edged sword seems to be a Lamont theme.

Hmmm...would it be race baiting for Lamont to denounce that Danny Glover endorsement?

· The Lamont media people are continuing their "turncoat" message with another TV ad on that theme. I'm not sure why. The Lieberman folks are thanking their opponents for the ad. They may be right.

Lieberman's new TV ad pushes the "experience" angle. This is a toss-up for effectiveness. On the one hand, the voters will go with who's most effective at bringing home the bacon, in spite of how they say they want people in other states to sacrifice the pork. On the other hand, if the "winds of change" really are blowing, being "experienced" can bring a rather turgid, heavily inertial feeling to a campaign.

· The Lamont campaign is returning a $100 donation from the Democratic Socialists of America...because they don't take PAC money:

...We can see the commercials now: "I'm Ned Lamont and I approve this collectivization of property - and so do we!"...

Heh.

· We have a debate set!

U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman and Democratic challenger Ned Lamont have agreed to a televised debate next month in New London, according to debate co-sponsor The Day newspaper.

The Oct. 23 debate, co-sponsored by the League of Women Voters, also will include Republican candidate Alan Schlesinger. The debate will take place at the Garde Arts Center and will be broadcast live on WTNH-TV, Channel 8...

...George Stephanopoulos, chief Washington correspondent for ABC News, will moderate the debate. WTNH is an ABC affiliate.

Candidates will field questions from a three-member media panel that will include Ted Mann, political reporter for The Day; Mark Davis, state Capitol correspondent for WTNH; and a member of The Day's editorial page staff.

· On this Rosh Hashanah, this article looks at what the Orthodox Joe Lieberman will be doing: Keeping the faith Lieberman stays on the sidelines during holy days. The answer is, nothing.

· A reminder for you conservatives who support Lieberman...He's still liberal: Lieberman Defends Health Care Record

After spending most of his Senate career advocating piecemeal health care reforms, Joseph I. Lieberman said Wednesday he strongly supports universal health care.

· On the other hand, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine doesn't seem to mind. She'll be pulling for Lieberman.

[The Lieberman/Lamont Notebook is part of my ongoing coverage of the race for Pajamas Media.]

Friday, September 22, 2006

The watchman painted the walls

...with swastikas. Harry Chapin's midnight watchman from "A Better Place to Be" gone Nazi...and you thought he was just lonely...

Berlin (Connecticutt) man charged with anti-Semitic graffiti

Police have charged a Berlin man with more than a dozen hate crimes against the local Jewish community while working as a security guard.

Police say Eric Milne was arrested last night at his home on charges that he wrote slurs aimed at the Jewish community each night as he made his security rounds.

Police say the 30-year-old Milne was employed to secure a West Hartford building that houses The Jewish Ledger, Israel Bonds and Hadassah, a women's organization.

Milne was arrested on charges of 17 counts of intimidation based on bigotry or bias, 17 counts of desecration of property, 17 counts of breach of peace and criminal mischief...


John Adams' Marginalia

This sounds neat:

Vast library, thoughts of John Adams displayed

...opening today at the Boston Public Library is the first public exhibition of the second president's vast personal library, a priceless collection of 3,802 works whose breadth helps show why this Braintree farmer is gaining recognition as one of the true American giants.

Not only will the public be able to see the entire collection for the first time, but dozens of Adams's books have been laid open in glass cases to display the notes, musings, and commentaries he wrote in the margins of nearly everything he read. The free exhibit will continue until April, but the library already has embarked on a years-long project to digitize the books for public study on the Internet.

``God bless the man," said Beth Prindle, curator of the John Adams collection. ``It seems that a thought never trickled through his mind that he didn't write down."

Scholarly and scathing, catty and conversational, Adams's writings show strong opinions on many of the great events, leaders, and debates of his day.

``Not one of the Projects of the Sage of La Mancha was more absurd, ridiculous or delirious than this of a Revolution in France," Adams wrote in 1812 in the margins of Mary Wollstonecraft's ``Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution." In that book, whose author Adams alternately called ``a Lady of a masculine masterly Understanding" and ``this foolish Woman," the former president penned 10,000 words of analysis.

There's a forensic map, drawn by Paul Revere, that Adams used at trial in his defense of British soldiers in the Boston Massacre. And there's his personal atlas, published in Paris in 1778, that shows his native Massachusetts in careful, stunning detail...


First Identification of U.S. Soldier Missing in Action from World War I

From DoD:

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that the remains of a U.S. serviceman, missing in action from World War I, have been identified and returned to his family for burial with full military honors.

This is the first time the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC) has identified a soldier unaccounted for from World War I.

He is Army Pvt. Francis Lupo of Cincinnati, Ohio. He will be buried on Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2006, at Arlington National Cemetery near Washington, D.C...

...In 1918, Lupo participated in the combined French-American attack on the Germans near Soissons, France, in what came to be known as the Second Battle of the Marne. Despite heavy Allied losses, this battle has been regarded as a turning point in the war, halting and reversing the final German advances toward Paris.

Lupo, a member of Company E, 18th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, was killed in action during the battle, but his remains were never recovered.

In 2003, while conducting a survey in preparation for a construction project, a French archaeological team discovered human remains and other items a short distance from Soissons. Among the items recovered were a military boot fragment and a wallet bearing Lupo’s name. The items were given by the French to U.S. officials for analysis.

Among other forensic identification tools and circumstantial evidence, scientists from JPAC and the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory also used mitochondrial DNA in the identification of Lupo’s remains...

Some more, here.

Welcome home, Private.

Boston Jewish Lesbian Group Protests Combined Jewish Philanthropies

OK, I admit to embellishing a little bit. Judging from the photos at IndyMedia, they may or may not be Jewish...and there seems to be one guy with them. At least, that individual has a beard.

Young Boston Jewish Activists Confront CJP Board of Directors

Focusing on the upcoming Jewish holidays - Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur – they demanded that CJP reflect upon their support for Israel’s bombing campaign in Lebanon; occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem; and ongoing attacks of the Gaza Strip. As is traditional for the high holidays, the group was dressed in white and sounded the shofar (ram’s horn) as a wake-up call to CJP about their role in the Middle East and the opinion of young Jewish Bostonians about this role.

“Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are times to reflect upon and take responsibility for our wrongs and chart a new and brighter course for the year to come. We call upon the Board of the CJP to support justice in Lebanon and Palestine instead of providing cover for war and occupation,” said action participant and Boston resident Marjorie Dove...

Enjoy the comments:

...They are desperate to save the source of the power that up keeps their myths of jewish superiority and allows them to overlook the genocide in palestine and hold jewish only rallies at jewish only institutions.

Isn't it time for people here to get real and start confronting racist supremisism where its strongest even if its on the front page of "indy media".

Lets all unite in calling for the total unconditional withdrawal and removal of all zionists from palestine wherever they have built their forts anywhere from the river to the sea. The whole world is waiting for us to do it.

Shouldn't all boston zionist property such as philanthropies, temples, banks and other safe houses be reclaimed for restitution and repatriations for the victims of the engineered genocide of arabs, muslims, and christians in palestine, iraq, and lebanon?

Apparently, expressing shame and self-loathing isn't sufficient protection in today's world (or any day's world, for that matter), eventually you have to pick up a gun...or someone needs to do it for you. Like it or not, at least you're alive for another round of public chest beating.

Because We're Better Than Them

Another commander may have made a different decision, but the fact is that a concern for civilian casualties is a part of our calculus...not theirs: General Explains Decision to Refrain From Targeting Taliban Funeral

WASHINGTON, Sept. 21, 2006 – Much has been made in recent days of an aerial photograph taken in Afghanistan that reportedly shows hundreds of Taliban fighters attending a funeral and the decision to refrain from wiping out the gathering militarily.

At a Pentagon news conference today, the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan said the rules of engagement provide all the flexibility needed to take the fight to the enemy and to protect coalition forces, but the decision in this case was not as simple as it might appear to be.

Army Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry said the intelligence available to the coalition commander on the ground did, indeed, support the belief that the gathering was for the funeral of a mid-level Taliban operative. “It was also reasonable to believe that, as he looked down at that photograph or looked down at the video, that a number of the people that were standing there at that funeral were Taliban fighters,” the general added.

But it’s what the picture didn’t show that ultimately led to the decision not to strike, Eikenberry said. Just outside the frame, he said, was an Afghan village.

“And it also was reasonable for the commander to conclude from that village that there were probably innocents -- maybe sympathetic to Taliban, but innocents, noncombatants -- that had moved to participate in that funeral,” the general said. And the photo couldn’t rule out the possible presence of women and children, he added.

“So that commander made a decision, based upon our values as a people, based upon our values as a nation, that he would not strike,” Eikenberry said.

The general noted that the enemy has no such values...

[via Jihad Watch]

Bangladeshi Muslim editor faces death penalty for moderate views

Bangladeshi Muslim editor faces death penalty for moderate views

A Bangladeshi Muslim journalist arrested in the past for advocating ties with Israel now faces charges of sedition, a crime punishable by death in Bangladesh, and will likely be put on trial by the end of the month, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

In a court session on Tuesday in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, a state-appointed judge ruled that the government's case against Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury could proceed to trial and that the hearings would commence within 15 days.

As editor of The Weekly Blitz, an English-language newspaper published in Dhaka, Choudhury aroused the ire of Bangladeshi authorities after he printed articles favorable to Israel and critical of Muslim extremism.

Bangladesh does not recognize Israel's existence and refuses to establish diplomatic relations with the Jewish state.

In November 2003, Choudhury was arrested at Dhaka's international airport just prior to boarding a flight on his way to Israel, where he was scheduled to deliver an address on promoting understanding between Muslims and Jews. His visit to Israel would have been the first by a Bangladeshi journalist...

[via Jihad Watch]

From Newton to the Negev

Women play key role on an Israeli front

ON THE ISRAELI-EGYPTIAN BORDER -- Sergeant Tzipora Schindler , a 2004 graduate of Newton South High School, is on the front lines of Israel's other border war, on the lookout for terrorists and smugglers along the country's southern frontier.

From her base camp atop Mount Uzia, she can see through binoculars where Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia intersect at the Gulf of Aqaba below, gleaming like an oasis in the desert landscape.

Schindler, 20, left her parents in Newton and moved to Israel two years ago, seeking spiritual rebirth after spending part of her childhood in Jerusalem. She quickly volunteered for the only infantry battalion in the Israel Defense Forces that includes women.

Now, while much of the world focuses on Israel's tense northern border with Lebanon, Schindler and her comrades in the Karkal, or ``Lynx," battalion -- about 70 percent of whom are female -- are attempting to choke off a sophisticated criminal and terrorist smuggling network that poses a growing threat to the Jewish state.

They are on the hunt not only for Palestinian terrorists from the Gaza Strip and other Islamic militants. The soldiers are also seeking to capture thousands of would-be illegal workers and a growing number of women from such countries as Turkey, Georgia, Russia, China, Sudan, and Colombia who are being smuggled into the country to meet the demands of a burgeoning sex industry.

Stopping the flow poses enormous challenges for Israel, which has relatively few troops to patrol this vast and dangerous mountainous terrain, where borders exist only on maps and remain largely unrecognized by local tribes. But it is also a new opportunity for Israeli women like Schindler, who are breaking their own barrier by serving on the front lines with men...

Note:

...One of the unit's growing priorities is stopping human smuggling, including a worrisome scourge of sex trafficking.

Israel was recently added to a United Nations list of problem nations where girls -- some as young as 12 -- are smuggled from Eastern Europe and Asia and often sold into prostitution rings in Tel Aviv, Haifa, and other cities.

Officials said that 3,000 Sudanese women have been intercepted on the border in the past several years. Because Israel has no diplomatic relations with Sudan, it cannot send them home and has tried to assimilate them into Israeli society, placing them in Arab villages or in women's centers...

...The problem is expected to worsen with the arrival in Lebanon of 15,000 UN peacekeeping troops. An Israeli government task force recently warned Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that this ``mass of solitary men" will likely take weekend leave in the north of Israel, an influx that ``will increase tenfold the demand for prostitutes."...

[h/t: Soccer Dad] More women in the IDF here and here.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Ahmadinejad: Yes, he really is nuts

You may have seen it already at LGF, but this short interview with one of the people who saw Ahmadinejad address the Council on Foreign Relations is a must-read. Here's a snip, but be sure to read the rest. I'm glad to see that one of these controversial invitations seems to have had some positive result: Crazy like a Fox: Business Leader Maurice R. Greenberg Describes Ahmadinejad's Performance

Q: Please give us your perspective of President Ahmadinejad's much-publicized performance yesterday at the Council on Foreign Relation, where only members were invited and no televisions cameras were present. Could we start with your personal exchange with the president of Iran?

MRG: He has been quoted many times, including last evening, that the Holocaust needs to be explored as to whether or not it really occurred. And he says, "Well you know, every time somebody tries to do that, they get imprisoned." Well, the reason some have been imprisoned is because it's against the law in some places to deny that the Holocaust occurred.

Of course it occurred. And when he said that, I responded: "Listen, I went through Dachau during the war. To suggest it didn't occur is simply a lie." So he turned around and asked me how old I was, to determine if I was old enough to have been there. And then he changed the subject.

Q: So that was the extent of it?

MRG: Yes, but then there was a lot of follow up on that. He wanted to know why there was an objection to have professors and historians explore whether or not it had occurred. The fact of the matter, obviously we said, is that it's a recognized fact that it occurred; it was 6 million Jews that perished in the Holocaust and that any single individual that denies that is not only wrong but is also trying to be revisionist of history.

Q: Was it your sense that he truly doubts whether the Holocaust occurred or was he grandstanding? He was presumably playing just to that audience because there were no television cameras there.

MRG: No, no, but there were reporters there. Look, he has said this on many occasions, not just last evening. And it's offensive. I would say that this man, he's not only out of touch, he's very clever and I worry about what he's capable of doing. And I do believe that the administration's, and the president's in particular, view of Iran and the danger that it presents to the world, particularly our country and Israel, is not only real, it reflects a real and present danger. I do not think that we can take lightly what he stands for and is capable of, if he came into possession of nuclear weapons...


Columbia Watch: Untenured Jew

We last saw James Russell when he hosted Andrew Bostom's talk at Harvard. Here he is talking about being a Jew in Columbia's Middle East Department and beyond: Professor Talks of Jihad -- on the Battlefields and in the Classroom

After producing two books, seven articles and a course that earned widespread accolades from the student body, James Russell was sure he'd be a shoe-in for tenure at Columbia University.

But Russell, an expert in Armenian studies, soon learned that other factors besides the quality of his scholarship were under consideration.

"Two senior professors in my department explained that I could not expect, as a Jew, to be kept as a tenured professor in the Middle East department," he said.

Now, three years later, Russell, a tenured professor at Harvard University, speaks brazenly against anti-Semitism in academia.

Addressing more than 100 people at the Gershman Y on a recent Sunday morning, he pointed to numerous examples of what some have referred to an "academic jihad."

He called Edward Said, the late Columbia University professor who espoused the Arab cause, the "academic apostle" of radical Islam. Russell blamed Said's "pseudo-scholarship" for painting Israel as a colonial tyrant and Arabs as hapless victims.

"It created an innocent and passive Arab population, raped by imperialists and colonized by Zionists," explained Russell. The scholar also said that Said's work engendered "a general sympathy for the Arabs as postcolonial revolutionaries, together with an easy antipathy towards Israel."

He added that such "scholarship" misrepresents the Middle East, and its history...

[h/t: Adam Holland]

Columbia Watch: Marwan Dalal and Adalah with extra Dabashi

Columbia Law School's Public Interest Law Initiative will be inviting Marwan Dalal of Adalah, The Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel this fall.

NGO Monitor has an extensive dossier on Adalah, for instance:

...Adalah has been particularly successful in pushing its political agenda because of the appearance of 'firm' evidence presented in its legal arguments. However, the NGO is clearly part of a widespread phenomenon of the distortion of human rights for political agendas...

Dalal has called Israel, pre-1967(!), as "a classical apartheid state."

Adalah actively participated in the 2001 Durban anti-Racism Conference, "promoted efforts to demonize Israel as an "apartheid" state committing "genocide" against Palestinians." (scroll to end)

See also, here:

...In its May 2004 Newsletter, Adalah draws Durban-like false parallels between Israel and South African apartheid, and strips the context of terrorism from the analysis of Israeli policies. The text refers to "massive human rights violations in the Occupied Territories: the killing of Palestinians, assassinations, the demolition of homes and neighborhoods, the imposition of closures and curfews, the establishment of roadblocks and checkpoints that isolate villages, the land confiscation, and the construction of the Apartheid Wall and Bantustans".

Linked to this issue is an article titled "The Racist Separation Wall in the West Bank." The article accuses the Israeli army of, among other things, "war crimes" in Jenin and Nablus, and calls Israel's protective security fence "the most comprehensive, colonial and racist project undertaken since the occupation of the West Bank in 1967".

Adalah also defended Azmi Bishara's candidacy for Knesset. Bishara hails Hizballah as heroes, and Palestinian Media Watch quotes him: "Solidarity with these heroes [Hezbollah and Palestinian terrorists] is the least [we can do]."

Columbia Law: Learning to use law as a weapon to delegitimize Israel...or whereever it is you happen to live.

Extra Material: When last we saw Columbia's Hamid Dabashi, he was trashing Wolf Blitzer and various "neocon creatures." This would seem to be a good opportunity to bring out some of the more outrageous statements, particularly his lauding of the brave resistance of Hamas and Hizballah in his recent Al Ahram column: Lessons from Lebanon: Rethinking national liberation movements

The piece is long, but I've highlighted a few of the choicer bits which I've included in the extended entry below. Bolding is mine. Welcome to USrael:

Continue reading "Columbia Watch: Marwan Dalal and Adalah with extra Dabashi"

Columbia Watch: Inviting Ahmadinejad

First, Columbia's invites Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak, blindsiding University President Lee Bollinger, who, one of my Columbia contacts tells me, "needed this (entirely avoidable) controversy like he needed a hole in his head": Iranian President Invited to Speak at CU

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been invited to speak at Columbia this Friday, University officials confirmed Wednesday night.

Ahmadinejad, who has been criticized for promoting Islamic fundamentalist rule in Iran, is in New York for the United Nations General Assembly meeting.

University President Lee Bollinger, who learned of the invitation on Wednesday, said in a statement, "I happen to find many of President Ahmadinejad's stated beliefs to be repugnant, a view that I'm sure is widely shared within our university community."

David Stone, executive vice president of communications, said in an e-mail that he understands the invitation came from Lisa Anderson, dean of the School of International and Public Affairs, "as many such invitations to foreign leaders and government officials to speak at the university often do."...

It didn't take long for the invite to be revoked for "security reasons": Ahmadinejad Will Not Speak at CU

A day after the University invited the Iranian president to speak at Columbia, University officials announced late this morning that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will not come to campus.

Dean of the School of International and Public Affairs Lisa Anderson invited Ahmadinejad to speak Wednesday morning, and he accepted Wednesday afternoon, Robert Garris, SIPA director of communications told Spectator.

But SIPA and University officials decided Thursday morning that it was not possible to coordinate the security precautions necessary to accommodate such a high profile guest under short notice...

Bollinger showing good sense and putting his foot down, or a real excuse? We may never know.

News Flash: Hamas won't stop murdering

Haniyeh again refuses to recognize Israel

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh reiterated his opposition to recognizing Israel's right to exist and halting terrorism on Wednesday, but the comments were not enough to deter Prime Minister Ehud Olmert from his intention to meet in the near future with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

As Abbas was meeting with US President George W. Bush in New York on Wednesday, Haniyeh addressed supporters in Gaza City, saying the Hamas-led government would not accept the conditions set by America and the rest of the Quartet for resuming financial aid to the Palestinians.

"They are imposing unacceptable conditions on our people," Haniyeh said in statements that were seen as a warning to Abbas not to succumb to US pressure.

"They want us to condemn the heroic resistance and recognize the agreements [signed between Israel and the PLO]. But we will continue to abide by the national reconciliation document [drafted by Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails], which does not recognize the legitimacy of the occupation."

Haniyeh added that the document, which he believes should serve as the political program for a future unity government, clearly states that the Palestinians have the right to continue the "resistance" against Israel...

...For Palestinian politics, Haniyeh's remarks are yet another indication of the deepening crisis between Abbas and Hamas over the formation of a unity government. Moreover, his remarks contradict statements by Abbas aides to the effect that a unity government would recognize Israel and honor all agreements with Israel...


Islamism and Fascism: Dare to Compare

Martin Kramer does so, tracing some of the intellectual pedigree of the comparison, he quotes Manfred Halpin, for instance:

...The neo-Islamic totalitarian movements are essentially fascist movements. They concentrate on mobilizing passion and violence to enlarge the power of their charismatic leader and the solidarity of the movement. They view material progress primarily as a means for accumulating strength for political expansion, and entirely deny individual and social freedom. They champion the values and emotions of a heroic past, but repress all free critical analysis of either past roots or present problems...

In a separate piece, Kramer takes on friend Juan Cole: Cole, fascism, and mind quality control

...The comparison wasn't born in the White House, but has a long academic pedigree. There I quote Michigan professor Juan Cole's denunciation of "the lazy conflation of Muslim fundamentalist movements with fascism." But there was nothing lazy in the "conflations" made by Manfred Halpern, Maxime Rodinson, and Said Amir Arjomand, who spent a lot more time vetting their ideas than blog-hurried Cole spends vetting his.

The full Cole quote provides but one more example:

The lazy conflation of Muslim fundamentalist movements with fascism cannot account for their increasing willingness to participate in elections and serve in parliamentary government. Hizbullah, for example, ran in the 2005 elections and had 12 members elected to parliament. Altogether, the Shiite parties of Hizbullah and Amal, who have a parliamentary alliance, have 29 members in the Lebanese parliament of 128 seats. Hizbullah and Amal both joined the national unity government, receiving cabinet posts. This is not the behavior of a fascist movement tout court.

Tout court? How about applying this to a certain Israeli party that has participated in elections, served in parliamentary government, joined parliamentary alliances and national unity governments, and received cabinet posts? A party that has even surrendered power to its opponents in free elections? This can't be the behavior of a fascist movement, right?...

I think you can see where this is going...

To hold out Hizballah's participation in Parliamentary forms as an example of their non-Fascism is silly. Of course, Hizballah participates in elections, they'll use whatever means that are at their disposal to seek power, as Fascists do. If they were truly democratic, they'd put down their weapons, stop threatening war with their neighbor and stop intimidating those Lebanese that disagree with them.

Holdouts in the PC(USA), More missed points in the UCC

Will Spotts reports that, despite the Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly's overwhelming refutation of the previous GA's anti-Israel stances, as feared, the professional class within the PC(USA) continues to be a problem: The More Things Change

...The MRTI [Mission Responsibility Through Investment committee] now lacks the authority to single out companies solely based on their affiliations with Israel. If they continue to engage these companies, they'd be well advised to come up with better excuses to cover their actions. For a permanent committee like the MRTI to violate the instructions of the GA is unethical and immoral. This is corruption, plain and simple. Until it stops – until Presbyterians demand that it stop – we will continue to be a force for evil in the world.

Meanwhile, the new blog MainlineTruths reports on the continuing problems within the United Church of Christ (UCC): UCC President makes a mockery of Jewish-Christian relationship

According to UC News, UCC President John Thomas delivered another speech on Jewish and Christian relationships -and the strained relationship of UCC with major Jewish groups - in his Fall Convocation Address at United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities this week.

And again, John Thomas misses the reason why the UCC's relationship with Jewish groups has soured.

While Thomas reflected positively on the UCC's history with Jewish groups (and our denomination's explicit recognition of God's covenant with Jews), Thomas failed to take any responsibility for the problems he personally, and completely unnecessarily, created in the last three years...

Continues here.

Jenny Tonge's Conspiracies

Baroness (former MP) Jenny Tonge at a recent Liberal-Democrat meeting in the UK:

The pro-Israeli lobby has got its grips on the western world, its financial grips. I think they have probably got a certain grip on our party.

According to the JPost:

...One of the most common forms of myths and stereotypes is that a "Jewish lobby" controls the media, the economy or a political party, as suggested by Tonge Tuesday night.

"Baroness Tonge's comments could have been lifted from the parliamentary inquiry's report as a textbook example of the kind of discourse that so concerned them," said Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies. "At a time when anti-Semitism is on the increase and everyone should be working to develop communal harmony, I find it despicable that she believed it was appropriate to make comments such as these at a major political conference." ...

This is, of course, not the first time we've met Tonge. Also see, CAMERA: Baroness Blames Suicide Bombing in Iraq on Israel

Tonge was famously removed from the front bench of the Lib Dems for expressing understanding of suicide bombing, and believes the real enemy of the Jews is...wait for it...Zionism.

Norm comments on this latest outburst of expository idiocy (includes link to audio -- be sure to select Wednesday on choice of shows at BBC site):

Criticism of Israel isn't necessarily anti-Semitic, and Tonge goes on to say that her notorious remark about suicide bombers wasn't that. No, it wasn't; egregious for other reasons, but not in itself anti-Semitic. This time, though, I think she may have edged rather closer, don't you?

Much more at Engage, which concludes with this:

...Increasingly cranky “anti-Zionist” conspiracy theory is emerging out of the cobwebbed corners of the left into the mainstream. This is no longer a problem of the left. It is a problem of the political left, right, and centre.

[h/t: Adam Holland for many of the links]

Update: More here: Baroness Tonge At It Again

...The party also suffered a snub by Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, who declined an invitation to the conference after discovering its leader Sir Menzies Campbell had written a letter to the Prime Minister calling for an arms embargo against Israel.

Tonge’s words have sparked fury, coming just months after her colleague Chris Davies MEP, who was also at the meeting, was stripped of the leadership of the Liberal Democrats in Europe after he told a Jewish News reader that he would expose ‘Jewish influence over Western governments’.

The Liberal Democrats have now pledged to take action in response to calls for Tonge’s position in the party to be reviewed...


Dershowitz slimed by The Guardian?

Not surprising:

...But in the quarter of a century that I have been writing books, I've never had the experience of a reviewer claiming that I take a position in one of my books that is the exact opposite of what I have actually asserted. To make things worse, when I showed that the reviewer, Louise Christian, had turned black to white (not even to gray), the publication in question, the Guardian, refused to print my corrective letter, thus allowing a total fabrication to remain on the public record, uncorrected. Here are the facts, so that the readers may render judgment in the court of public opinion...

...A section in my book concerns Israel. It is supportive of some, and critical of others, of Israel's pre-emptive military actions. Christian focused on this section for the majority of her article. She characterized Preemption as an attempt to "justify the Iraq war and even the actions of the state of Israel (which the author, a Harvard law professor, obsessively admires)." First, notice the "even" before Israel, showing that the author assumes the actions of Israel to be particularly indefensible. Second, she misreads the fundamental point of this chapter. I do not try to justify Israel's actions. I analyze its actions, and I conclude that some of them were justified and beneficial, while others were wrongheaded and unnecessary. Finally, had Christian read the book, she would know that I opposed the war in Iraq. She apparently assumed that because I support Israel's right to exist, I also supported America's war in Iraq. It's a telling assumption. Liberalism and Zionism are not considered mutually exclusive in America. In fact, they are complementary. The prevailing view at the Guardian is to the contrary...

[h/t: Adam Holland]

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

MAS Watch: More PLO Ambassador...and even more besides

Mahdi Bray's Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation is continuing to push the visit of PLO Ambassador Afif Safieh:

"Five opportunities to hear PLO Ambassador Afif Safieh during his visit to Boston, September 26 - 28"

Locations and sponsors are:

Location: Tufts University
Sponsors: New Initiative for Middle East Peace (NIMEP) at Tufts University

Location: Hilton Hotel - Back Bay
Sponsors: WorldBoston

Location: Cathedral Church of St. Paul-Episcopal, 138 Tremont Street
Sponsors: American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - Massachusetts, American Diaspora Alliance for Israeli Palestinian Peace, American Friends Service Committee - New England Regional Office,Birthright Unplugged, Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights, Boston to Palestine, Friends of Sabeel – New England, Boston Women in Black, Jewish Voice for Peace - Boston, Jewish Women for Justice in Israel/Palestine, Network of Arab American Professionals, Unitarian Universalists for Justice in the Middle East – Greater Boston Chapter, United for Justice with Peace - Israel Palestine Task Force, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.

Location: Harvard University, The Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
Sponsors: WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar

Location: The Irish American Club, 177 West St., Malden, MA
Sponsors: Palestinian American Congress - Massachusetts and American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - Massachusetts

Bonus material: The invitation to the Iftar dinner was also sent to a Palestinian Christian email list I subscribe to -- always a good source of anti-Semitic material and bizarro conspiracy-thoeries -- sent out by Sameer Tuffaha of the Palestinian American Congress. The invitation is here. Like that map in the banner?

Say, where's Palestine, and where's Israel on that map?

I wonder, in the midst of this "peace tour," will anyone, particularly the Jewish groups involved, ask him about the PLO's charter? Like, for instance, their goal in Article 12: "Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence."

More bonus material [h/t to Miss Kelly for putting me on the trail of this]: Another email sent to the moderated MAS list contained a link to this site: The Quran Miracles Encyclopedia, specifically to this page -- at first glance just a site about Creationism from a Muslim perspective. Eh, OK...so what? Well, let's have a look around the site a little more and see what we find. There's this, on usury in the Koran:

...The meanness and immorality of the Jews led them to conspire against the societies that opened their doors for them and for the world at large. They always ignite the flames of war and they do their best to corrupt this land. Allah tells us in (surat Al-Ma’edah {The Table} verse 64) about their dreadful nature...

...Many trusty writers drew our attention that the Jewish Emperors of money are the main reason behind the wars broken out last century, it were them who ignited the flames of those wars. Consequently, much blood was shed, and millions of money were squandered. All of this was in order for the Jewish money to grow and their power to increase...

...the Jews insist on dealing through usury and spreading it among people. Moreover, they are keen on teaching such a “profession” to their children in order to take hold of the money and hoard it in their safes...

A dose of replacement theology:

...These words were said by Jesus to the Jews after scolding them for murdering the prophets and refuting the Divine messages , Also , the text shows that Jesus had told them that God would substitute them by a nation that would take their place in looking after that religion "Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and be given to people who will produce its fruit"...

On a somewhat different note, the Allah fish and the Evil Eye make appearances.

UN Human Rights High Commissioner Admits...'Hezbollah Deliberately Targeted Israeli Civilians'

From the Wiesenthal Center:

UN HUMAN RIGHTS HIGH COMMISSIONER ADMITS TO WIESENTHAL CENTER DELEGATION… “HEZBOLLAH DELIBERATELY TARGETED ISRAELI CIVILIANS"

A Simon Wiesenthal Center delegation to the UN Human Rights Council charged Hezbollah with war crimes and crimes against humanity by targeting Israeli population centers and civilian infrastructure including hospitals, schools and houses of worship during this summer’s 34-day war.

During a 45 minute meeting with Louise Arbour, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, delegation member Shlomo Bohbot, the Mayor of the Jewish and Arab twin City of Maalot-Tarshiha, which lies 6 miles from the Lebanese border spoke of the devastation wrought by the over 680 Katyusha rockets that struck his municipality. Bohbot emphasized that there are no military installations anywhere in his region.

Western Galilee Hospital representative, Dr. Norman Loberant presented graphic images of the impact of the constant targeting of Nahariya and the specific damage done to the hospital during the war. Included were X-rays that depicted the catastrophic injuries caused by multiple ball bearings from Katyusha warheads that maimed and murdered both Jewish and Arab citizens of the Northern Galilee.

Clearly shocked by the photographic evidence, High Commissioner Arbour declared that “the deliberate Hezbollah attacks on primarily civilians targets were deliberate” and thus “violated international humanitarian law”...

I know, tell you something you didn't know...but getting this out of a UN official is something a little different.

Scientific American: Darfur Dead Much Higher than Commonly Reported

Darfur Dead Much Higher than Commonly Reported

...In an attempt to form a more accurate assessment, sociologists calculated death rates and total deaths during a 19-month period using what they consider the seven best primary surveys from camps in the state of West Darfur. Together the surveys, conducted by the WHO and the humanitarian group Médecins Sans Frontières, document pre-camp violence in five camps and in-camp mortality throughout the state. Projecting their data to 31 months, or about three quarters of the conflict's duration, they estimated that between 58,000 and 85,000 died in West Darfur alone. Assuming the same ratios of death and displacement in adjoining North and South Darfur, they arrive at a conservative estimate of 170,000 to 255,000 deaths.

The death toll is likely much higher, notes John Hagan, co-author of the report published in the September 15 Science. Their reported upper limit "likely increases to the 400,000 range if the further year of the conflict is estimated and if missing and presumed dead persons are included," he says. Other experts agree that the new tally is a low estimate. This study should "not in any way bill itself, or be billed as, a global mortality study of the Darfur genocide," says Sudan researcher Eric Reeves of Smith College. A major survey of violent mortality counted a death toll of 397,000 as of April 2005, he observes. Better counting of the dead will not be possible until investigators can safely enter the region.

But still, not genocide?

Qaradhawi's Day of Rage

Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi (Qaradhawi) is one of those calling for a "Day of Rage" in the Muslim World over the Pope's remarks. He, of course, is trying to emphasize that it be a "peaceful" Day of Rage. Of course, when people come pouring out of Mosques on a Friday to protest the latest perceived outrage, these events are marked by their quiet, dignified righteousness...ahem.

Now recall that Qaradhawi was the guy used by the Islamic Society of Boston as a fund-raising name, and that he was added as an honorary Director to the project. Honorary or not, the ISB are Qaradhawi's kind of peeps.

And if it were not for the attention that the Boston Mosque project received, attention the ISB is now attempting to quash through lawsuits and subpoenas, the ISB would never have had to distance itself from this man and his type, and we'd now have, here in Catholic Boston, a major center of "peaceful rage" over the remarks of the Pope.

As Michael Graham jokes:

Sheik Al-Qaradawi, friend of Menino's Mosque here in Boston and noted Islamo-feminist (he called for suicide bombings by WOMEN terrorists) has called on Muslims world to respond to the Pope's comments with a "day of rage."

Part of their ongoing PR campaign: "Muslims: Stop Calling Us 'Violent,' Or We'll Kill You."...


Interview with Karsenty

Honest Reporting has an interview with the defendant in the first Al Dura trial, Philippe Karsenty. This is a good, brief, primer for those who haven't been following the issue, as well as for those who have: Storm Clouds Over Paris

Monday, September 18, 2006

Gazans warn pope to accept Islam

Yeah, accept Islam and, oh yeah, doesn't he know it's the Joos that are the real enemy? From Khaled Abu Toameh:

Citing the words of the Prophet Muhammad, Muslim religious leaders in the Gaza Strip on Sunday warned Pope Benedict XVI that he must "accept" Islam if he wanted to live in peace.

The warning, the first of its kind, came as many Christians in the West Bank expressed anger over a spate of attacks on churches in protest against remarks made by the pope about the Muslims and the Prophet Muhammad.

Two more churches in the West Bank were targeted on Sunday in protest against the pope's remarks, bringing to seven the number of churches that have been attacked over the past three days.

In Tulkarm, arsonists set fire to the only Orthodox church in the area, causing heavy damage to the 150-year-old structure. Local residents said the attack occurred shortly after 4 a.m, when a number of assailants forced their way into the church and tossed several fire bombs into the building.

Some Christian families said they were living in fear because of the attacks and called on the Palestinian Authority to do its utmost to protect churches and Christians.

At a press conference in Gaza City, a number of Muslim clerics said the pope's statements were "the result of his hatred for Islam and not the result of ignorance."

One of them, Dr. Imad Hamto, called on the pope to "repent and ask for forgiveness." He added: "We want to use the words of the Prophet Muhammad and tell the pope: 'Aslim Taslam'" Aslim Taslam is a phrase that was taken from the letters sent by the Prophet Muhammad to the chiefs of tribes in his times in which he reportedly urged them to convert to Islam to spare their lives.

Some Muslim scholars, however, have endorsed a more moderate interpretation of the term, arguing that its real meaning was that those who surrendered to the will of God would find peace.

Hamto and his colleagues accused Christians of "resorting to the power of the sword in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine."

They also called on the pope to direct his words to the Jews who, they claimed, were "spreading corruption and destruction."


Muslims from Israel bring fresh views to Hub

This is very interesting and positive:

Muslims from Israel bring fresh views to Hub

Al Qasemi College , which was founded in 1989 as the first institute of Islamic higher education in Israel, is trying to export revolutionary openness and liberalism to the wider Islamic world, leaders of the faculty told educators, Jewish leaders, and local Muslims during a four-day visit to the Boston area that ended yesterday.

Speaking at campuses, mosques, and the homes of Muslims, the Al Qasemi faculty said that it is time for Muslims to quit blaming others and examine their own responsibility for the troubles of Islamic civilization; time for Arab Israelis to call themselves Israelis, not Palestinians; and, above all, time for women to have full equality with men in the Muslim world.

All these assertions are considered radical, even incendiary, in much of the Arab Muslim world. But Mohammad Essawi , the president of the college, said such changes in thinking are needed to transform an education system in the Islamic world ``that is still in the 12th century and does not have an open mind."

``There is a huge opportunity to teach openness and pluralism in these societies," Essawi said yesterday.

Al Qasemi College was started as a school of Islamic law by members of Israel's Sufi community who, according to college director-general Muhamed Abu Much , were concerned that youths who were studying religion abroad were coming back with ideas that were ``not good for our community."

Al Qasemi primarily educates teachers for Arab schools in Israel. It also trains Arab women for technology-based careers such as engineering that are difficult for them to pursue because of the expectations of the traditional communities in which the women are raised.

Essawi and 10 members of the Al Qasemi faculty spoke with faculty at Hebrew College and at Harvard University. They met Boston-area Muslims at Friday prayers at the mosque of Islamic Center of Boston , in Wayland, and at an organized discussion Saturday night at the Westwood home of a Muslim participant in the region's oldest Muslim-Jewish dialogue group.

The American Jewish Committee, which is a sponsor of the dialogue group, arranged the visitors' trip to the United States, which also included stops in Washington and New York.

``Some of our members asked very pointed questions about how horrible it must be to live in such a closed, undemocratic society as Israel," said Mahmoud Jafri , a cochairman of the dialogue group who was moderator of the Saturday night discussion. But the Israeli Arab academics ``were very positive. It is the first time our community has heard from Israeli Arabs who said `This is our country.' "

``It was a wonderful evening," Jafri said in a telephone interview yesterday. ``There are some good things happening in that part of the world that are not known, or do not get enough attention." He said some Boston-area Muslims are considering inviting the Al Qasemi group back for a more extensive public program, and sending a local delegation to Baqa el Gharbiya, Israel, where the college is located.

Dahlia Fadila , who teaches English literature at Al Qasemi, said in an interview yesterday that men and women on the faculty share a conviction, heightened by their exposure to Jewish Israeli society, that ``unless women are active and empowered, our society will not develop."...


Lieberman/Lamont Notebook -- Bloomberg Edition

Republican (I often forget) New York Mayor Bloomberg is going to be hosting a fund-raiser for Lieberman.

Mayor Bloomberg is taking his already enthusiastic support for Senator Lieberman to the next level: He is planning to hold a fund-raiser the week before the general election.

The fund-raiser — to be held on November 1 at Mr. Bloomberg's Upper East Side townhouse — comes with Mr. Lieberman attempting to win back his Connecticut seat as an Independent after losing the Democratic primary to anti-war challenger Ned Lamont.

Mr. Bloomberg, a lifelong Democrat who became a Republican just before running for mayor, has repeatedly said Mr. Lieberman's willingness to put his views before his party's is something that's sorely lacking in Washington...

Interestingly, Lieberman's blog doesn't mention the event and endorsement (yet), while Ned Lamont's blog does: "That’s a lot of out-of-state money and influence – a real departure from the status quo."

The Lamont people are also touting the local AFSCME's switch from a Lieberman to a Lamont endorsement:

This November, we have an opportunity to elect a Senator willing to hold the Bush Administration to account and ask the tough questions on foreign and domestic policy. For too long, Senator Lieberman has not. What’s worse, since the primary, Senator Lieberman has accepted the warm embrace of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and the extreme right-wing of the Republican Party...

Nothing to balance the "extreme right-wing" like an endorsement from big labor.

Marginalia:

John Hall: A case study of principle vs. power

...Bush sent word he was behind Chafee as the best hope to win in the November election and preserve the Republican majority. The backing from the Senate and national leadership gave him his narrow victory over a conservative challenger.

Contrast that with Lieberman, a Democratic supporter of the Iraq war. He is running as an independent in Connecticut against anti-war Democrat Ned Lamont, who defeated him in the Democratic primary.

When Lieberman returned to Washington, most Senate Democrats treated him like a leper because he refused to withdraw.

Last week, even former President Jimmy Carter joined in the call for Lieberman to be ousted because of his stand on Iraq.

If Lieberman wins in Connecticut this fall, which now seems like a better-than-even chance, and the Senate ends up deadlocked, he could haunt the Democratic cloakroom...

[The Lieberman/Lamont Notebook is part of my ongoing coverage of the race for Pajamas Media.]

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Open Fund-Raising for Terror in Boston -- Tonight! -- Important Update!

The New England Committee to Defend Palestine is advertising a fund-raiser for tonight. In fact, it's happening at this moment [emphasis mine]:

In memory of Black September

The New England Committee to Defend Palestine and Jericho Boston Invite you to

A Benefit for Palestinian Political Prisoners

Featuring:

*Ahmad Kawash, Palestinian refugee from Lebanon, and other Palestinian speakers

*Myriam Ortiz, Puerto Rican independentista and member of Jericho Boston

*Kazi Toure, former political prisoner and National Co-Chair of the Jericho Movement

[snip]

When: Sunday, September 17, 6:00 p.m.
Where: Encuentro-5, 33 Harrison Ave. 5th Floor, Boston (near the Chinatown stop on the Orange Line T) Suggested Donations: $15 - $20

[snip]

In September, 1970, over 3000 Palestinian refugees in Jordan gave their lives in a revolutionary uprising against the repressive "US" and Zionist puppet government of the Jordanian monarchy. In September, 1982, "Israel," in an effort to crush Palestinian resistance in Lebanon, slaughtered over 2000 refugees in Sabra and Shatila. In September of 1993, the official signing of the Oslo Accords gave recognition to the theft of more than 78% of Palestine and created an infrastructure for settlement expansion in all the remaining land. In September 2000, "Israel" murdered 13 Palestinians, marking the beginning of the Al Aqsa Intifada.

Zionist aggression over the past months in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon, is a continuation of "Israel"'s 70 year assault on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. By late August, more than 200 Palestinians had been killed and hundreds wounded in this latest period of escalated attacks.

Although the Zionists have intensified their assault on Palestinians because of their defeat in Lebanon, 2006 marks an important turning point in the history of regional resistance to this aggression--the rise of a more and more united regional movement to reclaim sovereignty over Arab land by Palestinian, Lebanese, and Iraqi resistance fighters.

Over the past few months, resistance movements in Palestine and Lebanon have acted with extreme courage. The Popular Resistance Committees in Gaza captured an "Isreali" soldier in order to press for the release of Palestinian political prisoners, who number more than 10,000 and now include over 65 elected leaders. Hizbollah captured two "Israeli" soldiers to press for the release of Lebanese political prisoners.

Join us for an evening in solidarity with the Palestinian resistance.

All proceeds will go to Palestinian political prisoners and their families.

We all know what "political" prisoners are -- terrorists. No one is in jail in Israel for publishing bad poetry. And how, pray, will they get this money over there? And who will receive it? And how do we know it won't get into the hands of terrorists? Obviously, the NECDP doesn't care (well, they do, but in the wrong way), but we, and Federal Law, should. Are the right people listening? Do they care?

Recall that it was some folks from NECDP that got in the now infamous tussle with our friend Seva.

Update (9:28pm): I have had it confirmed that Massachusetts Green-Rainbow Party candidate for Governor, Grace Ross, was in attendance at this event. This after a morning appearance at a local Synagogue! Further, our friend Seva was assaulted in the hallway outside the venue. More details to follow soon!

Amnesty's Dirty Little Secret

Charles Jacobs of The David Project takes on Amnesty in Boston's Jewish Advocate [in full -- not on-line]. Amnesty International is far more interested in Israel and the "sins" of the West than they are in the world's millions of human slaves: Paradigm Shift - Amnesty's Dirty Little Secret

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (HRW) are attacking Israel for acting in self-defense against Hezbollah, accusing her of “war crimes” and “indiscriminate bombardment” in Lebanon. These groups have a long, documented record of disproportionately picking on the Jewish state, so these latest condemnations cannot surprise. However, Jews will not understand this reflexive anti-Israel attitude unless they step back and examine today’s broad human rights agenda, which is blind to the world’s most oppressed people.

In 1993 I realized that human rights groups are not actually working for universal human rights. I read in the Economist that black women and children could be bought or sold for $15 in Sudan and Mauritania. I called Amnesty and Human Rights Watch to see if they knew. They knew. They sent me their reports on the issue.

Guardians of “human rights” knew that tens of thousands of blacks were being enslaved, yet they were not making a fuss. Why? Apart from guarding life itself, what is more central and sacred to human rights champions than guarding personal liberty – the freedom from being “owned” by another person?

So I went to Amnesty’s national convention and proposed that AI include emancipation of today’s slaves—numbering 27 million, mostly in the Third World—in their mandate. After a long floor debate, I lost.

AI won’t fight hard against Arab enslavement of blacks because their unstated, subconscious principles downplay non-Western crimes.

Why? The human rights community consists mostly of decent middle-class white people who, when they see—or think they see— evil done by Westerners like themselves, feel impelled to act. Think apartheid South Africa, Kosovo, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo.

But when these same folks see evil done by non-Westerners, they choke. They feel that real or imagined Western sin forfeits their right to criticize “others.” After all, they rationalize, we had slaves too. It’s prejudice, they feel, to criticize non-Westerners: they live in dread of being labeled racist, or worse, “Islamophobic.”

Human rights groups do not seek to bring justice to all people. They select cases to expiate Western guilt or scold white elites. In the Muslim world, millions desperately need their help: Blacks, women, gays, apostates, atheists, labor leaders, freedom fighters, and racial and religious minorities live without basic human rights. Yet Amnesty and others abandon them, ignoring non-Western totalitarianism so that they can narcissistically and theatrically define themselves in opposition to Western sins—imperialism, colonialism, and racism.

It's white guilt – not anti-Semitism -- that explains Amnesty's disproportionate attacks on Israel. "Rights" groups frame Israelis as “white, Western, colonialists,” and Palestinians as “indigenous, dark-skinned, and poor.” In other words, as classic victims of Western sin.

It is horribly wrong for “rights” activists to project their white guilt onto Israel, but that may not be their worst crime. In order to pound Israel (and America), Amnesty and other groups must look away, and stay out of the path of non-Western despots, who then oppress millions with impunity. Amnesty’s greatest sin is against these they have abandoned in order to, they think, make themselves clean.


So a partnership with Fatah will moderate Hamas?

Have you looked at Fatah's (aka Fateh, aka the PLO) Constitution lately?

Let's extract a few key bits:

Essential Principles:

Article (1) Palestine is part of the Arab World, and the Palestinian people are part of the Arab Nation, and their struggle is part of its struggle...

Article (4) The Palestinian struggle is part and parcel of the world-wide struggle against Zionism, colonialism and international imperialism...

Article (6) UN projects, accords and reso, or those of any individual cowhich undermine the Palestinian people's right in their homeland are illegal and rejected.

Article (7) The Zionist Movement is racial, colonial and aggressive in ideology, goals, organisation and method.

Article (8) The Israeli existence in Palestine is a Zionist invasion with a colonial expansive base, and it is a natural ally to colonialism and international imperialism...

Goals:

Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.

Article (13) Establishing an independent democratic state with complete sovereignty on all Palestinian lands, and Jerusalem is its capital city, and protecting the citizens' legal and equal rights without any racial or religious discrimination...

Article (15) Active participation in achieving the Arab Nation's goals in liberation and building an independent, progressive and united Arab society...

Method:

Article (17) Armed public revolution is the inevitable method to liberating Palestine...

Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated...

Article (22) Opposing any political solution offered as an alternative to demolishing the Zionist occupation in Palestine, as well as any project intended to liquidate the Palestinian case or impose any international mandate on its people...

Article (24) Maintaining relations with all liberal forces supporting our just struggle in order to resist together Zionism and imperialism.

Article (25) Convincing concerned countries in the world to prevent Jewish immigration to Palestine as a method of solving the problem...

So tell me again who's going to moderate whom?

Lieberman/Lamont Notebook -- Ned's Turncoat Ad

Lamont's new TV ad is interesting for what it shows as a difference between the two campaigns: You Don't Switch Teams Just Because You Lost. Featuring a Yankee and a Red Sox fan sitting at a table, they complain that Joe Lieberman is a "turncoat" (read: traitor to the Democrats) for continuing his campaign. This is representative of understandable frustration and satisfying to the true-believers. As one Lamont commenter notes:

...I think I can safely say on behalf of the peanut gallery that this ad very nicely sums up our intense frustration with Joe Lieberman.

But the primaries are over and Lamont already won. He needs to do more than appeal to the base. I'm not sure that an ad like this really appeals to that vast swath of voters one needs to win a general election, where loyalty to party politics is probably not a great selling point. Advantage Lieberman for his blackboard ad and current "I'm above political parties" posture.

As another commenter notes:

You know what….you need to give people a reason to vote for Ned, not keep attacking Lieberman…Lieberman is ahead in the polls and while this ad is cute, it does not say anything about what a freshman senator will do for the people of Connecticut in place of Lieberman…get your bearings folks and stop gloating….Lieberman is laying low and that is all he has to do unless you give people a REASON to vote for you…Independents don’t care about the main two parties…

Another:

Most people in CT don’t hold it against Joe for running as an indepedent. It only bugs Lamont supporters...

That about sums it up.

Short takes:

Ray Hackett checks out the accusation of "negative campaigning" in some of the Connecticut races:

...Take U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's independent candidacy. His internal polling has shown among likely voters in November, Democratic rival Ned Lamont has a favorable/unfavorable rating of 41-41. That tells them as many people who approve of Lamont also disapprove of him.

Add to that another poll, an independent survey of likely voters released last week, that suggests 57 percent of those supporting Lamont are doing so only so they can vote against Lieberman.

Those numbers are seen as advantages the Lieberman campaign is trying to exploit. The objective is to keep the unfavorable ratings as high as possible and chip away at the other 43 percent of his support by portraying Lamont as running a negative campaign. The more you say it, the more believable it might become...

Meanwhile, while Lamont is still appealing to his base, pols in other parts of the country are using Lieberman to polish their centrist bona fides. For instance, in Ohio, Republican Congresswoman Deborah L. Pryce...

...was lamenting the political defeat of, of all things, a Democrat. Just days earlier, Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut had lost a primary to an anti-war challenger, and Pryce was telling a Rotary Club gathering that Lieberman was "a great man."

"He was someone that results mattered to more than partisan politics," said Pryce, an Upper Arlington congresswoman. "And because of that, the left wing of his party kicked him off. And the more that happens, you lose the reasonable people in the middle" — people, she made clear to her audience, like herself...


Saturday, September 16, 2006

2500 Al Qaeda Released in Pakistan, Including Daniel Pearl's Murderers

Just amazing. Are we about to witness the re-constituting of Al Qaeda with a geographic base, this time as a parasite on a country under a nuclear umbrella?

The Pope Spoke

The Pope made some comments some Muslims didn't like, and, following peaceful Friday prayers, the riots started. Excellent round-ups at Instapundit and Michelle here and here. Pictures at LGF here and here.

Friday, September 15, 2006

The disgrace of Durban

If you want to know what the crazy guy in the third video of this post is ranting about, here's an excellent essay to read. In fact, it's good to read even if you don't care about the crazy guy in the video: The disgrace of Durban - five years later

...if 9/11 was a transformative event, the same description must apply to another event that ended on the eve of 9/11. I am referring to "The World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance" in Durban, South Africa, which was the "tipping point" for the emergence of a new wave of anti-Semitism masquerading as anti-racism. Unfortunately, the 5th anniversary of this event has gone largely unremarked.

As one of my colleagues put it at the time, if 9/11 was the Kristallnacht of terror, Durban was the Mein Kampf. Those of us who personally witnessed the Durban festival of hate -- with its hateful declarations, incantations, pamphlets and marches -- have forever been transformed. For us, Durban is part of our everyday lexicon as a byword for racism and anti-Semitism, just as 9/11 is a byword for terrorist mass murder...

...what happened at Durban was truly Orwellian: A conference purportedly organized to fight racism was turned into a festival of racism against Israel and the Jewish people. A conference intended to commemorate the dismantling of South Africa as an apartheid state resonated with spurious calls for the dismantling of Israel's alleged apartheid state. A conference dedicated to the promotion of human rights as the new secular religion of our time increasingly singled out Israel as a sort of modern-day geopolitical Anti-Christ.

How did this happen?

The World Conference Against Racism was organized around four regional conferences -- in Europe, Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Each regional conference was to formulate a declaration against racism and a plan of action. Then the four regional declarations and plans of action were to be collated in Durban into a composite draft declaration against racism.

The problem originated with the Asian regional conference, held in Tehran in February, 2001. Although Israel belonged to the Asian group, the conference organizers excluded Israel and Jewish non-governmental organizations from participation: Contrary to the United Nations' own principles with respect to universality and equality, a member state was made a pariah. The Tehran conference also supported a country-specific indictment of Israel, yet another breach of international human-rights principles and the UN's own procedures in this regard.

The six-point indictment emanating from the Tehran regional conference, which became a dominant blueprint for Durban, has emerged as one of the more scurrilous documents relating to Israel and the Jewish people to appear since the Second World War...

The whole thing is good. [via Norm]

Lieberman/Lamont Notebook

The Lamont campaign has been making a big push on the issue of Lieberman's missed votes. Greg Pallowitz at NRO notes:

...According to this handy Washington Post site, Lieberman missed 7.3% of the votes. Lieberman, however, is far from the worst Democrat in the Senate. Jay Rockefeller missed 23.3% of the votes. Jon Corzine missed 37.2% of the votes. Daniel Inouye missed 11.1% of the votes. Joe Biden missed 8.6% of the votes.

I assume this means Ned Lamont will be quickly praising George Allen (0.3% missed), Mike DeWine (0.3% missed), Jim Talent (0.3% missed) and John Kyl, (0.7% missed).

Lieberman has also stated that many of those missed votes occured while he was running for President. If he wants those absences excused he'll need a note from his campaign manager next time, though.

Charles Walsh writing in the Connecticut Post has a decent take on the "Was Ned Lamont a 'teacher' or wasn't he?" kerfuffle: Lieberman, Lamont need some detention

... The way the Lamont gang splits it, someone who teaches, even for a moment, is, by definition, a teacher. You were expecting a cobbler? If old Ned wants to call himself a teacher, he has a perfect right. After all, the dictionary definition of teacher is "someone who teaches."

Then again, putting yourself in a television commercial with of a group of enthusiastic young urban high school types, ostensibly your students, takes political license to the edge of the abyss would work here, but we've been in that hole for too long a time.

When it comes to who is and who is not a teacher, Lieberman's spinmeisters are strict constructionists.

In Lieberman-land, teachers are people who have been specifically trained, often at prestigious institutions of higher learning, to, well, teach. They are people who get paid to set up bulletin boards using colored paper, doilies and thumbtacks, most which they bought with their own money.

Are the people who assist elementary teachers with their classes teachers? No, they are teachers' aides. If they were teachers, they would be getting a living wage (though still not enough)...

Here's Ned's ad. You can decide whether he oversold his "teaching credentials" or not. I admit to being a bit confused when I first saw it, "He's a teacher?"

BTW, Joe gave a speech today. Ostensible topic: "An update on the War on Terror." Real topic: "I can work with both parties to get things done."

Hinduism no barrier to job as priest in Church of England

Something of an identity crisis, I'd say:

A PRIEST with the Church of England who converted to Hinduism has been allowed to continue to officiate as a cleric.

The Rev David Hart’s diocese renewed his licence this summer even though he had moved to India, changed his name to Ananda and daily blesses a congregation of Hindus with fire previously offered up to Nagar, the snake god. He also “recites Gayatri Mantram with the same devotion with which he celebrates the Eucharist”, according to The Hindu, India’s national newspaper.

The Hindu this week pictures him offering prayers to an idol of the elephant god Ganesh in front of his house. However, he still believes he is fit to celebrate as an Anglican priest and plans to do so when he returns to Britain.

Mr Hart, a former chairman of Christian Aid in Loughborough and chaplain at Loughborough University, now serves in the Hindu temple in Thiruvananthapuram, a village in Kerala, southern India...

...He also said that he would continue to celebrate as an Anglican priest when he visited England, but he would also visit a Hindu temple while there. “My philosophical position is that all religions are cultural constructs,” he said. “I am acting out God’s story in local terms.”...

"I am The Lord your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me." Lots of interesting implications here.

A poem: Come Enjoy Jehovah-Yoga

MAS Watch: Welcoming the PLO to Boston

The Muslim American Society is touting the visit of a real gem of a guest, Ambassador Afif Safieh of the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Maybe someone has papers to serve him. I remember when members of terror organizations had to wear masks and hide in basements. Ah for the good old days.

Via the MAS email list:

Mark your calendars: Palestinian Ambassador Afif Safieh is coming to Boston 9/27.

Come hear Ambassador AFIF SAFIEH , the Ambassador of the PLO to the USA , who is visiting Boston !

When: Wednesday, September 27 , 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM
Where: Cathedral Church of St. Paul-Episcopal , 138 Tremont Street (across from Park Street Station and the Boston Common in downtown Boston )
Theme: "Palestine/Israel: Peace Process from Breakthrough to Breakdown - What Next?

"Afif Safieh is considered the most articulate Palestinian diplomat in Europe and the world. The most experienced speakers the foreign ministry can muster have been sent to face off against him in international conferences and on BBC talk shows, and have run into difficulty opposite the Jerusalem-born Palestinian with the rich vocabulary and smooth delivery." - Akiva Eldar in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, July 22, 2002

Sponsored by : American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - Massachusetts , American Diaspora Alliance for Israeli Palestinian Peace, American Friends Service Committee - New England Regional Office, Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights, Boston to Palestine [local International Solidarity Movement chapter], Friends of Sabeel - New England, Jewish Voice for Peace - Boston .
For more information, contact: hilary_rantisi@ksg.harvard.edu [yes, that's a Kennedy School address]

Ambassador AFIF SAFIEH will also be the honored guest and speaker at a Ramadan Iftar (dinner to break the fast on-going during the holy month of Ramadan)

When: Thursday, September 28 , 6:30 PM
Where: The Irish American Club [!], 177 West St. , Malden , MA
Tickets: Adults $20, Children $10

Sponsored by : Palestinian American Congress - Massachusetts and American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - Massachusetts

For more information and to purchase tickets, contact...

Update: Judith Weiss wrote two posts on Afif Safieh some months ago: Working on mysteries without any clues and Meet the new PLO diplomat. From the first of those two:

...he noted that since Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas met in February, there are 3,000 more Palestinians in Israeli jails. Safieh, 55, pointed out that Israel refuses to release those “with blood on their hands.” “If we applied the same criteria to Israel,” he continued, “I would hardly find any Israelis to talk to.”

When Stone later challenged him on that, Safieh —who assumed his post on Nov. 1 — said he saw no difference between Palestinian suicide bombers and Israelis, all of whom must serve in the military. “I found that truly horrifying,” Stone told The Jewish Week. “If this is the way he feels — that a soldier in the line of duty is the same as a guy who blows up in a nightclub — he is not the one we want to sit down to have lunch with...

But just fine for Iftar dinner with the Muslim American Society...

Blogging for Bolton

Egyptian Democracy Activists Call for End to Peace with Israel

Hey, they couldn't get any satisfaction getting "democracy" going in Egypt, so taking it out on their neighbor must be the next best thing: Egyptian Activists Turn Against Israel

CAIRO, Egypt -- Egypt's best-known democracy movement has switched causes and is now focused on demanding an end to the country's peace treaty with Israel.

The campaign by the Kifaya group is a sign of how the war in Lebanon knocked momentum from democracy efforts and left many reform activists deeply resentful of the United States.

Over the past two years, Washington has made promoting democracy a key part of its Middle East policy. But now reformists accuse Washington of supporting Israel in its offensive against Hezbollah guerrillas, which wreaked widespread destruction in Lebanon.

Edward S. Walker, a former U.S. ambassador to Egypt and Israel, believes Kifaya's new campaign showcases Washington's dilemma as it strives to sell the values of democracy and freedom in a region galvanized for decades by the Arab-Israeli conflict.

"One of the costs of pressing for democracy in the Middle East is the fact that most democratically based Arab parties ... will be hostile to Israel," said Walker, now with the Middle East Institute, a Washington-based think tank.

The Kifaya movement has launched a campaign to collect 1 million signatures on a petition calling for the annulment of Egypt's U.S.-sponsored 1979 peace treaty with Israel.

The move is mainly symbolic, but it highlights the extent of resentment felt by Egyptians toward Israel _ and by association, the United States, its main backer...

The dilemma is that the region isn't even close to being ready for peace or democracy. No colonial power is forcing these people to circulate this petition, nor compelling people to apply their signatures. They are their own agents, making their own "shoot-own-foot" choices.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Back to Mel

I know this is an old item, but I still think it's interesting and I've been meaning to post about it for weeks, so I better get it done now or I never will. Yes, it's about Mel Gibson. You all remember his little run-in the The Law and his anti-Semitic outburst. No need to rehash it. He apologized, let's forgive but not forget and be embarrassed by Abe Foxman saying that Gibson should be investigated for hate crimes...

I did, however, find some of Mel's background extremely interesting -- not just his father, Hutton, who we all know is an old-fashioned anti-Semite, and who's foibles we were reluctant to hold the son responsible for (though not so much so after a little more research) -- no, there really is much more to it than that [h/t to Adam Holland for most of these links].

As a reminder, Gibson isn't a Roman Catholic, he's a "Traditionalist Catholic." They're the guys who didn't like the whole Vatican II thing -- you know, where the Church told everyone to stop calling the Jews "Christ Killers" among other things. Specifically, he's a Sedevacantist.

He has his own private Church in Malibu, where I understand one of the priests he's brought in is one, Father Louis J. Campbell, some of who's sermons are very interesting. For instance: The New Judaizers

...We are now suffering the disastrous effects of this strange fellowship with unbelievers. Jewish "agents of change" have long been at work attempting to change the results of papal conclaves, and to adulterate Catholic doctrines and practices. At Vatican II Jewish individuals and groups such as the Jewish Masonic organization, B'Nai Brith, managed to change the Catholic Church through the document Nostra Aetate, which was a collaborative effort of the Jewish caucus at the Council...

...In his time St. Paul had to confront the Judaizers, certain Jewish Christians who wanted to impose Jewish customs including circumcision on all new converts. We are facing the New Judaizers, who want to turn the Catholic Church into a servile religion, subservient to the new false Jewish religion of the Talmud. We could turn like cowards and simply walk away, but we have to stand up and fight for our holy Catholic Faith...

Following some links around [bottom of page], one may be lead to some interesting sites, like this one: THE TORTURE AND DEATH OF SAINT SIMON OF TRENT

The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slayed on the 21st March, 1475 A.D., on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town wanted to celebrate their Passover in their own way; so they secretly abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew Samuel. During Holy Week on Maundy-Thursday, the day before Good Friday, "and" on the day before the outlawed "Perfidious Passover", about three hours after supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his parents’ house. Neither his father nor mother were home at the time as they were at Church. It was at this time that the Jew Tobias approached the child, who was not quite 30 months old, and while speaking kindly and offering the boy a piece of money, picked him up and carried him at once to the house of the Jew Samuel.

When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias, Vitalis (Veitel), Moses, Israel and Mayr, undressed the little boy and unmercifully butchered him. While Moses strangled him with a handkerchief as he lay across Samuel’s knee, pieces of flesh from his neck were cut with a knife and the blood collected in a bowl. At the same time, they punctured the naked offering with needles and murmured Hebrew curses. They then cut pieces of flesh from the boy’s arm and legs and collected the blood in pots...

Oh, it's endlessly fascinating, and you could follow links around for a long while (like checking out their -- controversial even amongst Sedevacantists -- pope). Very little of it will make you feel any better, but feel free.

Then there's the Australian political party Mel was involved with:

MEL Gibson once had close links to the Australian League of Rights, a Far Right group notorious for its anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and Holocaust denial...

Is Mel Gibson an anti-Semite? Is the Pope...nevermind. Mel Gibson's relationships with Jews (good) and all this stuff seething in the background is probably worthy of a book-length study and a long couch session. I wasn't (and still am not) one of those who found The Passion in the least bit anti-Semitic, but all these connections swirling about certainly begin to take the wonder out of the sources of a drunken outburst. In vino veritas.

Al Durah Trials: 'Good News' - Breaking

Nidra Poller explains the state of things at Pajamas Media. Take note of this part, then read the breaking news from Richard Landes that follows:

...The trial will take place in the august halls of the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris on the 14th of September 2006. Philippe Karsenty stands accused of casting dishonor on the reputation of the plaintiffs by suggesting, in a brief article published by Media-Ratings on 22 November 2004: “Arlette Chabot and Charles Enderlin should be immediately dismissed.” The sober factual article, devoid of inflammatory language and personal attacks, politely accepts the challenge inherent in the lawsuit against X and expresses the readiness of Media-Ratings to defend in court as it defends on its site the claim that the al-Dura news report is a staged scene. It should be mentioned that Karsenty has been sued three times in the short life of Media Ratings, simply for doing what media watch organizations do. The media are quick to remind critics that error is human but apparently in France a media watch organization isn’t even free to express itself when it is not mistaken. The incriminated article is based on concrete details that have led serious analysts to conclude that the al-Dura death scene cannot possibly represent the shooting, wounding, and killing described in Enderlin’s voice off commentary and elaborated in a stock narrative indiscriminately repeated ever since the incident allegedly occurred...

This just in from Richard Landes in France:

great day! the decision of the judges is oct 19, but the procureur (an impartial court advisor) came down entirely on philip's side and recommended dropping charges. wonderful.

One down, two to go?

Update: Nidra Poller has a must-read post-court description. A snip:

...The presiding judge and his two associates (I’ll get the details straight tomorrow) were human, humane, attentive. Especially the judge. He listened attentively, smiled, put people at ease, engaged in no silly manners or intimidating attitudes. The prosecutor, was bright, forceful, and forthright. Her name is Madame Halimi-Selam (more on that later). If the judge follows her appreciation of the case, Karsenty will win. He is free to ignore her interpretations and recommendations but I don’t think he will.

I can’t save this anecdote for tomorrow: a journalist from Le Figaro said to a photographer sitting near him in the press box—the prosecutor looked at the case that way because she’s Jewish. I’ll find out his name tomorrow and tell you a bit more about him.

There were not many journalists in the courtroom, not many people in the audience…they don’t know what they missed.

It was a beautiful trial. It was held in an atmosphere of respect for justice...

And Richard Landes, here:

...Then came Madame la Procureur de la Republique. A screen writer could not have written a better speech. All the best tropes of civil society — honesty, accountability, fairness, transparency, context… the dangerous powers of an uncriticized quatrième état (fourth estate)… the right of the public to know, and therefore the responsibility of France2 to show the tapes of their cameraman Talal abu Rahmeh… the fact that what Phillipe had said was in fact defamation of Charles Enderlin’s reputation as a journalist, but that the evidence more than supported such an accusation… that this was not the typical case of libel, where the person slings unconsidered insults at another, but a carefully studied and considered criticism… that any sharp language was more than justified in the context of a case where one wants to attract attention… that it was not malice to want que Charles Enderlin tombe [that Charles Enderlin should fall].

Oh, and did I mention that she made numerous references to the testimony, that witnesses had come from far away to testify, that this was not just a French issue, but an international issue, and that many had suffered a great deal because of these images...


Ned Opens his wallet, Carter Opens his mouth, Joe doesn't know what to do with his hands

Billed as a "major speech," Ned Lamont addressed the Yale Law School yesterday, laying out his criticisms of the Administration's priorities in the War on Terror: Courant: Lamont Says Focus On Afghanistan

Democratic Senate candidate Ned Lamont on Wednesday called for the Bush administration to shift the focus of the war on terrorism away from Iraq and back to Afghanistan.

In a speech at the Yale Law School, Lamont said America is on the wrong path and will not be truly safe until it is out of Iraq.

"Today we have five times more troops in Iraq than we do in Afghanistan," he said. "We spend more in eight weeks in Iraq than we do in an entire year in Afghanistan. These decisions are wrong and they have left us less safe."...

The full text of the speech is here.

Lamont must be good on security, because Jimmy Carter has come forward to say he would take it most kindly if the folks of Connecticut would defeat Joe Lieberman for him, and he's an expert on these things: Jimmy Carter urges defeat of Lieberman

Former President Jimmy Carter tonight said he hopes Senator Joe Lieberman is defeated in his bid for re-election.

Carter, who appeared on CNN's "Larry King Live," criticized Lieberman's support of the war and his decision to run as an independent. Carter did not mention Ned Lamont, the Democratic nominee who defeated Lieberman in last month's part primary.

The ex-president says he's lost confidence in Lieberman and doesn't wish to see him re-elected.

Joe Lieberman responded in a statement, saying he has disagreed with Carter on foreign policy for a long time. The senator says the former president's comments are not a surprise...

Folks at the Lamont blog are most pleased: "Among ex-presidents, President Carter is the one I respect the most. He was honest during his presidency and he’s still honest now..." "Isn’t it nice to think what things might be like with Jimmy Carter back in the White House? A true human being..." Aren't we all?

Note that Carter didn't actually endorse Lamont, he just trashed Lieberman. That Carter, always going negative...

And in, "It's good to have a fat check book if you want to run for Senate" news, the Democrat nominee is dishing out an additional $1.5 million for his campaign:

... The wealthy Greenwich businessman spent about $4 million of his own money in last month's Democratic primary to defeat Lieberman. The three-term incumbent responded to the loss by launching an independent bid to keep his seat. That means three more months of campaigning and pricey television time for both men.

Lamont dipped into his personal fortune again, writing checks totaling $1.5 million for his general election bid, his campaign confirmed Wednesday. Lamont gave his campaign $1 million on Sept. 11. He wrote a $500,000 check on Aug. 22...

Pffft...chump change.

In addition, in order to prevent an "attack-blog" gap, the Lamont folks have launched their own answer to The Full Lamonty. It's called...are you ready?...The Truth About Joe. Eh. Anyway, the Lamont folks are pushing the fact that Lieberman has missed an awful lot of votes over his Senate career, including and particularly 33 of 63 votes on Iraq since the invasion. Not only that, but the incumbent is a "flip-flopper." Hey, it worked for Bush.

Responding from their own attack-blog, the Lieberman folks accuse Lamonst of running a "non-stop negative campaign"...

...in which he again lashed out at Joe Lieberman for missing votes while the Senator was out trying to help get Al Gore elected in 2000, while he was running for president in 2003-04 to defeat George Bush and change the country’s direction, and while he was with his family following the death of his mother last year.

Well, we did some checking, and guess what? Joe Lieberman’s career voting record through this year is 93 percent. And Ned Lamont’s career voting record during his six years on the Greenwich Board of Estimate and Taxation? 93 percent...

93% is an A! A for both of them! And gold stars, too...

A B+ for Joe's newest commercial. I like the bit where Joe erases the line on the blackboard between Democrats and Republicans. Minus points for not knowing what to do with his hands. "It's about people, not politics..." OK, I just have one question, will the buttons say "We are the people," or "We are the people..."? De Niro fans will recognize the significance of the distinction.

The blackboard thing is ironic in a way. Is Ned Lamont a "teacher," or isn't he?

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

The ISM-Terror Connection

International Solidarity Movement activists pose with AK-47's in the presence of an Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades member:

Don't miss Lee Kaplan's latest eye-opener on this terror-support organization: The ISM-Terror Connection

...One of our volunteers in the United Kingdom for Stop the ISM managed to infiltrate the ISM late last June in the Holy Land where the ISM operates in direct support of terrorists. Our volunteer (who prefers to remain anonymous to avoid retaliatory attacks) has had prior experience going undercover for the police in the UK. The photos and intelligence he brought back are proving invaluable to intelligence agencies watching the ISM and have been in official hands for over a month prior to this publication.

Unfortunately, neither U.S. Homeland Security nor the Israeli security agencies have to date regarded the ISM as a serious threat. Some of these ISM people in these photos managed to escape; nevertheless, arrests have been made, and more are forthcoming...


Israeli Arabs against Mubarak: Learn from Israel

This is similar to something I've seen expressed in the Arab world before: Israeli Arabs against Mubarak: Learn from Israel

Relatives of Sinai accident casualties hold demonstration opposite Egyptian embassy in Tel Aviv, claim that Egypt authorities failed in treating injured, protest lenient sentence handed to bus driver

Some 100 Israeli Arabs held a rally Wednesday outside the Egyptian embassy in Tel Aviv in protest of what they perceive as the country's failed handling of the traffic accident in Sinai which left 12 Israelis dead.

The demonstrators also protested the lenient sentence handed to the bus driver involved in the accident, who will serve only one year in prison.

"Learn from Israel what human dignity means. Human dignity is a primary value in Israel," the protesters shouted.

Participants in the rally held up signs saying, "12 killed, 12 months in jail – justice Egypt-style," and "State of Israel – don't abandon injured and killed citizens."

One of the protesters was a woman whose son was wounded in the accident and who died later because he was not evacuated to the hospital in time. Assad Gaban from the community of Mazra'a lost his brother Najub in the accident. His daughter was seriously injured and is still hospitalized. Gaban called on President Hosni Mubarak to come to Israel and "learn from the Israelis what value for life means."

"I tell the Egyptians that they should be ashamed of themselves. They didn't send any letter of condolences. We want Israelis to learn from this not to go to Egypt or to Sinai. If anything happens to them there, they will not receive any treatment," he stated...

[h/t:Cynic]

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Testing the site waters with Joe and Ned

Well, I've been spending the last little while having a stroll through the Lamont and Lieberman web sites. I can't tell yet whether this new focus is going to be a load of fun or the source of the worst brain-freeze headache in the history of 7-11.

A few quick impressions: Lieberman clearly plays the role of the centrist incumbent -- there's very little material attacking Bush or Republicans, at least nothing that would make it uncomfortable to work with same later. Lamont's site gives the clear impression (pretty much every page) that there's something going on in Iraq, and it ain't good. If only that would stop, all our worries would be over. It's not clear whether Lamont is running against Lieberman, Bush or Jalal Talabani. I can see that this "appeals to the base," but to the great middle? We'll see.

The Lamont site is slightly more tech-savy, while Lieberman's has that big-type look of a site designed for a lower-common-denominator type of web user. While I think I've read some internet folks criticizing Lieberman on that count, personally, I think that's advantage Lieberman on the electronic billboard front.

I notice that as of Sunday, Joe's campaign blog has shut down comments.

Dude, Joe just plain sucks ass man. So cool that he is outta here. Don't let the door hit you in the ass shitball. Jimmy Peckerwood | 09.08.06 - 5:55pm | #

Ooooooo! I am risen from the grave to haunt and torment those who used my family's grief for their own petty political gain! Ooooooo! But not you, Joe, not just yet. I'll be back--right now I'm off to give Bill Frist a wedgie. A wedgie FROM BEYOND. Terri Schiavo | Homepage | 09.08.06 - 5:09 pm | #

joe is a neo liberal fascist. ILOVEJOE | 09.09.06 - 4:51 pm | #

I'm just tired of watching Joe Lieberman publicly fellating George Bush, Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. Is that so wrong? joebituary | 09.09.06 - 7:30 pm | #

I can't imagine why they decided blog comments weren't fitting in with their campaign image paradigm. Don't worry, Joe, even Abe Lincoln had issues with blog comments.

It's not all high road for Joe's site, though. The new, "The Full Lamonty" feature appears to be a sort of new attack-blog feature. That could make things entertaining. For instance, did you know that while Lamont is all against PAC money, his wife is no stranger to PAC contributions?

...And perhaps most noteworthy, Ann Lamont’s favorite pet PAC — which boasts that it is one of the most prominent and important political action committees in Washington – has contributed $7000 to none other than Joe Lieberman’s 2006 campaign. The Republican-American reports that Ann Lamont’s last contribution to Venture PAC was $3000 in January, and Venture PAC’s last contribution to Joe Lieberman was $3,000 in March...

Doh!

No worry, though, at least one commenter on Lamont's blog (yes, his still has comments), is promising that turn about is fair play...in spades:

I smell the stink of Rovian filthy neocon campaigning behind the “Full Lamonty”. Joe LieberME is a despicable human being to allow this. Maybe it’s time to blog about Mrs. LieberME not only being a “paid consultant” (GRRRstein’s description) for Hill & Knowlton , but also questions raised about the stories she told about her background, as opposed to what’s really true. Be careful though. I wouldn’t be surprised if the neocons have set a trap in all this that will be similar to the Clinton speech/e-mail/contribution business, so be very very careful how you answer this...

It's like a blog war with voting, ballots and millions of dollars at play! Woohoo!

She Lived

You might remember a series of photos in which a Lebanese woman died in her son's arms recently. Well, not quite.

She lived. Sandmonkey has the story.

A Scent of Dreyfus

Looks like Pajamas Media is going to be giving good coverage to the upcoming Al Durah trials, starting with this blog post, The Father of All Fauxtography, and this essay: A Scent of Dreyfus: A Trail of Jihad

...The Al-Dura trials begin this September 14th in Paris. The mainstream media may not deem the story fit for coverage (which in and of itself is intriguing and worthy of investigation), so I guess it’s up to us concerned and informed folks to push this issue into the headlines.

Perhaps it’s the public’s love affair with the macabre, and their lust for the sensational which enticed France 2 Television to recklessly release footage reportedly depicting the shooting to death of a young boy, and the wounding of his father - at the hand of the Israelis (at least that’s what the voiceover said). In the rush to air 55 seconds of exclusive footage, which was rushed to France 2 by their Palestinian cameraman who filmed the scene; 27 minutes of rushes (unedited footage) were deliberately left on the editing room floor. France 2’s Charles Enderlin was so anxious to get the news out, that he generously distributed the 55 second clip free of charge to the global media.

Despite the incredible questions surrounding the case, France 2 has persistently refused to release the unseen footage to the general public. However, those few who have seen the footage report that it’s rather embarrassing, as it essentially records 24 minutes of youths feigning injuries, and ambulances evacuating the uninjured...

This is a truly interesting case -- both the Al Durah incident itself and the current round of defamation suits by France's Dan Rather, Charles Enderlin -- where the MSM is completely uninterested. Hopefully the blogosphere can have an impact.

Khatami Commentary

Here are some follow-ups to Sunday's event at Harvard that I think will be of interest.

Neo-neocon muses on freedom of speech: Khatami, Cheney, whatever: misunderstanding freedom of speech

IHT: Former Iran president condemns bin Laden, praises Hezbollah for 'resistance' against Israel

On the eve of the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, former Iranian president Mohammed Khatami condemned Osama bin Laden and suicide bombing but also defended groups such as Hezbollah for what he characterized as resistance against Israeli colonialism.

In a 30-minute speech given under tight security at Harvard University, Khatami repeatedly praised the concept of democracy but said American politicians since World War II have been infatuated with "world domination."...

Pajamas Media has an excellent video on Khatami's visit to the National Cathedral: Murderer in the Cathedral

Finally, here's a letter sent to the Harvard Crimson and cc'd here. In full:

Dear Harvard Crimson Editors,

Last night I watched Iran's 'moderate' mullah and godfather of Hezbollah, Sheik Khatami, speak to the Tolerant and the Enlightened at Harvard.

At the end of the speech during the Q & A session, a young man asked Iraq's Holy Man about the Islamic Law that calls for the death penalty for homosexuals. The young questioner wanted to know if Khatami approved of this particular Islamic Law. The 'moderate' Holy Man from Teheran artfully dodged, pivoted and twirled around the issue, but in the final analysis said that every country has its laws and...well...in some cases putting the homosexual to death may indeed be called for. In some cultures, he said, the death sentence for gays may be appropriate.

There were no boos. There were no catcalls. There were no protests, angry slurs, no rotten tomatoes, no obscene placards, no cursing, no contorted red faces or shaking fists held high. There was only polite and tolerant silence from the entranced crowd seated in the presence of Allah's calm, serene spokesperson from Persia.

At the end of the evening as Khatami left the stage, there was grateful and appreciative applause...even some standing ovations. Teheran's Holy Man who just moments before had in effect condoned capital punishment for the homosexual was given a big symbolic hug from the tolerant, adoring and scholarly crowd from Harvard.

***

Now, just for fun, let's pretend that ...say...the Rev. Jerry Falwell had been invited to the Harvard campus to address The Tolerant and The Enlightened at Cambridge.

(I know, I know...that would never happen, but...hey!...let's pretend!)

Let's pretend that while speaking at Harvard, Rev. Falwell claimed that the homosexual act is a sin in the eyes of God. Let us also pretend that Rev. Falwell explained to his audience that through faith, repentance and God's Mercy and Grace the homosexual could receive God's forgiveness, spiritual and emotional healing and rich blessings in Christ...Eternal life in Glory from the God of Love.

Can you picture the reaction?

God bless,
Tom Graffagnino


Three MEMRI Videos


MEMRITV: Lebanese Shiite Leader Muhammad Hussein Fadhlallah: The Jews and Some American Powers May Be Behind 9/11

Following are excerpts from a Friday sermon delivered in Beirut by Lebanese Shiite leader Muhammad Hussein Fadhlallah, which aired on Al-'Alam TV on September 8, 2006.

Muhammad Hussein Fadhlallah: We say to President Bush: You have succeeded in becoming the most barbaric model of tyranny, because you and your despicable, extremist administration continue to threaten the Middle East, and to indiscriminately accuse those who oppose your policy, using ludicrous logic when talking about the danger Iran poses to America. All the while, everybody knows that the [real] danger is to the entire world, and comes from the imperialistic American power, with its plans for more than just a preemptive war. This is especially true now, with the commemoration of the events of 9/11, which were exploited by the American administration in order to impose its domination over the world, while everyone can see that these events were not subjected to any legal process. It's been said that the Jews and some American powers may be behind this. But they concealed this very well. Everybody can see that these events were not subjected to any legal process in America, which would determine clearly who is responsible.


Iranian TV 9/11 Special: Western Experts Say Both 9/11 and Pearl Harbor Were Planned by the American Administration

In a September 10, 2006 appearance on an Iranian Channel 2 TV special, Muhammad Al-Asi, who is affiliated with the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought, accused the U.S. government of carrying out the September 11 attacks.

Al-Asi is active in Islamic organizations and participates in Muslim conferences throughout the world and in the U.S. For instance, earlier this month he presented his paper, titled "Islamophobia: Its Causes and Cures," at the second annual conference of the Muslim Congress. According to the conference's brochure, the Muslim Congress is an "organization of the united Muslims of North America."(1)

Al-Asi has a history of making accusatory statements against the U.S., Israel, and Jews. In remarks he made prior to the Gulf War in 1990, that were aired in the November 1994 PBS documentary Jihad in America with terrorism expert Steve Emerson, Al-Asi said: "If Americans are placing their forces in the Persian Gulf, we should be creating another war front for the Americans in the Muslim world – specifically where American interests are concentrated."...

...Muhammad Al-'Asi, former head of the Islamic Center, Washington, D.C.: "The events of 9/11 were planned by the American administration, to be used as a pretext and justification to fight terrorism."...

Last, but certainly not least, there's MEMRI's documentary on the Arab and Iranian reaction to 9/11, starring Ron Silver:

The Arab and Iranian Reaction to 9/11: Five Years Later

Lieberman/Lamont Pointers

Hey all. Many of you are kind enough to send me pointers to stories of potential interest on a regular basis. That's great and always appreciated, even if I don't always post them. This is just a note to let you know that I'm going to be helping PJ Media with their (our) coverage of the Lieberman/Lamont race in Connecticut, so your pointers to stories on that situation are now particularly helpful. If you see material on that subject, be sure I'm interested. And if you start seeing links to stories of interest on the CT race all of a sudden around here, now you'll know why.

Thanks!

The first rule of the Islamic Society of Boston is...

...you don't talk about the Islamic Society of Boston. More subpoenas for bystanders in the Boston Mosque project: Islamic society subpoenas writer, TV co.

A group building an Islamic center in Roxbury has subpoenaed a freelance writer and a Christian broadcasting company who have reported on the project, documents show.

The Islamic Society of Boston issued subpoenas to Tamar Morad, a Waltham-based writer for The New Republic, and the Cambridge-based Christian Broadcasting Corp. as a part of its defamation case against the Boston Herald, WFXT-TV (Fox 25) and other, non-media groups.

The subpoena asks Morad, who declined to comment, to turn over any communications between her and the lawsuit’s defendants concerning the ISB and Osama Kandil and Yousef Abou-Allaban. The Christian Broadcasting Corp. is being asked to submit any of its broadcasts on the ISB, Kandil and Abou-Allaban, documents show.

ISB attorney Howard Cooper could not be reached yesterday.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Protesting Khatami at Harvard

Yes, I was one of those protesting the Kennedy School of Government's hosting of Mohammed Khatami yesterday. There have been several other bloggers reporting on the event, so I'll just confine myself to posting some interesting photos and video from the event. Other bloggers with reports are: Publius Pundit, Chicago Boyz, Miss Kelly, Technicalities and JR Telegraph. The video of Khatami's talk is here.

Here are some videos for you to start. First, talk radio guy Michael Graham (link goes to Michael's essay on the day) addressed the crowd. Video by our friend Seva Brodsky (misses the first few seconds of the speech):

What's a protest without terror-supporting Green-Rainbow Party officers? David Rolde (video by Seva -- don't miss this one):

This lone crazy guy was the most interesting character there (don't miss this one, either -- by the way, here and here are background on the UN's Durban Racism Conference he's talking about):

A sign carrying friend:

A speaker:

Signs:

Continue reading "Protesting Khatami at Harvard"

This is not a Dan Rather Bashing Post

Catching Up

Phew...sorry for the lack of updates. Been hella busy. Was at the Khatami protest yesterday and have some pictures and video in the pipeline on that...have promised posts on the Brandeis thing...and yes, Project Runway...and stuff in my inbox...AND...I've been engaged this 9/11 in a highly traditional American activity -- work. I can't possibly do justice to a decent 9/11 piece. I'm sure there are plenty of others out there.

Be catching up with you soon...

Saturday, September 9, 2006

House Passes American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act

Note signs on lower-right. Best...slogan...ever.

Down the Homestretch, the House Wanders Off Course

...what did House leaders decide to make the centerpiece of the week? H.R. 503: the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act...

...The debate -- lasting nearly four hours while horse lover Bo Derek watched from the gallery -- quickly degenerated into dueling expressions of equestrian love...

...Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), meeting privately with colleagues in the morning, referred to the legislation as "the horse [expletive] bill," according to someone present at the meeting...

Not such great news for the slaughterhouse employees. All via Harry's Place who notes:

The slogan nicely combines the American pastimes of horse-loving and French-bashing. It conjures up amusing images of snooty Parisian horsemeat connoisseurs shouting "Sacre Bleu!" as they learn their favorite delicacy has been removed from the menu.

Khatami Tomorrow

President Bush explains a bit about why he allowed Khatami to come [h/t: Sissy]:

...Intriguingly, the president broke a little news on the subject of Iran, acknowledging that he personally signed off on the U.S. visit this week by former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami. The trip has angered many conservatives because Mr. Khatami presided over the nuclear weapons development and cheating that Mr. Bush has pledged to stop. Why let him visit?

"I was interested to hear what he had to say," Mr. Bush responds without hesitation. "I'm interested in learning more about the Iranian government, how they think, what people think within the government. My hope is that diplomacy will work in convincing the Iranians to give up their nuclear weapons ambitions. And in order for diplomacy to work, it's important to hear voices other than [current President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's."

One thing Mr. Khatami has said this week is that because the U.S. is bogged down in Iraq it will never have the will to stop Iran's nuclear program. Is he right? "Well, he also said it's very important for the [coalition] troops to stay in Iraq so that there is a stable government on the Iranian border," Mr. Bush replies, rather forgivingly.

On other hand, Mr. Bush remains as blunt as ever about the nature of the Iranian regime when I ask if one lesson of North Korea is that Iran must be stopped before it acquires a bomb. "North Korea doesn't teach us that lesson. The current government [in Iran] teaches that lesson," Mr. Bush says. "Their declared policies of destruction and their support for terror makes it clear they should not have a nuclear weapon."

The impression Mr. Bush leaves is of a man deeply engaged on the Iran problem and, like several presidents before him, trying to understand what kind of diplomatic or economic pressure short of military means will change the regime's behavior. One way or another, Iran will be the major dilemma of the rest of his presidency, and Mr. Bush knows it...

I don't know whether or not it's OK for Khatami to have been allowed here in the first place, but I do intend to be on hand tomorrow to remind Harvard (and CAIR) who it is they've extended an invitation to...and that their timing stinks.

European Tribalism

Sissy emailed me a link to this blog and wondered about my reaction to the post, specifically, this part:

...At a table next to me were a few British expats having a few beers, and one of the gentlemen started up a conversation with me. I suspect he heard me place my order and deduced from my less than perfect German that I was American.

He was really pleasant, and as is usually the case, the conversation turned to world affairs and politics. Being a Brit, he was seriously concerned about the problem of Muslim immigrants in Britain with their failure to assimilate and their tendency to murderous hatred towards their fellow countrymen. When the conversation turned to negative European attitudes towards the US, I told him I believed those attitudes were mainly informed by a European media that spins the news to manipulate those views, and gave an example of BBC's anti-US bias.

He then said that he was surprised, because "...the BBC, just like Hollywood, is controlled by the Jews". Now, here was an otherwise perfectly reasonable, thoughtful man repeating the "Jews control the media" meme.

In order to keep things civil and not have our conversation descend into a shouting match, I just said "Huh...that's odd. For Jews, they were awfully critical of and biased against Israel during the war against Hizballah". He had no response...

Sissy:

I'm trying to figure out how these people fit the square peg of the "Jews control the media" -- meme into the round hole of overwhelmiing media bias against both Big Satan and Little Satan . . .

I'll look forward to Sissy's post, but here are my initial reactions to something like this (no sense in wasting perfectly good content on email alone!). They're on three levels (fleshed out a bit from the email):

On one level, I wish I could say I were surprised. My initial reaction is that there are a lot of memes out there fighting for survival in the meme stream. Some have been around for a long time and are very resistant strains that any new meme that comes along will be shaped by in some way or another…

“The perfidious Jews control this or that or everything” was around before the “Jews control the media” because it was around before there was a media -- so it’s a particularly tough, virulent and pervasive strain that one will find trumping any of these newer constructs regardless of counter-proofs. It’s a very useful and all-purpose fall-back. So how do you square "the Jews control the media" with overwhelming media bias against Israel? "The Jews control everything" is a strong, ancient idea. Evidence be damned. Looking for reason in the irrational leads inevitably to frustration. Where you wish to find reasons, instead you find only rationalizations.

On another level, it’s unclear whether the Brit in the story actually accepted that the media was biased against the Great and Little Satans. Maybe he thinks they’re *too nice* to them, but didn’t say so. That means there is no cognitive disonance here. Some facts are not in evidence.

Finally, on yet another level:

For all their crap about calling the US racist and classist, and all their institutional jibber-jabber about multi-culturalism, my own impression is that Europe is far more overtly tribal and class-oriented than we are. In the US, we’ve done a far better job of assimilating and subsuming our tribal identities into the American identity. You can have a sub-cultural identity and still be recognized as fully American far easier than you can anywhere else.

So talking about The Jews this and The Jews that sounds extremely dissonant and offensive to an American ear, which causes a great deal of confusion to a European ear which can’t understand what the offense they’ve given is all about. If one is going to talk about The Jews, or The Catholics, or The Italians, or The Irish, or The Blacks as a separate identity that you are pulling out of their place in the melting-pot, you’ve got to be VERY CAREFUL about how you do it without sounding like a fool or worse here in the US. This is true to a much lesser (or at least different) degree in Europe. So the Europeans desperately want to talk about the perfidious effects of The Jewish Lobby and can’t understand the resistance they get, taking it as proof of concept, when really it’s a natural American reaction to their offensively base and overt tribalism and inability to get multiculturalism right.

Walt and Mearsheimer want to have a European style conversation and keep bumping their heads against -- not the anti-free-speech Israel Lobby -- but American mores themselves. Reminds me of watching Fiddler on the Roof with my wife (who's Japanese). She just couldn't "get" the whole thing...these people aren't Russians, right? They have to move if they're told to, right? Who are they, anyway? How do they fit? Tough stuff to explain when you get down to it. Europe likes to think they're beyond all that. The elites try (too hard) to be. They're not.

How the British Left has Changed...

Jameel finds this editorial from The Guardian (!), 1917:

We speak of Palestine as a country, but it is not a country; it is at present little more than a small district of the vast Ottoman tyranny. But it will be a country; it will be the country of the Jews. That is the meaning of the letter which we publish to-day written by Mr. Balfour to Lord Rothschild for communication to the Zionist Federation. It is at once the fulfilment of an aspiration, the signpost of a destiny. Never since the days of the Dispersion has the extraordinary people scattered over the earth in every country of modern European and of the old Arabic civilisation surrendered the hope of an ultimate return to the historic seat of its national existence...

...Scattered and few, they have still brought with them schools and industry and scientific knowledge, and here and there have in truth made the waste places blossom as the rose. But for all this there was no security...

...The return of the Turk in victorious power would spell ruin; the rescue of this and the neighbouring lands from Turkish mis-rule was the first condition of security and hope. The British victories in Palestine and in the more distant eastern bounds of the ancient Arab Empire are the presage of the downfall of Turkish power; the declaration of policy by the British Government to-day is the security for a new, perhaps a very wonderful, future for Zionism and for the Jewish race.

Via Omri (who has lots of other interesting links), who comments, "Today in Britain, Zionist is an epithet."

Friday, September 8, 2006

And Cole Can't Blame the Neo-Cons

Readers may recall Yale's recent decision not to offer University of Michigan professor Juan Cole a position. This failure in career advancement on the part of Cole was widely hailed by critics as a rare showing of wisdom in academia, and a horrid right-wing consipiracy by a cabal of pro-Israel Likudniks by critics. The whole truth -- to what extent Cole's scholarship, or lack thereof, may have balanced out against his public image in the decision -- may never be known.

Apparently under the radar was the fact that Cole was also being considered for a position at Duke -- an event for which there was no publicity, and no lobbying...he failed there, too: Cole Case - So Much for the Accusations of a "Neocon" Conspiracy

...At the same time when Cole's pursuit of a job at New Haven was gaining so much attention, it turns out he was also applying for a job at Duke and getting passed over there, too. Since no one outside the halls of Duke knew about Cole's interest — this is the first time it has been reported — there was no "concerted press campaign by neoconservatives" such as had plagued his application at Yale; he was evidently passed up for the job on the merits...

...As the first finalist to visit, according to school officials, Cole's presentation was well attended. Most professors had high hopes for the lecture, which focused on Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and the Shiite democratic tradition. After all, as Malachi Hacohen, an associate professor of history, religion, and political science at Duke who attended Cole's lecture, explained, "Cole's earlier work was solid."

But according to several professors familiar with the proceedings, Cole's presentation was unimpressive. According to Hacohen, "It was one of the worst job talks I have heard in my life," "[it was] logically faulty," and "the talk seemed as if it were directed more to CNN viewers than to an academic audience." Michael Munger, chair of Duke's department of political science, explained that Cole's lecture "was just not at a level we were expecting…it was more like an undergraduate lecture."

...he eventually sank at Duke because his limited interest in academic life was so blatant. As Munger explained, "We wanted someone who had a clear commitment to internal institution building. We wanted someone who was going to build the Islamic Studies Center. And…he was honest that he wasn't that interested in that."

According to others, even Cole's supporters were eventually put off by this ambition. He was forthright about wanting to come to Duke because it's closer to Washington than is Ann Arbor, an attitude that led many of Cole's proponents to believe they were being used...


Al Durah as Staged: The Resistance

Richard Landes has another installment up: Al Durah as Staged: The Resistance. What do you do when you scream that the emperor is naked and the crowd turns to you and tells you to shut up?

Khatami visit part of anti-Israel tilt?

That's part of the speculation in this Boston Herald piece by Brett Arends: Furor at Harvard: Khatami visit part of anti-Israel tilt?

A furious row has broken out at Harvard over the decision to invite Mohammad Khatami, the pro-Hezbollah former president of Iran, to speak on Sunday.

And it has revived growing questions about whether the university itself is falling under the sway of anti-Israel sentiment.

“I’ve been getting e-mails and calls from alumni and students from all parts of the world,” university rabbi Hirschy Zrachi said yesterday. “People are shocked and offended. This man has no place speaking at a place like Harvard.”

He added: “It is unfortunate that some people don’t have the moral compass to condemn evil.”...

...This is the same Khatami who has advocated violence against Israel and said he “loves” the terrorist organization Hezbollah, which he calls “a shining sun that illuminates and warms the hearts of all Muslims and supporters of freedom in the world.”

Some are starting to see a pattern in recent events at Harvard.

“The Arab lobby is at work here,” said one prominent faculty member, who did not wish to be named. “The Arab lobby is in full flight.”

The critics blame Larry Summers’ downfall last winter, at least in part, on his staunch defense of Israel and his refusal to withdraw Harvard investment from that country.

They also wonder about the role of the Belfer Center for Science and International Relations at the Kennedy School of Government.

It is only five months since a faculty member there co-authored a research paper that said a pro-Israel conspiracy had hijacked American politics and the media for its own ends.

Sample quote: “Other ethnic lobbies can only dream of having the political muscle that pro-Israel organizations possess.”...

...Sources confirmed yesterday that the idea of inviting Khatami also started . . . within the Belfer Center. Stephen Walt, the paper’s co-author, also recently spoke about the “pro-Israel Lobby” to an Arabic organization involved in inviting Khatami to the United States.

Walt yesterday denied any role in Harvard’s invitation. “I have no information on that at all,” he said. “I’m telling you the absolute truth. I’ve been out of town for most of the summer.”

The question now being asked at Harvard: Who did invite Khatami?

Sources say the key players must have been Belfer Center director Graham Allison and research director Xenia Dormandy, and Kennedy School dean David Ellwood. None could be reached for comment yesterday.

A spokesperson defended the school yesterday, noting that other recent speakers included the Israeli ambassador Daniel Ayalon and deputy prime minister Silvan Shalom...

Not much of a defense, is it? Comparing Shalom and Ayalon to Khatami as though that completes a sort of symmetry. That's part of the problem. "We need the Nazi perspective...don't worry, he's a good Nazi..." People like me would care much less about invitations to people like Khatami if we trusted the people doing the inviting to recognize the evil they were welcoming. The fact is, this invitation is an honor, and they mean it that way. Is this invitation part of Harvard's anti-Israel tilt? Not exactly. Harvard's anti-Israel tilt and its decision to invite an Iranian fascist are the wicked children of a common moral neutrality. Some of us don't believe Harvard understands what they're doing, so it's up to us to tell them.

Free Muslim Coalition 9/11 Ad

The Free Muslim Coalition has a new TV ad condemning terrorism up on their web site. It's not bad and I take it as more sincere than I would a similar production from CAIR, for instance. They even have a picture of an exploded bus in Jerusalem.

But why, oh why, must it be Israel/Palestine, and not just "Israel," then "Palestine" separately? Why always the equivocation? They worried about street cred or what?

Return of Campus J

Steven Weiss's Campus J web site was resting for awhile, but he's back now and promises regular updates for the coming academic season. If you were a reader of CampusJ before (and I was), you might want to take a look again.

Israeli Tourism

USCIS, Reject Salah Soltan's Citizenship Application!

Amazingly enough, the radical Muslim preacher, Salah Soltan (also spelled Sultan), who we have covered here many times previously, is not yet a US citizen. Here I thought we were stuck with him, but no...well not quite yet. It may already be too late. Patrick Poole has an excellent post at FrontPage with all the background: Hometown Jihad: Our Newest Citizen?

...it is not just Sultan’s association with Qaradawi that is troubling. He had been in the country less than a year before he was making news. In 1999, Sultan spoke at a fundraiser for the Islamic Association for Palestine, which was closed down by the US government after 9/11 as the primary front group in the US for HAMAS, where he made a string of rabidly anti-Semitic statements (recorded in Rita Katz’s 2003 book, Terrorist Hunter):

What does "the Cause" mean to you? And what does it mean to your children?... How much do they know about these tragedies? Did we mention to them that the Children of Zion over there cut open the wombs of mothers. As Khalid M. Khalid mentioned in 1992 when he visited Shamir and saw on his desk a strange ashtray. He asked him, "What strange ashtray is this?" Shamir told him that this was the skull of an embryo. The skull of an embryo? An Israeli soldier opened the womb of a Palestinian mother, took out the embryo, cut off his head, and gave it to him as a present. He gave it to him as a present! This is the method of the Jews. Killing a Muslim or any other non-Jew does not matter to them. Because their motto is, "The gentiles mean nothing to us." This is what the text of the Talmud says: "If you come across a non-Jew kill him!"...

There's much, much more, but here Poole asks the key question:

...Since April, this story has progressed from a local interest story limited to my hometown of Hilliard, Ohio to one that raises serious questions about national policy. With Salah Sultan’s extensive connections to the international Islamic terror networks in view (which I uncovered with nothing more than an Internet connection), what exactly does one have to do and how many ties to terrorism does one need for our federal immigration officials to reject a citizenship application? Five years after 9/11, have we learned anything at all?...

Are there no standards at all for citizenship beyond what i's you've dotted and t's you've crossed? [h/t: Miss Kelly]

The Sounds of 9/11

Peggy Noonan in OpinionJournal:

...Rudy Giuliani said it was like an earthquake. The actor Jim Caviezel saw the second plane hit the towers on television and what he heard shook him: "A weird, guttural discordant sound," he called it, a sound exactly like lightning. He knew because earlier that year he'd been hit. My son, then a teenager in a high school across the river from the towers, heard the first plane go in at 8:45 a.m. It sounded, he said, like a heavy truck going hard over a big street grate.

I think too about the sounds that came from within the buildings and within the planes--the phone calls and messages left on answering machines, all the last things said to whoever was home and picked up the phone. They awe me, those messages.

Something terrible had happened. Life was reduced to its essentials. Time was short. People said what counted, what mattered. It has been noted that there is no record of anyone calling to say, "I never liked you," or, "You hurt my feelings." No one negotiated past grievances or said, "Vote for Smith." Amazingly --or not--there is no record of anyone damning the terrorists or saying "I hate them."

No one said anything unneeded, extraneous or small. Crisis is a great editor. When you read the transcripts that have been released over the years it's all so clear...

The rest. [h/t: BornIn1965]

Thursday, September 7, 2006

Dopes on a Plane

(You've probably seen this story already, but I couldn't resist the title.)

Jewish man removed from airplane for praying

Some fellow passengers are questioning why an Orthodox Jewish man was removed from an Air Canada Jazz flight in Montreal last week for praying.

The man was a passenger on a Sept. 1 flight from Montreal to New York City when the incident happened.

The airplane was heading toward the runway at the Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport when eyewitnesses said the Orthodox man began to pray.

"He was clearly a Hasidic Jew," said Yves Faguy, a passenger seated nearby. "He had some sort of cover over his head. He was reading from a book.

"He wasn't exactly praying out loud but he was lurching back and forth," Faguy added.

The action didn't seem to bother anyone, Faguy said, but a flight attendant approached the man and told him his praying was making other passengers nervous...

[h/t: isirota and JoeN]

Protest Khatami at Harvard

There will, of course, be a protest:

Former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami will speak at Harvard University on the issue of “ethics of tolerance” in an age of violence.

President Khatami called the Hezbollah terrorist group, a “shining sun that illuminates and warms the hearts of all Muslims and supporters of freedom in the world.”

A coalition of student groups will gather to counter the Iranian support for terror and drive for nuclear weapons.

Join us

Sunday, September 10 at 3 pm

Kennedy School of Government at the Institute of Politics JFK Dr.

Our messages will be:

Stop Supporting Terror

No Iranian Nukes

Please bring American flags, and signs (do not attach them to sticks). Feel free to make your own but please no signs or graphics offensive to any racial or ethnic group including but not limited to Iranians or Islam. We will ask that such signs be taken down. Ours is not a message of intolerance, but of peace.

Of course, we are a pro-Israel organization, but this will not be a rally for Israel or by Jews, but rather against a state sponsor of terror by a coalition of concerned groups and citizens. It is critical that we maintain a coherent peaceful message as a contrast to the extremist positions of Iran.

For more information click here and here

And don't miss Jeff Jacoby: Bowing to Iran, which concludes: "Khatami's visa is a win for the mullahs, but a slap in the face to the people of Iran. What a blunder by the Bush administration. What a disgrace."

For balance, see TigerHawk: Khatami vs. Ahmadinejad, "Unlike virtually every other conservative blogger, I tentatively supported the granting of a visa to former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami..." He makes some points worth considering.

Israeli Statement on Cluster Bombs

Behind the Headlines: Legal and operational aspects of the use of cluster bombs

1. The accepted legality of cluster weapons

Both international law and accepted practice do not prohibit the use of the family of weapons popularly as 'cluster bombs'. Consequently, the main issue in a discussion of Israel's use of such weaponry should the method of their use, rather than their legality.

A 2002 report by Human Rights Watch on explosive sub-munitions - the category of weapons to which cluster bombs belong - states that these weapons are stocked by 56 countries and have been used by at least nine (including the US, Britain, Russia, and Israel). There are 208 types of sub-munitions, which are manufactured by 33 countries. The US used cluster bombs during the Gulf War, as did NATO forces in Serbia and Kosovo...

etc...

I hate to criticize from afar, but this is another example of another Israeli PR (and possibly practical in that it's an open question whether it was even necessary to use the things) screw-up. It took them until the 5th to get this simple statement up. A little birdy told me about a week before that that this statement was coming ("they never drop them without checking with a special committee about whether it's legal. they have given unifil and the lebanese maps to where they have used them."). I didn't post about it because it just would have been silly for me to have done so..."Oh yeah, they check with a committee before they use them, and yeah, they've given the UN maps as to where they were used..." Lame. Begs the question. Should they have been used? Is it OK that they were used?

Any fool in Israel must have known there would be the usual shit-storm for using the things. Hell, even I remember the controversy from over 20 years ago when they were used against the PLO in Lebanon and the same process of controversy happened. So, if someone with the tactical and strategic planning knowledge decided the weapon should be used, why weren't the powers that be ready with their part of the formula to go on the offense right away and brazen it out when the questions arose on the very first day? "Yes, we used them. They are not illegal and we're not interested in any discussions on the question."

Instead, we supporters are sitting here twisting in the wind along with Israel's image for days (weeks?) while the questions stew. And by the way, if the situation on the ground didn't demand their use, then that's another story for which someone not on the PR side of things should answer. Some of us are here to make the case when there's a good case to make, which is often. But it's not always, and the longer it takes to get a definitive statement, the worse it looks.

The Islamization of European Anti-Semitism

It's baaaack...

Andrew Bostom: The Islamization of European Anti-Semitism

...When the late 23 year-old Parisian Jew Ilan Halimi was being tortured to death, his Muslim torturers, as Nidra Poller wrote in the Wall Street Journal

“…phoned the family on several occasions and made them listen to the recitation of verses from the Koran, while Ilan’s tortured screams could be heard in the background.”

Ilan Halimi’s torturers/murderers did not invoke any non-Islamic sources of anti-Jewish hate, only the Koran.

For the Muslim masses, basic Islamic education in the Koran, hadith (the putative words and deeds of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, as recorded by pious transmitters), and sira (earliest Muslim biographies of Muhammad) may create an immutable superstructure of Jew hatred, onto which non-Muslim sources of Jew hatred are easily grafted. Examples of this archetypal Jew hatred from the sacred Islamic texts, sira, and main early Sunni historiographical accounts, include:

- Koranic verses labeling Jews as malevolent enemies of Islam (5:82), and

- disobedient slayers of their own prophets who suffered justifiable abasement (2:61),

- including, for some, transformation into apes and swine (5:60); or

- the more profoundly hateful narratives (in the hadith, sira, and early histories, for example by Tabari) which maintain that the perfidious Jews fomented sectarian strife in early Islam by promoting heresies—including Shi’ism itself—that threatened the unity of the Muslim community (umma), and

- the canonical hadith (Sahih Muslim Book 026, Number 5431) that the Jews caused Muhammad’s protracted, excruciating death from poisoning...

Sounds familiar doesn't it? Muslims live in a pre-Vatican II world, where the Jews are perfidious Prophet-killers. No wonder there are so many rhymes between Middle Eastern and European anti-Semitism, and such a fertile ground to transplant and prosper old hatreds. This is dangerous stuff with a known history. Does Europe recognize it? No, because they're too busy deluding themselves that what they're doing has something to do with perfidious Israelis, not perfidious Jews.

Covering Al Durah

Richard Landes has begun his series of posts that will take us up to the trials involving France2's coverage of the Muhammed al Durah affair. He will be appearing at the trials in person and is now writing to bring everyone up to speed on the issues. This is must-read stuff, and a situation where the blogosphere may be able to have a real effect on the MSM, and blog readers can be a step way ahead of the average information consumer in the "understanding your reality" sweepstakes.

We the people need to find a way to force France2 to release their rushes (unedited complete video) of the incident.

The Al Durah Trials: Portrait of French Culture at the Beginning of the 21st Century

Al Durah Affair I: France2 Rushes by Talal Abu Rahmeh

No Blood? We’ve Got Some

British MP's note 'disturbing' rise in anti-Semitism - Updated

All "exacerbated," according to the BBC's report, by the situation in the Middle East, of course: MPs deliver anti-Semitism report

A cross-party group of MPs has delivered a report to Tony Blair calling for action to tackle an increase in anti-Semitism in the UK.

The panel of 14 MPs said the "disturbing" rise had been exacerbated by the situation in the Middle East.

It also said a minority of UK Islamist extremists had incited Jewish hatred.

Labour backbencher Denis McShane said abuse took "classic forms" such as synagogues being vandalised and school children being spat at and insulted...

...The former Conservative leader, Iain Duncan Smith, who was one of the members of the panel, said the situation regarding anti-Semitic attacks was worse than he had previously believed.

"A combination of complacency and ignorance seems to be the name of the game here," he said.

"Many police forces simply keep no record of these attacks at all and therefore are unable to understand the depth or the strength of the nature of the problem...

Note this section, under this heading, which I found odd:

'Accept responsibility'

Speaking after the report's delivery, Mr McShane said many British Jews were the butt of some people's anger about Israeli and American policies.

"British citizens who happen to be born Jews have to accept responsibility for the anger there is against Israel or America," he said...

I find that to be very odd phraseology, and can't imagine Mr. McShane actually meant what that limited quote the BBC has provided implies. I can't imagine they would say that Muslims who suffer "hate crimes" because of September 11, for instance, must simply accept responsibility, or that some other minority must simply "suck it up" because of the perceived mis-deeds of other members identified with them. What an odd thing to leave hanging out there.

It's as though the BBC just can't get over the impulse to shame Jews for what they perceive as Israeli and American (because the Jews run America, after all) mis-deeds. It's almost as though, even here in a report about rising anti-Semitism, they show some sort of...understanding...that it's OK to trot out traditional anti-Semitic tropes because you don't agree with this or that Israeli policy. Now maybe I'm making too big a deal out of what's really just some stilted syntax in a too-brief report with a dangerous idea left hanging, but I'm not convinced I am. I think there's something more at work here in the choices made for this reporting.

Update: Further cementing my feelings on the semiotics behind BBC's framing of this issue are their choices in guests to discuss the issue. Disturbing.

Wednesday, September 6, 2006

Just got back: The Hezbollah-Israel War

Just got back from this event at Brandeis, "The Hezbollah-Israel War: What''s Next?" with presentations and discussion by "Prof. Shai Feldman, Judith and Sydney Swartz Director, Crown Center for Middle East Studies, Brandeis University, Dr. Abdel Monem Said Aly, Senior Fellow, Crown Center for Middle East Studies, Brandeis University, and Mr. Charles Radin, Specialist on Religion and Society, Boston Globe."

I should have a report in a day or two. Fow now I'll just say that one speaker was very interesting, one somewhat interesting, and one only tangentially interesting and for reasons have nothing to do with the stated purpose of the talk. I'll let you puzzle over which one was which.

Cracking Down on Muslim Immigration in Australia

Here's a hard-hitting address by former Australian Senator and head of the Treasury, John Stone (quite similar in candor to this prior piece in the same publication: Tim Priest: The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime in Australia). Stone sets all PC aside to call for massive immigration reform and an end to multicultural madness: Quadrant: The Muslim Problem and What to Do about It

Regarding Indonesia, Stone says:

• How can we meaningfully describe as a “democracy” a nation which refuses to proscribe a body (Jemah Islamiya) that is not merely widely identified throughout the world as a terrorist organisation, but whose adherents have also been guilty of major terrorist attacks within Indonesia itself?

• If “moderate” is to describe a country in which Christians are openly discriminated against, persecuted, threatened and even killed, how much further do these “moderates” have to go before their apologists in Australia will cease describing them as such?

• As a recent Jakarta Post editorial has noted, sharia law is steadily gaining a wider foothold in Indonesia notwithstanding that country’s formally secular and pluralist Constitution. The province of Aceh is now “under a sharia regime, and today more than 20 regencies and municipalities across Indonesia proclaim themselves to be ruled by sharia or have introduced sharia-inspired legislation”.

• Have we forgotten that, in the wake of the Bali bombings of October 12, 2002, when eighty-eight Australians were killed and many others injured (not to mention all those of other nationalities, including the Balinese, who suffered similar fates), a reputable opinion poll in Indonesia recorded that some 16 per cent of Indonesian Muslims (almost 30 million people) supported those bombings, while a further 25 per cent declined to proffer an opinion? More recently, the highly regarded Pew Research Group, in its Pew Global Attitudes Project, showed a reduction in that 16 per cent figure to “only” 10 per cent (18 million people).

• The same survey showed, however, that 65 per cent of Indonesia’s Muslims today do not believe that the September 11 attacks on the United States were carried out by Arabs!

• Did nobody else notice the rapturous reception given recently to the Mad Iranian Bomber, President Ahmedinajad, when he visited Indonesia to attend a conference of non-Arab Muslim leaders? At a joint press conference with President Yudhoyono, this major threat to world peace and stability raved on for thirty minutes, denouncing the West’s well-justified distrust of his nuclear program and predicting that Israel will “be destroyed”. Politeness to one’s guest is of course important, but I cannot help feeling that at some point President Yudhoyono might have intervened to divert this rabid flow. What does the fact that he didn’t, tell us about the nature of Islam in Indonesia’s “democracy” today?

That's a taste. Does Stone go too far? You decide.

Al-Hayat editor admits report on Shalit in Egypt a mistake

Not 800 for 1...yet: Al-Hayat editor admits report on Shalit in Egypt a mistake

The editor of Palestinian affairs for the London-based Egyptian newspaper Al- Hayat said on Tuesday that its report claiming that kidnapped IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Shalit was transferred to Egypt was incorrect.

On Monday night, the paper reported that Shalit had already been transferred to Egypt as part of a deal to secure his release. According to the article, Shalit was handed over to Egypt days before in exchange for Israel's guarantee to release 800 Palestinian prisoners in three stages.

In an interview with Palestinian-Israeli radio station, Voice of Peace, Mahar Othman admitted that the report on Shalit's whereabouts had been an error, and that their source in Gaza had apparently made a mistake.

Gilad's father Noam Shalit immediately denied the report, saying unequivocally that Gilad was not in Egypt.

Meanwhile, official sources in Cairo said that Egypt had given Israel concrete evidence Tuesday that Shalit was alive. According to the sources, he was being held in a hidden location in Gaza...


Tuesday, September 5, 2006

CAIR's bogus stats

Speaking of CAIR's nonsense, Patrick Poole tears into an AFP report on increasing numbers of Hate Crimes against Muslims that relies on CAIR's bogus numbers: Agence France Presse Pushes CAIR's Fake Hate Crime Numbers

...Just one problem: a week after CAIR published the report, Daniel Pipes and Sharon Chadha revealed ("CAIR's Hate Crime Nonsense") that this report included "a pattern of sloppiness, exaggeration, and distortion", especially that it included incidents that CAIR reported as hate crimes when it was known that the "hate crimes" they cited were perpetrated by the Muslim "victims" themselves. In one case in McAllen, Texas included in the CAIR report, even the New York Times had debunked CAIR's "hate crime" claims seven months prior to the CAIR report's release. In another case reported by CAIR in May 2005 as a "hate crime", an Everett, Washington grocer had been charged with setting fire to his own store in August 2004 - a full eight months prior to CAIR's published report. The Seattle Times reported CAIR's "hate crime" as a hoax by in August 2004 when the charges were filed against the owner.

If you read the CAIR report that's posted on their website today you will find that all references to these hate crime hoaxes have been scrubbed, but CAIR has never changed the 2004 statistics in the report to account for these fraudulent incidents. Those statistics remain completely unchanged since the original publication of the report, and these are the very same stats parroted by AFP in the article from this weekend.

CAIR was clearly aware enough of this problematic information to scrub any mention of these incidents from the current version of the report available on their website, but careless or deceptive enough not to change the statistics. Regardless, CAIR nowhere indicates that the report has been corrected. And they are still peddling this fraudulent information to their old media allies, who appear to take any information received from CAIR at face value...

More here. [h/t: Miss Kelly]

CAIR: Pay no attention to the Islamists behind the curtain

CAIR is awfully upset that President Bush won't simply ignore Muslim terrorism and go back to sleep with the rest of us. They even trot out their bogus anti-Terror fatwa from the Fiqh Council of North America to prove that we shouldn't worry, cause they're taking care of it:

CAIR SAYS BUSH SPEECH GRANTS EXTREMISTS 'UNDESERVED LEGITIMACY'

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 9/5/06) - A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group said today's address by President Bush on the status of America's war on terrorism "grants undeserved legitimacy to extremists."

SEE: Political Season Opens With Focus on Security (NY Times)

In a statement responding to the president's speech before the Military Officers Association of America, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said:

"By focusing almost exclusively on the views of groups like Al-Qaeda and failing to address the concerns of the vast majority of Muslims worldwide who reject terrorism, President Bush grants undeserved legitimacy to extremists and marginalizes true moderates.

"Rather than focus on the negative messages of Al-Qaeda, the President ought to work with mainstream Muslims at home and abroad to isolate terrorists and promote a positive vision of hope, mutual respect and diplomacy.

"CAIR and other national American Muslim groups stand ready to help build bridges of understanding between America and the Islamic world."

Last year, CAIR coordinated a fatwa, or Islamic religious ruling, against terrorism and religious extremism issued by the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) and endorsed by hundreds of U.S. Muslim groups, leaders and institutions.

In 2004, CAIR launched an online petition drive, called " Not in the Name of Islam," designed to disassociate Islam from the violent acts of a few Muslims...

Not only was their "anti-terror" fatwa a sham (members of their Fiqh Council have very convenient definitions of the word), but their home page is trumpeting their private dinner with Mohammad Khatami even as this press release goes out:

Romney Denounces and Refuses State Support to Khatami Visit

Good for Mitt:

ROMNEY DENOUNCES KHATAMI VISIT TO HARVARD - Declines to provide escort, or offer state support for trip

Governor Mitt Romney today ordered all Massachusetts state government agencies to decline support, if asked, for former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami’s September 10 visit to the Boston area, where he is scheduled to speak at Harvard University.

“State taxpayers should not be providing special treatment to an individual who supports violent jihad and the destruction of Israel,” said Romney.

Romney’s action means that Khatami will be denied an official police escort and other VIP treatment when he is in town. The federal government provides security through the U.S. State Department.

Romney criticized Harvard for honoring Khatami by inviting him to speak, calling it “a disgrace to the memory of all Americans who have lost their lives at the hands of extremists, especially on the eve of the five-year anniversary of 9/11.”

Said Romney: “The U.S. State Department listed Khatami’s Iran as the number one state sponsor of terrorism. Within his own country, Khatami oversaw the torture and murder of dissidents who spoke out for freedom and democracy. For him to lecture Americans about tolerance and violence is propaganda, pure and simple.”...


I Stand with the Christian Zionists

I just had an email exchange with a reader that was started when they read this article: Christian Zionists angry over slur

The leaders of three Jerusalem-based Christian Evangelical organizations on Monday voiced distress over a recent proclamation by the Latin Patriarch and the heads of three other churches in Jerusalem issuing a stinging and virtually unprecedented public criticism of Christian Zionism and their unflinching support for the State of Israel.

The bitter inter-Christian tiff followed an August 22 "Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism" signed by the outgoing Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah, Archbishop Swerios Malki Mourad of the Syrian Orthodox Patriarchate, Bishop Riah Abu El-Assal of the Episcopal Church and Bishop Munib Younan of the Lutheran Church, was indicative of the deep discord and resentment within the Christian Church over the Evangelicals' support for Israel.

The declaration lambasted Christian Zionism as a "false teaching" that "condemn[s] the world to the doom of Armageddon."

"It is with concern that we note the negative opinions about Christian Zionism voiced by certain church clerics in Jerusalem... using inflammatory language they have expressed views that are far from the truth," read a joint response by the heads of the International Christian Embassy in Jerusalem, Bridges for Peace and Christian Friends of Israel.

"We find the paper unbalanced and notably one-sided. It totally ignores the jihadist goals of the Hamas Government and turns a blind eye to terrorism perpetrated by this regime," the statement read.

The unusually-harsh statement by the Latin Patriarch, who is a Palestinian, comes at a time of burgeoning ties between Israel and the Christian Evangelical community around the world...

Let's thank God for those ties. I see nothing wrong with them. The Christian leaders who signed the anti-Christian Zionist statement are lead far more by their Palestinian Nationalism than any theological issues. I have written about Abu El-Assal, for instance, a number of times, most recently: Anglican Bishop Abu El-Assal on the Stump for Hamas and Hizballah. Of course they don't like the Christian Zionists. The CZ's stand between them and their dream of dismantling the Jewish State.

My reader was lead to this old article in the Christian Science Monitor: Mixing prophecy and politics

Christian Zionists are growing in influence - even as they fight for policies their critics say work against peace in the Mideast. For these believers, it's all about fulfilling biblical prophecy.

This is a slightly edited version of my reaction: I have quite a few problems with that article. First, they gloss over the word “premillenial” in the term “premillenial dispensationalist.” The Christian Zionists in fact don’t believe they can hasten the second coming, quite the opposite. They believe no man (nor angel in heaven) can possibly know or have any affect at all on God’s timetable ("But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."). Christ himself will return to usher in the millennium (thus, PREmillenial), as opposed to POSTmillenialists who do believe that it’s man’s job to bring about the conditions for the second coming, and these guys (the Christian Zionists) don’t believe in that.

There’s a great book called Standing With Israel by David Brog that goes into all this.

So the article has as its bad guys the CZ’s, and who are its good guys? Well, Naim Ateek and his group Sabeel is one…I’ve written about him many a time. He’s a guy that does not think Israel should exist at all. He travels the world pushing, along with his group, for sanctions, divestment and boycotts of Israel, and far from working “to counter extremism on both sides of the conflict” as the article states, let’s just say he doesn’t spend a lot of time criticizing Hamas.

Likewise Jeff Halper, the Israeli academic quoted in the article, has his own NGO, and also travels the world demonizing Israel and making excuses for suicide bombing (really).

It’s not surprising that Lefties like Halper and Middle East Christians who Vatican 2 left behind (the ME churches were central in lobbying the Catholic Church NOT to repudiate the accusation of deicide against the Jews) don’t like the CZ’s – they don’t like Israel. Meanwhile, the CZ’s might have their opinions about what decisions Israelis should make (they may not like it when Israel makes land concessions), but they’ve all said (as far as I’ve ever heard) that they accept whatever decisions the government of Israel does make. They also don’t kill anyone when they don’t get just exactly their way.

Note that the article uses as an example the support Israel got from the CZ’s when they took out Rantisi. GOOD!

Israel needs all the friends it can get. I’m not too worried about people who think some odd things about the Jews when the last days come – I’ll take my chances on that -- not being a Christian, I don't believe in it, so I don't worry about it. Meanwhile, let’s compare body counts – Evangelical Christians versus Islamists and Palestinian Nationalists. I know which side my money is on. I'm happy to be dealing with some folks who may have some off ideas about the end of days as long as they treat me well here in these days and on this earth. The Christian Zionists do that. The religious leaders who signed that statement don't.

Abbas confirms deal on Shalit's release

800 prisoners for 1? Uggg.

Abbas confirms deal on Shalit's release

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas confirmed Tuesday that a deal had been reached to secure the release of kidnapped IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Shalit.

Abbas told Bahrain-based newspaper El-Halij that Shalit would be transferred to Egypt and held there until Israel fulfilled its part of the bargain...

...According to Al-Hayat, Shalit was handed over to Egypt "a short time ago" in exchange for Israel's guarantee to release 800 Palestinian prisoners in three stages.

Gilad's father Noam Shalit denied the report, saying unequivocally that Gilad was not in Egypt.

Israel Radio reported that Hamas had retracted its demand that Shalit be freed simultaneously with the Palestinian prisoners.

Al-Hayat said that Israel had stipulated that no prisoners with blood on their hands, as well as Tanzim leader Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Sadat, the PFLP head involved in the murder of former tourism minister Rehavam Ze'evi, should be freed as part of the deal. Channel 10 News reported that Hamas had agreed to Israel's conditions...


Monday, September 4, 2006

Jostein Gaarder's Supercessionism

I've finally read all three parts (in one big essay) of Richard Landes's fisking of Jostein Gaarder's piece (previous: Pop Quiz: When does legitimate criticism of Israel cross the line in anti-Semitism?). Augean Stables: Open Letter to Jostein Gaarder: Fisking Crypto-Supersessionism

It's long, but well worth the journey. Landes has a lot of patience, and refrains from snark while responding to Gaarder in detail. Highly recommened. You will learn something before it's done.

I rather thought Gaarder had a Mel Gibson moment. Rather than drunk on booze (though that may have been the case), he was drunk on images, and when it all got to a critical level, just as with Mel, all that old time religion came pouring out. "This is what he really thinks." And it's ugly, and it has familair tones, and oddly enough, exactly the same root structure. This is ancient, traditional stuff, and for a supposedly "liberal" European to unselfconsiously repeat these themes without knowledge (or worse, with!) of the implications and history of what he's saying is disturbing.

When you've got some time.

Goodbye Croc Hunter

Oh wow, Steve Irwin is dead: Stingray Kills "Crocodile Hunter"

Steve Irwin, 44, the hyper-enthusiastic, danger-courting Australian wildlife conservationist who gained a worldwide following for his television show "The Crocodile Hunter," was killed by a stingray Sept. 4 while filming at the Great Barrier Reef for a new documentary series called "Ocean's Deadliest."

Mr. Irwin was swimming off the northeastern Australian coastline, 60 miles north of Cairns, when the ray's whip-like tail struck him and the poisonous barb apparently punctured his heart. He was taken by his boat, Croc One, to a rescue helicopter that flew to the community of Low Isle. Despite attempts at resuscitation, he was pronounced dead.

Mr. Irwin was known for getting melodramatically near claws and jaws of land and sea creatures. This was the allure of his television franchise, mostly seen by American audiences on the Animal Planet cable channel during the past decade.

"While most shows use long lenses, we get right up close so the audience feels like they're smack in the middle of the bush," Mr. Irwin told Entertainment Weekly magazine. "One time, a 10-foot saltwater croc grabbed me on the hand and -- whap! -- pulled me into the water. Luckily, I swung around and landed on his head, which gave him a bit of a shock and gave me just enough time to get away."...

I don't care what you say, I liked the guy. Never got sick of him. When his show was on, I always paused my surfing, and talk about a great talk-show guest... Who could believe he'd be done in by an aquatic animal? A stingray through the heart. Wow. Rest In Peace.

Sunday, September 3, 2006

EU President: European Union 'should change its policy and contact Hamas'

The current president of the EU, Finish Foreign Minister Errki Tuomioja (see this report for an explanation of how Tuomioja's cluelessness should not surprise), has recommended that the EU "should change its policy and contact Hamas." That's the bad news. The good news is that the proposal isn't expected to go anywhere...for the moment.

FT: European Union 'should change its policy and contact Hamas'

The European Union should establish contact with Hamas, the proscribed Islamist group, the holder of the EU's presidency has proposed.

Errki Tuomioja, Finnish foreign minister, told FT Deutschland, the Financial Times' sister paper, that the EU would have to make an important shift in policy and be prepared to enter discussions with all "relevant" parties if it were to revive the stricken Middle East peace process.

"Hamas is not the same party it was before the elections," he said, referring to what he said were the group's encouraging but insufficient steps to moderate its stance after it won control of the Palestinian Authority this year.

"We have to be able to talk to anyone who is relevant," he added. "There are many ways of having contact . . . nobody will start with press conferences and photo opportunities."...

...Hamas remains on the EU's official list of proscribed terrorist organisations and the 25-nation bloc has repeatedly declaredit would only establish political contacts with the Islamist group if it honoured past agreements, ceased violence and recognised Israel.

Any attempt to shift towards more normal relations with the group could infuriate Israel and the US and provide a dilemma for the EU's big powers - Germany, France and the UK.

The EU only added Hamas to its terrorist list after pressure from Washington and Tel Aviv and some top-level officials have held discreet consultations with people linked to the organisation in the past.

Mr Tuomioja has also already clashed with some of his colleagues - most notably at the start of August when a Finnish draft declaration calling for an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon and criticising Israel was watered down by other EU ministers.

He subsequently complained in a weblog that "for a long time it has been known that, within an hour after being distributed to the member states, all EU documents have already reached Tel Aviv, and probably Washington and Moscow"...


'...one can ask why Jews had problems with Egyptians, with Jesus, with Europeans, and in modern times with Germans...'

From the Berkley [California] Daily Planet, where all ideas are worthy of space: Kurosh Arianpour, "an Iranian student studying in India" writes, Commentary: Zionist Crimes in Lebanon

... Perhaps the usual folks who attack Berkeley Daily Planet are right: There is, after all, anti-Semitism in the world. One can argue that the genocide of Lebanese people in the past few weeks has fueled anti-Semitism. But this is not the only reason. One should ask why anti-Semitism has persisted throughout the centuries.

Let us go back to 539 BC, when Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, went to Babylonia and liberated Jews. One can ask why Jews were enslaved by Babylonians. Also, one can ask why Jews had problem with Egyptians, with Jesus, with Europeans, and in modern times with Germans? The answer, among other things, is their racist attitude that they are the “Chosen People.” Because of this attitude, they do wrong to other people to the point that others turn against them, namely, become anti-Semite if you will. Since they think they are the Chosen People they can murder Lebanese and Palestinian children at will. Do you not remember the scene where a Palestinian father was screaming to stop Israeli soldiers shooting his son? But, the soldiers killed the boy mercilessly. Perhaps, Americans are so busy to amuse themselves with their iPods, lap-top computers, or cell phones. They do not have time to see the murders committed by the Chosen People. The Chosen People have become the Chosen Murderers. So long as the Zionists have no regard for the lives of others, people around the world will turn into anti-Semites, regardless of their religions. Even some Jews are condemning the atrocities of the Zionist regime...

Chip Johnson of the SF Chrinicle asks, Why did Berkeley paper run anti-Jewish column?

...The Anti-Defamation League's Northern California chapter sent O'Malley a letter demanding a public apology for the article. It carries the signatures of more than a half-dozen elected officials from the East Bay, including the mayors of Oakland, Berkeley and Emeryville.

The letter described the author's words as "a racist attack on all people of Jewish descent when he asserted that Jews have been the cause of every tragedy that has befallen them -- from slavery in Egypt to the Holocaust.

"We are not surprised when hate-mongers make such statements or when neo-Nazi publications print them. Vulgar and hate-filled statements are written all the time -- editors choose whether or not to publish them. We were, however, surprised, to find them in a Berkeley 'community' newspaper since racism of any kind violates all that our city and region stands for," it read...

Well, you know, the grown-ups have been asleep at the switch for a long time...all ideas are worthy of publication and debate on an equal field don't you know. Thought this was interesting:

..."All kinds of racist nonsense gets printed in the Planet -- and for good reason -- since racist thinking pervades American culture," wrote Joanna Graham, a reader who defended [editor] O'Malley's decision...

Interesting dynamic there. You think the worst, so you look for the worst and you find the worst...even if you need to, as in this case, import it from Iran.

Saturday, September 2, 2006

Thou Shalt Not Loom

Reuters just loves to do that Hizballah propaganda. Here they are legitimatizing the idea that Israel is "occupying" Shebaa Farms. Note the caption (same boiler-plate for a number of photos in the second sentence):


A U.N. armoured personnel carrier patrols in the disputed Shebaa Farms area as seen from south Lebanon August 31, 2006. The Israeli encampments, heavily defended and topped with aerials, loom over the villages bordering the disputed Shebaa Farms area, reminding the Lebanese they are under constant surveillance. Picture taken August 31, 2006. REUTERS/Ammar Awad (LEBANON)

Those poor Lebanese villagers. Of course, the only entity "disputing" Shebaa Farms at the moment is Hizballah. If the villagers are under threat of violence, that's who's presence it comes from, not hilltop listening posts. Don't bother expecting such nuance from Reuters, though. They're too busy encouraging the next war.

Here's one of those horrible "looming" sights:


A Lebanese soldier observes an Israeli position in the Shebaa hill while sitting in an armoured personnel carrier in the frontier Majidiyah village in the eastern sector of south Lebanon September 1, 2006. REUTERS/Karamallah Daher (LEBANON)

Do what thou wilt, oh Israel, but "loom" no longer...

Guest Blog: Accidental Comedians by Tom Glennon

A timely guest posting, considering the post below, 'Any infidel blood will have no sanctity'. Just what kind of Muslims would we have to be to prevent from being labelled an "infidel" and killed anyway? -S

Accidental Comedians by Tom Glennon

An English philosopher, Horace Walpole, is best remembered for one quote. He wrote “The world is a comedy to those who think, and a tragedy to those who feel.” While I admit to being a “feel” type person much of the time, I did have reason to find some dark humor in several news stories in the last two or three days. While the circumstances are anything but humorous, I did find a sardonic variety of amusement in the following stories.

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan announced, with a perfectly straight face, that Syria would increase it’s monitoring of the Syrian and Lebanese border to halt any arms shipments to Hezbollah. Apparently, Mr. Annan believes that the Iranian, Chinese and Soviet weapons used by Hezbollah against Israel were smuggled into Lebanon without the knowledge or participation of the Syrian government. My first thought was that Kofi would have a very successful career as an actor in Hollywood after his term expires in the United Nations. His ethics, political outlook, prejudices and obvious talent at delivering the most outrageous statements as fact would be a nice fit in the fantasyland of the entertainment industry.

My second thought was that he may actually believe the things he says. If that is the case, I have some retirement property in Florida that he may wish to buy. It can be viewed at low tide, but only during the dry season. Bring your hip waders Mr. Annan, for more reasons than just the mud.

The second item that brought a wry smile to my face was the release of a new al-Qaida tape from al-Zawahiri., the second in command of that terrorist organization. Mr. al-Zawahiri threatened continued death and destruction to Americans, and all things associated with Western culture. While this was not new, he did offer to mitigate this mayhem if Americans would immediately convert to Islam. According to Mr. al-Zawahiri, a mass conversion of Americans would be viewed positively by the Jihadists, and our lives would be spared. Like Mr. Annan’s Syrian announcement, these pronouncements were made with a perfectly straight face. What made me believe this was actually a satiric monologue, rather than a serious statement, were the things left unsaid.

Muslims in Afghanistan who believe in education, more freedom for women, voting for political leaders, and other aspects of modern culture are routinely murdered by the adherents to the seventh century philosophy as enforced by the remnants of the Taliban. Mr. al-Zawahiri did not explain which type of Islam he expects us to embrace.

In the same vein, Mr. al-Zawahiri did not specify if he expects us to become Shiite or Sunni Muslim. While Americans may believe the distinctions are similar to deciding between becoming a Baptist or a Lutheran, Muslims seem to take this much more seriously. Events in Iraq show quite clearly that many Sunni Muslims take great pleasure in slaughtering Shiite men, women and children, while Shiite Muslims seem to share this value system as they continue to abduct, massacre and bomb scores of Sunnis on a daily basis. Making the wrong choice of which sect to join appears to carry some serious ramifications.

Also untouched is the matter of ethnicity. In the Darfur region of Sudan, Arab Muslims continue to murder, rape and dispossess tens of thousands of Black African Muslims. Does this mean that if we convert to Islam, White American Muslims will be required to make war against Black American Muslims? And since I am not an Arab, which ethnicity would I have to join?

The final unstated requirement has to do with Jihadist factions. I would assume Mr. al-Zawahiri would expect us to join al-Qaida, or at least support them. However, relationships between different terrorist organizations seem to be a tenuous matter. Having to choose between al-Qaida, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Hamas, al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, and the plethora of lesser known organizations can be a dicey thing, since they are apt to shoot at each other almost as often as they shoot at us.

All of this leads me to suspect that the offer to spare Americans from murder if we convert to Islam is actually an expression of Mr. al-Zawahiri’s wry sense of humor. He knows that even if we do convert, we will almost certainly make some wrong choices among the multiple options I have mentioned. Therefore, we would still be targets, and the continued efforts of the Islamists to exterminate us could continue unabated.

OK Mr. al-Zawahiri, we get the joke. Perhaps you and Mr. Annan could form a comedy act after your regular employment ends. Kind of an alternate universe Martin and Lewis. I’m just not sure which of you would be the straight man.

Divestment A-Z

Our friend Jon Haber, one of the principle folks behind the fight against divestment in the City of Somerville, has a lengthy and excellent piece in the Jerusalem Post that touches all the bases on the subject...from the purpose, to the attempts to get divestment passed in municipalities, the churches, British academia and on to where things stand. Too long to excerpt:The vampire's kiss

Let me just give you the conclusion, but I recommend reading all that leads up to it:

...To see the degenerating effects of divestment at its fullest, one need only look at the Green Party in the US, now so heavily infiltrated by Islamist radicals that its main raison d'etre seems to be battling over "190," the party's own impotent divestment resolution. Once again, this resolution was made national party policy at the eleventh hour by radical members, with little input from party members and in contravention to party rules (including requirements to consult with other national Green parties, such as the one in Israel). With members leaving the party in droves over the issue, and Green candidates struggling with the 190 albatross in mainstream political races, a party once able to play spoiler in a national election may fully self-immolate long before it can even reach America's graveyard of failed third parties.

It may be that the Lebanon crisis will breathe new life into the struggling divestment movement. But at the time of this writing, even the most vocal institutional critics of Israel (such as the mainline Protestant churches) show no immediate interest in revisiting the campaign, no interest, that is, in inviting the vampire back across the threshold.


Britain: Attacks on Jews soar since Lebanon

TimesOnline: Attacks on Jews soar since Lebanon

BRITISH Jews are facing a wave of anti-Semitic attacks prompted by Israel's conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Synagogues have been daubed with graffiti, Jewish leaders have had hate-mail and ordinary people have been subjected to insults and vandalism.

On Thursday an all-party parliamentary inquiry will state that anti-Semitic violence has become endemic in Britain, both on the streets and university campuses. The report will call for urgent action from the Government, the police and educational establishments.

Mark Gardner, of the Community Security Trust, said: "In July, when the conflict in Lebanon began, we received reports of 92 incidents, which was the third-worst month since records began in 1984." In 2000 the monthly average was between 10 and 30 incidents.

The former minister Denis MacShane, who chaired the parliamentary inquiry, said: "These figures confirm the evidence given to us that anti-Semitic attacks are a very real problem."

The Board of Deputies of British Jews submitted evidence to the inquiry that anti-Semitism in Britain was at its worst level.

The July incidents "were more dispersed than usual", Mr Gardner said. "It is usually a small number responsible for a large number of attacks, but these were very widespread across the country and included graffiti attacks on synagogues in Edinburgh and Glasgow."

The attackers, when visible, are from across society, he said. "When it's verbal abuse, it's just ordinary people in the street, from middle-class women to working-class men. All colours and backgrounds. We hardly ever see incidents involving the classic neo-Nazi skinhead. Muslims are over-represented."

In hate-mail to senior Jewish figures, ordinary Jewish people were being blamed for the deaths of Lebanese civilians. "There are also references to the Holocaust, saying that Hitler should have wiped out the Jews."

Mr Gardner said that the rise in attacks reflected increased hostility to Israel and Jews in the media and across society: "The number of anti-Semitic attacks reflects the mood music around Jews and Israel."...

Thank you, BBC.

[h/t: Andrew Bostom]

Update: The World reflects on this issue in far more depth.

Update2: Glenn: "IF THEY HAD A HABIT OF BLOWING THINGS UP, they wouldn't face this problem..."

'Any infidel blood will have no sanctity'

Palestinian group to target non-Muslims

Palestinian militants who held two Fox News journalists hostage for nearly two weeks threatened in a statement posted online Saturday to abduct non-Muslims visiting the Palestinian territories and kill them unless their demands were met.

The statement, posted in the name of the Holy Jihad Brigades on a Web site frequently used by militants, said the group would kill any hostages it takes unless they converted to Islam, paid a ransom or Muslim prisoners were exchanged for their release.

"Any infidel blood will have no sanctity," the group said in the statement.

It was not possible to verify the authenticity of the statement, which was dated August 27 — the day militants released American journalist Steve Centanni, 60, and New Zealand cameraman Olaf Wiig, 36. They were seized Aug. 14 in Gaza City.

The militant group had demanded the release of Muslim prisoners held by the United States in exchange for freeing the journalists.

During their captivity, the journalists were forced at gunpoint to declare that they had converted to Islam, Centanni told Fox News after he was released. The group said in its statement that the journalists' declaration saved their lives.

"Nothing but Islam gave their blood sanctity and prevented their slaughter," the group said.

It added, "We are not the sort of people who are fooled ... but only God knows intentions."...

[h/t: Andrew Bostom]

Friday, September 1, 2006

Yes, Joe Wilson was full of it

Not that you needed the WaPo to tell you that. You've read it everywhere by now, but I feel I'd be derelict in my duties not to echo today's long overdue Washington Post editorial on the Wilson/Plame affair. Besides, I look to look at it. I wonder if there was any screaming in the chambers of The Washington Post over this: End of an Affair

...Mr. Armitage was one of the Bush administration officials who supported the invasion of Iraq only reluctantly. He was a political rival of the White House and Pentagon officials who championed the war and whom Mr. Wilson accused of twisting intelligence about Iraq and then plotting to destroy him. Unaware that Ms. Plame's identity was classified information, Mr. Armitage reportedly passed it along to columnist Robert D. Novak "in an offhand manner, virtually as gossip," according to a story this week by the Post's R. Jeffrey Smith, who quoted a former colleague of Mr. Armitage.

It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- is untrue. The partisan clamor that followed the raising of that allegation by Mr. Wilson in the summer of 2003 led to the appointment of a special prosecutor, a costly and prolonged investigation, and the indictment of Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, on charges of perjury. All of that might have been avoided had Mr. Armitage's identity been known three years ago...

[snip boiler-plate Libby and White House made mistakes prose]

...it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.

Michelle has some links.

Savage

What would a death cult display in a museum?

Israeli war trophies on display at makeshift Lebanon museum

HANINE, Lebanon (AFP) - Strawberry jam, bullets and a lock of human hair. These are among the mundane and macabre war trophies displayed at a makeshift roadside museum in this southern Lebanese village.

Somebody has laid the items out neatly on the cement driveway in front of a garage. A fence made from two rows of string is designed to keep people from getting too close.

A yellow flag of the Hezbollah Shiite militia flies over one corner of the display, and Hezbollah posters are stuck to a wall above a collection of seized Israeli food: cans of tuna and corn stacked with small packets of strawberry jam resting on top. There are large plastic bottles of Aqua Nova water, candy bars and packages of what looks like meat.

The rest of the display is not as appetizing.

A burned helmet contains a lock of hair. A second helmet cradles unidentifiable ashes while a third is attached to a radio set, apparently from a tank.

At least 119 Israeli soldiers died in their 34-day war with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The militia called it a victory but the war also killed 1,287 Lebanese, mostly civilians. A ceasefire has been in effect since August 14.

Much of the display consists of burned pieces of clothing. Three pairs of boots are still intact.

"Look this," a young man says in broken English after approaching from a nearby mosque. He holds up a pair of uniform trousers. One leg has been severed...

[via LGF]

Muslims must come forward

The first Muslim US Ambassador, M. Osman Siddique, writes in today's Washington Times:

...My pride in faith and country remain rock solid. But my real life American dream often feels more like a nightmare these days. Renegade members of my faith are committing horrendous acts of global terrorism, and I am left embarrassed and angry.

I am embarrassed when I read the names of the terrorists in the newspaper. What must non-Muslims think when some criminal claiming to act in the name of Islam and bearing the same name as the Prophet Muhammad is arrested?

I am also embarrassed that not all American Muslims do all they can to expose those in our community who would commit mayhem or would give succor in any way to those who would cause harm. Too many American Muslims hold back from publicly speaking out against extremist ideologies that threaten us all because they fear being stigmatized by their coreligionists for cooperating with security agencies.

Why is this? In part it is because some Muslim immigrants are relatively recent arrivals from nations in which security forces were corrupt and could not be trusted. Some shy from cooperation because of their immigration status or the status of those around them. Still others hold back because they disagree strongly with American foreign policy. They truly believe that the current administration is fighting a war against Islam under the guise of fighting terrorism. Regrettably, this sentiment is widespread among Muslims, more so abroad but to a substantial degree in America as well.

Our government may act incompetently and unwisely. But I'm confident that it holds no animosity toward Muslims simply because they are Muslims. Sadly, it is Muslims who perpetrate most of the worst terrorist attacks today. As we approach the fifth anniversary of September 11, this reality must be acknowledged by all Muslims...


You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear

CAIR is getting themselves a "new brand identity and logo." Sorry, the voice of Hamas needs more than an image consultant can provide.

Via email:

In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CAIR LAUNCHES NEW BRAND IDENTITY AND LOGO
Identity stresses openness, professionalism and the pursuit of mutual understanding and justice

(CHICAGO, IL, 9/1/06) - The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today announced the launch of a new brand identity and logo. The new identity focuses on openness, professionalism and the pursuit of mutual understanding and justice.

CAIR made its announcement at the convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) in Chicago, North America's largest annual gathering of Muslims...

...In a letter to the American Muslim community announcing the new brand, CAIR Board Chairman Parvez Ahmed stated: "After 12 years of dedicated service to the community, we are reaffirming our core values and recommitting ourselves to three central aspects of CAIR's mission - enhancing understanding of Islam, protecting civil liberties and empowering American Muslims."

He also wrote about the need to transform CAIR in ways that better reflect the group's core commitment to justice, education, diversity, and dialogue...


Yousef Al-Qaradhawi: The Jews of Today Bear Responsibility for Their Forefathers' Crime against Jesus

Renowned Muslim moderate and former Islamic Society of Boston pitch-man, Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, struts his "Vatican II sucks" stuff in this clip from MEMRI...

MEMRITV: Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi: The Jews of Today Bear Responsibility for Their Forefathers' Crime against Jesus

Following are excerpts from an interview with Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, which aired on Qatar TV on August 26, 2006.

Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi: In this film ["The Passion of the Christ"], there is an important positive aspect. The positive aspect lies in its exposing the Jews' crime of bringing Jesus to the crucifixion. Even though we [Muslims] believe that Jesus was not crucified, a crime was committed, and the people who paved the way for this crime, who helped to commit it, who brought Jesus to the crucifixion, and kept pursuing the issue, until the governor on behalf of the Romans in Jerusalem at that time sentenced him to death...

More than 30 years ago, the Vatican issued a document, exonerating the Jews of [spilling] the blood of Jesus. Not all Christians accepted this document. The Pope in the Vatican and the Catholics are the ones who exonerated them. They exonerated them under political pressure. But the Protestants did not exonerate them, the Orthodox did not exonerate them, and Patriarch Shinoda in Egypt did not exonerate them, and kept saying that they bear the responsibility...

Do the Jews of yesterday [sic] bear responsibility for the crimes committed by the Jews of the past? The principle is that they indeed bear responsibility for these crimes, as long as they do not renounce them. If they glorify and take pride in what their forefathers did, if they write about it, quote it, record it, and teach it to their children, and if they consider it to be part of their religion and heritage, they bear the responsibility. As we can see, the Koran held the Jews of the Prophet Muhammad's time responsible for what their forefathers did. It addressed them, saying: "We made Moses a promise extending over forty nights, then you took the calf for worship, wrongfully." It says, "you took," but it was their forefathers, not them. But they adopt the deeds of their forefathers, and so they bear responsibility for them - unless they renounce them...

They adopt the deeds of their forefathers, and they take pride in them. Therefore, I say that the Jews of the 21st century adopt what the Jews of the first century did. They adopt what [their forefathers] did to Jesus, and so they bear responsibility for it, unless they renounce it, saying: This was a crime, and we ask Allah to absolve us of it. But they have not said this, and therefore, the Jews of today bear responsibility for the deeds of the Jews of yesterday.


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]